the behaviour and design of steel structures to ec3

513

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jan-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
File Attachment
200134f8coverv05bjpg

The Behaviour and Design ofSteel Structures to EC3

Also available from Taylor amp Francis

Steel Structures Practical Design Studies3rd EditionH Al Nagiem andT MacGinley Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash30156ndash5

Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash30157ndash2

Limit States Design of Structural SteelworkD Nethercot Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash419ndash26080ndash6

Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash419ndash26090ndash5

Fracture MechanicsM Janssen et al Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash34622ndash1

Assessment and Refurbishment of SteelStructuresZ Agocs et al Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash23598ndash3

Information and ordering details

For price availability and ordering visit our website wwwtandfcoukbuiltenvironment

Alternatively our books are available from all good bookshops

The Behaviour and Designof Steel Structures to EC3

Fourth edition

NS Trahair MA BradfordDA Nethercot and L Gardner

First edition published 1977Second edition 1988 revised second edition published 1988Third edition ndash Australian (AS4100) published 1998Third edition ndash British (BS5950) published 2001

Fourth edition published 2008byTaylor amp Francis2 Park Square Milton Park Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN

Simultaneously published in the USA and CanadabyTaylor amp Francis270 Madison Ave NewYork NY 10016

Taylor amp Francis is an imprint of theTaylor amp Francis Groupan informa business

copy 1977 1988 2001 2008 NS Trahair MA BradfordDA Nethercot and L Gardner

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reprinted orreproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronicmechanical or other means now known or hereafterinvented including photocopying and recording or in anyinformation storage or retrieval system without permission inwriting from the publishers

The publisher makes no representation express or impliedwith regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book andcannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any efforts oromissions that may be made

British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication DataThe behaviour and design of steel structures to EC3 NS Trahair

[et al] ndash 4th edp cm

Includes bibliographical references and index1 Building Iron and steel I Trahair NS

TA684T7 20086241prime821ndashdc22 2007016421

ISBN10 0ndash415ndash41865ndash8 (hbk)ISBN10 0ndash415ndash41866ndash6 (pbk)ISBN10 0ndash203ndash93593ndash4 (ebk)

ISBN13 978ndash0ndash415ndash41865ndash2 (hbk)ISBN13 978ndash0ndash415ndash41866ndash9 (pbk)ISBN13 978ndash0ndash203ndash93593ndash4 (ebk)

This edition published in the Taylor amp Francis e-Library 2007

ldquoTo purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor amp Francis or Routledgersquoscollection of thousands of eBooks please go to wwweBookstoretandfcoukrdquo

ISBN 0-203-93593-4 Master e-book ISBN

Contents

Preface ixUnits and conversion factors xGlossary of terms xiNotations xv

1 Introduction 1

11 Steel structures 112 Design 313 Material behaviour 814 Member and structure behaviour 1415 Loads 1716 Analysis of steel structures 2117 Design of steel structures 24

References 30

2 Tension members 33

21 Introduction 3322 Concentrically loaded tension members 3323 Eccentrically and locally connected tension members 3724 Bending of tension members 3925 Stress concentrations 4026 Design of tension members 4227 Worked examples 4528 Unworked examples 48

References 49

3 Compression members 50

31 Introduction 5032 Elastic compression members 51

vi Contents

33 Inelastic compression members 5534 Real compression members 6135 Design of compression members 6236 Restrained compression members 6537 Other compression members 7438 Appendix ndash elastic compression members 7839 Appendix ndash inelastic compression members 81310 Appendix ndash effective lengths of compression members 83311 Appendix ndash torsional buckling 88312 Worked examples 89313 Unworked examples 96

References 98

4 Local buckling of thin-plate elements 100

41 Introduction 10042 Plate elements in compression 10243 Plate elements in shear 11344 Plate elements in bending 11845 Plate elements in bending and shear 12146 Plate elements in bearing 12447 Design against local buckling 12648 Appendix ndash elastic buckling of plate elements

in compression 13949 Worked examples 141410 Unworked examples 151

References 152

5 In-plane bending of beams 154

51 Introduction 15452 Elastic analysis of beams 15653 Bending stresses in elastic beams 15754 Shear stresses in elastic beams 16355 Plastic analysis of beams 17556 Strength design of beams 18357 Serviceability design of beams 18958 Appendix ndash bending stresses in elastic beams 19059 Appendix ndash thin-walled section properties 191510 Appendix ndash shear stresses in elastic beams 195511 Appendix ndash plastic analysis of beams 197

Contents vii

512 Worked examples 205513 Unworked examples 224

References 225

6 Lateral buckling of beams 227

61 Introduction 22762 Elastic beams 22863 Inelastic beams 23764 Real beams 23965 Design against lateral buckling 24066 Restrained beams 24567 Cantilevers and overhanging beams 25368 Braced and continuous beams 25669 Rigid frames 261610 Monosymmetric beams 263611 Non-uniform beams 266612 Appendix ndash elastic beams 268613 Appendix ndash effective lengths of beams 273614 Appendix ndash monosymmetric beams 274615 Worked examples 275616 Unworked examples 290

References 291

7 Beam-columns 295

71 Introduction 29572 In-plane behaviour of isolated beam-columns 29673 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of isolated

beam-columns 31174 Biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns 31975 Appendix ndash in-plane behaviour of elastic beam-columns 32376 Appendix ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling of

elastic beam-columns 32677 Worked examples 32978 Unworked examples 343

References 345

8 Frames 347

81 Introduction 34782 Triangulated frames 348

viii Contents

83 Two-dimensional flexural frames 35084 Three-dimensional flexural frames 37285 Worked examples 37386 Unworked examples 386

References 388

9 Joints 392

91 Introduction 39292 Joint components 39293 Arrangement of joints 39694 Behaviour of joints 39895 Common joints 40696 Design of bolts 41097 Design of bolted plates 41498 Design of welds 41799 Appendix ndash elastic analysis of joints 420910 Worked examples 423911 Unworked examples 431

References 432

10 Torsion members 433

101 Introduction 433102 Uniform torsion 436103 Non-uniform torsion 449104 Torsion design 461105 Torsion and bending 466106 Distortion 469107 Appendix ndash uniform torsion 471108 Appendix ndash non-uniform torsion 473109 Worked examples 4781010 Unworked examples 484

References 485

Index 487

Preface

This fourth British edition has been directed specifically to the design of steel structures inaccordance with Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures The principal part of this is Part1-1General Rules and Rules for Buildings and this is referred to generally in the text asEC3 Also referred to in the text are Part 1-5 Plated Structural Elements and Part 1-8Design Of Joints which are referred to as EC3-1-5 and EC3-1-8 EC3 will be accompaniedby NationalAnnexes which will contain any National Determined Parameters for the UnitedKingdom which differ from the recommendations given in EC3

Designers who have previously used BS5950 (which is discussed in the third Britishedition of this book) will see a number of significant differences in EC3 One of the moreobvious is the notation The notation in this book has been changed generally so that it isconsistent with EC3

Another significant difference is the general absence of tables of values computed fromthe basic design equations which might be used to facilitate manual design Some design-ers will want to prepare their own tables but in some cases the complexities of the basicequations are such that computer programs are required for efficient design This is espe-cially the case for members under combined compression and bending which are discussedin Chapter 7 However the examples in this book are worked in full and do not rely on suchdesign aids

EC3 does not provide approximations for calculating the lateral buckling resistancesof beams but instead expects the designer to be able to determine the elastic bucklingmoment to be used in the design equations Additional information to assist designers inthis determination has been given in Chapter 6 of this book EC3 also expects the designerto be able to determine the elastic buckling loads of compression members The additionalinformation given in Chapter 3 has been retained to assist designers in the calculation ofthe elastic buckling loads

EC3 provides elementary rules for the design of members in torsion These are gener-alised and extended in Chapter 10 which contains a general treatment of torsion togetherwith a number of design aids

The preparation of this fourth British edition has provided an opportunity to revise thetext generally to incorporate the results of recent findings and research This is in accordancewith the principal objective of the book to provide students and practising engineers withan understanding of the relationships between structural behaviour and the design criteriaimplied by the rules of design codes such as EC3

NS Trahair MA Bradford DA Nethercot and L GardnerApril 2007

Units and conversion factors

Units

While most expressions and equations used in this book are arranged so that theyare non-dimensional there are a number of exceptions In all of these SI units areused which are derived from the basic units of kilogram (kg) for mass metre (m)for length and second (s) for time

The SI unit of force is the newton (N) which is the force which causes a mass of1 kg to have an acceleration of 1 ms2 The acceleration due to gravity is 9807 ms2

approximately and so the weight of a mass of 1 kg is 9807 NThe SI unit of stress is the pascal (Pa) which is the average stress exerted by a

force of 1 N on an area of 1 m2 The pascal is too small to be convenient in structuralengineering and it is common practice to use either the megapascal (1 MPa =106 Pa) or the identical newton per square millimetre (1 Nmm2 = 106 Pa) Thenewton per square millimetre (Nmm2) is used generally in this book

Table of conversion factors

To Imperial (British) units To SI units

1 kg = 0068 53 slug 1 slug = 1459 kg1 m = 3281 ft 1 ft = 0304 8 m

= 3937 in 1 in = 0025 4 m1 mm = 0003 281 ft 1 ft = 3048 mm

= 0039 37 in 1 in = 254 mm1 N = 0224 8 lb 1 lb = 4448 N1 kN = 0224 8 kip 1 kip = 4448 kN

= 0100 36 ton 1 ton = 9964 kN1 Nmm2lowastdagger = 0145 0 kipin2 (ksi) 1 kipin2 = 6895 Nmm2

= 0064 75 tonin2 1 tonin2 = 1544 Nmm2

1 kNm = 0737 6 kip ft 1 kip ft = 1356 kNm= 0329 3 ton ft 1 ton ft = 3037 kNm

Noteslowast 1 Nmm2 = 1 MPadagger There are some dimensionally inconsistent equations used in this book which arise

because a numerical value (in Nmm2) is substituted for the Youngrsquos modulus of elasticityE while the yield stress fy remains algebraic The value of the yield stress fy used in theseequations should therefore be expressed in Nmm2 Care should be used in convertingthese equations from SI to Imperial units

xii Glossary of terms

Distortion A mode of deformation in which the cross-section of a memberchanges shape

Effective length The length of an equivalent simply supported member whichhas the same elastic buckling load as the actual member Referred to in EC3 asthe buckling length

Effective width That portion of the width of a flat plate which has a non-uniformstress distribution (caused by local buckling or shear lag) which may be con-sidered as fully effective when the non-uniformity of the stress distribution isignored

Elastic buckling analysis An analysis of the elastic buckling of the member orframe out of the plane of loading

Elastic buckling load The load at elastic buckling Referred to in EC3 as theelastic critical buckling load

Elastic buckling stress The maximum stress at elastic buckling Referred to inEC3 as the elastic critical buckling stress

Factor of safety The factor by which the strength is divided to obtain the workingload capacity and the maximum permissible stress

Fastener A bolt pin rivet or weld used in a connectionFatigue A mode of failure in which a member fractures after many applications

of loadFirst-order analysis An analysis in which equilibrium is formulated for the

undeformed position of the structure so that the moments caused by productsof the loads and deflections are ignored

Flexural buckling A mode of buckling in which a member deflectsFlexuralndashtorsional buckling A mode of buckling in which a member deflects

and twists Referred to in EC3 as torsionalndashflexural buckling or lateralndashtorsionalbuckling

Friction-grip joint A joint in which forces are transferred by friction forces gen-erated between plates by clamping them together with preloaded high-strengthbolts

Geometrical imperfection Initial crookedness or twist of a memberGirt A horizontal member between columns which supports wall sheetingGusset A short-plate element used in a connectionImposed load The load assumed to act as a result of the use of the structure but

excluding wind loadInelastic behaviour Deformations accompanied by yieldingIn-plane behaviour The behaviour of a member which deforms only in the plane

of the applied loadsJoint The means by which members are connected together and through which

forces and moments are transmittedLateral buckling Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of a beam Referred to in EC3 as

lateralndashtorsional bucklingLimit states design Amethod of design in which the performance of the structure

is assessed by comparison with a number of limiting conditions of usefulness

Glossary of terms xiii

The most common conditions are the strength limit state and the serviceabilitylimit state

Load effects Internal forces and moments induced by the loadsLoad factor A factor used to multiply a nominal load to obtain part of the design

loadLoads Forces acting on a structureLocal buckling A mode of buckling which occurs locally (rather than generally)

in a thin-plate element of a memberMechanism A structural system with a sufficient number of frictionless and

plastic hinges to allow it to deform indefinitely under constant loadMember A one-dimensional structural element which supports transverse or

longitudinal loads or momentsNominal load The load magnitude determined from a loading code or

specificationNon-uniform torsion The general state of torsion in which the twist of the

member varies non-uniformlyPlastic analysis Amethod of analysis in which the ultimate strength of a structure

is computed by considering the conditions for which there are sufficient plastichinges to transform the structure into a mechanism

Plastic hinge A fully yielded cross-section of a member which allows themember portions on either side to rotate under constant moment (the plasticmoment)

Plastic section A section capable of reaching and maintaining the full plasticmoment until a plastic collapse mechanism is formed Referred to in EC3 as aClass 1 section

Post-buckling strength A reserve of strength after buckling which is possessedby some thin-plate elements

Preloaded bolts High-strength bolts used in friction-grip jointsPurlin A horizontal member between main beams which supports roof sheetingReduced modulus The modulus of elasticity used to predict the buckling of

inelastic members under the so called constant applied load because it isreduced below the elastic modulus

Residual stresses The stresses in an unloaded member caused by non-uniformplastic deformation or by uneven cooling after rolling flame cutting or welding

Rigid frame A frame with rigid connections between members Referred to inEC3 as a continuous frame

Second-order analysis An analysis in which equilibrium is formulated for thedeformed position of the structure so that the moments caused by the productsof the loads and deflections are included

Semi-compact section A section which can reach the yield stress but whichdoes not have sufficient resistance to inelastic local buckling to allow it to reachor to maintain the full plastic moment while a plastic mechanism is formingReferred to in EC3 as a Class 3 section

Semi-rigid frame A frame with semi-rigid connections between membersReferred to in EC3 as a semi-continuous frame

xiv Glossary of terms

Service loads The design loads appropriate for the serviceability limit stateShear centre The point in the cross-section of a beam through which the resultant

transverse force must act if the beam is not to twistShear lag A phenomenon which occurs in thin wide flanges of beams in which

shear straining causes the distribution of bending normal stresses to becomesensibly non-uniform

Simple frame A frame for which the joints may be assumed not to transmitmoments

Slender section Asection which does not have sufficient resistance to local buck-ling to allow it to reach the yield stress Referred to in EC3 as a Class 4 section

Splice A connection between two similar collinear membersSquash load The value of the compressive axial load which will cause yielding

throughout a short memberStiffener A plate or section attached to a web to strengthen a memberStrain-hardening Astressndashstrain state which occurs at stresses which are greater

than the yield stressStrength limit state The state of collapse or loss of structural integritySystem length Length between adjacent lateral brace points or between brace

point and an adjacent end of the memberTangent modulus The slope of the inelastic stressndashstrain curve which is used to

predict buckling of inelastic members under increasing loadTensile strength The maximum nominal stress which can be reached in tensionTension field A mode of shear transfer in the thin web of a stiffened plate girder

which occurs after elastic local buckling takes place In this mode the tensiondiagonal of each stiffened panel behaves in the same way as does the diagonaltension member of a parallel chord truss

Tension member A member which supports axial tension loadsTorsional buckling A mode of buckling in which a member twistsUltimate load design A method of design in which the ultimate load capacity

of the structure is compared with factored loadsUniform torque That part of the total torque which is associated with the rate

of change of the angle of twist of the member Referred to in EC3 as St Venanttorque

Uniform torsion The special state of torsion in which the angle of twist of themember varies linearly Referred to in EC3 as St Venant torsion

Warping A mode of deformation in which plane cross-sections do not remainin plane

Warping torque The other part of the total torque (than the uniform torque)This only occurs during non-uniform torsion and is associated with changes inthe warping of the cross-sections

Working load design A method of design in which the stresses caused by theservice loads are compared with maximum permissible stresses

Yield strength The average stress during yielding when significant strainingtakes place Usually the minimum yield strength in tension specified for theparticular steel

Glossary of terms

Actions The loads to which a structure is subjectedAdvanced analysis An analysis which takes account of second-order effects

inelastic behaviour residual stresses and geometrical imperfectionsBeam A member which supports transverse loads or moments onlyBeam-column A member which supports transverse loads or moments which

cause bending and axial loads which cause compressionBiaxial bending The general state of a member which is subjected to bending

actions in both principal planes together with axial compression and torsionactions

Brittle fracture Amode of failure under a tension action in which fracture occurswithout yielding

Buckling A mode of failure in which there is a sudden deformation in a directionor plane normal to that of the loads or moments acting

Buckling length The length of an equivalent simply supported member whichhas the same elastic buckling load as the actual member

Cleat A short-length component (often of angle cross-section) used in aconnection

Column A member which supports axial compression loadsCompact section Asection capable of reaching the full plastic moment Referred

to in EC3 as a Class 2 sectionComponent method of design A method of joint design in which the behaviour

of the joint is synthesised from the characteristics of its componentsConnection A jointDead load The weight of all permanent construction Referred to in EC3 as

permanent loadDeformation capacity A measure of the ability of a structure to deform as a

plastic collapse mechanism develops without otherwise failingDesign load A combination of factored nominal loads which the structure is

required to resistDesign resistance The capacity of the structure or element to resist the design

load

Notations

The following notation is used in this book Usually only one meaning is assignedto each symbol but in those cases where more meanings than one are possiblethen the correct one will be evident from the context in which it is used

Main symbols

A AreaB Bimomentb WidthC Coefficientc Width of part of sectiond Depth or DiameterE Youngrsquos modulus of elasticitye Eccentricity or ExtensionF Force or Force per unit lengthf Stress property of steelG Dead load or Shear modulus of elasticityH Horizontal forceh Height or Overall depth of sectionI Second moment of areai Integer or Radius of gyrationk Buckling coefficient or Factor or Relative stiffness ratioL LengthM Momentm IntegerN Axial force or Number of load cyclesn Integerp Distance between holes or rows of holesQ Loadq Intensity of distributed loadR Radius or Reaction or Resistancer Radius

xvi Notations

s SpacingT Torquet ThicknessU Strain energyu Deflection in x directionV Shear or Vertical loadv Deflection in y directionW Section modulus or Work donew Deflection in z directionx Longitudinal axisy Principal axis of cross-sectionz Principal axis of cross-sectionα Angle or Factor or Load factor at failure or Stiffnessχ Reduction factor∆ Deflection∆σ Stress rangeδ Amplification factor or Deflectionε Normal strain or Yield stress coefficient = radic

(235fy)φ Angle of twist rotation or Global sway imperfectionγ Partial factor or Shear strainκ Curvatureλ Plate slenderness = (ct)ελ Generalised slendernessmicro Slip factorν Poissonrsquos ratioθ Angleσ Normal stressτ Shear stress

Subscripts

as AntisymmetricB Bottomb Beam or Bearing or Bending or Bolt or Bracedc Centroid or Column or Compressioncr Elastic (critical) bucklingd DesignEd Design load effecteff Effectiveel ElasticF Forcef FlangeG Dead loadI Imposed load

Notations xvii

i Initial or Integerj Jointk Characteristic valueL LeftLT Lateral (or lateralndashtorsional) bucklingM Materialm Momentmax Maximummin MinimumN Axial forcen Integer or Nominal valuenet Netop Out-of-planep Bearing or Platep pl PlasticQ Variable loadR Resistance or Rightr Rafter or ReducedRd Design resistanceRk Characteristic resistances Slip or Storey or Sway or Symmetricser Servicest Stiffener or Strain hardeningT Top or Torsional bucklingt St Venant or uniform torsion or TensionTF Flexuralndashtorsional (or torsionalndashflexural) bucklingtf Tension fieldult UltimateV v ShearW Wind loadw Warping or Web or Weldx x axisy y axis or Yieldz z axisσ Normal stressτ Shear stress0 Initial value1ndash4 Cross-section class

Additional notationsAe Area enclosed by hollow sectionAf max Flange area at maximum sectionAf min Flange area at minimum section

xviii Notations

Ah Area of hole reduced for staggerAnt Anv Net areas subjected to tension or shearAs Tensile stress area of a boltAv Shear area of sectionC Index for portal frame bucklingCm Equivalent uniform moment factorD Plate rigidity Et312(1 minus v2)

D Vector of nodal deformationsEr Reduced modulusEt Tangent modulusF Buckling factor for beam-columns with unequal end momentsFpC Bolt preloadFL FT Weld longitudinal and transverse forces per unit lengthFT Rd Design resistance of a T-stub flange[G] Stability matrixIcz Second moment of area of compression flangeIm Second moment of area of memberIn = b3

ntn12Ir Second moment of area of restraining member or rafterIt Uniform torsion section constantIyz Product second moment of areaIw Warping torsion section constantIzm Value of Iz for critical segmentIzr Value of Iz for restraining segmentK Beam or torsion constant = radic

(π2EIwGJL2) or Fatigue lifeconstant

[K] Elastic stiffness matrixKm = radic

(π2EIyd2f 4GItL2)

Lc Distance between restraints or Length of column which failsunder N alone

Lj Length between end bolts in a long jointLm Length of critical segment or Member lengthLr Length of restraining segment or rafterLstable Stable length for member with plastic hingesLF Load factorMA MB End momentsMb0yRd Design member moment resistance when N = 0 and Mz = 0Mc0zRd Design member moment resistance when N = 0 and My = 0McrMN Elastic buckling moment reduced for axial compressionMN yRd MN zRd Major and minor axis beam section moment resistancesME = (πL)

radic(EIyGIt)

Mf First-order end moment of frame memberMfb Braced component of Mf

Notations xix

Mfp Major axis moment resisted by plastic flangesMfs Sway component of Mf

MI Inelastic beam buckling momentMIu Value of MI for uniform bendingML Limiting end moment on a crooked and twisted beam at first

yieldMmax0 Value of Mmax when N = 0MN Plastic moment reduced for axial forceMb Out-of-plane member moment resistance for bending aloneMbt Out-of-plane member moment resistance for bending and

tensionMry Mrz Section moment capacities reduced for axial loadMS Simple beam momentMty Lesser of Mry and Mbt

Mzx Value of Mcr for simply supported beam in uniform bendingMzxr Value of Mzx reduced for incomplete torsional end restraintNi Vector of initial axial forcesNbRd Design member axial force resistance when My = 0 and Mz = 0NcrMN Elastic buckling load reduced for bending momentNcrL = π2EIL2

Ncrr Reduced modulus buckling loadNim Constant amplitude fatigue life for ith stress rangeNcrt Tangent modulus buckling loadQD Concentrated dead loadQI Concentrated imposed loadQm Upper-bound mechanism estimate of Qult

Qms Value of Qs for the critical segmentQrs Value of Qs for an adjacent restraining segmentQs Buckling load for an unrestrained segment or Lower bound

static estimate of Qult

R Radius of circular cross-section or Ratio of column and rafterstiffnesses or Ratio of minimum to maximum stress

RH Ratio of rafter rise to column heightR R1minus4 Restraint parametersSF Factor of safetySj Joint stiffnessTM Torque exerted by bending momentTP Torque exerted by axial loadVR Resultant shear forceVTy VTz Transverse shear forces in a fillet weldVvi Shear force in ith fastenera = radic

(EIwGJ ) or Distance along member or Distance fromweb to shear centre or Effective throat size of a weld or Ratioof web to total section area or Spacing of transverse stiffeners

xx Notations

a0 Distance from shear centreb cf or cw

c Factor for flange contribution to shear resistancecm Bending coefficient for beam-columns with unequal end

momentsde Depth of elastic coredf Distance between flange centroidsd0 Hole diametere1 End distance in a platee2 Edge distance in a plateeNy Shift of effective compression force from centroidf Factor used to modify χLT

hw Clear distance between flangesif z Radius of gyration of equivalent compression flangeip Polar radius of gyration

i0 =radic(i2

p + y20 + z2

0)

k Deflection coefficient or Modulus of foundation reactionkc Slenderness correction factor or Correction factor for moment

distributionkij Interaction factors for bending and compressionks Factor for hole shape and sizekt Axial stiffness of connectorkv Shear stiffness of connectorkσ Plate buckling coefficientk1 Factor for plate tension fracturek1 k2 Stiffness factorseff Effective length of a fillet weld or Effective length of an

unstiffened column flangey Effective loaded lengthm Fatigue life index or Torque per unit lengthn Axial compression ratio or Number of shear planespF Probability of failurep(x) Particular integralp1 Pitch of bolt holesp2 Spacing of bolt hole liness Distance around thin-walled sectionss Stiff bearing lengths Staggered pitch of holessm Minimum staggered pitch for no reduction in effective areas1 s2 Side widths of a fillet weldw = WplWel

wAB Settlement of B relative to Awc Mid-span deflectionz Distance to centroid

Notations xxi

yp zp Distances to plastic neutral axesyr zr Coordinates of centre of rotationy0 z0 Coordinates of shear centrezc Distance to buckling centre of rotation or Distance to centroidzn Distance below centroid to neutral axiszQ Distance below centroid to loadzt Distance below centroid to translational restraintα Coefficient used to determine effective width or Unit warping

(see equation 1035)αbc Buckling coefficient for beam columns with unequal end

momentsαbcI Inelastic moment modification factor for bending and com-

pressionαbcu Value of αbc for ultimate strengthαd Factor for plate tear outαi In-plane load factorαL Limiting value of α for second mode bucklingαLT Imperfection factor for lateral bucklingαLα0 Indices in interaction equations for biaxial bendingαm Moment modification factor for beam lateral buckling

αn = (1A)int E

0 αtdsαr αt Rotational and translational stiffnessesαxαy Stiffnesses of rotational restraints acting about the x y axesαst Buckling moment factor for stepped and tapered beamsα β Indices in section interaction equations for biaxial bendingβ Correction factor for the lateral buckling of rolled sections or

Safety indexβe Stiffness factor for far end restraint conditionsβLf Reduction factor for bolts in long jointsβm End moment factor or Ratio of end momentsβw Fillet weld correlation factorβy Monosymmetry section constant for I-beamβ23 Effective net area factors for eccentrically connected tension

membersσC Reference value for fatigue siteσL Fatigue endurance limitε Load height parameter = (Kπ)2zQdf

Φ Cumulative frequency distribution of a standard normalvariate or Value used to determine χ

φCd Design rotation capacity of a jointφj Joint rotationγF γG γQ Load partial factorsγm γn γs Factors used in moment amplification

xxii Notations

γ12 Relative stiffnessesη Crookedness or imperfection parameter or Web shear resis-

tance factor (= 12 for steels up to S460)λc0 Slenderness limit of equivalent compression flangeλp Generalised plate slenderness = radic

(fyσcr)

λ1 = πradic(Efy)

micro = radic(NEI)

θ Central twist or Slope change at plastic hinge or Torsion stressfunction

ρ Perpendicular distance from centroid or Reduction factorρm Monosymmetric section parameter = IzcIz

ρc ρr Column and rafter factors for portal frame bucklingρ0 Perpendicular distance from shear centreσac σat Stresses due to axial compression and tensionσbcy Compression stress due to bending about y axisσbty σbtz Tension stresses due to bending about y z axesσcrl Bending stress at local bucklingσcrp Bearing stress at local bucklingσL Limiting major axis stress in a crooked and twisted beam at

first yieldτh τv Shear stresses due to Vy Vz

τhc τvc Shear stresses due to a circulating shear flowτho τvo Shear stresses in an open sectionψ End moment ratio or Stress ratioψ0 Load combination factor

Chapter 1

Introduction

11 Steel structures

Engineering structures are required to support loads and resist forces and totransfer these loads and forces to the foundations of the structures The loads andforces may arise from the masses of the structure or from manrsquos use of the struc-tures or from the forces of nature The uses of structures include the enclosure ofspace (buildings) the provision of access (bridges) the storage of materials (tanksand silos) transportation (vehicles) or the processing of materials (machines)Structures may be made from a number of different materials including steelconcrete wood aluminium stone plastic etc or from combinations of these

Structures are usually three-dimensional in their extent but sometimes they areessentially two-dimensional (plates and shells) or even one-dimensional (linesand cables) Solid steel structures invariably include comparatively high volumesof high-cost structural steel which are understressed and uneconomic except invery small-scale components Because of this steel structures are usually formedfrom one-dimensional members (as in rectangular and triangulated frames) orfrom two-dimensional members (as in box girders) or from both (as in stressedskin industrial buildings) Three-dimensional steel structures are often arranged sothat they act as if composed of a number of independent two-dimensional framesor one-dimensional members (Figure 11)

Structural steel members may be one-dimensional as for beams and columns(whose lengths are much greater than their transverse dimensions) or two-dimensional as for plates (whose lengths and widths are much greater than theirthicknesses) as shown in Figure 12c While one-dimensional steel members maybe solid they are usually thin-walled in that their thicknesses are much less thantheir other transverse dimensions Thin-walled steel members are rolled in a num-ber of cross-sectional shapes [1] or are built up by connecting together a numberof rolled sections or plates as shown in Figure 12b Structural members canbe classified as tension or compression members beams beam-columns torsionmembers or plates (Figure 13) according to the method by which they transmitthe forces in the structure The behaviour and design of these structural membersare discussed in this book

2 Introduction

[2-D]rigid frames

+

[1-D]beams(purlins and girts)

+

[2-D] bracingtrusses

[3-D] structure

equiv

Figure 11 Reduction of a [3-D] structure to simpler forms

(a) Solid [1-D] member (b) Thin-walled [1-D] members

(c) [2-D] member

t d ltlt L~~ t ltlt d ltlt L

t ltlt d L~~

Figure 12 Types of structural steel members

Structural steel members may be connected together at joints in a number ofways and by using a variety of connectors These include pins rivets bolts andwelds of various types Steel plate gussets or angle cleats or other elements mayalso be used in the connections The behaviour and design of these connectors andjoints are also discussed in this book

Introduction 3

(a) Tension member(b) Compression

member (c) Beam

(d) Beam-column (e) Torsion member (f) Plate

Figure 13 Load transmission by structural members

This book deals chiefly with steel frame structures composed of one-dimensionalmembers but much of the information given is also relevant to plate structuresThe members are generally assumed to be hot-rolled or fabricated from hot-rolledelements while the frames considered are those used in buildings However muchof the material presented is also relevant to bridge structures [2 3] and to structuralmembers cold-formed from light-gauge steel plates [4ndash7]

The purposes of this chapter are first to consider the complete design process andthe relationships between the behaviour and analysis of steel structures and theirstructural design and second to present information of a general nature (includinginformation on material properties and structural loads) which is required for usein the later chapters The nature of the design process is discussed first and thenbrief summaries are made of the relevant material properties of structural steeland of the structural behaviour of members and frames The loads acting on thestructures are considered and the choice of appropriate methods of analysing thesteel structures is discussed Finally the considerations governing the synthesis ofan understanding of the structural behaviour with the results of analysis to formthe design processes of EC3 [8] are treated

12 Design

121 Design requirements

The principal design requirement of a structure is that it should be effective thatis it should fulfil the objectives and satisfy the needs for which it was created The

4 Introduction

structure may provide shelter and protection against the environment by enclosingspace as in buildings or it may provide access for people and materials as inbridges or it may store materials as in tanks and silos or it may form part of amachine for transporting people or materials as in vehicles or for operating onmaterials The design requirement of effectiveness is paramount as there is littlepoint in considering a structure which will not fulfil its purpose

The satisfaction of the effectiveness requirement depends on whether the struc-ture satisfies the structural and other requirements The structural requirementsrelate to the way in which the structure resists and transfers the forces and loadsacting on it The primary structural requirement is that of safety and the first con-sideration of the structural engineer is to produce a structure which will not fail inits design lifetime or which has an acceptably low risk of failure The other impor-tant structural requirement is usually concerned with the stiffness of the structurewhich must be sufficient to ensure that the serviceability of the structure is notimpaired by excessive deflections vibrations and the like

The other design requirements include those of economy and of harmony Thecost of the structure which includes both the initial cost and the cost of mainte-nance is usually of great importance to the owner and the requirement of economyusually has a significant influence on the design of the structure The cost of thestructure is affected not only by the type and quantity of the materials used butalso by the methods of fabricating and erecting it The designer must thereforegive careful consideration to the methods of construction as well as to the sizes ofthe members of the structure

The requirements of harmony within the structure are affected by the relation-ships between the different systems of the structure including the load resistanceand transfer system (the structural system) the architectural system the mechan-ical and electrical systems and the functional systems required by the use of thestructure The serviceability of the structure is usually directly affected by the har-mony or lack of it between the systems The structure should also be in harmonywith its environment and should not react unfavourably with either the communityor its physical surroundings

122 The design process

The overall purpose of design is to invent a structure which will satisfy the designrequirements outlined in Section 121 Thus the structural engineer seeks to inventa structural system which will resist and transfer the forces and loads acting onit with adequate safety while making due allowance for the requirements of ser-viceability economy and harmony The process by which this may be achieved issummarised in Figure 14

The first step is to define the overall problem by determining the effectivenessrequirements and the constraints imposed by the social and physical environmentsand by the ownerrsquos time and money The structural engineer will need to consult theowner the architect the site construction mechanical and electrical engineers

Introduction 5

Definition of the problem

Invention of alternatives

Preliminary design

Preliminary evaluation

Selection

Modification

Final design

Final evaluation

Documentation

Execution

Use

Needs

Constraints

Objectives

Overall system

Structural system

Other systems

Structural designLoadsAnalysisProportioningOther design

Effectiveness

Safety and serviceability

Economy

Harmony

Structural design

Other design

DrawingsSpecification

TenderingConstruction andsupervisionCertification

Figure 14 The overall design process

and any authorities from whom permissions and approvals must be obtainedA set of objectives can then be specified which if met will ensure the successfulsolution of the overall design problem

The second step is to invent a number of alternative overall systems and theirassociated structural systems which appear to meet the objectives In doing sothe designer may use personal knowledge and experience or that which can be

6 Introduction

Invention or modificationof structural system

Preliminary analysis

Proportioning membersand joints

KnowledgeExperienceImaginationIntuitionCreativity

Approximations

Loads

Behaviour

Design criteria

Design codes

larrlarrlarrlarrlarr

---

larrlarr

AnalysisLoads

Behaviour

--

EvaluationDesign criteria

Design codes

larrlarr

Figure 15 The structural design process

gathered from others [9ndash12] or the designer may use his or her own imaginationintuition and creativity [13] or a combination of all of these

Following these first two steps of definition and invention come a series of stepswhich include the structural design evaluation selection and modification of thestructural system These may be repeated a number of times before the structuralrequirements are met and the structural design is finalised A typical structuraldesign process is summarised in Figure 15

After the structural system has been invented it must be analysed to obtain theinformation required for determining the member sizes First the loads supportedby and the forces acting on the structure must be determined For this purpose load-ing codes [14 15] are usually consulted but sometimes the designer determinesthe loading conditions or commissions experts to do this Anumber of approximateassumptions are made about the behaviour of the structure which is then analysedand the forces and moments acting on the members and joints of the structureare determined These are used to proportion the structure so that it satisfies thestructural requirements usually by referring to a design code such as EC3 [8]

At this stage a preliminary design of the structure will have been completed how-ever because of the approximate assumptions made about the structural behaviourit is necessary to check the design The first steps are to recalculate the loads and to

Introduction 7

reanalyse the structure designed and these are carried out with more precision thanwas either possible or appropriate for the preliminary analysis The performanceof the structure is then evaluated in relation to the structural requirements and anychanges in the member and joint sizes are decided on These changes may requirea further reanalysis and re-proportioning of the structure and this cycle may berepeated until no further change is required Alternatively it may be necessary tomodify the original structural system and repeat the structural design process untila satisfactory structure is achieved

The alternative overall systems are then evaluated in terms of their service-ability economy and harmony and a final system is selected as indicatedin Figure 14 This final overall system may be modified before the design isfinalised The detailed drawings and specifications can then be prepared andtenders for the construction can be called for and let and the structure canbe constructed Further modifications may have to be made as a consequenceof the tenders submitted or due to unforeseen circumstances discovered duringconstruction

This book is concerned with the structural behaviour of steel structures andthe relationships between their behaviour and the methods of proportioning themparticularly in relation to the structural requirements of the European steel struc-tures code EC3 and the modifications of these are given in the National AnnexesThis code consists of six parts with basic design using the conventional membersbeing treated in Part 1 This part is divided into 12 sub-parts with those likely tobe required most frequently being

Part 11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings [8]Part 15 Plated Structural Elements [16]Part 18 Design of Joints [17] andPart 110 Selection of Steel for Fracture Toughness and Through-Thickness

Properties [18]

Other parts that may be required from time to time include Part 12 that coversresistance to fire Part 13 dealing with cold-formed steel Part 19 dealing withfatigue and Part 2 [19] that covers bridges Composite construction is covered byEC4 [20] Since Part 11 of EC3 is the document most relevant to much of thecontent of this text (with the exception of Chapter 9 on joints) all references toEC3 made herein should be taken to mean Part 11 [8] including any modificationsgiven in the National Annex unless otherwise indicated

Detailed discussions of the overall design process are beyond the scope of thisbook but further information is given in [13] on the definition of the designproblem the invention of solutions and their evaluation and in [21ndash24] on theexecution of design Further the conventional methods of structural analysis areadequately treated in many textbooks [25ndash27] and are discussed in only a fewisolated cases in this book

8 Introduction

13 Material behaviour

131 Mechanical properties under static load

The important mechanical properties of most structural steels under static loadare indicated in the idealised tensile stressndashstrain diagram shown in Figure 16Initially the steel has a linear stressndashstrain curve whose slope is the Youngrsquos mod-ulus of elasticity E The values of E vary in the range 200 000ndash210 000 Nmm2and the approximate value of 205 000 Nmm2 is often assumed (EC3 uses210 000 Nmm2) The steel remains elastic while in this linear range and recoversperfectly on unloading The limit of the linear elastic behaviour is often closelyapproximated by the yield stress fy and the corresponding yield strain εy = fyEBeyond this limit the steel flows plastically without any increase in stress untilthe strain-hardening strain εst is reached This plastic range is usually consider-able and accounts for the ductility of the steel The stress increases above theyield stress fy when the strain-hardening strain εst is exceeded and this contin-ues until the ultimate tensile stress fu is reached After this large local reductionsin the cross-section occur and the load capacity decreases until tensile fracturetakes place

The yield stress fy is perhaps the most important strength characteristic of a struc-tural steel This varies significantly with the chemical constituents of the steel themost important of which are carbon and manganese both of which increase theyield stress The yield stress also varies with the heat treatment used andwith the amount of working which occurs during the rolling process Thus thinnerplates which are more worked have higher yield stresses than thicker plates of thesame constituency The yield stress is also increased by cold working The rateof straining affects the yield stress and high rates of strain increase the upper orfirst yield stress (see the broken line in Figure 16) as well as the lower yieldstress fy The strain rates used in tests to determine the yield stress of a particular

Upper yield stressStress

Strain

Strain-hardening E

Tensile rupture Plastic

Elastic E

f

f

0

u

y

y st

st

Not to scale

Figure 16 Idealised stressndashstrain relationship for structural steel

Introduction 9

steel type are significantly higher than the nearly static rates often encountered inactual structures

For design purposes a lsquominimumrsquo yield stress is identified for each differ-ent steel classification For EC3 these classifications are made on the basis of thechemical composition and the heat treatment and so the yield stresses in each clas-sification decrease as the greatest thickness of the rolled section or plate increasesThe minimum yield stress of a particular steel is determined from the results ofa number of standard tension tests There is a significant scatter in these resultsbecause of small variations in the local composition heat treatment amount ofworking thickness and the rate of testing and this scatter closely follows a nor-mal distribution curve Because of this the minimum yield stress fy quoted fora particular steel and used in design is usually a characteristic value which hasa particular chance (often 95) of being exceeded in any standard tension testConsequently it is likely that an isolated test result will be significantly higherthan the quoted yield stress This difference will of course be accentuated if thetest is made for any but the thickest portion of the cross-section In EC3 [8] theyield stress to be used in design is listed in Table 31 for hot-rolled structural steeland for structural hollow sections for each of the structural grades

The yield stress fy determined for uniaxial tension is usually accepted as beingvalid for uniaxial compression However the general state of stress at a point ina thin-walled member is one of biaxial tension andor compression and yieldingunder these conditions is not so simply determined Perhaps the most generallyaccepted theory of two-dimensional yielding under biaxial stresses acting in the1prime2prime plane is the maximum distortion-energy theory (often associated with namesof Huber von Mises or Hencky) and the stresses at yield according to this theorysatisfy the condition

σ 21prime minus σ1primeσ2prime + σ 2

2prime + 3σ 21prime2prime = f 2

y (11)

in which σ1prime σ2prime are the normal stresses and σ1prime2prime is the shear stress at the pointFor the case where 1prime and 2prime are the principal stress directions 1 and 2 equation 11takes the form of the ellipse shown in Figure 17 while for the case of pure shear(σ1prime = σ2prime = 0 so that σ1 = minusσ2 = σ1prime2prime) equation 11 reduces to

σ1prime2prime = fyradic

3 = τy (12)

which defines the shear yield stress τy

132 Fatigue failure under repeated loads

Structural steel may fracture at low average tensile stresses after a large numberof cycles of fluctuating load This high-cycle fatigue failure is initiated by localdamage caused by the repeated loads which leads to the formation of a small localcrack The extent of the fatigue crack is gradually increased by the subsequent loadrepetitions until finally the effective cross-section is so reduced that catastrophic

10 Introduction

Pri

ncip

al s

tres

s ra

tio

2f

y

100 10

10

ndash

ndash

10

Un i a x i a l t e n si o n

Pu r e s h e a r

Un i a x i a lco m p r e s s i o n

P r i n c i p a l s t r es s

Ma x i m u m d i s t o r t i o n - e n er g ycr i t e r i o n 1

2 ndash 12 + 12 = fy

2

rati o 1fy 2

Figure 17 Yielding under biaxial stresses

failure may occur High-cycle fatigue is only a design consideration when a largenumber of loading cycles involving tensile stresses is likely to occur during thedesign life of the structure (compressive stresses do not cause fatigue) This isoften the case for bridges cranes and structures which support machinery windand wave loading may also lead to fatigue problems

Factors which significantly influence the resistance to fatigue failure includethe number of load cycles N the range of stress

σ = σmax minus σmin (13)

during a load cycle and the magnitudes of local stress concentrations An indi-cation of the effect of the number of load cycles is given in Figure 18 whichshows that the maximum tensile stress decreases from its ultimate static value fuin an approximately linear fashion as the logarithm of the number of cycles Nincreases As the number of cycles increases further the curve may flatten out andthe maximum tensile stress may approach the endurance limit σL

The effects of the stress magnitude and stress ratio on the fatigue life are demon-strated in Figure 19 It can be seen that the fatigue life N decreases with increasingstress magnitude σmax and with decreasing stress ratio R = σminσmax

The effect of stress concentration is to increase the stress locally leading to localdamage and crack initiation Stress concentrations arise from sudden changes inthe general geometry and loading of a member and from local changes due tobolt and rivet holes and welds Stress concentrations also occur at defects in themember or its connectors and welds These may be due to the original rolling of thesteel or due to subsequent fabrication processes including punching shearing

Introduction 11

Max

imum

tens

ile

stre

ngh

Stress range = max ndash min

Stress ratio R = min max

max

1cycle

Ultimate tensile strength

Endurance limit

Number of cycles N (log scale)

(b) Fatigue strength(a) Stress cycle

Stress

min

f

Time1

u

L

Figure 18 Variation of fatigue strength with number of load cycles

Alternating

N =

N = 1

Max

imum

tens

ile

stre

ss

max

(Compression) Minimum stress min (Tension)

Staticloading

loadingTypical ofexperiments

Approximateequation 14

fufu

fu

R = ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

infin

Figure 19 Variation of fatigue life with stress magnitudes

and welding or due to damage such as that caused by stray arc fusions duringwelding

It is generally accepted for design purposes that the fatigue life N varies withthe stress range σ according to equations of the type

σC

)m (N

2 times 106

)= K (14)

in which the reference value σC depends on the details of the fatigue site andthe constants m and K may change with the number of cycles N This assumeddependence of the fatigue life on the stress range produces the approximatingstraight lines shown in Figure 19

12 Introduction

Reference values ∆C

Str

ess

rang

e ∆

=

max

ndash m

in(N

mm

2 )

Constant amplitudefatigue limit

m = 5 Cut-off limit1

Number of stress cycles N10 10 10 10 104 6 7 85 5 5 5 52

m = 3

m =3

m

10

50

100

500

1000

1401129071564536

16012510080635040

∆C =∆ when N = 2 times 106

Reference values ∆C

Figure 110 Variation of the EC3-1-9 fatigue life with stress range

EC3-1-1 [8] does not provide a treatment of fatigue since it is usually the casethat either the stress range σ or the number of high amplitude stress cycles Nis comparatively small However for structures supporting vibrating machineryand plant reference should be made to EC3-1-9 [28] The general relationshipsbetween the fatigue life N and the service stress rangeσ for constant amplitudestress cycles are shown in Figure 110 for reference valuesσC which correspondto different detail categories For N le 5 times 106 m = 3 and K = 1 so thatthe reference value σC corresponds to the value of σ at N = 2 times 106 For5 times 106 le N le 108 m = 5 and K = 0423 asymp 0543

Fatigue failure under variable amplitude stress cycles is normally assessed usingMinerrsquos rule [29]sum

NiNim le 1 (15)

in which Ni is the number of cycles of a particular stress range σi and Nim theconstant amplitude fatigue life for that stress range If any of the stress rangesexceeds the constant amplitude fatigue limit (at N = 5 times 106) then the effects ofstress ranges below this limit are included in equation 15

Designing against fatigue involves a consideration of joint arrangement as wellas of permissible stress Joints should generally be so arranged as to minimisestress concentrations and produce as smooth a lsquostress flowrsquo through the joint as ispracticable This may be done by giving proper consideration to the layout of ajoint by making gradual changes in section and by increasing the amount of mate-rial used at points of concentrated load Weld details should also be determined

Introduction 13

with this in mind and unnecessary lsquostress-raisersrsquo should be avoided It willalso be advantageous to restrict where practicable the locations of joints to lowstress regions such as at points of contraflexure or near the neutral axis Furtherinformation and guidance on fatigue design are given in [30ndash33]

133 Brittle fracture under impact load

Structural steel does not always exhibit a ductile behaviour and under some cir-cumstances a sudden and catastrophic fracture may occur even though the nominaltensile stresses are low Brittle fracture is initiated by the existence or formation ofa small crack in a region of high local stress Once initiated the crack may prop-agate in a ductile (or stable) fashion for which the external forces must supply theenergy required to tear the steel More serious are cracks which propagate at highspeed in a brittle (or unstable) fashion for which some of the internal elastic strainenergy stored in steel is released and used to fracture the steel Such a crack isself-propagating while there is sufficient internal strain energy and will continueuntil arrested by ductile elements in its path which have sufficient deformationcapacity to absorb the internal energy released

The resistance of a structure to brittle fracture depends on the magnitude of localstress concentrations on the ductility of the steel and on the three-dimensionalgeometrical constraints High local stresses facilitate crack initiation and so stressconcentrations due to poor geometry and loading arrangements (including impactloading) are dangerous Also of great importance are flaws and defects in thematerial which not only increase the local stresses but also provide potential sitesfor crack initiation

The ductility of a structural steel depends on its composition heat treatmentand thickness and varies with temperature and strain rate Figure 111 shows theincrease with temperature of the capacity of the steel to absorb energy during

Crack initiationand propagation easy

Crack initiationmore difficult

Crack initiationdifficult

Temperature

Ene

rgy

abso

rpti

on

Figure 111 Effect of temperature on resistance to brittle fracture

14 Introduction

impact At low temperatures the energy absorption is low and initiation andpropagation of brittle fractures are comparatively easy while at high temperaturesthe energy absorption is high because of ductile yielding and the propagation ofcracks can be arrested Between these two extremes is a transitional range in whichcrack initiation becomes increasingly difficult The likelihood of brittle fracture isalso increased by high strain rates due to dynamic loading since the consequentincrease in the yield stress reduces the possibility of energy absorption by ductileyielding The chemical composition of steel has a marked influence on its ductilitybrittleness is increased by the presence of excessive amounts of most non-metallicelements while ductility is increased by the presence of some metallic elementsSteel with large grain size tends to be more brittle and this is significantly influ-enced by heat treatment of the steel and by its thickness (the grain size tendsto be larger in thicker sections) EC3-1-10 [18] provides values of the maximumthickness t1 for different steel grades and minimum service temperatures as wellas advice on using a more advanced fracture mechanics [34] based approach andguidance on safeguarding against lamellar tearing

Three-dimensional geometrical constraints such as those occurring in thickeror more massive elements also encourage brittleness because of the higher localstresses and because of the greater release of energy during cracking and theconsequent increase in the ease of propagation of the crack

The risk of brittle fracture can be reduced by selecting steel types which haveductilities appropriate to the service temperatures and by designing joints with aview to minimising stress concentrations and geometrical constraints Fabricationtechniques should be such that they will avoid introducing potentially dangerousflaws or defects Critical details in important structures may be subjected to inspec-tion procedures aimed at detecting significant flaws Of course the designer mustgive proper consideration to the extra cost of special steels fabrication techniquesand inspection and correction procedures Further information on brittle fractureis given in [31 32 34]

14 Member and structure behaviour

141 Member behaviour

Structural steel members are required to transmit axial and transverse forces andmoments and torques as shown in Figure 13 The response of a member tothese actions can be described by the load-deformation characteristics shown inFigure 112

A member may have the linear response shown by curve 1 in Figure 112at least until the material reaches the yield stress The magnitudes of the defor-mations depend on the elastic moduli E and G Theoretically a member can onlybehave linearly while the maximum stress does not exceed the yield stress fyand so the presence of residual stresses or stress concentrations will cause earlynon-linearity However the high ductility of steel causes a local redistributionafter this premature yielding and it can often be assumed without serious error

Introduction 15

Load Buckling

Linear

Geometric non-linearity

Materialnon-linearity

Material and geometricnon-linearity

Deformation

1

2

3

4

5

Brittle fracture8Local buckling7

Fully plastic6

Figure 112 Member behaviour

that the member response remains linear until more general yielding occurs Themember behaviour then becomes non-linear (curve 2) and approaches the condi-tion associated with full plasticity (curve 6) This condition depends on the yieldstress fy

The member may also exhibit geometric non-linearity in that the bendingmoments and torques acting at any section may be influenced by the deformationsas well as by the applied forces This non-linearity which depends on the elasticmoduli E and G may cause the deformations to become very large (curve 3) as thecondition of elastic buckling is approached (curve 4) This behaviour is modifiedwhen the material becomes non-linear after first yield and the load may approacha maximum value and then decrease (curve 5)

The member may also behave in a brittle fashion because of local bucklingin a thin plate element of the member (curve 7) or because of material fracture(curve 8)

The actual behaviour of an individual member will depend on the forces actingon it Thus tension members laterally supported beams and torsion membersremain linear until their material non-linearity becomes important and then theyapproach the fully plastic condition However compression members and laterallyunsupported beams show geometric non-linearity as they approach their bucklingloads Beam-columns are members which transmit both transverse and axial loadsand so they display both material and geometric non-linearities

142 Structure behaviour

The behaviour of a structure depends on the load-transferring action of its mem-bers and joints This may be almost entirely by axial tension or compressionas in the triangulated structures with joint loading as shown in Figure 113a

16 Introduction

(a) Axial force (b) Bending (c) Shear(d) Axial force and bending

Figure 113 Structural load-transfer actions

Alternatively the members may support transverse loads which are transferred bybending and shear actions Usually the bending action dominates in structures com-posed of one-dimensional members such as beams and many single-storey rigidframes (Figure 113b) while shear becomes more important in two-dimensionalplate structures (Figure 113c) The members of many structures are subjectedto both axial forces and transverse loads such as those in multistorey buildings(Figure 113d) The load-transferring action of the members of a structure dependson the arrangement of the structure including the geometrical layout and the jointdetails and on the loading arrangement

In some structures the loading and joints are such that the members are effec-tively independent For example in triangulated structures with joint loads anyflexural effects are secondary and the members can be assumed to act as ifpin-jointed while in rectangular frames with simple flexible joints the momenttransfers between beams and columns may be ignored In such cases the responseof the structure is obtained directly from the individual member responses

More generally however there will be interactions between the members andthe structure behaviour is not unlike the general behaviour of a member as canbe seen by comparing Figures 114 and 112 Thus it has been traditional toassume that a steel structure behaves elastically under the service loads Thisassumption ignores local premature yielding due to residual stresses and stressconcentrations but these are not usually serious Purely flexural structures andpurely axial structures with lightly loaded compression members behave as iflinear (curve 1 in Figure 114) However structures with both flexural and axialactions behave non-linearly even near the service loads (curve 3 in Figure 114)This is a result of the geometrically non-linear behaviour of its members (seeFigure 112)

Most steel structures behave non-linearly near their ultimate loads unless theyfail prematurely due to brittle fracture fatigue or local buckling This non-linearbehaviour is due either to material yielding (curve 2 in Figure 114) or memberor frame buckling (curve 4) or both (curve 5) In axial structures failure may

Introduction 17

Load Buckling

Linear

Geometric non-linearity

Material non-linearity

Material and geometricnon-linearity

Deformation

1

2

3

4

5

Figure 114 Structure behaviour

involve yielding of some tension members or buckling either of some compressionmembers or of the frame or both In flexural structures failure is associated withfull plasticity occurring at a sufficient number of locations that the structure canform a collapse mechanism In structures with both axial and flexural actions thereis an interaction between yielding and buckling (curve 5 in Figure 114) and thefailure load is often difficult to determine The transitions shown in Figure 114between the elastic and ultimate behaviour often take place in a series of non-linearsteps as individual elements become fully plastic or buckle

15 Loads

151 General

The loads acting on steel structures may be classified as dead loads as imposedloads including both gradually applied and dynamic loads as wind loads as earthor ground-water loads or as indirect forces including those due to temperaturechanges foundation settlement and the like The more general collective termActions is used throughout the Eurocodes The structural engineer must evaluatethe magnitudes of any of these loads which will act and must determine thosewhich are the most severe combinations of loads for which the structure must bedesigned These loads are discussed in the following subsections both individuallyand in combinations

152 Dead loads

The dead loads acting on a structure arise from the weight of the structure includingthe finishes and from any other permanent construction or equipment The dead

18 Introduction

loads will vary during construction but thereafter will remain constant unlesssignificant modifications are made to the structure or its permanent equipment

The dead load may be assessed from the knowledge of the dimensions and spe-cific weights or from the total weights of all the permanent items which contributeto the total dead load Guidance on specific weights is given in [14] the valuesin which are average values representative of the particular materials The dimen-sions used to estimate dead loads should also be average and representative inorder that consistent estimates of the dead loads can be made By making theseassumptions the statistical distribution of dead loads is often taken as being of aWeibull type [35] The practice sometimes used of consistently overestimatingdimensions and specific weights is often wasteful and may also be danger-ous in cases where the dead load component acts in the opposite sense to theresultant load

153 Imposed loads

The imposed loads acting on a structure are gravity loads other than the dead loadsand arise from the weights of materials added to the structure as a result of its usesuch as materials stored people and snow Imposed loads usually vary both inspace and time Imposed loads may be sub-divided into two groups dependingon whether they are gradually applied in which case static load equivalents canbe used or whether they are dynamic including repeated loads and impact orimpulsive loads

Gradually applied imposed loads may be sustained over long periods of timeor may vary slowly with time [36] The past practice however was to consideronly the total imposed load and so only extreme values (which occur rarely andmay be regarded as lifetime maximum loads) were specified The present imposedloads specified in loading codes [14] often represent peak loads which have 95probability of not being exceeded over a 50-year period based on a Weibull typedistribution [35]

It is usual to consider the most severe spatial distribution of the imposed loadsand this can only be determined by using both the maximum and minimum valuesof the imposed loads In the absence of definite knowledge it is often assumed thatthe minimum values are zero When the distribution of imposed load over largeareas is being considered the maximum imposed loads specified which representrare events are often reduced in order to make some allowance for the decreasedprobability that the maximum imposed loads will act on all areas at the same time

Dynamic loads which act on structures include both repeated loads and impactand blast loads Repeated loads are of significance in fatigue problems (see Section132) in which case the designer is concerned with both the magnitudes rangesand the number of repetitions of loads which are very frequently applied At theother extreme impact loads (which are particularly important in the brittle fractureproblems discussed in Section 133) are usually specified by values of extrememagnitude which represent rare events In structures for which the static loads

Introduction 19

dominate it is common to replace the dynamic loads by static force equivalents[14] However such a procedure is likely to be inappropriate when the dynamicloads form a significant proportion of the total load in which case a proper dynamicanalysis [37 38] of the structure and its response should be made

154 Wind loads

The wind loads which act on structures have traditionally been allowed for byusing static force equivalents The first step is usually to determine a basic windspeed for the general region in which the structure is to be built by using infor-mation derived from meteorological studies This basic wind speed may representan extreme velocity measured at a height of 10 m and averaged over a period of3 seconds which has a return period of 50 years (ie a velocity which will onaverage be reached or exceeded once in 50 years or have a probability of beingexceeded of 150) The basic wind speed may be adjusted to account for the topog-raphy of the site for the ground roughness structure size and height above groundand for the degree of safety required and the period of exposure The resultingdesign wind speed may then be converted into the static pressure which will beexerted by the wind on a plane surface area (this is often referred to as the dynamicwind pressure because it is produced by decelerating the approaching wind veloc-ity to zero at the surface area) The wind force acting on the structure may thenbe calculated by using pressure coefficients appropriate to each individual surfaceof the structure or by using force coefficients appropriate to the total structureMany values of these coefficients are tabulated in [15] but in special cases wherethese are inappropriate the results of wind tunnel tests on model structures maybe used

In some cases it is not sufficient to treat wind loads as static forces For examplewhen fatigue is a problem both the magnitudes and the number of wind fluctuationsmust be estimated In other cases the dynamic response of a structure to wind loadsmay have to be evaluated (this is often the case with very flexible structures whoselong natural periods of vibration are close to those of some of the wind gusts) andthis may be done analytically [37 38] or by specialists using wind tunnel testsIn these cases special care must be taken to model correctly those properties ofthe structure which affect its response including its mass stiffness and dampingas well as the wind characteristics and any interactions between wind and structure

155 Earth or ground-water loads

Earth or ground-water loads act as pressure loads normal to the contact surface ofthe structure Such loads are usually considered to be essentially static

However earthquake loads are dynamic in nature and their effects on the struc-ture must be allowed for Very flexible structures with long natural periods ofvibration respond in an equivalent static manner to the high frequencies of earth-quake movements and so can be designed as if loaded by static force equivalents

20 Introduction

On the other hand stiff structures with short natural periods of vibration respondsignificantly and so in such a case a proper dynamic analysis [37 38] shouldbe made The intensities of earthquake loads vary with the region in which thestructure is to be built but they are not considered to be significant in the UK

156 Indirect forces

Indirect forces may be described as those forces which result from the strainingof a structure or its components and may be distinguished from the direct forcescaused by the dead and applied loads and pressures The straining may arise fromtemperature changes from foundation settlement from shrinkage creep or crack-ing of structural or other materials and from the manufacturing process as in thecase of residual stresses The values of indirect forces are not usually specifiedand so it is common for the designer to determine which of these forces should beallowed for and what force magnitudes should be adopted

157 Combinations of loads

The different loads discussed in the preceding subsections do not occur alone but incombinations and so the designer must determine which combination is the mostcritical for the structure However if the individual loads which have differentprobabilities of occurrence and degrees of variability were combined directlythe resulting load combination would have a greatly reduced probability Thusit is logical to reduce the magnitudes of the various components of a combinationaccording to their probabilities of occurrence This is similar to the procedure usedin reducing the imposed load intensities used over large areas

The past design practice was to use the worst combination of dead load withimposed load andor wind load and to allow increased stresses whenever thewind load was included (which is equivalent to reducing the load magnitudes)These increases seem to be logical when imposed and wind loads act togetherbecause the probability that both of these loads will attain their maximum valuessimultaneously is greatly reduced However they are unjustified when applied inthe case of dead and wind load for which the probability of occurrence is virtuallyunchanged from that of the wind load

A different and more logical method of combining loads is used in the EC3 limitstates design method [8] which is based on statistical analyses of the loads andthe structure capacities (see Section 1734) Strength design is usually carriedout for the most severe combination of actions for normal (termed persistent) ortemporary (termed transient) conditions usingsum

jge1

γG jGk j + γQ1Qk 1 +sumigt1

γQiψ0iQk i (16)

where implies lsquothe combined effect ofrsquo γG and γQ are partial factors for thepersistent G and variable Q actions andψ0 is a combination factor The concept is

Introduction 21

Table 11 Partial load factors for common situations

Ultimate limit state Permanent actions γG Variable actions γQ

Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable

EQU 11 09 15 0STRGEO 135 10 15 0

thus to use all the persistent actions Gk j such as self-weight and fixed equipmentwith a leading variable action Qk 1 such as imposed snow or wind load andreduced values of the other variable actions Qk i More information on the Eurocodeapproach to loading for steel structures is given in [39ndash41]

This approach is applied to the following forms of ultimate limit state

EQU = loss of static equilibrium of the structure on any part of itSTR = failure by excessive deformation transformation of the structure or

any part of it into a mechanism rupture or loss of stability of thestructure or of any part of it

GEO = failure or excessive deformation of the groundFAT = fatigue failure

For the most common set of design situations use of the appropriate values from[41] gives the load factors of Table 11

Using the combination factors of ψ0 = 07 and 05 of [41] for most variableactions and wind actions respectively leads to the following common STR loadcombinations for buildings

135 G + 15 QI + 075 QW

135 G + 105 QI + 15 QW

minus 10 G + 15 QI and

minus 10 G + 15 QW

in which the minus signs indicate that the permanent action is favourable

16 Analysis of steel structures

161 General

In the design process the assessment of whether the structural design require-ments will be met or not requires the knowledge of the stiffness and strength ofthe structure under load and of its local stresses and deformations The term struc-tural analysis is used to denote the analytical process by which this knowledge

22 Introduction

of the response of the structure can be obtained The basis for this process is theknowledge of the material behaviour and this is used first to analyse the behaviourof the individual members and joints of the structure The behaviour of the completestructure is then synthesised from these individual behaviours

The methods of structural analysis are fully treated in many textbooks[eg 25ndash27] and so details of these are not within the scope of this book Howeversome discussion of the concepts and assumptions of structural analysis is neces-sary so that the designer can make appropriate assumptions about the structure andmake a suitable choice of the method of analysis

In most methods of structural analysis the distribution of forces and momentsthroughout the structure is determined by using the conditions of static equilib-rium and of geometric compatibility between the members at the joints The wayin which this is done depends on whether a structure is statically determinate(in which case the complete distribution of forces and moments can be determinedby statics alone) or is statically indeterminate (in which case the compatibilityconditions for the deformed structure must also be used before the analysis can becompleted)

An important feature of the methods of structural analysis is the constitutiverelationships between the forces and moments acting on a member or connectionand its deformations These play the same role for the structural element as do thestressndashstrain relationships for an infinitesimal element of a structural material Theconstitutive relationship may be linear (force proportional to deflection) and elastic(perfect recovery on unloading) or they may be non-linear because of material non-linearities such as yielding (inelastic) or because of geometrical non-linearities(elastic) such as when the deformations themselves induce additional momentsas in stability problems

It is common for the designer to idealise the structure and its behaviour so asto simplify the analysis A three-dimensional frame structure may be analysed asthe group of a number of independent two-dimensional frames while individualmembers are usually considered as one-dimensional and the joints as points Thejoints may be assumed to be frictionless hinges or to be semi-rigid or rigid Insome cases the analysis may be replaced or supplemented by tests made on anidealised model which approximates part or all of the structure

162 Analysis of statically determinate membersand structures

For an isolated statically determinate member the forces and moments acting onthe member are already known and the structural analysis is only used to determinethe stiffness and strength of the member A linear elastic (or first-order elastic)analysis is usually made of the stiffness of the member when the material non-linearities are generally unimportant and the geometrical non-linearities are oftensmall The strength of the member however is not so easily determined as oneor both of the material and geometric non-linearities are most important Instead

Introduction 23

the designer usually relies on a design code or specification for this informationThe strength of the isolated statically determinate members is fully discussed inChapters 2ndash7 and 10

For a statically determinate structure the principles of static equilibrium areused in the structural analysis to determine the member forces and moments andthe stiffness and strength of each member are then determined in the same way asfor statically determinate members

163 Analysis of statically indeterminate structures

A statically indeterminate structure can be approximately analysed if a sufficientnumber of assumptions are made about its behaviour to allow it to be treated asif determinate One method of doing this is to guess the locations of points ofzero bending moment and to assume there are frictionless hinges at a sufficientnumber of these locations that the member forces and moments can be determinedby statics alone Such a procedure is commonly used in the preliminary analysisof a structure and followed at a later stage by a more precise analysis Howevera structure designed only on the basis of an approximate analysis can still be safeprovided the structure has sufficient ductility to redistribute any excess forces andmoments Indeed the method is often conservative and its economy increaseswith the accuracy of the estimated locations of the points of zero bending momentMore commonly a preliminary analysis is made of the structure based on thelinear elastic computer methods of analysis [42 43] using approximate memberstiffnesses

The accurate analysis of statically indeterminate structures is complicated by theinteraction between members the equilibrium and compatibility conditions andthe constitutive relationships must all be used in determining the member forcesand moments There are a number of different types of analysis which might bemade and some indication of the relevance of these is given in Figure 115 andin the following discussion Many of these can only be used for two-dimensionalframes

For many structures it is common to use a first-order elastic analysis which isbased on linear elastic constitutive relationships and which ignores any geometricalnon-linearities and associated instability problems The deformations determinedby such an analysis are proportional to the applied loads and so the principle ofsuperposition can be used to simplify the analysis It is often assumed that axialand shear deformations can be ignored in structures whose action is predominantlyflexural and that flexural and shear deformations can be ignored in structureswhose member forces are predominantly axial These assumptions further simplifythe analysis which can then be carried out by any of the well-known methods[25ndash27] for which many computer programs are available [44 45] Some of theseprograms can be used for three-dimensional frames

However a first-order elastic analysis will underestimate the forces andmoments in and the deformations of a structure when instability effects are present

24 Introduction

Deformation

Load

First-order elastic analysis

Elastic stability analysis

Second-orderelastic analysis

First-order plasticanalysis

Advancedanalysis

Strength load

Service load

1

4

3

2

5

Figure 115 Predictions of structural analyses

Some estimate of the importance of these in the absence of flexural effects can beobtained by making an elastic stability analysis A second-order elastic analysisaccounts for both flexure and instability but this is difficult to carry out althoughcomputer programs are now generally available [44 45] EC3 permits the useof the results of an elastic stability analysis in the amplification of the first-ordermoments as an alternative to second-order analysis

The analysis of statically indeterminate structures near the ultimate load isfurther complicated by the decisive influence of the material and geometricalnon-linearities In structures without material non-linearities an elastic stabilityanalysis is appropriate when there are no flexural effects but this is a rare occur-rence On the other hand many flexural structures have very small axial forcesand instability effects in which case it is comparatively easy to use a first-orderplastic analysis according to which a sufficient number of plastic hinges mustform to transform the structure into a collapse mechanism

More generally the effects of instability must be allowed for and as a firstapproximation the nominal first yield load determined from a second-order elasticanalysis may be used as a conservative estimate of the ultimate load A much moreaccurate estimate may be obtained for structures where local and lateral bucklingis prevented by using an advanced analysis [46] in which the actual behaviour isclosely analysed by allowing for instability yielding residual stresses and initialcrookedness However this method is not yet in general use

17 Design of steel structures

171 Structural requirements and design criteria

The designerrsquos task of assessing whether or not a structure will satisfy the structuralrequirements of serviceability and strength is complicated by the existence of errors

Introduction 25

and uncertainties in his or her analysis of the structural behaviour and estimation ofthe loads acting and even in the structural requirements themselves The designerusually simplifies this task by using a number of design criteria which allow him orher to relate the structural behaviour predicted by his or her analysis to the structuralrequirements Thus the designer equates the satisfaction of these criteria by thepredicted structural behaviour with satisfaction of the structural requirements bythe actual structure

In general the various structural design requirements relate to correspondinglimit states and so the design of a structure to satisfy all the appropriate require-ments is often referred to as a limit states design The requirements are commonlypresented in a deterministic fashion by requiring that the structure shall not failor that its deflections shall not exceed prescribed limits However it is not possibleto be completely certain about the structure and its loading and so the structuralrequirements may also be presented in probabilistic forms or in deterministicforms derived from probabilistic considerations This may be done by defining anacceptably low risk of failure within the design life of the structure after reachingsome sort of balance between the initial cost of the structure and the economic andhuman losses resulting from failure In many cases there will be a number of struc-tural requirements which operate at different load levels and it is not unusual torequire a structure to suffer no damage at one load level but to permit some minordamage to occur at a higher load level provided there is no catastrophic failure

The structural design criteria may be determined by the designer or he or shemay use those stated or implied in design codes The stiffness design criteriaadopted are usually related to the serviceability limit state of the structure underthe service loads and are concerned with ensuring that the structure has sufficientstiffness to prevent excessive deflections such as sagging distortion and settle-ment and excessive motions under dynamic load including sway bounce andvibration

The strength limit state design criteria are related to the possible methods offailure of the structure under overload and understrength conditions and so thesedesign criteria are concerned with yielding buckling brittle fracture and fatigueAlso of importance is the ductility of the structure at and near failure ductilestructures give a warning of the impending failure and often redistribute the loadeffects away from the critical regions while ductility provides a method of energydissipation which will reduce the damage due to earthquake and blast loading Onthe other hand a brittle failure is more serious as it occurs with no warning offailure and in a catastrophic fashion with a consequent release of stored energyand increase in damage Other design criteria may also be adopted such as thoserelated to corrosion and fire

172 Errors and uncertainties

In determining the limitations prescribed by design criteria account must be takenof the deliberate and accidental errors made by the designer and of the uncertainties

26 Introduction

in his or her knowledge of the structure and its loads Deliberate errors includethose resulting from the assumptions made to simplify the analysis of the loadingand of the structural behaviour These assumptions are often made so that anyerrors involved are on the safe side but in many cases the nature of the errorsinvolved is not precisely known and some possibility of danger exists

Accidental errors include those due to a general lack of precision either inthe estimation of the loads and the analysis of the structural behaviour or in themanufacture and erection of the structure The designer usually attempts to controlthe magnitudes of these by limiting them to what he or she judges to be suitablysmall values Other accidental errors include what are usually termed blundersThese may be of a gross magnitude leading to failure or to uneconomic structuresor they may be less important Attempts are usually made to eliminate blunders byusing checking procedures but often these are unreliable and the logic of such aprocess is open to debate

As well as the errors described above there exist a number of uncertaintiesabout the structure itself and its loads The material properties of steel fluctuateespecially the yield stress and the residual stresses The practice of using a min-imum or characteristic yield stress for design purposes usually leads to oversafedesigns especially for redundant structures of reasonable size for which an aver-age yield stress would be more appropriate because of the redistribution of loadwhich takes place after early yielding Variations in the residual stress levels arenot often accounted for in design codes but there is a growing tendency to adjustdesign criteria in accordance with the method of manufacture so as to make someallowance for gross variations in the residual stresses This is undertaken to someextent in EC3

The cross-sectional dimensions of rolled-steel sections vary and the valuesgiven in section handbooks are only nominal especially for the thicknesses ofuniversal sections The fabricated lengths of a structural member will vary slightlyfrom the nominal length but this is usually of little importance except wherethe variation induces additional stresses because of lack-of-fit problems or wherethere is a cumulative geometrical effect Of some significance to members subjectto instability problems are the variations in their straightness which arise duringmanufacture fabrication and erection Some allowances for these are usuallymade in design codes while fabrication and erection tolerances are specified inEN1090 [47] to prevent excessive crookedness

The loads acting on a structure vary significantly Uncertainty exists in thedesignerrsquos estimate of the magnitude of the dead load because of the variations inthe densities of materials and because of the minor modifications to the structureduring or subsequent to its erection Usually these variations are not very signif-icant and a common practice is to err on the safe side by making conservativeassumptions Imposed loadings fluctuate significantly during the design usage ofthe structure and may change dramatically with changes in usage These fluctua-tions are usually accounted for by specifying what appear to be extreme values inloading codes but there is often a finite chance that these values will be exceeded

Introduction 27

Wind loads vary greatly and the magnitudes specified in loading codes are usuallyobtained by probabilistic methods

173 Strength design

1731 Load and capacity factors and factors of safety

The errors and uncertainties involved in the estimation of the loads on and thebehaviour of a structure may be allowed for in strength design by using load fac-tors to increase the nominal loads and capacity factors to decrease the structuralstrength In the previous codes that employed the traditional working stress designthis was achieved by using factors of safety to reduce the failure stresses to permis-sible working stress values The purpose of using various factors is to ensure thatthe probability of failure under the most adverse conditions of structural overloadand understrength remains very small The use of these factors is discussed in thefollowing subsections

1732 Working stress design

The working stress methods of design given in previous codes and specificationsrequired that the stresses calculated from the most adverse combination of loadsmust not exceed the specified permissible stresses These specified stresses wereobtained after making some allowances for the non-linear stability and materialeffects on the strength of isolated members and in effect were expressions of theirultimate strengths divided by the factors of safety SF Thus

Working stress le Permissible stress asymp Ultimate stress

SF(16)

It was traditional to use factors of safety of 17 approximatelyThe working stress method of a previous steel design code [48] has been replaced

by the limit states design method of EC3 Detailed discussions of the working stressmethod are available in the first edition of this book [49]

1733 Ultimate load design

The ultimate load methods of designing steel structures required that the calculatedultimate load-carrying capacity of the complete structure must not exceed the mostadverse combination of the loads obtained by multiplying the working loads bythe appropriate load factors LF Thussum

(Working load times LF) le Ultimate load (17)

These load factors allowed some margins for any deliberate and accidentalerrors and for the uncertainties in the structure and its loads and also provided the

28 Introduction

structure with a reserve of strength The values of the factors should depend on theload type and combination and also on the risk of failure that could be expectedand the consequences of failure A simplified approach often employed (perhapsillogically) was to use a single load factor on the most adverse combination of theworking loads

A previous code [48] allowed the use of the plastic method of ultimate loaddesign when stability effects were unimportant These have used load factors of170 approximately However this ultimate load method has also been replacedby the limit states design method in EC3 and will not be discussed further

1734 Limit states design

It was pointed out in Section 156 that different types of load have different proba-bilities of occurrence and different degrees of variability and that the probabilitiesassociated with these loads change in different ways as the degree of overloadconsidered increases Because of this different load factors should be used for thedifferent load types

Thus for limit states design the structure is deemed to be satisfactory if itsdesign load effect does not exceed its design resistance The design load effectis an appropriate bending moment torque axial force or shear force and iscalculated from the sum of the effects of the specified (or characteristic) loadsFk multiplied by partial factors γGQ which allow for the variabilities of the loadsand the structural behaviour The design resistance RkγM is calculated from thespecified (or characteristic) resistance Rk divided by the partial factor γM whichallows for the variability of the resistance Thus

Design load effect le Design resistance (18a)

or sumγgQ times (effect of specified loads) le (specified resistanceγM ) (18b)

Although the limit states design method is presented in deterministic formin equations 18 the partial factors involved are usually obtained by usingprobabilistic models based on statistical distributions of the loads and thecapacities Typical statistical distributions of the total load and the structuralcapacity are shown in Figure 116 The probability of failure pF is indicatedby the region for which the load distribution exceeds that for the structuralcapacity

In the development of limit state codes the probability of failure pF is usuallyrelated to a parameter β called the safety index by the transformation

Φ(minusβ) = pF (19)

where the functionΦ is the cumulative frequency distribution of a standard normalvariate [35] The relationship between β and pF shown in Figure 117 indicates

Introduction 29

Total load effect or resistance

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Total loadeffect

Resistance

Shaded area illustratesprobability of failure

Sum

of

effe

cts

of s

peci

fied

load

sD

esig

n lo

ad e

ffec

t

Des

ign

resi

stan

ce

Spe

cifi

ed r

esis

tanc

e

Figure 116 Limit states design

ndash8 ndash6 ndash4 ndash2

Probability of failure pF

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Saf

ety

inde

x

10 10 10 10

Figure 117 Relationship between safety index and probability of failure

that an increase in β of 05 implies a decrease in the probability of failure byapproximately an order of magnitude

The concept of the safety index was used to derive the partial factors for EC3This was done with reference to previous national codes such as BS 5950 [50]to obtain comparable values of the probability of failure pF although much ofthe detailed calibration treated the load and resistance sides of equations 18separately

30 Introduction

174 Stiffness design

In the stiffness design of steel structures the designer seeks to make the structuresufficiently stiff so that its deflections under the most adverse working load con-ditions will not impair its strength or serviceability These deflections are usuallycalculated by a first-order linear elastic analysis although the effects of geometri-cal non-linearities should be included when these are significant as in structureswhich are susceptible to instability problems The design criteria used in the stiff-ness design relate principally to the serviceability of the structure in that theflexibility of the structure should not lead to damage of any non-structural compo-nents while the deflections should not be unsightly and the structure should notvibrate excessively It is usually left to the designer to choose limiting values foruse in these criteria which are appropriate to the structure although a few valuesare suggested in some design codes The stiffness design criteria which relate tothe strength of the structure itself are automatically satisfied when the appropriatestrength design criteria are satisfied

References

1 British Standards Institution (2005) BS4-1 Structural Steel Sections-Part 1 Specifica-tion for hot-rolled sections BSI London

2 OrsquoConnor C (1971) Design of Bridge Superstructures John Wiley New York3 Chatterjee S (1991) The Design of Modern Steel Bridges BSP Professional Books

Oxford4 Rhodes J (editor) (1991) Design of Cold Formed Members Elsevier Applied Science

London5 Rhodes J and Lawson RM (1992) Design of Steel Structures Using Cold Formed

Steel Sections Steel Construction Institute Ascot6 Yu W-W (2000) Cold-Formed Steel Design 3rd edition John Wiley New York7 Hancock GJ (1998) Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structures 3rd edition Australian

Institute of Steel Construction Sydney8 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 11

General Rules and Rules for Buildings BS EN 1993-1-1 BSI London9 Nervi PL (1956) Structures McGraw-Hill New York

10 Salvadori MG and Heller R (1963) Structure in Architecture Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

11 Torroja E (1958) The Structures of Educardo Torroja FW Dodge Corp New York12 Fraser DJ (1981) Conceptual Design and Preliminary Analysis of Structures Pitman

Publishing Inc Marshfield Massachusetts13 Krick EV (1969) An Introduction to Engineering and Engineering Design 2nd

edition John Wiley New York14 British Standards Institution (2002) Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 11

General Actions ndash Densities Self-weight Imposed Loads for Buildings BS EN1991-1-1 BSI London

15 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 14General Actions ndash Wind Actions BS EN 1991-1-4 BSI London

Introduction 31

16 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 15Plated Structural Elements BS EN 1993-1-5 BSI London

17 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 18Design of Joints BS EN 1993-1-8 BSI London

18 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 110Selection of Steel for Fracture Toughness and Through-Thickness Properties BS EN1993-1-10 BSI London

19 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 2Steel Bridges BS EN 1993-2 BSI London

20 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 4 Design of Composite Steel and Con-crete Structures Part 11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings BS EN 1994-1-1BSI London

21 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2003) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th editionBlackwell Publishing Oxford

22 CIMsteel (1997) Design for Construction Steel Construction Institute Ascot23 Antill JM and Ryan PWS (1982) Civil Engineering Construction 5th edition

McGraw-Hill Sydney24 Australian Institute of Steel Construction (1991) Economical Structural Steelwork

AISC Sydney25 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis 3rd

edition McGraw-Hill New York26 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1990) Structural Analysis 3rd edition

Van Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham27 Ghali A Neville AM and Brown TG (1997) Structural Analysis ndash A Unified

Classical and Matrix Approach 5th edition Routledge Oxford28 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 19

Fatigue Strength of Steel Structures BS EN 1993-1-9 BSI London Rules for BuildingsECS Brussels

29 Miner MA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue Journal of Applied MechanicsASME 12 No 3 September pp A-159ndashA-164

30 Gurney TR (1979) Fatigue of Welded Structures 2nd edition Cambridge UniversityPress

31 Lay MG (1982) Structural Steel Fundamentals Australian Road Research BoardMelbourne

32 Rolfe ST and Barsoum JM (1977) Fracture and Fatigue Control in Steel StructuresPrentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs New Jersey

33 Grundy P (1985) Fatigue limit state for steel structures Civil Engineering Transac-tions Institution of Engineers Australia CE27 No 1 February pp 143ndash8

34 Navy Department Advisory Committee on Structural Steels (1970) Brittle Fracture inSteel Structures (ed GM Boyd) Butterworth London

35 Walpole RE Myers RH Myers SL and Ye K (2007) Probability and Statisticsfor Engineers and Scientists 8th edition Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs

36 Ravindra MK and Galambos TV (1978) Load and resistance factor design for steelJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 104 No ST9 September pp 1337ndash54

37 Clough RW and Penzien J (2004) Dynamics of Structures 2nd edition CSI BooksBerkeley California

38 Irvine HM (1986) Structural Dynamics for the Practising Engineer Allen andUnwin London

32 Introduction

39 Gulvanesian H Calgaro J-A and Holicky M (2002) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1990Eurocode Basis of Structural Design Thomas Telford Publishing London

40 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) Designersrsquo Guide to EN 1993-1-1 ThomasTelford Publishing London

41 Gardner L and Grubb PJ (2008) Guide to Eurocode Load Combinations for SteelStructures British Constructional Steelwork Association

42 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

43 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 Pergamon PressOxford

44 Computer Service Consultants (2006) S-Frame 3D Structural Analysis Suite CSC(UK) Limited Leeds

45 Research Engineers Europe Limited (2006) STAADPro Space Frame Analysis REEBristol

46 Clarke MJ (1994) Plastic-zone analysis of frames Chapter 6 of Advanced Analysis ofSteel Frames Theory Software and Applications (eds WF Chen and S Toma) CRCPress Inc Boca Raton Florida pp 259ndash319

47 British Standards Institution (1998) Execution of Steel Structures ndash General Rules andRules for Buildings BS DD ENV 1090-1 BSI London

48 British Standards Institution (1969) BS449 Part 2 Specification for the Use ofStructural Steel in Building BSI London

49 Trahair NS (1977) The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures 1st editionChapman and Hall London

50 British Standards Institution (2000) BS5950 The Structural Use of Steelwork inBuilding Part 1 Code of Practice for Design Rolled and Welded Sections BSILondon

Chapter 2

Tension members

21 Introduction

Concentrically loaded uniform tension members are perhaps the simplest structuralelements as they are nominally in a state of uniform axial stress Because of thistheir load-deformation behaviour very closely parallels the stressndashstrain behaviourof structural steel obtained from the results of tensile tests (see Section 131)Thus a member remains essentially linear and elastic until the general yield loadis approached even if it has residual stresses and initial crookedness

However in many cases a tension member is not loaded or connected concen-trically or it has transverse loads acting resulting in bending actions as well asan axial tension action Simple design procedures are available which enable thebending actions in some members with eccentric connections to be ignored butmore generally special account must be taken of the bending action in design

Tension members often have comparatively high average stresses and in somecases the effects of local stress concentrations may be significant especially whenthere is a possibility that the steel material may not act in a ductile fashion In suchcases the causes of stress concentrations should be minimised and the maximumlocal stresses should be estimated and accounted for

In this chapter the behaviour and design of steel tension members are discussedThe case of concentrically loaded members is dealt with first and then a procedurewhich allows the simple design of some eccentrically connected tension membersis presented The design of tension members with eccentric or transverse loads isthen considered the effects of stress concentrations are discussed and finally thedesign of tension members according to EC3 is dealt with

22 Concentrically loaded tension members

221 Members without holes

The straight concentrically loaded steel tension member of length L and constantcross-sectional area A which is shown in Figure 21a has no holes and is free fromresidual stress The axial extension e of the member varies with the load N in the

34 Tension members

Load N

Npl

Nu

Elastic

Plastic

Strain-hardeningFracture

Not to scale

Axial extension e

(b) Axial extension e

ey est

E AN N

L e

(a) Tension member

Figure 21 Load-extension behaviour of a perfect tension member

same way as does the average strain ε= eL with the average stress σ = NA andso the load-extension relationship for the member shown in Figure 21b is similarto the material stressndashstrain relationship shown in Figure 16 Thus the extensionat first increases linearly with the load and is equal to

e = NL

EA (21)

where E is the Youngrsquos modulus of elasticity This linear increase continues untilthe yield stress fy of the steel is reached at the general yield load

Npl = Afy (22)

when the extension increases with little or no increase in load until strain-hardeningcommences After this the load increases slowly until the maximum value

Nu = Afu (23)

is reached in which fu is the ultimate tensile strength of the steel Beyond thisa local cross-section of the member necks down and the load N decreases untilfracture occurs

The behaviour of the tension member is described as ductile in that it can reachand sustain the general yield load while significant extensions occur before itfractures The general yield load Npl is often taken as the load capacity of themember

If the tension member is not initially stress free but has a set of residual stressesinduced during its manufacture such as that shown in Figure 22b then localyielding commences before the general yield load Npl is reached (Figure 22c) andthe range over which the load-extension behaviour is linear decreases Howeverthe general yield load Npl at which the whole cross-section is yielded can stillbe reached because the early yielding causes a redistribution of the stresses The

Tension members 35

1 Residual stress(N = 0)

First yield

b

Fully yielded(N = Npl)

2

3

4

fy

t

(a) Section

(b) Stressdistributions

tc

c

Load N

Npl

est

Extension e

ey1

23 4

(c) Load-extension behaviour

Figure 22 Effect of residual stresses on load-extension behaviour

N = 0 N = 0 N Nww0

(a) Initial crookedness (b) Deflection under load

Figure 23 Tension member with initial crookedness

residual stresses also cause local early strain-hardening and while the plastic rangeis shortened (Figure 22c) the member behaviour is still regarded as ductile

If however the tension member has an initial crookedness w0 (Figure 23a)the axial load causes it to bend and deflect laterally w (Figure 23b) These lateraldeflections partially straighten the member so that the bending action in the centralregion is reduced The bending induces additional axial stresses (see Section 53)which cause local early yielding and strain-hardening in much the same way asdo residual stresses (see Figure 22c) The resulting reductions in the linear andplastic ranges are comparatively small when the initial crookedness is small as isnormally the case and the member behaviour is ductile

222 Members with small holes

The presence of small local holes in a tension member (such as small bolt holesused for the connections of the member) causes early yielding around the holesso that the load-deflection behaviour becomes non-linear When the holes aresmall the member may reach the gross yield load (see equation 22) calculated

36 Tension members

No holesHoles not significantSignificant holes

Extension e

Load N

Afu

Afy

Anet fu

Figure 24 Effect of holes on load-extension behaviour

on the gross area A as shown in Figure 24 because of strain-hardening effectsaround the holes In this case the member behaviour is ductile and the non-linearbehaviour can be ignored because the axial extension of the member under load isnot significantly increased except when there are so many holes along the lengthof the member that the average cross-sectional area is significantly reduced Thusthe extension e can normally be calculated by using the gross cross-sectional areaA in equation 21

223 Members with significant holes

When the holes are large the member may fail before the gross yield load Npl isreached by fracturing at a hole as shown in Figure 24 The local fracture load

Nu = Anet fu (24)

is calculated on the net area of the cross-section Anet measured perpendicular tothe line of action of the load and is given by

Anet = A minussum

d0t (25)

where d0 is the diameter of a hole t the thickness of the member at the hole andthe summation is carried out for all holes in the cross-section under considerationThe fracture load Nu is determined by the weakest cross-section and therefore bythe minimum net area Anet A member which fails by fracture before the grossyield load can be reached is not ductile and there is little warning of failure

In many practical tension members with more than one row of holes the reduc-tion in the cross-sectional area may be reduced by staggering the rows of holes(Figure 25) In this case the possibility must be considered of failure along a zigndashzag path such as ABCDE in Figure 25 instead of across the section perpendicular

Tension members 37

A

B

C

D

E

p

p

s s

N N

Figure 25 Possible failure path with staggered holes

to the load The minimum amount of stagger sm for which a hole no longer reducesthe area of the member depends on the diameter d0 of the hole and the inclinationps of the failure path where p is the gauge distance between the rows of holesAn approximate expression for this minimum stagger is

sm asymp (4pd0)12 (26)

When the actual stagger s is less than sm some reduced part of the hole areaAh must be deducted from the gross area A and this can be approximated byAh = d0t(1 minus s2s2

m) whence

Ah = d0t(1 minus s24pd0) (27)

Anet = A minussum

d0t +sum

s2t4p (28)

where the summations are made for all the holes on the zigndashzag path consideredand for all the staggers in the path The use of equation 28 is allowed for inClause 6222 of EC3 and is illustrated in Section 271

Holes in tension members also cause local stress increases at the hole boundariesas well as the increased average stresses NAnet discussed above These localstress concentrations and their influence on member strength are discussed laterin Section 25

23 Eccentrically and locally connectedtension members

In many cases the fabrication of tension members is simplified by making theirend connections eccentric (ie the centroid of the connection does not coincidewith the centroidal axis of the member) and by connecting to some but not all ofthe elements in the cross-section It is common for example to make connections

38 Tension members

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 26 Eccentrically and locally connected tension members

to an angle section through one leg only to a tee-section through the flange (ortable) or to a channel section through the web (Figure 26) The effect of eccentricconnections is to induce bending moments in the member whilst the effect ofconnecting to some but not all elements in the cross-section is to cause thoseregions most remote from the connection point(s) to carry less load The latter isessentially a shear lag effect (see Section 545) Both of these effects are localto the connections decreasing along the member length and are reduced furtherby ductile stress redistribution after the onset of yielding Members connected bysome but not all of the elements in the cross-section (including those connectedsymmetrically as in Figure 26d) are also discussed in Section 25

While tension members in bending can be designed rationally by using the pro-cedure described in Section 24 simpler methods [1ndash3] also produce satisfactoryresults In these simpler methods the effects described above are approximatedby reducing the cross-sectional area of the member (to an effective net area)and by designing it as if concentrically loaded For a single angle in tension con-nected by a single row of bolts in one leg the effective net section Aneteff to beused in place of the net area Anet in equation 24 is defined in EC3-1-8 [4] It isdependent on the number of bolts and the pitch p1 and for one bolt is given by

Aneteff = 20(e2 minus 05 d0)t (29)

for two bolts by

Aneteff = β2Anet (210)

and for three or more bolts by

Aneteff = β3Anet (211)

The symbols in equations 29ndash211 are defined below and in Figure 27 and Anet

is the net area of the angle For an unequal angle connected by its smaller leg Anet

Tension members 39

e1 p1 p1

e2 d0

Figure 27 Definition of symbols for tension connections in single angles

should be taken as the net section of an equivalent equal angle of leg length equalto the smaller leg of the unequal angle In the case of welded end connections foran equal angle or an unequal angle connected by its larger leg the eccentricitymay be neglected and the effective area Anet may be taken as equal to the grossarea A (Clause 413(2) of EC3-1-8 [4])

For a pair of bolts in a single row in an angle leg β2 in equation 210 is takenas 04 for closely spaced bolts (p1 le 25 d0) as 07 if they are widely spaced(p1 ge 5 d0) or as a linear interpolation for intermediate spacings For three ormore bolts in a single row in an angle leg β3 in equation 211 is taken as 05 forclosely spaced bolts (p1 le 25 d0) as 07 if they are widely spaced (p1 ge 5 d0)or again as a linear interpolation for intermediate spacings

24 Bending of tension members

Tension members often have bending actions caused by eccentric connectionseccentric loads or transverse loads including self-weight as shown in Figure 28These bending actions which interact with the tensile loads reduce the ultimatestrengths of tension members and must therefore be accounted for in design

The axial tension N and transverse deflections w of a tension member causedby any bending action induce restoring moments Nw which oppose the bend-ing action It is a common (and conservative) practice to ignore these restoringmoments which are small when either the bending deflections w or the tensile loadN are small In this case the maximum stress σmax in the member can be safelyapproximated by

σmax = σat + σbty + σbtz (212)

where σat = NA is the average tensile stress and σbty and σbtz are the maximumtensile bending stresses caused by the major and minor axis bending actions My

and Mz alone (see Section 53) The nominal first yield of the member thereforeoccurs when σmax = fy whence

σat + σbty + σbtz = fy (213)

When either the tensile load N or the moments My and Mz are not small the firstyield prediction of equation 213 is inaccurate A suggested interaction equation

40 Tension members

N Nw

(a) Transverse load only (b) Transverse load and tension

Bending moment diagrams

Nw

Figure 28 Bending of a tension member

for failure is the linear inequality

MyEd

MtyRd+ MzEd

MrzRdle 1 (214)

where MrzRd is the cross-section resistance for tension and bending about theminor principal (z) axis given by

MrzRd = MczRd(1 minus NtEdNtRd) (215)

and MtyRd is the lesser of the cross-section resistance MryRd for tension andbending about the major principal (y) axis given by

MryRd = McyRd(1 minus NtEdNtRd) (216)

and the out-of-plane member buckling resistance MbtRd for tension and bendingabout the major principal axis given by

MbtRd = MbRd(1 + NtEdNtRd) le McyRd (217)

in which MbRd is the lateral buckling resistance when N = 0 (see Chapter 6)In these equations NtRd is the tensile resistance in the absence of bending

(taken as the lesser of Npl and Nu) while McyRd and MczRd are the cross-sectionresistances for bending alone about the y and z axes (see Sections 472 and 5613)Equation 214 is similar to the first yield condition of equation 213 but includesa simple approximation for the possibility of lateral buckling under large valuesof MyEd through the use of equation 217

25 Stress concentrations

High local stress concentrations are not usually important in ductile materialsunder static loading situations because the local yielding resulting from these

Tension members 41

concentrations causes a favourable redistribution of stress However in situationsfor which it is doubtful whether the steel will behave in a ductile manner aswhen there is a possibility of brittle fracture of a tension member under dynamicloads (see Section 133) or when repeated load applications may lead to fatiguefailure (see Section 132) stress concentrations become very significant It isusual to try to avoid or minimise stress concentrations by providing suitable jointand member details but this is not always possible in which case some estimateof the magnitudes of the local stresses must be made

Stress concentrations in tension members occur at holes in the member andwhere there are changes or very local reductions in the cross-section and at pointswhere concentrated forces act The effects of a hole in a tension member (ofnet width bnet and thickness t) are shown by the uppermost curve in Figure 29which is a plot of the variation of the stress concentration factor (the ratio ofthe maximum tensile stress to the nominal stress averaged over the reduced cross-section bnet t)with the ratio of the hole radius r to the net width bnet The maximumstress approaches three times the nominal stress when the plate width is very large(rbnet rarr 0)

This curve may also be used for plates with a series of holes spaced equallyacross the plate width provided bnet is taken as the minimum width betweenadjacent holes The effects of changes in the cross-section of a plate in tension areshown by the lower curves in Figure 29 while the effects of some notches or verylocal reductions in the cross-section are given in [5] Methods of analysing theseand other stress concentrations are discussed in [6]

Large concentrated forces are usually transmitted to structural members by localbearing and while this produces high local compressive stresses any subsequent

Str

ess

conc

entr

atio

n fa

ctor

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 01 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

3 0

3 5

N o m i n al s t r e s s i sc a l cu la t e d f o r n e t area bnet times t

b

2 r bnet 2

b r bnet

Ratio rbnet

15 225

(b-bnet )2r=1

Figure 29 Stress concentrations in tension members

42 Tension members

plastic yielding is not usually serious Of more importance are the increased tensilestresses which result when only some of the plate elements of a tension memberare loaded (see Figure 26) as discussed in Section 23 In this case conservativeestimates can be made of these stresses by assuming that the resulting bending andaxial actions are resisted solely by the loaded elements

26 Design of tension members

261 General

In order to design or to check a tension member the design tensile force NtEd ateach cross-section in the member is obtained by a frame analysis (see Chapter 8)or by statics if the member is statically determinate using the appropriate loadsand partial load factors γG γQ (see Section 17) If there is substantial bendingpresent the design moments MyEd and MzEd about the major and minor principalaxes respectively are also obtained

The process of checking a specified tension member or of designing an unknownmember is summarised in Figure 210 for the case where bending actions can beignored If a specified member is to be checked then both the strength limit statesof gross yielding and the net fracture are considered so that both the yield strengthfy and the ultimate strength fu are required When the member size is not knownan approximate target area A can be established The trial member selected maybe checked for the fracture limit state once its holes connection eccentricities andnet area Anet have been established and modified if necessary

The following sub-sections describe each of the EC3 check and design processesfor a statically loaded tension member Worked examples of their application aregiven in Sections 271ndash275

262 Concentrically loaded tension members

The EC3 method of strength design of tension members which are loaded concen-trically follows the philosophy of Section 22 with the two separate limit statesof yield of the gross section and fracture of the net section represented by a singleequation

NtEd le NtRd (218)

where NtRd is the design tension resistance which is taken as the lesser of theyield (or plastic) resistance of the cross-section NplRd and the ultimate (or fracture)resistance of the cross-section containing holes NuRd

The yield limit state of equation 22 is given in EC3 as

NplRd = AfyγM0 (219)

where A is the gross area of the cross-section and γM0 is the partial factor forcross-section resistance with a value of 10

Tension members 43

Checking Designing

Section

Loading

Analysis for NEd

Find fy fu Anet

Assume fy

Find trial section A ge

ge

NEd fy

NtRd is the lesser of NplRd and NuRd

Check NEd Nt Rd

Check complete

Design complete

Find new section

Yes

No

NplRd = Afy γM0 NuRd = 09Anet fu γM2

Figure 210 Flow chart for the design of tension members

The fracture limit state of equation 24 is given in EC3 as

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 (220)

where Anet is the net area of the cross-section and γM2 is the partial factor forresistance in tension to fracture with a value of 11 given in the National Annex

44 Tension members

to EC3 The factor 09 in equation 220 ensures that the effective partial factorγM209(asymp122) for the limit state of material fracture (NuRd) is suitably higherthan the value of γM0(=10) for the limit state of yielding (NplRd) reflecting theinfluence of greater variability in fu and the reduced ductility of members whichfail by fracture at bolt holes

263 Eccentrically connected tension members

The EC3 method of strength design of simple angle tension members which areconnected eccentrically as shown in Figure 26 is similar to the method discussedin Section 262 for concentrically loaded members with the lsquo09Anetrsquo used inequation 220 being replaced by an effective net area Aneteff as described inSection 23

264 Tension members with bending

2641 Cross-section resistance

EC3 provides the conservative inequality

NtEd

NtRd+ MyEd

MyRd+ MzEd

MzRdle 1 (221)

for the cross-section resistance of tension members with design bending momentsMyEd and MzEd where MyRd and MzRd are the cross-section moment resistances(Sections 472 and 5613)

Equation 221 is rather conservative and so EC3 allows I-section tensionmembers with Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections (see Section 472) with bendingabout the major (y) axis to satisfy

MyEd le MN yRd = MplyRd

(1 minus NtEdNplRd

1 minus 05a

)le MplyRd (222)

in which MN yRd is the reduced plastic design moment resistance about themajor (y) axis (reduced from the full plastic design moment resistance MplyRd toaccount for the axial force (see Section 7241) and

a = (A minus 2btf )A le 05 (223)

in which b and tf are the flange width and thickness respectively For I-sectiontension members with Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections with bending about the

Tension members 45

minor (z) axis EC3 allows

MzEd le MN zRd = MplzRd

1 minus

(NtEdNplRd minus a

1 minus a

)2

le MplzRd (224)

where MN zRd is the reduced plastic design moment resistance about the minor (z)axis

EC3 also provides an alternative to equation 221 for the section resistance toaxial tension and bending about both principal axes of Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections This is the more accurate interaction equation (see Section 742)(

MyEd

MN yRd

)α+

(MzEd

MN z Rd

)βle 1 (225)

where the values of α and β depend on the cross-section type (eg α= 20 andβ = 5NtEdNplRd for I-sections and α=β = 2 for circular hollow sections)

A worked example of a tension member with bending actions is given inSection 275

2642 Member resistance

EC3 does not provide any specific rules for determining the influence of lateralbuckling on the member resistance of tension members with bending This maybe accounted for conservatively by using

MyEd le MbRd (226)

in equation 221 in which MbRd is the design buckling moment resistance of themember (see Section 65) This equation conservatively omits the strengtheningeffect of tension on lateral buckling A less conservative method is provided byequations 214ndash217

27 Worked examples

271 Example 1 ndash net area of a bolted universal columnsection member

Problem Both flanges of a universal column section member have 22 mm diam-eter holes arranged as shown in Figure 211a If the gross area of the section is201 times 102 mm2 and the flange thickness is 25 mm determine the net area Anet ofthe member which is effective in tensionSolution Using equation 26 the minimum stagger is sm = radic

(4 times 60 times 22)=727 mmgt 30 mm = s The failure path through each flange is therefore stag-gered and by inspection it includes four holes and two staggers The net area can

46 Tension members

6 0 6 0 6 0

6 0

1 2 0

6 0

6 0 6 0

Gross area of member = 201times102 mm2

Flange is 3112 mm times 25 mm Holes are 22 mm diameter

(a) Flange of universal column section

1 0 0

1 0 0

1 0 2 9 1

2 6 1 2

1 2 y

z

(b) Universal beam section

(c) Double angle section

Dimensions in mm

A = 159 cm2 A = 2 times 227 cm2

Figure 211 Examples 1ndash6

therefore be calculated from equation 28 (or Clause 6222(4) of EC3) as

Anet = [201 times 102] minus [2 times 4 times (22 times 25)] + [2 times 2 times (302 times 25)(4 times 60)]= 161 times 102 mm2

272 Example 2 ndash checking a bolted universal columnsection member

Problem Determine the tension resistance of the tension member of example 1assuming it is of S355 steel

Solution

tf = 25 mm fy = 345 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 201 times 102 times 34510 = 6935 kN 623(2)a

From Section 271

Anet = 161 times 102 mm2

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 = 09 times 161 times 102 times 49011 = 6445 kN623(2)b

NtRd = 6445 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) 623(2)

Tension members 47

273 Example 3 ndash checking a bolted universal beamsection member

Problem A 610times229 UB 125 tension member of S355 steel is connected throughboth flanges by 20 mm bolts (in 22 mm diameter bolt holes) in four lines twoin each flange as shown in Figure 211b Check the member for a design tensionforce of NtEd = 4000 kN

Solution

tf = 196 mm fy = 345 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

A = 15 900 mm2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 15900 times 34510 = 5486 kN 623(2)a

Anet = 15 900 minus (4 times 22 times 196) = 14175 mm2 6222(3)

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 = 09 times 14175 times 49011 = 5683 kN 623(2)b

NtRd = 5486 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) gt 4000 kN = NtEd

623(2)

and so the member is satisfactory

274 Example 4 ndash checking an eccentrically connectedsingle (unequal) angle

Problem A tension member consists of a 150 times 75 times 10 single unequal anglewhose ends are connected to gusset plates through the larger leg by a singlerow of four 22 mm bolts in 24 mm holes at 60 mm centres Use the method ofSection 23 to check the member for a design tension force of NtEd = 340 kN if theangle is of S355 steel and has a gross area of 217 cm2

Solution

t = 10 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

Gross area of cross-section A = 2170 mm2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 2170 times 35510 = 7704 kN 623(2)a

Anet = 2170 minus (24 times 10) = 1930 mm2 6222(3)

β3 = 05 (since the pitch p1 = 60 mm = 25d0) EC3-1-8 3103(2)

NuRd = β3Anet fuγM2 = 05 times 1930 times 49011 = 4299 kN 623(2)b

NtRd = 4299 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) gt 340 kN = NtEd

623(2)

and so the member is satisfactory

48 Tension members

275 Example 5 ndash checking a member under combinedtension and bending

Problem A tension member consists of two equal angles of S355 steel whose endsare connected to gusset plates as shown in Figure 211c If the load eccentricityfor the tension member is 391 mm and the tension and bending resistances are1438 kN and 377 kNm determine the resistance of the member by treating it asa member under combined tension and bending

SolutionSubstituting into equation 221 leads to

NtEd1438 + NtEd times (3911000)377 le 1 621(7)

so that NtEd le 5772 kNBecause the load eccentricity causes the member to bend about its minor axis

there is no need to check for lateral buckling which only occurs when there ismajor axis bending

276 Example 6 ndash estimating the stress concentration factor

Problem Estimate the maximum stress concentration factor for the tensionmember of Section 271

Solution For the inner line of holes the net width is

bnet = 60 + 30 minus 22 = 68 mm and so

rbnet = (222)68 = 016

and so using Figure 29 the stress concentration factor is approximately 25However the actual maximum stress is likely to be greater than 25 times the

nominal average stress calculated from the effective area Anet = 161 times 102 mm2

determined in Section 271 because the unconnected web is not completelyeffective A safe estimate of the maximum stress can be determined on the basisof the flange areas only of

Anet = [2 times 3106 times 25] minus [2 times 4 times 22 times 25] + [2 times 2 times (302 times 25)(4 times 60)]= 1151 times 102 mm2

28 Unworked examples

281 Example 7 ndash bolting arrangement

A channel section tension member has an overall depth of 381 mm width of1016 mm flange and web thicknesses of 163 and 104 mm respectively and an

Tension members 49

yield strength of 345 Nmm2 Determine an arrangement for bolting the web of thechannel to a gusset plate so as to minimise the gusset plate length and maximisethe tension member resistance

282 Example 8 ndash checking a channel section memberconnected by bolts

Determine the design tensile resistance NtRd of the tension member of Section281

283 Example 9 ndash checking a channel section memberconnected by welds

If the tension member of Section 281 is fillet welded to the gusset plate insteadof bolted determine its design tensile resistance NtRd

284 Example 10 ndash checking a member under combinedtension and bending

The beam of example 1 in Section 6151 has a concentric axial tensile load 5Q inaddition to the central transverse load Q Determine the maximum value of Q

References

1 Regan PE and Salter PR (1984) Tests on welded-angle tension members StructuralEngineer 62B(2) pp 25ndash30

2 Nelson HM (1953) Angles in Tension Publication No 7 British Constructional SteelAssociation pp 9ndash18

3 Bennetts ID Thomas IR and Hogan TJ (1986) Design of statically loaded tensionmembers Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE28No 4 November pp 318ndash27

4 British Standards Institute (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash8Design of Joints BSI London

5 Roark RJ (1965) Formulas for Stress and Strain 4th edition McGraw-HillNew York

6 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

Chapter 3

Compression members

31 Introduction

The compression member is the second type of axially loaded structural elementthe first type being the tension member discussed in Chapter 2 Very stocky com-pression members behave in the same way as do tension members until after thematerial begins to flow plastically at the squash load Ny = Afy However the resis-tance of a compression member decreases as its length increases in contrast tothe axially loaded tension member whose resistance is independent of its lengthThus the compressive resistance of a very slender member may be much less thanits tensile resistance as shown in Figure 31

This decrease in resistance is caused by the action of the applied compressiveload N which causes bending in a member with initial curvature (see Figure 32a)In a tension member the corresponding action decreases the initial curvature andso this effect is usually ignored However the curvature and the lateral deflectionof a compression member increase with the load as shown in Figure 32b Thecompressive stresses on the concave side of the member also increase until themember fails due to excessive yielding This bending action is accentuated bythe slenderness of the member and so the resistance of a compression memberdecreases as its length increases

For the hypothetical limiting case of a perfectly straight elastic member thereis no bending until the applied load reaches the elastic buckling value Ncr (EC3refers to Ncr as the elastic critical force) At this load the compression memberbegins to deflect laterally as shown in Figure 32b and these deflections grow untilfailure occurs at the beginning of compressive yielding This action of suddenlydeflecting laterally is called flexural buckling

The elastic buckling load Ncr provides a measure of the slenderness of acompression member while the squash load Ny gives an indication of itsresistance to yielding In this chapter the influences of the elastic bucklingload and the squash load on the behaviour of concentrically loaded compres-sion members are discussed and related to their design according to EC3Local buckling of thin-plate elements in compression members is treated inChapter 4 while the behaviour and design of eccentrically loaded compression

Compression members 51

Tension memberand very stocky compression member

Slender compression member

Change in length

Axi

al lo

ad

Ny = Afy

fy LE

Figure 31 Resistances of axially loaded members

Straight member 0 = 0 equation 32

Member with initial curvature0 =0 sinπxLequation 39

Straight member 0 = 0

0 5 10 15 20

02

04

06

08

10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss lo

ad N

Ncr

Dimensionless deflection 0

(b) Central deflection(a) Compression member

N

N

L2

L2x

Initial position(N = 0)

δ 0

δ

0

Figure 32 Elastic behaviour of a compression member

members are discussed in Chapter 7 and compression members in frames inChapter 8

32 Elastic compression members

321 Buckling of straight members

Aperfectly straight member of a linear elastic material is shown in Figure 33a Themember has a frictionless hinge at each end its lower end being fixed in positionwhile its upper end is free to move vertically but is prevented from deflectinghorizontally It is assumed that the deflections of the member remain small

52 Compression members

N

N N

N

v

x

L

(a) Unloaded member (b) Undeflected loaded member

(c) Deflected member

Figure 33 Straight compression member

The unloaded position of the member is shown in Figure 33a A concentricaxial load N is applied to the upper end of the member which remains straight(Figure 33b) The member is then deflected laterally by a small amount v asshown in Figure 33c and is held in this position If the original straight positionof Figure 33b is one of stable equilibrium the member will return to it whenreleased from the deflected position while if the original position is one of unstableequilibrium the member will collapse away from it when released When theequilibrium of the original position is neither stable nor unstable the member isin a condition described as one of neutral equilibrium For this case the deflectedposition is one of equilibrium and the member will remain in this position whenreleased Thus when the load N reaches the elastic buckling value Ncr at which theoriginal straight position of the member is one of neutral equilibrium the membermay deflect laterally without any change in the load as shown in Figure 32b

The load Ncr at which a straight compression member buckles laterally can bedetermined by finding a deflected position which is one of equilibrium It is shownin Section 381 that this position is given by

v = δ sin πxL (31)

in which δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that theelastic buckling load is

Ncr = π2EIL2 (32)

in which EI is the flexural rigidity of the compression member

Compression members 53

The elastic buckling load Ncr and the elastic buckling stress

σcr = NcrA (33)

can be expressed in terms of the geometrical slenderness ratio Li by

Ncr = σcrA = π2EA

(Li)2(34)

in which i = radic(IA) is the radius of gyration (which can be determined for a

number of sections by using Figure 56) The buckling load varies inversely asthe square of the slenderness ratio Li as shown in Figure 34 in which thedimensionless buckling load NcrNy is plotted against the generalised slendernessratio

λ =radic

Ny

Ncr=

radicfyσcr

= L

i

radicfyπ2E

(35)

in which

Ny = Afy (36)

is the squash load If the material ceases to be linear elastic at the yield stress fythen the above analysis is only valid for λ = radic

(NyNcr) = radic(fyσcr) ge 1 This

limit is equivalent to a slenderness ratio Li of approximately 85 for a materialwith a yield stress fy of 275 Nmm2

0 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

Dim

ensi

onle

ss lo

ad N

crN

y or

NLN

y Complete

yielding

First yield NLNydue to initial curvature (equations 311ndash314)

Elastic buckling NcrNy

(equations 34 and 35)

Figure 34 Buckling and yielding of compression members

54 Compression members

322 Bending of members with initial curvature

Real structural members are not perfectly straight but have small initial curva-tures as shown in Figure 32a The buckling behaviour of the hypothetical straightmembers discussed in Section 321 must therefore be interpreted as the limit-ing behaviour of real members with infinitesimally small initial curvatures Theinitial curvature of the real member causes it to bend from the commencementof application of the axial load and this increases the maximum stress in themember

If the initial curvature is such that

v0 = δ0 sin πxL (37)

then the deflection of member is given by

v = δ sin πxL (38)

where

δ

δ0= NNcr

1 minus NNcr (39)

as shown in Section 382 The variation of the dimensionless central deflectionδδ0 is shown in Figure 32b and it can be seen that deflection begins at thecommencement of loading and increases rapidly as the elastic buckling load Ncr

is approachedThe simple load-deflection relationship of equation 39 is the basis of the

Southwell plot technique for extrapolating the elastic buckling load from experi-mental measurements If equation 39 is rearranged as

δ

N= 1

Ncrδ + δ0

Ncr (310)

then the linear relation between δN and δ shown in Figure 35 is obtained Thusif a straight line is drawn which best fits the points determined from experimen-tal measurements of N and δ the reciprocal of the slope of this line gives anexperimental estimate of the buckling load Ncr An estimate of the magnitudeδ0 of the initial crookedness can also be determined from the intercept on thehorizontal axis

As the deflections v increase with the load N so also do the bending momentsand the stresses It is shown in Section 382 that the limiting axial load NL at whichthe compression member first yields (due to a combination of axial plus bending

Compression members 55

Central deflection

0

NStraight line of best fit (see equation 310)

Slope = crN

1

0

Figure 35 Southwell plot

stresses) is given by

NL

Ny= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2 (311)

in which

Φ = 1 + η + λ2

2 (312)

η = δ0b

2i2 (313)

and b is the width of the member The variation of the dimensionless limiting axialload NLNy with the generalised slenderness ratio λ is shown in Figure 34 for thecase when

η = 1

4

Ny

Ncr (314)

For stocky members the limiting load NL approaches the squash load Ny whilefor slender members the limiting load approaches the elastic buckling load Ncr Equations 311 and 312 are the basis for the member buckling resistance in EC3

33 Inelastic compression members

331 Tangent modulus theory of buckling

The analysis of a perfectly straight elastic compression member given inSection 321 applies only to a material whose stressndashstrain relationship remains

56 Compression members

Strain Tangent modulus Et Slenderness Li

(a) Elastic stressndashstrainrelationship

(b) Tangent modulus (c) Buckling stress

E

E

Et

Et

Ncr

Ncrt(equation 317)B

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

t

Str

ess

NA

Str

ess

NA

(equation 34)

Figure 36 Tangent modulus theory of buckling

linear However the buckling of an elastic member of a non-linear material suchas that whose stressndashstrain relationship is shown in Figure 36a can be analysedby a simple modification of the linear elastic treatment It is only necessary tonote that the small bending stresses and strains which occur during buckling arerelated by the tangent modulus of elasticity Et corresponding to the average com-pressive stress NA (Figure 36a and b) instead of the initial modulus E Thus theflexural rigidity is reduced from EI to EtI and the tangent modulus buckling loadNcrt is obtained from equation 34 by substituting Et for E whence

Ncrt = π2EtA

(Li)2 (315)

The deviation of this tangent modulus buckling load Ncrt from the elastic bucklingload Ncr is shown in Figure 36c It can be seen that the deviation of Ncrt fromNcr increases as the slenderness ratio Li decreases

332 Reduced modulus theory of buckling

The tangent modulus theory of buckling is only valid for elastic materials Forinelastic nonlinear materials the changes in the stresses and strains are related bythe initial modulus E when the total strain is decreasing and the tangent modulusEt only applies when the total strain is increasing as shown in Figure 37 Theflexural rigidity ErI of an inelastic member during buckling therefore depends onboth E and Et As a direct consequence of this the effective (or reduced) modulusof the section Er depends on the geometry of the cross-section as well It is shownin Section 391 that the reduced modulus of a rectangular section is given by

Er = 4EEt(radicE + radic

Et

)2 (316)

Compression members 57

E

E

Et

Strain

Str

ess

NA

Figure 37 Inelastic stressndashstrain relationship

Lateral deflection

Load

Rate of increase in load required to prevent strain reversal

Ncr

Ncrr

Ncrt

Nmax

Figure 38 Shanleyrsquos theory of inelastic buckling

The reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr can be obtained by substituting Er for Ein equation 34 whence

Ncrr = π2ErA

(Li)2 (317)

Since the tangent modulus Et is less than the initial modulus E it follows thatEt lt Er lt E and so the reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr lies between thetangent modulus buckling load Ncrt and the elastic buckling load Ncr as indicatedin Figure 38

58 Compression members

333 Shanleyrsquos theory of inelastic buckling

Although the tangent modulus theory appears to be invalid for inelastic materialscareful experiments have shown that it leads to more accurate predictions thanthe apparently rigorous reduced modulus theory This paradox was resolved byShanley [1] who reasoned that the tangent modulus theory is valid when bucklingis accompanied by a simultaneous increase in the applied load (see Figure 38) ofsufficient magnitude to prevent strain reversal in the member When this happensall the bending stresses and strains are related by the tangent modulus of elasticityEt the initial modulus E does not feature and so the buckling load is equal to thetangent modulus value Ncrt

As the lateral deflection of the member increases as shown in Figure 38 thetangent modulus Et decreases (see Figure 36b) because of the increased axial andbending strains and the post-buckling curve approaches a maximum load Nmax

which defines the ultimate resistance of the member Also shown in Figure 38is a post-buckling curve which commences at the reduced modulus load Ncrr

(at which buckling can take place without any increase in the load) The tangentmodulus load Ncrt is the lowest load at which buckling can begin and the reducedmodulus load Ncrr is the highest load for which the member can remain straightIt is theoretically possible for buckling to begin at any load between Ncrt and Ncrr

It can be seen that not only is the tangent modulus load more easily calculatedbut it also provides a conservative estimate of the member resistance and is incloser agreement with experimental results than the reduced modulus load Forthese reasons the tangent modulus theory of inelastic buckling has gained wideacceptance

334 Buckling of members with residual stresses

The presence of residual stresses in an intermediate length steel compressionmember may cause a significant reduction in its buckling resistance Resid-ual stresses are established during the cooling of a hot-rolled or welded steelmember (and during plastic deformation such as cold-rolling) The shrinking ofthe late-cooling regions of the member induces residual compressive stresses inthe early-cooling regions and these are balanced by equilibrating tensile stressesin the late-cooling regions In hot-rolled I-section members the flange ndash webjunctions are the least exposed to cooling influences and so these are the regionsof residual tensile stress as shown in Figure 39 while the more exposed flangetips are regions of residual compressive stress In a straight intermediate lengthcompression member the residual compressive stresses cause premature yield-ing under reduced axial loads as shown in Figure 310 and the member bucklesinelastically at a load which is less than the elastic buckling load Ncr

In applying the tangent modulus concept of inelastic buckling to a steel whichhas the stressndashstrain relationships shown in Figure 16 (see Chapter 1) the strain-hardening modulus Est is sometimes used in the yielded regions as well as in

Compression members 59

05fy compression

y

z

03fy tension

03fy compression

Figure 39 Idealised residual stress pattern

N = 0 025Ny N Ny

de

de

0

d

bz

y

(EI)t = EI EIYielded

areas

(a)Load

c ct

fyResidual stress pattern

05Ny

05fy

05fy

(b)Stress

distribution

(c)Cross-section

(d)Effective flexural

rigidity

Fully yielded

EI (EI)t (EI)t = 0

Shaded areas due to axial load

First yield

Elastic

Elasticcore

Elastic

Figure 310 Effective section of a member with residual stresses

the strain-hardened regions This use is based on the slip theory of dislocationin which yielding is represented by a series of dynamic jumps instead of by asmooth quasi-static flow Thus the material in the yielded region is either elasticor strain-hardened and its subsequent behaviour may be estimated conservativelyby using the strain-hardening modulus However the even more conservativeassumption that the tangent modulus Et is zero in both the yielded and strain-hardened regions is frequently used because of its simplicity According to thisassumption these regions of the member are ineffective during buckling and themoment of resistance is entirely due to the elastic core of the section

60 Compression members

Thus for a rectangular section member which has the simplified residual stressdistribution shown in Figure 310 the effective flexural rigidity (EI)t about the zaxis is (see Section 392)

(EI)t = EI [2(1 minus NNy)]12 (318)

when the axial load N is greater than 05Ny at which first yield occurs and theaxial load at buckling Ncrt is given by

Ncrt

Ny=

(Ncr

Ny

)2

[1 + 2(NyNcr)2]12 minus 1 (319)

The variation of this dimensionless tangent modulus buckling load Ncrt Ny withthe generalised slenderness ratio λ = radic

(NyNcr) is shown in Figure 311For stocky members the buckling load Ncrt approaches the squash load Nywhile for intermediate length members it approaches the elastic buckling loadNcr as λ = radic

(NyNcr) approachesradic

2 For more slender members prema-ture yielding does not occur and these members buckle at the elastic bucklingload Ncr

Also shown in Figure 311 is the dimensionless tangent modulus buckling loadNcrtNy given by

Ncrt

Ny= 1 minus 1

4

Ny

Ncr (320)

0 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

tN

y Completeyield

Elastic buckling NcrNy

Inelastic buckling of rectangular section shown in Fig 310 (equation 319)

NN

crt

y---- = 1ndash 1

4----N

Ny

cr----

(equation 320)

radic2

Figure 311 Inelastic buckling of compression members with residual stresses

Compression members 61

which was developed as a compromise between major and minor axis bucklingof hot-rolled I-section members It can be seen that this simple compromise isvery similar to the relationship given by equation 319 for the rectangular sectionmember

34 Real compression members

The conditions under which real members act differ in many ways from theidealised conditions assumed in Section 321 for the analysis of the elastic buck-ling of a perfect member Real members are not perfectly straight and theirloads are applied eccentrically while accidental transverse loads may act Theeffects of small imperfections of these types are qualitatively the same as thoseof initial curvature which were described in Section 322 These imperfectionscan therefore be represented by an increased equivalent initial curvature whichhas a similar effect on the behaviour of the member as the combined effectof all of these imperfections The resulting behaviour is shown by curve A inFigure 312

A real member also has residual stresses and its elastic modulus E and yieldstress fy may vary throughout the member The effects of these material vari-ations are qualitatively the same as those of the residual stresses which weredescribed in Section 334 and so they can be represented by an equivalent set ofthe residual stresses The resulting behaviour of the member is shown by curve B inFigure 312

Since real members have both kinds of imperfections their behaviour is asshown by curve C in Figure 312 which is a combination of curves A and B Thusthe real member behaves as a member with equivalent initial curvature (curve A)until the elastic limit is reached It then follows a path which is similar to andapproaches that of a member with equivalent residual stresses (curve B)

Elastic bending

Curve A ndash equivalentinitial curvature

Curve B ndash equivalent residual stresses

Curve C ndash real members

Elastic limit

Nmax

Elastic buckling

Ncr

NL

Ncrt

Lateral deflection

Load

Figure 312 Behaviour of real compression members

62 Compression members

35 Design of compression members

351 EC3 design buckling resistance

Real compression members may be analysed using a model in which the initialcrookedness and load eccentricity are specified Residual stresses may be includedand the realistic stressndashstrain behaviour may be incorporated in the prediction of theload versus deflection relationship Thus curve C in Figure 312 may be generatedand the maximum load Nmax ascertained

Rational computer analyses based on the above modelling are rarely used exceptin research and are inappropriate for the routine design of real compression mem-bers because of the uncertainties and variations that exist in the initial crookednessand residual stresses Instead simplified design predictions for the maximumload (or resistance) are used in EC3 that have been developed from the results ofcomputer analyses and correlations with available test data

A close prediction of numerical solutions and test results may be obtained byusing equations 311 and 312 which are based on the first yield of a geometricallyimperfect member This is achieved by writing the imperfection parameter η ofequation 312 as

η = α(λminus 02) ge 0 (321)

in which α is a constant (imperfection factor) which shifts the resistance curve asshown in Figure 313 for different cross-section types proportions thicknessesbuckling axes and material strengths (Table 62 of EC3) The advantage of thisapproach is that the resistances (referred to as buckling resistances in EC3) of aparticular group of sections can be determined by assigning an appropriate value

0

02

04

06

08

1

12

0 05 1 15 2 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

resi

stan

ce χ

= N

bR

dN

y

Curve d

Curve c

Curve b

Curve a

Curve a0

Figure 313 Compression resistances of EC3

Compression members 63

of α to them The design buckling resistance NbRd is then given by

NbRd = χNyγM1 (322)

in which γM1 is the partial factor for member instability which has a recommendedvalue of 10 in EC3

The dimensionless compressive design buckling resistances NbRdNy for α =013 021 034 049 and 076 which represent the EC3 compression membercurves (a0) (a) (b) (c) and (d) respectively are shown in Figure 313 Memberswith higher initial crookedness have lower strengths due to premature yieldingand these are associated with higher values of α On the other hand members withlower initial crookedness are not as greatly affected by premature yielding andhave lower values of α assigned to them

352 Elastic buckling load

Although the design buckling resistance NbRd given by equation 322 was derivedby using the expression for the elastic buckling load Ncr given by equation 32 for apin-ended compression member equation 322 is also used for other compressionmembers by generalising equation 32 to

Ncr = π2EIL2cr (323)

in which Lcr is the effective length (referred to as the buckling length in EC3)The elastic buckling load Ncr varies with the member geometry loading and

restraints but there is no guidance given in EC3 for determining either Ncr or Lcr Section 36 following summarises methods of determining the effects of restraintson the effective length Lcr while Section 37 discusses the design of compressionmembers with variable sections or loading

353 Effects of local buckling

Compression members containing thin-plate elements are likely to be affected bylocal buckling of the cross-section (see Chapter 4) Local buckling reduces theresistances of short compression members below their squash loads Ny and theresistances of longer members which fail by flexural buckling

Local buckling of a short compression member is accounted for by using areduced effective area Aeff instead of the gross area A as discussed in Section 471Local buckling of a longer compression member is accounted for by using Aeff

instead of A and by reducing the generalised slenderness to

λ =radic

Aeff fyNcr (324)

but using the gross cross-sectional properties to determine Ncr

64 Compression members

354 Design procedures

For the design of a compression member the design axial force NEd is determinedby a rational frame analysis as in Chapter 8 or by statics for a statically determinatestructure The design loads (factored loads) FEd are for the ultimate limit state andare determined by summing up the specified loads multiplied by the appropriatepartial load factors γF (see Section 156)

To check the compression resistance of a member both the cross-sectionresistance NcRd and the member buckling resistance NbRd should generally beconsidered though it is usually the case for practical members that the bucklingresistance will govern The cross-section resistance of a compression memberNcRd must satisfy

NEd le NcRd (325)

in which

NcRd = AfyγM0 (326)

for a fully effective section in which γM0 is the partial factor for cross-sectionresistance (with a recommended value of 10 in EC3) or

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0 (327)

for the cross-sections that are susceptible to local buckling prior to yieldingThe member buckling resistance NbRd must satisfy

NEd le NbRd (328)

where the member buckling resistance NbRd is given by equation 322The procedure for checking a specified compression member is summarised

in Figure 314 The cross-section is checked to determine if it is fully effective(Aeff = A where A is the gross area) or slender (in which case the reducedeffective area Aeff is used) and the design buckling resistance NbRd is then foundand compared with the design compression force NEd

An iterative series of calculations is required when designing a compressionmember as indicated in Figure 314 An initial trial section is first selected eitherby using tabulations formulations or graphs of design buckling resistance NbRd

versus effective length Lcr or by making initial guesses for fy Aeff A and χ (say05) and calculating a target area A A trial section is then selected and checkedIf the section is not satisfactory then a new section is selected using the latestvalues of fy Aeff A and χ and the checking process is repeated The iterationsusually converge within a few cycles but convergence can be hastened by using themean of the previous and current values of χ in the calculation of the target area A

A worked example of checking the resistance of a compression member is givenin Section 3121 while worked examples of the design of compression membersare given in Sections 3122 and 3123

Compression members 65

No

Yes

Yes

Checking Designing

Section Length and loading

Analysis for NEd

Find fy Aeff

Find

Find

Compression resistance NbRd = Aeff fy M1

Check if NEd NbRd

Check complete

Design complete

Find section A NEd( times fy)

No

Table or graph

Trial section

Find Lcr

Initial values fy (= nom) Aeff (= A)

