the environmentally friendly pipes - mitweb.mit.edu/3.042/team2_10/docs/pres/peps_final... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
PEPSPEPS
Polyethylene Pipes Systems
The Environmentally Friendly Pipes
Lina Garcia Kathy Bui Ian Matts William Kyei-Manu
Agenda1. Background
2. Goals
3. Device Design
4. Polymer Science Theory
5. Sample Testing
6. Cost Analysis
7. Gantt Chart
8. Acknowledgement
Background
• Food and water shortages in developing parts of the world such as Africa are common
• Many small agricultural operations in developing countries are stagnant due to countries are stagnant due to lack of resources
• Excess of unrecycled plastic shopping bags in many parts of the world is a wasted resource
Picture from www.defeatpoverty.com
Picture from www.greencrawler.com
Irrigation Kits on Current Market
The International Development Enterprises Krishak Bandhu Family Nutrition Kit: $6.00
Source: http://www.ide-india.org and http://www.ideorg.org
• Includes 20 m of tubes to irrigate 20 m2 of land
• Water Height: 1.5 m• Pressure: 0.15 atm
GoalsWe aim to produce irrigation tubing via a method that is:• Low tech• Low cost• While using recycled materials for tubes
Our final deliverable are:• A method to produce irrigation tubing• A method to produce irrigation tubing• An irrigation tube prototype
Specifications of tube prototype:• 6-25 mm in diameter• can scale up to 20 m per piece• can withstand at least 0.15 atm of water pressure
Design Considerations
1. Production Method• Hot gas welding, heat welding, blow
extrusion
2. Heat Source• Resistive heater, hot coals, hot water
Small image from first update “choices to make” slide
3. Construction Materials• Steel, Aluminum, plastics
4. Starting Material• 100% recycled vs. partially recycled HDPE
minco.com
larusse.com
Device Design
Key design features:
•Double seam• Aids in continuous processing
•Aluminum• High thermal conductivity
•Lack of contact•Lack of contact• Avoid friction-associated problems
•No monolithic layers• Fewer processing steps
•Heating away from rollers• Ease of pipe fabrication
Actual Device
Notable Features:
•Fixed distance between rollers
•Gears to coordinate roller rotation.
Hand crank
Resistive Heaters
rotation.
•Hand crank for ease of use
•80-20 base allows for adjustment
Aluminum rollerswith teflon tape
Driven gear
Further Improvements
Potential Future Work:
•Interchangeable rollers
•More precise machining
•Lower cost of device
•Motorized rotation
•Take away variac
Theoretical ranges of relevant parameters:
•Temperature :
94°C to 156°C
Sample Production Parameters
94°C to 156°C
•Velocity :
2 mm/s - 100+ mm/s
•Pressure:
0 psi - 25+ psi
Weld Strength Model
Non-Fickean diffusion of polymer end chains
σw = strength of weldσm = strength of raw materialv = velocityT = processing temperature
Image Source: http://nobelprize.org
Peel Test
ASTM D6392-08:"Standard Test Method for Determining the Integrity of Nonreinforced Geomembrane Seams Produced Using Thermo-Fusion Methods”Methods”
Extension rate = 50 mm/minWidth = 25 mm
Peel Test Results
Temp~130°CV~6.3mm/s
Minimum Strength
Pressure2 m of tube, tested vertically, water source at 2 m above ground
Hydrostatic pressure: P = ρgh
where ρ is the density of the fluid, g is the gravitational acceleration, h is the height of gravitational acceleration, h is the height of the fluid column.
Stereomicroscopy
8-layer weld under 1x magnification
1mm
Same 8-layer weld under 5x magnification
1mm
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
8-layer weld under 17x magnification
SEM Elemental AnalysisC
CaCa
O NaAl Cl
Cost Analysis
Product Cost per 20m tube
PEPS $1.15
Krishak Bandhu Family Nutrition Kit $4.00 (Est.)
