the bellagio process country entities · time agenda item 10.00 –10.20 welcome and overview of...
TRANSCRIPT
The Bellagio process – Country entities17 June 2020
Establishing the Bellagio Principles of Circular Economy Monitoring
Building on the succes of the
1996 Bellagio Principles: Guidelines
for the Practical Assessment of
Progress Toward Sustainable
Development
The process
Country perspective 17th June 2020
Non-country perspective 18th June 2020
Writing group:
Advisory group
ISPRA
EEA6th May 2020 (done)
Time Agenda item
10.00 – 10.20 Welcome and overview of the agendaPeder Jensen, Expert on resource efficiency in a circular economy (EEA)
Overview of the Bellagio Process and introduction to the draft Bellagio DeclarationLuca Demicheli, Head of International Affairs and Institutional Relations (ISPRA)
10.20 – 10.35 Vision for, and experience in circular economy monitoring in FinlandTuuli Myllymaa, Head of Unit for Waste and Circular Economy, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
10.35 – 10.50 Discussion
10.50 – 11.05 National monitoring for a European framework and the role of targets seen from the NetherlandsAldert Hanemaaijer, Coordinator Program Circular Ecocomy, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
11.05 – 11.20 Discussion
11.20 – 11.25 5-minute comfort break
11.25 – 11.40 Monitoring principles suited for all countries as seen from SlovakiaBarbora Bondorová, Director of the Department of Environmental Policy, Ministry of Environment of the Slovak
Republic
11.40 – 11.55 Discussion11.55 – 12.55 Moderated discussion around the role of countries when it comes to monitoring of circular economy
Co-moderated by EEA/ISPRA
Planned Interventions:ISO TC 323 WG3 on measuring circularity, Roberto Morabito, Director of Dept. of Sustainability of ENEACircular Economy in Manufacturing, Massimiliano Mazzanti, Prof. of Economic Policy, University of FerreraCircular Economy Initiative Deutchland, Susanne Kadner, Director, CEID, German Academy of Science and Engineering
12.55 – 13.00 Wrap upPeder Jensen, Expert on resource efficiency in a circular economy (EEA)
Housekeeping
• All participants except speaker will be muted to avoid noise
• Please ask questions via the chat function. If you send to all then all can see questions and not repeat them
• Please state name and affiliation in the chat together with the question
• We will try to cover as many questions as possible but willalso need to be mindful of time
• Webinar will be recorded
• Documentation including slides will be available after the webinar https://epanet.eea.europa.eu/reports-letters/monitoring-progress-in-europes-circular-economy
The Bellagio Process6th May – 16th October 2020
Principles of Circular Economy Monitoring
Building on the succes of the
1996 Bellagio Principles: Guidelines for
the Practical Assessment of Progress
Toward Sustainable Development
From a single event (6-8 may 2020) to a
Process
KEY DRIVERS
Fully inclusive (EU led)
Gaps: e.g. harmonisation
(systemic approach)
Focus on implementation
and innovation
User driven and political back up
THE BELLAGIO DECLARATION
A commitment to follow agreed principles to
monitor progress towards circular economy
implementation, to identify and fill gaps in the
monitoring exercise, and to verify that
innovation is not hampered.
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US!
Tuuli Myllymaa, Tiina Karppinen,
Enni Ruokamo & Hannu Savolainen
Finnish Environment Institute SYKE
Vision for, and experience in Circular Economy monitoring in Finland
2
Creating circular economy means multifunctional optimizing to increase wellbeing and to decouple the use of natural resources from economic indicators
Source: SITRA 2016, Graphic explanation on term decoupling.
Wellbeing
Economy
Use of
Natural
resources
TUU
LI MYLLYM
AA
, SYKE
● The material use is predicted to
radically increase globally
● More than half of all GHG emissions
related to materials management
activities. Construction dominates
material use.