Find section NbRd NEd

Test convergence

Modify to hasten

convergence

(= 05)

ge

ge

le

Figure 314 Flow chart for the design of compression members

36 Restrained compression members

361 Simple supports and rigid restraints

In the previous sections it was assumed that the compression member was sup-ported only at its ends as shown in Figure 315a If the member has an additionallateral support which prevents it from deflecting at its centre so that (v)L2 = 0

66 Compression members

Ncr Ncr Ncr NcrNcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr LcrL L L

L

L

22 LEINcr π=Lcr = L

(a)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = L2

(b)

22 2 LEINcr πasympasympLcr 07L

(c)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = L2

(d)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = 2L

(e)

Figure 315 Effective lengths of columns

as shown in Figure 315b then its buckled shape v is given by

v = δ sin 2πxL (329)

and its elastic buckling load Ncr is given by

Ncr = 4π2EI

L2 (330)

The end supports of a compression member may also differ from the simple sup-ports shown in Figure 315a which allow the member ends to rotate but preventthem from deflecting laterally For example one or both ends may be rigidly built-in so as to prevent end rotation (Figure 315c and d) or one end may be completelyfree (Figure 315e) In each case the elastic buckling load of the member may beobtained by finding the solution of the differential equilibrium equation whichsatisfies the boundary conditions

All of these buckling loads can be expressed by the generalisation ofequation 323 which replaces the member length L of equation 32 by the effectivelength Lcr Expressions for Lcr are shown in Figure 315 and in each case it canbe seen that the effective length of the member is equal to the distance betweenthe inflexion points of its buckled shape

The effects of the variations in the support and restraint conditions on the com-pression member buckling resistance NbRd may be accounted for by replacingthe actual length L used in equation 32 by the effective length Lcr in the calcula-tion of the elastic buckling load Ncr and hence the generalised slenderness λ andusing this modified generalised slenderness throughout the resistance equationsIt should be noted that it is often necessary to consider the member behaviour ineach principal plane since the effective lengths Lcry and Lcrz may also differ aswell as the radii of gyration iy and iz

Compression members 67

0 10 20 30 40Stiffness (16EIL3 )

0

2

4

6

8

Second mode(equation 330)

L = 16 2EIL3 (equation 331)

L2

L2

Ncr

2

x

v

22 4 LEI

(a) Braced firstmode

(b) Second mode

(c) Buckling loadB

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

2

EI

L2

Braced first mode (equations 365 and 366)

Llt L

2

ge

Figure 316 Compression member with an elastic intermediate restraint

362 Intermediate restraints

In Section 361 it was shown that the elastic buckling load of a simply supportedmember is increased by a factor of 4 to Ncr = 4π2EIL2 when an additionallateral restraint is provided which prevents it from deflecting at its centre asshown in Figure 315b This restraint need not be completely rigid but may beelastic (Figure 316) provided its stiffness exceeds a certain minimum value If thestiffness α of the restraint is defined by the force αδ acting on the restraint whichcauses its length to change by δ then the minimum stiffness αL is determined inSection 3101 as

αL = 16π2EIL3 (331)

The limiting stiffness αL can be expressed in terms of the buckling load Ncr =4π2EIL2 as

αL = 4NcrL (332)

Compression member restraints are generally required to be able to transmit 1(Clause 533(3)) of EC3) of the force in the member restrained This is a littleless than the value of 15 suggested [2] as leading to the braces which aresufficiently stiff

363 Elastic end restraints

When the ends of a compression member are rigidly connected to its adjacentelastic members as shown in Figure 317a then at buckling the adjacent members

68 Compression members

N

N

EI L

1

2

(a) Frame (b) Member

2

1

x

v

N

NM1

M2 M1 + M2 + N

L

M1 + M2 + N

L

13

13

Figure 317 Buckling of a member of a rigid frame

exert total elastic restraining moments M1 M2 which oppose buckling and whichare proportional to the end rotations θ1 θ2 of the compression member Thus

M1 = minusα1θ1

M2 = minusα2θ2

(333)

in which

α1 =sum

1

α (334)

where α is the stiffness of any adjacent member connected to the end 1 of thecompression member and α2 is similarly defined The stiffness α of an adjacentmember depends not only on its length L and flexural rigidity EI but also on itssupport conditions and on the magnitude of any axial load transmitted by it

The particular case of a braced restraining member which acts as if simplysupported at both ends as shown in Figure 318a and which provides equal andopposite end moments M and has an axial force N is analysed in Section 3102where it is shown that when the axial load N is compressive the stiffness α isgiven by

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tan(π2)radic

NNcrL(335)

where

NcrL = π2EIL2 (336)

Compression members 69

01 2 3123 23

ndash2

ndash4

ndash6

2

4

Tension Compression

Dimensionless axial load

(b) Stiffness

Exact equation 335

NNcrLL

N

N

v

x

M

M

(a) Braced member

Exact equation 337

Approx equation 338

(2E

IL)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss s

tiff

ness

Figure 318 Stiffness of a braced member

and by

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tanh(π2)radic

NNcrL(337)

when the axial load N is tensile These relationships are shown in Figure 318band it can be seen that the stiffness decreases almost linearly from 2EI L to zeroas the compressive axial load increases from zero to NcrL and that the stiffness isnegative when the axial load exceeds NcrL In this case the adjacent member nolonger restrains the buckling member but disturbs it When the axial load causestension the stiffness is increased above the value 2EI L

Also shown in Figure 318b is the simple approximation

α = 2EI

L

(1 minus N

NcrL

) (338)

The term (1 minus NNcrL) in this equation is the reciprocal of the amplification fac-tor which expresses the fact that the first-order rotations ML2EI associated withthe end moments M are amplified by the compressive axial load N to (ML2EI )(1 minus NNcrL) The approximation provided by equation 338 is close and con-servative in the range 0 lt NNcrL lt 1 but errs on the unsafe side and withincreasing error as the axial load N increases away from this range

70 Compression members

N N N N N N

N N N N N N

(a) Braced members

M M M

M M M M M M

(b) Unbraced members

)1(2

LcrN

N

L

EI minus )1(3

LcrN

N

L

EI minus

)(while

)41(6

Lcr

Lcr

NN

N

N

L

EI

lt

minus ) ) )21( ( (4

LcrN

N

L

EI minus

minusminus

Lcr

Lcr

NN

NN

L

EI

2

1

42 π

minus

minusLcr

Lcr

NN

NN

L

EI

2

41

π

Figure 319 Approximate stiffnesses of restraining members

Similar analyses may be made of braced restraining members under other endconditions and some approximate solutions for the stiffnesses of these are sum-marised in Figure 319 These approximations have accuracies comparable withthat of equation 338

When a restraining member is unbraced its ends sway ∆ as shown inFigure 320a and restoring end moments M are required to maintain equilibriumSuch a member which receives equal end moments is analysed in Section 3103where it is shown that its stiffness is given by

α = minus(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL(339)

when the axial load N is compressive and by

α =(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtanh

π

2

radicN

NcrL(340)

when the axial load N is tensile These relationships are shown in Figure 320band it can be seen that the stiffness α decreases as the tensile load N decreases andbecomes negative as the load changes to compressive Also shown in Figure 320bis the approximation

α = minus2EI

L

(π24)(NNcrL)

(1 minus NNcrL) (341)

Compression members 71

4 3 2 10

1

ndash2

ndash4

ndash6

2

4

Tension

(b) Stiffness

L

N

N

x

M

M

(a) Unbraced member

Exact equation 340

Approx equation 341

Compression

Exact equation 339

Dimensionless axial load NNcrL

(2E

IL

)D

imen

sion

less

sti

ffne

ss

Figure 320 Stiffness of an unbraced member

which is close and conservative when the axial load N is compressive and whicherrs on the safe side when the axial load N is tensile It can be seen from Figure 320bthat the stiffness of the member is negative when it is subjected to compressionso that it disturbs the buckling member rather than restraining it

Similar analyses may be made of unbraced restraining members with other endconditions and another approximate solution is given in Figure 319 This has anaccuracy comparable with that of equation 341

364 Buckling of braced members with end restraints

The buckling of an end-restrained compression member 1ndash2 is analysed inSection 3104 where it is shown that if the member is braced so that it cannotsway (∆ = 0) then its elastic buckling load Ncr can be expressed in the gen-eral form of equation 323 when the effective length ratio kcr = LcrL is thesolution of

γ1γ2

4

kcr

)2

+(γ1 + γ2

2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan(π2kcr)

π2kcr= 1 (342)

where the relative stiffness of the braced member at its end 1 is

γ1 = (2EIL)12sum1α

(343)

72 Compression members

k

0

02

04

06

08

10

2

0

02

04

06

08

10

0 02 04 06 08 10 0 02 04 06 08 10

k2

k1 k1

10 infin

050525

0550575

060625

0650675

07

07508

08509

095

10105

11115

12125

1314

1516

1718

1920

2224

2628

34

5

(a) Bracedmembers (equations 342 344)

(b) Unbraced members (equations 346 348)

Figure 321 Effective length ratios LcrL for members in rigid-jointed frames

in which the summationsum

1 α is for all the other members at end 1 γ2 is similarlydefined and 0 le γ le infin The relative stiffnesses may also be expressed as

k1 = (2EIL)12

05sum1α + (2EIL)12

= 2γ1

1 + 2γ1(344)

and a similar definition of k2 (0 le k le 1) Values of the effective lengthratio LcrL which satisfy equations 342ndash344 are presented in chart form inFigure 321a

In using the chart of Figure 321a the stiffness factors k may be calculatedfrom equation 344 by using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319 Thus forbraced restraining members of the type shown in Figure 318a the factor k1 canbe approximated by

k1 = (IL)12

05sum1(IL)(1 minus NNcrL)+ (IL)12

(345)

in which N is the compression force in the restraining member and NcrL its elasticbuckling load

365 Buckling of unbraced members with end restraints

The buckling of an end-restrained compression member 1ndash2 is analysed inSection 3105 where it is shown that if the member is unbraced against sidesway

Compression members 73

then its elastic buckling load Ncr can be expressed in the general form ofequation 323 when the effective length ratio kcr = LcrL is the solution of

γ1γ2(πkcr)2 minus 36

6(γ1 + γ2)= π

kcrcot

π

kcr (346)

where the relative stiffness of the unbraced member at its end 1 is

γ1 = (6EIL)12sum1α

(347)

in which the summationsum

1 α is for all the other members at end 1 and γ2 issimilarly defined The relative stiffnesses may also be expressed as

k1 = (6EIL)12

15sum1α + (6EIL)12

= γ1

15 + γ1(348)

and a similar definition of k2 Values of the effective length ratio Lcr L whichsatisfy equation 346 are presented in chart form in Figure 321b

In using the chart of Figure 321b the stiffness factors k may be calculatedfrom equation 348 by using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319 Thus forbraced restraining members of the third type shown in Figure 319a

k1 = (IL)12

15sum1(IL)(1 minus N4NcrL)+ (IL)12

(349)

366 Bracing stiffness required for a braced member

The elastic buckling load of an unbraced compression member may be increasedsubstantially by providing a translational bracing system which effectively pre-vents sway The bracing system need not be completely rigid but may be elasticas shown in Figure 322 provided its stiffness α exceeds a certain minimumvalue αL It is shown in Section 3106 that the minimum value for a pin-endedcompression member is

αL = π2EIL3 (350)

This conclusion can be extended to compression members with rotational endrestraints and it can be shown that if the sway bracing stiffness α is greater than

αL = NcrL (351)

where Ncr is the elastic buckling load for the braced mode then the member iseffectively braced against sway

74 Compression members

0 10 20 30 400

05

10

15

20Ncr L

EIL22

(a) Mode 2

L

(b) Mode 1 (c) Buckling load

Mode 1

Mode 2

L = 2EIL3

(equation 350)

(EIL3)

Buc

klin

g lo

ad N

cr

2 EI

L2

lt L

Stiffness

ge

Figure 322 Compression member with an elastic sway brace

37 Other compression members

371 General

The design method outlined in Section 35 together with the effective length con-cept developed in Section 36 are examples of a general approach to the analysisand design of the compression members whose ultimate resistances are governedby the interaction between yielding and buckling This approach often termeddesign by buckling analysis originates from the dependence of the design com-pression resistance NbRd of a simply supported uniform compression member onits squash load Ny and its elastic buckling load Ncr as shown in Figure 323which is adapted from Figure 313 The generalisation of this relationship to othercompression members allows the design buckling resistance NbRd of any memberto be determined from its yield load Ny and its elastic buckling load Ncr by usingFigure 323

In the following subsections this design by buckling analysis method isextended to the in-plane behaviour of rigid-jointed frames with joint loadingand also to the design of compression members which either are non-uniformor have intermediate loads or twist during buckling This method has alsobeen used for compression members with oblique restraints [3] Similar andrelated methods may be used for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams(Sections 66ndash69)

372 Rigid-jointed frames with joint loads only

The application of the method of design by buckling analysis to rigid-jointedframes which only have joint loads is a simple extrapolation of the design

Compression members 75

0

02

04

06

08

1

12

050 1 15 2 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

resi

stan

ce N

bR

dN

y Elastic buckling NcrNy

Design buckling resistance NbRdNy

Figure 323 Compression resistance of structures designed by buckling analysis

method for simply supported compression members For this extrapolation itis assumed that the resistance NbRd of a compression member in a frame isrelated to its squash load Ny and to the axial force Ncr carried by it whenthe frame buckles elastically and that this relationship (Figure 323) is thesame as that used for simply supported compression members of the same type(Figure 313)

This method of design by buckling analysis is virtually the same as the effectivelength method which uses the design charts of Figure 321 because these chartswere obtained from the elastic buckling analyses of restrained members The onlydifference is that the elastic buckling load Ncr may be calculated directly for themethod of design by buckling analysis as well as by determining the approximateeffective length from the design charts

The elastic buckling load of the member may often be determined approximatelyby the effective length method discussed in Section 36 In cases where this is notsatisfactory a more accurate method must be used Many such methods have beendeveloped and some of these are discussed in Sections 8353 and 8354 and in[4ndash13] while other methods are referred to in the literature [14ndash16] The bucklingloads of many frames have already been determined and extensive tabulations ofapproximations for some of these are available [14 16ndash20]

While the method of design by buckling analysis might also be applied torigid frames whose loads act between joints the bending actions present in thoseframes make this less rational Because of this consideration of the effects ofbuckling on the design of frames with bending actions will be deferred untilChapter 8

76 Compression members

373 Non-uniform members

It was assumed in the preceding discussions that the members are uniform butsome practical compression members are of variable cross-section Non-uniformmembers may be stepped or tapered but in either case the elastic buckling loadNcr can be determined by solving a differential equilibrium equation similar to thatgoverning the buckling of uniform members (see equation 358) but which hasvariable values of EI In general this can best be done using numerical techniques[4ndash6] and the tedium of these can be relieved by making use of a suitable computerprogram Many particular cases have been solved and tabulations and graphs ofsolutions are available [5 6 16 21ndash23]

Once the elastic buckling load Ncr of the member has been determined themethod of design by buckling analysis can be used For this the squash load Ny

is calculated for the most highly stressed cross-section which is the section ofminimum area The design buckling resistance NbRd = χNyγM1 can then beobtained from Figure 323

374 Members with intermediate axial loads

The elastic buckling of members with intermediate as well as end loads is alsobest analysed by numerical methods [4ndash6] while solutions of many particularcases are available [5 16 21] Once again the method of design by bucklinganalysis can be used and for this the squash load will be determined by themost heavily stressed section If the elastic buckling load Ncr is calculated for thesame member then the design buckling resistance NbRd can be determined fromFigure 323

375 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling

In the previous sections attention was confined to compression members whichbuckle by deflecting laterally either perpendicular to the section minor axis at anelastic buckling load

Ncrz = π2EIzL2crz (352)

or perpendicular to the major axis at

Ncry = π2EIyL2cry (353)

However thin-walled open section compression members may also buckle bytwisting about a longitudinal axis as shown in Figure 324 for a cruciform sectionor by combined bending and twisting

Compression members 77

L

f

y

x

z

Figure 324 Torsional buckling of a cruciform section

A compression member of doubly symmetric cross-section may buckle elasti-cally by twisting at a torsional buckling load (see Section 311) given by

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2crT

)(354)

in which GIt and EIw are the torsional and warping rigidities (see Chapter 10)LcrT is the distance between inflexion points of the twisted shape and

i20 = i2

p + y20 + z2

0 (355)

in which y0 z0 are the shear centre coordinates (which are zero for doublysymmetric sections see Section 543) and

ip = radic(Iy + Iz)A (356)

is the polar radius of gyration For most rolled steel sections the minor axisbuckling load Ncrz is less than NcrT and the possibility of torsional bucklingcan be ignored However short members which have low torsional and warpingrigidities (such as thin-walled cruciforms) should be checked Such members canbe designed by using Figure 323 with the value of NcrT substituted for the elasticbuckling load Ncr

Monosymmetric and asymmetric section members (such as thin-walled teesand angles) may buckle in a combined mode by twisting and deflecting Thisaction takes place because the axis of twist through the shear centre does not

78 Compression members

0 1 2 3 4 5Length L (m)

0

250

500

750

1000

NcrzNcry

NcrT

Ncr

75

100

6

(a) Cross-section

y

z

(b) Elastic buckling loadsL

oads

Ncr

y N

crz

Ncr

T a

nd N

cr

Figure 325 Elastic buckling of a simply supported angle section column

coincide with the loading axis through the centroid and any twisting which occurscauses the centroidal axis to deflect For simply supported members it is shown in[5 24 25] that the (lowest) elastic buckling load Ncr is the lowest root of the cubicequation

N 3cr

i20 minus y2

0 minus z20

minus N 2cr

(Ncry + Ncrz + NcrT )i

20 minus Ncrzy2

0 minus Ncryz20

+ Ncri2

0NcryNcrz + NcrzNcrT + NcrT Ncry minus NcryNcrzNcrT i20 = 0

(357)

For example the elastic buckling load Ncr for a pin-ended unequal angle is shownin Figure 325 where it can be seen that Ncr is less than any of Ncry Ncrz orNcrT

These and other cases of flexuralndashtorsional buckling (referred to as torsionalndashflexural buckling in EC3) are treated in a number of textbooks and papers [4ndash624ndash26] and tabulations of solutions are also available [16 27] Once the bucklingload Ncr has been determined the compression resistance NbRd can be found fromFigure 323

38 Appendix ndash elastic compression members

381 Buckling of straight members

The elastic buckling load Ncr of the compression member shown in Figure 33 canbe determined by finding a deflected position which is one of equilibrium Thedifferential equilibrium equation of bending of the member is

EId2v

dx2= minusNcrv (358)

Compression members 79

This equation states that for equilibrium the internal moment of resistanceEI (d2vdx2) must exactly balance the external disturbing moment minusNcrv at anypoint along the length of the member When this equation is satisfied at all pointsthe displaced position is one of equilibrium

The solution of equation 358 which satisfies the boundary condition at the lowerend that (v)0 = 0 is

v = δ sinπx

kcrL

where

1

k2cr

= Ncr

π2EIL2

and δ is an undetermined constant The boundary condition at the upper end that(v)L = 0 is satisfied when either

δ = 0v = 0

(359)

or kcr = 1n in which n is an integer so that

Ncr = n2π2EIL2 (360)

v = δ sin nπxL (361)

The first solution (equations 359) defines the straight stable equilibrium positionwhich is valid for all loads N less than the lowest value of Ncr as shown inFigure 32b The second solution (equations 360 and 361) defines the bucklingloads Ncr at which displaced equilibrium positions can exist This solution does notdetermine the magnitude δ of the central deflection as indicated in Figure 32bThe lowest buckling load is the most important and this occurs when n = 1so that

Ncr = π2EIL2 (32)

v = δ sin πxL (31)

382 Bending of members with initial curvature

The bending of the compression member with initial curvature shown inFigure 32a can be analysed by considering the differential equilibrium equation

EId2v

dx2= minusN (v + v0) (362)

which is obtained from equation 358 for a straight member by adding the additionalbending moment minusNv0 induced by the initial curvature

80 Compression members

If the initial curvature of the member is such that

v0 = δ0 sin πxL (37)

then the solution of equation 362 which satisfies the boundary conditions(v)0L = 0 is the deflected shape

v = δ sin πxL (38)

where

δ

δ0= NNcr

1 minus NNcr (39)

The maximum moment in the compression member is N (δ+ δ0) and so the max-imum bending stress is N (δ + δ0)Wel where Wel is the elastic section modulusThus the maximum total stress is

σmax = N

A+ N (δ + δ0)

Wel

If the elastic limit is taken as the yield stress fy then the limiting axial load NL forwhich the above elastic analysis is valid is given by

NL = Ny minus NL(δ + δ0)A

Wel (363)

where Ny = Afy is the squash load By writing Wel = 2Ib in which b is themember width equation 363 becomes

NL = Ny minus δ0b

2i2

NL

(1 minus NLNcr)

which can be solved for the dimensionless limiting load NLNy as

NL

Ny=

[1 + (1 + η)NcrNy

2

]minus

[1 + (1 + η)Ncr Ny

2

]2

minus Ncr

Ny

12

(364)

where

η = δ0b

2i2 (313)

Alternatively equation 364 can be rearranged to give the dimensionless limitingload NLNy as

NL

Ny= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(311)

Compression members 81

in which

Φ = 1 + η + λ2

2(312)

and

λ = radicNyNcr (35)

39 Appendix ndash inelastic compression members

391 Reduced modulus theory of buckling

The reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr of a rectangular section compressionmember which buckles in the y direction (see Figure 326a) can be determinedfrom the bending strain and stress distributions which are related to the curvatureκ(= minusd2vdx2) and the moduli E and Et as shown in Figure 326b and c Theposition of the line of zero bending stress can be found by using the condition thatthe axial force remains constant during buckling from which it follows that theforce resultant of the bending stresses must be zero so that

1

2dbcEtbcκ = 1

2dbtEbtκ

or

bc

b=

radicEradic

E + radicEt

Axial strain b c

b t

bt

bc

(b) Straindistribution

bt

bc

(a) Rectangular cross-section

d

y

z

Et

E

b

(c) Stressdistribution

Axial stress NA Et bc

Eb t

Figure 326 Reduced modulus buckling of a rectangular section member

82 Compression members

The moment of resistance of the section ErI(d2vdx2) is equal to the momentresultant of the bending stresses so that

ErId2v

dx2= minusdbc

2Etbcκ

2bc

3minus dbt

2Ebtκ

2bt

3

or

ErId2v

dx2= minus4b2

cEt

b2

db3

12κ

The reduced modulus of elasticity Er is therefore given by

Er = 4EEt

(radic

E + radicEt)

2 (316)

392 Buckling of members with residual stresses

Arectangular section member with a simplified residual stress distribution is shownin Figure 310 The section first yields at the edges z = plusmnd2 at a load N = 05Nyand yielding then spreads through the section as the load approaches the squashload Ny If the depth of the elastic core is de then the flexural rigidity for bendingabout the z axis is

(EI)t = EI

(de

d

)

where I = b3d12 and the axial force is

N = Ny

(1 minus 1

2

d2e

d2

)

By combining these two relationships the effective flexural rigidity of the partiallyyielded section can be written as

(EI)t = EI [2(1 minus NNy)]12 (318)

Thus the axial load at buckling Nt is given by

Ncrt

Ncr= [2(1 minus NcrtNy)]12

which can be rearranged as

Ncrt

Ny=

(Ncr

Ny

)2

[1 + 2(NyNcr)2]12 minus 1 (319)

Compression members 83

310 Appendix ndash effective lengths of compressionmembers

3101 Intermediate restraints

A straight pin-ended compression member with a central elastic restraint is shownin Figure 316a It is assumed that when the buckling load Ncr is applied to themember it buckles symmetrically as shown in Figure 316a with a central deflec-tion δ and the restraint exerts a restoring force αδ The equilibrium equation forthis buckled position is

EId2v

dx2= minusNcrv + αδ

2x

for 0 le x le L2

The solution of this equation which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 =(dvdx)L2 = 0 is given by

v = αδL

2Ncr

(x

Lminus sin πxkcrL

2(π2kcr) cosπ2kcr

)

where kcr = LcrL and Lcr is given by equation 323 Since δ = (v)L2 itfollows that(

π

2kcr

)3

cotπ

2kcr(π

2kcrcot

π

2kcrminus 1

) = αL3

16EI (365)

The variation with the dimensionless restraint stiffness αL316EI of the dimen-sionless buckling load

Ncr

π2EIL2= 4

π2

2kcr

)2

(366)

which satisfies equation 365 is shown in Figure 316c It can be seen that thebuckling load for this symmetrical mode varies from π2EIL2 when the restraintis of zero stiffness to approximately 8π2EIL2 when the restraint is rigid Whenthe restraint stiffness exceeds

αL = 16π2EIL3 (331)

the buckling load obtained from equations 365 and 366 exceeds the value of4π2EIL2 for which the member buckles in the antisymmetrical second modeshown in Figure 316b Since buckling always takes place at the lowest possibleload it follows that the member buckles at 4π2EIL2 in the second mode shownin Figure 316b for all restraint stiffnesses α which exceed αL

84 Compression members

3102 Stiffness of a braced member

When a structural member is braced so that its ends act as if simply supportedas shown in Figure 318a then its response to equal and opposite disturbing endmoments M can be obtained by considering the differential equilibrium equation

EId2v

dx2= minusNv minus M (367)

The solution of this which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 = (v)L = 0 whenN is compressive is

v = M

N

1 minus cosπ

radicNNcrL

sin πradic

NNcrLsin

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ cos

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus 1

where

NcrL = π2EIL2 (336)

The end rotation θ = (dvdx)0 is

θ = 2M

NL

π

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL

whence

α = M

θ= 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tan(π2)radic

NNcrL (335)

When the axial load N is tensile the solution of equation 367 is

v = M

N

1 minus cosh π

radicNNcrL

sinh πradic

NNcrLsinh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]

+ cosh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus 1

whence

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tanh(π2)radic

NNcrL (337)

Compression members 85

3103 Stiffness of an unbraced member

When a structural member is unbraced so that its ends sway ∆ as shown inFigure 320a restoring end moments M are required to maintain equilibriumThe differential equation for equilibrium of a member with equal end momentsM = N∆2 is

EId2v

dx2= minusNv + M (368)

and its solution which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 = 0 (v)L = ∆ is

v = M

N

1 + cosπ

radicNNcrL

sin πradic

NNcrLsin

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus cos

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ 1

The end rotation θ = (dvdx)0 is

θ = 2M

NL

π

2

radicN

NcrLcot

π

2

radicN

NcrL

whence

α = minus(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL (339)

where the negative sign occurs because the end moments M are restoring insteadof disturbing moments

When the axial load N is tensile the end moments M are disturbing momentsand the solution of equation 368 is

v = M

N

1 + cosh π

radicNNcrL

sinh πradic

NNcrLsinh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]

minus cosh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ 1

whence

α =(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtanh

π

2

radicN

NcrL (340)

3104 Buckling of a braced member

A typical compression member 1ndash2 in a rigid-jointed frame is shown inFigure 317b When the frame buckles the member sways∆ and its ends rotate by

86 Compression members

θ1 θ2 as shown Because of these actions there are end shears (M1 +M2 +N∆)Land end moments M1 M2 The equilibrium equation for the member is

EId2v

dx2= minusNv minus M1 + (M1 + M2)

x

L+ N∆

x

L

and the solution of this is

v = minus(

M1 cosπkcr + M2

Ncr sin πkcr

)sin

πx

kcrL+ M1

Ncr

(cos

πx

kcrLminus 1

)

+(

M1 + M2

Ncr

)x

L+

x

L

where Ncr is the elastic buckling load transmitted by the member (seeequation 323) and kcr = LcrL By using this to obtain expressions for the endrotations θ1 θ2 and by substituting equation 333 the following equations can beobtained

M1

(NcrL

α1+ 1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ M2

(1 minus π

kcrcosec

π

kcr

)+ Ncr∆ = 0

M1

(1 minus π

kcrcosec

π

kcr

)+ M2

(NcrL

α2+ 1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ Ncr∆ = 0

(369)

If the compression member is braced so that joint translation is effectively pre-vented the sway terms Ncr∆ disappear from equations 369 The moments M1M2 can then be eliminated whence

(EIL)2

α1α2

kcr

)2

+ EI

L

(1

α1+ 1

α2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan π2kcr

π2kcr= 1

(370)

By writing the relative stiffness of the braced member at the end 1 as

γ1 = 2EIL

α1= (2EIL)12sum

(343)

with a similar definition for γ2 equation 370 becomes

γ1γ2

4

kcr

)2

+(γ1 + γ2

2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan(π2kcr)

π2kcr= 1 (342)

3105 Buckling of an unbraced member

If there are no reaction points or braces to supply the member end shears (M1 +M2 + N∆)L the member will sway as shown in Figure 317b and the sway

Compression members 87

moment N∆ will be completely resisted by the end moments M1 and M2 so that

N∆ = minus(M1 + M2)

If this is substituted into equation 369 and if the moments M1 and M2 areeliminated then

(EIL)2

α1α2

kcr

)2

minus 1 = EI

L

(1

α1+ 1

α2

kcrcot

π

kcr(371)

where kcr = LcrL By writing the relative stiffnesses of the unbraced member atend 1 as

γ1 = 6EIL

α1= (6EIL)12sum

(347)

with a similar definition of γ 2 equation 371 becomes

γ1γ2(πkcr)2 minus 36

6(γ1 + γ2)= π

kcrcot

π

kcr (346)

3106 Stiffness of bracing for a rigid frame

If the simply supported member shown in Figure 322 has a sufficiently stiff swaybrace acting at one end then it will buckle as if rigidly braced as shown inFigure 322a at a load π2EIL2 If the stiffness α of the brace is reduced below aminimum value αL the member will buckle in the rigid body sway mode shownin Figure 322b The elastic buckling load Ncr for this mode can be obtained fromthe equilibrium condition that

Ncr∆ = α∆L

where α∆ is the restraining force in the brace so that

Ncr = αL

The variation of Ncr with α is compared in Figure 322c with the braced modebuckling load of π2EIL2 It can be seen that when the brace stiffness α isless than

αL = π2EIL3 (350)

the member buckles in the sway mode and that when α is greater than αL itbuckles in the braced mode

88 Compression members

311 Appendix ndash torsional buckling

Thin-walled open-section compression members may buckle by twisting as shownin Figure 324 for a cruciform section or by combined bending and twisting Whenthis type of buckling takes place the twisting of the member causes the axialcompressive stresses NA to exert a disturbing torque which is opposed by thetorsional resistance of the section For the typical longitudinal element of cross-sectional area δA shown in Figure 327 which rotates a0(dφdx) (where a0 is thedistance to the axis of twist) when the section rotates φ the axial force (NA)δAhas a component (NA)δAa0(dφdx) which exerts a torque (NA)δAa0(dφdx)a0

about the axis of twist (which passes through the shear centre y0 z0 as shown inChapter 5) The total disturbing torque TP exerted is therefore

TP = N

A

dx

intA

a20dA

where

a20 = (y minus y0)

2 + (z minus z0)2

This torque can also be written as

TP = Ni20

dx

where

i20 = i2

p + y20 + z2

0 (355)

ip = radic (Iy + Iz)A

(356)

For members of doubly symmetric cross-section (y0 = z0 = 0) a twistedequilibrium position is possible when the disturbing torque TP exactly balances

xast

AN

d

d 0

xa

d

d0

δ

δ

δδ

xAxis of twist

stAN st

A

N

f

f

Figure 327 Torque exerted by axial load during twisting

Compression members 89

the internal resisting torque

Mx = GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3

in which GIt and EIw are the torsional and warping rigidities (see Chapter 10)Thus at torsional buckling

N

Ai20

dx= GIt

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3 (372)

The solution of this which satisfies the boundary conditions of end twistingprevented ((φ)0L = 0) and ends free to warp ((d2φdx2)0L = 0) (see Chapter 10)is φ = (φ)L2 sin πxL in which (φ)L2 is the undetermined magnitude of theangle of twist rotation at the centre of the member and the buckling load NcrT is

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2

)

This solution may be generalised for compression members with other endconditions by writing it in the form

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2crT

)(354)

in which the torsional buckling effective length LcrT is the distance betweeninflexion points in the twisted shape

312 Worked examples

3121 Example 1 ndash checking a UB compression member

Problem The 457 times 191 UB 82 compression member of S275 steel of Figure 328ais simply supported about both principal axes at each end (Lcry = 120 m) andhas a central brace which prevents lateral deflections in the minor principal plane(Lcrz = 60 m) Check the adequacy of the member for a factored axial compres-sive load corresponding to a nominal dead load of 160 kN and a nominal imposedload of 230 kN

Factored axial load NEd = (135 times 160)+ (15 times 230) = 561 kN

Classifying the sectionFor S275 steel with tf = 16 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235275)05 = 0924

cf (tf ε) = [(1913 minus 99 minus 2 times 102)2](160 times 0924) = 544 lt 14T52

90 Compression members

125

125

75

12

10

y

z

y

z z

y

1913

4600

99

160

RHS

(a) Example 1

457 times 191 UB 82 Iz = 1871 cm4

A = 104 cm2

iy = 188 cm iz = 423 cm r = 102 mm

(b) Example 3

2 ndash 125 times 75 times 10 UA Iy = 1495 cm4

Iz = 1642 cm4

(c) Example 4

Figure 328 Examples 1 3 and 4

cw = (4600 minus 2 times 160 minus 2 times 102) = 4076 mm T52

cw(twε) = 4076(99 times 0924) = 445 gt 42 T52

and so the web is Class 4 (slender) T52

Effective area

λp =radic

fyσcr

= bt

284εradic

kσ= 407699

284 times 0924 times radic40

= 0784 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρ= λp minus 0055(3 +ψ)λ

2p

= 0784 minus 0055(3 + 1)

07842= 0918 EC3-1-5 44(2)

d minus deff = (1 minus 0918)times 4076 = 336 mm

Aeff = 104 times 102 minus 336 times 99 = 10 067 mm2

Cross-section compression resistance

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0

= 10 067 times 275

10= 2768 kN gt 561 kN = NEd 624(2)

Compression members 91

Member buckling resistance

λy =radic

Aeff fyNcry

= Lcry

iy

radicAeff A

λ1= 12 000

(188 times 10)

radic10 06710 400

939 times 0924= 0724

6313(1)

λz =radic

Aeff fyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

radicAeff A

λ1= 6000

(423 times 10)

radic10 06710 400

939 times 0924

= 1608 gt 0724 6313(1)

Buckling will occur about the minor (z) axis For a rolled UB section (with hb gt12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about the z-axis use buckling curve (b) withα = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034(1608 minus 02)+ 16082] = 2032 6312(1)

χz = 1

2032 + radic20322 minus 16082

= 0305 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAeff fyγM1

= 0305 times 10 067 times 275

10= 844 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the member is satisfactory

3122 Example 2 ndash designing a UC compression member

Problem Design a suitable UC of S355 steel to resist the loading of example 1 inSection 3121

Design axial load NEd = 561 kN as in Section 3121

Target area and first section choiceAssume fy = 355 Nmm2 and χ = 05

A ge 561 times 103(05 times 355) = 3161 mm2

Try a 152 times 152 UC 30 with A = 383 cm2 iy = 676 cm iz = 383 cmtf = 94 mm

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(676 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 2322 6313(1)

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

1

λ1= 6000

(383 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 2050 lt 2322

6313(1)

92 Compression members

Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis For a rolled UC section (with hb le12 and tf le 100 mm) buckling about the y-axis use buckling curve (b) withα = 034 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 034(2322 minus 02)+ 23222] = 3558 6312(1)

χy = 1

3558 + radic35582 minus 23222

= 0160 6312(1)

which is much less than the guessed value of 05

Second section choice

Guess χ = (05 + 0160)2 = 033

A ge 561 times 103(033 times 355) = 4789 mm2

Try a 203 times 203 UC 52 with A = 663 cm2 iy = 891 cm tf = 125 mmFor S355 steel with tf = 125 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = [(2043 minus 79 minus 2 times 102)2](125 times 0814) = 865 lt 14 T52

cw(twε) = (2062 minus 2 times 125 minus 2 times 102)(79 times 0814) = 250 lt 42T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(891 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1763 6313(1)

For a rolled UC section (with hb le 12 and tf le 100 mm) buckling about they-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 034(1763 minus 02)+ 17632] = 2320 6312(1)

χy = 1

2320 + radic23202 minus 17632

= 0261 6312(1)

NbyRd = χAfyγM1

= 0261 times 663 times 102 times 355

10= 615 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the 203 times 203 UC 52 is satisfactory

3123 Example 3 ndash designing an RHS compression member

Problem Design a suitable hot-finished RHS of S355 steel to resist the loading ofexample 1 in Section 3121

Compression members 93

Design axial load NEd = 561 kN as in Section 3121SolutionGuess χ = 03

A ge 561 times 103(03 times 355) = 5268 mm2

Try a 250 times 150 times 8 RHS with A = 608 cm2 iy = 917 cm iz = 615 cmt = 80 mmFor S355 steel with t = 8 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235355)05 = 0814

cw(tε) = (2500 minus 2 times 80 minus 2 times 40)(80 times 0814) = 347 lt 42 T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(918 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1710 6313(1)

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

1

λ1= 6000

(615 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1276 lt 1710

6313(1)

Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis For a hot-finished RHS use bucklingcurve (a) with α = 021 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 021(1710 minus 02)+ 17102] = 2121 6312(1)

χy = 1

2121 + radic21212 minus 17102

= 0296 6312(1)

NbyRd = χAfyγM1

= 0296 times 608 times 102 times 355

10= 640 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the 250 times 150 times 8 RHS is satisfactory

3124 Example 4 ndash buckling of double angles

Problem Two steel 125 times 75 times 10 UA are connected together at 15 m intervalsto form the long compression member whose properties are given in Figure 328cThe minimum second moment of area of each angle is 499 cm4 The member issimply supported about its major axis at 45 m intervals and about its minor axisat 15 m intervals Determine the elastic buckling load of the member

94 Compression members

Member buckling about the major axis

Ncry = π2 times 210 000 times 1495 times 10445002 N = 1530 kN

Member buckling about the minor axis

Ncrz = π2 times 210 000 times 1642 times 10415002 N = 1513 kN

Single angle buckling

Ncrmin = π2 times 210 000 times 499 times 10415002 N = 4597 kN

and so for both angles 2Ncrmin = 2 times 4597 = 919 kN lt 1520 kNIt can be seen that the lowest buckling load of 919 kN corresponds to the case

where each unequal angle buckles about its own minimum axis

3125 Example 5 ndash effective length factor inan unbraced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of member 1ndash2 of the unbracedframe shown in Figure 329a

Solution Using equation 348

k1 = 6EIL

15 times 0 + 6EIL= 10

k2 = 6EIL

15 times 6(2EI)(2L)+ 6EIL= 04

Using Figure 321b Lcr L = 23

2058

2096

142

94y

z

EI

2EI

2L

L

5N

1

2 3

(a) Example 5

5N

EI

203 times 203 UC 60Iy = 6125 cm4

Iz = 2065 cm4

A = 764 cm2

iz = 520 cmr = 102 mm

(b) Example 7

Figure 329 Examples 5 and 7

Compression members 95

3126 Example 6 ndash effective length factor in a braced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of member 1ndash2 of the frame shownin Figure 329a if bracing is provided which prevents sway buckling

SolutionUsing equation 344

k1 = 2EIL

05 times 0 + 2EIL= 10

k2 = 2EIL

05 times 2(2EI)(2L)+ 2EIL= 0667

Using Figure 321a Lcr L = 087

3127 Example 7 ndash checking a non-uniform member

Problem The 50 m long simply supported 203 times 203 UC 60 member shown inFigure 329b has two steel plates 250 mm times 12 mm times 2 m long welded to itone to the central length of each flange This increases the elastic buckling loadabout the minor axis by 70 If the yield strengths of the plates and the UC are355 Nmm2 determine the compression resistance

Solution

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = [(2058 minus 93 minus 2 times 102)2](142 times 0814) = 762 lt 14T52

cw(twε) = (2096 minus 2 times 142 minus 2 times 102)(93 times 0814) = 2124 lt 42T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

Ncrz = 17 times π2 times 210 000 times 2065 times 10450002 = 2910 kN

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

=radic

764 times 102 times 355

2910 times 103= 0965

For a rolled UC section with welded flanges (tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (c) with α = 049 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 049(0965 minus 02)+ 09652] = 1153 6312(1)

χz = 1

1153 + radic11532 minus 09652

= 0560 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAfyγM1

= 0560 times 764 times 102 times 355

10= 1520 kN 6311(3)

96 Compression members

3128 Example 8 ndash checking a member with intermediateaxial loads

Problem A 5 m long simply supported 457 times 191 UB 82 compression member ofS355 steel whose properties are given in Figure 328a has concentric axial loads ofNEd and 2NEd at its ends and a concentric axial load NEd at its midpoint At elasticbuckling the maximum compression force in the member is 2000 kN Determinethe compression resistance

SolutionFrom Section 3121 the cross-section is Class 4 slender and Aeff =10 067 mm2

Ncrz = 2000 kN

λz =radic

Aeff fyNcrz

=radic

10 067 times 355

2000 times 103= 1337

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034(1337 minus 02)+ 13372] = 1587 6312(1)

χz = 1

1587 + radic15872 minus 13372

= 0410 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAeff fyγM1

= 0410 times 10 067 times 355

10= 1465 kN 6311(3)

313 Unworked examples

3131 Example 9 ndash checking a welded column section

The 140 m long welded column section compression member of S355 steel shownin Figure 330(a) is simply supported about both principal axes at each end (Lcry =140 m) and has a central brace that prevents lateral deflections in the minorprincipal plane (Lcrz = 70 m) Check the adequacy of the member for a factoredaxial compressive force corresponding to a nominal dead load of 420 kN and anominal imposed load of 640 kN

3132 Example 10 ndash designing a UC section

Design a suitable UC of S275 steel to resist the loading of example 9 inSection 3131

Compression members 97

300

40

28

355

100 100

175

100

380

25

25090

90

8

Cy y

z z

u

v

Welded column section

Iy = 747 times 10 6 mm4

Iz = 286 times 106 mm4

iy = 145 mm iz = 896 mm A = 35 700 mm2

(a) Example 9

2 ndash 380 times 100 channels

For each channel

Iy = 15034 times 106 mm4

Iz = 643 times 106 mm4

A = 6870 mm2

(b) Example 11

90 times 90 times 8 EA

Iu = 166 times 106 mm4

Iv = 0431 times 106 mm4

iu = 345 mm iv = 176 mm A = 1390 mm2

It = 328 times 103 mm4

y0 = 250 mm

(c) Example 14

Figure 330 Examples 9 11 and 14

L2

N

EA EA

E I L

L2

Figure 331 Example 12

3133 Example 11 ndash checking a compound section

Determine the minimum elastic buckling load of the two laced 380 times 100 channelsshown in Figure 330(b) if the effective length about each axis is Lcr = 30 m

3134 Example 12 ndash elastic buckling

Determine the elastic buckling load of the guyed column shown in Figure 331 Itshould be assumed that the guys have negligible flexural stiffness that (EA)guy =2(EI )columnL2 and that the column is built-in at its base

98 Compression members

3135 Example 13 ndash checking a non-uniform compressionmember

Determine the maximum design load NEd of a lightly welded box section can-tilever compression member 1ndash2 made from plates of S355 steel which taper from300 mm times 300 mm times 12 mm at end 1 (at the cantilever tip) to 500 mm times 500 mmtimes 12 mm at end 2 (at the cantilever support) The cantilever has a length of 100 m

3136 Example 14 ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling

A simply supported 90 times 90 times 8 EA compression member is shown inFigure 330(c) Determine the variation of the elastic buckling load with memberlength

References

1 Shanley FR (1947) Inelastic column theory Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 14No 5 May pp 261ndash7

2 Trahair NS (2000) Column bracing forces Australian Journal of StructuralEngineering Institution of Engineers Australia 3 Nos 2 amp 3 pp 163ndash8

3 Trahair NS and Rasmussen KJR (2005) Finite-element analysis of the flexuralbuckling of columns with oblique restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE131 No 3 pp 481ndash7

4 Structural Stability Research Council (1998) Guide to Stability Design Criteria forMetal Structures 5th edition (ed TV Galambos) John Wiley New York

5 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

6 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York7 Livesley RK (1964) Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis Pergamon Press Oxford8 Horne MR and Merchant W (1965) The Stability of Frames Pergamon Press

Oxford9 Gregory MS (1967) Elastic Instability E amp FN Spon London

10 McMinn SJ (1961) The determination of the critical loads of plane frames TheStructural Engineer 39 No 7 July pp 221ndash7

11 Stevens LK and Schmidt LC (1963) Determination of elastic critical loads Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 89 No ST6 pp 137ndash58

12 Harrison HB (1967) The analysis of triangulated plane and space structures account-ing for temperature and geometrical changes Space Structures (ed RM Davies)Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford pp 231ndash43

13 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

14 Lu LW (1962) A survey of literature on the stability of frames Welding ResearchCouncil Bulletin No 81 pp 1ndash11

15 Archer JS et al (1963) Bibliography on the use of digital computers in structuralengineering Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 89 No ST6 pp 461ndash91

16 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

Compression members 99

17 Brotton DM (1960) Elastic critical loads of multibay pitched roof portal frames withrigid external stanchions The Structural Engineer 38 No 3 March pp 88ndash99

18 Switzky H and Wang PC (1969) Design and analysis of frames for stability Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 95 No ST4 pp 695ndash713

19 Davies JM (1990) In-plane stability of portal frames The Structural Engineer 68No 8 April pp 141ndash7

20 Davies JM (1991) The stability of multi-bay portal frames The Structural Engineer69 No 12 June pp 223ndash9

21 Bresler B Lin TY and Scalzi JB (1968) Design of Steel Structures 2nd editionJohn Wiley New York

22 Gere JM and Carter WO (1962) Critical buckling loads for tapered columns Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 88 No ST1 pp 1ndash11

23 Bradford MA andAbdoli Yazdi N (1999)ANewmark-based method for the stabilityof columns Computers and Structures 71 No 6 pp 689ndash700

24 Trahair NS (1993) FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN SponLondon

25 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

26 Trahair NS and Rasmussen KJR (2005) Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of columnswith oblique eccentric restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 131 No 11pp 1731ndash7

27 Chajes A and Winter G (1965) Torsionalndashflexural buckling of thin-walled membersJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST4 pp 103ndash24

Chapter 4

Local buckling ofthin-plate elements

41 Introduction

The behaviour of compression members was discussed in Chapter 3 where itwas assumed that no local distortion of the cross-section took place so thatfailure was only due to overall buckling and yielding This treatment is appro-priate for solid section members and for members whose cross-sections arecomposed of comparatively thick-plate elements including many hot-rolled steelsections

However in some cases the member cross-section is composed of more slender-plate elements as for example in some built-up members and in most light-gaugecold-formed members These slender-plate elements may buckle locally as shownin Figure 41 and the member may fail prematurely as indicated by the reduc-tion from the full line to the dashed line in Figure 42 A slender-plate elementdoes not fail by elastic buckling but exhibits significant post-buckling behaviouras indicated in Figure 43 Because of this the platersquos resistance to local fail-ure depends not only on its slenderness but also on its yield strength andresidual stresses as shown in Figure 44 The resistance of a plate elementof intermediate slenderness is also influenced significantly by its geometricalimperfections while the resistance of a stocky-plate element depends primar-ily on its yield stress and strain-hardening moduli of elasticity as indicated inFigure 44

In this chapter the behaviour of thin rectangular plates subjected to in-planecompression shear bending or bearing is discussed The behaviour under com-pression is applied to the design of plate elements in compression members andcompression flanges in beams The design of beam webs is also discussed andthe influence of the behaviour of thin plates on the design of plate girders to EC3is treated in detail

Figure 41 Local buckling of an I-section column

0 05 10 15 20 25 30 350

02

04

06

08

10

Complete yielding

Overall elasticbuckling

Ultimate strengthwithout local buckling

Ultimate strengthreduced by local buckling

Modified slenderness (Ny Ncr)

Ult

imat

e lo

ad r

atio

Nul

t N

y

NcrNy

Nult Ny

Nult Ny

Figure 42 Effects of local buckling on the resistances of compression members

102 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 05 10 15 20 25Dimensionless transverse deflection t

0

05

10

15

20First yield

Failure

Elasticpost-bucklingbehaviour

Buckling

Flat plate

Plate with initialcurvatureD

imen

sion

less

load

NN

cr

Figure 43 Post-buckling behaviour of thin plates

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Modified plate slenderness

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

Strain-hardening bucklingplates free along one edge

simply supported plates

Yielding

Ultimate strengths of simplysupported plates ultfy

Flat plates withoutresidual stresses

Plates withinitialcurvature

Plates with residualstresses and initial

curvature

Elastic buckling crfy

Str

ess

rati

o c

rf y

ul

tfy

k

f

Et

bf

cr

y2

2)1(12

) )( (=

ndash

Figure 44 Ultimate strengths of plates in compression

42 Plate elements in compression

421 Elastic buckling

4211 Simply supported plates

The thin flat plate element of length L width b and thickness t shown in Figure 45bis simply supported along all four edges The applied compressive loads N are

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 103

L

L

EI

t

t

N

N

b

b= Ebt

12-----------

3

Ebt

12(1ndash2)--------------------------

3bD

Nbt

Nbt

SimplysupportedSimply

supported

(a) Column buckling (b) Plate buckling

SS

2

2

4

4

22

4

4

4

2

2

4

4

2partx

partN

z

zx

x

bDdx

N

dx

EI ndash=++ndash=

xx

yy

z

z

( )

=

partpartpartpartpartdd partpart

Figure 45 Comparison of column and plate buckling

uniformly distributed over each end of the plate When the applied loads are equalto the elastic buckling loads the plate can buckle by deflecting v laterally out ofits original plane into an adjacent position [1ndash4]

It is shown in Section 481 that this equilibrium position is given by

v = δ sinmπx

Lsin

nπz

b(41)

with n = 1 where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection Theelastic buckling load Ncr at which the plate buckles corresponds to the bucklingstress

σcr = Ncrbt (42)

which is given by

σcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(bt)2

(43)

The lowest value of the buckling coefficient kσ (see Figure 46) is

kσ = 4 (44)

which is appropriate for the high aspect ratios Lb of most structural steel members(see Figure 47)

104 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

2

4

6

8

10

L

b2 3 4 5

2

34

m = 1

n = 1

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 46 Buckling coefficients of simply supported plates in compression

b

b b b

L = bm

cr cr

Figure 47 Buckled pattern of a long simply supported plate in compression

The buckling stress σcr varies inversely as the square of the plate slendernessor widthndashthickness ratio bt as shown in Figure 44 in which the dimensionlessbuckling stress σcrfy is plotted against a modified plate slenderness ratio

radicfyσcr

= b

t

radicfyE

12(1 minus ν2)

π2kσ (45)

If the material ceases to be linear elastic at the yield stress fy the above analysisis only valid for

radic(fyσcr) ge 1 This limit is equivalent to a widthndashthickness ratio

bt given by

b

t

radicfy

235= 568 (46)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 105

for a steel with E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 (The yield stress fy inequation 46 and in all of the similar equations which appear later in this chaptermust be expressed in Nmm2)

The values of the buckling coefficient kσ shown in Figure 46 indicate that theuse of intermediate transverse stiffeners to increase the elastic buckling stress ofa plate in compression is not effective except when their spacing is significantlyless than the plate width Because of this it is more economical to use interme-diate longitudinal stiffeners which cause the plate to buckle in a number of halfwaves across its width When such stiffeners are used equation 43 still holds pro-vided b is taken as the stiffener spacing Longitudinal stiffeners have an additionaladvantage when they are able to transfer compressive stresses in which case theircross-sectional areas may be added to that of the plate

An intermediate longitudinal stiffener must be sufficiently stiff flexurally toprevent the plate from deflecting at the stiffener An approximate value for theminimum second moment of area Ist of a longitudinal stiffener at the centre lineof a simply supported plate is given by

Ist = 45bt3[

1 + 23Ast

bt

(1 + 05

Ast

bt

)](47)

in which b is now the half width of the plate and Ast is the area of the stiffenerThis minimum increases with the stiffener area because the load transmitted bythe stiffener also increases with its area and the additional second moment of areais required to resist the buckling action of the stiffener load

Stiffeners should also be proportioned to resist local buckling A stiffener isusually fixed to one side of the plate rather than placed symmetrically about themid-plane and in this case its effective second moment of area is greater than thevalue calculated for its centroid It is often suggested [2 3] that the value of Ist

can be approximated by the value calculated for the mid-plane of the plate butthis may provide an overestimate in some cases [4ndash6]

The behaviour of an edge stiffener is different from that of an intermediatestiffener in that theoretically it must be of infinite stiffness before it can providean effective simple support to the plate However if a minimum value of thesecond moment of area of an edge stiffener of

Ist = 225bt3[

1 + 46Ast

bt

(1 + Ast

bt

)](48)

is provided the resulting reduction in the plate buckling stress is only a few percent[5] Equation 48 is derived from equation 47 on the basis that an edge stiffeneronly has to support a plate on one side of the stiffener while an intermediatestiffener has to support plates on both sides

The effectiveness of longitudinal stiffeners decreases as their number increasesand the minimum stiffness required for them to provide effective lateral supportincreases Some guidance on this is given in [3 5]

106 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

b

L

Simply supported Simply supported

Free edge

cr cr

Figure 48 Buckled pattern of a plate free along one edge

4212 Plates free along one longitudinal edge

The thin flat plate shown in Figure 48 is simply supported along both transverseedges and one longitudinal edge and is free along the other The differen-tial equation of equilibrium of the plate in a buckled position is the sameas equation 4105 (see Section 481) The buckled shape which satisfies thisequation differs however from the approximately square buckles of the simplysupported plate shown in Figure 47 The different boundary conditions along thefree edge cause the plate to buckle with a single half wave along its length asshown in Figure 48 Despite this the solution for the elastic buckling stress σcr

can still be expressed in the general form of equation 43 in which the bucklingcoefficient kσ is now approximated by

kσ = 0425 +(

b

L

)2

(49)

as shown in Figure 49For the long-plate elements which are used as flange outstands in many structural

steel members the buckling coefficient kσ is close to the minimum value of 0425In this case the elastic buckling stress (for a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2

and ν = 03) is equal to the yield stress fy when

b

t

radicfy

235= 185 (410)

Once again it is more economical to use longitudinal stiffeners to increase theelastic buckling stress than transverse stiffeners The stiffness requirements ofintermediate and edge longitudinal stiffeners are discussed in Section 4211

4213 Plates with other support conditions

The edges of flat-plate elements may be fixed or elastically restrained insteadof being simply supported or free The elastic buckling loads of flat plates with

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 107

0 1 2 3 4 5Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

1

2

3

4

5

L

b

Free

Exact= 0425 + (bL)2

0425

k

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 49 Buckling coefficients of plate free along one edge

various support conditions have been determined and many values of the bucklingcoefficient kσ to be used in equation 43 are given in [2ndash6]

4214 Plate assemblies

Many structural steel compression members are assemblies of flat-plate elementswhich are rigidly connected together along their common boundaries The localbuckling of such an assembly can be analysed approximately by assuming that theplate elements are hinged along their common boundaries so that each plate actsas if simply supported along its connected boundary or boundaries and free alongany unconnected boundary The buckling stress of each plate element can then bedetermined from equation 43 with kσ = 4 or 0425 as appropriate and the lowestof these can be used as an approximation for determining the buckling load of themember

This approximation is conservative because the rigidity of the joints between theplate elements causes all plates to buckle simultaneously at a stress intermediatebetween the lowest and the highest of the buckling stresses of the individual plateelements Anumber of analyses have been made of the stress at which simultaneousbuckling takes place [4ndash6]

For example values of the elastic buckling coefficient kσ for an I-section inuniform compression are shown in Figure 410 and for a box section in uniformcompression in Figure 411 The buckling stress can be obtained from these figuresby using equation 43 with the plate thickness t replaced by the flange thicknesstf The use of these stresses and other results [4ndash6] leads to economic thin-walledcompression members

108 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Outstand width to depth ratio bfdf

0

02

04

06

08

10

= E--------------------------

2

12(1ndash 2)k ----------------------

( )b tf f2

bf

df

tw

tf

t twf =100

150

200

075

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

cr

Figure 410 Local buckling coefficients for I-section compression members

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Width to depth ratio bfdf

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

bf

dftw

tf

t twf = 075

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

100

125

150

200

= E--------------------------

2

12(1ndash 2)k----------------------

( )b tf f2cr

Figure 411 Local buckling coefficients for box section compression members

422 Ultimate strength

4221 Inelastic buckling of thick plates

The discussion given in Section 421 on the elastic buckling of rectangular platesapplies only to materials whose stressndashstrain relationships remain linear Thusfor stocky steel plates for which the calculated elastic buckling stress exceeds theyield stress fy the elastic analysis must be modified accordingly

One particularly simple modification which can be applied to strain-hardenedsteel plates is to use the strain-hardening modulus Est and

radic(EEst) instead of E

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 109

in the terms of equation 4105 (Section 481) which represent the longitudinalbending and the twisting resistances to buckling while still using E in the termfor the lateral bending resistance With these modifications the strain-hardeningbuckling stress of a long simply supported plate is equal to the yield stress fy when

b

t

radicfy

235= 237 (411)

More accurate investigations [7] of the strain-hardening buckling of steel plateshave shown that this simple approach is too conservative and that the strain-hardening buckling stress is equal to the yield stress when

b

t

radicfy

235= 321 (412)

for simply supported plates and when

b

t

radicfy

235= 82 (413)

for plates which are free along one longitudinal edge If these are compared withequations 46 and 410 then it can be seen that these limits can be expressed interms of the elastic buckling stress σcr byradic

fyσcr

= 057 (414)

for simply supported plates and byradicfyσcr

= 046 (415)

for plates which are free along one longitudinal edge These limits are shown inFigure 44

4222 Post-buckling strength of thin plates

A thin elastic plate does not fail soon after it buckles but can support loads signifi-cantly greater than its elastic buckling load without deflecting excessively This isin contrast to the behaviour of an elastic compression member which can only carryvery slightly increased loads before its deflections become excessive as indicatedin Figure 412 This post-buckling behaviour of a thin plate is due to a number ofcauses but the main reason is that the deflected shape of the buckled plate cannotbe developed from the pre-buckled configuration without some redistribution ofthe in-plane stresses within the plate This redistribution which is ignored in the

110 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Central deflection

Simply supported thinplates with constantdisplacement of loadededges

Constant displacementalong unloaded edges

Unloaded edgesfree to deflect

Thin column

Small deflection theoryCom

pres

sive

load

on

plat

e N

Ncr

Figure 412 Post-buckling behaviour of thin elastic plates

small deflection theory of elastic buckling usually favours the less stiff portionsof the plate and causes an increase in the efficiency of the plate

One of the most common causes of this redistribution is associated with thein-plane boundary conditions at the loaded edges of the plate In long structuralmembers the continuity conditions along the transverse lines dividing consecu-tive buckled panels require that each of these boundary lines deflects a constantamount longitudinally However the longitudinal shortening of the panel due toits transverse deflections varies across the panel from a maximum at the centreto a minimum at the supported edges This variation must therefore be compen-sated for by a corresponding variation in the longitudinal shortening due to axialstrain from a minimum at the centre to a maximum at the edges The longitudinalstress distribution must be similar to the shortening due to strain and so the stressat the centre of the panel is reduced below the average stress while the stress atthe supported edges is increased above the average This redistribution whichis equivalent to a transfer of stress from the more flexible central region of thepanel to the regions near the supported edges leads to a reduction in the transversedeflection as indicated in Figure 412

A further redistribution of the in-plane stresses takes places when the longitu-dinal edges of the panel are supported by very stiff elements which ensure thatthese edges deflect a constant amount laterally in the plane of the panel In thiscase the variation along the panel of the lateral shortening due to the transversedeflections induces a self-equilibrating set of lateral in-plane stresses which aretensile at the centre of the panel and compressive at the loaded edges The tensilestresses help support the less stiff central region of the panel and lead to furtherreductions in the transverse deflections as indicated in Figure 412 However this

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 111

action is not usually fully developed because the elements supporting the panelsof most structural members are not very stiff

The post-buckling effect is greater in plates supported along both longitudinaledges than it is in plates which are free along one longitudinal edge This is becausethe deflected shapes of the latter have much less curvature than the former and theredistributions of the in-plane stresses are not as pronounced In addition it is notpossible to develop any lateral in-plane stresses along free edges and so it is notuncommon to ignore any post-buckling reserves of slender flange outstands

The redistribution of the in-plane stresses after buckling continues with increas-ing load until the yield stress fy is reached at the supported edges Yielding thenspreads rapidly and the plate fails soon after as indicated in Figure 43 The occur-rence of the first yield in an initially flat plate depends on its slenderness and athick plate yields before its elastic buckling stress σcr is reached As the slender-ness increases and the elastic buckling stress decreases below the yield stress theratio of the ultimate stress fult to the elastic buckling stress increases as shown inFigure 44

Although the analytical determination of the ultimate strength of a thin flat plateis difficult it has been found that the use of an effective width concept can lead tosatisfactory approximations According to this concept the actual ultimate stressdistribution in a simply supported plate (see Figure 413) is replaced by a simplifieddistribution for which the central portion of the plate is ignored and the remainingeffective width beff carries the yield stress fy It was proposed that this effectivewidth should be approximated by

beff

b=

radicσcr

fy (416)

Actual ultimatestress distribution

Averageultimatestress ult

Centralexcess widthignored

(a) Ultimate stress distribution (b) Effective width concept

asymp fyfy

b

equiv

beff 2 beff 2

y

ulteff

fb

b=

Figure 413 Effective width concept for simply supported plates

112 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

which is equivalent to supposing that the ultimate load carrying capacity of the platefybeff t is equal to the elastic buckling load of a plate of width beff Alternativelythis proposal can be regarded as determining an effective average ultimate stressfult which acts on the full width b of the plate This average ultimate stress whichis given by

fult

fy=

radicσcr

fy(417)

is shown in Figure 44Experiments on real plates with initial curvatures and residual stresses have

confirmed the qualitative validity of this effective width approach but suggestthat the quantitative values of the effective width for hot-rolled and welded platesshould be obtained from equations of the type

beff

b= α

radicσcr

fy (418)

where α reflects the influence of the initial curvatures and residual stresses Forexample test results for the ultimate stresses fult(= fybeff b) of hot-rolled sim-ply supported plates with residual stresses and initial curvatures are shown inFigure 414 and suggest a value of α equal to 065 Other values of α are given in[8] Tests on cold-formed members also support the effective width concept withquantitative values of the effective width being obtained from

beff

b=

radicσcr

fy

(1 minus 022

radicσcr

fy

) (419)

4223 Effects of initial curvature and residual stresses

Real plates are not perfectly flat but have small initial curvatures similar to thosein real columns (see Section 322) and real beams (see Section 622) The initialcurvature of a plate causes it to deflect transversely as soon as it is loaded as shownin Figure 43 These deflections increase rapidly as the elastic buckling stress isapproached but slow down beyond the buckling stress and approach those of aninitially flat plate

In a thin plate with initial curvature the first yield and failure occur only slightlybefore they do in a flat plate as indicated in Figure 43 while the initial curvaturehas little effect on the resistance of a thick plate (see Figure 44) It is only in a plateof intermediate slenderness that the initial curvature causes a significant reductionin the resistance as indicated in Figure 44

Real plates usually have residual stresses induced by uneven cooling after rollingor welding These stresses are generally tensile at the junctions between plateelements and compressive in the regions away from the junctions Residual com-pressive stresses in the central region of a simply supported thin plate cause it

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 113

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16

Modified plate slenderness

02

04

06

08

10

12

(f y )

Test results

Yielding

Elastic buckling

equation 418 ( = 065)

cr

Eff

ecti

ve w

idth

rat

io b

eff

b

radic

Figure 414 Effective widths of simply supported plates

to buckle prematurely and reduce its ultimate strength as shown in Figure 44Residual stresses also cause premature yielding in plates of intermediate slender-ness as indicated in Figure 44 but have a negligible effect on the strain-hardeningbuckling of stocky plates

Some typical test results for thin supported plates with initial curvatures andresidual stresses are shown in Figure 414

43 Plate elements in shear

431 Elastic buckling

The thin flat plate of length L depth d and thickness t shown in Figure 415is simply supported along all four edges The plate is loaded by shear stressesdistributed uniformly along its edges When these stresses are equal to the elasticbuckling value τcr then the plate can buckle by deflecting v laterally out of itsoriginal plane into an adjacent position For this adjacent position to be one ofequilibrium the differential equilibrium equation [1ndash4](

part4v

partx4+ 2

part4v

partx2partz2+ part4v

partz4

)= minus2τcrt

D

part2v

partxpartz(420)

must be satisfied (this may be compared with the corresponding equation 4105 ofSection 481 for a plate in compression)

Closed form solutions of this equation are not available but numerical solutionshave been obtained These indicate that the plate tends to buckle along compressiondiagonals as shown in Figure 415 The shape of the buckle is influenced bythe tensile forces acting along the other diagonal while the number of buckles

114 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

L

d

Line of zero deflection

Compression diagonals

cr

cr

Figure 415 Buckling pattern of a simply supported plate in shear

increases with the aspect ratio Ld The numerical solutions for the elastic bucklingstress τcr can be expressed in the form

τcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kτ(dt)2

(421)

in which the buckling coefficient kτ is approximated by

kτ = 534 + 4

(d

L

)2

(422)

when L ge d and by

kτ = 534

(d

L

)2

+ 4 (423)

when L le d as shown in Figure 416The shear stresses in many structural members are transmitted by unstiffened

webs for which the aspect ratio Ld is large In this case the buckling coefficientkτ approaches 534 and the buckling stress can be closely approximated by

τcr = 534π2E12(1 minus ν2)

(dt)2 (424)

This elastic buckling stress is equal to the yield stress in shear τy = fyradic

3 (seeSection 131) of a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 when

d

t

radicfy

235= 864 (425)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 115

Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

5

10

15

20

25

L

b

5341 buckle 2 buckles 3 buckles

Approximations ofequations 422 and 423

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Figure 416 Buckling coefficients of plates in shear

The values of the buckling coefficient kτ shown in Figure 416 and the form ofequation 421 indicate that the elastic buckling stress may be significantly increasedeither by using intermediate transverse stiffeners to decrease the aspect ratio Ldand to increase the buckling coefficient kτ or by using longitudinal stiffeners todecrease the depthndashthickness ratio dt It is apparent from Figure 416 that suchstiffeners are likely to be most efficient when the stiffener spacing a is such thatthe aspect ratio of each panel lies between 05 and 2 so that only one buckle canform in each panel

Any intermediate stiffeners used must be sufficiently stiff to ensure that theelastic buckling stress τcr is increased to the value calculated for the stiffenedpanel Some values of the required stiffener second moment of area Ist are givenin [3 5] for various panel aspect ratios ad These can be conservatively approx-imated by using

Ist

at312(1 minus ν2)= 6

ad(426)

when ad ge 1 and by using

Ist

at312(1 minus ν2)= 6

(ad)4(427)

when ad le 1

116 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

432 Ultimate strength

4321 Unstiffened plates

A stocky unstiffened web in an I-section beam in pure shear is shown inFigure 417a The elastic shear stress distribution in such a section is analysedin Section 5102 The web behaves elastically in shear until first yield occurs atτy = fy

radic3 and then undergoes increasing plastification until the web is fully

yielded in shear (Figure 417b) Because the shear stress distribution at first yieldis nearly uniform the nominal first yield and fully plastic loads are nearly equaland the shear shape factor is usually very close to 10 Stocky unstiffened webs insteel beams reach first yield before they buckle elastically so that their resistancesare determined by the shear stress τy as indicated in Figure 418

(a) I-section (b) Shear stress distributions

y y

d

Elastic First yield Fully plastic

Figure 417 Plastification of an I-section web in shear

0 05 10 15 20 25 300

02

04

06

08

10

Yieldingad = 04

0610

15

Ultimate strengthsof stiffened plates

Elastic bucklingUltimate strength ofunstiffened plates

Modified plate slenderness

cr fy

ult fy

kE

f

t

df y

cr

y

2

2)1(12

3

3

3( () )

ult fy33

=ndash

She

ar r

atio

s 3

crf

y 3

ult

fy

Figure 418 Ultimate strengths of plates in shear

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 117

Thus the resistance of a stocky web in a flanged section for which the shearshape factor is close to unity is closely approximated by the web plastic shearresistance

Vpl = dtτy (428)

When the depthndashthickness ratio dt of a long unstiffened steel web exceeds864

radic(fy235) its elastic buckling shear stress τcr is less than the shear yield

stress (see equation 425) The post-buckling reserve of shear strength of such anunstiffened web is not great and its ultimate stress τult can be approximated withreasonable accuracy by the elastic buckling stress τcr given by equation 424 andshown by the dashed line in Figure 418

4322 Stiffened plates

Stocky stiffened webs in steel beams yield in shear before they buckle and so thestiffeners do not contribute to the ultimate strength Because of this stocky websare usually unstiffened

In a slender web with transverse stiffeners which buckles elastically before ityields there is a significant reserve of strength after buckling This is causedby a redistribution of stress in which the diagonal tension stresses in the webpanel continue to increase with the applied shear while the diagonal compressivestresses remain substantially unchanged The increased diagonal tension stressesform a tension field which combines with the transverse stiffeners and the flangesto transfer the additional shear in a truss-type action [7 9] as shown in Figure 419The ultimate shear stresses τult of the web is reached soon after yield occurs in thetension field and this can be approximated by

τult = τcr + τtf (429)

in which τcr is the elastic buckling stress given by equations 421ndash423 with Lequal to the stiffener spacing a and τtf is the tension field contribution at yieldwhich can be approximated by

τtf = fy2

(1 minus radic3τcrfy)radic

1 + (ad)2 (430)

Thus the approximate ultimate strength can be obtained from

radic3τult

fy=

radic3τcr

fy+

radic3

2

(1 minus radic3τcrfy)radic

1 + (ad)2 (431)

which is shown in Figure 418 This equation is conservative as it ignores anycontributions made by the bending resistance of the flanges to the ultimate strengthof the web [9 10]

118 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Chord Web strut Tension member

(a) Equivalent truss

(b)Tension fields

Tension fieldWeb stiffenerFlange

a a a

d

Figure 419 Tension fields in a stiffened web

Not only must the intermediate transverse stiffeners be sufficiently stiff to ensurethat the elastic buckling stress τcr is reached as explained in Section 431 butthey must also be strong enough to transmit the stiffener force

Nst = fydt

2

(1 minus

radic3τcr

fy

)[a

dminus (ad)2radic

1 + (ad)2

](432)

required by the tension field action Intermediate transverse stiffeners are often sostocky that their ultimate strengths can be approximated by their squash loads inwhich case the required area Ast of a symmetrical pair of stiffeners is given by

Ast = Nstfy (433)

However the stability of very slender stiffeners should be checked in whichcase the second moment of area Ist required to resist the stiffener force can beconservatively estimated from

Ist = Nstd2

π2E(434)

which is based on the elastic buckling of a pin-ended column of length d

44 Plate elements in bending

441 Elastic buckling

The thin flat plate of length L width d and thickness t shown in Figure 420is simply supported along all four edges The plate is loaded by bending stress

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 119

Ld

All edges simply supported

2d3

2d3

2d3

crl

crl

crl

crl

Figure 420 Buckled pattern of a plate in bending

distributions which vary linearly across its width When the maximum stressreaches the elastic buckling value σcrl the plate can buckle out of its originalplane as shown in Figure 420 The elastic buckling stress can be expressed inthe form

σcrl = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(dt)2

(435)

where the buckling coefficient kσ depends on the aspect ratio Ld of the plate andthe number of buckles along the plate For long plates the value of kσ is close toits minimum value of

kσ = 239 (436)

for which the length of each buckle is approximately 2d3 By using thisvalue of kσ it can be shown that the elastic buckling stress for a steel for whichE = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 is equal to the yield stress fy when

d

t

radicfy

235= 1389 (437)

The buckling coefficient kσ is not significantly greater than 239 except when thebuckle length is reduced below 2d3 For this reason transverse stiffeners areineffective unless more closely spaced than 2d3 On the other hand longitudinalstiffeners may be quite effective in changing the buckled shape and therefore thevalue of kσ Such a stiffener is most efficient when it is placed in the compression

120 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

region at about d5 from the compression edge This is close to the position ofthe crests in the buckles of an unstiffened plate Such a stiffener may increase thebuckling coefficient kσ significantly the maximum value of 1294 being achievedwhen the stiffener acts as if rigid The values given in [5 6] indicate that a hypo-thetical stiffener of zero area Ast will produce this effect if its second moment ofarea Ist is equal to 4dt3 This value should be increased to allow for the compres-sive load in the real stiffener and it is suggested that a suitable value might begiven by

Ist = 4dt3[

1 + 4Ast

dt

(1 + Ast

dt

)] (438)

which is of a similar form to that given by equation 47 for the longitudinal stiffenersof plates in uniform compression

442 Plate assemblies

The local buckling of a plate assembly in bending such as an I-beam bent about itsmajor axis can be analysed approximately by assuming that the plate elements arehinged along their common boundaries in much the same fashion as that describedin Section 4214 for compression members The elastic buckling moment canthen be approximated by using kσ = 0425 or 4 for the flanges as appropriateand kσ = 239 for the web and determining the element which is closest tobuckling The results of more accurate analyses of the simultaneous buckling ofthe flange and web elements in I-beams and box section beams in bending aregiven in Figures 421 and 422 respectively

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Outstand width to depth ratio bf df

0

02

04

06

08

10

t twf

bf

df

tw

t f

= E

--------------------------2

12(1ndash )2----------------------( )b tf f

2 = 10

15

20

40

kcrl

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 421 Local buckling coefficients for I-beams

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 121

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Width to depth ratio bfdf

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

bf

dftw

tf

= E--------------------------

2----------------------( )b tf f

2= 075

100125

150

200

t twf

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k crl

k

12(1ndash 2)

Figure 422 Local buckling coefficients for box section beams

443 Ultimate strength

The ultimate strength of a thick plate in bending is governed by its yield stress fyand by its plastic shape factor which is equal to 15 for a constant thickness plateas discussed in Section 552

When the width to thickness ratio dt exceeds 1389radic(fy235) the elastic

buckling stress σcrl of a simply supported plate is less than the yield stress fy(see equation 437) A long slender plate such as this has a significant reserve ofstrength after buckling because it is able to redistribute the compressive stressesfrom the buckled region to the area close to the supported compression edge in thesame way as a plate in uniform compression (see Section 4222) Solutions forthe post-buckling reserve of strength of a plate in bending given in [6 11ndash13] showthat an effective width treatment can be used with the effective width being takenover part of the compressive portion of the plate In the more general case of theslender plate shown in Figure 420 being loaded by combined bending and axialforce the post-buckling strength reserve of the plate can be substantial For suchplates the effective width is taken over a part of the compressive portion of the plateEffective widths can be obtained in this way from the local buckling stressσcr undercombined bending and axial force using the modified plate slenderness

radic(f yσcr)

in a similar fashion to that depicted in Figure 414 although the procedure is morecomplex

45 Plate elements in bending and shear

451 Elastic buckling

The elastic buckling of the simply supported thin flat plate shown in Figure 423which is subjected to combined shear and bending can be predicted by using the

122 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

L

d

cr

cr

crcr

crl

crl

crl

crl

Figure 423 Simply supported plate under shear and bending

approximate interaction equation [2 4 5 13]

(τcr

τcro

)2

+(σcrl

σcrlo

)2

= 1 (439)

in which τcro is the elastic buckling stress when the plate is in pure shear(see equations 421ndash424) and σcrlo is the elastic buckling stress for pure bending(see equations 435 and 436) If the elastic buckling stresses τcr σcrl are used inthe HenckyndashVon Mises yield criterion (see Section 131)

3τ 2cr + σ 2

crl = f 2y (440)

it can shown from equations 439 and 440 that the most severe loading conditionfor which elastic buckling and yielding occur simultaneously is that of pure shearThus in an unstiffened web of a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03yielding will occur before buckling while (see equation 425)

d

t

radicfy

235le 864 (441)

452 Ultimate strength

4521 Unstiffened plates

Stocky unstiffened webs in steel beams yield before they buckle and their designresistances can be estimated approximately by using the HenckyndashVon Mises yieldcriterion (see Section 131) so that the shear force Vw and moment Mw in theweb satisfy

3

(Vw

dt

)2

+(

6Mw

d2t

)2

= f 2y (442)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 123

This approximation is conservative as it assumes that the plastic shape factor forweb bending is 10 instead of 15

While the elastic buckling of slender unstiffened webs under combined shearand bending has been studied the ultimate strengths of such webs have not beenfully investigated However it seems possible that there is only a small reserveof strength after elastic buckling so that the ultimate strength can be approxi-mated conservatively by the elastic buckling stress combinations which satisfyequation 439

4522 Stiffened plates

The ultimate strength of a stiffened web under combined shear and bending can bediscussed in terms of the interaction diagram shown in Figure 424 for the ultimateshear force V and bending moment M acting on a plate girder When there isno shear the ultimate moment capacity is equal to the full plastic moment Mpproviding the flanges are Class 1 or Class 2 (see Section 472) while the ultimateshear capacity in the absence of bending moment is

Vult = dtτult (443)

where the ultimate stress τult is given approximately by equation 431 (whichignores any contributions made by the bending resistance of the flanges) Thisshear capacity remains unchanged as the bending moment increases to the valueMfp which is sufficient to fully yield the flanges if they alone resist the momentThis fact forms the basis for the widely used proportioning procedure for which itis assumed that the web resists only the shear and that the flanges are required to

10

08

06

04

02

0

MMp

VV

ult

Equation 444

Typical interaction curve

0 02 04 06 08 10

Figure 424 Ultimate strengths of stiffened webs in shear and bending

124 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

resist the full moment As the bending moment increases beyond Mfp the ultimateshear capacity falls off rapidly as shown A simple approximation for the reducedshear capacity is given by

V

Vult= 05

(1 +

radic1 minus MMp

1 minus MfpMp

)(444)

while MfpMp le MMp le 1 This approximation ignores the influence of thebending stresses on the tension field and the bending resistance of the flanges Amore accurate method of analysis is discussed in [14]

46 Plate elements in bearing

461 Elastic buckling

Plate elements are subjected to bearing stresses by concentrated or locally dis-tributed edge loads For example a concentrated load applied to the top flangeof a plate girder induces local bearing stresses in the web immediately beneaththe load In a slender girder with transverse web stiffeners the load is resisted byvertical shear stresses acting at the stiffeners as shown in Figure 425a Bearingcommonly occurs in conjunction with shear (as at an end support see Figure 425b)bending (as at mid-span see Figure 425c) and with combined shear and bending(as at an interior support see Figure 425d)

In the case of a panel of a stiffened web the edges of the panel may be regardedas simply supported When the bearing load is distributed along the full length a ofthe panel and there is no shear or bending the elastic bearing buckling stress σcrp

VR

VR

VLVL

M M

M M

(a) Bearing (c) Bearing and bending

(b) Bearing and shear (d) Bearing shear and bending

p

p p

p

Figure 425 Plate girder webs in bearing

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 125

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Panel aspect ratio ad

0

5

10

15

20

25

= E

--------------------------2

12(1ndash )2

k---------------( )dt 2

a

a

d

06 =1

=1

0ad = infin

[4]

[15]

Ela

stic

buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

crp

crp

Figure 426 Buckling coefficients of plates in bearing

can be expressed as

σcrp = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(dt)2

(445)

in which the buckling coefficient kσ varies with the panel aspect ratio ad as shownin Figure 426

When a patch-bearing load acts along a reduced length αa of the top edge ofthe panel the value of αkσ is decreased This effect has been investigated [15]and some values of αkσ are shown in Figure 426 These values suggest a limitingvalue of αkσ = 08 approximately for the case of unstiffened webs (ad rarr infin)

with concentrated loads (α rarr 0)For the case of a panel in combined bearing shear and bending it has been

suggested [6 15] that the elastic buckling stresses can be determined from theinteraction equation

σcrp

σcrpo+

(τcr

τcro

)2

+(σcrl

σcrlo

)2

= 1 (446)

in which the final subscripts o indicate the appropriate elastic buckling stress whenonly that type of loading is applied Some specific interaction diagrams are givenin [15]

462 Ultimate strength

The ultimate strength of a thick web in bearing depends chiefly on its yield stressfy Although yielding first occurs under the centre of the bearing plate general

126 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

yielding does not take place until the applied load is large enough to yield a webarea defined by a dispersion of the applied stress through the flange Even at thisload the web does not collapse catastrophically and some further yielding andredistribution is possible When the web is also subjected to shear and bendinggeneral yielding in bearing can be approximated by using the HenckyndashVon Misesyield criterion (see Section 131)

σ 2p + σ 2

b minus σpσb + 3τ 2 = f 2y (447)

in which σp is the bearing stress σb the bending stress and τ the shear stressThin stiffened web panels in bearing have a reserve of strength after elastic buck-

ling which is due to a redistribution of stress from the more flexible central regionto the stiffeners Studies of this effect suggest that the reserve of strength decreasesas the bearing loads become more concentrated [15] The collapse behaviour ofstiffened panels is described in [16 17]

47 Design against local buckling

471 Compression members

The cross-sections of compression members must be designed so that the designcompression force NEd does not exceed the design compressive resistance NcRd whence

NEd le NcRd (448)

This ignores overall member buckling as discussed in Chapter 3 for whichthe non-dimensional slenderness λ le 02 The EC3 design expression forcross-section resistance under uniform compression is

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0

(449)

in which Aeff is the effective area of the cross-section fy is the nominalyield strength for the section and γM0(=1) is the partial section resistancefactor

The cross-section of a compression member may buckle locally before it reachesits yield stress fy in which case it is defined in EC3 as a Class 4 cross-sectionCross-sections of compression members which yield prior to local buckling arelsquoeffectiversquo and are defined in EC3 as being either of Class 1 Class 2 or Class 3For these cross-sections which are unaffected by local bucking the effective areaAeff in equation 449 is taken as the gross area A A cross-section composed offlat-plate elements has no local buckling effects when the widthndashthickness ratio

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 127

bt of every element of the cross-section satisfies

b

tle λ3ε (450)

where λ3ε is the appropriate Class 3 slenderness limit of Table 52 of EC3 andε is a constant given by

ε =radic

235fy (451)

in which fy is in Nmm2 units Some values of λ3ε are given in Figures 427and 428

Class 4 cross-sections are those containing at least one slender element for whichequation 450 is not satisfied For these the effective area is reduced to

Aeff =sum

Aceff (452)

in which Aceff is the effective area of a flat compression element comprising thecross-section which is obtained from its gross area Ac by

Aceff = ρAc (453)

where ρ is a reduction factor given by

ρ = (λp minus 022)λ2p le 10 (454)

along both edges

---- -

Section andelement widths

---Diameter d0

b1 b1 b2 b1

d1

d0

d1 d1

b2

Flange outstand b1

Flange b2 supportedalong both edges

Web d1 supported

Section description UB UC CHS Box RHS

14 14

42 42

4242 42

902

Figure 427 Yield limits for some compression elements

128 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

for element supported on both edges and

ρ = (λp minus 0188)λ2p le 10 (455)

for outstands and where

λp =radic

fyσcr

= b

t

1

284εradic

kσ(456)

is the modified plate slenderness (see equation 45) Values of the local buck-ling coefficient kσ are given in Table 42 of EC3-1-5 and are similar to those inFigures 410 and 411

A circular hollow section member has no local buckling effects when itsdiameterndashthickness ratio dt satisfies

d

tle 90ε2 (457)

If the diameterndashthickness ratio does not satisfy equation 457 then it has a Class4 cross-section whose effective area is reduced to

Aeff =radic

90

d(tε2)A (458)

Worked examples for checking the section capacities of compression members aregiven in Sections 491 and 3121ndash3123

472 Beam flanges and webs in compression

Compression elements in a beam cross-section are classified in EC3 as Class 1Class 2 Class 3 or Class 4 depending on their local buckling resistance

Class 1 elements are unaffected by local buckling and are able to developand maintain their fully plastic capacities (Section 55) while inelastic momentredistribution takes place in the beam Class 1 elements satisfy

bt le λ1ε (459)

in which λ1ε is the appropriate plasticity slenderness limit given in Table 52 ofEC3 (some values of λ1ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits areclosely related to equations 412 and 413 for the strain-hardening buckling stressesof inelastic plates

Class 2 elements are unaffected by local buckling in the development of theirfully plastic capacities (Section 55) but may be unable to maintain these capacities

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 129

Beams Mp

Not to scale

Columns

Mp

0 1 2 3 = bt

Beams

NRd MRd prop1

Wel fy

Ny My

Ny

Sec

tion

res

ista

nces

NR

d M

Rd

1 2 3 4 Section classification

Flange outstands 9 10 14

33 38 42Simplysupportedflanges

Figure 428 EC3 section resistances

while inelastic moment redistribution takes place in the beam Class 2 sectionssatisfy

λ1ε le bt le λ2ε (460)

in which λ2ε is the appropriate Class 2 slenderness limit given in Table 52 of EC3(some values of λ2ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits are slightlygreater than those implied in equations 412 and 413 for the strain-hardeningbuckling of inelastic plates

Class 3 elements are able to reach first yield but buckle locally before theybecome fully plastic Class 3 elements satisfy

λ2ε le bt le λ3ε (461)

in which λ3ε is the appropriate yield slenderness limit given in Table 52 of EC3(some values of λ3ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits are closelyrelated to equations 418 used to define the effective widths of flange plates inuniform compression or modified from equation 437 for web plates in bendingClass 4 elements buckle locally before they reach first yield and satisfy

λ3ε lt bt (462)

Beam cross-sections are classified as being Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 or Class 4depending on the classification of their elements A Class 1 cross-section has allof its elements being Class 1 A Class 2 cross-section has no Class 3 or Class 4elements and has at least one Class 2 element while a Class 3 cross-section hasno Class 4 elements and at least one Class 3 element A Class 4 cross-section hasat least one Class 4 element

130 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

A beam cross-section must be designed so that its factored design moment MEd

does not exceed the design section moment resistance so that

MEd le McRd (463)

Beams must also be designed for shear (Section 473) and against lateral buckling(Section 69) The section resistance McRd is given by

McRd = WfyγM0

(464)

in which W is the appropriate section modulus fy the yield strength and γM0(=1)the partial section resistance factor For Class 1 and 2 beam cross-sections

W = Wpl (465)

where Wpl is the plastic section modulus and which allows many beams to bedesigned for the full plastic moment

Mp = Wplfy (466)

as indicated in Figure 428For Class 3 beam cross-sections the effective section modulus is taken as the

minimum elastic section modulus Welmin which is that based on the extremefibre that reaches yield first Some I-sections have Class 1 or 2 flanges but con-tain a Class 3 web and so based on the EC3 classification they would be Class3 cross-sections and unsuitable for plastic design However the EC3 permitsthese sections to be classified as effective Class 2 cross-sections by neglectingpart of the compression portion of the web This simple procedure for hot-rolled or welded sections conveniently replaces the compressed portion of theweb by a part of width 20εtw adjacent to the compression flange and withanother part of width 20εtw adjacent to the plastic neutral axis of the effectivecross-section

For a beam with a slender compression flange supported along both edgesthe effective section modulus Wel may be determined by calculating the elasticsection modulus of an effective cross-section obtained by using a compres-sion flange effective width beff obtained using equation 453 The calculationof Wel must incorporate the possibility that the effective section is not sym-metric and that the centroids of the gross and effective sections do notcoincide

Worked examples of classifying the section and checking the section momentcapacity are given in Sections 492ndash494 51215 and 51217

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 131

473 Members in compression and bending

For cross-sections subjected to a design compressive force NEd and a design majoraxis bending moment MyEd EC3 requires the interaction equation

NEd

NRd+ MyEd

MyRdle 1 (467)

to be satisfied where NRd is the compression resistance of the cross-section deter-mined from equation 449 and MyRd is the bending resistance of the cross-sectiondetermined according to equation 463 Generally the provision of equation 467is overly conservative and is of use only for preliminary member sizing and soEC3 provides less conservative and more detailed member checks depending onthe section classification

If the cross-section is Class 1 or 2 EC3 reduces the design bending resistanceMyRd to a value MyN Rd dependent on the coincident axial force NEd Providedthat

NEd le 025NplRd and (468)

NEd le 05hwtwfyγM0

(469)

where NplRd is the resistance based on yielding given by equation 449 andγM0(= 1) is the partial section resistance factor no reduction in the plastic momentcapacity MyRd = MplyRd is needed since for small axial loads the theoreticalreduction in the plastic moment is offset by strain hardening If either of equations468 or 469 is not satisfied EC3 requires that

MN yRd = MplyRd

(1 minus n

1 minus 05a

)(470)

where

n = NEdNplRd (471)

is the ratio of the applied compression load to the plastic compression resistanceof the cross-section and

a = (A minus 2bf tf )A le 05 (472)

is the ratio of the area of the web to the total area of the cross-sectionFor Class 3 cross-sections EC3 allows only a linear interaction of the stresses

arising from the combined bending moment and axial force so that the maximumlongitudinal stress is limited to the yield stress that is

σxEd le fyγM0 (473)

As for Class 3 cross-sections the longitudinal stress in Class 4 sections sub-jected to combined compression and bending is calculated based on the effective

132 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

properties of the cross-section so that equation 473 is satisfied The resultingexpression that satisfies equation 473 is

NEd

Aeff fyγM0+ MyEd + NEdeNy

Weff ymin fyγM0le 1 (474)

Equation 474 accounts for the additional bending moment caused by a shift eNy

in the compression force NEd from the geometric centroid of the net cross-sectionto the centroid of the effective cross-section

474 Longitudinal stiffeners

A logical basis for the design of a web in pure bending is to limit its proportions sothat its maximum elastic bending strength can be used so that the web is a Class 3element When this is done the section resistance MyRd of the beam is governedby the slenderness of the flanges Thus EC3 requires a fully effective unstiffenedweb to satisfy

hwtw le 124ε (475)

This limit is close to the value of 1269 at which the elastic buckling stress is equalto the yield stress (see equation 437)

Unstiffened webs whose slenderness exceeds this limit are Class 4 elementsbut the use of one or more longitudinal stiffeners can delay local buckling so thatthey become Class 3 elements and the cross-section can be designed as a Class 2section as discussed in Section 472 EC3 does not specify the minimum stiffnessof longitudinal stiffeners to prevent the web plate from deflecting at the stiffenerlocation during local buckling such as in equation 438 Rather it allows theplate slenderness λp in equation 456 to be determined from the local bucklingcoefficient kσ p which incorporates both the area and second moment of the areaof the stiffener If the stiffened web plate is proportioned such that λp le 0874 thereduction factor in equation 453 is unity and the longitudinal stress in the stiffenedweb can reach its yield strength prior to local buckling

The Australian standard AS4100 [18] gives a simpler method of design inwhich a first longitudinal stiffener whose second moment of area is at least thatof equation 428 is placed one-fifth of the web depth from the compression whenthe overall depthndashthickness ratio of the web exceeds the limit of

hwtw = 194ε (476)

which is greater than that of equation 475 because it considers the effect of theflanges on the local buckling stress of the web An additional stiffener whosesecond moment of area exceeds

Ist = hwt3w (477)

is required at the neutral axis when hwtw exceeds 242ε

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 133

475 Beam webs in shear

4751 Stocky webs

The factored design shear force VEd on a cross-section must satisfy

VEd le VcRd (478)

in which VcRd is the design uniform shear resistance which may be calculatedbased on a plastic (VplRd) or elastic distribution of shear stress

I-sections have distributions of shear stress through their webs that are approx-imately uniform (Section 542) and for stocky webs with hwtw lt 72ε the yieldstress in shear τy = fy

radic3 is reached before local buckling Hence EC3 requires

that

VcRd = VplRd = Av(fyradic

3)

γM0(479)

where γM0 = 1 and Av is the shear area of the web which is defined in Clause626 of EC3 This resistance is close to but more conservative than the resistancegiven in equation 428 since the shear area Av is reduced for hot-rolled sectionsby including the root radius in its calculation and because equation 479 ignoresthe effects of strain hardening Some sections such as a monosymmetric I-sectionhave non-uniform distributions of the shear stress τEd in their webs Based on anelastic stress distribution the maximum value of τEd may be determined as inSection 542 and EC3 then requires that

τEd le fyradic

3

γM0 (480)

Cross-sections for which hwtw le 72ε are stocky and the webs of all UBrsquos andUCrsquos in Grade 275 steel satisfy hwtw le 72ε

4752 Slender webs

The shear resistance of slender unstiffened webs for which hwtw gt 72ε decreasesrapidly from the value in equation 479 as the slenderness hwtw increases Forthese

VcRd = VbwRd le ηfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (481)

where VbwRd is the design resistance governed by buckling of the web in shearfyw is the yield strength of the web η is a factor for the shear area that can betaken as 12 for steels up to S460 and 10 otherwise and γM1(= 1) is a partialresistance factor based on buckling The buckling resistance of the web is given

134 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

in EC3 as

VbwRd = χwfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (482)

in which the web reduction factor on the yield strength hwtwfywradic

3 due tobuckling is

χw =

1 λw lt 083083λw λw ge 083

(483)

where the modified web plate slenderness is

λw =radic

fywradic

3

τcrasymp 076

radicfyw

τcr(484)

and τcr is the elastic local buckling stress in shear given in equation 421equation 484 is of the same form as equation 45 For an unstiffened webλw = (hwtw)864ε and so it can be seen from equation 482 that the resis-tance of an unstiffened web decreases with an increase in its depthndashthickness ratiohwtw

The shear resistance of a slender web may be increased by providing transversestiffeners which increase the resistance to elastic buckling (Section 431) andalso permit the development of tension field action (Section 4322) Thus

VcRd = VbwRd + Vbf Rd le ηfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (485)

in which VbwRd is the web resistance given in equation 481 and Vbf Rd isthe flange shear contribution provided by the understressed flanges during thedevelopment of the tension field in the web which further enhances the shearresistance In determining the web resistance reduction factor due to buckling χw

in equation 482 the modified plate slenderness is given by

λw = hw

tw

1

374εradic

kτ(486)

where kτ is the local buckling coefficient given in equations 422 or 423 with Lequal to the stiffener spacing a and d equal to the web depth hw The additionalpost-buckling reserve of capacity due to tension field action for web plates withλw gt 108 is achieved by the use of an enhanced reduction factor of χw = 137(07+λw) instead of the more conservativeχw = 083λw The presence of tensionfield action is also accounted for implicitly in the additional flange resistance

Vbf Rd = bf t2f

c

fyf

γM1

[1 minus

(MEd

Mf Rd

)2]

(487)

where MEd is the design bending moment Mf Rd is the moment of resistance ofthe cross-section consisting of the area of the effective flanges only fyf is the

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 135

yield strength of the flanges and where

c = a

(025 + 16

bf t2f

twh2w

fyf

fyw

) (488)

Worked examples of checking the shear capacity of a slender web are given inSections 495 and 496

4753 Transverse stiffeners

Provisions are made in EC3 for a minimum value for the second moment of areaIst of intermediate transverse stiffeners These must be stiff enough to ensure thatthe elastic buckling stress τcr of a panel can be reached and strong enough totransmit the tension field stiffener force The stiffness requirement of EC3 is thatthe second moment of area of a transverse stiffener must satisfy

Ist ge 075hwt3w (489)

when ahw gtradic

2 in which hw is the depth of the web and

Ist ge 15h3wt3

wa2 (490)

when ahw le radic2 These limits are shown in Figure 429 and are close to those of

equations 427 and 426The strength requirement of EC3 for transverse stiffeners is that they should

be designed as compression members of length hw with an initial imperfection

Value of ad

00 1 2 3

1

2

equation 427

equation 489

equation 490

equation 426

Val

ue o

f I s

at w

3

Figure 429 Stiffness requirements for web stiffeners

136 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

w0 = hw300 using second-order elastic analysis for which the maximum stressis limited by

σzRd = fyγM1 (491)

The effective stiffener cross-section for this design check consists of the cross-section of the stiffener itself plus a width of the web 15εtw each side of the stiffenerand the force to be resisted by the effective stiffener cross-section is

NzEd = VEd minus hwtw

λ2w

fywradic

3

γM1(492)

where λw is given by equation 485 Using equation 38 for the bending of aninitially crooked compression member this procedure implies that the maximumstress in the effective stiffener cross-section is

σzRd = NzEd

Ast

[1 + hwAst

300Wxstmin

(NzEdNcr

1 minus NzEdNcr

)](493)

where

Ncr = π2EIsth2w (494)

is the elastic flexural buckling load of the effective stiffener area and Ast and Ist

are the area and second moment of area of the effective stiffener area and Wxstmin

is its minimum elastic section modulusA worked example of checking a pair of transverse stiffeners is given in

Section 498

4754 End panels

At the end of a plate girder there is no adjacent panel to absorb the horizontalcomponent of the tension field in the last panel and so this load may have to beresisted by the end stiffener A rigid end post is required if tension field action is tobe utilised in design Special treatment of this end stiffener may be avoided if thelength of the last (anchor) panel is reduced so that the tension field contributionτtf to the ultimate stress τult is not required (see equation 429) This is achievedby designing the anchor panel so that its shear buckling resistance VbwRd givenby equation 482 is not less than the design shear force VEd A worked example ofchecking an end panel is given in Section 497

Alternatively a rigid end post consisting of two double-sided load-bearingtransverse stiffeners (see Section 4762) may be used to anchor the tension fieldat the end of a plate girder The end post region consisting of the web and twinpairs of stiffeners can be thought of as a short beam of length hw and EC3 requiresthis beam to be designed to resist the in-plane stresses in the web resulting fromthe shear VEd

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 137

476 Beam webs in shear and bending

Where the design moment MEd and shear VEd are both high the beam must bedesigned against combined shear and bending For stocky webs when the shearforce is less than half the plastic resistance VplRd EC3 allows the effect of theshear on the moment resistance to be neglected When VEd gt 05VplRd EC3requires the bending resistance to be determined using a reduced yield strength

fyr = (1 minus ρ)fyw (495)

for the shear area where

ρ =(

2VEd

VplRdminus 1

)2

(496)

The interaction curve between the design shear force VEd and design moment MEd

is shown in Figure 430 These equations are less conservative than the von-Misesyield condition (see Section 131)

f 2yr + 3τ 2

Ed = f 2y (497)

Equations 495 and 496 may be used conservatively for the well-known propor-tioning method of design for which only the flanges are used to resist the momentand the web to resist the shear force and which is equivalent to using a reducedyield strength fyr = 0 in equation 495 for the web

10

08

06

04

02

00 02 04 06 08 10

MvEd MplRd

VE

dV

plR

d

07

05

Figure 430 Section resistances of beams under bending and shear

138 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

EC3 also uses a simpler reduced design plastic resistance MyV Rd for I-sectionswith a stocky web in lieu of the more tedious use of equations 495 and 496 Hence

MyV Rd = (Wply minus ρA2w4tw)fy

γM0 (498)

where ρ is given in equation 496 Aw = hwtw is the area of the web and Wply isthe major axis plastic section modulus If the web is slender so that its resistanceis governed by shear buckling EC3 allows the effect of shear on the bendingresistance to be neglected when VEd lt 05VbwRd When this is not the case thereduced bending resistance is

MV Rd = MplRd(1 minus ρ2)+ Mf Rdρ2 (499)

where ρ is given in equation 496 using the shear buckling resistance VbwRd

instead of the plastic resistance VplRd Mf Rd is the plastic moment of resistanceconsisting of the effective area of the flanges and MplRd is the plastic resistanceof the cross-section consisting of the effective area of the flanges and the fullyeffective web irrespective of the section class The reduced bending strength inequation 499 is similar to that implied in equation 444 If the contribution ofthe web is conservatively neglected in determining MplRd for the cross-sectionequation 499 leads to MV Rd = Mf Rd which is the basis of the proportioningmethod of design

477 Beam webs in bearing

4771 Unstiffened webs

For the design of webs in bearing according to EC3 the bearing resistance FRd

based on yielding and local buckling is taken as

FRd = χFfywtwy

γM1(4100)

in which y is the effective loaded length of the web and

χF = 05

λF(4101)

is a reduction factor for the yield strength Fy = fywtwy due to local buckling inbearing in which

λF =radic

Fy

Fcr(4102)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 139

is a modified plate slenderness for bearing buckling (which is of the same form asequation 45) and

Fcr = kFπ2E

12(1 minus ν2)

(twhw

)2

hwtw (4103)

is the elastic buckling load for a web of area hwtw in bearing The buck-ling coefficients for plates in bearing are similar to those in Figure 426 withkF = 6 + 2(ahw)

2 being used for a web of the type shown in Figure 425a Theeffective loaded length used in determining the yield resistance Fy in bearing is

y = ss + 2ntf (4104)

in which ss is the stiff bearing length and ntf is the additional length assuming adispersion of the bearing at 1 n through the flange thickness More convenientlythe dispersion can be thought of as being at a slope 11 through a depth of (nminus1)tfinto the web For a thick web (for which λF lt 05) n = 1 + radic

(bf tw) while fora slender web (for which λF gt 05) n = 1 + radic[bf tw + 002(hwtf )2]

4772 Stiffened webs

When a web alone has insufficient bearing capacity it may be strengthened byadding one or more pairs of load-bearing stiffeners These stiffeners increase theyield and buckling resistances by increasing the effective section to that of thestiffeners together with the web lengths 15twε on either side of the stiffeners ifavailable The effective length of the compression member is taken as the stiffenerlength hw or as 075hw if flange restraints act to reduce the stiffener end rotationsduring buckling and curve c of Figure 313 for compression members should beused

A worked example of checking load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

48 Appendix ndash elastic buckling of plateelements in compression

481 Simply supported plates

A simply supported rectangular plate element of length L width b and thicknesst is shown in Figure 45b Applied compressive loads N are uniformly distributedover both edges b of the plate The elastic buckling load Ncr can be determinedby finding a deflected position such as that shown in Figure 45b which is one ofequilibrium The differential equation for this equilibrium position is [1ndash4]

bD

(part4v

partx4+ 2

part4v

partx2partz2+ part4v

partz4

)= minusNcr

part2v

partxpartz(4105)

140 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

where

bD = Ebt3

12(1 minus ν2)(4106)

is the flexural rigidity of the plateEquation 4105 is compared in Figure 45 with the corresponding differential

equilibrium equation for a simply supported rectangular section column (obtainedby differentiating equation 356 twice) It can be seen that bD for the plate corre-sponds to the flexural rigidity EI of the column except for the (1minusν2) term whichis due to the Poissonrsquos ratio effect in wide plates Thus the term bDpart4vpartx4 repre-sents the resistance generated by longitudinal flexure of the plate to the disturbingeffect minusNpart2vpartx2 of the applied load The additional terms 2bDpart4vpartx2partz2 andbDpart4vpartz4 in the plate equation represent the additional resistances generated bytwisting and lateral bending of the plate

A solution of equation 4105 which satisfies the boundary conditions along thesimply supported edges [1ndash4] is

v = δ sinmπx

Lsin

nπz

b (41)

where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the deflected shape When this is sub-stituted into equation 4105 an expression for the elastic buckling load Ncr isobtained as

Ncr = n2π2bD

L2

[1 + 2

(nL

mb

)2

+(

nL

mb

)4]

which has its lowest values when n = 1 and the buckled shape has one half waveacross the width of the plate b Thus the elastic buckling stress

σcr = Ncr

bt(42)

can be expressed as

σcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(bt)2

(43)

in which the buckling coefficient kσ is given by

kσ =[(

mb

L

)2

+ 2 +(

L

mb

)2]

(4107)

The variation of the buckling coefficient kσ with the aspect ratio Lb of the plateand the number of half waves m along the plate is shown in Figure 46 It can beseen that the minimum value of kσ is 4 and that this occurs whenever the buckles

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 141

are square (mbL = 1) as shown in Figure 47 In most structural steel membersthe aspect ratio Lb of the plate elements is large so that the value of the bucklingcoefficient kσ is always close to the minimum value of 4 The elastic bucklingstress can therefore be closely approximated by

σcr = π2E3(1 minus ν2)

(bt)2 (4108)

49 Worked examples

491 Example 1 ndash compression resistance ofa Class 4 compression member

Problem Determine the compression resistance of the cross-section of the membershown in Figure 431a The weld size is 8 mm

Classifying the section plate elements

tf = 10 mm tw = 10 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = (4002 minus 102 minus 8)(10 times 0814) T52

= 230 gt 14 and so the flange is Class 4 T52

cw(twε) = (420 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 8)(10 times 0814) T52

= 472 gt 42 and so the web is Class 4 T52

400

400

10

10

8 8 1070

1711 97

= 102

10

10

410

20

430

450

420

S355 steel

r

z

S355 steel S355 steel z

351

4

S355 steel z

1540

(a) Section of (b) Section of (c) Section of (d) Section of 356 times 171 UB 45 beam

A = 573 cm2

Wpl = 775 cm3

compression member box beam plate girder

Figure 431 Worked examples

142 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Effective flange area

kσ f = 043 EC3-1-5 T42

λp f = (4002 minus 102 minus 8)10

284 times 0814 times radic043

= 123 gt 0748 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρf = (123 minus 0188)1232 = 0687 EC3-1-5 44(2)

Aeff f = 0687 times 4 times (4002 minus 102 minus 8)times 10

+ (10 + 2 times 8)times 10 times 2 EC3-1-5 44(1)

= 5658 mm2

Effective web area

kσ w = 40 EC3-1-5 T41

λpw = (420 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 8)10

284 times 0814 times radic40

= 0831 gt 0673 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρw = 0831 minus 0055 times (3 + 1)08312 = 0885 EC3-1-5 44(2)

Aeff w = 0885times (420minus2times10minus2 times 8)times (10+8times10times2)

= 3558 mm2 EC3-1-5 44(1)

Compression resistance

Aeff = 5658 + 3558 = 9216 mm2

NcRd = 9216 times 35510 N = 3272 kN

492 Example 2 ndash section moment resistance of aClass 3 I-beam

Problem Determine the section moment resistance and examine the suitability forplastic design of the 356 times 171 UB 45 of S355 steel shown in Figure 431b

Classifying the section-plate elements

tf = 97 mm tw = 70 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = (17112 minus 702 minus 102)(97 times 0814) T52

= 91 gt 9 but lt 10 and so the flange is Class 2 T52

cw(twε) = (3514 minus 2 times 97 minus 2 times 102)(70 times 0814) T52

= 547 lt 72 and so the web is Class 1 T52

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 143

Section moment resistanceThe cross-section is Class 2 and therefore unsuitable for plastic design

McRd = 775 times 103 times 35510 N mm = 2751 kNm 625(2)

493 Example 3 ndash section moment resistance ofa Class 4 box beam

Problem Determine the section moment resistance of the welded-box sectionbeam of S355 steel shown in Figure 431c The weld size is 6 mm

Classifying the section-plate elements

tf = 10 mm tw = 8 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = 410(10 times 0814) T52

= 504 gt 42 and so the flange is Class 4 T52

cw(twε) = (430 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 6)(8 times 0814) T52

= 611 lt 72 and so the web is Class 1 T52

The cross-section is therefore Class 4 since the flange is Class 4

Effective cross-section

kσ = 40 EC3-1-5 T42

λp = 410

10 times 284 times 0814 times radic40

= 0887 gt 0673

EC3-1-5 44(2)

ψ = 1 EC3-1-5 T41

ρ = (0887 minus 0055 times (3 + 1))08872 = 0848 EC3-1-5 44(2)

bceff = 0848 times 410 = 3475 mm

Aeff = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 + (450 times 10)

+ 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8

= 14 935 mm2

14 935 times zc = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 times (430 minus 102)

+ 450 times 10 times 102 + 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8 times 4302

zc = 2062 mm

Ieff = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 times (430 minus 102 minus 2062)2

+ 450 times 10 times (2062 minus 102)2 + 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)3 times 812

+ 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8 times (4302 minus 2062)2 mm4

= 4601 times 106 mm4

144 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Section moment resistance

Weff min = 4601 times 106(430 minus 2062) = 2056 times 106 mm3

McRd = 2056 times 106 times 35510 Nmm = 7299 kNm 625(2)

494 Example 4 ndash section moment resistance of aslender plate girder

Problem Determine the section moment resistance of the welded plate girder ofS355 steel shown in Figure 431d The weld size is 6 mm

Solution

tf = 20 mm tw = 10 mm fyf = 345 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235345) = 0825 T52

cf (tf ε) = (4002 minus 102 minus 6)(20 times 0825) T52

= 115 gt 10 but lt 14 and so the flange is Class 3 T52

cw(twε) = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)(10 times 0825) T52

= 1803 gt 124 and so the web is Class 4 T52

A conservative approximation for the cross-section moment resistance may beobtained by ignoring the web completely so that

McRd = Mf = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 20)times 34510 Nmm = 4195 kNm

A higher resistance may be calculated by determining the effective width of theweb

ψ = minus1 EC3-1-5 T41

kσ = 239 EC3-1-5 T41

λp = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)10

284 times 0825 times radic239

= 1299 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρ = (1299 minus 0055 times (3 minus 1))12992 = 0705 EC3-1-5 44(2)

bc = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)1 minus (minus1) = 7440 mm EC3-1-5 T41

beff = 0705 times 7440 = 5244 mm EC3-1-5 T41

be1 = 04 times 5244 = 2098 mm EC3-1-5 T41

be2 = 06 times 5244 = 3146 mm EC3-1-5 T41

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 145

and the ineffective width of the web is

bc minus be1 minus be2 = 7440 minus 2098 minus 3146 = 2196 mm EC3-1-5 T41

Aeff = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2196)times 10 + 2 times 400 times 20

= 28 804 mm2

28 804 times zc = (2 times 400 times 20 + (1540 minus 2 times 20)times 10)times (15402)

minus 2196 times 10 times (1540 minus 20 minus 6 minus 2098 minus 21962)

zc = 7376 mm

Ieff = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 10 minus 7376)2

+ (400 times 20)times (7376 minus 10)2

+ (1540 minus 2 times 20)3 times 1012 + (1540 minus 2 times 20)

times 10 times (15402 minus 7376)2

minus 21963 times 1012 minus 2196

times 10 times (1540 minus 20 minus 6 minus 2098 minus 21962 minus 7376)2 mm4

= 1162 times 109 mm4

Weff = 1162 times 109(1540 minus 7376) = 1448 times 106 mm3

McRd = 1448 times 106 times 34510 Nmm = 4996 kNm

495 Example 5 ndash shear buckling resistance of anunstiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear buckling resistance of the unstiffened plate girderweb of S355 steel shown in Figure 431d

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

η = 12 EC3-1-5 51(2)

hw = 1540 minus 2 times 20 = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 F51

ηhw(twε) = 12 times 1500(10 times 0814)

= 2212 gt 72 and so the web is slender EC3-1-5 51(2)

ahw = infinhw = infin kτ st = 0 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

kτ = 534 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

146 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

τcr = 534 times 190 000 times (101500)2 = 451 Nmm2

EC3-1-5 A1(2)

λw = 076 times radic(355451) = 2132 gt 108 EC3-1-5 53(3)

Assuming that there is a non-rigid end post then

χw = 0832132 = 0389 EC3-1-5 T51

Neglecting any contribution from the flanges

VbRd = VbwRd = 0389 times 355 times 1500 times 10radic3 times 10

N = 1196 kN EC3-1-5 2(1)

496 Example 6 ndash shear buckling resistance of astiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear buckling resistance of the plate girder web of S355steel shown in Figure 431d if intermediate transverse stiffeners are placed at1800 mm spacing

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

hw = 1540 minus 2 times 20 = 1500 mm

ahw = 18001500 = 120 kτ st = 0 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

kτ = 534 + 4001202 = 812 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

τcr = 812 times 190 000 times (101500)2 = 686 Nmm2 EC3-1-5 A1(2)

Assuming that there is a rigid end post then

λw = 076 times radic(355686) = 173 gt 108 EC3-1-5 53(3)

χw = 137(07 + 173) = 0564 EC3-1-5 T51

Neglecting any contribution from the flanges

VbRd = VbwRd = 0564 times 355 times 1500 times 10radic3 times 10

N = 1734 kN

EC3-1-5 52(1)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 147

If the flange contribution is considered and MEd = 0

2 times (15εtf )+ tw = 2 times (15 times 0814 times 20)+ 10 EC3-1-5 54(1)

= 498 mm gt 400 mm and so bf = 400 mm EC3-1-5 54(1)

c = 1800 times(

025 + 16 times 400 times 202 times 345

10 times 15002 times 355

)= 4699 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

Vbf Rd = (400 times 202 times 345 times 10)(4699 times 10) N = 117 kNEC3-1-5 54(1)

VbRd = 1734 + 117 = 1851 kN EC3-1-5 52(1)

497 Anchor panel in a stiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear elastic buckling resistance of the end anchor panelof the welded stiffened plate girder of Section 496 if the width of the panel is1800 mm

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Using λw = 173 (Section 496) the shear elastic buckling resistance of the endpanel is

VpRd = (11732)times 355 times 1500 times 10(103 times radic3 times 10) N = 1027 kN

EC3-1-5 933(3)

498 Example 8 ndash intermediate transverse stiffener

Problem Check the adequacy of a pair of intermediate transverse web stiffeners100 times 16 of S460 steel for the plate girder of Section 496

SolutionUsing VEd = 1734 kN (Section 496) and VpRd = 1027 kN (Section 497)

the stiffener section must resist an axial force of

NEds = 1734 minus 1027 = 7064 kN EC3-1-5 933(3)

The stiffener section consists of the two stiffener plates and a length of the webdefined in Figure 91 of EC3-1-5 For the stiffener plates

tp = 16 mm fyp = 460 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235460) = 0715 T52

cp(tpε) = 100(16 times 0715) = 874 lt 9 T51

and so the plates are fully effective and the stiffener section is Class 1

148 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Using the lower of the web and plate yield stresses of fyw = 355 Nmm2 andε = 0814

Aeff s = 2 times (16 times 100)+ (2 times 15 times 0814 times 10 + 16)times 10

= 5801 mm2 EC3-1-5 F91

Ieff s = (2 times 100 + 10)3 times 1612 = 1235 times 106 mm4 EC3-1-5 F91

ieff s = radic (1235 times 1065801

) = 461 mm

λ1 = 939 times 0814 = 764 6313(1)

Lcr = 10 times 1500 = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 94(2)

λ = 1500(461 times 764) = 0426 6313(1)

For buckling curve c α = 049 EC3-1-5 94(2) T61

Φ = 05 times [1 + 049 times (0426 minus 02)+ 04262] = 06466312(1)

χ = 1[0646 + radic(06462 minus 04262)] = 0884 6312(1)

NbRd = 0884 times 5801 times 35510 N 6311(3)

= 1820 kN gt 7064 kN = NEds OK

ahw = 18001500 = 120 ltradic

2 EC3-1-5 933(3)

15h3wt3

wa2 = 15 times 15003 times 10318002 EC3-1-5 933(3)

= 1563 times 106 mm4 lt 1235 times 106 mm4 = Is OK

499 Example 9 ndash load-bearing stiffener

Problem Check the adequacy of a pair of load-bearing stiffeners 100 times 16 of S460steel which are above the support of the plate girder of Section 496 The flangesof the girder are not restrained by other structural elements against rotation Thegirder is supported on a stiff bearing ss = 300 mm long the end panel width is1000 mm and the design reaction is 1400 kN

Stiffener yield resistance

ts = 16 mm fy = 460 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235460) = 0715 T52

cs(tsε) = 100(16 times 0715) T51

= 874 lt 9 and so the stiffeners are fully effective T51

FsRd = 2 times (100 times 16)times 46010 N = 1472 kN

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 149

Unstiffened web resistance

kF = 2 + 6 times (300 + 0)1500 = 32 EC3-1-5 F61

Fcr = 09 times 32 times 210 000 times 1031500 N = 4032 kN EC3-1-5 64(1)

e = 32 times 210 000 times 102

2 times 355 times 1500= 631 mm lt 300 mm

= ss + c EC3-1-5 65(3)

m1 = (355 times 400)(355 times 10) = 40 EC3-1-5 65(1)

m2 = 002 times (150020)2 = 1125 EC3-1-5 65(1)

ly611 = 631 + 20 timesradic

402 + (63120)2 + 1125

= 3018 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

ly612 = 631 + 20 times radic40 + 1125

= 3101 mm gt 3018 mm = ly611 EC3-1-5 65(3)

ly = 301 8 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

λF =radic

3018 times 10 times 355

4032 times 103= 1630(gt05) EC3-1-5 64(1)

χF = 051630 = 0307 EC3-1-5 64(1)

Leff = 0307 times 3018 = 926 mm EC3-1-5 64(1)

FRd = 355 times 926 times 1010 N EC3-1-5 62(1)

= 3286 kN lt 1400 kN and so load bearing stiffeners are required

Stiffener buckling resistance

Aeff s = 2 times (16 times 100)+ (2 times 15 times 0814 times 10 + 16)times 10

= 5801 mm2 EC3-1-5 F91

Ieff s = (2 times 100 + 10)3 times 1612 = 1235 times 106 mm4 EC3-1-5 F91

ieff s = radic (1235 times 1065801

) = 461 mm

λ1 = 939 times 0814 = 764 6313(1)

Lcr = 10 times 1500 mm = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 94(2)

λ = 1500(461 times 764) = 0426 6313(1)

For buckling curve c α = 049 EC3-1-5 94(2) T61

Φ = 05 times [1 + 049 times (0426 minus 02)+ 04262] = 0646 6312(1)

χ = 1[0646 + radic(06462 minus 04262)] = 0884 6312(1)

NbRd = 0884 times 5801 times 35510 N = 1820 kN gt 1400 kN OK6311(3)

150 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

4910 Example 10 ndash shear and bending of a Class 2 beam

Problem Determine the design resistance of the 356 times 171 UB 45 of S355steel shown in Figure 431b at a point where the design moment is MEd =230 kNm

SolutionAs in Section 492 fy = 355 Nmm2 ε = 0814 η = 12 the flange is Class 2

and the web is Class 1 the section is Class 2 and Wpl = 775 cm3

Av = 573 times 102 minus 2 times 1711 times 97 + (70 + 2 times 102)times 97

= 2676 mm2 626(3)

η = 12 EC3-1-5 51(2)

ηhwtw = 12 times (3514 minus 2 times 97)times 70 = 2789 mm2 gt 2676 mm2

626(3)

VplRd = 2789 times (355radic

3)10 N = 5716 kN 626(2)

ηhw(twε) = 12 times (3514 minus 2 times 97)(70 times 0814) = 700 lt 72EC3-1-5 51(2)

so that shear buckling need not be consideredUsing a reduced bending resistance corresponding to MV Rd = MEd = 230

kNm then

(1 minus ρ)times 355 times 775 times 103 = 230 times 106 so that 628(3)

ρ = 0164

Now ρ = (2VEdVplRd minus 1)2 which leads to 628(3)

VcM RdVplRd = [radic(0164)+ 1]2 = 0702 so that

VcM Rd = 0702 times 5716 = 4015 kN

4911 Example 11 ndash shear and bending of a stiffenedplate girder

Problem Determine the shear resistance of the stiffened plate web girder of Section496 shown and shown in Figure 431d at the point where the design moment isMEd = 4000 kNm

SolutionAs previously fyf = 345 Nmm2 εf = 0825 and the flanges are Class 3

(Section 494) fyw = 345 Nmm2 and εw = 0814 (Section 495) and VbwRd =1733 kNm (Section 496)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 151

The resistance of the flanges to bending is

Mf Rd = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 20)times 34510 Nmm

= 4195 kNm gt 4000 kNm = MEd EC3-1-5 54(1)

and so the flange resistance is not completely utilised in resisting the bendingmoment

2 times (15εtf )+ tw = 2 times (15 times 0814 times 20)+ 10 = 498 mm gt 400 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

bf = 400 mm lt 498 mm EC3-1-5 54(1)

c = 1800 times(

025 + 16 times 400 times 202 times 345

10 times 15002 times 355

)= 4699 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

Vbf Rd = 400 times 202 times 355

4699 times 10times

[1 minus

(4000

4195

)2]

N = 11 kN

EC3-1-5 54(1)

VbwRd + Vbf Rd = 1733 + 11 = 1744 kN EC3-1-5 52(1)

410 Unworked examples

4101 Example 12 ndash elastic local buckling of a beam

Determine the elastic local buckling moment for the beam shown in Figure 432a

4102 Example 13 ndash elastic local buckling of a beam-column

Determine the elastic local buckling load for the beam-column shown inFigure 432b when MN = 20 mm

4103 Example 14 ndash section capacity of a welded box beam

Determine the section moment resistance for the welded box beam of S275 steelshown in Figure 432c

4104 Example 15 ndash designing a plate web girder

The overall depth of the laterally supported plate girder of S275 steel shown inFigure 432d must not exceed 1800 mm Design a constant section girder for the

152 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

150

10 mm6 mm

150 150600

(a) Beam section

Z = 139 times 10 mm

300

300

6 mm

(b) Beam-column section

300 times 6 mm

200 times 6 mm

(c) Box beam section

A B C

500 kN

15 000 mm 000 mm

(d) Plate girder

95 Nmm

10 mm

max6 3

Z = 091 times10 mmmin6 3

5

Figure 432 Unworked examples

factored loads shown and determine

(a) The flange proportions(b) The web thickness(c) The distribution of any intermediate stiffeners(d) The stiffener proportions and(e) The proportions and arrangements of any load-bearing stiffeners

References

1 Timoshenko SP and Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959) Theory of Plates and Shells2nd edition McGraw-Hill New York

2 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

3 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York4 Bulson PS (1970) The Stability of Flat Plates Chatto and Windus London5 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural Stability

Corona Tokyo6 Allen HG and Bulson PS (1980) Background to Buckling McGraw-Hill (UK)7 Basler K (1961) Strength of plate girders in shear Journal of the Structural Division

ASCE 87 No ST7 pp 151ndash808 Bradford MA Bridge RQ Hancock GJ Rotter JM and Trahair NS (1987)

Australian limit state design rules for the stability of steel structures Proceedings FirstStructural Engineering Conference Institution of Engineers Australia Melbournepp 209ndash16

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 153

9 Evans HR (1983) Longitudinally and transversely reinforced plate girders Chapter1 in Plated Structures Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied SciencePublishers London pp 1ndash37

10 Rockey KC and Skaloud M (1972) The ultimate load behaviour of plate girdersloaded in shear The Structural Engineer 50 No 1 pp 29ndash47

11 Usami T (1982) Postbuckling of plates in compression and bending Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 108 No ST3 pp 591ndash609

12 Kalyanaraman V and Ramakrishna P (1984) Non-uniformly compressed stiffenedelements Proceedings Seventh International Specialty Conference Cold-FormedStructures St Louis Department of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Rollapp 75ndash92

13 Merrison Committee of the Department of Environment (1973) Inquiry into theBasis of Design and Method of Erection of Steel Box Girder Bridges Her MajestyrsquosStationery Office London

14 Rockey KC (1971)An ultimate load method of design for plate girders Developmentsin Bridge Design and Construction (eds KC Rockey JL Bannister and HR Evans)Crosby Lockwood and Son London pp 487ndash504

15 Rockey KC El-Gaaly MA and Bagchi DK (1972) Failure of thin-walled mem-bers under patch loading Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST12pp 2739ndash52

16 Roberts TM (1981) Slender plate girders subjected to edge loading ProceedingsInstitution of Civil Engineers 71 Part 2 September pp 805ndash19

17 Roberts TM (1983) Patch loading on plate girders Chapter 3 in Plated Struc-tures Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied Science Publishers Londonpp 77ndash102

18 SA (1998) AS4100ndash1998 Steel Structures Standards Australia Sydney Australia

Chapter 5

In-plane bending of beams

51 Introduction

Beams are structural members which transfer the transverse loads they carry to thesupports by bending and shear actions Beams generally develop higher stressesthan axially loaded members with similar loads while the bending deflections aremuch higher These bending deflections of a beam are often therefore a primarydesign consideration On the other hand most beams have small shear deflectionsand these are usually neglected

Beam cross-sections may take many different forms as shown in Figure 51 andthese represent various methods of obtaining an efficient and economical mem-ber Thus most steel beams are not of solid cross-section but have their materialdistributed more efficiently in thin walls Thin-walled sections may be open andwhile these tend to be weak in torsion they are often cheaper to manufacture thanthe stiffer closed sections Perhaps the most economic method of manufacturingsteel beams is by hot-rolling but only a limited number of open cross-sections isavailable When a suitable hot-rolled beam cannot be found a substitute may befabricated by connecting together a series of rolled plates and this has becomeincreasingly common Fabricating techniques also allow the production of beamscompounded from hot-rolled members and plates and of hybrid members in whichthe flange material is of a higher yield stress than the web Tapered and castellatedbeams can also be fabricated from hot-rolled beams In many cases a steel beamis required to support a reinforced concrete slab and in this case its strength maybe increased by connecting the steel and concrete together so that they act com-positely The fire resistance of a steel beam may also be increased by encasing itin concrete The final member cross-section chosen will depend on its suitabilityfor the use intended and on the overall economy

The strength of a steel beam in the plane of loading depends on its sectionproperties and on its yield stress fy When bending predominates in a determinatebeam the effective ultimate strength is reached when the most highly stressedcross-section becomes fully yielded so that it forms a plastic hinge The momentMp at which this occurs is somewhat higher than the first yield moment My at whichelastic behaviour nominally ceases as shown in Figure 52 and for hot-rolled

In-plane bending of beams 155

Solid section Rolled section

Cut

WeldTapered I-beam

Composite beam

Encased beam

Castellated I-beam

WeldWeld

Compoundsection

Fabricatedsection

Cut

Reverse

Shearconnector

Thin-walledopen section

Thin-walledclosed section

Weld

Displace

Figure 51 Beam types

M

2

2

d

d

x

w

Rigid plastic assumption

MpMy 4

5

1

Effect of residual stresses

(d) Momentndashcurvature relationships

3

2

2

d

d

x

w

1 2 3 4 5

fy fy fy fy

(c) Stress distributions

First yield 2

Elastic Firstyield

Strain-hardened

Fullyplastic

Elastic-plastic

Figure 52 Momentndashcurvature relationships for steel beams

I-beams this margin varies between 10 and 20 approximately The attainmentof the first plastic hinge forms the basis for the traditional method of design ofbeams in which the bending moment distribution is calculated from an elasticanalysis

156 In-plane bending of beams

However in an indeterminate beam a substantial redistribution of bendingmoment may occur after the first hinge forms and failure does not occur untilsufficient plastic hinges have formed to cause the beam to become a mechanismThe load which causes this mechanism to form provides the basis for the morerational method of plastic design

When shear predominates as in some heavily loaded deep beams of short spanthe ultimate strength is controlled by the shear force which causes complete plas-tification of the web In the more common sections this is close to the shear forcewhich causes the nominal first yield in shear and so the shear design is carriedout for the shear forces determined from an elastic analysis In this chapter thein-plane behaviour and design of beams are discussed It is assumed that neitherlocal buckling (which is treated in Chapter 4) nor lateral buckling (which is treatedin Chapter 6) occurs Beams with axial loads are discussed in Chapter 7 while thetorsion of beams is treated in Chapter 10

52 Elastic analysis of beams

The design of a steel beam is often preceded by an elastic analysis of the bendingof the beam One purpose of such an analysis is to determine the bending momentand shear force distributions throughout the beam so that the maximum bend-ing moments and shear forces can be found and compared with the moment andshear capacities of the beam An elastic analysis is also required to determine thedeflections of the beam so that these can be compared with the desirable limitingvalues

The data required for an elastic analysis include both the distribution and themagnitudes of the applied loads and the geometry of the beam In particular thevariation along the beam of the effective second moment of area I of the cross-section is needed to determine the deflections of the beam and to determine themoments and shears when the beam is statically indeterminate For this purposelocal variations in the cross-section such as those due to bolt holes may be ignoredbut more general variations including any general reductions arising from theuse of the effective width concept for excessively thin compression flanges (seeSection 4222) should be allowed for

