the chronology digital vol 1 mai 5th 2013

7/27/2019 The CHRONOLOGY Digital Vol 1 Mai 5th 2013

1/188

FEYOU DE HAPPY III

***

PANORKROSS

THE CHRONOLOGY

African Diaspora & Motherland From Prehistory To

Present

***

Copyright Alexis Maxime Feyou de Happy 1987- 2013

Illustrations:

Egypt calligraphies by Gaudin, public domain

Photographs and artist works by AM Feyou de Happy, 2007-2009

***

Alexis Maxime Feyou de Happy

***

Warning:

In 2005-2007, my computer was hacked and some of my files corrupted.

Working at the time on many documents both in French and English (over tenfictions and non fictions books some of which are now published) it was only in

2010 that I became aware of the extend of this invasion of my privacy. Due to


2/188

time and financial constraint, this book is here presented in ULDBeta (Unedited

Literary & Non-fiction work digital publication).

With your support another volume fully edited will be published perhaps with

the contribution of other scholars.

Thank you for your support

Alexis Maxime Feyou de Happy

***

PANORKROSS1

(People crossing)

THE CHRONOLOGYVol I of 10

WHERE WE CAME FROM

HOW WE GOT THERE AND

1 PanoRKross

pa'nor, African (Bamileke) for: people. And kross, instead of cross

to illustrate the criss-crossing nature of genetic and memetic (cultural)

connections. Culture expands from one generation to another from one group

of people to another. Thus Kross stands for gene's and meme's exchange

regardless of skin color.


3/188

WHAT HAPPENED NEXT

***FROM THE AWAKENING OF INTELLIGENCE TO THE

CONQUEST OF PLANET EARTH!

***

Simple curiosity inspired this work. We wanted to know

"what was what" in the past. So we went after the facts. To

retrace the path of our ancestors from the origin to present.

The work has no other ambition. We kept our focus on the

African diaspora because in late 1980's there were few

works on the subject.

*****

African Saint, Kimpa Vita aka Donna Beatrice of Kongo

The African woman that stood against the practice of slavery in Africa in

16th/17th century. She paid her audacity with her life. In Brazil she was

celebrated for centuries by African slaves who venerated her as Saint. In Congothere were great ladies and royals that also fought against slavery. The other

great woman perhaps more successful than Kimpa, was Queen of Matamba

Nzinga Kuwu, who vanquished Europeans armies (Portugal) and their African

allies in regular battles. She was a renegade princess of ancient Kongo. Upset by

the desecration of African religious monuments and paraphernalia as well as

the selling of people she took arm and formed her own army. She eventuallycreated her own free kingdom remembered as the kingdom of Matamba, thus

her name.


4/188

It should be noted that slavery was forbidden in many

African kingdoms (already in 16th-19th centuries). In somekingdoms, monarchs were judged and executed by the

Kamvu Congress/supreme court (Bamileke for example)

when they were convicted of such major crime as slavery.

***

FOREWORD:

From prehistory to history there was an amazing

movement of people criss-crossing the continents. The lack

of informations on this great human odyssey was

disconcerting. It was ignoring the reality of

African exploratory initiative that in prehistory took our

foremost ancestors all over the world. It is long after their

great plural journey that the term, perhaps the concept

subsaharan was invented.

The concept effectively imposed a balkanizing vue

on the continent. It erects a barricade of the mind. One that

separated us from our forefathers. This became clear to us

ten years on the scholarly journey that unraveled this

chronology.

During those early years, there were great


5/188

epiphanies: the realization that ancient Egypt never had an

issue with color. On their beautiful murals, you see people

from the four cardinals that are proudly Egyptians.

To this day in the African continent color is not

important when it comes to people. Our brothers and

sisters regardless of the variation of their skin are just that:

brothers and sisters!Unfortunately, many people still look at Africans

from a bias prospective. Our common ancestors must be

turning in their graves!

To anyone that understands our common humanity

it makes little sense writing the chronology of one group

alone. Alas! I had already written over 500 pages of

manuscript with a focus on the black presence in ancient

history. What was I going to do now? I stopped the research

work. What was the point? There was no black history!There was only human history! The correct thing to do now

was to write a universal chronology. However, I had no

means to engage in such an enormous task alone.

Nevertheless many years later various encounters

made me realized that what was obvious to us was still

news to many. So it appeared that the work although


6/188

limited, was still relevant. There were compelling

encounters that stressed the need to make this work public.

People wanted to know. I obliged

Where there is an evident absence of informations it

behooves to the scholar to fill the gaps. Fortunately I had

already gone through amazing findings. Enough to present

this modest first volume.The story of the African Diaspora is a human story. It

stems from the roots of everything human. It stands at the

core of our existence. We all share a great deal from

prehistory. The tree from which all branches blossom.

Descendants of people described here are found all over the

world today and in all continents, skin colors and shapes.

***

THE DIASPORA & MOTHERLAND

(Azanians/Asanians)Thousand years ago Humans sprawled from the

Great Lakes of Africa to the four cardinals. All over the

world they went. These were our ancestors: Blacks, White,

Yellow and all. They all shared the same hearth that made

the world as we know it today.

To reach said conclusions back in the 80's, long


7/188

before Y-chromosome findings, we had to foray deep into

the past. The result was thousands of pages of manuscript.

Compilation of events, people, places. Wild bush of data,

powerful discoveries. Enough to create cognitive

revolutions of the kind that enlighten the mind and soothe

the heart. Information rush into the brain. There they

progressively organized to reveal events of the past.Unavoidable facts that piled up into written data. In the

process they revealed the plain reality of the past. Events all

connected beyond elementary appearances.

Hand written documents were divided in five parts:

history, religion, sciences, sport and Art. We followed the

origin of Modern Man. From Africa to the rest of the world.

We proceeded in the same manner with every section of

what was latter called Super Chronology.

After following the path of our ancestors fromprehistory to modern time, the picture of social evolution

imposed itself with such force that we had to analyze its

many ramifications. Here, I must give credit to Japanese

researcher Manao Fujiwara. In the interviewed of 1998 he

encouraged me to explore the roots of human social

evolution. The result was the philosophical treatise on


8/188

social evolution now titled Kosmicks (originally cosmic

symmetry or chasyncrism).

The work in social evolution demonstrated without a

shadow of a doubt that we were all linked to the same

original roots and that the trend, though intermittent, never

stopped (now confirmed by Y chromosome findings and

Mitochondrial DNA).There remained a need. To understand the African

experience. If we were all connected to the same original

roots how is it that we knew so little about the African link

perhaps the most important in the understanding of the

Human experience? Thus this book maybe called the

Recovered Missing Link of Human Civilization. Why?

There was indeed a gap in the knowledge of African

past. Human division however is not sustainable. Thus far

it has impoverished the gene pool. It is now threatening thefuture of humanity. Science and modern technology are

incessantly bringing us back together even though

remnants of prejudices still creeps here and there. It is only

a question of time before we realize the importance to

connect cultural missing links. There is an imperious

necessity to reconnect. There is no forward without a


9/188

present, no present without a past. In other words: No past,

no future.

To know where we came from, each and everyone of

us is to glimpse into a better future. A better understanding

of African past and chronology can only be helpful. The

idea that people that left Africa never came back is

erroneous and misleading. World's population at any timein history clearly shows the pattern of connective links.

From one part of the globe to another people meet people.

Even in the case of islands like Australia sea crossing was

possible long before the great sea trades of the Middle

Ages. There were sea crossings between Africa and the

Americas centuries before Columbus arrival. There were

sea crossing between Europe and Africa (Red Sea) at all

time in the past. The Sea crossing went both ways. There

was a time in history when it was more profitable to go toAfrica. We thus reiterate as evidenced in this work that the

absolute certainty of human brotherhood is not theoretical.

