the demography of hampshire’s new...the demography of hampshire’s new housing developments . 1...

0

Published by Research and Intelligence September 2014

www.hants.gov.uk

Hampshire County Council

The Demography of Hampshire’s New

Housing Developments

1

Contents

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2

Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 2

Limitations and caveats .................................................................................................................... 2

Output areas consisting mostly of new development ..................................................................... 3

Summary Characteristics of New Development ............................................................................. 10

Population Pyramids ...................................................................................................................... 11

Area Summaries ............................................................................................................................. 15

Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 44

Appendix ........................................................................................................................................ 46

2

Hampshire’s New Housing Developments

2011 Census Output Area Analysis

Introduction

This demographic analysis focuses on output areas (OAs) where new housing development was built

between 2001 and 2011. The aim of the report is to aid understanding of the make up of new

housing development communities.

Methodology

The methodology was to:

Utilise a shapefile of all housing sites with completions between April 2001 and March 2011

(using Hampshire’s Land Availability Monitoring System (LAMS))

Determine whether the OAs containing these sites consisted mostly of new development

built or inhabited since the 2001 Census, by using LAMS, address data, council tax records

and aerial photography.

Record the development that the OA consisted of (LAMS site code, name and year of start

and completion).

Analyse the OAs that meet this criteria against a number of 2011 Census topics.

Limitations and caveats

In order to meet the criteria the area must have seen the number of dwellings grow considerably or

a complete change in content (regeneration). This means that the sites included are mostly green

field, regeneration or brownfield sites and the method does not readily capture infill, garden

grabbing or small sites. These limitations should be kept in mind when analysing the data.

3

Output areas consisting mostly of new development

All local authorities within Hampshire had at least five output areas (OAs) that met the criteria.

Basingstoke and Deane had the highest number of OAs with 55, whilst Havant and the New Forest

only had 5 (Table 1). The analysis of Census topics will be more meaningful and reliable for those

districts with a larger sample size, than for those with only a handful of new development OAs.

Table 1: Number of output areas meeting new development criteria

LA Name Number of Output Areas

Portsmouth 12

Southampton 19

Basingstoke and Deane 55

East Hampshire 6

Eastleigh 18

Fareham 7

Gosport 22

Hart 18

Havant 5

New Forest 5

Rushmoor 14

Test Valley 12

Winchester 11

Hampshire County Council Area 172

Hampshire including Portsmouth and Southampton 203

Table 2 shows the developments that these OAs cover. It should be noted that the OA does not

necessarily cover the whole development, and may only represent a small part of the whole site.

There are 97 sites in total and 62 of these are made up of only one OA. Figure 1 shows the broad

location of the new development OAs across Hampshire.

Table 2: Development sites included in new development output areas

Area Site Name Number of Output Areas

Portsmouth Victoria Road North and Cumberland Business Park 1

Portsmouth Historic Ships' Car Park 3

Portsmouth Land Adjacent to Roebuck House 1

Portsmouth University Business School 1

Portsmouth Vulcan Building Gunwharf 6

4

Southampton Shirley Garage Services and Pennant Information Services 1

Southampton 57/58 High Street 1

Southampton Andersons Road/Deanery Annexe Site 5

Southampton French Quarter Castle Way 1

Southampton Clausentum Quay Hawkeswood Road 1

Southampton County Cricket Ground 1

Southampton Custom House Orchard Place 2

Southampton Dock House Canute Road 1

Southampton Former Wickes Store 1

Southampton Land at St Mary St/Kingsway North 1

Southampton Land Bounded by Ocean Way and the Boatyard Site 1

Southampton Nazareth House 1

Southampton Orions Point 1

Southampton Telephone House 1

Basingstoke and Deane The Old Down Kempshott Lane 2

Basingstoke and Deane Adjacent to Forge Cottage Sherfield Road 1

Basingstoke and Deane Aldermaston Junction Priestley Road 1

Basingstoke and Deane Alencon House 1

Basingstoke and Deane Beech Road 2

Basingstoke and Deane Crown Heights 2

Basingstoke and Deane Down West Yard 3

Basingstoke and Deane Churchill Way West 2

Basingstoke and Deane John Hunt School 1

Basingstoke and Deane Kempshott Park 11

Basingstoke and Deane Merton Rise 2

Basingstoke and Deane North Binfields 3

Basingstoke and Deane North Hampshire Hospital Land 1

Basingstoke and Deane Old Kempshott Lane 3

Basingstoke and Deane Park Prewett 8

Basingstoke and Deane Popley Fields 6

Basingstoke and Deane Skippetts House 1

Basingstoke and Deane Taylor's Farm and Sherfield Place 5

East Hampshire Land rear of Winchester Road 1

East Hampshire Borough Grove Grange Road 1

East Hampshire Former OSU Midhurst Road 1

East Hampshire Land at Chase Road 1

East Hampshire Lord Mayor Treloar Hospital Chawton 1

East Hampshire Ramshill 1

Eastleigh Site of Golden Hind PH Twyford Road 1

Eastleigh Dowds Farm 4

Eastleigh Ensign Way & Hamble Lane Junction 1

5

Eastleigh Land at Bodmin Road 1

Eastleigh Land North Botleigh Grange 2

Eastleigh Leigh House Hospital 1

Eastleigh Pirelli Site 6

Eastleigh Land South of South Street 1

Eastleigh The Gardens Estate and 229-245 Desborough Road 1

Fareham Land to Rear of Hunts Pond Road 1

Fareham Land at the Rear of Working Mens Club 1

Fareham Dairy Cottage and Cartshed Cold East Way 1

Fareham Dickens Drive Land at North Whiteley 2

Fareham East of Lower Duncan Road 1

Fareham Land at "Marlborough Gardens" Whiteley Lane 1

Gosport Daedalus 1

Gosport Howe Road Land 1

Gosport Land East of Cherque Farm 8

Gosport Priddy's Hard 7

Gosport St Georges Barracks North 2

Gosport Schat - Harding Site Mumby Road 1

Gosport St Georges Barracks South 2

Hart Elvetham Heath 15

Hart Holt Lane Land 3

Havant Homewell, East Street, West Street and the Pallant 1

Havant Park Parade and Greywell Centre 1

Havant Proctor & Gamble 2

Havant Ramsdale Playing Fields Woolston Road 1

New Forest Britannia Gate Shore Road 1

New Forest Hazel Farm 1

New Forest Mulberry Estate 1

New Forest RNAD Site, Magazine Lane 1

New Forest Vernall's Farm 1

Rushmoor 250 Concept House and Rear of 294 Farnborough Road 1

Rushmoor Alma House Crimea Road and Copthall House 1

Rushmoor Salamanca Park 2

Rushmoor Boots Depot Site 4

Rushmoor Concept House Farnborough Road 1

Rushmoor Farnborough Business Park Land at O'Gorman Avenue 1

Rushmoor Guillemont Fields 1

Rushmoor Ladywood Avenue 1

Rushmoor Land off Whetstone Road and NAAFI Guillemont Fields 1

Rushmoor Whetstone Road and Brownsover Road 1

Test Valley South of Knights 2

6

Test Valley East Anton 3

Test Valley Grove Place 1

Test Valley West of Floral Way 3

Test Valley Willow Way Estate 3

Winchester Whiteley Farm 4

Winchester Harvest Home PH 1

Winchester Knowle Hospital 3

Winchester Staple Gardens 1

Winchester Old Park Farm 1

Winchester Winton House 1

Figure 1: Location of new development output areas

7

Figure 2 shows some of Gosport’s new development OAs (in purple) and an example development

(Land East of Cherque Farm, shown by the purple hatching). This new development has led to the

creation of eight new OAs that are entirely made up of the development. At the north of the

development, the new housing is combined with an existing OA and so these new development

residents are not included in this analysis.