The bending moments and shear forces in statically determinate beams can bedetermined by making use of the principles of static equilibrium These are fullydiscussed in standard textbooks on structural analysis [1 2] as are various methodsof analysing the deflections of such beams On the other hand the conditions ofstatics are not sufficient to determine the bending moments and shear forces instatically indeterminate beams and the conditions of compatibility between thevarious elements of the beam or between the beam and its supports must alsobe used This is done by analysing the deflections of the statically indeterminatebeam Many methods are available for this analysis both manual and computerand these are fully described in standard textbooks [3ndash8] These methods can also

In-plane bending of beams 157

MS = MA ndash MB MS = qL2 8 MS = QL 4 MS = QL 3 MS = QL 4

k = 298 k = k = k = k = 496 397 507 546

L2

MA

L L L2

qQ Q Q QQ

(a) Mid-span deflection wc

(b) Moments MS and deflection coefficients k

and units wc = kMS L

2I wc ndash mm

MS ndash kNm L ndash m I ndash cm4

L3 L3 L3 L4 L2 L4

MB

Figure 53 Mid-span deflections of steel beams

be used to analyse the behaviour of structural frames in which the member axialforces are small

While the deflections of beams can be determined accurately by using themethods referred to above it is often sufficient to use approximate estimatesfor comparison with the desirable maximum values Thus in simply supported orcontinuous beams it is usually accurate enough to use the mid-span deflection(see Figure 53) The mid-span deflection wc (measured relative to the level of theleft-hand support) depends on the distribution of the applied load the end momentsMA and MB (taken as clockwise positive) and the sinking wAB of the right-handsupport below the left-hand support and can be expressed as

wc = kMS + 298(MA minus MB)L2

I+ wAB

2 (51)

In this equation the deflections wc and wAB are expressed in mm the momentsMS MA MB are in kNm the span L is in m and the second moment of area I is incm4 Expressions for the simple beam moments MS and values of the coefficientsk are given in Figure 53 for a number of loading distributions These can becombined together to find the central deflections caused by many other loadingdistributions

53 Bending stresses in elastic beams

531 Bending in a principal plane

The distribution of the longitudinal bending stresses σ in an elastic beam bent in aprincipal plane xz can be deduced from the experimentally confirmed assumptionthat plane sections remain substantially plane during bending provided any shearlag effects which may occur in beams with very wide flanges (see Section 545)

158 In-plane bending of beams

are negligible Thus the longitudinal strains ε vary linearly through the depth ofthe beam as shown in Figure 54 as do the longitudinal stresses σ It is shown inSection 581 that the moment resultant My of these stresses is

My = minusEIyd2w

dx2(52)

where the sign conventions for the moment My and the deflection w are as shownin Figure 55 and that the stress at any point in the section is

σ = Myz

Iy(53)

in which tensile stresses are positive In particular the maximum stresses occur atthe extreme fibres of the cross-section and are given by

in compression and

σmax = MyzT

Iy= minus My

WelyT

σmax = MyzB

Iy= My

WelyB

(54)

in tension in which WelyT = minus IyzT and WelyB = IyzB are the elastic sectionmoduli for the top and bottom fibres respectively for bending about the y axis

The corresponding equations for bending in the principal plane xy are

Mz = EIzd2v

dx2(55)

where the sign conventions for the moment Mz and the deflection v are also shownin Figure 55

σ = minusMzyIz (56)

(c) Strains

δx δx

δx

(b) Bending (a) Cross-section (d) Stresses

= E

=

= ndash

zdAA

(e) Moment resultant

y

ndashzT

z

My

z2

2

dd

xwEI

M

y

y

x

w

d

d2

2

My

zB

z

C

b

Figure 54 Elastic bending of beams

In-plane bending of beams 159

z w

xC

y v

xCMy

My

Mz

Mz

C

y

z

x

+ve My

ndashve d2wdx2

+ve Mz

+ve d2vdx

(b) Curvature in xz plane

(c) Curvature in xy plane(a) Positive bending actions

Figure 55 Bending sign conventions

andσmax = MzWelzL

σmax = minusMzWelzR

(57)

in which WelzL = minus IzyL and WelzR = IzyR are the elastic section moduli forbending about the z axis

Values of Iy Iz Welz Welz for hot-rolled steel sections are given in [9] whilevalues for other sections can be calculated as indicated in Section 59 or in standardtextbooks [1 2] Expressions for the properties of some thin-walled sections aregiven in Figure 56 [10] When a section has local holes or excessive widths (seeSection 4222) these properties may need to be reduced accordingly

Worked examples of the calculation of cross-section properties are given inSections 5121ndash5124

532 Biaxial bending

When a beam deflects only in a plane xz1 which is not a principal plane (seeFigure 57a) so that its curvature d2v1d x2 in the perpendicular xy1 plane is zerothen the bending stresses

σ = minusEz1d2w1dx2 (58)

have moment resultants

andMy1 = minusEIy1d2w1dx2

Mz1 = minusEIy1z1d2w1dx2

(59)

160 In-plane bending of beams

b1

2b

b33t

2t

1t

y

z

1b

1t

2t3b3t

3t

z

y

1b = b2

dt

A

I

I

y

z

y

z

0

0

A + A + A

A z + I

I + I

I b12

12

z

A z + z t

A bnsum2

n 4

0

b

3

2

3

3

321

nnsum3

1

2

sum2

n pn pn 2)(

I I12( )Iz2

A ndashndash ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash A12( )A2

A + A + A321

A z +1 A z +21 2

22

2

2

(

]

2

2 2

SectionGeometry

Wply12

Wplz12

Wely12

Welz12

Iy z

bn3tn 12

A z +323 2I3

I + I + A b 21 21 2 3

I zny

I b1z2

A z + z t3sum2

n pn pn )(

A bnsum2

n 4 + A b13

0

b3I I12( )

Iz2

A A12( )

A2

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

t

t3 8

t3 8

t2 4

t2 4

t2

d t2

0

0

An = b tnn In=

z1 2 = b A + A3 2 1 2) A3

z3 = ( )z z2 1 2

zpn=[0 A An2( )2t3le le b3

Figure 56a Thin-walled section properties

where Iy1z1 is the product second moment of area (see Section 59) Thus theresultant bending moment

M = radic(M 2

y1 + M 2z1

) (510)

is inclined to the xz1 plane of the bending deflections as shown in Figure 57aThe simplest method of analysing this or any other biaxial bending situation is

to replace the moments My1 Mz1 by their principal plane static equivalents My

In-plane bending of beams 161

b1

1b

2b

2b

2b

2b

1b

3b

3b

b3b3

3t

1t

1t t t

y

y

y

z

z

z

SectionGeometry

A 2A +

+ + +++

A3

A2

1 2 A 2sumA+2 A + A321 22 n

sumA2 n

I

I

y

z

y

y1

y2

y3

yp

z

0

0

Wply

Wplz

Wely

Welz

A b 2 2 22

31

A b 23 b

3b

22

1I3

I3 I2 ndash( ) A2 b3

b2

2ndash( 2)

4 +

sumI2

n+

A3 b3

2

2A1y12 +A3y3

2 +2I1 2A1y12 +2A2y2

2 + A3y32+2I1 A2b3

2 4 + A3b224

2Iyb3

Iz(b1 ndash y3) and Izy3

A1b3 + A3b34 A1b3 + A2(b3 ndash b2) + A3b34

(b1 ndash yp)2t1 + yp

2t1+A3yp

A1 b32b1

b1A32A

b1A1A

(A ndash 2 A3)4t1 ge 0 (A ndash 2 A3)4t ge 0

An= bntn In = bn3 tn12

(b1 + 2b2)A1A

b12 ndash y3

b1 ndash y3

4Iy y3

+ (b3 yp)t

ndash 8b233

(b1 ndash yp)2 + yp2 +2b2(b1 ndash yp)

Izy2 and Izy3

2Iyb3

+

0 0 0

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

y3 +b32(b1 + 2b2) A1

4Iy

radic2Iyb3

2radic2Iz(b2+b3)

(b32+2b2 b3 ndash b2

2)t2radic2

(b2+b3)2t2radic2

3radic2Iy

(b2+b3) 2radic2+ (3b3ndash2b2)b2

2b3t

Figure 56b Thin-walled section properties

Mz calculated from

My = My1 cosα + Mz1 sin αMz = minusMy1 sin α + Mz1 cosα

(511)

162 In-plane bending of beams

M

M

y

y1 (v1 = 0)

Plane of moment

My

Mz

Mz1

y

z1

zz1

z

zM 1

My1

My1y1

Principalplanes

(a) Deflection in a non-principal plane (b) Principal plane moments My Mz

Plane ofdeflection

Figure 57 Bending in a non-principal plane

zw

x

y v

x

y

z

q

C

qy ( ) +

ndash~

+

+

+

qz ( )

My

Mz ve

(b) Bending My in xz plane qy ( )

qz ( )

(a) Section and loading (c) Bending Mz in xy plane

+ ve

Figure 58 Biaxial bending of a zed beam

in which α is the angle between the y1 z1 axes and the principal y z axes as shownin Figure 57b The bending stresses can then be determined from

σ = Myz

Iyminus Mzy

Iz (512)

in which Iy Iz are the principal second moments of area If the values of α Iy Iz

are unknown they can be determined from Iy1 Iz1 Iy1z1 as shown in Section 59Care needs to be taken to ensure that the correct signs are used for My and Mz

in equation 512 as well as for y and z For example if the zed section shown inFigure 58a is simply supported at both ends with a uniformly distributed load qacting in the plane of the web then its principal plane components qy qz causepositive bending My and negative bending Mz as indicated in Figure 58b and c

In-plane bending of beams 163

The deflections of the beam can also be determined from the principal planemoments by solving equations 52 and 55 in the usual way [1ndash8] for the principalplane deflections w and v and by adding these vectorially

Worked examples of the calculation of the elastic stresses and deflections in anangle section cantilever are given in Section 5125

54 Shear stresses in elastic beams

541 Solid cross-sections

A vertical shear force Vz acting parallel to the minor principal axis z of a section ofa beam (see Figure 59a) induces shear stresses τxy τxz in the plane of the sectionIn solid section beams these are usually assumed to act parallel to the shear force(ie τxy = 0) and to be uniformly distributed across the width of the section asshown in Figure 59a The distribution of the vertical shear stresses τxz can bedetermined by considering the horizontal equilibrium of an element of the beamas shown in Figure 59b Because the bending normal stresses σ vary with x theycreate an imbalance of force in the x direction which can only be compensatedfor by the horizontal shear stresses τzx = τv which are equal to the vertical shearstresses τxz It is shown in Section 5101 that the stress τv at a distance z2 fromthe centroid where the section width is b2 is given by

τv = minus Vz

Iyb2

int z2

zT

bzdz (513)

y

z

x

V

ndash z

z

bx2

z

b

z

T

2

bδz

x+ )(

+z

)(

(b) Horizontal equilibrium(a) Assumed shear stress distribution

Shear stresses vparallel to shearforce Vz and constantacross width of section

vbδx

δx

bδzδx

(vb)vb

δz

δzpart

part

partpart

Figure 59 Shear stresses in a solid section

164 In-plane bending of beams

This can also be expressed as

τv = minusVzA2z2

Iyb2(514)

in which A2 is the area above b2 and z2 is the height of its centroidFor the particular example of the rectangular section beam of width b and depth

d shown in Figure 510a the width is constant and so equation 513 becomes

τv = Vz

bd

(15 minus 6z2

d2

) (515)

This shear stress distribution is parabolic as shown in Figure 510b and has amaximum value at the y axis of 15 times of average shear stress Vzbd

The shear stresses calculated from equations 513 or 514 are reasonably accuratefor solid cross-sections except near the unstressed edges where the shear stress isparallel to the edge rather than to the applied shear force

542 Thin-walled open cross-sections

The shear stress distributions in thin-walled open-section beams differ from thosegiven by equations 513 or 514 for solid section beams in that the shear stressesare parallel to the wall of the section as shown in Figure 511a instead of parallelto the applied shear force Because of the thinness of the walls it is quite accurateto assume that the shear stresses are uniformly distributed across the thickness t ofthe thin-walled section Their distribution can be determined by considering thehorizontal equilibrium of an element of the beam as shown in Figure 511b It isshown in Section 5102 that the stress τv at a distance s from the end of the section

b

y

z z

d

Vz

15Vz bd

(a) Cross-section (b) Shear stress distribution

v

Figure 510 Shear stress distribution in a rectangular section

In-plane bending of beams 165

t

yy

zV

0

z

O

C

E

xy

z

x

+

st

)(δx δsδxv

tδx

δx

v

t

tδs

δs δx t δs

δs

tv

v

(a) Shear stress distribution (b) Horizontal equilibrium

partpart

partxpart

Figure 511 Shear stresses in a thin-walled open section

caused by a vertical shear force Vz can be obtained from the shear flow

τvt = minusVz

Iy

int s

0ztds (516)

This can also be expressed as

τv = minusVzAszs

Iyt(517)

in which As is the area from the free end to the point s and zs is the height of thecentroid of this area above the point s

At a junction in the cross-section wall such as that of the top flange and theweb of the I-section shown in Figures 512 and 513 horizontal equilibrium of thezero area junction element requires

(τvtf )21δx + (τvtf )23δx = (τvtw)24δx (518)

This can be thought of as an analogous flow continuity condition for the corre-sponding shear flows in each cross-section element at the junction as shown inFigure 513c so that

(τvtf )21 + (τvtf )23 = (τvtw)24 (519)

which is a particular example of the general junction conditionsum(τvt) = 0 (520)

in which each shear flow is now taken as positive if it acts towards the junction

166 In-plane bending of beams

b

dy

sf

f

f

t sw

wt

z

1 2 3

45 6

42

btdIVvtw

ff

y

z

4==

42

2btdIVvtw

ff

y

zIV

y

z8td wf

= +

btdIV

vtfff

y

z

(b) Shear flow distribution(a) I-section

Figure 512 Shear flow distribution in an I-section

0

12

3

4

y

z

x

V

2

2

2z

4

1 2 3

0

0

My

My My+

(c) Flow analogy(b) Flange-web junction

(a) Sign of shear flow

δx

δ

δA

(+δ)δA

(tf)21δx

(tw)24δx

(tf)23δx

(tw)24

(tf)23(tf)21

(tw)24δx

tf δx

Figure 513 Horizontal equilibrium considerations for shear flow

Afree end of a cross-section element is the special case of a one-element junctionfor which equation 520 reduces to

τvt = 0 (521)

This condition has already been used (at s = 0) in deriving equation 516

In-plane bending of beams 167

An example of the analysis of the shear flow distribution in the I-section beamshown in Figure 512a is given in Section 5126 The shear flow distributionis shown in Figure 512b It can be seen that the shear stress in the web is nearlyconstant and equal to its average value

τv(av) = Vz

df tw (522)

which provides the basis for the commonly used assumption that the applied shearis resisted only by the web A similar result is obtained for the shear stress in theweb of the channel section shown in Figure 514 and analysed in Section 5127

When a horizontal shear force Vy acts parallel to the y axis additional shearstresses τh parallel to the walls of the section are induced These can be obtainedfrom the shear flow

τht = minusVy

Iz

int s

0ytds (523)

which is similar to equation 517 for the shear flow due to a vertical shear forceA worked example of the calculation of the shear flow distribution caused by ahorizontal shear force is given in Section 5128

y

z+

CS

ya

t

b

w

0

df

tf

tf

vf

Vf

Vw

btfIy Iydf tf

df tf b df twVz Vzb

2

2

82

2

+=wv t

Iy

df tf bVz

2=fv t

Iy

df tf bVz

2=wv t

(a) Shear flow due to shear force Vz (b) Shear centre and flange and web shears

Figure 514 Shear flow distribution in a channel section

168 In-plane bending of beams

543 Shear centre

The shear stresses τv induced by the vertical shear force Vz exert a torque equalto intE

0 τvtρds about the centroid C of the thin-walled cross-section as shown inFigure 515 and are therefore statically equivalent to a vertical shear force Vz

which acts at a distance y0 from the centroid equal to

y0 = 1

Vz

int E

0τvtρds (524)

Similarly the shear stresses τh induced by the horizontal shear force Vy arestatically equivalent to a horizontal shear force Vy which acts at a distance z0 fromthe centroid equal to

z0 = minus 1

Vy

int E

0τhtρds (525)

The coordinates y0 z0 define the position of the shear centre S of the cross-sectionthrough which the resultant of the bending shear stresses must act When anyapplied load does not act through the shear centre as shown in Figure 516then it induces another set of shear stresses in the section which are additionalto those caused by the changes in the bending normal stresses described above(see equations 516 and 523) These additional shear stresses are statically equiv-alent to the torque exerted by the eccentric applied load about the shear centreThey can be calculated as shown in Sections 10214 and 10312

s

t

y

z

V

y0

CE

O

z

vtδs

δs

Figure 515 Moment of shear stress τv about centroid

In-plane bending of beams 169

e

y

z

Vz

Vz

VzeS

C y

z

S

C y

z

S

C+

+Pure bendingBending shear stresses

Off shear centreloading

Pure torsionTorsion shear stresses

Figure 516 Off shear centre loading

Centroid C Shear centre S

Figure 517 Centroids and shear centres

The position of the shear centre of the channel section shown in Figure 514 isdetermined in Section 5128 Its y0 coordinate is given by

y0 = d2f tf b2

4Iy+ b2tf

2btf + df tw(526)

while its z0 coordinate is zero because the section is symmetrical about the y axisIn Figure 517 the shear centres of a number of thin-walled open sections are

compared with their centroids It can be seen that

(a) if the section has an axis of symmetry then the shear centre and centroid lieon it

170 In-plane bending of beams

(b) if the section is of a channel type then the shear centre lies outside the weband the centroid inside it and

(c) if the section consists of a set of concurrent rectangular elements (tees anglesand cruciforms) then the shear centre lies at the common point

A general matrix method for analysing the shear stress distributions and fordetermining the shear centres of thin-walled open-section beams has been prepared[11 12]

Worked examples of the determination of the shear centre position are given inSections 5128 and 51210

544 Thin-walled closed cross-sections

The shear stress distribution in a thin-walled closed-section beam is similar tothat in an open-section beam except that there is an additional constant shearflow τvct around the section This additional shear flow is required to prevent anydiscontinuity in the longitudinal warping displacements u which arise from theshear straining of the walls of the closed sections To show this consider the slitrectangular box whose shear flow distribution τvot due to a vertical shear force Vz isas shown in Figure 518a Because the beam is not twisted the longitudinal fibresremain parallel to the centroidal axis so that the transverse fibres rotate throughangles τvoG equal to the shear strain in the wall as shown in Figure 519 Theserotations lead to the longitudinal warping displacements u shown in Figure 518bthe relative warping displacement at the slit being

int E0 (τvoG)ds

b

df

Vz

y

yz

z

x

E

E

y0

C

C

S

S

O

O

Slit

EvoG

0

ds

(b) Warping displacements due to shear stress

Relative warpingdisplacement

(a) Shear flow vo t

Figure 518 Warping of a slit box

In-plane bending of beams 171

v

v v

v

x

s

G

Projection of s x axes onto plane ofelementδs times δx

δsδu

δs

δx=

Change in warpingdisplacement due toshear strain

Element δs times δx times t

Figure 519 Warping displacements due to shear

b

y

z

= +

Thickness tw

Thickness tf

df Vz

(a) Circulating shear flow vc t(slit box shear flow vo t

shown in Fig 518a)

v t vc t vo t (b) Total shear flow

Figure 520 Shear stress distribution in a rectangular box

However when the box is not slit as shown in Figure 520 this relative warpingdisplacement must be zero Thus

∮τv

Gds = 0 (527)

in which total shear stress τv can be considered as the sum

τv = τvc + τvo (528)

of the slit box shear stress τvo (see Figure 518a) and the shear stress τvc due to aconstant shear flow τvct circulating around the closed section (see Figure 520a)Alternatively equation 516 for the shear flow in an open section can be modified

172 In-plane bending of beams

for the closed section to

τvt = τvct minus Vz

Iy

int s

0ztds (529)

since it can no longer be said that τv is zero at s = 0 this not being a free end (theclosed section has no free ends) Mathematically τvct is a constant of integrationSubstituting equation 528 or 529 into equation 527 leads to

τvct = minus∮τvods∮(1t)ds

(530)

which allows the circulating shear flow τvct to be determinedThe shear stress distribution in any single-cell closed section can be obtained

by using equations 529 and 530 The shear centre of the section can then bedetermined by using equations 524 and 525 as for open sections For the particularcase of the rectangular box shown in Figure 520

τvct = Vz

Iy

(d2

f tw

8+ df tf b

4

) (531)

and the resultant shear flow shown in Figure 520b is symmetrical because of thesymmetry of the cross-section while the shear centre coincides with the centroid

A worked example of the calculation of the shear stresses in a thin-walled closedsection is given in Section 51211

The shear stress distributions in multi-cell closed sections can be determinedby extending this method as indicated in Section 5103 A general matrix methodof analysing the shear flows in thin-walled closed sections has been described[11 12] This can be used for both open and closed sections including compositeand asymmetric sections and sections with open and closed parts It can also beused to determine the centroid principal axes section constants and the bendingnormal stress distribution

545 Shear lag

In the conventional theory of bending shear strains are neglected so that it can beassumed that plane sections remain plane after loading From this assumptionfollow the simple linear distributions of the bending strains and stresses dis-cussed in Section 53 and from these the shear stress distributions discussed inSections 541ndash544 The term shear lag [13] is related to some of the discrep-ancies between this approximate theory of the bending of beams and their realbehaviour and in particular refers to the increases of the bending stresses near theflange-to-web junctions and the corresponding decreases in the flange stressesaway from these junctions

The shear lag effects near the mid-point of the simply supported centrally loadedI-section beam shown in Figure 521a are illustrated in Figure 522 The shear

In-plane bending of beams 173

Q

Q2

Q2

(+)

(ndash)

Warping displacementsdue to positive shear

Warping displacementsdue to negative shear

(b) Warping displacements calculated from conventional theory

(a) Beam and shear for diagram

Q2

Q2

Figure 521 Incompatible warping displacements at a shear discontinuity

Real behaviour

Approximateconventionaltheory

Real behaviour

(b) Shear flow distribution(a) Bending stress distribution

Approximateconventionaltheory

Figure 522 Shear lag effects in an I-section beam

stresses calculated by the conventional theory are as shown in Figure 523a andthese induce the warping (longitudinal) displacements shown in Figure 523b Thewarping displacements of the web are almost linear and these are responsible forthe shear deflections [13] which are usually neglected when calculating the beamrsquosdeflections The warping displacements of the flanges vary parabolically and itis these which are responsible for most of the shear lag effect The applicationof the conventional theory of bending at either side of a point in a beam where

174 In-plane bending of beams

y

z

x

C

(b) Warping displacements due to shear

(a) Shear flow due to a vertical shear Vz

Approximate shear flow givenby conventional theory

Figure 523 Warping of an I-section beam

there is a sudden change in the shear force such as at the mid-point of the beamof Figure 521a leads to two different distributions of warping displacement asshown in Figure 521b These are clearly incompatible and so changes are requiredin the bending stress distribution (and consequently in the shear stress distribution)to remove the incompatibility These changes which are illustrated in Figure 522constitute the shear lag effect

Shear lag effects are usually very small except near points of high concentratedload or at reaction points in short-span beams with thin wide flanges In particularshear lag effects may be significant in light-gauge cold-formed sections [14]and in stiffened box girders [15ndash17] Shear lag has no serious consequences ina ductile structure in which any premature local yielding leads to a favourableredistribution of stress However the increased stresses due to shear lag may beof consequence in a tension flange which is liable to brittle fracture or fatiguedamage or in a compression flange whose strength is controlled by its resistanceto local buckling

An approximate method of dealing with shear lag is to use an effective widthconcept in which the actual width b of a flange is replaced by a reduced widthbeff given by

beff

b= nominal bending stress

maximum bending stress (532)

This is equivalent to replacing the actual flange bending stresses by constantstresses which are equal to the actual maximum stress and distributed over theeffective flange area beff times t Some values of effective widths are given in [14ndash16]

In-plane bending of beams 175

This approach is similar to that used to allow for the redistribution of stress whichtakes place in a thin compression flange after local buckling (see Chapter 4) How-ever the two effects of shear lag and local buckling are quite distinct and shouldnot be confused

55 Plastic analysis of beams

551 General

As the load on a ductile steel beam is increased the stresses in the beam alsoincrease until the yield stress is reached With further increases in the load yieldingspreads through the most highly strained cross-section of the beam until it becomesfully plastic at a moment Mp At this stage the section forms a plastic hinge whichallows the beam segments on either side to rotate freely under the moment MpIf the beam was originally statically determinate this plastic hinge reduces it to amechanism and prevents it from supporting any additional load

However if the beam was statically indeterminate the plastic hinge does notreduce it to a mechanism and it can support additional load This additional loadcauses a redistribution of the bending moment during which the moment at theplastic hinge remains fixed at Mp while the moment at another highly strainedcross-section increases until it forms a plastic hinge This process is repeated untilenough plastic hinges have formed to reduce the beam to a mechanism The beamis then unable to support any further increase in load and its ultimate strength isreached

In the plastic analysis of beams this mechanism condition is investigated todetermine the ultimate strength The principles and methods of plastic analysis arefully described in many textbooks [18ndash24] and so only a brief summary is givenin the following sub-sections

552 The plastic hinge

The bending stresses in an elastic beam are distributed linearly across any section ofthe beam as shown in Figure 54 and the bending moment M is proportional to thecurvature minusd2wdx2 (see equation 52) However once the yield strain εy = fyE(see Figure 524) of a steel beam is exceeded the stress distribution is no longerlinear as indicated in Figure 52c Nevertheless the strain distribution remainslinear and so the inelastic bending stress distributions are similar to the basicstressndashstrain relationship shown in Figure 524 provided the influence of shearon yielding can be ignored (which is a reasonable assumption for many I-sectionbeams) The moment resultant M of the bending stresses is no longer proportionalto the curvature minusd2wdx2 but varies as shown in Figure 52d Thus the sectionbecomes elastic-plastic when the yield moment My = fyWel is exceeded and thecurvature increases rapidly as yielding progresses through the section At highcurvatures the limiting situation is approached for which the section is completely

176 In-plane bending of beams

0 sty

Stress

Plastic Strain-hardened

Est

Strain

Rigid plasticassumption

Elastic E

fy

Figure 524 Idealised stressndashstrain relationships for structural steel

yielded at the fully plastic moment

Mp = fyWpl (533)

where Wpl is the plastic section modulus Methods of calculating the fully plasticmoment Mp are discussed in Section 5111 and worked examples are given inSections 51212 and 51213 For solid rectangular sections the shape factorWplWel is 15 but for rolled I-sections WplWel varies between 11 and 12approximately Values of Wpl for hot-rolled I-section members are given in [9]

In real beams strain-hardening commences just before Mp is reached and thereal momentndashcurvature relationship rises above the fully plastic limit of Mp asshown in Figure 52d On the other hand high shear forces cause small reductionsin Mp below fyWpl due principally to reductions in the plastic bending capacityof the web This effect is discussed in Section 452

The approximate approach of the momentndashcurvature relationship shown inFigure 52d to the fully plastic limit forms the basis of the simple rigid-plasticassumption for which the basic stressndashstrain relationship is replaced by the rect-angular block shown by the dashed line in Figure 524 Thus elastic strainsare completely ignored as are the increased stresses due to strain-hardeningThis assumption ignores the curvature of any elastic and elasticndashplastic regions(M ltMp) and assumes that the curvature becomes infinite at any point whereM = Mp

The consequences of the rigid-plastic assumption on the theoretical behaviourof a simply supported beam with a central concentrated load are shown inFigures 525 and 526 In the real beam shown in Figure 525a there is a finitelength of the beam which is elastic-plastic and in which the curvatures are largewhile the remaining portions are elastic and have small curvatures Howeveraccording to the rigid-plastic assumption the curvature becomes infinite at mid-span when this section becomes fully plastic (M = Mp) while the two halves ofthe beam have zero curvature and remain straight as shown in Figure 525b The

In-plane bending of beams 177

Qult = 4Mp L Qult = 4Mp L

Plastichinge

(b) Rigid-plastic beam(a) Real beam

Qult Qult

13

Rigid Rigid

Curvature

Deflectedshape

Beam

Elastic Elastic

Elastic-plasticinfin

Figure 525 Beam with full plastic moment Mp at mid-span

Q

Q

1

2

3 4

5

0

Mp

My 12

34

5

Real

(b) Bending moment

Elastic

Strain-hardened Fully plastic

Elasticndashplastic First yield

Rigidndashplastic

(c) Deflection

(a) Beam

L2L2

Figure 526 Behaviour of a simply supported beam

infinite curvature at mid-span causes a finite change θ in the beam slope and sothe deflected shape of the rigid-plastic beam closely approximates that of the realbeam despite the very different curvature distributions The successive stages inthe development of the bending moment diagram and the central deflection of thebeam as the load is increased are summarised in Figure 526b and c

178 In-plane bending of beams

M M

MM

Mp

(b) Frictionless hinge(a ) Pl a s tic h i n g e s

Behaviour

1313

1313

00

Hinges

Figure 527 Plastic hinge behaviour

The infinite curvature at the point of full plasticity and the finite slope changeθ predicted by the rigid-plastic assumption lead to the plastic hinge concept illus-trated in Figure 527a The plastic hinge can assume any slope change θ once thefull plastic moment Mp has been reached This behaviour is contrasted with thatshown in Figure 527b for a frictionless hinge which can assume any slope changeθ at zero moment

It should be noted that when the full plastic moment Mp of the simply supportedbeam shown in Figure 526a is reached the rigid-plastic assumption predicts thata two-bar mechanism will be formed by the plastic hinge and the two frictionlesssupport hinges as shown in Figure 525b and that the beam will deform freelywithout any further increase in load as shown in Figure 526c Thus the ultimateload of the beam is

Qult = 4MpL (534)

which reduces the beam to a plastic collapse mechanism

553 Moment redistribution in indeterminate beams

The increase in the full plastic moment Mp of a beam over its nominal first yieldmoment My is accounted for in elastic design (ie design based on an elasticanalysis of the bending of the beam) by the use of Mp for the moment capacityof the cross-section Thus elastic design might be considered to be lsquofirst hingersquodesign However the feature of plastic design which distinguishes it from elasticdesign is that it takes into account the favourable redistribution of the bendingmoment which takes place in an indeterminate structure after the first hinge formsThis redistribution may be considerable and the final load at which the collapse

In-plane bending of beams 179

mechanism forms may be significantly higher than that at which the first hinge isdeveloped Thus a first hinge design based on an elastic analysis of the bendingmoment may significantly underestimate the ultimate strength

The redistribution of bending moment is illustrated in Figure 528 for a built-inbeam with a concentrated load at a third point This beam has two redundan-cies and so three plastic hinges must form before it can be reduced to a collapsemechanism According to the rigid-plastic assumption all the bending momentsremain proportional to the load until the first hinge forms at the left-hand sup-port A at Q = 675MpL As the load increases further the moment at this hingeremains constant at Mp while the moments at the load point and the right-handsupport increase until the second hinge forms at the load point B at Q = 868MpLThe moment at this hinge then remains constant at Mp while the moment at theright-hand support C increases until the third and final hinge forms at this point atQ = 900MpL At this load the beam becomes a mechanism and so the ultimateload is Qult = 900MpL which is 33 higher than the first hinge load of 675MpLThe redistribution of bending moment is shown in Figure 528b and d while thedeflection of the load point (derived from an elasticndashplastic assumption) is shownin Figure 528c

554 Plastic collapse mechanisms

A number of examples of plastic collapse mechanisms in cantilevers and single-and multi-span beams is shown in Figure 529 Cantilevers and overhanging beams

Q Q Q

Mp

A B C

Q

M------

p90

AB

C

B

MM----

p10

MpMp

Mp Mp

MpMp

MA

MB

MC

QLM------

p

QL

Mp

Mp

QL

(d ) Ben d ing moment diagrams

( b ) Moment (a ) B u i l t - i n b ea m (c) Deflection

= 868 Mp

QL= 90Mp

QL= 675

redistribution

2L3 L3

675868

90

675868

Hinges

Figure 528 Moment redistribution in a built-in beam

180 In-plane bending of beams

(a ) Can til e v e rs and over- hanging beams

(b) Single-span beams

(c ) Multi-span beams

Figure 529 Beam plastic collapse mechanisms

generally collapse as single-bar mechanisms with a plastic hinge at the supportWhen there is a reduction in section capacity then the plastic hinge may form inthe weaker section

Single-span beams generally collapse as two-bar mechanisms with a hinge(plastic or frictionless) at each support and a plastic hinge within the spanSometimes general plasticity may occur along a uniform moment region

Multi-span beams generally collapse in one span only as a local two-bar mech-anism with a hinge (plastic or frictionless) at each support and a plastic hingewithin the span Sometimes two adjacent spans may combine to form a three-barmechanism with the common support acting as a frictionless pivot and one plastichinge forming within each span Similar mechanisms may form in over-hangingbeams

Potential locations for plastic hinges include supports points of concentratedload and points of cross-section change The location of a plastic hinge in a beamwith distributed load is often not well defined

555 Methods of plastic analysis

The purpose of the methods of plastic analysis is to determine the ultimate load atwhich a collapse mechanism first forms Thus it is only this final mechanism con-dition which must be found and any intermediate load conditions can be ignoredA further important simplification arises from the fact that in its collapse condi-tion the beam is a mechanism and can be analysed by statics without any of thedifficulties associated with the elastic analysis of a statically indeterminate beam

The basic method of plastic analysis is to assume the locations of a series ofplastic hinges and to investigate whether the three conditions of equilibrium mech-anism and plasticity are satisfied The equilibrium condition is that the bending

In-plane bending of beams 181

moment distribution defined by the assumed plastic hinges must be in staticequilibrium with the applied loads and reactions This condition applies to allbeams elastic or plastic The mechanism condition is that there must be a suffi-cient number of plastic and frictionless hinges for the beam to form a mechanismThis condition is usually satisfied directly by the choice of hinges The plastic-ity condition is that the full plastic moment of every cross-section must not beexceeded so that

minusMp le M le Mp (535)

If the assumed plastic hinges satisfy these three conditions they are the correctones and they define the collapse mechanism of the beam so that

(Collapse mechanism) satisfies

Equilibrium

MechanismPlasticity

(536)

The ultimate load can then be determined directly from the equilibrium conditionsHowever it is usually possible to assume more than one series of plastic hinges

and so while the assumed plastic hinges may satisfy the equilibrium and mechanismconditions the plasticity condition (equation 535) may be violated In this casethe load calculated from the equilibrium condition is greater than the true ultimateload (QmgtQult) This forms the basis of the mechanism method of plastic analysis(

Mechanism methodQm ge Qult

)satisfies

(EquilibriumMechanism

) (537)

which provides an upper-bound solution for the true ultimate loadA lower bound solution (Qs le Qult) for the true ultimate load can be obtained

by reducing the loads and bending moments obtained by the mechanism methodproportionally (which ensures that the equilibrium condition remains satisfied)until the plasticity condition is satisfied everywhere These reductions decreasethe number of plastic hinges and so the mechanism condition is not satisfied Thisis the statical method of plastic analysis(

Statical MethodQs le Qult

)satisfies

(EquilibriumPlasticity

)(538)

If the upper and lower bound solutions obtained by the mechanism and staticalmethods coincide or are sufficiently close the beam may be designed immediatelyIf however these bounds are not precise enough the original series of hingesmust be modified (and the bending moments determined in the statical analysiswill provide some indication of how to do this) and the analysis repeated

The use of the methods of plastic analysis is demonstrated in Sections 5112and 5113 for the examples of the built-in beam and the propped cantilever shown

182 In-plane bending of beams

in Figures 530a and 531a A worked example of the plastic collapse analysis ofa non-uniform beam is given in Section 51214

The limitations on the use of the method of plastic analysis in the EC3 strengthdesign of beams are discussed in Section 562

The application of the methods of plastic analysis to rigid-jointed frames isdiscussed in Section 8355 This application can only be made provided the effectsof any axial forces in the members are small enough to preclude any instabilityeffects and provided any significant decreases in the full plastic moments due toaxial forces are accounted for (see Section 722)

321 4L 3 L 3 L 3

Q

Q1

2

4

Q

Q 2 Q

2 Q 2 Q

2δ13

2δ13

δ13

δ13

2 Q

2 Q1

3

4

Mp

Mp

MpMp

Mp Mp

M1 M2 M3 M4

Mp

Mp

Q

M4 M3ndashL3

1 2 3 42 3

(b) Beam segments

(c ) Fi r st mec han i sm and virtual displacements

(a ) Bu i lt- in b e a m

(d ) Co r r ec t mech a n i sm and virtual displacements

M3 M2ndashL3

M2 M1ndashL3

Figure 530 Plastic analysis of a built-in beam

Mp

MpMp

q

L05L

0586L

(a) Propped cantilever (c) First mechanism

(d) Second mechanism(b) Correct mechanism

0583L

Figure 531 Plastic analysis of a propped cantilever

In-plane bending of beams 183

56 Strength design of beams

561 Elastic design of beams

5611 General

For the elastic method of designing a beam for the strength limit state the strengthdesign loads are first obtained by multiplying the nominal loads (dead imposedor wind) by the appropriate load combination factors (see Section 156) The dis-tributions of the design bending moments and shear forces in the beam under thestrength design load combinations are determined by an elastic bending analysis(when the structure is statically indeterminate) or by statics (when it is staticallydeterminate) EC3 also permits a moment redistribution to be made in each ade-quately braced Class 1 or Class 2 span of a continuous beam of up to 15 of thespanrsquos peak elastic moment provided equilibrium is maintained The beam mustbe designed to be able to resist the design moments and shears as well as anyconcentrated forces arising from the factored loads and their reactions

The processes of checking a specified member or of designing an unknownmember for the design actions are summarised in Figure 532 When a specified

Check serviceability

Guess fy and sectionclassification

Check fy andclassification

Select trial section(usually for moment)

Check bracingCheck shearCheck shear and bendingCheck bearing

Analysis for MEd VEd REd

DesigningChecking

Section Length and loading

Find fy Classify section

Check moment

Figure 532 Flow chart for the elastic design of beams

184 In-plane bending of beams

member is to be checked then the cross-section should first be classified asClass 1 2 3 or 4 This allows the effective section modulus to be determinedand the design section moment resistance to be compared with the maximumdesign moment Following this the lateral bracing should be checked then theweb shear resistance and then combined bending and shear should be checkedat any cross-sections where both the design moment and shear are high Finallythe web bearing resistance should be checked at reactions and concentrated loadpoints

When the member size is not known then a target value for the effective sectionmodulus may be determined from the maximum design moment and a trial sectionchosen whose effective section modulus exceeds this target The remainder of thedesign process is then the same as that for checking a specified member Usuallythe moment resistance governs the design but when it doesnrsquot then an iterativeprocess may need to be followed as indicated in Figure 532

The following sub-sections describe each of the EC3 checking processes sum-marised in Figure 532 A worked example of their application is given inSection 51215

5612 Section classification

The moment shear and concentrated load bearing resistances of beams whoseplate elements are slender may be significantly influenced by local buckling con-siderations (Chapter 4) Because of this beam cross-sections are classified asClass 1 2 3 or 4 depending on the ability of the elements to resist local buckling(Section 472)

Class 1 sections are unaffected by local buckling and are able to develop andmaintain their fully plastic resistances until a collapse mechanism forms Class 2sections are able to form a first plastic hinge but local buckling prevents subsequentmoment redistribution Class 3 sections are able to reach the yield stress but localbuckling prevents full plastification of the cross-section Class 4 sections have theirresistances reduced below their first yield resistances by local buckling effects

Sections are classified by comparing the slendernessλ= (ct)radic(fy235)of eachcompression element with the appropriate limits of Table 52 of EC3 These limitsdepend on the way in which the longitudinal edges of the element are supported(either one edge supported as for the flange outstand of an I-section or two edgessupported as for the internal flange element of a box section) the bending stressdistribution (uniform compression as in a flange or varying stresses as in a web)and the type of section as indicated in Figures 533 and 429

The section classification is that of the lowest classification of its elements withClass 1 being the highest possible and Class 4 the lowest All UBrsquos in S275 steelare Class 1 all UCrsquos are Class 1 or 2 but welded I-section members may also beClass 3 or 4

Worked examples of section classification are given in Sections 51215 and492ndash494

In-plane bending of beams 185

cw

cf1 cf1

cf1cf1 cf 2 cf1

cf 2

cw cw cw

Section description

Section andelement widths

Welded box RHS Hot-rolled UBUC

Welded PWG

Flangeoutstandcf1

Class 1Class 2Class 3

Class 1Class 2Class 3

ndashndashndash

ndashndashndash

91014

7283

124

910143338427283

124

3338427283

124

Class 1Class 2Class 3

Flange supportedalong bothedges cf 2

Web cw

Figure 533 Local buckling limits λ = (ct)ε for some beam sections

5613 Checking the moment resistance

For the moment resistance check of a beam that has adequate bracing against lateralbuckling the inequality

MEd le McRd (539)

must be satisfied in which MEd is the maximum design moment and

McRd = WfyγM0 (540)

is the design section moment resistance in which W is the appropriate sectionmodulus fy the nominal yield strength for the section and γM0(=1) the partialfactor for section resistance

For Class 1 and Class 2 sections the appropriate section modulus is the plasticsection modulus Wpl so that

W = Wpl (541)

For Class 3 sections the appropriate section modulus may simply be taken as theminimum elastic section modulus Welmin For Class 4 sections the appropriatesection modulus is reduced below the elastic section modulus Welmin as discussedin Section 472

186 In-plane bending of beams

Worked examples of checking the moment resistance are given inSections 51215 and 492ndash494 and a worked example of using the momentresistance check to design a suitable section is given in Section 51216

5614 Checking the lateral bracing

Beams with insufficient lateral bracing must also be designed to resist lateralbuckling The design of beams against lateral buckling is discussed in Section 69It is assumed in this chapter that there is sufficient bracing to prevent lateralbuckling While the adequacy of bracing for this purpose may be checked bydetermining the lateral buckling moment resistance as in Section 69 EC3 alsogives simpler (and often conservative) rules for this purpose For example lateralbuckling may be assumed to be prevented if the geometrical slenderness of eachsegment between restraints satisfies

Lc

if zle 3756

kc

McRd

MyEd

radic235

fy(542)

in which if z is the radius of gyration about the z axis of an equivalent compressionflange kc is a correction factor which allows for the moment distribution McRd isthe design resistance of a fully braced segment and MyEd is the maximum designmoment in the segment

A worked example of checking the lateral bracing is given in Section 51215

5615 Checking the shear resistance

For the shear resistance check the inequality

VEd le VcRd (543)

must be satisfied in which VEd is the maximum design shear force and VcRd thedesign shear resistance

For a stocky web with dwtw le 72radic(235fy) and for which the elastic shear

stress distribution is approximately uniform (as in the case of an equal flangedI-section) the uniform shear resistance VcRd is usually given by

VcRd = Av(fyradic

3) (544)

in which fyradic

3 is the shear yield stress τy (Section 131) and Av is the shear areaof the web defined in Clause 626(2) of EC3 All the webs of UBrsquos and UCrsquosin S275 steel satisfy dwtw le 72

radic(235fy) A worked example of checking the

uniform shear capacity of a compact web is given in Section 51215

In-plane bending of beams 187

For a stocky web with dwtw le 72radic(235fy) and with a non-uniform elastic

shear stress distribution (such as an unequal flanged I-section) the inequality

τEd le fyradic

3 (545)

must be satisfied in which τEd is the maximum design shear stress induced in theweb by VEd as determined by an elastic shear stress analysis (Section 54)

Webs for which dwtw ge 72radic(235fy) have their shear resistances reduced by

local buckling effects as discussed in Section 474 The shear design of thin websis governed by EC3-1-5 [25] Worked examples of checking the shear capacity ofsuch webs are given in Sections 495 and 496

5616 Checking for bending and shear

High shear forces may reduce the ability of a web to resist bending moment asdiscussed in Section 45 To allow for this Class 1 and Class 2 beams undercombined bending and shear in addition to satisfying equations 539 and 543must also satisfy

MEd le McRd

1 minus

(2VEd

VplRdminus 1

)2

(546)

in which VEd is the design shear at the cross-section being checked and VplRd isthe design plastic shear resistance This condition need only be considered whenVEd gt 05VplRd as indicated in Figure 432 It therefore need only be checked atcross-sections under high bending and shear such as at the internal supports ofcontinuous beams Even so many such beams have VEd le 05VplRd and so thischeck for combined bending and shear rarely governs

5617 Checking the bearing resistance

For the bearing check the inequality

FEd le FRd (547)

must be satisfied at all supports and points of concentrated load In this equationFEd is the design-concentrated load or reaction and FRd the bearing resistance ofthe web and its load-bearing stiffeners if any The bearing design of webs andload-bearing stiffeners is governed by EC3-1-5 [25] and discussed in Sections 46and 476 Stocky webs often have sufficient bearing resistance and do not requirethe addition of load-bearing stiffeners

A worked example of checking the bearing resistance of a stocky unstiffenedweb is given in Section 51215 while a worked example of checking the bearingresistance of a slender web with load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

188 In-plane bending of beams

562 Plastic design of beams

In the plastic method of designing for the strength limit state the distributions ofbending moment and shear force in a beam under factored loads are determinedby a plastic bending analysis (Section 555) Generally the material propertiesfor plastic design should be limited to ensure that the stressndashstrain curve has anadequate plastic plateau and exhibits strain-hardening so that plastic hinges canbe formed and maintained until the plastic collapse mechanism is fully developedThe use of the plastic method is restricted to beams which satisfy certain limitationson cross-section form and lateral bracing (additional limitations are imposed onmembers with axial forces as discussed in Section 7242)

EC3 permits only Class 1 sections which are symmetrical about the axis per-pendicular to the axis of bending to be used at plastic hinge locations in order toensure that local buckling effects (Sections 42 and 43) do not reduce the ability ofthe section to maintain the full plastic moment until the plastic collapse mechanismis fully developed while Class 1 or Class 2 sections should be used elsewhereThe slenderness limits for Class 1 and Class 2 beam flanges and webs are shownin Figure 533

The spacing of lateral braces is limited in plastic design to ensure that inelasticlateral buckling (see Section 63) does not prevent the complete development ofthe plastic collapse mechanism EC3 requires the spacing of braces at both endsof a plastic hinge segment to be limited A conservative approximation for thespacing limit for sections with htf le 40

radic(235fy) is given by

Lstable le 35izradic(235fy) (548)

in which iz is the radius of gyration about the minor z axis although higher valuesmay be calculated by allowing for the effects of moment gradient

The resistance of a beam designed plastically is based principally on its plasticcollapse load Qult calculated by plastic analysis using the full plastic moment Mp

of the beam The plastic collapse load must satisfy QEd le Qult in which QEd is thecorresponding design load

The shear capacity of a beam analysed plastically is based on the fully plasticshear capacity of the web (see Section 4321) Thus the maximum shear VEd

determined by plastic analysis under the design loads is limited to

VEd le VplRd = Avfyradic

3 (549)

EC3 also requires web stiffeners to be provided near all plastic hinge locationswhere an applied load or reaction exceeds 10 of the above limit

In-plane bending of beams 189

The ability of a beam web to transmit concentrated loads and reactions isdiscussed in Section 462 The web should be designed as in Section 476 usingthe design loads and reactions calculated by plastic analysis

A worked example of the plastic design of a beam is given in Section 51217

57 Serviceability design of beams

The design of a beam is often governed by the serviceability limit state forwhich the behaviour of the beam should be so limited as to give a high proba-bility that the beam will provide the serviceability necessary for it to carry out itsintended function The most common serviceability criteria are associated withthe stiffness of the beam which governs its deflections under load These mayneed to be limited so as to avoid a number of undesirable situations an unsightlyappearance cracking or distortion of elements fixed to the beam such as claddinglinings and partitions interference with other elements such as crane girders orvibration under dynamic loads such as traffic wind or machinery loads

Aserviceability design should be carried out by making appropriate assumptionsfor the load types combinations and levels for the structural response to loadand for the serviceability criteria Because of the wide range of serviceability limitstates design rules are usually of limited extent The rules given are often advisoryrather than mandatory because of the uncertainties as to the appropriate values tobe used These uncertainties result from the variable behaviour of real structuresand what is often seen to be the non-catastrophic (in terms of human life) natureof serviceability failures

Serviceability design against unsightly appearance should be based on the totalsustained load and so should include the effects of dead and long-term imposedloads The design against cracking or distortion of elements fixed to a beam shouldbe based on the loads imposed after their installation and will often include theunfactored imposed load or wind load but exclude the dead load The designagainst interference may need to include the effects of dead load as well as ofimposed and wind loads Where imposed and wind loads act simultaneously itmay be appropriate to multiply the unfactored loads by combination factors suchas 08 The design against vibration will require an assessment to be made of thedynamic nature of the loads

Most stiffness serviceability limit states are assessed by using an elastic anal-ysis to predict the static deflections of the beam For vibration design it may besufficient in some cases to represent the dynamic loads by static equivalents andcarry out an analysis of the static deflections More generally however a dynamicelastic analysis will need to be made

The serviceability deflection limits depend on the criterion being used To avoidunsightly appearance a value of L200 (L180 for cantilevers) might be used aftermaking allowances for any pre-camber Values as low as L360 have been usedfor design against the cracking of plaster finishes while a limit of L600 has been

190 In-plane bending of beams

used for crane gantry girders Avalue of H300 has been used for horizontal storeydrift in buildings under wind load

A worked example of the serviceability design is given in Section 51218

58 Appendix ndash bending stresses in elastic beams

581 Bending in a principal plane

When a beam bends in the xz principal plane plane cross-sections rotate asshown in Figure 54 so that sections δx apart become inclined to each other atminus(d2wdx2)δx where w is the deflection in the z principal direction as shownin Figure 55 and δx the length along the centroidal axis between the two cross-sections The length between the two cross-sections at a distance z from the axisis greater than δx by z(minusd2wd x2)δx so that the longitudinal strain is

ε = minuszd2w

d x2

The corresponding tensile stress σ = Eε is

σ = minusEzd2w

d x2(550)

which has the stress resultants

N =int

AσdA = 0

sinceint

A zdA = 0 for centroidal axes (see Section 59) and

My =int

Aσ zdA

whence

My = minusEIyd2w

dx2(52)

sinceint

A z2dA = Iy (see Section 59) If this is substituted into equation 550 thenthe bending tensile stress σ is obtained as

σ = Myz

Iy (53)

In-plane bending of beams 191

582 Alternative formulation for biaxial bending

When bending moments My1 Mz1 acting about non-principal axes y1 z1 causecurvatures d2w1dx2 d2v1dx2 in the non-principal planes xz1 xy1 the stress σat a point y1 sz1 is given by

σ = minusEz1d2w1dx2 minus Ey1d2v1dx2 (551)

and the moment resultants of these stresses are

andMy1 = minusEIy1d2w1dx2 minus EIy1z1d2v1dx2

Mz1 = EIy1z1d2w1dx2 + EIz1d2v1dx2

(552)

These can be rearranged as

and

minusEd2w1

dx2= My1Iz1 + Mz1Iy1z1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

Ed2v1

dx2= My1Iy1z1 + Mz1Iy1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

(553)

which are much more complicated than the principal plane formulations ofequations 59

If equations 553 are substituted then equation 551 can be expressed as

σ =(

My1Iz1 + Mz1Iy1z1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

)z1 minus

(My1Iy1z1 + Mz1Iy1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

)y1 (554)

which is much more complicated than the principal plane formulation ofequation 512

59 Appendix ndash thin-walled section properties

The cross-section properties of many steel beams can be analysed with suffi-cient accuracy by using the thin-walled assumption demonstrated in Figure 534in which the cross-section is replaced by its mid-thickness line While the thin-walled assumption may lead to small errors in some properties due to junction andthickness effects its consistent use will avoid anomalies that arise when a moreaccurate theory is combined with thin-walled theory as might be the case in thedetermination of shear flows The small errors are typically of the same order asthose introduced by the common practice of ignoring the fillets or corner radii ofhot-rolled sections

192 In-plane bending of beams

t2

t1

b1 times t1

b2 times t2

b3 times t3

b1

b 2

b3

t 3

aa

(a) Actual cross-section (b) Thin-walled approximation

Figure 534 Thin-walled cross-section assumption

The area A of a thin-walled section composed of a series of thin rectangles bn

wide and tn thick (bn tn) is given by

A =int

AdA =

sumn

An (555)

in which An = bntn This approximation may make small errors of the order of(tb)2 at some junctions

The centroid of a cross-section is defined by

intA

ydA =int

AzdA = 0

and for a thin-walled section these conditions become

sumn

Anyn =sum

n

Anzn = 0 (556)

in which yn zn are the centroidal distances of the centre of the rectangular ele-ment as demonstrated in Figure 535a The position of the centroid can be foundby adopting any convenient initial set of axes yi zi as shown in Figure 535aso that

yn = yin minus yic

zn = zin minus zic

In-plane bending of beams 193

A2 = b2 times t2 A2 = b2 times t2

z1z1

y1

zi

y12y12 yic

yi2

yi

z12

zi2

zic

132

z12

y1C 0

2

C

2

(b) Second moments of area(a) Centroid

Figure 535 Calculation of cross-section properties

When these are substituted into equation 556 the centroid position is found from

yic =sum

AnyinA

zic =sum

AnzinA

(557)

The second moments of area about the centroidal axes are defined by

Iy =int

Az2 dA =

sum(Anz2

n + In sin2 θn)

Iz =int

Ay2 dA =

sum(Any2

n + In cos2 θn)

Iyz =int

Ayz dA =

sum(Anynzn + In sin θn cos θn)

(558)

in which θn is always the angle from the y axis to the rectangular element (positivefrom the y axis to the z axis) as shown in Figure 535b and

In = b3ntn12 (559)

These thin-walled approximations ignore small terms bnt3n12 while the use of

the angle θn adjusts for the inclination of the element to the y z axes

194 In-plane bending of beams

The principal axis directions y z are defined by the condition that

Iyz = 0 (560)

These directions can be found by considering a rotation of the centroidal axes fromy1 z1 to y2 z2 through an angle α as shown in Figure 536a The y2 z2 coordinatesof any point are related to its y1 z1 coordinates as demonstrated in Figure 536a by

y2 = y1 cosα + z1 sinαz2 = minusy1 sinα + z1 cosα

(561)

The second moments of area about the y2 z2 axes are

Iy2 =int

Az2

2 dA = Iy1 cos2 α minus 2Iy1z1 sinα cosα + Iz1 sin2 α

Iz2 =int

Ay2

2 dA = Iy1 sin2α + 2Iy1z1 sinα cosα + Iz1 cos2 α

Iy2z2 =int

Ay2z2 dA = 1

2(Iy1 minus Iz1) sin 2α + Iy1z1 cos 2α

(562)

The principal axis condition of equation 560 requires Iy2z2 = 0 so that

tan 2α = minus2Iy1z1(Iy1 minus Iz1) (563)

In this book y and z are reserved exclusively for the principal centroidal axes

C

(y1 z1)

z1z2

y2

z2

z1

z1 cos

Iy

1z

IyIz

(Iy1 ndashIy1z1)

(Iy1Iy1z1)

Iyz

y1 sin

2

z1 sin y1 cos

y2

y1

(y2 z2)

(a) Rotation of axes (b) Mohrrsquos circle construction

Figure 536 Calculation of principal axis properties

In-plane bending of beams 195

The principal axis second moments of area can be obtained by using this valueof α in equation 562 whence

Iy = 1

2(Iy1 + Iz1)+ (Iy1 minus Iz1)2 cos 2α

Iz = 1

2(Iy1 + Iz1)minus (Iy1 minus Iz1)2 cos 2α

(564)

These results are summarised by the Mohrrsquos circle constructed in Figure 536b onthe diameter whose ends are defined by (Iy1 Iy1z1) and (Iz1 minusIy1z1) The anglesbetween this diameter and the horizontal axis are equal to 2α and (2α+ 180)while the intersections of the circle with the horizontal axis define the principalaxis second moments of area Iy Iz

Worked examples of the calculation of cross-section properties are given inSections 5121ndash5124

510 Appendix ndash shear stresses in elastic beams

5101 Solid cross-sections

A solid cross-section beam with a shear force Vz parallel to the z principal axis isshown in Figure 59a It is assumed that the resulting shear stresses also act parallelto the z axis and are constant across the width b of the section The correspondinghorizontal shear stresses τzx = τv are in equilibrium with the horizontal bendingstresses σ For the element b times δz times δx shown in Figure 59b this equilibriumcondition reduces to

bpartσ

partxδxδz + part(τvb)

partzδzδx = 0

whence

τv = minus 1

b2

int z2

zT

bpartσ

partxdz (565)

which satisfies the condition that the shear stress is zero at the unstressed boundaryzT The bending normal stresses σ are given by

σ = Myz

Iy

and the shear force Vz is

Vz = dMy

dx

196 In-plane bending of beams

and so

partσ

partx= Vzz

Iy (566)

Substituting this into equation 565 leads to

τv = minus Vz

Iyb2

int z2

zT

bz dz (513)

5102 Thin-walled open cross-sections

A thin-walled open cross-section beam with a shear force Vz parallel to the z prin-cipal axis is shown in Figure 511a It is assumed that the resulting shear stressesact parallel to the walls of the section and are constant across the wall thicknessThe corresponding horizontal shear stresses τv are in equilibrium with the hori-zontal bending stresses σ For the element t times δs times δx shown in Figure 511b thisequilibrium condition reduces to

partσ

partxδxtδs + part(τvt)

partxδsδx = 0

and substitution of equation 566 and integration leads to

τvt = minusVz

Iy

int s

0zt ds (516)

which satisfies the condition that the shear stress is zero at the unstressed boundarys = 0

The direction of the shear stress can be determined from the sign of the right-hand side of equation 516 If this is positive then the direction of the shear stressis the same as the positive direction of s and vice versa The direction of the shearstress may also be determined from the direction of the corresponding horizontalshear force required to keep the out-of-balance bending force in equilibrium asshown for example in Figure 513a Here a horizontal force τvtf δx in the positive xdirection is required to balance the resultant bending force δσ δA (due to the shearforce Vz = dMydx) and so the direction of the corresponding flange shear stressis from the tip of the flange towards its centre

5103 Multi-cell thin-walled closed sections

The shear stress distributions in multi-cell closed sections can be determined byextending the method discussed in Section 544 for single-cell closed sections Ifthe section consists of n junctions connected by m walls then there are (m minus n + 1)independent cells In each wall there is an unknown circulating shear flow τvct

In-plane bending of beams 197

There are (m minus n + 1) independent cell warping continuity conditions of the type(see equation 527)

sumcell

intwall(τG) ds = 0

and (n minus 1) junction equilibrium equations of the typesumjunction

(τ t) = 0

These equations can be solved simultaneously for the m circulating shearflows τvct

511 Appendix ndash plastic analysis of beams

5111 Full plastic moment

The fully plastic stress distribution in a section bent about a y axis of symmetryis antisymmetric about that axis as shown in Figure 537a for a channel sectionexample The plastic neutral axis which divides the cross-section into two equalareas so that there is no axial force resultant of the stress distribution coincides withthe axis of symmetry The moment resultant of the fully plastic stress distribution is

Mpy = fysum

T

Anzn minus fysum

C

Anzn (567)

in which the summationssum

T sum

C are carried out for the tension and com-pression areas of the cross-section respectively Note that zn is negative forthe compression areas of the channel section so that the two summations in

yy

z

z

T

C

T

CT

C

(a) Bending about an axis of symmetry

(b) Bending of a monosymmetric section in a plane of symmetry

(c) Bending of an asymmetric section

b2 times t

b times tf

df times twb times tf

b times tf

df times tw b1 times t

y1 Mpy1

Mpz1

Mp

zp

zp

z1

fyfyfy fy fy

fy

Figure 537 Full plastic moment

198 In-plane bending of beams

equation 567 are additive The plastic section modulus Wply = Mpyfy is obtainedfrom equation 567 as

Wply =sum

T

Anzn minussum

C

Anzn (568)

A worked example of the determination of the full plastic moment of a doublysymmetric I-section is given in Section 51212

The fully plastic stress distribution in a monosymmetric section bent in a planeof symmetry is not antisymmetric as can be seen in Figure 537b for a channelsection example The plastic neutral axis again divides the cross-section into twoequal areas so that there is no axial force resultant but the neutral axis no longerpasses through the centroid of the cross-section The fully plastic moment Mpy

and the plastic section modulus Wply are given by equations 567 and 568 Forconvenience any suitable origin may be used for computing zn Aworked exampleof the determination of the full plastic moment of a monosymmetric tee-section isgiven in Section 51213

The fully plastic stress distribution in an asymmetric section is also not antisym-metric as can be seen in Figure 537c for an angle section example The plasticneutral axis again divides the cross-section into two equal areas The direction ofthe plastic neutral axis is perpendicular to the plane in which the moment resul-tant acts The full plastic moment is given by the vector addition of the momentresultants about any convenient y1 z1 axes so that

Mp = radic(M 2

py1 + M 2pz1) (569)

where Mpy1 is given by an equation similar to equation 567 and Mpz1 isgiven by

Mpz1 = minusfysum

T

Any1n + fysum

C

Any1n (570)

The inclination α of the plastic neutral axis to the y1 axis (and of the plane of thefull plastic moment to the zx plane) can be obtained from

tan α = Mpz1Mpy1 (571)

5112 Built-in beam

51121 General

The built-in beam shown in Figure 530a has two redundancies and so three plastichinges must form before it can be reduced to a collapse mechanism In this casethe only possible plastic hinge locations are at the support points 1 and 4 and at theload points 2 and 3 and so there are two possible mechanisms one with a hinge at

In-plane bending of beams 199

point 2 (Figure 530c) and the other with a hinge at point 3 (Figure 530d) Threedifferent methods of analysing these mechanisms are presented in the followingsub-sections

51122 Equilibrium equation solution

The equilibrium conditions for the beam express the relationships between theapplied loads and the moments at these points These relationships can be obtainedby dividing the beam into the segments shown in Figure 530b and expressing theend shears of each segment in terms of its end moments so that

V12 = (M2 minus M1)(L3)

V23 = (M3 minus M2)(L3)

V34 = (M4 minus M3)(L3)

For equilibrium each applied load must be equal to the algebraic sum of the shearsat the load point in question and so

Q = V12 minus V23 = 1

L(minus3M1 + 6M2 minus 3M3)

2Q = V23 minus V34 = 1

L(minus3M2 + 6M3 minus 3M4)

which can be rearranged as

4QL = minus 6M1 + 9M2 minus 3M4

5QL = minus 3M1 + 9M3 minus 6M4

(572)

If the first mechanism chosen (incorrectly as will be shown later) is that withplastic hinges at points 1 2 and 4 (see Figure 530c) so that

minusM1 = M2 = minusM4 = Mp

then substitution of this into the first of equations 572 leads to 4QL = 18Mp

and so

Qult le 45MpL

If this result is substituted into the second of equations 572 then

M3 = 15 Mp gt Mp

200 In-plane bending of beams

and the plasticity condition is violated The statical method can now be used toobtain a lower bound by reducing Q until M3 = Mp whence

Q = 45Mp

L

M3

Mp= 3Mp

L

and so

3MpL lt Qult lt 45MpL

The true collapse load can be obtained by assuming a collapse mechanismwith plastic hinges at point 3 (the point of maximum moment for the previousmechanism) and at points 1 and 4 For this mechanism

minusM1 = M3 = minusM4 = Mp

and so from the second of equations 572

Qult le 36MpL

If this result is substituted into the first of equations 572 then

M2 = 06Mp lt Mp

and so the plasticity condition is also satisfied Thus

Qult = 36MpL

51123 Graphical solution

A collapse mechanism can be analysed graphically by first plotting the known freemoment diagram (for the applied loading on a statically determinate beam) andthen the reactant bending moment diagram (for the redundant reactions) whichcorresponds to the collapse mechanism

For the built-in beam (Figure 538a) the free moment diagram for a simplysupported beam is shown in Figure 538c It is obtained by first calculating theleft-hand reaction as

RL = (Q times 2L3 + 2Q times L3)L = 4Q3

In-plane bending of beams 201

(+)

L3 L3 L3

4QL9 5QL9

5QL9

321 4

(+)

(-) (-)

(-)Mp MpMp

Mp

(d) Reactant moment diagram(b) Collapse moment diagram

(c) Free moment diagram(a) Built-in beam

Q 2Q

Figure 538 Graphical solution for the plastic collapse of a built-in beam

and then using this to calculate the moments

M2 = (4Q3)times L3 = 4QL9

and

M3 = (4Q3)times 2L3 minus QL3 = 5QL9

Both of the possible collapse mechanisms (Figure 529c and d) require plastichinges at the supports and so the reactant moment diagram is one of uniformnegative bending as shown in Figure 538d When this is combined with the freemoment diagram as shown in Figure 538b it becomes obvious that there must bea plastic hinge at point 3 and not at point 2 and that at collapse

2Mp = 5QultL9

so that

Qult = 36MpL

as before

51124 Virtual work solution

The virtual work principle [4 7 8] can also be used to analyse each mechanismFor the first mechanism shown in Figure 530c the virtual external work done

202 In-plane bending of beams

by the forces Q 2Q during the incremental virtual displacements defined by theincremental virtual rotations δθ and 2δθ shown is given by

δW = Q times (δθ times 2L3)+ 2Q times (δθ times L3) = 4QLδθ3

while the internal work absorbed at the plastic hinge locations during theincremental virtual rotations is given by

δU = Mp times 2δθ + Mp times (2δθ + δθ)+ Mp times δθ = 6Mpδθ

For equilibrium of the mechanism the virtual work principle requires

δW = δU

so that the upper-bound estimate of the collapse load is

Qult le 45MpL

as in Section 51122Similarly for the second mechanism shown in Figure 530d

δW = 5QLδθ3

δU = 6Mpδθ

so that

Qult le 36MpL

once more

5113 Propped cantilever

51131 General

The exact collapse mechanisms for beams with distributed loads are not always aseasily obtained as those for beams with concentrated loads only but sufficientlyaccurate solutions can usually be found without great difficulty Three differentmethods of determining these mechanisms are presented in the following sub-sections for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 531

In-plane bending of beams 203

51132 Equilibrium equation solution

If the plastic hinge is assumed to be at the mid-span of the propped cantilever asshown in Figure 531c (the other plastic hinge must obviously be located at thebuilt-in support) then equilibrium considerations of the left and right segments ofthe beam allow the left and right reactions to be determined from

RLL2 = 2Mp + (qL2)L4

and

RRL2 = Mp + (qL2)L4

while for overall equilibrium

qL = RL + RR

Thus

qL = (4MpL + qL4)+ (2MpL + qL4)

so that

qult le 12MpL2

The left-hand reaction is therefore given by

RL = 4MpL + (12MpL2)L4 = 7MpL

The bending moment variation along the propped cantilever is therefore given by

M = minusMp + (7MpL)x minus (12MpL2)x22

which has a maximum value of 25Mp24gtMp at x = 7L12 Thus the lowerbound is given by

qult ge (12MpL2)(2524) asymp 1152MpL

2

and so

1152Mp

L2lt qult lt

12Mp

L2

If desired a more accurate solution can be obtained by assuming that the hinge islocated at a distance 7L12(= 0583L) from the built-in support (ie at the point

204 In-plane bending of beams

of maximum moment for the previous mechanism) whence

116567Mp

L2lt qult lt

116575Mp

L2

These are very close to the exact solution of

qult = (6 + 4radic

2)MpL2 asymp 116569MpL

2

for which the hinge is located at a distance (2 minus radic2)L asymp 05858L from the built-in

support

51133 Graphical solution

For the propped cantilever of Figure 531 the parabolic free moment diagramfor a simply supported beam is shown in Figure 539c All the possible collapsemechanisms have a plastic hinge at the left-hand support and a frictionless hingeat the right-hand support so that the reactant moment diagram is triangular asshown in Figure 539d A first attempt at combining this with the free momentdiagram so as to produce a trial collapse mechanism is shown in Figure 539b Forthis mechanism the interior plastic hinge occurs at mid-span so that

Mp + Mp2 = qL28

which leads to

q = 12MpL2

as before

q

LRL RR

(+)

Mp ( + ) qL 8

L 2 L 2

Mp

Mp 22

qL 82

Mp

MpMmax

(-)( - )

(d) Reactant moment diagram

(a) Propped cantilever

(b) T ri a l c ol l ap s e m o m e n t d ia gram

(c) Free moment diagram

Figure 539 Graphical analysis of the plastic collapse of a propped cantilever

In-plane bending of beams 205

Figure 539b indicates that in this case the maximum moment occurs to the rightof mid-span and is greater than Mp so that the solution above is an upper boundA more accurate solution can be obtained by trial and error by increasing theslope of the reactant moment diagram until the moment of the left-hand supportis equal to the interior maximum moment as indicated by the dashed line inFigure 539b

51134 Virtual work solution

For the first mechanism for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 531c forvirtual rotations δθ

δW = qL2δθ4

δU = 3Mpδθ

and

qult le 12MpL2

as before

512 Worked examples

5121 Example 1 ndash properties of a plated UB section

Problem The 610 times 229 UB 125 section shown in Figure 540a is strengthened bywelding a 300 mm times 20 mm plate to each flange Determine the section propertiesIy and Wely

Solution Because of the symmetry of the section the centroid of the plated UBis at the web centre Adapting equation 558

Iy = 98 610 + 2 times 300 times 20 times [(6122 + 20)2]2104 = 218 500 cm4

Wely = 218 500[(6122 + 2 times 20)(2 times 10)] = 6701 cm3

5122 Example 2 ndash properties of a tee-section

Problem Determine the section properties Iy and Wely of the welded tee-sectionshown in Figure 540b

206 In-plane bending of beams

80

5

8010

y

zz

y

zpzi

(a) 610 times 229 UB 125

Iy = 98 610 cm4

Wply = 3676 cm3

(b) Tee-section

6122

1 1 9

196229

Figure 540 Worked examples 1 2 and 18

Solution Using the thin-walled assumption and equations 557 and 558

zi = (80 + 52)times 10 times (80 + 52)2

(80 times 5)+ (80 + 52)times 10= 278 mm

Iy = (80 times 5)times 2782 + (8253 times 1012)+ (825 times 10)

times (8252 minus 278)2 mm4

= 9263 cm4

Wely = 9263(825 minus 278)10 = 1693 cm3

Alternatively the equations of Figure 56 may be used

5123 Example 3 ndash properties of an angle section

Problem Determine the properties A Iy1 Iz1 Iy1z1 Iy Iz and α of the thin-walledangle section shown in Figure 541c

Solution Using the thin-walled assumption the angle section is replaced by tworectangles 1425(= 150 minus 152)times 15 and 825(= 90 minus 152)times 15 as shown in

In-plane bending of beams 207

37 mm

967 mm

188 mm

Deflection of tip centroid

(c) Actual cross-section

90 mm

15 mm

15 mm

6 kN15 m

150 90 15unequal angle

A

C

S

6 kN

z

y

93 mm

100 mm

y1

z1

150

mm

Iy = 8426 cm4

Iz = 1205 cm4

=1982o

(a) Cantilever

(b) Section properties(d) Thin-walled section (deflections to different scale)

825 times 15

times times 1425 times 15

Figure 541 Worked examples 3 and 5

Figure 541d If the initial origin is taken at the intersection of the legs and theinitial yi zi axes parallel to the legs then using equations 555 and 557

A = (1425 times 15)+ (825 times 15) = 3375 mm2

yic = (1425 times 15)times 0 + (825 times 15)times (minus8252)3375

= minus151 mm

zic = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252)+ (825 times 15)times 03375

= minus451 mm

Transferring the origin to the centroid and using equations 558

Iy1 = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252 + 451)2 + (14253 times 1512)times sin2 90

+ (825 times 15)times (451)2 + (8253 times 1512)times sin2 180

= 7596 times 106 mm4 = 7596 cm4

208 In-plane bending of beams

Iz1 = (1425 times 15)times (151)2 + (14253 times 1512)times cos2 90

+ (825 times 15)times (minus8252 + 151)2 + (8253 times 1512)times cos2 180

= 2035 times 106 mm4 = 2035 cm4

Iy1z1 = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252 + 451)times 151 + (14253 times 1512)

times sin 90 cos 90 + (825 times 15)times (451)times (minus8252 + 151)

+ (8253 times 1512)times sin 180 cos 180

= minus2303 times 106 mm4 = minus2303 cm4

Using equation 563

tan 2α = minus2 times (minus2303)(7596 minus 2035) = 08283

whence 2α= 3963 and α= 1982Using Figure 530b the Mohrrsquos circle centre is at

(Iy1 + Iz1)2 = (7596 + 2035)2 = 4816 cm4

and the Mohrrsquos circle diameter is

radic(Iy1 minus Iz1)2 + (2Iy1z1)

2 = radic(7596 minus 2035)2 + (2 times 2303)2= 7221 cm4

and so

Iy = 4816 + 72212 = 8426 cm4

Iz = 4816 minus 72212 = 1205 cm4

5124 Example 4 ndash properties of a zed section

Problem Determine the properties Iyl Izl Iylzl Iy Iz and α of the thin-walledZ-section shown in Figure 542aSolution

Iy1 = 2 times (75 times 10 times 752)+ (1503 times 512) = 9844 times 103 mm4

= 9844 cm4

In-plane bending of beams 209

150

50

875

62

5

6 6

6

125

75 100 100505075

1 0

1 0

yy

z

z1

6 6

1

y

z

121 2 3 4

6 5

1 25

4 3

= = 1400 cm4 600 cm4I Iz z

z

yCC

C

150

(b) Pi-section (c) Rectangular hollow section (All dimensions in mm)

(a) Z-section

Figure 542 Worked examples 4 9 10 and 11

Iz1 = 2 times (75 times 10 times 3752)+ 2 times (753 times 1012)

= 2813 times 103 mm4 = 2813 cm4

Iy1z1 = 75 times 10 times 375 times (minus75)+ 75 times 10 times (minus375)times 75

= minus4219 times 103 mm4 = minus4219 cm4

The centre of the Mohrrsquos circle (see Figure 537b) is at

Iy1 + Iz1

2=

[9844 + 2813

2

]= 6328 cm4

The diameter of the circle isradic[(9844 minus 2813)2 + (2 times 4219)2] = 10983 cm4

and so

Iy = (6328 + 109832) = 1182 cm4

Iz = (6328 minus 109832) = 837 cm4

tan 2α = 2 times 4219

(9844 minus 2813)= 1200

α = 251

5125 Example 5 ndash biaxial bending of an anglesection cantilever

Problem Determine the maximum elastic stress and deflection of the angle sectioncantilever shown in Figure 541 whose section properties were determined inSection 5123

210 In-plane bending of beams

Solution for maximum stress The shear centre (see Section 543) load of 6 kNacting in the plane of the long leg of the angle has principal plane components of

6 cos 1982 = 5645 kN parallel to the z axis and

6 sin 1982 = 2034 kN parallel to the y axis

as indicated in Figure 541d These load components cause principal axis momentcomponents at the support of

My = minus5645 times 15 = minus8467 kNm about the y axis and

Mz = +2034 times 15 = +3052 kNm about the z axis

The maximum elastic bending stress occurs at the point A (y1A = 151 mmz1A = minus974 mm) shown in Figure 541d The coordinates of this point can beobtained by using equation 561 as

y = 151 cos 1982 minus 974 sin 1982 = minus188 mm and

z = minus151 sin 1982 minus 974 cos 1982 = minus967 mm

The maximum stress at A can be obtained by using equation 512 as

σmax = (minus8467 times 106)times (minus967)

8426 times 104minus (3052 times 106)times (minus188)

1205 times 104

= 1469 Nmm2

The stresses at the other leg ends should be checked to confirm that the maximumstress is at A

Solution for maximum deflection The maximum deflection occurs at the tip of thecantilever Its components v and w can be calculated using QL33EI Thus

w = (5645 times 103)times (1500)3(3 times 210 000 times 8426 times 104) = 36 mm

and

v = (2034 times 103)times (1500)3(3 times 210 000 times 1205 times 104) = 90 mm

The resultant deflection can be obtained by vector addition as

δ = radic(362 + 902) = 97 mm

Using non-principal plane properties Problems of this type are sometimes incor-rectly analysed on the basis that the plane of loading can be assumed to be a

In-plane bending of beams 211

principal plane When this approach is used the maximum stress calculated forthe cantilever is

σmax = (6 times 103)times 1500 times (974)7596 times 104 = 115 Nmm2

which seriously underestimates the correct value by more than 20 The correctnon-principal plane formulations which are needed to solve the example in thisway are given in Section 582 The use of these formulations should be avoidedsince their excessive complication makes them very error-prone The much simplerprincipal plane formulations of equations 59ndash512 should be used instead

It should be noted that in this book y and z are reserved exclusively for theprincipal axis directions instead of also being used for the directions parallel tothe legs

5126 Example 6 ndash shear stresses in an I-section

Problem Determine the shear flow distribution and the maximum shear stress inthe I-section shown in Figure 512a

Solution Applying equation 516 to the left-hand half of the top flange

τvtf = minus(VzIy)

int sf

0(minusdf 2)tf dsf = (VzIy)df tf sf 2

which is linear as shown in Figure 512bAt the flange web junction (τvtf )12 = (VzIy)df tf b4 which is positive and

so the shear flow acts into the flangendashweb junction as shown in Figure 512aSimilarly for the right-hand half of the top flange (τvtf )23 = (VzIy)df tf b4 andagain the shear flow acts in to the flangendashweb junction

For horizontal equilibrium at the flangendashweb junction the shear flow from thejunction into the web is obtained from equation 520 as

(τvtw)24 = (VzIy)df tf b4 + (VzIy)df tf b4 = (VzIy)df tf b2

Adapting equation 516 for the web

τvtw = (VzIy)(df tf b2)minus (VzIy)

int sw

0(minusdf 2 + sw)twdsw

= (VzIy)(df tf b2)+ (VzIy)(df sw2 minus s2w2)tw

which is parabolic as shown in Figure 512b At the web centre (τvtw)df 2 =(VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2

f tw8) which is the maximum shear flowAt the bottom of the web

(τvtw)df = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw2 minus d2

f tw2)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2) = (τvtw)24

which provides a symmetry check

212 In-plane bending of beams

The maximum shear stress is

(τv)df 2 = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw8)tw

A vertical equilibrium check is provided by finding the resultant of the web shearflow as

Vw =int df

0(τvtw)dsw

= (VzIy)[df tf bsw2 + df tws2w4 minus s3

wtw6]df

0

= (VzIy)(d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12)

= Vz

when Iy = d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12 is substituted

5127 Example 7 ndash shear stress in a channel section

Problem Determine the shear flow distribution in the channel section shown inFigure 514

Solution Applying equation 515 to the top flange

τvtf = minus(VzIy)

int sf

0(minusdf 2)tf dsf = (VzIy)df tf sf 2

(τvtf )b = (VzIy)df tf b2

τvtw = (VzIy)(df tf b2 minusint sw

0(minusdf 2 + sw)twdsw)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2 + df swtw2 minus s2wtw2)

(τvtw)df = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw2 minus d2

f tw2)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2) = (τvtf )b

which provides a symmetry checkA vertical equilibrium check is provided by finding the resultant of the web

flows as

Vw =int df

0(τvtw)dsw

= (VzIy)[df tf bsw2 + df s2wtw4 minus s3

wtw6]df

0

= (VzIy)(d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12)

= Vz

when Iy = d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12 is substituted

In-plane bending of beams 213

5128 Example 8 ndash shear centre of a channel section

Problem Determine the position of the shear centre of the channel section shownin Figure 514

Solution The shear flow distribution in the channel section was analysed inSection 5127 and is shown in Figure 514a The resultant flange shear forcesshown in Figure 514b are obtained from

Vf =int b

0(τvtf )dsf

= (VzIy)[df tf s2f 4]b

0

= (VzIy)(df tf b24)

while the resultant web shear force is Vw = Vz (see Section 5127)These resultant shear forces are statically equivalent to a shear force Vz acting

through the point S which is a distance

a = Vf df

Vw= d2

f tf b2

4Iyfrom the web and so

y0 = d2f tf b2

4Iy+ b2tf

2btf + df tw

5129 Example 9 ndash shear stresses in a pi-section

Problem The pi shaped section shown in Figure 542b has a shear force of 100kN acting parallel to the y axis Determine the shear stress distribution

Solution Using equation 523 the shear flow in the segment 12 is

(τh times 12)12 = minus100 times 103

1400 times 104

int s1

0(minus100 + s1)times 12 times ds1

whence (τh)12 = 0007143 times (100s1 minus s212) Nmm2

Similarly the shear flow in the segment 62 is

(τh times 6)62 = minus100 times 103

1400 times 104

int s6

0(minus50)times 6 times ds1

whence (τh)62 = 0007143 times (50s6) Nmm2

214 In-plane bending of beams

For horizontal equilibrium of the longitudinal shear forces at the junction 2 theshear flows in the segments 12 62 and 23 must balance (equation 520) and so

[(τh times 12)23]s3=0 = [(τh times 12)12]s1=50 + [(τh times 6)62]s6=200

= 0007143

[(100 times 50 minus 502

2

)times 12 + 50 times 200 times 6

]

= 0007143 times 8750

The shear flow in the segment 23 is

(τh times 12)23 = 0007143 times 12 times 8750 minus 100 times 103

1400 times 104

timesint s2

0(minus50 + s2)times 12 times ds2

whence (τh)23 = 0007143(8750 + 50s2 minus s222) Nmm2

As a check the resultant of the shear stresses in the segments 12 23 and 34 is

intτhtds = 2 times 0007143 times 12

int 50

0(100s1 minus s2

12)ds1

+ 0007143 times 12 timesint 100

0(8750 + 50s2 minus s2

22)ds2

= 0007143 times 122 times (100 times 5022 minus 5036)

+ (8750 times 100 + 50 times 10022 minus 10036)N= 100 kN

which is equal to the shear force

51210 Example 10 ndash shear centre of a pi-section

Problem Determine the position of the shear centre of the pi section shown inFigure 542b

Solution The resultant of the shear stresses in the segment 62 is

intτhtds = 0007143 times 6

int 200

0(50s6)times ds6

= 0007143 times 6 times 50 times 20022 N

= 4286 kN

The resultant of the shear stresses in the segment 53 is equal and opposite to this

In-plane bending of beams 215

The torque about the centroid exerted by the shear stresses is equal to the sumof the torques of the force in the flange 1234 and the forces in the webs 62 and 53Thus

intAτhtρds = (100 times 50)+ (2 times 4286 times 50) = 9286 kNmm

For the applied shear to be statically equivalent to the shear stresses it must exertan equal torque about the centroid and so

minus100 times z0 = 9286

whence z0 = minus929 mmBecause of symmetry the shear centre lies on the z axis and so y0 = 0

51211 Example 11 ndash shear stresses in a box section

Problem The rectangular box section shown in Figure 542c has a shear force of100 kN acting parallel to the y axis Determine the maximum shear stress

Solution If initially a slit is assumed at point 1 on the axis of symmetry so that(τ hot)1 = 0 then

(τhot)12 = minus100 times 103

6 times 106

int s1

0s1 times 12 times ds1 = minus01s2

1

(τhot)2 = minus01 times 502 = minus01 times 2500 Nmm

(τhot)23 = minus01 times 2500 minus 100 times 103

6 times 106

int s2

050 times 6 times ds2

= minus01(2500 + 50s2)

(τhot)3 = minus01(2500 + 50 times 150) = minus01 times 10 000 Nmm

(τhot)34 = minus01 times 10 000 minus 100 times 103

6 times 106

int s3

0(50 minus s3)times 6 times ds3

= minus01[10 000 + (50s3 minus s232)]

(τhot)4 = minus01[10 000 + (50 times 100 minus 10022)] = minus01 times 10 000 Nmm

= (τhot)3 which is a symmetry check

The remainder of the shear stress distribution can therefore be obtained bysymmetry

216 In-plane bending of beams

The circulating shear flow τ hct can be determined by adapting equation 530For this∮

τhods = 2 times (01 times 5033)12

+ 2 times (minus01)times (2500 times 150 + 50 times 15022)6

+ (minus01)times (10 000 times 100 + 50 times 10022 minus 10036)6

= (minus01)times (6 000 000)12 Nmm∮1

tds = 100

12+ 150

6+ 100

6+ 150

6

= 90012

Thus

τhct = (minus01)times (6 000 000)

12times 12

900

= 66667 Nmm

The maximum shear stress occurs at the centre of the segment 34 and adaptingequation 529

(τh)max = minus01 times (10 000 + 50 times 50 minus 5022)+ 66676 Nmm2

= minus764 Nmm2

51212 Example 12 ndash fully plastic moment of a plated UB

Problem A 610 times 229 UB 125 beam (Figure 540a) of S275 steel is strengthenedby welding a 300 mm times 20 mm plate of S275 steel to each flange Compare thefull plastic moments of the unplated and the plated sections

Unplated section

For tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Mplu = fyWply = 265 times 3676 times 103 Nmm = 974 kNm

Plated section

For tp = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Because of the symmetry of the cross-section the plastic neutral axis is at thecentroid Adapting equation 567

Mplp = 974 + 2 times 265 times (300 times 20)times (61222 + 202)106 kNm

= 1979 kNm asymp 2 times Mplu

In-plane bending of beams 217

51213 Example 13 ndash fully plastic moment of a tee-section

Problem The welded tee-section shown in Figure 540b is fabricated from twoS275 steel plates Compare the first yield and fully plastic moments

First yield moment The minimum elastic section modulus was determined inSection 5122 as

Wely = 1693 cm3

For tmax = 10 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Mely = fyWely = 275 times 1693 times 103 Nmm = 4656 kNm

Full plastic moment For the plastic neutral axis to divide the cross-section intotwo equal areas then using the thin-walled assumption leads to

(80 times 5)+ (zp times 10) = (825 minus zp)times 10

so that zp = (825 times 10 minus 80 times 5)(2 times 10) = 213 mmUsing equation 567

Mply = 275 times [(80 times 5)times 213 + (213 times 10)times 2132

+ (825 minus 213)2 times 102] Nmm

= 8117 kNm

Alternatively the section properties Wely and Wply can be calculated usingFigure 56 and used to calculate Mely and Mply

51214 Example 14 ndash plastic collapse of a non-uniform beam

Problem The two-span continuous beam shown in Figure 543a is a 610 times 229UB 125 of S275 steel with 2 flange plates 300 mm times 20 mm of S275 steelextending over a central length of 12 m Determine the value of the applied loadsQ at plastic collapse

Solution The full plastic moments of the beam (unplated and plated) weredetermined in Section 51212 as Mplu = 974 kNm and Mplp = 1979 kNm

The bending moment diagram is shown in Figure 543b Two plastic collapsemechanisms are possible both with a plastic hinge (minusMplp) at the central supportFor the first mechanism (Figure 543c) plastic hinges (Mplp) occur in the platedbeam at the load points but for the second mechanism (Figure 543d) plastichinges (Mplu) occur in the unplated beam at the changes of cross-section

218 In-plane bending of beams

Q Q

M M Mpu pp pu

Q 9 6 4

(a) C o n t in u ou s b ea m (le n g t h s

(b) Bending moment

Mpp Mpp

Mpu Mpu

96

48

96

36Mpp

(c) First me chanism

(d) Second mechanism

Mpp

times

36 12 48 3 61248

(+ ) ( + ) ( )ndash

m )i n

Figure 543 Worked example 14

For the first mechanism shown in Figure 543c inspection of the bendingmoment diagram shows that

Mplp + Mplp2 = Q1 times 964

so that

Q1 = (3 times 19792)times 496 = 1237 kN

For the second mechanism shown in Figure 543d inspection of the bendingmoment diagram shows that

Mplu + 36Mplp96 = (3648)times Q2 times 964

so that

Q2 = [974 + (3696)times 1979] times (4836)times 496 = 954 kN

which is less than Q1 = 1237 kNThus plastic collapse occurs at Q = 954 kN by the second mechanism

51215 Example 15 ndash checking a simply supported beam

Problem The simply supported 610 times 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown inFigure 544a has a span of 60 m and is laterally braced at 15 m intervals Checkthe adequacy of the beam for a nominal uniformly distributed dead load of 60 kNmtogether with a nominal uniformly distributed imposed load of 70 kNm

In-plane bending of beams 219

4 1 5 = 6 0 m h

pl

bftf

tw

3 0 m

qD = 60 kNm qI = 70 kNm

QD = 40 kNQI

qD = 20 kNm

qI = 10 kNm

(a) Examples 15 17 and 18

(c) Example 16

bf = 229 mm A = 159 cm2

h = 6122 mm Iz = 3932 cm4

tf = 196 mm i z = 497 mmtw = 119 mm W y = 3676 cm3

r = 127 mm

(b) 610 229 UB 125

= 120 kN

times

Figure 544 Worked examples 15ndash18

Classifying the section

tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε =radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cf (tf ε) = (2292 minus 1192 minus 127)(196 times 0942) T52

= 519 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = (6122 minus 2 times 196 minus 2 times 127)(119 times 0942) T52

= 489 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

(Note the general use of the minimum fy obtained for the flange)

Checking for moment

qEd = (135 times 60)+ (15 times 70) = 186 kNm

MEd = 186 times 628 = 837 kNm

McRd = 3676 times 103 times 26510 Nmm 625

= 974 kNm gt 837 kNm = MEd

which is satisfactory

220 In-plane bending of beams

Checking for lateral bracing

if z =radic

2293 times 19612

229 times 196 + (6122 minus 2 times 196)times 1196= 591 mm 6324

kcLc(if zλ1) = 10 times 1500(591 times 939 times 0942) = 0287 6324

λc0McRdMEd = 04 times 974837 = 0465 gt 0287 6324

and the bracing is satisfactory

Checking for shear

VEd = 186 times 62 = 558 kN

Av = 159 times 102 minus 2 times 229 times 196 + (119 + 2 times 127)times 196

= 7654 mm2 626(3)

VcRd = 7654 times (265radic

3)10 N = 1171 kN gt 558 kN = VEd 626(2)

which is satisfactory

Checking for bending and shear The maximum MEd occurs at mid-span whereVEd = 0 and the maximum VEd occurs at the support where MEd = 0 and so thereis no need to check for combined bending and shear (Note that in any case 05VcRd = 05 times 1171 = 5855 kN gt 558 kN = VEd and so the combined bendingand shear condition does not operate)

Checking for bearing

REd = 186 times 62 = 558 kN

tw = 119 fyw = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

hw = 6122 minus 2 times 196 = 5730 mm

Assume (ss + c) = 100 mm which is not difficult to achieve

kF = 2 + 6 times 1005730 = 3047 EC3-1-5 61(4)(c)

Fcr = 09 times 3047 times 210 000 times 11935730 N = 1694 kNEC3-1-5 64(1)

m1 = (265 times 229)(275 times 119) = 1854 EC3-1-5 65(1)

m2 = 002 times (5727196)2 = 1709 if λF gt 05 EC3-1-5 65(1)

In-plane bending of beams 221

e = 3047 times 210 000 times 1192(2 times 275 times 5730) = 2875 gt 100EC3-1-5 65(3)

y1 = 100 + 196 times radic(18542 + (100196)2 + 1709) = 2419

EC3-1-5 65(3)

y2 = 100 + 196 times radic(1854 + 1709) = 2170 lt 2419 EC3-1-5 65(3)

y = 2170 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

λF =radic

2170 times 119 times 275

1694 times 103= 0648 gt 05 EC3-1-5 64(1)

χF = 050648 = 0772 EC3-1-5 62

Leff = 0772 times 2170 = 1676 mm EC3-1-5 62

FRd = 275 times 1676 times 11910 N = 548 kN EC3-1-5 62

lt 558 kN = REd and so the assumed value of (ss + c) = 100 mm

is inadequate

51216 Example 16 ndash designing a cantilever

Problem A 30 m long cantilever has the nominal imposed and dead loads (whichinclude allowances for self weight) shown in Figure 544c Design a suitable UBsection in S275 steel if the cantilever has sufficient bracing to prevent lateralbuckling

Selecting a trial section

MEd = 135 times (40 times 3 + 20 times 322)+ 15 times (120 times 3 + 10 times 322)

= 891 kNm

Assume that fy = 265 MPa and that the section is Class 2

Wply ge MEdfy = 891 times 106265 mm3 = 3362 cm3 625

Choose a 610 times 229 UB 125 with Wply = 3676 cm3 gt 3362 cm3

Checking the trial section The trial section must now be checked by classifyingthe section and checking for moment shear moment and shear and bearing Thisprocess is similar to that used in Section 51215 for checking a simply supportedbeam If the section chosen fails any of the checks then a new section must bechosen

222 In-plane bending of beams

51217 Example 17 ndash checking a plastically analysed beam

Problem Check the adequacy of the non-uniform beam shown in Figure 543and analysed plastically in Section 51214 The beam and its flange plates areof S275 steel and the concentrated loads have nominal dead load components of250 kN (which include allowances for self weight) and imposed load componentsof 400 kN

Classifying the sections The 610 times 229 UB 125 was found to be Class 1 inSection 51215For the 300 times 20 plate tp = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε= radic(235265)= 0942 T52

For the 300 times 20 plate as two outstands

cp(tpε) = (3002)(196 times 0942) T52

= 813 lt 9 and the outstands are Class 1 T52

For the internal element of the 300 times 20 plate

cp(tpε) = 229(20 times 0942) T52

= 122 lt 33 and the internal element is Class 1 T52

Checking for plastic collapse The design loads are QEd = (135 times 250)+ (15 times400)= 9375 kN

The plastic collapse load based on the nominal full plastic moments of thebeam was calculated in Section 51214 as

Q = 954 kN gt 9375 kN = QEd

and so the resistance appears to be adequate

Checking for lateral bracing For the unplated segment

Lstable = (60 minus 40 times 0)times 0924 times 497 times 10 = 2808 mm 6353

Thus a brace should be provided at the change of section (a plastic hinge location)and a second brace between this and the support

For the plated segment

iz =radic

(3932 times 104)+ (2 times 3003 times 2012)

(159 times 102)+ (2 times 300 times 20)

= 681 mm

and so

Lstable = 60 minus 40 times 974(minus1979) times 0924 times 681 = 5109 mm 6353

Thus a single brace should be provided in the plated segment A satisfactorylocation is at the load point

In-plane bending of beams 223

Checking for shear Under the collapse loads Q = 954 kN the end reactions are

RE = (954times48)minus197996 = 2706 kN

and the central reaction is

RC = 2 times 954 minus 2 times 2706 = 1366 kN

so that the maximum shear at collapse is

V = 13662 = 683 kN

From Section 51215 the design shear resistance is VcRd = 1171 kNgt 683 kNwhich is satisfactory

Checking for bending and shear At the central support V = 683 kN and

05 VcRd = 05 times 1171 = 586 kNlt 683 kN

and so there is a reduction in the full plastic moment Mpp This reduction is from1979 kNm to 1925 kNm (after using Clause 628(3) of EC3) The plastic collapseload is reduced to 942 kNgt 9375 kN = QEd and so the resistance is adequate

Checking for bearing Web stiffeners are required for beams analysed plasticallywithin h2 of all plastic hinge points where the design shear exceeds 10 of theweb capacity or 01 times 1171 = 1171 kN (Clause 56(2b) of EC3) Thus stiffenersare required at the hinge locations at the points of cross-section change and at theinterior support Load-bearing stiffeners should also be provided at the points ofconcentrated load but are not required at the outer supports (see Section 51215)An example of the design of load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

51218 Example 18 ndash serviceability of a simplysupported beam

Problem Check the imposed load deflection of the 610 times 220 UB 125 ofFigure 544a for a serviceability limit of L360

Solution The central deflection wc of a simply supported beam with uniformlydistributed load q can be calculated using

wc = 5qL4

384EIy= 5 times 70 times 60004

384 times 210 000 times 98 610 times 104= 57 mm (573)

(The same result can be obtained using Figure 53)L360 = 6000360 = 167 mmgt 57 mm = wc and so the beam is satisfactory

224 In-plane bending of beams

513 Unworked examples

5131 Example 19 ndash section properties

Determine the principal axis properties Iy Iz of the half box section shown inFigure 545a

5132 Example 20 ndash elastic stresses and deflections

The box section beam shown in Figure 545b is to be used as a simply supportedbeam over a span of 200 m The erection procedure proposed is to fabricate thebeam as two half boxes (the right half as in Figure 545a) to erect them separatelyand to pull them together before making the longitudinal connections between theflanges The total construction load is estimated to be 10 kNm times 20 m

(a) Determine the maximum elastic bending stress and deflection of onehalf box

(b) Determine the horizontal distributed force required to pull the two half boxestogether

(c) Determine the maximum elastic bending stress and deflection after the halfboxes are pulled together

10

16

2020

20

20

30

20

2020

25

400 200 100 200200 200800

1000 1000

1000

500

600

300

800400

25

(a) Half box section(c) I-section with

off-centre web(b) Box section

(d) Monosymmetric I-section

4500

(e) Propped cantilever

QD =150 kN

Q = 200 kNI

qD = 50 kNm

q = 20 kNmI

1500

20

Figure 545 Unworked examples

In-plane bending of beams 225

5133 Example 21 ndash shear stresses

Determine the shear stress distribution caused by a vertical shear force of 500 kNin the section shown in Figure 545c

5134 Example 22 ndash shear centre

Determine the position of the shear centre of the section shown in Figure 545c

5135 Example 23 ndash shear centre of a box section

Determine the shear flow distribution caused by a horizontal shear force of 2000 kNin the box section shown in Figure 545b and determine the position of its shearcentre

5136 Example 24 ndash plastic moment of a monosymmetricI-section

Determine the fully plastic moment and the shape factor of the monosymmetricI-beam shown in Figure 545d if the yield stress is 265 Nmm2

5137 Example 25 ndash elastic design

Determine a suitable hot-rolled I-section member of S275 steel for the proppedcantilever shown in Figure 545e by using the elastic method of design

5138 Example 26 ndash plastic collapse analysis

Determine the plastic collapse mechanism of the propped cantilever shown inFigure 545e

5139 Example 27 ndash plastic design

Use the plastic design method to determine a suitable hot-rolled I-section of S275steel for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 545e

References

1 Popov EP (1968) Introduction to Mechanics of Solids Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

2 Hall AS (1984) An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids 2nd edition John WileySydney

3 Pippard AJS and Baker JF (1968) The Analysis of Engineering Structures4th edition Edward Arnold London

226 In-plane bending of beams

4 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

5 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

6 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 2nd editionPergamon Press Oxford

7 Ghali A Neville AM and Brown TG (1997) Structural Analysis ndash A UnifiedClassical and Matrix Approach 5th edition Routledge Oxford

8 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1990) Structural Analysis 3rd editionVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham

9 British Standards Institution (2005) BS4-12005 Structural Steel Sections ndash Part1Specification for hot-rolled sections BSI London

10 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1981) Bending shear and torsion of thin-walled beamsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 15(1) pp 2ndash18

11 Hancock GJ and Harrison HB (1972) A general method of analysis of stressesin thin-walled sections with open and closed parts Civil Engineering TransactionsInstitution of Engineers Australia CE14 No 2 pp 181ndash8

12 Papangelis JP and Hancock GJ (1995) THIN-WALL ndash Cross-section Analysisand Finite Strip Buckling Analysis of Thin-Walled Structures Centre for AdvancedStructural Engineering University of Sydney

13 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

14 Winter G (1940) Stress distribution in and equivalent width of flanges of wide thin-walled steel beams Technical Note 784 NationalAdvisory Committee forAeronautics

15 Abdel-Sayed G (1969) Effective width of steel deck-plates in bridges Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 95 No ST7 pp 1459ndash74

16 Malcolm DJ and Redwood RG (1970) Shear lag in stiffened box girders Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST7 pp 1403ndash19

17 Kristek V (1983) Shear lag in box girders Plated Structures Stability and Strength(ed R Narayanan) Applied Science Publishers London pp 165ndash94

18 Baker JF and Heyman J (1969) Plastic Design of Frames ndash 1 FundamentalsCambridge University Press Cambridge

19 Heyman J (1971) Plastic Design of Frames ndash 2 Applications Cambridge UniversityPress Cambridge

20 Horne MR (1978) Plastic Theory of Structures 2nd edition Pergamon Press Oxford21 Neal BG (1977) The Plastic Methods of Structural Analysis 3rd edition Chapman

and Hall London22 Beedle LS (1958) Plastic Design of Steel Frames John Wiley New York23 Horne MR and Morris LJ (1981) Plastic Design of Low-rise frames Granada

London24 Davies JM and Brown BA (1996) Plastic Design to BS5950 Blackwell Science

Ltd Oxford25 British Standards Institution (2006) Eυρoχoδε 3 ndash Design of Steel Structures ndash Part

1ndash5 Plated structural elements BSI London

Chapter 6

Lateral buckling of beams

61 Introduction

In the discussion given in Chapter 5 of the in-plane behaviour of beams it wasassumed that when a beam is loaded in its stiffer principal plane it deflects only inthat plane If the beam does not have sufficient lateral stiffness or lateral supportto ensure that this is so then it may buckle out of the plane of loading as shown inFigure 61 The load at which this buckling occurs may be substantially less thanthe beamrsquos in-plane load resistance as indicated in Figure 62

For an idealised perfectly straight elastic beam there are no out-of-plane defor-mations until the applied moment M reaches the elastic buckling moment Mcr when the beam buckles by deflecting laterally and twisting as shown in Figure 61These two deformations are interdependent when the beam deflects laterally theapplied moment has a component which exerts a torque about the deflected longi-tudinal axis which causes the beam to twist This behaviour which is important forlong unrestrained I-beams whose resistances to lateral bending and torsion are lowis called elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling (referred to as elastic lateralndashtorsionalbuckling in EC3) In this chapter it will simply be referred to as lateral buckling

The failure of a perfectly straight slender beam is initiated when the additionalstresses induced by elastic buckling cause the first yield However a perfectlystraight beam of intermediate slenderness may yield before the elastic bucklingmoment is reached because of the combined effects of the in-plane bendingstresses and any residual stresses and may subsequently buckle inelastically asindicated in Figure 62 For very stocky beams the inelastic buckling momentmay be higher than the in-plane plastic collapse moment Mp in which case themoment resistance of the beam is not affected by lateral buckling

In this chapter the behaviour and design of beams which fail by lateral bucklingand yielding are discussed It is assumed that local buckling of the compressionflange or of the web (which is dealt with in Chapter 4) does not occur The behaviourand design of beams bent about both principal axes and of beams with axial loadsare discussed in Chapter 7

228 Lateral buckling of beams

Figure 61 Lateral buckling of a cantilever

62 Elastic beams

621 Buckling of straight beams

6211 Simply supported beams with equal end moments

A perfectly straight elastic I-beam which is loaded by equal and opposite endmoments is shown in Figure 63 The beam is simply supported at its ends sothat lateral deflection and twist rotation are prevented while the flange ends arefree to rotate in horizontal planes so that the beam ends are free to warp (seeSection 1083) The beam will buckle at a moment Mcr when a deflected andtwisted equilibrium position such as that shown in Figure 63 is possible It isshown in Section 61211 that this position is given by

v = Mcr

π2EIzL2φ = δ sin

πx

L (61)

Lateral buckling of beams 229

Full plasticity M = Mp

Beams without residual stresses

Welded beams with residual stresses

MM

L

Elastic bucklingStrain-hardening

14

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Slenderness ratio Liz

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

mom

ent M

My

Hot-rolled beams with residual stresses (see Fig 39)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Figure 62 Lateral buckling strengths of simply supported I-beams

v

L

x

dvdx

v

z

(d) Plan on longitudinal axis

(b) Part plan

y

McrMcr

(a) Elevation

Pins prevent end twist rotation (f = 0) and allow end warping (f = 0)

(c) Section

f

Figure 63 Buckling of a simply supported beam

where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that the elasticbuckling moment is given by

Mcr = Mzx (62)

230 Lateral buckling of beams

where

Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2

) (63)

and in which EIz is the minor axis flexural rigidity GIt is the torsional rigidityand EIw is the warping rigidity of the beam Equation 63 shows that the resistanceto buckling depends on the geometric mean of the flexural stiffness EIz and thetorsional stiffness (GIt + π2EIwL2) Equations 62 and 63 apply to all beamswhich are bent about an axis of symmetry including equal flanged channels andequal angles

Equation 63 ignores the effects of the major axis curvature d2wdx2 =minusMcrEIy and produces conservative estimates of the elastic buckling momentequal to radic[(1minusEIzEIy)1minus (GIt +π2EIwL2)2EIy] times the true value Thiscorrection factor which is just less than unity for many beam sections but may besignificantly less than unity for column sections is usually neglected in designNevertheless its value approaches zero as Iz approaches Iy so that the true elasticbuckling moment approaches infinity Thus an I-beam in uniform bending aboutits weak axis does not buckle which is intuitively obvious Research [1] has indi-cated that in some other cases the correction factor may be close to unity and thatit is prudent to ignore the effect of major axis curvature

6212 Beams with unequal end moments

A simply supported beam with unequal major axis end moments M and βmM isshown in Figure 64a It is shown in Section 61212 that the value of the end

L

Mom

ent

f

acto

r m

3

2

1

M

mM

m M

M

(a) Beam

(b) Bending moment (c) Moment factors m

End moment ratio m

Equation 66

Equation 65

K = 30

K = 005

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

Figure 64 Buckling of beams with unequal end moments

Lateral buckling of beams 231

moment Mcr at elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling can be expressed in the form of

Mcr = αmMzx (64)

in which the moment modification factor αm which accounts for the effect ofthe non-uniform distribution of the major axis bending moment can be closelyapproximated by

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (65)

or by

1αm = 057 minus 033βm + 010β2m ge 043 (66)

These approximations form the basis of a very simple method of predicting thebuckling of the segments of a beam which is loaded only by concentrated loadsapplied through transverse members preventing local lateral deflection and twistrotation In this case each segment between load points may be treated as a beamwith unequal end moments and its elastic buckling moment may be estimated byusing equation 64 and either equation 65 or 66 and by taking L as the segmentlength Each buckling moment so calculated corresponds to a particular bucklingload parameter for the complete load set and the lowest of these parameters givesa conservative approximation of the actual buckling load parameter This simplemethod ignores any buckling interactions between the segments A more accuratemethod which accounts for these interactions is discussed in Section 682

6213 Beams with central concentrated loads

A simply supported beam with a central concentrated load Q acting at a distanceminuszQ above the centroidal axis of the beam is shown in Figure 65a When the beambuckles by deflecting laterally and twisting the line of action of the load moveswith the central cross-section but remains vertical as shown in Figure 65c Thecase when the load acts above the centroid is more dangerous than that of centroidalloading because of the additional torque minusQ zQφL2 which increases the twistingof the beam and decreases its resistance to buckling

It is shown in Section 61213 that the dimensionless buckling loadQL2

radic(EIzGIt) varies as shown in Figure 66 with the beam parameter

K = radic(π2EIwGItL

2) (67)

and the dimensionless height ε of the point of application of the load given by

ε = zQ

L

radic(EIz

GIt

) (68)

232 Lateral buckling of beams

Q(vndashzQf)L2

2

After buckling

Q

x

v

d

d

x

vx

d

d

Before buckling

Qndash zQfL2

zQfL2

fL2

nL2

vL2v

x

Q2

L2 L2

ndashzQ

(b) Plan on longitudinal axis

(c) Section at mid-span(a) Elevation

QQ

ndash

ndashzQ

Figure 65 I-beam with a central concentrated load

= (zQL) (EIzGIt)

= 06

03

0ndash03

ndash06

ndash1

0

2zQdf = 1

Centroid

Approximate equation 64 with m = 135

80

60

40

20

0

Beam parameter K = (2EIwGItL2)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

QL

2 radic(E

I zG

I t)

Top flange

Bottom flange

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

radic

Figure 66 Elastic buckling of beams with central concentrated loads

For centroidal loading (ε = 0) the elastic buckling load Q increases with thebeam parameter K in much the same way as does the buckling moment of beams

Lateral buckling of beams 233

with equal and opposite end moments (see equation 63) The elastic buckling load

Qcr = 4McrL (69)

can be approximated by using equation 64 with the moment modification factorαm (which accounts for the effect of the non-uniform distribution of major axisbending moment) equal to 135

The elastic buckling load also varies with the load height parameter ε andalthough the resistance to buckling is high when the load acts below the cen-troidal axis it decreases significantly as the point of application rises as shown inFigure 66 For equal flanged I-beams the parameter ε can be transformed into

2zQ

df= π

Kε (610)

where df is the distance between flange centroids The variation of the bucklingload with 2zQdf is shown by the solid lines in Figure 66 and it can be seen that thedifferences between top (2zQdf = minus1) and bottom (2zQdf = 1) flange loadingincrease with the beam parameter K This effect is therefore more important fordeep beam-type sections of short span than for shallow column-type sections oflong span Approximate expressions for the variations of the moment modifica-tion factor αm with the beam parameter K which account for the dimensionlessload height 2zQdf for equal flanged I-beams are given in [2] Alternatively themaximum moment at elastic buckling Mcr = QL4 may be approximated by using

Mcr

Mzx= αm

radic[1 +

(04αmzQNcrz

Mzx

)2]

+ 04αmzQNcrz

Mzx

(611)

and αm asymp 135 in which

Ncrz = π2EIzL2 (612)

6214 Other loading conditions

The effect of the distribution of the applied load along the length of a simplysupported beam on its elastic buckling strength has been investigated numericallyby many methods including those discussed in [3ndash5] A particularly powerfulcomputer method is the finite element method [6ndash10] while the finite integralmethod [11 12] which allows accurate numerical solutions of the coupled minoraxis bending and torsion equations to be obtained has been used extensively Manyparticular cases have been studied [13ndash16] and tabulations of elastic bucklingloads are available [2 3 5 13 15 17] as is a user-friendly computer program[18] for analysing elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling

Some approximate solutions for the maximum moments Mcr at elastic bucklingof simply supported beams which are loaded along their centroidal axes can beobtained from equation 64 by using the moment modification factors αm givenin Figure 67 It can be seen that the more dangerous loadings are those which

234 Lateral buckling of beams

M

Beam Moment distribution Range

M

q

M

m

m

Mm

QQ

2a

a

Q

Q

L2 L2

Q

L2 L2

QLm16

3 QL16m3

QLm QL8m

qLm

mqL2

qLm qL212m

QLm

qL2m

----- -----------

8--------- ------

8-- ---- ---- ---------------

q

12--------- --------

12------- -----------

M

QL2

--------(1ndash )L2a------

QL4

-------- 2

QL4

--------(1ndash 3 8)m

QL4

--------(1ndash

qL8

8

-------- (1ndash2

2

qL8

-------- (12

8-- -------- ---- --

1ndash(2 ) aL

2)m

4)m

ndash 3)m2

175 +105 m+ 03m2

25

ndash1 le m le 0606 le m le 1

0 le m le 0909 le m le 1

0 le m le 0707 le m le 1

0 le m le 075075le m le 1

0 le m le1

0 le 2aL le 1

0 le 2aL le 1

10 + 035(1ndash2aL)2

135 + 04(2aL)2

135 + 015mndash12 + 30m

113 + 010mndash125 + 35m

113 + 012mndash238 + 48m

135 + 036m

Figure 67 Moment modification factors for simply supported beams

produce more nearly constant distributions of major axis bending moment andthat the worst case is that of equal and opposite end moments for which αm = 10

For other beam loadings than those shown in Figure 67 the momentmodification factor αm may be approximated by using

αm = 175Mmaxradic(M 2

2 + M 23 + M 2

4 )le 25 (613)

in which Mmax is the maximum moment M2 M4 are the moments at the quarterpoints and M3 is the moment at the mid-point of the beam

The effect of load height on the elastic buckling moment Mcr may generallybe approximated by using equation 611 with αm obtained from Figure 67 orequation 613

622 Bending and twisting of crooked beams

Real beams are not perfectly straight but have small initial crookednesses andtwists which cause them to bend and twist at the beginning of loading If a simplysupported beam with equal and opposite end moments M has an initial crookednessand twist rotation which are given by

v0

δ0= φ0

θ0= sin

πx

L (614)

Lateral buckling of beams 235

in which the central initial crookedness δ0 and twist rotation θ0 are related by

δ0

θ0= Mzx

π2EIzL2 (615)

then the deformations of the beam are given by

v

δ= φ

θ= sin

πx

L (616)

in which

δ

δ0= θ

θ0= MMzx

1 minus MMzx (617)

as shown in Section 6122 The variations of the dimensionless central deflectionδδ0 and twist rotation θθ0 are shown in Figure 68 and it can be seen thatdeformation begins at the commencement of loading and increases rapidly as theelastic buckling moment Mzx is approached

The simple loadndashdeformation relationships of equations 616 and 617 are ofthe same forms as those of equations 38 and 39 for compression memberswith sinusoidal initial crookedness It follows that the Southwell plot tech-nique for extrapolating the elastic buckling loads of compression members fromexperimental measurements (see Section 322) may also be used for beams

Beam with initial crookedness and twist 00 = f0130 = sin xL

0 f0 = Mzx Ncrzequation 617

Straight beam 0 = f0 = 0 equations 61 and 63

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Dimensionless deformation 0 or 13130

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t MM

zx

0 5 10 15 20 25

Figure 68 Lateral deflection and twist of a beam with equal end moments

236 Lateral buckling of beams

As the deformations increase with the applied moments M so do the stresses Itis shown in Section 6122 that the limiting moment ML at which a beam withoutresidual stresses first yields is given by

ML

My= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(618)

in which

Φ = (1 + η + λ2)2 (619)

λ = radic(MyMzx) (620)

is a generalised slenderness My = Welyfy is the nominal first yield moment andη is a factor defining the imperfection magnitudes when the central crookednessδ0 is given by

δ0Ncrz

Mzx= θ0 = WelzWely

1 + (df 2) (NcrzMzx)η (621)

in which Ncrz is given by equation 612 Equations 618ndash620 are similar toequations 311 312 and 35 for the limiting axial force at first yield of a

ndash

==

zx

zcrfzx

crz

M

Nd

WWM

N

0

0

21

)(Generalised slenderness =

0 05 10 15 20 25

Yielding due to major axis bending alone

First yield MLMy due to initial crookedness and twist

Elastic buckling MzxMy

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t Mzx

My

or M

LM

y

My Mcr

13 elyelz

( )

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Figure 69 Buckling and yielding of beams

Lateral buckling of beams 237

compression member The variation of the dimensionless limiting moment MLMy

for η = λ24 is shown in Figure 69 in which λ = radic

(MyMzx) plotted along thehorizontal axis is equivalent to the generalised slenderness ratio used in Figure 34for an elastic compression member Figure 69 shows that the limiting momentsof short beams approach the yield moment My while for long beams the limitingmoments approach the elastic buckling moment Mzx

63 Inelastic beams

The solution for the buckling moment Mzx of a perfectly straight simply sup-ported I-beam with equal end moments given by equations 62 and 63 is onlyvalid while the beam remains elastic In a short-span beam yielding occursbefore the ultimate moment is reached and significant portions of the beamsare inelastic when buckling commences The effective rigidities of these inelasticportions are reduced by yielding and consequently the buckling moment is alsoreduced

For beams with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) the distributionof yield across the section does not vary along the beam and when there are noresidual stresses the inelastic buckling moment can be calculated from a modifiedform of equation 63 as

MI =radic[

π2(EIz)t

L2

] [(GIt)t + π2(EIw)t

L2

](622)

in which the subscripted quantities ( )t are the reduced inelastic rigidities whichare effective at buckling Estimates of these rigidities can be obtained by usingthe tangent moduli of elasticity (see Section 331) which are appropriate to thevarying stress levels throughout the section Thus the values of E and G are usedin the elastic areas while the strain-hardening moduli Est and Gst are used inthe yielded and strain-hardened areas (see Section 334) When the effectiverigidities calculated in this way are used in equation 622 a lower bound esti-mate of the buckling moment is determined (Section 333) The variation of thedimensionless buckling moment MMy with the geometrical slenderness ratioLiz of a typical rolled-steel section which has been stress-relieved is shown inFigure 62 In the inelastic range the buckling moment increases almost linearlywith decreasing slenderness from the first yield moment My = Welyfy to thefull plastic moment Mp = Wplyfy which is reached soon after the flanges arefully yielded beyond which buckling is controlled by the strain-hardening moduliEst Gst

The inelastic buckling moment of a beam with residual stresses can be obtainedin a similar manner except that the pattern of yielding is not symmetrical about thesection major axis so that a modified form of equation 676 for a monosymmetricI-beam must be used instead of equation 622 The inelastic buckling momentvaries markedly with both the magnitude and the distribution of the residual

238 Lateral buckling of beams

stresses The moment at which inelastic buckling initiates depends mainly onthe magnitude of the residual compressive stresses at the compression flange tipswhere yielding causes significant reductions in the effective rigidities (EIz)t and(EIw)t The flange-tip residual stresses are comparatively high in hot-rolled beamsespecially those with high ratios of flange to web area and so the inelastic bucklingis initiated comparatively early in these beams as shown in Figure 62 The resid-ual stresses in hot-rolled beams decrease away from the flange tips (see Figure 39for example) and so the extent of yielding increases and the effective rigiditiessteadily decrease as the applied moment increases Because of this the inelasticbuckling moment decreases in an approximately linear fashion as the slendernessincreases as shown in Figure 62

In beams fabricated by welding flange plates to web plates the compressiveresidual stresses at the flange tips which increase with the welding heat input areusually somewhat smaller than those in hot-rolled beams and so the initiation ofinelastic buckling is delayed as shown in Figure 62 However the variations ofthe residual stresses across the flanges are more nearly uniform in welded beamsand so once flange yielding is initiated it spreads quickly through the flange withlittle increase in moment This causes large reductions in the inelastic bucklingmoments of stocky beams as indicated in Figure 62

When a beam has a more general loading than that of equal and opposite endmoments the in-plane bending moment varies along the beam and so whenyielding occurs its distribution also varies Because of this the beam acts as ifnon-uniform and the torsion equilibrium equation becomes more complicatedNevertheless numerical solutions have been obtained for some hot-rolled beamswith a number of different loading arrangements [19 20] and some of these(for unequal end moments M and βmM ) are shown in Figure 610 together withapproximate solutions given by

MI

Mp= 07 + 03(1 minus 07MpMcr)

(061 minus 03βm + 007β2m)

(623)

in which Mcr is given by equations 64 and 65In this equation the effects of the bending moment distribution are included

in both the elastic buckling resistance Mcr = αmMzx through the use of the endmoment ratio βm in the moment modification factor αm and also through the directuse of βm in equation 623 This latter use causes the inelastic buckling momentsMI to approach the elastic buckling moment Mcr as the end moment ratio increasestowards βm = 1

The most severe case is that of equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) forwhich yielding is constant along the beam so that the resistance to lateral bucklingis reduced everywhere Less severe cases are those of beams with unequal endmoments M andβmM withβm gt 0 where yielding is confined to short regions nearthe supports for which the reductions in the section properties are comparativelyunimportant The least severe case is that of equal end moments that bend the beam

Lateral buckling of beams 239

Elastic buckling Mcr

= 10 05 0 05 10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t MIM

p

11

10

09

08

07

06

05

m = 10 05 0 05 10

L MM

Computer solution (254 UB 31) Approximate equation 623

Full plasticity Mp

Generalised slenderness ( MpMcr)

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

m

m

Figure 610 Inelastic buckling of beams with unequal end moments

in double curvature (βm = 1) for which the moment gradient is steepest and theregions of yielding are most limited

The range of modified slenderness radic(MpMcr) for which a beam can reach

the full plastic moment Mp depends very much on the loading arrangement Anapproximate expression for the limit of this range for beams with end momentsM and βmM can be obtained from equation 623 asradic(

Mp

Mcr

)p

=radic(

039 + 030βm minus 007β2m

070

) (624)

In the case of a simply supported beam with an unbraced central concen-trated load yielding is confined to a small central portion of the beam sothat any reductions in the section properties are limited to this region Inelas-tic buckling can be approximated by using equation 623 with βm = minus07 andαm = 135

64 Real beams

Real beams differ from the ideal beams analysed in Section 621 in much thesame way as do real compression members (see Section 341) Thus any smallimperfections such as initial crookedness twist eccentricity of load or horizon-tal load components cause the beam to behave as if it had an equivalent initialcrookedness and twist (see Section 622) as shown by curve A in Figure 611On the other hand imperfections such as residual stresses or variations in material

240 Lateral buckling of beams

Curve C ndash real beams

Curve B ndash equivalentresidual stresses

Curve A ndash equivalent initialcrookedness and twist

Elastic limit

Elastic bendingand twisting

Inelastic buckling

Elastic buckling

MultMI

ML

Mcr

Lateral deflection and twist

Moment

Figure 611 Behaviour of real beams

properties cause the beam to behave as shown by curve B in Figure 611 Thebehaviour of real beams having both types of imperfection is indicated by curve Cin Figure 611 which shows a transition from the elastic behaviour of a beam withcurvature and twist to the inelastic post-buckling behaviour of a beam with residualstresses

65 Design against lateral buckling

651 General

It is possible to develop a refined analysis of the behaviour of real beams whichincludes the effects of all types of imperfection However the use of such ananalysis is not warranted because the magnitudes of the imperfections are uncer-tain Instead design rules are often based on a simple analysis for one type ofequivalent imperfection which allows approximately for all imperfections or onapproximations of experimental results such as those shown in Figure 612

For the EC3 method of designing against lateral buckling the maximum momentin the beam at elastic lateral buckling Mcr and the beam section resistance Wyfyare used to define a generalised slenderness

λLT =radic(WyfyMcr) (625)

Lateral buckling of beams 241

EC3 welded I-sections (hbf gt 2)

EC3 rolled I-sections (hbf gt 2)

Full plasticity MpElastic buckling Mcr

L

M M

QQ

Q

L4

L4

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

ts M

bR

d M

p or

Mul

tMp

15

10

05

00 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness )( crpLT MM=

159 hot-rolled beams

Figure 612 Moment resistances of beams in near-uniform bending

and this is used in a modification of the first yield equation 618 which approximatesthe experimental resistances of many beams in near-uniform bending such as thoseshown in Figure 612

652 Elastic buckling moment

The EC3 method for designing against lateral buckling is an example of a moregeneral approach to the analysis and the design of structures whose strengths aregoverned by the interaction between yielding and buckling Another example ofthis approach was developed in Section 37 in which the relationship between theultimate strength of a simply supported uniform member in uniform compressionand its squash and elastic buckling loads was used to determine the in-plane ulti-mate strengths of other compression members This method has been called themethod of design by buckling analysis because the maximum moment at elasticbuckling Mcr must be used rather than the approximations of somewhat variableaccuracy which have been used in the past

The first step in the method of design by buckling analysis is to determine theload at which the elastic lateral buckling takes place so that the elastic bucklingmoment Mcr can be calculated This varies with the beam geometry its loadingand its restraints but unfortunately there is no simple general method of finding it

However there are a number of general computer programs which can be usedfor finding Mcr [6 8 10 21ndash23] including the user-friendly computer programPRFELB [18] which can calculate the elastic buckling moment for any beam orcantilever under any loading or restraint conditions While such programs have

242 Lateral buckling of beams

S

B

B

B

B

C

O

O

O

In-plane support

Fixed end

Out-of-plane brace

Buckled shape

Braced

Cantilevered

Overhung

Simply supported

B

C

O

S

Figure 613 Beams cantilevers and overhanging beams

not been widely used in the past it is expected that the use of EC3 will result intheir much greater application

Alternatively many approximations for the elastic buckling moments Mcr undera wide range of loading conditions are given in [16] Later sections summarisethe methods of obtaining Mcr for restrained beams cantilevers and overhangingbeams braced and continuous beams (Figure 613) rigid frames and monosym-metric and non-uniform beams under common loading conditions which causebending about an axis of symmetry

653 EC3 design buckling moment resistances

The EC3 design buckling moment resistance MbRd is defined by

MbRdγM1

Wyfy= 1

ΦLT +radicΦ2

LT minus βλ2LT

(626)

and

ΦLT = 05

1 + αLT (λLT minus λLT 0)+ βλ2LT

(627)

in which γM1 is the partial factor for member instability which has a recommendedvalue of 10 in EC3 Wyfy is the section moment resistance λLT is the modifiedslenderness given by equation 625 and the values of αLT β and λLT 0 depend onthe type of beam section Equations 625ndash627 are similar to equations 620 618and 619 for the first yield of a beam with initial crookedness and twist exceptthat the section moment resistance Wyfy replaces the yield moment My the termαLT (λLT minus λLT 0) replaces η and the term β is introduced

Lateral buckling of beams 243

The EC3 uniform bending design buckling resistances MbRd for β = 075λLT 0 = 04 and αLT = 049 (rolled I-sections with hb gt 2) are compared withexperimental results for beams in near-uniform bending in Figure 612 For veryslender beams with high values of the modified slenderness λLT the design buck-ling moment resistance MbRd shown in Figure 612 approaches the elastic bucklingmoment Mcr while for stocky beams the moment resistance MbRd reaches thesection resistance Wyfy and so is governed by yielding or local buckling asdiscussed in Section 472 For beams of intermediate slenderness equations 625ndash627 provide a transition between these limits which is close to the lower boundof the experimental results shown in Figure 612 Also shown in Figure 612 arethe EC3 design buckling moment resistances for αLT = 076 (welded I-sectionswith hb gt 2)

The EC3 provides two methods of design a simple but conservative methodwhich may be applied to any type of beam section and a less conservative limitedmethod

For the simple general method β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 and the imperfectionfactor αLT depends on the type of beam section as set out in Tables 64 and 63 ofEC3 This method is conservative because it uses a very low threshold modifiedslenderness of λLT 0 = 02 above which the buckling resistance is reduced belowthe section resistance Wyfy and because it ignores the increased inelastic bucklingresistances of beams in non-uniform bending shown for example in Figure 610

For the less conservative limited method for uniform beams of rolled I-sectionβ = 075 and λLT 0 = 04 and a modified design buckling moment resistance

MbRdmod = MbRdf le MbRd (628)

is determined using

f = 1 minus 05(1 minus kc)1 minus 2(λLT minus 08)2 (629)

in which the values of the correction factor kc depend on the bending momentdistribution and are given by

kc = 1radic

C1 = 1radicαm (630)

in which αm is the moment modification factor obtained from Figure 67 orequation 65 66 or 613 The EC3 design buckling moment resistances MbRdmod

for β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 and αLT = 049 (rolled I-sections with hb gt 2) arecompared with the inelastic buckling moment approximations of equation 623 inFigure 614

654 Lateral buckling design procedures

For the EC3 strength design of a beam against lateral buckling the distribution ofthe bending moment and the value of the maximum moment MEd are determined

244 Lateral buckling of beams

10

08

06

04

02

0

m =

Section resistance Wy fy

M mM Elastic buckling Mcr

Inelastic buckling approximationfor MI (equation 623)

EC3 moment resistance MbRdmod Wy fy(equations 628 29)

Generalised slenderness (Wy fyMcr)

m = 10 05 0 10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t Mb

Rd

mod

Wy

f y o

r M

IWy

f y

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

ndash

ndash

ndash05ndash10 0 10

Figure 614 EC3 design buckling moment resistances

by an elastic analysis (if the beam is statically indeterminate) or by statics (ifthe beam is statically determinate) The strength design loads are obtained bysumming the nominal loads multiplied by the appropriate partial load factors γF

(see Section 156)In both the EC3 simple general and less conservative methods of checking a

uniform equal-flanged beam the section moment resistance WyfyγM0 is checkedfirst the elastic buckling moment Mcr is determined and the modified slendernessλLT is calculated using equation 625 The appropriate EC3 values of αLT βand λLT 0 (the values of these differ according to which of the two methods ofdesign is used) are then selected and the design buckling moment resistance MbRd

calculated using equations 626 and 627 In the simple general method the beamis satisfactory when

MEd le MbRd le WyfyγM0 (631)

In the less conservative method MbRd in equation 631 is replaced by MbRdmod

obtained using equations 628ndash630The beam must also be checked for shear shear and bending and bearing

as discussed in Sections 5615ndash5617 and for serviceability as discussed inSection 57

When a beam is to be designed the beam section is not known and so a trialsection must be chosen An iterative process is then used in which the trial sectionis evaluated and a new trial section chosen until a satisfactory section is found

Lateral buckling of beams 245

One method of finding a first-trial section is to make initial guesses for fy (usuallythe nominal value) and MbRdWyfy (say 05) to use these to calculate a targetsection plastic modulus

