the evolution of assessment - the conference exchange · the evolution of assessment: how we can...
TRANSCRIPT
The Evolution of Assessment: How We Can Use Technology to Fulfill the Promise of RtI
Christopher Camcho, Ph.D.Laura Kramer, Ph.D.
Mississippi Department of Education
Where Are We Now?
3
NAEP - Periodic Assessment of Progress
National Assessment of Educational Progress
• Administered periodically to children in grades 4, 8, and 12.
• Examines students’ progress in reading, math, and other areas.
• Provides a yardstick for measuring impact of educational policy.
Nationwide Achievement Gap
Grade 4 Reading
White-Black Achievement Gap
White-Hispanic Achievement Gap
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
50%54%
22%
Percentage of 4th Graders Below Basic
white black hispanic
+28+32
Grade 4 Math
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
30%
36%
9%
Percentage of 4th Graders Below Basic
white black hispanic
White-Black Achievement Gap
White-Hispanic Achievement Gap
+21+27
Nationwide Achievement Gap
By Family Income
4th Grade Reading Scores 4th Grade Math Scores
Not Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch
Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch
Nationwide Achievement Gap
Where Have We Been?
IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
• A model for identifying children with “unexpected low achievement,” i.e., learning disabled
IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
IQ
Ach
IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
• A model for identifying children with “unexpected low achievement,” i.e., learning disabled
• Consists of administering a battery of IQ and Achievement tests
IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
IQ Score
AchievementScore
IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
• A model for identifying children with “unexpected low achievement,” i.e., learning disabled
• Consists of administering a battery of IQ and Achievement tests
• Learning disabled children are qualitatively different from general education children
IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
general education
SpEd
Unresolved Issues
• Model does not tell use what to do next.
• Model does not work reliably with young children.
• Model does not identify specific student needs.
• Model does not identify a role for teachers.
What It Does NOT Tell Us!
Where Are We Going?
Research tells us:
• Early identification is effective
• Intensive intervention is effective
• Ongoing assessment and intervention is effective
Early Identification, Early Intervention
Assess
Instruct Inform
Response to Intervention:
• Is a prevention model
• Utilizes multiple tiers of service with increasingly intensive interventions
• Is applied to all children in the classroom
What is Response to Intervention?
inte
nsity
of i
nter
vent
ion
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
• Education is not “one size fits all”
Assumptions of Response to Intervention
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
• Education is not “one size fits all”
• All students deserve a high quality education
Assumptions of Response to Intervention
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
• Education is not “one size fits all”
• All students deserve a high quality education
• All students can learn
Assumptions of Response to Intervention
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
• Education is not “one size fits all”
• All students deserve a high quality education
• All students can learn
• Students learn at different rates
Assumptions of Response to Intervention
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
• Education is not “one size fits all”
• All students deserve a high quality education
• All students can learn
• Students learn at different rates
• Schools should not “wait for failure” to act
Assumptions of Response to Intervention
RTI Requires Assessments to:
• Identify where students’ skill levels fall within the curriculum
New Approach, New Assessments
RTI Requires Assessments to:
• Identify where students’ skill levels fall within the curriculum
• Identify what a student can do with and without assistance
New Approach, New Assessments
RTI Requires Assessments to:
• Identify where students’ skill levels fall within the curriculum
• Identify what a student can do with and without assistance
• Measures short and long-term goals
New Approach, New Assessments
How Do We Get There?
Principles of Dynamic Assessment
Provides scaffolded feedback throughout
Principles of Dynamic Assessment
Functions as bi-directional process
Principles of Dynamic Assessment
Gain insights into the child’s content understanding
Principles of Dynamic Assessment
Provides evidence to support instructional adjustment
Principles of Dynamic Assessment
Informs the teacher AND benefits the child
Principles of Dynamic Assessment
Seeks to identify the zone of proximal development
What the Child Can Do Independently
What the Child Can Do with Scaffolding
Zone of Proximal Development
Task Difficulty
What the Child Can Do Independently
What the Child Can Do with Scaffolding
Zone of Proximal
Development
Zone of Proximal Development
Task Difficulty
Adoption of a Response to Intervention Model and Dynamic Assessment Means:
•New Responsibilities for All
•New Methods of Support for All
A New Approach To Education
How Do We Support This Evolution?
Benefits of Computer-Delivered Assessments
• Engaging and child-friendly
Using Technology to Support Assessment
Benefits of Computer-Delivered Assessments
• Engaging and child-friendly
• Objective protocols and data
Using Technology to Support Assessment
Benefits of Computer-Delivered Assessments
• Engaging and child-friendly
• Objective protocols and data
• Quick and easy to administer
Using Technology to Support Assessment
Benefits of Computer-Delivered Assessments
• Engaging and child-friendly
• Objective protocols and data
• Quick and easy to administer
• Instant scoring, reporting, and analysis
Using Technology to Support Assessment
Benefits of Computer-Delivered Assessments
• Engaging and child-friendly
• Objective protocols and data
• Quick and easy to administer
• Instant scoring, reporting, and analysis
• Instantly link assessment to instruction
Using Technology to Support Assessment
Children’s Progress Academic Assessment
Dynamic Assessment for Early Childhood
• Computer-delivered assessment and teaching tool
• Early Literacy and Mathematics
• Kindergarten through 3rd Grade
• Screening and Progress Monitoring
The Formative Assessment Cycle
Assess
1
Report
2
Teach
3
Assessment for Learning
Scaffolding in Action
Initial Presentation
69%
correct
incorrect
31%
Scaffolding
Scaffolding in Action
Initial Presentation Scaffolding
31%
52%
17%
correct on first try
correct with a hint
incorrect, even with hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
Adaptive Structure
Phonemic Awareness
More challenging
Less challenging
Vowel Sound
RhymingBlending
Syllable Counting
Phonemic Addition
Final Sound
Adaptive Structure
Phonemic Awareness
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
Vowel Sound
RhymingBlending
Syllable Counting
Phonemic Addition
Final Sound
incorrect
correct
correct w/ hint
More challenging
Less challenging
Over 19,000 unique paths
Phonemic Awareness
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hint
hinthint
Vowel Sound
RhymingBlending
Syllable Counting
Phonemic Addition
Final Sound
incorrect
correct
correct w/ hint
More challenging
Less challenging
The Formative Assessment Cycle
Assess
1
Report
2
Teach
3
Assessment for Learning
The Formative Assessment Cycle
Assess
1
Report
2
Teach
3
Assessment for Learning
How Do We Support Large Scale Evolution?
Mississippi House Bill 1058
• Requires implementation of early literacy and numeracy screening instruments.
• Used for children in kindergarten through grade 3.
• To be used statewide in all districts.
Statewide Implementation
Mississippi Department of Education
• Implemented in a three-phase rollout- Year 1: three month pilot release with 20% of
the schools
- Year 2: widely distributed release with 60% of schools
- Year 3: 2010-11 school year; release with 100% of schools
• Phased rollout allowed to develop procedures for proper pedagogical implementation
Statewide Implementation
• Gives teachers timely information
• Differentiates instruction by matching instruction to students’ need
• Analyzes students’ progress to determine effectiveness of services
Actionable Information
• Teachers Welcome the Assessment
- Almost universal positive feedback
Reactions From the Field
• Teachers Welcome the Assessment
- Almost universal positive feedback
Reactions From the Field
• Children LOVE the Assessment
- Ever see a child SAD at the conclusion of a test?
Evolution of Assessment
• Incorporate latest research into design of assessment program
• Develop supportive infrastructure for educators
• Refine approach during and after implementation
Thank You!
Mississippi Department of Education