the business of disease prevention - abic web presentations/health... · the business of disease...
TRANSCRIPT
The Business of Disease Prevention
Huw Hughes and Paul Wood
Veterinary Medicine Research and Development
Pfizer Animal Health
Introduction
Technologies & Delivery
Manufacturing
Challenges
Endnote
Introduction to Animal Biologicals
Animal Health Biologicals
• Need to answer different customer needs
– Basic classes fall into classification by animal husbandry category
– Pets, sport animals
– Large animal production (cattle)
Complex
Wide Client – Large animal production (cattle)
– Large animal production (swine)
– Poultry
– “minor species” Goats, sheep, exotics
• Huge variation in Price to consumer varying from 0.02 cents per dose to 1000 $ per dose
• Huge variation in technologies and platforms.
Wide Client
Base
Global Animal Health Sales
Global sales in 2009 were 18.6 BN USD
FarEast
N.America
W Europe
E Europe ROW
MFA
Biologicals
Anti-infectives
Parasiticides
Other Pharmas
Biologicals represent 25% of global sales
Veterinary Vaccine Cost
10
100
1000
10000Melanoma
Kennel cough
Lyme WNV
Neospora
per dose
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
1 100 10000 1000000
Cattle Respiratory
Feline line
Canine lineBTV
Mareks
Neospora
Relative No of doses sold
US$ Cost
Introduction
Technologies & Delivery
Manufacturing
Challenges
Endnote
Living up to the Promise
Biotechnology applications in Animal Health have yielded over 100 Biotechnology applications in Animal Health have yielded over 100 new products and servicesnew products and services
•• DiagnosticsDiagnostics
•• Gene markers for genetic selectionGene markers for genetic selection
•• VaccinesVaccines•• VaccinesVaccines
•• BiomarkersBiomarkers
•• BiopharmaceuticalsBiopharmaceuticals
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION HOST SPECIES GEOGRAPHY
Canarypox vector Distemper virus HA and F Dog, Ferret Americas
Canarypox vector Rabies G Cat
Canarypox vector FeLV Env, Gag/pro cat EMEA, N. America
Canarypox vector Equine Flu HA Horse EMEA (Australia)
Canarypox vector WNV prM-E Horse N America
Fowlpox vector H5 avian flu poultry S. America Asia
HVT Vector Newcastle Disease poultry N America
HVT Vector Bursal Disease poultry Global
Virus Deletion/truncation IBR Killed virus Cattle Europe
Virus Deletion/truncation IBR MLV Cattle Europe
Virus Deletion/truncation Aujesky's Pigs N America
Licensed Novel Technologies
Virus Deletion/truncation Aujesky's Pigs N America
DNA Infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus Salmon N. America
DNA WNV Horse N America
DNA Melanoma Dog N America
Peptide/protein Interferon omega Dog/Cat Europe
Peptide/protein GnRH Pigs Global
Peptide/protein Baculo PCV2 Pigs N America
Plant NDV Poulltry N America
Peptide/protein Lyme Disease (OSP A) Dog N America
Fowlpox vector Avian Encephalomyelitis poultry N America
HVT Vector Mareks Disease poultry N America
Fowlpox vector Laryngotracheitis poultry N America
Peptide/protein IFN-Omega cats Europe
Chimeric viruses PCV1/2 Pigs N America
Vaccinia vector Rabies G Wildllife EMEA, N. America
Fowlpox vector Newcastle Disease poultry N America
Peptide/protein GnRH (immunotherapeutic for BPH) canine N America
Subunit technology Neonatal scours - E coli pili Pigs Global
Adjuvant technologies disease prevention, immunotherapeutics All Global
Biopharma / Nomenclature
• For AH:
– Biological = vaccines
– Biopharmaceuticals = protein-based therapeutics
• For HH:
– Biological = large molecule (therapeutic or vaccine)
– 3 main targets: Growth enhancement, cancer and immunomodulation
Biopharmaceuticals
– 3 main targets: Growth enhancement, cancer and immunomodulation
• 3 types of products at this time with several specific characteristics
– Anti-peptide vaccine (hormone RF)
– Bioactive peptides (immunomodulator or antiinfective)
– Monoclonal antibodies (anti-cancer/immunomodulator/anti-infective)
Diverse regulatory environment
• US: FDA for growth enhancement but the antiinfectives/immunomodulators could be linked to a disease and go through USDA
• EU: EMEA registration as vaccine (including growth enhancement) or drug
Substitute for endogenous proteinsSmall molecules often cannot replace naturally occurring proteins
Expand druggable targetsBiologics can interact with targets not amenable to small molecules
• Less toxic (no residues)
• Easier to predict distribution,
metabolism and elimination
• Suitable for EU market that is
reluctant to growth inducing drugs
Upsides vs. Downsides
Provide selective targetingBiologics will always be more selective for their targets reducing side effects
amenable to small molecules resulting in new mechanisms of action (e.g., protein-protein interactions)
• Faster to POC
• Faster development cycles
• Reduces expensive medicinal
chemistry
• Reduces expensive HTS
• No erosion of market by generics to date
Immuno-privileged sites
Extracellular targets
Routes of administration
Supply chain issues
–
Rectal Suppository
Control Release Device
DNA Vaccination
Vaccine Delivery Technologies
Viral/Bacterial Vectors
Biodegradable Implant
Intranasal puffer
Transgenic Plants
Transdermal Patchbait
Introduction
Technologies & Delivery
Manufacturing
Challenges
Endnote
The Animal Health Global Factory
Technologies under the same roof:
• Bacterial fermentation
• Roller bottle
• Cell factory
• Disposables and Hard Pipe reactors
• Egg culture• Egg culture
• Live animals
Inspected by:
• USDA, EMEA/VMD, FDA, JMAFFD..
