the eu audiovisual media services directive and its ... · and its transposition into national law...
TRANSCRIPT
Synopsis consolidated AVMSD 2010 with
Commission proposal AVMSD May 2016
Important Notice
This text is an unofficial synopsis conducted at the University of Luxembourg in the framework of the research project on the transposition of the “Audiovisual Media Services Directive” in the Member States of the European Union. The AVMSD project was initiated by Prof. Dr. Mark D. Cole and Jenny Metzdorf.
For more information on the research project, see www.medialaw.lu. On this website, the original and translated versions of the national legal acts are also made available, together with synopses illustrating differences to the AVMSD 2010. The project has been extended to a cooperation with the European Audiovisual Observatory (EAO) which now hosts a more extensively searchable version of the database at http://avmsd.obs.coe.int/.
This document contains a synopsis in the form of a table displaying the AVMSD in its
consolidated version of 2010 aside the proposal of a revised Directive published 25
May 2016. It merely serves to illustrate differences and similarities in wording. It
cannot be guaranteed that the comparisons are absolutely correct. The synopsis
therefore remains an unofficial version with no legal value.
The EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive
and its transposition into national law – a comparative study of the 28 Member States
www.medialaw.lu
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 2 - University of Luxembourg
CHAPTER I
DEFINITIONS
Art. 1 AVMSD
Art. 1 COM proposal
1. For the purposes of this Directive, the
following definitions shall apply:
(a) ‘audiovisual media service’ means:
(i) a service as defined by Articles 56
and 57 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union
which is under the editorial
responsibility of a media service
provider and the principal purpose of
which is the provision of programmes,
in order to inform, entertain or
educate, to the general public by
electronic communications networks
within the meaning of point (a) of
Article 2 of Directive 2002/21/EC.
Such an audiovisual media service is
either a television broadcast as
defined in point (e) of this paragraph
or an on-demand audiovisual media
service as defined in point (g) of this
paragraph;
(i) a service as defined by Articles 56
and 57 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union
which is under the editorial
responsibility of a media service
provider and the principal purpose of
which is the provision of programmes,
where the principal purpose of the
service or a dissociable section
thereof is devoted to providing
programmes, under the editorial
responsibility of a media service
provider, in order to inform, entertain
or educate, to the general public by
electronic communications networks
within the meaning of point (a) of
Article 2 of Directive 2002/21/EC.
Such an audiovisual media service is
either a television broadcast as
defined in point (e) of this paragraph
or an on-demand audiovisual media
service as defined in point (g) of this
paragraph;
(ii) audiovisual commercial
communication;
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 3 - University of Luxembourg
(aa) “video-sharing platform service” means
a service, as defined by Articles 56 and 57 of
the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union, which meets all of the
following requirements:
(i) the service consists of the storage of
a large amount of programmes or
user-generated videos, for which the
video-sharing platform provider does
not have editorial responsibility;
(ii) the organisation of the stored content
is determined by the provider of the
service including by automatic means
or algorithms, in particular by hosting,
displaying, tagging and sequencing;
(iii) the principal purpose of the service or
a dissociable section thereof is
devoted to providing programmes
and user-generated videos to the
general public, in order to inform,
entertain or educate;
(iv) the service is made available by
electronic communications networks
within the meaning of point (a) of
Article 2 of Directive 2002/21/EC.
(b) ‘programme’ means a set of moving
images with or without sound constituting an
individual item within a schedule or a
catalogue established by a media service
provider and the form and content of which
are comparable to the form and content of
television broadcasting. Examples of
programmes include feature-length films,
sports events, situation comedies,
documentaries, children’s programmes and
original drama;
(b) ‘programme’ means a set of moving
images with or without sound constituting an
individual item within a schedule or a
catalogue established by a media service
provider and the form and content of which
are comparable to the form and content of
television broadcasting. Examples of
programmes include including feature-length
films, videos of short duration, sports events,
situation comedies, documentaries,
children’s programmes and original drama;
(ba) “user-generated video” means a set of
moving images with or without sound
constituting an individual item that is created
and/or uploaded to a video-sharing platform
by one or more users;
(c) ‘editorial responsibility’ means the
exercise of effective control both over the
selection of the programmes and over their
organisation either in a chronological
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 4 - University of Luxembourg
schedule, in the case of television
broadcasts, or in a catalogue, in the case of
on-demand audiovisual media services.
Editorial responsibility does not necessarily
imply any legal liability under national law for
the content or the services provided;
(d) ‘media service provider’ means the
natural or legal person who has editorial
responsibility for the choice of the
audiovisual content of the audiovisual media
service and determines the manner in which
it is organised;
(da) “video-sharing platform provider” means
the natural or legal person who provides a
“video-sharing platform service;
(e) ‘television broadcasting’ or ‘television
broadcast’ (i.e. a linear audiovisual media
service) means an audiovisual media service
provided by a media service provider for
simultaneous viewing of programmes on the
basis of a programme schedule;
(f) ‘broadcaster’ means a media service
provider of television broadcasts;
(g) ‘on-demand audiovisual media service’
(i.e. a non-linear audiovisual media service)
means an audiovisual media service
provided by a media service provider for the
viewing of programmes at the moment
chosen by the user and at his individual
request on the basis of a catalogue of
programmes selected by the media service
provider;
(h) ‘audiovisual commercial communication’
means images with or without sound which
are designed to promote, directly or
indirectly, the goods, services or image of a
natural or legal entity pursuing an economic
activity. Such images accompany or are
included in a programme in return for
payment or for similar consideration or for
self-promotional purposes. Forms of
audiovisual commercial communication
include, inter alia, television advertising,
sponsorship, teleshopping and product
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 5 - University of Luxembourg
placement;
(i) ‘television advertising’ means any form of
announcement broadcast whether in return
for payment or for similar consideration or
broadcast for self-promotional purposes by a
public or private undertaking or natural
person in connection with a trade, business,
craft or profession in order to promote the
supply of goods or services, including
immovable property, rights and obligations,
in return for payment;
(j) ‘surreptitious audiovisual commercial
communication’ means the representation in
words or pictures of goods, services, the
name, the trade mark or the activities of a
producer of goods or a provider of services in
programmes when such representation is
intended by the media service provider to
serve as advertising and might mislead the
public as to its nature. Such representation
shall, in particular, be considered as
intentional if it is done in return for payment
or for similar consideration;
(k) ‘sponsorship’ means any contribution
made by public or private undertakings or
natural persons not engaged in providing
audiovisual media services or in the
production of audiovisual works, to the
financing of audiovisual media services or
programmes with a view to promoting their
name, trade mark, image, activities or
products;
(l) ‘teleshopping’ means direct offers
broadcast to the public with a view to the
supply of goods or services, including
immovable property, rights and obligations,
in return for payment;
(m) ‘product placement’ means any form of
audiovisual commercial communication
consisting of the inclusion of or reference to
a product, a service or the trade mark thereof
so that it is featured within a programme, in
return for payment or for similar
consideration;
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 6 - University of Luxembourg
(n) ‘European works’ means the following:
(i) works originating in Member States;
(ii) works originating in European third
States party to the European
Convention on Transfrontier
Television of the Council of Europe
and fulfilling the conditions of
paragraph 3;
(iii) works co-produced within the
framework of agreements related to
the audiovisual sector concluded
between the Union and third
countries and fulfilling the conditions
defined in each of those agreements.
2. The application of the provisions of points
(n)(ii) and (iii) of paragraph 1 shall be
conditional on works originating in Member
States not being the subject of discriminatory
measures in the third country concerned.
3. The works referred to in points (n)(i) and
(ii) of paragraph 1 are works mainly made
with authors and workers residing in one or
more of the States referred to in those
provisions provided that they comply with
one of the following three conditions:
(i) they are made by one or more
producers established in one or more
of those States;
(ii) the production of the works is
supervised and actually controlled by
one or more producers established in
one or more of those States;
(iii) the contribution of co-producers of
those States to the total co-
production costs is preponderant and
the co-production is not controlled by
one or more producers established
outside those States.
4. Works that are not European works within
the meaning of point (n) of paragraph 1 but
that are produced within the framework of
bilateral co-production agreements
concluded between Member States and third
countries shall be deemed to be European
works provided that the co-producers from
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 7 - University of Luxembourg
the Union supply a majority share of the total
cost of production and that the production is
not controlled by one or more producers
established outside the territory of the
Member States.