● Material use causes pressure to
increased land use
● Solutions leading to decrease in the
use of natural resources are also
solving the problems related to climate
change and biodiversity depletion 3
Natural resources use is connected to climate change and biodiversity
Construction materials dominate total materials use in 2011 and 2060. Source: OECD 2018: Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060
TUU
LI MYLLYM
AA
, SYKE
The understanding on the course developes by
monitoring own trend – case Finland
TUU
LI MYLLYM
AA
, SYKE
GDP,
Municipal solid waste, Index 2000 = 100
* = preliminary data ** = selected non-material services, excluding the sale of
material products
5
Development of gross value added of selected** services in Finland – an upward trend
17
.6.2
020TU
ULI M
YLLYMA
A, SYK
E
0
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
50.000
60.000
70.000
80.000
90.000
100.000M
illio
ns o
f e
uro
s
Gross value added at
basic prices, volume
series, reference year
2010
6
Regional data is needed for decision-making1
7.6
.2020
TUU
LI MYLLYM
AA
, SYKE
Amount (kg/person) and Recycling Rate (%) of Household Waste
200300400500600
2015 2016 2017
Hyvinkää & Riihimäki
41 % 42 %
200300400500600
2015 2016 2017
Joensuu
48 % 49 %
200300400500600
2015 2016 2017
Jyväskylä
56 % 58 %
200300400500600
2015 2016 2017
Kuopio
63 % 61 %
200300400500600
2015 2016 2017
Lappeenranta
53 % 59 %
200300400500600
2015 2016 2017
Porvoo
45 % 45 %
7
Circular economy indicator work in Finland
8
Circular economy indicator work in Finland
Circular material use
9
Circular economy indicator work in Finland
Circular material use
10
Circular economy indicator work in Finland
Circular material use
Key messages and lessons learned - potentialand expectations from the circular economy monitoring on data production and use● To analyse the level of circularity of an economy, more data on secondary material
use and internal material cycles are needed
● Social impacts are very important, but also very complicated to identify and measure
● Regional data is needed in regional decision-making and regional level of data
production is therefore very important
● Crucial is to manage the local trends and have the understanding on where are you
going and where are you coming - comparisons between economies are secondary
when local actions are needed
11
17
.6.2
020TU
ULI M
YLLYMA
A, SYK
E
Key messages and lessons learned -potential and expectations from the circular economy monitoring on policy instruments● Current markets drive for overusing natural resources and nature. Therefore, binding
legislation and target setting is needed for
Quantitative limits for the use of natural resources
Quantitative minimun requirements on recycled material use in products
Tax on natural resources use
● Regional data is needed in regional decision-making. CE would benefit from binding
legislation in EU or national level regulation for regional qdata production
12
17
.6.2
020TU
ULI M
YLLYMA
A, SYK
E
13
Thank you for listening our viewsand messages!
Aldert Hanemaaijer Input for Bellagioworkshop CE June 17th 2020
Targets and indicators for a Circular
Economy seen from the Netherlands
› Government broad program CE
› 2017 “Resource agreement”
– Signed by > 400 organizations
› 2018 Transition CE agenda’s 5 domains
– Companies, ngo’s and government
› 2019 Cabinet’s reaction / Action program
– 4 Ministries involved; Min IenW coordinates
Circular Economy Policy in The Netherlands
Construction, Manufacturing industry, Biomass and Food, Plastics, Consumer goods
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop 2
› CE targets NL: Fully circular in 2050
› 50% Reduction primary abiotic raw materials in 2030
› How to measure the 50%% reduction?
– Production or consumption? Both are relevant
– Direct or also indirect? Use chain approach
– Include fossil for fuels? Logical to include
PBL Policy brief Dutch CE Targets 2030
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop
› Main conclusions study:
› Not possible to steer CE transition with 1 target
› Single indicator useful for communication and ‘dot on the horizon’
› Better use a set of targets to steer towards a circular economy
› Look at input, use and output of materials and their effects
› Differentiated sets of targets for different product goups
PBL Policy brief Dutch CE Targets 2030
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop
Can we agree
on what CE is
about?
Key input for
Bellaggio
principles
› Starting with (quantitative) goals and targets
› Providing information on how to get there
› Derive / develop indicators for what we want to know
› Building on the existing knowledge base
› Identifying (and filling) knowlegde gaps
What do we want to know?