Over 40 products released
• Final product release
• For further manufacturing
Manufacturing Technologies
ANAPLASMOSISNecrotic hepatitisof rabbits
IBDVCOCCIDIOSIS
NDVIBFLU
Disposable Technology
Hard pipe vs. PlasticHard pipe vs. Plastic
•• Capital cost vs. consumable costCapital cost vs. consumable cost–– Dedicated facility to make plastic worth whileDedicated facility to make plastic worth while
•• Running costsRunning costs–– Lower running costsLower running costs
–– Environmental balance plastic disposal vs. CIP fluidsEnvironmental balance plastic disposal vs. CIP fluids–– Environmental balance plastic disposal vs. CIP fluidsEnvironmental balance plastic disposal vs. CIP fluids
•• Down timeDown time–– TroubleshootingTroubleshooting
–– ReRe--validation/qualificationvalidation/qualification
–– Media runsMedia runs
–– D..D..
•• QualityQuality–– Need consistencyNeed consistency
–– Customers need to be aware of/be integrated into change control Customers need to be aware of/be integrated into change control processes of plastic suppliersprocesses of plastic suppliers
Disposable Technologies
Cells
• Non-adherent
Cell scale-up
• Wave bags
• SUBs (250L)
Virus production
• SUBs (1000L)
Controller
• Finesse• Finesse
Probes
• Finesse Optical
In Addition6
The Challenges of ScaleThe Challenges of Scale Cost constraints are critical
• Scale up should not compromise costs and yields.
• Inactivation often a bottleneck
• DSP is expensive, time consuming and also can be a bottleneck.
Safety, particularly for pets and sport horses is critical
bottleneck.
• Veterinary vaccines typically have little or no DSP
vs.
Animal Health Human Health
Introduction
Technologies & Delivery
Manufacturing
Challenges
Endnote
Case Study: Mission Impossible
Active ingredient X
• For use in pets, production animals and wildlife
• COGs of >0.10 USD per dose
• Live presentation– Stable expression over 10 passages
– Must pass shed/spread criteria
• Formulations– Lyophilized for companion animals
– Bait for wildlife
– RTU for Production animals
• Refrigerator storage OK, RT preferred
• Stable for 12 (24 h preferred) hours at 25 to 30°C in bait, 24 months at 4°C
Multiple Regulatory Pathways
Animal Health Biological Regulation
FDA
• US Biotherapeutics
USDA/CFIA
• N. American Biologicals
JMAFF
• Japan
Autogenous Vaccines
• USDA (9CFR)
Conditional license
• USDA, EMEA
Strain swap
• Provisions in 9CFR and EMEA• Japan
EMEA
• Europe
AQIS
• Australia
Other
• China, Latin America
EMEA
Exceptional MA
• EMEA
• Flu, FMD, BTV
Provisional MA
• EMEA
Biotherapeutics
• USDA, FDA and/or EMEA
MUMS
• Minor use, minor species
Examples of Speed-to-Market
Industry uses a conditional license or provisional market authorization to be First to market
• Provisional Market Authorizations in EU have included vaccines protecting against PMWS in pigs through sow vaccination.
• Allows vaccine to be available to producers in multiple countries without the rigours of a full MAwithout the rigours of a full MA
• Conditional licenses in the US are granted to companies with new disease entities (or new field strains) and are renewable after one year, until a full license is granted
– ‘Reasonable expectation of efficacy’
Industry works with regulators to answer specific and urgent needs in the field
• Vaccine stocks for government use– Q Fever, CSF, FMDD
• Exceptional MA– BTV, FMD & Influenza
• Strain updates– Influenza – swine and equine.
Executed in similar ways by both the USDA and EMEA
Timeline for an Emergency
pH1N1 Influenza vaccine for pigs
Outbreak
USDA Policy established
Strain available to industry Strain available to industry from USDA
MS, WS production
Efficacy serial production
Prelicense serials (field trials waived due to the use of existing technologies and formulations)
Approval November 2009
4
Months
Introduction
Technologies & Delivery
Manufacturing
Challenges
Endnote
Basic Tenets of Animal Health Vaccines
Superior Efficacy
• Stronger claims– Prevention/reduction
– Infection/disease
• Higher proportion of protected animals
• Less severe clinical signs
• Reduced shedding
• Cross-protection
Price
• COGs low
• Production improvements
• Competitive pricing
Convenience
• Combination vaccines
• Single dose• Cross-protection
• Protection in the face of MDA
• Minimum age
• Longer DOI
• Onset of immunity
Superior Safety
• Fewer smaller or no reaction
• Safe in pregnant/lactating animals
• Safe in small breeds
• Vaccination frequency
• Mass vaccination
• Needle free injection
• Longer DOI
• Route(s)
• Husbandry compatible
Other
• State of the art – “High Tech”
ENDNOTE
The Animal Health industry is a complex environment in terms of client base, product mix and technologies.
Biotechnology applications have been successfully integrated into product offerings, with over 100 products registered and launched in the field. These new vaccines have been successfully integrated into combinations with conventional vaccines
Production methods and registration pathways reflect the complexity of the business. The modern Animal Health factory is extremely versatile, with new manufacturing technologies being optimized to ensure maximum flexibility and speed especially when addressing emergency vaccine requests.
Vaccines still need to be safe, efficacious and answer client needs. Technology by itself does not sell products
THANKS
Pfizer Animal Health
Jay Thompson
Tedd Childers
Hans Draayer
Jim FreemanJim Freeman