CHAPTER II
GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER II
GENERAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR
AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES
Art. 2 AVMSD
Art. 2 COM proposal
1. Each Member State shall ensure that all
audiovisual media services transmitted by
media service providers under its jurisdiction
comply with the rules of the system of law
applicable to audiovisual media services
intended for the public in that Member State.
2. For the purposes of this Directive, the
media service providers under the jurisdiction
of a Member State are any of the following:
(a) those established in that Member State in
accordance with paragraph 3;
(b) those to whom paragraph 4 applies.
3. For the purposes of this Directive, a media
service provider shall be deemed to be
established in a Member State in the
following cases:
(a) the media service provider has its head
office in that Member State and the editorial
decisions about the audiovisual media
service are taken in that Member State;
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 8 - University of Luxembourg
(b) if a media service provider has its head
office in one Member State but editorial
decisions on the audiovisual media service
are taken in another Member State, it shall
be deemed to be established in the Member
State where a significant part of the
workforce involved in the pursuit of the
audiovisual media service activity operates.
If a significant part of the workforce involved
in the pursuit of the audiovisual media
service activity operates in each of those
Member States, the media service provider
shall be deemed to be established in the
Member State where it has its head office.
If a significant part of the workforce involved
in the pursuit of the audiovisual media
service activity operates in neither of those
Member States, the media service provider
shall be deemed to be established in the
Member State where it first began its activity
in accordance with the law of that Member
State, provided that it maintains a stable and
effective link with the economy of that
Member State;
(b) if a media service provider has its head
office in one Member State but editorial
decisions on the audiovisual media service
are taken in another Member State, it shall
be deemed to be established in the Member
State where a significant part the majority of
the workforce involved in the pursuit of the
audiovisual media service activity operates.
If a significant part of the workforce involved
in the pursuit of the audiovisual media
service activity operates in each of those
Member States, the media service provider
shall be deemed to be established in the
Member State where it has its head office.
If a significant part of the workforce involved
in the pursuit of the audiovisual media
service activity operates in neither of those
Member States, the media service provider
shall be deemed to be established in the
Member State where it first began its activity
in accordance with the law of that Member
State, provided that it maintains a stable and
effective link with the economy of that
Member State;
(c) if a media service provider has its head
office in a Member State but decisions on the
audiovisual media service are taken in a third
country, or vice versa, it shall be deemed to
be established in the Member State
concerned, provided that a significant part of
the workforce involved in the pursuit of the
audiovisual media service activity operates in
that Member State.
4. Media service providers to whom the
provisions of paragraph 3 are not applicable
shall be deemed to be under the jurisdiction
of a Member State in the following cases:
(a) they use a satellite up-link situated in that
Member State;
(b) although they do not use a satellite up-
link situated in that Member State, they use
satellite capacity appertaining to that
Member State.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 9 - University of Luxembourg
5. If the question as to which Member State
has jurisdiction cannot be determined in
accordance with paragraphs 3 and 4, the
competent Member State shall be that in
which the media service provider is
established within the meaning of Articles 49
to 55 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union.
5a. Member States shall communicate to the
Commission a list of the audiovisual media
service providers under their jurisdiction and
the criteria set out in paragraphs 2 to 5 on
which their jurisdiction is based. They shall
subsequently inform the Commission without
undue delay of any changes to that list. The
Commission shall ensure that the competent
independent regulatory authorities have
access to this information.
5b. Where, in applying Articles 3 and 4 of this
Directive, the Member States concerned do
not agree on which Member State has
jurisdiction, they shall bring the matter to the
Commission's attention without undue delay.
The Commission may request the European
Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media
Services (ERGA) to provide an opinion on
the matter within 15 working days from
submission of the Commission's request. If
the Commission requests an opinion from
ERGA, the time-limits set out in Articles 3(5)
and 4(5) shall be suspended until ERGA has
adopted an opinion.
6. This Directive does not apply to
audiovisual media services intended
exclusively for reception in third countries
and which are not received with standard
consumer equipment directly or indirectly by
the public in one or more Member States.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 10 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 3 AVMSD
Art. 3 COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure freedom of
reception and shall not restrict
retransmissions on their territory of
audiovisual media services from other
Member States for reasons which fall within
the fields coordinated by this Directive.
2. In respect of television broadcasting,
Member States may provisionally derogate
from paragraph 1 if the following conditions
are fulfilled:
2. In respect of television broadcasting,
Member States may provisionally derogate
from paragraph 1 if the following conditions
are fulfilled if an audiovisual media service
provided by a media service provider under
the jurisdiction of another Member State:
(a) a television broadcast coming from
another Member State manifestly, seriously
and gravely infringes Article 27(1) or (2)
and/or Article 6;
(a) a television broadcast coming from
another Member State manifestly, seriously
and gravely infringes Article 27(1) or (2)
and/or Article 6; Articles 6 or 12, or both;
(b) during the previous 12 months, the
broadcaster has infringed the provision(s)
referred to in point (a) on at least two prior
occasions;
(b) during the previous 12 months, the
broadcaster has infringed the provision(s)
referred to in point (a) on at least two prior
occasions; prejudices or presents a serious
and grave risk of prejudice to public security,
including the safeguarding of national
security and defence; or
(c) the Member State concerned has notified
the broadcaster and the Commission in
writing of the alleged infringements and of
the measures it intends to take should any
such infringement occur again;
(c) the Member State concerned has notified
the broadcaster and the Commission in
writing of the alleged infringements and of
the measures it intends to take should any
such infringement occur again; prejudices or
presents a serious and grave risk of
prejudice to public health.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 11 - University of Luxembourg
(d) consultations with the transmitting
Member State and the Commission have not
produced an amicable settlement within 15
days of the notification provided for in point
(c), and the alleged infringement persists.
The Commission shall, within 2 months
following notification of the measures taken
by the Member State, take a decision on
whether the measures are compatible with
Union law. If it decides that they are not, the
Member State will be required to put an end
to the measures in question as a matter of
urgency.
(d) consultations with the transmitting
Member State and the Commission have not
produced an amicable settlement within 15
days of the notification provided for in point
(c), and the alleged infringement persists.
The Commission shall, within 2 months
following notification of the measures taken
by the Member State, take a decision on
whether the measures are compatible with
Union law. If it decides that they are not, the
Member State will be required to put an end
to the measures in question as a matter of
urgency.
3. Paragraph 2 shall be without prejudice to
the application of any procedure, remedy or
sanction to the infringements in question in
the Member State which has jurisdiction over
the broadcaster concerned.
3. Paragraph 2 shall be without prejudice to
the application of any procedure, remedy or
sanction to the infringements in question in
the Member State which has jurisdiction over
the broadcaster concerned.
Member States may only apply paragraph 2
where the following conditions are met:
(a) during the 12 months preceding the
notification referred to in point (b) of this
paragraph, the media service provider has, in
the opinion of the Member State concerned,
contravened point (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph
2 on at least two occasions;
(b) the Member State concerned has notified
the media service provider, the Member
State which has jurisdiction over the provider
and the Commission in writing of the alleged
contraventions and of the measures it
intends to take should any such alleged
contraventions occur again;
(c) consultations with the Member State
which has jurisdiction over the provider and
the Commission have not produced an
amicable settlement within one month of the
notification provided for in point (b);
(d) the media services provider has
contravened point (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph
2 at least once after the notification provided
for in point (b) of this paragraph;
(e) the notifying Member State has respected
the rights of defence of the media services
provider concerned and, in particular, has
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 12 - University of Luxembourg
given the media services provider the
opportunity to express its views on the
alleged contraventions and the measures
that that Member State intends to take. It
shall duly take into account those views as
well as the views of the Member State of
jurisdiction.
Points (a) and (d) of paragraph 3 shall apply
only in respect of linear services.