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop
CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop
Both effects and process are relevant
› Information needed for measuring progress transition CE:
› Effects in the chain: tons and euros
› Material use, CO2, footprints, etc.
› Added value, jobs, etc.
› Process: actions, resources, performance
› CE companies, CE patents, CE innovation programs
› Laws and barriers, GPP, EPR, etc. Source PBL, 2018
CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop 17-06-2020
What can we already measure in NL and what not yet?
› Progress of 200 actions in Dutch CE program
– Lot of actions aim for recycling or are generic
› Much known about national effects
– Raw materials, GHGs, waste, recycling and
environmental services
– Less data on other R-strategies and product level,
footprints, security of supply, value retention, etc.
› Little information to monitor transition dynamics
CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop17-06-2020
1. Targets help to shape the transition and assess progress CE
2. Use a framework with different tiers:
– Lead, dashboard and specific indicators
3. Monitoring framework CE should cover:
– Effects and the transition process to get there
4. Effect monitoring for environmental and socio-economic effects
– Footprint indicators as extension to domestic/EU effects
5. Monitoring transition process: what’s happening outside?
– Circularity strategies and actions by companies and policy
Main messages EPA discussion paper 2017
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop
› For more information:
› Aldert Hanemaaijer
› https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/international-workshop-on-targets-for-a-circular-economy-summary
› https://www.pbl.nl/publicaties/doelstelling-circulaire-economie-2030 (EN summary)
› https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/monitoring-progress-of-the-circular-economy-in-the-eu
› https://www.pbl.nl/en/publicaties/circular-economy-what-we-want-to-know-and-can-measure
Thank you for your interest!
17-06-2020CE monitoring and targets: the Dutch perspective for Bellagio workshop 11
Monitoring principles suited for allcountries as seen from Slovakia
Barbora Bondorová
Head of Environmental Policy DepartmentDirectorate for Environmental Policy, EU and International relations
Bellagio process webinar: Monitoring experiences (countries), 17.6.2020
OVERVIEW
1. Challenges for Slovak economy and environment
2. Slovakia‘s approach towards circular transition (T2gE)
3. Circular economy in Slovakia – next steps
4. Monitoring framework of circular economy in Slovakia
5. Recommendations for monitoring principles
6. Discussion – Q&A
2
• Industrial economy, growing manufacturing sector, rising materials consumption, high dependency on external markets
• Limited natural resource base and low resource productivity
• Risk of automatization of jobs
• Economy – lack of diversification and innovations
• Rising amounts of generated waste, low recycling rates and high landfilling rates
1. Challenges for Slovak economy and environment3
2. Slovakia´s approach towards circular transition(T2gE – Transition to Green Economy)
4
Policy Legislation Knowledge Cooperation
5Greener Slovakia: Strategy of the Environmental Policy until 2030
6 2. Slovakia´s approach towards circular transition(T2gE – Transition to Green Economy)
73. Circular Economy in Slovakia - next steps...
Roadmap for Circular Economy in Slovakia – project with OECD
• Analysis of relation between circular economy and climate change (based on OECD Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060)
• Analysis of economic potential of circular economy transition forSlovakia, including trends, scenarios, and indicators
• Creating draft Roadmap for Circular Economy, including measures
84. Monitoring framework of Circular Economy in Slovakia
The monitoring framework on the circular economy as set up by the European Commission consists of ten indicators in four areas:
Productionand
consumption
Wastemanagement
Secondaryraw
materials
Competitivenessand innovation
94. Monitoring framework of circular economy in Slovakia
In addition, we use other relevant indicators, which are included in other sets of indicators evaluated in the Slovak Republic:
Key indicators – a set of key indicators including 11 thematic areas of the environment (e.g. biodiversity, climate change, energy, industry) with a total of 29 indicators (e.g. protected areas, GHG emissions)Green growth indicators - national set of indicators, in cooperation with the OECD –publications (set of indicators comprises 32 individual indicators that are relevant in Slovakia's conditions. Four of them are national indicators that describe voluntary instruments of the environmental strategy)Sectoral indicators - effective use of materials and the impact of sectors on the environment
All indicators are available at:
105. Recommendations for monitoring principles 1/3
1. Transdisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach to ensure balancebetween all areas of CE: production and consumption, wastemanagement, secondary raw materials, competitiveness and innovation
2. Integration of CE principles into a wide range of policies - they need to be linked to sectoral policy evaluations into one comprehensive system
115. Recommendations for monitoring principles 2/3
3. The set of CE indicators adopted by the EC is a good starting point, but not sufficient for CE assessment at national levels
4. It is necessary to develop national sets, use and share relevant indicators from other sectors; evaluation not only at the country level but also at the local level
5. The set of CE indicators should be composed of output indicators –(assessing the state of CE) and additional indicators serving for more detailed assessment of the situation and identifying necessary next steps
125. Recommendations for monitoring principles 3/3
6. In case no specific national strategic document is adopted – it is necessary to start with the definition and principles of CE as well as goals adopted at the European level (this is also the example of Slovakia) and evaluate how the country stands in CE.