Figure 2 also shows a contrast to these new development OAs. Areas where a number of properties

were vacant at the time of the 2011 Census will have had their OAs merged to form larger

geographic areas and populations. In Gosport, the Rowner renewal project (shown in blue hatching)

was being redeveloped at the time of the 2011 Census and so the four 2001 OAs covering this area

were merged into two for 2011 (2011 OA boundaries shown in blue).

8

Figure 2: Example of new development and merged output areas in Gosport

9

Comparison of the total number of dwellings in sites included within each new development OA with

the total number of net dwellings (gains minus losses) built over the decade (gained from LAMS)

reveal how much of each areas’ development is included in this report. However, it is an over

estimate, as not all of some sites are included in the selected OAs (Table 3).

For Hampshire overall (including Portsmouth and Southampton) 41.5% of all dwellings built over the

decade are included in this report. For Hampshire County (excluding Portsmouth and Southampton),

the figure is 46.0%. There are four districts where more than half of all dwellings built over the

decade are included here (Southampton, Basingstoke and Deane, Eastleigh, Portsmouth). However,

there are three districts where less than a fifth of all dwellings built are included (Fareham, Havant

and New Forest).

Table 3: Percentage of development over the decade included in new development analysis

Area

Dwellings within New Development Output

Areas All Net Gains within

the Area

Percentage of All Development Over the

Decade Included in New Development Output Areas

Basingstoke and Deane 6,295 9,401 66.96%

East Hampshire 1029 2,240 45.94%

Eastleigh 2,455 3,705 66.26%

Fareham 895 4,865 18.40%

Gosport 2,640 9,054 29.16%

Hart 2,579 6,643 38.82%

Havant 576 3,917 14.71%

New Forest 690 3,678 18.76%

Portsmouth 1808 3,487 51.85%

Rushmoor 1623 4,800 33.81%

Southampton 2599 3,250 79.97%

Test Valley 1376 3,406 40.40%

Winchester 1496 4,380 34.16%

Hampshire County Council Area 21,654 47,129 45.95%

Hampshire including Portsmouth and Southampton 26,061 62,826 41.48%

10

Ethnically diverse

Shared ownership

households

Cohabiting

households

Overcrowded

households

More single (never

married) residents

More flats

More densely populated Younger residents

More commute by train

Population

Summary Characteristics of New Development

Households

11

Hampshire (including Portsmouth and Southampton)

Hampshire County (excluding Portsmouth and Southampton) Portsmouth

Population Pyramids

The population pyramids for the new development output areas

(OAs) (shown in pink for females and blue for males) compared

to each area as a whole (shown with a black line) are presented

below.

It is clear that residents of new development OAs tend to be

younger than the general population, with peaks in the young

adult and young child populations.

New Development Males

New Development Females

All Males

All Females

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

12

Southampton Basingstoke and Deane

East Hampshire Eastleigh

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

13

Fareham Gosport

Hart Havant

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4

10 ‒ 14

20 ‒ 24

30 ‒ 34

40 ‒ 44

50 ‒ 54

60 ‒ 64

70 ‒ 74

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

14

New Forest Rushmoor

Test Valley Winchester

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15 10 5 0 5 10 15

0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79

80 and over

15

Area Summaries

The pages below present summaries of the 2011 Census demographic characteristics of new

development output areas (OAs) for Hampshire including and excluding Portsmouth and

Southampton and at district, borough and unitary level. The data summarised below can be seen in

full within the charts in the appendix.

3.6% of Hampshire’s population live in the 203 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(63,240 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. The vast

majority of these people live in households. 89.7% of new development OAs are in urban cities and

towns.

More flats

44.4% of new development accommodation is flats, compared to 21.5% for Hampshire as a whole.

Smaller properties

25.3% of new development households only have 1-3 rooms, in comparison to 12.9% for Hampshire overall.

More overcrowded

15.2% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are fewer rooms than required for the number of people living in the household and thus it is overcrowded. This compares with the Hampshire average of only 7.1%.

More densely populated

Population density of new developments in urban cities and towns is much larger than for Hampshire as a whole, with 32.8 people per hectare compared to 20.6. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 17.8% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 27.9% for Hampshire overall.

More likely to be private rented or under shared ownership

Over a quarter (25.9%) of new development households are privately rented, above the Hampshire average of 15.6%. A much larger percentage of new development households are under shared ownership (part owned and part rented) than the Hampshire average, with 6.2% compared to only 0.9%.

More likely to cohabit

17.1% of new development households contain cohabiting couples, compared to 9.3% of all households in Hampshire.

Hampshire (including Portsmouth and Southampton)

Households

16

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 10 years younger than for

Hampshire as a whole (30 years, compared to 40 years). 39.4% of household reference persons

are aged under 35, compared to only 16.9% in Hampshire overall.

Young population

16,860 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 38.7% of these are aged 0-4 years.

More ethnically diverse

81.5% of new development residents are White British, compared to 89.0% for

Hampshire overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all

other ethnicities, including 6.7% Asian and 6.2% White Other, compared to

Hampshire as a whole (3.8% and 4.0% respectively).

More likely to catch the train to work

6.4% of new development residents catch a train to work, compared to 4.1%

overall.

Population

17

4.2% of Hampshire County’s population live in the 172 output areas (OAs) containing new

development (55,110 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new

development. The vast majority of these people live in households.

More urban areas

87.9% of new development OAs are in urban cities and towns, compared to 77.9% overall.

More flats

36.3% of new development accommodation is flats, compared to 16.1% for the county as a whole.

More overcrowded

11.2% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are fewer rooms than required for the number of people living in the household and thus it is overcrowded. This compares with the county average of only 5.3%.

Smaller properties

20.4% of households have 1-3 rooms, compared to 10.4% in the county overall. More densely populated

Population density of new developments in urban cities and towns is much higher than Hampshire County as a whole, with 29.4 people per hectare compared to 16.5. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 20.7% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 34.3% for the county overall.


Over a fifth (22.2%) of new development households are privately rented, above the county average of 12.5%. A much larger percentage of new development households are under shared ownership (part owned and part rented) than the county average, with 6.0% compared to only 0.9%.


17.3% of new development households contain cohabiting couples, compared to 9.5% of all households in Hampshire County.