4. In respect of on-demand audiovisual
media services, Member States may take
measures to derogate from paragraph 1 in
respect of a given service if the following
conditions are fulfilled:
(a) the measures are:
(i) necessary for one of the following
reasons:
- public policy, in particular the
prevention, investigation,
detection and prosecution of
criminal offences, including the
protection of minors and the fight
against any incitement to hatred
on grounds of race, sex, religion
or nationality, and violations of
human dignity concerning
individual persons,
- the protection of public health,
- public security, including the
safeguarding of national security
and defence,
- the protection of consumers,
including investors;
(ii) taken against an on-demand
audiovisual media service which
prejudices the objectives referred to
in point (i) or which presents a serious
and grave risk of prejudice to those
objectives;
(iii) proportionate to those objectives;
(b) before taking the measures in question
and without prejudice to court proceedings,
including preliminary proceedings and acts
carried out in the framework of a criminal
4. In respect of on-demand audiovisual
media services, Member States may take
measures to derogate from paragraph 1 in
respect of a given service if the following
conditions are fulfilled:
(a) the measures are:
(i) necessary for one of the following
reasons:
- public policy, in particular the
prevention, investigation,
detection and prosecution of
criminal offences, including the
protection of minors and the fight
against any incitement to hatred
on grounds of race, sex, religion
or nationality, and violations of
human dignity concerning
individual persons,
- the protection of public health,
- public security, including the
safeguarding of national security
and defence,
- the protection of consumers,
including investors;
(ii) taken against an on-demand
audiovisual media service which
prejudices the objectives referred to
in point (i) or which presents a serious
and grave risk of prejudice to those
objectives;
(iii) proportionate to those objectives;
(b) before taking the measures in question
and without prejudice to court proceedings,
including preliminary proceedings and acts
carried out in the framework of a criminal
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 13 - University of Luxembourg
investigation, the Member State has:
(i) asked the Member State under
whose jurisdiction the media service
provider falls to take measures and
the latter did not take such measures,
or they were inadequate;
(ii) notified the Commission and the
Member State under whose
jurisdiction the media service provider
falls of its intention to take such
measures.
investigation, the Member State has:
(i) asked the Member State under
whose jurisdiction the media service
provider falls to take measures and
the latter did not take such measures,
or they were inadequate;
(ii) notified the Commission and the
Member State under whose
jurisdiction the media service provider
falls of its intention to take such
measures.
The Commission shall, within three months
following the notification of the measures
taken by the Member State in application of
paragraphs 2 and 3 and after having
consulted ERGA, take a decision on whether
those measures are compatible with Union
law. That period shall begin on the day
following the receipt of a complete
notification. The notification shall be
considered as complete if, within three
months from its receipt, or from the receipt of
any additional information requested, the
Commission does not request any further
information.
Where the Commission considers the
notification as incomplete, it shall request all
necessary additional information. The
Commission shall inform the Member State
of the receipt of the response to that request.
Where the Member State concerned does
not provide the information requested within
the period fixed by the Commission or where
it provides incomplete information, the
Commission shall take a decision that the
measures taken by the Member State in
accordance with paragraph 2 are
incompatible with Union law. If the
Commission decides that the measures are
incompatible with Union law, the Member
State shall put an end to the measures in
question as a matter of urgency.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 14 - University of Luxembourg
5. Member States may, in urgent cases,
derogate from the conditions laid down in
point (b) of paragraph 4. Where this is the
case, the measures shall be notified in the
shortest possible time to the Commission
and to the Member State under whose
jurisdiction the media service provider falls,
indicating the reasons for which the Member
State considers that there is urgency.
5. Member States may, in urgent cases,
derogate from the conditions laid down in
point (b) of paragraph 4. Where this is the
case, the measures shall be notified in the
shortest possible time to the Commission
and to the Member State under whose
jurisdiction the media service provider falls,
indicating the reasons for which the Member
State considers that there is urgency. Paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be without
prejudice to the application of any procedure,
remedy or sanction to the contraventions in
question in the Member State which has
jurisdiction over the media service provider
concerned.
6. Without prejudice to the Member State’s
possibility of proceeding with the measures
referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5, the
Commission shall examine the compatibility
of the notified measures with Union law in
the shortest possible time. Where it comes to
the conclusion that the measures are
incompatible with Union law, the Commission
shall ask the Member State in question to
refrain from taking any proposed measures
or urgently to put an end to the measures in
question.
6. Without prejudice to the Member State’s
possibility of proceeding with the measures
referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5, the
Commission shall examine the compatibility
of the notified measures with Union law in
the shortest possible time. Where it comes to
the conclusion that the measures are
incompatible with Union law, the Commission
shall ask the Member State in question to
refrain from taking any proposed measures
or urgently to put an end to the measures in
question. Member States may, in urgent
cases, derogate from the conditions laid
down in points (b) and (c) of paragraph 3.
Where this is the case, the measures shall
be notified in the shortest possible time to the
Commission and to the Member State which
has jurisdiction over the media service
provider, setting out the reasons for which
the Member State considers that there is
such urgency that derogating from those
conditions is necessary.
7. Without prejudice to the Member State’s
possibility of proceeding with the measures
referred to in paragraph 6, the Commission
shall examine the compatibility of the notified
measures with Union law in the shortest
possible time. Where it comes to the
conclusion that the measures are
incompatible with Union law, the Commission
shall require the Member State concerned to
refrain from taking any intended measures or
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 15 - University of Luxembourg
urgently to put an end to those measures.
8. Member States and the Commission shall
regularly exchange experiences and best
practices regarding the procedure set out in
paragraphs 2 to 7 in the framework of the
contact committee established pursuant to
Article 29 and ERGA.
Art. 4 AVMSD
Art. 4 COM proposal
1. Member States shall remain free to require
media service providers under their
jurisdiction to comply with more detailed or
stricter rules in the fields coordinated by this
Directive provided that such rules are in
compliance with Union law.
1. Member States shall remain free to require
media service providers under their
jurisdiction to comply with more detailed or
stricter rules with regard to Articles 5, 6, 6a,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19 to 26, 30 and
30a, in the fields coordinated by this Directive
provided that such rules are in compliance
with Union law.
2. In cases where a Member State:
(a) has exercised its freedom under
paragraph 1 to adopt more detailed or stricter
rules of general public interest; and
(b) assesses that a broadcaster under the
jurisdiction of another Member State
provides a television broadcast which is
wholly or mostly directed towards its territory;
it may contact the Member State having
jurisdiction with a view to achieving a
mutually satisfactory solution to any
problems posed. On receipt of a
substantiated request by the first Member
State, the Member State having jurisdiction
shall request the broadcaster to comply with
the rules of general public interest in
question. The Member State having
jurisdiction shall inform the first Member
State of the results obtained following this
request within 2 months. Either Member
State may invite the contact committee
established pursuant to Article 29 to examine
the case.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 16 - University of Luxembourg
3. The first Member State may adopt
appropriate measures against the
broadcaster concerned where it assesses
that:
(a) the results achieved through the
application of paragraph 2 are not
satisfactory; and
3. The first Member State may adopt
appropriate measures against the
broadcaster concerned where it assesses
that:
(a) the results achieved through the
application of paragraph 2 are not
satisfactory; and
(b) the broadcaster in question has
established itself in the Member State having
jurisdiction in order to circumvent the stricter
rules, in the fields coordinated by this
Directive, which would be applicable to it if it
were established in the first Member State.
Such measures shall be objectively
necessary, applied in a non-discriminatory
manner and proportionate to the objectives
which they pursue.
(b) the broadcaster in question has
established itself in the Member State having
jurisdiction in order to circumvent the stricter
rules, in the fields coordinated by this
Directive, which would be applicable to it if it
were established in the first Member State.
Such measures shall be objectively
necessary, applied in a non-discriminatory
manner and proportionate to the objectives
which they pursue.
The Member State which took steps in
accordance with points (a) and (b) of
paragraph 2 should substantiate the grounds
on which it bases its assessment of the
alleged circumvention.
4. A Member State may take measures
pursuant to paragraph 3 only if the following
conditions are met:
(a) it has notified the Commission and the
Member State in which the broadcaster is
established of its intention to take such
measures while substantiating the grounds
on which it bases its assessment; and
4. A Member State may take measures
pursuant to paragraph 3 only if where the
following conditions are met:
(a) it has notified the Commission and the
Member State in which the broadcaster is
established of its intention to take such
measures while substantiating the grounds
on which it bases its assessment; and
(b) the Commission has decided that the
measures are compatible with Union law,
and in particular that assessments made by
the Member State taking those measures
under paragraphs 2 and 3 are correctly
founded.
(b) the Commission has decided that the
measures are compatible with Union law,
and in particular that assessments made by
the Member State taking those measures
under paragraphs 2 and 3 are correctly
founded. it has respected the rights of
defence of the broadcaster concerned and, in
particular, has given the broadcaster the
opportunity to express its views on the
alleged circumvention and the measures the
notifying Member States intends to take;
(c) the Commission has decided, after having
consulted ERGA, that the measures are
compatible with Union law, in particular that
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 17 - University of Luxembourg
assessments made by the Member State
taking those measures under paragraphs 2
and 3 are correctly founded.
5. The Commission shall decide within 3
months following the notification provided for
in point (a) of paragraph 4. If the Commission
decides that the measures are incompatible
with Union law, the Member State in question
shall refrain from taking the proposed
measures.
