the effect of two hop varieties (humulus lupulus l.) …...-in vitro gas production data fitted with...

1
THE EFFECT OF TWO HOP VARIETIES (Humulus lupulus L.) ON IN VITRO GAS AND VOLATILE FATTY ACID PRODUCTION IN DAIRY COWS A. Lavrenčič 1 , A. Levart 1 , I.J. Košir 2 and A. Čerenak 2 1 University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Dept. of Animal Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Slovenian Institute of Hop Research and Brewing, Žalec, Slovenia Objectives information on the use of hops as feed additives for ruminants to determine the effects of the two hop varieties, differing in the ratio between alpha- and beta-acids on fermentation in the rumen Short-chain fatty acid concentrations (mmol/g DM) in the buffered rumen fluid after 24 hours of in vitro incubation Material and methods Diet: total mixed ration (TMR) with two varieties of hop cones, Aurora (A) and Dana (D) were added in amounts corresponding to their concentration in the rumen of cow consuming 50, 100 and 200 g daily In vitro test: - in vitro gas production (Menke and Steingass, 1988) - 4 samples/batch (2) incubated for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h - after 24 h two syringes short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) analysis (Holdeman et al., 1977) Calculations and statistical analysis - in vitro gas production data fitted with the Gompertz model (estimated and calculated parameters were “B”, “C”, “D”, maximum fermentation rate („MFR“), time of maximum fermentation rate („TMFR“), volume of gas produced in 24 h („Gas24“) - differences were tested for the effects of hop variety, hop concentration and their interaction 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 In vitro gas production (ml/g DM) Incubation time (hours) TMR A 50 A 100 A 200 D 50 D 100 D 200 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 In vitro gas production rate (ml/hour) Incubation time (hours) TMR A 50 A 100 A 200 D 50 D 100 D 200 Gas production curves of TMR and TMR containing different varieties and amounts of hops fitted with the Gompertz model Gas production rates of TMR and TMR containing different varieties and amounts of hops Results Substrate Acetic Propionic Butyric ΣSCFA TMR 3.28 a 1.14 0.78 a 5.20 a A50 2.82 ab 0.90 0.57 b 4.30 abc A100 3.20 a 1.27 0.48 b 4.94 ab A200 2.18 bc 1.36 0.26 c 3.79 bc D50 3.24 a 1.29 0.71 a 5.24 a D100 3.07 a 1.01 0.45 b 4.63 abc D200 2.07 c 1.40 0.21 c 3.67 c RMSE § 0.440 0.356 0.078 0.758 Variety Concentration *** *** * Var . × conc. abc = Means in columns with different superscripts are significantly different at the level P = 0.05 § Root mean-square error References Al-Mamun M/Saito A/Sano H 2011. Effects of ensiled hop (Humulus lupulus L.) residues on plasma acetate turnover rate in sheep. Anim. Sci. J. 82, 451-455. Flythe MD 2009. The antimicrobial effects of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) on ruminal hyper ammonia-producing bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol 48, 721-717. Flythe MD/Aiken GE 2010. Effects of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) extracts on volatile fatty acids production by rumen bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 109, 1169-1176. Sakamoto K/Konings W 2003. Beer spoilage bacteria and hop resistance. Int. J. Food Microbiol 89, 105-124. Van Cleemput M/Cattor K/De Bosscher K/Haegeman G/De Keukeleire D/Heyerick A 2009. Hop (Humulus lupulus)-derived bitter acids as multipotent bioactive compounds. J. Nat. Prod. 72, 1220-1230. Conclusions the supplementation of diets with hops changed the fermentation pattern in vitro hop cones contain antimicrobial substances which modulate rumen fermentation these data are not sufficiently conclusive to give a definitive recommendation about the variety and amount of hops fed to ruminant animals other in vitro and in vivo studies should be performed before thorough conclusions could be made Introduction ban of the use of nutritive antibiotics research of other chemical substances alternatives to antibiotics secondary plant metabolites (plant essential oils …) hop (Humulus lupulus L.) antimicrobial properties in beer production increased resistance to microbial spoilage herbal medicine antimicrobial properties + estrogenic and anticancerogenic properties + alleviate digestive upsets. hops production >> hop utilization Kiev, Ukraine - June 2013 Acklowledgement Research was funded by Slovenian Research Agency (grant V4-1112) IHGC Scientific Commission

Upload: others

Post on 18-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE EFFECT OF TWO HOP VARIETIES (Humulus lupulus L.) …...-in vitro gas production data fitted with the Gompertz model (estimated and calculated parameters were “B”, “C”,