Wply ge MEd fyMbRd(Wyfy)

(632)

and then to select a suitable trial sectionAfter the trial section has been selected its elastic buckling moment Mcr yield

stress fy and design moment resistance MbRd can be found and used to calculate anew value of Wply and to select a new trial section The iterative process usuallyconverges within a few cycles but convergence can be hastened by using the meanof the previous and current values of MbRdWyfy in the calculation of the targetsection modulus

Worked examples of checking and designing beams against lateral bucklingare given in Sections 6151ndash6157

655 Checking beams supported at both ends

6551 Section moment resistance

The classification of a specified beam cross-section as Class 1 2 3 or 4 is describedin Sections 472 and 5612 and the determination of the design section momentresistance McRd = WyfyγM0 in Sections 472 and 5613

6552 Elastic buckling moment

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supported beam depends onits geometry loading and restraints It may be obtained by calculating Mzx

(equation 63) Ncrz (equation 612) and αm (equation 613) and substitutingthese into equation 611 or by using a computer program such as those referredto in Section 652

6553 Design buckling moment resistance

The design buckling moment resistance MbRd can be obtained as described inSection 653

66 Restrained beams

661 Simple supports and rigid restraints

In the previous sections it was assumed that the beam was supported laterally onlyat its ends When a beam with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus10) has

246 Lateral buckling of beams

an additional rigid restraint at its centre which prevents lateral deflection and twistrotation then its buckled shape is given by

φ

(φ)L4= v

(v)L4= sin

π x

L2 (633)

and its elastic buckling moment is given by

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

(L2)2

) (GIt + π2EIw

(L2)2

) (634)

The end supports of a beam may also differ from simple supports For exampleboth ends of the beam may be rigidly built-in against lateral rotation about the minoraxis and against end warping If the beam has equal and opposite end momentsthen its buckled shape is given by

φ

(φ)L2= v

(v)L2= 1

2

(1 minus cos

π x

L2

) (635)

and its elastic buckling moment is given by equation 634In general the elastic buckling moment Mcr of a restrained beam with equal

and opposite end moments (βm = minus10) can be expressed as

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

) (636)

in which

Lcr = kcrL (637)

is the effective length and kcr is an effective length factorWhen a beam has several rigid restraints which prevent local lateral deflection

and twist rotation then the beam is divided into a series of segments The elasticbuckling of each segment may be approximated by using its length as the effectivelength Lcr One segment will be the most critical and the elastic buckling momentof this segment will provide a conservative estimate of the elastic buckling resis-tance of the whole beam This method ignores the interactions between adjacentsegments which increase the elastic buckling resistance of the beam Approximatemethods of allowing for these interactions are given in Section 68

The use of the effective length concept can be extended to beams with loadingconditions other than equal and opposite end moments In general the maximummoment Mcr at elastic buckling depends on the beam section its loading and itsrestraints so that

McrLradic(EIzGIt)

= fn

(π2EIw

GItL2 loading

2zQ

df restraints

) (638)

A partial separation of the effect of the loading from that of the restraintconditions may be achieved for beams with centroidal loading (zQ = 0) by

Lateral buckling of beams 247

approximating the maximum moment Mcr at elastic buckling by using

Mcr = αm

radic(π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

) (639)

for which it is assumed that the factor αm depends only on the in-plane bend-ing moment distribution and that the effective length Lcr depends only on therestraint conditions This approximation allows the αm factors calculated for sim-ply supported beams (see Section 621) and the effective lengths Lcr determinedfor restrained beams with equal and opposite end moments (αm = 1) to be usedmore generally

Unfortunately the form of equation 639 is not suitable for beams with loadsacting away from the centroid It has been suggested that approximate solutionsfor Mcr may be obtained by using equation 611 with Lcr substituted for L inequations 63 and 612 but it has been reported [16] that predictions obtained inthis way are sometimes of somewhat variable accuracy

662 Intermediate restraints

In the previous sub-section it was shown that the elastic buckling moment of asimply supported I-beam is substantially increased when a restraint is providedwhich prevents the centre of the beam from deflecting laterally and twisting Thisrestraint need not be completely rigid but may be elastic provided its translationaland rotational stiffnesses exceed certain minimum values

The case of the beam with equal and opposite end moments M shown inFigure 615a is analysed in [24] This beam has a central translational restraint ofstiffnessαt (whereαt is the ratio of the lateral force exerted by the restraint to the lat-eral deflection of the beam measured at the height zt of the restraint) and a centraltorsional restraint of stiffness αr (where αr is the ratio of the torque exerted by therestraint to the twist rotation of the beam) It is shown in [24] that the elastic buck-ling moment Mcr can be expressed in the standard form of equation 639 when thestiffnessesαt αr are related to each other and the effective length factor kcr through

αtL3

16EIz

(1 + 2ztdf

2zcdf

)=

2kcr

)3cot π

2kcr

π2kcr

cot π2kcr

minus 1 (640)

αrL3

16EIw

(1 minus 2zt2zc

df df

)=

2kcr

)3cot π

2kcr

π2kcr

cot π2kcr

minus 1 (641)

in which

zc = Mcr

π2EIz(kcrL)2= df

2radic(1 + k2

crK2) (642)

and K = radic(π2EIwGItL2)

248 Lateral buckling of beams

0 5 10 15 20 25

x

y

z

Mcr

Mcr

rfL2ndashzt

t( ndash ztf)L2

(a) Beam

Axis of buckled beam

Second mode buckling

Beam with equal and opposite end moments

Braced first mode buckling

30

25

20

15

10

05

0

Rec

ipro

cal o

f ef

fect

ive

leng

th f

acto

r 1

k cr

Translational restraint stiffness

Rotational restraint stiffness

(b) Effective length factors

+

fdcz

fd

fdfd

tzLr

zEI

Lt

22

cztz 22

13

116

wEI16

3

fL2

L2

2

ndash

)()(

Figure 615 Beam with elastic intermediate restraints

These relationships are shown graphically in Figure 615b and are similar tothat shown in Figure 316c for compression members with intermediate restraintsIt can be seen that the effective length factor kcr varies from 1 when the restraintsare of zero stiffness to 05 when

αtL3

16EIz

(1 + 2ztdf

2zcdf

)= αrL3

16EIw

(1 minus 2zt

df

2zc

df

)= π2 (643)

If the restraint stiffnesses exceed these values the beam buckles in the secondmode with zero central deflection and twist at a moment which corresponds tokcr = 05 When the height minuszt of the translational restraint above the centroidis equal to minusd2

f 4zc the required rotational stiffness αr given by equation 643is zero Since zc is never less than df 2 (see equation 642) it follows that a topflange translational restraint of stiffness

αL = 16π2EIzL3

1 + df 2zc(644)

is always sufficient to brace the beam into the second mode This minimum stiffnesscan be expressed as

αL = 8Mcr

L df

1

1 + radic(1 + 4K2) (645)

Lateral buckling of beams 249

Shear diaphragm Shear diaphragmI - beam

(a) Elevation (b) Section

M M

L

Figure 616 Diaphragm-braced I-beams

and the greatest value of this is

αL = 4Mcr

L df (646)

The flange force Qf at elastic buckling can be approximated by

Qf = Mcrdf (647)

and so the minimum top-flange translational stiffness can be approximated by

αL = 4Qf L (648)

This is of the same form as equation 333 for the minimum stiffness ofintermediate restraints for compression members

There are no restraint stiffness requirements in EC3 This follows the finding[25 26] that compression member restraints which are capable of transmitting25 of the force in the compression member invariably are stiff enough to ensurethe second mode buckling Thus EC3 generally requires any restraining elementat a plastic hinge location to be capable of transmitting 25 of the flange forcein the beam being restrained

The influence of intermediate restraints on beams with central concentrated anduniformly distributed loads has also been studied and many values of the minimumrestraint stiffnesses required to cause the beams to buckle as if rigidly braced havebeen determined [16 24 27ndash30]

The effects of diaphragm bracing on the lateral buckling of simply supportedbeams with equal and opposite end moments (see Figure 616) have also beeninvestigated [16 31 32] and a simple method of determining whether a diaphragmis capable of providing full bracing has been developed [31]

250 Lateral buckling of beams

663 Elastic end restraints

6631 General

When a beam forms part of a rigid-jointed structure the adjacent memberselastically restrain the ends of the beam (ie they induce restraining momentswhich are proportional to the end rotations) These restraining actions significantlymodify the elastic buckling moment of the beam Four different types of restrainingmoment may act at each end of a beam as shown in Figure 617 They are

(a) the major axis end moment M which provides restraint about the major axis(b) the bottom flange end moment MB and(c) the top flange end moment MT which provide restraints about the minor axis

and against end warping and(d) the axial torque T0 which provides restraint against end twisting

6632 Major axis end moments

The major axis end restraining moments M vary directly with the applied loadsand can be determined by a conventional in-plane bending analysis The degree ofrestraint experienced at one end of the beam depends on the major axis stiffness αy

of the adjacent member (which is defined as the ratio of the end moment to the endrotation) This may be expressed by the ratio R1 of the actual restraining moment tothe maximum moment required to prevent major axis end rotation Thus R1 variesfrom 0 when there is no restraining moment to 1 when there is no end rotationFor beams which are symmetrically loaded and restrained the restraint parameter

MB

MT

T0 df M

z

y

x

Figure 617 End-restraining moments

Lateral buckling of beams 251

R1 is related to the stiffness αy of each adjacent member by

αy = EIy

L

2R1

1 minus R1 (649)

Although the major axis end moments are independent of the buckling deforma-tions they do affect the buckling load of the beam because of their effect on thein-plane bending moment distribution (see Section 6214) Many particular caseshave been studied and tabulations of buckling loads are available [5 12 1333ndash35]

6633 Minor axis end restraints

On the other hand the flange end moments MB and MT remain zero until thebuckling load of the beam is reached and then increase in proportion to the flangeend rotations Again the degree of end restraint can be expressed by the ratio of theactual restraining moment to the maximum value required to prevent end rotationThus the minor axis end restraint parameter R2 (which describes the relativemagnitude of the restraining moment MB + MT ) varies between 0 and 1 and theend warping restraint parameter R4 (which describes the relative magnitude of thedifferential flange end moments (MT minusMB)2) varies from 0 when the ends are freeto warp to 1 when end warping is prevented The particular case of symmetricallyrestrained beams with equal and opposite end moments (Figure 618) is analysed inSection 6131 It is assumed for this that the minor axis and end warping restraintstake the form of equal rotational restraints which act at each flange end and whose

Eff

ecti

ve le

ngth

fac

tors

kcr

L

M M

MB+ MT MB + MTx

v

10

05

00 02 04 06 08 10

(c) Effective length factors

Restraint parameter R

(b) Plan on centroidal axis

(a) Elevation

Figure 618 Elastic buckling of end-restrained beams

252 Lateral buckling of beams

stiffnesses are such that

Flange end moment

Flange end rotation= minusEIz

L

R

1 minus R (650)

in which case

R2 = R4 = R (651)

It is shown in Section 6131 that the moment Mcr at which the restrained beambuckles elastically is given by equations 636 and 637 when the effective lengthfactor kcr is the solution of

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (652)

It can be seen from the solutions of this equation shown in Figure 618c thatthe effective length factor kcr decreases from 1 to 05 as the restraint parameter Rincreases from 0 to 1 These solutions are exactly the same as those obtained fromthe compression member effective length chart of Figure 321a when

k1 = k2 = 1 minus R

1 minus 05R (653)

which suggests that the effective length factors kcr for beams with unequal endrestraints may be approximated by using the values given by Figure 321a

The elastic buckling of symmetrically restrained beams with unequal endmoments has also been analysed [36] while solutions have been obtained formany other minor axis and end warping restraint conditions [16 27 32ndash34]

6634 Torsional end restraints

The end torques T0 which resist end twist rotations also remain zero until elasticbuckling occurs and then increase with the end twist rotations It has been assumedthat the ends of all the beams discussed so far are rigidly restrained against endtwist rotations When the end restraints are elastic instead of rigid some end twistrotation occurs during buckling and the elastic buckling load is reduced Analyticalstudies [21] of beams in uniform bending with elastic torsional end restraints haveshown that the reduced buckling moment Mzxr can be approximated by

Mzxr

Mzx=

radic1

(49 + 45 K2)R3 + 1

(654)

in which 1R3 is the dimensionless stiffness of the torsional end restraints given by

1

R3= αxL

GIt(655)

in which αx is the ratio of the restraining torque T0 to the end twist rotation(φ)0 Reductions for other loading conditions can be determined from the elastic

Lateral buckling of beams 253

Top flange unrestrained

Bottom flange prevented from twisting

Figure 619 End distortion of a beam with an unrestrained top flange

buckling solutions in [16 34 37] or by using a computer program [18] to carryout an elastic buckling analysis

Another situation for which end twist rotation is not prevented is illustrated inFigure 619 where the bottom flange of a beam is simply supported at its endand prevented from twisting but the top flange is unrestrained In this case beambuckling may be accentuated by distortion of the cross-section which results in theweb bending shown in Figure 619 Studies of the distortional buckling [38ndash40] ofbeams such as that shown in Figure 619 have suggested that the reduction in thebuckling capacity can be allowed for approximately by using an effective lengthfactor

kcr = 1 + (df 6L

) (tf tw

)3 (1 + bf df

)2 (656)

in which tf and tw are the flange and web thicknesses and bf is the flange widthThe preceding discussion has dealt with the effects of each type of end restraint

but most beams in rigid-jointed structures have all types of elastic restraint actingsimultaneously Many such cases of combined restraints have been analysed andtabular graphical or approximate solutions are given in [12 16 33 35 41]

67 Cantilevers and overhanging beams

671 Cantilevers

The support conditions of cantilevers differ from those of beams in that a cantileveris usually assumed to be completely fixed at one end (so that lateral deflectionlateral rotation and warping are prevented) and completely free (to deflect rotateand warp) at the other The elastic buckling solution for such a cantilever in uniformbending caused by an end moment M which rotatesφL with the end of the cantilever[16] can be obtained from the solution given by equations 62 and 63 for simply

254 Lateral buckling of beams

supported beams by replacing the beam length L by twice the cantilever length 2Lwhence

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

4L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

4L2

) (657)

This procedure is similar to the effective length method used to obtain thebuckling load of a cantilever column (see Figure 315e) This loading condition isvery unusual and probably never occurs and so the solution of equation 657 hasno practical relevance

Cantilevers with other loading conditions are not so easily analysed but numer-ical solutions are available [16 37 42 43] The particular case of a cantileverwith an end concentrated load Q is discussed in Section 61214 and plots ofthe dimensionless elastic buckling moments QL2

radic(EIzGIt) for bottom flange

centroidal and top flange loading are given in Figure 620 together with plotsof the dimensionless elastic buckling moments (qL32)

radic(EIzGIt) of cantilevers

with uniformly distributed loads qMore accurate approximations may be obtained by using

QL2

radic(EIzGIt)

= 11

1 + 12εradic

(1 + 122ε2)

+ 4(K minus 2)

1 + 12(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 122(ε minus 01)2)

(658)

Bottom flange loading Centroidal loading Top flange loading

L

L

Qq

60

40

20

0 0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Cantilever parameter K = (2EIwGItL2)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

sQ

L2

(EI z

GI t)

or

(qL

3 2)

(E

I zG

I t)

Figure 620 Elastic buckling loads of cantilevers

Lateral buckling of beams 255

or

qL3

2radic(EIzGIt)

= 27

1 + 14(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 142(ε minus 01)2)

+ 10(K minus 2)

1 + 13(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 132(ε minus 01)2)

(659)

Cantilevers which have restraints at the unsupported end which prevent lateraldeflection and twist rotation (Figure 613) may be treated as beams which aresupported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

Intermediate restraints which prevent lateral deflection and twist rotation dividea cantilever into segments (Figure 613) The elastic buckling of each segmentcan be approximated by assuming that there are no interactions between adjacentsegments The segment with the free end can then be treated as an overhangingbeam as in Section 672 following while the interior segments may be treated asbeams supported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

672 Overhanging beams

Overhanging beams are similar to cantilevers in that they are free to deflect rotateand warp at one end (Figure 613) However lateral rotation and warping are notcompletely prevented at the supported end but are elastically restrained by thecontinuity of the overhanging beam with its continuation beyond the support Thebuckling moments of some examples are reported in [16 37]

It is usually very difficult to predict the degrees of lateral rotation and warpingrestraint in which case they should be assumed to be zero The elastic buck-ling moments of such overhanging beams with either concentrated end load oruniformly distributed load can be predicted by using [16]

QL2

radic(EIzGIt)

= 6

1 + 15(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 152(ε minus 01)2)

+ 15(K minus 2)

1 + 3(ε minus 03)radic

(1 + 32(ε minus 03)2)

(660)

or

qL3

2radic(EIzGIt)

= 15

1 + 18(ε minus 03)radic

(1 + 182(ε minus 03)2)

+ 40(K minus 2)

1 + 28(ε minus 04)radic

(1 + 282(ε minus 04)2)

(661)

256 Lateral buckling of beams

Overhanging beams which have restraints at the unsupported end which preventlateral deflection and twist rotation (Figure 613) may be treated as beams whichare supported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

Intermediate restraints which prevent lateral deflection and twist rotation dividean overhanging beam into segments (Figure 613) The elastic buckling of eachsegment can be approximated by assuming that there are no interactions betweenadjacent segments The segment with the free end is an overhanging beam whilethe interior segments may be treated as beams supported laterally at both ends asin Section 66

68 Braced and continuous beams

Perhaps the simplest types of rigid-jointed structure are the braced beam and thecontinuous beam (Figure 613) which can be regarded as a series of segmentswhich are rigidly connected together at points where lateral deflection and twistare prevented In general the interaction between the segments during bucklingdepends on the loading pattern for the whole beam and so also do the magnitudesof the buckling loads This behaviour is similar to the in-plane buckling behaviourof rigid frames discussed in Section 8353

681 Beams with only one segment loaded

When only one segment of a braced or continuous beam is loaded its elasticbuckling load may be evaluated approximately when tabulations for segmentswith elastic end restraints are available [12 33 35] To do this it is first necessaryto determine the end restraint parameters R1 R2 R4 (R3 = 0 because it is assumedthat twisting is prevented at the supports and brace points) from the stiffnesses ofthe adjacent unloaded segments For example when only the centre span of thesymmetrical three span continuous beam shown in Figure 621a is loaded (Q1 = 0)then the end spans provide elastic restraints which depend on their stiffnesses Byanalysing the major axis bending minor axis bending and differential flangebending of the end spans it can be shown [34] that

R1 = R2 = R4 = 1

1 + 2L13L2(662)

approximately With these values the elastic buckling load for the centre span canbe determined from the tabulations in [33 35] Some elastic buckling loads (forbeams of narrow rectangular section for which K = 0) determined in this way areshown in a non-dimensional form in Figure 622

A similar procedure can be followed when only the outer spans of the symmetri-cal three span continuous beam shown in Figure 621 are loaded (Q2 = 0) In this

Lateral buckling of beams 257

L1 L2 L1

Q1 Q2 Q1

(a) Elevation

Points of inflection

Points of inflection

(b) Mode1 Q2 = 0

(c) Mode 2 Q1 = 0

(d) Mode 3 zero interaction

Figure 621 Buckling modes for a symmetrical three span continuous beam

0 02 04 06 08 10 08 06 04 02 0

(a) Three span beam

L1L2L1

Q2 Q1Q1

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

QL

2 (

EI z

GI t)60

50

40

30

20

10

L1L2 Span ratios L2L1

(b) Significant buckling loads

Q2L22 (EIzGIt) for zero interaction 3

Q2L22 (EIzGIt) for span L1 unloaded 2

(2EIwGItL2) = 0

Q1L12 (EIzGIt)

for zero interaction 3

Q1L12 (EIzGIt) for span L2 unloaded 1

=K

Figure 622 Significant buckling loads of symmetrical three span beams

case the restraint parameters [12] are given by

R1 = R2 = R4 = 1

1 + 3L22L1(663)

approximately Some dimensionless buckling loads (for beams of narrow rectan-gular section) determined by using these restraint parameters in the tabulations of

258 Lateral buckling of beams

60

50

40

30

20

10

0L1

Zerointeraction

Q2

L1L2

Q1 Q1

Dimensionless buckling load

L2L1 = 02

0 10 20 30 40

L2L1 = 1

L2L1 = 5

(b) Buckling load combinations(a) Three span beam

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

Q2L

22 (E

I zG

I t)

Q1L12 (EIzGIt)(2EIwGItL

2) = 0= K

Figure 623 Elastic buckling load combinations of symmetrical three span beams

[12] are shown in Figure 622 Similar diagrams have been produced [44] for twospan beams of narrow rectangular section

682 Beams with general loading

When more than one segment of a braced or continuous beam is loaded the buck-ling loads can be determined by analysing the interaction between the segmentsThis has been done for a number of continuous beams of narrow rectangularsection [44] and the results for some symmetrical three span beams are shown inFigure 623 These indicate that as the loads Q1 on the end spans increase from zeroso does the buckling load Q2 of the centre span until a maximum value is reachedand that a similar effect occurs as the centre span load Q2 increases from zero

The results shown in Figure 623 suggest that the elastic buckling load interactiondiagram can be closely and safely approximated by drawing straight lines as shownin Figure 624 between the following three significant load combinations

1 When only the end spans are loaded (Q2 = 0) they are restrained duringbuckling by the centre span and the buckled shape has inflection points in theend spans as shown in Figure 621b In this case the buckling loads Q1 canbe determined by using R1 = R2 = R4 = 1(1 + 3L22L1) in the tabulationsof [12]

2 When only the centre span is loaded (Q1 = 0) it is restrained by the end spansand the buckled shape has inflection points in the centre span as shown in

Lateral buckling of beams 259

(2) Spans 1 unloaded (3) Zero interaction

Straight lines(1) Span 2 unloaded

Load Q1

Loa

d Q

2

Figure 624 Straight line approximation

Figure 621c In this case the buckling load Q2 can be determined by usingR1 = R2 = R4 = 1(1 + 2L13L2) in the tabulations of [33 35]

3 Between these two extremes exists the zero interaction load combination forwhich the buckled shape has inflection points at the internal supports as shownin Figure 621d and each span buckles as if unrestrained in the buckling planeIn this case the buckling loads can be determined by using

R2 = R4 = 0 (664)

R11 = 1 + Q2L22Q1L2

1

1 + 3L22L1(665)

R12 = 1 + Q1L21Q2L2

2

1 + 2L13L2 (666)

in the tabulations of [12 33 35] Some zero interaction load combinations(for three span beams of narrow rectangular section) determined in this wayare shown in Figure 622 while other zero interaction combinations are givenin [44]

Unfortunately this comparatively simple approximate method has proved toocomplex for use in routine design possibly because the available tabulations ofelastic buckling loads are not only insufficient to cover all the required loading andrestraint conditions but also too detailed to enable them to be easily used Insteadan approximate method of analysis [45] is often used in which the effects of lateralcontinuity between adjacent segments are ignored and each segment is regardedas being simply supported laterally Thus the elastic buckling of each segment is

260 Lateral buckling of beams

analysed for its in-plane moment distribution (the moment modification factors ofequation 613 or Figure 67 may be used) and for an effective length Lcr equal tothe segment length L The so-determined elastic buckling moment of each segmentis then used to evaluate a corresponding beam load set and the lowest of theseis taken as the elastic buckling load set This method produces a lower boundestimate which is sometimes remarkably close to the true buckling load set

However this is not always the case and so a much more accurate but stillreasonably simple method has been developed [36] In this method the accuracy ofthe lower bound estimate (obtained as described above) is improved by allowing forthe interactions between the critical segment and the adjacent segments at bucklingThis is done by using a simple approximation for the destabilising effects of thein-plane bending moments on the stiffnesses of the adjacent segments and byapproximating the restraining effects of these segments on the critical segment byusing the effective length chart of Figure 321a for braced compression members toestimate the effective length of the critical beam segment A step-by-step summary[36] is as follows

(1) Determine the properties EIz GIt EIw L of each segment(2) Analyse the in-plane bending moment distribution through the beam and

determine the moment modification factors αm for each segment fromequation 613 or Figure 67

(3) Assume all effective length factors kcr are equal to unity(4) Calculate the maximum moment Mcr in each segment at elastic buckling

from

Mcr = αm

radic(π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

)(667)

with Lcr = L and the corresponding beam buckling loads Qs(5) Determine a lower-bound estimate of the beam buckling load as the lowest

value Qms of the loads Qs and identify the segment associated with this asthe critical segment 12 (This is the approximate method [45] described inthe preceding paragraph)

(6) If a more accurate estimate of the beam buckling load is required use the val-ues Qms and Qrs1 Qrs2 calculated in step 5 together with Figure 625 (whichis similar to Figure 319 for braced compression members) to approximatethe stiffnesses αr1αr2 of the segments adjacent to the critical segment 12

(7) Calculate the stiffness of the critical segment 12 from 2EIzmLm(8) Calculate the stiffness ratios k1 k2 from

k12 = 2EIzmLm

05αr1r2 + 2EIzmLm (668)

(9) Determine the effective length factor kcr for the critical segment 12 fromFigure 321a and the effective length Lcr = kcrL

Lateral buckling of beams 261

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

EI1

4

(b) Segment hinged at one end

(c) Segment fixed at one end

(a) Segment providing equal end restraints

r ndash )(

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

EI1

3r ndash )(

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

rL

EI1

2r ndash )(

Figure 625 Stiffness approximations for restraining segments

(10) Calculate the elastic buckling moment Mcr of the critical segment 12using Lcr in equation 667 and from this the corresponding improvedapproximation of the elastic buckling load Qcr of the beam

It should be noted that while the calculations for the lower bound (the first fivesteps) are made for all segments those for the improved estimate are only madefor the critical segment and so comparatively little extra effort is involved Thedevelopment and application of this method is further described in [36] The useof user-friendly computer programs such as in [18] eliminates the need for theseapproximate procedures

69 Rigid frames

Under some conditions the elastic buckling loads of rigid frames with only onemember loaded can be determined from the available tabulations [12 33 35] in asimilar manner to that described in Section 681 for braced and continuous beamsFor example consider a symmetrically loaded beam which is rigidly connected totwo equal cross-beams as shown in Figure 626a In this case the comparativelylarge major axis bending stiffnesses of the cross-beams ensure that end twistingof the loaded beam is effectively prevented and it may therefore be assumed thatR3 = 0 If the cross-beams are of open section so that their torsional stiffness iscomparatively small then it is not unduly conservative to assume that they do notrestrain the loaded beam about its major axis and so

R1 = 0 (669)

262 Lateral buckling of beams

L2

L1

Position and torsionalend restraints

(a) Beam supported by cross-beams (b) Symmetrical portal frame

L2

L1

Figure 626 Simple rigid-jointed structures

By analysing the minor axis and differential flange bending of the cross-beamsit can be shown that

R2 = R4 = 1(1 + L1Iz26L2Iz1) (670)

This result is based on the assumption that there is no likelihood of the cross-beams themselves buckling so that their effective minor axis rigidity can be takenas EIz1 With these values for the restraint parameters the elastic buckling loadcan be determined from the tabulations in [33 35]

The buckling loads of the symmetrical portal frame shown in Figure 626b canbe determined in a similar manner provided there are sufficient external restraintsto position-fix the joints of the frame The columns of portal frames of this typeare usually placed so that the plane of greatest bending stiffness is that of theframe In this case the minor axis stiffness of each column provides only a smallresistance against end twisting of the beam and this resistance is reduced by theaxial force transmitted by the column so that it may be necessary to provideadditional torsional end restraints to the beam If these additional restraints arestiff enough (and the information given in [16 34] will give some guidance) thenit may be assumed without serious error that R3 = 0 The major axis stiffness ofa pinned base column is 3EIy1L1 and of a fixed base column is 4EIy1L1 and itcan be shown by analysing the in-plane flexure of a portal frame that for pinnedbase portals

R1 = 1(1 + 2L1Iy23L2Iy1) (671)

Lateral buckling of beams 263

and for fixed base portals

R1 = 1(1 + L1Iy22L2Iy1) (672)

If the columns are of open cross-section their torsional stiffness is comparativelysmall and it is not unduly conservative to assume that the columns do not restrainthe beam element or its flanges against minor axis flexure and so

R2 = R4 = 0 (673)

Using these values of the restraint parameters the elastic buckling load can bedetermined from the tabulations in [33 35]

When more than one member of a rigid frame is loaded the buckling restraintparameters cannot be easily determined because of the interactions between mem-bers which take place during buckling The typical member of such a frame acts asa beam-column which is subjected to a combination of axial and transverse loadsand end moments The buckling behaviour of beam-columns and of rigid framesis treated in detail in Chapters 7 and 8

610 Monosymmetric beams

6101 Elastic buckling resistance

When a monosymmetric I-beam (see Figure 627) which is loaded in its plane ofsymmetry twists during buckling the longitudinal bending stresses MyzIy exert

S

C

b1 t1

b2 t2

df

z0

z

yh

twz

12

ndash2z0

4])2()2[(

]12[

])(12[)(1

)1(

)()(1

1

2)()(

12)()(

)(

2))((

2)(

22

32

41

42

2111

31

2222

32

0

123

12

2221

32122

2 211

212211

22122

21

fmw

wf

ff

y

f

m

w

wfy

w

wf

f

dtbI

ttztzd

ztbtbz

zdtbtbzd

I

zdz

ttbb

thyttth

ttthzdtbztbI

ttthtbtb

tthtthdtbz

tthd

m

ndashndashndashndash

+ndash

ndashndash

=

=

ndashndash=

+=

ndashndashndash ndash+

ndashndash+ndash+=

ndashndash++ndashndashndash+

=

minusndash=

y

+

+

Figure 627 Properties of monosymmetric sections

264 Lateral buckling of beams

a torque (see Section 614)

TM = Myβydφ

dx(674)

in which

βy = 1

Iy

intA(y2z + z3)dA minus 2z0 (675)

is the monosymmetry property of the cross-section An explicit expression for βy

for an I-section is given in Figure 627The action of the torque TM can be thought of as changing the effective torsional

rigidity of the section from GIt to (GIt + Myβy) and is related to the effect whichcauses some short concentrically loaded compression members to buckle torsion-ally (see Section 375) In that case the compressive stresses exert a disturbingtorque so that there is a reduction in the effective torsional rigidity In doubly sym-metric beams the disturbing torque exerted by the compressive bending stresses isexactly balanced by the restoring torque due to the tensile stresses and βy is zeroIn monosymmetric beams however there is an imbalance which is dominated bythe stresses in the smaller flange which is further from the shear centre Thus whenthe smaller flange is in compression there is a reduction in the effective torsionalrigidity (Myβy is negative) while the reverse is true (Myβy is positive) when thesmaller flange is in tension Consequently the resistance to buckling is increasedwhen the larger flange is in compression and decreased when the smaller flangeis in compression

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supported monosymmetric beamwith equal and opposite end moments can be obtained by substituting Mcr forMzx and the effective rigidity (GIt + Mcrβy) for GIt in equation 63 for a doublysymmetric beam and rearranging whence

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) radic

GIt + π2EIw

L2+

βy

2

radic(π2EIz

L2

)2

+βy

2

radic(π2EIz

L2

) (676)

in which the warping section constant Iw is as given in Figure 627The evaluation of the monosymmetry property βy is not straightforward and it

has been suggested that the more easily calculated parameter

ρm = IczIz (677)

Lateral buckling of beams 265

should be used instead where Icz is the section minor axis second moment ofarea of the compression flange The monosymmetry property βy may then beapproximated [46] by

βy = 09df (2ρm minus 1)(1 minus I2z I

2y ) (678)

and the warping section constant Iw by

Iw = ρm(1 minus ρm)Izd2f (679)

The variations of the dimensionless elastic buckling moment McrLradic(EIzGIt)

with the values of ρm and Km = radic(π2EIzd2

f 4GItL2) are shown in Figure 628The dimensionless buckling resistance for a T-beam with the flange in compression(ρm = 10) is significantly higher than for an equal flanged I-beam (ρm = 05)with the same value of Km but the resistance is greatly reduced for a T-beam withthe flange in tension (ρm = 00)

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of simply supported monosymmetricbeams with other loading conditions has been investigated numerically and tabu-lated solutions and approximating equations are available [5 13 16 42 47ndash49]for beams under moment gradient or with central concentrated loads or uni-formly distributed loads Solutions are also available [16 42 50] for cantileverswith concentrated end loads or uniformly distributed loads These solutions canbe used to find the maximum moment Mcr in the beam or cantilever at elasticbuckling

IzIy = 01

M M

Monosymmetric beam parameter

T

T075

050

025

0

C

C

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

mom

ent

Mcr

L

(E

I zG

I t) 20

15

10

5

00 05 10 15 20 25 30

(2EIzdf 24GItL2) =Km

m = Icz Iz =100

Figure 628 Monosymmetric I-beams in uniform bending

266 Lateral buckling of beams

6102 Design rules

EC3 has no specific rules for designing monosymmetric beams against lateralbuckling because it regards them as being the same as doubly symmetric beamsThus it requires the value of the elastic buckling moment resistance Mcr of themonosymmetric beam to be used in the simple general design method describedin Section 653 However the logic of this approach has been questioned [49]and in some cases may lead to less safe results

A worked example of checking a monosymmetric T-beam is given inSection 6156

611 Non-uniform beams

6111 Elastic buckling resistance

Non-uniform beams are often more efficient than beams of constant section andare frequently used in situations where the major axis bending moment variesalong the length of the beam Non-uniform beams of narrow rectangular sectionare usually tapered in their depth Non-uniform I-beams may be tapered in theirdepth or less commonly in their flange width and rarely in their flange thicknesswhile steps in flange width or thickness are common

Depth reductions in narrow rectangular beams produce significant reductionsin their minor axis flexural rigidities EIz and torsional rigidities GIt Because ofthis there are also significant reductions in their resistances to lateral bucklingClosed form solutions for the elastic buckling loads of many tapered beams andcantilevers are given in the papers cited in [13 16 51 52]

Depth reductions in I-beams have no effect on the minor axis flexural rigidityEIz and little effect on the torsional rigidity GIt although they produce significantreductions in the warping rigidity EIw It follows that the resistance to buckling ofa beam which does not depend primarily on its warping rigidity is comparativelyinsensitive to depth tapering On the other hand reductions in the flange widthcause significant reductions in GIt and even greater reductions in EIz and EIwwhile reductions in flange thickness cause corresponding reductions in EIz andEIw and in GIt Thus the resistance to buckling varies significantly with changesin the flange geometry

General numerical methods of calculating the elastic buckling loads of taperedI-beams have been developed in [51ndash53] while the elastic and inelastic bucklingof tapered monosymmetric I-beams are discussed in [53ndash55] Solutions for beamswith constant flanges and linearly tapered depths under unequal end moments aregiven in [56 57] and more general solutions are given in [58] The buckling ofI-beams with stepped flanges has also been investigated and many solutions aretabulated in [59]

Approximations for the elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supportednon-uniform beam can be obtained by reducing the value calculated for a uniform

Lateral buckling of beams 267

beam having the properties of the maximum section of the beam by multiplyingit by

αst = 10 minus 12

(Lr

L

) 1 minus

(06 + 04

dmin

dmax

)Af min

Af max

(680)

in which Af min Af max are the flange areas and dmin dmax are the section depthsat the minimum and maximum cross-sections and Lr is either the portion of thebeam length which is reduced in section or is 05L for a tapered beam Thisequation agrees well with the buckling solutions shown in Figure 629 for centralconcentrated loads on stepped [59] and tapered [51] beams whose minimum cross-sections are at their simply supported ends

6112 Design rules

EC3 requires non-uniform beams to be designed against lateral buckling by usingthe methods described in Section 653 with the section moment resistance McRd =Wyfy and the elastic buckling moment Mcr being the values for the most criticalsection where the ratio of MEdMcRd of the design bending moment to the sectionmoment capacity is greatest

A worked example of checking a stepped beam is given in Section 6157

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10

Red

uctio

n fa

ctor

st

033

050

067

100

Depth taperedWidth taperedThickness tapered

Mean of width andthickness stepped2

L----r

2L----r

L

Section parameter (06 + 04dmindmax)Afmin Afmax

LrL = 0

LrL = 05

Figure 629 Reduction factors for stepped and tapered I-beams

268 Lateral buckling of beams

612 Appendix ndash elastic beams

6121 Buckling of straight beams

61211 Beams with equal end moments

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of the beam shown in Figure 63 can be deter-mined by finding a deflected and twisted position which is one of equilibrium Thedifferential equilibrium equation of bending of the beam is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMcrφ (681)

which states that the internal minor axis moment of resistance EIzd2vdx2 mustexactly balance the disturbing component minusMcrφ of the applied bending momentMcr at every point along the length of the beam The differential equation of torsionof the beam is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Mcr

dv

dx(682)

which states that the sum of the internal resistance to uniform torsion GItdφdxand the internal resistance to warping torsion minusEIwd3φdx3 must exactly balancethe disturbing torque Mcrdvdx caused by the applied moment Mcr at every pointalong the length of the beam

The derivation of the left-hand side of equation 682 is fully discussed in Sec-tions 102 and 103 The torsional rigidity GIt in the first term determines thebeamrsquos resistance to uniform torsion for which the rate of twist dφdx is constantas shown in Figure 10la For thin-walled open sections the torsion constant It isapproximately given by the summation

It asympsum

bt33

in which b is the length and t the thickness of each rectangular element of thecross-section Accurate expressions for It are given in [3 Chapter 10] from whichthe values for hot-rolled I-sections have been calculated [4 Chapter 10]

The warping rigidity EIw in the second term of equation 682 determines theadditional resistance to non-uniform torsion for which the flanges bend in oppositedirections as shown in Figure 101b and c When this flange bending varies alongthe length of the beam flange shear forces are induced which exert a torqueminusEIwd3φdx3 For equal flanged I-beams

Iw = Izd2f

4

in which df is the distance between flange centroids An expression for Iw for amonosymmetric I-beam is given in Figure 627

Lateral buckling of beams 269

When equations 681 and 682 are both satisfied at all points along the beamthen the deflected and twisted position is one of equilibrium Such a position isdefined by the buckled shape

v = Mcr

π2EIzL2φ = δ sin

π x

L (61)

in which the maximum deflection δ is indeterminate This buckled shape satisfiesthe boundary conditions at the supports of lateral deflection prevented

(v)0 = (v)L = 0 (683)

twist rotation prevented

(φ)0 = (φ)L = 0 (684)

and ends free to warp (see Section 1083)

(d2φ

dx2

)0

=(

d2φ

dx2

)L

= 0 (685)

Equation 61 also satisfies the differential equilibrium equations (equations 681and 682) when Mcr = Mzx where

Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2

)(63)

which defines the moment at elastic lateral buckling

61212 Beams with unequal end moments

The major axis bending moment My and shear Vz in the beam with unequal endmoments M and βmM shown in Figure 64a are given by

My = M minus (1 + βm)MxL

and

Vz = minus(1 + βm)ML

When the beam buckles the minor axis bending equation is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

270 Lateral buckling of beams

and the torsion equation is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= My

dv

dxminus Vzv

These equations reduce to equations 681 and 682 for the case of equal andopposite end moments (βm = minus1)

Closed form solutions of these equations are not available but numerical meth-ods [3ndash11] have been used The numerical solutions can be conveniently expressedin the form of

Mcr = αmMzx (64)

in which the factor αm accounts for the effect of the non-uniform distribution ofthe bending moment My on elastic lateral buckling The variation of αm with theend moment ratio βm is shown in Figure 64c for the two extreme values of thebeam parameter

K =radic(

π2EIw

GJL2

)(67)

of 005 and 3 Also shown in Figure 64c is the approximation

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (65)

61213 Beams with central concentrated loads

The major axis bending moment My and the shear Vz in the beam with a centralconcentrated load Q shown in Figure 65 are given by

My = Q x2 minus Q 〈x minus L2〉Vz = Q2 minus Q 〈x minus L2〉0

in which the values of the second terms are taken as zero when the values insidethe Macaulay brackets 〈〉 are negative When the beam buckles the minor axisbending equation is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

and the torsion equation is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Q

2(v minus zQ φ)L2(1 minus 2〈x minus L2〉0)+ My

dv

dxminus Vzv

in which zQ is the distance of the point of application of the load below the centroidand (Q2)(v minus zQφ)L2 is the end torque

Lateral buckling of beams 271

Numerical solutions of these equations for the dimensionless buckling loadQL2

radic(EIzGIt) are available [3 13 16 42] and some of these are shown in

Figure 66 in which the dimensionless height ε of the point of application of theload is generally given by

ε = zQ

L

radic(EIz

GIt

) (68)

or for the particular case of equal flanged I-beams by

ε = K

π

2zQ

df

61214 Cantilevers with concentrated end loads

The elastic buckling of a cantilever with a concentrated end load Q applied at adistance zQ below the centroid can be predicted from the solutions of the differentialequations of minor axis bending

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

and of torsion

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Q(v minus zQφ)L + My

dv

dxminus Vzv

in which

My = minusQ(L minus x)

and

Vz = Q

These solutions must satisfy the fixed end (x = 0) boundary conditions of

(v)0 = (φ)0 = (dvdx)0 = (dφdx)0 = 0

and the condition that the end x = L is free to warp whence

(d2φdx2)L = 0

Numerical solutions of these equations are available [16 37 42 43] and someof these are shown in Figure 620

272 Lateral buckling of beams

6122 Deformations of beams with initial crookednessand twist

The deformations of a simply supported beam with initial crookedness and twistcaused by equal and opposite end moments Mcan be analysed by considering theminor axis bending and torsion equations

EIzd2v

dx2= minusM (φ + φ0) (686)

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= M

(dv

dxminus dv0

dx

) (687)

which are obtained from equations 681 and 682 by adding the additional momentMφ0 and torque Mdv0dx induced by the initial twist and crookedness

If the initial crookedness and twist rotation are such that

v0

δ0= φ0

θ0= sin

π x

L (614)

in which the central initial crookedness δ0 and twist rotation θ0 are related by

δ0

θ0= Mzx

π2EIzL2 (615)

then the solution of equations 686 and 687 which satisfies the boundary conditions(equations 683ndash685) is given by

v

δ= φ

θ= sin

π x

L (616)

in which

δ

δ0= θ

θ0= MMzx

1 minus MMzx (617)

The maximum longitudinal stress in the beam is the sum of the stresses due tomajor axis bending minor axis bending and warping and is equal to

σmax = M

Welyminus EIz

Welz

(d2(v + df φ2)

dx2

)L2

If the elastic limit is taken as the yield stress fy then the limiting nominal stressσL for which this elastic analysis is valid is given by

σL = fy minus δ0Ncrz

Mzx

(1 + df

2

Ncrz

Mzx

)1

Welz

ML

1 minus MLMzx

Lateral buckling of beams 273

or

ML = My minus δ0Ncrz

Mzx

(1 + df

2

Ncrz

Mzx

)Wely

Welz

ML

1 minus MLMzx

in which Ncrz = π2EIzL2 ML = fLWely is the limiting moment at first yieldand My = fyWely is the nominal first yield moment This can be solved for thedimensionless limiting moment MLMy In the case where the central crookednessδ0 is given by

δ0Ncrz

Mzx= θ0 = WelzWely

1 + (df 2) (NcrzMzx)η (621)

in which η defines the magnitudes δ0θ0 then the dimensionless limiting momentsimplifies to

ML

My= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(618)

in which

Φ = (1 + η + λ2)2 (619)

and

λ =radic(MyMzx) (620)

is a generalised slenderness

613 Appendix ndash effective lengths of beams

6131 Beams with elastic end restraints

The beam shown in Figure 618 is restrained at its ends against minor axis rotationsdvdx and against warping rotations (df 2)dφdx and the boundary conditionsat the end x = L2 can be expressed in the form of

MB + MT

(dvdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R2

1 minus R2

and

MT minus MB

(df 2) (dφdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R4

1 minus R4

274 Lateral buckling of beams

in which MT and MB are the flange minor axis end restraining moments

MT = 12EIz(d2vdx2)L2 + (df 4)EIz(d

2φdx2)L2

MB = 12EIz(d2vdx2)L2 minus (df 4)EIz(d

2φdx2)L2

and R2 and R4 are the dimensionless minor axis bending and warping end restraintparameters If the beam is symmetrically restrained then similar conditions applyat the end x = minusL2 The other support conditions are

(v)plusmnL2 = (φ)plusmnL2 = 0

The particular case for which the minor axis and warping end restraints areequal so that

R2 = R4 = R (651)

may be analysed The differential equilibrium equations for a buckled positionvφ of the beam are

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMcrφ + (MB + MT )

and

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Mcr

dv

dx

These differential equations and the boundary conditions are satisfied by thebuckled shape

v = Mcrφ

π2EIzk2crL2

= A

(cos

π x

kcrLminus cos

π

2kcr

)

in which the effective length factor kcr satisfies

R

1 minus R= minus π

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (652)

The solutions of this equation are shown in Figure 618c

614 Appendix ndash monosymmetric beams

When a monosymmetric beam (see Figure 627) is bent in its plane of symmetryand twisted the longitudinal bending stresses σ exert a torque which is similar

Lateral buckling of beams 275

to that which causes some short concentrically loaded compression members tobuckle torsionally (see Sections 375 and 311) The longitudinal bending force

σ δA = Myz

IyδA

acting on an element δA of the cross-section rotates a0dφdx (where a0 is thedistance to the axis of twist through the shear centre y0 = 0 z0) and so its transversecomponent σ middot δA middot a0dφdx exerts a torque σ middot δA middot a0dφdx middot a0 about the axis oftwist The total torque TM exerted is

TM = dφ

dx

intA

a20

Myz

IydA

in which

a20 = y2 + (z minus z0)

2

Thus

TM = Myβydφ

dx (674)

in which the monosymmetry property βy of the cross-section is given by

βy = 1

Iy

intA

z3 dA +int

Ay2zdA

minus 2z0 (675)

An explicit expression for βy for a monosymmetric I-section is given inFigure 627 and this can also be used for tee-sections by putting the flange thick-ness t1 or t2 equal to zero Also given in Figure 627 is an explicit expression forthe warping section constant Iw of a monosymmetric I-section For a tee-sectionIw is zero

615 Worked examples

6151 Example 1 ndash checking a beam supported at both ends

Problem The 75 m long 610 times 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown in Figure 630 issimply supported at both ends where lateral deflections v are effectively preventedand twist rotations φ are partially restrained Check the adequacy of the beam fora central concentrated top flange load caused by an unfactored dead load of 60 kN(which includes an allowance for self-weight) and an unfactored imposed load of100 kN

Design bending moment

MEd = (135 times 60)+ (15 times 100) times 754 = 433 kNm

276 Lateral buckling of beams

375 m 375 m

QD = 60 kN QI = 100 kN at top flange

Quantity 610 times 229 UB 125 457 times 191 UB 82 Units bf 2290 1913 mmtf 196 160 mmh 6122 4600 mmtw 119 99 mmr 127 102 mm

Wply 3676 1831 cm3

Iz 3932 1871 cm4

It 154 692 cm4

Iw 345 0922 dm6

(b) Section properties

(a) Example 1

Figure 630 Examples 1 and 4

Section resistanceAs in Section 51215 fy = 265 Nmm2 the section is Class 1 and the sectionresistance is McRd = 974 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd and the section resistance isadequate

Elastic buckling momentUsing equation 656 to allow for the partial torsional end restraints

kcr = 1 + (6122 minus 196)(6 times 7500)(196119)3

times 1 + 2290(6122 minus 196)2= 1041

so that Lcr = 1041 times 7500 = 7806 mmAdapting equation 636

Mzx0 =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 3932 times 104

78062

times(

81 000 times 154 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 345 times 1012

78062

)Nmm

= 569 kNm

Using equation 612 Ncrz = π 2 times 210 000 times 3932 times 10475002 N = 1449 kN

Lateral buckling of beams 277

Using Figure 67 αm = 135

04αmzQNcrz

Mzx0= 04 times 135 times (minus 61222)times 1449 times 103

569 times 106= minus0421

Adapting equation 611

Mcr = 135 times 569radic[1 + (minus0421)2] + (minus0421) Nmm = 510 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] with L = 7806 mm leads to Mcr =522 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(974510) = 1382

hb = 61222290 = 267 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(1382 minus 02)+ 10 times 13822 = 1656

Using equation 626

MbRd = 9741656 + radic(16562 minus 13822) kNm

= 379 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequateUsing the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause

6323) and αLT = 049 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 049(1382 minus 04)+ 075 times 13822 = 1457

Using equation 626

MbRd = 9741457 + radic(14572 minus 075 times 13822) kNm

= 426 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance still appears to be inadequateThe design moment resistance is further increased by using equations 629 630

and 628 to find

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

135)1 minus 2 times (1382 minus 08)2 = 0978 and

MbRdmod = 4260978 = 436 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is adequate after all

278 Lateral buckling of beams

Brace preventslateral deflection and twist rotation

254 times 146 UB 37

254 times 146 UB 37

457 times 191 UB 82

70 kN

70kNm

1 2 3

45 m 45 m

(a) Example 2 (c) Example 3 (b) Properties of

12 kNm at top flange

80 m

bf = 1464 mmtf = 109 mmh = 256 mm tw = 63 mm r = 76 mm

Wply = 483 cm3

Iz = 571 cm4

It = 153 cm4

Iw = 00857 dm6

Figure 631 Examples 2 and 3

6152 Example 2 ndash checking a braced beam

Problem The 9 m long 254 times 146 UB 37 braced beam of S275 steel shownin Figure 631a and b has a central concentrated design load of 70 kN (whichincludes an allowance for self-weight) and a design end moment of 70 kNm Lateraldeflections v and twist rotations φ are effectively prevented at both ends and by abrace at mid-span Check the adequacy of the braced beam

Design bending moment

R3 = (70 times 45)minus 709 = 2722 kN MEd2 = 2722 times 45 = 1225 kNm

Section resistance

tf = 109 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (14642 minus 632 minus 76)(109 times 0924) T52

= 620 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = (256 minus 2 times 109 minus 2 times 76)(63 times 0924) T52

= 376 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRd = 275 times 483 times 103 Nmm 625

= 1328 kNm gt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Lateral buckling of beams 279

Elastic buckling momentThe beam is fully restrained at mid-span and so consists of two equal lengthsegments 12 and 23 By inspection the check will be controlled by segment 23which has the lower moment gradient and therefore the lower value of αm UsingFigure 67 αm = 175

Using equation 63

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104

45002

times(

81 000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

45002

) Nmm

= 1112 kNm

Using equation 64

Mcr = 175 times 1112 = 1946 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] on the segment 23 alone leads toMcr = 2045 kNm Using PRFELB on the complete beam leads to Mcr =2379 kNm which indicates the increase caused by the restraint offered by segment12 to segment 23 The increased elastic buckling moment may be approxi-mated by using the improved method given in Section 682 as demonstratedin Section 6155)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(13281946) = 0826

hb = 2561464 = 175 lt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 021 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 021(0826 minus 02)+ 10 times 08262 = 0907

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280907 + radic(09072 minus 08262) kNm

= 1037 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequate

280 Lateral buckling of beams

Using the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause6323) and αLT = 034 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0826 minus 04)+ 075 times 08262 = 0828

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280828 + radic(08282 minus 075 times 08262) kNm = 1066 kNm

The design moment resistance is further increased by using equations 629 630and 628 to find

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

175)1 minus 2 times (0826 minus 08)2 = 0878 and

MbRdmod = 10660878 = 1214 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is just inadequate

6153 Example 3 ndash checking a cantilever

Problem The 80 m long 457 times 191 UB 82 cantilever of S275 steel shown inFigure 631c has the section properties shown in Figure 630b The cantilever haslateral torsional and warping restraints at the support is free at the tip and hasa factored upwards design uniformly distributed load of 12 kNm (which includesan allowance for self-weight) acting at the top flange Check the adequacy of thecantilever

Design bending moment

MEd = 12 times 822 = 384 kNm

Section resistance

tf = 160 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (19132 minus 992 minus 102)(160 times 0924) T52

= 544 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

Lateral buckling of beams 281

cw(twε) = (4602 minus 2 times 160 minus 2 times 102)(99 times 0924) T52

= 446 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRd = 275 times 1831 times 103 Nmm 625

= 5035 kNm gt 384 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Elastic buckling momentThe upwards load at the top flange is equivalent to a downwards load at the bottomflange so that zQ = 46002 = 2300 mm Using equation 68

ε = 2300

8000

radic(210 000 times 1871 times 104

81 000 times 692 times 104

)= 0241

Using equation 67

K = radic(π2 times 210 000 times 0922 times 1012)(81 000 times 692 times 104 times 80002)= 0730

Using equation 659

qL3

2radic

EIzGIt= 27

1 + 14(0241 minus 01)radic1 + 142(0241 minus 01)2

+ 10(0730 minus 2)

1 + 13(0241 minus 01)radic1 + 132(0241 minus 01)2

= 1723

Mcr = qL22 = 1723 times radic(210 000 times 1871 times 104

times 81 000 times 692 times 104)8000 Nmm

= 1011 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1051 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(50351011) = 0706

hb = 46001913 = 240 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0706 minus 02)+ 10 times 07062 = 0835

282 Lateral buckling of beams

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350835 + radic(08352 minus 07062)

= 3930 kNm gt 384 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is adequate

6154 Example 4 ndash designing a braced beam

Problem Determine a suitable UB of S275 steel for the simply supported beamof Section 6151 if twist rotations are effectively prevented at the ends and if abrace is added which effectively prevents lateral deflection v and twist rotation φat mid-span

Design bending momentUsing Section 6151 MEd = 433 kNm

Selecting a trial sectionThe central brace divides the beam into two identical segments each of lengthL = 3750 mm and eliminates the effect of the load height

Guess fy = 275 Nmm2 and MbRdWyfy = 09Using equation 632 Wply ge (433 times 106275)09 mm3 = 1750 cm3Try a 457 times 191 UB 82 with Wply = 1831 cm3 gt 1750 cm3

Section resistanceAs in Section 6153 fy = 275 Nmm2 McRd = 5035 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Elastic buckling momentUsing Figure 67 αm = 175

Using equation 63

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 1871 times 104

37502

times(

81 000 times 692 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 0922 times 1012

37502

) Nmm

= 7275 kNm

Using equation 64

Mcr = 175 times 7275 = 1273 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1345 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(50351273) = 0629

hb = 46001913 = 240 gt 2

Lateral buckling of beams 283

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0629 minus 02)+ 10 times 06292 = 0771

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350771 + radic(07712 minus 06292) kNm

= 414 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequateUsing the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause

6323) and αLT = 049 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 049(0629 minus 04)+ 075 times 06292 = 0704

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350704 + radic(07042 minus 075 times 06292) kNm

= 437 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and so the design moment resistance is adequate after all

6155 Example 5 ndash checking a braced beam bybuckling analysis

Problem Use the method of elastic buckling analysis given in Section 682 tocheck the braced beam of Section 6152

Elastic buckling analysisThe application of the method of elastic buckling analysis given in Section 682is summarised below using the same step numbering as in Section 682

(2) The beam is fully restrained at mid-span and so consists of two segments12 and 23For segment 12 M1 = minus70 kNm and M2 = 1225 kNm (as in Section6152)βm12 = 701225 = 0571Using equation 65 αm12 = 175 + 105 times 0571 + 03 times 05712

= 2448 lt 256For segment 23 βm23 = 01225 = 0 and αm23 = 175 as in Section 6152

(3) Lcr12 = Lcr23 = 4500 mm

284 Lateral buckling of beams

(4) Using Mzx12 = Mzx23 = 1112 kNm from Section 6152

Mcr12 = 2448 times 1112 = 2723 kNm

Qs12 = 70 times 27231225 = 1556 kN

Mcr23 = 175 times 1112 = 1946 kNm

Qs23 = 70 times 19461225 = 1112 kN

(5) Qs23 lt Qs12 and so 23 is the critical segment(6) αr12 = (3 times 210 000 times 571 times 1044500)times (1 minus 11121556)

= 2279 times 106 Nmm(7) α23 = 2 times 210 000 times 571 times 1044500 = 5329 times 106 Nmm(8) k2 = 5329 times 106(05 times 2279 times 106 + 5329 times 106) = 0824

k3 = 10 (zero restraint at 3)(9) Using Figure 321a kcr23 = 093 Lcr23 = 093 times 4500 = 4185 mm

(10) Using equation 639

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104

41852

times(

81 000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

41852

) Nmm

= 1234 kNm

and Mcr23 = 175 times 1234 = 2159 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr23 = 2379 kNm)

Member resistanceMcRd = 1328 kNm as in Section 6152

Using equation 625 λLT = radic(13282159) = 0784

hb = 2561464 = 175 lt 2

Using the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause6323) and αLT = 034 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0784 minus 04)+ 075 times 07842 = 0796

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280796 + radic(07962 minus 075 times 07842) kNm = 1056 kNm

Lateral buckling of beams 285

Using equations 629 630 and 628

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

175)1 minus 2 times (0784 minus 08)2 = 0878 and

MbRdmod = 10560878 = 1202 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is just inadequate

6156 Example 6 ndash checking aT-beam

Problem The 50 m long simply supported monosymmetric 229 times 305 BT 63T-beam of S275 steel shown in Figure 632 has the section properties shown inFigure 632c Determine the uniform bending design moment resistances whenthe flange is in either compression or tension

Section resistance (flange in compression)

tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cf (tf ε) = (22902 minus 1192 minus 127)(196 times 0942) T52

= 519 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

The plastic neutral axis bisects the area and in this case lies in the flange (atzp = 2290 times 196 + (3060 minus 196)times 119(2 times 2290) = 172 mm)

Thus the whole web is in tension and is automatically Class 1

McRd = 265 times 531 times 103 Nmm = 1407 kNm 625

M

119

1963060

2290

50 m

Mr = 127 mm

Wply = 531 cm3

Welymin = 299 cm3

Iz = 1966 cm4

It = 769 cm4

(a) Beam (b) Cross-section (c) Properties

Figure 632 Example 6

286 Lateral buckling of beams

Elastic buckling (flange in compression)Using Figure 627

df = 3060 minus (196 + 0)2 = 2962 mm

z = 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times (3060 minus 0)times 1192

(2290 times 196)+ 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times 119= 660 mm

Iy = (2290 times 196 times 6602)+ 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)3 times 11912

+ (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times 119 times 660 minus (3060 minus 0)22

= 6864 times 106 mm4

1 minus ρm = 0

z0 = 0 times 2962 minus 660 = minus660 mm

βy = 1

6864 times 106

(2962 minus 660)times (0 + 0)minus 660times (

2293 times 19612 + 229 times 196 times 6602)

+ [(2962 minus 660 minus 0)4

minus (660 minus 1962)4] times 1194

minus 2 times (minus660) = 2156 mm

Iw = 0

π2EIz

L2= π2 times 210 000 times 1966 times 104

50002= 1630 times 106N

βy

2

radicπ2EIz

L2= 2156

2times

radic1630 times 106 = 1376 times 103

Using equation 676

Mcr =radic(1633 times 106)times radic[81 000 times 769 times 104 + 0 + (1376 times 103)2]

+ 1376 times 103 = 5401 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 5401 kNm)

Member resistance (flange in compression)Using equation 625 λLT = radic

(14075403) = 0510Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause

6322) and αLT = 076 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 076(0510 minus 02)+ 10 times 05102 = 0748

Lateral buckling of beams 287

Using equation 626

MbRd = 14070748 + radic(07482 minus 05102) kNm = 1086 kNm

Section resistance (flange in tension)Using Table 42 of EN1993-1-5 [60] and the ratio of the web outstand tipcompression to tension of

ψ = σ2σ1 = minus(660 minus 1962 minus 127)(3060 minus 1962 minus 660)

= minus0189

kσ = 057 minus 021 times (minus0189)+ 007 times (minus0189)2 = 0612 and

21radic

kσ = 21 times radic(0612) = 164

cw(twε) = (3060 minus 196 minus 127)(119 times 0942) T52

= 244gt 164 = 21radic

kσ and the web is Class 4 T52

The section may be treated as Class 3 if the effective value of ε is increased so thatthe Class 3 limit is just satisfied in which case

ε = cwtw21

radickσ

= (3060 minus 196 minus 127)119

164= 1400 552(9)

in which case the maximum design compressive stress is

σcomRd = fyγM0

ε2= 26510

14002= 135 Nmm2 552(9)

and so the section resistance is

McRd = 135 times 299 times 103 Nmm = 404 kNm 625

(If the effective section method of Clause 43(4) of EN1993-1-5 [60] is used thenan increased section resistance of McRd = Welyminfy = 532 kNm is obtained)

Elastic buckling (flange in tension)Using Figure 627 leads to βy = minus2156 mm

Using equation 676 leads to Mcr = 1883 kNm(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1883 kNm)

Member resistance (flange in tension)Using equation 625 λLT = radic

(4041883) = 0463Using the EC3 simple general method as before and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 076(0463 minus 02)+ 10 times 04632 = 0708

Using equation 626

MbRd = 4040708 + radic(07082 minus 04632) kNm = 326 kNm

288 Lateral buckling of beams

6157 Example 7 ndash checking a stepped beam

Problem The simply supported non-uniform welded beam of S275 steel shown inFigure 633 has a central concentrated design load Q acting at the bottom flangeThe beam has a 960 times 16 web and its equal flanges are 300 times 32 in the central20 m region and 300 times 20 in the outer 30 m regions Determine the maximumvalue of Q

Section properties

Wplyi = 300 times 32 times (960 + 32)+ 9602 times 164 = 1321 times 106 mm3

Wplyo = 300 times 20 times (960 + 20)+ 9602 times 164 = 9566 times 106 mm3

Izi = 2 times 3003 times 3212 = 144 times 106 mm4

Iti = 2 times 300 times 3233 + 960 times 1633 = 7864 times 106 mm4

Iwi = 144 times 106 times (960 + 32)24 = 3543 times 1012 mm6

Section resistances

tfi = 32 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

tfo = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cfo(tfoε) = (300 minus 16)2(20 times 0942) T52

= 754 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = 960(16 times 0942) T52

= 637 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRdo = 265 times 9566 times 106 Nmm = 2535 kNm 625

McRdi = 265 times 1321 times 106 Nmm = 3501 kNm 625

Quantity Inner length

Outer length Units

bf 300 300 mm tf 32 20 mm d 960 960 mm tw 16 16 mmbf

bf

tf

tw d

tfQ

30 m 10 10 30 m

(a) Beam and loading (b) Section (c) Dimensions

Figure 633 Example 7

Lateral buckling of beams 289

Critical sectionAt mid-span MEd4 = Q times 84 = 20 Q kNmAt the change of section MEd3 = (Q2)times 3 = 15 Q kNmMEd4McRdi = 20 times Q3501 = 0000571 QMEd3McRdo = 15 times Q2535 = 0000592 Q gt 0000571 Qand so the critical section is at the change of section

Elastic bucklingFor a uniform beam having the properties of the central cross-section usingequation 63

Mzxi =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradic

π2 times 210 000 times 144 times 106

80002

times(

81 000 times 7864 times 106 + π2 times 210 000 times 3543 times 1012

80002

)Nmm

= 2885 kNm

Using equation 612 Ncrz = π 2 times 210000 times 144 times 10680002 N = 4663 kNUsing Figure 67 αm = 135

04αmzQNcrz

Mzxi= 04 times 135 times (9602)times 4663 times 103

2885 times 106= 0491

Using equation 611

Mcri = 135 times 2885radic[1 + 04912] + 0491 Nmm = 5854 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcri = 5972 kNm)For the non-uniform beam

LrL = 6080 = 075(06 + 04

dmin

dmax

)Af min

Af max=

(06 + 04 times 960 + 2 times 20

960 + 2 times 32

)300 times 20

300 times 32= 0619

Using equation 680

αst = 10 minus 12 times(

6000

8000

)times (1 minus 0619) = 0657

Mcr = 0657 times 5854 = 3847 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 4420 kNm)

Moment resistanceAt the critical section Mcro = 3847 times 30004000 = 2885 kNm

290 Lateral buckling of beams

Using the values for the critical section in equation 625 λLT = radic(25352885) =

0937

hb = (960 + 2 times 20)300 = 333 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 and λLT 0 = 02(Clause 6322) and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0937 minus 02)+ 09372 = 1065

Using equation 626

MbRd = 25351065 + radic(10652 minus 09372) kNm

= 1615 kNm = (QbRd2

) times 30

QbRd = 1615 times 230 = 1077 kN

616 Unworked examples

6161 Example 8 ndash checking a continuous beam

A continuous 533times210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has two equal spans of 70 m Auniformly distributed design load q is applied along the centroidal axis Determinethe maximum value of q

6162 Example 9 ndash checking an overhanging beam

The overhanging beam shown in Figure 634a is prevented from twisting anddeflecting laterally at its end and supports The supported segment is a 250 times150 times 10 RHS of S275 steel and is rigidly connected to the overhanging segmentwhich is a 254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel Determine the maximum design loadQ that can be applied at the end of the UB

Q

(a) Overhanging beam (b) Braced beam

70 m 140 m 40 m 60 m 80 m

254 times146 UB 37 250 times150 times10 RHS Q kN 15 Q kN

5Q kNm

Lateral deflection and twist prevented at supports and load points

Lateral deflection and twist prevented at end and at supports

Figure 634 Unworked examples 9 and 10

Lateral buckling of beams 291

6163 Example 10 ndash checking a braced beam

Determine the maximum moment at elastic buckling of the braced 533 times 210 UB92 of S275 steel shown in Figure 634b

6164 Example 11 ndash checking a monosymmetric beam

A simply supported 60 m long 530times210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has equal andopposite end moments The moment resistance is to be increased by welding a fulllength 25 times 16 mm plate of S275 steel to one flange Determine the increases inthe moment resistances of the beam when the plate is welded to

(a) the compression flange or(b) the tension flange

6165 Example 12 ndash checking a non-uniform beam

A simply supported 530 times 210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has a concentratedshear centre load at the centre of the 100 m span The moment resistance is to beincreased by welding 250 times 16 plates of S275 steel to the top and bottom flangesover a central length of 40 m Determine the increase in the moment resistance ofthe beam

References

1 Vacharajittiphan P Woolcock ST and Trahair NS (1974) Effect of in-planedeformation on lateral buckling Journal of Structural Mechanics 3 pp 29ndash60

2 Nethercot DA and Rockey KC (1971) A unified approach to the elastic lateralbuckling of beams The Structural Engineer 49 pp 321ndash30

3 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

4 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York5 Structural Stability Research Council (1998) Guide to Design Criteria for Metal

Compression Members 5th edition (ed TV Galambos) John Wiley New York6 Barsoum RS and Gallagher RH (1970) Finite element analysis of torsional and

torsional-flexural stability problems International Journal of Numerical Methods inEngineering 2 pp 335ndash52

7 Krajcinovic D (1969) A consistent discrete elements technique for thin-walledassemblages International Journal of Solids and Structures 5 pp 639ndash62

8 Powell G and Klingner R (1970) Elastic lateral buckling of steel beams Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST9 pp 1919ndash32

9 Nethercot DA and Rockey KC (1971) Finite element solutions for the buckling ofcolumns and beams International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 13 pp 945ndash9

10 Hancock GJ and Trahair NS (1978) Finite element analysis of the lateral bucklingof continuously restrained beam-columns Civil Engineering Transactions Institutionof Engineers Australia CE20 No 2 pp 120ndash7

292 Lateral buckling of beams

11 Brown PT and Trahair NS (1968) Finite integral solution of differentialequations Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10pp 193ndash6

12 Trahair NS (1968) Elastic stability of propped cantilevers Civil EngineeringTransactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10 pp 94ndash100

13 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

14 Lee GC (1960) A survey of literature on the lateral instability of beams WeldingResearch Council Bulletin No 63 August

15 Clark JW and Hill HN (1960) Lateral buckling of beams Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 86 No ST7 pp 175ndash96

16 Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures E and FN SponLondon

17 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

18 Papangelis JP Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (1998) Elastic flexural-torsionalbuckling of structures by computer Computers and Structures 68 pp 125ndash37

19 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1976) Inelastic lateral buckling of determinatebeams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST4 pp 701ndash17

20 Trahair NS (1983) Inelastic lateral buckling of beams Chapter 2 in Beams and Beam-Columns Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied Science PublishersLondon pp 35ndash69

21 Nethercot DA (1972) Recent progress in the application of the finite element methodto problems of the lateral buckling of beams Proceedings of the EIC Conference onFinite Element Methods in Civil Engineering Montreal June pp 367ndash91

22 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1975) Analysis of lateral buckling in planeframes Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST7 pp 1497ndash516

23 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Direct stiffness analysis of lateralbuckling Journal of Structural Mechanics 3 pp 107ndash37

24 Mutton BR and Trahair NS (1973) Stiffness requirements for lateral bracingJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 99 No ST10 pp 2167ndash82

25 Mutton BR and Trahair NS (1975) Design requirements for column bracesCivil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE17 No 1pp 30ndash5

26 Trahair NS (1999) Column bracing forces Australian Journal of StructuralEngineering Institution of Engineers Australia SE2 Nos 23 pp 163ndash8

27 Nethercot DA (1973) Buckling of laterally or torsionally restrained beams Journalof the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 99 No EM4 pp 773ndash91

28 Trahair NS and Nethercot DA (1984) Bracing requirements in thin-walled struc-tures Chapter 3 of Developments in Thin-Walled Structures ndash 2 (eds J Rhodes andAC Walker) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Barking pp 93ndash130

29 Valentino J Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1997) Inelastic buckling of steel beamswith central torsional restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 123 No9 pp 1180ndash6

30 Valentino J and Trahair NS (1998) Torsional restraint against elastic lateral bucklingJournal of Structural Engineering ASCE 124 No 10 pp 1217ndash25

31 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1975) Design of diaphragm braced I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST10 pp 2045ndash61

Lateral buckling of beams 293

32 Trahair NS (1979) Elastic lateral buckling of continuously restrained beam-columnsThe Profession of a Civil Engineer (eds D Campbell-Allen and EH Davis) SydneyUniversity Press Sydney pp 61ndash73

33 Austin WJ Yegian S and Tung TP (1955) Lateral buckling of elastically end-restrained beams Proceedings of the ASCE 81 No 673 April pp 1ndash25

34 Trahair NS (1965) Stability of I-beams with elastic end restraints Journal of theInstitution of Engineers Australia 37 pp 157ndash68

35 Trahair NS (1966) Elastic stability of I-beam elements in rigid-jointed structuresJournal of the Institution of Engineers Australia 38 pp 171ndash80

36 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1976) Lateral buckling approximations for elasticbeams The Structural Engineer 54 pp 197ndash204

37 Trahair NS (1983) Lateral buckling of overhanging beams Instability and PlasticCollapse of Steel Structures (ed LJ Morris) Granada London pp 503ndash18

38 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1981) Distortional buckling of I-beams Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 107 No ST2 pp 355ndash70

39 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1983) Lateral stability of beams on seats Journalof Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No ST9 pp 2212ndash15

40 Bradford MA (1992) Lateral-distortional buckling of steel I-section membersJournal of Constructional Steel Research 23 Nos 1ndash3 pp 97ndash116

41 Trahair NS (1966) The bending stress rules of the draft ASCA1 Journal of theInstitution of Engineers Australia 38 pp 131ndash41

42 Anderson JM and Trahair NS (1972) Stability of monosymmetric beams andcantilevers Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST1 pp 269ndash86

43 Nethercot DA (1973) The effective lengths of cantilevers as governed by lateralbuckling The Structural Engineer 51 pp 161ndash8

44 Trahair NS (1968) Interaction buckling of narrow rectangular continuous beamsCivil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10 No 2pp 167ndash72

45 Salvadori MG (1951) Lateral buckling of beams of rectangular cross-section underbending and shear Proceedings of the First US National Congress of AppliedMechanics pp 403ndash5

46 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1980) Buckling properties of monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 106 No ST5 pp 941ndash57

47 Kitipornchai S Wang CM and Trahair NS (1986) Buckling of monosymmetricI-beams under moment gradient Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112 No 4pp 781ndash99

48 Wang CM and Kitipornchai S (1986) Buckling capacities of monosymmetric I-beams Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112 No 11 pp 2373ndash91

49 Woolcock ST Kitipornchai S and Bradford MA (1999) Design of Portal FrameBuildings 3rd edn Australian Institute of Steel Construction Sydney

50 Wang CM and Kitipornchai S (1986) On stability of monosymmetric cantileversEngineering Structures 8 No 3 pp 169ndash80

51 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1972) Elastic stability of tapered I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST3 pp 713ndash28

52 Nethercot DA (1973) Lateral buckling of tapered beams Publications IABSE 33pp 173ndash92

53 Bradford MA and Cuk PE (1988) Elastic buckling of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 114 No 5 pp 977ndash96

294 Lateral buckling of beams

54 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1975) Elastic behaviour of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST8 pp 1661ndash78

55 Bradford MA (1989) Inelastic buckling of tapered monosymmetric I-beamsEngineering Structures 11 No 2 pp 119ndash126

56 Lee GC Morrell ML and Ketter RL (1972) Design of tapered members Bulletin173 Welding Research Council June

57 Bradford MA (1988) Stability of tapered I-beams Journal of Constructional SteelResearch 9 pp 195ndash216

58 Bradford MA (2006) Lateral buckling of tapered steel members Chapter 1 inAnalysis and Design of Plated Structures Vol1Stability Woodhead Publishing LtdCambridge pp 1ndash25

59 Trahair NS and Kitipornchai S (1971) Elastic lateral buckling of stepped I-beamsJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 97 No ST10 pp 2535ndash48

60 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash5Plated Structural Elements BSI London

Chapter 7

Beam-columns

71 Introduction

Beam-columns are structural members which combine the beam function oftransmitting transverse forces or moments with the compression (or tension)member function of transmitting axial forces Theoretically all structural membersmay be regarded as beam-columns since the common classifications of tensionmembers compression members and beams are merely limiting examples ofbeam-columns However the treatment of beam-columns in this chapter is gen-erally limited to members in axial compression The behaviour and design ofmembers with moments and axial tension are treated in Chapter 2

Beam-columns may act as if isolated as in the case of eccentrically loadedcompression members with simple end connections or they may form part of arigid frame In this chapter the behaviour and design of isolated beam-columnsare treated The ultimate resistance and design of beam-columns in frames arediscussed in Chapter 8

It is convenient to discuss the behaviour of isolated beam-columns under thethree separate headings of In-Plane Behaviour FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling andBiaxial-Bending as is done in Sections 72ndash74 When a beam-column is bentabout its weaker principal axis or when it is prevented from deflecting laterallywhile being bent about its stronger principal axis (as shown in Figure 71a) itsaction is confined to the plane of bending This in-plane behaviour is related to thebending of beams discussed in Chapter 5 and to the buckling of compression mem-bers discussed in Chapter 3 When a beam-column which is bent about its strongerprincipal axis is not restrained laterally (as shown in Figure 71b) it may buckleprematurely out of the plane of bending by deflecting laterally and twisting Thisaction is related to the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams (referred to as lateralndashtorsional buckling in EC3) discussed in Chapter 6 More generally however abeam-column may be bent about both principal axes as shown in Figure 71cThis biaxial bending which commonly occurs in three-dimensional rigid framesinvolves interactions of beam bending and twisting with beam and column buck-ling Sections 72ndash74 discuss the in-plane behaviour flexuralndashtorsional bucklingand biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns

296 Beam-columns

x

y

z

N

NM

L

x

z

N

N

L

x

y

z

N

N My

Lateralrestraints

y

M

Mz

m M m M

mz Mz

myMy

(c) Biaxial bendingMember deflects vwand twists

(b) Flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling Member deflectsw in zx plane then bucklesby deflecting v in yx planeand twisting

(a) In-plane behaviourMember deflects w inzx plane only

Figure 71 Beam-column behaviour

72 In-plane behaviour of isolated beam-columns

When the deformations of an isolated beam-column are confined to the planeof bending (see Figure 71a) its behaviour shows an interaction between beambending and compression member buckling as indicated in Figure 72 Curve 1 ofthis figure shows the linear behaviour of an elastic beam while curve 6 shows thelimiting behaviour of a rigid-plastic beam at the full plastic moment Mpl Curve 2shows the transition of a real elastic ndash plastic beam from curve 1 to curve 6The elastic buckling of a concentrically loaded compression member at its elasticbuckling load Ncr y is shown by curve 4 Curve 3 shows the interaction betweenbending and buckling in an elastic member and allows for the additional momentNδ exerted by the axial load Curve 7 shows the interaction between the bendingmoment and axial force which causes the member to become fully plastic Thiscurve allows for reduction from the full plastic moment Mpl to Mplr caused by theaxial load and for the additional moment Nδ The actual behaviour of a beam-column is shown by curve 5 which provides a transition from curve 3 for an elasticmember to curve 7 for full plasticity

721 Elastic beam-columns

A beam-column is shown in Figures 71a and 73a which is acted on by axialforces N and end moments M and βmM where βm can have any value betweenminus1 (single curvature bending) and +1 (double curvature bending) For isolated

Beam-columns 297

1 2 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

In-plane deflection

Loading M or N

Ncry

Mpl

Mplr

34

57

0

First yield column M = 0

N

N

M

M(M N)max

interactionbeam-column

beam N = 0

Figure 72 In-plane behaviour of a beam-column

N

NM

w

L

x

M

Nw

Bending momentndashEIy d

2wdx2

M (1 + )L

M (1 + )L

M [1 ndash (1 + ) xL]

m M

m

m

m

m M

(b) Bending moment distribution (a) Beam-column

Figure 73 In-plane bending moment distribution in a beam-column

beam-columns these end moments are independent of the deflections and have noeffect on the elastic buckling load Ncr y =π2EIyL2 (They are therefore quite dif-ferent from the end restraining moments discussed in Section 363 which increasewith the end rotations and profoundly affect the elastic buckling load) The beam-column is prevented from bending about the minor axis out of the plane of the endmoments and is assumed to be straight before loading

298 Beam-columns

The bending moment in the beam-column is the sum of M minus M (1 + βm)xLdue to the end moments and shears and Nw due to the deflection w as shownin Figure 73b It is shown in Section 751 that the deflected shape of the beam-column is given by

w = M

N

[cosmicrox minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1 + (1 + βm)

x

L

]

(71)

where

micro2 = N

EIy= π2

L2

N

Ncr y (72)

As the axial force N approaches the buckling load Ncr y the value of microLapproaches π and the values of cosecmicroL cotmicroL and therefore of w approachinfinity as indicated by curve 3 in Figure 72 This behaviour is similar to that ofa compression member with geometrical imperfections (see Section 322) It isalso shown in Section 751 that the maximum moment Mmax in the beam-columnis given by

Mmax = M

1 +

βmcosecπ

radicN

Ncr y+ cot π

radicN

Ncr y

2

05

(73)

when βm lt minus cosπradic(NNcr y) and the point of maximum moment lies in the

span and is given by the end moment M that is

Mmax = M (74)

when βm ge minus cosπradic(NNcr y)

The variations of MmaxM with the axial load ratio NNcr y and the end momentratio βm are shown in Figure 74 In general Mmax remains equal to M for lowvalues of NNcr y but increases later The value of NNcr y at which Mmax beginsto increase above M is lowest for βm = minus1 (uniform bending) and increaseswith increasing βm Once Mmax departs from M it increases slowly at first thenmore rapidly and reaches very high values as N approaches the column bucklingload Ncr y

For beam-columns which are bent in single curvature by equal and oppo-site end moments (βm = minus1) the maximum deflection δmax is given by (seeSection 751)

δmax

δ= 8π2

NNcr y

[sec

π

2

radicN

Ncr yminus 1

](75)

Beam-columns 299

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

02

04

06

08

1010

ndash MN

N

= 10

05

0500

ndash

ndash

05

10

Mmax M

( = 1)

(06 ndash 04 )(1 ndash NNcry) 10

NN

cry

Mmax M or max

m M

mmax

m

m

ge

Figure 74 Maximum moments and deflections in elastic beam-columns

in which δ = ML28EIy is the value of δmax when N = 0 and the maximummoment by

Mmax = M secπ

2

radicN

Ncr y (76)

These two equations are shown non-dimensionally in Figure 74 It can be seenthat they may be approximated by using a factor 1(1 minus NNcr y) to amplify thedeflection δ and the moment M due to the applied moments alone (N = 0) Thissame approximation was used in Section 363 to estimate the reduced stiffness ofan axially loaded restraining member

For beam-columns with unequal end moments (βm gt minus1) the value of Mmax

may be approximated by using

Mmax

M= Cm

1 minus NNcr yge 10 (77)

in which

Cm = 06 minus 04βm (78)

These approximations are also shown in Figure 74 It can be seen that they aregenerally conservative for βm gt 0 and only a little unconservative for βm lt 0

300 Beam-columns

Approximations for the maximum moments Mmax in beam-columns with trans-verse loads can be obtained by using

Mmax = δMmax0 (79)

in which Mmax0 is the maximum moment when N = 0

δ = γm(1 minus γsNNcr)

(1 minus γnNNcr) (710)

Ncr = π2EI(k2crL2) (711)

and kcr = LcrL is the effective length ratio Expressions for Mmax0 and valuesof γm γn γs and kcr are given in Figure 75 for beam-columns with centralconcentrated loads Q and in Figure 76 for beam-columns with uniformly dis-tributed loads q A worked example of the use of these approximations is given inSection 771

The maximum stress σmax in the beam-column is the sum of the axial stress andthe maximum bending stress caused by the maximum moment Mmax It is thereforegiven by

σmax = σac + σbcyMmax

M(712)

Beam-column First-order moment (N = 0) k Mmax 0

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

16---------

Q

8---------

Q

L

4

05 10 10

QL

QL

018

m n s

QL

QL

32QL5

10 10 10 062

10 10 049 014

07

56------

10 10 028

10 10 045

20 10 10 019

10 10 10 018 4---------QL

3

2

8---------QL

32QL5

32QL5

16QL3

16QL3

16QL3

8QL

8QL

8QL

8QL

QL

16---------QL

8---------QL

8---------QL

+

+

+

+

+

+

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash ndash+

Q

L2 L2 L2

L2 L2

L2 L2

L2L2

L2L2

L2L2

3

16---------QL3

16---------QL3

cr

Figure 75 Approximations for beam-columns with central concentrated loads

Beam-columns 301

Mmax0Beam-column k

q

q

q

q

q

8---------

q

12---------

q

L L

8+

+

+

+

+

+

+

05 10 10

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

qL

qL

037

12---------qL

2

2

2

2

qL

82qL

82qL

22qL

82qL

1282qL9

1282qL9

1282qL9

242qL

242qL

122qL

122qL

10 05 10 04

10 10 049 018

07

916------

10 10 036

10 10 029

20 10 10 04

10 10 10 ndash003 8---------qL2

2---------qL2

8---------qL2

8---------qL2

8---------qL2

12---------qL2

12---------qL2

cr m n sFirst-order moment (N = 0)

Figure 76 Approximations for beam-columns with distributed loads

in which σac = NA and σbcy = MWely If the member has no residual stressesthen it will remain elastic while σmax is less than the yield stress fy and so theabove results are valid while

N

Ny+ M

My

Mmax

Mle 10 (713)

in which Ny = Afy is the squash load and My = fyWel the nominal first yieldmoment A typical elastic limit of this type is shown by the first yield point markedon curve 3 of Figure 72 It can be seen that this limit provides a lower boundestimate of the resistance of a straight beam-column while the elastic bucklingload Ncr y provides an upper bound

Variations of the first yield limits of NNy determined from equation 713 withMMy and βm are shown in Figure 77a for the case where Ncr y = Ny15 For abeam-column in double curvature bending (βm = 1) Mmax = M and so N varieslinearly with M until the elastic buckling load Ncr y is reached For a beam-columnin uniform bending (βm = minus1) the relationship between N and M is non-linear andconcave due to the amplification of the bending moment from M to Mmax by theaxial load Also shown in Figure 77a are solutions of equation 713 based on theuse of the approximations of equations 77 and 78 A comparison of these withthe accurate solutions also shown in Figure 77a again demonstrates thecomparative accuracy of the approximate equations 77 and 78

302 Beam-columns

NN

y

N = NbyRd

10

05 0

ndash05ndash10

ndash05ndash10

10

05 0

NN

yNcryNy = 115Ncry Ny = 115

Accurate MmaxMApproximate Mmax M

M = My

0 02 04 06 08 10MM

0

02

04

06

08

10

y

N=Ny

N=Ncry

0 02 04 06 08 10MM

0

02

04

06

08

10

y

N=Ny

N=Ncry

Crooked beam-columns Straight beam-columns

m M

βm

m

MN

N

M=My

(b) Crooked beam-columns(a) Straight beam-columns

Figure 77 First yield of beam-columns with unequal end moments

The elastic in-plane behaviour of members in which the axial forces causetension instead of compression can also be analysed The maximum moment insuch a member never exceeds M and so a conservative estimate of the elasticlimit can be obtained from

N

Ny+ M

Myle 10 (714)

This forms the basis for the methods of designing tension members for in-planebending as discussed in Section 24

722 Fully plastic beam-columns

An upper bound estimate of the resistance of an I-section beam-column bent aboutits major axis can be obtained from the combination of bending moment Mplr andaxial force Nyr which causes the cross-section to become fully plastic A particularexample is shown in Figure 78 for which the distance zn from the centroid to theunstrained fibre is less than (h minus 2tf )2 This combination of moment and forcelies between the two extreme combinations for members with bending momentonly (N = 0) which become fully plastic at

Mpl = fybf tf (h minus tf )+ fytw

(h minus 2tf

2

)2

(715)

Beam-columns 303

4 ndash

ndash

ndash )2(

)(

22

nfwy

fffyrpl

zthtf+

thtbfM

bf

tf

h

tw

zn

fy

y

z

Nyr =

=

2fyzntw

fy

(a) Section (b) Stress distribution (c) Stress resultants

Figure 78 Fully plastic cross-section

0 05 10MplrMpl

0

05

10

Ny

Ny

r

0=yi

L

y y

MplrMpl = 118[1 ndash (Nyr Ny)]

Analytical solution

Figure 79 Interaction curves for lsquozero lengthrsquo members

and members with axial force only (M = 0) which become fully plastic at

Ny = fy[2bf tf + (h minus 2tf )tw] (716)

The variations of Mplr and Nyr are shown by the dashed interaction curve inFigure 79 These combinations can be used directly for very short beam-columnsfor which the bending moment at the fully plastic cross-section is approximatelyequal to the applied end moment M

Also shown in Figure 79 is the approximation

Mplry

Mply= 118

[1 minus Nyr

Ny

]le 10 (717)

304 Beam-columns

which is generally close to the accurate solution except when Nyr asymp 015Nywhen the maximum error is of the order of 5 This small error is quite acceptablesince the accurate solutions ignore the strengthening effects of strain-hardening

A similar analysis may be made of an I-section beam-column bent about itsminor axis In this case a satisfactory approximation for the load and moment atfull plasticity is given by

Mplrz

Mpl z= 119

[1 minus

(Nyr

Ny

)2]

le 10 (718)

Beam-columns of more general cross-section may also be analysed to deter-mine the axial load and moment at full plasticity In general these may be safelyapproximated by the linear interaction equation

Mplr

Mpl= 1 minus Nyr

Ny (719)

In a longer beam-column instability effects become important and failureoccurs before any section becomes fully plastic Afurther complication arises fromthe fact that as the beam-column deflects by δ its maximum moment increasesfrom the nominal value M to (M +Nδ) Thus the value of M at which full plasticityoccurs is given by

M = Mplr minus Nδ (720)

and so the value of M for full plasticity decreases from Mplr as the deflection δincreases as shown by curve 7 in Figure 72 This curve represents an upper boundto the behaviour of beam-columns which is only approached after the maximumstrength is reached

723 Ultimate resistance

7231 General

An isolated beam-column reaches its ultimate resistance at a load which is greaterthan that which causes first yield (see Section 721) but is less than that whichcauses a cross-section to become fully plastic (see Section 722) as indicatedin Figure 72 These two bounds are often far apart and when a more accurateestimate of the resistance is required an elasticndashplastic analysis of the imperfectbeam-column must be made Two different approximate analytical approaches tobeam-column strength may be used and these are related to the initial crookednessand residual stress methods discussed in Sections 322 and 334 of allowing forthe effects of imperfections on the resistances of real compression members Thesetwo approaches are discussed below

Beam-columns 305

7232 Elasticndashplastic resistances of straight beam-columns

The resistance of an initially straight beam-column with residual stresses maybe found by analysing numerically its non-linear elasticndashplastic behaviour anddetermining its maximum resistance [1] Some of these resistances [2 3] are shownas interaction plots in Figure 710 Figure 710a shows how the ultimate load Nand the end moment M vary with the major axis slenderness ratio Liy for beam-columns with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) while Figure 710bshows how these vary with the end moment ratio βm for a slenderness ratio ofLiy = 60

It has been proposed that these ultimate resistances can be simply and closelyapproximated by using the values of M and N which satisfy the interactionequations of both equation 717 and

N

NbyRd+ Cm

(1 minus NNcr y)

M

Mplyle 1 (721)

in which NbyRd is the ultimate resistance of a concentrically loaded column (thebeam-column with M = 0) which fails by deflecting about the major axis Ncr y

is the major axis elastic buckling load of this concentrically loaded column andCm is given by

Cm = 06 minus 04βm ge 04 (722)

Equation 717 ensures that the reduced plastic moment Mplr is not exceededby the end moment M and represents the resistances of very short members

ndash05

ndash10

0

05

10

0 05 10MM

0

05

10

pl

0 05 100

05

10

Li---- = 60y

y y

y y

M

MN

N

LM

MN

N

M

N

N

M

MN

NLiy

20

40

60

80

100120

0

MMpl

NN

y

NN

y

(a) Effect of slenderness (b) Effect of end moment ratio

m

Figure 710 Ultimate resistance interaction curves

306 Beam-columns

NN

y

NN

y

1)1( ndash118

1+

+ ndash

ypl

ycr

m

Rdyb

NNMM

NN

CN

N

Analytical solutions

11 ndash

1

plycrRdyb N M

M=

1plM

M=

=

NN

N

0 05 100

05

10

0 05 10MM

0

05

10

plMMpl

Li---- =120y

y y

M

MN

N

m =1

Li---- = 40y

80

120 0

1ndash

Analytical solutions

le

(a) Effect of slenderness (b) Effect of end moment ratio

Figure 711 Interaction formulae

(Liy rarr 0) and of some members which are not bent in single curvature (ieβm gt 0) as shown for example in Figure 711b

Equation 721 represents the interaction between buckling and bending whichdetermines the resistance of more slender members If the case of equal and oppo-site end moments is considered first (βm = minus1 and Cm = 1) then it will be seen thatequation 721 includes the same approximate amplification factor 1(1minusNNcr y)

as does equation 77 for the maximum moments in elastic beam-columns It is ofa similar form to the first yield condition of equation 713 except that a conver-sion to ultimate resistance has been made by using the ultimate resistance NbyRd and moment Mply instead of the squash load Ny and the yield moment My Thesesubstitutions ensure that this interaction formula gives the same limit predictionsfor concentrically loaded columns (M = 0) and for beams (N = 0) as do thetreatments given in Chapters 3 and 5 The accuracy of equation 721 for beam-columns with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) is demonstrated inFigure 711a

The effects of unequal end moments (βm gt minus1) on the ultimate resistances ofbeam-columns are allowed for approximately in equation 721 by the coefficientCm which converts the unequal end moments M andβmM into equivalent equal andopposite end moments CmM Although this conversion is for in-plane behaviour itis remarkably similar to the conversion used for beams with unequal end momentswhich buckle out of the plane of bending (see Section 6212) The accuracy ofequation 721 for beam-columns with unequal end moments is demonstrated in

Beam-columns 307

Figure 711b and it can be seen that it is good except for high values of βm whenit tends to be oversafe and for high values of M when it tends to overestimatethe analytical solutions for the ultimate resistance (although this overestimate isreduced if strain-hardening is accounted for in the analytical solutions) The over-conservatism for high values ofβm is caused by the use of the 04 cut-off in equation722 for Cm but more accurate solutions can be obtained by using equation 78for which the minimum value of Cm is 02

Thus the interaction equations (equations 717 and 721) provide a reasonablysimple method of estimating the ultimate resistances of I-section beam-columnsbent about the major axis which fail in the plane of the applied moments Theinteraction equations have been successfully applied to a wide range of sectionsincluding solid and hollow circular sections as well as I-sections bent about theminor axis In the latter case Mply NbyRd and Ncr y must be replaced by theirminor axis equivalents while equation 717 should be replaced by equation 718

It should be noted that the interaction equations provide a convenient way ofestimating the ultimate resistances of beam-columns An alternative method hasbeen suggested [4] using simple design charts to show the variation of the momentratio MMplr with the end moment ratio βm and the length ratio LLc in which Lc

is the length of a column which just fails under the axial load N alone (the effectsof strain-hardening must be included in the calculation of Lc)

7233 First yield of crooked beam-columns

In the second approximate approach to the resistance of a real beam-column thefirst yield of an initially crooked beam-column without residual stresses is usedFor this the magnitude of the initial crookedness is increased to allow approx-imately for the effects of residual stresses One logical way of doing this is touse the same crookedness as is used in the design of the corresponding compres-sion member since this has already been increased so as to allow for residualstresses

The first yield of a crooked beam-column is analysed in Section 752 andparticular solutions are shown in Figure 77b for a beam-column with Ncr yNy =115 and whose initial crookedness is defined by η = 0290(Li minus 0152) It canbe seen that as M decreases to zero the axial load at first yield increases to thecolumn resistance NbyRd which is reduced below the elastic buckling load Ncr y

by the effects of imperfections As N decreases the first yield loads for crookedbeam-columns approach the corresponding loads for straight beam-columns

For beam-columns in uniform bending (βm = minus1) the interaction between Mand N is non-linear and concave as it was for straight beam-columns (Figure 77a)If this interaction is plotted using the maximum moment Mmax instead of the endmoment M then the relationships between Mmax and N becomes slightly convexsince the non-linear effects of the amplification of M are then included in MmaxThus a linear relationship between MmaxMy and NNbyRd will provide a sim-ple and conservative approximation for first yield which is of good accuracy

308 Beam-columns

Full plasticity (equation 717)

Column resistance N=NbyRd

05

=10

ndash10ndash10

050

0

Mmax Mpl Mmax Mpl

NN

y

NN

y

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10 N =Ny

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10 N =Ny

M=MplM=Mpl

N =NbyRd N=NbyRd

(a) Approximation (equation 723) (b) Elasticndashplastic analyses of straightbeam-columns

Parabolictransition

Linear

m =10m

Figure 712 Resistances of beam-columns

However if this approximation is used for the resistance then it will becomeincreasingly conservative as Mmax increases since it approaches the first yieldmoment My instead of the fully plastic moment Mpl This difficulty may be over-come by modifying the approximation to a linear relationship between MmaxMpl

and NNbyRd which passes through MmaxMpl = 1 when NNbyRd = 0 as shownin Figure 712a Such an approximation is also in good agreement with the uniformbending (βm = minus1) analytical strengths [2 3] shown in Figure 712b for initiallystraight beam-columns with residual stresses

For beam-columns in double curvature bending (βm = 1) the first yield inter-action shown in Figure 77b forms an approximately parabolic transition betweenthe bounds of the column resistance NbyRd and the first yield condition of astraight beam-column In this case the effects of initial curvature are greatestnear mid-span and have little effect on the maximum moment which is gener-ally greatest at the ends Thus the strength may be simply approximated by aparabolic transition from the column resistance NbyRd to the full plasticity condi-tion given by equation 717 for I-sections bent about the major axis as shown inFigure 712a This approximation is in good agreement with the double curvaturebending (βm = 1) analytical resistances [2 3] shown in Figure 712b for straightbeam-columns with residual stresses and zero strain-hardening

The ultimate resistances of beam-columns with unequal end moments may beapproximated by suitable interpolations between the linear and parabolic approx-imations for beam-columns in uniform bending (βm = minus1) and double curvaturebending (βm = 1) It has been suggested [5 6] that this interpolation should be

Beam-columns 309

made according to

M

Mply=

1 minus

(1 + βm

2

)3(

1 minus N

NbyRd

)

+ 118

(1 + βm

2

)3radic(

1 minus N

Ncr y

)le 1 (723)

This interpolation uses a conservative cubic weighting to shift the resulting curvesdownwards towards the linear curve for βm = minus1 as shown in Figure 712a Thisis based on the corresponding shift shown in Figure 712b of the analytical results[2 3] for initially straight beam-columns with residual stresses

724 Design rules

7241 Cross-section resistance

EC3 requires beam-columns to satisfy both cross-section resistance and overallmember buckling resistance limitations The cross-section resistance limitationsare intended to prevent cross-section failure due to plasticity or local buckling

The general cross-section resistance limitation of EC3 is given by a modificationof the first yield condition of equation 714 to

NEd

NcRd+ MEd

McRdle 1 (724)

in which NEd is the design axial force and MEd the design moment acting at thecross-section under consideration NcRd is the cross-section axial resistance Afy(obtained using the effective cross-sectional area Aeff for slender cross-sections incompression) and McRd is the cross-section moment resistance (based on eitherthe plastic elastic or effective section modulus depending on classification)

This linear interaction equation is often conservative and so EC3 allows theuse of the more economic alternative for Class 1 and 2 cross-sections of directlycalculating the reduced plastic moment resistance MN Rd in the presence of anaxial load NEd The following criterion should be satisfied

MEd le MN Rd (725)

For doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections there is no reduction to the major axisplastic moment resistance (ie MN Rd = MplRd) provided both

NEd le 025NplRd (726a)

and

NEd le 05hwtwfyγM0

(726b)

310 Beam-columns

For larger values of NEd the reduced major axis plastic moment resistance isgiven by

MN yRd = MplyRd(1 minus n)

(1 minus 05a)le MplyRd (727)

in which

n = NEdNplRd (728)

and

a = A minus 2btfA

le 05 (729)

where b and tf and the flange width and thickness respectivelyIn minor axis bending there is no reduction to the plastic moment resistance of

doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections provided

NEd le hwtwfyγM0

(730)

For larger values of NEd the reduced plastic minor axis moment resistance is givenby

MN zRd = Mpl zRd (731a)

for n le a and by

MN zRd = Mpl zRd

[1 minus

(n minus a

1 minus a

)2]

(731b)

for n gt a Similar formulae are also provided for box sections

7242 Member resistance

The general in-plane member resistance limitation of EC3 is given by a simplifi-cation of equation 721 to

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRdle 1 (732)

for major axis buckling and

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MzEd

MczRdle 1 (733)

Beam-columns 311

for minor axis buckling in which kyy and kzz are interaction factors whose valuesmay be obtained from Annex A or Annex B of EC3 and McyRd and MczRd arethe in-plane bending resistances about the major and minor axes respectively Theformer is based on enhancing the elastically determined resistance to allow forpartial plastification of the cross-section (ie following Section 7233) whilst thelatter reduced the plastically determined resistance to allow for instability effects(ie following Section 7232) Lengthy formulae to calculate the interactionfactors are provided in both cases

73 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of isolatedbeam-columns

When an unrestrained beam-column is bent about its major axis it may buckleby deflecting laterally and twisting at a load which is significantly less than themaximum load predicted by an in-plane analysis This flexuralndashtorsional bucklingmay occur while the member is still elastic or after some yielding due to in-planebending and compression has occurred as indicated in Figure 713

731 Elastic beam-columns

7311 Beam-columns with equal end moments

Consider a perfectly straight elastic beam-column bent about its major axis (seeFigure 71b) by equal and opposite end moments M (so that βm = minus1) and loadedby an axial force N The ends of the beam-column are assumed to be simply

Load Load

Out-of-plane deformation In-plane deflection

(a) Out-of-plane behaviour (b) In-plane behaviour

1

2

3

Elastic buckling1

Inelastic buckling2

3

Inelastic buckling

Elasticndashplasticbending

First yield

Elastic buckling

Figure 713 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns

312 Beam-columns

supported and free to warp but end twist rotations are prevented It is also assumedthat the cross-section of the beam-column has two axes of symmetry so that theshear centre and centroid coincide

When the applied load and moments reach the elastic buckling values NcrMN McrMN a deflected and twisted equilibrium position is possible It is shown inSection 761 that this position is given by

v = McrMN

Ncr z minus NcrMNφ = δ sin

πx

L(734)

in which δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that theelastic buckling combination NcrMN McrMN is given by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(735)

in which ip = radic[(Iy + Iz)A] is the polar radius of gyration and

Ncr z = π2EIzL2 (736)

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2

)(737)

are the minor axis and torsional buckling loads of an elastic axially loaded column(see Sections 321 and 375) It can be seen that for the limiting case whenMcrMN = 0 the beam-column buckles as a compression member at the lower ofNcr z and NcrT and when NcrMN = 0 it buckles as a beam at the elastic bucklingmoment (see equation 63)

Mcr = Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

)(GIt + π2EIw

L2

)= ip

radicNcr zNcrT (738)

Some more general solutions of equation 735 are shown in Figure 714The derivation of equation 735 given in Section 761 neglects the approx-

imate amplification by the axial load of the in-plane moments to McrMN

(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y) (see Section 721) When this is accounted for equation 735for the elastic buckling combination of NcrMN and McrMN changes to

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr y

)(1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(739)

The maximum possible value of NcrMN is the lowest value of Ncr y Ncr z andNcrT For most sections this is much less than Ncr y and so equation 739 is usuallyvery close to equation 735 For most hot-rolled sections Ncr z is less than NcrT

Beam-columns 313

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10McrMNMzx

0

02

04

06

08

10

Ncr

MN

N

crz

NcrzNcrT = 50

02

20

05

10

Figure 714 Elastic buckling load combinations for beam-columns with equal end moments

so that (1 minus NcrMN NcrT ) gt (1 minus NcrMN Ncr z)(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y) In this caseequation 739 can be safely approximated by the interaction equation

NcrMN

Ncr z+ 1

(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y)

McrMN

Mzx= 1 (740)

7312 Beam-columns with unequal end moments

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of simply supported beam-columns withunequal major axis end moments M and βmM has been investigated numericallyand many solutions are available [7ndash11] The conservative interaction equation(

Mradic

F

ME

)2

+(

N

Ncr z

)= 1 (741)

has also been proposed [9] in which

M 2E = π2EIzGItL

2 (742)

The factor 1radic

F in equation 741 varies with the end moment ratio βm as shown inFigure 715 and allows the unequal end moments to be treated as equivalent equalend moments M

radicF Thus the elastic buckling of beam-columns with unequal

end moments can also be approximated by modifying equation 735 to

(McrMN radic

F)2

M 2zx

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

) (743)

or by a similar modification of equation 740

314 Beam-columns

0 02 04 06 08 10

04

06

08

Flexural ndash torsional buckling

In-plane behaviour

ndash0ndash04ndash06ndash08ndash10

11

F

Cm

Cm

02

M

M

N

N N

N

10

1 F

M F

M F1

F

m

1 m

m 1m

End moment ratio m

equiv

Cm

Figure 715 Equivalent end moments for beam-columns

It is of interest to note that the variation of the factor 1radic

F for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns is very close to that of the coefficient 1αm

obtained from

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (744)

used for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams (see Section 6212) and closeto that of the coefficient Cm (see equation 722) used for the in-plane behaviour ofbeam-columns

However the results shown in Figure 716 of a more recent investigation [12]of the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns have indicated that thefactor for converting unequal end moments into equivalent equal end momentsshould vary with NNcr z as well as with βm More accurate predictions have beenobtained using

(McrMN

αbcMzx

)2

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

) (745)

with

1

αbc=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

NcrMN

Ncr z

) (746)

Beam-columns 315

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

02

04

08

10

(1ndash )2

(a)

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

02

04

08

10β m M

M

N

N

NNcrz000025050

075095

000025050

075

095

06 06

M

omen

t coe

ffic

ient

1

NNcrz

(1 ndash )2

(b)

mm

bc

M

omen

t coe

ffic

ient

1

bc

End moment ratio mEnd moment ratio m

2EIwGItL2 = 009 2EIwGItL

2 =10

Figure 716 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling coefficients 1αbc in equation 745

7313 Beam-columns with elastic end restraints

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of symmetrically restrained beam-columnswith equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) is analysed in Section 762The particular example considered is one for which the minor axis bending andend warping restraints are equal This corresponds to the situation in which bothends of both flanges have equal elastic restraints whose stiffnesses are such that

Flange end moment

Flange end rotation= minusEIz

L

R

1 minus R(747)

in which the restraint parameter R varies from 0 (flange unrestrained) to 1 (flangerigidly restrained)

It is shown in Section 762 that the elastic buckling values McrMN and NcrMN

of the end moments and axial load for which the restrained beam-column buckleselastically are given by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(748)

in which

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr (749)

316 Beam-columns

and

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2cr

) (750)

where Lcr is the effective length of the beam-column

Lcr = kcrL (751)

and the effective length ratio kcr is the solution of

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (752)

Equation 748 is the same as equation 735 for simply supported beam-columnsexcept for the familiar use of the effective length Lcr instead of the actual lengthL in equations 749 and 750 defining Ncr z and NcrT Thus the solutions shownin Figure 714 can also be applied to end-restrained beam-columns

The close relationships between the flexuralndashtorsional buckling condition ofequation 735 for unrestrained beam-columns with equal end moments (βm = minus1)and the buckling loads Ncr z NcrT of columns and moments Mzx of beams havealready been discussed It should also be noted that equation 752 for the effectivelengths of beam-columns with equal end restraints is exactly the same as equation343 for columns when (1 minus R)R is substituted for γ1 and γ2 and equation 652for beams These suggest that the flexuralndashtorsional buckling condition for beam-columns with unequal end restraints could well be approximated by equations748ndash751 if Figure 321a is used to determine the effective length ratio kcr inequation 751

A further approximation may be suggested for restrained beam-columns withunequal end moments (βm = minus1) in which modifications of equations 745 and746 (after substituting i2

pNcr zNcrT for M 2zx) are used (with equations 749ndash751)

instead of equation 748

732 Inelastic beam-columns

The solutions obtained in Section 731 for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling ofstraight isolated beam-columns are only valid while they remain elastic Whenthe combination of the residual stresses with those induced by the in-plane load-ing causes yielding the effective rigidities of some sections of the member arereduced and buckling may occur at a load which is significantly less than thein-plane maximum load or the elastic buckling load as indicated in Figure 713

A method of analysing the inelastic buckling of I-section beam-columns withresidual stresses has been developed [13] and used [14] to obtain the predictionsshown in Figure 717 for the inelastic buckling loads of isolated beam-columns

Beam-columns 317

0 05 10MMIu

0

05

10

NN

Iz

0 1 2 0 1 2 3

= ndash1

300

150

100 250

200

150

300

200

Accurate [13]

Approximate equations 753 ndash 756

M

N

N

Liz

Liz

Liz

= 0 = +1

MMIu MMIu

m

m M

m m

Figure 717 Inelastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns

with unequal end moments It was found that these could be closely approximatedby modifying the elastic equations 745 and 746 to

(M

αbcI MIu

)2

=(

1 minus N

NIz

)(1 minus N

NcrT

) (753)

1

αbcI=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

N

NIz

)(754)

in which

MIuMpl = 1008 minus 0245MplMzx le 10 (755)

is an approximation for the inelastic buckling of a beam in uniform bending(equation 755 is similar to equation 623 when βm = minus1) and

NIzNy = 1035 minus 0181radic

NyNcr z minus 0128NyNcr z le 10 (756)

provides an approximation for the inelastic buckling of a column

733 Ultimate resistance

The ultimate resistances of real beam-columns which fail by flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling are reduced below their elastic and inelastic buckling loads by the pres-ence of geometrical imperfections such as initial crookedness just as are those ofcolumns (Section 34) and beams (Section 64)

318 Beam-columns

One method of predicting these reduced resistances is to modify the approximateinteraction equation for in-plane bending (equation 721) to

N

Nb zRd+ Cmy

(1 minus NNcr y)

My

Mb0yRdle 1 (757)

where Nb zRd is the minor axis strength of a concentrically loaded column(My = 0) and Mb0yRd the resistance of a beam (N = 0) with equal and oppo-site end moments (βm = minus1) which fails either by in-plane plasticity at Mplyor by flexuralndashtorsional buckling The basis for this modification is the remark-able similarity between equation 757 and the simple linear approximation ofequation 740 for the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns withequal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) The application of equation 757 tobeam-columns with unequal end moments is simplified by the similarity shown inFigure 715 between the values of Cm for in-plane bending and 1

radicF and 1αm

for flexuralndashtorsional bucklingHowever the value of this simple modification is lost if the in-plane strength

of a beam-column is to be predicted more accurately than by equation 721 Iffor example equation 723 is to be used for the in-plane strength as suggested inSection 7233 then it would be more appropriate to modify the flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling equations 745 and 753 to obtain out-of-plane strength predictions It hasbeen suggested [15] that the modified equations should take the form

(M

αbcuMb0yRd

)2

=(

1 minus N

Nb zRd

)(1 minus N

NcrT

)(758)

in which

1

αbcu=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

N

Nb zRd

) (759)

734 Design rules

The design of beam-columns against out-of-plane buckling will generally begoverned by

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRdle 1 (760)

in which kzy is an interaction factor that may be determined from Annex A orAnnex B of EC3 Equation 760 is similar to equation 732 for in-plane majoraxis buckling resistance except for the allowance for lateral torsional buckling inthe second term and the use of the minor axis column buckling resistance in thefirst term

Beam-columns 319

For members with the intermediate lateral restraints against minor axis bucklingfailure by major axis buckling with lateral torsional buckling between the restraintsbecomes a possibility This leads to requirement

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRdle 1 (761)

which incorporates the major axis flexural buckling resistance NbyRd and thelateral torsional buckling resistance MbRd For members with no lateral restraintsalong the span equation 760 will always govern over equation 761

The design of members subjected to bending and tension is discussed inSection 24

A worked example of checking the out-of-plane resistance of a beam-column isgiven in Section 774

74 Biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns

741 Behaviour

The geometry and loading of most framed structures are three-dimensional andthe typical member of such a structure is compressed bent about both principalaxes and twisted by the other members connected to it as shown in Figure 71cThe structure is usually arranged so as to produce significant bending about themajor axis of the member but the minor axis deflections and twists are oftensignificant as well because the minor axis bending and torsional stiffnesses aresmall In addition these deformations are amplified by the components of theaxial load and the major axis moment which are induced by the deformations ofthe member

The elastic biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns with equal and oppositeend moments acting about each principal axis has been analysed [16ndash22] butthe solutions obtained cannot be simplified without approximation These anal-yses have shown that the elastic biaxial bending of a beam-column is similar toits in-plane behaviour (see curve 3 of Figure 72) in that the major and minoraxis deflections and the twist all begin at the commencement of loading andincrease rapidly as the elastic buckling load (which is the load which causes elas-tic flexuralndashtorsional buckling when there are no minor axis moments and torquesacting) is approached First yield predictions based on these analyses have givenconservative estimates of the member resistances The elastic biaxial bending ofbeam-columns with unequal end moments has also been investigated In one ofthese investigations [16] approximate solutions were obtained by changing bothsets of unequal end moments into equivalent equal end moments by multiply-ing them by the conversion factor 1

radicF (see Figure 715) for flexuralndashtorsional

bucklingAlthough the first yield predictions for the resistances of slender beam-columns

are of reasonable accuracy they are rather conservative for stocky members in

320 Beam-columns

which considerable yielding occurs before failure Sophisticated numerical analy-ses have been made [18 20ndash24] of the biaxial bending of inelastic beam-columnsand good agreement with test results has been obtained However such an analysisrequires a specialised computer program and is only useful as a research tool

A number of attempts have been made to develop approximate methods ofpredicting the resistances of inelastic beam-columns One of the simplest of theseuses a linear extension

N

NbRd+ Cmy

(1 minus NNcr y)

My

Mb0yRd+ Cmz

(1 minus NNcr z)

Mz

Mc0zRdle 1 (762)

of the linear interaction equations for in-plane bending and flexuralndashtorsional buck-ling In this extension Mb0yRd is the ultimate moment which the beam-columncan support when N = Mz = 0 for the case of equal end moments (βm = minus1) whileMc0zRd is similarly defined Thus equation 762 reduces to an equation similarto equation 721 for in-plane behaviour when My = 0 and to equation 757 forflexuralndashtorsional buckling when Mz = 0 Equation 762 is used in conjunctionwith

My

Mplry+ Mz

Mplrzle 1 (763)

where Mplry is given by equation 717 and Mplrz by equation 718 Equation 763represents a linear approximation to the biaxial bending full plasticity limit for thecross-section of the beam-column and reduces to equation 718 or 717 whichprovides the uniaxial bending full plasticity limit when My = 0 or Mz = 0

A number of criticisms may be made of these extensions of the interactionequations First there is no allowance in equation 762 for the amplification of theminor axis moment Mz by the major axis moment My (the term (1minusNNcr z) onlyallows for the amplification caused by axial load N ) A simple method of allowingfor this would be to replace the term (1minusNNcr z) by either (1minusNNcrMN ) or by(1 minus MyMcrMN ) where the flexuralndashtorsional buckling load NcrMN and momentMcrMN are given by equation 745

Second studies [22ndash26] have shown that the linear additions of the momentterms in equations 762 and 763 generally lead to predictions which are too con-servative as indicated in Figure 718 It has been proposed that for column typehot-rolled I-sections the section full plasticity limit of equation 763 should bereplaced by(

My

Mplry

)α0

+(

Mz

Mplrz

)α0

le 1 (764)

where Mplry and Mplrz are given in equations 717 and 718 as before and theindex α0 by

α0 = 160 minus NNy

2 ln(NNy) (765)

Beam-columns 321

0 02 04 06 08 100

0 2

0 4

0 6

0 8

1 0 M

zM

crz

Rd

or M

zM

plr

z

Analyticalsolutions

NNy = 03

Liy = 60

Liy = 0

My MbryRd or My Mplry

Modified interactions equations(equation 764 ( = 17) equations 766 and 767)

Linear interactions equations(equations 762 and 763)

0

Figure 718 Interaction curves for biaxial bending

At the same time the linear member interaction equation (equation 762) shouldbe replaced by(

My

MbryRd

)αL

+(

Mz

McrzRd

)αL

le 1 (766)

where MbryRd the maximum value of My when N acts but Mz = 0 is obtainedfrom equation 757 McrzRd is similarly obtained from an equation similar toequation 721 and the index αL is given by

αL = 140 + N

Ny (767)

The approximations of equations 764ndash767 have been shown to be of reasonableaccuracy when compared with test results [27] This conclusion is reinforcedby the comparison of some analytical solutions with the approximations ofequations 764ndash767 (but with α0 = 170 instead of 1725 approximately forNNy = 03) shown in Figure 718 Unfortunately these approximations are oflimited application although it seems to be possible that their use may be extended

742 Design rules

7421 Cross-section resistance

The general biaxial bending cross-section resistance limitation of EC3 is given by

NEd

NcRd+ MyEd

McyRd+ MzEd

MczRdle 1 (768)

322 Beam-columns

which is a simple linear extension of the uniaxial cross-section resistance limitationof equation 724 For Class 1 plastic and Class 2 compact sections a more economicalternative is provided by a modification of equation 763 to

(MyEd

MN yRd

)α+

(MzEd

MN zRd

)βle 1 (769)

in which α = 20 and β = 5n ge 1 for equal flanged I-sections α = β = 20 forcircular hollow sections and α = β = 166(1 minus 113n2) le 6) for rectangularhollow sections where n = NEdNplRd Conservatively α and β may be takenas unity

7422 Member resistance

The general biaxial bending member resistance limitations are given by extensionsof equations 761 and 760 for uniaxial bending to

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRdle 1 (770)

and

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRdle 1 (771)

both of which must be satisfiedAlternative expressions for the interaction factors kyy kyz kzy and kzz are pro-

vided inAnnexesAand B of EC3 TheAnnex B formulations for the determinationof the interaction factors kij are less complex than those set out in Annex A result-ing in quicker and simpler calculations though generally at the expense of somestructural efficiency [28] Annex B may therefore be regarded as the simplifiedapproach whereas Annex A represents a more exact approach The background tothe development of the Annex A interaction factors has been described in [29] andthat of the Annex B interaction factors in [30]

For columns in simple construction the bending moments arising as a resultof the eccentric loading from the beams are relatively small and much simplerinteraction expressions can be developed with no significant loss of structuralefficiency Thus it has been shown [31] that for simple construction with hot-rolledI- and H-sections and with no intermediate lateral restraints along the memberlength equations 770 and 771 may be replaced by the single equation

NEd

Nb zRd+ MyEd

MbRd+ 15

MzEd

MczRdle 1 (772)

Beam-columns 323

provided the ratio of end moments is less than zero (ie a triangular or less severebending moment diagram)

Aworked example for checking the biaxial bending of a beam-column is given inSection 775 Further worked examples of the application of the EC3 beam-columnformulae are given in [30] and [32]

75 Appendix ndash in-plane behaviour of elasticbeam-columns

751 Straight beam-columns

The bending moment in the beam-column shown in Figure 73 is the sum of themoment [M minus M (1 + βm)xL] due to the end moments and reactions and themoment Nw due to the deflection w Thus the differential equation of bending isobtained by equating this bending moment to the internal moment of resistanceminusEIyd2wdx2 whence

minusEIyd2w

dx2= M minus M (1 + βm)

x

L+ Nw (773)

The solution of this equation which satisfies the support conditions (w)0 =(w)L = 0 is

w = M

N

[cosmicrox minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1 + (1 +βm)

x

L

] (71)

where

micro2 = N

EIy= π2

L2

N

Ncr y (72)

The bending moment distribution can be obtained by substituting equation 71 intoequation 773 The maximum bending moment can be determined by solving thecondition

d(minusEIyd2wdx2)

dx= 0

for the position xmax of the maximum moment whence

tanmicroxmax = minusβmcosecmicroL minus cotmicroL (774)

The value of xmax is positive while

βm lt minuscosπ

radicN

Ncr y

324 Beam-columns

and the maximum moment obtained by substituting equation 774 into equation773 is

Mmax = M

1 +

βmcosecπ

radicN

Ncr y+ cot π

radicN

Ncr y

2

05

(73)

When βm gt minus cosπradic(NNcr y) xmax is negative in which case the maximum

moment in the beam-column is the end moment M at x = 0 whence

Mmax = M (74)

For beam-columns which are bent in single curvature by equal and oppositeend moments (βm = minus1) equation 71 for the deflected shape simplifies and thecentral deflection δmax can be expressed non-dimensionally as

δmax

δ= 8π2

NNcr y

[sec

π

2

radicN

Ncr yminus 1

](75)

in which δ = ML28EIy is the value of δmax when N = 0 The maximum momentoccurs at the centre of the beam-column and is given by

Mmax = M secπ

2

radicN

Ncr y (76)

Equations 75 and 76 are plotted in Figure 74

752 Beam-columns with initial curvature

If the beam-column shown in Figure 73 is not straight but has an initialcrookedness given by

w0 = δ0sinπxL

then the differential equation of bending becomes

minusEIyd2w

dx2= M minus M (1 + βm)

x

L+ N (w + w0) (775)

The solution of this equation which satisfies the support conditions of (w)0 =(w)L = 0 is

w = (MN )[cos microx minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1

+ (1 + βm)xL] + [(microLπ)21 minus (microLπ)2]δ0sinπxL (776)

Beam-columns 325

where

(microLπ)2 = NNcr y (777)

The bending moment distribution can be obtained by substituting equation 776into equation 775 The position of the maximum moment can then be determinedby solving the condition d(minusEIyd2wdx2)dx = 0 whence

Nδ0

M= microL

π

(1 minus micro2L2

π2

) (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) cosmicroxmax + sinmicroxmaxcosπxmaxL

(778)

The value of the maximum moment Mmax can be obtained from equations 775and 776 (with x = xmax) and from equation 778 and is given by

Mmax

M= cosmicroxmax minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicroxmax

+ (Nδ0M )

(1 minus micro2L2π2)sin

πxmax

L (779)

First yield occurs when the maximum stress is equal to the yield stress fy inwhich case

N

Ny+ Mmax

My= 1

or

N

Ny

1 + Mmax

M

Nyδ0

My

M

Nδ0

= 1 (780)

In the special case of M = 0 the first yield solution is the same as that given inSection 322 for a crooked column Equation 778 is replaced by xmax = L2 andequation 779 by

Mmax = Nδ0

(1 minus micro2L2π2)

The value NL of N which then satisfies equation 780 is given by the solution of

NL

Ny+ NLδ0My

1 minus (NLNy)(Ncr yNy) = 0 (781)

The value of MMy at first yield can be determined for any specified set ofvalues of Ncr yNy βm δ0NyMy and NNy An initial guess for xmaxL allowsNδ0M to be determined from equation 778 and MmaxM from equation 779and these can then be used to evaluate the left-hand side of equation 780 This

326 Beam-columns

process can be repeated until the values are found which satisfy equation 780Solutions obtained in this way are plotted in Figure 77b

76 Appendix ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling ofelastic beam-columns

761 Simply supported beam-columns

The elastic beam-column shown in Figure 71b is simply supported and preventedfrom twisting at its ends so that

(v)0L = (φ)0L = 0 (782)

and is free to warp (see Section 1083) so that(d2φ

dx2

)0L

= 0 (783)

The combination at elastic buckling of the axial load NcrMN and equal andopposite end moments McrMN (ie βm = minus1) can be determined by findinga deflected and twisted position which is one of equilibrium The differentialequilibrium equations for such a position are

EIzd2v

dx2+ NcrMN v = minusMcrMNφ (784)

for minor axis bending and

(GJ minus NcrMN i2

p

)dφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= McrMN

dv

dx(785)

for torsion where i2p = radic[(Iy+Iz)A] is the polar radius of gyration Equation 784

reduces to equation 359 for compression member buckling when McrMN = 0and to equation 682 for beam buckling when NcrMN = 0 Equation 785 canbe used to derive equation 373 for torsional buckling of a compression mem-ber when McrMN = 0 and reduces to equation 682 for beam buckling whenNcrMN = 0

The buckled shape of the beam-column is given by

v = McrMN

Ncr z minus NcrMNφ = δ sin

πx

L (734)

where Ncr z = π2EIzL2 is the minor axis elastic buckling load of an axiallyloaded column and δ the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection The

Beam-columns 327

boundary conditions of equations 782 and 783 are satisfied by this buckled shapeas is equation 784 while equation 785 is satisfied when

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(735)

where

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2

)(737)

is the elastic torsional buckling load of an axially loaded column (see Section 375)Equation 735 defines the combinations of axial load NcrMN and end momentsMcrMN which cause the beam-column to buckle elastically

762 Elastically restrained beam-columns

If the elastic beam-column shown in Figure 71b is not simply supported but is elas-tically restrained at its ends against minor axis rotations dvdx and against warpingrotations (df 2)dφdx (where df is the distance between flange centroids) thenthe boundary conditions at the end x = L2 of the beam-column can be expressedin the form

MB + MT

(dvdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R2

1 minus R2

MT minus MB

(df 2)(dφdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R4

1 minus R4

(786)

where MT and MB are the flange minor axis end restraining moments

MT = 12EIz(d2vdx2)

L2 + (df 4

)EIz

(d2φdx2)

L2

MB = 12EIz(d2vdx2)

L2 minus (df 4

)EIz

(d2φdx2)

L2

and R2 and R4 are dimensionless minor axis bending and warping end restraintparameters which vary between zero (no restraint) and one (rigid restraint)If the beam-column is symmetrically restrained similar conditions apply at theend x = minusL2 The other support conditions are

(v)plusmnL2 = (φ)plusmnL2 = 0 (787)

328 Beam-columns

The particular case for which the minor axis and warping end restraints areequal so that

R2 = R4 = R (788)

can be analysed When the restrained beam-column has equal and opposite endmoments (βm = minus1) the differential equilibrium equations for a buckled positionv φ are

EIzd2v

dx2+ NcrMN v = minusMcrMNφ + (MB + MT )(

GIt minus NcrMN i2p

)dφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= McrMN

dv

dx

(789)

These differential equations and the boundary conditions of equations 786ndash788are satisfied by the buckled shape

v = McrMNφ

Ncr z minus NcrMN= A

(cos

πx

kcrLminus cos

π

2kcr

)

where

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr (749)

Lcr = kcrL (751)

when the effective length ratio kcr satisfies

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (752)

This is the same as equation 652 for the buckling of restrained beams whosesolutions are shown in Figure 618c The values McrMN and NcrMN for flexuralndashtorsional buckling of the restrained beam-column are obtained by substituting thebuckled shape v φ into equations 789 and are related by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(748)

where

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2cr

) (751)

Beam-columns 329

77 Worked examples

771 Example 1 ndash approximating the maximum elasticmoment

Problem Use the approximations of Figures 75 and 76 to determine the maxi-mum moments Mmaxy Mmax z for the 254 times 146 UB 37 beam-columns shown inFigure 719d and c

Solution for Mmaxy for the beam-column of Figure 719d

Using Figure 75 kcr = 10 γm = 10 γn = 10 γs = 018My = 20 times 94 = 45 kNm

Ncr y = π2 times 210 000 times 5537 times 104(10 times 9000)2 N = 1417 kN

Using equation 710 δy = 10 times (1 minus 018 times 2001417)

(1 minus 10 times 2001417)= 1135

Using equation 79 Mmax y = 1135 times 45 = 511 kNm

Solution for Mmaxz for the beam-column of Figure 719c

Using Figure 76 kcr = 10 γm = 10 γn = 049 γs = 018

Mz = 32 times 4528 = 81 kNm

Ncr z = π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104(10 times 4500)2 N = 5844 kN

Using equation 710 δz = 10 times (1 minus 018 times 2005844)

(1 minus 049 times 2005844)= 1127

Using equation 79 Mmax z = 1127 times 81 = 91 kNm

4500 4500

20 kN

200 kN

z

x

(b) Example 2

4500 4500

32 kNm200 kN

y

x

(c) Examples1 3 5

4500 4500

20 kN

200 kN

z

x

(d) Examples1 4 5

v = = 0

y

z

(a) 254 times 146 UB 37

h = 2560 mm bf = 1464 mm tf = 109 mm tw = 63 mm r = 76 mm

A = 472 cm2

It = 153 cm4

Iw = 00857 dm6

Iy = 5537 cm4

iy = 108 cm Wply = 483 cm3

Wely = 433 cm3

Iz = 571 cm4

iz = 348 cm Wplz = 119 cm3

Welz = 780 cm3

Figure 719 Examples 1ndash5

330 Beam-columns

772 Example 2 ndash checking the major axis in-planeresistance

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719bhas a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a design concen-trated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) acting in themajor principal plane at mid-span The beam-column is the 254 times 146 UB 37of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a The beam-column is continuously bracedagainst lateral deflections v and twist rotations φ Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

tf = 109 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235275)05 = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = ((1464 minus 63 minus 2 times 76)2)(109 times 0924) = 620 lt 9 T52

and the flange is Class 1

cw = 2560 minus (2 times 109)minus (2 times 76) = 2190 mm

The compression proportion of web is

α =(

h

2minus (tf + r)+ 1

2

NEd

twfy

)cw

=(

256

2minus (109 + 76)+ 1

2times 200 times 103

63 times 275

)2190

= 076 gt 05 T52

cwtw = 219063 = 348 lt 413 = 396ε

13α minus 1T52

and the web is Class 1

McyRd = 275 times 483 times 10310 Nmm = 1328 kNm 625(2)

MyEd = 20 times 94 = 450 kNm

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 450

1328= 0493 le 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Beam-columns 331

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

Because the section is Class 1 Clause 6291 can be usedNo reduction in plastic moment resistance is required provided both

NEd = 200 kN lt 3245 kN = (025 times 472 times 102 times 27510)103

= 025NplRd and 6291(4)

NEd = 200 kN lt 2029 kN = 05 times (2560 minus 2 times 109)times 63 times 275

10 times 103

= 05 hwtwfyγM0

6291(4)

and so no reduction in the plastic moment resistance is requiredThus MN yRd = MplyRd = 1328 kNm gt 450 kNm = MyEd

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Compression member buckling resistance

Because the member is continuously braced beam lateral buckling and columnminor axis buckling need not be considered

