the "code status" conversation
DESCRIPTION
An evidence-based review of the evidence and guidelines behind the "code status" conversation in the hospital. Geared towards medical students & residents.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Kyle P. Edmonds, MDAssistant Clinical Professor
Doris A. Howell Palliative Care Consultation Service
UCSD Health System Ethics Committee
THE “CODE STATUS” CONVERSATION:
EVIDENCE AND GUIDELINES
![Page 2: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• List one reality of CPR.
• What are the guidelines for the code conversation?
• Name a positive and negative prognostic factor for a patient status post CPR.
• What was the likelihood of survival for patients with a “partial” code?
OBJECTIVES
![Page 3: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TIMELINE
• Elam, Safar & Gordon demonstrate CPR techniques in a surgical populationMid-1950s
• AMA recommends documentation of code status1974
• First hospital policies drafted1976• President’s Commission on Bioethics
Guidelines (still standing)1983• Patient Self Determination Act1990• AMA CEJA Report on End-of-Life Decision
Making (still standing)1991
![Page 4: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
THE USUAL
“I need to ask you some questions that we ask all patients who are very sick. These questions are about CPR, or cardiopulmonary
resuscitation. I need to know your preferences.
“If your hearts stops beating, do you want us to use electrical shocks and chest compressions to try to get your heart beating
again? Or if you stop breathing, do you want us to put a tube down your throat into your lungs and attach you to a breathing machine
to help you breathe?”
Ref: Balaban, 2000.
![Page 5: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INADEQUACIES OF THE USUAL
• Lack of empathy
• No discussion of prognosis
• Treats it as an “informed choice” conversation without offering all the information
![Page 6: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Do you frame CPR as “normal”?
“Normally, if someone’s heart stops…”
• Do you ever use “shock talk”?
“We smash on your chest and break your ribs…stick a tube in your throat…”
VARIATIONS ON THE USUAL
![Page 7: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ROSOW’S DECISION MATRIX
Patient
FamilyProvider
![Page 8: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• TV survival and discharge rate = 67%
PATIENT EXPECTATIONS
![Page 9: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• 37% did not want code status discussion
• Less likely to want if:
• Older
• More functionally impaired
• No partner
• BUT: 5 times more likely if conversation perceived as relevant
PATIENT EXPECTATIONS
Heyland et al, 2006
![Page 10: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PATIENT EXPECTATIONS: MEANING MAKING
Johnson et al., 2011.
![Page 11: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• 27% eventually requiring CPR judged stable at admit
• CPR conversation less likely to be documented on:
• Direct admissions
• Surgical admissions
• Hospital transfers
PROVIDER EXPECTATIONS
Mirza et al., 2005
![Page 12: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• More likely to have documented discussion:
• Older
• White
• More educated
• Residing in care facility
• Hospitalized in last 12 months
• Difficulties with ADLs/iADLs
PROVIDER EXPECTATIONS
Auerbach et al, 2008
![Page 13: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
“The experiences of our participants indicate that residents primarily adopt a model of informed choice in their discussions
about life-sustaining treatment...in employing this approach, what may actually be a value-laden medical decision is camouflaged as
a depersonalized, hypothetical...” – Deep et al, 2008
![Page 14: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• “Mandatory Autonomy”
• Pt Role: decide
• Doc Role:
• Provide info
• Execute Decision
…PROVIDER EXPECTATIONS: INFORMED CONSENT
![Page 15: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
REALITY OF CPR: BY THE NUMBERS
30% of in-hospital arrests (3000)
40% develop
ROC (1200)
1% live to discharge
(12)
25% live to 5 years
(3)
Loertscher et al, 2010
![Page 16: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• AHA Ethical Guidelines list goals of resuscitation:
• Preserve life
• Restore health
• Relieve suffering
• Limit disability
• Respect the individual
• The guidelines specify the role of patient autonomy
REALITY OF CPR: GUIDELINES
![Page 17: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
REALITY OF CPR: CONSCIOUS AWARENESS?...
101 Participants
No Memories (54%) Memories (46%)
Memories, no NDE, no recall
(33%)
Memories, NDE, no recall (9%)
Memories, NDE, Recall (2%)
Parnia et al, 2014
![Page 18: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Memories (46%)• Fear
• Animals & plans
• A bright light
• Violence / persecution
• Déjà vu
• Seeing family
• Recalling post-code events
• NDEs (9%)
• Explicit intra-code recall (2%, 1 unverified, 1 “verified”)
…CONSCIOUS AWARENESS?
Parnia et al, 2014
![Page 19: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
GUIDELINES
Unchanged from 1983…
• Begin with a discussion of prognosis and general values, goals and preferences;
• Discuss CPR as an intervention including likelihood, risks, benefits and outcomes; check for comprehension;
• Physician makes a recommendation consistent with the patient’s values and goals as discussed previously.