Hampshire County (excluding Portsmouth and Southampton)

Households

18

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 12 years younger than for the county as a whole (30 years, compared to 42 years). 35.9% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to only 13.6% in the county overall.

Young population

15,730 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 38.4% of these are aged 0-4 years. More ethnically diverse

84.8% of new development residents are White British, compared to 91.8% for Hampshire County overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 5.7% Asian and 5.1% White Other, compared to the county average (2.7% and 3.2% respectively).


6.5% of new development residents catch a train to work, compared to 4.3% overall.

Population

19

Only 1.3% of Portsmouth’s population live in the 12 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(2,670 people). The vast majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. All of

these people live in households.

More household spaces without usual residents

12.6% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 3.6% for the city as a whole.

Mainly flats

96.2% of accommodation in new development areas is flats, compared to 35.3% for the city’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households and living alone

New development households are smaller with 1.59 people on average compared to 2.34 for Portsmouth overall. This is linked to the high proportion of one person households (44.0% of all new development households, compared to 32.1% of all households).

Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms

The majority (64.4%) of households only have 1-3 rooms, compared to only 17.6% in the unitary overall. Over a third (35.2%) are studios or have only 1 bedroom.

More overcrowded

41.2% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are fewer rooms than required for the number of people living in the household and thus it is overcrowded. This compares with the unitary average of only 10.9%.


The population density of new developments in Portsmouth is substantially higher than any other area and for the city as a whole, with 133.9 people per hectare compared to 50.7. Showing that new developments consist of highly concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 0.5% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 4.1% for the city overall.

More likely to be rented or under shared ownership

22.1% of new development households are social rented, above the unitary average of 18.3%. Over a third (38.0%) are privately rented, above the Portsmouth average of 24.7%. A much larger percentage of new development households are under shared ownership than the unitary average, with 10.1% compared to only 1.0%.

Households

Portsmouth

20

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 6 years younger than for Portsmouth as a whole (28 years, compared to 34 years). The majority (57.0%) of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to a quarter (25.0%) overall.

Young population

380 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, The majority (60.1%) of these are aged 0-4 years.

More males

New development areas contain more males than females, with 56.3% of the population male, compared to 50.3% for the city in total.

More likely to be single

Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the city overall.

Much more ethnically diverse

Only 60.3% of new development residents are White British, compared to 84.0% for the city overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 11.6% Asian and 9.9% White Other, compared to the city as a whole (6.1% and 4.3% respectively).

More likely to walk to work

Over a fifth (22.8%) of new development residents commute to work on foot, compared to 16.9% across the unitary as a whole. This is linked to the 41.6% of households that do not have a car (compared to 33.4% in Portsmouth as a whole).

Population

Sites Victoria Road North and Cumberland Business Park

Historic Ships' Car Park

Land Adjacent to Roebuck House

University Business School

Vulcan Building Gunwharf

21

2.3% of Southampton’s population live in the 19 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(5,460 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast

majority of these people live in households.

Mainly flats

84.2% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 40.0% for the city’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households

New development households are smaller with 1.89 people on average compared to 2.33 for Southampton overall. This is linked to the high proportion of one person households (42.4% of all new development households, compared to 33.8% of all households).

More overcrowded

30.5% of new development households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding. The average for the city as a whole is only 13.6%.


46.5% of new development properties have 1-3 rooms, compared to only 22.9% in the unitary overall. Almost a third (31.9%) are studios or only have 1 bedroom.


The population density of new developments in Southampton is substantially higher than all other areas excluding Portsmouth and for the city as a whole, with 94.1 people per hectare compared to 47.5. Showing that new developments consist of highly concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 2.3% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 13.2% for the city overall.

Majority of households are private rented or under shared ownership

Over half (52.1%) of all new development households are private rented, compared to a quarter (24.9%) across the city. 5.5% of new households are under shared ownership; this is well above the average of only 1.0% for the unitary.

More cohabiting couple households

17.1% of new development households are cohabiting couple households, above the figure of 11.0% for the unitary as a whole.

Southampton

Households

22

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 7 years younger than for Southampton as a whole (25 years, compared to 32 years). 60.5% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 28.2% overall.

Young population

750 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, over a third (34.2%) of these are aged 0-4 years.


Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the city overall.

Much more ethnically diverse

Only half (58.9%) of new development residents are White British, compared to 77.7% for the city overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 15.4% White Other and 14.2% Asian, compared to the city as a whole (8.3% and 8.0% respectively).

More likely to walk to work

Nearly a third (30.4%) of new development residents commute to work on foot, much higher than the unitary average of only 16.5%. This is linked to the 36.8% of households that do not have a car (compared to 29.5% in Southampton as a whole).

Sites Shirley Garage Services and

Pennant Information Services

57/58 High Street

Andersons Road/Deanery Annexe

Site

French Quarter Castle Way

Clausentum Quay Hawkeswood

Road

County Cricket Ground

Custom House Orchard Place

Dock House Canute Road

Former Wickes Store

Land at St Mary St/Kingsway North

Land Bounded by Ocean Way and

the Boatyard Site

Nazareth House

Orions Point

Telephone House

Population

23

9.3% of Basingstoke and Deane’s population live in the 55 output areas (OAs) containing new

development (15,660 people). The vast majority of these people live in OAs made up of entirely new

development. The vast majority live in households.

More urban areas

The majority (94.5%) of new development has taken place in OAs now defined as urban.

More flats

36.2% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 14.9% for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households and living alone

New development households are smaller than the borough average with 2.30 people per household, compared to 2.40 for the borough overall.

Smaller properties

25.1% of new properties only have 1-3 rooms, compared to 11.3% overall. More overcrowded

14.7% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding, compared to only 5.5% across Basingstoke and Deane as a whole.


Population density of new developments in urban areas is double that of Basingstoke and Deane’s urban areas as a whole, with 44.6 people per hectare compared to 18.8. Showing that these new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 19.2% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 30.8% for the borough overall.

More likely to own via a mortgage or a loan

Only 8.0% of new development households are owned outright compared to 28.2% across the borough as a whole. A further 46.5% are owned via a mortgage or a loan, much higher than the borough average of 39.6%.


18.7% of new development households contain cohabiting couples, compared to only 10.7% across the borough.

Basingstoke and Deane

Households

24

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 9 years younger than for Basingstoke and Deane as a whole (30 years, compared to 39 years). 42.3% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 17.3% overall.

Young population

3,240 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas. 42.2% of this population are aged 0-4 years.


78.5% of new development residents are White British, compared to 88.2% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 9.4% Asian and 6.7% White Other, compared to the borough as a whole (4.0% and 4.7% respectively).

More commute by train

A larger proportion of new development residents travel to work by train (7.7%) compared to 5.3% across the borough.