Be it in one part of prehistory, in early history or in recent

history. The dynamic of multiculturalism and genetic

melting pot: lives on. And that is good for humanity for

that is what made us what we are today. Both


10/188

technologically and biologically. Civilization is the sum of

the human experience.

******

The Chronology barely stands, as the tree of life. All

along the way there are cultural and genetical branches

going in all directions. The blood that flows in those

branches is the same blood. The connection asdemonstrated by modern biology (Mitochondrial DNA & Y

Chromosome) is very young, that is a 200,000 years span

according to the molecular History Research Center (from

300,000 years as it was believed in the early stages of this

work). It is relatively young compared to the hominid

lineage that extended to millions of years. We show this in

the prehistoric portion of this book.

Recent fossils evidence found in the Arabian

peninsula now confirm that our ancestors made it there by120,000 years ago according to an article from Scientific

America by Katherine Harmon, Jan. 27, 2011 (digital

edition).

While we have used color to identify certain

cultures, it was done as a matter of historical rectitude as

imperfect as that maybe. Color it is clear does not equate


11/188

with gene identity. Thus people from all over the globe

should feel very comfortable with this connotation. Many

of us have ancestors that do not look like us. They are our

ancestors nevertheless and we should be very proud of

them.

A great African-American scholar with whom we

had the honor to share the stage in Harlem State building,once said:

To understand African history, you must study

European history.

The name of this scholar was celebrated historian

Henry Clark.

This Super Chronology (SuperKross), is the

evidence of worlds common heritage as it relates to Africa.

**

THE CHRONOLOGY(How it all began)

1987, New Orleans, Louisiana, 7pm. A lovely Bread &

Breakfast mezzanine in the heart of the city. Sitting around

a local cocktail four people are engaged in a heated debate.

One of them is the beautiful owner of the edifice. The other

were: a young Frenchman, a young American woman and I.


12/188

The subject of the debate turned around the condition of

people in America from inception to modern times.

The ladies knew something about Black history. The young

man did not. I recalled an incident in France in my college

years when a rich classmate just back from New York tried

to convince us that Blacks did nothing in America because

they did not had the acumen to do so. To the credit of myclassmates at Lycee Claude Monet (1978-1979), 95% of the

class reacted positively. That is they rejected the racist

assumption. After New Orleans, the need to investigate the

achievement of people of African ancestry from slavery to

modern time was uncontainable. It then occurred to me that

the best way to investigate the past was to follow step by

step not only major events in history but the daily life of

people. Began a research work that extended to decades. It

was clear at the outset that a chronology based on slaverywas incomplete. So I pushed further in time. I soon found

myself face to face with the grand history of the world. The

intellectual journey that ensued took me from the origin of

Modern Man to the explosion of culture. At the end I was

left with a dazzling realization that changed forever my

understanding of people and culture.


13/188

The ultimate propensity of this work turned out to

highlight through chronology a genetic flow from

prehistory to history. In the process it exposed brotherhood

where adversity was once emphasized.

I wondered why it took me this trajectory to understand the

past. Fact is a linear approach to history dominated

academic world. Such approach considered civilizations as

hermetic blocks of people moving from one continent to

another and remaining the same. In such views Greeks

went from Europe to Africa and Asia yet remained

unchanged in features and culture. Romans came to Africa

and lived there for centuries but did not change an iota as if

we had here different races totally impervious to one

another. Quite obviously this was not the case. There is a

large amount of data (historical, archeological and

anthropological showing African presence in Rome and

Roman presence in Africa). There was no racism in Rome!

To say it in modern terms: Black or White if you served the

Roman Empire you was welcome as a citizen of Rome.

Hence Africans were found at all levels of the Romanshierarchy, from centurions to Caesars. African son Septimus

Severus even rose to the rank of Caesar. Though in general,


14/188

works of this type focus on leaders and military events

essentially, The Chronology takes a different approach: we

pay close attention to people. When we find remnants

bones, we ask ourselves: how did they get there? In order to

properly answer this question we must know where they

came from. Then we may answer the next question: what

does this tell us about them if not about us and who werethey anyway?

To answer these questions we followed the trail of

paleontology. Forensic investigators of history we explored

step by step how humans populated the world.

In the scholarly journey we found an infinite and complex

wave of people rising from pre-history to history. The

fascinating experience placed siblings separated by

enormous distances to the same paleontological trail in

space and time. This revealed a human channel (ancestors

and their off-springs) tied together in magic corridors that

lead them from one stage of evolution to another and from

one country to another. ad infinitum. It became clear that

the concept of cultures was barely a smoke screen to thereality of our common humanity. And we suspected that


15/188

this was how the magnificent display of human diversity

enriched the world to create a kaleidoscopic like features of

modern era.

While the understanding of worlds chronology and

its constant link to Africa suggested twenty years ago how

we were all connected', biology eventually confirmed our

common origin. Mitochondrial DNA linked us to the same

original mother. She lived about 300, 000 years ago (now

estimated to 30,000 years) in East Africa. Although it is

widely accepted that Africa is the threshold of humanity

there was always an implication that those who stayed

behind remained 'primitives'. It is not so. All over the world

until recent times there were islands of people that

presented the characteristic feature of a primitive life. In the

case of Africa from slavery to colonialism, great empires

were destroyed and their history forgotten, leaving the

desolate panorama of a dislocated continent where culture

is hidden and poverty emphasized. Once again this is now

our past. Its knowledge serves us best as we look forward

not as a group of people but as people of the human family.An objective analysis of Modern Man footsteps


16/188

demonstrated a constant flow of people going from one

continent to another both in prehistory and in history. This

phenomenon allowed a shuffling of genes and cultures

from one part of the world to another (this revelation

became evident during the study of human social

evolution). Thus as it was demonstrated the secret

ingredient of civilization may very well be: diversity. Therecipe includes cross-cultural wind-flow, genes-

interchanges and meme-complexities. Civilization here

means the sum of humans cultures. In this context there I a

progressive development in human social evolution who

goal is to produce not only the best genes possible both the

best thing that can come out of the human experience. This

process is an ever evolving process and it can be define as

the making of Human Civilization. This is achieved by the

continuous and evolving contribution of one culture oranother irrespective of race and other denomination. Just

like nature evolution does not care about those things. It

cares about what works and that is why any scholar of

history observed rise and falls of empire. The reality is that

for each empire that fall, the next one that rise carries

within its genes the gain acquired by the previous


17/188

dominance. At the end it is humanity as a whole that wins.

This very intricate and extremely complex phenomenon is

painstakingly explained in The origin of Racism or Cosmic

Symmetry, our work on social evolution.

The rise of Hominids has been estimated to 7.5

million years ago. In various branches we evolved from

Hominids to Homosapiens (that is what we are today) or

perhaps Sapiens es Sapiens (Super brainy or Post-Modern

Man) as we would like ourselves to be known. Call it a

Super Intelligent Being since sapiens stands for intelligence.

Our most famous ancestor in the latter branch of Hominids

(the only surviving branch) is an enigmatic woman in East

Africa called Lucy or Mitochondrial Eve (c. 300 000 BP).

She is the common ancestor to Blacks, Whites, Yellows and

Reds. Though controversy has since surrounded

mitochondrial DNA findings, most scientists agree that we

are indeed related and place the birth place of that

enigmatic ancestor of ours in Africa.

It is interesting to observe that ancient Egyptians

already placed the Aaru (Holly referring in ancient Egyptdesignation of Eden) fields latter called Elysians fields by


18/188

Greeks and Romans in Eastern Africa around the Lakes

areas. This is known to us through the Bible as the Garden

of Eden. The Bible was written about two thousand years

after cardinal inscriptions found on the walls of ancient

Egypt. Some of these inscriptions as we show in the course

of this chronology very likely inspired es verbatim (literally

word for word) major tenets of the Bible. Notably suchmajor biblical statements as the Ten Commandments. Let us

state that here this is barely the expression of a scholarly

discovery. Such text are found in academic works from

European scholars made in ancient Egypt and describing

elements of that culture at one period of history.