5. The Commission shall decide within 3
months following the notification provided for
in point (a) of paragraph 4. That period shall
begin on the day following the receipt of a
complete notification. The notification will be
considered as complete if, within 3 months
from its receipt, or from the receipt of any
additional information requested, the
Commission does not request any further
information.
Where the Commission considers the
notification as incomplete, it shall request all
necessary additional information. The
Commission shall inform the Member State
of the receipt of the response to that request.
Where the Member State concerned does
not provide the information requested within
the period fixed by the Commission or
provides incomplete information, the
Commission shall take a decision that the
measures taken by the Member State in
accordance with paragraph 3 are
incompatible with Union law. If the
Commission decides that the measures are
incompatible with Union law, the Member
State in question shall refrain from taking the
intended measures.
6. Member States shall, by appropriate
means, ensure, within the framework of their
legislation, that media service providers
under their jurisdiction effectively comply with
the provisions of this Directive.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 18 - University of Luxembourg
7. Member States shall encourage co-
regulation and/or self-regulatory regimes at
national level in the fields coordinated by this
Directive to the extent permitted by their legal
systems. These regimes shall be such that
they are broadly accepted by the main
stakeholders in the Member States
concerned and provide for effective
enforcement.
7. Member States shall encourage co-
regulation and/or self- -regulatory regimes
regulation through codes of conduct adopted
at national level in the fields coordinated by
this Directive to the extent permitted by their
legal systems. These regimes Those codes
shall be such that they are broadly accepted
by the main stakeholders in the Member
States concerned. The codes of conduct
shall clearly and unambiguously set out their
objectives. They shall provide for regular,
transparent and independent monitoring and
evaluation of the achievement of the
objectives aimed at. They shall provide for
effective enforcement, including when
appropriate effective and proportionate
sanctions.
Draft Union codes of conduct referred to in
Articles 6a (3), 9(2) and 9(4) and
amendments or extensions to existing Union
codes of conduct shall be submitted to the
Commission by the signatories of these
codes.
The Commission may ask ERGA to give an
opinion on the drafts, amendments or
extensions of those codes. The Commission
may publish those codes as appropriate.
8. Directive 2000/31/EC shall apply unless
otherwise provided for in this Directive. In the
event of a conflict between a provision of
Directive 2000/31/EC and a provision of this
Directive, the provisions of this Directive shall
prevail, unless otherwise provided for in this
Directive.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 19 - University of Luxembourg
CHAPTER III
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL
AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES
CHAPTER III
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL
AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES
Art. 5 AVMSD
Art. 5 COM proposal
Member States shall ensure that audiovisual
media service providers under their
jurisdiction shall make easily, directly and
permanently accessible to the recipients of a
service at least the following information:
(a) the name of the media service provider;
(b) the geographical address at which the
media service provider is established;
(c) the details of the media service provider,
including its electronic mail address or
website, which allow it to be contacted
rapidly in a direct and effective manner;
(d) where applicable, the competent
regulatory or supervisory bodies.
(d) where applicable, the competent
regulatory or supervisory bodies.
the Member State having jurisdiction over the
media service providers and the competent
regulatory authorities or supervisory bodies.
Art. 6 AVMSD
Art. 6 COM proposal
Member States shall ensure by appropriate
means that audiovisual media services
provided by media service providers under
their jurisdiction do not contain any
incitement to hatred based on race, sex,
religion or nationality.
Member States shall ensure by appropriate
means that audiovisual media services
provided by media service providers under
their jurisdiction do not contain any
incitement to hatred based on race, sex,
religion or nationality. to violence or hatred
directed against a group of persons or a
member of such a group defined by
reference to sex, racial or ethnic origin,
religion or belief, disability, age or sexual
orientation.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 20 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 6a COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure that
audiovisual media services providers provide
sufficient information to viewers about
content which may impair the physical,
mental or moral development of minors. For
this purpose, Member States may use a
system of descriptors indicating the nature of
the content of an audiovisual media service.
2. For the implementation of this Article,
Member States shall encourage co-
regulation.
3. The Commission and ERGA shall
encourage media service providers to
exchange best practices on co-regulatory
systems across the Union. Where
appropriate, the Commission shall facilitate
the development of Union codes of conduct.
Art. 7 AVMSD
Art. 7 COM proposal
Member States shall encourage media
service providers under their jurisdiction to
ensure that their services are gradually
made accessible to people with a visual or
hearing disability.
deleted
Art. 8 AVMSD
Art. 8 COM proposal
Member States shall ensure that media
service providers under their jurisdiction do
not transmit cinematographic works outside
periods agreed with the rights holders.
Art. 9 AVMSD
Art. 9 COM proposal
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 21 - University of Luxembourg
1. Member States shall ensure that
audiovisual commercial communications
provided by media service providers under
their jurisdiction comply with the following
requirements:
(a) audiovisual commercial communications
shall be readily recognisable as such.
Surreptitious audiovisual commercial
communication shall be prohibited;
(b) audiovisual commercial communications
shall not use subliminal techniques;
(c) audiovisual commercial communications
shall not:
(i) prejudice respect for human dignity;
(ii) include or promote any discrimination
based on sex, racial or ethnic origin,
nationality, religion or belief, disability,
age or sexual orientation;
(iii) encourage behaviour prejudicial to
health or safety;
(iv) encourage behaviour grossly
prejudicial to the protection of the
environment;
(d) all forms of audiovisual commercial
communications for cigarettes and other
tobacco products shall be prohibited;
(e) audiovisual commercial communications
for alcoholic beverages shall not be aimed
specifically at minors and shall not
encourage immoderate consumption of such
beverages;
(f) audiovisual commercial communication for
medicinal products and medical treatment
available only on prescription in the Member
State within whose jurisdiction the media
service provider falls shall be prohibited;
(g) audiovisual commercial communications
shall not cause physical or moral detriment to
minors. Therefore they shall not directly
exhort minors to buy or hire a product or
service by exploiting their inexperience or
credulity, directly encourage them to
persuade their parents or others to purchase
the goods or services being advertised,
exploit the special trust minors place in
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 22 - University of Luxembourg
parents, teachers or other persons, or
unreasonably show minors in dangerous
situations.
2. Member States and the Commission shall
encourage media service providers to
develop codes of conduct regarding
inappropriate audiovisual commercial
communications, accompanying or included
in children’s programmes, of foods and
beverages containing nutrients and
substances with a nutritional or physiological
effect, in particular those such as fat, trans-
fatty acids, salt/sodium and sugars,
excessive intakes of which in the overall diet
are not recommended.
2. Member States and the Commission shall
encourage media service providers to
develop the development of self- and co
regulatory codes of conduct regarding
inappropriate audiovisual commercial
communications, accompanying or included
in children’s programmes in programmes
with a significant children’s audience, of
foods and beverages containing nutrients
and substances with a nutritional or
physiological effect, excessive intakes of
which in the overall diet are not
recommended, in particular those such as
fat, trans-fatty acids, salt/sodium and sugars,
excessive intakes of which in the overall diet
are not recommended or sodium and sugar.
Those codes should be used to effectively
reduce the exposure of minors to audiovisual
commercial communications of foods and
beverages that are high in salt, sugars or fat
or that otherwise do not fit national or
international nutritional guidelines. Those
codes should provide that the audiovisual
commercial communications are not to
emphasise the positive quality of the
nutritional aspects of such foods and
beverages.
The Commission and ERGA shall encourage
the exchange of best practices on self- and
co-regulatory systems across the Union.
Where appropriate, the Commission shall
facilitate the development of Union codes of
conduct.
3. Member States and the Commission shall
encourage the development of self- and co-
regulatory codes of conduct regarding
inappropriate audiovisual commercial
communications for alcoholic beverages.
Those codes should be used to effectively
limit the exposure of minors to audiovisual
commercial communications for alcoholic
beverages.
4. The Commission and ERGA shall
encourage the exchange of best practices on
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 23 - University of Luxembourg
self- and co-regulatory systems across the
Union. If considered appropriate, the
Commission shall facilitate the development
of Union codes of conduct.
Art. 10 AVMSD
Art. 10 COM proposal
1. Audiovisual media services or
programmes that are sponsored shall meet
the following requirements:
(a) their content and, in the case of television
broadcasting, their scheduling shall in no
circumstances be influenced in such a way
as to affect the responsibility and editorial
independence of the media service provider;
(b) they shall not directly encourage the
purchase or rental of goods or services, in
particular by making special promotional
references to those goods or services;
(b) they shall not directly encourage the
purchase or rental of goods or services in
particular by making special promotional
references to those goods or services;
(c) viewers shall be clearly informed of the
existence of a sponsorship agreement.