Sites

The Old Down Kempshott Lane

Adjacent to Forge Cottage Sherfield Road

Aldermaston Junction Priestley Road

Alencon House

Beech Road

Crown Heights

Down West Yard

Churchill Way West

John Hunt School

Kempshott Park

Merton Rise

North Binfields

North Hampshire

Hospital Land

Old Kempshott Lane

Park Prewett

Popley Fields

Skippetts House

Taylor's Farm and Sherfield Place

Population

25

Only 1.9% of East Hampshire’s population live in the 6 output areas (OAs) containing new

development (2,170 people). The vast majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new

development. All of these people live in households.

More flats

27.3% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 14.4% for the district’s accommodation as a whole.

Larger households

New development households are larger than the district average with 2.49 people per household, compared to 2.40 for the district overall.


A quarter (25.6%) of new development properties have 7 or more rooms, compared to 37.3% across the whole district. 13.2% are studios or have only one bedroom, compared to 9.2% overall.

Less Spacious

The majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (66.1%), however this is below the figure for the district as a whole (81.1%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.


Population density of new developments in the urban areas is three times that of East Hampshire’s urban areas as a whole, with 30.9 people per hectare compared to 9.1. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 24.3% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 42.5% for the district overall.

More likely to be social rented or under shared ownership

31.9% of new development households are social rented compared to only 12.0% across the district. 5.8% of new development households are under shared ownership, compared to 0.9% overall.

More likely to be cohabiting couples or lone parents

13.8% of new development households contain cohabiting couples compared to only 8.5% across East Hampshire. A further 13.4% are lone parent households, above the district average of 7.9%.

East Hampshire

Households

26

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 13 years younger than for East Hampshire as a whole (31 years, compared to 44 years). A quarter (24.8%) of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to 10.5% overall.

Young population

710 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas. 38.3% are aged 5-11 years. More females

52.6% of the new development population is female, compared to 51.4% for the district overall.


Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the district overall.


91.1% of new development residents are White British, compared to 93.0% for East Hampshire overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy many other ethnicities, including 4.3% White Other and 2.5% Asian, compared to East Hampshire as a whole (3.5% and 1.6% respectively).

More commute by train, fewer work from home

6.7% of people living in new developments commute to work by train, compared to 5.3% across the whole district. 6.1% work mainly from home, compared to 8.6% overall.

Population

Sites Land rear of Winchester Road

Borough Grove Grange Road

Former OSU Midhurst Road

Land at Chase Road

Lord Mayor Treloar Hospital Chawton

Ramshill

27

4.3% of Eastleigh’s population live in the 18 output areas (OAs) containing new development (5,400

people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. The vast majority

of these people live in households.

More flats

Almost half (48.4%) of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 16.2% for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households

New development households are slightly smaller than the borough average with 2.32 people per household, compared to 2.38 for the borough overall.

More overcrowded

12.1% of new development households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding, compared to 5.0% across the borough.


22.3% of new development properties have 1-3 rooms, compared to 10.2% overall. 13.2% are studios or have only one bedroom, compared to 9.2% for the borough as a whole.


Population density of new developments in urban areas is almost three times that of Eastleigh’s urban areas as a whole, with 54.4 people per hectare compared to 18.6. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Just 9.8% of new accommodation is detached properties, compared to 33.5% for the borough overall.

More private rented, social rented and shared ownership

Over a quarter of new development properties are private rented (25.4%) and social rented (25.4%), compared to the borough as a whole (12.3% for both rental categories). Shared ownership is also more common in new development areas, with 8.5% of households under this tenure, compared to 1.1% overall.

More cohabiting couples and lone parents

More than a fifth (22.4%) of new development households contain cohabiting couples compared to only 10.4% across the borough as a whole. This is the highest new development cohabiting couple figure seen across all boroughs. 16.0% of households contain lone parents, compared to 9.0% overall.

Eastleigh

Households

28

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 13 years younger than for Eastleigh as a whole (28 years, compared to 41 years). 46.9% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to only 15.5% in Eastleigh as a whole.

Young population

1,590 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 45.2% of these are aged 0-4 years.

More likely to be single or divorced

Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new

development than the borough overall. Those aged 35-49 are also more likely to be divorced in

new development areas.


83.4 % of new development residents are White British, compared to 91.8% for Eastleigh overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 7.1% Asian and 4.3% White Other, compared to Eastleigh as a whole (3.0% and 2.9% respectively).

More likely to commute by train or on foot

7.3% of new development residents travel to work by train, across the borough this stands at only 3.9%. A further 10.7% walk to work, compared to 7.5% for Eastleigh as a whole.

Population

Sites Site of Golden Hind PH Twyford Road

Dowds Farm

Ensign Way & Hamble Lane Junction

Land at Bodmin Road

Land North Botleigh Grange

Leigh House Hospital

Pirelli Site

Land South of South Street

The Gardens Estate and 229-245 Desborough Road

29

2.5% of Fareham’s population live in the 7 output areas (OAs) containing new development (2,780

people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast majority of



13.7% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 2.9% for the borough as a whole.

More flats

29.6% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 12.8% for the borough’s accommodation overall.

Smaller households

New development households are smaller with 2.16 people on average compared to 2.36 for Fareham overall.

Less Spacious

The majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (72.2%), however this is below the figure for the borough as a whole (83.8%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.

Similar population density

The population density of new developments in urban areas of Fareham is 17.2 people per hectare, slightly below the figure for Fareham’s urban areas overall (18.1 people per hectare).

More social rented and under shared ownership

18.1% of households are social rented in new development areas compared to 8.1% overall. A further 4.8% are under shared ownership, compared to 0.6% across the borough.

More cohabiting couples and lone parents

16.0% of new development households are occupied by cohabiting couples, compared to 9.0% across Fareham as a whole. A further 13.0% contain lone parents, above the 8.1% average for the borough.

More car ownership

92.4% of households own at least one car, compared to 86.6% in the whole borough.

Fareham

Households

30

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 11 years younger than for Fareham as a whole (33 years, compared to 44 years). 29.7% of household reference persons are aged under 25 in new developments, compared to 11.3% overall.

Young population

780 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 72.4% of these are under 12 years of age.


Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the borough overall.


93.1% of new development residents are White British, compared to 94.7% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 2.4% White Other and 1.9% Asian, compared to the borough as a whole (2.1% and 1.5% respectively).

More likely to drive to work

75.6% of new development residents drive to work, compared to 70.9% across the borough as a whole.

Population

Sites Land to Rear of Hunts Pond Road

Land at the Rear of Working Mens Club

Dairy Cottage and Cartshed Cold East Way

Dickens Drive Land at North Whiteley

East of Lower Duncan Road

Land at "Marlborough Gardens" Whiteley Lane

31

8.4% of Gosport’s population live in the 22 output areas (OAs) containing new development (6,920

people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. All of these people

live in households.

Homes without usual residents

8.4% of household spaces in new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 3.5% for the borough as a whole.

More flats

40.0% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 24.0% for the borough’s accommodation on average.

Smaller households

New development households are slightly smaller than the borough average with 2.27 people per household, compared to 2.31.

Smaller and larger properties

22.8% of households only have 1-3 rooms in new development areas, compared to 14.1% overall. However, 28.0% have 7 or more rooms, compared to 19.7% in the borough as a whole.