7. In case of the existence of a national strategic document for the CE:
- set of indicators must follow goals and targets
- clearly defined methodology for their evaluation
- data and information flow for their evaluation has to be set
8. It is also necessary to think about appropriate forms and tools for presenting results to the public
Thank you for your attention!
minzp.sk / [email protected]
https://zelene-hospodarstvo.enviroportal.sk/en
Webinar 2 – Monitoring Experience (Countries)
The ‘how to monitor’ question June 17, 2020
Measuring the circularity:
ENEA experiences and ISO TC 323 WG3
Roberto Morabito
Dipartimento Sostenibilità dei Sistemi Produttivi e Territoriali - ENEA
MONITORING PROGRESS IN EUROPE’S CIRCULAR ECONOMY
THE BELLAGIO PROCESS
• Circular Economy and the efficient use of resources -
Indicators for measuring circular economy
– MATTM-MISE WG on indicators for the Circular economy with
ENEA’s technical and scientific support
• Reports on Circular economy indicators.
– WG3 on Circular economy indicators - Italian Circular Economy
Platform Stakeholder (ICESP).
– WG on Indicators for monitoring the Industrial Symbiosis - Italian
Symbiosis Users Network.
• UNI CT 057
– WG3 on Circular economy indicators
• ISO TC 323
– WG3 on Measuring circularity
Activities on Circular Economy IndicatorsENEA experiences
Indicators for measuring circular economyMATTM-MISE WG on indicators for the Circular economy
Definition of indicators classified by: type of application
• Macro level• Meso level• Micro level
availability and/or need• Existing• Not existing but
possible calculation using available data
• Not existing
Definition of indicators for each step of value chain in the circular economy
Launch of working group coordinated by Italian Ministry
for environment and Italian
Ministry for economic
development
INDICATORI ESISTENTI
n. Fase del Ciclo A - Macro B- Meso C - Micro
1
Materie prime
Materie prime seconde
Sottoprodotti
2 Progettazione
3 Produzione e distribuzione
4 Uso e consumo
5 Riutil izzo e riparazione
6Raccolta e gestione rifiuti
Sottoprodotti
7
Smaltimento
Preparazione per i l riutil izzo
Recupero e riciclaggio rifiuti
Util izzo dei sottoprodotti
INDICATORI DA COSTRUIRE - DATI ESISTENTI
n. Fase del Ciclo A - Macro B- Meso C - Micro
1
Materie prime
Materie prime seconde
Sottoprodotti
2 Progettazione
3 Produzione e distribuzione
4 Uso e consumo
5 Riutil izzo e riparazione
6Raccolta e gestione rifiuti
Sottoprodotti
7
Smaltimento
Preparazione per i l riutil izzo
Recupero e riciclaggio rifiuti
Util izzo dei sottoprodotti
INDICATORI DA COSTRUIRE - DATI NON ESISTENTI
n. Fase del Ciclo A - Macro B- Meso C - Micro
1
Materie prime
Materie prime seconde
Sottoprodotti
2 Progettazione
3 Produzione e distribuzione
4 Uso e consumo
5 Riutil izzo e riparazione
6Raccolta e gestione rifiuti
Sottoprodotti
7
Smaltimento
Preparazione per i l riutil izzo
Recupero e riciclaggio rifiuti
Util izzo dei sottoprodotti
Iniziativa Ambito di riferimento
Macro Meso Micro
Agenda 2030
International Resource Panel
Ellen MacArthur Foundation
Circle Economy
Quadro di monitoraggio dell’economia circolare
Resource efficiency scoreboard
Raw Materials scoreboard
Conti ambientali
Tavolo di Lavoro MATTM-MiSE
Circular economy network
ENEL
Novamont
*Legenda Indicatori applicabili
Indicatori potenzialmente applicabili, con opportune modifiche a adattamenti
Experience FrameworkFramework of analysed
experiences
Most part of experiences (9
out of 12) is related to macro-
level and, among these, only
4 show indicators that with
some adjustment could be
applicable at meso- and
micro- level also.