***

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO CULTURAL

MISUNDERSTANDING

With slavery and colonialism Africa became a tool in

the hands of those that benefitted from the trade. To the

scholar of history this maybe the greatest failure of the

Akhenaten doctrine that proposed that humanity evolvesfaster and better without the exploitation of man by man.


19/188

The reality of such exploitations as slavery dictates that it is

always to work a small number of people In Africa it was

the old ammonite power structure. In Summeria it was the

old nobility of the time, so it was all over the word until the

French revolution.

Proponents of such exploitation as it is seen in the

Americas engineered the enslavement of Africans after that

of Native Americans in conjunction with that of poor

Europeans. In Middle Age Europe the Vile trade (or

slavery) was already a thriving institution subjugated poor

people to the benefit of the few. This stopped with the

French revolution (1789). In the early days of North

America European slaves were called indentured servants

(XVI to XVII century), they worked for free for an extended

and determined number of years. If semantic would like us

to call them indentured servants, we must remember that

those that died would like history to honor their pain by

recognizing what they endured for what it was. We cannot

avoid the reality that people that worked without rightful

compensation for their work and died without having hadthe opportunity to recover their freedom had been reduced

to a defacto state of slavery. They are as victims as anybody


20/188

else in the same predicament. They deserves the rectitude

of history. It is remarkable that at that period of history

there was great solidarity between Europeans and Africans

in the Americas. They understood then that they were both

victims of the same yoke. The exploitation was marked by

violence.

In general Africans, Europeans and Native

Americans in the same predicament made no mistake about

their condition. They often allied with each others to fight

for their freedom. They knew that they shared the same

cause until racism began digging a breach among them.

Eventually Africans in the Americas and Europe found

themselves abandoned in the realm of social castration.

Began the demonizing process (a process by which a group

of people are stigmatized into social oblivion). The road

was paved for cultural alienation. According to Leo

Africanus ...The countries of the Negroes are all inhabited

by men who lived like beasts, without a king, without a

ruler...They are dressed in sheep skin and the Edict of

1455 to conclude that Pagans should be reduced toperpetual slavery.


21/188

Leo Africanus statement was erroneous and the Edict

of 1455 a tragic mistake. Africa at all time could be called

the continent with the most rulers and kings. Slavery and

colonialism cumulatively created the most horrible

genocidal spree in humans history. Physical tortures were

numerous and took all forms. There was also a consistent

psychological onslaught that extended to centuries.

As a matter of historical accuracy it is worthy to mention

that Africa or ancient Egypt knew a great moment of

cultural, artistic and technological expansion thousands of

years before the birth of Christ. It then fell into decline until

the tenth century. There was a minor revival during the

Ambiguous period : XIII, XIV, XV & XVI centuries. At the

same time, Europe took off for a magnificent expansion.

Thus Europe progressively entered the hall of civilization.

The apparent dichotomy North/South was and remains an

illusion created by slavery, colonialism and neo-

colonialism. The difference between colonialism and neo-

colonialism is very simple. Colonialism was a direct

domination that was both military and economic. Neo-colonialism is an indirect domination that is political via

control of head of states cum power structures within


22/188

subjected nations and economic through the control of

financial institutions. There is an ongoing covert war that is

subsidized: Africans fight each others for the interests of

foreign entities. The bounties are the resources:diamond, oil

and other rare and precious stones. In the early years of

colonialism, the bounty was coffee & cocoa. In all it is a

very complex structure encompassing human socialevolutional patterns. We have explored this phenomenon in

our treatise on social evolution. This said all dominations

are temporal. Their aim serves to impart cultural memes

and dynamical phenotypes from one culture to another. It is

a very complicated process that is dramatic at many levels

and often tragic. We believe that it has an end as humanity

evolves towards higher spheres. The entire process and

complexities are explored in Kosmicks. There we delineates

the pitfalls and dangers as well as the greatest possibilities.There is a caution for our species is now in danger.

The history of the world is one of groups of people

called humans involved in a multi millennial process with

cycles of cross pollination that are both genetic and cultural.The History of northern and southern hemisphere was

marked by a succession of break up in the human family.


23/188

These break up were never definitive, they were

intermittent and served a purpose. In time there were

reconnections via conquests, migrations, alliances and

expansions.

In this Chronology we followed the advancement of

people (in history, science and religion) from Egypt to

Greece, from Africa to Asia and Europe. It is an inspiring

journey. It brightens the understanding of our commonality.

We find for example that the relation of Europeans and

Africans were not always blurred by racial considerations.

In Antiquity Europeans saw Africans as their brethren andteachers. For a long time the nobility of Europe respected

Africans. In 1249, the companion of Louis IX a.k.a. St. Louis,

during the crusade, was an African man of European

nobility named Jean. He was the son of Prince Robert

dEppes whose father was King William II. Indeed, Prince

dEppes married an African woman from Sudan named

Ismeria, a woman of great talent who demonstrated her

strength when she opposed the killing of Christians in

Africa. At her death Princess Ismeira was venerated as ablack Madonna. This was done to celebrate her life


24/188

achievement. She is remembered as Notre dame de Liesse

(Our lady of Liesse). Her son was described in a chart in

1236, as the son of the Black woman. In the thirteenth

century, it was an honor to be the son of a Black woman (the

term nigger which is simply classic Latin for the color black

did not have the negative connotation that it latter

acquired). In the 14th

century ravages of slavery had not yetalienated the understanding of history. And the memory of

holly men from Africa (then referred to as Ethiopia or India

due to ignorance of geography) was still fresh in many

Europeans minds. Renowned personalities to visit the

African princess memorial includes: Jeanne dArc of France,

kings Louis XI and Francis I. Ismeira was such an iconic

figure that her sanctity was required before going to the

Crusade.

To understand how Africa fell from grace is essential

for humanity because it teaches us lessons about the past.

Sometime people wonder how it is possible that a great

nation can fall into indigence. So many have asked how is it

that Black people declined if indeed Egypt was Black?Notwithstanding the equivocal nature of that term, let us

say here that it is quite possible for a great nation to fall into


25/188

indigence as it happens all the time to people from the

upper class or wealth that lost their suddenly fortune and

found themselves having to strive back from the lower ends

of society.

After Greek invasion and domination Azanian (Black

or mix Egypt) was subsequently conquered by Romans.

That is the history of the rise and fall of great empires. As

for Africa or more precisely for ancient Egypt (remember

that in ancient time it stood for Aethiopia or Africa as well

as North Africa for that matter), it knew its great decline. It

was a noted European writer who the first came up with an

appropriate answer to this question. According to Juvenal:

the lost of national sovereignty and that of historical

conscience following a prolonged foreign occupation

engenders stagnation, or even sometime regression,

disintegration, and the partial return to barbarism. A close

study of African history shows well how this applied to the

great continent. Juvenal in his observation was referring to

ancient Egypt.

In Africa, Greek domination was followed by Romandomination. The destruction of Carthage by Romans


26/188

announced the tragic faith of a continent. A great Roman

senator was famous to call for the annihilation of Carthage.

He finished all his speech with the phrase delante

carthagium (Carthage must be destroyed)! So the

destruction of Carthage was not an accident of history.

After Carthage the population was dispersed in four

cardinals. Running for their life they went South to sub-Sahara Africa, East to Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia and

further East to Asia and yes some went north to Europe as

well while other went west toward Senegal. Romans ran

after them all the way to Lake Chad and beyond. Romans

coins found in western Cameroon (archeological finding)

tend to confirm this deep penetration.