Sponsored programmes shall be clearly
identified as such by the name, logo and/or
any other symbol of the sponsor such as a
reference to its product(s) or service(s) or a
distinctive sign thereof in an appropriate way
for programmes at the beginning, during
and/or at the end of the programmes.
2. Audiovisual media services or
programmes shall not be sponsored by
undertakings whose principal activity is the
manufacture or sale of cigarettes and other
tobacco products.
3. The sponsorship of audiovisual media
services or programmes by undertakings
whose activities include the manufacture or
sale of medicinal products and medical
treatment may promote the name or the
image of the undertaking, but shall not
promote specific medicinal products or
medical treatments available only on
prescription in the Member State within
whose jurisdiction the media service provider
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 24 - University of Luxembourg
falls.
4. News and current affairs programmes shall
not be sponsored. Member States may
choose to prohibit the showing of a
sponsorship logo during children’s
programmes, documentaries and religious
programmes.
Art. 11 AVMSD
Art. 11 COM proposal
1. Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall apply only to
programmes produced after 19 December
2009.
2. Product placement shall be prohibited.
2. Product placement shall be prohibited.
Product placement shall be admissible in all
audiovisual media services, except in news
and current affairs programmes, consumer
affairs programmes, religious programmes
and programmes with a significant children's
audience.
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2,
product placement shall be admissible in the
following cases unless a Member State
decides otherwise:
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2,
product placement shall be admissible in the
following cases unless a Member State
decides otherwise:
Programmes that contain product placement
shall meet the following requirements:
(a) in cinematographic works, films and
series made for audiovisual media services,
sports programmes and light entertainment
programmes;
(a) in cinematographic works, films and
series made for audiovisual media services,
sports programmes and light entertainment
programmes;
their content and, in the case of television
broadcasting, their scheduling shall in no
circumstances be influenced in such a way
as to affect the responsibility and editorial
independence of the media service provider;
(b) where there is no payment but only the
provision of certain goods or services free of
charge, such as production props and prizes,
with a view to their inclusion in a programme.
The derogation provided for in point (a) shall
not apply to children’s programmes.
(b) where there is no payment but only the
provision of certain goods or services free of
charge, such as production props and prizes,
with a view to their inclusion in a programme.
The derogation provided for in point (a) shall
not apply to children’s programmes.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 25 - University of Luxembourg
Programmes that contain product placement
shall meet at least all of the following
requirements:
Programmes that contain product placement
shall meet at least all of the following
requirements:
they shall not directly encourage the
purchase or rental of goods or services;
(a) their content and, in the case of television
broadcasting, their scheduling shall in no
circumstances be influenced in such a way
as to affect the responsibility and editorial
independence of the media service provider;
(a) their content and, in the case of television
broadcasting, their scheduling shall in no
circumstances be influenced in such a way
as to affect the responsibility and editorial
independence of the media service provider;
(b) they shall not directly encourage the
purchase or rental of goods or services, in
particular by making special promotional
references to those goods or services;
(b) they shall not directly encourage the
purchase or rental of goods or services, in
particular by making special promotional
references to those goods or services;
(c) they shall not give undue prominence to
the product in question;
(c) they shall not give undue prominence to
the product in question;
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 26 - University of Luxembourg
(d) viewers shall be clearly informed of the
existence of product placement.
Programmes containing product placement
shall be appropriately identified at the start
and the end of the programme, and when a
programme resumes after an advertising
break, in order to avoid any confusion on the
part of the viewer.
By way of exception, Member States may
choose to waive the requirements set out in
point (d) provided that the programme in
question has neither been produced nor
commissioned by the media service provider
itself or a company affiliated to the media
service provider.
4. In any event programmes shall not contain
product placement of:
(a) tobacco products or cigarettes or product
placement from undertakings whose principal
activity is the manufacture or sale of
cigarettes and other tobacco products;
(b) specific medicinal products or medical
treatments available only on prescription in
the Member State under whose jurisdiction
the media service provider falls.
(c) viewers shall be clearly informed of the
existence of product placement.
Programmes containing product placement
shall be appropriately identified at the start
and the end of the programme, and when a
programme resumes after an advertising
break, in order to avoid any confusion on the
part of the viewer.
By way of exception, Member States may
choose to waive the requirements set out in
point (d) (c) provided that the programme in
question concerned has neither been
produced nor commissioned by the media
service provider itself or a company affiliated
to the media service provider.
Art. 12 AVMSD
Art. 12 COM proposal
Member States shall take appropriate
measures to ensure that on-demand
audiovisual media services provided by
media service providers under their
jurisdiction which might seriously impair the
physical, mental or moral development of
minors are only made available in such a
way as to ensure that minors will not
normally hear or see such on-demand
audiovisual media services.
Member States shall take appropriate
measures to ensure that on-demand
audiovisual media services provided by
media service providers under their
jurisdiction which might seriously
programmes provided by audiovisual media
service providers under their jurisdiction,
which may impair the physical, mental or
moral development of minors are only made
available in such a way as to ensure that
minors will not normally hear or see such on-
demand audiovisual media services them.
Such measures may include selecting the
time of the broadcast, age verification tools
or other technical measures. They shall be
proportionate to the potential harm of the
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 27 - University of Luxembourg
programme.
The most harmful content, such as
gratuitous violence and pornography, shall
be subject to the strictest measures, such as
encryption and effective parental controls.
CHAPTER IV
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE ONLY TO ON-
DEMAND AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA
SERVICES
Art. 13 AVMSD
Art. 13 COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure that on-
demand audiovisual media services provided
by media service providers under their
jurisdiction promote, where practicable and
by appropriate means, the production of and
access to European works.
1. Member States shall ensure that on-
demand audiovisual media services provided
by media service providers providers of on-
demand audiovisual media services under
their jurisdiction promote, where practicable
and by appropriate means, the production of
and access to European works. secure at
least a 20% share of European works in their
catalogue and ensure prominence of these
works.
Such promotion could relate, inter alia, to the
financial contribution made by such services
to the production and rights acquisition of
European works or to the share and/or
prominence of European works in the
catalogue of programmes offered by the on-
demand audiovisual media service.
Such promotion could relate, inter alia, to the
financial contribution made by such services
to the production and rights acquisition of
European works or to the share and/or
prominence of European works in the
catalogue of programmes offered by the on-
demand audiovisual media service.
2. Member States shall report to the
Commission no later than 19 December
2011 and every 4 years thereafter on the
implementation of paragraph 1.
2. Member States shall report to the
Commission no later than 19 December
2011 and every 4 years thereafter on the
implementation of paragraph 1.
Member States may require providers of on-
demand audiovisual media services under
their jurisdiction to contribute financially to
the production of European works, including
via direct investment in content and
contributions to national funds. Member
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 28 - University of Luxembourg
States may require providers of on-demand
audiovisual media services, targeting
audiences in their territories, but established
in other Member States to make such
financial contributions. In this case, the
financial contribution shall be based only on
the revenues earned in the targeted Member
States. If the Member State where the
provider is established imposes a financial
contribution, it shall take into account any
financial contributions imposed by targeted
Member States. Any financial contribution
shall comply with Union law, in particular with
State aid rules.
3. The Commission shall, on the basis of the
information provided by Member States and
of an independent study, report to the
European Parliament and to the Council on
the application of paragraph 1, taking into
account the market and technological
developments and the objective of cultural
diversity.
3. The Commission shall, on the basis of the
information provided by Member States and
of an independent study, report to the
European Parliament and to the Council on
the application of paragraph 1, taking into
account the market and technological
developments and the objective of cultural
diversity
Member States shall report to the
Commission by [date – no later than three
years after adoption] at the latest and every
two years thereafter on the implementation of
paragraphs 1 and 2.
4. The Commission shall, on the basis of the
information provided by Member States and
of an independent study, report to the
European Parliament and to the Council on
the application of paragraphs 1 and 2, taking
into account the market and technological
developments and the objective of cultural
diversity.