More overcrowded

12.6% of new development households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding, compared to only 6.2% across the borough as a whole.

Less densely populated

Population density of new developments is lower than that of Gosport as a whole, with 21.0 people per hectare compared to 32.6. Showing that new developments consist of less concentrated housing (24.1% of the accommodation is detached, compared to 13.2% for the borough as a whole).

Many private rented and under shared ownership

26.0% of new development households are private rented compared to only 16.3% across the borough as a whole. 4.5% of new development households are under shared ownership, compared to 1.1% overall.

More likely to be cohabiting couples

14.9% of households contain cohabiting couples, in comparison to 10.5% across the borough.

More car ownership

87.3% of households own at least one car, compared to 77.1% in the whole borough.

Gosport

Households

32

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 7 years younger than for Gosport as a whole (33 years, compared to 40 years). 27.7% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 17.5% overall.

Young population

1,950 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, almost a third (32.6%) of these are aged 0-4 years.


Household reference persons aged 25-34 are more likely to be single in new development than the borough overall.


92.3% of new development residents are White British, compared to 94.4% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy many other ethnicities, including 3.0% White Other and 1.8% Asian, compared to the borough as a whole (2.0% and 1.3% respectively).

More likely to drive to work

65.5% of new development residents drive to work, much higher than the 59.5% experienced across the borough.

Population

Sites Daedalus

Howe Road Land

Land East of Cherque Farm

Priddy's Hard

St Georges Barracks North

Schat - Harding Site Mumby Road

St Georges Barracks South

33

6.7% of Hart’s population live in the 18 output areas (OAs) containing new development (6,080

people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. All of these people

live in households.

More urban areas

The majority (83.3%) of new development has taken place in OAs now defined as urban.

Larger households

New development households are larger than the district average with 2.78 people per household, compared to 2.52.

Slightly less spacious

The vast majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (82.1%) which is the highest figure across all districts. However this is below the figure for the district as a whole (84.6%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.


Population density of new developments in urban areas is more than double that of Hart’s urban areas as a whole, with 29.7 people per hectare compared to 13.6. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 15.2% of new accommodation is flats, compared to 11.1% for the district as a whole.

More private rented and shared ownership households

17.0% of new development households are private rented, compared to only 12.1% across the district and a further 7.8% of new development households are under shared ownership, much higher than the district figure of 1.1%.

Less likely to live alone, more likely to cohabit

15.3% of new development households are one person, compared to a much higher district average of 22.4%. A further 16.2% are cohabiting couple households, well above the average across the district of only 9.1%.

Hart

Households

34

Younger

Median age of the population living in new developments is 8 years younger than for Hart as a whole (33 years, compared to 41 years). 22.5% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new development areas, higher than the figure for Hart overall (11.5%).

Young population

2,000 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 39.4% of these are aged 5-11 years.


82.9% of new development residents are White British, compared to 90.7% for the district overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 6.7% White Other and 7.0% Asian, compared to the district as a whole (4.2% and 2.7% respectively).

More likely to commute by train and less likely to walk to work

11.7% of new development residents travel to work by train, above the district average of 7.2%. 3.9% of new development residents walk to work, which is lower than the average of 7.4%.

Population

Sites Elvetham Heath

Holt Lane Land

35

Only 1.9% of Havant’s population live in the 5 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(2,260 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast

majority of these people live in households.

Mainly flats

54.8% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 19.1% for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households

New development households are smaller than the borough average with 2.14 people per household, compared to 2.33.


29.8% of new development households have 1-3 rooms, the highest percentage in any Hampshire County borough. This compares to 11.4% across the borough overall. 18.3% of new development households have no or only 1 bedroom, compared to 10.9% for Havant overall.

More overcrowded

17.2% of all new development households in the borough have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning the household has fewer rooms than required for the number of residents. This is much higher than the borough average of only 6.5%.

Less densely populated

Population density of new developments in urban areas of Havant is slightly lower than for Havant as a whole, with 20.6 people per hectare compared to 24.6.

More private rented and shared ownership households

26.1% of new development households are private rented, compared to only 9.9% across the borough and a further 4.0% of new development households are under shared ownership, much higher than the borough figure of 0.5%.

More to likely to cohabit or be lone parent households

16.7% of new development households are cohabiting couple households in comparison to only 9.7% across the borough. Almost a fifth (19.5%) of new development households are lone parent households, compared to 11.0% on average.

Lower car ownership

Almost a third (32.4%) of new development households do not own a car, the highest of any Hampshire County borough, compared to 20.7% in the whole borough.

Havant

Households

36

Much Younger


Havant as a whole (29 years, compared to 44 years). This is the largest age difference of any

borough. 37.9% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to 13.2% in

Havant overall.

Young population

600 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 40.4% of these are aged 0-4 years.



development than the borough overall. Those aged 35-49 are also more likely to be divorced in

new development areas.


93.1% of new development residents are White British, compared to 95.2% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy most other ethnicities, including 3.1% White Other and 1.9% Asian, compared to the borough as a whole (1.9% and 1.2% respectively).

More likely to be a car passenger, walk, or go by bus

9.0% of new development residents commute to work as a passenger in a car

compared to only 6.3% across the borough as a whole. A further 10.9% walk,

above the borough average of 8.0%. Fewer drive their own car to work with 58.3%

compared to 68.5%.

Population

Sites Homewell, East Street, West Street and the Pallant

Park Parade and Greywell Centre

Proctor & Gamble

Ramsdale Playing Fields Woolston Road

37

Only 1.1% of New Forest’s population live in the 5 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(1,910 people). The vast majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. All of


More flats

35.4% of new development accommodation is flats, compared to 13.9% for the district as a whole.

Larger households

New development households are larger than the district average with 2.46 people per household, compared to 2.26.

Smaller properties

16.2% of new development households have 1-3 rooms, compared to 9.0% for the district overall.

Less spacious

The vast majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (65.6%), however this is below the figure for the district as a whole (82.1%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.


Population density of new developments in urban areas is over three times that of New Forest urban areas as a whole, with 41.8 people per hectare compared to 11.3. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 18.7% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 45.3% for the district overall.

More likely to be private or social rented

Almost a third (30.3%) of new development households are private rented, above the 12.1% district average. A further 16.6% are social rented, compared to 11.0% overall.

More to likely to cohabit or be lone parent households

14.1% of new development households are cohabiting couple households in comparison to only 8.1% across the borough. 13.3% of new development households are lone parent households, compared to 8.1% across the borough.

New Forest

Households

38

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 17 years younger than for New Forest as a whole (30 years, compared to 47 years). This is the largest difference of any district. Over a third (34.0%) of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to only 10.0% in New Forest as a whole.

Young population

580 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 37.4% of these are aged 5-11 years. More ethnically diverse

86.2% of new development residents are White British, compared to 94.9% for the district overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 5.2% Black and 3.6% White Other, compared to the district as a whole (0.3% and 2.7% respectively).

