the evaluative methods on shale gas productivity …members.igu.org/old/igu...

26
The evaluative methods on shale gas productivity using the DFIT 2014. 9. 18 Dr. Sangyup Jang T.H. Kim, G.S. Lee C.H. Shin

Upload: nguyenanh

Post on 14-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

The evaluative methods on shale gas

productivity using the DFIT

2014. 9. 18

Dr. Sangyup Jang

T.H. Kim, G.S. Lee

C.H. Shin

This is the Eternal Flame Waterfall, on Shale Creek, in Chestnut Ridge Park, near Buffalo, New York. A pocket of natural methane gas in an alcove below the waterfall seeps out through a fracture in the rocks.

Better Energy, Better World

1. Introduction

2. DFIT(diagonal fracture injection test)

3. Pre-closure analysis

4. After-closure analysis

5. Summary and future works

Contents

Better Energy, Better World

Milli-darcies 1 x 10 -3 D

Micro-darcies 1 x 10 -6 D

Nano-darcies 1 x 10 -9 D

Sand stone

Formations

Tight

Formations

Shale

Formation

Introduction

Better Energy, Better World

• Low permeability, Long transient time

• Build-up, Draw-down, flow test is impossible

• Needs for rapid test method for shale/tight formation.

→ Mini fracture test(DFIT)

• Effective permeability using DFIT(diagonal fracture

injection test)

The limit of conventional well test method for

shale formation.

Better Energy, Better World

DFIT or Mini frac test

Ewens, 2012

Perforation Installation of pressure

gauge

Injection Shut-in

and record

Better Energy, Better World

PRE CLOSURE ANALYSIS •Formation Breakdown Pressure •Fracture Closure Pressure •Instantaneous Shut in Pressure(ISIP) •Fracture Gradient = ISIP / Formation Depth •Net Fracture Pressure (Δpnet) = ISIP - Closure Pressure •Fluid efficiency = Gc/(2+Gc) : Gc is the G-function time at fracture closure •Formation Leak Off Characteristics AFTER CLOSURE ANALYSIS •Formation permeability (k) •Reservoir pressure (pi) •Net Horizontal Stress(closure – pore pressure)

Diagonal Fracture Injection Test (Mini frac test)

Fracture Closure

Pressure

Nolte, 1982

Better Energy, Better World

Research Trend

Nolte (1979)

• G-function and fracture pressure decline analysis

Castillo(1987), Mukherjee(1996), Baree(1998)

• Pressure dependent leak-off vs. G-function, dP/dG, GdP/dG plot

Gu et al(1993), Nolte(1997), Benelkadi and Tiab (2004)

• After closure time function, Impulse fracture test

Soliman et al. (2005) / Craig and Blasingame (2006)

• Short term test

Meyer (2007)

• Mass and momentum equation for 2D-fracture

Better Energy, Better World

PRE-CLOSURE ANALYSIS

Fracture Closure Pressure

Nolte, 1982

Better Energy, Better World

• Located in north eastern British Columbia

• Horn River Group(Muskwa Fm., Otter Park Fm., Evie Fm.)

• Approximately 2,500m below surface

• Average 170m thick, Average TOC : 4.3%

• Composed of siliceous, organic rich shale (high quartz content)

Horn River

(Kiwigana)

British Columbia Alberta

General information

Better Energy, Better World

Data Chart

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

55000

60000

65000

70000

75000

80000

85000

90000

Cal

cula

ted

San

dfa

ce P

ress

ure

(kP

a(a)

)

-6000

-5500

-5000

-4500

-4000

-3500

-3000

-2500

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

Liq

uid

Rate (m

3/d)

0.48 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.64 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.82

Cum Time (h)

Injection data for Well A

Better Energy, Better World

• G function : dimensionless time function relating shut-in time to total pumping time

3

4

2

)(

))1((sin)1()(

)1(3

4)(

))((4

)(

5.05.01

5.15.1

o

o

p

p

D

DDDD

DDD

oDD

g

g

t

ttt

ttttg

tttg

gtgtG

(For high leak-off)

(For low leak-off)

(For high leak-off)

(For low leak-off)

Definition of G-function

Better Energy, Better World

Pressure dependent leak-off -> Existence of fracture!

SHmax

G-function analysis of Well-A

Better Energy, Better World

Oil base micro-imager

Better Energy, Better World

Pressure dependent leak-off

G-function analysis of Well-B

Better Energy, Better World

Better Energy, Better World

Normal leak-off

G-function analysis of Well-C

wellbore

Better Energy, Better World

• It could be possible to find out the leak-off behavior and

fracture related reservoir properties for shale formation

by pre-closure analysis

• G-function analysis data and OBMI data were compared

to validate the existence of natural fracture near well

bore and reliable correlation is found with this methods.

Summary

Better Energy, Better World

AFTER CLOSURE ANALYSIS

Fracture Closure Pressure

Nolte, 1982

Better Energy, Better World

• Combing the continuity equation, the equation

of motion, and the EOS

t

p

k

c

r

pr

rr

t

1

t

p

z

p

k

c

r

p

z

pr

rr

t

1

Diffusivity eqn.

Real gas law

Gas compressibility, pseudo state (ф, μ, z constant)

'43173.7lnln

711)()(

2s

rC

kt

kh

QTPmPm

wt

aiwf

Conventional gas well test

Better Energy, Better World

Nolte

Radial flow

0

000,251

000,251

000,251

1

1

1

1

Rwi

cR

t

c

tR

R

c

tiw

Fpp

tm

Qkh

kht

Qm

Fkht

Qptp

Soliman-Craig

Radial flow

)01

(

)4.1694(

)4.1694(

1)4.1694()(

2

2

ttpp

m

Vkh

kh

Vm

ttkh

Vptp

p

wi

R

inj

inj

R

p

inj

iw

Linear flow

5.0

2

105.31)(

ttkhxC

Vptp

pft

inj

iw

L

t

Liw FCk

Cptp

Linear flow

Better Energy, Better World

Linear and Radial flow plot for well A

Better Energy, Better World

Permeability : 11.6 d

Initial pressure for radial flow

: 5,324 psi

Leak-off coefficient

: 6.0519 10-4 ft/min1/2

Permeability : 9.98 d

Initial pressure for radial flow

: 5,317 psi

Fracture half-length : 16.6 ft

Nolte method Soliman-Craig method

Reservoir properties from 2 methods(well A)

Better Energy, Better World 24

96.1

038.0

01.0086.0

pct

zf

ErGc

pk

f: Viscosity of injected fluid (=1 cp, assumption)

pz: Net fracture extension pressure above closure pressure(9873 psi)

Gc: G-function closure time (=32.705h)

E: Young’s modulus(=3.35Mpsi)

rp: Storage ratio(=1)

ø : porosity(=0.04)

Ct : Total compressibility(=5.09X10-5 /psi)

Calculate K = 4.4351uD

Permeability estimation

Case G-function(Baree) Nolte Soliman

Well A(μD) 4.4351 11.6 9.98

Better Energy, Better World

Summary and further study DFIT results in the Kiwigana shale formation were presented.

The results have good consistency between other analytical methods and will be used for hydraulic fracturing job effectively.

The need for the prolonged shut-in time is realized to analyze the radial flow regime in DFIT.

Permeability estimation equation is useful for rough calculation.

Many production characteristics of shale gas reservoir need to be monitored to correlate reservoir properties.

Influence on adsorbed gas and stress dependent rock properties should be considered to evaluate more precisely.

Thank you for your attention!