5. Member States shall waive the
requirements laid down in paragraphs 1 and
2 for providers with a low turnover or low
audience or if they are small and micro
enterprises. Member States may also waive
such requirements in cases where they
would be impracticable or unjustified by
reason of the nature or theme of the on-
demand audiovisual media services.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 29 - University of Luxembourg
CHAPTER V
PROVISIONS CONCERNING EXCLUSIVE
RIGHTS AND SHORT NEWS REPORTS IN
TELEVISION BROADCASTING
Art. 14 AVMSD
Art. 14 COM proposal
1. Each Member State may take measures in
accordance with Union law to ensure that
broadcasters under its jurisdiction do not
broadcast on an exclusive basis events
which are regarded by that Member State as
being of major importance for society in such
a way as to deprive a substantial proportion
of the public in that Member State of the
possibility of following such events by live
coverage or deferred coverage on free
television. If it does so, the Member State
concerned shall draw up a list of designated
events, national or non-national, which it
considers to be of major importance for
society. It shall do so in a clear and
transparent manner in due time. In so doing
the Member State concerned shall also
determine whether these events should be
available by whole or partial live coverage or,
where necessary or appropriate for objective
reasons in the public interest, whole or partial
deferred coverage.
2. Member States shall immediately notify to
the Commission any measures taken or to
be taken pursuant to paragraph 1. Within a
period of 3 months from the notification, the
Commission shall verify that such measures
are compatible with Union law and
communicate them to the other Member
States. It shall seek the opinion of the
contact committee established pursuant to
Article 29. It shall forthwith publish the
measures taken in the Official Journal of the
European Union and at least once a year the
consolidated list of the measures taken by
Member States.
3. Member States shall ensure, by
appropriate means within the framework of
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 30 - University of Luxembourg
their legislation, that broadcasters under their
jurisdiction do not exercise the exclusive
rights purchased by those broadcasters after
18 December 2007 in such a way that a
substantial proportion of the public in another
Member State is deprived of the possibility of
following events which are designated by
that other Member State in accordance with
paragraphs 1 and 2 by whole or partial live
coverage or, where necessary or appropriate
for objective reasons in the public interest,
whole or partial deferred coverage on free
television as determined by that other
Member State in accordance with paragraph
1.
Art. 15 AVMSD
Art. 15 COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure that for the
purpose of short news reports, any
broadcaster established in the Union has
access on a fair, reasonable and non-
discriminatory basis to events of high interest
to the public which are transmitted on an
exclusive basis by a broadcaster under their
jurisdiction.
2. If another broadcaster established in the
same Member State as the broadcaster
seeking access has acquired exclusive rights
to the event of high interest to the public,
access shall be sought from that
broadcaster.
3. Member States shall ensure that such
access is guaranteed by allowing
broadcasters to freely choose short extracts
from the transmitting broadcaster’s signal
with, unless impossible for reasons of
practicality, at least the identification of their
source.
4. As an alternative to paragraph 3, Member
States may establish an equivalent system
which achieves access on a fair, reasonable
and non-discriminatory basis through other
means.
5. Short extracts shall be used solely for
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 31 - University of Luxembourg
general news programmes and may be used
in on-demand audiovisual media services
only if the same programme is offered on a
deferred basis by the same media service
provider.
6. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 to 5,
Member States shall ensure, in accordance
with their legal systems and practices, that
the modalities and conditions regarding the
provision of such short extracts are defined,
in particular, with respect to any
compensation arrangements, the maximum
length of short extracts and time limits
regarding their transmission. Where
compensation is provided for, it shall not
exceed the additional costs directly incurred
in providing access.
CHAPTER VI
PROMOTION OF DISTRIBUTION AND
PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION
PROGRAMMES
Art. 16 AVMSD
Art. 16 COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure, where
practicable and by appropriate means, that
broadcasters reserve for European works a
majority proportion of their transmission time,
excluding the time allotted to news, sports
events, games, advertising, teletext services
and teleshopping.
This proportion, having regard to the
broadcaster’s informational, educational,
cultural and entertainment responsibilities to
its viewing public, should be achieved
progressively, on the basis of suitable
criteria.
2. Where the proportion laid down in
paragraph 1 cannot be attained, it must not
be lower than the average for 1988 in the
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 32 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 17 AVMSD
Art. 17 COM proposal
Member States shall ensure, where
practicable and by appropriate means, that
broadcasters reserve at least 10 % of their
transmission time, excluding the time allotted
to news, sports events, games, advertising,
teletext services and teleshopping, or
alternately, at the discretion of the Member
State, at least 10 % of their programming
budget, for European works created by
Member State concerned.
However, in respect of Greece and Portugal,
the year 1988 shall be replaced by the year
1990.
3. Member States shall provide the
Commission every 2 years, starting from 3
October 1991, with a report on the
application of this Article and Article 17.
That report shall in particular include a
statistical statement on the achievement of
the proportion referred to in this Article and
Article 17 for each of the television
programmes falling within the jurisdiction of
the Member State concerned, the reasons, in
each case, for the failure to attain that
proportion and the measures adopted or
envisaged in order to achieve it.
The Commission shall inform the other
Member States and the European Parliament
of the reports, which shall be accompanied,
where appropriate, by an opinion. The
Commission shall ensure the application of
this Article and Article 17 in accordance with
the provisions of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union. The
Commission may take account in its opinion,
in particular, of progress achieved in relation
to previous years, the share of first broadcast
works in the programming, the particular
circumstances of new television
broadcasters and the specific situation of
countries with a low audiovisual production
capacity or restricted language area.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 33 - University of Luxembourg
producers who are independent of
broadcasters. This proportion, having regard
to the broadcaster’s informational,
educational, cultural and entertainment
responsibilities to its viewing public, should
be achieved progressively, on the basis of
suitable criteria. It must be achieved by
earmarking an adequate proportion for
recent works, that is to say works
transmitted within 5 years of their production.
Art. 18 AVMSD
Art. 18 COM proposal
This Chapter shall not apply to television
broadcasts that are intended for local
audiences and do not form part of a national
network.
CHAPTER VII
TELEVISION ADVERTISING AND
TELESHOPPING
Art. 19 AVMSD
Art. 19 COM proposal
1. Television advertising and teleshopping
shall be readily recognisable and
distinguishable from editorial content. Without
prejudice to the use of new advertising
techniques, television advertising and
teleshopping shall be kept quite distinct from
other parts of the programme by optical
and/or acoustic and/or spatial means.
2. Isolated advertising and teleshopping
spots, other than in transmissions of sports
events, shall remain the exception.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 34 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 20 AVMSD
Art. 20 COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure, where
television advertising or teleshopping is
inserted during programmes, that the integrity
of the programmes, taking into account
natural breaks in and the duration and the
nature of the programme concerned, and the
rights of the right holders are not prejudiced.
2. The transmission of films made for
television (excluding series, serials and
documentaries), cinematographic works and
news programmes may be interrupted by
television advertising and/or teleshopping
once for each scheduled period of at least 30
minutes. The transmission of children’s
programmes may be interrupted by television
advertising and/or teleshopping once for
each scheduled period of at least 30 minutes,
provided that the scheduled duration of the
programme is greater than 30 minutes.
2. The transmission of films made for
television (excluding series, serials and
documentaries), cinematographic works and
news programmes may be interrupted by
television advertising and/or teleshopping
once for each scheduled period of at least 30
20 minutes. The transmission of children’s
programmes may be interrupted by television
advertising and/or teleshopping once for
each scheduled period of at least 30
minutes, provided that the scheduled
duration of the programme is greater than 30
minutes.
No television advertising or teleshopping
shall be inserted during religious services.
No television advertising or teleshopping
shall be inserted during religious services.
Art. 21 AVMSD
Art. 21 COM proposal
Teleshopping for medicinal products which
are subject to a marketing authorisation
within the meaning of Directive 2001/83/EC,
as well as teleshopping for medical
treatment, shall be prohibited.
Art. 22 AVMSD
Art. 22 COM proposal
Television advertising and teleshopping for
alcoholic beverages shall comply with the
following criteria:
(a) it may not be aimed specifically at minors
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 35 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 23 AVMSD
Art. 23 COM proposal
1. The proportion of television advertising
spots and teleshopping spots within a given
clock hour shall not exceed 20 %.
