the corporate manslaughter and corporate homicide act 2007 judicial studies board for northern...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland
Richard Matthews
![Page 2: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
The Act
• Creates one offence – Corporate Manslaughter;
• Abolishes common law for organisations;
• No individual liability;
• DPP’s consent required for prosecution
• Territorial extent: harm resulting death within the seaward limits of UK UK ship, hovercraft, aircraft, oil rig or in consequence of
mishap affecting it
![Page 3: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The Offence
1. By an organisation subject to the Act, where;
2. The organisation owed a relevant duty of care to the deceased; and
3. The way in which its activities are managed or organised: caused a person’s death; amounted to a gross breach of that duty of care; by its senior management is a substantial element in the
breach
![Page 4: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. By an organisation subject to the Act,
![Page 5: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
1. The Organisations
The organisations are—
(a) a corporation;
(b) a department or other body listed in Schedule 1;
(c) a police force;
(d) a partnership, or a trade union or employers' association, that is an employer.
![Page 6: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Government bodies and Crown immunity
• Sch 1 sets out 48 Government departments/ Crown bodies that are deemed to be organisations subject to the Act.
• s.11(1) provides, ‘An organisation that is a servant or agent of the Crown is not immune from prosecution under this Act for that reason.’
• S.11(2) provides that a Sch 1 body and a ‘corporation that is a servant or agent of the Crown’ is to be treated as owing whatever duties of care it would owe if it were a corporation that was not a servant or agent of the Crown’.
![Page 7: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2. The organisation owed a relevant duty of care to the
deceased
![Page 8: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
2. The relevant duty of care =
Any of the following duties owed by the organisation under the law of negligence—
(a) a duty owed to its employees or to other persons working for the organisation or performing services for it;
(b) a duty owed as occupier of premises;
(c) a duty owed in connection with—
(i) the supply by the organisation of goods or services (whether for consideration or not),
(ii) the carrying on by the organisation of any construction or maintenance operations,
(iii) the carrying on by the organisation of any other activity on a commercial basis, or
(iv) the use or keeping by the organisation of any plant, vehicle or other thing
![Page 9: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Relevant duty of care: a judicial determination of law and fact
“For the purposes of this Act, whether a particular organisation owes a duty of care to a particular individual is a question of law. The judge must make any findings of fact necessary to decide that question.” s 2(5)
![Page 10: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
“.. the standard textbook on the duty of care in the
law of negligence in the civil world .. is a very large
amount of literature. The issue has gone to the House
of Lords for decision very many times in the past ten
years. I was very troubled about the possible
consequences. However, if you make this a question
of law for the judge, depending on whatever facts he
has to find…I do not think it presents a problem. “
![Page 11: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
• “The questions of fact that the judge will need to consider
will generally be uncontroversial and in any event will only
be decided by the judge for the purposes of the duty of care
question“ [Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Bill [HL 19], Explanatory Notes para 24 ]
• “Criminal proceedings will often involve questions that need
to be decided by the judge as a matter of law and this
matter will fall to be decided in the same way. “ [Mr Gerry Sutcliffe
MP (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department)]
![Page 12: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Directing the jury
• s.1(4)(b), ‘a breach of a duty of care by an organisation is a
“gross” breach if the conduct alleged to amount to a breach
of that duty falls far below what can reasonably be expected
of the organisation in the circumstances’.
• This test would appear to involve the determination of two
questions by the jury:
• What was reasonably expected of the organisation in the
circumstances?; and
• Did the conduct of the organisation, the way in which its
activities were managed or organised, fall far below that
standard?
![Page 13: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
The Caparo factors
•Foreseeability of harm
•Proximity
•Whether it is just and reasonable to
impose a duty of care
![Page 14: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
s. 2(1) (a) the duty owed to employees and other workers
• Approx 200 – 270 worker deaths per year (approx 70
in construction)
• The Explanatory Notes describe how this category, ‘will
include an employer’s duty to provide a safe system of
work for its employees. An organisation may also owe
duties of care to those whose work it is able to control
or direct, even though they are not formally employed
by it. This might include contractors or volunteers. The
new offence does not impose new duties of care where
these are not currently owed.’
![Page 15: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
• In law, an organisation as an employer, will owe different duties and be potentially civilly liable for breaches on the following bases: Primary liability for breach of a personal, non-delegable,
duty of care. Vicariously liable for torts committed by employees in
the course of employment. Liability for breach of a statutory duty.
• It is the first of these that is the relevant duty of care under the Act.
• An organisation may also owe a relevant duty of care arising from work to those workers who are not strictly employees and to those who provide services to it.
![Page 16: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
The employer duty – problems & issues
• Who is an employee?
Agency workers
• Non-employee workers
• Distinguishing vicarious liability
• Statutory health and safety duties
• Volenti non fit injuria
![Page 17: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
The limitations and exclusions
• Sections 3–7 create a series of activities and circumstances exempt from be capable of founding a relevant duty of care for the offence. The sections are variously concerned with: public policy and exclusively public functions
(s.3); military activities (s.4); policing and law enforcement (s 5); emergencies (s 6); and child and probation services (s 7).
