the contraceptive choice project
DESCRIPTION
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Enter Presenter’s Name Enter Presenter’s Organization Enter Presentation Date. Objectives. Describe the study design and methods Review key findings from Pre-CHOICE surveys Review important findings from CHOICE - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project
Enter Presenter’s Name
Enter Presenter’s Organization
Enter Presentation Date
![Page 2: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objectives
• Describe the study design and methods• Review key findings from Pre-CHOICE surveys• Review important findings from CHOICE• Discuss dissemination and translation of
results into practice
![Page 3: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Unintended Pregnancy in the U.S.
• Over 3 million unintended pregnancies– 59% mistimed– 39% unwanted
• 1.2 million abortions• 367,752 births to teens 15-19 years• Contraception
– 52% non-use– 43% incorrect use
Finer Contraception 2011; Hamilton NCHS 2012; Frost Guttmacher Inst 2008
![Page 4: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC)
LNG-IUS• 99% effective• 20 mcg
levonorgestrel/day• Up to 5 years
Copper T IUD• 99% effective• Copper ions
• Up to 10 years
Subdermal Implant• 99% effective• 60 mcg
etonogestrel/day• Up to 3 years
![Page 5: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Study Primary Objectives
• To increase the acceptance and use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods among women of childbearing age
• To measure acceptability, satisfaction, side-effects, and rates of continuation across a variety of reversible contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible methods
![Page 6: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Study Hypotheses
• Increase IUD use– Sentinel clinics from <2% to 6% or more– Post-abortion insertion <1% to 10% or more
• Increase implant use to 3% or more• Observe higher 12-month continuation rates for
LARC vs. other methods• Population outcomes
– Teen pregnancy decline by 10%– Repeat abortion decline by 10%
![Page 7: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Study Design: Prospective CohortEL
IGIB
LE
Exposure Outcome2–3 y
LNG-IUSCu-IUDImplantDMPA
PillsPatchRing
Other
Unintended pregnancy
Teen pregnancyRepeat abortion
AbortionContinuationSatisfaction
STI
![Page 8: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Study Inclusion Criteria
• 14-45 years• Primary residency in STL City or County• Sexually active with male partner
(or soon to be)• Does not desire pregnancy during next 12
months• Desires reversible contraception• Willing to try a new contraceptive method
![Page 9: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Study Timeline
![Page 10: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Screening & Enrollment
Introduce study
Eligibility screenLARC Blurb
Offer participation
Enroll participant!
Eligible
Agrees
• Contraceptive Counseling• Informed Consent • Contact Information• Medical Record Authorization• Clinical Forms and
Evaluation• Baseline STI• Baseline Survey• Method Allocation
![Page 11: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Contraceptive Counseling• P000001• Development and training included
– Counseling Framework– Standard Script– Contraception 101 Lecture– Counseling and Medical History Forms– Testing & Observation
• Provided by 53 research staff & volunteers– 37 staff, 14 medical, 1 graduate and 1 undergraduate students
• Additional resource for managing patient calls
Madden Contraception 2012
![Page 12: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Contraceptive “Menu of Options”
![Page 13: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Study Recruitment
Aug 07Dec 07
Dec 08Dec 09
Dec 10Sep 11
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Location 9,256
2 Abortion clinics 17%
8 Community clinics 14%
University-based research clinic• Word-of-mouth• Provider referrals
69%
![Page 14: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Study Follow-Up Rates
6 12 24 36
98% 94% 87% 81%
Survey
![Page 15: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Pre-CHOICE Survey Results
![Page 16: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
STL Population Survey• Objective: Survey knowledge and attitudes about IUDs
among women in St. Louis area• Methods:
– 8-page written survey– Mailed to 12,500 randomly selected households
• One adult female in household asked to complete survey• 1,665 of 7,722 (22%) deliverable and eligible surveys returned
– Measures:• Obstetric & contraceptive history• Knowledge regarding method effectiveness• Knowledge regarding appropriate candidates, side effects, and
myths of IUD
Hladky Obstet Gynecol 2011
![Page 17: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
STL Population Survey Results• Respondents overall:
– Mean age = 31.9– 57% white– 82% had insurance (83% private)– 70% greater than high school education– 18% history of abortion
• 127 (8%) were currently using or had used IUD– Slightly older (mean age = 32.4)– More likely to be parous– More likely to be receiving public assistance
Hladky Obstet Gynecol 2011
![Page 18: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
MYTHS Regarding IUDs• 50% of women surveyed believe IUD is SAFE• Common safety concerns:
– Pelvic Pain 36% – Infertility 30%– Cancer 14%– STDs 11%
• 61% underestimate the effectiveness
Hladky Obstet Gynecol 2011
![Page 19: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Knowledge About IUDs
![Page 20: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
STL Population Survey Results
![Page 21: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
STL Provider Survey• Objective: Survey knowledge and attitudes about IUD
among providers in St. Louis area• Methods:
– Written self-administered survey– Mailed to 250 providers
• Medical directories and electronic searches• 137/186 (73.7%) delivered and eligible surveys returned
– Measures:• Demographic characteristics• Graduate medical training• Contraceptive patients seen and willingness to insert IUD
Madden Contraception 2010
![Page 22: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
STL Provider Survey Results• 99% physicians• 85% white, 4% black, 10% other• Residency training:
– 44% completed before 1989– 41% 1989-1999– 16% after 1999
• 56% completed residency at a Catholic institution• Contraceptive patients each week
– 35%: 0–25 – 50%: 26-50 – 15%: 50+
Madden Contraception 2010
![Page 23: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
STL Provider Survey Results• 36% not trained in IUD insertion during residency or
clinical training• Discussed IUD with patients