Roman invasion of Africa was followed by Muslims

and Europeans. Then there was Arab domination and

slavery. The latter lead to the African holocaust (millions

killed and thousands burned at stake). Distraught people

lost their civilization and fell into pseudo barbarism. With

Greek invasion Egyptian intelligentsia migrated mostly to

the Eagan and to Asia where their forefather hadestablished strongholds from the controversial Sesostris

invasion to that of latter years. It is not surprising therefore


27/188

that with the decline of Egypt around 500 BC, began an

emergence of genius in Asia and the Aegean (Greek

world). For centuries Africans traveled on these roads and

dominated these territories. Like rich Americans finding

heavens of peace from Uncle Sams heavy taxes in Jamaican

islands instead of Europe. Egyptian nobility choose to

retreat in India, Iran, Europe or even China instead ofNubia or further South. In their case they were not looking

for tax heaven. They were looking for safe heaven. When

war came rumbling over their walls (Greek & Romans) the

destination of flight was no longer a matter of choice but

that of survival. Each man went where he could. The retreat

to Nubia and to the rest of Africa was on its way. It was

only the beginning. After Greek and Romans came the

Muslims. The first dispersal was perhaps the first refugee

catastrophe in humans history. It left little evidence becausethe concept did not existed. People abandoned all their

possessions to save their life. They did not leave an imprint

of their travail for archeological findings to behold. How

does one knows thousands years later that remains dating

from the fifth century AD found in the heart of Africa

actually came from a Black refugee from Carthage?


28/188

Touaregs and Gypsies have been called Egyptians.

There is a reason to that. It is because in history there was

ground for them to be called that way even though

subsequent prejudices cluttered this reality. They were not

the only one. They were merely the most visible in Europe

and Africa. Those North African and Egyptians that were

less conspicuous integrated local populations in sub-saharan or Upper-great-lakes Africa. Fact is the fall of

Egypt created various groups of migration. This was

possible because Egypt at the time of Roman invasion

(perhaps more dramatic than the preceding Greek

domination) was a cosmopolitan center and was multi

racial. If in Europe gypsies were eventually isolated, in

Africa Fulani and Touaregs were also isolated. They had in

common their complexion and perhaps culture. In Europe

Nomads were considered a little too dark, in AfricaNomads were considered a little too white. Both groups

remained nomads to the twenty first century. Like Jewish

people who survived the genocidal spree of early

Christianity what binds Nomads together was not their

complexion, but their culture. In this respect Jewish were

more successful than Gypsies and African Nomads. This is


29/188

because Jewish had developed a strong religious

foundation before the fall of ancient Egypt. These groups it

must be stressed are only the more visible descendants of

Carthage, Fezzan, Phoenicia and ancient Egypt. Why they

were so isolated is still open to debate. Other possible

reasons includes: class, cultural differences, religion and

ultimately race, although the latter was a consequence ofthe former. Races are born out of cultural isolation. There

were those Egyptians that for various reasons were

accepted and integrated into local population not only in

Africa, but in Europe and Asia. We have just delineated in

few words a complex history that took about a thousand

years to unfold. But we can already see how disorganized

migrations out of despair caused the lost of identity. The

modalities of this lost have yet to be studied. Little works

has been done on the subject because of the refusal toconfront an African origin of Egyptian civilization. Talking

about Gandhara (in India) in the first century AD, Francis

Hudson spoke of its position in the web of caravan routes

between Asia and the Mediterranean. That is Egypt-

Carthage-and Phoenicia. Already in the time of pharaohs

this route existed. Egyptians however were not the first to


30/188

create a route between Africa and Asia or Europe. Before

them Hominids found their way from Africa to Eurasia.

Hominids were pre-humans. If they could cross the

continents one million years ago why is it so hard to accept

that the great civilization that was Egypt reached China?

The Americas were not out of reach as we have been taught

to believe. Vikings reached the Americas in the ninth

century AD. Well before that time, in BC era Pharaohs

ordered a transatlantic invasion of which evidences have

remained. Scholars now link South America to Africa.

Professor Van Sertima, a renowned archeologist who did

great work on this subject observed We have also found

zea mays in pre-Columbian Africa. American zea mays!

Professor M.D.W. Jeffreys of Witwaterstrand University, a

brilliant South African linguist, showed how American

maize had traveled to Africa. It is distinct from African

sorghum. It had moved across the African continent and he

traced it down meticulously through linguistic footprints.

And the Russian pick it up as it moved from Africa into

Asia. Botanists Kuleshov and Vavilov identified it. Theyshowed that American maize may have entered Asia before

the time of Columbus voyages. Archeology confirms this


31/188

fact. There are countless

evidences of an African

trail from the heart of

Africa to Asia and to

Europe. More

research in such

direction will continuouslyunveil compelling

evidences

corroborating these theses. Thus reconciling the brothers

enemies.

***

UNDERSTANDING THE LINK BETWEEN PRE-

COLONIAL AFRICA AND ANCIENT EGYPT

(KEHMET)

Ancient Egyptians called themselves K'mt or Kehmet.

This is generally translated as people from the Black land,an allusion to the Nile river. Nile's alluvium were very

fertile thus considered source of life since it nurture the soil


32/188

that nourished the nation. Another interpretation would be

People with Black skin. This latter version saw here

reference to skin color since in those days (c. 10,000

BCE/4,000 BCE) ancient Egypt which extended from the

source of the Nile (deep in the heart of Africa) to the delta

(further North into the red Sea) was inhabited by people in

really black skin. As Greek scholar observed in their time.It is possible that the name kehmet may refer to

either of these interpretations or rather to a third one that

would be: descendants of the Black. In this latter meaning

the color was associated to the beginning of time. Black was

associated the origin of life before the first chaos and

subsequent birth of energy. In this latter understanding the

color black, thus had very powerful spiritual meaning.

Whatever the meaning one choose to adopt what is

undeniable and agreed by all scholars is that the ancientterm was indeed Kehmet. So we have retained this word

to designate ancient Egypt. It is indeed proper for people to

be called in the manner that they themselves chose. Hence

we shall call ancient Egypt: Kehmet!

In Kehmet there was no such thing as sub-Saharan

Africa. This concept was created with colonialism. Proto-


33/188


34/188

found in the Chronology: the people involved, when it

happened, what happened, how it happened and why it

happened.

******

HOMOSAPIENS CONQUER THE WORLD

(North, East and South)

Pre-Kehmetian period

1/ Prehistory

From Africa took place the first Hominid Great Walk. From

this sacred dawn a magnificent journey spread the genes of

Modern Man all over the globe. The next important wave

out of Africa was that of small men or Negritos who

implanted themselves in Europe and Asia. They also began

their exploratory forays into North America through the

Bering straits. They were the foremost ancestors of present

day Native Americans as they were of people all over

planet earth. They eventually disappeared as new migrants

took over their land. They survived in mythology. Therewas interbreeding as well in all continents. In the Americas

an Asian migration followed. The suplantation of Negritos


35/188

was finalized by a powerful and consistent Asian

migration. In Africa they survived in pygmies population

by isolating themselves. I visited pygmies in early sixties in

Cameroon. My father then prefect of Sanaga maritime had

administrative control over their territories. When I asked

him to bring them into the modern world, his response was

simple: I have tried. They dont want our modern way.My mother and I paid them private visits. My mother, a

fine seamstress who studied with Christian Dior in Paris

was also a connoisseur of natural medicine. She knew that

pygmies had a deep knowledge of plants and other

remedies. She was right. And I was impressed by their

kindness and most of all by their deep sense of self. I was

also fascinated by their strange songs and music.


36/188


37/188

Modern scholars that used base their accounting on the

pyramids and the Sphinx. They also use astronomical data.