• (For GME: Replication of discussion by attending if (1) DNR status or (2) high likelihood of patient requiring CPR)
![Page 20: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
“Discussions that do not include the recommended elements yield, at best, a decision for full code, the default without a discussion. At
worst, brief discussions may reinforce misinformation about the effectiveness of CPR which may negatively impact future
discussions.” –Anderson et al, 2010
![Page 21: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
GUIDELINES
• Begin with a discussion of prognosis and general values, goals and preferences;
• Discuss CPR as an intervention including likelihood, risks, benefits and outcomes; check for comprehension;
• Physician makes a recommendation consistent with the patient’s values and goals as discussed previously.
![Page 22: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Categorize : Low or high risk
• Eliminate distractions
• Patient comfort level
• Who is this PERSON?
• Patient’s understanding (Dx, Px)
UNDERSTAND THE PATIENT
Adapted from: Loertscher et al, 2010
![Page 23: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
GUIDELINES
• Begin with a discussion of prognosis and general values, goals and preferences;
• Discuss CPR as an intervention including likelihood, risks, benefits and outcomes; check for comprehension;
• Physician makes a recommendation consistent with the patient’s values and goals as discussed previously.
![Page 24: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
WHEN THE USUAL DOESN’T WORK
Goals of
CareAlive Code
StatusDead
![Page 25: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
A BRIEF ASIDE ON “GOALS OF CARE”
Goals of Care
Hopes
Fears
Values
Code Status
Patient/Family Us
![Page 26: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Emphasize routineness
• “If you were to die while here in the hospital…”
• Describe CPR as a package
PROVIDE CONTEXT
Adapted from: Loertscher et al, 2010
![Page 27: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Age >70
• Sepsis
• Metastatic cancer
• ESLD or ESRD
• GI Bleeding
• Healthy baseline
• Younger age
• Witnessed arrest
• Initial cardiac rhythm = VFib
• CPR duration <10 minutes
• Respiratory arrest (rather than cardiac)
…PROVIDE CONTEXT: PROGNOSIS
Favorable Poor
Adapted from Mirza et al, 2005 & Loertscher et al, 2010
![Page 28: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
GUIDELINES
• Begin with a discussion of prognosis and general values, goals and preferences;
• Discuss CPR as an intervention including likelihood, risks, benefits and outcomes; check for comprehension;
• Physician makes a recommendation consistent with the patient’s values and goals as discussed previously.
![Page 29: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• Offer recommendation based on:
• Condition (“medically appropriate”)
• Goals/priorities
• “We want to do anything we can to help you live longer and better, but CPR in our opinion would only hurt you, so I don’t recommend it.”
• Clarify you will never abandon
• Develop a plan based on the discussion
OWN YOUR DEGREE
Adapted from: Loertscher et al, 2010
![Page 30: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• Document
• Who was there?
• Context
• Patient/Family goals & values
• Your medical recommendation & if you shared it
• Outcome
THE FINE PRINT: PROOF OF THE CONVERSATION
![Page 31: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
GUIDELINES
• Begin with a discussion of prognosis and general values, goals and preferences;
• Discuss CPR as an intervention including likelihood, risks, benefits and outcomes; check for comprehension;
• Physician makes a recommendation consistent with the patient’s values and goals as discussed previously.
![Page 32: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• Ethical recommendations:
• Should not preclude aggressive pre-arrest care
• Should not preclude ICU care
• May not preclude short term ventilator support
THE FINE PRINT: PRE-ARREST MANAGEMENT
![Page 33: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
• Overall survival to discharge: 15-23%
• Survival for those with partial code status:
0%
“Choosing to include or exclude one element of a larger combination of treatments may
inadvertently prevent what otherwise would be a successful resuscitation.”
THE FINE PRINT: “PARTIAL” STATUS
Sanders et al, 2011
![Page 34: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• Guide your planning to wean from a vent
• Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index to stratify:
• Score ≤ 3 : 94.4% success
• Score > 3 : 23.4% success
THE FINE PRINT: “SHORT TERM” VENTILATION
![Page 35: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• 67 yoM with widely metastatic lung CA
• Poor oral intake
• Admission Dx: ARF
• Wishes to remain full code
CLINICAL SCENARIO ONE
Loertscher et al, 2008
![Page 36: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• 82 yoF with DM and CKD who has a POLST listing DNAR status
• p/w Afib with RVR
• Elects for cardioversion
• Is this okay? Do you rescind the DNAR?