1. The daily proportion of television
advertising spots and teleshopping spots
within a given clock hour within the period
between 7:00 and 23:00 shall not exceed 20
%.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to
announcements made by the broadcaster in
connection with its own programmes and
ancillary products directly derived from those
programmes, sponsorship announcements
and product placements.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to
announcements made by the broadcaster in
connection with its own programmes and
ancillary products directly derived from those
programmes, sponsorship announcements
and product placements:
(a) announcements made by the broadcaster
in connection with its own programmes and
ancillary products directly derived from those
programmes or with programmes from other
entities belonging to the same media group;
(b) sponsorship announcements;
(c) product placements.
or, in particular, depict minors consuming
these beverages;
(b) it shall not link the consumption of
alcohol to enhanced physical performance or
to driving;
(c) it shall not create the impression that the
consumption of alcohol contributes towards
social or sexual success;
(d) it shall not claim that alcohol has
therapeutic qualities or that it is a stimulant,
a sedative or a means of resolving personal
conflicts;
(e) it shall not encourage immoderate
consumption of alcohol or present
abstinence or moderation in a negative light;
(f) it shall not place emphasis on high
alcoholic content as being a positive quality
of the beverages.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 36 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 24 AVMSD
Art. 24 COM proposal
Teleshopping windows shall be clearly
identified as such by optical and acoustic
means and shall be of a minimum
uninterrupted duration of 15 minutes.
Art. 25 AVMSD
Art. 25 COM proposal
This Directive shall apply mutatis mutandis
to television channels exclusively devoted to
advertising and teleshopping as well as to
television channels exclusively devoted to
self-promotion.
However, Chapter VI as well as Articles 20
and 23 shall not apply to these channels.
Art. 26 AVMSD
Without prejudice to Article 4, Member
States may, with due regard for Union law,
lay down conditions other than those laid
down in Article 20(2) and Article 23 in
respect of television broadcasts intended
solely for the national territory which cannot
be received directly or indirectly by the public
in one or more other Member States.
CHAPTER VIII
PROTECTION OF MINORS IN
TELEVISION BROADCASTING
deleted
Art. 27 AVMSD
Art. 27 COM proposal
1. Member States shall take appropriate
measures to ensure that television
deleted
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 37 - University of Luxembourg
broadcasts by broadcasters under their
jurisdiction do not include any programmes
which might seriously impair the physical,
mental or moral development of minors, in
particular programmes that involve
pornography or gratuitous violence.
2. The measures provided for in paragraph 1
shall also extend to other programmes which
are likely to impair the physical, mental or
moral development of minors, except where
it is ensured, by selecting the time of the
broadcast or by any technical measure, that
minors in the area of transmission will not
normally hear or see such broadcasts.
3. In addition, when such programmes are
broadcast in unencoded form Member States
shall ensure that they are preceded by an
acoustic warning or are identified by the
presence of a visual symbol throughout their
duration.
CHAPTER IX
RIGHT OF REPLY IN TELEVISION
BROADCASTING
Art. 28 AVMSD
Art. 28 COM proposal
1. Without prejudice to other provisions
adopted by the Member States under civil,
administrative or criminal law, any natural or
legal person, regardless of nationality, whose
legitimate interests, in particular reputation
and good name, have been damaged by an
assertion of incorrect facts in a television
programme must have a right of reply or
equivalent remedies. Member States shall
ensure that the actual exercise of the right of
reply or equivalent remedies is not hindered
by the imposition of unreasonable terms or
conditions. The reply shall be transmitted
within a reasonable time subsequent to the
request being substantiated and at a time
and in a manner appropriate to the broadcast
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 38 - University of Luxembourg
to which the request refers.
2. A right of reply or equivalent remedies
shall exist in relation to all broadcasters
under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
3. Member States shall adopt the measures
needed to establish the right of reply or the
equivalent remedies and shall determine the
procedure to be followed for the exercise
thereof. In particular, they shall ensure that a
sufficient time span is allowed and that the
procedures are such that the right or
equivalent remedies can be exercised
appropriately by natural or legal persons
resident or established in other Member
States.
4. An application for exercise of the right of
reply or the equivalent remedies may be
rejected if such a reply is not justified
according to the conditions laid down in
paragraph 1, would involve a punishable act,
would render the broadcaster liable to civil-
law proceedings or would transgress
standards of public decency.
5. Provision shall be made for procedures
whereby disputes as to the exercise of the
right of reply or the equivalent remedies can
be subject to judicial review.
CHAPTER IXa
PROVISION APPLICABLE TO VIDEO-
SHARING PLATFORMS
Art. 28a COM proposal
1. Without prejudice to Articles 14 and 15 of
Directive 2000/31/EC, Member States shall
ensure that video-sharing platform providers
take appropriate measures to:
(a) protect minors from content which may
impair their physical, mental or moral
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 39 - University of Luxembourg
development;
(b) protect all citizens from content
containing incitement to violence or hatred
directed against a group of persons or a
member of such a group defined by
reference to sex, race, colour, religion,
descent or national or ethnic origin.
2. What constitutes an appropriate measure
for the purposes of paragraph 1 shall be
determined in light of the nature of the
content in question, the harm it may cause,
the characteristics of the category of persons
to be protected as well as the rights and
legitimate interests at stake, including those
of the video-sharing platform providers and
the users having created and/or uploaded
the content as well as the public interest.
Those measures shall consist of, as
appropriate:
(a) defining and applying in the terms and
conditions of the video-sharing platform
providers the concepts of incitement to
violence or hatred as referred to in point (b)
of paragraph 1 and of content which may
impair the physical, mental or moral
development of minors, in accordance with
Articles 6 and 12 respectively;
(b) establishing and operating mechanisms
for users of video-sharing platforms to report
or flag to the video-sharing platform provider
concerned the content referred to in
paragraph 1 stored on its platform;
(c) establishing and operating age
verification systems for users of video-
sharing platforms with respect to content
which may impair the physical, mental or
moral development of minors;
(d) establishing and operating systems
allowing users of video-sharing platforms to
rate the content referred to in paragraph 1;
(e) providing for parental control systems
with respect to content which may impair the
physical, mental or moral development of
minors;
(f) establishing and operating systems
through which providers of video-sharing
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 40 - University of Luxembourg
platforms explain to users of video-sharing
platforms what effect has been given to the
reporting and flagging referred to in point (b).
3. For the purposes of the implementation of
the measures referred to in paragraphs 1
and 2, Member States shall encourage co-
regulation as provided for in Article 4(7).
4. Member States shall establish the
necessary mechanisms to assess the
appropriateness of the measures referred to
in paragraphs 2 and 3 taken by video-sharing
platform providers. Member States shall
entrust this task to the authorities designated
in accordance with Article 30.
5. Member States shall not impose on video-
sharing platform providers measures that are
stricter than the measures referred to in
paragraph 1 and 2. Member States shall not
be precluded from imposing stricter
measures with respect to illegal content.
When adopting such measures, they shall
respect the conditions set by applicable
Union law, such as, where appropriate, those
set in Articles 14 and 15 of Directive
2000/31/EC or Article 25 of Directive
2011/93/EU.
6. Member States shall ensure that complaint
and redress mechanisms are available for
the settlement of disputes between users
and video-sharing platform providers relating
to the application of the appropriate
measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
7. The Commission and ERGA shall
encourage video-sharing platform providers
to exchange best practices on co-regulatory
systems across the Union. Where
appropriate, the Commission shall facilitate
the development of Union codes of conduct.
8. Video-sharing platform providers or, where
applicable, the organisations representing
those providers in this respect shall submit to
the Commission draft Union codes of
conduct and amendments to existing Union
codes of conduct. The Commission may
request ERGA to give an opinion on the
drafts, amendments or extensions of those
codes of conduct. The Commission may give
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 41 - University of Luxembourg
appropriate publicity to those codes of
conduct.
Art. 28b COM proposal
1. Member States shall ensure that video-
sharing platform providers which are not
established on their territory, but which have
either a parent company or a subsidiary that
is established on their territory or which are
part of a group and another entity of that
group is established on their territory, are
deemed to have been established on their
territory for the purposes of Article 3(1) of
Directive 2000/31/EEC.
For the purposes of applying the first
subparagraph, where the parent company,
the subsidiary or the other entity of the group
are each established in different Member
States, the provider shall be deemed to have
been established in the Member State where
its parent company is established or, in the
absence of such an establishment in a
Member State, where its subsidiary is
established or, in the absence of such an
establishment in a Member State, where the
other entity of the group is established.
For the purposes of applying the second
subparagraph, where there are several
subsidiaries each of which are established in
different Member States, or where there are
several other entities of the group each of
which are established in different Member
States, the Member States concerned shall
ensure that the provider designates in which
of these Member States it shall be deemed
to have been established.
2. Member States shall communicate to the
Commission a list of the video-sharing
platform providers established on their
territory and the criteria, set out in Article 3(1)
of Directive 2000/31/EC and in paragraph 1,
on which their jurisdiction is based. They
shall update the list regularly. The
Commission shall ensure that the competent
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 42 - University of Luxembourg
independent regulatory authorities have
access to this information.