This later theory propose the thesis that the pyramid were

build in accordance to the constellations. The constellation

upon which they were built were seen in the heaven around

10,000 years before present era (BP). Those who agree with

this thesis, also basing their conclusions on scientific data,proposed that the Sphinx was built before the flood.

Arguing that erosions evidences found on the sphinx were

fluvial (made by water during the flood). Studied have

shown that there were great floods around 14,000 BC which

would extends ancient Egypt era to that period. Those that

disagree with said thesis usually cited Manetho dynasty

that extends the reign of dynasties under 3000 years.

Manetho account is important because it is the earliest

written document on the chronology of kings. This

document however is often misquoted. First of all it is a

second hand account since the original was lost. The most

notable historian to have kept the long lasting account of

this document was Josephus. All controversies aside(notably a few years here and there) we shall focus on the

unspoken period that is the reign that preceded that of


38/188


39/188

can be very valid. Arguably the controversy on ancient

Egypt actual age will go on.

What we should remember is that: The age of the Egyptian

period was largely based on the works of Manhetto who

coined the term dynasty. His celebrated account of ancient

Egypt succession of kings still has resonance to this day. He

gave the first total account of these kings including detail

informations

Osiris I, was one of these early kings whose accounts

predated that of the known world. His ventures included

Europe and Asia. In all accounts he was a great king whosestories latter inspired Alexander of Macedonia.

Osiris was rejected by historians in particular post

19th centuries. They relegated his reign to mythology.

However if Osiris was no mythology but a real king, that

will confirm thesis that saw the building of the first

pyramid and that of the Sphinx to have occurred before the

age of Manethos dynasties. Thus Osiris journey across the

world would be vindicated and the age of ancient Egypt

extended beyond 3000 years BC. We would also have

evidence of African monarch in China. Vindicating the


40/188

Chinese account of rulers with oily black skin.

This would give credence to the theory advanced by

noted archeologist professor Van Sertima that saw in the

kings with oily Blacks skin described in the Chinese

record as Shangs. They would be the descendants if not

actual officers of Emperor Osiris I.

Indeed Chinese ancient writings described them as

people with oily black skin. It is also possible that some

of these African Lords went across the Sea of Japan to Japan

proper. Indeed Japan mythology and ancient history

mentioned a great Lord that was of black skin. Thischronology places these events in time and followed what

happened latter. Though it keeps a focus on the Azanic

connection (in which color matters less to the benefit of the

human story). The accent on color here helps only to have a

better grasp of the African past since that is the missing link

of world history.

I cannot stress enough in this work that color

specifications are really secondary. We look forward to a

time when they will not matter at all. That said we still have

to use reference patterns that helps us better understand the


41/188

past.

Another important moment of Asian-African relations in

the beginning of history is indubitably the notable Hyksos

invasion. Hyksos have been accurately called Asians and

subsequently likened to White men from the Sea. There

are strong evidences however suggesting an Asian (not

Middle East) presence in ancient Egypt. Archeological

evidences from Tutankhamen tombs shows clearly Asian

features in Egyptians artifacts, notably a staff with Negroid

and Asiatic features and depicting slaves in ancient Egypt

(post-Hyksos era). Black slaves in ancient Egypt are over

emphasized in literature. Egyptians did not discriminate.

All conquered people regardless of skin pigmentation were

slaves. That was the ancient world. This was true in Egypt,

it was true in China, in was true in Rome. It is unfortunate

that most books and exhibits of ancient Egypt, Greece and

Rome, choose to hide Black men and women in the upper

hierarchy, showing mostly Black captives. This is even more

troubling when in a panel with Black and Whites slaves;

one part of the panel is obliterated.The ancient did not have such problems. Hyksos rule over


42/188

ancient Egypt lasted close to one hundred years. It was

followed by an African revival.


43/188

Middle East pre-dynastic period was essentially Azanic

(Black, Semitic or Mix) thus it would have been redundant

to speak of an African-Middle East. This part of the world

was a meeting point for people going back and forth from

Africa to Asia/Europe and vice versa. Ancient Egypt Empire

extends well beyond Red Sea. Eventually Egypt and the

Euphrates became polarizing points in civilization. A cross-

cultural phenomenon created in this part of the world the

blossoming of a new population. This phenomenon was not

privy to this part of the world. In the course of history

whenever great civilizations pollinate genetic and cultural

mixing occurred. We find this Indus valley (BC era), in

Middle East proper (BC-early AD) in South America (BC-

AD era) and in present day. Indeed, in modern times

because of the revolution of transportation the

phenomenon expended. Thus the new pollinating matrix

maybe seen between Europe and North America.

In ancient Egypt if one was to compare Africans with those

in Nubia, the main centers of African concentration at thisperiod of history, one would have noticed that those in


44/188

Lower Egypt and Middle East were strongly mix with

Asian and European. However they remained essentially

Africans. This was going to change drastically following

Greek and Roman's invasions.

We shall note here that there was a Nubian period that may

have preceded the era of pharaohs as archeological records

seems to infer. This period however is still not well known.


45/188

3/ GRECO-ROMAN PERIOD

With Alexander (circa 500 BC) began the fall of African rule

over the world. Within a millennium Egypt the light of the

world, was invaded and lost forever its grip over history.

African leadership was supplanted by Greek and Romans.


46/188

We should note here that among Greeks and Roman were

also Africans (or Blacks) as evidenced by the archeological

record.

The Greco-Roman period is the most important

period to the understanding of present day Africa and

world recent history. For it was indeed during Roman

invasion that the dispersion of Africans out of Egypt took a

definitive turn. They went to all cardinals that is: Europe,

Asia and Africa proper. It was the silent exodus. Silent

because it remained muted in history books.

This scattering had a precedent. Before the crucial nexus ofRomans invasion there was the biblical Exodus. People

who were enslaved as a result of Egyptian colonialism left

in droves. These people contrary to what is believed were

not necessarily Europeans. They did not fit any racial

denomination because they were a mix population. They

came from all countries subjected to ancient Egypt. Slaves

were prisoners of war. In ancient Egypt they were Blacks,

Whites and Asians. To understand who were these people

caught into slavery one has to consider where they camefrom. They came from conquered territories (Nubia,


47/188

Assyria and beyond, Greece and beyond).

The Chronology clearly shows these countries and

pinpoint in time and space their relation to ancient Egypt.

Furthermore, Exodus brothers came from all strata of

Egyptian social structure (Akhenaten effect). The idea that

people that left Egypt were only slaves may not be accurate.

Historical and archeological findings tends to demonstrated

the contrary. The Exodus it appeared was directly related to

Akhenaton. The enlighten pharaoh of ancient Egypt, the

true father of monotheism at least if we should rely on

historical and archeological records. Akhenaton is a giant

that has been often misunderstood. The idea that he was

somehow crazy is controversial enough. Fact is he was

the leader and founder of an important movement. One of

the most important movements in human history.

Indeed Akhenatism not only proclaimed the

existence of one and only one God, it declared for the first

time in human history that this God was good and loving.