λy =radic

AfyNcr y

= Lcr y

iy

1

λ1= 9000

(108 times 10)

1

939 times 0924= 0960 6313(1)

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about they-axis use buckling curve (a) with α = 021 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 021(0960 minus 02)+ 09602] = 1041 6312(1)

χy = 1(1041 +radic

10412 minus 09602) = 0693 6312(1)

NbyRd = χyAfyγM1 = 0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510 N

= 900 kN gt 200 kN = NEd 6311(3)

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

αh = MhMs = 0 ψ = 0 Cmy = 090 + 01αh = 090 TB3

Cmy

(1 + (λy minus 02)

NEd

χyNRkγM1

)= 090

times(

1 + (0960 minus 02)times 200 times 103

0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1052

332 Beam-columns

lt Cmy

(1 + 08

NEd

χyNRkγM1

)= 090

times(

1 + 08 times 200 times 103

0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1060 TB1

so that kyy = 1052

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1328

= 0222 + 0356 = 0579 lt 1 633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

λmax = λy = 0960 TA1

Ncr y = π2EIyL2cr = π2 times 21 0000 times 5537 times 10490002 = 1417 kN

Since there is no lateral buckling λ0 = 0 bLT = 0 CmLT = 10 TA1

Cmy = Cmy0 = 1 minus 018NEdNcr y = 1 minus 018 times 2001417 = 0975 TA2

wy = Wply

Wely= 483

433= 1115

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

wyC2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09752 times 0960 minus 16

1115

times09752 times 09602) times 0154 minus 0]

= 0990 gt 0896 = 11115 TA1

Beam-columns 333

microy = 1 minus NEdNcr y

1 minus χyNEdNcr y= 1 minus 2001417

1 minus 0693 times 2001417= 0952 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

(1 minus NEdNcr y)

1

Cyy

= 0975 times 10 times 0952

1 minus 2001417times 1

0990= 1091 TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRd= 200

900+ 1091 times 450

1328

= 0222 + 0370 = 0592 lt 1 633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

773 Example 3 ndash checking the minor axis in-planeresistance

Problem The 9 m long two span beam-column shown in Figure 719c has a fac-tored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a factored design uniformlydistributed load of 32 kNm acting in the minor principal plane The beam-columnis the 254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacyof the beam-column

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

MzEd = 32 times 4528 = 81 kNm

The flange is Class 1 under uniform compression and so remains Class 1 undercombined loading

cw(twε)= (2560 minus 2 times 109 minus 2 times 76)(63 times 0924)= 376lt 38 T52

and the web is Class 2 Thus the overall cross-section is Class 2

MczRd = 275 times 119 times 10310 Nmm = 327 kNm 625(2)

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 81

327= 0402 lt 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

334 Beam-columns

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

Because the section is Class 2 Clause 6291 can be used

NEd = 200 kN lt 406 kN = (256 minus 2 times 109)times 63 times 275

10 times 103= hwtwfy

γM0

6291(4)

and so no reduction in plastic moment resistance is required

Thus MN zRd = Mpl zRd = 327 kNm gt 81 kNm = MzEd 625(2)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Compression member buckling resistance

λz =radic

AfyNcr z

= Lcr z

iz

1

λ1= 4500

(348 times 10)

1

939 times 0924= 1490 6313(1)

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034 (1490 minus 02)+ 14902] = 1829 6312(1)

χz = 1(1829 +radic

18292 minus 14902) = 0346 6312(1)

Nb zRd = χzAfyγM1 = 0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510 N

= 449 kN gt 200 kN = NEd 6311(3)

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

Because the member is bent about the minor axis beam lateral buckling need notbe considered and eLT = 0

Mh = minus81 kNm Ms = 9 times 32 times 452128 = 456 kNm ψ = 0 TB3

αs = MsMh = 456(minus81) = minus0563 TB3

Cmz = 01 minus 08αs = 01 minus 08 times (minus0563) = 0550 gt 040 TB3

Cmz

(1 + (2λz minus 06)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)= 0550 times

(1 + (2 times 1490 minus 06)

times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1133

Beam-columns 335

gt Cmz

(1 + 14

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

= 0550 times(

1 + 14 times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0893 TB1

kzz = 0893 TB1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MzEd

McyRd= 200

449+ 0893

81

327= 0445 + 0221 = 0666 le 1

633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

From Section 772 λy = 0960

λmax = λz = 1490 gt 0960 = λy TA1

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr z = π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 10445002 N = 5844 kN

|δx| = qL4

185EIz= 32 times 45004

185 times 210 000 times 571 times 104= 592 mm

∣∣MzEd(x)∣∣ = 81 kNm

Cmz = Cmz0 = 1 +(

π2EIz |δx|L2

∣∣MzEd(x)∣∣ minus 1

)NEd

Ncr z

= 1 +(π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104 times 59

45002 times 81 times 106minus 1

)200

5844= 0804 TA2

wz = Wpl z

Welz= 119

78= 1526 gt 15

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Czz = 1 + (wz minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wzC2

mzλmax minus 16

wzC2

mzλ2max

)npl minus eLT

]ge Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

15times 08042 times 1490 minus 16

15times 08042 times 14902

)

times 0154 minus 0

]= 0958 gt 0667 = 115 TA1

336 Beam-columns

microz = 1 minus NEdNcr z

1 minus χzNEdNcr z= 1 minus 2005844

1 minus 0346 times 2005844= 0746 TA1

kzz = Cmzmicroz

(1 minus NEdNcr z)

1

Czz= 0804 times 0746

1 minus 200584times 1

0958= 0952

TA1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MyEd

McyRd= 200

449+ 0952 times 81

327= 0445 + 0236 = 0681 lt 1

633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

774 Example 4 ndash checking the out-of-plane resistance

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719dhas a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a factored designconcentrated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) actingin the major principal plane at mid-span Lateral deflections v and twist rotationsφ are prevented at the ends and at mid-span The beam-column is the 254 times146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Design bending moment

MyEd = 450 kNm as in Section 772

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

The cross-section resistance was checked in Section 772

Beam-column member buckling resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

While the member major axis in-plane resistance without lateral buckling waschecked in Section 772 the lateral buckling resistance between supports shouldbe used in place of the in-plane bending resistance to check against equation 661of EC3

From Section 6152 MbRd = 1214 kNmFrom Section 772 NbyRd = 900 kN kyy = 1052 and MyEd = 450 kNm

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1214= 0222 + 0390

= 0612 le 1 633(4)

and the member in-plane resistance is adequateFor the member out-of-plane resistance (equation 662 of EC3)

Beam-columns 337

From Section 773 Nb zRd = 449 kN χz = 0346 λz = 1490 λmax = 1490Ncr z = 5844 kN and wz = 15

ψ = 0 CmLT = 06 + 04ψ = 06 gt 04 TB3(1 minus 01λz

(CmLT minus 025)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

=(

1 minus 01 times 1490

(06 minus 025)times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0810

(1 minus 01

(CmLT minus 025)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

=(

1 minus 01

(06 minus 025)times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0873 TB1

kzy = 0873 TB1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

449+ 0873 times 450

1214= 0445 + 0324 = 0769 lt 1

633(4)

and the member out-of-plane resistance is adequate

Beam-column member buckling resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

The member in-plane resistance was checked in Section 772 but as for the sim-plified approach equation 661 should be checked by taking the lateral bucklingresistance in place of the in-plane major axis bending resistance The interactionfactor kyy also requires re-calculating due to the possibility of lateral buckling

λy = 0960 λmax = λz = 1490 TA1

Using Mzx = 1112 kNm from Section 6152

λ0 = radic13281112 = 1093 TA1

Since cross-section is doubly-symmetrical using equation 737 with

ip =radic(Iy + Iz)A =

radic(5537 times 104 + 571 times 104)472 times 102

= 1138 mm

NcrT = 1

i2p

(G It + π2EIw

L2crT

)

= 1

11382

(81000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

45002

)

= 1636 kN

338 Beam-columns

Using αm of equation 65 for C1 with βm = 0 leads to C1 = 175

02radic

C14

radic(1 minus NEd

Ncr z

)(1 minus NEd

NcrT

)

= 02 times radic175 times 4

radic(1 minus 200

5844

)(1 minus 200

1636

)

= 0231 lt 1093 = λ0 TA1

aLT = 1 minus ItIy = 1 minus 1545537 = 0997 gt 0 TA1

εy = MyEd

NEd

A

Wely= 45 times 106

200 times 103times 472 times 102

433 times 103= 2453 TA1

Using Ncr y = 1417 kN from Section 772

Cmy0 = 1 minus 018NEdNcr y = 1 minus 018 times 2001417 = 0975 TA2

Cmy = Cmy0 + (1 minus Cmy0)

radicεyaLT

1 + radicεyaLT

= 0975 + (1 minus 0975)timesradic

2453 times 0997

1 + radic2453 times 0997

= 0990 TA1

CmLT = C2my

aLTradic(1 minus NEd

Ncr z

)(1 minus NEd

NcrT

)

= 09902 times 0997radic(1 minus 200

5844

)(1 minus 200

1636

) = 1287 gt 1 TA1

wy = Wply

Wely= 483

433= 1115

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

wyC2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

Beam-columns 339

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09902 times 1490 minus 16

1115

times 09902 times 14902)

times 0154 minus 0

]

= 0942 gt 0896 TA1

Using χy = 0693 from Section 772

microy = 1 minus NEdNcr y

1 minus χyNEdNcr y= 1 minus 2001417

1 minus 0693 times 2001417= 0952 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Cyy= 09900 times 1287

times 0952

1 minus 2001417

1

0942= 1499 TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

900+ 1499 times 450

1214

= 0222 + 0556 = 0778 lt 1 633(4)

and the member in-plane resistance (with lateral buckling between the lateralsupports) is adequate

For the member out-of-plane resistance (equation 662 of EC3)

Czy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

2 minus 14

C2myλ

2max

w5y

npl minus dLT

ge 06

radicwy

wz

Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 09902 times 14902

11155

)times 0154 minus 0

]

= 0722 gt 046 TA1

Using χz = 0346 from Section 773

microz = 1 minus NEdNcr z

1 minus χzNEdNcr z= 1 minus 2005844

1 minus 0346 times 2005844= 0746 TA1

kzy = CmyCmLTmicroz

1 minus NEd

Ncr y

1

Czy06

radicwy

wz= 0990 times 1287

times 0746

1 minus 200

1417

times 1

0722times 06 times

radic1115

15= 0793 TA1

340 Beam-columns

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

449+ 0793 times 450

1214= 0445 + 0294 = 0739 lt 1

633(4)

and the member out-of-plane resistance is adequate

775 Example 5 ndash checking the biaxial bending capacity

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719cand d has a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN a factored designconcentrated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) actingin the major principal plane and a factored design uniformly distributed loadof 32 kNm acting in the minor principal plane Lateral deflections v and twistrotations φ are prevented at the ends and at mid-span The beam-column is the254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Design bending moments

MyEd = 450 kNm(Section 772) MzEd = 81 kNm(Section 773)

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

Combining the calculations of Sections 772 and 773

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 450

1328+ 81

327= 0740 lt 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

As shown in Sections 772 and 773 the axial load is sufficiently low for there is tobe no reduction in the moment resistance about either the major or the minor axis

n = NEdNplRd = 200 times 103(472 times 102 times 27510) = 0154

β = 5n = 0770 6291(6)[MyEd

MN yRd

]α+

[MzEd

MN zRd

]β=

[450

1328

]2

+[

81

327

]0770

= 0456 le 1

6291(6)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Beam-columns 341

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

Checks are required against equations 661 and 662 of EC3 From the appropriateparts of Sections 772ndash774

kyy = 1052 kzz = 0893 kzy = 0873 NbyRd = 900 kN

MbRd = 1214 kNm MzRd = 327 kNm and Nb zRd = 449 kN

kyz = 06kzz = 06 times 0893 = 0536 TB1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1214+ 0536

times 81

327= 0222 + 0390 + 0133 = 0745 lt 1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

449+ 0873 times 450

1214

+ 0893 times 81

327= 0445 + 0324 + 0221 = 0990 lt 1

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

Checks are required against equations 661 and 662 of EC3 Relevant details aretaken from the appropriate parts of Sections 772 773 and 774

bLT = 05aLTλ20

MyEd

χLT MplyRd

MzEd

Mpl zRd= 05 times 0997 times 10932

times 45

1214times 81

327= 00546 TA1

cLT = 10aLTλ

20

5 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd= 10 times 0997

times 10932

5 + 14904times 45

0990 times 1214= 0449 TA1

dLT = 2aLTλ0

01 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd

MzEd

CmzMpl zRd

= 2 times 0997 times 1093

01 + 14904times 45

0990 times 1214times 81

0804 times 327

= 00500 TA1

eLT = 17aLTλ0

01 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd= 17 times 0997 times 1093

01 + 14904

times 45

0990 times 1214= 0138 TA1

342 Beam-columns

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

112C2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09902 times 1490 minus 16

1115

times09902 times 14902) times 0154 minus 00546] = 0936 gt 0896 TA1

Cyz = 1 + (wz minus 1)

[(2 minus 14

C2mzλ

2max

w5z

)npl minus cLT

]ge 06

radicwz

wy

Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 08042 times 14902

155

)times 0154 minus 0449

]

= 0726 gt 0456 TA1

Czy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

2 minus 14

C2myλ

2max

w5y

npl minus dLT

ge 06

radicwy

wz

Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 09902 times 14902

11155

)times 0154 minus 00500

]

= 0716 gt 0464 TA1

Czz = 1+ (wz minus1)

[(2 minus 16

wzC2

mzλmax minus 16

wzC2

mzλ2max

)npl minus eLT

]ge Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

15times 08042 times 1490 minus 16

15times 08042

times14902)

times 0154 minus 0138

]= 0888 gt 0655 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Cyy

= 0990 times 1287 times 0952

1 minus 2001417times 1

0936= 1508 TA1

kyz = Cmzmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr z

1

Cyz06

radicwz

wy= 0804 times 0952

1 minus 2005844

times 1

0726times 06 times

radic15

1115= 1115 TA1

Beam-columns 343

kzy = CmyCmLTmicroz

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Czy06

radicwy

wz= 0990

times 1287 times 0746

1 minus 2001417times 1

0716times 06 times

radic1115

15= 0800 TA1

kzz = Cmzmicroz

1 minus NEdNcr z

1

Czz= 0804 times 0746

1 minus 2005844times 1

0888= 1027

TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

900+ 1508 times 450

1214

+ 1115 times 81

327= 0222 + 0559 + 0276 = 1057 gt 1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

449+ 0800 times 450

1214+ 1027

times 81

327= 0445 + 0296 + 0254 = 0995 lt 1

and the member resistance appears to be inadequate

78 Unworked examples

781 Example 6 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 720a and show that the maximum moment Mmax maybe closely approximated by using the greater of Mmax = qL28 and

Mmax = 9qL2

128

(1 minus 029NNcr y)

(1 minus NNcr y)

in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

782 Example 7 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the propped cantilever shownin Figure 720b and show that the maximum moment Mmax may be closelyapproximated by using

Mmax

qL28asymp (1 minus 018NNcr y)

(1 minus 049NNcr y)

in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

344 Beam-columns

qL L8

2

(a) Simply supported beam-column

L

(b) Propped cantilever

q

L

(c) Continuous beam-column

qN

L

Figure 720 Examples 6ndash8

783 Example 8 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the two-span beam-columnshown in Figure 720c and show that the maximum moment Mmax may be closelyapproximated by using

Mmax

qL28asymp (1 minus 018NNcr y)

(1 minus 049NNcr y)

while N le Ncr y in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

784 Example 9 ndash in-plane design

A 70 m long simply supported beam-column which is prevented from swayingand from deflecting out of the plane of bending is required to support a factoreddesign axial load of 1200 kN and factored design end moments of 300 and 150 kNmwhich bend the beam-column in single curvature about the major axis Design asuitable UB or UC beam-column of S275 steel

785 Example 10 ndash out-of-plane design

The intermediate restraints of the beam-column of example 9 which preventdeflection out of the plane of bending are removed Design a suitable UB orUC beam-column of S275 steel

786 Example 11 ndash biaxial bending design

The beam-column of example 10 has to carry additional factored design endmoments of 75 and 75 kNm which cause double curvature bending about theminor axis Design a suitable UB or UC beam-column of S275 steel

Beam-columns 345

References

1 Chen W-F and Atsuta T (1976) Theory of Beam-Columns Vol 1 In-Plane Behaviorand Design McGraw-Hill New York

2 Galambos TV and Ketter RL (1959) Columns under combined bending andthrust Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 85 No EM2 Aprilpp 1ndash30

3 Ketter RL (1961) Further studies of the strength of beam-columns Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 87 No ST6 August pp 135ndash52

4 Young BW (1973) The in-plane failure of steel beam-columns The StructuralEngineer 51 pp 27ndash35

5 Trahair NS (1986) Design strengths of steel beam-columns Canadian Journal ofCivil Engineering 13 No 6 December pp 639ndash46

6 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1987) Limit state design rules for steel beam-columnsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 21 No 2 Septemberpp 2ndash11

7 Salvadori MG (1955) Lateral buckling of I-beams Transactions ASCE 120pp 1165ndash77

8 Salvadori MG (1955) Lateral buckling of eccentrically loaded I-columns Transac-tions ASCE 121 pp 1163ndash78

9 Horne MR (1954) The flexuralndashtorsional buckling of members of symmetricalI-section under combined thrust and unequal terminal moments Quarterly Journalof Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 7 pp 410ndash26

10 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

11 Trahair NS (1993) FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN SponLondon

12 Cuk PE and Trahair NS (1981) Elastic buckling of beam-columns with unequalend moments Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE23 No 3 August pp 166ndash71

13 Bradford MA Cuk PE Gizejowski MA and Trahair NS (1987) Inelastic lateralbuckling of beam-columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 11November pp 2259ndash77

14 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1985) Inelastic buckling of beam-columnswith unequal end moments Journal of Constructional Steel Research 5 No 3pp 195ndash212

15 Cuk PE Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1986) Inelastic lateral buckling ofsteel beam-columns Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 13 No 6 Decemberpp 693ndash9

16 Horne MR (1956) The stanchion problem in frame structures designed accordingto ultimate load carrying capacity Proceedings of the Institution of Civil EngineersPart III 5 pp 105ndash46

17 Culver CG (1966) Exact solution of the biaxial bending equations Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 92 No ST2 pp 63ndash83

18 Harstead GA Birnsteil C and Leu K-C (1968) Inelastic H-columns under biaxialbending Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 94 No ST10 pp 2371ndash98

19 Trahair NS (1969) Restrained elastic beam-columns Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 95 No ST12 pp 2641ndash64

346 Beam-columns

20 Vinnakota S and Aoshima Y (1974) Inelastic behaviour of rotationally restrainedcolumns under biaxial bending The Structural Engineer 52 pp 245ndash55

21 Vinnakota S and Aysto P (1974) Inelastic spatial stability of restrained beam-columns Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST11 pp 2235ndash54

22 Chen W-F and Atsuta T (1977) Theory of Beam-Columns Vol 2 Space Behaviorand Design McGraw-Hill New York

23 Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columnsI Theory Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2041ndash61

24 Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns IIApplications Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2062ndash85

25 Tebedge N and Chen W-F (1974) Design criteria for H-columns under biaxialloading Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST3 pp 579ndash98

26 Young BW (1973) Steel column design The Structural Engineer 51 pp 323ndash3627 Bradford MA (1995) Evaluation of design rules of the biaxial bending of beam-

columns Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE 37No 3 pp 241ndash45

28 Nethercot D A and Gardner L (2005) The EC3 approach to the design of columnsbeams and beam-columns Journal of Steel and Composite Structures 5 pp 127ndash40

29 Boissonnade N Jaspart J-P Muzeau J-P and Villette M (2004) New interactionformulae for beam-columns in Eurocode 3 The French-Belgian approach Journal ofConstructional Steel Research 60 pp 421ndash31

30 Greiner R and Lindner J (2006) Interaction formulae for members subjected tobending and axial compression in EUROCODE 3 ndash the Method 2 approach Journalof Constructional Steel Research 62 pp 757ndash70

31 SCI (2007) Verification of columns in simple construction ndash a simplified interactioncriterion UK localised NCCI The Steel Construction Institute wwwaccess-steelcom

32 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3Design of Steel Structures Thomas Telford Publishing London

Chapter 8

Frames

81 Introduction

Structural frames are composed of one-dimensional members connected togetherin skeletal arrangements which transfer the applied loads to the supports Whilemost frames are three-dimensional they may often be considered as a series of par-allel two-dimensional frames or as two perpendicular series of two-dimensionalframes The behaviour of a structural frame depends on its arrangement andloading and on the type of connections used

Triangulated frames with joint loading only have no primary bending actionsand the members act in simple axial tension or compression The behaviour anddesign of these members have already been discussed in Chapters 2 and 3

Frames which are not triangulated include rectangular frames which may bemulti-storey or multi-bay or both and pitched-roof portal frames The membersusually have substantial bending actions (Chapters 5 and 6) and if they also havesignificant axial forces then they must be designed as beam-ties (Chapter 2) orbeam-columns (Chapter 7) In frames with simple connections (see Figure 93a)the moments transmitted by the connections are small and often can be neglectedand the members can be treated as isolated beams or as eccentrically loaded beam-ties or beam-columns However when the connections are semi-rigid (referred toas semi-continuous in EC3) or rigid (referred to as continuous in EC3) then thereare important moment interactions between the members

When a frame is or can be considered as two-dimensional then its behaviour issimilar to that of the beam-columns of which it is composed With in-plane loadingonly it will fail either by in-plane bending or by flexural ndash torsional buckling outof its plane If however the frame or its loading is three-dimensional then it willfail in a mode in which the individual members are subjected to primary biaxialbending and torsion actions

In this chapter the in-plane out-of-plane and biaxial behaviour analysisand design of two- and three-dimensional frames are treated and related to thebehaviour and design of isolated tension members compression members beamsand beam-columns discussed in Chapters 2 3 5 6 and 7

348 Frames

82 Triangulated frames

821 Statically determinate frames

The primary actions in triangulated frames whose members are concentricallyconnected and whose loads act concentrically through the joints are those of axialcompression or tension in the members and any bending actions are secondaryonly These bending actions are usually ignored in which case the member forcesmay be determined by a simple analysis for which the member connections areassumed to be made through frictionless pin-joints

If the assumed pin-jointed frame is statically determinate then each memberforce can be determined by statics alone and is independent of the behaviourof the remaining members Because of this the frame may be assumed tofail when its weakest member fails as indicated in Figure 81a and b Thuseach member may be designed independently of the others by using the pro-cedures discussed in Chapters 2 (for tension members) or 3 (for compressionmembers)

If all the members of a frame are designed to fail simultaneously (either bytension yielding or by compression buckling) there will be no significant momentinteractions between the members at failure even if the connections are not pin-jointed Because of this the effective lengths of the compression members shouldbe taken as equal to the lengths between their ends If however the membersof a rigid-jointed frame are not designed to fail simultaneously there will bemoment interactions between them at failure While it is a common and conserva-tive practice to ignore these interactions and to design each member as if pin-endedsome account may be taken of these by using one of the procedures discussed inSection 8353 to estimate the effective lengths of the compression members andexemplified in Section 851

Frame fails aftertension diagonalyields or fractures

Frame fails aftercompression diagonalbuckles

Frame remains stableafter compressiondiagonal buckles

with tension diagonalDeterminate framewith compressiondiagonal

Indeterminate framewith double-bracedpanel

(a) Determinate frame (b) (c)

Figure 81 Determinate and indeterminate triangulated frames

Frames 349

822 Statically indeterminate frames

When an assumed pin-jointed triangulated frame without primary bending actionsis statically indeterminate then the forces transferred by the members will dependon their axial stiffnesses Since these decrease with tension yielding or compressionbuckling there is usually some force redistribution as failure is approached Todesign such a frame it is necessary to estimate the member forces at failure andthen to design the individual tension and compression members for these forces asin Chapters 2 and 3 Four different methods may be used to estimate the memberforces

In the first method a sufficient number of members are ignored so that the framebecomes statically determinate For example it is common to ignore completelythe compression diagonal in the double-braced panel of the indeterminate frameof Figure 81c in which case the strength of the now determinate frame is con-trolled by the strength of one of the other members This method is simple andconservative

A less conservative method can be used when each indeterminate member canbe assumed to be ductile so that it can maintain its maximum strength over aconsiderable range of axial deformations In this method the frame is convertedto a statically determinate frame by replacing a sufficient number of early failingmembers by sets of external forces equal to their maximum load capacities Forthe frame shown in Figure 81c this might be done for the diagonal compressionmember by replacing it by forces equal to its buckling strength This simplemethod is very similar in principle to the plastic method of analysing the collapseof flexural members (Section 55) and frames (Section 8357) However themethod can only be used when the ductilities of the members being replaced areassured

In the third method each member is assumed to behave linearly and elasticallywhich allows the use of a linear elastic method to analyse the frame and deter-mine its member force distribution The frame strength is then controlled by thestrength of the most severely loaded member For the frame shown in Figure 81cthis would be the compression diagonal if this reaches its buckling strength beforeany of the other members fail This method ignores redistribution and is conser-vative when the members are ductile or when there are no lacks-of-fit at memberconnections

In the fourth method account is taken of the effects of changes in the memberstiffnesses on the force distribution in the frame Because of its complexity thismethod is rarely used

When the members of a triangulated frame are eccentrically connected orwhen the loads act eccentrically or are applied to the members between thejoints the flexural effects are no longer secondary and the frame should betreated as a flexural frame Flexural frames are discussed in the followingsections

350 Frames

83 Two-dimensional flexural frames

831 General

The structural behaviour of a frame may be classified as two-dimensional whenthere are a number of independent two-dimensional frames with in-plane loadingor when this is approximately so The primary actions in a two-dimensional framein which the members support transverse loads are usually flexural and are oftenaccompanied by significant axial actions The structural behaviour of a flexuralframe is influenced by the behaviour of the member joints which are usuallyconsidered to be either simple semi-rigid (or semi-continuous) or rigid (or con-tinuous) according to their ability to transmit moment The EC3 classifications ofjoints are given in [1]

In the following sub-sections the behaviour analysis and design of two-dimensional flexural frames with simple semi-rigid or rigid joints are discussedtogether with the corresponding EC3 requirements An introduction to the EC3requirements is given in [2]

832 Frames with simple joints

Simple joints may be defined as being those that will not develop restrainingmoments which adversely affect the members and the structure as a wholein which case the structure may be designed as if pin-jointed It is usually assumedtherefore that no moment is transmitted through a simple joint and that the mem-bers connected to the joint may rotate The joint should therefore have sufficientrotation capacity to permit member end rotations to occur without causing failureof the joint or its elements An example of a typical simple joint between a beamand column is shown in Figure 93a

If there are a sufficient number of pin-joints to make the structure staticallydeterminate then each member will act independently of the others and maybe designed as an isolated tension member (Chapter 2) compression member(Chapter 3) beam (Chapters 5 and 6) or beam-column (Chapter 7) Howeverif the pin-jointed structure is indeterminate then some part of it may act as arigid-jointed frame The behaviour analysis and design of rigid-jointed framesare discussed in Sections 834 835 and 836

One of the most common methods of designing frames with simple joints isoften used for rectangular frames with vertical (column) and horizontal (beam)members under the action of vertical loads only The columns in such a frame areassumed to act as if eccentrically loaded A minimum eccentricity of 100 mm fromthe face of the column was specified in [3] but there is no specific guidance inEC3 Approximate procedures for distributing the moment caused by the eccentricbeam reaction between the column lengths above and below the connection aregiven in [1] It should be noted that such a pin-jointed frame is usually incapableof resisting transverse forces and must therefore be provided with an independentbracing or shear wall system

Frames 351

833 Frames with semi-rigid joints

Semi-rigid joints are those which have dependable moment capacities and whichpartially restrain the relative rotations of the members at the joints The actionof these joints in rectangular frames is to reduce the maximum moments in thebeams and so the semi-rigid design method offers potential economies over thesimple design method [4ndash10] An example of a typical semi-rigid joint between abeam and column is shown in Figure 93b

A method of semi-rigid design is permitted by EC3 In this method the stiffnessstrength and rotation capacities of the joints based on experimental evidence aresuggested in [1] and may be used to assess the moments and forces in the membersHowever this method has not found great favour with designers and thereforewill not be discussed further

834 In-plane behaviour of frames with rigid joints

A rigid joint may be defined as a joint which has sufficient rigidity to virtually pre-vent relative rotation between the members connected Properly arranged weldedand high-strength friction grip bolted joints are usually assumed to be rigid (ten-sioned high strength friction grip bolts are referred to in [1] as preloaded bolts)An example of a typical rigid joint between a beam and column is shown inFigure 93c There are important interactions between the members of frames withrigid joints which are generally stiffer and stronger than frames with simple orsemi-rigid joints Because of this rigid frames offer significant economies whilemany difficulties associated with their analysis have been greatly reduced by thewidespread availability of standard computer programs

The in-plane behaviour of rigid frames is discussed in general terms inSection 142 where it is pointed out that although a rigid frame may behavein an approximately linear fashion while its service loads are not exceeded espe-cially when the axial forces are small it becomes non-linear near its in-planeultimate load because of yielding and buckling effects When the axial compres-sion forces are small then failure occurs when a sufficient number of plastic hingeshas developed to cause the frame to form a collapse mechanism in which case theload resistance of the frame can be determined by plastic analysis of the collapsemechanism More generally however the in-plane buckling effects associatedwith the axial compression forces significantly modify the behaviour of the framenear its ultimate loads The in-plane analysis of rigid-jointed frames is discussedin Section 835 and their design in 836

835 In-plane analysis of frames with rigid joints

8351 General

The most common reason for analysing a rigid-jointed frame is to determine themoments shears and axial forces acting on its members and joints These may

352 Frames

then be used with the design rules of EC3 to determine if the members and jointsare adequate

Such an analysis must allow for any significant second-order moments arisingfrom the finite deflections of the frame Two methods may be used to allow forthese second-order moments In the first of these the moments determined by afirst-order elastic analysis are amplified by using the results of an elastic bucklinganalysis In the second and more accurate method a full second-order elasticanalysis is made of the frame

Aless common reason for analysing a rigid-jointed frame is to determine whetherthe frame can reach an equilibrium position under the factored loads in which casethe frame is adequate A first-order plastic analysis may be used for a frame withnegligible second-order effects When there are significant second-order effectsthen an advanced analysis may be made in which account is taken of second-ordereffects inelastic behaviour and residual stresses and geometrical imperfectionsalthough this is rarely done in practice

These various methods of analysis are discussed in more detail in the followingsub-sections

8352 First-order elastic analysis

A first-order (linear) elastic analysis of a rigid-jointed frame is based on theassumptions that

(a) the material behaves linearly so that all yielding effects are ignored(b) the members behave linearly with no member instability effects such as those

caused by axial compressions which reduce the membersrsquo flexural stiffnesses(these are often called the P-δ effects) and

(c) the frame behaves linearly with no frame instability effects such as thosecaused by the moments of the vertical forces and the horizontal framedeflections (these are often called the P- effects)

For example for the portal frame of Figure 82 a first-order elastic analysis ignoresall second-order moments such as RR(δ+zh) in the right-hand column so thatthe bending moment distribution is linear in this case First-order analyses predictlinear behaviour in elastic frames as shown in Figure 115

Rigid-jointed frames are invariably statically indeterminate and while thereare many manual methods of first-order elastic analysis available [11ndash13] theseare labour-intensive and error-prone for all but the simplest frames In the pastdesigners were often forced to rely on approximate methods or available solutionsfor specific frames [14 15] However computer methods of first-order elasticanalysis [16 17] have formed the basis of computer programs such as [18ndash20]which are now used extensively These first-order elastic analysis programs requirethe geometry of the frame and its members to have been established (usually by

Frames 353

N NH

H2H2

N HhL N + HhLL

N N

H

RL RR

HL

HR

Hh2

H h +RRR

h

Frame

Frame

Bending moments

(a) First-order analysis

(b) Second-order behaviour

Bending moments

RR

Mmax

First-orderanalysis

ndash

Figure 82 First-order analysis and second-order behaviour

a preliminary design) and then compute the first-order member moments andforces and the joint deflections for each specified set of loads Because these areproportional to the loads the results of individual analyses may be combined bylinear superposition The results of computer first-order elastic analyses [18] of abraced and an unbraced frame are given in Figures 83 and 84

8353 Elastic buckling of braced frames

The results of an elastic buckling analysis may be used to approximate any second-order effects (Figure 82) The elastic buckling analysis of a rigid-jointed frame iscarried out by replacing the initial set of frame loads by a set which produces thesame set of member axial forces without any bending as indicated in Figure 85bThe set of member forces Ncr which causes buckling depends on the distributionof the axial forces in the frame and is often expressed in terms of a load factor αcr

by which the initial set of axial forces Ni must be multiplied to obtain the memberforces Ncr at frame buckling so that

Ncr = αcrNi (81)

354 Frames

(c) Elasticdeflections

(d) Elasticbuckling

(e) Plasticcollapse

(a) Frame and loads

40 80

6000 6000

5000

500020

10

1

2

3 4 5

(kN mm units)

8106

2864

=1132cr p= 1248

998499

125

250

Member Section

123 152 152 UC 37 2210 47 1 8 5 0345 305 165 UB 40 8503 51 3 1 7 1 3

(b) Section properties

Iy (cm4) A (cm2) Mpy(kNm)

Quantity Units First-orderelastic

Elasticbuckling

Second-orderelastic

First-orderplastic

M kNm 235 246 199M kNm ndash530 0

0ndash536 ndash850

M kNm 1366 0

0

1373 1713M kNm ndash1538 ndash1546 ndash1713

N kN ndash716 ndash8106 ndash716 ndash926N kN ndash253 ndash2864 ndash252 ndash335

v mm 574 (0154) 578u mm 185 (1000) 206

2

3

4

5

123

345

4

2

(f) Analysis results

ndash

ndash

timestimes

Figure 83 Analysis of a braced frame

Alternatively it may be expressed by a set of effective length factors kcr = LcrLwhich define the member forces at frame buckling by

Ncr = π2EI(kcrL)2 (82)

For all but isolated members and very simple frames the determination of theframe buckling factor αcr is best carried out numerically using a suitable computerprogram The bases of frame elastic buckling programs are discussed in [16 17]The computer program PRFSA [18] first finds the initial member axial forces Ni

Frames 355

1531

4485 4485

(c) Elastic deflections

(d) Elastic buckling

(e) Plastic collapse

(a) Frame and loads

20 40

6000 6000

5000

500020

10

12

3

(kN mm units)

12 67 203 203 UC 52timestimestimestimes

5259 663 1 5 5 9 23 78 152 152 UC 37 2210 471 8 5 0

(b) Section properties

5 820

247 356 171 UB 51 14136 649 2 4 6 4 358 254 102 UB 25 3415 320 8 4 2

7

2599 2928

16021602

4537 6512

= 6906

4

40 80 40

6

281 561

281

140

281

5611122

561

= 1403pcr

Quantity Units First-orderelastic

Elasticbuckling

Second-orderelastic

First-orderplastic

(f) Analysis results

MMMMMM

kNm 2360kNm 717 729

1539842

kNm ndash1193 ndash1305 ndash1559kNm ndash1728 ndash1847 ndash2409kNm 535 542 850kNm ndash625 ndash644 ndash842

NNNN

kN ndash1033 ndash7136 ndash1009 ndash1449kN ndash376 ndash2599 ndash376 ndash561kN ndash1367 ndash9438 ndash1383 ndash1917kN ndash424 ndash2926 ndash423 ndash561

vvuu

mm 447 (0003) 461mm 801 (0001) 832mm 855 (0826) 1003mm 1214 (1000) 1404

4

5

76

74

78

8

12

23

67

78

4

5

2

3

ndashndashndashndash

Member Section Iy (cm4) A (cm2) Mpy(kNm)

00

0000

Figure 84 Analysis of an unbraced frame

by carrying out a first-order elastic analysis of the frame under the initial loadsIt then uses a finite element method to determine the elastic buckling load factorsαcr for which the total frame stiffness vanishes [21] so that

[K]D minus αcr[G]D = 0 (83)

in which [K] is the elastic stiffness matrix [G] is the stability matrix associatedwith the initial axial forces Ni and D is the vector of nodal deformations which

356 Frames

0397

0139 0185

0455

0270 0258 0516 0484 crqi

04L

0

2L

015

qiL

q Li

05L 05L

Axial loads only

Actual loads

Typical deflection

(a) Actual loads (b) Initial axial loadsqiL (c) Behaviour

Figure 85 In-plane behaviour of a rigid frame

define the buckled shape of the frame The results of a computer elastic bucklinganalysis [18] of a braced frame are given in Figure 83

For isolated braced members or very simple braced frames a buckling analysismay also be made from first principles as demonstrated in Section 310 Alterna-tively the effective length factor kcr of each compression member may be obtainedby using estimates of the member relative end stiffness factors k1 k2 in a bracedmember chart such as that of Figure 321a The direct application of this chart islimited to the vertical columns of regular rectangular frames with regular loadingpatterns in which each horizontal beam has zero axial force and all the columnsbuckle simultaneously in the same mode In this case the values of the columnend stiffness factors can be obtained from

k = (IcLc)

(IcLc)+(βeIbLb)(84)

where βe is a factor which varies with the restraint conditions at the far end ofthe beam (βe = 05 if the restraint condition at the far end is the same as that atthe column βe = 075 if the far end is pinned and βe = 10 if the far end isfixed ndash note that the proportions 0507510 of these are the same as 234 of theappropriate stiffness multipliers of Figure 319) and where the summations arecarried out for the columns (c) and beams (b) at the column end

The effective length chart of Figure 321a may also be used to approximate thebuckling forces in other braced frames In the simplest application an effectivelength factor kcr is determined for each compression member of the frame byapproximating its member end stiffness factors (see equation 346) by

k = IL

IL +(βeαrIrLr)(85)

where αr is a factor which allows for the effect of axial force on the flexuralstiffness of each restraining member (Figure 319) and the summation is carriedout for all of the members connected to that end of the compression member Each

Frames 357

effective length factor so determined is used with equations 81 and 82 to obtainan estimate of the frame buckling load factor as

αcri = π2EIi(kcriLi)2

Ni (86)

The lowest of these provides a conservative approximation of the actual framebuckling load factor αcr

The accuracy of this method of calculating effective lengths using the stiffnessapproximations of Figure 319 is indicated in Figure 86c for the rectangular frameshown in Figure 86a and b For the buckling mode shown in Figure 86a thebuckling of the vertical members is restrained by the horizontal members Thesehorizontal members are braced restraining members which bend in symmetricalsingle curvature so that their stiffnesses are (2EI1L1)(1 minus N1Ncr1) in whichNcr1 =π2EI1L2

1 as indicated in Figure 319 It can be seen from Figure 86c thatthe approximate buckling loads are in very close agreement with the accurate val-ues Worked examples of the application of this method are given in Sections 851and 852

A more accurate iterative procedure [22] may also be used in which the accu-racies of the approximations for the member end stiffness factors k increase witheach iteration

8354 Elastic buckling of unbraced frames

The determination of the frame buckling load factor αcr of a rigid-jointed unbracedframe may also be carried out using a suitable computer program such as thatdescribed in [16 17]

N2

Ncr

2

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(a) Buckling mode1

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(b) Buckling mode 2

0 05 10 15 20N N

0

05

10

15

20Mode 1

Mode 2

Exact

= 10

cr1

I L22I L11-------- --------------

Approximate

(c) Buckling loads1

Figure 86 Buckling of a braced frame

358 Frames

For isolated unbraced members or very simple unbraced frames a bucklinganalysis may also be made from first principles as demonstrated in Section 310Alternatively the effective length factor kcr of each compression member may beobtained by using estimates of the end stiffness factors k1 k2 in a chart such as thatof Figure 321b The application of this chart is limited to the vertical columns ofregular rectangular frames with regular loading patterns in which each horizontalbeam has zero axial force and all the columns buckle simultaneously in the samemode and with the same effective length factor The member end stiffness factorsare then given by equation 84

The effects of axial forces in the beams of an unbraced regular rectangularframe can be approximated by using equation 85 to approximate the relativeend stiffness factors k1 k2 (but with βe = 15 if the restraint conditions at thefar end are the same as at the column βe = 075 if the far end is pinned andβe = 10 if the far end is fixed ndash note that the proportions 1507510 of theseare the same as 634 of the appropriate stiffness multipliers of Figure 319) andFigure 321b

The accuracy of this method of using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319is indicated in Figure 87c for the rectangular frame shown in Figure 87a and b Forthe sway buckling mode shown in Figure 87a the sway buckling of the verticalmembers is restrained by the horizontal members These horizontal members arebraced restraining members which bend in antisymmetrical double curvature sothat their stiffnesses are (6EI1L1)(1 minus N14Ncr1) as indicated in Figure 319It can be seen from Figure 87c that the approximate buckling loads are in closeagreement with the accurate values A worked example of the application of thismethod is given in Section 854

The effective length factor chart of Figure 321b may also be used to approximatethe storey buckling load factor αcrs for each storey of an unbraced rectangular

N1

N2

Ncr

2

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(a) Buckling mode1

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(b) Buckling mode 2

0 05 10 15 20N N

0

02

04

06

08

Mode 1

Mode 2

Exact

= 10

cr1

I L 22I L11-------- --------------

Approximate

(c) Buckling loads1

Figure 87 Buckling of an unbraced frame

Frames 359

frame with negligible axial forces in the beams as

αcrs =sum(NcrL)sum(NiL)

(87)

in which Ncr is the buckling load of a column in a storey obtained by usingequation 84 and the summations are made for each column in the storey For astorey in which all the columns are of the same length this equation implies thatthe approximate storey buckling load factor depends on the total stiffness of thecolumns and the total load on the storey and is independent of the distributions ofstiffness and load The frame buckling load factor αcr may be approximated by thelowest of the values of αcrs calculated for all the stories of the frame This methodgives close approximations when the buckling pattern is the same in each storeyand is conservative when the horizontal members have zero axial forces and thebuckling pattern varies from storey to storey

A worked example of the application of this method is given in Section 853Alternatively the storey buckling load factor αcrs may be approximated by

using

αcrs = Hs

Vs

hs

δHs(88)

in which Hs is the storey shear hs is the storey height Vs is the vertical loadtransmitted by the storey and δHs is the first-order shear displacement of the storeycaused by Hs This method is an adaptation of the sway buckling load solutiongiven in Section 3106 for a column with an elastic brace (of stiffness HsδHs)

The approximate methods described above of analysing the elastic bucklingof unbraced frames are limited to rectangular frames While the buckling ofnon-rectangular unbraced frames may be analysed by using a suitable computerprogram such as that described in [18] there are many published solutions forspecific frames [23]

Approximate solutions for the elastic buckling load factors of symmetrical portalframes have been presented in [24ndash27] The approximations of [27] for portalframes with elastically restrained bases take the general form of

αcr =(

Nc

ρcNcrc

)C

+(

Nr

ρrNcrr

)Cminus1C

(89)

in which Nc Nr are the column and rafter forces Ncrc Ncrr are the referencebuckling loads obtained from

Ncrcr = π2EIcrL2cr (810)

and the values of C ρc and ρr depend on the base restraint stiffness and thebuckling mode

360 Frames

Nr EIrLr EIrLr

Nr Nr

Nr

EI Lc c EI Lc c

(b) Antisymmetric buckling mode

NN

(a) Frame and loads(c) Symmetric buckling mode

cc

NN cc

Figure 88 Pinned base portal frame

For portal frames with pinned bases

C = 12 (811)

and for antisymmetric buckling as shown in Figure 88b

ρc = 3(10R + 12) (812a)

and

ρr = 1 (812b)

in which

R = (IcLc)(IrLr) (813)

For symmetric buckling as shown in Figure 88c

ρc = 48 + 12R(1 + RH )

24 + 12R(1 + RH )+ 7R2R2H

(814a)

and

ρr = 12R + 84RRH

12R + 4(814b)

in which

RH = (LrLc) sin θR (815)

in which θR is the inclination of the rafter A worked example of the application ofthis method is given in Section 855

Frames 361

For portal frames with fixed bases

C = 16 (816)

and for antisymmetric buckling

ρc = R + 3

4R + 3(817a)

and

ρr = 2R + 4

R + 4(817b)

For symmetric buckling

ρc = 1 + 48R + 42RRH

24R + 2R2R2H

(818a)

and

ρr = 4R + 42RRH + R2R2H

4R + 2(818b)

Approximate methods for multi-bay frames are given in [25]

8355 Second-order elastic analysis

Second-order effects in elastic frames include additional moments such asRR(δ +zh) in the right-hand column of Figure 82 which result from the finitedeflections δ and of the frame The second-order moments arising from the mem-ber deflections from the straight line joining the member ends are often called theP-δ effects while the second-order moments arising from the joint displacements are often called the P- effects In braced frames the joint displacements aresmall and only the P-δ effects are important In unbraced frames the P- effectsare important and often much more so than the P-δ effects Other second-ordereffects include those arising from the end-to-end shortening of the members dueto stress (= NLEA) due to bowing (= 1

2

int L0 (dδdx)2dx) and from finite deflec-

tions Second-order effects cause non-linear behaviour in elastic frames as shownin Figure 114

The second-order P-δ effects in a number of elastic beam-columns havebeen analysed and approximations for the maximum moments are given inSection 721 A worked example of the use of these approximations is givenin Section 771

The P-δ and P- second-order effects in elastic frames are most easily andaccurately accounted for by using a computer second-order elastic analysis pro-gram such as those of [18ndash20] The results of second-order elastic analyses [18]

362 Frames

of braced and unbraced frames are given in Figures 83 and 84 For the bracedframe of Figure 83 the second-order results are only slightly higher than thefirst-order results This is usually true for well-designed braced frames that havesubstantial bending effects and small axial compressions For the unbraced frameof Figure 84 the second-order sway deflections are about 18 larger than those ofthe first-order analysis while the moment at the top of the right-hand lower-storeycolumn is about 10 larger than that of the first-order analysis

Second-order effects are often significant in unbraced frames

8356 Approximate second-order elastic analysis

There are a number of methods of approximating second-order effects which allowa general second-order analysis to be avoided In many of these the results of afirst-order elastic analysis are amplified by using the results of an elastic bucklinganalysis (Sections 8353 and 8354)

For members without transverse forces in braced frames the maximum membermoment Mmax determined by first-order analysis may be used to approximate themaximum second-order design moment M as

M = δMmax (819)

in which δ is an amplification factor given by

δ = δb = cm

1 minus NNcrbge 1 (820)

in which Ncrb is the elastic buckling load calculated for the braced member and

cm = 06 minus 04βm le 10 (821)

in which βm is the ratio of the smaller to the larger end moment (equations 820and 821 are related to equations 77 and 78 used for isolated beam-columns)A worked example of the application of this method is given in Section 856A procedure for approximating the value of βm to be used for members withtransverse forces is available [28] while more accurate solutions are obtained byusing equations 79ndash711 and Figures 75 and 76

For unbraced frames the amplification factor δ may be approximated by

δ = δs = 1

1 minus 1αcr(822)

in which αcr is the elastic sway buckling load factor calculated for the unbracedframe (Section 8354) A worked example of the application of this method isgiven in Section 857

For unbraced rectangular frames with negligible axial forces in the beamsa more accurate approximation can be obtained by amplifying the column moments

Frames 363

of each storey by using the sway buckling load factor αcrs for that storey obtainedusing equation 87 in

δ = δs = 1

1 minus 1αcrs(823)

in which αcrs is the elastic sway buckling load factor calculated for the storey(Section 8354) A worked example of the application of this method is given inSection 858

Alternatively the first-order end moment

Mf = Mfb + Mfs (824)

may be separated into a braced frame component Mfb and a complementary swaycomponent Mfs [29] The second-order maximum moment M may be approximatedby using these components in

M = Mfb + Mfs

(1 minus 1αcr)(825)

in which αcr is the load factor at frame elastic sway buckling (Section 8354)Amore accurate second-order analysis can be made by including the P- effects

of sway displacement directly in the analysis An approximate method of doingthis is to include fictitious horizontal forces equivalent to the P- effects in aniterative series of first-order analyses [30 31] A series of analyses must be carriedout because the fictitious horizontal forces increase with the deflections If theanalysis series converges then the frame is stable An approximate method ofanticipating convergence is to examine the value of (n+1 minus n)(n minus nminus1)

computed from the values of at the steps (n minus 1) n and (n + 1) If this isless than n(n + 1) then the analysis series probably converges This method ofanalysing frame buckling is slow and clumsy but it does allow the use of thewidely available first-order elastic computer programs The method ignores thedecreases in the member stiffnesses caused by axial compressions (the P-δ effects)and therefore tends to underestimate the second-order moments

8357 First-order plastic analysis

In the first-order method of plastic analysis all instability effects are ignored andthe collapse strength of the frame is determined by using the rigid-plastic assump-tion (Section 552) and finding the plastic hinge locations which first convert theframe to a collapse mechanism

The methods used for the plastic analysis of frames are extensions of thosediscussed in Section 555 which incorporate reductions in the plastic momentcapacity to account for the presence of axial force (Section 722) These meth-ods are discussed in many texts such as those [18ndash24 Chapter 5] referred to in

364 Frames

Section 514 The manual application of these methods is not as simple as it is forbeams but computer programs such as [18] are available The results of computerfirst-order plastic analyses [18] of a braced and an unbraced frame are given inFigures 83 and 84

8358 Advanced analysis

Present methods of designing statically indeterminate steel structures rely on pre-dictions of the stress resultants acting on the individual members and on models ofthe strengths of these members These member strength models include allowancesfor second-order effects and inelastic behaviour as well as for residual stressesand geometrical imperfections It is therefore possible that the common methodsof second-order elastic analysis used to determine the member stress resultantswhich do not account for inelastic behaviour residual stresses and geometricalimperfections may lead to inaccurate predictions

Second-order effects and inelastic behaviour cause redistributions of the mem-ber stress resultants in indeterminate structures as some of the more criticalmembers lose stiffness and transfer moments to their neighbours Non-proportionalloading also causes redistributions For example frame shown in Figure 89 thecolumn end moments induced initially by the beam loads decrease as the col-umn load increases and the column becomes less stiff due to second-order effectsat first and then due to inelastic behaviour The end moments may reduce tozero or even reverse in direction In this case the end moments change from ini-tially disturbing the column to stabilising it by resisting further end rotations Thischange in the sense of the column end moments which contributes significantlyto the column strength cannot be predicted unless an analysis is made which moreclosely models the behaviour of the real structure than does a simple plastic analy-sis (which ignores second-order effects) or a second-order elastic analysis (whichignores inelastic behaviour)

Bea

m lo

adin

g on

ly

Bea

m lo

ads

cons

tant

incr

easi

ng c

olum

n lo

ads

Tot

al a

xial

for

ce in

col

umn

Failure

Tot

al a

xial

for

ce in

col

umn

Central column rotation Column end moment

(b) Load-rotation behaviour(a) Frame (c) Variation of column end moment

Figure 89 Reversal of column end moments in frames

Frames 365

Ideally the member stress resultants should be determined by a method offrame analysis which accounts for both second-order effects (P-δ and P-) inelas-tic behaviour residual stresses and geometrical imperfections and any local orout-of-plane buckling effects Such a method has been described as an advancedanalysis Not only can an advanced analysis be expected to lead to predictions thatare of high accuracy it has the further advantage that the design process can begreatly simplified since the structure can be considered to be satisfactory if theadvanced analysis can show that it can reach an equilibrium position under thedesign loads

Past research on advanced analysis and the prediction of the strengths of realstructures has concentrated on frames for which local and lateral buckling areprevented (by using Class 1 sections and full lateral bracing) One of the earliestand perhaps the simplest methods of approximating the strengths of rigid-jointedframes was suggested in [32] where it was proposed that the ultimate load factorαult of a frame should be calculated from the load factorαp at which plastic collapseoccurs (all stability effects being ignored) and the load factor αcr at which elasticin-plane buckling takes place (all plasticity effects being ignored) by using

1

αult= 1

αp+ 1

αcr(826)

or

αultαp = 1 minus αultαcr (827)

However it can be said that this method represents a considerable simplificationof a complex relationship between the ultimate strength and the plastic collapseand elastic buckling strengths of a frame

More accurate predictions of the strengths of two-dimensional rigid frames canbe made using a sub-assemblage method of analysis In this method the bracedor unbraced frame is considered as a number of subassemblies [33ndash35] such asthose shown in Figure 810 The conditions at the ends of the sub-assemblage areapproximated according to the structural experience and intuition of the designer(it is believed that these approximations are not critical) and the sub-assemblage isanalysed by adding together the load-deformation characteristics ([36] and curve 5in Figure 72) of the individual members Although the application of this manualtechnique to the analysis of braced frames was developed to an advanced stage[37 38] it does not appear to have achieved widespread popularity

Further improvements in the prediction of frame strength are provided by com-puter methods of second-order plastic analysis such as the deteriorated stiffnessmethod of analysis in which progressive modifications are made to a second-orderelastic analysis to account for the formation of plastic hinges [16 39 40] The useof such an analysis is limited to structures with appropriate material propertiesand for which local and out-of-plane buckling effects are prevented However theuse of such an analysis has in the past been largely limited to research studies

366 Frames

(a) No-sway sub-assemblage (b) Sway sub-assemblage

Figure 810 Sub-assemblages for multi-storey frames

More recent research [41] has concentrated on extending computer methods ofanalysis so that they allow for residual stresses and geometrical imperfections aswell as for second-order effects and inelastic behaviour Such methods can dupli-cate design code predictions of the strengths of individual members (through theincorporation of allowances for residual stresses and geometrical imperfections) aswell as the behaviour of complete frames Two general types of analysis have devel-oped called plastic zone analysis [42 43] and concentrated plasticity analysis [44]While plastic zone analysis is the more accurate concentrated plasticity is the moreeconomical of computer memory and time It seems likely that advanced meth-ods of analysis will play important roles in the future design of two-dimensionalrigid-jointed frames in which local and lateral buckling are prevented

836 In-plane design of frames with rigid joints

8361 Residual stresses and geometrical imperfections

The effects of residual stresses are allowed for approximately in EC3 by usingenhanced equivalent geometrical imperfections These include both global (frame)imperfections (which are associated with initial sway or lack of verticality) andlocal (member) imperfections (which are associated with initial bow or crooked-ness) EC3 also allows the equivalent geometrical imperfections to be replaced byclosed systems of equivalent fictitious forces The magnitudes of the equivalentgeometrical imperfections and equivalent fictitious forces are specified in Clause532 of EC3

In some low slenderness frames the equivalent imperfections or fictitious forceshave only small effects on the distributions of moments and axial forces in the

Frames 367

frames and may be ignored in the analysis (their effects on member resistanceare included in Clause 63 of EC3) More generally the global (frame) imperfec-tions or fictitious forces are included in the analysis but not the local (member)imperfections or fictitious forces It is rare to include both the global and the localimperfections or fictitious forces in the analysis

The EC3 methods used for the analysis and design of frames with rigid jointsare discussed in the following sub-sections

8362 Strength design using first-order elastic analysis

When a braced or unbraced frame has low slenderness so that

αcr = FcrFEd ge 10 (828)

in which FEd is the design loading on the frame and Fcr is the elastic buckling loadthen EC3 allows the moments and axial forces in the frame to be determined usinga first-order elastic analysis of the frame with all the equivalent imperfections orfictitious forces ignored The frame members are adequate when their axial forcesand moments satisfy the section and member buckling resistance requirements ofClauses 62 and 633 of EC3

When a braced frame does not satisfy equation 828 Clause 522(3)b of EC3appears to allow a first-order elastic analysis to be used which neglects all second-order effects and the imperfections associated with member crookedness providedthe member axial forces and moments satisfy the buckling resistance require-ments of Clause 633 It is suggested however that amplified first-order analysisshould be used for frames of moderate slenderness which satisfy equation 829(Section 8363) and that second-order analysis should be used for frames of highslenderness which satisfy equation 830 (Section 8364)

8363 Strength design using amplified first-order elastic analysis

When an unbraced frame has moderate slenderness so that

10 gt αcr = FcrFEd ge 3 (829)

then EC3 allows the moments in the frame to be determined by amplifying(Section 8356) the moments determined by a first-order elastic analysis pro-vided the equivalent global imperfections or fictitious forces are included in theanalysis The frame members are adequate when their axial forces and momentssatisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3 and the memberbuckling resistance requirements of Clause 633 EC3 allows the member lengthto be used in Clause 633 but this may overestimate the resistances of members forwhich compression effects dominate It is suggested that in this case the member

368 Frames

should also satisfy the member buckling requirements of Clause 631 in whichthe effective length is used

If the member imperfections or fictitious forces are also included in the analysisthen the frame members are satisfactory when their axial forces and momentssatisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3

8364 Strength design using second-order elastic analysis

When an unbraced frame has high slenderness so that

3 gt αcr = FcrFEd (830)

then EC3 requires a more accurate analysis to be made of the second-order effects(Section 8355) than by amplifying the moments determined by a first-orderelastic analysis EC3 requires the equivalent global imperfections or fictitiousforces to be included in the analysis The frame members are adequate when theiraxial forces and moments satisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62of EC3 and the member buckling resistance requirements of Clause 633 EC3allows the member length to be used in Clause 633 but this may overestimate theresistances of members for which compression effects dominate It is suggestedthat in this case the member should also satisfy the member buckling requirementsof Clause 631 in which the effective length is used

If the member imperfections or fictitious forces are also included in the analysisthen the frame members are satisfactory when the axial forces and moments satisfythe section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3

8365 Strength design using first-order plastic collapse analysis

When a braced or unbraced frame has low slenderness so that

αcr = FcrFEd ge 15 (831)

then EC3 allows all the equivalent imperfections or fictitious forces to be ignoredand a first-order rigid plastic collapse analysis (Section 8357) to be used Thislimit is reduced to αcr ge 10 for clad structures and to αcr ge 5 for some portalframes subjected to gravity loads only

All members forming plastic hinges must be ductile so that the plastic momentcapacity can be maintained at each hinge over a range of hinge rotations sufficientto allow the plastic collapse mechanism to develop Ductility is usually ensured byrestricting the steel type to one which has a substantial yield plateau and significantstrain-hardening (Section 131) and by preventing reductions in rotation capacityby local buckling effects (by satisfying the requirements of Clause 56 of EC3including the use of Class 1 sections) by out-of-plane buckling effects (by sat-isfying the requirements of Clause 635 of EC3 including limiting the unbraced

Frames 369

lengths) and by in-plane buckling effects (by using equation 831 to limiting themember in-plane slendernesses and axial compression forces)

The frame members are adequate when

αp = FpFEd ge 1 (832)

in which Fp is the plastic collapse load It should be noted that the use of reducedfull plastic moments (to allow for the axial forces) will automatically ensure thatClause 629 of EC3 for the bending and axial force resistance is satisfied

8366 Strength design using advanced analysis

EC3 permits the use of a second-order plastic analysis When the effects of residualstresses and geometrical imperfections are allowed for through the use of globaland local equivalent imperfections or fictitious forces and when local and lateralbuckling are prevented (Clauses 56 and 635 of EC3) then this provides a methodof design by advanced analysis

The members of the structure are satisfactory when the section resistancerequirements of Clause 62 of EC3 are met Because these requirements are auto-matically satisfied by the prevention of local buckling and the accounting forinelastic behaviour the members can be regarded as satisfactory if the analysisshows that the structure can reach an equilibrium position under the design loads

8367 Serviceability design

Because the service loads are usually substantially less than the factored loadsused for strength design the behaviour of a frame under its service loads isusually closely approximated by the predictions of a first-order elastic analysis(Section 8352) For this reason the serviceability design of a frame is usuallycarried out using the results of a first-order elastic analysis The serviceabilitydesign of a frame is often based on the requirement that the service load deflec-tions must not exceed specified values Thus the member sizes are systematicallychanged until this requirement is met

837 Out-of-plane behaviour of frames with rigid joints

Most two-dimensional rigid frames which have in-plane loading are arranged sothat the stiffer planes of their members coincide with that of the frame Such a framedeforms only in its plane until the out-of-plane (flexuralndashtorsional) buckling loadsare reached and if these are less than the in-plane ultimate loads then the membersand the frame will buckle by deflecting out of the plane and twisting

In some cases the action of one loaded member dominates and its elastic buck-ling load can be determined by evaluating the restraining effects of the remainderof the frame For example when the frame shown in Figure 811 has a zero beam

370 Frames

Q1

Q2

Q1

L2

L1

Lateral restraint

Rigid joint

Column built-in at base

Figure 811 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of a portal frame

load Q2 then the beam remains straight and does not induce moments in thecolumns which buckle elastically out of the plane of the frame at a load givenby Q1 asymp π2EIz(07L1)

2 (see Figure 315c) On the other hand if the effectsof the compressive forces in the columns are small enough to be neglected thenthe elastic stiffnesses and restraining effects of the columns on the beam can beestimated and the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling load Q2 of the beam can beevaluated The solution of a related problem is discussed in Section 69

In general however both the columns and the beams of a rigid frame buckleand there is an interaction between them during out-of-plane buckling Thisinteraction is related to that which occurs during the in-plane buckling of rigidframes (see Sections 8353 and 8354 and Figures 86 and 87) and also tothat which occurs during the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of continuousbeams (see Section 682 and Figure 621) Because of the similarities between theelastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of restrained beam-columns (Section 7313)and restrained columns (Section 364) it may prove possible to extend furtherthe approximate method given in Section 8353 for estimating the in-planeelastic buckling loads of rigid frames (which was applied to the elasticflexuralndashtorsional buckling of some beams in Section 682) Thus the elas-tic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of some rigid frames might be calculatedapproximately by using the column effective length chart of Figure 321aHowever this development has not yet been investigated

On the other hand there have been developments [45ndash47] in the analytical tech-niques used to determine the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of generalrigid plane frames with general in-plane loading systems and a computer program[48] has been prepared which requires only simple data specifying the geometryof the frame its supports and restraints and the arrangement of the loads The use

Frames 371

Bea

m lo

ad Q

2Q1 Q1

Q1 Q1Q2

Q2

L L21 = 05

L L21 = 2

Column loads Q1

Figure 812 Elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of portal frames

of this program to calculate the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling load of a framewill simplify the design problem considerably

Interaction diagrams for the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of a numberof frames have been determined [45] and two of these (for the portal framesshown in Figure 811) are given in Figure 812 These diagrams show that theregion of stability is convex as it is for the in-plane buckling of rigid frames(Figures 86 and 87) and for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of continuous beams(Figure 623b) Because of this convexity linear interpolations (as in Figure 624)made between known buckling load sets are conservative

Although the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of rigid frames has been inves-tigated the related problems of inelastic buckling and its influence on the strengthof rigid frames have not yet been systematically studied However advanced com-puter programs for the inelastic out-of-plane behaviour of beam-columns [49ndash54]have been developed and it seems likely that these will be extended in the nearfuture to rigid-jointed frames

838 Out-of-plane design of frames

While there is no general method yet available of designing for flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling in rigid frames design codes imply that the strength formulations forisolated beam-columns (see Section 734) can be used in conjunction with themoments and forces determined from an appropriate elastic in-plane analysis ofthe frame

372 Frames

A rational design method has been developed [55] for the columns oftwo-dimensional building frames in which laterally braced horizontal beams formplastic hinges Thus when plastic analysis is used columns which do not par-ticipate in the collapse mechanism may be designed as isolated beam-columnsagainst flexuralndashtorsional buckling In later publications [56 57] the method wasextended so that the occurrence of plastic hinges at one or both ends of the column(instead of in the beams) could be allowed for Because the assumption of plastichinges at all the beam-column joints is only valid for frames with vertical loadsthe analysis for lateral loads must be carried out independently A frame analysedby this method must therefore have an independent bracing or shear wall systemto resist the lateral loads

A number of current research efforts are being directed towards the extension ofadvanced methods of analysing the in-plane behaviour of frames (Section 8358)to include the out-of-plane flexuralndashtorsional buckling effects [52ndash54] Theavailability of a suitable computer program will greatly simplify the design of two-dimensional frames in which local buckling is prevented since such a frame canbe considered to be satisfactory if it can be shown that it can reach an equilibriumposition under the factored design loads

84 Three-dimensional flexural frames

The design methods commonly used when either the frame or its loading is three-dimensional are very similar to the methods used for two-dimensional framesThe actions caused by the design loads are usually calculated by allowing forsecond-order effects in the elastic analysis of the frame and then compared withthe design resistances determined for the individual members acting as isolatedbeam-columns In the case of three-dimensional frames or loading the elasticframe analysis is three-dimensional while the design resistances are based on thebiaxial bending resistances of isolated beam-columns (see Section 74)

A more rational method has been developed [55 56] of designing three-dimensional braced rigid frames for which it could be assumed that plastic hingesform at all major and minor axis beam ends This method is an extension of themethod of designing braced two-dimensional frames ([55ndash57] and Section 838)For such frames all the beams can be designed plastically while the columns canagain be designed as if independent of the rest of the frame The method of design-ing these columns is based on a second-order elastic analysis of the biaxial bendingof an isolated beam-column Once again the assumption of plastic hinges at allthe beam ends is valid only for frames with vertical loads and so an independentdesign must be made for the effects of lateral loads

In many three-dimensional rigid frames the vertical loads are carried principallyby the major axis beams while the minor axis beams are lightly loaded and do notdevelop plastic hinges at collapse but restrain and strengthen the columns In thiscase an appropriate design method for vertical loading is one in which the majoraxis beams are designed plastically and the minor axis beams elastically The chief

Frames 373

difficulty in using such a method is in determining the minor axis column momentsto be used in the design In the method presented in [58] this is done by firstmaking a first-order elastic analysis of the minor axis frame system to determinethe column end moments The larger of these is then increased to allow for thesecond-order effects of the axial forces the amount of the increase depending onthe column load ratio NNcrz (in which Ncrz is the minor axis buckling load of theelastically restrained column) and the end moment ratio βm The increased minoraxis end moment is then used in a nominal first yield analysis of the column whichincludes the effects of initial crookedness

However it appears that this design method is erratically conservative [59] andthat the small savings achieved do not justify the difficulty of using it Anotherdesign method was proposed [60] which avoids the intractable problem of inelasticbiaxial bending in frame structures by omitting altogether the calculation of theminor axis column moments This omission is based on the observation that theminor axis moments induced in the columns by the working loads reduce to zeroas the ultimate loads are approached and even reverse in sign so that they finallyrestrain the column as shown in Figure 89 With this simplification the momentsfor which the column is to be designed are the same as those in a two-dimensionalframe However the beneficial restraining effects of the minor axis beams must beallowed for and a simple way of doing this has been proposed [60] For this theelastic minor axis stiffness of the column is reduced to allow for plasticity causedby the axial load and the major axis moments and this reduced stiffness is usedto calculate the effects of the minor axis restraining beams on the effective lengthLcr of the column The reduced stiffness is also used to calculate the effectiveminor axis flexural rigidity EIeff of the column and the ultimate strength Nult ofthe column is taken as

Nult = π2EIeff L2cr (833)

The results obtained from two series of full-scale three-storey tests indicate thatthe predicted ultimate loads obtained by this method vary between 84 and 104of the actual ultimate loads

85 Worked examples

851 Example 1 ndash buckling of a truss

Problem All the members of the rigid-jointed triangulated frame shown inFigure 813a have the same in-plane flexural rigidity which is such thatπ2EIL2 = 1 Determine the effective length factor of member 12 and the elasticin-plane buckling loads of the frame

Solution The member 12 is one of the longest compression members and one ofthe most heavily loaded and so at buckling it will be restrained by its adjacentmembers An initial estimate is required of the buckling load and this can be

374 Frames

300

250

087ndash0 87

ndash1 73

L

L

ndash260

L116 L116 L116

Q

Q Q

=1

Q =1Q = 1

1

2

3

4

(a) Example 1

All members havethe same EI

L05

L05

Q5 Q5

EI2

EI EI

L2

1

2 3L

(b) Example 4

Figure 813 Worked examples 1 and 4

obtained after observing that the end 1 will be heavily restrained by the tensionmember 14 and that the end 2 will be moderately restrained by the short lightlyloaded compression member 24 Thus the initial estimate of the effective lengthfactor of member 12 in this braced frame should be closer to the rigidly restrainedvalue of 05 than to the unrestrained value of 10

Accordingly assume kcr12 = 070Then by using equation 82 Ncr12 = π2EI(070L)2 = 204

and Qcr = Ncr12300 = 068Thus N23 = 170 N24 = 059 N14 = minus177Using the form of equation 345 α12 = 2EIL Using Figure 319

α23 = 3EI

L

[1 minus 170

π2EIL2

]= minus210

EI

L

α24 = 4EI

058L

[1 minus 059

π2EI(058L)2

]= 622

EI

L

α14 = 4EI

116L

[1 minus (minus177)

2π2EI(116L)2

]= 755

EI

L

Using equation 345

k1 = 2(05 times 755 + 2) = 0346

k2 = 205 times (minus210 + 622)+ 2 = 0493

Using Figure 321a kcr12 = 065The calculation can be repeated using kcr12 = 065 instead of the initial estimate

of 070 in which case the solution kcr12 = 066 will be obtained The correspondingframe buckling loads are Qcr = π2EI(066L)23 = 077

Frames 375

852 Example 2 ndash buckling of a braced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factors of the members of the bracedframe shown in Figure 83a and estimate the frame buckling load factor αcr

SolutionFor the vertical member 13 using equation 85

k1 = 10 (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

Using the form of equation 345 and Figure 319

k3 = 2 times 2210 times 10410 000

05 times 4 times 8503 times 10412 000 + 20 times 2210 times 10410 000= 0238

kcr13 = 074 (using Figure 321a)

(kcr13 = 073 if a base stiffness ratio of 01 is used so that

k1 = (2 times 2210 times 10410 000)(2 times 11 times 2210 times 10410 000) = 0909)

Ncr13 = π2 times 210 000 times 2210 times 104(074 times 10 000)2N = 8365 kN

αcr13 = 8365716 = 117

For the horizontal member 35 using equation 85

k3 = 2 times 8503 times 10412 000

05 times 3 times 2210 times 10410 000 + 2 times 8503 times 10412 000= 0810

k5 = 0 (theoretical value for a fixed end)

kcr35 = 066 (using Figure 321a)

(kcr35 = 077 if a base stiffness ratio of 10 is used so that k5 = 05)

Ncr35 = π2 times 210 000 times 8503 times 104

(066 times 12 000)2N = 28096 kN

αcr35 = 28096253 = 111 gt 117 = αcr13

there4 αcr = 117 (compare with the computer analysis value of αcr = 1132 givenin Figure 83d)

A slightly more accurate estimate might be obtained by using equation 85 withαr obtained from Figure 319 as

αr = 1 minus 253 times 103

(2 times π2 times 210 000 times 8503 times 10412 0002)= 0990

376 Frames

so that

k3 = 2 times 2210 times 10410000

05 times 4 times 0990 times 8503 times 10412 000 + 2 times 2210 times 10410 000

= 0240

but kcr13 is virtually unchanged and so therefore is αcr

853 Example 3 ndash buckling of an unbraced two-storey frame

Problem Determine the storey buckling load factors of the unbraced two-storeyframe shown in Figure 84a and estimate the frame buckling load factor byusing

a the storey deflection method of equation 88 andb the member buckling load method of equation 87

(a) Solution using equation 88For the upper storey using the first-order analysis results shown in Figure 84

αcrsu = 10

(20 + 40 + 20)times 5000

(1214 minus 855)= 1741

For the lower storey using the first-order analysis results shown in Figure 84

αcrsl = (10 + 20)

(20 + 40 + 20 + 40 + 80 + 40)times 5000

855= 731 lt 1741 = αcrsu

there4 αcr = 731 (compare with the computer analysis value of αcr = 6905 given inFigure 84d)(b) Solution using equation 87

For the upper-storey columns using equation 84

kT = 2210 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 15 times 3415 times 10412 000= 0508

kB = 2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000 + 15 times 14136 times 10412 000

= 0458

kcru = 144 (using Figure 321b)

Ncru = π2 times 210 000 times 2210 times 104(144 times 5000)2N = 8836 kN

Frames 377

For the lower-storey columns using equation 84

kT = 2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000 + 15 times 14136 times 10412 000

= 0458

kB = infin (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

kcrl = 24 (using Figure 321b)

Ncrl = π2 times 210 000 times 5259 times 104(24 times 5000)2N = 7569 kN

Using equation 87 and the axial forces of Figure 84f

αcrsu = 2 times 883650

(376 + 424)50= 221

αcrsl = 2 times 756950

(1033 + 1367)50= 631 lt 221 = αcrsu

there4 αcr = 631 (compare with the storey deflection method value of αcr = 731calculated above and the computer analysis value of αcr = 6905 given inFigure 84d)

854 Example 4 ndash buckling of unbraced single storey frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of the member 12 of the unbracedframe shown in Figure 813b (and for whichπ2EIL2 = 1) and the elastic in-planebuckling loads

Solution The sway member 12 is unrestrained at end 1 and moderately restrainedat end 2 by the lightly loaded member 23 Its effective length factor is thereforegreater than 2 the value for a rigidly restrained sway member (see Figure 315e)Accordingly assume kcr12 = 250

Then by using equation 82 Ncr12 = π2EI(250L)2 = 016

and Qcr = Ncr125 = 0032

and N23 = Qcr = 0032

Using Figure 319

αb23 = 6 times (2EI)(2L)(

1 minus 0032

4π2(2EI)(2L)2

)= 5904EIL

378 Frames

and using equation 349

k2 = 6EIL

15 times 5904EIL + 6EIL= 0404

k1 = 10 (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

Using Figure 321b kcr12 = 23The calculation can be repeated using kcr12 = 23 instead of the initial estimate

of 250 in which case the solution kcr12 = 23 will be obtained The correspondingframe buckling loads are given by

Qcr = π2EI(23L)2

5= 0038

855 Example 5 ndash buckling of a portal frame

Problem A uniform section pinned-base portal frame is shown in Figure 814 withits member axial compression forces [42] Determine the elastic buckling loadfactor of the frameSolution

Lr = radic(12 0002 + 30002) = 12 369 mm

The average axial forces are

Nc = (514 + 691)2 = 603 kN

Nr = (581 + 480 + 430 + 530)4 = 505 kN

For a pinned base portal frame C = 12 (811)

581

514 430 480 691

691 514

530

12 000

356 times 171 UB 45 I = 12 066 cm4

12 000

3000

40003

Figure 814 Worked example 5

Frames 379

For antisymmetric buckling

R = (12 080 times 1044000)(12 080 times 10412 369) = 309 (813)

ρc = 3(10 times 309 + 12) = 00699 (812a)

ρr = 1 (812b)

Ncrc = π2 times 210 000 times 12 080 times 10440002N = 15 648 kN (810)

Ncrr = π2 times 210 000 times 12 080 times 10412 3692N = 1637 kN (810)

αcras =(

603

00699 times 15 648

)12

+(

505

1 times 1637

)12minus112

= 130 (89)

For symmetric buckling

RH = (12 3694000)times (300012 369) = 075 (815)

ρc = 48 + 12 times 309 times (1 + 075)

24 + 12 times 309 times (1 + 075)+ 7 times 3092 times 0752

= 0664 (814a)

ρr = 12 times 309 + 84 times 309 times 075

12 times 309 + 4= 1377 (814b)

αcrs =(

603

0664 times 15 648

)12

+(

505

1377 times 1637

)12minus112

= 384

gt 130 = αcras (89)

and so the frame buckling factor isαcr = 130 This is reasonably close to the valueof 139 predicted by a computer elastic frame buckling analysis program [18]

856 Example 6 ndash moment amplificationin a braced frame

Problem Determine the amplified design moments for the braced frame shown inFigure 83 (Second-order effects are rarely important in braced members whichhave significant moment gradients It can be inferred from Clause 522(3)b of EC3that second-order effects need not be considered in braced frames Nevertheless

380 Frames

an approximate method of allowing for second-order effects by estimating theamplified design moments is illustrated below)

Solution For the vertical member 123 the first-order moments are M1 = 0M2 = 235 kNm M3 = minus530 kNm and for these the method of [28] leads toβm = 0585 and so using equation 821

cm = 06 minus 04 times 0585 = 0366

Using Ncr13 = 8365 kN from Section 852 and using equations 819 and 820

MEd3 = 0366 times 530

1 minus 7168365= 212 kNm lt 530 kNm = M3

and so MEd3 = 530 kNm This is close to the second-order moment of 536 kNmdetermined using the computer program of [18]

For the horizontal member 345 the first-order moments are M3 = minus530 kNmM4 = 1366 kNm M5 = minus1538 kNm and for these the method of [28] leads toβm = 0292 and so

cm = 06 minus 04 times 0292 = 0483

Using Ncr35 = 28096 kN from Section 852 and using equations 819 and 820

MEd5 = 0483 times 1538

1 minus 25328096= 750 kNm lt 1538 kNm = M5

and so MEd5 = 1538 kNm This is close to the second-order moment of 1546 kNmdetermined using the computer program of [18]

857 Example 7 ndash moment amplification in a portal frame

Problem The maximum first-order elastic moment in the portal frame ofFigure 814 whose buckling load factor was determined in Section 855 is1518 kNm [26] Determine the amplified design moment

Solution Using the elastic frame buckling load factor determined in Section 855of αcrs = 130 and using equations 819 and 822

MEd = 1518

1 minus 1130= 1645 kNm

which is about 6 higher than the value of 1554 kNm obtained using the computerprogram of [18]

858 Example 8 ndash moment amplificationin an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the amplified design moments for the unbraced frame shownin Figure 84

Frames 381

Solution For the upper-storey columns using the value of αcrsu = 221determined in Section 853(b) and using equation 823

δsu = 1(1 minus 1221) = 1047 and so

MEd8 = 1047 times 625 = 655 kNm

which is close to the second-order moment of 644 kNm determined using thecomputer program of [18]

For the lower-storey columns using the value of αcrsl = 631 determined inSection 853(b) and using equation 823

δsl = 1(1 minus 1631) = 1188 and so

MEd76 = 1188 times 1193 = 1418 kNm

which is 9 higher than the value of 1305 kNm determined using the computerprogram of [18]

For the lower beam the second-order end moment MEd74 may be approximatedby adding the second-order end moments MEd76 and MEd78 so that

MEd74 = 1418 + 535(1 minus 1221) = 1978 kNm

which is 7 higher than the value of 1847 kNm determined using the computerprogram of [18]

Slightly different values of the second-order moments are obtained if the valuesof αcrslu and αcrsl determined by the storey deflection method in Section 853(a)are used

859 Example 9 ndash plastic analysis of a braced frame

Problem Determine the plastic collapse load factor for the braced frame shown inFigure 83 if the members are all of S275 steelSolution For the horizontal member plastic collapse mechanism shown inFigure 83e

δW = 80αph times (δθh times 60) = 480αphδθh for a virtual rotation δθhof 34

and

δU = (850 times δθh)+ (1713 times 2δθh)+ (1713 times δθh) = 5989 δθh

so that

αph = 5989480 = 1248

382 Frames

Checking for reductions in Mp using equation 717

Mpr13 = 118 times 850 times 1 minus 895(275 times 471 times 102103)

= 934 kNm gt 850 kNm = Mp13

and so there is no reduction in Mp for member 13

Mpr35 = 118 times 1713 times 1 minus 321(275 times 513 times 102103)

= 1975 kNm gt 1713 kNm = Mp35

and so there is no reduction in Mp for member 35Therefore αph = 1248For a plastic collapse mechanism in the vertical member with a frictionless hinge

at 1 and plastic hinges at 2 and 3

αpv = 850 times 2 times δθv + 850 times δθv

20 times 50 times δθv

= 255 gt 1248 = αph

and so

αp = 1248

8510 Example 10 ndash plastic analysis of an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the plastic collapse load factor for the unbraced frame shownin Figure 84 if the members are all of S275 steelSolution For the beam plastic collapse mechanism shown in Figure 84e

δW = 40αp times 6δθ = 240αpδθ

for virtual rotations δθ of the half beams 35 and 58 and

δU = (842 times δθ)+ (842 times 2δθ)+ (842 times δθ) = 3368δθ

so that

αp = 368240 = 1403

The frame is only partially determinate when this mechanism forms and so themember axial forces cannot be determined by statics alone The axial force N358

determined by a computer first-order plastic analysis (18) is N358 = 338 kN andthe axial force ratio is (NNy)358 = 338(275 times 320 times 102103) = 00384which is less than 015 the approximate value at which NNy begins to reduceMp and so αp is unchanged at αp = 1403

Frames 383

The collapse load factors calculated for the other possible mechanisms of

bull lower beam (αp = 2 times (1559 + 850 + 2464)(80 times 6) = 2030)bull lower-storey sway (αp = 2 times 1559(30 times 5) = 2079)bull upper-storey sway (αp = 2 times (842 + 850)(10 times 5) = 6768)bull combined beam sway

(αp = 2 times (842 + 842 + 2464 + 850 + 1559)

(40 + 80)times 6 + (20 times 5 + 10 times 10) = 1425

)

are all greater than 1403 and so αp = 1403

8511 Example 11 ndash elastic member design

Problem Check the adequacy of the lower-storey column 67 (of S275 steel) of theunbraced frame shown in Figure 84 The column is fully braced against deflectionout of the plane of the frame and twisting

Design actionsThe first-order actions are N67 = 1367 kN and M76 = 1193 kNm (Figure 84)and the amplified moment is 1418 kNm (Section 858)

HEd = 10 + 20 = 30 kN and

VEd = (20 + 40 + 20)+ (40 + 80 + 40) = 240 kN

HEdVEd = 30240 = 0125 lt 015 532(4)B

and so the effects of sway imperfections should be included

φ0 = 1200 532(3)

αh = 2radic

10 = 0632 lt 23 and so αh = 23 532(3)

m = 1 (one of the columns will have less than the average force) 532(3)

αm = radic05(1 + 11) = 10 and 532(3)

φ = (1200)times (23)times 10 = 000333 532(3)

The increased horizontal forces are 532(7)

10 + 000333 times 80 = 1027 kN for the upper storey and20 + 000333 times 240 = 2080 kN for the lower storey

If the frame is reanalysed for these increased forces then the axial force willincrease from 1367 to NEd = 1372 kN and the moment from 1193 times 1188 =1418 kNm to MyEd = 1219 times 1188 = 1448 kNm

384 Frames

Section resistance

tf = 125 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε =radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (20432 minus 792 minus 102)(125 times 0924) = 762 lt 9 T52

and the flange is Class 1 T52The worst case for the web classification is when the web is fully plastic in

compression for which

cw(twε) = (2062 minus 2 times 125 minus 2 times 102)(79 times 0924) = 220 lt 33T52

and the web is Class 1 T52Thus the section is Class 1

γM0 = 10 61

NcRd = 663 times 102 times 27510 N = 1823 kN = NplRd 624(2)

025NplRd = 025 times 1826 = 4558 kN gt 1372 kN = NEd 6291(4)

05hwtwfy = 05(2062 minus 2 times 125)times 79 times 275 N = 1968 kN 6291(4)

gt 1372 kN = NEd

and so no allowance need be made for the effect of axial force on the plasticresistance moment 6291(4)

MN Rd = MplRd = 567 times 103 times 27510 Nmm

= 1559 kNm gt 1448 kNm = MEd 6291(5)

and the section resistance is adequate 6291(2)

Member resistanceBecause the member is continuously braced out-of-plane beam lateral buckling

and column minor axis and torsional buckling need not be consideredThus MzEd = 0χLT = 10 and

λ0 = 0 CmLT = 10 aLT = 0 and bLT = 0 TA1

Lcr = 5000 522(7b)

Frames 385

Ncr = π2 times 210 000 times 5259 times 10450002 N = 4360 kN

h

b= 20622043 = 1009 lt 12 tf = 125 lt 100 and so for a S275 steel

UC buckling about the y axis use buckling curve b T62

α = 034 T61

λy =radic(663 times 102 times 275)(4360 times 103) = 0647 6312(1)

Φ = 05 times [1 + 034 times (0647 minus 02)+ 06472] = 0785 6312(1)

χy = 1

0785 + radic07852 minus 06472

= 0813 6312(1)

Using Annex A

microy = 1 minus 13724360

1 minus 0813 times 13724360= 0994 TA1

ψy = 01449 = 0 TA2

Cmy = Cmy0 = 079 + 021 times 0 + 036 times (0 minus 033)times 13724360 TA2

= 0786

wy = 567 times 103510 times 103 = 1112 lt 15 TA1

λmax = λy = 0647 TA1

NRk = NplRd times γM0 = 1823 times 10 = 1823 kN 532(11)

γM1 = 10 61

npl = 1372(182310) = 00753 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (1112 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1112times 07852 times 0647 minus 16

1112

times07852 times 06472) times 00753 minus 0] = 1009 TA1

kyy = 0785 times 10 times 0994

1 minus 13724360times 1

1009= 0798 TA1

Substituting into equation 661 of EC3

1372

0813 times 1823+ 0798 times 1448

10 times 1559= 0834 lt 10 633(4)

and so the member resistance is adequate

386 Frames

Alternatively using Annex B

Cmy = 09 TB3

kyy = 09

1 + (0647 minus 02)

1372

0813 times 182310

= 0937 TB1

Substituting into equation 661 of EC3

1372

0813 times 1823+ 0937 times 1448

10 times 1559= 0963 lt 10 633(4)

and so the member resistance is adequate

8512 Example 12 ndash plastic design of a braced frame

Problem Determine the plastic design resistance of the braced frame shownin Figure 83

Solution Using the solution of Section 852

αcr = 117 lt 15 521(3)

and so EC3 does not allow first-order plastic analysis to be used for this frameunless it is clad The restriction of Clause 521(3) of EC3 appears to be unnec-essarily severe in this case since the second-order effects are dominated by thebuckling of the column 123 and will have little effect on the plastic collapsemechanism of the beam 345

If first-order plastic analysis were allowed for this frame then using the solutionof Section 859αp = 1248 gt 10 and the structure would appear to be satisfactory

8513 Example 13 ndash plastic design of an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the plastic design resistance of the unbraced frame shown inFigure 84

Solution Using the solution of Section 853

αcr = 631 lt 10 521(3)

and so EC3 does not allow first-order plastic analysis to be used for this frame

86 Unworked examples

861 Example 14 ndash truss design

The members of the welded truss shown in Figure 815a are all UC sections ofS275 steel with their webs perpendicular to the plane of the truss The member

Frames 387

1 2 3

4 5 6

80

Member Section I

80 80 80

(a) Truss and loads(m kN)

80

100 100 100

f(cm4) (Nmm2)z A(cm2) y

14 36 305 305 UC 97 7308 123 27545 65 12569 201 26512 3242 62

7308 123 2757308 123 275

Member M (kNm)L

14 168 ndash688 ndash2174455612

ndash15022498ndash168

42 815

N (kN)M (kNm)R

2498 ndash1727ndash1502 ndash172 7

89 1591ndash406 85

(b) Memberproperties

(c) Elasticactions

305 305 UC 158305 305 UC 97305 305 UC 97

timestimestimestimes

Figure 815 Example 14

properties and the results of a first-order elastic analysis of the truss under thedesign loads are shown in Figure 815b and c

Determine

(a) the effective length factors kcr of the compression members and the frameelastic buckling load factor αcr

(b) the amplified first-order design moments MEd for the compression members(c) the adequacy of the members for the actions determined by elastic analysis(d) the plastic collapse load factor αp and(e) the adequacy of the truss for plastic design

862 Example 15 ndash unbraced frame design

The members of the unbraced rigid-jointed two-storey frame shown inFigure 816a are all of S275 steel The member properties and the results ofa first-order elastic analysis of the frame under its design loads are shown inFigure 816b and c

Determine

(a) the column effective length factors kcr the storey buckling load factors αcrsand the frame buckling load factor αcr

(b) the amplified first-order design moments MEd for the columns(c) the adequacy of the members for the actions determined by elastic analysis

388 Frames

Member Section I

(a) Frame and loads (m kN)

A f(cm ) (cm ) (Nmm )y y

1ndash3 10ndash12 152 times 152 UC 37305 times 165 UB 40254 times 102 UB 25

2210 471 2752ndash11 8503 513 275

(c) Member properties

(b) Elastic actions

3ndash12 3415 320 275

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

50

50

30 30 30 30

20

10 20 20 20 10

20 40 40 40 20

10

Member M (kNm)L

1ndash2

N (kN)M (kNm)R

10ndash112ndash3

11ndash122ndash44ndash66ndash88ndash113ndash55ndash77ndash99ndash12

ndash188ndash654546

ndash774ndash683895

1274452

ndash488345577209

ndash138795

ndash488759895

1274452

ndash1569345577209

ndash759

ndash1104ndash1297

ndash377ndash423

17171717

ndash307ndash307ndash307ndash307

4 2 2

Figure 816 Example 15

(d) the plastic collapse load factor αp and(e) the adequacy of the frame for plastic design

References

1 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures- Part 1-8Design of Joints BSI London

2 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3Design of Steel Structures General Rules and Rules for Buildings Thomas TelfordPublishing London

3 British Standards Institution (2000) BS5950-1 2000 Structural Use of Steelwork inBuilding ndash Part 1 Code of Practice for Design ndash Rolled and Welded Sections BSILondon

4 British Standards Institution (1969) PD3343 Recommendations for Design (SupplementNo 1 to BS 449) BSI London

5 Nethercot DA (1986) The behaviour of steel frame structures allowing for semi-rigid joint action Steel Structures ndash Recent Research Advances and Their Applica-tions to Design (ed MN Pavlovic) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Londonpp 135ndash51

6 Nethercot DA and Chen W-F (1988) Effect of connections of columns Journal ofConstructional Steel Research 10 pp 201ndash39

7 Anderson DA Reading SJ and Kavianpour K (1991) Wind moment design forunbraced frames SCI Publication P-082 The Steel Construction Institute Ascot

Frames 389

8 Couchman GH (1997) Design of semi-continuous braced frames SCI PublicationP-183 The Steel Construction Institute Ascot

9 Anderson D (ed) (1996) Semi-rigid Behaviour of Civil Engineering StructuralConnections COST-C1 Brussels

10 Faella C Piluso V and Rizzano G (2000) Structural Steel Semi-rigid ConnectionsCRC Press Boca Raton

11 Pippard AJS and Baker JF (1968) The Analysis of Engineering Structures4th edition Edward Arnold London

12 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

13 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1988) Structural Analysis 3rd editionVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham England

14 Kleinlogel A (1931) Mehrstielige Rahmen Ungar New York15 Steel Construction Institute (2005) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th edition Blackwell

Scientific Publications Oxford16 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-Hall

Englewood Cliffs New Jersey17 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 2nd ed Pergamon

Press Oxford18 Hancock GJ Papangelis JP and Clarke MJ (1995) PRFSA Userrsquos Manual Centre

for Advanced Structural Engineering University of Sydney19 Computer Service Consultants (2006) S-Frame Enterprise CSC (UK) Limited Leeds20 Research Engineers Europe Limited (2005) STAAD Pro + QSE RSE Bristol21 Hancock GJ (1984) Structural buckling and vibration analyses on microcomputers

Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE24 No 4pp 327ndash32

22 Bridge RQ and Fraser DJ (1987) Improved G-factor method for evaluating effec-tive lengths of columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 6 Junepp 1341ndash56

23 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

24 Davies JM (1990) In-plane stability of portal frames The Structural Engineer 68No 8 April pp 141ndash7

25 Davies JM (1991) The stability of multi-bay portal frames The Structural Engineer69 No 12 June pp 223ndash9

26 Trahair NS (1993) Steel structures ndash elastic in-plane buckling of pitched roof portalframes AS4100 DS04 Standards Australia Sydney

27 Silvestre N and Camotim D (2007) Elastic buckling and second-order behaviourof pitched roof steel frames Journal of Constructional Steel Research 63 No 6pp 804ndash18

28 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1987) Limit state design rules for steel beam-columnsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 21 No 2 Septemberpp 2ndash11

29 Lai S-MA and MacGregor JG (1983) Geometric non-linearities in unbracedmultistory frames Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No 11 pp 2528ndash45

30 Wood BR Beaulieu D and Adams PF (1976) Column design by P-delta methodJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST2 February pp 411ndash27

390 Frames

31 Wood BR Beaulieu D and Adams PF (1976) Further aspects of design byP-delta method Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST3 Marchpp 487ndash500

32 Merchant W (1954) The failure load of rigid jointed frameworks as influenced bystability The Structural Engineer 32 No 7 July pp 185ndash90

33 Levi V Driscoll GC and Lu L-W (1965) Structural subassemblages preventedfrom sway Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST5 pp 103ndash27

34 Levi V Driscoll GC and Lu L-W (1967) Analysis of restrained columns permittedto sway Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 93 No ST1 pp 87ndash108

35 Hibbard WR and Adams PF (1973) Subassemblage technique for asymmetricstructures Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 99 No STl1 pp 2259ndash68

36 Driscoll GC et al (1965) Plastic Design of Multi-storey Frames Lehigh UniversityPennsylvania

37 American Iron and Steel Institute (1968) Plastic Design of Braced Multi-storey SteelFrames AISI New York

38 Driscoll GC Armacost JO and Hansell WC (1970) Plastic design of multistoreyframes by computer Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST1 pp 17ndash33

39 Harrison HB (1967) Plastic analysis of rigid frames of high strength steel account-ing for deformation effects Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of EngineersAustralia CE9 No 1 April pp 127ndash36

40 El-Zanaty MH and Murray DW (1983) Nonlinear finite element analysis of steelframes Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No 2 February pp 353ndash68

41 White DW and Chen WF (editors) (1993) Plastic Hinge Based Methods forAdvanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames Structural Stability Research CouncilBethlehem Pa

42 Clarke MJ Bridge RQ Hancock GJ and Trahair NS (1993)Australian trends inthe plastic analysis and design of steel building frames Plastic Hinge Based Methods forAdvanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames Structural Stability Research CouncilBethlehem Pa pp 65ndash93

43 Clarke MJ (1994) Plastic-zone analysis of frames Chapter 6 of Advanced Analysisof Steel Frames Theory Software and Applications Chen WF and Toma S edsCRC Press Inc Boca Raton Florida pp 259ndash319

44 White DW Liew JYR and Chen WF (1993) Toward advanced analysis in LRFDPlastic Hinge Based Methods for Advanced Analysis and Design of Steel FramesStructural Stability Research Council Bethlehem Pa pp 95ndash173

45 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1975) Analysis of lateral buckling in planeframes Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST7 pp 1497ndash516

46 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Direct stiffness analysis of lateral bucklingJournal of Structural Mechanics 3 No 1 pp 107ndash37

47 Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN Spon London48 Papangelis JP Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (1995) Elastic flexural-torsional

buckling of structures by computer Proceedings 6th International Conference onCivil and Structural Engineering Computing Cambridge pp 109ndash119

49 Bradford MA Cuk PE Gizejowski MA and Trahair NS (1987) Inelasticbuckling of beam-columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 11pp 2259ndash77

Frames 391

50 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns ndashTheory Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2041ndash61

51 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns ndashApplications Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2062ndash85

52 Wongkaew K and Chen WF (2002) Consideration of out-of-plane buckling inadvanced analysis for planar steel frame design Journal of Constructional SteelResearch 58 pp 943ndash65

53 Trahair NS and Chan S-L (2003) Out-of-plane advanced analysis of steel structuresEngineering Structures 25 pp 1627ndash37

54 Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (2004) Steel member strength by inelastic lateralbuckling Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 130 No 1 pp 64ndash9

55 Horne MR (1956) The stanchion problem in frame structures designed according toultimate carrying capacity Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Part III5 pp 105ndash46

56 Horne MR (1964) Safe loads on I-section columns in structures designed by plastictheory Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 29 September pp 137ndash50

57 Horne MR (1964) The plastic design of columns Publication No 23 BCSA London58 Institution of Structural Engineers and Institute of Welding (1971) Joint Committee

Second Report on Fully Rigid Multi-Storey Steel Frames ISE London59 Wood RH (1973) Rigid-jointed multi-storey steel frame design a state-of-the-

art report Current Paper CP 2573 Building Research Establishment WatfordSeptember

60 Wood RH (1974) A New Approach to Column Design HMSO London

Chapter 9

Joints

91 Introduction

Connections or joints are used to transfer the forces supported by a structuralmember to other parts of the structure or to the supports They are also usedto connect braces and other members which provide restraints to the structuralmember Although the terms connections and joints are often regarded as havingthe same meaning the definitions of EC3-1-8 [1] are slightly different as followsA connection consists of fasteners such as bolts pins rivets or welds and thelocal member elements connected by these fasteners and may include additionalplates or cleats A joint consists of the zone in which the members are connectedand includes the connection as well as the portions of the member or members atthe joint needed to facilitate the action being transferred

The arrangement of a joint is usually chosen to suit the type of action (forceandor moment) being transferred and the type of member (tension or compres-sion member beam or beam-column) being connected The arrangement shouldbe chosen to avoid excessive costs since the design detailing manufacture andassembly of a joint is usually time consuming in particular the joint type has asignificant influence on costs For example it is often better to use a heavier mem-ber rather than stiffeners since this will reduce the number of processes requiredfor its manufacture

A joint is designed by first identifying the force transfers from the memberthrough the components of the joint to the other parts of the structure Each com-ponent is then proportioned so that it has sufficient strength to resist the force thatit is required to transmit General guidance on joints is given in [2ndash11]

92 Joint components

921 Bolts

Several different types of bolts may be used in structural joints including ordinarystructural bolts (ie commercial or precision bolts and black bolts) and high-strength bolts Turned close tolerance bolts are now rarely used Bolts may transfer

Joints 393

Bolt forces

Bearing

Bearing

BearingShear

Shear

(a) Shear and bearingjoint

(b) Preloadedfriction-grip joint

(c) Tension joint

Bearing Bearing

Bolt forces

Tension

Bearing

Bearing

Bearing

Friction

Friction

Friction

Plate forces

Figure 91 Use of bolts in joints

loads by shear and bearing as shown in Figure 91a by friction between platesclamped together as shown in the preloaded friction-grip joint of Figure 91b orby tension as shown in Figure 91c The shear bearing and tension capacitiesof bolts and the slip capacities of preloaded friction-grip joints are discussed inSection 96

The use of bolts often facilitates the assembly of a structure as only very simpletools are required This is important in the completion of site joints especiallywhere the accessibility of a joint is limited or where it is difficult to providethe specialised equipment required for other types of fasteners On the other handbolting usually involves a significant fabrication effort to produce the bolt holes andthe associated plates or cleats In addition special but not excessively expensiveprocedures are required to ensure that the clamping actions required for preloadedfriction-grip joints are achieved Precautions may need to be taken to ensure that thebolts do not become undone especially in situations where fluctuating or impactloads may loosen them Such precautions may involve the provision of speciallocking devices or the use of preloaded high-strength bolts Guidance on bolted(and on riveted) joints is given in [2ndash11]

922 Pins

Pin joints used to be provided in some triangulated frames where it was thoughtto be important to try to realise the common design assumption that these framesare pin-jointed The cost of making a pin joint is high because of the machiningrequired for the pin and its holes and also because of difficulties in assembly Pins

394 Joints

are used in special architectural features where it is necessary to allow relativerotation to occur between the members being connected In addition a joint whichrequires a very large diameter fastener often uses a pin instead of a bolt Guidanceon the design of pin joints is given in Clause 313 of EC3-1-8 [1]

923 Rivets

In the past hot-driven rivets were extensively used in structural joints They wereoften used in the same way as ordinary structural bolts are used in shear and bearingand in tension joints There is usually less slip in a riveted joint because of thetendency for the rivet holes to be filled by the rivets when being hot-driven Shop-riveting was cheaper than site riveting and for this reason shop-riveting was oftencombined with site-bolting However riveting has been replaced by welding orbolting except in some historical refurbishments Rivets are treated in a similarfashion to bolts in EC3-1-8 [1]

924 Welds

Structural joints between steel members are often made by arc-welding techniquesin which molten weld metal is fused with the parent metal of the members or com-ponent plates being connected at a joint Welding is used extensively in fabricatingshops where specialised equipment is available and where control and inspectionprocedures can be readily exercised ensuring the production of satisfactory weldsWelding is often cheaper than bolting because of the great reduction in the prepa-ration required while greater strength can be achieved the members or plates nolonger being weakened by bolt holes and the strength of the weld metal being supe-rior to that of the material connected In addition welds are more rigid than othertypes of load-transferring fasteners On the other hand welding often producesdistortion and high local residual stresses and may result in reduced ductilitywhile site welding may be difficult and costly

Butt welds such as that shown in Figure 92a may be used to splice tensionmembers A full penetration weld enables the full strength of the member to bedeveloped while the butting together of the members avoids any joint eccentric-ity Butt welds often require some machining of the elements to be joined Specialwelding procedures are usually needed for full strength welds between thick mem-bers to control the weld quality and ductility while special inspection proceduresmay be required for critical welds to ensure their integrity These butt weldinglimitations often lead to the selection of joints which use fillet welds

Fillet welds (see Figure 92b) may be used to connect lapped plates as in thetension member splice (Figure 92c) or to connect intersecting plates (Figure 92d)The member force is transmitted by shear through the weld either longitudinallyor transversely Fillet welds although not as efficient as butt welds require littleif any preparation which accounts for their extensive use They also require lesstesting to demonstrate their integrity

Joints 395

(a) Butt welded splice

(b) Fillet weld (c) Fillet welded splice (d) Fillet welded joint

Weldsize s

Throat thickness

legs sShear

Shear

Plate forcesTension~07s for equals

Shear

Figure 92 Use of welds in joints

Nominal webcleat and bolts

Minimum requirementsfor top cleat and

bolts

Full strengthbutt weld

Preloadedfriction gripbolted joint

Seat stiffener

(a) Simple joint (b) Semi-rigid joint (c) Rigid joint

web stiffener

Figure 93 Beam-to-column joints

925 Plates and cleats

Intermediate plates (or gussets) fin (or side) plates end plates and angle or teecleats are frequently used in structural joints to transfer the forces from one memberto another Examples of flange cleats and plates are shown in the beam-to-columnjoints of Figure 93 and an example of a gusset plate is shown in the truss joint ofFigure 94b Stiffening plates such as the seat stiffener (Figure 93b) and the col-umn web stiffeners (Figure 93c) are often used to help transfer the forces in a joint

Plates are comparatively strong and stiff when they transfer the forces byin-plane actions but are comparatively weak and flexible when they transfer theforces by out-of-plane bending Thus the angle cleat and seat shown in Figure 93a

396 Joints

are flexible and allow the relative rotation of the joint members while the flangeplates and web stiffeners (Figure 93c) are stiff and restrict the relative rotation

The simplicity of welded joints and their comparative rigidity has often resultedin the omission of stiffening plates when they are not required for strength purposesThus the rigid joint of Figure 93c can be greatly simplified by butt welding thebeam directly onto the column flange and by omitting the column web stiffenersHowever this omission will make the joint more flexible since local distortionsof the column flange and web will no longer be prevented

93 Arrangement of joints

931 Joints for force transmission

In many cases a joint is only required to transmit a force and there is nomoment acting on the group of connectors While the joint may be capable ofalso transmitting a moment it will be referred to as a force joint

Force joints are generally of two types For the first the force acts in the con-nection plane formed by the interface between the two plates connected and theconnectors between these plates act in shear as in Figure 91a For the secondtype the force acts out of the connection plane and the connectors act in tensionas in Figure 91c

Examples of force joints include splices in tension and compression memberstruss joints and shear splices and joints in beams A simple shear and bearingbolted tension member splice is shown in Figure 91a and a friction-grip boltedsplice in Figure 91b These are simpler than the tension bolt joint of Figure 91cand are typical of site joints

Ordinary structural and high-strength bolts are used in clearance holes (often2 or 3 mm oversize to provide erection tolerances) as shown in Figure 91a Thehole clearances lead to slip under service loading and when this is undesirable apreloaded friction-grip joint such as that shown in Figure 91b may be used In thisjoint the transverse clamping action produced by preloading the high-strengthbolts allows high frictional resistances to develop and transfer the longitudinalforce Preloaded friction-grip joints are often used to make site joints which needto be comparatively rigid

The butt and fillet welded splices of Figure 92a and c are typical of shop jointsand are of high rigidity While they are often simpler to manufacture under shopconditions than the corresponding bolted joints of Figure 91 special care mayneed to be taken during welding if these are critical joints

The truss joint shown in Figure 94b uses a gusset plate in order to providesufficient room for the bolts The use of a gusset plate is avoided in the joint ofFigure 94a while end plates are used in the joint of Figure 94c to facilitate thefield-bolted connection of shop-welded assemblies

The beam web shear splice of Figure 95a shows a typical shop-welded andsite-bolted arrangement The common simple joint between a beam and columnshown in Figure 93a is often considered to transmit only shear from the beam to

Joints 397

Stiffener

Tees

Bearing plate

Buttweld

(a) Butt welded jointbetween tees

Tee

Fillet welds Bolts

BoltsAngles

Double angles

Gusset plate

(b) Bolted joint withdouble angles

(c) Welded and bolted joint

Figure 94 Joints between axially loaded members

V

V

VMM M

V

M

Web plates

Bolts BoltsFillet welds Butt welds

(a) Shear splice (b) Moment splice (c) Shear and moment splice

Flange plate

Figure 95 Beam splices

the column flange Other examples of joints of this type are shown by the beam-to-beam joints of Figure 96a and b Common arrangements of beam splices aregiven in [2ndash9] and discussed in Sections 958 and 959

932 Joints for moment transmission

While it is rare that a real joint transmits only a moment it is not uncommon that theforce transmitted by the joint is sufficiently small for it to be neglected in designExamples of joints which may be used when the force to be transmitted is negligibleinclude the beam moment splice shown in Figure 95b which combines site-boltingwith shop-welding and the welded moment joint of Figure 96c A moment joint isoften capable of transmitting moderate forces as in the case of the beam-to-columnjoint shown in Figure 93c

933 Force and moment joints

A force and moment joint is required to transmit both force and moment asin the beam-to-column joint shown in Figure 97 Other examples include the

398 Joints

(a) Shear connectionto web

(b) Shear connectionto flange

(c) Moment joint

End plate connectedwith fillet welds Web stiffener Butt welds

Bolts Bolts

Figure 96 Joints between beams

e

Q Q

M = Qe

+

Figure 97 Analysis of a force and moment joint

semi-rigid beam-to-column connection of Figure 93b the full-strength beamsplice of Figure 95c and the beam joint of Figure 96c Common beam-to-columnjoints are given in [2ndash11] and are discussed in Section 95

In some instances joints may actually transfer forces or moments which arenot intended by the designer For example the cleats shown in Figure 93a maytransfer some horizontal forces to the column even though the beam is designedas if simply supported while a similar situation occurs in the shear splice shownin Figure 95a

94 Behaviour of joints

941 Joints for force transmission

When shear and bearing bolts in clearance holes are used in an in-plane force jointthere is an initial slip when the shear is first applied to the joint as some of theclearances are taken up (Figure 98) The joint then becomes increasingly stiff as

Joints 399

Preloaded friction-grip joint

High-strength boltsin clearance holes

Close tolerance boltsin fitted holes

Ordinary structural boltsin clearance holes

Jointforce

Slip load

Initial slip

Joint deformation

Figure 98 Behaviour of bolted joints

more of the bolts come into play At higher forces the more highly loaded boltsstart to yield and the joint becomes less stiff Later a state may be reached inwhich each bolt is loaded to its maximum capacity

It is not usual to analyse this complex behaviour and instead it is commonlyassumed that equal size bolts share equally in transferring the force as shown inFigure 99b (except if the joint is long) even in the service load range It is shownin Section 991 that this is the case if there are no clearances and all the boltsfit perfectly and if the members and connection plates act rigidly and the boltselastically If however the flexibilities of the joint component members and platesare taken into account then it is found that the forces transferred are highest inthe end bolts of any line of bolts parallel to the joint force and lowest in the centrebolts as shown in Figure 99c In long bolted joints the end bolt forces may beso high as to lead to premature failure (before these forces can be redistributed byplastic action) and the subsequent lsquounbuttoningrsquo of the joint

Shear and bearing joints using close tolerance bolts in fitted holes behave in asimilar manner to connections with clearance holes except that the bolt slips aregreatly reduced (It was noted earlier that fitted close tolerance bolts are now rarelyused) On the other hand slip is not reduced in preloaded friction-grip bolted shearjoints but is postponed until the frictional resistance is overcome at the slip loadas shown in Figure 98 Again it is commonly assumed that equal size bolts shareequally in transferring the force

This equal sharing of the force transfer is also often assumed for tension forcejoints in which the applied force acts out of the connection plane It is shown inSection 992 that this is the case for joints in which the plates act rigidly and thebolts act elastically

Welded force joints do not slip but behave as if almost rigid Welds are oftenassumed to be uniformly stressed whether loaded transversely or longitudinallyHowever there may be significantly higher stresses at the ends of long weldsparallel to the joint just as there are in the case of long bolted joints

400 Joints

Q

Q

Qn Qn

n connectors

(a) Shear joint (b) Assumed shear (c) Actual sheardistribution distribution(rigid plates) (elastic plates)

Figure 99 Shear distribution in a force connection

Due to the great differences in the stiffnesses of joints using different types ofconnectors it is usual not to allow the joint force to be shared between slip andnon-slip connectors and instead the non-slip connectors are required to transferall the force For example when ordinary site-bolting is used to hold two membersin place at a joint which is subsequently site welded the bolts are designed forthe erection conditions only while the welds are designed for the final total forceHowever it is rational and generally permissible to share the joint force betweenwelds and preloaded friction-grip bolts which are designed against slip and thisis allowed in EC3-1-8 [1]

On the other hand it is always satisfactory to use one type of connector totransfer the complete force at one part of a joint and a different type at anotherpart Examples of this are shown in Figure 95a and b where shop welds are usedto join each connection plate to one member and field bolts to join it to the other

942 Joints for moment transmission

9421 General

Although a real connection is rarely required to transmit only a moment thebehaviour of a moment joint may usefully be discussed as an introduction to theconsideration of joints which transmit both force and moment and to the componentmethod of joint design used in EC3-1-8 [1]

The idealised behaviour of a moment joint is shown in Figure 910 which ignoresany initial slip or taking up of clearances The characteristics of the joint are thedesign moment resistance MjRd the design rotational stiffness Sj and the rotationcapacity φCd These characteristics are related to those of the individual compo-nents of the joint For most joints it is difficult to determine their moment-rotation

Joints 401

Joint rotation fj

Join

t mom

ent M

j

MjRd

Stiffness Sj

MjEd

Initial stiffness Sjini

fCd

Figure 910 Characteristics of a moment joint

characteristics theoretically owing to the uncertainties in modelling the variouscomponents of the joint even though a significant body of experimental data isavailable

EC3-1-8 uses a component method of moment joint design in which the charac-teristics of a joint can be determined from the properties of its basic componentsincluding the fasteners or connectors beam end plates acting in bending col-umn web panels in shear (Section 43) or column webs in transverse compressioncaused by bearing (Section 46) The use of this method for moment joints betweenI-section members is given in Section 6 of EC3-1-8 and discussed in the followingsubsections while the method for moment joints between hollow section membersis given in Section 7 of EC3-1-8

9422 Design moment resistance

Each component of a joint must have sufficient resistance to transmit the actionsacting on it Thus the design moment resistance of the joint is governed by thecomponent which has the highest value of its design action to resistance It istherefore necessary to analyse the joint under its design moment to determine thedistribution of the design actions on the joint components

Joints where the moment acts in the plane of the connectors (as in Figure 911a)so that the moment is transferred by connector shear are often analysed elastically[12] by assuming that all the connectors fit perfectly and that each plate actsas if rigid so that the relative rotation between them is δθ x In this case eachconnector transfers a shear force Vvi from one plate to the other This shear forceacts perpendicular to the radius ri to the axis of rotation and is proportional to therelative displacement riδθ x of the two plates at the connector whence

Vvi = kvAiriδθx (91)

where Ai is the shear area of the connector and the constant kv depends on the shearstiffness of that type of connector It is shown in Section 991 by considering the

402 Joints

y

y

z

z

V

V

M

Vvi

Ai(yi zi)

ri

(yr zr)

(yr zr)

z

y

x

My

Mz

Ai

Nx

(yi zi)

Nxi

Centre of rotation

Centre ofrotation

Typical connector Connection plane

(a) In-plane joint (b) Out-of-plane joint

x

Typicalconnector

δ13x

δ13y

δ13x

Figure 911 Joint forces

equilibrium of the connector forces Vvi that the axis of rotation lies at the centroidof the connector group The moment exerted by the connector force is Vviri andso the total moment Mx is given by

Mx = kvδθx

sumi

Air2i (92)

If this is substituted into equation 91 the connector force can be evaluated as

Vvi = MxAirisumi

Air2i

(93)

However the real behaviour of in-plane moment joints is likely to be somewhatdifferent just as it is for the force joints discussed in Section 941 This differenceis due to the flexibility of the plates the inelastic behaviour of the connectors athigher moments and the slip due to the clearances between any bolts and theirholes

Welded moment joints may be analysed by making the same assumptions asfor bolted joints [12] Thus equations 92 and 93 may be used with the weld sizesubstituted for the bolt area and the summations replaced by integrals along theweld

The simplifying assumptions of elastic connectors and rigid plates are sometimesalso made for joints with moments acting normal to the plane of the connectorsas shown in Figure 912b It is shown in Section 992 that the connector tension

Joints 403

Beam

MEd

VEd

NEd

Supportingmember

Beam

MEd

VEd

NEd

End plate

(a) Welded joint (b) Bolted end plate

Supportingmember

Figure 912 Common rigid end joints

forces Nxi can be determined from

Nxi = MyAizisumAiz2

i

minus MzAiyisumAiy2

i

(94)

in which yi zi are the principal axis coordinates of the connector measured fromthe centroid of the connector group

This result implies that the compression forces are transmitted only by the con-nectors but in real bolted joints these are transmitted primarily through thoseportions of the connection plates which remain in contact Thus the connectortension forces determined from equation 94 will be inaccurate when there is a sig-nificant difference between the centroid of the contact area and that of the assumedcompression connectors Clause 627 of EC3-1-8 [1] corrects this defect by defin-ing the centres of compression for a number of bolted beam-column joints andby requiring the lever arms used in determining the bolt tensions to be measuredfrom these centres

The result of equation 94 is also defective when prying forces are introducedby flexure of any T-stubs (real or idealised) used to transfer bolt tensions asshown in Figure 913 [13ndash15] This shows two T-stubs connected through theirflanges (or tables) by rows of bolts which are used to model the tension zone ofbolted joints in Clause 624 of EC3-1-8 Isolating a T-stub simplifies the analysisof a joint For example the prying forces in the joint in Figure 913b that areproduced by flexure of the flange of the T-stub and which must be included in thetensile action NtEd on the bolt can be determined from bending theory (Chapter 5)Examples of tension zones which include idealised T-stub assemblies are shownin Figures 912 and 914

404 Joints

(a) Bolted T-stub assembly (b) Prying action

Applied force Applied force

Pryingforce

Pryingforce Bolt forces

Figure 913 T-stub elements

(a) Angle seat (b) Flexible end plate (c) Angle cleat

Supportingmember

Angle seat End plate

Beam Beam Beam

Top cleat Angle cleat

REdREd

REd

Supportingmember

Supportingmember

Figure 914 Common flexible end joints

9423 Design moment stiffness

Joints need to be classified for frame analysis purposes (Chapter 8) as being eithereffectively pinned (low moment stiffness) semi-rigid or effectively rigid (high-moment stiffness) When a joint cannot be assumed to be either effectively pinnedor rigid then its moment stiffness needs to be determined so that it can be classifiedIf a frame is to be analysed as if semi-rigid (Section 833) then the momentstiffnesses of its semi-rigid joints need to be used in the analysis

In the component method used in Clause 63 of EC3-1-8 [1] the moment stiff-ness of a joint is determined from the inverse of the sum of the flexibilities of thecomponents used at each link in the chain of force transfer through the joint Thusthe flexibilities of any plate or cleat components used must be included with thoseof the fasteners Plates are comparatively stiff (and often assumed to be rigid)when loaded in their planes but are comparatively flexible when bent out of theirplanes In general the overall behaviour of a joint can be assessed by determiningthe path by which force is transferred through the joint and by synthesising theresponses of all the components to their individual loads

Joints 405

9424 Rotation capacity

When rigid plastic analysis is used in the design of a frame (Section 8537)each plastic hinge location must have sufficient rotation capacity to ensure thatthe plastic moment can be maintained until the collapse mechanism is developedClause 64 of EC3-1-8 [1] provides methods of determining whether joints betweenI-section members have sufficient rotation capacity

9425 Joint classification

The behaviour of a structure is influenced as much by the behaviour of its joints asby the behaviour of its individual members Flexural frames are therefore analysedas being simple semi-continuous or continuous (Section 831) depending on theresistance and stiffness classifications of their joints

Clause 523 of EC3-1-8 [1] classifies joints according to strength as beingnominally pinned of partial strength or of full strength A joint may be classifiedas full strength if its design moment resistance is not less than that of the connectedmembers A joint may be classified as nominally pinned if its design momentresistance is not greater than 025 times that required for a full strength jointprovided it has sufficient rotation capacity A joint which cannot be classified aseither nominally pinned or full strength is classified as partial strength

Clause 522 of EC3-1-8 classifies joints according to stiffness as being nomi-nally pinned semi-rigid or rigid Ajoint in a frame that is braced against significantsway may be classified as rigid if Sj ge 8EIbLb where EIb is the flexural rigidityof the beam connected and Lb is its length A joint may be classified as nom-inally pinned if Sj le 05EIbLb A joint which cannot be classified as eithernominally pinned or rigid is classified as semi-rigid

943 Force and moment joints

Joints which are required to transfer both force and moment may be analysedelastically by using the method of superposition as shown in Section 99 Thus theindividual bolt forces in the eccentrically loaded in-plane plate connections shownin Figure 97 can be determined as the vector sum of the components caused by aconcentric force Q and a moment Qe Similarly the individual connector forcesin a joint loaded out of its plane as shown in Figure 911b may be determinedfrom the sum of the forces due to the out-of-plane force Nx and the principal axismoments My and Mz in which the centre of compression is used to determine theconnector lever arms

The connector forces in joints subjected to combined loadings may be analysedelastically by using superposition to combine the separate effects of in-plane andout-of-plane loading

The following section provides simplified descriptions of the response ofcommon joints

406 Joints

95 Common joints

951 General

There are many different joint arrangements used for force and moment transmis-sion between members and supports depending on the actions which are to betransferred Fabrication and erection procedures may be simplified by standardis-ing a number of joints for the more frequently occurring situations Examples ofsome common joints are shown in Figures 912 and 914ndash917

Flexible joints for simple construction (for which any moment transfer can beneglected) are described in Sections 952ndash954 a semi-rigid joint in Section 955and rigid joints for continuous structures (which are able to transfer moment aswell as force) in Sections 956 and 957 Welded and bolted splices are describedin Sections 958 and 959 and seats and base plates in Sections 9510 and 9511respectively

Guidance on the arrangement and analysis of some of these joints is given in[2ndash11] while EC3-1-8 [1] provides extensive and detailed methods of analysis fora large number of joints by considering them as assemblies of basic componentswhose properties are known Worked examples of a web side plate (fin plate) and

Supportingmember

Web side plate (fin plate)

Beam

MEdVEd

Figure 915 Common semi-rigid end joint

MEd

VEd

NEdErection plate

used as abacking bar

MEd

VEd

NEdWebplate

Flange plate

(a) Butt welded splice (b) Bolted splice

Figure 916 Common splices

Joints 407

Load-bearingstiffener

Column

Base plate

Anchor boltsHolding-down bolts

Beam

Seating plate

REd VEd

NEd

(a) Beam seat (b) Column base plate

Figure 917 Common beam seat and column base plate arrangements

a flexible end plate connection designed in accordance with EC3-1-8 are given inSection 910

952 Angle seat joint

An angle seat joint (Figure 914a) transfers a beam reaction force REd to thesupporting member through the angle seat The top cleat is for lateral restraintonly and may be bolted either to the top of the web or to the top flange The angleseat may be bolted or fillet welded to the supporting member The joint has verylittle moment capacity and is classified as a nominally pinned joint It may beused for simple construction

The beam reaction is transferred by bearing shear and bending of the horizon-tal leg of the angle by vertical shear through the connectors and by horizontalforces in the connectors and between the vertical leg and the supporting member

In this joint the beam is designed for zero end moment and the supportingmember for the eccentric beam reaction The beam web may need to be stiffened toresist shear (Section 474) and bearing (Section 476) Although this joint is easilydesigned its use is often discouraged because of erection difficulties associatedwith the close depth tolerances required at the top and bottom of the beam

953 Flexible end plate joint

A flexible end plate joint (Figures 96a and 914b) also transfers a beam reactionREd to the supporting member The end plate is fillet welded to the beam weband bolted to the supporting member The flanges may be notched or coped ifrequired This joint also has very little moment capacity as there may be significantflexibility in the end plate and is classified as a nominally pinned joint It may beused for simple construction

408 Joints

The beam reaction is transferred by weld shear to the end plate by shear andbearing to the bolts and by shear and bearing to the supporting member In mod-elling this joint the idealised T-stub assembly consists of the end plate and thebeam web to which it is welded as one T-stub which is bolted to the column flangewhich with the column web forms the other T-stub

The beam is designed for zero end moment with the end plate augmenting theweb shear and bearing capacity while the supporting member is designed for theeccentric beam reaction

954 Angle cleat joint

An angle cleat joint (Figure 914c) also transfers a beam reaction REd to the sup-porting member One or two angle cleats may be used and bolted to the beam weband to the supporting member The flanges may be notched or coped if requiredThis joint also has very little moment capacity as there may be significant flex-ibility in the angle legs connected to the supporting member and in the boltedconnection to the beam web The joint is classified as a nominally pinned jointand may be used for simple construction

The beam reaction is transferred by shear and bearing from the web to theweb bolts and to the angle cleats These actions are transferred by the cleats tothe supporting member bolts and by these to the supporting member by sheartension and compression If two angle cleats are used the idealised T-stub assemblyconsists of the column flange and web as one T-stub and angle cleats bolted to thebeam web as the other T-stub

The beam is designed for zero end moment with the angles augmenting theweb shear and bearing capacity while the supporting member is designed for theeccentric beam reaction

955 Web side plate (fin plate) joint

A web side plate (fin plate) joint (Figure 915) transfers a beam reaction REd tothe supporting member and can also transfer a moment MEd The fin plate is filletwelded to the supporting member and bolted to the beam web The flanges may benotched or coped if required This joint has limited flexibility and is classified assemi-rigid It may be used for simple construction and also for semi-continuousconstruction provided that the degree of interaction between the members can beestablished

The beam reaction REd and moment MEd are transferred by shear through thebolts to the fin plate by in-plane bending and shear to the welds and by verticaland horizontal shear to the supporting member

The beam and the supporting member are designed for the reaction REd andmoment MEd

956 Welded moment joint

A fully welded moment joint (Figure 912a) transfers moment MEd axial forceNEd and shear VEd from one member to another The welds may be fillet or butt

Joints 409

welds and erection cleats may be used to facilitate field welding The concentratedflange forces resulting from the moment MEd and axial force NEd may require theother member in the joint to be stiffened (Section 45) in order to transfer theseforces When suitably stiffened such a joint acts as if rigid and may be used incontinuous construction

The shear VEd is transferred by shear through the welds from one member to theother The flange forces are transferred by tension through the flange welds andby compression to the other member while the web moment and the axial forceare transferred by tension through the web welds and by compression to the othermember

957 Bolted moment end plate joint

A bolted moment end plate (extended end plate) joint (Figure 912b) also transfersmoment MEd axial force NEd and shear VEd from one member to another The endplate is fillet welded to the web and flanges of one member and bolted to the othermember Concentrated flange forces may require the other member to be stiffenedin order to transfer these forces This joint is also classified as rigid although it isless stiff than a welded moment joint due to flexure of the end plate EC3-1-8 [1]allows bolted moment end plate joints to be used in continuous construction

The beam moment axial force and shear are transferred by tension through theflange and web welds and compression and by shear through the web welds tothe end plate by bending and shear through the end plate to the bolts and by boltshear and tension and by horizontal plate reaction to the other member

The bolt tensions are increased by prying actions resulting from bending of theend plate as in Figure 913 They can be determined by considering an analysis ofthe idealised T-stub assembly of the end plate and beam web and of the columnflange and web to which it is bolted These prying actions must be considered inthe design of bolts subjected to tension and are discussed in Section 962

958 Welded splice

A fully welded splice (Figure 916a) transfers moment MEd axial force NEd andshear VEd from one member to another concurrent member The flange welds arebutt welds while the web welds may be fillet welds and erection plates may beused to facilitate site welding A welded splice acts as a rigid joint between themembers and may be used in continuous construction

The shear VEd is transferred by shear through the welds The flange forcesresulting from the moment MEd and axial force NEd are transferred by tension orcompression through the flange welds while the web moment and the axial forceare transferred by tension or compression (or shear) through the web welds

959 Bolted splice

A fully bolted splice (Figure 916b) also transfers moment MEd axial force NEd and shear VEd from one member to another concurrent member Flange and web

410 Joints

plates may be provided on one or both sides This joint may be used in continuousconstruction

The moment axial force and shear are transferred from one member by bearingand shear through the bolts to the plates to the other bolts and then to the othermember The flange plates only transfer the flange axial force components of themoment MEd axial force NEd while the web plates transfer all of the shear VEd

together with the web components of MEd and NEd

9510 Beam seat

A beam seat (Figure 917a) transfers a beam reaction REd to its support A seatingplate may be fillet welded to the bottom flange to increase the support bearingarea while holding-down bolts provide positive connections to the support If aload-bearing stiffener is provided to increase the web bearing capacity then thiswill effectively prevent lateral deflection of the top flange (see Figure 619)

The beam reaction REd is transferred by bearing through the seating plate to thesupport

9511 Base plate

A base plate (Figure 917b) transfers a column axial force NEd and shear VEd toa support or a concrete foundation and may also transfer a moment MEd Thebase plate is fillet welded to the flanges and web of the column while the anchoror holding-down bolts provide connections to the support Pinned bases used insimple construction often use four anchor bolts and the flexibility of these and thebase plate limits the effective moment resistance

An axial compression NEd is transferred from the column by end bearing orweld shear to the base plate and then by plate bending shear and bearing to thesupport An axial tension force NEd is transferred from the column by weld shearto the base plate by plate bending and shear to the holding-down anchor boltsand then by bolt tension to the support The shear force VEd is transferred fromthe column by weld shear to the base plate and then by shear and bearing throughthe holding-down bolts to the support or by friction Specific guidance on thedesign of holding-down bolts is given in Clause 62612 of EC3-1-8 [1] whilemore general guidance on the design of base plates as idealised T-stub assembliesis given in Clause 62

96 Design of bolts

961 Bearing bolts in shear

The resistance Fv of a bolt in shear (Figure 91a) depends on the shear strengthof the bolt (of tensile strength fub) and the area A of the bolt in a particular shearplane (either the gross area or the tensile stress area through the threads As as

Joints 411

appropriate) It can be expressed in the form

Fv = αvfubA (95)

in which αv = 06 generally (except Grade 109 bolts when the shear plane passesthrough the threaded portion of the bolt in which case αv = 05) The factorαv = 06 is close to the theoretical yield value of τyfy asymp 0577 (Section 131)and the experimental value of 062 reported in [9]

EC3-1-8 [1] therefore requires the design shear force FvEd to be limited by

FvEd le FvRd = fub

γM2

sumn

αvnAn (96)

where γM2 = 125 is the partial factor for the connector resistance (150 for Grade46 bolts) n is the number of shear planes An and αvn are the appropriate valuesfor the nth shear plane It is common and conservative to determine the area An ata shear plane by substituting the tensile stress area As for the shank area A of thebolt

For bolts in long joints with a distance Lj between the end bolts in the joint theshear resistance of all bolts is reduced by using the factor

βLf = 1 minus Lj minus 15d

200d(97)

provided that 075 le βLf le 1 where d is the diameter of the bolt

962 Bolts in tension

The resistance of a bolt in tension (Figure 91c) depends on the tensile strengthfub of the bolt and the minimum cross-sectional area of the threaded length of thebolt The design force FtEd is limited by EC3-1-8 [1] to