More likely to commute by car

73.0% of new development residents drive to work; this is above the district average of 69.4%.

Population

Sites Britannia Gate Shore Road

Hazel Farm

Mulberry Estate

RNAD Site, Magazine Lane

Vernall's Farm

39

4.6% of Rushmoor’s population live in the 14 output areas (OAs) containing new development (4,270

people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast majority of


Mainly flats

Half (50.9%) of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to a quarter (25.6%) for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households

New development households are slightly smaller than the borough average with 2.40 people per household, compared to 2.53.

Smaller properties

28.2% of new development households have 1-3 rooms, compared to 14.7% for the borough overall.

More overcrowded

16.4% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less indicating that there are too few rooms for the number of people living in that household, this is compared to the borough average of only 10.1%.


Population density of new developments is more than twice that of Rushmoor as a whole, with 61.8 people per hectare compared to 24.4. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 7.0% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 16.8% for the borough overall.

More private and social rented or under shared ownership

A quarter (25.0%) of new development households are private rented, 21.5% are social rented and 10.7% are under shared ownership (the highest shared ownership figure in any borough). This compares to borough wide figures of 17.6%, 16.3% and 1.8% respectively.


17.1% of new development households are cohabiting couple households, above the borough average of only 11.1%.

Rushmoor

Households

40

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 8 years younger than for Rushmoor as a whole (28 years, compared to 36 years). 44.6% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to 20.0% in Rushmoor as a whole.

Young population

1,280 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 38.5% of these are aged 0-4 years. More likely to be single


development than the borough overall.

More Ethnically Diverse

78.3% of new development residents are White British, compared to 80.5% for the borough overall. Only 8.9% of new development residents are Asian, down from the 10.4% observed across the borough as a whole.


8.6% of new development residents catch the train to work in comparison to 6.8% across the borough.

Population

Sites 250 Concept House and Rear of 294 Farnborough Road

Alma House Crimea Road and Copthall House

Salamanca Park

Boots Depot Site

Concept House Farnborough Road

Farnborough Business Park Land at O'Gorman Avenue

Guillemont Fields

Ladywood Avenue

Land off Whetstone Road and NAAFI Guillemont Fields

Whetstone Road and Brownsover Road

41

3.5% of Test Valley’s population live in the 12 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(4,130 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The majority



10.0% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 3.1% for the district as a whole.

Larger households

New development households are larger than the borough average with 2.55 people per household, compared to 2.40.

More bedrooms

34.5% of new development households have four or more bedrooms, compared to 29.0% overall.

Similar population density

The population density of new developments in urban areas of Test Valley is 12.1 people per hectare, slightly below the figure for Test Valley’s urban areas overall (13.3 people per hectare).


30.0% of households are private rented compared to only 12.9% across the borough as a whole. 3.1% are under shared ownership, compared to 0.7% overall.

Less likely to live alone, more likely to cohabit

Only 13.9% of new development households are one person households, much lower than the 24.9% average across the borough. 13.0% are cohabiting, higher than the borough average of only 9.3%.

More car ownership

The vast majority (92.7%) of new development households have at least one car, in comparison to 86.5% in Test Valley overall.

Test Valley

Households

42

Younger

Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 12 years younger than for Test Valley as a whole (31 years, compared to 43 years). Over a quarter (26.0%) of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 11.6% overall.

Young population

1,260 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 34.9% of these are aged 0-4 years. Less likely to be single

Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 25-49 are less likely to be single in new development than the borough overall.


90.0% of new development residents are White British, compared to 92.6% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy most other ethnicities, including 5.0% White Other and 1.6% Mixed, compared to the borough as a whole (3.4% and 1.3% respectively).

More likely to commute by cycle or on foot

6.3% of new development residents travel by bike compared to 2.9% across the borough. 12.5% walk, in comparison to 10.3% across the borough as a whole.

Population

Sites South of Knights

East Anton

Grove Place

West of Floral Way

Willow Way Estate

43

3.0% of Winchester’s population live in the 11 output areas (OAs) containing new development

(3,530 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The majority


Homes without usual residents

8.0% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 4.7% for the district as a whole.

More flats

43.4% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 16.7% for the district’s accommodation as a whole.

Smaller households

New development households are smaller than the district average with 1.99 people per household, compared to 2.38.


Almost a quarter (24.8%) of new development properties have 1-3 rooms, compared to only 11.0% across the district overall. A fifth (19.7%) of new development properties are studios or have only one bedroom, compared to 10.6% in Winchester as a whole.

More overcrowded

15.0% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less indicating that there are too few rooms for the number of people in that household, compared to the district average of 5.5%.


Population density of new developments in urban areas is greater than Winchester urban areas as a whole, with 24.2 people per hectare compared to 16.2. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 17.3% of new development is detached properties, compared to 36.6% for the district as a whole.

More private rented or under shared ownership

A much larger percentage of new development households are private rented, with 28.7% compared to 14.1% across the district. 4.2% of households are under shared ownership, compared to 0.9% overall.

More young people living alone and more cohabiting couples

A larger percentage of younger people live alone in new development areas than the district overall, with 29.7% in comparison to 14.0% overall. 18.8% are cohabiting couple households, much higher than the 8.9% average across the district.

Winchester

Households

44

Younger


Winchester as a whole (32 years, compared to 42 years). Over a third (36.6%) of household

reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 13.5% overall.

Young population

750 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 35.8% of these are aged 5-11 years.


Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single or divorced in

new development than the district overall.


88.9% of new development residents are White British, compared to 91.8% for the district

overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy many other ethnicities,

including 4.9% White Other and 3.5% Asian, compared to the district as a whole

(3.9% and 2.3% respectively).

More likely to commute by car and less likely to work from home

69.1% drive to work, compared to 61.0% across the district as a whole. 5.2% of

new development residents work from home, below the district average of

9.1%.

Population

Sites Whiteley Farm

Harvest Home PH

Knowle Hospital

Staple Gardens

Old Park Farm

Winton House

45

Conclusion

New development areas in Hampshire have been shown to contain generally young and ethnically

diverse communities where families will mature and children will be born and may grow up.

They are characterised by tenures typical of younger adults in the current housing market, with

higher levels of private renting and shared ownership. The shared ownership options available on

new developments will have no doubt shaped the age and life stage of those that have moved in.

The properties tend to be smaller and more overcrowded, which again reflects the life stage of the

residents and the affordability of their accommodation. It also reflects the age of the properties

themselves, as there has been less time for additions such as conservatories, loft conversions or

garage conversions to be required or built.

New development areas are more densely populated and contain more concentrated housing such

as flats and terraces. Their smaller size means they contain many young people that live alone,

particularly in the more urban areas.

The particular characteristics seen in each district vary but there are some trends than span a few

areas but not Hampshire as a whole, these include:

Lower levels of home working, perhaps due to the younger stages of career or lower level

occupations of the occupants.

More mixed communities including higher proportions of social housing and lone parents, likely

reflecting the requirement to include affordable accommodation within new developments.

Some evidence of divorced residents moving into new development areas, perhaps due to their

need for affordable accommodation.