It proposed a new vision of the world based on human and

esthetic values. Ancient Egypt did not just built pyramids itwas a great center of study that attracted scholars from all

over the world. Certainly there was an important


48/188

priesthood but most of all there was a true matrix of

thinking. Akhenaton did not get his inspiration out of the

blue. There was a strong body of intellectuals for lack of a

most appropriate world that scrutinized the heavens,

interpreted physical laws to developed mathematical

principles. A famous invention of that time reaches us

under the name of the Greek mathematician that introducesit to Europe. And that is Pythagoras. Today most

Egyptologists recognize that this theorem was used to build

the pyramids at least a thousand years before Pythagoras

was born. Mathematic in ancient Egypt was well developed

as evidenced by the papyrus of Moscow made famous by

professor Diop (see The Chronology). Herodotus however

stated that Pythagoras brought the famous theorem from

ancient Egypt. Thus Akhenatism as a philosophical and

social movement was a fertile ground for growth: itchanged the world. It made followers in the upper

hierarchy of society. The idea of a loving god or that of a

better world where people could live in peace was

intellectually approachable by a well educated class of men

and women from the upper class. Those from the working

class and slaves saw an obvious interest in espousing such


49/188

theories. However there was a strong and powerful class of

noble that violently disagreed with such anathema. It

threatened their world. It assaulted their belief. So when the

time came to annihilate the memory of the enlightened

king, a power struggle erupted. Because it was ultimately a

struggle at the apex of all social strata a compromise

ensued. That compromise was a voluntary departure. Thefollowers of Akhenaton left ancient Egypt. This was the

exodus! We understand therefore that the exodus was made

of learned men, working class, nobility and slaves. The

great struggle that survived in the Bible in fantastic

metaphors denoted a real struggle that was indeed

biblical. We must remember that ancient Egyptian kings

were considered gods. The great rupture at the upper

hierarchy of Egyptian nobility that lead to the exodus was

indeed a war of gods. We can only imagine how traumaticand catastrophic it must have been to those that lived them.

We just have to realize its far reaching consequences to

understand that Akhenaton created a movement that

effectively changed the world. It was the birth of

monotheism. It was the beginning of artistic and social

revolution. It was the first conception of a social idea that


50/188


51/188

ostracized after the fall of Akhenatism as well as slaves and

working class. They came from ancient Egypt proper and

from all countries dominated by ancient Egypt. Akhenaton

was also a humanist and a philanthropist as well as an artist

perhaps an esthete. That is one dedicated to the expression

of beauty in whatever medium he chooses to master.

Akhenatons revolution was multi faceted: it was political,social, artistic and religious, perhaps philosophical as well.

He aimed to destroy the Amon fellowship that existed in

ancient Egypt for many centuries. He had against him a

well rooted social hierarchy. In order to nurture his

uncanny revelation, that of monotheism he created a secret

society. Only a few converts were invited. This was the

covenant. This secret society of gods was made of nine or

seven members. The structure survived to this day in Africa

with Bamileke of western Cameroon. They call it Kamvu(kam vuh). Akhenaten secret organization was probably the

model at the origin of most secret societies. As members of

the first covenant, they brought knowledge and order to the

world. We must remember that these were learned men.

They however introduced a concept that eventually

destroyed the millennial old social structures of ancient


52/188

Egypt. Great religious and political leaders of his time

understood that at the outset and fought the Akhenaten

doctrine with all their might. Akhenatons legacy was even

annihilated after his death by existing power structures.

They did everything. There were persecutions. Followers of

Amon did what they could to save their privileges. To keep

the ancient structures that served them well. Akhenatentemple and mementos were destroyed all to no avail. This

despite the fact that his followers were as stated persecuted

and forced into exile or to abandon their faith.

Monotheisms survived If humans see themselves as

physical entities, they often forget that they are spirits first

and foremost. An idea that is good for all will live on.

Within 90 years after this great upheaval, just like the

phoenix, monotheism rose from its ashes to conquer the

world to this day. It is worthy to state here that religiouscrisis that divided ancient Egypt were serious. We must

remember that until then Egyptians kings or pharaohs were

literally believed to be gods. Let restate this: they were

not considered gods: They were gods! The crisis that

ensued effectively traumatized not only a population but

the world. There is not surprise therefore if to this day we


53/188


54/188

The main destination of people emigrating from Africa was

North through the Suez Straight (the canal did not existed.

It was recovered from a dig in the nineteenth century by

French engineer Ferdinand de Lessepz). About it, it is likely

that there was also an emigration southward, less organized

than the emigration Northward that had the particularity of

regrouping people of the same families (whether cultural orethnic without consideration of skin pigmentation). Other

members of Middle and Upper class remained in Egypt

until Romans onslaught.

4/PROTO-AFRICA (Carthagino-Egyptian)

Africa got its name from the Roman era. Proto-Africa

maybe called the Egyptian period.

Before Greek domination of Egypt there were


55/188

notable contacts between Africa and Asia. Such contacts

took place with Sesostris the Great and with Hyksos. In

prehistoric period, there were African incursions into Asia.

World populations were greatly affected by these

incursions. They took place in many waves consistently all

along prehistory and history. The most important

incursions post-hominid era was that of Negritos or littleblack people that push into North America. Migrants out of

Africa dominated the planet. Indeed the world was

populated by people coming from Africa into Europe and

Asia.

With the rise of civilization and the needs that it created

there were further incursions. Sesostris I or The Great

forays into Asia remains controversial, so are his incursions

into Europe. The presence of Azanians in Asia and Europe

however has been corroborated by archeological findings.

Some of these findings exist to this day in major museums

and rare books. Broader understanding of our commonality

is essential. The future of humanity is shaped by people

and events. The better we understand each other beyondracial lines, the better chance we have to build a most

functional universe. In our treatise on social evolution


56/188

(Kosmicks) we demonstrates that the future of humanity

resides in the conquest of the Milky way and beyond. In

this conquest numbers matters. In this regards Malthus was

wrong. There is no problem of over population for the man

of the twenty first century. The greatest danger to the planet

is Man. Thankfully he is also its greatest savior. As the

chronology demonstrates we are branches of the same tree.This empowering knowledge can save us from ourselves.

In volume II we explore the rise of humanity from

the the the musky waters of prehistory. Onward to the rise

of civilization.


57/188

A PRECURSOR TO MODERN TIMES

African emigration out of Egypt, following multiple

invasions (Hyksos, Assyryan, Greek and Roman) went East

toward India, possibly China, South toward Africa, West to:

Libya, Tunisia, Morocco and South-East to Nubia, Ethiopia,

Tanzania. Disparate waves push further to the Congo and

South Africa. These latter waves were the forgotten link to

Egypt that formed the main connection with the continent.They have been thus far ignored because it was until a

certain time, difficult to see any connections between


58/188

central Africa and ancient Egypt. But these connections are

unavoidable (they have survived as iconograpic evidence in

classic African art from the empires of Kongo, via Bamileke

kingdoms, Akan civilization and others.

Like an Atlantic wave over the shore of knowledge,

they keep up coming, battling our consciousness until they

are fully accepted. For centuries they rushed into the mind

of scholars asking them to reconsider their data.

They are embedded as dynamic elements in our

culture. They are hidden in civilization's connectivitys, to

safeguard humanity from itself. Waiting for their time toarise and once more enlighten the world with the might of

our ancestors. To celebrate the human family and to

reconnect the thousand and one arms that once linked us to

Mitochondrial Eve. These imprints of human history are

found in art, science and culture.

African migration into Asia did not come only from Egypt.

There were maritime trade between South-East Africa and

China (AD era). And we should not forget Madagascar.

This was a meeting point for Africans and Asians all along

history.


59/188

The African migration to Asia is more interesting because it

involves an important class of Egyptians, the nobility and

the working class.

The declining of African secular liturgy starting with

the Akhenaten revolution onward to Roman invasion left

no alternative to Egyptian priesthood, upper and middle

class but to seek refuge in foreign lands. Those who for

various reasons did not emigrate south and who went to

Asia had few possibilities. Their best chance for survival

was to find a sponsor among local Lords or to open theirown school. Some became wandering sages or monks other

became soldiers or engaged into whatever activities secured

them living wages. It is a reasonable inference to suggest

that the famous wandering monks in Asian mythology

were related to these new migrants from a dying

civilization. They were very likely members of the defunct

Egyptian priesthood. There is thus strong correlation

between worlds cultures and ancient Egypt. Evidences

exist to corroborate these facts (see chronology c. 700BC toAD)...