FtEd le FtRd = 09fubAsγM2 (98)

where γM2 = 125 (150 for Grade 46 bolts) and As is the tensile stress area of thebolt The use of 09fub for the limit state of bolt fracture in addition to the partialfactor γM2 for the connector resistance reflects the reduced ductility at tensilefracture compared with shear failure

If any of the connecting plates is sufficiently flexible then additional pryingforces may be induced in the bolts as in Figure 913b However EC3-1-8 does notprovide specific guidance on how to determine the prying force in the bolt even inthe T-stub component based method of design Under some circumstances whichminimise plate flexure in a joint component so that the additional tensile forcescaused by prying are small it has been suggested that the prying forces need not

412 Joints

be calculated provided that FtRd is determined from

FtRd = 072fubAsγM2 (99)

which results from the insertion of a reduction factor of 08 into equation 98Some methods for determining prying forces in T-stub connections are given in[13ndash15]

963 Bearing bolts in shear and tension

Test results [9] for bearing bolts in shear and tension suggest a circular interactionrelationship (Figure 918) for the strength limit state EC3-1-8 [1] uses a moreconservative interaction between shear and tension which can be expressed in theform of equations 96 98 and

FvEd

FvRd+ FtEd

14FtRdle 1 (910)

where FvRd is the shear resistance when there is no tension and FtRd is the tensionresistance when there is no shear

964 Bolts in bearing

It is now commonly the case that bolt materials are of much higher strengths thanthose of the steel plates or elements through which the bolts pass As a result of

Circular [9]

0 02 04 06 08 10

10

08

06

04

02

0

Shear ratio FvEdFvRd

Ten

sion

rat

io F

t EdF

t Rd

Equation 910

Figure 918 Bearing bolts in shear and tension

Joints 413

this bearing failure usually takes place in the plate material rather than in the boltThe design of plates against bearing failure is discussed in Section 972

For the situation in which bearing failure occurs in the bolt rather than the plateEC3-1-8 [1] requires the design bearing force FbEd on a bolt whose ultimate tensilestrength fub is less than that of the plate material fu to be limited to

FbEd le FbRd = fubdt

γM2(911)

in which γM2 = 125 (150 for Grade 46 bolts) t is the thickness of the connectedelement and d is the diameter of the bolt Equation 911 ignores the enhancementof the bearing strength caused by the triaxial stress state that exists in the bearingarea of the bolt but it seldom governs except for very high-strength plates

965 Preloaded friction-grip bolts

9651 Design against bearing

High-strength bolts may be used as bearing bolts or as preloaded bolts in friction-grip joints (Figure 91b) which are designed against joint slip under service orfactored loads When high-strength bolts are used as bearing bolts they should bedesigned as discussed in Sections 961ndash964

9652 Design against slip

For design against slip in a friction-grip joint for either serviceability or at ultimateloading the shear force on a preloaded bolt FvEdser or FvEd determined from theappropriate loads must satisfy

FvEd le FsRd = nksmicroFpCγM3 (912)

in which γM3 = 125 for ultimate loading (for serviceability γM3ser = 11) n isthe number of friction surfaces ks is a coefficient given in Table 36 of EC3-1-8[1] which allows for the shape and size of the hole micro is a slip factor given inTable 37 of EC3-1-8 and the preload FpC is taken as

FpC = 07fubAs (913)

When the joint loading induces bolt tensions these tend to reduce the frictionclamping forces EC3-1-8 requires the shear serviceability or ultimate design loadFvEdser or FvEd to satisfy

FvEd le FsRd = nksmicro(FpC minus 08FtEd

)γM3 (914)

in which FtEdser or FtEd is the total applied tension at service loading or ultimateloading including any prying forces and the slip resistance partial safety factoris γM3 = 11 for service loading and 125 for ultimate loading

414 Joints

97 Design of bolted plates

971 General

Aconnection plate used in a joint is required to transfer actions which may act in theplane of the plate or out of it These actions include axial tension and compressionforces shear forces and bending moments and may include components inducedby prying actions The presence of bolt holes often weakens the plate and failuremay occur very locally by the bearing of a bolt on the surface of the bolt holethrough the plate (punching shear) or in an overall mode along a path whoseposition is determined by the positions of several holes and the actions transferredby the plate such as that considered in Section 223 for staggered connectors intension members

Generally the proportions of the plates should be such as to ensure that thereare no instability effects in which case it will be conservative for the strengthlimit state to design against general yield and satisfactory to design against localfracture

The actual failure stress distributions in bolted connection plates are both uncer-tain and complicated When design is to be based on general yielding it is logicalto take advantage of the ductility of the steel and to use a simple plastic analysisA combined yield criterion such as

σ 2y + σ 2

z minus σyσz + 3τ 2yz le f 2

y (915)

(Section 131) may then be used in which σ y and σ z are the design normal stressesand τ yz is the design shear stress

When design is based on local fracture an elastic analysis may be made of thestress distribution Often approximate bending and shear stresses may be deter-mined by elastic beam theory (Chapter 5) The failure criterion should then betested at all potentially critical locations

972 Bearing and tension

Bearing failure of a plate may occur where a bolt bears against part of the surfaceof the bolt hole through the plate as shown in Figure 919a After local yieldingthe plate material flows plastically increasing the circumference and thickness ofthe bearing area and redistributing the contact force exerted by the bolt

EC3-1-8 [1] requires the plate-bearing force FbEd due to the design loads to belimited by

FbEd le FbRd = k1αd fudtγM2 (916)

in which fu is the ultimate tensile strength of the plate material d is the boltdiameter t is the plate thickness and γM2 = 125 is the partial factor for connectorresistance (150 for Grade 46 bolts)

Joints 415

The coefficient αd in equation 916 is associated with plate tear-out by shearingin the direction of load transfer commonly when the bolt is close to the end of aplate as shown in Figure 919b In this case EC3-1-8 requires αd to be determinedfrom

αd = e1

3d0le 1 (917)

for an end bolt or from

αd = p1

3d0minus 025 le 1 (918)

for internal bolts if these bolts are closely spaced in which d0 is the bolt diameterand the dimensions e1 and p1 are shown in Figure 27

The coefficient k1 in equation 916 is associated with tension fracture perpen-dicular to the direction of load transfer commonly when the bolt is close to anedge as shown in Figure 919e Hence EC3-1-8 uses

k1 = 28e2d0 minus 17 le 25 (919)

if the bolts are at the edge of the plate and

k1 = 14p2d0 minus 17 le 25 (920)

for internal bolts where p2 is the distance between rows of holes (p in Figure 25)

(a) Bearing (b) End shear (c) Shearing between holes

(d) Tension (e) Bending (f) Tension and bending

Boltforce

Boltforce

Boltforce

Boltforces

Boltforces

Boltforce

Plastic flow Failure path Failure path

Platestresses

Platestresses

Platestresses

Fracture plane Fracture Fracture

T

T T T

C C

Figure 919 Bolted plates in bearing shear tension or bending

416 Joints

Tension failure may be caused by tension actions as shown in Figure 919dTension failures of tension members are treated in Section 22 and it is logical toapply the EC3 tension members method discussed in Section 262 to the designof plates in tension However there are no specific limits given in EC3-1-8

973 Shear and tension

Plate sections may be subjected to simultaneous normal and shear stress as inthe case of the splice plates shown in Figure 920a and b These may be designedconservatively against general yield by using the shear and bending stresses deter-mined by elastic analyses of the gross cross-section in the combined yield criterionof equation 915 and against fracture by using the stresses determined by elasticanalyses of the net section in an ultimate strength version of equation 915

Block failure may occur in some connection plates as shown in Figure 920cand d In these failures it may be assumed that the total resistance is provided partlyby the tensile resistance across one section of the failure path and partly by theshear resistance along another section of the failure path This assumption impliesconsiderable redistribution from the elastic stress distribution which is likely tobe very non-uniform Hence EC3-1-8 [1] limits the block-tearing resistance forsituations of concentric loading such as in Figure 920c to

NEd le Veff 1Rd = fuAntγM2 +(

fyradic

3)

AnvγM0 (921)

in which Ant and Anv are the net areas subjected to tension and shear respectivelyfy

radic3 is the yield stress of the plate in shear (Section 13) γM0 = 10 is the partial

(a) Shear and bending

Boltforces

Platestresses

(b) Tension and bending

Bolt forces

Plate stresses

Failurepath

Failurepath

Boltforces

T

C

T

Boltforces

(c) Block tearing in plate (d) Block tearing in coped beam

Figure 920 Bolted plates in shear and tension

Joints 417

factor for plate resistance to yield and γM2 = 11 is the partial factor for fractureEquation 921 corresponds to an elastic analysis of the net section subjected touniform shear and tensile stresses

For situations of eccentric loading such as in Figure 920d the block-tearingresistance is limited to

NEd le Veff 2Rd = 05fuAntγM2 +(

fyradic

3)

AnvγM0 (922)

which corresponds to an elastic analysis of the net section subjected to a uniformshear stress and a triangularly varying tensile stress

98 Design of welds

981 Full penetration butt welds

Full penetration butt welds are so made that their thicknesses and widths are notless than the corresponding lesser values for the elements joined When the weldmetal is of higher strength than those of the elements joined (and this is usuallythe case) the static capacity of the weld is greater than those of the elementsjoined Hence the design is controlled by these elements and there are no designprocedures required for the weld EC3-1-8 [1] requires butt welds to have equalor superior properties to those of the elements joined so that the design resistanceis taken as the weaker of the parts connected

Partial penetration butt welds have effective (throat) thicknesses which are lessthan those of the elements joined EC3-1-8 requires partial penetration butt weldsto be designed as deep-penetration fillet welds

982 Fillet welds

Each of the fillet welds connecting the two plates shown in Figure 921 is of lengthL and the throat thickness a of the weld is inclined at α = tanminus1(s2s1) Eachweld transfers a longitudinal shear VL and transverse forces or shears VTy and VTz

between the plates The average normal and shear stresses σw and τw on the weldthroat may be expressed in terms of the forces

σwLa = VTy sin α + VTz cosα (923)

τwLa = radic [(VTy cosα minus VTz sin α

) 2 + V 2L

] (924)

In addition to these stresses there are local stresses in the weld arising frombending effects shear lag and stress concentrations together with longitudinalnormal stresses induced by compatibility between the weld and each plate

It is customary to assume that the static strength of the weld is determined bythe average throat stresses σw and τw alone and that the ultimate strength of the

418 Joints

s2

VTz2

VTy2

VTy2

VL2

VL2

s1

a

Law

Law

VLVTz

L

(a) Connection (b) Part weld

Throat

VTz2

VTy

Figure 921 Fillet welded joint

weld is reached when

radic(σ 2

w + 3τ 2w

) = fuw (925)

in which fuw is the ultimate tensile strength of the weld which is assumed to begreater than that of the plate This equation is similar to equation 11 used in Section131 to express the distortion energy theory for yield under combined stressesSubstituting equations 923 and 924 into equation 925 and rearranging leads to

3(

V 2Ty + V 2

Tz + V 2L

)minus 2

(VTy sin α + VTz cosα

) 2 = (fuwLa) 2 (926)

This is often simplified conservatively to

VR

La= fuwradic

3(927)

in which VR is the vector resultant

VR =radic(

V 2Ty + V 2

Tz + V 2L

)(928)

of the applied forces VTy VTz and VLIn the simple design method of EC3-1-8 [1] based on equations 927 and 928

the design weld forces FTyEd FTzEd and FLEd per unit length due to the factored

Joints 419

loads are limited by

FwEd le FwRd (929)

where FwEd is the resultant of all of the forces transmitted by the weld per unitlength given by

FwEd =radic(

F2TyEd + F2

TzEd + F2LEd

)(930)

and

FwRd = fvwda (931a)

is the design weld resistance per unit length in which

fvwd = furadic

3

βw γM2(931b)

is the design shear strength of the weld fu is the ultimate tensile strength of theplate which is less than that of the weld βw is a correlation factor for the steeltype between 08 and 10 given in Table 41 of EC3-1-8 and γM2 = 125 is theconnector resistance partial safety factor

EC3-1-8 also provides a less conservative directional method which is based onequations 923 to 925 and which makes some allowance for the dependence ofthe weld strength on the direction of loading by assuming that the normal stressparallel to the axis of the weld throat does not influence the design resistance Forthis method the normal stress perpendicular to the throat σperp is determined fromequation 923 as

σperpa = FTyEd sin α + FTzEd cosα (932)

the shear stress perpendicular to the throat τperp from equation 924 as

τperpa = FTyEd cosα minus FTzEd sin α (933)

and the shear stress parallel to the throat τ || from equation 924 as

τ||a = FLEd (934)

The stresses in equations 932 to 934 are then required to satisfyradic[σ 2perp + 3

(τ 2perp + τ 2||

)]le fuβwγM2

(935)

and

σperp le 09fuγM2 (936)

where γM2 = 125 and βw is the correlation factor used in equation 931b

420 Joints

99 Appendix ndash elastic analysis of joints

991 In-plane joints

The in-plane joint shown in Figure 911a is subjected to a moment Mx and to forcesVy Vz acting through the centroid of the connector group (which may consist ofbolts or welds) defined by (see Section 59)

sumAiyi = 0sumAizi = 0

(937)

in which Ai is the area of the ith connector and yi zi its coordinatesIt is assumed that the joint undergoes a rigid body relative rotation δθ x between

its plate components about a point whose coordinates are yr zr If the plate com-ponents are rigid and the connectors elastic then it may be assumed that eachconnector transfers a force Vvi which acts perpendicular to the line ri to the centreof rotation (Figure 911a) and which is proportional to the distance ri so that

Vvi = kvAiriδθx (91)

in which kv is a constant which depends on the elastic shear stiffness of theconnector

The centroidal force resultants Vy Vz of the connector forces are

Vy = minusVvi (zi minus zr)ri = kvδθxzrAi

Vz = Vvi (yi minus yr)ri = minuskvδθxyrAi (938)

after using equations 937 and 91 The moment resultant Mx of the connectorforces about the centroid is

Mx = Vvi(zi minus zr) ziri +Vvi(yi minus yr) yiri

whence

Mx = kvδθx

sumAi

(y2

i + z2i

) (939)

after using equations 937 and 91 This can be used to eliminate kvδθ x fromequations 938 and these can then be rearranged to find the coordinates of thecentre of rotation as

yr = minusVzsum

Ai(y2

i + z2i

)Mx

sumAi

(940)

zr = Vysum

Ai(y2

i + z2i

)Mx

sumAi

(941)

Joints 421

The term kvδθ x can also be eliminated from equation 91 by using equation 939so that the connector force can be expressed as

Vvi = MxAirisumAi

(y2

i + z2i

) (942)

Thus the greatest connector shear stress VviAi occurs at the connector at thegreatest distance ri from the centre of rotation yr zr

When there are n bolts of equal area these equations simplify to

yr = minusVzsum(

y2i + z2

i

)nMx

(940a)

zr = Vysum(

y2i + z2

i

)nMx

(941a)

Vvi = Mxrisum(y2

i + z2i

) (942a)

When the connectors are welds the summations in equations 940ndash942 shouldbe replaced by integrals so that

yr = minusVz(Iy + Iz

)MxA

(940b)

zr = Vy(Iy + Iz

)MxA

and (941b)

τw = Mxr(Iy + Iz

) (942b)

in which A is the area of the weld group given by the sum of the products of theweld lengths L and throat thicknesses a Iy and Iz are the second moments of areaof the weld group about its centroid and r is the distance to the weld where theshear stress is τw The properties of some specific weld groups are given in [5]

In the special case of a moment joint with Vy Vz equal to zero the centre ofrotation is at the centroid of the connector group (equations 941 and 942) andthe connector forces are given by

Vvi = MxAirisumi

Air2i

(93)

with ri = radic(y2

i + z2i ) In the special case of a force joint with Mx Vz equal to zero

the centre of rotation is at zr = infin and the connector forces are given by

Vvi = VyAisumAi

(943)

422 Joints

In the special case of a force joint with Mx Vy equal to zero the centre of rotationis at yr = minusinfin and the connector forces are given by

Vvi = VzAisumAi

(944)

Equations 943 and 944 indicate that the connector stresses VviAi caused byforces Vy Vz are constant throughout the joint

It can be shown that the superposition by vector addition of the components ofVvi obtained from equations 93 943 and 944 for the separate connection actionsof Vy Vz and Mx leads to the general result given in equation 942

992 Out-of-plane joints

The out-of-plane joint shown in Figure 911b is subjected to a normal force Nx

and moments My Mz acting about the principal axes y z of the connector group(which may consist of bolts or welds) defined by (Section 59)sum

Aiyi = 0sumAizi = 0sumAiyizi = 0

(945)

in which Ai is the area of the ith connector and yi zi are its coordinatesIt is assumed that the plate components of the joint undergo rigid body relative

rotations δθ y δθ z about axes which are parallel to the y z principal axes and whichpass through a point whose coordinates are yr zr and that only the connectorstransfer forces If the plates are rigid and the connectors elastic then it may beassumed that each connector transfers a force Nxi which acts perpendicular tothe plane of the joint and which has components which are proportional to thedistances (yi minus yr) (zi minus zr) from the axes of rotation so that

Nxi = ktAi (zi minus zr) δθy minus ktAi (yi minus yr) δθz (946)

in which kt is a constant which depends on the axial stiffness of the connectorThe centroidal force resultant Nx of the connector forces is

Nx =sum

Nxi = kt(minuszrδθy + yrδθz

)sumAi (947)

after using equations 945 The moment resultants My Mz of the connector forcesabout the centroidal axes are

My =sum

Nxizi = ktδθyAiz2i (948)

Mz = minussum

Nxiyi = ktδθzAiy2i (949)

after using equations 946

Joints 423

Equations 947ndash949 can be used to eliminate kt δθ y δθ z yr zr from equation946 which then becomes

Nxi = NxAisumAi

+ MyAizisumAiz2

i

minus MzAiyisumAiy2

i

(950)

This result demonstrates that the connector force can be obtained by super-position of the separate components due to the centroidal force Nx and the prin-cipal axis moments My Mz When there are n bolts of equal area this equationsimplifies to

Nxi = Nx

n+ Myzisum

z2i

minus Mzyisumy2

i

(950a)

When the connectors are welds the summations in equation 947 should bereplaced by integrals so that

σw = Nx

A+ Myz

Iyminus Mzy

Iz(950b)

in which y z are the coordinates of the weld where the stress is σwThe assumption that only the connectors transfer compression forces through

the connection may be unrealistic when portions of the plates remain in contactIn this case the analysis above may still be used provided that the values Ai yizi used for the compression regions represent the actual contact areas between theplates

910 Worked examples

9101 Example 1 ndash in-plane analysis of a bolt group

Problem The semi-rigid web side plate (fin plate) joint shown in Figure 922a is totransmit factored design actions equivalent to a vertical downwards force of Q kNacting at the centroid of the bolt group and a clockwise moment of 02Q kNmDetermine the maximum bolt shear force

SolutionFor the bolt group(y2

i +z2i ) = 4times(702+1052)+4times(702+352) = 88 200 mm2

Using equation 940 yr = minusQ times 103 times 88 200

minus02Q times 106 times 8= 551 mm

and so the most heavily loaded bolts are at the top and bottom of the right-handrow

For these ri = radic(551 + 70)2 + 1052 = 1633 mmand the maximum bolt force may be obtained from equation 93 as

FvEd = minus02Q times 106

88200N = minus0370 Q kN

424 Joints

t = 8 mm

fy = 355 Nmm2

fu = 510 Nmm2

t =10 mm

fy =355 Nmm2

fu

65

35

70

70

70

35

25 30 140 55

35

70

70

70

35

All bolts are Grade 8820 mm diameter in 22 mmholes with threads in theshear plane

86

(a) Semi-rigid web fin plate joint (b) Flexible end plate joint

30 90 30

= 510 Nmm2

Figure 922 Examples 1ndash9

9102 Example 2 ndash in-plane design resistance of a bolt group

Problem Determine the design resistance of the bolt group in the web fin platejoint shown in Figure 922a

Solution For 20 mm Grade 88 bolts As = At = 245 mm2

αv = 06 EC3-1-8 T34

fub = 800 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 T31

and so

FvRd = 06 times 800 times 245

125N = 941 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the solution of example 1

0370 Q le 941 so that Qv le 2540

9103 Example 3 ndash plate-bearing resistance

Problem Determine the bearing resistance of the web fin plate shown inFigure 922a

Joints 425

Solution

αd = 35(3 times 22) = 0530 fubfu = 800510 = 1569 gt 0530EC3-1-8 T34

and so

αb = 0530 EC3-1-8 T34

28e2d0 minus 17 = 28 times 5522 minus 17 = 53 gt 25 and so k1 = 25EC3-1-8 T34

FbRd = 25 times 0530 times 510 times 20 times 1011 N = 1229 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the solution of example 1 Qb le 12290370 = 3319 gt

2540(ge Qv)

9104 Example 4 ndash plate shear and tension resistance

Problem Determine the shear and tension resistance of the web fin plate shownin Figure 922a

Solution If the yield criterion of equation 915 is used with the elastic stresseson the gross cross-section of the plate then the elastic bending stress may bedetermined using an elastic section modulus of bd26 so that

σy = 02 Q times 106 times 6(10 times 2802) Nmm2 = 1531 Q Nmm2

and the average shear stress is

τyz = Q times 103(280 times 10) Nmm2 = 0357 Q Nmm2

Substituting into equation 915 (1531 Q)2 + 3 times (0357Q)2 le 3552

so that Qvty le 2150 lt 2540(ge Qv)

If the equivalent fracture criterion derived from equation 915 is used with theelastic stresses on the net cross-section of the plate then

Ip = 2803 times 1012 minus 2 times 22 times 10 times 1052 minus 2 times 22 times 10 times 352

= 1290 times 106 mm4

so that

Welp = 1290 times 106140 = 922 times 103mm3 and

σy = 02 Q times 106(922 times 103)Nmm2 = 2170 Q Nmm2

426 Joints

and the average shear stress is

τyz = Q times 103(280 minus 4 times 22)times 10 Nmm2 = 0521 Q Nmm2

Using the equivalent of equation 915 for fracture with fu = 510 Nmm2

(EN10025-2)

(2170 Q)2 + 3 times (0521 Q)2 le 5102

so that Qvtu le 2285 gt 2150(ge Qvty)However these calculations are conservative since the maximum bending

stresses occur at the top and bottom of the plate where the shear stresses are zeroIf the shear stresses are ignored then Qty le 3551531 = 2319 lt 2543(ge Qv)

and

Qtu le 5102170 = 2350gt 2319(ge Qty)

9105 Example 5 ndash fillet weld resistance

Problem Determine the resistance of the two fillet welds shown in Figure 922aWeld forces per unit lengthAt the welds the design actions consist of a vertical shear of Q kN and a moment of

(minus02 Q minus Q times (25 + 30 + 70)1000) kNm = minus0325 Q kNm

leff = 280 minus 2 times 8radic

2 = 2687 mm EC3-1-8 451(1)

The average shear force per unit weld length can be determined as

FLEd = (Q times 103)(2 times 2687)Nmm = 1861 Q Nmm

and the maximum bending force per unit weld length from equation 950b as

FTyEd = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872)

2 times 2687312Nmm = minus1351 Q Nmm

and using equation 930 the resultant of these forces is

FwEd = radic[(1861 Q)2 + (1351 Q)2] = 1363 Q Nmm

Simplified method of EC3-1-8

For Grade S355 steel βw = 09 EC3-1-8 T41

fvwd = 510radic

3

09 times 125= 2617 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 4533

FwRd = 2617 times (8radic

2) = 1481 Nmm EC3-1-8 4533

Hence 1363 Q le 1481

Joints 427

so that

Qw le 1086 lt 2319(ge Qty)

Directional method of EC3-1-8

Using equations 932ndash934

σperp = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872) sin 45o

2 times (2687312)times (8radic

2)= minus1688 Q Nmm2

τperp = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872) cos 45o

2 times (2687312)times (8radic

2)= minus1688 Q Nmm2

τ|| = Q times 103

2 times 2687 times (8radic

2)= 0329 Q Nmm2

The strength condition is

(minus1688 Q)2 + 3 times [(minus1688 Q)2 + (0329Q)2]05 le 510

09 times 125EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 1324 lt 2319(ge Qty)

and

1688Q le 09 times 510125 EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 2175 gt 1324

and so the joint resistance is governed by the shear and bending capacity of thewelds

9106 Example 6 ndash bolt slip

Problem If the bolts of the semi-rigid web fin plate joint shown in Figure 922aare preloaded then determine the value of Q at which the first bolt slip occurs ifthe joint is designed to be non-slip in service and the friction surface is Class B

428 Joints

Solution

FpC = 07 times 800 times 245 N = 1372 kN EC3-1-8 391(2)

ks = 10 EC3-1-8 T36

micro = 04 EC3-1-8 T37

γM3ser = 11 EC3-1-8 22(2)

FsRd = 10 times 04 times 137211 = 499 kN EC3-1-8 391(1)

and using the solution of example 1

QsL = 4990370 = 1347

9107 Example 7 ndash out-of-plane resistance of a bolt group

Problem The flexible end plate joint shown in Figure 922b is to transmit fac-tored design actions equivalent to a downwards force of Q kN acting at thecentroid of the bolt group and an out-of-plane moment of Mx = minus005 QkNm Determine the maximum bolt forces and the design resistance of the boltgroup

Bolt group analysis

z2i = 4 times 1052 + 4 times 352 mm2 = 49 000 mm2

and using equation 950a the maximum bolt tension is

FtEd = (minus005 Q times 106)times (minus35 minus 70)

49 000N = 0107 Q kN

(A less-conservative value of FtEd = 00824 Q kN is obtained if the centre ofcompression is assumed to be at the lowest pair of bolts so that the lever arm tothe highest pair of bolts is 175 mm)

The average bolt shear is FvEd = (Q times 103)8 N = 0125 Q kN

Plastic resistance of plate

If the web thickness is 88 mm

m = 902 minus 882 minus 08 times 6 = 358 mm EC3-1-8 F68

leff = 2 times 358 + 0625 times 30 + 35 = 1254 mm EC3-1-8 T64

Mpl1Rd = 025 times 1254 times 82 times 35510 Nmm = 0712 kNm EC3-1-8 T62

FT 1Rd = 4 times 0712 times 10630 N = 949 kN EC3-1-8 T62

and so FT 1Rd ge 2 times 0107 Q whence Qp le 4430 kN

Joints 429

Bolt resistanceAt plastic collapse of the plate the prying force causes a plastic hinge at the boltline so that the prying force = 0712 times 10630 N = 237 kN

Bolt tension = 0107 times 4430 + 237 = 706 kN

Using the solution of example 2 FvRd = 941 kNFor 20 mm Grade 88 bolts At = 245 mm2 and fub = 800 Nmm2

EC3-1-8 T31

FtRd = 09 times 800 times 245125 N = 1411 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Hence0125 times 4430

941+ 706

14 times 1411= 0946 lt 10 EC3-1-8 T31

and so the bolt resistance does not governThus Q le 4430

9108 Example 8 ndash plate-bearing resistance

Problem Determine the bearing resistance of the end plate of example 7 shownin Figure 922b

Solution

αd = 35(3 times 22) = 0530 fubfu = 800510 = 1569 gt 0530EC3-1-8 T34

and so αb = 0530 EC3-1-8 T34

k1 = 28 times 3022 = 382 gt 25 so that k1 = 25 EC3-1-8 T34

FbRd = 25 times 0530 times 510 times 20 times 811 N = 983 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the analysis solution of example 7 0125 Q le 983so that Qb le 7868 gt 4430 (ge Qp)

9109 Example 9 ndash fillet weld resistance

Problem Determine the resistance of the two fillet welds shown in Figure 922b

Solutionlw = 2687 mm and FLEd = 1861 Q Nmm as in example 5

430 Joints

The maximum bending force per unit weld length can be determined fromequation 950b as

FTyEd = (minus005 Q times 106)times (26872)

2 times 2687312= 2078 Q Nmm

Using equation 930 the resultant of these is

FwEd = radic[(1861 Q)2 + (2078 Q)2] = 2789 Q Nmm

For S355 Grade steel βw = 09 EC3-1-8 T41

fvwd = 510radic

3

09 times 125= 2617 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 4533

FwRd = 2617 times (6

radic2) = 1110 Nmm EC3-1-8 4533

Hence 2789 Q le 1110so that Qw le 3981 lt 4430 (ge Qp)

Using the directional method of EC3-1-8 with equations 932ndash934

σperp = (minus005 Qtimes106)times (26872) sin 45o

2 times (2687312)times (6radic

2)= minus0346 Q Nmm2

τperp = (minus005 Q times 106)times (26872) cos 45o

2 times (2687312)times (6radic

2)= minus0346 Q Nmm2

τ|| = Q times 103

2 times 2687 times (6radic

2)= 0439 Nmm2

The strength condition is

(minus0346 Q)2 + 3 times [(minus0346 Q)2 + (0439 Q)2]05 le 510

09 times 125EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 4410 lt 4430 (ge Qp)

and

0346 Q le 09 times 510125

so that

Qw le 1060 gt 4410

Thus the connection capacity is governed by the shear and bending resistanceof the welds

Joints 431

911 Unworked examples

9111 Example 10 ndash bolted joint

Arrange and design a bolted joint to transfer a design force of 800 kN from theinclined member to the truss joint shown in Figure 923a

9112 Example 11 ndash tension member splice

Arrange and design the tension member splice shown in Figure 923b so as tomaximise the tension resistance

9113 Example 12 ndash tension member welds

Proportion the weld lengths shown in Figure 923c to transfer the design tensionforce concentrically

9114 Example 13 ndash channel section bracket

Determine the design resistance Q of the fillet welded bracket shown inFigure 923d

9115 Example 14 ndash tee-section bracket

Design the fillet welds for the bracket shown in Figure 923e

Teebf = 209tf = 156d = 266tw = 102

bf tf = 152 94 d tw = 1575 66

(d) Channel column bracketfy = 275 Nmm2

fu = 430 Nmm2

FtEd = 800 kN

FtEd = 800 kN

2L100 100 10

(b) Tension member splice (c) Tension member welds

2L125 times 75 times 10

fy = 275 Nmm2

225 243 150

Q

380

(a) Bolted truss joint (e) Tee column bracket

282

718

152 152 UC 30

8

Q

f = 275 Nmmy2

f = 275 Nmmy2times

timestimes times times

times times

Figure 923 Examples 10ndash14

432 Joints

References

1 British Standards Institute (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash8Design of Joints BSI London

2 The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional Steelwork Associ-ation (2002) Joints in Steel Construction Simple Connections SCI and BCSAAscot

3 The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional Steelwork Associ-ation (1995) Joints in Steel Construction Moment Connections SCI and BCSAAscot

4 Jaspart JP Renkin S and Guillaume ML (2003) European Recommendations forthe Design of Simple Joints in Steel Structures University of Liegravege Liegravege

5 Faella C Piluso V and Rizzano G (2000) Structural Steel Semi-rigid ConnectionsCRC Press Boca Raton

6 Owens GW and Cheal BD (1989) Structural Steelwork Connections ButterworthsLondon

7 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2003) Steel Designerrsquos Manual 6th editionBlackwell Publishing Oxford

8 Morris LJ (1988) Connection design in the UK Steel Beam-to-Column BuildingConnections (ed Chen WF) Elsevier Applied Science pp 375ndash414

9 Kulak GL Fisher JW and Struik JHA (1987) Guide to Design Criteria for Boltedand Rivetted Joints 2nd edition John Wiley and Sons New York

10 CIDECT (1992) Design Guide Recommendations for Rectangular Hollow Section(RHS) Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading Comiteacute International pour leDeacuteveloppment et lrsquoEacutetude de la Construction Tubulaire Cologne

11 CIDECT (1991) Design Guide Recommendations for Circular Hollow Section (CHS)Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading Comiteacute International pour le Deacutevelopp-ment et lrsquoEacutetude de la Construction Tubulaire Cologne

12 Harrison HB (1980) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 Pergamon PressOxford

13 Zoetemeijer P (1974) A design method for the tension side of statically loaded boltedbeam-to-column connections Heron 20 No 1 pp 1ndash59

14 Piluso V Faella C and Rizzano G (2001) Ultimate behavior of bolted T-stubsI Theoretical model Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 127 No 6pp 686ndash93

15 Witteveen J Stark JWB Bijlaard FSK and Zoetemeijer P (1982) Welded andbolted beam-to-column connections Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 108No ST2 pp 433ndash55

Chapter 10

Torsion members

101 Introduction

The resistance of a structural member to torsional loading may be considered tobe the sum of two components When the rate of change of the angle of twistrotation is constant along the member (see Figure 101a) it is in a state of uniform(or St Venant) torsion [1 2] and the longitudinal warping deflections are alsoconstant along the member In this case the torque acting at any cross-sectionis resisted by a single set of shear stresses distributed around the cross-sectionThe ratio of the torque acting to the twist rotation per unit length is defined as thetorsional rigidity GIt of the member

The second component of the resistance to torsional loading may act whenthe rate of change of the angle of twist rotation varies along the member (seeFigures 101b and c) so that it is in a state of non-uniform torsion [1] In thiscase the warping deflections vary along the member and an additional set of shearstresses may act in conjunction with those due to uniform torsion to resist thetorque acting The stiffness of the member associated with these additional shearstresses is proportional to the warping rigidity EIw

When the first component of the resistance to torsional loading completelydominates the second the member is in a state of uniform torsion This occurswhen the torsion parameter K = radic

(π2EIwGItL2) is very small as indicatedin Figure 102 which is adapted from [1] Thin-walled closed-section memberswhose torsional rigidities are very large behave in this way as do members withnarrow rectangular sections and angle and tee-sections whose warping rigidi-ties are negligible If on the other hand the second component of the resistanceto torsional loading completely dominates the first the member is in a limit-ing state of non-uniform torsion referred to as warping torsion This may occurwhen the torsion parameter K is very large as indicated in Figure 102 whichis the case for some very thin-walled open sections (such as light gauge cold-formed sections) whose torsional rigidities are very small Between these twoextremes the torsional loading is resisted by a combination of the uniform andwarping torsion components and the beam is in the general state of non-uniformtorsion This occurs for intermediate values of the parameter K as shown in

434 Torsion members

(a) Uniform torsion (c) Non-uniform torsion(b) Non-uniform torsion

Varying torqueConstant torqueends free to warp

End warping prevented

Figure 101 Uniform and non-uniform torsion of an I-section member

= ( 22EI w GIt L )

10

08

06

04

02

0

channel sections

01 1 10

L

Hot-rolledI-sections

Closedsections

Angles

torsiontorsionNon-uniform

Warping torsion

Very thin-walled

Uniform

Torsion parameter K

(War

ping

torq

uet

otal

torq

ue)

at m

id-s

pan

Figure 102 Effect of cross-section on torsional behaviour

Figure 102 which are appropriate for most hot-rolled I- or channel-sectionmembers

Whether a member is in a state of uniform or non-uniform torsion also dependson the loading arrangement and the warping restraints If the torque resisted is con-stant along the member and warping is unrestrained (as in Figure 10la) then themember will be in uniform torsion even if the torsional rigidity is very small Ifhowever the torque resisted varies along the length of the member (Figure 101b)or if the warping displacements are restrained in any way (Figure 101c) thenthe rate of change of the angle of twist rotation will vary and the member willbe in non-uniform torsion In general these variations must be accounted forbut in some cases they can be ignored and the member analysed as if it werein uniform torsion This is the case for members of very low warping rigidity

Torsion members 435

(d) Distortion(c) Torsion

++equiv

(b) Bending(a) Eccentric load

Figure 103 Eccentric loading of a thin-walled closed section

and for members of high-torsional rigidity for which the rates of change of theangle of twist rotation vary only locally near points of concentrated torque andwarping restraint This simple method of analysis usually leads to satisfactory pre-dictions of the angles of twist rotation but may produce underestimates of the localstresses

In this chapter the behaviour and design of torsion members are discussedUniform torsion is treated in Section 102 and non-uniform torsion in Section 103while the design of torsion members for strength and serviceability is treated inSection 104

Structural members however are rarely used to resist torsion alone and it ismuch more common for torsion to occur in conjunction with bending and othereffects For example when the box section beam shown in Figure 103a is subjectedto an eccentric load this causes bending (Figure 103b) torsion (Figure 103c)and distortion (Figure 103d) There may also be interactions between bending andtorsion For example the longitudinal stresses due to bending may cause a changein the effective torsional rigidity This type of interaction is of some importancein the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of thin-walled open-section members as dis-cussed in Sections 375 and 610 Also significant twist rotations of the membermay cause increases in the bending stresses in thin-walled open-section membersHowever these interactions are usually negligible when the torsional rigidity isvery high as in thin-walled closed-section members The behaviour of membersunder combined bending and torsion is discussed in Section 105

The effects of distortion of the cross-section are only significant in very thin-walled open-sections and in thin-walled closed sections with high-distortionalloadings Thus for the box-section beam shown in Figure 103 the relativelyflexible plates may bend out of their planes as indicated in Figure 103d causingthe cross-section to distort Because of this the in-plane plate bending and shearstress distributions are changed and significant out-of-plane plate bending stressesmay be induced The distortional behaviour of structural members is discussedbriefly in Section 106

436 Torsion members

102 Uniform torsion

1021 Elastic deformations and stresses

10211 General

In elastic uniform torsion the twist rotation per unit length is constant along thelength of the member This occurs when the torque is constant and the ends ofthe member are free to warp as shown in Figure 101a When a member twists inthis way

(a) lines which were originally parallel to the axis of twist become helices(b) cross-sections rotate φ as rigid bodies about the axis of twist and(c) cross-sections warp out of their planes the warping deflections (u) being

constant along the length of the member (see Figure 104)

The uniform torque Tt acting at any section induces shear stresses τxy τxz whichact in the plane of the cross-section The distribution of these shear stresses canbe visualised by using Prandtlrsquos membrane analogy as indicated in Figure 105for a rectangular cross-section Imagine a thin uniformly stretched membranewhich is fixed to the cross-section boundary and displaced by a uniform transversepressure The contours of the displaced membrane coincide with the shear stress

x y

z

Element δx times δs times t

Tt

Tt

Helix

Warpingdisplacements u

Figure 104 Warping displacements u due to twisting

Torsion members 437

b

t

z

y

(b) Distribution of shear stress (a) Transversely loaded membrane

Sections through membrane

Membranecontours

Rectangularcross-section

b

t

Figure 105 Prandtlrsquos membrane analogy for uniform torsion

xyxy

yx

yx

x

y δz

δy

δx

z

Longitudinal axis Change in warpingdisplacement dueto shear strain= (yx G)δy

of member

Total change inwarping displacement δu

Change in warpingdue to twisting

Rotation of longitudinalfibres due to twisting

Thin elementδy times δz times δx

Figure 106 Warping displacements

trajectories the slope of the membrane is proportional to the shear stress and thevolume under the membrane is proportional to the torque The shear strains causedby these shear stresses are related to the twisting and warping deformations asindicated in Figure 106

The stress distribution can be found by solving the equation [2]

part2θ

party2+ part2θ

partz2= minus2G

dx (101)

438 Torsion members

(in which G is the shear modulus of elasticity) for the stress function θ (whichcorresponds to the membrane displacement in Prandtlrsquos analogy) defined by

τxz = τzx = minuspartθparty

τxy = τyx = partθpartz

(102)

subject to the condition that

θ = constant (103)

around the section boundary The uniform torque Tt which is the static equivalentof the shear stresses τxy τxz is given by

Tt = 2intint

section

θ dy dz (104)

10212 Solid cross-sections

Closed-form solutions of equations 101ndash103 are not generally available exceptfor some very simple cross-sections For a solid circular section of radius R thesolution is

θ = G

2

dx(R2 minus y2 minus z2) (105)

If this is substituted in equations 102 the circumferential shear stress τt at a radiusr = radic

(y2 + z2) is found to be

τt = Grdφ

dx (106)

The torque effect of these shear stresses is

Tt =int R

0τt(2πr)dr (107)

which can be expressed in the form

Tt = GItdφ

dx(108)

where the torsion section constant It is given by

It = πR42 (109)

which can also be expressed as

It = A4

4π2 (Iy + Iz) (1010)

The same result can be obtained by substituting equation 105 directly intoequation 104 Equation 106 indicates that the maximum shear stress occurs at

Torsion members 439

the boundary and is equal to

τtmax = TtR

It (1011)

For other solid cross-sections equation 1010 gives a reasonably accurateapproximation for the torsion section constant but the maximum shear stressdepends on the precise shape of the section When sections have re-entrant cor-ners the local shear stresses may be very large (as indicated in Figure 107)although they may be reduced by increasing the radius of the fillet at the re-entrantcorner

10213 Rectangular cross-sections

The stress function θ for a very narrow rectangular section of width b and thicknesst is approximated by

θ asymp Gdφ

dx

(t2

4minus z2

) (1012)

The shear stresses can be obtained by substituting equation 1012 intoequations 102 whence

τxy = minus2zGdφ

dx (1013)

which varies linearly with z as shown in Figure 108c The torque effect of theτxy shear stresses can be obtained by integrating their moments about the x axis

0 05 10 15 20Ratio rt

10

15

20

25

30

r

t

t

Note crowding ofcontours at re-entrantcorner correspondingto stress concentration

Equal angle section [3]with large bt ratio

Approximation [2]

(a) Membrane contours at re-entrant corner (b) Increased shear stresses

Rat

io o

f ac

tual

str

ess

nom

inal

str

ess

Figure 107 Stress concentrations at re-entrant corners

440 Torsion members

t

bz

y

(b) Cross-section and shear flow

(a) Membrane or stress function 13

(c) Shear stress distribution

Parabolic tmax

Linear

Figure 108 Uniform torsion of a thin rectangular section

whence

minusint t2

minust2τxybz dz = G

bt3

6

dx(1014)

which is one half of the total torque effect The other half arises from the shearstresses τxz which have their greatest effects near the ends of the thin rectangleAlthough they act there over only a small length of the order of t (compared withb for the τxy stresses) they have a large lever arm of the order of b2 (instead oft2) and they make an equal contribution The total torque can therefore beexpressed in the form of equation 108 with

It asymp bt33 (1015)

The same result can be obtained by substituting equation 1012 directly intoequation 104 Equation 1013 indicates that the maximum shear stress occurs atthe centre of the long boundary and is given by

τtmax asymp Ttt

It (1016)

For stockier rectangular sections the stress function θ varies significantly alongthe width b of the section as indicated in Figure 105 and these approximationsmay not be sufficiently accurate In this case the torsion section constant It andthe maximum shear stress τtmax can be obtained from Figure 109

10214 Thin-walled open cross-sections

The stress distribution in a thin-walled open cross-section is very similar to that ina narrow rectangular section as shown in Figure 1010a Thus the shear stressesare parallel to the walls of the section and vary linearly across the thickness t thispattern remaining constant around the section except at the ends Because of this

Torsion members 441

10

08

06

04

02

0

30

25

20

15

10

05

b

t

0 2 4 6 8 10

33bt

It

)3( 2btTt

tmax

Tor

sion

sec

tion

con

stan

t rat

io I

t (

bt3 3

)

Max

imum

she

ar s

tres

s ra

tio

tm

ax

Tt

(bt2 3

)

Widthndashthickness ratio bt

Figure 109 Torsion properties of rectangular sections

t t t

C C

tmax

tmax

y

z

y

z

(a) Open section

Constant shearflow t

(b) Closed section

t

Figure 1010 Shear stresses due to uniform torsion of thin-walled sections

similarity the torsion section constant It can be closely approximated by

It asympsum

bt33 (1017)

442 Torsion members

where b is the developed length of the mid-line and t the thickness of each thin-walled element of the cross-section while the summation is carried out for all suchelements

The maximum shear stress away from the concentrations at re-entrant cornerscan also be approximated as

τtmax asymp Tttmax

It (1018)

where tmax is the maximum thickness When more accurate values for the torsionsection constant It are required the formulae developed in [3] can be used Thevalues given in [4ndash6] for British hot-rolled steel sections have been calculated inthis way

10215 Thin-walled closed cross-sections

The uniform torsional behaviour of thin-walled closed-section members is quitedifferent from that of open-section members and there are dramatic increases inthe torsional stiffness and strength The shear stress no longer varies linearly acrossthe thickness of the wall but is constant as shown in Figure 1010b and there is aconstant shear flow around the closed section

This shear flow is required to prevent any discontinuities in the longitudinalwarping displacements of the closed section To show this consider the slit rect-angular tube shown in Figure 1011a The mid-thickness surface of this opensection is unstrained and so the warping displacements of this surface are entirelydue to the twisting of the member The distribution of the warping displacementscaused by twisting (see Section 10312) is shown in Figure 1011b The relative

O E

E C

C S

O

S

Slit

xy

z

y

z

E00 ds

dd

z

tw

bf

y0tf

df

(b) Warping displacements(a) Cross-section of a slit tube

Relative warpingdisplacement

ndash

Figure 1011 Warping of a slit tube

Torsion members 443

S

E O

SC

t t

Ae

0

0

0

δs δs

δs

wtδs ttδs

z

y

=21

0ds=21

(b) Uniform torque in a closed section (a) Warping torque in an open section

Shaded area

Total area enclosed

Figure 1012 Torques due to shear flows in thin-walled sections

warping displacement at the slit is equal to

uE minus u0 = minusdφ

dx

int E

0ρ0ds (1019)

in whichρ0 is the distance (see Figure 1012a) from the tangent at the mid-thicknessline to the axis of twist (which passes through the shear centre of the section asdiscussed in Sections 10312 and 543)

However when the tube is not slit this relative warping displacement cannotoccur In this case the relative warping displacement due to twisting shown inFigure 1013a is exactly balanced by the relative warping displacement causedby shear straining (see Figure 106) of the mid-thickness surface shown inFigure 1013b so that the total relative warping displacement is zero It is shownin Section 1071 that the required shear straining is produced by a constant shearflow τt t around the closed section which is given by

τt t = Tt

2Ae(1020)

where Ae is the area enclosed by the section and that the torsion section constantis given by

It = 4A2e∮

(1t)ds (1021)

The maximum shear stress can be obtained from equation 1020 as

τtmax = Tt

2Aetmin(1022)

444 Torsion members

C S C S

xdd 0

x x

y y

z z

Relative warping displacement

(a) Warping displacementsdue to twisting only

(due to twisting)

(b) Warping displacementsdue to shear only

Relative warping displacement

(due to shear)

Constantshearflow t t

ds

G dsndash

Figure 1013 Warping of a closed section

The membrane analogy can also be used for thin-walled closed sections byimagining that the inner-section boundary is fixed to a weightless horizontal platesupported at a distance equivalent to τt t above the outer-section boundary bythe transverse pressures and the forces in the membrane stretched between theboundaries as shown in Figure 1014b Thus the slope (τt t)t of the membraneis substantially constant across the wall thickness and is equivalent to the shearstress τt while twice the volume Aeτt t under the membrane is equivalent to theuniform torque Tt given by equation 1020

The membrane analogy is used in Figure 1014 to illustrate the dramaticincreases in the stiffnesses and strengths of thin-walled closed sections over thoseof open sections It can be seen that the torque (which is proportional to the volumeunder the membrane) is much greater for the closed section when the maximumshear stress is the same The same conclusion can be reached by considering theeffective lever arms of the shear stresses which are of the same order as the overalldimensions of the closed section compared with those of the same order as thewall thickness of the open section

The behaviour of multi-cell closed-section members in uniform torsion can bedetermined by using the warping displacement continuity condition for each cellas indicated in Section 1071 Ageneral matrix method of carrying out this analysisby computer has been given in [7] and a computer program has been developed[8] Alternatively the membrane analogy can be extended by considering a set ofhorizontal plates at different heights one for each cell of the cross-section

Torsion members 445

S lit

M e m b rane

t tt

t

t

14

t t

t

t

tt

t tStressdistribution

Cross-s ec tio n

Membraneanalogy

(a) Slit tube (b) Closed tube

Horizontalplate

Membrane

Figure 1014 Comparison of uniform torsion of open and closed sections

1022 Elastic analysis

10221 Statically determinate members

Some members in uniform torsion are statically determinate such as the cantilevershown in Figure 1015 In these cases the distribution of the total torque Tx = Tt

can be determined from statics and the maximum stresses can be evaluated fromequations 1011 1016 1018 or 1020 or from Figures 107 or 109 The twistedshape of the member can be determined by integrating equation 108 using thesign conventions of Figure 1016a Thus the angle of twist rotation in a region ofconstant torque Tx will vary linearly in accordance with

φ = φ0 + Txx

GIt (1023)

as indicated in Figure 1015c

10222 Statically indeterminate members

Many torsion members are statically indeterminate such as the beam shown inFigure 1017 and the distribution of torque cannot be determined from staticsalone The redundant quantities can be determined by substituting the correspond-ing compatibility conditions into the solution of equation 108 Once these havebeen found the maximum torque can be evaluated by statics and the maximumstress can be determined The maximum angle of twist can also be derived fromthe solution of equation 108

446 Torsion members

(+) T

(+ )

L

T

T

0 = 0

(a) Cantilever

xtGI

TL

Twist rotation prevented

(b) Torque Tx

(c) Twist rotation

Figure 1015 Uniform torsion of a statically determinate cantilever

x

C

B

B

O

EC

x u

z

z S(y0 z0)

a0

0 (+ve)

δs

+ve rsquo ve rsquo+ve Tt ve Tt

+ve rdquo ndashve rdquo

ve rdquorsquo +ve Tw

y

rdquo = 0

y

(a) Positive torsion actions

S(y0 z0)Tx Tt Tw

Tx Tt Tw

(b) Sign convention for 0

(c) Conventions for rsquo rdquo rdquorsquoTt Tw

ndash

ndashndash

Clockwise +ve (RH systemabout S axis parallel to x)

Figure 1016 Torsion sign conventions

As an example of this procedure the indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1017is analysed in Section 1072 The theoretical twisted shape of this beam is shownin Figure 1017c and it can be seen that there is a jump discontinuity in the twist perunit length dφdx at the loaded point This discontinuity is a consequence of the useof the uniform torsion theory to analyse the behaviour of the member In practicesuch a discontinuity does not occur because an additional set of local warpingstresses is induced These additional stresses which may have high values at theloaded point have been investigated in [9 10] High local stresses can usuallybe tolerated in static loading situations when the material is ductile whether thestresses are induced by concentrated torques or by other concentrated loads In

Torsion members 447

(+)

(+)

x

L ndash aa

T

( )

T0 0 = 0 L = 0

T ndash

ndash

ndash T0

T0

T ndash T0

LGIaLTa

t

)(

Twist rotation prevented

(c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

(a) Beam

Figure 1017 Uniform torsion of a statically indeterminate beam

members for which the use of the uniform torsion theory is appropriate such asthose with high torsional rigidity and low warping rigidity these additional stressesdecrease rapidly as the distance from the loaded point increases Because of this theangles of twist predicted by the uniform torsion analysis are of sufficient accuracy

1023 Plastic collapse analysis

10231 Fully plastic stress distribution

The elastic shear stress distributions described in the previous sub-sections remainvalid while the shear yield stress τy is not exceeded The uniform torque at nominalfirst yield Tty may be obtained from equations 1011 1016 1018 or 1022 byusing τtmax = τy Yielding commences at Tty at the most highly stressed regionsand then generally spreads until the section is fully plastic

The fully plastic shear stress distribution can be visualised by using the lsquosandheaprsquo modification of the Prandtl membrane analogy Because the fully plasticshear stress distribution is constant the slope of the Prandtl membrane is alsoconstant and its contours are equally spaced in the same way as are those of aheap formed by pouring sand on to a base area of the same shape as the membercross-section until the heap is fully formed

This is demonstrated in Figure 1018a for a circular cross-section for which thesand heap is conical Its fully plastic uniform torque may be obtained from

Ttp =int R

0τy(2πr)r dr (1024)

whence

Ttp = (2πR33

)τy (1025)

448 Torsion members

Parabola Cone

(b) Rectangular cross-section(a) Circular cross-section

Parabola

First yieldFirst yield Fully plastic Fully plastic

Sectionsandmembercontours

Chisel wedge

Membranesandsand heaps

Figure 1018 First yield and fully plastic uniform torsion shear stress distributions

The corresponding first yield uniform torque may be obtained fromequations 109 and 1011 as

Tty = (πR32

)τy (1026)

and so the uniform torsion plastic shape factor is TtpTty = 43The sand heap for a fully plastic rectangular section b times t is chisel-shaped

as shown in Figure 1018b In this case the fully plastic uniform torque isgiven by

Ttp = bt2

2

(1 minus t

3b

)τy (1027)

and for a narrow rectangular section this becomes Ttp asymp (bt22)τy Thecorresponding first yield uniform torque is

Tty asymp (bt23

)τy (1028)

and so the uniform torsion plastic shape factor is TtpTty = 32For thin-walled open sections the fully plastic uniform torque is approximated

by

Ttp asymp (bt22

)τy (1029)

and the first yield torque is obtained from equation 1018 as

Tty = τyIt

tmax(1030)

Torsion members 449

For a hollow section the equilibrium condition of constant shear flow lim-its the maximum shear flow to the shear flow τytmin in the thinnest wall (seeequation 1022) so that the first yield uniform torque is given by

Tty = 2Aetminτy (1031)

This is the maximum torque that can be resisted even though walls with t gt tmin

are not fully yielded and so this value of Tty should also be used for the fully plasticuniform torque Ttp

10232 Plastic analysis

A member in uniform torsion will collapse plastically when there is a sufficientnumber of fully plastic cross-sections to transform the member into a mechanismas shown for example in Figure 1019 Each fully plastic cross-section can bethought of as a shear lsquohingersquo which allows increasing torsional rotations underthe uniform plastic torque Ttp The plastic shear hinges usually form at the sup-ports where there are reaction torques as indicated in Figure 1019 In generalthe plastic shear hinges develop progressively until the collapse mechanism isformed Examples of uniform torsion plastic collapse mechanisms are shown inFigures 1020 and 1021

At plastic collapse the mechanism is statically determinate and can be analysedby using statics to determine the plastic collapse torques For the member shownin Figure 1019 the mechanism forms when there are plastic shear hinges at eachsupport The total applied torque αtT at plastic collapse must be in equilibriumwith these plastic uniform torques and so

αtT = 2Ttp (1032)

so that the uniform torsion plastic collapse load factor is given by

αt = 2TtpT (1033)

Values of the uniform torsion plastic collapse load factor αt for a number ofexample torsion members can be obtained from Figures 1020 and 1021

103 Non-uniform torsion

1031 Elastic deformations and stresses

10311 General

In elastic non-uniform torsion both the rate of change of the angle of twist rotationdφdx and the longitudinal warping deflections u vary along the length of the

T

L

(ndash)(+)

t TTtp

Ttp

(b) Uniform torsion collapse mechanism

(c) Uniform torque distribution (a) Torsion member and loading

Prevention of warpingineffective in uniform torsion

Uniform torsionplastic shear hinge

Bottom flange

Top flange

Figure 1019 Uniform torsion plastic collapse

Mechanism

T

T

T

T

L

L

L L

L L

T

LT

L

T

L

T

L L

T

L L

T

L L

T

L L

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

0

10

10

10

40

60

80

60

60

80

80

10

10

10

10

025

025

025

025

025

025

025

0333

0667

0583

00208

000931

000521

00150

00142

000751

000721

tT Ttp wTLMfp df

Warping torsion frictionless hinge

Warping torsion plastic hinge

Uniform torsion shear hinges

Free to warp

Warping prevented

Top flange

Bottom flange

Plastic collapseWarping torsionUniform torsion

Memberand

loading

Rotations

Mechanism

Warping

wmEIwTL3

Uniform tm

tmGIt TL

infin

Figure 1020 Plastic collapse and maximum rotation ndash concentrated torque

Torsion members 451

TL

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

0

20

20

20

80

1166

160

1166

1166

160

160

05

05

05

05

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0139

0292

0250

00130

000541

000260

000915

000860

000417

000397

TL

L

TL

L

TL

L

TL

LTL

LTL

L

TL

LTL

LTL

LTL

L

Warping torsion frictionless hinge

Warping torsion plastic hinge

Uniform torsion shear hinges

Free to warp

Warping prevented

Top flange

Bottom flange

tT Ttp wTLMfp df

Plastic collapseWarping torsionUniform torsion

Memberand

loading

Rotations

Mechanism

Warping

wmEIwTL3Uniform

tmGItTL Mechanism

infin

Figure 1021 Plastic collapse and maximum rotation ndash uniformly distributed torque

member The varying warping deflections induce longitudinal strains and stressesσw When these warping normal stresses also vary along the member there areassociated warping shear stresses τw distributed around the cross-section andthese may act in conjunction with the shear stresses due to uniform torsion toresist the torque acting at the section [1 11] In the following sub-sections thewarping deformations stresses and torques in thin-walled open-section membersof constant cross-section are treated The local warping stresses induced by thenon-uniform torsion of closed sections are beyond the scope of this book but are

452 Torsion members

treated in [9 10] while some examples of the non-uniform torsion of taperedopen-section members are discussed in [12 13]

10312 Warping deflections and stresses

In thin-walled open-section members the longitudinal warping deflections u dueto twist are much greater than those due to shear straining (see Figure 106) andthe latter are usually neglected The warping deflections due to twist arise becausethe lines originally parallel to the axis of twist become helical locally as indicatedin Figures 104 1022 and 1023 In non-uniform torsion the axis of twist is thelocus of the shear centres (see Section 543) since otherwise the shear centre axiswould be deformed and the member would be bent as well as twisted It is shownin Section 1081 that the warping deflections due to twist (see Figure 1023) canbe expressed as

u = (αn minus α)dφ

dx (1034)

where

α =int s

0ρ0ds (1035)

and

αn = 1

A

int E

0α t ds (1036)

where ρ0 is the perpendicular distance from the shear centre S to the tangent tothe mid-line of the section wall (see Figures 1016b and 1023)

In non-uniform torsion the warping displacements u vary along the length of themember as shown for example in Figure 101b and c Because of this longitudinal

C δ

δx

x y

z

xdd

a0

a0

a0Line parallel to the

axis of twist

Axis of twist

Helix

(y z)

S(y0 z0)

Figure 1022 Rotation of a line parallel to the axis of twist

Torsion members 453

δx

δs

δs

δu

xdda0

a0

0

0

a0

S

O

E C y

z

x

(b) Plan on axis of twist(not to scale)

Axis of twist

Helix

(a) Section

Figure 1023 Warping of an element δx times δs times t due to twisting

strains are induced and the corresponding longitudinal warping normalstresses are

σw = E(αn minus α)d2φ

dx2 (1037)

These stresses define the bimoment stress resultant

B = minusint E

0σw(αn minus α) tds (1038)

Substituting equation 1037 leads to

B = minusEIwd2φ

dx2(1039)

in which

Iw =int E

0(αn minus α)2tds (1040)

is the warping section constant Substituting equation 1039 into equation 1037allows the warping normal stresses to be expressed as

σw = minusB(αn minus α)

Iw (1041)

Values of the warping section constant Iw and of the warping normal stressesσw for structural sections are given in [5 6] while a general computer program fortheir evaluation has been developed [8]

454 Torsion members

When the warping normal stresses σw vary along the length of the memberwarping shear stresses τw are induced in the same way that variations in thebending normal stresses in a beam induce bending shear stresses (see Section 54)The warping shear stresses can be expressed in terms of the warping shear flow

τwt = minusEd3φ

dx3

int s

0(αn minus α) tds (1042)

Information for calculating the warping shear stresses in structural sections isalso given in [5 6] while a general computer program for their evaluation hasbeen developed [8]

The warping shear stresses exert a warping torque

Tw =int E

0ρ0τwtds (1043)

about the shear centre as shown in Figure 1012a It can be shown [14 15] thatthis reduces to

Tw = minusEIwd3φ

dx3 (1044)

after substituting for τw and integrating by parts The warping torque Tw given byequation 1044 is related to the bimoment B given by equation 1039 through

Tw = dB

dx (1045)

Sign conventions for Tw and B are illustrated in Figure 1016A somewhat simpler explanation of the warping torque Tw and bimoment B

can be given for the I-section illustrated in Figure 1024 This is discussed inSection 1082 where it is shown that for an equal flanged I-section the bimomentB is related to the flange moment Mf through

B = df Mf (1046)

and the warping section constant Iw is given by

Iw = Izd2f

4(1047)

in which df is the distance between the flange centroids

1032 Elastic analysis

10321 Uniform torsion

Some thin-walled open-section members such as thin rectangular sections andangle and tee sections have very small warping section constants In such casesit is usually sufficiently accurate to ignore the warping torque Tw and to analysethe member as if it were in uniform torsion as discussed in Section 1022

Torsion members 455

10322 Warping torsion

Very thin-walled open-section members have very small torsion-section constantsIt while some of these such as I- and channel sections have significant warpingsection constants Iw In such cases it is usually sufficiently accurate to analyse themember as if the applied torque were resisted entirely by the warping torque sothat Tx = Tw Thus the twisted shape of the member can be obtained by solving

minusEIwd3φ

dx3= Tx (1048)

as

minusEIwφ =int x

0

int x

0

int x

0Txdxdxdx + A1x2

2+ A2x + A3 (1049)

where A1 A2 and A3 are constants of integration whose values depend on theboundary conditions

For statically determinate members there are three boundary conditions fromwhich the three constants of integration can be determined As an example ofthe three commonly assumed boundary conditions the statically determinate can-tilever shown in Figures 101c and 1025 is analysed in Section 1083 The twistedshape of the cantilever is shown in Figure 1025c and it can be seen that themaximum angle of twist rotation occurs at the loaded end and is equal to TL33EIw

For statically indeterminate members such as the beam shown in Figure 1026there is an additional boundary condition for each redundant quantity involvedThese redundants can be determined by substituting the additional boundary

vf

yC S

Mf

Mf

dfVf

Vf

yx

z

z (a) Rotation ofcross-section (b) Bimoment and warping stresses

Warping normal stresses w

Bimoment df Mf

Warping shear stresses w

Flange shears Vf

df

Figure 1024 Bimoment and stresses in an I-section member

456 Torsion members

conditions into equation 1049 As an example of this procedure the beam shownin Figure 1026 is analysed in Section 1084

The warping torsion analysis of equal flanged I-sections can also be carried outby analysing the flange bending model shown in Figure 1027 Thus the warping

(+) T

(+)

x L

T

T

Twist rotation andwarping prevented

Free to warpL= 0

0 = 0 = 0

(b) Torque Tx

(c) Twist rotation (a) Cantilever

TL3

3EIw

Figure 1025 Warping torsion of a statically determinate cantilever

(+)

(+)x L

munit length

(-)

E I w

T 0

Twist rotation andwarping prevented Twist rotation

preventedfree to warp0 =0 = 0

L =L = 0

mL - T0

T0mL - T0

(a) Beam (c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

00054mL4

Figure 1026 Warping torsion of a statically indeterminate beam

y

z

y

z

=

(b) Equivalent flange shears Vf

Vf

Vf Tx

dfdf

df

Tx

(a) Flange deflection Vf

=vf w

w

df 2

Figure 1027 Flange bending model of warping torsion

Torsion members 457

torque Tw = Tx acting on the I-section is replaced by two transverse shears

Vf = Txdf (1050)

one on each flange The bending deflections vf of each flange can then be deter-mined by elastic analysis or by using available solutions [4] and the twist rotationscan be calculated from

φw = 2vf df (1051)

10323 Non-uniform torsion

When neither the torsional rigidity nor the warping rigidity can be neglected asin hot-rolled steel I- and channel sections the applied torque is resisted by acombination of the uniform and warping torques so that

Tx = Tt + Tw (1052)

In this case the differential equation of non-uniform torsion is

Tx = GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3 (1053)

the general solution of which can be written as

φ = p(x)+ A1exa + A2eminusxa + A3 (1054)

where

a2 = EIw

GIt= K2L2

π2 (1055)

The function p(x) in this solution is a particular integral whose form dependson the variation of the torque Tx along the beam This can be determined by thestandard techniques used to solve ordinary linear differential equations (see [16]for example) The values of the constants of integration A1 A2 and A3 depend onthe form of the particular integral and on the boundary conditions

Complete solutions for a number of torque distributions and boundary conditionshave been determined and graphical solutions for the twist φ and its derivativesdφdx d2φdx2 and d3φdx3 are available [5 6] As an example the non-uniformtorsion of the cantilever shown in Figure 1028 is analysed in Section 1085

Sometimes the accuracy of the method of solution described above is notrequired in which case a much simpler method may be used The maximumangle of twist rotation φm may be approximated by

φm = φtmφwm

φtm + φwm(1056)

in which φtm is the maximum uniform torsion angle of twist rotation obtained bysolving equation 108 with Tt = Tx and φwm is the maximum warping torsion

458 Torsion members

(+) T

(+)x

T

L

T

Twist rotation andwarping prevented

0 =0 = 0Free to warp

L = 0

(a) Cantilever (c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

TL

GIt

1ndash endash2La1ndash

1+ endash2LaaL

Figure 1028 Non-uniform torsion of a cantilever

angle of twist rotation obtained by solving equation 1048 Values of φtm and φwm

can be obtained from Figures 1020 and 1021 for a number of different torsionmembers

This approximate method tends to overestimate the true maximum angle of twistrotation partly because the maximum values φtm and φwm often occur at differentlocations along the member In the case of the cantilever of Figure 1028 theapproximate solution

φm = TLGIt

1 + 3EIwGItL2(1057)

obtained using Figures 1015c and 1025c in equation 1056 has a maximum errorof about 12 [17]

1033 Plastic collapse analysis

10331 Fully plastic bimoment

The warping normal stresses σw developed in elastic warping torsion are usuallymuch larger than the warping shear stresses τw Thus the limit of elastic behaviouris often reached when the bimoment is close to its nominal first yield value forwhich the maximum value of σw is equal to the yield stress fy

For the equal flanged I-section shown in Figure 1024 the first yield bimomentBy corresponds to the flange moment Mf reaching the yield value

Mfy = fyb2f tf 6 (1058)

so that

By = fydf b2f tf 6 (1059)

in which bf is the flange width tf is the flange thickness and df is the dis-tance between flange centroids As the bimoment increases above By yielding

Torsion members 459

spreads from the flange tips into the cross-section until the flanges become fullyyielded at

Mfp = fyb2f tf 4 (1060)

which corresponds to the fully plastic bimoment

Bp = fydf b2f tf 4 (1061)

The plastic shape factor for warping torsion of the I-section is therefore given byBpBy = 32

Expressions for the full plastic bimoments of a number of monosymmetricthin-walled open sections are given in [18]

10332 Plastic analysis of warping torsion

An equal flanged I-section member in warping torsion will collapse plasticallywhen there is a sufficient number of warping hinges (frictionless or plastic) totransform the member into a mechanism as shown for example in Figure 1029In general the warping hinges develop progressively until the collapse mechanismforms

A frictionless warping hinge occurs at a point where warping is unrestrained(φprimeprime = 0) so that there is a frictionless hinge in each flange while at aplastic warping hinge the bimoment is equal to the fully plastic value Bp

(equation 1061) and the moment in each flange is equal to the fully plastic valueMfp (equation 1060) so that there is a flexural plastic hinge in each flange Warpingtorsion plastic collapse therefore corresponds to the simultaneous plastic collapse

T

L

Mfp

Mfp

(-)

(+)

End warpingprevented

End free towarp

(a) Torsion member and loading

(b) Warping torsion collapse mechanism

(c) Top flange moment distribution

Top flange

Warping torsionplastic hinges

Bottomflange

Frictionlesshinge

Figure 1029 Warping torsion plastic collapse

460 Torsion members

of the flanges in opposite directions with a series of flexural hinges (frictionlessor plastic) in each flange Thus warping torsion plastic collapse can be analysedby using the methods discussed in Section 555 to analyse the flexural plasticcollapse of the flanges

Warping torsion plastic hinges often form at supports or at points of concentratedtorque as indicated in Figure 1029 Examples of warping torsion plastic collapsemechanisms are shown in Figures 1020 and 1021

At plastic collapse each flange becomes a mechanism which is staticallydeterminate so that it can be analysed by using statics to determine the plas-tic collapse torques For the member shown in Figure 1029 each flange formsa mechanism with plastic hinges at the concentrated torque and the right-handsupport and a frictionless hinge at the left-hand support where warping is unre-strained If the concentrated torque αwT acts at mid-length then the flangescollapse when

αw(Tdf )L4 = Mfp + Mfp2 (1062)

so that the warping torsion plastic collapse load factor is given by

αw = 6Mfpdf TL (1063)

Values of the warping torsion plastic collapse load factor αw for a number ofexample-torsion members are given in Figures 1020 and 1021

10333 Plastic analysis of non-uniform torsion

It has not been possible to develop a simple but rigorous model for the analysis ofthe plastic collapse of members in non-uniform torsion where both uniform andwarping torsion are important This is because

(a) different types of stress (shear stresses τt τw and normal stress σw) areassociated with uniform and warping torsion collapse

(b) the different stresses τt τw and σw are distributed differently across thesection and

(c) the uniform torque Tt and the warping torque Tw are distributed differentlyalong the member

A number of approximate theories have been proposed the simplest of which isthe Merchant approximation [19] according to which the plastic collapse loadfactor αx is the sum of the uniform and warping torsion collapse load factorsso that

αx = αt + αw (1064)

Torsion members 461

0604020 08 021 0 0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

0 5 L

T

05L

App

lied

torq

ue T

(kN

m)

Small rotation inelastic analysis [25]

Larger otation inelastic analysis [25]

Plastic collapse [2225]

Test results by Farwell and Galambos [20]

Central twist rotation (radian)

Figure 1030 Comparison of analysis and test results

This approximation assumes that there is no interaction between uniform andwarping torsion at plastic collapse so that the separate plastic collapse capacitiesare additive

If strain-hardening is ignored and only small twist rotations are consideredthen the errors arising from this approximation are on the unsafe side but aresmall because the warping torsion shear stresses τw are small because the yieldinteractions between normal and shear stresses (see Section 131) are smalland because cross-sections which are fully plastic due to warping torsion oftenoccur at different locations along the member than those which are fully plas-tic due to uniform torsion These small errors are more than compensated forby the conservatism of ignoring strain-hardening and second-order longitudinalstresses that develop at large rotations Test results [20 21] and numerical studies[22 23] have shown that these cause significant strengthening at large rotationsas indicated in Figure 1030 and that the approximation of equation 1064 isconservative

An example of the plastic collapse analysis of the non-uniform torsion is givenin Section 1096

104 Torsion design

1041 General

EC3 gives limited guidance for the analysis and design of torsion membersWhile both elastic and plastic analysis are permitted generally only accurateand approximate methods of elastic analysis are specifically discussed for torsionmembers Also while both first yield and plastic design resistances are referred

462 Torsion members

to generally only the first yield design resistance is specifically discussed for tor-sion members Further there is no guidance on section classification for torsionmembers nor on how to allow for the effects of local buckling on the designresistance

In the following sub-sections the specific EC3 provisions for torsion analysisand design are extended so as to provide procedures which are consistent withthose used in EC3 for the design of beams against bending and shear

First the member cross-section is classified as Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 orClass 4 in much the same way as is a beam cross-section (see Sections 472and 5612) and then the effective section resistances for uniform and warpingtorsion are determined Following this an appropriate method of torsion analysis(plastic or elastic) is selected and then an appropriate method (plastic first hingefirst yield or local buckling) is used for strength design All of the strength designmethods suggested ignore the warping shear stresses τw because these are generallysmall and because they occur at different points in the cross-section and alongthe member than do the much more significant uniform torsion shear stresses τt

and the warping bimoment normal stresses σw Finally a method of serviceabilitydesign is discussed

1042 Section classification

Cross-sections of torsion members need to be classified according to the extentby which local buckling effects may reduce their cross-section resistances Cross-sections which are capable of reaching and maintaining plasticity while a torsionplastic hinge collapse mechanism develops may be called Class 1 as are thecorresponding cross-sections of beams Class 2 sections are capable of developinga first hinge but inelastic local buckling may prevent the development of a plasticcollapse mechanism Class 3 sections are capable of reaching the nominal firstyield before local buckling occurs while Class 4 sections will buckle locallybefore the nominal first yield is reached

For open cross-sections the warping shear stresses τw are usually very smalland can be neglected without serious error The uniform torsion shear stresses τt

change sign and vary linearly across the wall thickness t and so can be consideredto have no effect on local buckling The flange elastic and plastic warping normalstress distributions are similar to those due to bending in the plane of the flangeand so the section classification may be based on the same widthndashthickness limitsThus the flange outstands of a Class 1 open section would satisfy

λ le 9 (1065)

in which λ is the element slenderness given by

λ = (ct)radic (

fy235)

(1066)

Torsion members 463

Class 2 open sections would satisfy

9 lt λ le 10 (1067)

Class 3 open sections would satisfy

10 lt λ le 14 (1068)

and Class 4 open sections would satisfy

14 lt λ (1069)

For closed cross-sections the only significant stresses that develop during tor-sion are uniform torsion shear stresses τt that are constant across the wall thicknesst and along the length b of any element of the cross-section This stress distribu-tion is very similar to that caused by a bending shear force in the web of anequal-flanged I-section and so the section classification may be based on thesame widthndashthickness limits [24] Thus the elements of Class 1 Class 2 and Class3 rectangular hollow sections would satisfy

λ le 60 (1070)

in which λ is the element slenderness given by

λ = (hwt)radic (

fy235)

(1071)

in which hw is the clear distance between flanges Rectangular hollow sectionswhich do not satisfy this condition would be classified as Class 4 Circular hollowsections do not buckle under shear unless they are exceptionally slender and sothey may generally be classified as Class 1

1043 Uniform torsion section resistance

The effective uniform torsion section resistance of all open sections TtRd can beapproximated by the plastic section resistance Ttp given by equation 1029 in whichthe shear yield stress is given by

τy = fyradic

3 (1072)

The uniform torsion section resistance of Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3 rectangularhollow sections TtRd123 can be determined by using the first yield uniform torqueTty of equation 1031 The effective uniform torsion section resistance of a Class 4rectangular hollow section TtRd4 can be approximated by reducing the first yielduniform torque Tty of equation 1031 to

TtRd4 = Tty(60λ) (1073)

The effective uniform torsion section resistance of a circular hollow section TtRd

can generally be approximated by using equation 1031 to find the first yielduniform torque Tty

464 Torsion members

1044 Bimoment section resistance

The bimoment section resistance of Class 1 and Class 2 equal-flanged I-sectionsBRd12 is given by equation 1061 The bimoment section resistance of a Class 3equal-flanged I-section can be approximated by using

BRd3 = By + (Bp minus By)(14 minus λ)4 (1074)

in which By is the first yield bimoment given by equation 1059 The bimomentsection resistance of a Class 4 equal-flanged I-section can be approximated byusing

BRd4 = By (14λ) (1075)

These equations may also be used for the bimoment section resistances of otheropen sections by using their fully plastic bimoments Bp [18] or first yield bimo-ments By Alternatively the bimoment section resistances of other Class 1 Class 2or Class 3 open sections can be conservatively approximated by using

BRd123 = By (1076)

and the bimoment section resistances of other Class 4 open sections can be approx-imated using equation 1075

It is conservative to ignore bimoments in hollow section members and so thereis no need to consider their bimoment section resistances

1045 Plastic design

The use of plastic design should be limited to Class 1 members which have suf-ficient ductility to reach the plastic collapse mechanism Plastic design should becarried out by using plastic analysis to determine the plastic collapse load factorαx (see Section 10333) and then checking that

1 le αx (1077)

1046 First hinge design

The use of first hinge design should be limited to Class 1 and Class 2 membersin which the first hinge of a collapse mechanism can form The design uniformtorques Tt and bimoments B can be determined by using elastic analysis and themember is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd2

)2

+(

B

BRd2

)2

le 1 (1078)

is satisfied at all points along the member The first hinge method is more conserva-tive than plastic design and more difficult to use because elastic member analysis

Torsion members 465

is much more difficult than plastic analysis and also because equation 1078 oftenneeds to be checked at a number of points along the member

1047 First yield design

The use of first yield design should be limited to Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3members which can reach first yield The maximum design uniform torques Tt andbimoments B can be determined by elastic analysis The member is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd3

)2

+(

B

BRd3

)2

le 1 (1079)

is satisfied at all points along the member This first yield method is the same asthat specified in EC3 except for the neglect of the warping shear stresses τw It isjust as difficult to use as the first hinge method

1048 Local buckling design

Class 4 members should designed against local buckling The maximum designuniform torques Tt and bimoments B can be determined by elastic analysis Themember is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd4

)2

+(

B

BRd4

)2

le 1 (1080)

is satisfied at all points along the member

1049 Design for serviceability

Serviceability design usually requires the estimation of the deformations under partor all of the serviceability loads Because these loads are usually significantly lessthan the factored combined loads used for strength design the member remainslargely elastic and the serviceability deformations can be evaluated by linearelastic analysis

There are no specific serviceability criteria for satisfactory deformations of atorsion member given in EC3 However general recommendations such as lsquothedeformations of a structure and of its component members should be appropriateto the location loading and function of the structure and the component membersrsquomay be applied to torsion members so that the onus is placed on the designer todetermine what are appropriate magnitudes of the twist rotations

Because of the lack of precise serviceability criteria highly accurate predictionsof the serviceability rotations are not required Thus the maximum twist rotationsof members in non-uniform torsion may be approximated by using equation 1056

Usually the twist rotations of thin-walled closed-section members are verysmall and can be ignored (although in some cases the distortional deformations

466 Torsion members

may be quite large as discussed in Section 106) On the other hand thin-walledopen-section members are comparatively flexible and special measures may berequired to limit their rotations

105 Torsion and bending

1051 Behaviour

Pure torsion occurs very rarely in steel structures Most commonly torsion occursin combination with bending actions The torsion actions may be classified asprimary or secondary depending on whether the torsion action is required to trans-fer load (primary torsion) or whether it arises as a secondary action Secondarytorques may arise as a result of differential twist rotations compatible with the jointrotations of primary frames as shown in Figure 1031 and are often predicted bythree-dimensional analysis programs They are not unlike the secondary bend-ing moments which occur in rigid-jointed trusses but which are usually ignored(a procedure justified by many years of satisfactory experience based on the long-standing practice of analysing rigid-jointed trusses as if pin-jointed) Secondarytorques are usually small when there are alternative load paths of high stiffnessand may often be ignored

Primary torsion actions may be classified as being restrained free or destab-lising as shown in Figure 1032 For restrained torsion the member applying thetorsion action (such as ABC shown in Figure 1032b) also applies a restrainingaction to the member resisting the torsion (DEC in Figure 1032b) In this case thestructure is redundant and compatibility between the members must be satisfied inthe analysis if the magnitudes of the torques and other actions are to be determinedcorrectly Free torsion occurs when the member applying the torsion action (such as

Joint rotation offlexible portalframe

Negligible rotationat end wall

Differential endrotations inducesecondarytorsion

Figure 1031 Secondary torsion in an industrial frame

Torsion members 467

E

C

DB

Q

BAC

CQ

C AB

E

C

D B

AQ

Q

Cantilever BC permitslateral deflection oftorsion member

Reaction eccentricity atpin connection C causestorque

Rigid joint Crequires compatibletwisting

(b) Restrained torsion

Torsionmember DCE

LoadingmemberABC

(a) Torsion and loading members

(c) Free torsion (d) Destabilising torsion

Figure 1032 Torsion actions

ABC in Figure 1032c) does not restrain the twisting of the torsion member (DEF)but does prevent its lateral deflection Destablising torsion may occur when themember applying the torsion action (such as BC in Figure 1032d) does not restraineither the twisting or the lateral deflection of the torsion member (DCE) In thiscase lateral buckling actions (Chapter 6) caused by the in-plane loading of thetorsion member amplify the torsion and out-of-plane bending behaviour

The inelastic non-linear bending and torsion of fully braced centrally bracedand unbraced I-beams with central concentrated loads (see Figure 1033) have beenanalysed [25] and interaction equations developed for predicting their strengths Itwas found that while circular interaction equations are appropriate for short lengthbraced beams these provide unsafe predictions for beams subject to destablis-ing torsion where lateral buckling effects become important On the other handdestablising interactions between lateral buckling and torsion tend to be masked bythe favourable effects of the secondary axial stresses that develop at large rotationsand linear interaction equations based on plastic analyses provide satisfactorystrength predictions as shown in Figure 1034 Proposals based on these find-ings are made below for the analysis and design of members subject to combinedtorsion and bending

468 Torsion members

Q

L

Q

L

Q

L

e

Q

e

Q

(d) Eccentric load

(i) Free torsion (ii) Destabilising torsion

(c) Unbraced(Destabilising torsion)

(b) Centrally braced(Free torsion)

(a) Continuously braced(Free torsion)

Figure 1033 Beams in torsion and bending

0 0 2 0 4 06 08 10 12 1 4 0

0 2

0 4

0 6

0 8

1 0

1 2

1 4

py

0510141

Q

L

eQ

MMzx

Dimensionless torque 1x

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t M

yM

py

Approximateequation 1082( )Accurate

[25]

Figure 1034 Interaction between lateral buckling and torsion for unbraced beams

1052 Plastic design of fully braced members

The member must be Class 1 Plastic collapse analyses should be used to determinethe plastic collapse load factors αi for in-plane bending (Section 55) and αx fortorsion (Section 10333)

The member should satisfy the circular interaction equation

1α2i + 1α2

x le 1 (1081)

Torsion members 469

1053 Design of members without full bracing

A member without full bracing has its bending resistance reduced by lateral buck-ling effects (Chapter 6) Its bending should be analysed elastically and the resultingmoment distribution used to determine its bending resistance MbRd according toEC3

An elastic torsion analysis should be used to find the values of the design uniformtorques Tt and bimoments B An appropriate torsion design method should beselected from Sections 1045ndash1048 and used to find the load factor αx by whichthe design torques and bimoments should be multiplied so that the appropriatetorsion design equation (equations 1077ndash1080) is just satisfied

The member should then satisfy the linear interaction equation

MEd

MbRd+ 1

αxle 1 (1082)

There is no need to amplify the moment because of the finding [25] that lin-ear interaction equations are satisfactory even for unbraced beams as shown inFigure 1034

106 Distortion

Twisting and distortion of a flexural member may be caused by the local distri-bution around the cross-section of the forces acting as shown in Figure 103If the member responds significantly to either of these actions the bending stressdistribution may depart considerably from that calculated in the usual way whileadditional distortional stresses may be induced by out-of-plane bending of the wall(see Figure 103d) To avoid possible failure the designer must either increase thestrength of the member which may be uneconomic or must limit both twistingand distortion

The resistance to distortion of a thin-walled member depends on the arrangementof the cross-section Members with triangular closed cells have high resistancesbecause of the truss-like action of the triangulated cross-section which causes thedistortional loads to be transferred by in-plane bending and shear of the cell wallsOn the other hand the walls of the members with rectangular or trapezoidal cellsbend out of their planes when under distortional loading and when the resistancesto distortion are low [26] while members of open cross-section are even moremore flexible Concentrated distortional loads can be distributed locally by pro-viding stiff diaphragms which reduce or prevent local distortion However isolateddiaphragms are not fully effective when the distortional loads are distributed orcan move along the member In such cases it is necessary to analyse the distortionof the section and the stresses induced by the distortion

The resistance to torsion of a thin-walled open section is comparatively smalland the dominant mode of deformation is twisting of the member Because thistwisting is usually accounted for the importance of distortion lies in its modifying

470 Torsion members

influence on the torsional behaviour Significant distortions occur only in verythin-walled members for which the distortional rigidity which varies as the cubeof the wall thickness reduces at a much faster rate than the warping rigidity whichvaries directly with the thickness [27] These distortions may induce significantwall bending stresses and may increase the angles of twist and change the warpingstress distributions [28 29]

Thin-walled closed-section members are very stiff torsionally and the twistingdeformations due to uniform torsion are not usually of great importance except incurved members On the other hand rectangular and trapezoidal members are notvery resistant to distortional loads and the distortional deformations may be largewhile the stresses induced by the distortional loads may dominate the design [26]

The distortional behaviour of single-cell rectangular or trapezoidal memberscan be classified as uniform or non-uniform Uniform distortion occurs when theapplied distortional loading is uniformly distributed along a member of constantcross-section which has no diaphragms In this case the distortional loading isresisted solely by the out-of-plane bending rigidity of the plate elements of thesection In non-uniform distortion the distortions vary along the member and theplate elements bend in their planes producing in-plane shear stresses which helpto resist the distortional loading

Perhaps the simplest method of analysing non-uniform distortion is by using ananalogy to the problem [30] of a beam on an elastic foundation (BEF analogy) Inthis analogy which is shown diagrammatically in Figure 1035 the distortional

Q q

Deflection wBeam rigidity EIFoundation modulus kBeam loads Q qBeam momentBeam shear

DistortionIn-plane stiffnessOut-of-plane stiffnessDistortional loadsWarping normal stressWarping shear stress

(c) Analogy

(b) Beam on an elasticfoundation

(a) Elevation of abox section member

Rigiddiaphragm

free towarp

Concentrateddistortional

load

Flexiblediaphragm

Distributeddistortional

load

Rigiddiaphragmwarping

preventedBeamrigidity EI

Foundation modulus kEI d4wdx4 + kw = q

Figure 1035 BEF analogy for box section distortion

Torsion members 471

Distortion deflections

Warping normal stresses

Warping shear stresses

Figure 1036 Warping stresses in non-uniform distortion

loading corresponds to the applied beam loads in the analogy and the out-of-planeresistance of the plate elements corresponds to the stiffness k of the elastic foun-dation while the in-plane resistance of these elements corresponds to the flexuralrigidity EI of the analogous beam The BEF analogy can account for concentratedand distributed distortional loads for rigid diaphragms which either permit orprevent warping and for flexible diaphragms and stiffening rings as indicated inFigure 1035 Many solutions for problems of beams on elastic foundations havebeen obtained [31] and these can be used to find the out-of-plane bending stressesin the plate elements (which are related to the foundation reactions) and the warp-ing and normal shear stresses due to non-uniform distortion (which are relatedto the bending moment and shear force in the beam on the elastic foundation)The distributions of the warping stresses in a rectangular box section are shown inFigure 1036

107 Appendix ndash uniform torsion

1071 Thin-walled closed sections

The shear flow τt t around a thin-walled closed-section member in uniform torsioncan be determined by using the condition that the total change in the warpingdisplacement u around the complete closed section must be zero for continuityThe change in the warping displacement due to the twist rotations φ is equal to

472 Torsion members

minus(dφdx)∮ρ0ds (see Section 10215 and Figure 1013a) while the change in

the warping displacement due to the shear straining of the mid-surface is equal to∮(τtG)ds (see Figures 106 and 1013b) Thus∮

τt

Gds = dφ

dx

∮ρ0ds

The shear flow τt t is constant around the closed section (otherwise the correspond-ing longitudinal shear stresses would not be in equilibrium) while

∮ρ0ds is equal

to twice the area Ae enclosed by the section as shown in Figure 1012b Thus

τt t∮

1

tds = 2GAe

dx (1083)

The moment resultant of the shear flow around the section is equal to the torqueacting and so

Tt =∮τt tρ0ds (1084)

whence

τt t = Tt

2Ae (1020)

Substituting this into equation 1083 leads to

Tt = G4A2

e∮(1t)ds

dx

and so the torsion section constant is

It = 4A2e∮

(1t)ds (1021)

The torsion section constants and the shear flows in multi-cell closed-sectionmembers can be determined by extending this method If the member consists ofn junctions linked by m walls then there are (m minus n + 1) independent cells Thelongitudinal equilibrium conditions require there to be m constant shear flows τt tone for each wall and (n minus 1) junction equations of the typesum

junction

(τt t) = 0 (1085)

There are (m minus n + 1) independent cell warping continuity conditions of the typesumcell

intwall

(τtG)ds = 2Aedφ

dx(1086)

where Ae is the area enclosed by the cell Equations 1085 and 1086 can besolved simultaneously for the m shear flows τt t The total uniform torque Tt can

Torsion members 473

be determined as the torque resultant of these shear flows and the torsion sectionconstant It can then be found from

It = Tt

Gdφdx

1072 Analysis of statically indeterminate members

The uniform torsion of the statically indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1017amay be analysed by taking the left-hand reaction torque T0 as the redundant quan-tity The distribution of torque Tx is therefore as shown in Figure 1017b andequation 108 becomes

GItdφ

dx= T0 minus T 〈x minus a〉0

where the value of the second term is taken as zero when the value inside theMacaulay brackets 〈 〉 is negative

The solution of this equation which satisfies the condition that the angle of twistat the left-hand support is zero is

GItφ = T0x minus T 〈x minus a〉 (1087)

The other condition which must be satisfied is that the angle of twist at the right-hand support must be zero Using this in equation 1087

0 = T0L minus T (L minus a)

and so

T0 = T (L minus a)

L

Thus the maximum torque is T0 when a is less than L2 while the maximum angleof twist rotation occurs at the loaded point and is equal to

φa = Ta(L minus a)

GItL

108 Appendix ndash non-uniform torsion

1081 Warping deflections

When a member twists lines originally parallel to the axis of twist become helicaland any element δx times δs times t of the section wall rotates a0dφdx about the line a0

474 Torsion members

from the shear centre S as shown in Figures 104 and 1022 The increase δu inthe warping displacement of the element is shown in Figure 1023 and is equal to

δu = minusρ0dφ

dxδs

where ρ0 is the perpendicular distance from the shear centre S to the tangent to themid-line of the wall The sign convention for ρ0 is demonstrated in Figure 1016bwhich shows a cross-section viewed by looking in the positive x direction Thevalue of ρ0 is positive when the line a0 from the shear centre rotates in a clockwisesense when the distance s increases which is the case for Figure 1016b Thus thewarping displacement is given by

u = (αn minus α)dφ

dx (1034)

where

α =int s

0ρ0ds (1035)

and the quantity αn is chosen to be

αn = 1

A

int E

0αtds (1036)

so that the average warping displacement of the section is zero

1082 Warping torque and bimoment in an I-section

When an equal flanged I-section member twists φ as shown in Figure 1024a theflanges deflect laterally

vf = df

Thus the flanges may have curvatures

d2vf

dx2= df

2

d2φ

dx2

in opposite directions as for example in the cantilever shown in Figure 101cThese curvatures can be thought of as being produced by the equal and opposite

Torsion members 475

flange bending moments

Mf = EIfd2vf

dx2= EIz

2

df

2

d2φ

dx2

shown in Figure 1024b This pair of equal and opposite flange moments Mf spaced df apart form the bimoment

B = df Mf (1046)

The bending stresses induced by the bimoment are the warping normal stresses

σw = ∓Mf y

If= ∓E

df

2y

d2φ

dx2

shown in Figure 1024b These can also be obtained from equation 1037When the flange moments Mf vary along the member they induce equal and

opposite flange shears

Vf = minusdMf

dx= minusEIz

2

df

2

d3φ

dx3

as shown in Figure 1024b The warping shear stresses

τw = plusmn Vf

bf tf

(15 minus 6y2

b2f

)

(in which bf is the flange width) which are statically equivalent to these shear forcesare also shown in Figure 1024b They can also be obtained from equation 1042

The equal and opposite flange shears Vf are statically equivalent to the warpingtorque

Tw = Vf df = minusEIzd2f

4

d3φ

dx3

If this is compared with equation 1044 it can be deduced that the warping sectionconstant for the I-section is

Iw = Izd2f

4 (1047)

This result can also be obtained from equation 1040

476 Torsion members

1083 Warping torsion analysis of staticallydeterminate members

The twisted shape of a statically determinate member in warping torsion is givenby equation 1049 For example the cantilever shown in Figure 1025a the torqueTx is constant and equal to the applied torque T and so the twisted shape is givenby

minusEIwφ = Tx3

6+ A1x2

2+ A2x + A3 (1088)

The constants of integration A1 A2 and A3 depend on the boundary conditionsAt the support it is assumed that twisting is prevented so that

φ0 = 0

and that warping is also prevented so that (see equation 1034)(dφ

dx

)0

= 0

At the loaded end the member is free to warp (ie the warping normal stresses σw

are zero) so that (see equation 1037)(d2φ

dx2

)L

= 0

By substituting these conditions into equation 1088 the constants of integrationcan be determined as

A1 = minusTL

A2 = 0

A3 = 0

If these are substituted into equation 1088 the complete solution for the twistedshape is obtained as

minusEIwφ = Tx3

6minus TLx2

2

The maximum angle of twist occurs at the loaded end and is equal to

φL = TL3

3EIw

The warping shear stress distribution (see equation 1042) is constant along themember but the maximum warping normal stress (see equation 1037) occurs atthe support where d2φdx2 reaches its highest value

Torsion members 477

1084 Warping torsion analysis of staticallyindeterminate members

The warping torsion of the statically indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1026amay be analysed by taking the left-hand reaction torque T0 as the redundant Thedistribution of torque Tx is then given by (see Figure 1026b)

Tx = T0 minus mx

and equation 1049 becomes

minusEIwφ = T0x3

6minus mx4

24+ A1x2

2+ A2x + A3

After using the boundary conditions φ0 = (dφdx)0 = 0 the constants A2 and A3

are determined as

A2 = A3 = 0

while the condition φL = 0 requires that

A1 = minusT0L

3+ mL2

12

The additional boundary condition is (d2φdx2)L = 0 and so

T0 = 5mL8

Thus the complete solution is

minusEIwφ = m

(minusx4

24+ 5Lx3

48minus L2x2

16

)

The maximum angle of twist occurs near x = 058L and is approximately equal to00054mL4EIw The warping shear stresses are greatest at the left-hand supportwhere the torque Tx has its greatest value of 5mL8 The warping normal stressesare greatest at x = 5L8 where ndash EIwd2φdx2 has its maximum value of 9mL2128

1085 Non-uniform torsion analysis

The twisted shape of a member in non-uniform torsion is given by equation 1054For the example of the cantilever shown in Figure 1028a the torque Tx is constant

478 Torsion members

and equal to the applied torque T In this case a particular integral is

p(x) = Tx

GIt

while the boundary conditions require that

0 = A1 + A2 + A3

0 = T

GIt+ A1

aminus A2

a

0 = A1

a2eLa + A2

a2eminusLa

so that

φ = Tx

GItminus Ta

GIt(1 + eminus2La)

[e(xminus2L)a minus eminusxa + 1 minus eminus2La

]

At the fixed end the uniform torque is zero because dφdx = 0 Because ofthis the torque Tx there is resisted solely by the warping torque and the maximumwarping shear stresses occur at this point The value of d2φdx2 is greatest at thefixed end and therefore the value of the warping normal stress is also greatest thereThe value of dφdx is greatest at the loaded end of the cantilever and therefore thevalue of the shear stress due to uniform torsion is also greatest there The warpingtorque at the loaded end is

TwL = T2eminusLa

1 + eminus2La

which decreases from T to zero as La increases from 0 to infin Thus the warp-ing shear stresses at the loaded end are not zero but are less than those at thefixed end

109 Worked examples

1091 Example 1 ndash approximations for the serviceabilitytwist rotation

Problem The cantilever shown in Figure 1028 is 5 m long and has the propertiesshown in Figure 1037 If the serviceability end torque T is 3 kNm determineapproximate values of the serviceability end twist rotation either by

(a) assuming that the cantilever is in uniform torsion (EIw equiv 0) or(b) assuming that the cantilever is in warping torsion (GIt equiv 0) or(c) using the approximation of equation 1056

Torsion members 479

5175

101

z

yI

E

G

=

=

=

=

w

It

2093156

5331

127radius

Dimensions in mm

533 times 210 UB 92

210 000 Nmm2

81 000 Nmm2

757 cm4

160 dm6

Figure 1037 Examples 1ndash7

Solution

(a) If EIw = 0 then the end twist rotation (see Section 10221) is

φum = TL

GIt= 3 times 106 times 5000

81 000 times 757 times 104= 0245 radians = 140

(b) If GIt = 0 then the end twist rotation is (see Section 10322)

φwm = TL33EIw = 3 times 106 times 50003

3 times 210 000 times 16 times 1012= 0372 radians = 213

(c) Using the results of (a) and (b) above in the approximation of equation 1056

φm = 0245 times 0372

0245 + 0372= 0148 radians = 85

1092 Example 2 ndash serviceability twist rotation

Problem Use the solution obtained in Section 1085 to determine an accuratevalue of the serviceability end twist rotation of the cantilever of example 1

Solution Using equation 1051

a =radic

EIw

GIt=

radic(210 000 times 16 times 1012

81 000 times 757 times 104

)= 2341 mm

Therefore eminus2La = eminus2times50002341 = 001396

480 Torsion members

Using Section 1085

φL = TL

GIt

[1 minus a

L

(1 minus eminus2La)

(1 + eminus2La)

]

= 3times106times5000

81 000times757times104

[1minus2341

5000

(1 minus 001396)

(1 + 001396)

]= 0133 radians = 76

which is about 10 less than the approximate value of 85 obtained inSection 1091c

1093 Example 3 ndash elastic uniform torsion shear stress

Problem For the cantilever of example 2 determine the maximum elastic uniformtorsion shear stress caused by a strength design end torque of 5 kNm

Solution An expression for the nominal maximum elastic uniform torsion shearstress can be obtained by combining equations 108 and 1018 whence

τtmax asymp G

(dφ

dx

)max

tmax

An expression for dφdx can be obtained from the solution for φ inSection 1085 whence

dx= T

GIt

1 minus [e(xminus2L)a + eminusxa]

(1 + eminus2La)

The maximum value of this occurs at the free end x = L and is given by

(dφ

dx

)max

= T

GIt

[1 minus 2eminusLa

(1 + eminus2La)

]

Adapting the solution of example 2

(dφ

dx

)max

= T

GIt

[1 minus 2 times radic

(001396)

101396

]= 0767

T

GIt

Thus

τtmax asymp 0767Ttmax

Itasymp 0767 times 5 times 106 times 156

757 times 104Nmm2 asymp 790 Nmm2

Torsion members 481

This nominal maximum shear stress occurs at the centre of the long edge of theflange A similar value may be calculated for the opposite edge but the actualstresses near this point are increased because of the re-entrant corner at the junctionof the web and flange An approximate estimate of the stress concentration factorcan be made by using Figure 107b with

r

t= 127

156= 081

Thus the actual local maximum stress is approximately τtmax = 17 times 790 =134 Nmm2

1094 Example 4 ndash elastic warping shear and normal stresses

Problem For the cantilever of example 3 determine the maximum elastic warpingshear and normal stresses

Solution The maximum warping shear stress τw occurs at the fixed end (x = 0)of the cantilever (see Section 1085) where the uniform torque is zero Thus thetotal torque there is resisted only by the warping torque and so

Vf = Tdf

where Vf is the flange shear (see Section 1082) The shear stresses in the flangevary parabolically (see Figure 1024b) and so

τwmax = 15 Vf

bf tf

Thus

τwmax = 15 times (5 times 106)5175

2093 times 156Nmm2 = 44 Nmm2

The maximum warping normal stress σw occurs where d2φdx2 is a maximum(see equation 1037) An expression for d2φdx2 can be obtained from the solutionin Section 1085 for φ

whenced2φ

dx2= T

aGIt

[(minuse(xminus2L)a + eminusxa)

(1 + eminus2La)

]

The maximum value of this occurs at the fixed end x = 0 and is given by

(d2φ

dx2

)max

= T

aGIt

(1 minus eminus2La)

(1 + eminus2La)

482 Torsion members

The corresponding maximum warping normal stress (see Section 1082) is

σwmax = Edf bf

2 times 2

(d2φ

dx2

)max

= 210 000 times 5175 times 2093 times 5 times 106

2 times 2 times 2341 times 81 000 times 757 times 104times (1 minus 001396)

(1 + 001396)Nmm2

= 1926 Nmm2

1095 Example 5 ndash first yield design torque capacity

Problem If the cantilever of example 2 has a yield stress of 275 Nmm2 then useSection 1047 to determine the torque resistance which is consistent with EC3 anda first yield strength criterion

Solution In this case the maximum uniform torsion shear and warping torsionshear and normal stresses occur either at different points along the cantilever orelse at different points around the cross-section Because of this each stress maybe considered separately

For first yield in uniform torsion equation 1079 is equivalent to

τtτy le 1

in which τy asymp 275radic

3 = 159 Nmm2 Thus

τtmax le 159 Nmm2

Using Section 1093 a design torque of T = 5 kNm causes a maximum shear stressof τtmax = 790 Nmm2 if the stress concentration at the flangendashweb-junction isignored Thus the design uniform torsion torque resistance is

Tt = 5 times 159790 = 1005 kNm

The maximum warping shear stress τwmax caused by a design torque ofT = 5 kNm (see Section 1094) is 44 Nmm2 which is much less than the corre-sponding maximum uniform torsion shear stress τtmax = 790 Nmm2 Becauseof this the design torque resistance is not limited by the warping shear stress

For first yield in warping torsion equation 1079 reduces to

σwfy le 1

Thus

σwmax le 275 Nmm2

Using Section 1094 a design torque of T = 5 kNm causes a design warpingnormal stress of σwmax = 1926 Nmm2 Thus the design warping torsion torque

Torsion members 483

resistance is

Tw = 5 times 2751926 = 714 kNm

This is less than the value of 1005 kNm determined for uniform torsion and sothe design torque resistance is 714 kNm

1096 Example 6 ndash plastic collapse analysis

Problem Determine the plastic collapse torque of the cantilever of example 5

Uniform torsion plastic collapseUsing equation 1029

Ttp = (2 times 2093 times 15622 + (5331 minus 2 times 156)times 10122

)times 159 Nmm = 1215 kNm

Using Figure 1020 αtT = Ttp = 1215 kNm

Warping torsion plastic collapse

Using equation 1060 Mfp = 275 times 20932 times 1564 Nmm = 4698 kNmUsing Figure 1020 αwT = Mfpdf L = 4698 times 51755000 = 486 kNm

Non-uniform torsion plastic collapse

Using equation 1064 αxT = 1215 + 486 = 1701 kNm

1097 Example 7 ndash plastic design

Problem Determine the plastic design torque capacity of the cantilever ofexample 5

Section classification Using equation 1065

tf = 156 mm fy = 275 Nmm2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924

cf (tf ε) = (20932 minus 1012 minus 127)(156 times 0924) = 60 lt 9

and so the section is Class 1 and plastic design can be used

Plastic design torque resistance

Using the result of section 1096 T = 1701 kNmwhich is significantly higher than the first yield design torque resistance of714 kNm determined in Section 1095

484 Torsion members

1 0 0

1 2 6

6

6

8 2 7 6 61 54200

20

20

10

L2 L4 L4

mL 4m

L L= = 00 0= = 0

S C150 500

(c)(b) Channel Statically indeterminatebeam

section(a) Box section

Figure 1038 Examples 8ndash13

1010 Unworked examples

10101 Example 8 ndash uniform torsion of a box section

Determine the torsion section constant It for the box section shown inFigure 1038a and find the maximum elastic shear stress caused by a uniformtorque of 10 kNm

10102 Example 9 ndash warping torsion section constant of achannel section

Determine the warping torsion section constant Iw for the channel section shownin Figure 1038b

10103 Example 10 ndash approximation for the maximumtwist rotation

The steel beam shown in Figure 1038c is 5 m long has the cross-section shownin Figure 1038b and a torque per unit length of m = 1000 Nmm Determineapproximate values of the maximum angle of twist rotation by assuming

(a) that the beam is in uniform torsion (EIw equiv 0) or(b) that the beam is in warping torsion (GIt equiv 0) or(c) the approximation of equation 1056

10104 Example 11 ndash accurate twist rotation

If the steel beam shown in Figure 1026 is 5 m long and has the cross-sectionshown in Figure 1038b determine an accurate value for the maximum angle oftwist rotation

Torsion members 485

10105 Example 12 ndash elastic stresses

Use the solutions of examples 9 and 11 to determine

(a) the maximum nominal uniform torsion shear stress(b) the maximum warping shear stress and(c) the maximum warping normal stress

10106 Example 13 ndash design

Determine the maximum design torque per unit length that should be permitted onthe beam of examples 11 and 12 if the beam has a yield stress of fy = 275 Nmm2

References

1 Kollbrunner CF and Basler K (1969) Torsion in Structures 2nd edition Springer-Verlag Berlin

2 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

3 El Darwish IA and Johnston BG (1965) Torsion of structural shapes Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST1 pp 203ndash27

4 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2005) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th editionBlackwell Scientific Publications Oxford

5 Terrington JS (1968) Combined bending and torsion of beams and girders Publica-tion 31 (First Part) British Construction Steelwork Association London

6 Nethercot DA Salter PR and Malik AS (1989) Design of members subject tocombined bending and torsion SCI Publication 057 The Steel Construction InstituteAscot

7 Hancock GJ and Harrison HB (1972) A general method of analysis of stressesin thin-walled sections with open and closed parts Civil Engineering TransactionsInstitution of Engineers Australia CE14 No 2 pp 181ndash8

8 Papangelis JP and Hancock GJ (1975) THIN-WALL ndash Cross Section Analysis andFinite Strip Buckling Analysis of Thin-walled Structures ndash Users Manual Centre forAdvanced Structural Engineering University of Sydney

9 Von Karman T and Chien W-Z (1946) Torsion with variable twist Journal of theAeronautical Sciences 13 No 10 pp 503ndash10

10 Smith FA Thomas FM and Smith J0 (1970) Torsion analysis of heavy box beamsin structures Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST3 pp 613ndash35

11 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

12 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1972) Elastic stability of tapered I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST3 pp 713ndash28

13 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1975) Elastic behaviour of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST8 pp 1661ndash78

14 Vlasov VZ (1961) Thin-walled Elastic Beams 2nd edition Israel Program forScientific Translations Jerusalem

15 Zbirohowski-Koscia K (1967) Thin-walled Beams Crosby Lockwood and Son LtdLondon

486 Torsion members

16 Piaggio HTH (1962) Differential Equations 3rd edition G Bell London17 Trahair NS and Pi Y-L (1996) Simplified torsion design of compact I-beams Steel

Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 30 No 1 pp 2ndash1918 Trahair NS (1999) Plastic torsion analysis of mono- and point-symmetric beams

Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 125 No 2 pp 175ndash8219 Dinno KS and Merchant W (1965)Aprocedure for calculating the plastic collapse of

I-sections under bending and torsion The Structural Engineer 43 No 7 pp 219ndash22120 Farwell CR and Galambos TV (1969) Non-uniform torsion of steel beams in

inelastic range Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 95 No ST12 pp 2813ndash2921 Aalberg A (1995) An experimental study of beam-columns subjected to combined

torsion bending and axial actions Dring thesis Department of Civil EngineeringNorwegian Institute of Technology Trondheim

22 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1995) Inelastic torsion of steel I-beams Journal of StructuralEngineering ASCE 121 No 4 pp 609ndash20

23 Trahair NS (2005) Non-linear elastic non-uniform torsion Journal of StructuralEngineering ASCE 131 No 7 pp 1135ndash42

24 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 ndash Design of Steel Structures ndash Part1ndash5 Plated structural elements BSI London

25 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Inelastic bending and torsion of steel I-beams Journalof Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 12 pp 3397ndash417

26 Subcommittee on Box Girders of the ASCE-AASHO Task Committee on Flexu-ral Members (1971) Progress report on steel box bridges Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 97 No ST4 pp 1175ndash86

27 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Warping and distortion at I-section jointsJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST3 pp 547ndash64

28 Goodier JN and Barton MV (1944) The effects of web deformation on the torsionof I-beams Journal of Applied Mechanics ASME 2 pp A-35ndashA-40

29 Kubo GG Johnston BG and Eney WJ (1956) Non-uniform torsion of plategirders Transactions ASCE 121 pp 759ndash85

30 Wright RN Abdel-Samad SR and Robinson AR (1968) BEF analogy for analysisof box girders Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 94 No ST7 pp 1719ndash43

31 Hetenyi M (1946) Beams on Elastic Foundations University of Michigan Press

Index

amplification 69 299 306 307 312 320352 362 367 467

analysis 3 5 6 21ndash4 351ndash66 advanced24 364ndash6 371 distortion 469ndash71dynamic 19 elastic first-order 22 23156 157 352 353 369 second-order24 361ndash3 372 elastic buckling 2451ndash4 67ndash73 74ndash9 83ndash9 228ndash30 241245ndash9 251 263ndash5 268ndash71 273ndash5353ndash61 in-plane 352ndash66 joint 401ndash3405 420ndash3 plastic first-order 24175ndash82 302ndash4 363 second-order seeanalysis advanced preliminary 6 23sub-assemblage 365 torsionnon-uniform 449ndash61 473ndash8 plastic447ndash9 458ndash61 uniform 445ndash7 454471ndash3 warping 455ndash7

area effective 38 44 63ndash5 126ndash8gross section 36 37 42ndash4 63ndash5 netsection 36ndash9 42ndash4 reducedsection 38

aspect ratio 103 104 107 115119 125

axis principal 157ndash63 190ndash5axis of twist 78 88 437 443 452

beam 1 154ndash226 227ndash94 built-in 179182 198ndash202 continuous 256ndash61hot-rolled 229 238 243monosymmetric 263ndash6non-uniform 266 stepped 266tapered 266 welded 229 238

beam-column 295ndash346beam-tie 39 44 347bearing 124ndash6 138 bolt 392 410ndash13

plate 124ndash6 415BEF analogy 470

behaviour 14ndash17 brittle 13 15dynamic 18ndash19 elastic 8 22 2333 155 inelastic 15 55ndash61 81 82175 237ndash40 305 316ndash18 in-plane154ndash226 296ndash311 323ndash6 347 350ndash66400ndash6 420ndash2 interaction 16 256ndash61351 467 joint 398ndash411 linear 14ndash1633 349 351ndash3 material 8ndash14 55ndash61member 14 15 non-linear geometrical54 79ndash81 234ndash7 272ndash3 296ndash302361ndash3 material 15 16 24 58 175ndash82296 304ndash7 363ndash6 447ndash9 458ndash61out-of-plane 227ndash94 311ndash19 326ndash8369ndash72 post-buckling 100 109ndash12117ndash18 structure 15ndash17 347ndash51

bending 37ndash40 54 79 118ndash24 154ndash226234ndash7 272 biaxial 159 191 295319ndash21 466

bimoment 453ndash4 plastic 458ndash60 464blunder 26bolt 2 392 396ndash402 410ndash14 bearing

410ndash13 preloaded friction-grip 393396 400 413ndash14

bracing 67 73 83 87 186 188 247ndash9256ndash61 467ndash9

brittle fracture 13buckling flexural 15 50ndash99

flexural-torsional 76ndash8 88 89 227ndash94295 311ndash19 326ndash8 369ndash72 frame353ndash61 369ndash71 inelastic 55ndash61 81ndash2108 237ndash40 316 lateral see bucklingflexural-torsional lateral-torsional seebuckling flexural-torsional local 1563 64 100ndash53 184 462ndash4 465torsional 76ndash8 88 89

buckling coefficient 103ndash8 114 119ndash21125 139ndash41

buckling length see effective length

488 Index

cantilever 179 253ndash5 271 455 457 477propped 182 202ndash5

capacity see resistancecentroid 37 168ndash70 192circular hollow section 45 128 463cleat 392 393 407 408cold working 8component method of design 401 403 404compression member 50ndash99compression resistance curve 62connection see jointconnector 392ndash4 combination of 400crack 9 13critical stress see stress bucklingcrookedness 35 54 61 79 100 112

234ndash7 272 307ndash9 324curvature initial see crookedness major

axis 230

defect 10 13deflection 4 25 30 39 54 79 154 156

163 189 190 296ndash9 323ndash6 352 361deflection limit 189depth-thickness ratio 115 121design 3ndash7 24ndash30 elastic 183ndash7 frame

348 366ndash9 371 limit states 25 28plastic 184 368 464 468 semi-rigid351 serviceability 189 369 465simple 350 stiffness 25 30strength 27ndash9 beam 183ndash9 240ndash5beam-column 309ndash11 318 321ndash3brittle fracture 13 compressionmember 62ndash4 74ndash8 fatigue 9ndash13frame 348 366ndash9 371 plate 126ndash39414ndash17 tension member 42ndash5 torsionmember 461ndash6 ultimate load 27working stress 27

design by buckling analysis 74 241design code 7 27design criterion 24design process 4ndash7design requirements 3 4destabilizing load 231ndash3 torsion 466diaphragm 469dispersion 126 139distortion 253 469ndash71ductility 8 13 34 175

effective area 126effective length beam 245ndash52 258ndash61

273 beam-column 315 327compression member 63 65ndash74 83 86frame 353ndash61

effective width local buckling 111 121129 130 shear lag 174

elasticity 8endurance limit 10example beam 205ndash25 273ndash91

beam-column 329ndash44 compressionmember 89ndash98 frame 373ndash88joint 423ndash31 tension member 45ndash9thin-plate element 141ndash52 torsionmember 478ndash85

fabrication 14 154 393 406factor of safety 27fastener see connectorfatigue 9ndash13fracture 34 36 brittle 13frame 15 347ndash91 advanced analysis 24

364ndash6 design 366ndash9 371 372 elasticbuckling 24 353ndash61 first-orderanalysis 23 352 flexural 350ndash73pin-jointed 348 350 plastic analysis24 352 363 rigid 74 261ndash3 351ndash72second-order analysis 24 361 362semi-rigid 351 serviceability 369statically determinate 22 348 350statically indeterminate 23 349three-dimensional 372 triangulated348 349 two-dimensional 350ndash72

friction coefficient 413

gauge 37gusset 395

hole 35ndash7 41 42

impact 14 18imperfection geometrical see twist

initial material 10 13 56ndash61237ndash40

interaction bearing and tension 414ndash15compression and bending 131 295ndash346shear and bending 121ndash4 137 shearand tension 412 413 416 tension andbending 39 44

interaction behaviour see behaviourinteraction

joint 392ndash432 angle cleat 408 angleseat 407 base plate 410 beamseat 410 bolted moment end plate 409bolted splice 409ndash10 eccentric 37ndash944 fin plate 408 flexible endplate 408ndash9 force 396 398 force and

Index 489

moment 397ndash8 405 moment 397400ndash5 pin 393 preloadedfriction-grip 393 396 399 400 413rivet 394 web side plate 408 weldedmoment 408ndash9 welded splice 409

joint flexibility 399 404

limit state 25 28 30load combination 20 dead 17 design

effect 28 design resistance 28dynamic 18 19 earth or ground-water19 earthquake 19 impact 13 18imposed 18 indirect 20 intermediate76 nominal 27 patch 125 repeated18 snow 18 squash 50 60 82 topflange 233 254 wind 19

load effect 28load factor 20 27 28load sharing 399loading code 6

maximum distortion energy theory 9 122414 418

mechanism 156 175 178ndash82 198ndash205351 363 368 449 459 462 464

mechanism method 180 198ndash205member non-uniform 76 266

structural 1ndash2membrane analogy 436 440 444Minerrsquos rule 12modulus effective elastic 56 108

effective section 130 185 elasticsection 130 185 plastic section 130176 185 198 245 reduced 56 81shear 14 170 230 312 313 316 326439 strain-hardening 8 59 108 237tangent 55 237 Youngrsquos 8 14

monosymmetry property 263ndash5 275

non-linear behaviour see behaviournon-linear

partial factor 21 28pin 392 393plastic hinge 154 175ndash82 188 363

449 459plastic moment 130 175ndash82 188 197

363 459plastic uniform torque 447 463plate 395 396 401 405 407 408 409

410 414ndash17plate assembly 107 120Poissonrsquos ratio 103 114 119 125 140

principal axes 157ndash63 190ndash5probability 9 20 28product second moment of area 159 191ndash5prying force 403

redistribution post-buckling 109ndash12 117121 yielding 34 38 41 126175ndash82 364

residual stress see stress residualresistance bearing 138 187 biaxial

bending 321ndash3 bimoment 464bolt 410ndash14 bolted plate 414ndash17compression 62 74ndash8 126ndash32concentrated load 124ndash6 138 factor27 in-plane 309ndash11 member 45 64130 131 185 242ndash5 310 moment183ndash6 242ndash5 309ndash11 318out-of-plane 240ndash5 317ndash19 section42 44 126 130 131 185 243 245309 shear 133ndash8 186 uniformtorsion 463 weld 417ndash20

restraint end 65 67ndash73 85ndash7 250ndash3 255256ndash62 273 315 327 intermediate 6783 247ndash9 lateral buckling 186 188minor axis rotation 250 251 256ndash62273 315 327 rigid 65 245 twist 250252 warping 250 251 256ndash62 273315 327

restraint stiffness 67ndash71 73 84 85 247ndash9251ndash3 256ndash63 273 315 327

return period 19rigidity flexural 52 82 230 torsional 77

89 230 268 433 warping 77 89 230268 433

rigid-plastic assumption 176 178rivet 392 394rotation capacity 368 405

safety 4 26 27safety index 28sand heap analogy 447second moment of area 156 157 191ndash5section asymmetric 77 198 Class 1 126

128 131 184 187 188 309 462ndash5Class 2 126 128 131 184 187 188309 462ndash5 Class 3 126 128 131 184462ndash5 Class 4 126 128 131 184462ndash5 closed 170ndash2 196 433 442ndash5monosymmetric 77 263ndash6 274open 164ndash70 196 433 440 rectangular164 439 448 rolled 1 58 237 solid 1195 438 thin-walled 1 191ndash5 196welded 238

490 Index

serviceability 4 25 30 189 369 413 465settlement 20 157Shanleyrsquos theory 58shear 113ndash24 133ndash8 163ndash75 186 187

195ndash7 bolt 393 396 399 410 411412 plate 416

shear and bending 121ndash4 137shear and tension 412 416shear centre 168 452shear flow 164ndash7 196 442ndash4shear lag 38 172ndash5slenderness compression member 53 55

62 66 75 flange 111 126ndash9 plate104 116 126ndash9 web 126ndash9

slip 396 399 401 413Southwell plot 54 235splice 396 397 398 406 409squash load see load squashstagger 36statical method 181 200stiffener 105 106 115 117 119 123 124

126 132 135 137 139 187 188stiffness see restraint stiffnessstrain 8 33 158 170 437 443 453strain-hardening 8 35 36 58 108 113

176 237strength 27ndash30 beam 183ndash7 188 240ndash5

266 267 beam-column 309ndash11 318321ndash3 bolt 410ndash14 bolted plate414ndash17 compression member 64 7476 frame 366ndash9 371 local buckling126ndash39 tensile 8 34 36 42 43 tensionmember 42ndash5 torsion member 461ndash5468 469 weld 417ndash20 see alsoresistance

strength limit state 20 28stress bending 157ndash63 190 buckling 53

103 109 111 113 117 119 122 124134 normal 8 permissible 27residual 33 58 61 82 112 155 237239 shear 9 113ndash18 121ndash4 133 136137 163ndash75 186 195ndash7 411 412 416417ndash20 436ndash44 451 454 458 460462 471 475 476 477 478 shearyield 9 114 116 133 186 411 417447 463 ultimate tensile see strengthtensile warping normal 417 449 453458 460 462 yield 8 34 50 104 154236 301 414 458

stress concentration 10 13 33 37 40 442stress raiser 13stress range 10structure statically determinate 22 348

350 statically indeterminate 23 349352 steel 1

tension bolt 393 411 412 plate 414ndash17tension field 117 134 135 136tension member 33ndash49torque see torsiontorsion 433ndash86 non-uniform 433

449ndash61 uniform 433 436ndash49 463warping 433 449ndash57

torsion member 1 433torsion section constant 438 440 441 443twist 76ndash8 88 227 228 239 246 250

252 268ndash73 275 311 326 369433ndash86 initial 234ndash7 272

unbuttoning connection 349uncertainty 25 27 401

vibration 19 30 189virtual work method 201 205

warping 170 173 197 230 268 433 436442ndash4 449ndash61

warping section constant 312 326 328433 453 455

web 116ndash18 122ndash6 128ndash39 165 172186 187 188 397

weld 392 394 397 400 403 407 408409 410 421 423 butt 394 417fillet 394 417ndash19

wind load see load windwind pressure dynamic 19wind speed basic 19

yield 8 beam 175ndash82 184 185 186 197234ndash9 272 beam-column 300ndash9 316324 compression member 54ndash6079ndash82 frame 363 plate 101 104 106108 112 114 117 119 121 122 125126 129 131 137 138 414 tensionmember 34 35 39 40 42 torsionmember 447ndash9 458ndash61 461ndash5467 468

  • Book Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Units and conversion factors
  • Glossary of terms
  • Notations
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
  • Chapter 2 Tension members
  • Chapter 3 Compression members
  • Chapter 4 Local buckling of thin-plate elements
  • Chapter 5 In-plane bending of beams
  • Chapter 6 Lateral buckling of beams
  • Chapter 7 Beam-columns
  • Chapter 8 Frames
  • Chapter 9 Joints
  • Chapter 10 Torsion members
  • Index
Page 2: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3

The Behaviour and Design ofSteel Structures to EC3

Also available from Taylor amp Francis

Steel Structures Practical Design Studies3rd EditionH Al Nagiem andT MacGinley Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash30156ndash5

Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash30157ndash2

Limit States Design of Structural SteelworkD Nethercot Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash419ndash26080ndash6

Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash419ndash26090ndash5

Fracture MechanicsM Janssen et al Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash34622ndash1

Assessment and Refurbishment of SteelStructuresZ Agocs et al Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash23598ndash3

Information and ordering details

For price availability and ordering visit our website wwwtandfcoukbuiltenvironment

Alternatively our books are available from all good bookshops

The Behaviour and Designof Steel Structures to EC3

Fourth edition

NS Trahair MA BradfordDA Nethercot and L Gardner

First edition published 1977Second edition 1988 revised second edition published 1988Third edition ndash Australian (AS4100) published 1998Third edition ndash British (BS5950) published 2001

Fourth edition published 2008byTaylor amp Francis2 Park Square Milton Park Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN

Simultaneously published in the USA and CanadabyTaylor amp Francis270 Madison Ave NewYork NY 10016

Taylor amp Francis is an imprint of theTaylor amp Francis Groupan informa business

copy 1977 1988 2001 2008 NS Trahair MA BradfordDA Nethercot and L Gardner

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reprinted orreproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronicmechanical or other means now known or hereafterinvented including photocopying and recording or in anyinformation storage or retrieval system without permission inwriting from the publishers

The publisher makes no representation express or impliedwith regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book andcannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any efforts oromissions that may be made

British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication DataThe behaviour and design of steel structures to EC3 NS Trahair

[et al] ndash 4th edp cm

Includes bibliographical references and index1 Building Iron and steel I Trahair NS

TA684T7 20086241prime821ndashdc22 2007016421

ISBN10 0ndash415ndash41865ndash8 (hbk)ISBN10 0ndash415ndash41866ndash6 (pbk)ISBN10 0ndash203ndash93593ndash4 (ebk)

ISBN13 978ndash0ndash415ndash41865ndash2 (hbk)ISBN13 978ndash0ndash415ndash41866ndash9 (pbk)ISBN13 978ndash0ndash203ndash93593ndash4 (ebk)

This edition published in the Taylor amp Francis e-Library 2007

ldquoTo purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor amp Francis or Routledgersquoscollection of thousands of eBooks please go to wwweBookstoretandfcoukrdquo

ISBN 0-203-93593-4 Master e-book ISBN

Contents

Preface ixUnits and conversion factors xGlossary of terms xiNotations xv

1 Introduction 1

11 Steel structures 112 Design 313 Material behaviour 814 Member and structure behaviour 1415 Loads 1716 Analysis of steel structures 2117 Design of steel structures 24

References 30

2 Tension members 33

21 Introduction 3322 Concentrically loaded tension members 3323 Eccentrically and locally connected tension members 3724 Bending of tension members 3925 Stress concentrations 4026 Design of tension members 4227 Worked examples 4528 Unworked examples 48

References 49

3 Compression members 50

31 Introduction 5032 Elastic compression members 51

vi Contents

33 Inelastic compression members 5534 Real compression members 6135 Design of compression members 6236 Restrained compression members 6537 Other compression members 7438 Appendix ndash elastic compression members 7839 Appendix ndash inelastic compression members 81310 Appendix ndash effective lengths of compression members 83311 Appendix ndash torsional buckling 88312 Worked examples 89313 Unworked examples 96

References 98

4 Local buckling of thin-plate elements 100

41 Introduction 10042 Plate elements in compression 10243 Plate elements in shear 11344 Plate elements in bending 11845 Plate elements in bending and shear 12146 Plate elements in bearing 12447 Design against local buckling 12648 Appendix ndash elastic buckling of plate elements

in compression 13949 Worked examples 141410 Unworked examples 151

References 152

5 In-plane bending of beams 154

51 Introduction 15452 Elastic analysis of beams 15653 Bending stresses in elastic beams 15754 Shear stresses in elastic beams 16355 Plastic analysis of beams 17556 Strength design of beams 18357 Serviceability design of beams 18958 Appendix ndash bending stresses in elastic beams 19059 Appendix ndash thin-walled section properties 191510 Appendix ndash shear stresses in elastic beams 195511 Appendix ndash plastic analysis of beams 197

Contents vii

512 Worked examples 205513 Unworked examples 224

References 225

6 Lateral buckling of beams 227

61 Introduction 22762 Elastic beams 22863 Inelastic beams 23764 Real beams 23965 Design against lateral buckling 24066 Restrained beams 24567 Cantilevers and overhanging beams 25368 Braced and continuous beams 25669 Rigid frames 261610 Monosymmetric beams 263611 Non-uniform beams 266612 Appendix ndash elastic beams 268613 Appendix ndash effective lengths of beams 273614 Appendix ndash monosymmetric beams 274615 Worked examples 275616 Unworked examples 290

References 291

7 Beam-columns 295

71 Introduction 29572 In-plane behaviour of isolated beam-columns 29673 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of isolated

beam-columns 31174 Biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns 31975 Appendix ndash in-plane behaviour of elastic beam-columns 32376 Appendix ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling of

elastic beam-columns 32677 Worked examples 32978 Unworked examples 343

References 345

8 Frames 347

81 Introduction 34782 Triangulated frames 348

viii Contents

83 Two-dimensional flexural frames 35084 Three-dimensional flexural frames 37285 Worked examples 37386 Unworked examples 386

References 388

9 Joints 392

91 Introduction 39292 Joint components 39293 Arrangement of joints 39694 Behaviour of joints 39895 Common joints 40696 Design of bolts 41097 Design of bolted plates 41498 Design of welds 41799 Appendix ndash elastic analysis of joints 420910 Worked examples 423911 Unworked examples 431

References 432

10 Torsion members 433

101 Introduction 433102 Uniform torsion 436103 Non-uniform torsion 449104 Torsion design 461105 Torsion and bending 466106 Distortion 469107 Appendix ndash uniform torsion 471108 Appendix ndash non-uniform torsion 473109 Worked examples 4781010 Unworked examples 484

References 485

Index 487

Preface

This fourth British edition has been directed specifically to the design of steel structures inaccordance with Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures The principal part of this is Part1-1General Rules and Rules for Buildings and this is referred to generally in the text asEC3 Also referred to in the text are Part 1-5 Plated Structural Elements and Part 1-8Design Of Joints which are referred to as EC3-1-5 and EC3-1-8 EC3 will be accompaniedby NationalAnnexes which will contain any National Determined Parameters for the UnitedKingdom which differ from the recommendations given in EC3

Designers who have previously used BS5950 (which is discussed in the third Britishedition of this book) will see a number of significant differences in EC3 One of the moreobvious is the notation The notation in this book has been changed generally so that it isconsistent with EC3

Another significant difference is the general absence of tables of values computed fromthe basic design equations which might be used to facilitate manual design Some design-ers will want to prepare their own tables but in some cases the complexities of the basicequations are such that computer programs are required for efficient design This is espe-cially the case for members under combined compression and bending which are discussedin Chapter 7 However the examples in this book are worked in full and do not rely on suchdesign aids

EC3 does not provide approximations for calculating the lateral buckling resistancesof beams but instead expects the designer to be able to determine the elastic bucklingmoment to be used in the design equations Additional information to assist designers inthis determination has been given in Chapter 6 of this book EC3 also expects the designerto be able to determine the elastic buckling loads of compression members The additionalinformation given in Chapter 3 has been retained to assist designers in the calculation ofthe elastic buckling loads

EC3 provides elementary rules for the design of members in torsion These are gener-alised and extended in Chapter 10 which contains a general treatment of torsion togetherwith a number of design aids