THE EFFECT OF TWO HOP VARIETIES (Humulus lupulus L.) ON IN VITRO GAS AND VOLATILE FATTY ACID PRODUCTION IN

DAIRY COWS A. Lavrenčič1, A. Levart1, I.J. Košir2 and A. Čerenak2

1University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Dept. of Animal Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2Slovenian Institute of Hop Research and Brewing, Žalec, Slovenia

Objectives • information on the use of hops as feed

additives for ruminants • to determine the effects of the two hop

varieties, differing in the ratio between alpha- and beta-acids on fermentation in the rumen

Short-chain fatty acid concentrations (mmol/g DM) in the buffered rumen fluid after 24 hours of in vitro incubation

Material and methods

• Diet: total mixed ration (TMR) with two varieties of hop cones, Aurora (A) and Dana (D) were added in amounts corresponding to their concentration in the rumen of cow consuming 50, 100 and 200 g daily

• In vitro test:

- in vitro gas production (Menke and Steingass, 1988)

- 4 samples/batch (2) incubated for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 h

- after 24 h two syringes short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) analysis (Holdeman et al., 1977)

• Calculations and statistical analysis

- in vitro gas production data fitted with the Gompertz model (estimated and calculated parameters were “B”, “C”, “D”, maximum fermentation rate („MFR“), time of maximum fermentation rate („TMFR“), volume of gas produced in 24 h („Gas24“)

- differences were tested for the effects of hop variety, hop concentration and their interaction

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

In v

itro

gas

pro

du

ctio

n (

ml/

g D

M)

Incubation time (hours)

TMR

A 50

A 100

A 200

D 50

D 100

D 200

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

In v

itro

gas

pro

du

ctio

n r

ate

(m

l/h

ou

r)

Incubation time (hours)

TMR

A 50

A 100

A 200

D 50

D 100

D 200

Gas production curves of TMR and TMR containing different varieties and amounts of hops fitted with the Gompertz model

Gas production rates of TMR and TMR containing different varieties and amounts of hops

Results

Substrate Acetic Propionic Butyric ΣSCFA

TMR 3.28a 1.14 0.78a 5.20a

A50 2.82ab 0.90 0.57b 4.30abc

A100 3.20a 1.27 0.48b 4.94ab

A200 2.18bc 1.36 0.26c 3.79bc

D50 3.24a 1.29 0.71a 5.24a

D100 3.07a 1.01 0.45b 4.63abc

D200 2.07c 1.40 0.21c 3.67c

RMSE§ 0.440 0.356 0.078 0.758

Variety

Concentration *** *** *

Var. × conc. abc = Means in columns with different superscripts are significantly different at the level P = 0.05 § Root mean-square error

References Al-Mamun M/Saito A/Sano H 2011. Effects of ensiled hop (Humulus lupulus L.) residues on plasma acetate turnover rate in sheep. Anim. Sci. J. 82, 451-455. Flythe MD 2009. The antimicrobial effects of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) on ruminal hyper ammonia-producing bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol 48, 721-717. Flythe MD/Aiken GE 2010. Effects of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) extracts on volatile fatty acids production by rumen bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 109, 1169-1176. Sakamoto K/Konings W 2003. Beer spoilage bacteria and hop resistance. Int. J. Food Microbiol 89, 105-124. Van Cleemput M/Cattor K/De Bosscher K/Haegeman G/De Keukeleire D/Heyerick A 2009. Hop (Humulus lupulus)-derived bitter acids as multipotent bioactive

compounds. J. Nat. Prod. 72, 1220-1230.

Conclusions

• the supplementation of diets with hops changed the fermentation pattern in vitro hop cones contain antimicrobial substances which modulate rumen fermentation

• these data are not sufficiently conclusive to give a definitive recommendation about the variety and amount of hops fed to ruminant animals other in vitro and in vivo studies should be performed before thorough conclusions could be made

Introduction • ban of the use of nutritive antibiotics

research of other chemical substances • alternatives to antibiotics secondary plant

metabolites (plant essential oils …) • hop (Humulus lupulus L.) • antimicrobial properties in beer production

increased resistance to microbial spoilage • herbal medicine antimicrobial properties +

estrogenic and anticancerogenic properties + alleviate digestive upsets.

• hops production >> hop utilization

Kiev, Ukraine - June 2013

Acklowledgement Research was funded by Slovenian Research Agency (grant V4-1112)

IHGC Scientific Commission