60/188


61/188

Intercontinental criss-crossing of population has


62/188


63/188

presence in Europe, near-East and parts of Asia. The most

important was that of Sesostris the Great who went as far

as England. Other accomplishments of this remarkable

leader involved Greece, Anatolia, and Crete as well as

forays into Asia. The African presence left an indelible mark

on language, mythology and culture.


64/188

B-POST GREEK AND ROMAN PERIOD

The History of Africa and Europe following Greek and

Romans invasion has been well covered in most accounts. It

involves the birth of Christianity, the transformation of the

Catholic Church; the domination of Spain (usually called

Moorish or Muslim domination).

Important moments include the famous conquest and fall of

Hannibal, the martyrdom of African Christians in North

Africa and the great suppression of African writings during

inquisition, which was preceded by iconoclasm. The latter

beyond its theological discourse was an attempt to

eradicate images. Europeans kings that converted to

Christianity realized that God their purported father did

not exactly looked like them. The change was cultural,perhaps political. Not racial. We know that there were great

resistance at the early years of monotheistic adoption and

transformation. Formidable times that extended to the

Middle ages. It was the beginning of a new religion. The

emperor was considered divine. There religious movements

still faithful to the African monotheistic religion. The need


65/188

to impose a new concept demanded in the views of early

rulers that the process of identity be as complete as

possible. This was readily an attempt to quench rebellion

and establish belief and sovereignty. Iconoclasm to this day

is known as a religious schism. There was a little more than

that going on in those days. But again it was not racial in

the modern understanding of the term. Black Virginssurvived. They are still venerated to this day.

4/ Conclusion

This has been an attempt to outline our misunderstanding

of what happened following the fall of Egypt and why it

was difficult to understand Africa of the Great Lakes link to

ancient Egypt. The most important evidence of these links

is not only African mythology, but African Art of the classic

period (c. 12th - 19th. c) as well African enduring civilization

(culture and philosophy). The understanding of African

ancestral principle and its symbolism. A comparative study

of such symbolism with Egypt religious practices and

mythology will show similarities of striking concordance.

Such symbolism has been preserved in African Art. There is


66/188

thus iconographic evidence. Recent discoveries are re-

enforcing this reality. Beyond Greco-Egyptian link there is

more to discover in Africa ancient history.

The Nok period in Northern Nigeria which of course was

not called Nigeria in BC era changed our understanding of

central Africa old history. Professor Diop made an

interesting linguistic study of North Cameroon language

(Kare) and ancient Egypt. The study of Bamileke origin,

culture, social organization and ancestorship, including

burial rites showing compelling similarities with ancient

Egypt largely corroborate these theses. There were studied

made y Douala and Akan also suggesting evidences of their

link to ancient Egypt. Concurrent appearance of thinkers

(and events of notable similarity) at the same period of

history and following the final fall of ancient Egypt was

observed by historians. While some attempted a link other

preferred to see simple coincidences with no other

correlation. But even to the latter, it is impossible to ignore

correlation of events and time. According to Thames and


67/188

Hudson:

The procession of world-teachers through these centuries

can be followed from Laotzu and Confucius in China

through the Hebrews prophets to the Greek philosophical

schools of Pythagoras and of Socrates

Essentials tenets of Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism,

Confucianism, martial arts (found in ancient Egypt

archeology) and Greek philosophical movements are to be

traced back to old civilization. After all it was the only place

in ancient where existed a well structured and totally

dedicated class of scientist, thinkers and researchers. Theywere the priesthood and their most essential job was to

understand the universe. Many of their research work were

lost with the burning of the library of Alexandria in ancient

times

Indeed, besides monotheism inspired by Pharaoh

Akhenaton ancient Egypt priesthood engaged in what can

be understood today as a scientific enterprise with the aim

to better understand humanity and its relation to the

universe. While refusing to connect these movements in

African secret societies scholars did not hesitate to find


68/188

similarities with Europeans counterparts. To Watson, The

Mahayana form in which Buddhism, at the beginning of the

Christian era, made its way through central Asia into China

was influenced by the other faiths with which it was in

contact. This other faith is essentially ancient Egypt

teachings and possibly Indians religious movements.


69/188

What really matters in the understanding of the march of


70/188

history is not necessarily who so and so was, but how so

and so got influenced. Of course it is good to know when

possible the nationality and ethnicity of men involved in a

philosophical or historical movement though it is

somewhat secondary. As people of this earth we are all

involve in the same endeavor. The search for the truth in

history is redeeming.To recapitulate Greek and Roman invasions created an

intellectual vacuum in North East Africa. The lords and

priests of Egypt retreated in the territories that they

previously dominated (Sesostris I, was the first Egyptian

monarch to conquer lands all the way to the Caucasus and

Asiaincluding India--), while those who were stranded in

Egypt moved back where they came from. In the lands of

the South. And latter further south into west Africa (post

Roman era). Resistant to Romans were followed by Romanssoldiers all the way to Lake Chad and possibly as far as

western Cameroon.


71/188

In ancient Egypt Pharaoh Akhenaton was the first

king ever to impose a monotheist religion over his entire

empire. He was also the first leader to inspire the idea of a

Good God and to laid down premises for social liberty,

including the liberalization of art. In this respect what has

been called the laxism of Akhenaton was really the

application of a philosophy based upon non-violence. His

refusal to intervene in the Egyptians colonies in the Middle

East (then called Eastern territories of Egypt) was the direct

application of such philosophy. With Akhenaton (see the

four hundred years following the death of Akhenaton in


72/188

this Chrono-history), began a religious and social

revolution that was going to expand with the first exodus

and to continue with latter waves out of Egypt. A

phenomenon that lead to the birth of Judaism, Buddhism,

Confucianism, democracy and Christianity3.

Conversely, Ancient Egyptians were not only great

innovators of religious precepts and fascinating

architectural accomplishments, they were also the first

powers to develop slavery. Conquest is not an egg walk.

Their military legacy announced the likes of Cesars and

Napoleon. Certainly there were great kingdoms in the

Euphrates and the Indus valleys but they had less

influenced in worlds development.

The lost of total power is an important cause for

traumatism. This is true for people, this is true for nations.

When Egypt fell it was like the end of the world.

It is in this context that we understand the impression of

doom that transpired in some ancient writings. When the

gods fell it certainly must have felt like doom. The so-

3 It is clear that this is an historical appreciation of events

and not a religious one.


73/188

called curse of Ham was definitely related to the fall of

Egypt. As we have said in another work: a man can live a

wealthy and powerful life, yet if he falls abruptly let say by

murder and particularly if the killing is gruesome, there

would be a tendency to wonder whether such terrible death

is not the result of some curse or whether in the case of a

difficult life, of some bad karma. Indeed all those conceptswere borne out of the experience of people all over history.

According to Professor Ben Jochannan There is no doubt

that since we (the Jews) were enslaved by our fellows

Nubians, Ethiopians and Egyptians of other religions we

placed curses on them As a direct consequence of our

frustration, anger and spirit of revenge, coming from not

only the enslavement but also the invasions That is one

way to look at it. But curse could also be the interpretation

of an event that reason alone does not satisfactorily clarifies.Any event that is beyond our understanding can be

interpreted as supernatural. This was often the case in

antiquity when people did not understood complexities of

the human mind and emotion as we do today. We now

know that civilization like people evolve in cycle of chaos

and synchronicity that have nothing to do with mysticism.


74/188

When a criminal attack you and steal your property there is

no two ways about it. The criminal is the bad guy (not

karma, neither voodu or bad luck and certainly not the

victim). It has been demonstrated with modern sciences

that a rapist is a rapist regardless of circumstances. Rape

being considered a crime of violence. Rape of culture, IQ or

territory is rape.