![Page 18: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Public policy and public function. s 3
(1) Any duty of care owed by a public authority in respect of a decision as to matters of public policy (including in particular the allocation of public resources or the weighing of competing public interests) is not a “relevant duty of care”.
(2) Any duty of care owed in respect of things done in the exercise of an exclusively public function is not a “relevant duty of care” unless it falls within s.2(1)(a) [employer duty] , (b) [occupier duty] or (d) [custody duty-not in force].
(4) “exclusively public function” means a function that falls within the prerogative of the Crown or is, by its nature, exercisable only with authority conferred—
(a) by the exercise of that prerogative, or
(b) by or under a statutory provision;
![Page 19: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Exemption for Military Operations: s.4• Wide range of operational military activities are
exclusively public functions, excluded by s 3(2)
• s 4 excludes operations including peacekeeping dealing with terrorism, civil unrest or serious public disorder, in the course of which armed forces come under attack or face the threat of attack or violent resistance’
• Any duty of care owed by MOD in respect of such operations, preparation or training of a hazardous nature which it is considered needs to be carried out is excluded
![Page 20: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Police Operations: s 5(1) & (2)
s. 5(2): the limitation extends to certain policing ‘operations’, that:
(a) are operations for dealing with terrorism, civil unrest or serious disorder,
(b) involve the carrying on of policing or law-enforcement activities, and
(c) officers/ employees come under attack, or face the threat of attack or violent resistance, in the course of the operations.
s.5(1) provides no relevant duty of care in respect of:
(a) such operations,
(b) activities carried on in preparation for, or directly in support of, such operations, or
(c) training carried out in a hazardous way, which it is considered needs to be carried out, for such operations
![Page 21: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Law enforcement: s 5(3)
Section 5(3) creates a further exemption by
providing that any duty of care owed by a
public authority in respect of all other
policing or law enforcement activities is not a
‘relevant duty of care’ unless it falls within
s.2(1)(a) [employer duty] , (b) [occupier duty]
or (d) [custody duty-not in force]
![Page 22: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Emergencies: s 6
• s 6 provides that the offence does not apply to emergency services (fire, ambulance and NHS bodies), and some others, when responding to emergencies.
• Does not exclude the duties such organisations owe as employers, as occupiers nor to the duties that arise which do not relate to the way in which a body responds to an emergency.
• Emergency circumstances are those that are life-threatening or which are causing, or threaten to cause, serious injury or illness or serious harm to the environment or buildings or other property.
• The exemption does not extend to medical treatment itself, or decisions about this (other than decisions that establish the priority for treating patients).
![Page 23: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
3. Gross breach & Causation
![Page 24: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
3. Gross breach and causation
s 1(1): An organisation to which this section applies is guilty of an offence if the way in which its activities are managed or organised—
(a) causes a person’s death, and
(b) amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased.
S 1(3) An organisation is guilty of an offence under this section only if the way in which its activities are managed or organised by its senior management is a substantial element in the breach referred to in subsection (1).
![Page 25: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Gross Breach: s 1(4)(b)
Section 1(4)(b):
‘a breach of a duty of care by an organisation is a “gross” breach if the conduct alleged to amount to a breach of that duty falls far below what can reasonably be expected of the organisation in the circumstances’.
![Page 26: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
The section 8 jury factors
• A factor the jury must consider is whether the evidence shows that the organisation failed to comply with any H&S legislation that relates to the alleged breach of relevant duty of care
• A jury may consider the extent to which the evidence shows that there were ‘attitudes, policies, systems or accepted practices within the organisation’ that were likely to have encouraged or produced tolerance of any such failure
• The jury may also have regard to any H&S guidance that relates to the alleged breach.
![Page 27: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
The senior management test
s.1(3) ‘An organisation is only guilty of an
offence if the way its activities are
managed or organised by its senior
management is a substantial element in
the gross breach.’
![Page 28: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
“senior management”
s.1(4)(c) ‘‘senior management’,.. means the persons
who play significant roles in—
i) the making of decisions about how the whole or a
substantial part of its activities are to be
managed or organised, or
ii) the actual managing or organising of the whole or
a substantial part of those activities.
![Page 29: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Sentencing powers
• An organisation guilty of corporate
manslaughter ‘is liable on conviction to a
fine’
• A judge may impose a ‘remedial order’
• A judge may impose a ‘publicity order’
![Page 30: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Richard Matthews](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649ce45503460f949b090c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
The Last Slide!
• Estimated 10-13 additional prosecutions a year
(including 2 – 3 from Scotland and NI)
• Existing Work Related Death Protocol to remain
• No new police powers – how obtain senior
management evidence?
• 3 years until the custody duty?