the carbon reduction commitment
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Philip Douglas, head of branch, CRC - at the CBI Climate Change Summit, Tuesday 2 December 2008TRANSCRIPT
The Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC)
CBI Climate Change Summit conference
2 December 2008
Dr Philip Douglas
Head of Branch, CRC
CRC Summary Mandatory auction based emissions trading scheme
– targeting UK energy use emissions of highest parent organisation, from business + public sector organisations
– Large organisations: HHM electricity > 6,000 MWhr / year
– Climate Committee to advise Ministers on CRC caps
Revenue neutral to the Exchequer– Auction revenue recycled to participants
Avoiding overlap– Target energy use emissions outside EU ETS and CCAs
– Organisations with more than 25% of their emissions in CCAs would be completely exempt
As simple a scheme as possible
CRC Summary
“Cap and trade”: Certainty of environmental outcome through the cap – participants decide where reductions take place
Three key actions during the scheme year1. Purchase allowances at auction, taking account
of energy efficiency effort
2. Surrender allowances equal to total emissions, buying / selling allowances as appropriate
3. Receive a recycling payment
Policy development
From consultation to policy: Market Design I
Stakeholder concern Action
Complexity of auction design
• A simpler sealed bid auction• Simple fixed price sale in 3 year introductory phase
CRC revenue recycling undermines rest of scheme, leading to risk of ad-hoc changes / further regulation
• Payment proportional to 2010 emissions, with a clear trajectory to strengthen the bonus / penalty over time, so that the revenue recycling gives positive incentives
Growth / decline – notably, impact on league table position from buying/selling large subsidiaries
• ‘Growth metric’ in the league table • Updating baselines when large subsidiaries bought / sold
Auction revenue top-sliced for Carbon Trust / Salix
• Not top-slicing
From consultation to policy: Market Design II
Stakeholder concern Action
League table based on ‘since the start of the scheme’ would eventually have old irrelevant data
• CRC league table to have only a “five year memory”, i.e. measure performance against previous 5 years
Improving the “early action” league table metric
• Basing “early action” league table metric on both AMR and EEAS• Only applies to the intro phase
Cash flow – 18 month gap between auction and revenue recycling
•Double recycling payment in first recycling payment• Gap reduced to 6 months
VAT applied to sales of allowances
• Not applying VAT to fixed price sales of allowances
From consultation to policy: Reporting
Stakeholder support Action
For clarifying approach to CHP, avoiding complexity
• A simple approach, ‘zero rating’ heat, and avoiding different factors for different CHP plant
For some disclosure based “tick box” questions in the CRC league table
• Yes / No questions on whether annual reporting includes a carbon target, performance against target, and a named Director
For an obligation on energy suppliers to provide an annual statement of gas and electricity use
• Requiring suppliers to produce such a statement, if asked by CRC organisations
CRC consultation responses0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1a2a5a7a8a
10a11a1213
14a14b14c16a17181920212224262829
30a31a32a33a33b34a34b34c35a35b36
37a38a39a4041
43a43b45a47484950
Yes
Not sure
No
Number of respondents
Some key practicalities
Latest thinking on timetable• Government consultation on the draft CRC
regulations and CRC User Guide – expected around ~ end Feb 2009
• Stakeholder engagement and awareness raising by the Environment Agency – in Spring 2009
• CRC regulations go before UK Parliament and DAs – Autumn 2009
• Entry into force of the CRC regulations and start of scheme – in April 2010
• Note this timetable means that there would not be reporting in the period October 2009 – March 2010
2008 2009 2010
Calendar year 2008:
Assess HH electricity use for all organisations with settled half-hourly metering systems
1 Apr 2010:
Scheme Starts
April – Sept 2010: Registration
All qualifying organisations disclose total half hourly electricity consumption
Spring 2009:Env Agency awareness raising
The scheme will begin in April 2010
2011
Year one
2012
Year two
Parent Company
Subsidiaries with emissions in CCAs
Subsidiaries
In this company structure, subsidiaries M & N have emissions covered by CCAs. These CCAs cover more than 25% of the subsidiaries’ total emissions, therefore they are exempt from CRC
A
X
Y
Z
M
N
Emission Coverage
Are you the highest parent company?
Does your organisation have a HHM settled on the half hourly market?
Do you consume more than 6,000 MWh through all
HHM?
You qualify for CRC and must
register as a participant
You do not qualify as a CRC participant but will need to comply with requests from your highest
parent company
You do not qualify for the he rest of the guide is not relevant for you
You are required to make an information
Disclosure
Are you the highest parent company?
Does your organisation have a HHM settled on the half hourly market?
Do you consume more than 6,000 MWh through all
HHM?
You qualify for CRC and must
register as a participant
You do not qualify as a CRC participant but will need to comply with requests from your highest
parent company
You do not qualify for the CRC.
You are required to make an information
Disclosure
Qualification - summary
Government has proposed that HH electricity use will include:
Mandatory HH metersVoluntary remotely read AMR HH meters
Pseudo HH meters
What should you do now?
• Work out your organisation structure and where you fit into it• Establish a mechanism for collecting energy information at the highest UK part of the organisation• Start thinking about your sources to meet the 90% rule. Do you want to go beyond the minimum?• Decide if you want to participate in the early action metric
- Roll out AMR
- Register with Carbon Trust Standard (CTS – formerly EEAS)
What should you do now? (continued)
• Decide if you want to participate in the growth metric• Collate information on turnover / revenue for the whole organisation• To score ticks, you will need to annually report:
(i) a longer term quantitative carbon target
(ii) performance against that carbon target
(iii) a named Director responsible for carbon
• Familiarise yourself with the evidence pack
Context
Growing international interest in CRC
USA
Brazil
Japan
SouthKorea
China
Australia
New Zealand
Europe
“Diminishing returns in the EU ETS industries... In commerce there is much more scope to make progress” CBI, November 2005
Source: Ecofys: ENUSIM abatement curves, BRE buildings measures abatement curves
SMEs
Public sector
Large non-energyintensive
organisations
Large energyintensive industry
Absolute cost effective carbon abatement opportunity to 2020
3.2
0.1
0.5 1.8
0.8
1.10.5
MtC (% of total emissions in brackets); NPV positive at 15% discount rate
3.3 (13%)
2.3 (18%)
1.6 (15%)
0.8 (15%)
4.5 (20%)
4.3 (33%)
2.6 (25%)
1.3 (23%)
TOTALS
MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTAL
4.1 (12%) 3.8 (22%) 7.9 (15%)
Technical potential
TOTAL
12.7 (25%)