Past 3.042 Project $98
•Fixed Cost (Cost of device, maintenance etc) ~ $290-$300•Energy Cost = $0.20 per kWh•Labor Cost =$2.75 per day (working for 250 days per year)•Estimated Kits per year ~ 1100 kits
Strategic Plan
Decision Tree Results:Plan
Produce on Large Scale Plant
Capacity1100 units/yr
Period One (First 5 years)
Scale: Large Scale
Price: $1.3
Period Two (Subsequent 5 years)
Low Demand Very Large Scale; $1.5
Medium Demand Very Large Scale; $1.51100 units/yr Medium Demand Very Large Scale; $1.5
High Demand Very Large Scale; $1.5
Initial Investment$1,950 Return on Investment if we use this plan
Market Share Profit
Low $394
Medium $1,609
High $2,060
Gantt Chant
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the following people for their support and guidance throughout the project:
Mr. David BonoMr. Harlan BreindelProf. Yet-Ming ChiangProf. Yet-Ming ChiangDr. Suzanne T LaneDr. Joseph ParseMs. Joy C PerkinsonDr. Christoph SachsMr. Mike TarkanianMs. Yinlin XieMr. Tom Geyer from AMPAC
Questions?
Thermal Analysis
Thermal Properties
Thermal Analysis via Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
• Tested 6 different bags
• Average melting temperature, T = 124.9 ± 1.3°C• Average melting temperature, Tm = 124.9 ± 1.3°C
• Softening point, ~105-115°C
• Average heat capacity, Cp = 2.1 ± 0.6 kJ/kg°C1
1. W. Martienssen, H. Warlimont, Springer Handbook of Condensed Matter and
Materials, 2005, XVIII, 1120, p. 1025
Tube Strength
•Water Pressure:
•Minimum Weld Strength:Source: Pipeline Engineering Design
Weld Failure Modes
The ASTM standards specify different failure modes for peel test:
X-Ray Diffraction Test ParametersNo ASTM Standards found for measuring polymer crystallinity using XRD
Equipment:PANalytical Multipurpose Diffractometer in 13-4027
Parameters:•5°to 70°•90 min/sample•At 40mA•Max penetration depth exceeded thickness of entire sample
X-Ray Diffraction Data
Heat Transfer Model
Will temperature at contact Will the heating requirement bepoint be high enough? reasonable when considering losses?
Heat in Heat out
Yes!
Yes!
Heat conduction approximations
For:• Ts=100 C, t = 48 sec• Ts=102 C, t = 13 sec• Ts=110 C, t = 2 sec
Peel Test ParamtersASTM D6392-08: "Standard Test Method for Determining the Integrity of Nonreinforced Geomembrane Seams Produced Using Thermo-Fusion Methods”
Geomembranes are composed of Polyethylene of various densities, Polyvinyl Chloride, or Polypropylene.
Variable ASTM Actual
Sample Width 25 mm 25 mm
Sample Height 150 mm 100 mm
Extension Rate 50 mm/min 50 mm/min
Grip 25 mm x 25 mm 25 mm x 25mm
Tube Geometry Model
Young’s Modulus E ~180MPaYield Strength in tension ~4.4 MPaDiameter ~ 0.75''Thickness ~ 8 layers of bag ~ 0.517mmFactor Of Safety: 1Water pressure ~ 0.15 atm
PE Relaxation Time
Robelin-Souffach et al. Relationship between the Relaxation of Polyethylene Coils in the Melt and the Molecular Weight Distribution. Macromolecules, 1984.
Non-Fickean Diffusion
Reptation Model• Reptation time = avg time for a chain to move a distance equal to its radius of gyrationo
o trep for PE of Mw=104 g/mole is in the
• Diffusion scales as t1/4
1. Robelin-Souffach et al. 1984
o trep for PE of Mw=104 g/mole is in the order of 10 seconds1
Weld Strength
Heat Affected Zone (HAZ)
• Processing parameters also determine microstructure
Cost of Device Production
Aluminum rollers~$80Heating element ~ $70Insulation ~ $10Machining(5hours X $10/hour) ~ $508020 Aluminum Extrusion ~$208020 Aluminum Extrusion ~$20Steel rods ~ $40 Overhead Cost (nuts/bolts,shipping, etc) ~ $20
Total Cost of Prototype Device ~ $290
FTIR Results
FTIR Results
• Peaks observed comparable to those obtained from literature2
• No significant traces of additives• Processed Bag show lower peak intensity2. Table adapted from “Physical and mechanical behaviour of hot rolled HDPE/HA composites” by A. Pandey, E. Jan, P.B. Aswath,
published 12, April 2006.
Stress-Strain Response
Sample Peel Test: Sample 6A
30
40
Load (N)
0
10
20
0 10 20 30
Load (N)
Extension (mm)