CHAPTER X
CONTACT COMMITTEE
Art. 29 AVMSD
Art. 29 COM proposal
1. A contact committee is established under
the aegis of the Commission. It shall be
composed of representatives of the
competent authorities of the Member States.
It shall be chaired by a representative of the
Commission and meet either on his initiative
or at the request of the delegation of a
Member State.
2. The tasks of the contact committee shall
be:
(a) to facilitate effective implementation of
this Directive through regular consultation on
any practical problems arising from its
application, and particularly from the
application of Article 2, as well as on any
other matters on which exchanges of views
are deemed useful;
(b) to deliver own-initiative opinions or
opinions requested by the Commission on
the application by the Member States of this
Directive;
(c) to be the forum for an exchange of views
on what matters should be dealt with in the
reports which Member States must submit
pursuant to Article 16(3) and on their
methodology;
(d) to discuss the outcome of regular
consultations which the Commission holds
with representatives of broadcasting
organisations, producers, consumers,
manufacturers, service providers and trade
unions and the creative community;
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 43 - University of Luxembourg
(e) to facilitate the exchange of information
between the Member States and the
Commission on the situation and the
development of regulatory activities
regarding audiovisual media services, taking
account of the Union’s audiovisual policy, as
well as relevant developments in the
technical field;
(f) to examine any development arising in
the sector on which an exchange of views
appears useful.
CHAPTER XI
COOPERATION BETWEEN REGULATORY
BODIES OF THE MEMBER STATES
CHAPTER XI
COOPERATION BETWEEN REGULATORY
BODIES OF THE MEMBER STATES
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OF THE
MEMBER STATES
Art. 30 AVMSD
Art. 30 COM proposal
Member States shall take appropriate
measures to provide each other and the
Commission with the information necessary
for the application of this Directive, in
particular Articles 2, 3 and 4, in particular
through their competent independent
regulatory bodies.
Member States shall take appropriate
measures to provide each other and the
Commission with the information necessary
for the application of this Directive, in
particular Articles 2, 3 and 4, in particular
through their competent independent
regulatory bodies.
1. Each Member State shall designate one or
more independent national regulatory
authorities. Member States shall ensure that
they are legally distinct and functionally
independent of any other public or private
body. This shall be without prejudice to the
possibility for Member States to set up
regulators having oversight over different
sectors.
2. Member States shall ensure that national
regulatory authorities exercise their powers
impartially and transparently and in
accordance with the objectives of this
Directive, in particular media pluralism,
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 44 - University of Luxembourg
cultural diversity, consumer protection,
internal market and the promotion of fair
competition.
National regulatory authorities shall not seek
or take instructions from any other body in
relation to the exercise of the tasks assigned
to them under national law implementing
Union law. This shall not prevent supervision
in accordance with national constitutional
law.
3. The competences and powers of the
independent regulatory authorities, as well as
the ways of making them accountable shall
be clearly defined in law.
4. Member States shall ensure that national
regulatory authorities have adequate
enforcement powers to carry out their
functions effectively.
5. The Head of a national regulatory authority
or the members of the collegiate body
fulfilling that function within a national
regulatory authority, may be dismissed only if
they no longer fulfil the conditions required
for the performance of their duties which are
laid down in advance in national law. A
dismissal decision shall be made public and
a statement of reasons shall be made
available.
6. Member States shall ensure that
independent national regulatory authorities
have separate annual budgets. The budgets
shall be made public. Member States shall
also ensure that national regulatory
authorities have adequate financial and
human resources to enable them to carry out
the task assigned to them and to actively
participate in and contribute to ERGA.
7. Member States shall ensure that effective
mechanisms exist at national level under
which any user or media services provider or
video-sharing platform provider who is
affected by a decision of a national
regulatory authority has the right of appeal
against the decision to an appeal body. The
appeal body shall be independent of the
parties involved in the appeal.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 45 - University of Luxembourg
That appeal body, which should be a court,
shall have the appropriate expertise to
enable it to carry out its functions effectively.
Member States shall ensure that the merits
of the case are duly taken into account and
that there is an effective appeal mechanism.
Pending the outcome of the appeal, the
decision of the national regulatory authority
shall stand, unless interim measures are
granted in accordance with national law.
Art. 30a COM proposal
1. The European Regulators Group for
Audiovisual Media Services (ERGA) is
hereby established.
2. It shall be composed of national
independent regulatory authorities in the
field of audiovisual media services. They
shall be represented by the heads or by
nominated high level representatives of the
national regulatory authority with primary
responsibility for overseeing audiovisual
media services, or in cases where there is
no national regulatory authority, by other
representatives as chosen through their
procedures. A Commission representative
shall participate in the group meetings.
3. ERGA shall have the following tasks:
(a) to advise and assist the Commission in
its work to ensure a consistent
implementation in all Member States of the
regulatory framework for audiovisual media
services;
(b) to advise and assist the Commission as
to any matter related to audiovisual media
services within the Commission's
competence. If justified in order to advise the
Commission on certain issues, the group
may consult market participants, consumers
and end-users in order to collect the
necessary information;
(c) to provide for an exchange of experience
and good practice as to the application of the
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 46 - University of Luxembourg
regulatory framework for audiovisual media
services;
(d) to cooperate and provide its members
with the information necessary for the
application of this Directive, in particular as
regards Articles 3 and 4 thereof;
(e) to give opinions, when requested by the
Commission, on the issues envisaged in
Articles 2(5b), 6a(3), 9(2), 9(4) and on any
matter relating to audiovisual media
services, in particular on the protection of
minors and incitement to hatred.
4. The Commission shall be empowered to
adopt, by means of an implementing act, the
rules of procedure for ERGA.
CHAPTER XII
FINAL PROVISIONS
Art. 31 AVMSD
Art. 31 COM proposal
In fields which this Directive does not
coordinate, it shall not affect the rights and
obligations of Member States resulting from
existing conventions dealing with
telecommunications or broadcasting.
Art. 32 AVMSD
Art. 32 COM proposal
Member States shall communicate to the
Commission the text of the main provisions
of national law which they adopt in the field
covered by this Directive.
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 47 - University of Luxembourg
Art. 33 AVMSD Art. 33 COM proposal
Not later than 19 December 2011, and every
3 years thereafter, the Commission shall
submit to the European Parliament, to the
Council and to the European Economic and
Social Committee a report on the application
of this Directive and, if necessary, make
further proposals to adapt it to developments
in the field of audiovisual media services, in
particular in the light of recent technological
developments, the competitiveness of the
sector and levels of media literacy in all
Member States.
Not later than 19 December 2011, and every
3 years thereafter, the Commission shall
submit to the European Parliament, to the
Council and to the European Economic and
Social Committee a report on the application
of this Directive and, if necessary, make
further proposals to adapt it to developments
in the field of audiovisual media services, in
particular in the light of recent technological
developments, the competitiveness of the
sector and levels of media literacy in all
Member States.
That report shall also assess the issue of
television advertising accompanying or
included in children’s programmes, and in
particular whether the quantitative and
qualitative rules contained in this Directive
have afforded the level of protection
required.
That report shall also assess the issue of
television advertising accompanying or
included in children’s programmes, and in
particular whether the quantitative and
qualitative rules contained in this Directive
have afforded the level of protection
required.
The Commission shall monitor Member
States' application of the Directive, including
its application of co-regulation and self-
regulation through codes adopted at national
level.
By [date – no later than four years after
adoption] at the latest, and every three years
thereafter, the Commission shall submit to
the European Parliament, to the Council and
to the European Economic and Social
Committee a report on the application of this
Directive.
By [date - no later than 10 years after
adoption] at the latest, the Commission shall
submit to the European Parliament and the
Council an ex post evaluation, accompanied
where appropriate by proposals for its
review, in order to measure the impact of the
Directive and its added value.
Art. 34 AVMSD
Art. 34 COM proposal
Project AVMS-Directive www.medialaw.lu AVMSD 2010 – AVMSD proposal - 48 - University of Luxembourg
Directive 89/552/EEC, as amended by the
Directives listed in Annex I, Part A, is
repealed, without prejudice to the obligations
of the Member States relating to the time
limits for trans position into national law of
the Directives set out in Annex I, Part B.
References to the repealed Directive shall
be construed as references to this Directive
and shall be read in accordance with the
correlation table in Annex II.
Art. 35 AVMSD
Art. 35 COM proposal
This Directive shall enter into force on the
20th day following its publication in the
Official Journal of the European Union.
Art. 36 AVMSD
Art. 36 COM proposal
This Directive is addressed to the Member
States.