A lot of work should be done
for measuring circularity at
meso- and micro- level.
ICESP WG3: 2018-19 output
Iniziativa
Pilastro dell’economia circolare
Input1 Prodotto
come servizio
Condivisione, uso e
consumo
Estensione vita utile
Riutilizzo e riparazione
Output2
Agenda 2030
International Resource Panel
Ellen MacArthur Foundation
Circle Economy
Quadro di monitoraggio dell’economia circolare
Resource efficiency scoreboard
Raw Materials scoreboard
Conti ambientali
Tavolo di Lavoro MATTM-MiSE
Circular economy network
ENEL
Novamont
1 Materie prime, Materie prime seconde, Sottoprodotti, Progettazione, Produzione e distribuzione
2 Raccolta e gestione rifiuti, Sottoprodotti, End of waste, Preparazione per il riutilizzo, Recupero e riciclaggio
rifiuti, Utilizzo dei sottoprodotti
Circular economy pillars
ExperienceProduct
as a
service
Sharing,
use and
consumpti
on
Life
extension,
reuse and
repair
CIRCULAR ECONOMY PILLARS
For circular economy indicators, all
experiences take into consideration
issues related to
• INPUTS (raw materials, secondary
raw materials, by-products, design,
production and distribution) and
• OUTPUTS (waste collection and
management, reuse, by-products,
end-of-waste, preparation for
reuse, recovery, recycling, by-
products use).
Few experiences take into
consideration other circular economy
steps as product as a service, sharing,
use and consumption, life extension,
reuse, repair).
ICESP WG3: 2018-19 output
- Self-Sufficiency in raw materials
- Green Procurement
- Waste Generation
- Food waste
- Industrial symbiosis
- Life cycle design
- Recycling Rates
- Recycling / Recovery for specific waste
Stream
- Contribution of recycled materials to raw
materials
- Trade in recycled materials
- Investment, Jobs and gross value added
- Number of Patents related to recycling and
secondary raw materials
- Social & Environmental Issues
From the analysis of 95 documents on Indicators for C.E. – Matrix as a method to take under control
future CE development. Selection based on a query with the following keys:
1. COMPUTABILITY, 2. SCALABILITY, 3. REPRODUCIBILITY
UNI TC057 Proposal to the ISO TC323 plenary
meeting, June 2020
A Circular Economy beyond waste? Innovation adoptions and inventions in the manufacturing sector
Evidence from Italy
• “The Circular economy offers an opportunity to reinvent our economy, making it more sustainable and competitive“
• “This will bring benefits for European businesses, industries, and citizens alike”
(European Commission, December 2015)
Resource efficiency
Eco Innovationscoreboard
the EU Eco-Innovation Scoreboard (EIO, 2018), the ASEM Eco-Innovation Index (ASEI) (ASEM, 2017), the OECD's Green Growth Indicator framework (OECD, 2017) and the Global Cleantech Innovation Index (Cleantech Group and WWF, 2017).
Community Innovation surveyhttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/community-innovation-survey
• The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) based innovation statistics are part of the EU science and technology statistics. Surveys are carried out with two years' frequency by EU member states and number of ESS member countries.