Some areas where larger and more exclusive developments are taking place.

In conclusion, despite making up a very small percentage of Hampshire’s overall land and

population, new housing developments have helped shape Hampshire’s overall population between

the 2001 and 2011 Censuses. They provide a necessary first step on the housing ladder and will likely

continue to do so in ongoing development that will be seen in censuses of the future.

46

Appendix

The charts below present the demographic characteristics described in each area summary. In the

charts with two bars for each area, the left hand bar represents the new development areas and the

right hand bar the area average (including the new development areas).

Figure 3: Percentage of the area’s population that live in new development output areas

1.1 0.6

7.4

0.2

2.5

0.4

6.7 5.6

0.8 0.2

2.0 1.4 1.5

2.5 2.1 0.2 1.7

1.9

1.6

1.8

2.1

1.7

1.0

1.1

0.9

2.6

2.1 1.6

1.7 1.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Entirely New Mostly New

47

Figure 4: Percentage of output areas that are urban and rural

Figure 5: Household spaces without usual residents

95

73 67 64

94 90 99 95

83 69

98

60 71 67 62

55 42

88 78

90 83

12 17

14

6 9 5

17

17

20

15

8 9

45

31

8

11

7 8

4

8 17

12 9 20 6 25

18 14

4 6

3 5

7 10 5 8 11 12 5 4

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Urban city and town Rural town and fringe Rural village Rural hamlets and isolated dwellings

13

6

4 3 4

14

8

2

6

4 4

10

8

6 6

4 3

2

4

2 3

3 3 3

4 4

3

5

3 3

0

3

6

9

12

15

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Pe

rcen

tage

New Development Average

48

Figure 6: Household spaces by accommodation type

Figure 7: Percentage of household spaces that are flats

4 13

19 31

24

43

10

33 30 36

24 13

38 44

28 19

45

7 17

36 39

17

37

21

34

18 28 16

4

26 16

25

21

25

12

28

19

32

13 26

24

25

18

28

17

23

25

32

27 26

15

25

18

26

15

25

2

45

9

21 29

29

27

18

30

22

22

19

23

36

23 18

24

24

29

16

17

25

23 22

24

21

25

22

22

25

96

35

84

40 36

15 27

14

48

16 30

13

40

24 15 11

55

19

35

14

51

26 14 12

43

17

36

16

44

22

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Detached Semi-Detached Terraced Flat Caravan or other

96

84

36

27

48

30

40

15

55

35

51

14

43

36

44

35 40

15 14 16 13

24

11

19 14

26

12 17 16

22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Per

cen

tage


49

Figure 8: Average household size

1.6

1.9

2.3

2.5

2.3

2.2

2.3

2.8

2.1

2.5 2.4

2.6

2.0

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4

2.3

2.5

2.3 2.3

2.5

2.4 2.4 2.4

2.2

1.50

1.70

1.90

2.10

2.30

2.50

2.70

2.90

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Ave

rage

Ho

use

ho

ld S

ize


50

Figure 9: Number of rooms

The definition of a room does not include bathrooms, toilets, halls or landings, or rooms that can only be used for storage. All other rooms, for example, kitchens, living rooms, bedrooms, utility rooms, studies and conservatories are counted. If two rooms have been converted into one they are counted as one room. Rooms shared between a number of households, for example a shared kitchen, are not counted.

64

18

47

23 25

11 16 10

22 10 12 8

23 14

4 7

30

11 16 9

28

15 7 9

25

11 20

10

25 13

34

63

49

62 54

59 58

53

66

62 61 59

49 66

52 50

63

65 63

62

62

65

58 57

59

52

57

59

55

60

1

19

5 15

20 30 26

37

12

28 28 33 28 20

45 43

7

23 21 29

10 20

35 34

17

37

23 30

20 27

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

1-3 rooms 4-6 rooms 7 or more rooms

51

Figure 10: Number of bedrooms

A bedroom is defined as any room that was intended to be used as a bedroom when the property was built, or any room that has been permanently converted for use as a bedroom. It also includes all rooms intended for use as a bedroom even if not being used as a bedroom at the time of the Census. Bedsits and studio flats are counted as having one bedroom.

35

16

32 21

12 9 13 9 13 9 9 8 11 12 2 7

18 11 6 9

16 13 4 9

20 11 11 10 15 12

64

71

58

66

66 65 61

59

76

68 67 66 62

74

55 55

75

71 74 69

72 71

61 62

64

57 66 65

65 66

1 13 10 13

22 26 26 31

11 23 24 26 27

13

43 38

7 18 20 23

12 16

34 29

16

32 23 25 20 22

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

0-1 bedroom 2-3 bedrooms 4 or more bedrooms

52

Figure 11: Percentage of households with an occupancy rating of -1 or less (over occupied) and an

occupancy rating of +1 or more (under occupied). Households with sufficient occupancy are not

shown

Figure 12: Population density – urban city and town

-22

-67

-35

-60 -61 -78 -66 -81

-53 -79 -72 -84

-66 -74 -82 -85 -50

-76 -66 -82 -51

-69 -80 -82 -62

-80 -64 -79 -59

-75

41

11

31

14 15 6 9 5

12 5 7 4

13 6 3 4 17

7 8 4 16

10 4 4 15

6 12 5 15

7

-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f H

ou

seh

old

s

Under Occupied Over Occupied

134

94

45

31

54

17 21 30

21

42

62

12

24 29 33

51 47

19 9

19 18

33

14

25

11

24

13 16 16 21

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Peo

ple

Pe

r H

ecta

re

New Development All

53

Figure 13: Households by tenure

Figure 14: Percentage of households that are under shared ownership (part owned and part rented)

13 24

8 22

8

28 17

37

8

33 17

39

15 29

12

36

17

35

14

44

7 23

13

34

17

35

12

35

11

32 15

31

19

28 46

40

34

37

32

41

47

41

40

36 58

43

28

34

35

31

35

40

39

36

37

33

42

37

38

35

10 6

6 6

8

5

5

8

4 3 11

2

3 4 6 6

22

18

14

23 20

18 32

12

25

12 18 8

13 16

5 8

24

20

17

11

22

16

14

14

13

15 18

14

18

16 38

25

52

25 19 12 11 12

25 12 13 10

26 16 17 12

26 10

30 12

25 18 30

13 29

14 22 13

26 16

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Owned outright Owned with a mortgage or loan Shared ownership

