the enigma of the ulna in the primate wrist · almécija et al., 2015, the anatomical record...

1
The enigma of the ulna in the primate wrist Marie Vanhoof Evie Vereecke, Filip Stockmans , Koen Nelissen Jan Palfijn Anatomy Lab, Dept. Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Belgium The wrist is a highly complex structure, as it is a combination of different articulations that together constitute the overall mobility of the wrist. [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the zoos and institutions that contributed by providing the primate cadaver and skeletal specimens, and AZ Groeninge (Kortrijk, Belgium) for CT-scanning. The research is funded by KU Leuven. REFERENCES * © Kristiaan D’Août Lewis, O.J., 1969, Am J Phys Anthropol 30, 251-267 Almécija et al., 2015, The Anatomical Record 298(1), 212-229. Boyer et al., 2015, The Anatomical Record 298(1), 249-276. GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS Include the 3D bone models of both the skeletal and cadaver specimens dataset: > 400 specimens of a wide range of primate taxa Use dedicated scripts and toolboxes for analysis (e.g. Fig. 2 and Boyer et al. (2015)) Figure 2: Left hamate of Pan troglodytes illustrating the 23 surface landmarks (Almécija et al., 2015) Investigate the interrelationship between distal ulnar and carpal morphology and wrist mobility in primate species with a distinct phylogenetic position relative to modern humans and a different locomotor behaviour. GOAL METHODOLOGY RADIOULNAR RANGE OF MOTION Skeletal specimens and fresh-frozen cadaver specimens of different locomotor groups A self-designed rig to standardize the wrist (and elbow) positions Each cadaver specimen is CT-scanned in five positions (neutral, maximal radial/ulnar deviation, maximal pro/supination) All scans include the entire radius, ulna, carpal bones and third metacarpal 1. Quantify differences in ulnar and carpal morphology across primates 2. Correlation between morphology of carpal bones and distal ulna across primates? 3. Link between different morphology and different locomotor behaviour? BONOBO SCAPHOID GIBBON SCAPHOID Figure 1: Proximal wrist joint in different primates. S: scaphoid, L: lunate, T: triquetrum, P: pisiform, R: radius, U: ulna, d: os daubentonii (intrameniscal), m: menisus [adapted from Lewis (1969)] What is the precise contribution of these articulations in radial and ulnar deviation? During primate evolution, there is a reduction of the distal ulna in the hominoid lineage (Fig. 1). suspensory/brachiators terrestrial knuckle-walkers terrestrial palmigrades/digitigrades 3. Wrist kinematics contribution of different articulations to radial/ulnar deviation? BABOON SCAPHOID 2. Segmentation of CT-scans to create 3D surface models to measure the maximal range of motion (ROM) ROM 1. CT-scanning * (n = 5) (n = 19)

Upload: others

Post on 19-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The enigma of the ulna in the primate wrist · Almécija et al., 2015, The Anatomical Record 298(1), 212-229. Boyer et al., 2015, The Anatomical Record 298(1), 249-276. GEOMETRIC

The enigma of the ulna in the primate wristMarie Vanhoof

Evie Vereecke, Filip Stockmans , Koen NelissenJan Palfijn Anatomy Lab, Dept. Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk, Belgium

The wrist is a highly complex structure, asit is a combination of differentarticulations that together constitute theoverall mobility of the wrist.

[email protected]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank the zoos and institutions that contributed by providing the primate cadaverand skeletal specimens, and AZ Groeninge (Kortrijk, Belgium) for CT-scanning. The research is fundedby KU Leuven.

REFERENCES

* © Kristiaan D’AoûtLewis, O.J., 1969, Am J Phys Anthropol 30, 251-267Almécija et al., 2015, The Anatomical Record 298(1), 212-229.Boyer et al., 2015, The Anatomical Record 298(1), 249-276.

GEOMETRIC

MORPHOMETRICS

Include the 3D bone models of both the skeletal and cadaver specimens dataset: > 400 specimens of a wide range of primate taxa Use dedicated scripts and toolboxes for analysis (e.g. Fig. 2 and Boyer et al. (2015))

Figure 2: Left hamate of Pan troglodytes illustrating

the 23 surface landmarks (Almécija et al., 2015)

Investigate the interrelationship betweendistal ulnar and carpal morphology andwrist mobility in primate species with adistinct phylogenetic position relative tomodern humans and a differentlocomotor behaviour.

GOAL METHODOLOGY

RADIOULNAR

RANGE OF MOTION

Skeletal specimens and fresh-frozen cadaver specimens of different locomotor groups

A self-designed rig to standardize the wrist (and elbow) positions

Each cadaver specimen is CT-scanned in five positions (neutral, maximal radial/ulnar deviation, maximal pro/supination)

All scans include the entire radius, ulna, carpal bones and third metacarpal

1. Quantify differences in ulnar and carpal morphology across primates

2. Correlation between morphology of carpal bones and distal ulna across primates?

3. Link between different morphology and different locomotor behaviour?

BONOBO SCAPHOID

GIBBON SCAPHOID

Figure 1: Proximal wrist joint in different primates. S: scaphoid, L: lunate, T: triquetrum, P:

pisiform, R: radius, U: ulna, d: os daubentonii (intrameniscal), m: menisus [adapted from Lewis

(1969)]

What is the precise contribution of thesearticulations in radial and ulnardeviation?

During primate evolution, there is areduction of the distal ulna in thehominoid lineage (Fig. 1).

suspensory/brachiators terrestrial knuckle-walkers terrestrial palmigrades/digitigrades

3. Wrist kinematics contribution of differentarticulations to radial/ulnardeviation?

BABOON SCAPHOID

2. Segmentation of CT-scans to create 3D surface models to measurethe maximal range of motion (ROM)

ROM

1. CT-scanning

*

(n = 5) (n = 19)