• The CIS is a survey of innovation activity in enterprises. The harmonised survey is designed to provide information on the innovativeness of sectors by type of enterprises, on the different types of innovation and on various aspects of the development of an innovation, such as the objectives, the sources of information, the public funding, the innovation expenditures etc. The CIS provides statistics broken down by countries, type of innovators, economic activities and size classes.
Some CIS waves are dedicated to eco innovations with some insights intoresource efficiency and waste…
CIS like Survey on Italy (in fieri) over CE innovation and inventions 2018-19
Final dataset ready by July 2020
Now we have collected 1400 out of 4000 firms
Next year we ll have a new survey with additional focus on BIOECONOMY & CE
OECD, Frascati Manual 2015 - Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development.
Pavitt tech category & geo areas
Total 13 163 176 10 77 572 659 3 17 93 113
Supplier Dominated 5 113 118 7 34 354 395 1 10 52 63
Specialised Suppliers 2 19 21 1 19 102 122 1 3 16 20
Science-Based 2 5 7 6 25 31 4 4
Scale Intensive 4 26 30 2 18 91 111 1 4 21 26
Pavitt Large Medium Small Total Large Medium Small Total Large Medium Small Total
Centre North South
Geo and Size2018
Small 25-50 employees50-250 medium250+ large
The dataset is regions based
Adoptions (CE and energyInnovations)
Type of inno number of firms share of innovators
Inno Water use reduction 1,366 8.05%
Inno Mat use reduction 1,366 16.47%
Inno renewables energy 1,366 14.93%
Inno energy savings 1,366 22.77%
Inno Waste production reduction 1,366 19.33%
Inno reuse of materials 1,366 10.98%
Inno waste flows conveyed to other firms 1,366 16.62%
Inno design for reducing rawmaterial 1,366 8.78%
Inno design for recycling 1,366 7.76%
Inn CO2 reduction 1,366 8.13%
Analyse correlations
Drivers
Effects
Sector/regionalfocus
Patenting activities in SMEs
Number of patent (per firm) Number of firms
0 1297
1 39
2 13
3 4
4 4
5 1
7 1
8 1
10 4
11 1
15 1
Number of green patent (per firm)
Number of firms
0 13511 82 43 2
10 1
The CE is more aboutinnovation adoption thanformalised innovations..
Funding sources for CE innovations
Source Average Share
internal 68.99
Standard banking 15.43
Specific loan 1.57
shares 0.91
Public subsidies 6.52
crowdfunding 1.51
others 2.05
The Circular Economy
Initiative Germany (CEID)
Bellagio Process Seminar - Second Webinar
June 17, 2020
Dr. Susanne Kadner, acatech - National Academy of Science and Engineering
1 | Circular Economy Initiative Deutschland | Bellagio Process Seminar – Second Webinar | June 17, 2020
Politics CEID office
Industry Science
Civil society
and other
organisations
As of June 17, 2020
Members of the Circular Economy Initiative Germany: Broad stakeholder
involvement to ensure acceptance and to generate momentum
2 | Circular Economy Initiative Deutschland | Bellagio Process Seminar – Second Webinar | June 17, 2020
Metrics are needed to track progress of the transition to a circular
economy and need to be considered in roadmap development
Goals of the Circular Economy Initiative Germany Approach to consider CE Metrics in Roadmap
• All relevant stakeholders agree on a joint target
vision 2030/2050 of circular value creation in
Germany until April 2021
The following themes are elaborated in working
groups
• Circular business models
• New value networks for traction batteries
• New value networks for packaging
• Policy recommendations on technology development
and regulatory framework
• Macroeconomic analysis of contribution to reduced
material input and GHG emissions
Assessment and selection of existing metrics to
evaluate progress and success of national
roadmaps
1. An assessment of existing CE metrics on micro and
macro-level
2. A prioritization of selected metrics enabling the
measurement of CE roadmap activities in line with
the three dimensions of sustainability
3. Results from a science and industry-based
discourse on how CE metrics could be
operationalized by introducing the necessary
reporting infrastructure
We are looking forward to
being in touch
www.circular-economy-initiative.de
Dr. Joern Kobus ([email protected])
Dr. Susanne Kadner ([email protected])