The preparation of this fourth British edition has provided an opportunity to revise thetext generally to incorporate the results of recent findings and research This is in accordancewith the principal objective of the book to provide students and practising engineers withan understanding of the relationships between structural behaviour and the design criteriaimplied by the rules of design codes such as EC3

NS Trahair MA Bradford DA Nethercot and L GardnerApril 2007

Units and conversion factors

Units

While most expressions and equations used in this book are arranged so that theyare non-dimensional there are a number of exceptions In all of these SI units areused which are derived from the basic units of kilogram (kg) for mass metre (m)for length and second (s) for time

The SI unit of force is the newton (N) which is the force which causes a mass of1 kg to have an acceleration of 1 ms2 The acceleration due to gravity is 9807 ms2

approximately and so the weight of a mass of 1 kg is 9807 NThe SI unit of stress is the pascal (Pa) which is the average stress exerted by a

force of 1 N on an area of 1 m2 The pascal is too small to be convenient in structuralengineering and it is common practice to use either the megapascal (1 MPa =106 Pa) or the identical newton per square millimetre (1 Nmm2 = 106 Pa) Thenewton per square millimetre (Nmm2) is used generally in this book

Table of conversion factors

To Imperial (British) units To SI units

1 kg = 0068 53 slug 1 slug = 1459 kg1 m = 3281 ft 1 ft = 0304 8 m

= 3937 in 1 in = 0025 4 m1 mm = 0003 281 ft 1 ft = 3048 mm

= 0039 37 in 1 in = 254 mm1 N = 0224 8 lb 1 lb = 4448 N1 kN = 0224 8 kip 1 kip = 4448 kN

= 0100 36 ton 1 ton = 9964 kN1 Nmm2lowastdagger = 0145 0 kipin2 (ksi) 1 kipin2 = 6895 Nmm2

= 0064 75 tonin2 1 tonin2 = 1544 Nmm2

1 kNm = 0737 6 kip ft 1 kip ft = 1356 kNm= 0329 3 ton ft 1 ton ft = 3037 kNm

Noteslowast 1 Nmm2 = 1 MPadagger There are some dimensionally inconsistent equations used in this book which arise

because a numerical value (in Nmm2) is substituted for the Youngrsquos modulus of elasticityE while the yield stress fy remains algebraic The value of the yield stress fy used in theseequations should therefore be expressed in Nmm2 Care should be used in convertingthese equations from SI to Imperial units

xii Glossary of terms

Distortion A mode of deformation in which the cross-section of a memberchanges shape

Effective length The length of an equivalent simply supported member whichhas the same elastic buckling load as the actual member Referred to in EC3 asthe buckling length

Effective width That portion of the width of a flat plate which has a non-uniformstress distribution (caused by local buckling or shear lag) which may be con-sidered as fully effective when the non-uniformity of the stress distribution isignored

Elastic buckling analysis An analysis of the elastic buckling of the member orframe out of the plane of loading

Elastic buckling load The load at elastic buckling Referred to in EC3 as theelastic critical buckling load

Elastic buckling stress The maximum stress at elastic buckling Referred to inEC3 as the elastic critical buckling stress

Factor of safety The factor by which the strength is divided to obtain the workingload capacity and the maximum permissible stress

Fastener A bolt pin rivet or weld used in a connectionFatigue A mode of failure in which a member fractures after many applications

of loadFirst-order analysis An analysis in which equilibrium is formulated for the

undeformed position of the structure so that the moments caused by productsof the loads and deflections are ignored

Flexural buckling A mode of buckling in which a member deflectsFlexuralndashtorsional buckling A mode of buckling in which a member deflects

and twists Referred to in EC3 as torsionalndashflexural buckling or lateralndashtorsionalbuckling

Friction-grip joint A joint in which forces are transferred by friction forces gen-erated between plates by clamping them together with preloaded high-strengthbolts

Geometrical imperfection Initial crookedness or twist of a memberGirt A horizontal member between columns which supports wall sheetingGusset A short-plate element used in a connectionImposed load The load assumed to act as a result of the use of the structure but

excluding wind loadInelastic behaviour Deformations accompanied by yieldingIn-plane behaviour The behaviour of a member which deforms only in the plane

of the applied loadsJoint The means by which members are connected together and through which

forces and moments are transmittedLateral buckling Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of a beam Referred to in EC3 as

lateralndashtorsional bucklingLimit states design Amethod of design in which the performance of the structure

is assessed by comparison with a number of limiting conditions of usefulness

Glossary of terms xiii

The most common conditions are the strength limit state and the serviceabilitylimit state

Load effects Internal forces and moments induced by the loadsLoad factor A factor used to multiply a nominal load to obtain part of the design

loadLoads Forces acting on a structureLocal buckling A mode of buckling which occurs locally (rather than generally)

in a thin-plate element of a memberMechanism A structural system with a sufficient number of frictionless and

plastic hinges to allow it to deform indefinitely under constant loadMember A one-dimensional structural element which supports transverse or

longitudinal loads or momentsNominal load The load magnitude determined from a loading code or

specificationNon-uniform torsion The general state of torsion in which the twist of the

member varies non-uniformlyPlastic analysis Amethod of analysis in which the ultimate strength of a structure

is computed by considering the conditions for which there are sufficient plastichinges to transform the structure into a mechanism

Plastic hinge A fully yielded cross-section of a member which allows themember portions on either side to rotate under constant moment (the plasticmoment)

Plastic section A section capable of reaching and maintaining the full plasticmoment until a plastic collapse mechanism is formed Referred to in EC3 as aClass 1 section

Post-buckling strength A reserve of strength after buckling which is possessedby some thin-plate elements

Preloaded bolts High-strength bolts used in friction-grip jointsPurlin A horizontal member between main beams which supports roof sheetingReduced modulus The modulus of elasticity used to predict the buckling of

inelastic members under the so called constant applied load because it isreduced below the elastic modulus

Residual stresses The stresses in an unloaded member caused by non-uniformplastic deformation or by uneven cooling after rolling flame cutting or welding

Rigid frame A frame with rigid connections between members Referred to inEC3 as a continuous frame

Second-order analysis An analysis in which equilibrium is formulated for thedeformed position of the structure so that the moments caused by the productsof the loads and deflections are included

Semi-compact section A section which can reach the yield stress but whichdoes not have sufficient resistance to inelastic local buckling to allow it to reachor to maintain the full plastic moment while a plastic mechanism is formingReferred to in EC3 as a Class 3 section

Semi-rigid frame A frame with semi-rigid connections between membersReferred to in EC3 as a semi-continuous frame

xiv Glossary of terms

Service loads The design loads appropriate for the serviceability limit stateShear centre The point in the cross-section of a beam through which the resultant

transverse force must act if the beam is not to twistShear lag A phenomenon which occurs in thin wide flanges of beams in which

shear straining causes the distribution of bending normal stresses to becomesensibly non-uniform

Simple frame A frame for which the joints may be assumed not to transmitmoments

Slender section Asection which does not have sufficient resistance to local buck-ling to allow it to reach the yield stress Referred to in EC3 as a Class 4 section

Splice A connection between two similar collinear membersSquash load The value of the compressive axial load which will cause yielding

throughout a short memberStiffener A plate or section attached to a web to strengthen a memberStrain-hardening Astressndashstrain state which occurs at stresses which are greater

than the yield stressStrength limit state The state of collapse or loss of structural integritySystem length Length between adjacent lateral brace points or between brace

point and an adjacent end of the memberTangent modulus The slope of the inelastic stressndashstrain curve which is used to

predict buckling of inelastic members under increasing loadTensile strength The maximum nominal stress which can be reached in tensionTension field A mode of shear transfer in the thin web of a stiffened plate girder

which occurs after elastic local buckling takes place In this mode the tensiondiagonal of each stiffened panel behaves in the same way as does the diagonaltension member of a parallel chord truss

Tension member A member which supports axial tension loadsTorsional buckling A mode of buckling in which a member twistsUltimate load design A method of design in which the ultimate load capacity

of the structure is compared with factored loadsUniform torque That part of the total torque which is associated with the rate

of change of the angle of twist of the member Referred to in EC3 as St Venanttorque

Uniform torsion The special state of torsion in which the angle of twist of themember varies linearly Referred to in EC3 as St Venant torsion

Warping A mode of deformation in which plane cross-sections do not remainin plane

Warping torque The other part of the total torque (than the uniform torque)This only occurs during non-uniform torsion and is associated with changes inthe warping of the cross-sections

Working load design A method of design in which the stresses caused by theservice loads are compared with maximum permissible stresses

Yield strength The average stress during yielding when significant strainingtakes place Usually the minimum yield strength in tension specified for theparticular steel

Glossary of terms

Actions The loads to which a structure is subjectedAdvanced analysis An analysis which takes account of second-order effects

inelastic behaviour residual stresses and geometrical imperfectionsBeam A member which supports transverse loads or moments onlyBeam-column A member which supports transverse loads or moments which

cause bending and axial loads which cause compressionBiaxial bending The general state of a member which is subjected to bending

actions in both principal planes together with axial compression and torsionactions

Brittle fracture Amode of failure under a tension action in which fracture occurswithout yielding

Buckling A mode of failure in which there is a sudden deformation in a directionor plane normal to that of the loads or moments acting

Buckling length The length of an equivalent simply supported member whichhas the same elastic buckling load as the actual member

Cleat A short-length component (often of angle cross-section) used in aconnection

Column A member which supports axial compression loadsCompact section Asection capable of reaching the full plastic moment Referred

to in EC3 as a Class 2 sectionComponent method of design A method of joint design in which the behaviour

of the joint is synthesised from the characteristics of its componentsConnection A jointDead load The weight of all permanent construction Referred to in EC3 as

permanent loadDeformation capacity A measure of the ability of a structure to deform as a

plastic collapse mechanism develops without otherwise failingDesign load A combination of factored nominal loads which the structure is

required to resistDesign resistance The capacity of the structure or element to resist the design

load

Notations

The following notation is used in this book Usually only one meaning is assignedto each symbol but in those cases where more meanings than one are possiblethen the correct one will be evident from the context in which it is used

Main symbols

A AreaB Bimomentb WidthC Coefficientc Width of part of sectiond Depth or DiameterE Youngrsquos modulus of elasticitye Eccentricity or ExtensionF Force or Force per unit lengthf Stress property of steelG Dead load or Shear modulus of elasticityH Horizontal forceh Height or Overall depth of sectionI Second moment of areai Integer or Radius of gyrationk Buckling coefficient or Factor or Relative stiffness ratioL LengthM Momentm IntegerN Axial force or Number of load cyclesn Integerp Distance between holes or rows of holesQ Loadq Intensity of distributed loadR Radius or Reaction or Resistancer Radius

xvi Notations

s SpacingT Torquet ThicknessU Strain energyu Deflection in x directionV Shear or Vertical loadv Deflection in y directionW Section modulus or Work donew Deflection in z directionx Longitudinal axisy Principal axis of cross-sectionz Principal axis of cross-sectionα Angle or Factor or Load factor at failure or Stiffnessχ Reduction factor∆ Deflection∆σ Stress rangeδ Amplification factor or Deflectionε Normal strain or Yield stress coefficient = radic

(235fy)φ Angle of twist rotation or Global sway imperfectionγ Partial factor or Shear strainκ Curvatureλ Plate slenderness = (ct)ελ Generalised slendernessmicro Slip factorν Poissonrsquos ratioθ Angleσ Normal stressτ Shear stress

Subscripts

as AntisymmetricB Bottomb Beam or Bearing or Bending or Bolt or Bracedc Centroid or Column or Compressioncr Elastic (critical) bucklingd DesignEd Design load effecteff Effectiveel ElasticF Forcef FlangeG Dead loadI Imposed load

Notations xvii

i Initial or Integerj Jointk Characteristic valueL LeftLT Lateral (or lateralndashtorsional) bucklingM Materialm Momentmax Maximummin MinimumN Axial forcen Integer or Nominal valuenet Netop Out-of-planep Bearing or Platep pl PlasticQ Variable loadR Resistance or Rightr Rafter or ReducedRd Design resistanceRk Characteristic resistances Slip or Storey or Sway or Symmetricser Servicest Stiffener or Strain hardeningT Top or Torsional bucklingt St Venant or uniform torsion or TensionTF Flexuralndashtorsional (or torsionalndashflexural) bucklingtf Tension fieldult UltimateV v ShearW Wind loadw Warping or Web or Weldx x axisy y axis or Yieldz z axisσ Normal stressτ Shear stress0 Initial value1ndash4 Cross-section class

Additional notationsAe Area enclosed by hollow sectionAf max Flange area at maximum sectionAf min Flange area at minimum section

xviii Notations

Ah Area of hole reduced for staggerAnt Anv Net areas subjected to tension or shearAs Tensile stress area of a boltAv Shear area of sectionC Index for portal frame bucklingCm Equivalent uniform moment factorD Plate rigidity Et312(1 minus v2)

D Vector of nodal deformationsEr Reduced modulusEt Tangent modulusF Buckling factor for beam-columns with unequal end momentsFpC Bolt preloadFL FT Weld longitudinal and transverse forces per unit lengthFT Rd Design resistance of a T-stub flange[G] Stability matrixIcz Second moment of area of compression flangeIm Second moment of area of memberIn = b3

ntn12Ir Second moment of area of restraining member or rafterIt Uniform torsion section constantIyz Product second moment of areaIw Warping torsion section constantIzm Value of Iz for critical segmentIzr Value of Iz for restraining segmentK Beam or torsion constant = radic

(π2EIwGJL2) or Fatigue lifeconstant

[K] Elastic stiffness matrixKm = radic

(π2EIyd2f 4GItL2)

Lc Distance between restraints or Length of column which failsunder N alone

Lj Length between end bolts in a long jointLm Length of critical segment or Member lengthLr Length of restraining segment or rafterLstable Stable length for member with plastic hingesLF Load factorMA MB End momentsMb0yRd Design member moment resistance when N = 0 and Mz = 0Mc0zRd Design member moment resistance when N = 0 and My = 0McrMN Elastic buckling moment reduced for axial compressionMN yRd MN zRd Major and minor axis beam section moment resistancesME = (πL)

radic(EIyGIt)

Mf First-order end moment of frame memberMfb Braced component of Mf

Notations xix

Mfp Major axis moment resisted by plastic flangesMfs Sway component of Mf

MI Inelastic beam buckling momentMIu Value of MI for uniform bendingML Limiting end moment on a crooked and twisted beam at first

yieldMmax0 Value of Mmax when N = 0MN Plastic moment reduced for axial forceMb Out-of-plane member moment resistance for bending aloneMbt Out-of-plane member moment resistance for bending and

tensionMry Mrz Section moment capacities reduced for axial loadMS Simple beam momentMty Lesser of Mry and Mbt

Mzx Value of Mcr for simply supported beam in uniform bendingMzxr Value of Mzx reduced for incomplete torsional end restraintNi Vector of initial axial forcesNbRd Design member axial force resistance when My = 0 and Mz = 0NcrMN Elastic buckling load reduced for bending momentNcrL = π2EIL2

Ncrr Reduced modulus buckling loadNim Constant amplitude fatigue life for ith stress rangeNcrt Tangent modulus buckling loadQD Concentrated dead loadQI Concentrated imposed loadQm Upper-bound mechanism estimate of Qult

Qms Value of Qs for the critical segmentQrs Value of Qs for an adjacent restraining segmentQs Buckling load for an unrestrained segment or Lower bound

static estimate of Qult

R Radius of circular cross-section or Ratio of column and rafterstiffnesses or Ratio of minimum to maximum stress

RH Ratio of rafter rise to column heightR R1minus4 Restraint parametersSF Factor of safetySj Joint stiffnessTM Torque exerted by bending momentTP Torque exerted by axial loadVR Resultant shear forceVTy VTz Transverse shear forces in a fillet weldVvi Shear force in ith fastenera = radic

(EIwGJ ) or Distance along member or Distance fromweb to shear centre or Effective throat size of a weld or Ratioof web to total section area or Spacing of transverse stiffeners

xx Notations

a0 Distance from shear centreb cf or cw

c Factor for flange contribution to shear resistancecm Bending coefficient for beam-columns with unequal end

momentsde Depth of elastic coredf Distance between flange centroidsd0 Hole diametere1 End distance in a platee2 Edge distance in a plateeNy Shift of effective compression force from centroidf Factor used to modify χLT

hw Clear distance between flangesif z Radius of gyration of equivalent compression flangeip Polar radius of gyration

i0 =radic(i2

p + y20 + z2

0)

k Deflection coefficient or Modulus of foundation reactionkc Slenderness correction factor or Correction factor for moment

distributionkij Interaction factors for bending and compressionks Factor for hole shape and sizekt Axial stiffness of connectorkv Shear stiffness of connectorkσ Plate buckling coefficientk1 Factor for plate tension fracturek1 k2 Stiffness factorseff Effective length of a fillet weld or Effective length of an

unstiffened column flangey Effective loaded lengthm Fatigue life index or Torque per unit lengthn Axial compression ratio or Number of shear planespF Probability of failurep(x) Particular integralp1 Pitch of bolt holesp2 Spacing of bolt hole liness Distance around thin-walled sectionss Stiff bearing lengths Staggered pitch of holessm Minimum staggered pitch for no reduction in effective areas1 s2 Side widths of a fillet weldw = WplWel

wAB Settlement of B relative to Awc Mid-span deflectionz Distance to centroid

Notations xxi

yp zp Distances to plastic neutral axesyr zr Coordinates of centre of rotationy0 z0 Coordinates of shear centrezc Distance to buckling centre of rotation or Distance to centroidzn Distance below centroid to neutral axiszQ Distance below centroid to loadzt Distance below centroid to translational restraintα Coefficient used to determine effective width or Unit warping

(see equation 1035)αbc Buckling coefficient for beam columns with unequal end

momentsαbcI Inelastic moment modification factor for bending and com-

pressionαbcu Value of αbc for ultimate strengthαd Factor for plate tear outαi In-plane load factorαL Limiting value of α for second mode bucklingαLT Imperfection factor for lateral bucklingαLα0 Indices in interaction equations for biaxial bendingαm Moment modification factor for beam lateral buckling

αn = (1A)int E

0 αtdsαr αt Rotational and translational stiffnessesαxαy Stiffnesses of rotational restraints acting about the x y axesαst Buckling moment factor for stepped and tapered beamsα β Indices in section interaction equations for biaxial bendingβ Correction factor for the lateral buckling of rolled sections or

Safety indexβe Stiffness factor for far end restraint conditionsβLf Reduction factor for bolts in long jointsβm End moment factor or Ratio of end momentsβw Fillet weld correlation factorβy Monosymmetry section constant for I-beamβ23 Effective net area factors for eccentrically connected tension

membersσC Reference value for fatigue siteσL Fatigue endurance limitε Load height parameter = (Kπ)2zQdf

Φ Cumulative frequency distribution of a standard normalvariate or Value used to determine χ

φCd Design rotation capacity of a jointφj Joint rotationγF γG γQ Load partial factorsγm γn γs Factors used in moment amplification

xxii Notations

γ12 Relative stiffnessesη Crookedness or imperfection parameter or Web shear resis-

tance factor (= 12 for steels up to S460)λc0 Slenderness limit of equivalent compression flangeλp Generalised plate slenderness = radic

(fyσcr)

λ1 = πradic(Efy)

micro = radic(NEI)

θ Central twist or Slope change at plastic hinge or Torsion stressfunction

ρ Perpendicular distance from centroid or Reduction factorρm Monosymmetric section parameter = IzcIz

ρc ρr Column and rafter factors for portal frame bucklingρ0 Perpendicular distance from shear centreσac σat Stresses due to axial compression and tensionσbcy Compression stress due to bending about y axisσbty σbtz Tension stresses due to bending about y z axesσcrl Bending stress at local bucklingσcrp Bearing stress at local bucklingσL Limiting major axis stress in a crooked and twisted beam at

first yieldτh τv Shear stresses due to Vy Vz

τhc τvc Shear stresses due to a circulating shear flowτho τvo Shear stresses in an open sectionψ End moment ratio or Stress ratioψ0 Load combination factor

Chapter 1

Introduction

11 Steel structures

Engineering structures are required to support loads and resist forces and totransfer these loads and forces to the foundations of the structures The loads andforces may arise from the masses of the structure or from manrsquos use of the struc-tures or from the forces of nature The uses of structures include the enclosure ofspace (buildings) the provision of access (bridges) the storage of materials (tanksand silos) transportation (vehicles) or the processing of materials (machines)Structures may be made from a number of different materials including steelconcrete wood aluminium stone plastic etc or from combinations of these

Structures are usually three-dimensional in their extent but sometimes they areessentially two-dimensional (plates and shells) or even one-dimensional (linesand cables) Solid steel structures invariably include comparatively high volumesof high-cost structural steel which are understressed and uneconomic except invery small-scale components Because of this steel structures are usually formedfrom one-dimensional members (as in rectangular and triangulated frames) orfrom two-dimensional members (as in box girders) or from both (as in stressedskin industrial buildings) Three-dimensional steel structures are often arranged sothat they act as if composed of a number of independent two-dimensional framesor one-dimensional members (Figure 11)

Structural steel members may be one-dimensional as for beams and columns(whose lengths are much greater than their transverse dimensions) or two-dimensional as for plates (whose lengths and widths are much greater than theirthicknesses) as shown in Figure 12c While one-dimensional steel members maybe solid they are usually thin-walled in that their thicknesses are much less thantheir other transverse dimensions Thin-walled steel members are rolled in a num-ber of cross-sectional shapes [1] or are built up by connecting together a numberof rolled sections or plates as shown in Figure 12b Structural members canbe classified as tension or compression members beams beam-columns torsionmembers or plates (Figure 13) according to the method by which they transmitthe forces in the structure The behaviour and design of these structural membersare discussed in this book

2 Introduction

[2-D]rigid frames

+

[1-D]beams(purlins and girts)

+

[2-D] bracingtrusses

[3-D] structure

equiv

Figure 11 Reduction of a [3-D] structure to simpler forms

(a) Solid [1-D] member (b) Thin-walled [1-D] members

(c) [2-D] member

t d ltlt L~~ t ltlt d ltlt L

t ltlt d L~~

Figure 12 Types of structural steel members

Structural steel members may be connected together at joints in a number ofways and by using a variety of connectors These include pins rivets bolts andwelds of various types Steel plate gussets or angle cleats or other elements mayalso be used in the connections The behaviour and design of these connectors andjoints are also discussed in this book

Introduction 3

(a) Tension member(b) Compression

member (c) Beam

(d) Beam-column (e) Torsion member (f) Plate

Figure 13 Load transmission by structural members

This book deals chiefly with steel frame structures composed of one-dimensionalmembers but much of the information given is also relevant to plate structuresThe members are generally assumed to be hot-rolled or fabricated from hot-rolledelements while the frames considered are those used in buildings However muchof the material presented is also relevant to bridge structures [2 3] and to structuralmembers cold-formed from light-gauge steel plates [4ndash7]

The purposes of this chapter are first to consider the complete design process andthe relationships between the behaviour and analysis of steel structures and theirstructural design and second to present information of a general nature (includinginformation on material properties and structural loads) which is required for usein the later chapters The nature of the design process is discussed first and thenbrief summaries are made of the relevant material properties of structural steeland of the structural behaviour of members and frames The loads acting on thestructures are considered and the choice of appropriate methods of analysing thesteel structures is discussed Finally the considerations governing the synthesis ofan understanding of the structural behaviour with the results of analysis to formthe design processes of EC3 [8] are treated

12 Design

121 Design requirements

The principal design requirement of a structure is that it should be effective thatis it should fulfil the objectives and satisfy the needs for which it was created The

4 Introduction

structure may provide shelter and protection against the environment by enclosingspace as in buildings or it may provide access for people and materials as inbridges or it may store materials as in tanks and silos or it may form part of amachine for transporting people or materials as in vehicles or for operating onmaterials The design requirement of effectiveness is paramount as there is littlepoint in considering a structure which will not fulfil its purpose

The satisfaction of the effectiveness requirement depends on whether the struc-ture satisfies the structural and other requirements The structural requirementsrelate to the way in which the structure resists and transfers the forces and loadsacting on it The primary structural requirement is that of safety and the first con-sideration of the structural engineer is to produce a structure which will not fail inits design lifetime or which has an acceptably low risk of failure The other impor-tant structural requirement is usually concerned with the stiffness of the structurewhich must be sufficient to ensure that the serviceability of the structure is notimpaired by excessive deflections vibrations and the like

The other design requirements include those of economy and of harmony Thecost of the structure which includes both the initial cost and the cost of mainte-nance is usually of great importance to the owner and the requirement of economyusually has a significant influence on the design of the structure The cost of thestructure is affected not only by the type and quantity of the materials used butalso by the methods of fabricating and erecting it The designer must thereforegive careful consideration to the methods of construction as well as to the sizes ofthe members of the structure

The requirements of harmony within the structure are affected by the relation-ships between the different systems of the structure including the load resistanceand transfer system (the structural system) the architectural system the mechan-ical and electrical systems and the functional systems required by the use of thestructure The serviceability of the structure is usually directly affected by the har-mony or lack of it between the systems The structure should also be in harmonywith its environment and should not react unfavourably with either the communityor its physical surroundings

122 The design process

The overall purpose of design is to invent a structure which will satisfy the designrequirements outlined in Section 121 Thus the structural engineer seeks to inventa structural system which will resist and transfer the forces and loads acting onit with adequate safety while making due allowance for the requirements of ser-viceability economy and harmony The process by which this may be achieved issummarised in Figure 14

The first step is to define the overall problem by determining the effectivenessrequirements and the constraints imposed by the social and physical environmentsand by the ownerrsquos time and money The structural engineer will need to consult theowner the architect the site construction mechanical and electrical engineers

Introduction 5

Definition of the problem

Invention of alternatives

Preliminary design

Preliminary evaluation

Selection

Modification

Final design

Final evaluation

Documentation

Execution

Use

Needs

Constraints

Objectives

Overall system

Structural system

Other systems

Structural designLoadsAnalysisProportioningOther design

Effectiveness

Safety and serviceability

Economy

Harmony

Structural design

Other design

DrawingsSpecification

TenderingConstruction andsupervisionCertification

Figure 14 The overall design process

and any authorities from whom permissions and approvals must be obtainedA set of objectives can then be specified which if met will ensure the successfulsolution of the overall design problem

The second step is to invent a number of alternative overall systems and theirassociated structural systems which appear to meet the objectives In doing sothe designer may use personal knowledge and experience or that which can be

6 Introduction

Invention or modificationof structural system

Preliminary analysis

Proportioning membersand joints

KnowledgeExperienceImaginationIntuitionCreativity

Approximations

Loads

Behaviour

Design criteria

Design codes

larrlarrlarrlarrlarr

---

larrlarr

AnalysisLoads

Behaviour

--

EvaluationDesign criteria

Design codes

larrlarr

Figure 15 The structural design process

gathered from others [9ndash12] or the designer may use his or her own imaginationintuition and creativity [13] or a combination of all of these

Following these first two steps of definition and invention come a series of stepswhich include the structural design evaluation selection and modification of thestructural system These may be repeated a number of times before the structuralrequirements are met and the structural design is finalised A typical structuraldesign process is summarised in Figure 15

After the structural system has been invented it must be analysed to obtain theinformation required for determining the member sizes First the loads supportedby and the forces acting on the structure must be determined For this purpose load-ing codes [14 15] are usually consulted but sometimes the designer determinesthe loading conditions or commissions experts to do this Anumber of approximateassumptions are made about the behaviour of the structure which is then analysedand the forces and moments acting on the members and joints of the structureare determined These are used to proportion the structure so that it satisfies thestructural requirements usually by referring to a design code such as EC3 [8]

At this stage a preliminary design of the structure will have been completed how-ever because of the approximate assumptions made about the structural behaviourit is necessary to check the design The first steps are to recalculate the loads and to

Introduction 7

reanalyse the structure designed and these are carried out with more precision thanwas either possible or appropriate for the preliminary analysis The performanceof the structure is then evaluated in relation to the structural requirements and anychanges in the member and joint sizes are decided on These changes may requirea further reanalysis and re-proportioning of the structure and this cycle may berepeated until no further change is required Alternatively it may be necessary tomodify the original structural system and repeat the structural design process untila satisfactory structure is achieved

The alternative overall systems are then evaluated in terms of their service-ability economy and harmony and a final system is selected as indicatedin Figure 14 This final overall system may be modified before the design isfinalised The detailed drawings and specifications can then be prepared andtenders for the construction can be called for and let and the structure canbe constructed Further modifications may have to be made as a consequenceof the tenders submitted or due to unforeseen circumstances discovered duringconstruction

This book is concerned with the structural behaviour of steel structures andthe relationships between their behaviour and the methods of proportioning themparticularly in relation to the structural requirements of the European steel struc-tures code EC3 and the modifications of these are given in the National AnnexesThis code consists of six parts with basic design using the conventional membersbeing treated in Part 1 This part is divided into 12 sub-parts with those likely tobe required most frequently being

Part 11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings [8]Part 15 Plated Structural Elements [16]Part 18 Design of Joints [17] andPart 110 Selection of Steel for Fracture Toughness and Through-Thickness

Properties [18]

Other parts that may be required from time to time include Part 12 that coversresistance to fire Part 13 dealing with cold-formed steel Part 19 dealing withfatigue and Part 2 [19] that covers bridges Composite construction is covered byEC4 [20] Since Part 11 of EC3 is the document most relevant to much of thecontent of this text (with the exception of Chapter 9 on joints) all references toEC3 made herein should be taken to mean Part 11 [8] including any modificationsgiven in the National Annex unless otherwise indicated

Detailed discussions of the overall design process are beyond the scope of thisbook but further information is given in [13] on the definition of the designproblem the invention of solutions and their evaluation and in [21ndash24] on theexecution of design Further the conventional methods of structural analysis areadequately treated in many textbooks [25ndash27] and are discussed in only a fewisolated cases in this book

8 Introduction

13 Material behaviour

131 Mechanical properties under static load

The important mechanical properties of most structural steels under static loadare indicated in the idealised tensile stressndashstrain diagram shown in Figure 16Initially the steel has a linear stressndashstrain curve whose slope is the Youngrsquos mod-ulus of elasticity E The values of E vary in the range 200 000ndash210 000 Nmm2and the approximate value of 205 000 Nmm2 is often assumed (EC3 uses210 000 Nmm2) The steel remains elastic while in this linear range and recoversperfectly on unloading The limit of the linear elastic behaviour is often closelyapproximated by the yield stress fy and the corresponding yield strain εy = fyEBeyond this limit the steel flows plastically without any increase in stress untilthe strain-hardening strain εst is reached This plastic range is usually consider-able and accounts for the ductility of the steel The stress increases above theyield stress fy when the strain-hardening strain εst is exceeded and this contin-ues until the ultimate tensile stress fu is reached After this large local reductionsin the cross-section occur and the load capacity decreases until tensile fracturetakes place

The yield stress fy is perhaps the most important strength characteristic of a struc-tural steel This varies significantly with the chemical constituents of the steel themost important of which are carbon and manganese both of which increase theyield stress The yield stress also varies with the heat treatment used andwith the amount of working which occurs during the rolling process Thus thinnerplates which are more worked have higher yield stresses than thicker plates of thesame constituency The yield stress is also increased by cold working The rateof straining affects the yield stress and high rates of strain increase the upper orfirst yield stress (see the broken line in Figure 16) as well as the lower yieldstress fy The strain rates used in tests to determine the yield stress of a particular

Upper yield stressStress

Strain

Strain-hardening E

Tensile rupture Plastic

Elastic E

f

f

0

u

y

y st

st

Not to scale

Figure 16 Idealised stressndashstrain relationship for structural steel

Introduction 9

steel type are significantly higher than the nearly static rates often encountered inactual structures

For design purposes a lsquominimumrsquo yield stress is identified for each differ-ent steel classification For EC3 these classifications are made on the basis of thechemical composition and the heat treatment and so the yield stresses in each clas-sification decrease as the greatest thickness of the rolled section or plate increasesThe minimum yield stress of a particular steel is determined from the results ofa number of standard tension tests There is a significant scatter in these resultsbecause of small variations in the local composition heat treatment amount ofworking thickness and the rate of testing and this scatter closely follows a nor-mal distribution curve Because of this the minimum yield stress fy quoted fora particular steel and used in design is usually a characteristic value which hasa particular chance (often 95) of being exceeded in any standard tension testConsequently it is likely that an isolated test result will be significantly higherthan the quoted yield stress This difference will of course be accentuated if thetest is made for any but the thickest portion of the cross-section In EC3 [8] theyield stress to be used in design is listed in Table 31 for hot-rolled structural steeland for structural hollow sections for each of the structural grades

The yield stress fy determined for uniaxial tension is usually accepted as beingvalid for uniaxial compression However the general state of stress at a point ina thin-walled member is one of biaxial tension andor compression and yieldingunder these conditions is not so simply determined Perhaps the most generallyaccepted theory of two-dimensional yielding under biaxial stresses acting in the1prime2prime plane is the maximum distortion-energy theory (often associated with namesof Huber von Mises or Hencky) and the stresses at yield according to this theorysatisfy the condition

σ 21prime minus σ1primeσ2prime + σ 2

2prime + 3σ 21prime2prime = f 2

y (11)

in which σ1prime σ2prime are the normal stresses and σ1prime2prime is the shear stress at the pointFor the case where 1prime and 2prime are the principal stress directions 1 and 2 equation 11takes the form of the ellipse shown in Figure 17 while for the case of pure shear(σ1prime = σ2prime = 0 so that σ1 = minusσ2 = σ1prime2prime) equation 11 reduces to

σ1prime2prime = fyradic

3 = τy (12)

which defines the shear yield stress τy

132 Fatigue failure under repeated loads

Structural steel may fracture at low average tensile stresses after a large numberof cycles of fluctuating load This high-cycle fatigue failure is initiated by localdamage caused by the repeated loads which leads to the formation of a small localcrack The extent of the fatigue crack is gradually increased by the subsequent loadrepetitions until finally the effective cross-section is so reduced that catastrophic

10 Introduction

Pri

ncip

al s

tres

s ra

tio

2f

y

100 10

10

ndash

ndash

10

Un i a x i a l t e n si o n

Pu r e s h e a r

Un i a x i a lco m p r e s s i o n

P r i n c i p a l s t r es s

Ma x i m u m d i s t o r t i o n - e n er g ycr i t e r i o n 1

2 ndash 12 + 12 = fy

2

rati o 1fy 2

Figure 17 Yielding under biaxial stresses

failure may occur High-cycle fatigue is only a design consideration when a largenumber of loading cycles involving tensile stresses is likely to occur during thedesign life of the structure (compressive stresses do not cause fatigue) This isoften the case for bridges cranes and structures which support machinery windand wave loading may also lead to fatigue problems

Factors which significantly influence the resistance to fatigue failure includethe number of load cycles N the range of stress

σ = σmax minus σmin (13)

during a load cycle and the magnitudes of local stress concentrations An indi-cation of the effect of the number of load cycles is given in Figure 18 whichshows that the maximum tensile stress decreases from its ultimate static value fuin an approximately linear fashion as the logarithm of the number of cycles Nincreases As the number of cycles increases further the curve may flatten out andthe maximum tensile stress may approach the endurance limit σL

The effects of the stress magnitude and stress ratio on the fatigue life are demon-strated in Figure 19 It can be seen that the fatigue life N decreases with increasingstress magnitude σmax and with decreasing stress ratio R = σminσmax

The effect of stress concentration is to increase the stress locally leading to localdamage and crack initiation Stress concentrations arise from sudden changes inthe general geometry and loading of a member and from local changes due tobolt and rivet holes and welds Stress concentrations also occur at defects in themember or its connectors and welds These may be due to the original rolling of thesteel or due to subsequent fabrication processes including punching shearing

Introduction 11

Max

imum

tens

ile

stre

ngh

Stress range = max ndash min

Stress ratio R = min max

max

1cycle

Ultimate tensile strength

Endurance limit

Number of cycles N (log scale)

(b) Fatigue strength(a) Stress cycle

Stress

min

f

Time1

u

L

Figure 18 Variation of fatigue strength with number of load cycles

Alternating

N =

N = 1

Max

imum

tens

ile

stre

ss

max

(Compression) Minimum stress min (Tension)

Staticloading

loadingTypical ofexperiments

Approximateequation 14

fufu

fu

R = ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

infin

Figure 19 Variation of fatigue life with stress magnitudes

and welding or due to damage such as that caused by stray arc fusions duringwelding

It is generally accepted for design purposes that the fatigue life N varies withthe stress range σ according to equations of the type

σC

)m (N

2 times 106

)= K (14)

in which the reference value σC depends on the details of the fatigue site andthe constants m and K may change with the number of cycles N This assumeddependence of the fatigue life on the stress range produces the approximatingstraight lines shown in Figure 19

12 Introduction

Reference values ∆C

Str

ess

rang

e ∆

=

max

ndash m

in(N

mm

2 )

Constant amplitudefatigue limit

m = 5 Cut-off limit1

Number of stress cycles N10 10 10 10 104 6 7 85 5 5 5 52

m = 3

m =3

m

10

50

100

500

1000

1401129071564536

16012510080635040

∆C =∆ when N = 2 times 106

Reference values ∆C

Figure 110 Variation of the EC3-1-9 fatigue life with stress range

EC3-1-1 [8] does not provide a treatment of fatigue since it is usually the casethat either the stress range σ or the number of high amplitude stress cycles Nis comparatively small However for structures supporting vibrating machineryand plant reference should be made to EC3-1-9 [28] The general relationshipsbetween the fatigue life N and the service stress rangeσ for constant amplitudestress cycles are shown in Figure 110 for reference valuesσC which correspondto different detail categories For N le 5 times 106 m = 3 and K = 1 so thatthe reference value σC corresponds to the value of σ at N = 2 times 106 For5 times 106 le N le 108 m = 5 and K = 0423 asymp 0543

Fatigue failure under variable amplitude stress cycles is normally assessed usingMinerrsquos rule [29]sum

NiNim le 1 (15)

in which Ni is the number of cycles of a particular stress range σi and Nim theconstant amplitude fatigue life for that stress range If any of the stress rangesexceeds the constant amplitude fatigue limit (at N = 5 times 106) then the effects ofstress ranges below this limit are included in equation 15

Designing against fatigue involves a consideration of joint arrangement as wellas of permissible stress Joints should generally be so arranged as to minimisestress concentrations and produce as smooth a lsquostress flowrsquo through the joint as ispracticable This may be done by giving proper consideration to the layout of ajoint by making gradual changes in section and by increasing the amount of mate-rial used at points of concentrated load Weld details should also be determined

Introduction 13

with this in mind and unnecessary lsquostress-raisersrsquo should be avoided It willalso be advantageous to restrict where practicable the locations of joints to lowstress regions such as at points of contraflexure or near the neutral axis Furtherinformation and guidance on fatigue design are given in [30ndash33]

133 Brittle fracture under impact load

Structural steel does not always exhibit a ductile behaviour and under some cir-cumstances a sudden and catastrophic fracture may occur even though the nominaltensile stresses are low Brittle fracture is initiated by the existence or formation ofa small crack in a region of high local stress Once initiated the crack may prop-agate in a ductile (or stable) fashion for which the external forces must supply theenergy required to tear the steel More serious are cracks which propagate at highspeed in a brittle (or unstable) fashion for which some of the internal elastic strainenergy stored in steel is released and used to fracture the steel Such a crack isself-propagating while there is sufficient internal strain energy and will continueuntil arrested by ductile elements in its path which have sufficient deformationcapacity to absorb the internal energy released

The resistance of a structure to brittle fracture depends on the magnitude of localstress concentrations on the ductility of the steel and on the three-dimensionalgeometrical constraints High local stresses facilitate crack initiation and so stressconcentrations due to poor geometry and loading arrangements (including impactloading) are dangerous Also of great importance are flaws and defects in thematerial which not only increase the local stresses but also provide potential sitesfor crack initiation

The ductility of a structural steel depends on its composition heat treatmentand thickness and varies with temperature and strain rate Figure 111 shows theincrease with temperature of the capacity of the steel to absorb energy during

Crack initiationand propagation easy

Crack initiationmore difficult

Crack initiationdifficult

Temperature

Ene

rgy

abso

rpti

on

Figure 111 Effect of temperature on resistance to brittle fracture

14 Introduction

impact At low temperatures the energy absorption is low and initiation andpropagation of brittle fractures are comparatively easy while at high temperaturesthe energy absorption is high because of ductile yielding and the propagation ofcracks can be arrested Between these two extremes is a transitional range in whichcrack initiation becomes increasingly difficult The likelihood of brittle fracture isalso increased by high strain rates due to dynamic loading since the consequentincrease in the yield stress reduces the possibility of energy absorption by ductileyielding The chemical composition of steel has a marked influence on its ductilitybrittleness is increased by the presence of excessive amounts of most non-metallicelements while ductility is increased by the presence of some metallic elementsSteel with large grain size tends to be more brittle and this is significantly influ-enced by heat treatment of the steel and by its thickness (the grain size tendsto be larger in thicker sections) EC3-1-10 [18] provides values of the maximumthickness t1 for different steel grades and minimum service temperatures as wellas advice on using a more advanced fracture mechanics [34] based approach andguidance on safeguarding against lamellar tearing

Three-dimensional geometrical constraints such as those occurring in thickeror more massive elements also encourage brittleness because of the higher localstresses and because of the greater release of energy during cracking and theconsequent increase in the ease of propagation of the crack

The risk of brittle fracture can be reduced by selecting steel types which haveductilities appropriate to the service temperatures and by designing joints with aview to minimising stress concentrations and geometrical constraints Fabricationtechniques should be such that they will avoid introducing potentially dangerousflaws or defects Critical details in important structures may be subjected to inspec-tion procedures aimed at detecting significant flaws Of course the designer mustgive proper consideration to the extra cost of special steels fabrication techniquesand inspection and correction procedures Further information on brittle fractureis given in [31 32 34]

14 Member and structure behaviour

141 Member behaviour

Structural steel members are required to transmit axial and transverse forces andmoments and torques as shown in Figure 13 The response of a member tothese actions can be described by the load-deformation characteristics shown inFigure 112

A member may have the linear response shown by curve 1 in Figure 112at least until the material reaches the yield stress The magnitudes of the defor-mations depend on the elastic moduli E and G Theoretically a member can onlybehave linearly while the maximum stress does not exceed the yield stress fyand so the presence of residual stresses or stress concentrations will cause earlynon-linearity However the high ductility of steel causes a local redistributionafter this premature yielding and it can often be assumed without serious error

Introduction 15

Load Buckling

Linear

Geometric non-linearity

Materialnon-linearity

Material and geometricnon-linearity

Deformation

1

2

3

4

5

Brittle fracture8Local buckling7

Fully plastic6

Figure 112 Member behaviour

that the member response remains linear until more general yielding occurs Themember behaviour then becomes non-linear (curve 2) and approaches the condi-tion associated with full plasticity (curve 6) This condition depends on the yieldstress fy

The member may also exhibit geometric non-linearity in that the bendingmoments and torques acting at any section may be influenced by the deformationsas well as by the applied forces This non-linearity which depends on the elasticmoduli E and G may cause the deformations to become very large (curve 3) as thecondition of elastic buckling is approached (curve 4) This behaviour is modifiedwhen the material becomes non-linear after first yield and the load may approacha maximum value and then decrease (curve 5)

The member may also behave in a brittle fashion because of local bucklingin a thin plate element of the member (curve 7) or because of material fracture(curve 8)

The actual behaviour of an individual member will depend on the forces actingon it Thus tension members laterally supported beams and torsion membersremain linear until their material non-linearity becomes important and then theyapproach the fully plastic condition However compression members and laterallyunsupported beams show geometric non-linearity as they approach their bucklingloads Beam-columns are members which transmit both transverse and axial loadsand so they display both material and geometric non-linearities

142 Structure behaviour

The behaviour of a structure depends on the load-transferring action of its mem-bers and joints This may be almost entirely by axial tension or compressionas in the triangulated structures with joint loading as shown in Figure 113a

16 Introduction

(a) Axial force (b) Bending (c) Shear(d) Axial force and bending

Figure 113 Structural load-transfer actions

Alternatively the members may support transverse loads which are transferred bybending and shear actions Usually the bending action dominates in structures com-posed of one-dimensional members such as beams and many single-storey rigidframes (Figure 113b) while shear becomes more important in two-dimensionalplate structures (Figure 113c) The members of many structures are subjectedto both axial forces and transverse loads such as those in multistorey buildings(Figure 113d) The load-transferring action of the members of a structure dependson the arrangement of the structure including the geometrical layout and the jointdetails and on the loading arrangement

In some structures the loading and joints are such that the members are effec-tively independent For example in triangulated structures with joint loads anyflexural effects are secondary and the members can be assumed to act as ifpin-jointed while in rectangular frames with simple flexible joints the momenttransfers between beams and columns may be ignored In such cases the responseof the structure is obtained directly from the individual member responses

More generally however there will be interactions between the members andthe structure behaviour is not unlike the general behaviour of a member as canbe seen by comparing Figures 114 and 112 Thus it has been traditional toassume that a steel structure behaves elastically under the service loads Thisassumption ignores local premature yielding due to residual stresses and stressconcentrations but these are not usually serious Purely flexural structures andpurely axial structures with lightly loaded compression members behave as iflinear (curve 1 in Figure 114) However structures with both flexural and axialactions behave non-linearly even near the service loads (curve 3 in Figure 114)This is a result of the geometrically non-linear behaviour of its members (seeFigure 112)

Most steel structures behave non-linearly near their ultimate loads unless theyfail prematurely due to brittle fracture fatigue or local buckling This non-linearbehaviour is due either to material yielding (curve 2 in Figure 114) or memberor frame buckling (curve 4) or both (curve 5) In axial structures failure may

Introduction 17

Load Buckling

Linear

Geometric non-linearity

Material non-linearity

Material and geometricnon-linearity

Deformation

1

2

3

4

5

Figure 114 Structure behaviour

involve yielding of some tension members or buckling either of some compressionmembers or of the frame or both In flexural structures failure is associated withfull plasticity occurring at a sufficient number of locations that the structure canform a collapse mechanism In structures with both axial and flexural actions thereis an interaction between yielding and buckling (curve 5 in Figure 114) and thefailure load is often difficult to determine The transitions shown in Figure 114between the elastic and ultimate behaviour often take place in a series of non-linearsteps as individual elements become fully plastic or buckle

15 Loads

151 General

The loads acting on steel structures may be classified as dead loads as imposedloads including both gradually applied and dynamic loads as wind loads as earthor ground-water loads or as indirect forces including those due to temperaturechanges foundation settlement and the like The more general collective termActions is used throughout the Eurocodes The structural engineer must evaluatethe magnitudes of any of these loads which will act and must determine thosewhich are the most severe combinations of loads for which the structure must bedesigned These loads are discussed in the following subsections both individuallyand in combinations

152 Dead loads

The dead loads acting on a structure arise from the weight of the structure includingthe finishes and from any other permanent construction or equipment The dead

18 Introduction

loads will vary during construction but thereafter will remain constant unlesssignificant modifications are made to the structure or its permanent equipment

The dead load may be assessed from the knowledge of the dimensions and spe-cific weights or from the total weights of all the permanent items which contributeto the total dead load Guidance on specific weights is given in [14] the valuesin which are average values representative of the particular materials The dimen-sions used to estimate dead loads should also be average and representative inorder that consistent estimates of the dead loads can be made By making theseassumptions the statistical distribution of dead loads is often taken as being of aWeibull type [35] The practice sometimes used of consistently overestimatingdimensions and specific weights is often wasteful and may also be danger-ous in cases where the dead load component acts in the opposite sense to theresultant load

153 Imposed loads

The imposed loads acting on a structure are gravity loads other than the dead loadsand arise from the weights of materials added to the structure as a result of its usesuch as materials stored people and snow Imposed loads usually vary both inspace and time Imposed loads may be sub-divided into two groups dependingon whether they are gradually applied in which case static load equivalents canbe used or whether they are dynamic including repeated loads and impact orimpulsive loads

Gradually applied imposed loads may be sustained over long periods of timeor may vary slowly with time [36] The past practice however was to consideronly the total imposed load and so only extreme values (which occur rarely andmay be regarded as lifetime maximum loads) were specified The present imposedloads specified in loading codes [14] often represent peak loads which have 95probability of not being exceeded over a 50-year period based on a Weibull typedistribution [35]

It is usual to consider the most severe spatial distribution of the imposed loadsand this can only be determined by using both the maximum and minimum valuesof the imposed loads In the absence of definite knowledge it is often assumed thatthe minimum values are zero When the distribution of imposed load over largeareas is being considered the maximum imposed loads specified which representrare events are often reduced in order to make some allowance for the decreasedprobability that the maximum imposed loads will act on all areas at the same time

Dynamic loads which act on structures include both repeated loads and impactand blast loads Repeated loads are of significance in fatigue problems (see Section132) in which case the designer is concerned with both the magnitudes rangesand the number of repetitions of loads which are very frequently applied At theother extreme impact loads (which are particularly important in the brittle fractureproblems discussed in Section 133) are usually specified by values of extrememagnitude which represent rare events In structures for which the static loads

Introduction 19

dominate it is common to replace the dynamic loads by static force equivalents[14] However such a procedure is likely to be inappropriate when the dynamicloads form a significant proportion of the total load in which case a proper dynamicanalysis [37 38] of the structure and its response should be made

154 Wind loads

The wind loads which act on structures have traditionally been allowed for byusing static force equivalents The first step is usually to determine a basic windspeed for the general region in which the structure is to be built by using infor-mation derived from meteorological studies This basic wind speed may representan extreme velocity measured at a height of 10 m and averaged over a period of3 seconds which has a return period of 50 years (ie a velocity which will onaverage be reached or exceeded once in 50 years or have a probability of beingexceeded of 150) The basic wind speed may be adjusted to account for the topog-raphy of the site for the ground roughness structure size and height above groundand for the degree of safety required and the period of exposure The resultingdesign wind speed may then be converted into the static pressure which will beexerted by the wind on a plane surface area (this is often referred to as the dynamicwind pressure because it is produced by decelerating the approaching wind veloc-ity to zero at the surface area) The wind force acting on the structure may thenbe calculated by using pressure coefficients appropriate to each individual surfaceof the structure or by using force coefficients appropriate to the total structureMany values of these coefficients are tabulated in [15] but in special cases wherethese are inappropriate the results of wind tunnel tests on model structures maybe used

In some cases it is not sufficient to treat wind loads as static forces For examplewhen fatigue is a problem both the magnitudes and the number of wind fluctuationsmust be estimated In other cases the dynamic response of a structure to wind loadsmay have to be evaluated (this is often the case with very flexible structures whoselong natural periods of vibration are close to those of some of the wind gusts) andthis may be done analytically [37 38] or by specialists using wind tunnel testsIn these cases special care must be taken to model correctly those properties ofthe structure which affect its response including its mass stiffness and dampingas well as the wind characteristics and any interactions between wind and structure

155 Earth or ground-water loads

Earth or ground-water loads act as pressure loads normal to the contact surface ofthe structure Such loads are usually considered to be essentially static

However earthquake loads are dynamic in nature and their effects on the struc-ture must be allowed for Very flexible structures with long natural periods ofvibration respond in an equivalent static manner to the high frequencies of earth-quake movements and so can be designed as if loaded by static force equivalents

20 Introduction

On the other hand stiff structures with short natural periods of vibration respondsignificantly and so in such a case a proper dynamic analysis [37 38] shouldbe made The intensities of earthquake loads vary with the region in which thestructure is to be built but they are not considered to be significant in the UK

156 Indirect forces

Indirect forces may be described as those forces which result from the strainingof a structure or its components and may be distinguished from the direct forcescaused by the dead and applied loads and pressures The straining may arise fromtemperature changes from foundation settlement from shrinkage creep or crack-ing of structural or other materials and from the manufacturing process as in thecase of residual stresses The values of indirect forces are not usually specifiedand so it is common for the designer to determine which of these forces should beallowed for and what force magnitudes should be adopted

157 Combinations of loads

The different loads discussed in the preceding subsections do not occur alone but incombinations and so the designer must determine which combination is the mostcritical for the structure However if the individual loads which have differentprobabilities of occurrence and degrees of variability were combined directlythe resulting load combination would have a greatly reduced probability Thusit is logical to reduce the magnitudes of the various components of a combinationaccording to their probabilities of occurrence This is similar to the procedure usedin reducing the imposed load intensities used over large areas

The past design practice was to use the worst combination of dead load withimposed load andor wind load and to allow increased stresses whenever thewind load was included (which is equivalent to reducing the load magnitudes)These increases seem to be logical when imposed and wind loads act togetherbecause the probability that both of these loads will attain their maximum valuessimultaneously is greatly reduced However they are unjustified when applied inthe case of dead and wind load for which the probability of occurrence is virtuallyunchanged from that of the wind load

A different and more logical method of combining loads is used in the EC3 limitstates design method [8] which is based on statistical analyses of the loads andthe structure capacities (see Section 1734) Strength design is usually carriedout for the most severe combination of actions for normal (termed persistent) ortemporary (termed transient) conditions usingsum

jge1

γG jGk j + γQ1Qk 1 +sumigt1

γQiψ0iQk i (16)

where implies lsquothe combined effect ofrsquo γG and γQ are partial factors for thepersistent G and variable Q actions andψ0 is a combination factor The concept is

Introduction 21

Table 11 Partial load factors for common situations

Ultimate limit state Permanent actions γG Variable actions γQ

Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable

EQU 11 09 15 0STRGEO 135 10 15 0

thus to use all the persistent actions Gk j such as self-weight and fixed equipmentwith a leading variable action Qk 1 such as imposed snow or wind load andreduced values of the other variable actions Qk i More information on the Eurocodeapproach to loading for steel structures is given in [39ndash41]

This approach is applied to the following forms of ultimate limit state

EQU = loss of static equilibrium of the structure on any part of itSTR = failure by excessive deformation transformation of the structure or

any part of it into a mechanism rupture or loss of stability of thestructure or of any part of it

GEO = failure or excessive deformation of the groundFAT = fatigue failure

For the most common set of design situations use of the appropriate values from[41] gives the load factors of Table 11

Using the combination factors of ψ0 = 07 and 05 of [41] for most variableactions and wind actions respectively leads to the following common STR loadcombinations for buildings

135 G + 15 QI + 075 QW

135 G + 105 QI + 15 QW

minus 10 G + 15 QI and

minus 10 G + 15 QW

in which the minus signs indicate that the permanent action is favourable

16 Analysis of steel structures

161 General

In the design process the assessment of whether the structural design require-ments will be met or not requires the knowledge of the stiffness and strength ofthe structure under load and of its local stresses and deformations The term struc-tural analysis is used to denote the analytical process by which this knowledge

22 Introduction

of the response of the structure can be obtained The basis for this process is theknowledge of the material behaviour and this is used first to analyse the behaviourof the individual members and joints of the structure The behaviour of the completestructure is then synthesised from these individual behaviours

The methods of structural analysis are fully treated in many textbooks[eg 25ndash27] and so details of these are not within the scope of this book Howeversome discussion of the concepts and assumptions of structural analysis is neces-sary so that the designer can make appropriate assumptions about the structure andmake a suitable choice of the method of analysis

In most methods of structural analysis the distribution of forces and momentsthroughout the structure is determined by using the conditions of static equilib-rium and of geometric compatibility between the members at the joints The wayin which this is done depends on whether a structure is statically determinate(in which case the complete distribution of forces and moments can be determinedby statics alone) or is statically indeterminate (in which case the compatibilityconditions for the deformed structure must also be used before the analysis can becompleted)

An important feature of the methods of structural analysis is the constitutiverelationships between the forces and moments acting on a member or connectionand its deformations These play the same role for the structural element as do thestressndashstrain relationships for an infinitesimal element of a structural material Theconstitutive relationship may be linear (force proportional to deflection) and elastic(perfect recovery on unloading) or they may be non-linear because of material non-linearities such as yielding (inelastic) or because of geometrical non-linearities(elastic) such as when the deformations themselves induce additional momentsas in stability problems

It is common for the designer to idealise the structure and its behaviour so asto simplify the analysis A three-dimensional frame structure may be analysed asthe group of a number of independent two-dimensional frames while individualmembers are usually considered as one-dimensional and the joints as points Thejoints may be assumed to be frictionless hinges or to be semi-rigid or rigid Insome cases the analysis may be replaced or supplemented by tests made on anidealised model which approximates part or all of the structure

162 Analysis of statically determinate membersand structures

For an isolated statically determinate member the forces and moments acting onthe member are already known and the structural analysis is only used to determinethe stiffness and strength of the member A linear elastic (or first-order elastic)analysis is usually made of the stiffness of the member when the material non-linearities are generally unimportant and the geometrical non-linearities are oftensmall The strength of the member however is not so easily determined as oneor both of the material and geometric non-linearities are most important Instead

Introduction 23

the designer usually relies on a design code or specification for this informationThe strength of the isolated statically determinate members is fully discussed inChapters 2ndash7 and 10

For a statically determinate structure the principles of static equilibrium areused in the structural analysis to determine the member forces and moments andthe stiffness and strength of each member are then determined in the same way asfor statically determinate members

163 Analysis of statically indeterminate structures

A statically indeterminate structure can be approximately analysed if a sufficientnumber of assumptions are made about its behaviour to allow it to be treated asif determinate One method of doing this is to guess the locations of points ofzero bending moment and to assume there are frictionless hinges at a sufficientnumber of these locations that the member forces and moments can be determinedby statics alone Such a procedure is commonly used in the preliminary analysisof a structure and followed at a later stage by a more precise analysis Howevera structure designed only on the basis of an approximate analysis can still be safeprovided the structure has sufficient ductility to redistribute any excess forces andmoments Indeed the method is often conservative and its economy increaseswith the accuracy of the estimated locations of the points of zero bending momentMore commonly a preliminary analysis is made of the structure based on thelinear elastic computer methods of analysis [42 43] using approximate memberstiffnesses

The accurate analysis of statically indeterminate structures is complicated by theinteraction between members the equilibrium and compatibility conditions andthe constitutive relationships must all be used in determining the member forcesand moments There are a number of different types of analysis which might bemade and some indication of the relevance of these is given in Figure 115 andin the following discussion Many of these can only be used for two-dimensionalframes

For many structures it is common to use a first-order elastic analysis which isbased on linear elastic constitutive relationships and which ignores any geometricalnon-linearities and associated instability problems The deformations determinedby such an analysis are proportional to the applied loads and so the principle ofsuperposition can be used to simplify the analysis It is often assumed that axialand shear deformations can be ignored in structures whose action is predominantlyflexural and that flexural and shear deformations can be ignored in structureswhose member forces are predominantly axial These assumptions further simplifythe analysis which can then be carried out by any of the well-known methods[25ndash27] for which many computer programs are available [44 45] Some of theseprograms can be used for three-dimensional frames

However a first-order elastic analysis will underestimate the forces andmoments in and the deformations of a structure when instability effects are present

24 Introduction

Deformation

Load

First-order elastic analysis

Elastic stability analysis

Second-orderelastic analysis

First-order plasticanalysis

Advancedanalysis

Strength load

Service load

1

4

3

2

5

Figure 115 Predictions of structural analyses

Some estimate of the importance of these in the absence of flexural effects can beobtained by making an elastic stability analysis A second-order elastic analysisaccounts for both flexure and instability but this is difficult to carry out althoughcomputer programs are now generally available [44 45] EC3 permits the useof the results of an elastic stability analysis in the amplification of the first-ordermoments as an alternative to second-order analysis

The analysis of statically indeterminate structures near the ultimate load isfurther complicated by the decisive influence of the material and geometricalnon-linearities In structures without material non-linearities an elastic stabilityanalysis is appropriate when there are no flexural effects but this is a rare occur-rence On the other hand many flexural structures have very small axial forcesand instability effects in which case it is comparatively easy to use a first-orderplastic analysis according to which a sufficient number of plastic hinges mustform to transform the structure into a collapse mechanism

More generally the effects of instability must be allowed for and as a firstapproximation the nominal first yield load determined from a second-order elasticanalysis may be used as a conservative estimate of the ultimate load A much moreaccurate estimate may be obtained for structures where local and lateral bucklingis prevented by using an advanced analysis [46] in which the actual behaviour isclosely analysed by allowing for instability yielding residual stresses and initialcrookedness However this method is not yet in general use

17 Design of steel structures

171 Structural requirements and design criteria

The designerrsquos task of assessing whether or not a structure will satisfy the structuralrequirements of serviceability and strength is complicated by the existence of errors

Introduction 25

and uncertainties in his or her analysis of the structural behaviour and estimation ofthe loads acting and even in the structural requirements themselves The designerusually simplifies this task by using a number of design criteria which allow him orher to relate the structural behaviour predicted by his or her analysis to the structuralrequirements Thus the designer equates the satisfaction of these criteria by thepredicted structural behaviour with satisfaction of the structural requirements bythe actual structure

In general the various structural design requirements relate to correspondinglimit states and so the design of a structure to satisfy all the appropriate require-ments is often referred to as a limit states design The requirements are commonlypresented in a deterministic fashion by requiring that the structure shall not failor that its deflections shall not exceed prescribed limits However it is not possibleto be completely certain about the structure and its loading and so the structuralrequirements may also be presented in probabilistic forms or in deterministicforms derived from probabilistic considerations This may be done by defining anacceptably low risk of failure within the design life of the structure after reachingsome sort of balance between the initial cost of the structure and the economic andhuman losses resulting from failure In many cases there will be a number of struc-tural requirements which operate at different load levels and it is not unusual torequire a structure to suffer no damage at one load level but to permit some minordamage to occur at a higher load level provided there is no catastrophic failure

The structural design criteria may be determined by the designer or he or shemay use those stated or implied in design codes The stiffness design criteriaadopted are usually related to the serviceability limit state of the structure underthe service loads and are concerned with ensuring that the structure has sufficientstiffness to prevent excessive deflections such as sagging distortion and settle-ment and excessive motions under dynamic load including sway bounce andvibration

The strength limit state design criteria are related to the possible methods offailure of the structure under overload and understrength conditions and so thesedesign criteria are concerned with yielding buckling brittle fracture and fatigueAlso of importance is the ductility of the structure at and near failure ductilestructures give a warning of the impending failure and often redistribute the loadeffects away from the critical regions while ductility provides a method of energydissipation which will reduce the damage due to earthquake and blast loading Onthe other hand a brittle failure is more serious as it occurs with no warning offailure and in a catastrophic fashion with a consequent release of stored energyand increase in damage Other design criteria may also be adopted such as thoserelated to corrosion and fire

172 Errors and uncertainties

In determining the limitations prescribed by design criteria account must be takenof the deliberate and accidental errors made by the designer and of the uncertainties

26 Introduction

in his or her knowledge of the structure and its loads Deliberate errors includethose resulting from the assumptions made to simplify the analysis of the loadingand of the structural behaviour These assumptions are often made so that anyerrors involved are on the safe side but in many cases the nature of the errorsinvolved is not precisely known and some possibility of danger exists

Accidental errors include those due to a general lack of precision either inthe estimation of the loads and the analysis of the structural behaviour or in themanufacture and erection of the structure The designer usually attempts to controlthe magnitudes of these by limiting them to what he or she judges to be suitablysmall values Other accidental errors include what are usually termed blundersThese may be of a gross magnitude leading to failure or to uneconomic structuresor they may be less important Attempts are usually made to eliminate blunders byusing checking procedures but often these are unreliable and the logic of such aprocess is open to debate

As well as the errors described above there exist a number of uncertaintiesabout the structure itself and its loads The material properties of steel fluctuateespecially the yield stress and the residual stresses The practice of using a min-imum or characteristic yield stress for design purposes usually leads to oversafedesigns especially for redundant structures of reasonable size for which an aver-age yield stress would be more appropriate because of the redistribution of loadwhich takes place after early yielding Variations in the residual stress levels arenot often accounted for in design codes but there is a growing tendency to adjustdesign criteria in accordance with the method of manufacture so as to make someallowance for gross variations in the residual stresses This is undertaken to someextent in EC3

The cross-sectional dimensions of rolled-steel sections vary and the valuesgiven in section handbooks are only nominal especially for the thicknesses ofuniversal sections The fabricated lengths of a structural member will vary slightlyfrom the nominal length but this is usually of little importance except wherethe variation induces additional stresses because of lack-of-fit problems or wherethere is a cumulative geometrical effect Of some significance to members subjectto instability problems are the variations in their straightness which arise duringmanufacture fabrication and erection Some allowances for these are usuallymade in design codes while fabrication and erection tolerances are specified inEN1090 [47] to prevent excessive crookedness

The loads acting on a structure vary significantly Uncertainty exists in thedesignerrsquos estimate of the magnitude of the dead load because of the variations inthe densities of materials and because of the minor modifications to the structureduring or subsequent to its erection Usually these variations are not very signif-icant and a common practice is to err on the safe side by making conservativeassumptions Imposed loadings fluctuate significantly during the design usage ofthe structure and may change dramatically with changes in usage These fluctua-tions are usually accounted for by specifying what appear to be extreme values inloading codes but there is often a finite chance that these values will be exceeded

Introduction 27

Wind loads vary greatly and the magnitudes specified in loading codes are usuallyobtained by probabilistic methods

173 Strength design

1731 Load and capacity factors and factors of safety

The errors and uncertainties involved in the estimation of the loads on and thebehaviour of a structure may be allowed for in strength design by using load fac-tors to increase the nominal loads and capacity factors to decrease the structuralstrength In the previous codes that employed the traditional working stress designthis was achieved by using factors of safety to reduce the failure stresses to permis-sible working stress values The purpose of using various factors is to ensure thatthe probability of failure under the most adverse conditions of structural overloadand understrength remains very small The use of these factors is discussed in thefollowing subsections

1732 Working stress design

The working stress methods of design given in previous codes and specificationsrequired that the stresses calculated from the most adverse combination of loadsmust not exceed the specified permissible stresses These specified stresses wereobtained after making some allowances for the non-linear stability and materialeffects on the strength of isolated members and in effect were expressions of theirultimate strengths divided by the factors of safety SF Thus

Working stress le Permissible stress asymp Ultimate stress

SF(16)

It was traditional to use factors of safety of 17 approximatelyThe working stress method of a previous steel design code [48] has been replaced

by the limit states design method of EC3 Detailed discussions of the working stressmethod are available in the first edition of this book [49]

1733 Ultimate load design

The ultimate load methods of designing steel structures required that the calculatedultimate load-carrying capacity of the complete structure must not exceed the mostadverse combination of the loads obtained by multiplying the working loads bythe appropriate load factors LF Thussum

(Working load times LF) le Ultimate load (17)

These load factors allowed some margins for any deliberate and accidentalerrors and for the uncertainties in the structure and its loads and also provided the

28 Introduction

structure with a reserve of strength The values of the factors should depend on theload type and combination and also on the risk of failure that could be expectedand the consequences of failure A simplified approach often employed (perhapsillogically) was to use a single load factor on the most adverse combination of theworking loads

A previous code [48] allowed the use of the plastic method of ultimate loaddesign when stability effects were unimportant These have used load factors of170 approximately However this ultimate load method has also been replacedby the limit states design method in EC3 and will not be discussed further

1734 Limit states design

It was pointed out in Section 156 that different types of load have different proba-bilities of occurrence and different degrees of variability and that the probabilitiesassociated with these loads change in different ways as the degree of overloadconsidered increases Because of this different load factors should be used for thedifferent load types

Thus for limit states design the structure is deemed to be satisfactory if itsdesign load effect does not exceed its design resistance The design load effectis an appropriate bending moment torque axial force or shear force and iscalculated from the sum of the effects of the specified (or characteristic) loadsFk multiplied by partial factors γGQ which allow for the variabilities of the loadsand the structural behaviour The design resistance RkγM is calculated from thespecified (or characteristic) resistance Rk divided by the partial factor γM whichallows for the variability of the resistance Thus

Design load effect le Design resistance (18a)

or sumγgQ times (effect of specified loads) le (specified resistanceγM ) (18b)

Although the limit states design method is presented in deterministic formin equations 18 the partial factors involved are usually obtained by usingprobabilistic models based on statistical distributions of the loads and thecapacities Typical statistical distributions of the total load and the structuralcapacity are shown in Figure 116 The probability of failure pF is indicatedby the region for which the load distribution exceeds that for the structuralcapacity

In the development of limit state codes the probability of failure pF is usuallyrelated to a parameter β called the safety index by the transformation

Φ(minusβ) = pF (19)

where the functionΦ is the cumulative frequency distribution of a standard normalvariate [35] The relationship between β and pF shown in Figure 117 indicates

Introduction 29

Total load effect or resistance

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Total loadeffect

Resistance

Shaded area illustratesprobability of failure

Sum

of

effe

cts

of s

peci

fied

load

sD

esig

n lo

ad e

ffec

t

Des

ign

resi

stan

ce

Spe

cifi

ed r

esis

tanc

e

Figure 116 Limit states design

ndash8 ndash6 ndash4 ndash2

Probability of failure pF

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Saf

ety

inde

x

10 10 10 10

Figure 117 Relationship between safety index and probability of failure

that an increase in β of 05 implies a decrease in the probability of failure byapproximately an order of magnitude

The concept of the safety index was used to derive the partial factors for EC3This was done with reference to previous national codes such as BS 5950 [50]to obtain comparable values of the probability of failure pF although much ofthe detailed calibration treated the load and resistance sides of equations 18separately

30 Introduction

174 Stiffness design

In the stiffness design of steel structures the designer seeks to make the structuresufficiently stiff so that its deflections under the most adverse working load con-ditions will not impair its strength or serviceability These deflections are usuallycalculated by a first-order linear elastic analysis although the effects of geometri-cal non-linearities should be included when these are significant as in structureswhich are susceptible to instability problems The design criteria used in the stiff-ness design relate principally to the serviceability of the structure in that theflexibility of the structure should not lead to damage of any non-structural compo-nents while the deflections should not be unsightly and the structure should notvibrate excessively It is usually left to the designer to choose limiting values foruse in these criteria which are appropriate to the structure although a few valuesare suggested in some design codes The stiffness design criteria which relate tothe strength of the structure itself are automatically satisfied when the appropriatestrength design criteria are satisfied

References

1 British Standards Institution (2005) BS4-1 Structural Steel Sections-Part 1 Specifica-tion for hot-rolled sections BSI London

2 OrsquoConnor C (1971) Design of Bridge Superstructures John Wiley New York3 Chatterjee S (1991) The Design of Modern Steel Bridges BSP Professional Books

Oxford4 Rhodes J (editor) (1991) Design of Cold Formed Members Elsevier Applied Science

London5 Rhodes J and Lawson RM (1992) Design of Steel Structures Using Cold Formed

Steel Sections Steel Construction Institute Ascot6 Yu W-W (2000) Cold-Formed Steel Design 3rd edition John Wiley New York7 Hancock GJ (1998) Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structures 3rd edition Australian

Institute of Steel Construction Sydney8 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 11

General Rules and Rules for Buildings BS EN 1993-1-1 BSI London9 Nervi PL (1956) Structures McGraw-Hill New York

10 Salvadori MG and Heller R (1963) Structure in Architecture Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

11 Torroja E (1958) The Structures of Educardo Torroja FW Dodge Corp New York12 Fraser DJ (1981) Conceptual Design and Preliminary Analysis of Structures Pitman

Publishing Inc Marshfield Massachusetts13 Krick EV (1969) An Introduction to Engineering and Engineering Design 2nd

edition John Wiley New York14 British Standards Institution (2002) Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 11

General Actions ndash Densities Self-weight Imposed Loads for Buildings BS EN1991-1-1 BSI London

15 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 14General Actions ndash Wind Actions BS EN 1991-1-4 BSI London

Introduction 31

16 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 15Plated Structural Elements BS EN 1993-1-5 BSI London

17 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 18Design of Joints BS EN 1993-1-8 BSI London

18 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 110Selection of Steel for Fracture Toughness and Through-Thickness Properties BS EN1993-1-10 BSI London

19 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 2Steel Bridges BS EN 1993-2 BSI London

20 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 4 Design of Composite Steel and Con-crete Structures Part 11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings BS EN 1994-1-1BSI London

21 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2003) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th editionBlackwell Publishing Oxford

22 CIMsteel (1997) Design for Construction Steel Construction Institute Ascot23 Antill JM and Ryan PWS (1982) Civil Engineering Construction 5th edition

McGraw-Hill Sydney24 Australian Institute of Steel Construction (1991) Economical Structural Steelwork

AISC Sydney25 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis 3rd

edition McGraw-Hill New York26 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1990) Structural Analysis 3rd edition

Van Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham27 Ghali A Neville AM and Brown TG (1997) Structural Analysis ndash A Unified

Classical and Matrix Approach 5th edition Routledge Oxford28 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 19

Fatigue Strength of Steel Structures BS EN 1993-1-9 BSI London Rules for BuildingsECS Brussels

29 Miner MA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue Journal of Applied MechanicsASME 12 No 3 September pp A-159ndashA-164

30 Gurney TR (1979) Fatigue of Welded Structures 2nd edition Cambridge UniversityPress

31 Lay MG (1982) Structural Steel Fundamentals Australian Road Research BoardMelbourne

32 Rolfe ST and Barsoum JM (1977) Fracture and Fatigue Control in Steel StructuresPrentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs New Jersey

33 Grundy P (1985) Fatigue limit state for steel structures Civil Engineering Transac-tions Institution of Engineers Australia CE27 No 1 February pp 143ndash8

34 Navy Department Advisory Committee on Structural Steels (1970) Brittle Fracture inSteel Structures (ed GM Boyd) Butterworth London

35 Walpole RE Myers RH Myers SL and Ye K (2007) Probability and Statisticsfor Engineers and Scientists 8th edition Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs

36 Ravindra MK and Galambos TV (1978) Load and resistance factor design for steelJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 104 No ST9 September pp 1337ndash54

37 Clough RW and Penzien J (2004) Dynamics of Structures 2nd edition CSI BooksBerkeley California

38 Irvine HM (1986) Structural Dynamics for the Practising Engineer Allen andUnwin London

32 Introduction

39 Gulvanesian H Calgaro J-A and Holicky M (2002) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1990Eurocode Basis of Structural Design Thomas Telford Publishing London

40 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) Designersrsquo Guide to EN 1993-1-1 ThomasTelford Publishing London

41 Gardner L and Grubb PJ (2008) Guide to Eurocode Load Combinations for SteelStructures British Constructional Steelwork Association

42 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

43 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 Pergamon PressOxford

44 Computer Service Consultants (2006) S-Frame 3D Structural Analysis Suite CSC(UK) Limited Leeds

45 Research Engineers Europe Limited (2006) STAADPro Space Frame Analysis REEBristol

46 Clarke MJ (1994) Plastic-zone analysis of frames Chapter 6 of Advanced Analysis ofSteel Frames Theory Software and Applications (eds WF Chen and S Toma) CRCPress Inc Boca Raton Florida pp 259ndash319

47 British Standards Institution (1998) Execution of Steel Structures ndash General Rules andRules for Buildings BS DD ENV 1090-1 BSI London

48 British Standards Institution (1969) BS449 Part 2 Specification for the Use ofStructural Steel in Building BSI London

49 Trahair NS (1977) The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures 1st editionChapman and Hall London

50 British Standards Institution (2000) BS5950 The Structural Use of Steelwork inBuilding Part 1 Code of Practice for Design Rolled and Welded Sections BSILondon

Chapter 2

Tension members

21 Introduction

Concentrically loaded uniform tension members are perhaps the simplest structuralelements as they are nominally in a state of uniform axial stress Because of thistheir load-deformation behaviour very closely parallels the stressndashstrain behaviourof structural steel obtained from the results of tensile tests (see Section 131)Thus a member remains essentially linear and elastic until the general yield loadis approached even if it has residual stresses and initial crookedness

However in many cases a tension member is not loaded or connected concen-trically or it has transverse loads acting resulting in bending actions as well asan axial tension action Simple design procedures are available which enable thebending actions in some members with eccentric connections to be ignored butmore generally special account must be taken of the bending action in design

Tension members often have comparatively high average stresses and in somecases the effects of local stress concentrations may be significant especially whenthere is a possibility that the steel material may not act in a ductile fashion In suchcases the causes of stress concentrations should be minimised and the maximumlocal stresses should be estimated and accounted for

In this chapter the behaviour and design of steel tension members are discussedThe case of concentrically loaded members is dealt with first and then a procedurewhich allows the simple design of some eccentrically connected tension membersis presented The design of tension members with eccentric or transverse loads isthen considered the effects of stress concentrations are discussed and finally thedesign of tension members according to EC3 is dealt with

22 Concentrically loaded tension members

221 Members without holes

The straight concentrically loaded steel tension member of length L and constantcross-sectional area A which is shown in Figure 21a has no holes and is free fromresidual stress The axial extension e of the member varies with the load N in the

34 Tension members

Load N

Npl

Nu

Elastic

Plastic

Strain-hardeningFracture

Not to scale

Axial extension e

(b) Axial extension e

ey est

E AN N

L e

(a) Tension member

Figure 21 Load-extension behaviour of a perfect tension member

same way as does the average strain ε= eL with the average stress σ = NA andso the load-extension relationship for the member shown in Figure 21b is similarto the material stressndashstrain relationship shown in Figure 16 Thus the extensionat first increases linearly with the load and is equal to

e = NL

EA (21)

where E is the Youngrsquos modulus of elasticity This linear increase continues untilthe yield stress fy of the steel is reached at the general yield load

Npl = Afy (22)

when the extension increases with little or no increase in load until strain-hardeningcommences After this the load increases slowly until the maximum value

Nu = Afu (23)

is reached in which fu is the ultimate tensile strength of the steel Beyond thisa local cross-section of the member necks down and the load N decreases untilfracture occurs

The behaviour of the tension member is described as ductile in that it can reachand sustain the general yield load while significant extensions occur before itfractures The general yield load Npl is often taken as the load capacity of themember

If the tension member is not initially stress free but has a set of residual stressesinduced during its manufacture such as that shown in Figure 22b then localyielding commences before the general yield load Npl is reached (Figure 22c) andthe range over which the load-extension behaviour is linear decreases Howeverthe general yield load Npl at which the whole cross-section is yielded can stillbe reached because the early yielding causes a redistribution of the stresses The

Tension members 35

1 Residual stress(N = 0)

First yield

b

Fully yielded(N = Npl)

2

3

4

fy

t

(a) Section

(b) Stressdistributions

tc

c

Load N

Npl

est

Extension e

ey1

23 4

(c) Load-extension behaviour

Figure 22 Effect of residual stresses on load-extension behaviour

N = 0 N = 0 N Nww0

(a) Initial crookedness (b) Deflection under load

Figure 23 Tension member with initial crookedness

residual stresses also cause local early strain-hardening and while the plastic rangeis shortened (Figure 22c) the member behaviour is still regarded as ductile

If however the tension member has an initial crookedness w0 (Figure 23a)the axial load causes it to bend and deflect laterally w (Figure 23b) These lateraldeflections partially straighten the member so that the bending action in the centralregion is reduced The bending induces additional axial stresses (see Section 53)which cause local early yielding and strain-hardening in much the same way asdo residual stresses (see Figure 22c) The resulting reductions in the linear andplastic ranges are comparatively small when the initial crookedness is small as isnormally the case and the member behaviour is ductile

222 Members with small holes

The presence of small local holes in a tension member (such as small bolt holesused for the connections of the member) causes early yielding around the holesso that the load-deflection behaviour becomes non-linear When the holes aresmall the member may reach the gross yield load (see equation 22) calculated

36 Tension members

No holesHoles not significantSignificant holes

Extension e

Load N

Afu

Afy

Anet fu

Figure 24 Effect of holes on load-extension behaviour

on the gross area A as shown in Figure 24 because of strain-hardening effectsaround the holes In this case the member behaviour is ductile and the non-linearbehaviour can be ignored because the axial extension of the member under load isnot significantly increased except when there are so many holes along the lengthof the member that the average cross-sectional area is significantly reduced Thusthe extension e can normally be calculated by using the gross cross-sectional areaA in equation 21

223 Members with significant holes

When the holes are large the member may fail before the gross yield load Npl isreached by fracturing at a hole as shown in Figure 24 The local fracture load

Nu = Anet fu (24)

is calculated on the net area of the cross-section Anet measured perpendicular tothe line of action of the load and is given by

Anet = A minussum

d0t (25)

where d0 is the diameter of a hole t the thickness of the member at the hole andthe summation is carried out for all holes in the cross-section under considerationThe fracture load Nu is determined by the weakest cross-section and therefore bythe minimum net area Anet A member which fails by fracture before the grossyield load can be reached is not ductile and there is little warning of failure

In many practical tension members with more than one row of holes the reduc-tion in the cross-sectional area may be reduced by staggering the rows of holes(Figure 25) In this case the possibility must be considered of failure along a zigndashzag path such as ABCDE in Figure 25 instead of across the section perpendicular

Tension members 37

A

B

C

D

E

p

p

s s

N N

Figure 25 Possible failure path with staggered holes

to the load The minimum amount of stagger sm for which a hole no longer reducesthe area of the member depends on the diameter d0 of the hole and the inclinationps of the failure path where p is the gauge distance between the rows of holesAn approximate expression for this minimum stagger is

sm asymp (4pd0)12 (26)

When the actual stagger s is less than sm some reduced part of the hole areaAh must be deducted from the gross area A and this can be approximated byAh = d0t(1 minus s2s2

m) whence

Ah = d0t(1 minus s24pd0) (27)

Anet = A minussum

d0t +sum

s2t4p (28)

where the summations are made for all the holes on the zigndashzag path consideredand for all the staggers in the path The use of equation 28 is allowed for inClause 6222 of EC3 and is illustrated in Section 271

Holes in tension members also cause local stress increases at the hole boundariesas well as the increased average stresses NAnet discussed above These localstress concentrations and their influence on member strength are discussed laterin Section 25

23 Eccentrically and locally connectedtension members

In many cases the fabrication of tension members is simplified by making theirend connections eccentric (ie the centroid of the connection does not coincidewith the centroidal axis of the member) and by connecting to some but not all ofthe elements in the cross-section It is common for example to make connections

38 Tension members

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 26 Eccentrically and locally connected tension members

to an angle section through one leg only to a tee-section through the flange (ortable) or to a channel section through the web (Figure 26) The effect of eccentricconnections is to induce bending moments in the member whilst the effect ofconnecting to some but not all elements in the cross-section is to cause thoseregions most remote from the connection point(s) to carry less load The latter isessentially a shear lag effect (see Section 545) Both of these effects are localto the connections decreasing along the member length and are reduced furtherby ductile stress redistribution after the onset of yielding Members connected bysome but not all of the elements in the cross-section (including those connectedsymmetrically as in Figure 26d) are also discussed in Section 25

While tension members in bending can be designed rationally by using the pro-cedure described in Section 24 simpler methods [1ndash3] also produce satisfactoryresults In these simpler methods the effects described above are approximatedby reducing the cross-sectional area of the member (to an effective net area)and by designing it as if concentrically loaded For a single angle in tension con-nected by a single row of bolts in one leg the effective net section Aneteff to beused in place of the net area Anet in equation 24 is defined in EC3-1-8 [4] It isdependent on the number of bolts and the pitch p1 and for one bolt is given by

Aneteff = 20(e2 minus 05 d0)t (29)

for two bolts by

Aneteff = β2Anet (210)

and for three or more bolts by

Aneteff = β3Anet (211)

The symbols in equations 29ndash211 are defined below and in Figure 27 and Anet

is the net area of the angle For an unequal angle connected by its smaller leg Anet

Tension members 39

e1 p1 p1

e2 d0

Figure 27 Definition of symbols for tension connections in single angles

should be taken as the net section of an equivalent equal angle of leg length equalto the smaller leg of the unequal angle In the case of welded end connections foran equal angle or an unequal angle connected by its larger leg the eccentricitymay be neglected and the effective area Anet may be taken as equal to the grossarea A (Clause 413(2) of EC3-1-8 [4])

For a pair of bolts in a single row in an angle leg β2 in equation 210 is takenas 04 for closely spaced bolts (p1 le 25 d0) as 07 if they are widely spaced(p1 ge 5 d0) or as a linear interpolation for intermediate spacings For three ormore bolts in a single row in an angle leg β3 in equation 211 is taken as 05 forclosely spaced bolts (p1 le 25 d0) as 07 if they are widely spaced (p1 ge 5 d0)or again as a linear interpolation for intermediate spacings

24 Bending of tension members

Tension members often have bending actions caused by eccentric connectionseccentric loads or transverse loads including self-weight as shown in Figure 28These bending actions which interact with the tensile loads reduce the ultimatestrengths of tension members and must therefore be accounted for in design

The axial tension N and transverse deflections w of a tension member causedby any bending action induce restoring moments Nw which oppose the bend-ing action It is a common (and conservative) practice to ignore these restoringmoments which are small when either the bending deflections w or the tensile loadN are small In this case the maximum stress σmax in the member can be safelyapproximated by

σmax = σat + σbty + σbtz (212)

where σat = NA is the average tensile stress and σbty and σbtz are the maximumtensile bending stresses caused by the major and minor axis bending actions My

and Mz alone (see Section 53) The nominal first yield of the member thereforeoccurs when σmax = fy whence

σat + σbty + σbtz = fy (213)

When either the tensile load N or the moments My and Mz are not small the firstyield prediction of equation 213 is inaccurate A suggested interaction equation

40 Tension members

N Nw

(a) Transverse load only (b) Transverse load and tension

Bending moment diagrams

Nw

Figure 28 Bending of a tension member

for failure is the linear inequality

MyEd

MtyRd+ MzEd

MrzRdle 1 (214)

where MrzRd is the cross-section resistance for tension and bending about theminor principal (z) axis given by

MrzRd = MczRd(1 minus NtEdNtRd) (215)

and MtyRd is the lesser of the cross-section resistance MryRd for tension andbending about the major principal (y) axis given by

MryRd = McyRd(1 minus NtEdNtRd) (216)

and the out-of-plane member buckling resistance MbtRd for tension and bendingabout the major principal axis given by

MbtRd = MbRd(1 + NtEdNtRd) le McyRd (217)

in which MbRd is the lateral buckling resistance when N = 0 (see Chapter 6)In these equations NtRd is the tensile resistance in the absence of bending

(taken as the lesser of Npl and Nu) while McyRd and MczRd are the cross-sectionresistances for bending alone about the y and z axes (see Sections 472 and 5613)Equation 214 is similar to the first yield condition of equation 213 but includesa simple approximation for the possibility of lateral buckling under large valuesof MyEd through the use of equation 217

25 Stress concentrations

High local stress concentrations are not usually important in ductile materialsunder static loading situations because the local yielding resulting from these

Tension members 41

concentrations causes a favourable redistribution of stress However in situationsfor which it is doubtful whether the steel will behave in a ductile manner aswhen there is a possibility of brittle fracture of a tension member under dynamicloads (see Section 133) or when repeated load applications may lead to fatiguefailure (see Section 132) stress concentrations become very significant It isusual to try to avoid or minimise stress concentrations by providing suitable jointand member details but this is not always possible in which case some estimateof the magnitudes of the local stresses must be made

Stress concentrations in tension members occur at holes in the member andwhere there are changes or very local reductions in the cross-section and at pointswhere concentrated forces act The effects of a hole in a tension member (ofnet width bnet and thickness t) are shown by the uppermost curve in Figure 29which is a plot of the variation of the stress concentration factor (the ratio ofthe maximum tensile stress to the nominal stress averaged over the reduced cross-section bnet t)with the ratio of the hole radius r to the net width bnet The maximumstress approaches three times the nominal stress when the plate width is very large(rbnet rarr 0)

This curve may also be used for plates with a series of holes spaced equallyacross the plate width provided bnet is taken as the minimum width betweenadjacent holes The effects of changes in the cross-section of a plate in tension areshown by the lower curves in Figure 29 while the effects of some notches or verylocal reductions in the cross-section are given in [5] Methods of analysing theseand other stress concentrations are discussed in [6]

Large concentrated forces are usually transmitted to structural members by localbearing and while this produces high local compressive stresses any subsequent

Str

ess

conc

entr

atio

n fa

ctor

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 01 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

3 0

3 5

N o m i n al s t r e s s i sc a l cu la t e d f o r n e t area bnet times t

b

2 r bnet 2

b r bnet

Ratio rbnet

15 225

(b-bnet )2r=1

Figure 29 Stress concentrations in tension members

42 Tension members

plastic yielding is not usually serious Of more importance are the increased tensilestresses which result when only some of the plate elements of a tension memberare loaded (see Figure 26) as discussed in Section 23 In this case conservativeestimates can be made of these stresses by assuming that the resulting bending andaxial actions are resisted solely by the loaded elements

26 Design of tension members

261 General

In order to design or to check a tension member the design tensile force NtEd ateach cross-section in the member is obtained by a frame analysis (see Chapter 8)or by statics if the member is statically determinate using the appropriate loadsand partial load factors γG γQ (see Section 17) If there is substantial bendingpresent the design moments MyEd and MzEd about the major and minor principalaxes respectively are also obtained

The process of checking a specified tension member or of designing an unknownmember is summarised in Figure 210 for the case where bending actions can beignored If a specified member is to be checked then both the strength limit statesof gross yielding and the net fracture are considered so that both the yield strengthfy and the ultimate strength fu are required When the member size is not knownan approximate target area A can be established The trial member selected maybe checked for the fracture limit state once its holes connection eccentricities andnet area Anet have been established and modified if necessary

The following sub-sections describe each of the EC3 check and design processesfor a statically loaded tension member Worked examples of their application aregiven in Sections 271ndash275

262 Concentrically loaded tension members

The EC3 method of strength design of tension members which are loaded concen-trically follows the philosophy of Section 22 with the two separate limit statesof yield of the gross section and fracture of the net section represented by a singleequation

NtEd le NtRd (218)

where NtRd is the design tension resistance which is taken as the lesser of theyield (or plastic) resistance of the cross-section NplRd and the ultimate (or fracture)resistance of the cross-section containing holes NuRd

The yield limit state of equation 22 is given in EC3 as

NplRd = AfyγM0 (219)

where A is the gross area of the cross-section and γM0 is the partial factor forcross-section resistance with a value of 10

Tension members 43

Checking Designing

Section

Loading

Analysis for NEd

Find fy fu Anet

Assume fy

Find trial section A ge

ge

NEd fy

NtRd is the lesser of NplRd and NuRd

Check NEd Nt Rd

Check complete

Design complete

Find new section

Yes

No

NplRd = Afy γM0 NuRd = 09Anet fu γM2

Figure 210 Flow chart for the design of tension members

The fracture limit state of equation 24 is given in EC3 as

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 (220)

where Anet is the net area of the cross-section and γM2 is the partial factor forresistance in tension to fracture with a value of 11 given in the National Annex

44 Tension members

to EC3 The factor 09 in equation 220 ensures that the effective partial factorγM209(asymp122) for the limit state of material fracture (NuRd) is suitably higherthan the value of γM0(=10) for the limit state of yielding (NplRd) reflecting theinfluence of greater variability in fu and the reduced ductility of members whichfail by fracture at bolt holes

263 Eccentrically connected tension members

The EC3 method of strength design of simple angle tension members which areconnected eccentrically as shown in Figure 26 is similar to the method discussedin Section 262 for concentrically loaded members with the lsquo09Anetrsquo used inequation 220 being replaced by an effective net area Aneteff as described inSection 23

264 Tension members with bending

2641 Cross-section resistance

EC3 provides the conservative inequality

NtEd

NtRd+ MyEd

MyRd+ MzEd

MzRdle 1 (221)

for the cross-section resistance of tension members with design bending momentsMyEd and MzEd where MyRd and MzRd are the cross-section moment resistances(Sections 472 and 5613)

Equation 221 is rather conservative and so EC3 allows I-section tensionmembers with Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections (see Section 472) with bendingabout the major (y) axis to satisfy

MyEd le MN yRd = MplyRd

(1 minus NtEdNplRd

1 minus 05a

)le MplyRd (222)

in which MN yRd is the reduced plastic design moment resistance about themajor (y) axis (reduced from the full plastic design moment resistance MplyRd toaccount for the axial force (see Section 7241) and

a = (A minus 2btf )A le 05 (223)

in which b and tf are the flange width and thickness respectively For I-sectiontension members with Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections with bending about the

Tension members 45

minor (z) axis EC3 allows

MzEd le MN zRd = MplzRd

1 minus

(NtEdNplRd minus a

1 minus a

)2

le MplzRd (224)

where MN zRd is the reduced plastic design moment resistance about the minor (z)axis

EC3 also provides an alternative to equation 221 for the section resistance toaxial tension and bending about both principal axes of Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections This is the more accurate interaction equation (see Section 742)(

MyEd

MN yRd

)α+

(MzEd

MN z Rd

)βle 1 (225)

where the values of α and β depend on the cross-section type (eg α= 20 andβ = 5NtEdNplRd for I-sections and α=β = 2 for circular hollow sections)

A worked example of a tension member with bending actions is given inSection 275

2642 Member resistance

EC3 does not provide any specific rules for determining the influence of lateralbuckling on the member resistance of tension members with bending This maybe accounted for conservatively by using

MyEd le MbRd (226)

in equation 221 in which MbRd is the design buckling moment resistance of themember (see Section 65) This equation conservatively omits the strengtheningeffect of tension on lateral buckling A less conservative method is provided byequations 214ndash217

27 Worked examples

271 Example 1 ndash net area of a bolted universal columnsection member

Problem Both flanges of a universal column section member have 22 mm diam-eter holes arranged as shown in Figure 211a If the gross area of the section is201 times 102 mm2 and the flange thickness is 25 mm determine the net area Anet ofthe member which is effective in tensionSolution Using equation 26 the minimum stagger is sm = radic

(4 times 60 times 22)=727 mmgt 30 mm = s The failure path through each flange is therefore stag-gered and by inspection it includes four holes and two staggers The net area can

46 Tension members

6 0 6 0 6 0

6 0

1 2 0

6 0

6 0 6 0

Gross area of member = 201times102 mm2

Flange is 3112 mm times 25 mm Holes are 22 mm diameter

(a) Flange of universal column section

1 0 0

1 0 0

1 0 2 9 1

2 6 1 2

1 2 y

z

(b) Universal beam section

(c) Double angle section

Dimensions in mm

A = 159 cm2 A = 2 times 227 cm2

Figure 211 Examples 1ndash6

therefore be calculated from equation 28 (or Clause 6222(4) of EC3) as

Anet = [201 times 102] minus [2 times 4 times (22 times 25)] + [2 times 2 times (302 times 25)(4 times 60)]= 161 times 102 mm2

272 Example 2 ndash checking a bolted universal columnsection member

Problem Determine the tension resistance of the tension member of example 1assuming it is of S355 steel

Solution

tf = 25 mm fy = 345 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 201 times 102 times 34510 = 6935 kN 623(2)a

From Section 271

Anet = 161 times 102 mm2

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 = 09 times 161 times 102 times 49011 = 6445 kN623(2)b

NtRd = 6445 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) 623(2)

Tension members 47

273 Example 3 ndash checking a bolted universal beamsection member

Problem A 610times229 UB 125 tension member of S355 steel is connected throughboth flanges by 20 mm bolts (in 22 mm diameter bolt holes) in four lines twoin each flange as shown in Figure 211b Check the member for a design tensionforce of NtEd = 4000 kN

Solution

tf = 196 mm fy = 345 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

A = 15 900 mm2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 15900 times 34510 = 5486 kN 623(2)a

Anet = 15 900 minus (4 times 22 times 196) = 14175 mm2 6222(3)

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 = 09 times 14175 times 49011 = 5683 kN 623(2)b

NtRd = 5486 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) gt 4000 kN = NtEd

623(2)

and so the member is satisfactory

274 Example 4 ndash checking an eccentrically connectedsingle (unequal) angle

Problem A tension member consists of a 150 times 75 times 10 single unequal anglewhose ends are connected to gusset plates through the larger leg by a singlerow of four 22 mm bolts in 24 mm holes at 60 mm centres Use the method ofSection 23 to check the member for a design tension force of NtEd = 340 kN if theangle is of S355 steel and has a gross area of 217 cm2

Solution

t = 10 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

Gross area of cross-section A = 2170 mm2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 2170 times 35510 = 7704 kN 623(2)a

Anet = 2170 minus (24 times 10) = 1930 mm2 6222(3)

β3 = 05 (since the pitch p1 = 60 mm = 25d0) EC3-1-8 3103(2)

NuRd = β3Anet fuγM2 = 05 times 1930 times 49011 = 4299 kN 623(2)b

NtRd = 4299 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) gt 340 kN = NtEd

623(2)

and so the member is satisfactory

48 Tension members

275 Example 5 ndash checking a member under combinedtension and bending

Problem A tension member consists of two equal angles of S355 steel whose endsare connected to gusset plates as shown in Figure 211c If the load eccentricityfor the tension member is 391 mm and the tension and bending resistances are1438 kN and 377 kNm determine the resistance of the member by treating it asa member under combined tension and bending

SolutionSubstituting into equation 221 leads to

NtEd1438 + NtEd times (3911000)377 le 1 621(7)

so that NtEd le 5772 kNBecause the load eccentricity causes the member to bend about its minor axis

there is no need to check for lateral buckling which only occurs when there ismajor axis bending

276 Example 6 ndash estimating the stress concentration factor

Problem Estimate the maximum stress concentration factor for the tensionmember of Section 271

Solution For the inner line of holes the net width is

bnet = 60 + 30 minus 22 = 68 mm and so

rbnet = (222)68 = 016

and so using Figure 29 the stress concentration factor is approximately 25However the actual maximum stress is likely to be greater than 25 times the

nominal average stress calculated from the effective area Anet = 161 times 102 mm2

determined in Section 271 because the unconnected web is not completelyeffective A safe estimate of the maximum stress can be determined on the basisof the flange areas only of

Anet = [2 times 3106 times 25] minus [2 times 4 times 22 times 25] + [2 times 2 times (302 times 25)(4 times 60)]= 1151 times 102 mm2

28 Unworked examples

281 Example 7 ndash bolting arrangement

A channel section tension member has an overall depth of 381 mm width of1016 mm flange and web thicknesses of 163 and 104 mm respectively and an

Tension members 49

yield strength of 345 Nmm2 Determine an arrangement for bolting the web of thechannel to a gusset plate so as to minimise the gusset plate length and maximisethe tension member resistance

282 Example 8 ndash checking a channel section memberconnected by bolts

Determine the design tensile resistance NtRd of the tension member of Section281

283 Example 9 ndash checking a channel section memberconnected by welds

If the tension member of Section 281 is fillet welded to the gusset plate insteadof bolted determine its design tensile resistance NtRd

284 Example 10 ndash checking a member under combinedtension and bending

The beam of example 1 in Section 6151 has a concentric axial tensile load 5Q inaddition to the central transverse load Q Determine the maximum value of Q

References

1 Regan PE and Salter PR (1984) Tests on welded-angle tension members StructuralEngineer 62B(2) pp 25ndash30

2 Nelson HM (1953) Angles in Tension Publication No 7 British Constructional SteelAssociation pp 9ndash18

3 Bennetts ID Thomas IR and Hogan TJ (1986) Design of statically loaded tensionmembers Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE28No 4 November pp 318ndash27

4 British Standards Institute (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash8Design of Joints BSI London

5 Roark RJ (1965) Formulas for Stress and Strain 4th edition McGraw-HillNew York

6 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

Chapter 3

Compression members

31 Introduction

The compression member is the second type of axially loaded structural elementthe first type being the tension member discussed in Chapter 2 Very stocky com-pression members behave in the same way as do tension members until after thematerial begins to flow plastically at the squash load Ny = Afy However the resis-tance of a compression member decreases as its length increases in contrast tothe axially loaded tension member whose resistance is independent of its lengthThus the compressive resistance of a very slender member may be much less thanits tensile resistance as shown in Figure 31

This decrease in resistance is caused by the action of the applied compressiveload N which causes bending in a member with initial curvature (see Figure 32a)In a tension member the corresponding action decreases the initial curvature andso this effect is usually ignored However the curvature and the lateral deflectionof a compression member increase with the load as shown in Figure 32b Thecompressive stresses on the concave side of the member also increase until themember fails due to excessive yielding This bending action is accentuated bythe slenderness of the member and so the resistance of a compression memberdecreases as its length increases

For the hypothetical limiting case of a perfectly straight elastic member thereis no bending until the applied load reaches the elastic buckling value Ncr (EC3refers to Ncr as the elastic critical force) At this load the compression memberbegins to deflect laterally as shown in Figure 32b and these deflections grow untilfailure occurs at the beginning of compressive yielding This action of suddenlydeflecting laterally is called flexural buckling

The elastic buckling load Ncr provides a measure of the slenderness of acompression member while the squash load Ny gives an indication of itsresistance to yielding In this chapter the influences of the elastic bucklingload and the squash load on the behaviour of concentrically loaded compres-sion members are discussed and related to their design according to EC3Local buckling of thin-plate elements in compression members is treated inChapter 4 while the behaviour and design of eccentrically loaded compression

Compression members 51

Tension memberand very stocky compression member

Slender compression member

Change in length

Axi

al lo

ad

Ny = Afy

fy LE

Figure 31 Resistances of axially loaded members

Straight member 0 = 0 equation 32

Member with initial curvature0 =0 sinπxLequation 39

Straight member 0 = 0

0 5 10 15 20

02

04

06

08

10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss lo

ad N

Ncr

Dimensionless deflection 0

(b) Central deflection(a) Compression member

N

N

L2

L2x

Initial position(N = 0)

δ 0

δ

0

Figure 32 Elastic behaviour of a compression member

members are discussed in Chapter 7 and compression members in frames inChapter 8

32 Elastic compression members

321 Buckling of straight members

Aperfectly straight member of a linear elastic material is shown in Figure 33a Themember has a frictionless hinge at each end its lower end being fixed in positionwhile its upper end is free to move vertically but is prevented from deflectinghorizontally It is assumed that the deflections of the member remain small

52 Compression members

N

N N

N

v

x

L

(a) Unloaded member (b) Undeflected loaded member

(c) Deflected member

Figure 33 Straight compression member

The unloaded position of the member is shown in Figure 33a A concentricaxial load N is applied to the upper end of the member which remains straight(Figure 33b) The member is then deflected laterally by a small amount v asshown in Figure 33c and is held in this position If the original straight positionof Figure 33b is one of stable equilibrium the member will return to it whenreleased from the deflected position while if the original position is one of unstableequilibrium the member will collapse away from it when released When theequilibrium of the original position is neither stable nor unstable the member isin a condition described as one of neutral equilibrium For this case the deflectedposition is one of equilibrium and the member will remain in this position whenreleased Thus when the load N reaches the elastic buckling value Ncr at which theoriginal straight position of the member is one of neutral equilibrium the membermay deflect laterally without any change in the load as shown in Figure 32b

The load Ncr at which a straight compression member buckles laterally can bedetermined by finding a deflected position which is one of equilibrium It is shownin Section 381 that this position is given by

v = δ sin πxL (31)

in which δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that theelastic buckling load is

Ncr = π2EIL2 (32)

in which EI is the flexural rigidity of the compression member

Compression members 53

The elastic buckling load Ncr and the elastic buckling stress

σcr = NcrA (33)

can be expressed in terms of the geometrical slenderness ratio Li by

Ncr = σcrA = π2EA

(Li)2(34)

in which i = radic(IA) is the radius of gyration (which can be determined for a

number of sections by using Figure 56) The buckling load varies inversely asthe square of the slenderness ratio Li as shown in Figure 34 in which thedimensionless buckling load NcrNy is plotted against the generalised slendernessratio

λ =radic

Ny

Ncr=

radicfyσcr

= L

i

radicfyπ2E

(35)

in which

Ny = Afy (36)

is the squash load If the material ceases to be linear elastic at the yield stress fythen the above analysis is only valid for λ = radic

(NyNcr) = radic(fyσcr) ge 1 This

limit is equivalent to a slenderness ratio Li of approximately 85 for a materialwith a yield stress fy of 275 Nmm2

0 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

Dim

ensi

onle

ss lo

ad N

crN

y or

NLN

y Complete

yielding

First yield NLNydue to initial curvature (equations 311ndash314)

Elastic buckling NcrNy

(equations 34 and 35)

Figure 34 Buckling and yielding of compression members

54 Compression members

322 Bending of members with initial curvature

Real structural members are not perfectly straight but have small initial curva-tures as shown in Figure 32a The buckling behaviour of the hypothetical straightmembers discussed in Section 321 must therefore be interpreted as the limit-ing behaviour of real members with infinitesimally small initial curvatures Theinitial curvature of the real member causes it to bend from the commencementof application of the axial load and this increases the maximum stress in themember

If the initial curvature is such that

v0 = δ0 sin πxL (37)

then the deflection of member is given by

v = δ sin πxL (38)

where

δ

δ0= NNcr

1 minus NNcr (39)

as shown in Section 382 The variation of the dimensionless central deflectionδδ0 is shown in Figure 32b and it can be seen that deflection begins at thecommencement of loading and increases rapidly as the elastic buckling load Ncr

is approachedThe simple load-deflection relationship of equation 39 is the basis of the

Southwell plot technique for extrapolating the elastic buckling load from experi-mental measurements If equation 39 is rearranged as

δ

N= 1

Ncrδ + δ0

Ncr (310)

then the linear relation between δN and δ shown in Figure 35 is obtained Thusif a straight line is drawn which best fits the points determined from experimen-tal measurements of N and δ the reciprocal of the slope of this line gives anexperimental estimate of the buckling load Ncr An estimate of the magnitudeδ0 of the initial crookedness can also be determined from the intercept on thehorizontal axis

As the deflections v increase with the load N so also do the bending momentsand the stresses It is shown in Section 382 that the limiting axial load NL at whichthe compression member first yields (due to a combination of axial plus bending

Compression members 55

Central deflection

0

NStraight line of best fit (see equation 310)

Slope = crN

1

0

Figure 35 Southwell plot

stresses) is given by

NL

Ny= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2 (311)

in which

Φ = 1 + η + λ2

2 (312)

η = δ0b

2i2 (313)

and b is the width of the member The variation of the dimensionless limiting axialload NLNy with the generalised slenderness ratio λ is shown in Figure 34 for thecase when

η = 1

4

Ny

Ncr (314)

For stocky members the limiting load NL approaches the squash load Ny whilefor slender members the limiting load approaches the elastic buckling load Ncr Equations 311 and 312 are the basis for the member buckling resistance in EC3

33 Inelastic compression members

331 Tangent modulus theory of buckling

The analysis of a perfectly straight elastic compression member given inSection 321 applies only to a material whose stressndashstrain relationship remains

56 Compression members

Strain Tangent modulus Et Slenderness Li

(a) Elastic stressndashstrainrelationship

(b) Tangent modulus (c) Buckling stress

E

E

Et

Et

Ncr

Ncrt(equation 317)B

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

t

Str

ess

NA

Str

ess

NA

(equation 34)

Figure 36 Tangent modulus theory of buckling

linear However the buckling of an elastic member of a non-linear material suchas that whose stressndashstrain relationship is shown in Figure 36a can be analysedby a simple modification of the linear elastic treatment It is only necessary tonote that the small bending stresses and strains which occur during buckling arerelated by the tangent modulus of elasticity Et corresponding to the average com-pressive stress NA (Figure 36a and b) instead of the initial modulus E Thus theflexural rigidity is reduced from EI to EtI and the tangent modulus buckling loadNcrt is obtained from equation 34 by substituting Et for E whence

Ncrt = π2EtA

(Li)2 (315)

The deviation of this tangent modulus buckling load Ncrt from the elastic bucklingload Ncr is shown in Figure 36c It can be seen that the deviation of Ncrt fromNcr increases as the slenderness ratio Li decreases

332 Reduced modulus theory of buckling

The tangent modulus theory of buckling is only valid for elastic materials Forinelastic nonlinear materials the changes in the stresses and strains are related bythe initial modulus E when the total strain is decreasing and the tangent modulusEt only applies when the total strain is increasing as shown in Figure 37 Theflexural rigidity ErI of an inelastic member during buckling therefore depends onboth E and Et As a direct consequence of this the effective (or reduced) modulusof the section Er depends on the geometry of the cross-section as well It is shownin Section 391 that the reduced modulus of a rectangular section is given by

Er = 4EEt(radicE + radic

Et

)2 (316)

Compression members 57

E

E

Et

Strain

Str

ess

NA

Figure 37 Inelastic stressndashstrain relationship

Lateral deflection

Load

Rate of increase in load required to prevent strain reversal

Ncr

Ncrr

Ncrt

Nmax

Figure 38 Shanleyrsquos theory of inelastic buckling

The reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr can be obtained by substituting Er for Ein equation 34 whence

Ncrr = π2ErA

(Li)2 (317)

Since the tangent modulus Et is less than the initial modulus E it follows thatEt lt Er lt E and so the reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr lies between thetangent modulus buckling load Ncrt and the elastic buckling load Ncr as indicatedin Figure 38

58 Compression members

333 Shanleyrsquos theory of inelastic buckling

Although the tangent modulus theory appears to be invalid for inelastic materialscareful experiments have shown that it leads to more accurate predictions thanthe apparently rigorous reduced modulus theory This paradox was resolved byShanley [1] who reasoned that the tangent modulus theory is valid when bucklingis accompanied by a simultaneous increase in the applied load (see Figure 38) ofsufficient magnitude to prevent strain reversal in the member When this happensall the bending stresses and strains are related by the tangent modulus of elasticityEt the initial modulus E does not feature and so the buckling load is equal to thetangent modulus value Ncrt

As the lateral deflection of the member increases as shown in Figure 38 thetangent modulus Et decreases (see Figure 36b) because of the increased axial andbending strains and the post-buckling curve approaches a maximum load Nmax

which defines the ultimate resistance of the member Also shown in Figure 38is a post-buckling curve which commences at the reduced modulus load Ncrr

(at which buckling can take place without any increase in the load) The tangentmodulus load Ncrt is the lowest load at which buckling can begin and the reducedmodulus load Ncrr is the highest load for which the member can remain straightIt is theoretically possible for buckling to begin at any load between Ncrt and Ncrr

It can be seen that not only is the tangent modulus load more easily calculatedbut it also provides a conservative estimate of the member resistance and is incloser agreement with experimental results than the reduced modulus load Forthese reasons the tangent modulus theory of inelastic buckling has gained wideacceptance

334 Buckling of members with residual stresses

The presence of residual stresses in an intermediate length steel compressionmember may cause a significant reduction in its buckling resistance Resid-ual stresses are established during the cooling of a hot-rolled or welded steelmember (and during plastic deformation such as cold-rolling) The shrinking ofthe late-cooling regions of the member induces residual compressive stresses inthe early-cooling regions and these are balanced by equilibrating tensile stressesin the late-cooling regions In hot-rolled I-section members the flange ndash webjunctions are the least exposed to cooling influences and so these are the regionsof residual tensile stress as shown in Figure 39 while the more exposed flangetips are regions of residual compressive stress In a straight intermediate lengthcompression member the residual compressive stresses cause premature yield-ing under reduced axial loads as shown in Figure 310 and the member bucklesinelastically at a load which is less than the elastic buckling load Ncr

In applying the tangent modulus concept of inelastic buckling to a steel whichhas the stressndashstrain relationships shown in Figure 16 (see Chapter 1) the strain-hardening modulus Est is sometimes used in the yielded regions as well as in

Compression members 59

05fy compression

y

z

03fy tension

03fy compression

Figure 39 Idealised residual stress pattern

N = 0 025Ny N Ny

de

de

0

d

bz

y

(EI)t = EI EIYielded

areas

(a)Load

c ct

fyResidual stress pattern

05Ny

05fy

05fy

(b)Stress

distribution

(c)Cross-section

(d)Effective flexural

rigidity

Fully yielded

EI (EI)t (EI)t = 0

Shaded areas due to axial load

First yield

Elastic

Elasticcore

Elastic

Figure 310 Effective section of a member with residual stresses

the strain-hardened regions This use is based on the slip theory of dislocationin which yielding is represented by a series of dynamic jumps instead of by asmooth quasi-static flow Thus the material in the yielded region is either elasticor strain-hardened and its subsequent behaviour may be estimated conservativelyby using the strain-hardening modulus However the even more conservativeassumption that the tangent modulus Et is zero in both the yielded and strain-hardened regions is frequently used because of its simplicity According to thisassumption these regions of the member are ineffective during buckling and themoment of resistance is entirely due to the elastic core of the section

60 Compression members

Thus for a rectangular section member which has the simplified residual stressdistribution shown in Figure 310 the effective flexural rigidity (EI)t about the zaxis is (see Section 392)

(EI)t = EI [2(1 minus NNy)]12 (318)

when the axial load N is greater than 05Ny at which first yield occurs and theaxial load at buckling Ncrt is given by

Ncrt

Ny=

(Ncr

Ny

)2

[1 + 2(NyNcr)2]12 minus 1 (319)

The variation of this dimensionless tangent modulus buckling load Ncrt Ny withthe generalised slenderness ratio λ = radic

(NyNcr) is shown in Figure 311For stocky members the buckling load Ncrt approaches the squash load Nywhile for intermediate length members it approaches the elastic buckling loadNcr as λ = radic

(NyNcr) approachesradic

2 For more slender members prema-ture yielding does not occur and these members buckle at the elastic bucklingload Ncr

Also shown in Figure 311 is the dimensionless tangent modulus buckling loadNcrtNy given by

Ncrt

Ny= 1 minus 1

4

Ny

Ncr (320)

0 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

tN

y Completeyield

Elastic buckling NcrNy

Inelastic buckling of rectangular section shown in Fig 310 (equation 319)

NN

crt

y---- = 1ndash 1

4----N

Ny

cr----

(equation 320)

radic2

Figure 311 Inelastic buckling of compression members with residual stresses

Compression members 61

which was developed as a compromise between major and minor axis bucklingof hot-rolled I-section members It can be seen that this simple compromise isvery similar to the relationship given by equation 319 for the rectangular sectionmember

34 Real compression members

The conditions under which real members act differ in many ways from theidealised conditions assumed in Section 321 for the analysis of the elastic buck-ling of a perfect member Real members are not perfectly straight and theirloads are applied eccentrically while accidental transverse loads may act Theeffects of small imperfections of these types are qualitatively the same as thoseof initial curvature which were described in Section 322 These imperfectionscan therefore be represented by an increased equivalent initial curvature whichhas a similar effect on the behaviour of the member as the combined effectof all of these imperfections The resulting behaviour is shown by curve A inFigure 312

A real member also has residual stresses and its elastic modulus E and yieldstress fy may vary throughout the member The effects of these material vari-ations are qualitatively the same as those of the residual stresses which weredescribed in Section 334 and so they can be represented by an equivalent set ofthe residual stresses The resulting behaviour of the member is shown by curve B inFigure 312

Since real members have both kinds of imperfections their behaviour is asshown by curve C in Figure 312 which is a combination of curves A and B Thusthe real member behaves as a member with equivalent initial curvature (curve A)until the elastic limit is reached It then follows a path which is similar to andapproaches that of a member with equivalent residual stresses (curve B)

Elastic bending

Curve A ndash equivalentinitial curvature

Curve B ndash equivalent residual stresses

Curve C ndash real members

Elastic limit

Nmax

Elastic buckling

Ncr

NL

Ncrt

Lateral deflection

Load

Figure 312 Behaviour of real compression members

62 Compression members

35 Design of compression members

351 EC3 design buckling resistance

Real compression members may be analysed using a model in which the initialcrookedness and load eccentricity are specified Residual stresses may be includedand the realistic stressndashstrain behaviour may be incorporated in the prediction of theload versus deflection relationship Thus curve C in Figure 312 may be generatedand the maximum load Nmax ascertained

Rational computer analyses based on the above modelling are rarely used exceptin research and are inappropriate for the routine design of real compression mem-bers because of the uncertainties and variations that exist in the initial crookednessand residual stresses Instead simplified design predictions for the maximumload (or resistance) are used in EC3 that have been developed from the results ofcomputer analyses and correlations with available test data

A close prediction of numerical solutions and test results may be obtained byusing equations 311 and 312 which are based on the first yield of a geometricallyimperfect member This is achieved by writing the imperfection parameter η ofequation 312 as

η = α(λminus 02) ge 0 (321)

in which α is a constant (imperfection factor) which shifts the resistance curve asshown in Figure 313 for different cross-section types proportions thicknessesbuckling axes and material strengths (Table 62 of EC3) The advantage of thisapproach is that the resistances (referred to as buckling resistances in EC3) of aparticular group of sections can be determined by assigning an appropriate value

0

02

04

06

08

1

12

0 05 1 15 2 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

resi

stan

ce χ

= N

bR

dN

y

Curve d

Curve c

Curve b

Curve a

Curve a0

Figure 313 Compression resistances of EC3

Compression members 63

of α to them The design buckling resistance NbRd is then given by

NbRd = χNyγM1 (322)

in which γM1 is the partial factor for member instability which has a recommendedvalue of 10 in EC3

The dimensionless compressive design buckling resistances NbRdNy for α =013 021 034 049 and 076 which represent the EC3 compression membercurves (a0) (a) (b) (c) and (d) respectively are shown in Figure 313 Memberswith higher initial crookedness have lower strengths due to premature yieldingand these are associated with higher values of α On the other hand members withlower initial crookedness are not as greatly affected by premature yielding andhave lower values of α assigned to them

352 Elastic buckling load

Although the design buckling resistance NbRd given by equation 322 was derivedby using the expression for the elastic buckling load Ncr given by equation 32 for apin-ended compression member equation 322 is also used for other compressionmembers by generalising equation 32 to

Ncr = π2EIL2cr (323)

in which Lcr is the effective length (referred to as the buckling length in EC3)The elastic buckling load Ncr varies with the member geometry loading and

restraints but there is no guidance given in EC3 for determining either Ncr or Lcr Section 36 following summarises methods of determining the effects of restraintson the effective length Lcr while Section 37 discusses the design of compressionmembers with variable sections or loading

353 Effects of local buckling

Compression members containing thin-plate elements are likely to be affected bylocal buckling of the cross-section (see Chapter 4) Local buckling reduces theresistances of short compression members below their squash loads Ny and theresistances of longer members which fail by flexural buckling

Local buckling of a short compression member is accounted for by using areduced effective area Aeff instead of the gross area A as discussed in Section 471Local buckling of a longer compression member is accounted for by using Aeff

instead of A and by reducing the generalised slenderness to

λ =radic

Aeff fyNcr (324)

but using the gross cross-sectional properties to determine Ncr

64 Compression members

354 Design procedures

For the design of a compression member the design axial force NEd is determinedby a rational frame analysis as in Chapter 8 or by statics for a statically determinatestructure The design loads (factored loads) FEd are for the ultimate limit state andare determined by summing up the specified loads multiplied by the appropriatepartial load factors γF (see Section 156)

To check the compression resistance of a member both the cross-sectionresistance NcRd and the member buckling resistance NbRd should generally beconsidered though it is usually the case for practical members that the bucklingresistance will govern The cross-section resistance of a compression memberNcRd must satisfy

NEd le NcRd (325)

in which

NcRd = AfyγM0 (326)

for a fully effective section in which γM0 is the partial factor for cross-sectionresistance (with a recommended value of 10 in EC3) or

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0 (327)

for the cross-sections that are susceptible to local buckling prior to yieldingThe member buckling resistance NbRd must satisfy

NEd le NbRd (328)

where the member buckling resistance NbRd is given by equation 322The procedure for checking a specified compression member is summarised

in Figure 314 The cross-section is checked to determine if it is fully effective(Aeff = A where A is the gross area) or slender (in which case the reducedeffective area Aeff is used) and the design buckling resistance NbRd is then foundand compared with the design compression force NEd

An iterative series of calculations is required when designing a compressionmember as indicated in Figure 314 An initial trial section is first selected eitherby using tabulations formulations or graphs of design buckling resistance NbRd

versus effective length Lcr or by making initial guesses for fy Aeff A and χ (say05) and calculating a target area A A trial section is then selected and checkedIf the section is not satisfactory then a new section is selected using the latestvalues of fy Aeff A and χ and the checking process is repeated The iterationsusually converge within a few cycles but convergence can be hastened by using themean of the previous and current values of χ in the calculation of the target area A

A worked example of checking the resistance of a compression member is givenin Section 3121 while worked examples of the design of compression membersare given in Sections 3122 and 3123

Compression members 65

No

Yes

Yes

Checking Designing

Section Length and loading

Analysis for NEd

Find fy Aeff

Find

Find

Compression resistance NbRd = Aeff fy M1

Check if NEd NbRd

Check complete

Design complete

Find section A NEd( times fy)

No

Table or graph

Trial section

Find Lcr

Initial values fy (= nom) Aeff (= A)

Find section NbRd NEd

Test convergence

Modify to hasten

convergence

(= 05)

ge

ge

le

Figure 314 Flow chart for the design of compression members

36 Restrained compression members

361 Simple supports and rigid restraints

In the previous sections it was assumed that the compression member was sup-ported only at its ends as shown in Figure 315a If the member has an additionallateral support which prevents it from deflecting at its centre so that (v)L2 = 0

66 Compression members

Ncr Ncr Ncr NcrNcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr LcrL L L

L

L

22 LEINcr π=Lcr = L

(a)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = L2

(b)

22 2 LEINcr πasympasympLcr 07L

(c)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = L2

(d)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = 2L

(e)

Figure 315 Effective lengths of columns

as shown in Figure 315b then its buckled shape v is given by

v = δ sin 2πxL (329)

and its elastic buckling load Ncr is given by

Ncr = 4π2EI

L2 (330)

The end supports of a compression member may also differ from the simple sup-ports shown in Figure 315a which allow the member ends to rotate but preventthem from deflecting laterally For example one or both ends may be rigidly built-in so as to prevent end rotation (Figure 315c and d) or one end may be completelyfree (Figure 315e) In each case the elastic buckling load of the member may beobtained by finding the solution of the differential equilibrium equation whichsatisfies the boundary conditions

All of these buckling loads can be expressed by the generalisation ofequation 323 which replaces the member length L of equation 32 by the effectivelength Lcr Expressions for Lcr are shown in Figure 315 and in each case it canbe seen that the effective length of the member is equal to the distance betweenthe inflexion points of its buckled shape

The effects of the variations in the support and restraint conditions on the com-pression member buckling resistance NbRd may be accounted for by replacingthe actual length L used in equation 32 by the effective length Lcr in the calcula-tion of the elastic buckling load Ncr and hence the generalised slenderness λ andusing this modified generalised slenderness throughout the resistance equationsIt should be noted that it is often necessary to consider the member behaviour ineach principal plane since the effective lengths Lcry and Lcrz may also differ aswell as the radii of gyration iy and iz

Compression members 67

0 10 20 30 40Stiffness (16EIL3 )

0

2

4

6

8

Second mode(equation 330)

L = 16 2EIL3 (equation 331)

L2

L2

Ncr

2

x

v

22 4 LEI

(a) Braced firstmode

(b) Second mode

(c) Buckling loadB

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

2

EI

L2

Braced first mode (equations 365 and 366)

Llt L

2

ge

Figure 316 Compression member with an elastic intermediate restraint

362 Intermediate restraints

In Section 361 it was shown that the elastic buckling load of a simply supportedmember is increased by a factor of 4 to Ncr = 4π2EIL2 when an additionallateral restraint is provided which prevents it from deflecting at its centre asshown in Figure 315b This restraint need not be completely rigid but may beelastic (Figure 316) provided its stiffness exceeds a certain minimum value If thestiffness α of the restraint is defined by the force αδ acting on the restraint whichcauses its length to change by δ then the minimum stiffness αL is determined inSection 3101 as

αL = 16π2EIL3 (331)

The limiting stiffness αL can be expressed in terms of the buckling load Ncr =4π2EIL2 as

αL = 4NcrL (332)

Compression member restraints are generally required to be able to transmit 1(Clause 533(3)) of EC3) of the force in the member restrained This is a littleless than the value of 15 suggested [2] as leading to the braces which aresufficiently stiff

363 Elastic end restraints

When the ends of a compression member are rigidly connected to its adjacentelastic members as shown in Figure 317a then at buckling the adjacent members

68 Compression members

N

N

EI L

1

2

(a) Frame (b) Member

2

1

x

v

N

NM1

M2 M1 + M2 + N

L

M1 + M2 + N

L

13

13

Figure 317 Buckling of a member of a rigid frame

exert total elastic restraining moments M1 M2 which oppose buckling and whichare proportional to the end rotations θ1 θ2 of the compression member Thus

M1 = minusα1θ1

M2 = minusα2θ2

(333)

in which

α1 =sum

1

α (334)

where α is the stiffness of any adjacent member connected to the end 1 of thecompression member and α2 is similarly defined The stiffness α of an adjacentmember depends not only on its length L and flexural rigidity EI but also on itssupport conditions and on the magnitude of any axial load transmitted by it

The particular case of a braced restraining member which acts as if simplysupported at both ends as shown in Figure 318a and which provides equal andopposite end moments M and has an axial force N is analysed in Section 3102where it is shown that when the axial load N is compressive the stiffness α isgiven by

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tan(π2)radic

NNcrL(335)

where

NcrL = π2EIL2 (336)

Compression members 69

01 2 3123 23

ndash2

ndash4

ndash6

2

4

Tension Compression

Dimensionless axial load

(b) Stiffness

Exact equation 335

NNcrLL

N

N

v

x

M

M

(a) Braced member

Exact equation 337

Approx equation 338

(2E

IL)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss s

tiff

ness

Figure 318 Stiffness of a braced member

and by

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tanh(π2)radic

NNcrL(337)

when the axial load N is tensile These relationships are shown in Figure 318band it can be seen that the stiffness decreases almost linearly from 2EI L to zeroas the compressive axial load increases from zero to NcrL and that the stiffness isnegative when the axial load exceeds NcrL In this case the adjacent member nolonger restrains the buckling member but disturbs it When the axial load causestension the stiffness is increased above the value 2EI L

Also shown in Figure 318b is the simple approximation

α = 2EI

L

(1 minus N

NcrL

) (338)

The term (1 minus NNcrL) in this equation is the reciprocal of the amplification fac-tor which expresses the fact that the first-order rotations ML2EI associated withthe end moments M are amplified by the compressive axial load N to (ML2EI )(1 minus NNcrL) The approximation provided by equation 338 is close and con-servative in the range 0 lt NNcrL lt 1 but errs on the unsafe side and withincreasing error as the axial load N increases away from this range

70 Compression members

N N N N N N

N N N N N N

(a) Braced members

M M M

M M M M M M

(b) Unbraced members

)1(2

LcrN

N

L

EI minus )1(3

LcrN

N

L

EI minus

)(while

)41(6

Lcr

Lcr

NN

N

N

L

EI

lt

minus ) ) )21( ( (4

LcrN

N

L

EI minus

minusminus

Lcr

Lcr

NN

NN

L

EI

2

1

42 π

minus

minusLcr

Lcr

NN

NN

L

EI

2

41

π

Figure 319 Approximate stiffnesses of restraining members

Similar analyses may be made of braced restraining members under other endconditions and some approximate solutions for the stiffnesses of these are sum-marised in Figure 319 These approximations have accuracies comparable withthat of equation 338

When a restraining member is unbraced its ends sway ∆ as shown inFigure 320a and restoring end moments M are required to maintain equilibriumSuch a member which receives equal end moments is analysed in Section 3103where it is shown that its stiffness is given by

α = minus(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL(339)

when the axial load N is compressive and by

α =(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtanh

π

2

radicN

NcrL(340)

when the axial load N is tensile These relationships are shown in Figure 320band it can be seen that the stiffness α decreases as the tensile load N decreases andbecomes negative as the load changes to compressive Also shown in Figure 320bis the approximation

α = minus2EI

L

(π24)(NNcrL)

(1 minus NNcrL) (341)

Compression members 71

4 3 2 10

1

ndash2

ndash4

ndash6

2

4

Tension

(b) Stiffness

L

N

N

x

M

M

(a) Unbraced member

Exact equation 340

Approx equation 341

Compression

Exact equation 339

Dimensionless axial load NNcrL

(2E

IL

)D

imen

sion

less

sti

ffne

ss

Figure 320 Stiffness of an unbraced member

which is close and conservative when the axial load N is compressive and whicherrs on the safe side when the axial load N is tensile It can be seen from Figure 320bthat the stiffness of the member is negative when it is subjected to compressionso that it disturbs the buckling member rather than restraining it