Social rented Private rented Living rent free

10.1

5.5 5.8 5.8

8.5

4.8 4.5

7.8

4.0 3.5

10.7

3.1

4.2

6.0 6.2

1.0 1.0 1.4 0.9 1.1

0.6 1.1 1.1

0.5 0.6

1.8

0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Per

cen

tage


54

Figure 15: Households by composition

Figure 16: Percentage of households that contain cohabiting couples

4 12 4

11 10 8 13 12 4

13 4

13 10 8 15 4

16 9 12 4 13

3 13

3 12

40 20 39 22 25 16 20 13

22 15

18 12

22 17

14 12 21 14

16

13 25 16

12

13 30 14 22

14 24

16

3

6 6 8 3 11 9

4 12 4

9 10

4 11

3

14 6

3

10 11 10 9

17 27 13 27 37

40 37

42

29

39 39

40 39

33

53

46

23

34

42

36

32 38

54

41 27

40

38

39 34

36

15 11 17

11 19 11

14 8

22

10 16

9 15 10 16

9

17

10 14

8

17 11 13 9

19 9

17 10

17 10 8 12

6 10

9 9 13 8 16

9 13 8 10 12 7 7 19

11 13 8 12 10 8 8 8 7 11 9 10 9

14 12 20 12 7 6 5 5 7 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 7 6 7 5 11 9 7 6 8 7 7 6 9 8

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

One person: Aged 65 and over One person: OtherFamily: All aged 65 and over Family: Married/civil partnership coupleFamily: Cohabiting couple Family: Lone parentOther household types

15

17 19

14

22

16 15

16 17

14

17

13

19 17 17

11 11 11

8 10

9 10

9 10 8

11 9 9 10 10

0

5

10

15

20

25

Po

rtsm

ou

th

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Per

cen

tage


55

Figure 17: Households by car ownership

Figure 18: Percentage of the population that are male

42 33 37

30

14 15 12 11 15 13 8

13 13 23

3 8

32 21

8 13 15 17

7 13 13 14 13 15 16 19

47

44 48

45

45 40 45 37

49 41

43 40

47

48

34 35

46

42

50 42 50 43

39 39 45 39 45 41

45 41

10

18 13

20

35 34

36

37

32

35 42 35 33

24

54 42

18

28 35 33

30 31

43 35 34

34 36

33 33 30

1 4 2 5 6 11 7 15

4 11 8 11 7 6 9

15 4 9 6

12 4 9 11 12 8 12

7 11 6 10

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

No cars or vans 1 car or van 2 cars or vans 3 or more cars or vans

56 53

50 47 48 48

51 50 48 50 51 52 52

50 51 50 50 50 49 49 49 49 50 49 48 50 49 49 49 49

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Po

rtsm

ou

th

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Per

cen

tage


56

Figure 19: Median age

Figure 20: Age of household reference persons

28 25

30 31 28

33 33 33 29 30

28 31 32

30 30 34

32

39

44 41

44 40 41

44 47

36

43 42 42 40

0

10

20

30

40

50

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Age


20

7

21 8 7 3 6 10

3 6 6 3 11

3 5 8 3 5 6 3 6 9 4

37

18

40

20 36

15 9

37

13

24

10

22 14 22

10

26

11

29

8

36

17 21

10

31

11

30

11

31

13

21

29

25

28

39

33

39

29

34

30

41

29

40

29

54

33

26

26

38

25

37

35

47

30

33

28

40

29

37

29

13

23

9

22

14

27

23

31

14

28

19

29

22

27

18

29

20

28

19

29

13

25

18

30

20

29

17

28

16

27

9

22

6

22

5

23 13

30

5

26

11

31

10

26

6

27 16

32

9

37

6

20 8

28

11

30

8

29

7

27

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Age 24 and under Age 25 to 34 Age 35 to 49 Age 50 to 64 Age 65 and over

57

Figure 21: Young population

Figure 22: Household reference persons aged 25-34 by marital status

227 256

1,790

213 719

282 635 760

241 214 493 440 256 166

1,077

186

366

208

578 625

132 164 356 304

205

846

207

288

189

412 396

258 282 526

652

269 397 251

135

227 298

166

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Nu

mb

er

of

pe

op

le

Aged 0 - 4 Aged 5 - 9 Aged 10-14 Aged 15-19

73 65

77 66

58 57 59 52

66 57 59 56 61 57 52 51

64 61

40 57 59

51

34

53 68

58 58 56 62 59

24 27

17 27 35 35 32

40 28

35 34 36 29 32 40 42 27 29

50

35 34 41

58

38 23

36 34 36 31 33

4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 6 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 5 3 4 4 3 4

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Single Married Civil partnership Separated Divorced Widowed

58

Figure 23: Household reference persons aged 35-49 by marital status

Figure 24: Percentage of the population that is Non-White British

43 32

44 33

25 23 21 19 26 22 22 19 20 24

17 19 33

25 22 22 27 24 14 20

32 22 23 22 25 24

31 41

29 42

49 53 53 59 40 53 51 57 53 46 65 63 30 48 47 53 45 53 64 57 37 59 51 55 49 51

6 7 8 7 7 6 8 6

11 6 7 7

7 8

5 5

9 7

8 6 8

6 7 6 10

5 7 6 7 6

19 19 19 17 17 16 17 15 22 17 18 16 20 21 13 13

26 19 21 17 19 16 15 16 22

13 18 16 18 17

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Single Married Civil partnership Separated Divorced Widowed

40 41

21

9

17

7 8

17

7

14

22

10 11

15 18

16

22

12

7 8 5 6

9

5 5

20

7 8 8 11

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Po

rtsm

out

h

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Pe

rcen

tage


59

Figure 25: Percentage of the working population aged 16-74 that work from home, travel to work by

train or bus, as a passenger in a car or van, by bicycle or on foot

Figure 26: Percentage of the working population aged 16-74 that drive a car or van to work

5 3 3 3 5 6 6 9 3 5 6 5 4 3

8 8 2 4 5 8

3 4 4 7 5 9

5 6 5 6

7 4 5 3

8 5 7 5

7 4 5 4 2

12 7

5 3 2 2

9 7 3 3 5

6 7 4 6 4

6

7 8 9 5 4 3 3 2

3 5 8 5 3

2 4 4

2 2

3 3 3 4 4

5 6 5 7 5

5 5 4 5 5 3 5

4 5

3 3 9

6 5

5 5 5

5 5

3

4 5 5 5 5

5 7 4 5 2 2 2 3

3 4 10

11 2

4

3 5 4

3 3 6

3 2

2 3 3 3 4

23 17

30

16

8 10 11 9 10

7 6

7 7

10

4 7

11

8 6

8 9 10 12 10

12

14 8 9

11 11

0

10

20

30

40

50

60P

ort

smo

uth

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

inc

P&

S

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Work mainly at or from home Train Bus, minibus or coach

Passenger in a car or van Bicycle On foot

46 42

67 68 68

76

65 70

58

73

66 65 69 67

65

52 54

66 68 71 71

59

69 68 69 65

67

61

67 64

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Po

rtsm

ou

th

Sou

tham

pto

n

Bas

ings

toke

an

d D

ean

e

East

Ham

psh

ire

East

leig

h

Fare

ham

Go

spo

rt

Har

t

Hav

ant

New

Fo

rest

Ru

shm

oo

r

Test

Val

ley

Win

ches

ter

Ham

psh

ire

Co

un

ty

Ham

psh

ire

incl

ud

ing

P&

S

Per

cen

tage


the demography of hampshire’s new...the demography of hampshire’s new housing developments . 1...

Documents