CLINICAL SCENARIO TWO
Loertscher et al, 2008
![Page 37: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• 73 yoF w/ metastatic colon CA in hospice w/ severe abd pain LBO
• Rec: palliative diverting colostomy
• Wants to maintain DNAR during surgery
• Surgical team wants DNAR suspended
CLINICAL SCENARIO THREE
![Page 38: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
CONCLUSION
![Page 39: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
• AHA Ethical Guidelines list goals of resuscitation:
• Preserve life
• Restore health
• Relieve suffering
• Limit disability
• Respect the individual
• Guidelines in establishing code status:
• Discuss prognosis & goals of care
• Discuss CPR as an intervention to revive
• Provide your recommendation
• (Document!)
CONCLUSION
![Page 41: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
REFERENCES• Anderson, Wendy G., Rebecca Chase, Steven Z. Pantilat, James A. Tulsky, and Andrew D.
Auerbach. "Code Status Discussions between Attending Hospitalist Physicians and Medical Patients at Hospital Admission." Journal of General Internal Medicine (2010): 1-8. Web. 10 Jan. 2011. <springerlink.com>.
• Auerbach AD, Katz R, Pantilat SZ, et al. Factors associated with discussion of care plans and code status at the time of hospital admission: results from the Multicenter Hospitalist Study. J Hosp Med. 2008;3(6):437–45.
• Back, A. L., R. M. Arnold, W. F. Baile, K. A. Fryer-Edwards, S. C. Alexander, G. E. Barley, T. A. Gooley, and J. A. Tulsky. "Efficacy of Communication Skills Training for Giving Bad News and Discussing Transitions to Palliative Care." Archives of Internal Medicine 167.5 (2007): 453-60. Print.
• Balaban, Richard B. "A Physician's Guide to Talking about End-of-life Care." Journal of General Internal Medicine 15 (2000): 195-200. Print.
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis, 40(5): 373-383.
![Page 42: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
REFERENCES• Cotter, P. E., M. Simon, and S. T. O'Keeffe. "Changing Attitudes to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
in Older People: A 15-year Follow-up Study." Age and Ageing 38 (2009): 200-05. Print.
• Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association: Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. JAMA 1991; 265:1868–1871.
• De Vos, Rien, Rudolph W. Koster, Rob J. De Haan, Hans Oosting, Poll A. Van Der Wouw, and Angela J. Lampe-Schoenmaeckers. "In-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Pre-arrest Morbidity and Outcome." Archives of Internal Medicine 159 (1999): 845-50. Print.
• Deep, Kristy S., Charles H. Griffith, and John F. Wilson. "Communication and Decision Making about Life-sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-ill Hospitalized Patients." Journal of General Internal Medicine 23.11 (2008): 1877-882. Print.
• Ebell MH, Kruse JA: A proposed model for the cost of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Med Care. 1994; 32(6): 640-649.
• Heyland, D. K., Chris Frank, Dianne Groll, Deb Pinchora, Peter Dodek, Graeme Rocker, and Amiram Gafni. "Understanding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decision Making: Perspectives of Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Family Members." Chest 130.2 (2006): 419-28. Web. 10 Jan. 2011. <http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/130/2/419.full.html>.
![Page 43: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
REFERENCES• Kass-Bartelmes BL, Hughes R, Rutherford MK. Advance care planning: preferences for care at the end of
life. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003. Research in Action Issue #12. AHRQ Pub No. 03-0018.
• Loertscher, Laura, Darcy A. Reed, Michael P. Bannon, and Paul S. Mueller. "Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-no-resuscitate Orders: A Guide for Clinicians." American Journal of Medicine 123 (2010): 4-9. Print.
• Mirza A, Kad R, Ellison NM. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not addressed in the admitting medical records for the majority of patients who undergo CPR in the hospital. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005;22(1):20–5.
• Morrison, Laurie J., Gerald Kierzek, Douglas S. Diekema, Michael R. Sayre, Scott M. Silvers, Ahamed H. Idris, and Mary E. Mancini. "Part 3: Ethics: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care."Circulation 122 (suppl 3) (2010): S665-675. Web. 10 Jan. 2011. <circ.ahajournals.org>.
• Parnia S, Spearpoint K et al. (2014). AWARE-AWAreness during Resuscitation: A prospective study. Resuscitation. ePub ahead of print.
• Prigerson HG. Socialization to dying: social determinants of death acknowledgement and treatment among terminally ill geriatric patients. J Health Soc Behav. 1992;33(4):378–95
![Page 44: The "Code Status" Conversation](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022013100/554b7108b4c90564168b50e6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
REFERENCES
• Sanders, Alan, Melissa Schepp, and Marianne Baird. "Partial Do-not-resuscitate Orders: a Hazard to Patient Safety and Clinical Outcomes?" Critical Care Medicine 39.1 (2011): 14-18. Print.
• Smith, Alexander K., Angela P. Ries, Baohui Zhang, James A. Tulsky, Holly G. Prigerson, and Susan D. Block. "Resident Approaches to Advance Care Planning on the Day of Hospital Admission." Archives of Internal Medicine 166.15 (2006): 1597-602. Print.