The End of Handover

F i a t e c h – T e c h T u e s d a y W e b i n a r

J u l y 1 8 , 2 0 1 7

Unlock ing the va lue o f a p rogress ive handover approach to In fo rmat ion

Management

Generated By Engineering

Received By Operations

Use

ful I

nfo

rmat

ion

Required By Operations

The Traditional Handover Approach

OPERATE/MAINTAIN/MODIFYCOMMISSIONINGCONSTRUCTPROCUREDETAILED

ENGINEERINGFEED

Key Handover Challenges - Ambition vs. Reality

Reason 1Lack of a well-structured and well-enforced plan for information handover

Reason 2Using inadequate information management technologies

Reason 3Handover is viewed as a late stage activity

▪ Asset Integrity & Reliability▪ Work Management▪ Maintenance Management▪ Asset Management▪ Risk Management▪ Automation Control & Monitoring▪ Process Safety Management

100%UNSTRUCTURED DATA

30%STRUCTURED DATA

Who fills the gap and how?

The need to shift to a Progressive Handover approach – Operations

4.2% of capital project for $100M = $4.2M

CFIHOS - Capital Facilities Information Hand Over Specification

• USPI-NL is the organizational owner

• Comprised of Owners, EPCs and Technology Suppliers

• Value drivers are for capital project execution and operations• Interoperability: Drive consistency through a common specification and dictionary to reduce

costs at each step in the supply chain across the project

• Debottlenecking: Raise productivity by finding bottlenecks in design review & approval process using status reporting on information delivery & review

• Accelerated handovers: Continuously stage and validate asset information to assure data quality and accelerate population of operational systems

• Speed up searches for information. Reduce search time by linking documents to tags (often quoted as 25% of operational staff time). Improve management of change for brownfield modifications.

• Reduce operational risk. Demonstrate control over as-built data as a “minimum standard” for asset information and a specification for data cleansing & integrated service contractors.

Generated By Engineering

Use

ful I

nfo

rmat

ion

OPERATE/MAINTAIN/MODIFYCOMMISSIONINGCONSTRUCTPROCUREDETAILED

ENGINEERINGFEED

Received By OperationsRequired By Operations

Incremental handover would

reduce cost

A better way forward – Progressive Handover

Source : AVEVA, End of Handover Report

Digital Asset

Information

Physical Asset

SteelEvergreen

Mechanical Integrity Data Integrity

The Digital Asset makes Progressive Handover possible

Information Modeling

Information Standards

Management

Written Specifications

or

Excel Spreadsheets

Governance• Role/Responsibilities• Access/Security Controls• Compliance & Conformance Policies

Information Modeling• Tags/Documents• Attributes and UOM• Master Reference Data• Naming / Numbering Rules• Lifecycle Phase Definitions• Maturity Rules

Configuration Management• Change Management• Class Library Publishing• Standards Mapping • Data Loaders

Key capabilities required to manage Information Standards

The Digital Asset Transformation Journey

Manage the Digital Asset

System of Context

Quality & Progress Reporting

Project/Asset Information Search

Engine Tag Centric Information Retrieval

Tag-to-DocCross Referencing

Multi-Project/Asset access and

VisibilityVisualization

Dig

ital

Ass

et J

ou

rney

System of Reference

Defines the Digital AssetNumbering

SystemsClass Library/Taxonomies

BusinessValidation

Rules

Data RequirementsSpecification

Data Governance

Modal

Asset Hierarchies

Create/Modify the Digital Asset

Systems of Record

Exploit the Digital Asset

Systems of Engagement

Multi-player Gaming PlatformTouch Devices Mobile Devices Human Machine Devices

{ }