– 18% “always”– 75% “most or some of the time”
• 66% reported inserted >10 IUD in past year• GC/CT testing prior to IUD insertion
– 40% always – 52% sometimes
Madden Contraception 2010
![Page 24: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
STL Provider Survey Results• Appropriate candidates for IUDs
– 62% nulliparous– 31% adolescent– 45% STI in past 2 years– 37% PID in past 5 years– 37% non-monogamous relationship
• Offer IUD– 98% if 35 y.o., married, with 3 children– 50% if unmarried 17 y.o., monogamous, and one child– 19% if unmarried 17 y.o., never been pregnant
Madden Contraception 2010
![Page 25: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CHOICE Project Results
![Page 26: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
CHOICE Study Participants
Peipert Obstet Gynecol 2012
![Page 27: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Baseline Chosen Method%
LNG-IUS 46.0Copper IUD 11.9Implant 16.9DMPA 6.9Pills 9.4Ring 7.0Patch 1.8Other <1.0
75%
Peipert Obstet & Gynecol 2012
![Page 28: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Choice of LARC Methods among Adolescents
Mestad Contraception 2011
![Page 29: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
12-Month ContinuationMethod Continuation Rate (%)
LNG-IUS 87.5Copper IUD 84.1Implant 83.3Any LARC 86.2DMPA 56.2OCPs 55.0Ring 54.2Patch 49.5Non-LARC 54.7
Peipert Obstet Gynecol 2011
![Page 30: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
12-month Continuation: Adolescents Compared to Older Women
Rosenstock Obstet Gynecol 2012
![Page 31: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Unintended Pregnancy by Contraceptive Method
1 2 30%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%LARC DMPA PPR
Year
Parti
cipa
nts w
ith C
ontr
acep
tive
Failu
re (%
) HRadj = 22.395% CI 14.0, 35.4
Winner NEJM 2012
![Page 32: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Method Failure by Age
Winner NEJM 2012
![Page 33: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Repeat Abortion in St. Louis Region
• Data obtained from MO DHHS– Represents women who reside in Missouri at time of
abortion• Repeat abortion measured as ever had a
previous abortion• Compared to Kansas City & non-metro MO
– KC: One abortion clinic– KC: Similar demographic characteristics to STL
![Page 34: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Repeat Abortion 2006 - 2010
2006 2007 2008 2009 201025%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
St. Louis City/CountyKansas CityNon-Metro Missouri
Perc
ent o
f rep
eat a
borti
ons
Peipert Obstet Gynecol 2012
Test of Trend 2006-2010: STL, p=.002; KC, p=.003; Non-metro MO, p=.18
![Page 35: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CHOICE Compared to U.S.• Teen birth rate (age 15-19 years)
– 6.3 per 1,000 teens (first year use rate)– 16.3 per 1,000 teens (average annual rate)– Compared to 34.3 per 1,000 nationally
• Abortion rate (women ages 15-44)– 6.0 per 1,000 women (average annual rate)– Compared to 19.6 per 1,000 nationally
• Unintended pregnancy rate– 15.0 per 1,000 women (average annual rate)– Cumulative: 35.0 per 1,000 women– Compared to 52.0 per 1,000 nationally
Peipert Obstet Gynecol 2012
![Page 36: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Main Findings from CHOICE
• Women overwhelmingly choose LARC• LARC methods associated with higher
continuation & satisfaction than shorter-acting methods– Regardless of age
• LARC methods associated with lower rates of unintended pregnancy
• Increasing LARC use can decrease unintended pregnancy in the population
![Page 37: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Dissemination & Translating Research into Practice
![Page 38: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The Secret: 3 Key Ingredients
• Education regarding all methods, especially LARC– Reframe the conversation to start with the most
effective methods• Access to providers who will offer & provide LARC
– Dispel myths and increase the practice of evidence-based medicine
• Affordable contraception– Institute of Medicine recommendation, Affordable
Care Act, Medicaid Expansion
![Page 39: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Successful Implementation of CHOICE Model
Key Element Barrier Facilitator
EducationLimited time for contraceptive counseling during appointment
Counseling provided by non-clinician trained in tiered-based counseling
Access Outdated myths regarding teens as LARC candidates
Identify local “champion clinician” who is LARC proficient, trusted, and can dispel myths
Cost
Lack of reimbursement for contraceptive method, insertion & removal
Network with clinics that have identified how best to manage cost issue through effective billing or payer mix
Up-front cost of stocking LARC methods for same-day insertions
Investigate ways to purchase a few methods that serve as temporary supply
![Page 40: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Dissemination Strategies• Create online Resource Center to disseminate
CHOICE materials LARC First– The Evidence– Contraceptive Counseling– Advanced Practitioner Resources– Patient Management– Effective Staffing & Management
• Provide technical assistance to end users– >100 national & international requests
• Evaluate how CHOICE materials are adopted and adapted for successful use– PCORI Funding
40
![Page 41: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Online Resource Center
![Page 42: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Examples of Dissemination
Courtesy of Mary Alexander, Healthy Start Indianapolis
![Page 43: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Dissemination Strategies• National forums & grand rounds• Community presentations & festivals/events
![Page 44: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Dissemination Strategies• Website transitioned from recruitment to
resource guide
• Social media
• Lay Press
• Short videos
![Page 45: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Open the Dialog Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAsdg7f7M7w
![Page 46: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Pathway to Choice Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd46pXtMHOo
![Page 47: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
What method is right for you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9SHoy1C3tU
![Page 48: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062411/568166e5550346895ddb213d/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
To Learn More Visit
www.choiceproject.wustl.edu
www.facebook.com/choiceproject
http://www.youtube.com/user/WUSTLChoiceProject
https://twitter.com/WUSTLChoice