***

GENIUS IN ANCIENT AFRICA

Professor Van Sertima in a public address to the

American Smithsonian Institution in November 1991proposed that Peter Schmidt and Donald Avery of Brown

University in Rhode Island found African smelting steel

that was 1500 years old. The finds were located along the

lakes of Tanzania and Uganda and consisted of machines

that achieved temperatures 200 degrees higher than any

machines in Europe until the late nineteenth century.

These African machines blast furnaces produced steel in a

single stage process; that is superior to the technique

developed in the late nineteenth century by Germanscientist George Wilhelm Siemens whose machine for


75/188

manufacturing steel did the same thing in two crude

processes, noted Dr. Van Sertima. This tells us that existed

in Africa a long time ago a highly developed civilization

capable of building such a refine and highly efficient

furnace. Other discoveries were done in Africa showing

developed civilizations tat have disappeared since. We have

described in details some of these inventions in Science &Religion of this Chrono-History4. That admitted, it is only

logical that proto-African would have preceded all other

cultures on the path of mathematical, astronomical,

philosophical and technical innovations. After all it was

only the first human stepping stone into history. By

recognizing it for what it was we would have developed a

homogenous consciousness and would not have wandered

in the eerie waters of discrimination that creates a confusion

in the reading of history and our common identity as ahuman specie.

The fact that civilization started in the continent now

called Africa has no intrinsic significance. In all events

4 Unfortunately as we edited this book we still have not

been ale to locate our lost manuscripts that were lost or stolen. Westill hope to find at least the early generations in floppy disc.


76/188

ancient Sumerians and ancient Egyptians according to

modern scholars were from the African continent. The

controversy in the origin of civilizations an oxymoron. We

are all people. Our complexes and reservation s when it

come to Africa is usually tainted by ethnic considerations

born out of slavery. Advances in genetics coupled with the

discovery of mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosomebrought an end to the debate in humans common origin. At

such time the research work on this Chronology was

basically finished. Essential elements of our past were

delineated. It was refreshing to have our work vindicated.

Indeed the most fascinating discovery in our research was

the undeniable brotherhood of man not only in prehistory,

but in history. This Chronology could have been called a

chromonome. We ultimately called it Panorkross because it

was more important to emphasize that history is made ofpeople (panor5) that meet and exchange ideas, genes and

culture (Kross or cross).

Prejudices and greed divided us. Let us hope that

knowledge and progress will unite us.5

Bamileke word for people


77/188

***


78/188

Chapter I:

PHYSICAL AFRICA

3.5 billion years ago

- Appearance of life in embryonic form.

***

PREHISTORY

GREAT PANGEA

Great Pangaea was the amalgam of worlds continents. It is

latter on that the continent separated. The derive ofcontinents refer to this prehistoric period.

Imagine the worlds continents as a large puzzle.

South America was once connected by land to West Africa,

so were Europe and Asia.

***

1- PRE CAMBRIAN

. 3000 Millions years BC to -580 million years. Including the

geological periods called Pan-African (beginning around

1000 BC) and comprising the Damaran-Katangan. At this

period of Prehistory there is no international subdivision.


79/188


80/188

a-The Cambrian:

It began in 580 and lasted until 520 millions years ago

b- The Ordovician

Goes from 520 to 460 million years ago.

430 000 000 FP

430 000 000 FP

. Ordovician: First mass extinction, with an enormous

collapse of Earth species.

c- Silurian

Extending from -460 to -360. It marked the beginning of the

cape deposition.

d- Devonian

End of the Cape deposition. This period began in 415 and

lasted to 360 millions years ago.

350 000 000FP = Devonian: Second mass extinctions, with a

catastrophic collapse of living species on Earth.

e- Carboniferous Period

From 360 to 280, saw the first formation of the Nubian

Sandstone. Began the Karoo deposition, which lasted until


81/188

the Jurassic period.

f- Permian

From 280 to 255 million years ago. Second formation of

Nubian sandstone.

225 000 000 FP = Permian: Third collapse of living species.

B- Mesozoic

A geological period that extended from 255 to 65 millions

years. It comprised: The Triassic, the Jurassic and the

Cretaceous.

a- Triassic

Extended from 255 to 210 million years ago. Third Nubian

sandstone formation and continental intercalaire.

200 000 000FP = Triassic: Fourth extinction of living species.

200 million years ago

What the world was 200 millions years ago has been the

subject of serious studies. The search continues relentlessly

and new discoveries in science are very helpful in

elucidating the mystery. It is any one guess whether we

shall ever be able to say with absolute certainty, what was


82/188


83/188


84/188

ANIMALS & PLANTS IN PREHISTORY

Bones found in Egypt, in Niger and other places in the

continent by modern researchers shows that in Africa lived

various species of plants and animals. There were great

dinosaurs. And in the Sahara desert there was lush

vegetation.

1 Animals

The Allosaurus was a carnivore contemporaneous to theSpinausaurus; also a carnivore dinosaur which bones found

in Egypt by Germans expeditions ascertains their presence

in Africa. There were other carnivores such as the

Alaphrosaurus.

In West Africa, precisely in Gadoufaoua area in Niger,

French researchers isolated bones from a plant eating


85/188


86/188


87/188


88/188

AFRICA:

Cradle of Humankind


89/188


90/188

Chapter II:

A MATTER OF ORIGIN

Hominid lineage stands in the center of the Darwinian

concept.

Life evolved from one specie to another in a logical

cycle usually described as the tree of evolution. To

understand this principle we have to consider the

importance of genetics. Through a complicated processcalled adaptation, species evolved through space and time.

Genes are organic data bank of dynamic information. They


91/188


92/188

The nature of our humanity one hundred years after

Darwin is still a subject of debate. Are Hominids the true

ancestors of Homo sapiens? Sometime in the past a break

occurred and homosapiens broke away from hominids

pongid characteristics by walking upright in the posture

that has been since then our landmark in the cycle of

evolution. Some believe that brain size plaid a role in thisrevolution. Anthropology have suggested beside

bipetallism, the use of tools as the direct result of brain

expansion. So is the consumption of meat that

complemented the enormous demand of protein from an

active brain (Leakey fils).

Om the evolution of specie, Darwin in his famous book

made a demonstration of his theory using the example of

plants. He also postulated the transmission of physical

traits by inheritance in particular with birds and mammals.

From three existing genera (animals or plants with similar

characters and belonging to the same family), was formed a

small family which in turn formed allied or closed family,

as they extend in different branches. They would remainconnected by their genus of origin. The three different

branches exploded in other branches A, B, C and sub-A,


93/188

Sub-B, sub-C in a continuum as complex as the human

genome. While descendants of each group can be totally

different from their originators, the possibility remains that

a given group might maintain its initial characteristic. All

depending of the environment of evolution and the

principle of natural selection. In the process of evolution

some forms vanished while other prospers. Naturalselection through divergence of character and extinction

went on with speciation. Descendants of one specie through

intercrossing survived as they adapt to environment. So

from the common ancestor, taken in abstract, a given Y

generation of grand children of the third son would go

extinct for various reasons including external and genetic,

while those of the first son survived and live on to develop

a branch of evolution. And all inhabitants of the world

today, from Africa to Europe to Asia and America descentfrom the same primeval mother knew today as

Mitochondrial Eve.

The oldest remain of Hominids bones have been so far

discovered in Tanzania, placing the factual origin ofHumankind in that part of Africa. Interestingly ancient

Egyptians placed Aaru fields (garden of eden) later called


94/188


95/188


96/188


97/188

to 3 millions years ago. Australopithecus Africanus is a

good candidate for the transitional link between Ap

the chronology digital vol 1 mai 5th 2013

Documents