the constraints of policy: a critical discourse analysis of open education policies in virginia

23
THE CONSTRAINTS OF POLICY A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF OPEN EDUCATION POLICIES IN VIRGINIA JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY [email protected] | @MILLERJAMISON Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

Upload: jamison-miller

Post on 08-Apr-2017

180 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

THE CONSTRAINTS OF POLICYA CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF OPEN EDUCATION POLICIES IN VIRGINIA

JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & [email protected] | @MILLERJAMISON

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

Page 2: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

● Context of my doctoral research● Context of this policy research● Research questions● Theoretical frameworks● Methodology and methods● Findings● Discussion & implications

FORMAT:

Image: Public Domain | Une classe by Pieter van de Heyden, 1557

Page 3: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Open education has the potential to sustainably transform existing educational institutions into more equitable and democratic forms.

Public Domain Image: The subscription room at Lloyd's of London in the early 19th century

Page 4: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIALS OF OPEN EDUCATIONIN THEORY, POLICY, AND PRACTICE

JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY@MILLERJAMISON | [email protected]

Page 5: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

OPEN EDUCATION IN1) THEORY Open Education as a Real Utopia

2) POLICY The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

3) PRACTICE From EDUPUNK to Open Policy: Critical Technology Praxis in Higher Education

Image CC (BY-NC) Jonathan Cohen

Page 6: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

GLOBALLY, PROVISION OF AND ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION HAS COME TO BE UNDERSTOOD AS

UN Declaration of Human Rights (1948)World Conference on Education for All (1990)

UNESCO World Education Forum (2000)

A SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUE

Page 7: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & COPYRIGHT LAWS(Chon, 2007; Lessig, 2010; Slaughter & Rhoads 2004)

SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON EDUCATION AS A PUBLIC GOOD

(McMahon, 2009; Newfield, 2008; 2016)

BARRIERS

Page 8: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

OPEN UNIVERSITIES “...to promote educational well-being of the community generally...”

OER 2002 UNESCO Paris Declaration (2002)Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007)

Blessinger & Bliss (2016)

OPEN EDUCATION: POISED TO TRANSCEND THESE BARRIERS

Page 9: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Tidewater Community CollegeZ-Degree, Lumen Learning

Virginia Community College System

Zx23 Program

Virginia

WHAT IS GOING ON IN VIRGINIA?

Page 10: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

TWO QUESTIONS1. How is open education discursively framed

within institutional policies?

2. Do discursive framings in policies support open education and OER as transformational for

education, and if so, how? Image CC (BY-SA) Véronique Debord-Lazaro

Page 11: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS

● Tkacz (2015), Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness● Critical Theory (Horkheimer, 1947;1972)● Critical Approaches to Open Education

(Bayne, Knox, and Ross, 2015; Deimann and Farrow, 2013; Hall, 2011; and Knox, 2013)

Page 12: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Fairclough (1993, 1995)

Texts present ideologies, beliefs, messages, and meanings.

CDA proposes to illuminate these messages, how they are framed, and how they can be resisted and usurped.

Gee (1999)Language is not merely a means of communication, but also orders social activity.

CDA is concerned with how text presents discursive practices- the ways in which we are in the world.

Martínez-Alemán (2015)

Has been applying CDA in higher education policy analysis. Identifies its primary purposes as 1) to reveal ideological foundations of discourse, and 2) to provide evidence (data) to support corrective action

CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (CDA)

Page 14: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

DATA ANALYSIS

Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett

Following Martínez-Alemán (2015) and McGregor (2004), CDA is derived from an array of social science techniques and not a singular method:

Establishing context(s)● Identification of connections between aspects that construct and restrict discourse

○ CULTURE, SOCIAL IDENTITY, and LANGUAGE● Identification of linkages between TEXT, STRUCTURAL POWER, and CONTEXT

Framing the text (McGregor, 2004)● Power relations: who is depicted in power, who has agency, who does not?● Omission of information, nominalization (converting verbs to nouns), passive verbs● Presuppositions, what is assumed by the author?● Insinuations and connotations● Tone of certainty and authority● Register, do the words spoken ring true?

Page 15: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

FINDINGS

Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett

“mandatory”“in accordance with the provisions”“compliance”

(TCC, 2014)“global model for successful development and use”

(VCCS, 2015, para. 1)

“creating a world where each and every person on earth can access and contribute to the sum of all human knowledge”

(Open Education Declaration, 2007, quoted in University of Edinburgh, 2016, p. 2)

Page 16: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

FINDINGS

Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett

“improve student success through increased access and affordability, and improve teaching efficiency and effectiveness through the ability to focus, analyze, augment, and evolve course materials directly aligned to course learning outcomes. Faculty will be supported in their use of OER to achieve both of the stated outcomes.”

(TCC, 2014, p. 1-2)

Page 17: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett

Faculty who incorporate OER materials into their courses shall assume all responsibility for maintaining the integrity of the course content as related to copyright and scholarly merit. In order for a course to carry a Z designation within TCC’s Student Information System, faculty must follow the procedures contained in this policy.

(TCC, 2014, p. 2, emphasis added)

FINDINGS

Page 18: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett

Faculty are to use only materials that are published under a Creative Commons License or exist in the Public Domain.

(TCC, 2014, p. 3, emphasis added)

It is the faculty member’s responsibility to ensure that such content is eligible for and meets the standards for a CC-BY license. As such, no portion of such work may be claimed by others in whole, in part, or as a derivative work. This requirement is mandatory for Z courses and strongly encouraged for OER courses.

(TCC, 2014, p. 3, emphasis added)

FINDINGS

Page 19: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

DISCUSSION/IMPLICATIONS

● “Open” is non-deterministicBoth conservative and progressive forces are at play

● Openings established for an emancipatory and social justice agenda

● Constraints are made explicit

Page 20: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

THE CONSTRAINTS OF POLICYA CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF OPEN EDUCATION POLICIES IN VIRGINIA

JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & [email protected] | @MILLERJAMISON

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

Page 21: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

REFERENCESBenkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. In The information age: Economy, society,

and culture (2nd ed., Vol 1). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of

education. New York: Macmillan.

Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Freire, P. (2000 [1970]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Goldrick-Rab, S. (2016). Paying the price: College costs, financial aid, and the betrayal of the

American dream. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Page 22: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

REFERENCEShooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York:

Routledge.McMillan-Cottom, T. 2017. Lower ed: The troubling rise of for-profits. New York, NY: The

New Press.Newfield, C. (2008). Unmaking the public university: The forty-year assault on the middle class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Newfield, C. (2016). The great mistake: How we wrecked public universities and how we can fix them. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy:

Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London, UK: Verso.Wright, E. O. (2012). Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1177/0003122412468882

Page 23: The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia

ASSUMPTIONS● Built on the assumptions that language is more than the mechanics

of communication; it orders social practices and expresses ideology and thus holds impact on actions

DELIMITATIONS● Focused on institutional and state-level higher education policies

from Virginia from 2007-2016

LIMITATIONS● As open education policies are only just emerging, there are

relatively few examples from which to draw● This study will not be analyzing the impact of evident discourses

Image CC (BY-SA) Edith Soto