Similar analyses may be made of unbraced restraining members with other endconditions and another approximate solution is given in Figure 319 This has anaccuracy comparable with that of equation 341

364 Buckling of braced members with end restraints

The buckling of an end-restrained compression member 1ndash2 is analysed inSection 3104 where it is shown that if the member is braced so that it cannotsway (∆ = 0) then its elastic buckling load Ncr can be expressed in the gen-eral form of equation 323 when the effective length ratio kcr = LcrL is thesolution of

γ1γ2

4

kcr

)2

+(γ1 + γ2

2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan(π2kcr)

π2kcr= 1 (342)

where the relative stiffness of the braced member at its end 1 is

γ1 = (2EIL)12sum1α

(343)

72 Compression members

k

0

02

04

06

08

10

2

0

02

04

06

08

10

0 02 04 06 08 10 0 02 04 06 08 10

k2

k1 k1

10 infin

050525

0550575

060625

0650675

07

07508

08509

095

10105

11115

12125

1314

1516

1718

1920

2224

2628

34

5

(a) Bracedmembers (equations 342 344)

(b) Unbraced members (equations 346 348)

Figure 321 Effective length ratios LcrL for members in rigid-jointed frames

in which the summationsum

1 α is for all the other members at end 1 γ2 is similarlydefined and 0 le γ le infin The relative stiffnesses may also be expressed as

k1 = (2EIL)12

05sum1α + (2EIL)12

= 2γ1

1 + 2γ1(344)

and a similar definition of k2 (0 le k le 1) Values of the effective lengthratio LcrL which satisfy equations 342ndash344 are presented in chart form inFigure 321a

In using the chart of Figure 321a the stiffness factors k may be calculatedfrom equation 344 by using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319 Thus forbraced restraining members of the type shown in Figure 318a the factor k1 canbe approximated by

k1 = (IL)12

05sum1(IL)(1 minus NNcrL)+ (IL)12

(345)

in which N is the compression force in the restraining member and NcrL its elasticbuckling load

365 Buckling of unbraced members with end restraints

The buckling of an end-restrained compression member 1ndash2 is analysed inSection 3105 where it is shown that if the member is unbraced against sidesway

Compression members 73

then its elastic buckling load Ncr can be expressed in the general form ofequation 323 when the effective length ratio kcr = LcrL is the solution of

γ1γ2(πkcr)2 minus 36

6(γ1 + γ2)= π

kcrcot

π

kcr (346)

where the relative stiffness of the unbraced member at its end 1 is

γ1 = (6EIL)12sum1α

(347)

in which the summationsum

1 α is for all the other members at end 1 and γ2 issimilarly defined The relative stiffnesses may also be expressed as

k1 = (6EIL)12

15sum1α + (6EIL)12

= γ1

15 + γ1(348)

and a similar definition of k2 Values of the effective length ratio Lcr L whichsatisfy equation 346 are presented in chart form in Figure 321b

In using the chart of Figure 321b the stiffness factors k may be calculatedfrom equation 348 by using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319 Thus forbraced restraining members of the third type shown in Figure 319a

k1 = (IL)12

15sum1(IL)(1 minus N4NcrL)+ (IL)12

(349)

366 Bracing stiffness required for a braced member

The elastic buckling load of an unbraced compression member may be increasedsubstantially by providing a translational bracing system which effectively pre-vents sway The bracing system need not be completely rigid but may be elasticas shown in Figure 322 provided its stiffness α exceeds a certain minimumvalue αL It is shown in Section 3106 that the minimum value for a pin-endedcompression member is

αL = π2EIL3 (350)

This conclusion can be extended to compression members with rotational endrestraints and it can be shown that if the sway bracing stiffness α is greater than

αL = NcrL (351)

where Ncr is the elastic buckling load for the braced mode then the member iseffectively braced against sway

74 Compression members

0 10 20 30 400

05

10

15

20Ncr L

EIL22

(a) Mode 2

L

(b) Mode 1 (c) Buckling load

Mode 1

Mode 2

L = 2EIL3

(equation 350)

(EIL3)

Buc

klin

g lo

ad N

cr

2 EI

L2

lt L

Stiffness

ge

Figure 322 Compression member with an elastic sway brace

37 Other compression members

371 General

The design method outlined in Section 35 together with the effective length con-cept developed in Section 36 are examples of a general approach to the analysisand design of the compression members whose ultimate resistances are governedby the interaction between yielding and buckling This approach often termeddesign by buckling analysis originates from the dependence of the design com-pression resistance NbRd of a simply supported uniform compression member onits squash load Ny and its elastic buckling load Ncr as shown in Figure 323which is adapted from Figure 313 The generalisation of this relationship to othercompression members allows the design buckling resistance NbRd of any memberto be determined from its yield load Ny and its elastic buckling load Ncr by usingFigure 323

In the following subsections this design by buckling analysis method isextended to the in-plane behaviour of rigid-jointed frames with joint loadingand also to the design of compression members which either are non-uniformor have intermediate loads or twist during buckling This method has alsobeen used for compression members with oblique restraints [3] Similar andrelated methods may be used for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams(Sections 66ndash69)

372 Rigid-jointed frames with joint loads only

The application of the method of design by buckling analysis to rigid-jointedframes which only have joint loads is a simple extrapolation of the design

Compression members 75

0

02

04

06

08

1

12

050 1 15 2 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

resi

stan

ce N

bR

dN

y Elastic buckling NcrNy

Design buckling resistance NbRdNy

Figure 323 Compression resistance of structures designed by buckling analysis

method for simply supported compression members For this extrapolation itis assumed that the resistance NbRd of a compression member in a frame isrelated to its squash load Ny and to the axial force Ncr carried by it whenthe frame buckles elastically and that this relationship (Figure 323) is thesame as that used for simply supported compression members of the same type(Figure 313)

This method of design by buckling analysis is virtually the same as the effectivelength method which uses the design charts of Figure 321 because these chartswere obtained from the elastic buckling analyses of restrained members The onlydifference is that the elastic buckling load Ncr may be calculated directly for themethod of design by buckling analysis as well as by determining the approximateeffective length from the design charts

The elastic buckling load of the member may often be determined approximatelyby the effective length method discussed in Section 36 In cases where this is notsatisfactory a more accurate method must be used Many such methods have beendeveloped and some of these are discussed in Sections 8353 and 8354 and in[4ndash13] while other methods are referred to in the literature [14ndash16] The bucklingloads of many frames have already been determined and extensive tabulations ofapproximations for some of these are available [14 16ndash20]

While the method of design by buckling analysis might also be applied torigid frames whose loads act between joints the bending actions present in thoseframes make this less rational Because of this consideration of the effects ofbuckling on the design of frames with bending actions will be deferred untilChapter 8

76 Compression members

373 Non-uniform members

It was assumed in the preceding discussions that the members are uniform butsome practical compression members are of variable cross-section Non-uniformmembers may be stepped or tapered but in either case the elastic buckling loadNcr can be determined by solving a differential equilibrium equation similar to thatgoverning the buckling of uniform members (see equation 358) but which hasvariable values of EI In general this can best be done using numerical techniques[4ndash6] and the tedium of these can be relieved by making use of a suitable computerprogram Many particular cases have been solved and tabulations and graphs ofsolutions are available [5 6 16 21ndash23]

Once the elastic buckling load Ncr of the member has been determined themethod of design by buckling analysis can be used For this the squash load Ny

is calculated for the most highly stressed cross-section which is the section ofminimum area The design buckling resistance NbRd = χNyγM1 can then beobtained from Figure 323

374 Members with intermediate axial loads

The elastic buckling of members with intermediate as well as end loads is alsobest analysed by numerical methods [4ndash6] while solutions of many particularcases are available [5 16 21] Once again the method of design by bucklinganalysis can be used and for this the squash load will be determined by themost heavily stressed section If the elastic buckling load Ncr is calculated for thesame member then the design buckling resistance NbRd can be determined fromFigure 323

375 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling

In the previous sections attention was confined to compression members whichbuckle by deflecting laterally either perpendicular to the section minor axis at anelastic buckling load

Ncrz = π2EIzL2crz (352)

or perpendicular to the major axis at

Ncry = π2EIyL2cry (353)

However thin-walled open section compression members may also buckle bytwisting about a longitudinal axis as shown in Figure 324 for a cruciform sectionor by combined bending and twisting

Compression members 77

L

f

y

x

z

Figure 324 Torsional buckling of a cruciform section

A compression member of doubly symmetric cross-section may buckle elasti-cally by twisting at a torsional buckling load (see Section 311) given by

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2crT

)(354)

in which GIt and EIw are the torsional and warping rigidities (see Chapter 10)LcrT is the distance between inflexion points of the twisted shape and

i20 = i2

p + y20 + z2

0 (355)

in which y0 z0 are the shear centre coordinates (which are zero for doublysymmetric sections see Section 543) and

ip = radic(Iy + Iz)A (356)

is the polar radius of gyration For most rolled steel sections the minor axisbuckling load Ncrz is less than NcrT and the possibility of torsional bucklingcan be ignored However short members which have low torsional and warpingrigidities (such as thin-walled cruciforms) should be checked Such members canbe designed by using Figure 323 with the value of NcrT substituted for the elasticbuckling load Ncr

Monosymmetric and asymmetric section members (such as thin-walled teesand angles) may buckle in a combined mode by twisting and deflecting Thisaction takes place because the axis of twist through the shear centre does not

78 Compression members

0 1 2 3 4 5Length L (m)

0

250

500

750

1000

NcrzNcry

NcrT

Ncr

75

100

6

(a) Cross-section

y

z

(b) Elastic buckling loadsL

oads

Ncr

y N

crz

Ncr

T a

nd N

cr

Figure 325 Elastic buckling of a simply supported angle section column

coincide with the loading axis through the centroid and any twisting which occurscauses the centroidal axis to deflect For simply supported members it is shown in[5 24 25] that the (lowest) elastic buckling load Ncr is the lowest root of the cubicequation

N 3cr

i20 minus y2

0 minus z20

minus N 2cr

(Ncry + Ncrz + NcrT )i

20 minus Ncrzy2

0 minus Ncryz20

+ Ncri2

0NcryNcrz + NcrzNcrT + NcrT Ncry minus NcryNcrzNcrT i20 = 0

(357)

For example the elastic buckling load Ncr for a pin-ended unequal angle is shownin Figure 325 where it can be seen that Ncr is less than any of Ncry Ncrz orNcrT

These and other cases of flexuralndashtorsional buckling (referred to as torsionalndashflexural buckling in EC3) are treated in a number of textbooks and papers [4ndash624ndash26] and tabulations of solutions are also available [16 27] Once the bucklingload Ncr has been determined the compression resistance NbRd can be found fromFigure 323

38 Appendix ndash elastic compression members

381 Buckling of straight members

The elastic buckling load Ncr of the compression member shown in Figure 33 canbe determined by finding a deflected position which is one of equilibrium Thedifferential equilibrium equation of bending of the member is

EId2v

dx2= minusNcrv (358)

Compression members 79

This equation states that for equilibrium the internal moment of resistanceEI (d2vdx2) must exactly balance the external disturbing moment minusNcrv at anypoint along the length of the member When this equation is satisfied at all pointsthe displaced position is one of equilibrium

The solution of equation 358 which satisfies the boundary condition at the lowerend that (v)0 = 0 is

v = δ sinπx

kcrL

where

1

k2cr

= Ncr

π2EIL2

and δ is an undetermined constant The boundary condition at the upper end that(v)L = 0 is satisfied when either

δ = 0v = 0

(359)

or kcr = 1n in which n is an integer so that

Ncr = n2π2EIL2 (360)

v = δ sin nπxL (361)

The first solution (equations 359) defines the straight stable equilibrium positionwhich is valid for all loads N less than the lowest value of Ncr as shown inFigure 32b The second solution (equations 360 and 361) defines the bucklingloads Ncr at which displaced equilibrium positions can exist This solution does notdetermine the magnitude δ of the central deflection as indicated in Figure 32bThe lowest buckling load is the most important and this occurs when n = 1so that

Ncr = π2EIL2 (32)

v = δ sin πxL (31)

382 Bending of members with initial curvature

The bending of the compression member with initial curvature shown inFigure 32a can be analysed by considering the differential equilibrium equation

EId2v

dx2= minusN (v + v0) (362)

which is obtained from equation 358 for a straight member by adding the additionalbending moment minusNv0 induced by the initial curvature

80 Compression members

If the initial curvature of the member is such that

v0 = δ0 sin πxL (37)

then the solution of equation 362 which satisfies the boundary conditions(v)0L = 0 is the deflected shape

v = δ sin πxL (38)

where

δ

δ0= NNcr

1 minus NNcr (39)

The maximum moment in the compression member is N (δ+ δ0) and so the max-imum bending stress is N (δ + δ0)Wel where Wel is the elastic section modulusThus the maximum total stress is

σmax = N

A+ N (δ + δ0)

Wel

If the elastic limit is taken as the yield stress fy then the limiting axial load NL forwhich the above elastic analysis is valid is given by

NL = Ny minus NL(δ + δ0)A

Wel (363)

where Ny = Afy is the squash load By writing Wel = 2Ib in which b is themember width equation 363 becomes

NL = Ny minus δ0b

2i2

NL

(1 minus NLNcr)

which can be solved for the dimensionless limiting load NLNy as

NL

Ny=

[1 + (1 + η)NcrNy

2

]minus

[1 + (1 + η)Ncr Ny

2

]2

minus Ncr

Ny

12

(364)

where

η = δ0b

2i2 (313)

Alternatively equation 364 can be rearranged to give the dimensionless limitingload NLNy as

NL

Ny= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(311)

Compression members 81

in which

Φ = 1 + η + λ2

2(312)

and

λ = radicNyNcr (35)

39 Appendix ndash inelastic compression members

391 Reduced modulus theory of buckling

The reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr of a rectangular section compressionmember which buckles in the y direction (see Figure 326a) can be determinedfrom the bending strain and stress distributions which are related to the curvatureκ(= minusd2vdx2) and the moduli E and Et as shown in Figure 326b and c Theposition of the line of zero bending stress can be found by using the condition thatthe axial force remains constant during buckling from which it follows that theforce resultant of the bending stresses must be zero so that

1

2dbcEtbcκ = 1

2dbtEbtκ

or

bc

b=

radicEradic

E + radicEt

Axial strain b c

b t

bt

bc

(b) Straindistribution

bt

bc

(a) Rectangular cross-section

d

y

z

Et

E

b

(c) Stressdistribution

Axial stress NA Et bc

Eb t

Figure 326 Reduced modulus buckling of a rectangular section member

82 Compression members

The moment of resistance of the section ErI(d2vdx2) is equal to the momentresultant of the bending stresses so that

ErId2v

dx2= minusdbc

2Etbcκ

2bc

3minus dbt

2Ebtκ

2bt

3

or

ErId2v

dx2= minus4b2

cEt

b2

db3

12κ

The reduced modulus of elasticity Er is therefore given by

Er = 4EEt

(radic

E + radicEt)

2 (316)

392 Buckling of members with residual stresses

Arectangular section member with a simplified residual stress distribution is shownin Figure 310 The section first yields at the edges z = plusmnd2 at a load N = 05Nyand yielding then spreads through the section as the load approaches the squashload Ny If the depth of the elastic core is de then the flexural rigidity for bendingabout the z axis is

(EI)t = EI

(de

d

)

where I = b3d12 and the axial force is

N = Ny

(1 minus 1

2

d2e

d2

)

By combining these two relationships the effective flexural rigidity of the partiallyyielded section can be written as

(EI)t = EI [2(1 minus NNy)]12 (318)

Thus the axial load at buckling Nt is given by

Ncrt

Ncr= [2(1 minus NcrtNy)]12

which can be rearranged as

Ncrt

Ny=

(Ncr

Ny

)2

[1 + 2(NyNcr)2]12 minus 1 (319)

Compression members 83

310 Appendix ndash effective lengths of compressionmembers

3101 Intermediate restraints

A straight pin-ended compression member with a central elastic restraint is shownin Figure 316a It is assumed that when the buckling load Ncr is applied to themember it buckles symmetrically as shown in Figure 316a with a central deflec-tion δ and the restraint exerts a restoring force αδ The equilibrium equation forthis buckled position is

EId2v

dx2= minusNcrv + αδ

2x

for 0 le x le L2

The solution of this equation which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 =(dvdx)L2 = 0 is given by

v = αδL

2Ncr

(x

Lminus sin πxkcrL

2(π2kcr) cosπ2kcr

)

where kcr = LcrL and Lcr is given by equation 323 Since δ = (v)L2 itfollows that(

π

2kcr

)3

cotπ

2kcr(π

2kcrcot

π

2kcrminus 1

) = αL3

16EI (365)

The variation with the dimensionless restraint stiffness αL316EI of the dimen-sionless buckling load

Ncr

π2EIL2= 4

π2

2kcr

)2

(366)

which satisfies equation 365 is shown in Figure 316c It can be seen that thebuckling load for this symmetrical mode varies from π2EIL2 when the restraintis of zero stiffness to approximately 8π2EIL2 when the restraint is rigid Whenthe restraint stiffness exceeds

αL = 16π2EIL3 (331)

the buckling load obtained from equations 365 and 366 exceeds the value of4π2EIL2 for which the member buckles in the antisymmetrical second modeshown in Figure 316b Since buckling always takes place at the lowest possibleload it follows that the member buckles at 4π2EIL2 in the second mode shownin Figure 316b for all restraint stiffnesses α which exceed αL

84 Compression members

3102 Stiffness of a braced member

When a structural member is braced so that its ends act as if simply supportedas shown in Figure 318a then its response to equal and opposite disturbing endmoments M can be obtained by considering the differential equilibrium equation

EId2v

dx2= minusNv minus M (367)

The solution of this which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 = (v)L = 0 whenN is compressive is

v = M

N

1 minus cosπ

radicNNcrL

sin πradic

NNcrLsin

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ cos

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus 1

where

NcrL = π2EIL2 (336)

The end rotation θ = (dvdx)0 is

θ = 2M

NL

π

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL

whence

α = M

θ= 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tan(π2)radic

NNcrL (335)

When the axial load N is tensile the solution of equation 367 is

v = M

N

1 minus cosh π

radicNNcrL

sinh πradic

NNcrLsinh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]

+ cosh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus 1

whence

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tanh(π2)radic

NNcrL (337)

Compression members 85

3103 Stiffness of an unbraced member

When a structural member is unbraced so that its ends sway ∆ as shown inFigure 320a restoring end moments M are required to maintain equilibriumThe differential equation for equilibrium of a member with equal end momentsM = N∆2 is

EId2v

dx2= minusNv + M (368)

and its solution which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 = 0 (v)L = ∆ is

v = M

N

1 + cosπ

radicNNcrL

sin πradic

NNcrLsin

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus cos

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ 1

The end rotation θ = (dvdx)0 is

θ = 2M

NL

π

2

radicN

NcrLcot

π

2

radicN

NcrL

whence

α = minus(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL (339)

where the negative sign occurs because the end moments M are restoring insteadof disturbing moments

When the axial load N is tensile the end moments M are disturbing momentsand the solution of equation 368 is

v = M

N

1 + cosh π

radicNNcrL

sinh πradic

NNcrLsinh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]

minus cosh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ 1

whence

α =(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtanh

π

2

radicN

NcrL (340)

3104 Buckling of a braced member

A typical compression member 1ndash2 in a rigid-jointed frame is shown inFigure 317b When the frame buckles the member sways∆ and its ends rotate by

86 Compression members

θ1 θ2 as shown Because of these actions there are end shears (M1 +M2 +N∆)Land end moments M1 M2 The equilibrium equation for the member is

EId2v

dx2= minusNv minus M1 + (M1 + M2)

x

L+ N∆

x

L

and the solution of this is

v = minus(

M1 cosπkcr + M2

Ncr sin πkcr

)sin

πx

kcrL+ M1

Ncr

(cos

πx

kcrLminus 1

)

+(

M1 + M2

Ncr

)x

L+

x

L

where Ncr is the elastic buckling load transmitted by the member (seeequation 323) and kcr = LcrL By using this to obtain expressions for the endrotations θ1 θ2 and by substituting equation 333 the following equations can beobtained

M1

(NcrL

α1+ 1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ M2

(1 minus π

kcrcosec

π

kcr

)+ Ncr∆ = 0

M1

(1 minus π

kcrcosec

π

kcr

)+ M2

(NcrL

α2+ 1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ Ncr∆ = 0

(369)

If the compression member is braced so that joint translation is effectively pre-vented the sway terms Ncr∆ disappear from equations 369 The moments M1M2 can then be eliminated whence

(EIL)2

α1α2

kcr

)2

+ EI

L

(1

α1+ 1

α2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan π2kcr

π2kcr= 1

(370)

By writing the relative stiffness of the braced member at the end 1 as

γ1 = 2EIL

α1= (2EIL)12sum

(343)

with a similar definition for γ2 equation 370 becomes

γ1γ2

4

kcr

)2

+(γ1 + γ2

2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan(π2kcr)

π2kcr= 1 (342)

3105 Buckling of an unbraced member

If there are no reaction points or braces to supply the member end shears (M1 +M2 + N∆)L the member will sway as shown in Figure 317b and the sway

Compression members 87

moment N∆ will be completely resisted by the end moments M1 and M2 so that

N∆ = minus(M1 + M2)

If this is substituted into equation 369 and if the moments M1 and M2 areeliminated then

(EIL)2

α1α2

kcr

)2

minus 1 = EI

L

(1

α1+ 1

α2

kcrcot

π

kcr(371)

where kcr = LcrL By writing the relative stiffnesses of the unbraced member atend 1 as

γ1 = 6EIL

α1= (6EIL)12sum

(347)

with a similar definition of γ 2 equation 371 becomes

γ1γ2(πkcr)2 minus 36

6(γ1 + γ2)= π

kcrcot

π

kcr (346)

3106 Stiffness of bracing for a rigid frame

If the simply supported member shown in Figure 322 has a sufficiently stiff swaybrace acting at one end then it will buckle as if rigidly braced as shown inFigure 322a at a load π2EIL2 If the stiffness α of the brace is reduced below aminimum value αL the member will buckle in the rigid body sway mode shownin Figure 322b The elastic buckling load Ncr for this mode can be obtained fromthe equilibrium condition that

Ncr∆ = α∆L

where α∆ is the restraining force in the brace so that

Ncr = αL

The variation of Ncr with α is compared in Figure 322c with the braced modebuckling load of π2EIL2 It can be seen that when the brace stiffness α isless than

αL = π2EIL3 (350)

the member buckles in the sway mode and that when α is greater than αL itbuckles in the braced mode

88 Compression members

311 Appendix ndash torsional buckling

Thin-walled open-section compression members may buckle by twisting as shownin Figure 324 for a cruciform section or by combined bending and twisting Whenthis type of buckling takes place the twisting of the member causes the axialcompressive stresses NA to exert a disturbing torque which is opposed by thetorsional resistance of the section For the typical longitudinal element of cross-sectional area δA shown in Figure 327 which rotates a0(dφdx) (where a0 is thedistance to the axis of twist) when the section rotates φ the axial force (NA)δAhas a component (NA)δAa0(dφdx) which exerts a torque (NA)δAa0(dφdx)a0

about the axis of twist (which passes through the shear centre y0 z0 as shown inChapter 5) The total disturbing torque TP exerted is therefore

TP = N

A

dx

intA

a20dA

where

a20 = (y minus y0)

2 + (z minus z0)2

This torque can also be written as

TP = Ni20

dx

where

i20 = i2

p + y20 + z2

0 (355)

ip = radic (Iy + Iz)A

(356)

For members of doubly symmetric cross-section (y0 = z0 = 0) a twistedequilibrium position is possible when the disturbing torque TP exactly balances

xast

AN

d

d 0

xa

d

d0

δ

δ

δδ

xAxis of twist

stAN st

A

N

f

f

Figure 327 Torque exerted by axial load during twisting

Compression members 89

the internal resisting torque

Mx = GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3

in which GIt and EIw are the torsional and warping rigidities (see Chapter 10)Thus at torsional buckling

N

Ai20

dx= GIt

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3 (372)

The solution of this which satisfies the boundary conditions of end twistingprevented ((φ)0L = 0) and ends free to warp ((d2φdx2)0L = 0) (see Chapter 10)is φ = (φ)L2 sin πxL in which (φ)L2 is the undetermined magnitude of theangle of twist rotation at the centre of the member and the buckling load NcrT is

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2

)

This solution may be generalised for compression members with other endconditions by writing it in the form

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2crT

)(354)

in which the torsional buckling effective length LcrT is the distance betweeninflexion points in the twisted shape

312 Worked examples

3121 Example 1 ndash checking a UB compression member

Problem The 457 times 191 UB 82 compression member of S275 steel of Figure 328ais simply supported about both principal axes at each end (Lcry = 120 m) andhas a central brace which prevents lateral deflections in the minor principal plane(Lcrz = 60 m) Check the adequacy of the member for a factored axial compres-sive load corresponding to a nominal dead load of 160 kN and a nominal imposedload of 230 kN

Factored axial load NEd = (135 times 160)+ (15 times 230) = 561 kN

Classifying the sectionFor S275 steel with tf = 16 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235275)05 = 0924

cf (tf ε) = [(1913 minus 99 minus 2 times 102)2](160 times 0924) = 544 lt 14T52

90 Compression members

125

125

75

12

10

y

z

y

z z

y

1913

4600

99

160

RHS

(a) Example 1

457 times 191 UB 82 Iz = 1871 cm4

A = 104 cm2

iy = 188 cm iz = 423 cm r = 102 mm

(b) Example 3

2 ndash 125 times 75 times 10 UA Iy = 1495 cm4

Iz = 1642 cm4

(c) Example 4

Figure 328 Examples 1 3 and 4

cw = (4600 minus 2 times 160 minus 2 times 102) = 4076 mm T52

cw(twε) = 4076(99 times 0924) = 445 gt 42 T52

and so the web is Class 4 (slender) T52

Effective area

λp =radic

fyσcr

= bt

284εradic

kσ= 407699

284 times 0924 times radic40

= 0784 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρ= λp minus 0055(3 +ψ)λ

2p

= 0784 minus 0055(3 + 1)

07842= 0918 EC3-1-5 44(2)

d minus deff = (1 minus 0918)times 4076 = 336 mm

Aeff = 104 times 102 minus 336 times 99 = 10 067 mm2

Cross-section compression resistance

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0

= 10 067 times 275

10= 2768 kN gt 561 kN = NEd 624(2)

Compression members 91

Member buckling resistance

λy =radic

Aeff fyNcry

= Lcry

iy

radicAeff A

λ1= 12 000

(188 times 10)

radic10 06710 400

939 times 0924= 0724

6313(1)

λz =radic

Aeff fyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

radicAeff A

λ1= 6000

(423 times 10)

radic10 06710 400

939 times 0924

= 1608 gt 0724 6313(1)

Buckling will occur about the minor (z) axis For a rolled UB section (with hb gt12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about the z-axis use buckling curve (b) withα = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034(1608 minus 02)+ 16082] = 2032 6312(1)

χz = 1

2032 + radic20322 minus 16082

= 0305 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAeff fyγM1

= 0305 times 10 067 times 275

10= 844 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the member is satisfactory

3122 Example 2 ndash designing a UC compression member

Problem Design a suitable UC of S355 steel to resist the loading of example 1 inSection 3121

Design axial load NEd = 561 kN as in Section 3121

Target area and first section choiceAssume fy = 355 Nmm2 and χ = 05

A ge 561 times 103(05 times 355) = 3161 mm2

Try a 152 times 152 UC 30 with A = 383 cm2 iy = 676 cm iz = 383 cmtf = 94 mm

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(676 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 2322 6313(1)

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

1

λ1= 6000

(383 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 2050 lt 2322

6313(1)

92 Compression members

Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis For a rolled UC section (with hb le12 and tf le 100 mm) buckling about the y-axis use buckling curve (b) withα = 034 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 034(2322 minus 02)+ 23222] = 3558 6312(1)

χy = 1

3558 + radic35582 minus 23222

= 0160 6312(1)

which is much less than the guessed value of 05

Second section choice

Guess χ = (05 + 0160)2 = 033

A ge 561 times 103(033 times 355) = 4789 mm2

Try a 203 times 203 UC 52 with A = 663 cm2 iy = 891 cm tf = 125 mmFor S355 steel with tf = 125 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = [(2043 minus 79 minus 2 times 102)2](125 times 0814) = 865 lt 14 T52

cw(twε) = (2062 minus 2 times 125 minus 2 times 102)(79 times 0814) = 250 lt 42T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(891 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1763 6313(1)

For a rolled UC section (with hb le 12 and tf le 100 mm) buckling about they-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 034(1763 minus 02)+ 17632] = 2320 6312(1)

χy = 1

2320 + radic23202 minus 17632

= 0261 6312(1)

NbyRd = χAfyγM1

= 0261 times 663 times 102 times 355

10= 615 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the 203 times 203 UC 52 is satisfactory

3123 Example 3 ndash designing an RHS compression member

Problem Design a suitable hot-finished RHS of S355 steel to resist the loading ofexample 1 in Section 3121

Compression members 93

Design axial load NEd = 561 kN as in Section 3121SolutionGuess χ = 03

A ge 561 times 103(03 times 355) = 5268 mm2

Try a 250 times 150 times 8 RHS with A = 608 cm2 iy = 917 cm iz = 615 cmt = 80 mmFor S355 steel with t = 8 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235355)05 = 0814

cw(tε) = (2500 minus 2 times 80 minus 2 times 40)(80 times 0814) = 347 lt 42 T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(918 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1710 6313(1)

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

1

λ1= 6000

(615 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1276 lt 1710

6313(1)

Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis For a hot-finished RHS use bucklingcurve (a) with α = 021 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 021(1710 minus 02)+ 17102] = 2121 6312(1)

χy = 1

2121 + radic21212 minus 17102

= 0296 6312(1)

NbyRd = χAfyγM1

= 0296 times 608 times 102 times 355

10= 640 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the 250 times 150 times 8 RHS is satisfactory

3124 Example 4 ndash buckling of double angles

Problem Two steel 125 times 75 times 10 UA are connected together at 15 m intervalsto form the long compression member whose properties are given in Figure 328cThe minimum second moment of area of each angle is 499 cm4 The member issimply supported about its major axis at 45 m intervals and about its minor axisat 15 m intervals Determine the elastic buckling load of the member

94 Compression members

Member buckling about the major axis

Ncry = π2 times 210 000 times 1495 times 10445002 N = 1530 kN

Member buckling about the minor axis

Ncrz = π2 times 210 000 times 1642 times 10415002 N = 1513 kN

Single angle buckling

Ncrmin = π2 times 210 000 times 499 times 10415002 N = 4597 kN

and so for both angles 2Ncrmin = 2 times 4597 = 919 kN lt 1520 kNIt can be seen that the lowest buckling load of 919 kN corresponds to the case

where each unequal angle buckles about its own minimum axis

3125 Example 5 ndash effective length factor inan unbraced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of member 1ndash2 of the unbracedframe shown in Figure 329a

Solution Using equation 348

k1 = 6EIL

15 times 0 + 6EIL= 10

k2 = 6EIL

15 times 6(2EI)(2L)+ 6EIL= 04

Using Figure 321b Lcr L = 23

2058

2096

142

94y

z

EI

2EI

2L

L

5N

1

2 3

(a) Example 5

5N

EI

203 times 203 UC 60Iy = 6125 cm4

Iz = 2065 cm4

A = 764 cm2

iz = 520 cmr = 102 mm

(b) Example 7

Figure 329 Examples 5 and 7

Compression members 95

3126 Example 6 ndash effective length factor in a braced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of member 1ndash2 of the frame shownin Figure 329a if bracing is provided which prevents sway buckling

SolutionUsing equation 344

k1 = 2EIL

05 times 0 + 2EIL= 10

k2 = 2EIL

05 times 2(2EI)(2L)+ 2EIL= 0667

Using Figure 321a Lcr L = 087

3127 Example 7 ndash checking a non-uniform member

Problem The 50 m long simply supported 203 times 203 UC 60 member shown inFigure 329b has two steel plates 250 mm times 12 mm times 2 m long welded to itone to the central length of each flange This increases the elastic buckling loadabout the minor axis by 70 If the yield strengths of the plates and the UC are355 Nmm2 determine the compression resistance

Solution

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = [(2058 minus 93 minus 2 times 102)2](142 times 0814) = 762 lt 14T52

cw(twε) = (2096 minus 2 times 142 minus 2 times 102)(93 times 0814) = 2124 lt 42T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

Ncrz = 17 times π2 times 210 000 times 2065 times 10450002 = 2910 kN

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

=radic

764 times 102 times 355

2910 times 103= 0965

For a rolled UC section with welded flanges (tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (c) with α = 049 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 049(0965 minus 02)+ 09652] = 1153 6312(1)

χz = 1

1153 + radic11532 minus 09652

= 0560 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAfyγM1

= 0560 times 764 times 102 times 355

10= 1520 kN 6311(3)

96 Compression members

3128 Example 8 ndash checking a member with intermediateaxial loads

Problem A 5 m long simply supported 457 times 191 UB 82 compression member ofS355 steel whose properties are given in Figure 328a has concentric axial loads ofNEd and 2NEd at its ends and a concentric axial load NEd at its midpoint At elasticbuckling the maximum compression force in the member is 2000 kN Determinethe compression resistance

SolutionFrom Section 3121 the cross-section is Class 4 slender and Aeff =10 067 mm2

Ncrz = 2000 kN

λz =radic

Aeff fyNcrz

=radic

10 067 times 355

2000 times 103= 1337

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034(1337 minus 02)+ 13372] = 1587 6312(1)

χz = 1

1587 + radic15872 minus 13372

= 0410 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAeff fyγM1

= 0410 times 10 067 times 355

10= 1465 kN 6311(3)

313 Unworked examples

3131 Example 9 ndash checking a welded column section

The 140 m long welded column section compression member of S355 steel shownin Figure 330(a) is simply supported about both principal axes at each end (Lcry =140 m) and has a central brace that prevents lateral deflections in the minorprincipal plane (Lcrz = 70 m) Check the adequacy of the member for a factoredaxial compressive force corresponding to a nominal dead load of 420 kN and anominal imposed load of 640 kN

3132 Example 10 ndash designing a UC section

Design a suitable UC of S275 steel to resist the loading of example 9 inSection 3131

Compression members 97

300

40

28

355

100 100

175

100

380

25

25090

90

8

Cy y

z z

u

v

Welded column section

Iy = 747 times 10 6 mm4

Iz = 286 times 106 mm4

iy = 145 mm iz = 896 mm A = 35 700 mm2

(a) Example 9

2 ndash 380 times 100 channels

For each channel

Iy = 15034 times 106 mm4

Iz = 643 times 106 mm4

A = 6870 mm2

(b) Example 11

90 times 90 times 8 EA

Iu = 166 times 106 mm4

Iv = 0431 times 106 mm4

iu = 345 mm iv = 176 mm A = 1390 mm2

It = 328 times 103 mm4

y0 = 250 mm

(c) Example 14

Figure 330 Examples 9 11 and 14

L2

N

EA EA

E I L

L2

Figure 331 Example 12

3133 Example 11 ndash checking a compound section

Determine the minimum elastic buckling load of the two laced 380 times 100 channelsshown in Figure 330(b) if the effective length about each axis is Lcr = 30 m

3134 Example 12 ndash elastic buckling

Determine the elastic buckling load of the guyed column shown in Figure 331 Itshould be assumed that the guys have negligible flexural stiffness that (EA)guy =2(EI )columnL2 and that the column is built-in at its base

98 Compression members

3135 Example 13 ndash checking a non-uniform compressionmember

Determine the maximum design load NEd of a lightly welded box section can-tilever compression member 1ndash2 made from plates of S355 steel which taper from300 mm times 300 mm times 12 mm at end 1 (at the cantilever tip) to 500 mm times 500 mmtimes 12 mm at end 2 (at the cantilever support) The cantilever has a length of 100 m

3136 Example 14 ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling

A simply supported 90 times 90 times 8 EA compression member is shown inFigure 330(c) Determine the variation of the elastic buckling load with memberlength

References

1 Shanley FR (1947) Inelastic column theory Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 14No 5 May pp 261ndash7

2 Trahair NS (2000) Column bracing forces Australian Journal of StructuralEngineering Institution of Engineers Australia 3 Nos 2 amp 3 pp 163ndash8

3 Trahair NS and Rasmussen KJR (2005) Finite-element analysis of the flexuralbuckling of columns with oblique restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE131 No 3 pp 481ndash7

4 Structural Stability Research Council (1998) Guide to Stability Design Criteria forMetal Structures 5th edition (ed TV Galambos) John Wiley New York

5 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

6 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York7 Livesley RK (1964) Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis Pergamon Press Oxford8 Horne MR and Merchant W (1965) The Stability of Frames Pergamon Press

Oxford9 Gregory MS (1967) Elastic Instability E amp FN Spon London

10 McMinn SJ (1961) The determination of the critical loads of plane frames TheStructural Engineer 39 No 7 July pp 221ndash7

11 Stevens LK and Schmidt LC (1963) Determination of elastic critical loads Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 89 No ST6 pp 137ndash58

12 Harrison HB (1967) The analysis of triangulated plane and space structures account-ing for temperature and geometrical changes Space Structures (ed RM Davies)Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford pp 231ndash43

13 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

14 Lu LW (1962) A survey of literature on the stability of frames Welding ResearchCouncil Bulletin No 81 pp 1ndash11

15 Archer JS et al (1963) Bibliography on the use of digital computers in structuralengineering Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 89 No ST6 pp 461ndash91

16 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

Compression members 99

17 Brotton DM (1960) Elastic critical loads of multibay pitched roof portal frames withrigid external stanchions The Structural Engineer 38 No 3 March pp 88ndash99

18 Switzky H and Wang PC (1969) Design and analysis of frames for stability Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 95 No ST4 pp 695ndash713

19 Davies JM (1990) In-plane stability of portal frames The Structural Engineer 68No 8 April pp 141ndash7

20 Davies JM (1991) The stability of multi-bay portal frames The Structural Engineer69 No 12 June pp 223ndash9

21 Bresler B Lin TY and Scalzi JB (1968) Design of Steel Structures 2nd editionJohn Wiley New York

22 Gere JM and Carter WO (1962) Critical buckling loads for tapered columns Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 88 No ST1 pp 1ndash11

23 Bradford MA andAbdoli Yazdi N (1999)ANewmark-based method for the stabilityof columns Computers and Structures 71 No 6 pp 689ndash700

24 Trahair NS (1993) FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN SponLondon

25 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

26 Trahair NS and Rasmussen KJR (2005) Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of columnswith oblique eccentric restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 131 No 11pp 1731ndash7

27 Chajes A and Winter G (1965) Torsionalndashflexural buckling of thin-walled membersJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST4 pp 103ndash24

Chapter 4

Local buckling ofthin-plate elements

41 Introduction

The behaviour of compression members was discussed in Chapter 3 where itwas assumed that no local distortion of the cross-section took place so thatfailure was only due to overall buckling and yielding This treatment is appro-priate for solid section members and for members whose cross-sections arecomposed of comparatively thick-plate elements including many hot-rolled steelsections

However in some cases the member cross-section is composed of more slender-plate elements as for example in some built-up members and in most light-gaugecold-formed members These slender-plate elements may buckle locally as shownin Figure 41 and the member may fail prematurely as indicated by the reduc-tion from the full line to the dashed line in Figure 42 A slender-plate elementdoes not fail by elastic buckling but exhibits significant post-buckling behaviouras indicated in Figure 43 Because of this the platersquos resistance to local fail-ure depends not only on its slenderness but also on its yield strength andresidual stresses as shown in Figure 44 The resistance of a plate elementof intermediate slenderness is also influenced significantly by its geometricalimperfections while the resistance of a stocky-plate element depends primar-ily on its yield stress and strain-hardening moduli of elasticity as indicated inFigure 44

In this chapter the behaviour of thin rectangular plates subjected to in-planecompression shear bending or bearing is discussed The behaviour under com-pression is applied to the design of plate elements in compression members andcompression flanges in beams The design of beam webs is also discussed andthe influence of the behaviour of thin plates on the design of plate girders to EC3is treated in detail

Figure 41 Local buckling of an I-section column

0 05 10 15 20 25 30 350

02

04

06

08

10

Complete yielding

Overall elasticbuckling

Ultimate strengthwithout local buckling

Ultimate strengthreduced by local buckling

Modified slenderness (Ny Ncr)

Ult

imat

e lo

ad r

atio

Nul

t N

y

NcrNy

Nult Ny

Nult Ny

Figure 42 Effects of local buckling on the resistances of compression members

102 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 05 10 15 20 25Dimensionless transverse deflection t

0

05

10

15

20First yield

Failure

Elasticpost-bucklingbehaviour

Buckling

Flat plate

Plate with initialcurvatureD

imen

sion

less

load

NN

cr

Figure 43 Post-buckling behaviour of thin plates

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Modified plate slenderness

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

Strain-hardening bucklingplates free along one edge

simply supported plates

Yielding

Ultimate strengths of simplysupported plates ultfy

Flat plates withoutresidual stresses

Plates withinitialcurvature

Plates with residualstresses and initial

curvature

Elastic buckling crfy

Str

ess

rati

o c

rf y

ul

tfy

k

f

Et

bf

cr

y2

2)1(12

) )( (=

ndash

Figure 44 Ultimate strengths of plates in compression

42 Plate elements in compression

421 Elastic buckling

4211 Simply supported plates

The thin flat plate element of length L width b and thickness t shown in Figure 45bis simply supported along all four edges The applied compressive loads N are

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 103

L

L

EI

t

t

N

N

b

b= Ebt

12-----------

3

Ebt

12(1ndash2)--------------------------

3bD

Nbt

Nbt

SimplysupportedSimply

supported

(a) Column buckling (b) Plate buckling

SS

2

2

4

4

22

4

4

4

2

2

4

4

2partx

partN

z

zx

x

bDdx

N

dx

EI ndash=++ndash=

xx

yy

z

z

( )

=

partpartpartpartpartdd partpart

Figure 45 Comparison of column and plate buckling

uniformly distributed over each end of the plate When the applied loads are equalto the elastic buckling loads the plate can buckle by deflecting v laterally out ofits original plane into an adjacent position [1ndash4]

It is shown in Section 481 that this equilibrium position is given by

v = δ sinmπx

Lsin

nπz

b(41)

with n = 1 where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection Theelastic buckling load Ncr at which the plate buckles corresponds to the bucklingstress

σcr = Ncrbt (42)

which is given by

σcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(bt)2

(43)

The lowest value of the buckling coefficient kσ (see Figure 46) is

kσ = 4 (44)

which is appropriate for the high aspect ratios Lb of most structural steel members(see Figure 47)

104 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

2

4

6

8

10

L

b2 3 4 5

2

34

m = 1

n = 1

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 46 Buckling coefficients of simply supported plates in compression

b

b b b

L = bm

cr cr

Figure 47 Buckled pattern of a long simply supported plate in compression

The buckling stress σcr varies inversely as the square of the plate slendernessor widthndashthickness ratio bt as shown in Figure 44 in which the dimensionlessbuckling stress σcrfy is plotted against a modified plate slenderness ratio

radicfyσcr

= b

t

radicfyE

12(1 minus ν2)

π2kσ (45)

If the material ceases to be linear elastic at the yield stress fy the above analysisis only valid for

radic(fyσcr) ge 1 This limit is equivalent to a widthndashthickness ratio

bt given by

b

t

radicfy

235= 568 (46)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 105

for a steel with E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 (The yield stress fy inequation 46 and in all of the similar equations which appear later in this chaptermust be expressed in Nmm2)

The values of the buckling coefficient kσ shown in Figure 46 indicate that theuse of intermediate transverse stiffeners to increase the elastic buckling stress ofa plate in compression is not effective except when their spacing is significantlyless than the plate width Because of this it is more economical to use interme-diate longitudinal stiffeners which cause the plate to buckle in a number of halfwaves across its width When such stiffeners are used equation 43 still holds pro-vided b is taken as the stiffener spacing Longitudinal stiffeners have an additionaladvantage when they are able to transfer compressive stresses in which case theircross-sectional areas may be added to that of the plate

An intermediate longitudinal stiffener must be sufficiently stiff flexurally toprevent the plate from deflecting at the stiffener An approximate value for theminimum second moment of area Ist of a longitudinal stiffener at the centre lineof a simply supported plate is given by

Ist = 45bt3[

1 + 23Ast

bt

(1 + 05

Ast

bt

)](47)

in which b is now the half width of the plate and Ast is the area of the stiffenerThis minimum increases with the stiffener area because the load transmitted bythe stiffener also increases with its area and the additional second moment of areais required to resist the buckling action of the stiffener load

Stiffeners should also be proportioned to resist local buckling A stiffener isusually fixed to one side of the plate rather than placed symmetrically about themid-plane and in this case its effective second moment of area is greater than thevalue calculated for its centroid It is often suggested [2 3] that the value of Ist

can be approximated by the value calculated for the mid-plane of the plate butthis may provide an overestimate in some cases [4ndash6]

The behaviour of an edge stiffener is different from that of an intermediatestiffener in that theoretically it must be of infinite stiffness before it can providean effective simple support to the plate However if a minimum value of thesecond moment of area of an edge stiffener of

Ist = 225bt3[

1 + 46Ast

bt

(1 + Ast

bt

)](48)

is provided the resulting reduction in the plate buckling stress is only a few percent[5] Equation 48 is derived from equation 47 on the basis that an edge stiffeneronly has to support a plate on one side of the stiffener while an intermediatestiffener has to support plates on both sides

The effectiveness of longitudinal stiffeners decreases as their number increasesand the minimum stiffness required for them to provide effective lateral supportincreases Some guidance on this is given in [3 5]

106 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

b

L

Simply supported Simply supported

Free edge

cr cr

Figure 48 Buckled pattern of a plate free along one edge

4212 Plates free along one longitudinal edge

The thin flat plate shown in Figure 48 is simply supported along both transverseedges and one longitudinal edge and is free along the other The differen-tial equation of equilibrium of the plate in a buckled position is the sameas equation 4105 (see Section 481) The buckled shape which satisfies thisequation differs however from the approximately square buckles of the simplysupported plate shown in Figure 47 The different boundary conditions along thefree edge cause the plate to buckle with a single half wave along its length asshown in Figure 48 Despite this the solution for the elastic buckling stress σcr

can still be expressed in the general form of equation 43 in which the bucklingcoefficient kσ is now approximated by

kσ = 0425 +(

b

L

)2

(49)

as shown in Figure 49For the long-plate elements which are used as flange outstands in many structural

steel members the buckling coefficient kσ is close to the minimum value of 0425In this case the elastic buckling stress (for a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2

and ν = 03) is equal to the yield stress fy when

b

t

radicfy

235= 185 (410)

Once again it is more economical to use longitudinal stiffeners to increase theelastic buckling stress than transverse stiffeners The stiffness requirements ofintermediate and edge longitudinal stiffeners are discussed in Section 4211

4213 Plates with other support conditions

The edges of flat-plate elements may be fixed or elastically restrained insteadof being simply supported or free The elastic buckling loads of flat plates with

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 107

0 1 2 3 4 5Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

1

2

3

4

5

L

b

Free

Exact= 0425 + (bL)2

0425

k

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 49 Buckling coefficients of plate free along one edge

various support conditions have been determined and many values of the bucklingcoefficient kσ to be used in equation 43 are given in [2ndash6]

4214 Plate assemblies

Many structural steel compression members are assemblies of flat-plate elementswhich are rigidly connected together along their common boundaries The localbuckling of such an assembly can be analysed approximately by assuming that theplate elements are hinged along their common boundaries so that each plate actsas if simply supported along its connected boundary or boundaries and free alongany unconnected boundary The buckling stress of each plate element can then bedetermined from equation 43 with kσ = 4 or 0425 as appropriate and the lowestof these can be used as an approximation for determining the buckling load of themember

This approximation is conservative because the rigidity of the joints between theplate elements causes all plates to buckle simultaneously at a stress intermediatebetween the lowest and the highest of the buckling stresses of the individual plateelements Anumber of analyses have been made of the stress at which simultaneousbuckling takes place [4ndash6]

For example values of the elastic buckling coefficient kσ for an I-section inuniform compression are shown in Figure 410 and for a box section in uniformcompression in Figure 411 The buckling stress can be obtained from these figuresby using equation 43 with the plate thickness t replaced by the flange thicknesstf The use of these stresses and other results [4ndash6] leads to economic thin-walledcompression members

108 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Outstand width to depth ratio bfdf

0

02

04

06

08

10

= E--------------------------

2

12(1ndash 2)k ----------------------

( )b tf f2

bf

df

tw

tf

t twf =100

150

200

075

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

cr

Figure 410 Local buckling coefficients for I-section compression members

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Width to depth ratio bfdf

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

bf

dftw

tf

t twf = 075

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

100

125

150

200

= E--------------------------

2

12(1ndash 2)k----------------------

( )b tf f2cr

Figure 411 Local buckling coefficients for box section compression members

422 Ultimate strength

4221 Inelastic buckling of thick plates

The discussion given in Section 421 on the elastic buckling of rectangular platesapplies only to materials whose stressndashstrain relationships remain linear Thusfor stocky steel plates for which the calculated elastic buckling stress exceeds theyield stress fy the elastic analysis must be modified accordingly

One particularly simple modification which can be applied to strain-hardenedsteel plates is to use the strain-hardening modulus Est and

radic(EEst) instead of E

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 109

in the terms of equation 4105 (Section 481) which represent the longitudinalbending and the twisting resistances to buckling while still using E in the termfor the lateral bending resistance With these modifications the strain-hardeningbuckling stress of a long simply supported plate is equal to the yield stress fy when

b

t

radicfy

235= 237 (411)

More accurate investigations [7] of the strain-hardening buckling of steel plateshave shown that this simple approach is too conservative and that the strain-hardening buckling stress is equal to the yield stress when

b

t

radicfy

235= 321 (412)

for simply supported plates and when

b

t

radicfy

235= 82 (413)

for plates which are free along one longitudinal edge If these are compared withequations 46 and 410 then it can be seen that these limits can be expressed interms of the elastic buckling stress σcr byradic

fyσcr

= 057 (414)

for simply supported plates and byradicfyσcr

= 046 (415)

for plates which are free along one longitudinal edge These limits are shown inFigure 44

4222 Post-buckling strength of thin plates

A thin elastic plate does not fail soon after it buckles but can support loads signifi-cantly greater than its elastic buckling load without deflecting excessively This isin contrast to the behaviour of an elastic compression member which can only carryvery slightly increased loads before its deflections become excessive as indicatedin Figure 412 This post-buckling behaviour of a thin plate is due to a number ofcauses but the main reason is that the deflected shape of the buckled plate cannotbe developed from the pre-buckled configuration without some redistribution ofthe in-plane stresses within the plate This redistribution which is ignored in the

110 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Central deflection

Simply supported thinplates with constantdisplacement of loadededges

Constant displacementalong unloaded edges

Unloaded edgesfree to deflect

Thin column

Small deflection theoryCom

pres

sive

load

on

plat

e N

Ncr

Figure 412 Post-buckling behaviour of thin elastic plates

small deflection theory of elastic buckling usually favours the less stiff portionsof the plate and causes an increase in the efficiency of the plate

One of the most common causes of this redistribution is associated with thein-plane boundary conditions at the loaded edges of the plate In long structuralmembers the continuity conditions along the transverse lines dividing consecu-tive buckled panels require that each of these boundary lines deflects a constantamount longitudinally However the longitudinal shortening of the panel due toits transverse deflections varies across the panel from a maximum at the centreto a minimum at the supported edges This variation must therefore be compen-sated for by a corresponding variation in the longitudinal shortening due to axialstrain from a minimum at the centre to a maximum at the edges The longitudinalstress distribution must be similar to the shortening due to strain and so the stressat the centre of the panel is reduced below the average stress while the stress atthe supported edges is increased above the average This redistribution whichis equivalent to a transfer of stress from the more flexible central region of thepanel to the regions near the supported edges leads to a reduction in the transversedeflection as indicated in Figure 412

A further redistribution of the in-plane stresses takes places when the longitu-dinal edges of the panel are supported by very stiff elements which ensure thatthese edges deflect a constant amount laterally in the plane of the panel In thiscase the variation along the panel of the lateral shortening due to the transversedeflections induces a self-equilibrating set of lateral in-plane stresses which aretensile at the centre of the panel and compressive at the loaded edges The tensilestresses help support the less stiff central region of the panel and lead to furtherreductions in the transverse deflections as indicated in Figure 412 However this

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 111

action is not usually fully developed because the elements supporting the panelsof most structural members are not very stiff

The post-buckling effect is greater in plates supported along both longitudinaledges than it is in plates which are free along one longitudinal edge This is becausethe deflected shapes of the latter have much less curvature than the former and theredistributions of the in-plane stresses are not as pronounced In addition it is notpossible to develop any lateral in-plane stresses along free edges and so it is notuncommon to ignore any post-buckling reserves of slender flange outstands

The redistribution of the in-plane stresses after buckling continues with increas-ing load until the yield stress fy is reached at the supported edges Yielding thenspreads rapidly and the plate fails soon after as indicated in Figure 43 The occur-rence of the first yield in an initially flat plate depends on its slenderness and athick plate yields before its elastic buckling stress σcr is reached As the slender-ness increases and the elastic buckling stress decreases below the yield stress theratio of the ultimate stress fult to the elastic buckling stress increases as shown inFigure 44

Although the analytical determination of the ultimate strength of a thin flat plateis difficult it has been found that the use of an effective width concept can lead tosatisfactory approximations According to this concept the actual ultimate stressdistribution in a simply supported plate (see Figure 413) is replaced by a simplifieddistribution for which the central portion of the plate is ignored and the remainingeffective width beff carries the yield stress fy It was proposed that this effectivewidth should be approximated by

beff

b=

radicσcr

fy (416)

Actual ultimatestress distribution

Averageultimatestress ult

Centralexcess widthignored

(a) Ultimate stress distribution (b) Effective width concept

asymp fyfy

b

equiv

beff 2 beff 2

y

ulteff

fb

b=

Figure 413 Effective width concept for simply supported plates

112 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

which is equivalent to supposing that the ultimate load carrying capacity of the platefybeff t is equal to the elastic buckling load of a plate of width beff Alternativelythis proposal can be regarded as determining an effective average ultimate stressfult which acts on the full width b of the plate This average ultimate stress whichis given by

fult

fy=

radicσcr

fy(417)

is shown in Figure 44Experiments on real plates with initial curvatures and residual stresses have

confirmed the qualitative validity of this effective width approach but suggestthat the quantitative values of the effective width for hot-rolled and welded platesshould be obtained from equations of the type

beff

b= α

radicσcr

fy (418)

where α reflects the influence of the initial curvatures and residual stresses Forexample test results for the ultimate stresses fult(= fybeff b) of hot-rolled sim-ply supported plates with residual stresses and initial curvatures are shown inFigure 414 and suggest a value of α equal to 065 Other values of α are given in[8] Tests on cold-formed members also support the effective width concept withquantitative values of the effective width being obtained from

beff

b=

radicσcr

fy

(1 minus 022

radicσcr

fy

) (419)

4223 Effects of initial curvature and residual stresses

Real plates are not perfectly flat but have small initial curvatures similar to thosein real columns (see Section 322) and real beams (see Section 622) The initialcurvature of a plate causes it to deflect transversely as soon as it is loaded as shownin Figure 43 These deflections increase rapidly as the elastic buckling stress isapproached but slow down beyond the buckling stress and approach those of aninitially flat plate

In a thin plate with initial curvature the first yield and failure occur only slightlybefore they do in a flat plate as indicated in Figure 43 while the initial curvaturehas little effect on the resistance of a thick plate (see Figure 44) It is only in a plateof intermediate slenderness that the initial curvature causes a significant reductionin the resistance as indicated in Figure 44

Real plates usually have residual stresses induced by uneven cooling after rollingor welding These stresses are generally tensile at the junctions between plateelements and compressive in the regions away from the junctions Residual com-pressive stresses in the central region of a simply supported thin plate cause it

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 113

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16

Modified plate slenderness

02

04

06

08

10

12

(f y )

Test results

Yielding

Elastic buckling

equation 418 ( = 065)

cr

Eff

ecti

ve w

idth

rat

io b

eff

b

radic

Figure 414 Effective widths of simply supported plates

to buckle prematurely and reduce its ultimate strength as shown in Figure 44Residual stresses also cause premature yielding in plates of intermediate slender-ness as indicated in Figure 44 but have a negligible effect on the strain-hardeningbuckling of stocky plates

Some typical test results for thin supported plates with initial curvatures andresidual stresses are shown in Figure 414

43 Plate elements in shear

431 Elastic buckling

The thin flat plate of length L depth d and thickness t shown in Figure 415is simply supported along all four edges The plate is loaded by shear stressesdistributed uniformly along its edges When these stresses are equal to the elasticbuckling value τcr then the plate can buckle by deflecting v laterally out of itsoriginal plane into an adjacent position For this adjacent position to be one ofequilibrium the differential equilibrium equation [1ndash4](

part4v

partx4+ 2

part4v

partx2partz2+ part4v

partz4

)= minus2τcrt

D

part2v

partxpartz(420)

must be satisfied (this may be compared with the corresponding equation 4105 ofSection 481 for a plate in compression)

Closed form solutions of this equation are not available but numerical solutionshave been obtained These indicate that the plate tends to buckle along compressiondiagonals as shown in Figure 415 The shape of the buckle is influenced bythe tensile forces acting along the other diagonal while the number of buckles

114 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

L

d

Line of zero deflection

Compression diagonals

cr

cr

Figure 415 Buckling pattern of a simply supported plate in shear

increases with the aspect ratio Ld The numerical solutions for the elastic bucklingstress τcr can be expressed in the form

τcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kτ(dt)2

(421)

in which the buckling coefficient kτ is approximated by

kτ = 534 + 4

(d

L

)2

(422)

when L ge d and by

kτ = 534

(d

L

)2

+ 4 (423)

when L le d as shown in Figure 416The shear stresses in many structural members are transmitted by unstiffened

webs for which the aspect ratio Ld is large In this case the buckling coefficientkτ approaches 534 and the buckling stress can be closely approximated by

τcr = 534π2E12(1 minus ν2)

(dt)2 (424)

This elastic buckling stress is equal to the yield stress in shear τy = fyradic

3 (seeSection 131) of a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 when

d

t

radicfy

235= 864 (425)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 115

Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

5

10

15

20

25

L

b

5341 buckle 2 buckles 3 buckles

Approximations ofequations 422 and 423

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Figure 416 Buckling coefficients of plates in shear

The values of the buckling coefficient kτ shown in Figure 416 and the form ofequation 421 indicate that the elastic buckling stress may be significantly increasedeither by using intermediate transverse stiffeners to decrease the aspect ratio Ldand to increase the buckling coefficient kτ or by using longitudinal stiffeners todecrease the depthndashthickness ratio dt It is apparent from Figure 416 that suchstiffeners are likely to be most efficient when the stiffener spacing a is such thatthe aspect ratio of each panel lies between 05 and 2 so that only one buckle canform in each panel

Any intermediate stiffeners used must be sufficiently stiff to ensure that theelastic buckling stress τcr is increased to the value calculated for the stiffenedpanel Some values of the required stiffener second moment of area Ist are givenin [3 5] for various panel aspect ratios ad These can be conservatively approx-imated by using

Ist

at312(1 minus ν2)= 6

ad(426)

when ad ge 1 and by using

Ist

at312(1 minus ν2)= 6

(ad)4(427)

when ad le 1

116 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

432 Ultimate strength

4321 Unstiffened plates

A stocky unstiffened web in an I-section beam in pure shear is shown inFigure 417a The elastic shear stress distribution in such a section is analysedin Section 5102 The web behaves elastically in shear until first yield occurs atτy = fy

radic3 and then undergoes increasing plastification until the web is fully

yielded in shear (Figure 417b) Because the shear stress distribution at first yieldis nearly uniform the nominal first yield and fully plastic loads are nearly equaland the shear shape factor is usually very close to 10 Stocky unstiffened webs insteel beams reach first yield before they buckle elastically so that their resistancesare determined by the shear stress τy as indicated in Figure 418

(a) I-section (b) Shear stress distributions

y y

d

Elastic First yield Fully plastic

Figure 417 Plastification of an I-section web in shear

0 05 10 15 20 25 300

02

04

06

08

10

Yieldingad = 04

0610

15

Ultimate strengthsof stiffened plates

Elastic bucklingUltimate strength ofunstiffened plates

Modified plate slenderness

cr fy

ult fy

kE

f

t

df y

cr

y

2

2)1(12

3

3

3( () )

ult fy33

=ndash

She

ar r

atio

s 3

crf

y 3

ult

fy

Figure 418 Ultimate strengths of plates in shear

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 117

Thus the resistance of a stocky web in a flanged section for which the shearshape factor is close to unity is closely approximated by the web plastic shearresistance

Vpl = dtτy (428)

When the depthndashthickness ratio dt of a long unstiffened steel web exceeds864

radic(fy235) its elastic buckling shear stress τcr is less than the shear yield

stress (see equation 425) The post-buckling reserve of shear strength of such anunstiffened web is not great and its ultimate stress τult can be approximated withreasonable accuracy by the elastic buckling stress τcr given by equation 424 andshown by the dashed line in Figure 418

4322 Stiffened plates

Stocky stiffened webs in steel beams yield in shear before they buckle and so thestiffeners do not contribute to the ultimate strength Because of this stocky websare usually unstiffened

In a slender web with transverse stiffeners which buckles elastically before ityields there is a significant reserve of strength after buckling This is causedby a redistribution of stress in which the diagonal tension stresses in the webpanel continue to increase with the applied shear while the diagonal compressivestresses remain substantially unchanged The increased diagonal tension stressesform a tension field which combines with the transverse stiffeners and the flangesto transfer the additional shear in a truss-type action [7 9] as shown in Figure 419The ultimate shear stresses τult of the web is reached soon after yield occurs in thetension field and this can be approximated by

τult = τcr + τtf (429)

in which τcr is the elastic buckling stress given by equations 421ndash423 with Lequal to the stiffener spacing a and τtf is the tension field contribution at yieldwhich can be approximated by

τtf = fy2

(1 minus radic3τcrfy)radic

1 + (ad)2 (430)

Thus the approximate ultimate strength can be obtained from

radic3τult

fy=

radic3τcr

fy+

radic3

2

(1 minus radic3τcrfy)radic

1 + (ad)2 (431)

which is shown in Figure 418 This equation is conservative as it ignores anycontributions made by the bending resistance of the flanges to the ultimate strengthof the web [9 10]

118 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Chord Web strut Tension member

(a) Equivalent truss

(b)Tension fields

Tension fieldWeb stiffenerFlange

a a a

d

Figure 419 Tension fields in a stiffened web

Not only must the intermediate transverse stiffeners be sufficiently stiff to ensurethat the elastic buckling stress τcr is reached as explained in Section 431 butthey must also be strong enough to transmit the stiffener force

Nst = fydt

2

(1 minus

radic3τcr

fy

)[a

dminus (ad)2radic

1 + (ad)2

](432)

required by the tension field action Intermediate transverse stiffeners are often sostocky that their ultimate strengths can be approximated by their squash loads inwhich case the required area Ast of a symmetrical pair of stiffeners is given by

Ast = Nstfy (433)

However the stability of very slender stiffeners should be checked in whichcase the second moment of area Ist required to resist the stiffener force can beconservatively estimated from

Ist = Nstd2

π2E(434)

which is based on the elastic buckling of a pin-ended column of length d

44 Plate elements in bending

441 Elastic buckling

The thin flat plate of length L width d and thickness t shown in Figure 420is simply supported along all four edges The plate is loaded by bending stress

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 119

Ld

All edges simply supported

2d3

2d3

2d3

crl

crl

crl

crl

Figure 420 Buckled pattern of a plate in bending

distributions which vary linearly across its width When the maximum stressreaches the elastic buckling value σcrl the plate can buckle out of its originalplane as shown in Figure 420 The elastic buckling stress can be expressed inthe form

σcrl = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(dt)2

(435)

where the buckling coefficient kσ depends on the aspect ratio Ld of the plate andthe number of buckles along the plate For long plates the value of kσ is close toits minimum value of

kσ = 239 (436)

for which the length of each buckle is approximately 2d3 By using thisvalue of kσ it can be shown that the elastic buckling stress for a steel for whichE = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 is equal to the yield stress fy when

d

t

radicfy

235= 1389 (437)

The buckling coefficient kσ is not significantly greater than 239 except when thebuckle length is reduced below 2d3 For this reason transverse stiffeners areineffective unless more closely spaced than 2d3 On the other hand longitudinalstiffeners may be quite effective in changing the buckled shape and therefore thevalue of kσ Such a stiffener is most efficient when it is placed in the compression

120 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

region at about d5 from the compression edge This is close to the position ofthe crests in the buckles of an unstiffened plate Such a stiffener may increase thebuckling coefficient kσ significantly the maximum value of 1294 being achievedwhen the stiffener acts as if rigid The values given in [5 6] indicate that a hypo-thetical stiffener of zero area Ast will produce this effect if its second moment ofarea Ist is equal to 4dt3 This value should be increased to allow for the compres-sive load in the real stiffener and it is suggested that a suitable value might begiven by

Ist = 4dt3[

1 + 4Ast

dt

(1 + Ast

dt

)] (438)

which is of a similar form to that given by equation 47 for the longitudinal stiffenersof plates in uniform compression

442 Plate assemblies

The local buckling of a plate assembly in bending such as an I-beam bent about itsmajor axis can be analysed approximately by assuming that the plate elements arehinged along their common boundaries in much the same fashion as that describedin Section 4214 for compression members The elastic buckling moment canthen be approximated by using kσ = 0425 or 4 for the flanges as appropriateand kσ = 239 for the web and determining the element which is closest tobuckling The results of more accurate analyses of the simultaneous buckling ofthe flange and web elements in I-beams and box section beams in bending aregiven in Figures 421 and 422 respectively

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Outstand width to depth ratio bf df

0

02

04

06

08

10

t twf

bf

df

tw

t f

= E

--------------------------2

12(1ndash )2----------------------( )b tf f

2 = 10

15

20

40

kcrl

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 421 Local buckling coefficients for I-beams

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 121

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Width to depth ratio bfdf

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

bf

dftw

tf

= E--------------------------

2----------------------( )b tf f

2= 075

100125

150

200

t twf

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k crl

k

12(1ndash 2)

Figure 422 Local buckling coefficients for box section beams

443 Ultimate strength

The ultimate strength of a thick plate in bending is governed by its yield stress fyand by its plastic shape factor which is equal to 15 for a constant thickness plateas discussed in Section 552

When the width to thickness ratio dt exceeds 1389radic(fy235) the elastic

buckling stress σcrl of a simply supported plate is less than the yield stress fy(see equation 437) A long slender plate such as this has a significant reserve ofstrength after buckling because it is able to redistribute the compressive stressesfrom the buckled region to the area close to the supported compression edge in thesame way as a plate in uniform compression (see Section 4222) Solutions forthe post-buckling reserve of strength of a plate in bending given in [6 11ndash13] showthat an effective width treatment can be used with the effective width being takenover part of the compressive portion of the plate In the more general case of theslender plate shown in Figure 420 being loaded by combined bending and axialforce the post-buckling strength reserve of the plate can be substantial For suchplates the effective width is taken over a part of the compressive portion of the plateEffective widths can be obtained in this way from the local buckling stressσcr undercombined bending and axial force using the modified plate slenderness

radic(f yσcr)

in a similar fashion to that depicted in Figure 414 although the procedure is morecomplex

45 Plate elements in bending and shear

451 Elastic buckling

The elastic buckling of the simply supported thin flat plate shown in Figure 423which is subjected to combined shear and bending can be predicted by using the

122 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

L

d

cr

cr

crcr

crl

crl

crl

crl

Figure 423 Simply supported plate under shear and bending

approximate interaction equation [2 4 5 13]

(τcr

τcro

)2

+(σcrl

σcrlo

)2

= 1 (439)

in which τcro is the elastic buckling stress when the plate is in pure shear(see equations 421ndash424) and σcrlo is the elastic buckling stress for pure bending(see equations 435 and 436) If the elastic buckling stresses τcr σcrl are used inthe HenckyndashVon Mises yield criterion (see Section 131)

3τ 2cr + σ 2

crl = f 2y (440)

it can shown from equations 439 and 440 that the most severe loading conditionfor which elastic buckling and yielding occur simultaneously is that of pure shearThus in an unstiffened web of a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03yielding will occur before buckling while (see equation 425)

d

t

radicfy

235le 864 (441)

452 Ultimate strength

4521 Unstiffened plates

Stocky unstiffened webs in steel beams yield before they buckle and their designresistances can be estimated approximately by using the HenckyndashVon Mises yieldcriterion (see Section 131) so that the shear force Vw and moment Mw in theweb satisfy

3

(Vw

dt

)2

+(

6Mw

d2t

)2

= f 2y (442)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 123

This approximation is conservative as it assumes that the plastic shape factor forweb bending is 10 instead of 15

While the elastic buckling of slender unstiffened webs under combined shearand bending has been studied the ultimate strengths of such webs have not beenfully investigated However it seems possible that there is only a small reserveof strength after elastic buckling so that the ultimate strength can be approxi-mated conservatively by the elastic buckling stress combinations which satisfyequation 439

4522 Stiffened plates

The ultimate strength of a stiffened web under combined shear and bending can bediscussed in terms of the interaction diagram shown in Figure 424 for the ultimateshear force V and bending moment M acting on a plate girder When there isno shear the ultimate moment capacity is equal to the full plastic moment Mpproviding the flanges are Class 1 or Class 2 (see Section 472) while the ultimateshear capacity in the absence of bending moment is

Vult = dtτult (443)

where the ultimate stress τult is given approximately by equation 431 (whichignores any contributions made by the bending resistance of the flanges) Thisshear capacity remains unchanged as the bending moment increases to the valueMfp which is sufficient to fully yield the flanges if they alone resist the momentThis fact forms the basis for the widely used proportioning procedure for which itis assumed that the web resists only the shear and that the flanges are required to

10

08

06

04

02

0

MMp

VV

ult

Equation 444

Typical interaction curve

0 02 04 06 08 10

Figure 424 Ultimate strengths of stiffened webs in shear and bending

124 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

resist the full moment As the bending moment increases beyond Mfp the ultimateshear capacity falls off rapidly as shown A simple approximation for the reducedshear capacity is given by

V

Vult= 05

(1 +

radic1 minus MMp

1 minus MfpMp

)(444)

while MfpMp le MMp le 1 This approximation ignores the influence of thebending stresses on the tension field and the bending resistance of the flanges Amore accurate method of analysis is discussed in [14]

46 Plate elements in bearing

461 Elastic buckling

Plate elements are subjected to bearing stresses by concentrated or locally dis-tributed edge loads For example a concentrated load applied to the top flangeof a plate girder induces local bearing stresses in the web immediately beneaththe load In a slender girder with transverse web stiffeners the load is resisted byvertical shear stresses acting at the stiffeners as shown in Figure 425a Bearingcommonly occurs in conjunction with shear (as at an end support see Figure 425b)bending (as at mid-span see Figure 425c) and with combined shear and bending(as at an interior support see Figure 425d)

In the case of a panel of a stiffened web the edges of the panel may be regardedas simply supported When the bearing load is distributed along the full length a ofthe panel and there is no shear or bending the elastic bearing buckling stress σcrp

VR

VR

VLVL

M M

M M

(a) Bearing (c) Bearing and bending

(b) Bearing and shear (d) Bearing shear and bending

p

p p

p

Figure 425 Plate girder webs in bearing

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 125

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Panel aspect ratio ad

0

5

10

15

20

25

= E

--------------------------2

12(1ndash )2

k---------------( )dt 2

a

a

d

06 =1

=1

0ad = infin

[4]

[15]

Ela

stic

buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

crp

crp

Figure 426 Buckling coefficients of plates in bearing

can be expressed as

σcrp = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(dt)2

(445)

in which the buckling coefficient kσ varies with the panel aspect ratio ad as shownin Figure 426

When a patch-bearing load acts along a reduced length αa of the top edge ofthe panel the value of αkσ is decreased This effect has been investigated [15]and some values of αkσ are shown in Figure 426 These values suggest a limitingvalue of αkσ = 08 approximately for the case of unstiffened webs (ad rarr infin)

with concentrated loads (α rarr 0)For the case of a panel in combined bearing shear and bending it has been

suggested [6 15] that the elastic buckling stresses can be determined from theinteraction equation

σcrp

σcrpo+

(τcr

τcro

)2

+(σcrl

σcrlo

)2

= 1 (446)

in which the final subscripts o indicate the appropriate elastic buckling stress whenonly that type of loading is applied Some specific interaction diagrams are givenin [15]

462 Ultimate strength

The ultimate strength of a thick web in bearing depends chiefly on its yield stressfy Although yielding first occurs under the centre of the bearing plate general

126 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

yielding does not take place until the applied load is large enough to yield a webarea defined by a dispersion of the applied stress through the flange Even at thisload the web does not collapse catastrophically and some further yielding andredistribution is possible When the web is also subjected to shear and bendinggeneral yielding in bearing can be approximated by using the HenckyndashVon Misesyield criterion (see Section 131)

σ 2p + σ 2

b minus σpσb + 3τ 2 = f 2y (447)

in which σp is the bearing stress σb the bending stress and τ the shear stressThin stiffened web panels in bearing have a reserve of strength after elastic buck-

ling which is due to a redistribution of stress from the more flexible central regionto the stiffeners Studies of this effect suggest that the reserve of strength decreasesas the bearing loads become more concentrated [15] The collapse behaviour ofstiffened panels is described in [16 17]

47 Design against local buckling

471 Compression members

The cross-sections of compression members must be designed so that the designcompression force NEd does not exceed the design compressive resistance NcRd whence

NEd le NcRd (448)

This ignores overall member buckling as discussed in Chapter 3 for whichthe non-dimensional slenderness λ le 02 The EC3 design expression forcross-section resistance under uniform compression is

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0

(449)

in which Aeff is the effective area of the cross-section fy is the nominalyield strength for the section and γM0(=1) is the partial section resistancefactor

The cross-section of a compression member may buckle locally before it reachesits yield stress fy in which case it is defined in EC3 as a Class 4 cross-sectionCross-sections of compression members which yield prior to local buckling arelsquoeffectiversquo and are defined in EC3 as being either of Class 1 Class 2 or Class 3For these cross-sections which are unaffected by local bucking the effective areaAeff in equation 449 is taken as the gross area A A cross-section composed offlat-plate elements has no local buckling effects when the widthndashthickness ratio

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 127

bt of every element of the cross-section satisfies

b

tle λ3ε (450)

where λ3ε is the appropriate Class 3 slenderness limit of Table 52 of EC3 andε is a constant given by

ε =radic

235fy (451)

in which fy is in Nmm2 units Some values of λ3ε are given in Figures 427and 428

Class 4 cross-sections are those containing at least one slender element for whichequation 450 is not satisfied For these the effective area is reduced to

Aeff =sum

Aceff (452)

in which Aceff is the effective area of a flat compression element comprising thecross-section which is obtained from its gross area Ac by

Aceff = ρAc (453)

where ρ is a reduction factor given by

ρ = (λp minus 022)λ2p le 10 (454)

along both edges

---- -

Section andelement widths

---Diameter d0

b1 b1 b2 b1

d1

d0

d1 d1

b2

Flange outstand b1

Flange b2 supportedalong both edges

Web d1 supported

Section description UB UC CHS Box RHS

14 14

42 42

4242 42

902

Figure 427 Yield limits for some compression elements

128 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

for element supported on both edges and

ρ = (λp minus 0188)λ2p le 10 (455)

for outstands and where

λp =radic

fyσcr

= b

t

1

284εradic

kσ(456)

is the modified plate slenderness (see equation 45) Values of the local buck-ling coefficient kσ are given in Table 42 of EC3-1-5 and are similar to those inFigures 410 and 411

A circular hollow section member has no local buckling effects when itsdiameterndashthickness ratio dt satisfies

d

tle 90ε2 (457)

If the diameterndashthickness ratio does not satisfy equation 457 then it has a Class4 cross-section whose effective area is reduced to

Aeff =radic

90

d(tε2)A (458)

Worked examples for checking the section capacities of compression members aregiven in Sections 491 and 3121ndash3123

472 Beam flanges and webs in compression

Compression elements in a beam cross-section are classified in EC3 as Class 1Class 2 Class 3 or Class 4 depending on their local buckling resistance

Class 1 elements are unaffected by local buckling and are able to developand maintain their fully plastic capacities (Section 55) while inelastic momentredistribution takes place in the beam Class 1 elements satisfy

bt le λ1ε (459)

in which λ1ε is the appropriate plasticity slenderness limit given in Table 52 ofEC3 (some values of λ1ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits areclosely related to equations 412 and 413 for the strain-hardening buckling stressesof inelastic plates

Class 2 elements are unaffected by local buckling in the development of theirfully plastic capacities (Section 55) but may be unable to maintain these capacities

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 129

Beams Mp

Not to scale

Columns

Mp

0 1 2 3 = bt

Beams

NRd MRd prop1

Wel fy

Ny My

Ny

Sec

tion

res

ista

nces

NR

d M

Rd

1 2 3 4 Section classification

Flange outstands 9 10 14

33 38 42Simplysupportedflanges

Figure 428 EC3 section resistances

while inelastic moment redistribution takes place in the beam Class 2 sectionssatisfy

λ1ε le bt le λ2ε (460)

in which λ2ε is the appropriate Class 2 slenderness limit given in Table 52 of EC3(some values of λ2ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits are slightlygreater than those implied in equations 412 and 413 for the strain-hardeningbuckling of inelastic plates

Class 3 elements are able to reach first yield but buckle locally before theybecome fully plastic Class 3 elements satisfy

λ2ε le bt le λ3ε (461)

in which λ3ε is the appropriate yield slenderness limit given in Table 52 of EC3(some values of λ3ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits are closelyrelated to equations 418 used to define the effective widths of flange plates inuniform compression or modified from equation 437 for web plates in bendingClass 4 elements buckle locally before they reach first yield and satisfy

λ3ε lt bt (462)

Beam cross-sections are classified as being Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 or Class 4depending on the classification of their elements A Class 1 cross-section has allof its elements being Class 1 A Class 2 cross-section has no Class 3 or Class 4elements and has at least one Class 2 element while a Class 3 cross-section hasno Class 4 elements and at least one Class 3 element A Class 4 cross-section hasat least one Class 4 element

130 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

A beam cross-section must be designed so that its factored design moment MEd

does not exceed the design section moment resistance so that

MEd le McRd (463)

Beams must also be designed for shear (Section 473) and against lateral buckling(Section 69) The section resistance McRd is given by

McRd = WfyγM0

(464)

in which W is the appropriate section modulus fy the yield strength and γM0(=1)the partial section resistance factor For Class 1 and 2 beam cross-sections

W = Wpl (465)

where Wpl is the plastic section modulus and which allows many beams to bedesigned for the full plastic moment

Mp = Wplfy (466)

as indicated in Figure 428For Class 3 beam cross-sections the effective section modulus is taken as the

minimum elastic section modulus Welmin which is that based on the extremefibre that reaches yield first Some I-sections have Class 1 or 2 flanges but con-tain a Class 3 web and so based on the EC3 classification they would be Class3 cross-sections and unsuitable for plastic design However the EC3 permitsthese sections to be classified as effective Class 2 cross-sections by neglectingpart of the compression portion of the web This simple procedure for hot-rolled or welded sections conveniently replaces the compressed portion of theweb by a part of width 20εtw adjacent to the compression flange and withanother part of width 20εtw adjacent to the plastic neutral axis of the effectivecross-section

For a beam with a slender compression flange supported along both edgesthe effective section modulus Wel may be determined by calculating the elasticsection modulus of an effective cross-section obtained by using a compres-sion flange effective width beff obtained using equation 453 The calculationof Wel must incorporate the possibility that the effective section is not sym-metric and that the centroids of the gross and effective sections do notcoincide

Worked examples of classifying the section and checking the section momentcapacity are given in Sections 492ndash494 51215 and 51217

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 131

473 Members in compression and bending

For cross-sections subjected to a design compressive force NEd and a design majoraxis bending moment MyEd EC3 requires the interaction equation

NEd

NRd+ MyEd

MyRdle 1 (467)

to be satisfied where NRd is the compression resistance of the cross-section deter-mined from equation 449 and MyRd is the bending resistance of the cross-sectiondetermined according to equation 463 Generally the provision of equation 467is overly conservative and is of use only for preliminary member sizing and soEC3 provides less conservative and more detailed member checks depending onthe section classification

If the cross-section is Class 1 or 2 EC3 reduces the design bending resistanceMyRd to a value MyN Rd dependent on the coincident axial force NEd Providedthat

NEd le 025NplRd and (468)

NEd le 05hwtwfyγM0

(469)

where NplRd is the resistance based on yielding given by equation 449 andγM0(= 1) is the partial section resistance factor no reduction in the plastic momentcapacity MyRd = MplyRd is needed since for small axial loads the theoreticalreduction in the plastic moment is offset by strain hardening If either of equations468 or 469 is not satisfied EC3 requires that

MN yRd = MplyRd

(1 minus n

1 minus 05a

)(470)

where

n = NEdNplRd (471)

is the ratio of the applied compression load to the plastic compression resistanceof the cross-section and

a = (A minus 2bf tf )A le 05 (472)

is the ratio of the area of the web to the total area of the cross-sectionFor Class 3 cross-sections EC3 allows only a linear interaction of the stresses

arising from the combined bending moment and axial force so that the maximumlongitudinal stress is limited to the yield stress that is

σxEd le fyγM0 (473)

As for Class 3 cross-sections the longitudinal stress in Class 4 sections sub-jected to combined compression and bending is calculated based on the effective

132 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

properties of the cross-section so that equation 473 is satisfied The resultingexpression that satisfies equation 473 is

NEd

Aeff fyγM0+ MyEd + NEdeNy

Weff ymin fyγM0le 1 (474)

Equation 474 accounts for the additional bending moment caused by a shift eNy

in the compression force NEd from the geometric centroid of the net cross-sectionto the centroid of the effective cross-section

474 Longitudinal stiffeners

A logical basis for the design of a web in pure bending is to limit its proportions sothat its maximum elastic bending strength can be used so that the web is a Class 3element When this is done the section resistance MyRd of the beam is governedby the slenderness of the flanges Thus EC3 requires a fully effective unstiffenedweb to satisfy

hwtw le 124ε (475)

This limit is close to the value of 1269 at which the elastic buckling stress is equalto the yield stress (see equation 437)

Unstiffened webs whose slenderness exceeds this limit are Class 4 elementsbut the use of one or more longitudinal stiffeners can delay local buckling so thatthey become Class 3 elements and the cross-section can be designed as a Class 2section as discussed in Section 472 EC3 does not specify the minimum stiffnessof longitudinal stiffeners to prevent the web plate from deflecting at the stiffenerlocation during local buckling such as in equation 438 Rather it allows theplate slenderness λp in equation 456 to be determined from the local bucklingcoefficient kσ p which incorporates both the area and second moment of the areaof the stiffener If the stiffened web plate is proportioned such that λp le 0874 thereduction factor in equation 453 is unity and the longitudinal stress in the stiffenedweb can reach its yield strength prior to local buckling

The Australian standard AS4100 [18] gives a simpler method of design inwhich a first longitudinal stiffener whose second moment of area is at least thatof equation 428 is placed one-fifth of the web depth from the compression whenthe overall depthndashthickness ratio of the web exceeds the limit of

hwtw = 194ε (476)

which is greater than that of equation 475 because it considers the effect of theflanges on the local buckling stress of the web An additional stiffener whosesecond moment of area exceeds

Ist = hwt3w (477)

is required at the neutral axis when hwtw exceeds 242ε

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 133

475 Beam webs in shear

4751 Stocky webs

The factored design shear force VEd on a cross-section must satisfy

VEd le VcRd (478)

in which VcRd is the design uniform shear resistance which may be calculatedbased on a plastic (VplRd) or elastic distribution of shear stress

I-sections have distributions of shear stress through their webs that are approx-imately uniform (Section 542) and for stocky webs with hwtw lt 72ε the yieldstress in shear τy = fy

radic3 is reached before local buckling Hence EC3 requires

that

VcRd = VplRd = Av(fyradic

3)

γM0(479)

where γM0 = 1 and Av is the shear area of the web which is defined in Clause626 of EC3 This resistance is close to but more conservative than the resistancegiven in equation 428 since the shear area Av is reduced for hot-rolled sectionsby including the root radius in its calculation and because equation 479 ignoresthe effects of strain hardening Some sections such as a monosymmetric I-sectionhave non-uniform distributions of the shear stress τEd in their webs Based on anelastic stress distribution the maximum value of τEd may be determined as inSection 542 and EC3 then requires that

τEd le fyradic

3

γM0 (480)

Cross-sections for which hwtw le 72ε are stocky and the webs of all UBrsquos andUCrsquos in Grade 275 steel satisfy hwtw le 72ε

4752 Slender webs

The shear resistance of slender unstiffened webs for which hwtw gt 72ε decreasesrapidly from the value in equation 479 as the slenderness hwtw increases Forthese

VcRd = VbwRd le ηfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (481)

where VbwRd is the design resistance governed by buckling of the web in shearfyw is the yield strength of the web η is a factor for the shear area that can betaken as 12 for steels up to S460 and 10 otherwise and γM1(= 1) is a partialresistance factor based on buckling The buckling resistance of the web is given

134 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

in EC3 as

VbwRd = χwfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (482)

in which the web reduction factor on the yield strength hwtwfywradic

3 due tobuckling is

χw =

1 λw lt 083083λw λw ge 083

(483)

where the modified web plate slenderness is

λw =radic

fywradic

3

τcrasymp 076

radicfyw

τcr(484)

and τcr is the elastic local buckling stress in shear given in equation 421equation 484 is of the same form as equation 45 For an unstiffened webλw = (hwtw)864ε and so it can be seen from equation 482 that the resis-tance of an unstiffened web decreases with an increase in its depthndashthickness ratiohwtw

The shear resistance of a slender web may be increased by providing transversestiffeners which increase the resistance to elastic buckling (Section 431) andalso permit the development of tension field action (Section 4322) Thus

VcRd = VbwRd + Vbf Rd le ηfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (485)

in which VbwRd is the web resistance given in equation 481 and Vbf Rd isthe flange shear contribution provided by the understressed flanges during thedevelopment of the tension field in the web which further enhances the shearresistance In determining the web resistance reduction factor due to buckling χw

in equation 482 the modified plate slenderness is given by

λw = hw

tw

1

374εradic

kτ(486)

where kτ is the local buckling coefficient given in equations 422 or 423 with Lequal to the stiffener spacing a and d equal to the web depth hw The additionalpost-buckling reserve of capacity due to tension field action for web plates withλw gt 108 is achieved by the use of an enhanced reduction factor of χw = 137(07+λw) instead of the more conservativeχw = 083λw The presence of tensionfield action is also accounted for implicitly in the additional flange resistance

Vbf Rd = bf t2f

c

fyf

γM1

[1 minus

(MEd

Mf Rd

)2]

(487)

where MEd is the design bending moment Mf Rd is the moment of resistance ofthe cross-section consisting of the area of the effective flanges only fyf is the

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 135

yield strength of the flanges and where

c = a

(025 + 16

bf t2f

twh2w

fyf

fyw

) (488)

Worked examples of checking the shear capacity of a slender web are given inSections 495 and 496

4753 Transverse stiffeners

Provisions are made in EC3 for a minimum value for the second moment of areaIst of intermediate transverse stiffeners These must be stiff enough to ensure thatthe elastic buckling stress τcr of a panel can be reached and strong enough totransmit the tension field stiffener force The stiffness requirement of EC3 is thatthe second moment of area of a transverse stiffener must satisfy

Ist ge 075hwt3w (489)

when ahw gtradic

2 in which hw is the depth of the web and

Ist ge 15h3wt3

wa2 (490)

when ahw le radic2 These limits are shown in Figure 429 and are close to those of

equations 427 and 426The strength requirement of EC3 for transverse stiffeners is that they should

be designed as compression members of length hw with an initial imperfection

Value of ad

00 1 2 3

1

2

equation 427

equation 489

equation 490

equation 426

Val

ue o

f I s

at w

3

Figure 429 Stiffness requirements for web stiffeners

136 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

w0 = hw300 using second-order elastic analysis for which the maximum stressis limited by

σzRd = fyγM1 (491)

The effective stiffener cross-section for this design check consists of the cross-section of the stiffener itself plus a width of the web 15εtw each side of the stiffenerand the force to be resisted by the effective stiffener cross-section is

NzEd = VEd minus hwtw

λ2w

fywradic

3

γM1(492)

where λw is given by equation 485 Using equation 38 for the bending of aninitially crooked compression member this procedure implies that the maximumstress in the effective stiffener cross-section is

σzRd = NzEd

Ast

[1 + hwAst

300Wxstmin

(NzEdNcr

1 minus NzEdNcr

)](493)

where

Ncr = π2EIsth2w (494)

is the elastic flexural buckling load of the effective stiffener area and Ast and Ist

are the area and second moment of area of the effective stiffener area and Wxstmin

is its minimum elastic section modulusA worked example of checking a pair of transverse stiffeners is given in

Section 498

4754 End panels

At the end of a plate girder there is no adjacent panel to absorb the horizontalcomponent of the tension field in the last panel and so this load may have to beresisted by the end stiffener A rigid end post is required if tension field action is tobe utilised in design Special treatment of this end stiffener may be avoided if thelength of the last (anchor) panel is reduced so that the tension field contributionτtf to the ultimate stress τult is not required (see equation 429) This is achievedby designing the anchor panel so that its shear buckling resistance VbwRd givenby equation 482 is not less than the design shear force VEd A worked example ofchecking an end panel is given in Section 497

Alternatively a rigid end post consisting of two double-sided load-bearingtransverse stiffeners (see Section 4762) may be used to anchor the tension fieldat the end of a plate girder The end post region consisting of the web and twinpairs of stiffeners can be thought of as a short beam of length hw and EC3 requiresthis beam to be designed to resist the in-plane stresses in the web resulting fromthe shear VEd

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 137

476 Beam webs in shear and bending

Where the design moment MEd and shear VEd are both high the beam must bedesigned against combined shear and bending For stocky webs when the shearforce is less than half the plastic resistance VplRd EC3 allows the effect of theshear on the moment resistance to be neglected When VEd gt 05VplRd EC3requires the bending resistance to be determined using a reduced yield strength

fyr = (1 minus ρ)fyw (495)

for the shear area where

ρ =(

2VEd

VplRdminus 1

)2

(496)

The interaction curve between the design shear force VEd and design moment MEd

is shown in Figure 430 These equations are less conservative than the von-Misesyield condition (see Section 131)

f 2yr + 3τ 2

Ed = f 2y (497)

Equations 495 and 496 may be used conservatively for the well-known propor-tioning method of design for which only the flanges are used to resist the momentand the web to resist the shear force and which is equivalent to using a reducedyield strength fyr = 0 in equation 495 for the web

10

08

06

04

02

00 02 04 06 08 10

MvEd MplRd

VE

dV

plR

d

07

05

Figure 430 Section resistances of beams under bending and shear

138 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

EC3 also uses a simpler reduced design plastic resistance MyV Rd for I-sectionswith a stocky web in lieu of the more tedious use of equations 495 and 496 Hence

MyV Rd = (Wply minus ρA2w4tw)fy

γM0 (498)

where ρ is given in equation 496 Aw = hwtw is the area of the web and Wply isthe major axis plastic section modulus If the web is slender so that its resistanceis governed by shear buckling EC3 allows the effect of shear on the bendingresistance to be neglected when VEd lt 05VbwRd When this is not the case thereduced bending resistance is

MV Rd = MplRd(1 minus ρ2)+ Mf Rdρ2 (499)

where ρ is given in equation 496 using the shear buckling resistance VbwRd

instead of the plastic resistance VplRd Mf Rd is the plastic moment of resistanceconsisting of the effective area of the flanges and MplRd is the plastic resistanceof the cross-section consisting of the effective area of the flanges and the fullyeffective web irrespective of the section class The reduced bending strength inequation 499 is similar to that implied in equation 444 If the contribution ofthe web is conservatively neglected in determining MplRd for the cross-sectionequation 499 leads to MV Rd = Mf Rd which is the basis of the proportioningmethod of design

477 Beam webs in bearing

4771 Unstiffened webs

For the design of webs in bearing according to EC3 the bearing resistance FRd

based on yielding and local buckling is taken as

FRd = χFfywtwy

γM1(4100)

in which y is the effective loaded length of the web and

χF = 05

λF(4101)

is a reduction factor for the yield strength Fy = fywtwy due to local buckling inbearing in which

λF =radic

Fy

Fcr(4102)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 139

is a modified plate slenderness for bearing buckling (which is of the same form asequation 45) and

Fcr = kFπ2E

12(1 minus ν2)

(twhw

)2

hwtw (4103)

is the elastic buckling load for a web of area hwtw in bearing The buck-ling coefficients for plates in bearing are similar to those in Figure 426 withkF = 6 + 2(ahw)

2 being used for a web of the type shown in Figure 425a Theeffective loaded length used in determining the yield resistance Fy in bearing is

y = ss + 2ntf (4104)

in which ss is the stiff bearing length and ntf is the additional length assuming adispersion of the bearing at 1 n through the flange thickness More convenientlythe dispersion can be thought of as being at a slope 11 through a depth of (nminus1)tfinto the web For a thick web (for which λF lt 05) n = 1 + radic

(bf tw) while fora slender web (for which λF gt 05) n = 1 + radic[bf tw + 002(hwtf )2]

4772 Stiffened webs

When a web alone has insufficient bearing capacity it may be strengthened byadding one or more pairs of load-bearing stiffeners These stiffeners increase theyield and buckling resistances by increasing the effective section to that of thestiffeners together with the web lengths 15twε on either side of the stiffeners ifavailable The effective length of the compression member is taken as the stiffenerlength hw or as 075hw if flange restraints act to reduce the stiffener end rotationsduring buckling and curve c of Figure 313 for compression members should beused

A worked example of checking load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

48 Appendix ndash elastic buckling of plateelements in compression

481 Simply supported plates

A simply supported rectangular plate element of length L width b and thicknesst is shown in Figure 45b Applied compressive loads N are uniformly distributedover both edges b of the plate The elastic buckling load Ncr can be determinedby finding a deflected position such as that shown in Figure 45b which is one ofequilibrium The differential equation for this equilibrium position is [1ndash4]

bD

(part4v

partx4+ 2

part4v

partx2partz2+ part4v

partz4

)= minusNcr

part2v

partxpartz(4105)

140 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

where

bD = Ebt3

12(1 minus ν2)(4106)

is the flexural rigidity of the plateEquation 4105 is compared in Figure 45 with the corresponding differential

equilibrium equation for a simply supported rectangular section column (obtainedby differentiating equation 356 twice) It can be seen that bD for the plate corre-sponds to the flexural rigidity EI of the column except for the (1minusν2) term whichis due to the Poissonrsquos ratio effect in wide plates Thus the term bDpart4vpartx4 repre-sents the resistance generated by longitudinal flexure of the plate to the disturbingeffect minusNpart2vpartx2 of the applied load The additional terms 2bDpart4vpartx2partz2 andbDpart4vpartz4 in the plate equation represent the additional resistances generated bytwisting and lateral bending of the plate

A solution of equation 4105 which satisfies the boundary conditions along thesimply supported edges [1ndash4] is

v = δ sinmπx

Lsin

nπz

b (41)

where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the deflected shape When this is sub-stituted into equation 4105 an expression for the elastic buckling load Ncr isobtained as

Ncr = n2π2bD

L2

[1 + 2

(nL

mb

)2

+(

nL

mb

)4]

which has its lowest values when n = 1 and the buckled shape has one half waveacross the width of the plate b Thus the elastic buckling stress

σcr = Ncr

bt(42)

can be expressed as

σcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(bt)2

(43)

in which the buckling coefficient kσ is given by

kσ =[(

mb

L

)2

+ 2 +(

L

mb

)2]

(4107)

The variation of the buckling coefficient kσ with the aspect ratio Lb of the plateand the number of half waves m along the plate is shown in Figure 46 It can beseen that the minimum value of kσ is 4 and that this occurs whenever the buckles

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 141

are square (mbL = 1) as shown in Figure 47 In most structural steel membersthe aspect ratio Lb of the plate elements is large so that the value of the bucklingcoefficient kσ is always close to the minimum value of 4 The elastic bucklingstress can therefore be closely approximated by

σcr = π2E3(1 minus ν2)

(bt)2 (4108)

49 Worked examples

491 Example 1 ndash compression resistance ofa Class 4 compression member

Problem Determine the compression resistance of the cross-section of the membershown in Figure 431a The weld size is 8 mm

Classifying the section plate elements

tf = 10 mm tw = 10 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = (4002 minus 102 minus 8)(10 times 0814) T52

= 230 gt 14 and so the flange is Class 4 T52

cw(twε) = (420 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 8)(10 times 0814) T52

= 472 gt 42 and so the web is Class 4 T52

400

400

10

10

8 8 1070

1711 97

= 102

10

10

410

20

430

450

420

S355 steel

r

z

S355 steel S355 steel z

351

4

S355 steel z

1540

(a) Section of (b) Section of (c) Section of (d) Section of 356 times 171 UB 45 beam

A = 573 cm2

Wpl = 775 cm3

compression member box beam plate girder

Figure 431 Worked examples

142 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Effective flange area

kσ f = 043 EC3-1-5 T42

λp f = (4002 minus 102 minus 8)10

284 times 0814 times radic043

= 123 gt 0748 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρf = (123 minus 0188)1232 = 0687 EC3-1-5 44(2)

Aeff f = 0687 times 4 times (4002 minus 102 minus 8)times 10

+ (10 + 2 times 8)times 10 times 2 EC3-1-5 44(1)

= 5658 mm2

Effective web area

kσ w = 40 EC3-1-5 T41

λpw = (420 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 8)10

284 times 0814 times radic40

= 0831 gt 0673 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρw = 0831 minus 0055 times (3 + 1)08312 = 0885 EC3-1-5 44(2)

Aeff w = 0885times (420minus2times10minus2 times 8)times (10+8times10times2)

= 3558 mm2 EC3-1-5 44(1)

Compression resistance

Aeff = 5658 + 3558 = 9216 mm2

NcRd = 9216 times 35510 N = 3272 kN

492 Example 2 ndash section moment resistance of aClass 3 I-beam

Problem Determine the section moment resistance and examine the suitability forplastic design of the 356 times 171 UB 45 of S355 steel shown in Figure 431b

Classifying the section-plate elements

tf = 97 mm tw = 70 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = (17112 minus 702 minus 102)(97 times 0814) T52

= 91 gt 9 but lt 10 and so the flange is Class 2 T52

cw(twε) = (3514 minus 2 times 97 minus 2 times 102)(70 times 0814) T52

= 547 lt 72 and so the web is Class 1 T52

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 143

Section moment resistanceThe cross-section is Class 2 and therefore unsuitable for plastic design

McRd = 775 times 103 times 35510 N mm = 2751 kNm 625(2)

493 Example 3 ndash section moment resistance ofa Class 4 box beam

Problem Determine the section moment resistance of the welded-box sectionbeam of S355 steel shown in Figure 431c The weld size is 6 mm

Classifying the section-plate elements

tf = 10 mm tw = 8 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = 410(10 times 0814) T52

= 504 gt 42 and so the flange is Class 4 T52

cw(twε) = (430 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 6)(8 times 0814) T52

= 611 lt 72 and so the web is Class 1 T52

The cross-section is therefore Class 4 since the flange is Class 4

Effective cross-section

kσ = 40 EC3-1-5 T42

λp = 410

10 times 284 times 0814 times radic40

= 0887 gt 0673

EC3-1-5 44(2)

ψ = 1 EC3-1-5 T41

ρ = (0887 minus 0055 times (3 + 1))08872 = 0848 EC3-1-5 44(2)

bceff = 0848 times 410 = 3475 mm

Aeff = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 + (450 times 10)

+ 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8

= 14 935 mm2

14 935 times zc = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 times (430 minus 102)

+ 450 times 10 times 102 + 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8 times 4302

zc = 2062 mm

Ieff = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 times (430 minus 102 minus 2062)2

+ 450 times 10 times (2062 minus 102)2 + 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)3 times 812

+ 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8 times (4302 minus 2062)2 mm4

= 4601 times 106 mm4

144 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Section moment resistance

Weff min = 4601 times 106(430 minus 2062) = 2056 times 106 mm3

McRd = 2056 times 106 times 35510 Nmm = 7299 kNm 625(2)

494 Example 4 ndash section moment resistance of aslender plate girder

Problem Determine the section moment resistance of the welded plate girder ofS355 steel shown in Figure 431d The weld size is 6 mm

Solution

tf = 20 mm tw = 10 mm fyf = 345 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235345) = 0825 T52

cf (tf ε) = (4002 minus 102 minus 6)(20 times 0825) T52

= 115 gt 10 but lt 14 and so the flange is Class 3 T52

cw(twε) = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)(10 times 0825) T52

= 1803 gt 124 and so the web is Class 4 T52

A conservative approximation for the cross-section moment resistance may beobtained by ignoring the web completely so that

McRd = Mf = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 20)times 34510 Nmm = 4195 kNm

A higher resistance may be calculated by determining the effective width of theweb

ψ = minus1 EC3-1-5 T41

kσ = 239 EC3-1-5 T41

λp = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)10

284 times 0825 times radic239

= 1299 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρ = (1299 minus 0055 times (3 minus 1))12992 = 0705 EC3-1-5 44(2)

bc = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)1 minus (minus1) = 7440 mm EC3-1-5 T41

beff = 0705 times 7440 = 5244 mm EC3-1-5 T41

be1 = 04 times 5244 = 2098 mm EC3-1-5 T41

be2 = 06 times 5244 = 3146 mm EC3-1-5 T41

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 145

and the ineffective width of the web is

bc minus be1 minus be2 = 7440 minus 2098 minus 3146 = 2196 mm EC3-1-5 T41

Aeff = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2196)times 10 + 2 times 400 times 20

= 28 804 mm2

28 804 times zc = (2 times 400 times 20 + (1540 minus 2 times 20)times 10)times (15402)

minus 2196 times 10 times (1540 minus 20 minus 6 minus 2098 minus 21962)

zc = 7376 mm

Ieff = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 10 minus 7376)2

+ (400 times 20)times (7376 minus 10)2

+ (1540 minus 2 times 20)3 times 1012 + (1540 minus 2 times 20)

times 10 times (15402 minus 7376)2

minus 21963 times 1012 minus 2196

times 10 times (1540 minus 20 minus 6 minus 2098 minus 21962 minus 7376)2 mm4

= 1162 times 109 mm4

Weff = 1162 times 109(1540 minus 7376) = 1448 times 106 mm3

McRd = 1448 times 106 times 34510 Nmm = 4996 kNm

495 Example 5 ndash shear buckling resistance of anunstiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear buckling resistance of the unstiffened plate girderweb of S355 steel shown in Figure 431d

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

η = 12 EC3-1-5 51(2)

hw = 1540 minus 2 times 20 = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 F51

ηhw(twε) = 12 times 1500(10 times 0814)

= 2212 gt 72 and so the web is slender EC3-1-5 51(2)

ahw = infinhw = infin kτ st = 0 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

kτ = 534 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

146 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

τcr = 534 times 190 000 times (101500)2 = 451 Nmm2

EC3-1-5 A1(2)

λw = 076 times radic(355451) = 2132 gt 108 EC3-1-5 53(3)

Assuming that there is a non-rigid end post then

χw = 0832132 = 0389 EC3-1-5 T51

Neglecting any contribution from the flanges

VbRd = VbwRd = 0389 times 355 times 1500 times 10radic3 times 10

N = 1196 kN EC3-1-5 2(1)

496 Example 6 ndash shear buckling resistance of astiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear buckling resistance of the plate girder web of S355steel shown in Figure 431d if intermediate transverse stiffeners are placed at1800 mm spacing

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

hw = 1540 minus 2 times 20 = 1500 mm

ahw = 18001500 = 120 kτ st = 0 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

kτ = 534 + 4001202 = 812 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

τcr = 812 times 190 000 times (101500)2 = 686 Nmm2 EC3-1-5 A1(2)

Assuming that there is a rigid end post then

λw = 076 times radic(355686) = 173 gt 108 EC3-1-5 53(3)

χw = 137(07 + 173) = 0564 EC3-1-5 T51

Neglecting any contribution from the flanges

VbRd = VbwRd = 0564 times 355 times 1500 times 10radic3 times 10

N = 1734 kN

EC3-1-5 52(1)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 147

If the flange contribution is considered and MEd = 0

2 times (15εtf )+ tw = 2 times (15 times 0814 times 20)+ 10 EC3-1-5 54(1)

= 498 mm gt 400 mm and so bf = 400 mm EC3-1-5 54(1)

c = 1800 times(

025 + 16 times 400 times 202 times 345

10 times 15002 times 355

)= 4699 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

Vbf Rd = (400 times 202 times 345 times 10)(4699 times 10) N = 117 kNEC3-1-5 54(1)

VbRd = 1734 + 117 = 1851 kN EC3-1-5 52(1)

497 Anchor panel in a stiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear elastic buckling resistance of the end anchor panelof the welded stiffened plate girder of Section 496 if the width of the panel is1800 mm

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Using λw = 173 (Section 496) the shear elastic buckling resistance of the endpanel is

VpRd = (11732)times 355 times 1500 times 10(103 times radic3 times 10) N = 1027 kN

EC3-1-5 933(3)

498 Example 8 ndash intermediate transverse stiffener

Problem Check the adequacy of a pair of intermediate transverse web stiffeners100 times 16 of S460 steel for the plate girder of Section 496

SolutionUsing VEd = 1734 kN (Section 496) and VpRd = 1027 kN (Section 497)

the stiffener section must resist an axial force of

NEds = 1734 minus 1027 = 7064 kN EC3-1-5 933(3)

The stiffener section consists of the two stiffener plates and a length of the webdefined in Figure 91 of EC3-1-5 For the stiffener plates

tp = 16 mm fyp = 460 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235460) = 0715 T52

cp(tpε) = 100(16 times 0715) = 874 lt 9 T51

and so the plates are fully effective and the stiffener section is Class 1

148 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Using the lower of the web and plate yield stresses of fyw = 355 Nmm2 andε = 0814

Aeff s = 2 times (16 times 100)+ (2 times 15 times 0814 times 10 + 16)times 10

= 5801 mm2 EC3-1-5 F91

Ieff s = (2 times 100 + 10)3 times 1612 = 1235 times 106 mm4 EC3-1-5 F91

ieff s = radic (1235 times 1065801

) = 461 mm

λ1 = 939 times 0814 = 764 6313(1)

Lcr = 10 times 1500 = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 94(2)

λ = 1500(461 times 764) = 0426 6313(1)

For buckling curve c α = 049 EC3-1-5 94(2) T61

Φ = 05 times [1 + 049 times (0426 minus 02)+ 04262] = 06466312(1)

χ = 1[0646 + radic(06462 minus 04262)] = 0884 6312(1)

NbRd = 0884 times 5801 times 35510 N 6311(3)

= 1820 kN gt 7064 kN = NEds OK

ahw = 18001500 = 120 ltradic

2 EC3-1-5 933(3)

15h3wt3

wa2 = 15 times 15003 times 10318002 EC3-1-5 933(3)

= 1563 times 106 mm4 lt 1235 times 106 mm4 = Is OK

499 Example 9 ndash load-bearing stiffener

Problem Check the adequacy of a pair of load-bearing stiffeners 100 times 16 of S460steel which are above the support of the plate girder of Section 496 The flangesof the girder are not restrained by other structural elements against rotation Thegirder is supported on a stiff bearing ss = 300 mm long the end panel width is1000 mm and the design reaction is 1400 kN

Stiffener yield resistance

ts = 16 mm fy = 460 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235460) = 0715 T52

cs(tsε) = 100(16 times 0715) T51

= 874 lt 9 and so the stiffeners are fully effective T51

FsRd = 2 times (100 times 16)times 46010 N = 1472 kN

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 149

Unstiffened web resistance

kF = 2 + 6 times (300 + 0)1500 = 32 EC3-1-5 F61

Fcr = 09 times 32 times 210 000 times 1031500 N = 4032 kN EC3-1-5 64(1)

e = 32 times 210 000 times 102

2 times 355 times 1500= 631 mm lt 300 mm

= ss + c EC3-1-5 65(3)

m1 = (355 times 400)(355 times 10) = 40 EC3-1-5 65(1)

m2 = 002 times (150020)2 = 1125 EC3-1-5 65(1)

ly611 = 631 + 20 timesradic

402 + (63120)2 + 1125

= 3018 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

ly612 = 631 + 20 times radic40 + 1125

= 3101 mm gt 3018 mm = ly611 EC3-1-5 65(3)

ly = 301 8 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

λF =radic

3018 times 10 times 355

4032 times 103= 1630(gt05) EC3-1-5 64(1)

χF = 051630 = 0307 EC3-1-5 64(1)

Leff = 0307 times 3018 = 926 mm EC3-1-5 64(1)

FRd = 355 times 926 times 1010 N EC3-1-5 62(1)

= 3286 kN lt 1400 kN and so load bearing stiffeners are required

Stiffener buckling resistance

Aeff s = 2 times (16 times 100)+ (2 times 15 times 0814 times 10 + 16)times 10

= 5801 mm2 EC3-1-5 F91

Ieff s = (2 times 100 + 10)3 times 1612 = 1235 times 106 mm4 EC3-1-5 F91

ieff s = radic (1235 times 1065801

) = 461 mm

λ1 = 939 times 0814 = 764 6313(1)

Lcr = 10 times 1500 mm = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 94(2)

λ = 1500(461 times 764) = 0426 6313(1)

For buckling curve c α = 049 EC3-1-5 94(2) T61

Φ = 05 times [1 + 049 times (0426 minus 02)+ 04262] = 0646 6312(1)

χ = 1[0646 + radic(06462 minus 04262)] = 0884 6312(1)

NbRd = 0884 times 5801 times 35510 N = 1820 kN gt 1400 kN OK6311(3)

150 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

4910 Example 10 ndash shear and bending of a Class 2 beam

Problem Determine the design resistance of the 356 times 171 UB 45 of S355steel shown in Figure 431b at a point where the design moment is MEd =230 kNm

SolutionAs in Section 492 fy = 355 Nmm2 ε = 0814 η = 12 the flange is Class 2

and the web is Class 1 the section is Class 2 and Wpl = 775 cm3

Av = 573 times 102 minus 2 times 1711 times 97 + (70 + 2 times 102)times 97

= 2676 mm2 626(3)

η = 12 EC3-1-5 51(2)

ηhwtw = 12 times (3514 minus 2 times 97)times 70 = 2789 mm2 gt 2676 mm2

626(3)

VplRd = 2789 times (355radic

3)10 N = 5716 kN 626(2)

ηhw(twε) = 12 times (3514 minus 2 times 97)(70 times 0814) = 700 lt 72EC3-1-5 51(2)

so that shear buckling need not be consideredUsing a reduced bending resistance corresponding to MV Rd = MEd = 230

kNm then

(1 minus ρ)times 355 times 775 times 103 = 230 times 106 so that 628(3)

ρ = 0164

Now ρ = (2VEdVplRd minus 1)2 which leads to 628(3)

VcM RdVplRd = [radic(0164)+ 1]2 = 0702 so that

VcM Rd = 0702 times 5716 = 4015 kN

4911 Example 11 ndash shear and bending of a stiffenedplate girder

Problem Determine the shear resistance of the stiffened plate web girder of Section496 shown and shown in Figure 431d at the point where the design moment isMEd = 4000 kNm

SolutionAs previously fyf = 345 Nmm2 εf = 0825 and the flanges are Class 3

(Section 494) fyw = 345 Nmm2 and εw = 0814 (Section 495) and VbwRd =1733 kNm (Section 496)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 151

The resistance of the flanges to bending is

Mf Rd = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 20)times 34510 Nmm

= 4195 kNm gt 4000 kNm = MEd EC3-1-5 54(1)

and so the flange resistance is not completely utilised in resisting the bendingmoment

2 times (15εtf )+ tw = 2 times (15 times 0814 times 20)+ 10 = 498 mm gt 400 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

bf = 400 mm lt 498 mm EC3-1-5 54(1)

c = 1800 times(

025 + 16 times 400 times 202 times 345

10 times 15002 times 355

)= 4699 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

Vbf Rd = 400 times 202 times 355

4699 times 10times

[1 minus

(4000

4195

)2]

N = 11 kN

EC3-1-5 54(1)

VbwRd + Vbf Rd = 1733 + 11 = 1744 kN EC3-1-5 52(1)

410 Unworked examples

4101 Example 12 ndash elastic local buckling of a beam

Determine the elastic local buckling moment for the beam shown in Figure 432a

4102 Example 13 ndash elastic local buckling of a beam-column

Determine the elastic local buckling load for the beam-column shown inFigure 432b when MN = 20 mm

4103 Example 14 ndash section capacity of a welded box beam

Determine the section moment resistance for the welded box beam of S275 steelshown in Figure 432c

4104 Example 15 ndash designing a plate web girder

The overall depth of the laterally supported plate girder of S275 steel shown inFigure 432d must not exceed 1800 mm Design a constant section girder for the

152 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

150

10 mm6 mm

150 150600

(a) Beam section

Z = 139 times 10 mm

300

300

6 mm

(b) Beam-column section

300 times 6 mm

200 times 6 mm

(c) Box beam section

A B C

500 kN

15 000 mm 000 mm

(d) Plate girder

95 Nmm

10 mm

max6 3

Z = 091 times10 mmmin6 3

5

Figure 432 Unworked examples

factored loads shown and determine

(a) The flange proportions(b) The web thickness(c) The distribution of any intermediate stiffeners(d) The stiffener proportions and(e) The proportions and arrangements of any load-bearing stiffeners

References

1 Timoshenko SP and Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959) Theory of Plates and Shells2nd edition McGraw-Hill New York

2 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

3 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York4 Bulson PS (1970) The Stability of Flat Plates Chatto and Windus London5 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural Stability

Corona Tokyo6 Allen HG and Bulson PS (1980) Background to Buckling McGraw-Hill (UK)7 Basler K (1961) Strength of plate girders in shear Journal of the Structural Division

ASCE 87 No ST7 pp 151ndash808 Bradford MA Bridge RQ Hancock GJ Rotter JM and Trahair NS (1987)

Australian limit state design rules for the stability of steel structures Proceedings FirstStructural Engineering Conference Institution of Engineers Australia Melbournepp 209ndash16

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 153

9 Evans HR (1983) Longitudinally and transversely reinforced plate girders Chapter1 in Plated Structures Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied SciencePublishers London pp 1ndash37

10 Rockey KC and Skaloud M (1972) The ultimate load behaviour of plate girdersloaded in shear The Structural Engineer 50 No 1 pp 29ndash47

11 Usami T (1982) Postbuckling of plates in compression and bending Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 108 No ST3 pp 591ndash609

12 Kalyanaraman V and Ramakrishna P (1984) Non-uniformly compressed stiffenedelements Proceedings Seventh International Specialty Conference Cold-FormedStructures St Louis Department of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Rollapp 75ndash92

13 Merrison Committee of the Department of Environment (1973) Inquiry into theBasis of Design and Method of Erection of Steel Box Girder Bridges Her MajestyrsquosStationery Office London

14 Rockey KC (1971)An ultimate load method of design for plate girders Developmentsin Bridge Design and Construction (eds KC Rockey JL Bannister and HR Evans)Crosby Lockwood and Son London pp 487ndash504

15 Rockey KC El-Gaaly MA and Bagchi DK (1972) Failure of thin-walled mem-bers under patch loading Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST12pp 2739ndash52

16 Roberts TM (1981) Slender plate girders subjected to edge loading ProceedingsInstitution of Civil Engineers 71 Part 2 September pp 805ndash19

17 Roberts TM (1983) Patch loading on plate girders Chapter 3 in Plated Struc-tures Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied Science Publishers Londonpp 77ndash102

18 SA (1998) AS4100ndash1998 Steel Structures Standards Australia Sydney Australia

Chapter 5

In-plane bending of beams

51 Introduction

Beams are structural members which transfer the transverse loads they carry to thesupports by bending and shear actions Beams generally develop higher stressesthan axially loaded members with similar loads while the bending deflections aremuch higher These bending deflections of a beam are often therefore a primarydesign consideration On the other hand most beams have small shear deflectionsand these are usually neglected

Beam cross-sections may take many different forms as shown in Figure 51 andthese represent various methods of obtaining an efficient and economical mem-ber Thus most steel beams are not of solid cross-section but have their materialdistributed more efficiently in thin walls Thin-walled sections may be open andwhile these tend to be weak in torsion they are often cheaper to manufacture thanthe stiffer closed sections Perhaps the most economic method of manufacturingsteel beams is by hot-rolling but only a limited number of open cross-sections isavailable When a suitable hot-rolled beam cannot be found a substitute may befabricated by connecting together a series of rolled plates and this has becomeincreasingly common Fabricating techniques also allow the production of beamscompounded from hot-rolled members and plates and of hybrid members in whichthe flange material is of a higher yield stress than the web Tapered and castellatedbeams can also be fabricated from hot-rolled beams In many cases a steel beamis required to support a reinforced concrete slab and in this case its strength maybe increased by connecting the steel and concrete together so that they act com-positely The fire resistance of a steel beam may also be increased by encasing itin concrete The final member cross-section chosen will depend on its suitabilityfor the use intended and on the overall economy

The strength of a steel beam in the plane of loading depends on its sectionproperties and on its yield stress fy When bending predominates in a determinatebeam the effective ultimate strength is reached when the most highly stressedcross-section becomes fully yielded so that it forms a plastic hinge The momentMp at which this occurs is somewhat higher than the first yield moment My at whichelastic behaviour nominally ceases as shown in Figure 52 and for hot-rolled

In-plane bending of beams 155

Solid section Rolled section

Cut

WeldTapered I-beam

Composite beam

Encased beam

Castellated I-beam

WeldWeld

Compoundsection

Fabricatedsection

Cut

Reverse

Shearconnector

Thin-walledopen section

Thin-walledclosed section

Weld

Displace

Figure 51 Beam types

M

2

2

d

d

x

w

Rigid plastic assumption

MpMy 4

5

1

Effect of residual stresses

(d) Momentndashcurvature relationships

3

2

2

d

d

x

w

1 2 3 4 5

fy fy fy fy

(c) Stress distributions

First yield 2

Elastic Firstyield

Strain-hardened

Fullyplastic

Elastic-plastic

Figure 52 Momentndashcurvature relationships for steel beams

I-beams this margin varies between 10 and 20 approximately The attainmentof the first plastic hinge forms the basis for the traditional method of design ofbeams in which the bending moment distribution is calculated from an elasticanalysis

156 In-plane bending of beams

However in an indeterminate beam a substantial redistribution of bendingmoment may occur after the first hinge forms and failure does not occur untilsufficient plastic hinges have formed to cause the beam to become a mechanismThe load which causes this mechanism to form provides the basis for the morerational method of plastic design

When shear predominates as in some heavily loaded deep beams of short spanthe ultimate strength is controlled by the shear force which causes complete plas-tification of the web In the more common sections this is close to the shear forcewhich causes the nominal first yield in shear and so the shear design is carriedout for the shear forces determined from an elastic analysis In this chapter thein-plane behaviour and design of beams are discussed It is assumed that neitherlocal buckling (which is treated in Chapter 4) nor lateral buckling (which is treatedin Chapter 6) occurs Beams with axial loads are discussed in Chapter 7 while thetorsion of beams is treated in Chapter 10

52 Elastic analysis of beams

The design of a steel beam is often preceded by an elastic analysis of the bendingof the beam One purpose of such an analysis is to determine the bending momentand shear force distributions throughout the beam so that the maximum bend-ing moments and shear forces can be found and compared with the moment andshear capacities of the beam An elastic analysis is also required to determine thedeflections of the beam so that these can be compared with the desirable limitingvalues

The data required for an elastic analysis include both the distribution and themagnitudes of the applied loads and the geometry of the beam In particular thevariation along the beam of the effective second moment of area I of the cross-section is needed to determine the deflections of the beam and to determine themoments and shears when the beam is statically indeterminate For this purposelocal variations in the cross-section such as those due to bolt holes may be ignoredbut more general variations including any general reductions arising from theuse of the effective width concept for excessively thin compression flanges (seeSection 4222) should be allowed for

The bending moments and shear forces in statically determinate beams can bedetermined by making use of the principles of static equilibrium These are fullydiscussed in standard textbooks on structural analysis [1 2] as are various methodsof analysing the deflections of such beams On the other hand the conditions ofstatics are not sufficient to determine the bending moments and shear forces instatically indeterminate beams and the conditions of compatibility between thevarious elements of the beam or between the beam and its supports must alsobe used This is done by analysing the deflections of the statically indeterminatebeam Many methods are available for this analysis both manual and computerand these are fully described in standard textbooks [3ndash8] These methods can also

In-plane bending of beams 157

MS = MA ndash MB MS = qL2 8 MS = QL 4 MS = QL 3 MS = QL 4

k = 298 k = k = k = k = 496 397 507 546

L2

MA

L L L2

qQ Q Q QQ

(a) Mid-span deflection wc

(b) Moments MS and deflection coefficients k

and units wc = kMS L

2I wc ndash mm

MS ndash kNm L ndash m I ndash cm4

L3 L3 L3 L4 L2 L4

MB

Figure 53 Mid-span deflections of steel beams

be used to analyse the behaviour of structural frames in which the member axialforces are small

While the deflections of beams can be determined accurately by using themethods referred to above it is often sufficient to use approximate estimatesfor comparison with the desirable maximum values Thus in simply supported orcontinuous beams it is usually accurate enough to use the mid-span deflection(see Figure 53) The mid-span deflection wc (measured relative to the level of theleft-hand support) depends on the distribution of the applied load the end momentsMA and MB (taken as clockwise positive) and the sinking wAB of the right-handsupport below the left-hand support and can be expressed as

wc = kMS + 298(MA minus MB)L2

I+ wAB

2 (51)

In this equation the deflections wc and wAB are expressed in mm the momentsMS MA MB are in kNm the span L is in m and the second moment of area I is incm4 Expressions for the simple beam moments MS and values of the coefficientsk are given in Figure 53 for a number of loading distributions These can becombined together to find the central deflections caused by many other loadingdistributions

53 Bending stresses in elastic beams

531 Bending in a principal plane

The distribution of the longitudinal bending stresses σ in an elastic beam bent in aprincipal plane xz can be deduced from the experimentally confirmed assumptionthat plane sections remain substantially plane during bending provided any shearlag effects which may occur in beams with very wide flanges (see Section 545)

158 In-plane bending of beams

are negligible Thus the longitudinal strains ε vary linearly through the depth ofthe beam as shown in Figure 54 as do the longitudinal stresses σ It is shown inSection 581 that the moment resultant My of these stresses is

My = minusEIyd2w

dx2(52)

where the sign conventions for the moment My and the deflection w are as shownin Figure 55 and that the stress at any point in the section is

σ = Myz

Iy(53)

in which tensile stresses are positive In particular the maximum stresses occur atthe extreme fibres of the cross-section and are given by

in compression and

σmax = MyzT

Iy= minus My

WelyT

σmax = MyzB

Iy= My

WelyB

(54)

in tension in which WelyT = minus IyzT and WelyB = IyzB are the elastic sectionmoduli for the top and bottom fibres respectively for bending about the y axis

The corresponding equations for bending in the principal plane xy are

Mz = EIzd2v

dx2(55)

where the sign conventions for the moment Mz and the deflection v are also shownin Figure 55

σ = minusMzyIz (56)

(c) Strains

δx δx

δx

(b) Bending (a) Cross-section (d) Stresses

= E

=

= ndash

zdAA

(e) Moment resultant

y

ndashzT

z

My

z2

2

dd

xwEI

M

y

y

x

w

d

d2

2

My

zB

z

C

b

Figure 54 Elastic bending of beams

In-plane bending of beams 159

z w

xC

y v

xCMy

My

Mz

Mz

C

y

z

x

+ve My

ndashve d2wdx2

+ve Mz

+ve d2vdx

(b) Curvature in xz plane

(c) Curvature in xy plane(a) Positive bending actions

Figure 55 Bending sign conventions

andσmax = MzWelzL

σmax = minusMzWelzR

(57)

in which WelzL = minus IzyL and WelzR = IzyR are the elastic section moduli forbending about the z axis

Values of Iy Iz Welz Welz for hot-rolled steel sections are given in [9] whilevalues for other sections can be calculated as indicated in Section 59 or in standardtextbooks [1 2] Expressions for the properties of some thin-walled sections aregiven in Figure 56 [10] When a section has local holes or excessive widths (seeSection 4222) these properties may need to be reduced accordingly

Worked examples of the calculation of cross-section properties are given inSections 5121ndash5124

532 Biaxial bending

When a beam deflects only in a plane xz1 which is not a principal plane (seeFigure 57a) so that its curvature d2v1d x2 in the perpendicular xy1 plane is zerothen the bending stresses

σ = minusEz1d2w1dx2 (58)

have moment resultants

andMy1 = minusEIy1d2w1dx2

Mz1 = minusEIy1z1d2w1dx2

(59)

160 In-plane bending of beams

b1

2b

b33t

2t

1t

y

z

1b

1t

2t3b3t

3t

z

y

1b = b2

dt

A

I

I

y

z

y

z

0

0

A + A + A

A z + I

I + I

I b12

12

z

A z + z t

A bnsum2

n 4

0

b

3

2

3

3

321

nnsum3

1

2

sum2

n pn pn 2)(

I I12( )Iz2

A ndashndash ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash A12( )A2

A + A + A321

A z +1 A z +21 2

22

2

2

(

]

2

2 2

SectionGeometry

Wply12

Wplz12

Wely12

Welz12

Iy z

bn3tn 12

A z +323 2I3

I + I + A b 21 21 2 3

I zny

I b1z2

A z + z t3sum2

n pn pn )(

A bnsum2

n 4 + A b13

0

b3I I12( )

Iz2

A A12( )

A2

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

t

t3 8

t3 8

t2 4

t2 4

t2

d t2

0

0

An = b tnn In=

z1 2 = b A + A3 2 1 2) A3

z3 = ( )z z2 1 2

zpn=[0 A An2( )2t3le le b3

Figure 56a Thin-walled section properties

where Iy1z1 is the product second moment of area (see Section 59) Thus theresultant bending moment

M = radic(M 2

y1 + M 2z1

) (510)

is inclined to the xz1 plane of the bending deflections as shown in Figure 57aThe simplest method of analysing this or any other biaxial bending situation is

to replace the moments My1 Mz1 by their principal plane static equivalents My

In-plane bending of beams 161

b1

1b

2b

2b

2b

2b

1b

3b

3b

b3b3

3t

1t

1t t t

y

y

y

z

z

z

SectionGeometry

A 2A +

+ + +++

A3

A2

1 2 A 2sumA+2 A + A321 22 n

sumA2 n

I

I

y

z

y

y1

y2

y3

yp

z

0

0

Wply

Wplz

Wely

Welz

A b 2 2 22

31

A b 23 b

3b

22

1I3

I3 I2 ndash( ) A2 b3

b2

2ndash( 2)

4 +

sumI2

n+

A3 b3

2

2A1y12 +A3y3

2 +2I1 2A1y12 +2A2y2

2 + A3y32+2I1 A2b3

2 4 + A3b224

2Iyb3

Iz(b1 ndash y3) and Izy3

A1b3 + A3b34 A1b3 + A2(b3 ndash b2) + A3b34

(b1 ndash yp)2t1 + yp

2t1+A3yp

A1 b32b1

b1A32A

b1A1A

(A ndash 2 A3)4t1 ge 0 (A ndash 2 A3)4t ge 0

An= bntn In = bn3 tn12

(b1 + 2b2)A1A

b12 ndash y3

b1 ndash y3

4Iy y3

+ (b3 yp)t

ndash 8b233

(b1 ndash yp)2 + yp2 +2b2(b1 ndash yp)

Izy2 and Izy3

2Iyb3

+

0 0 0

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

y3 +b32(b1 + 2b2) A1

4Iy

radic2Iyb3

2radic2Iz(b2+b3)

(b32+2b2 b3 ndash b2

2)t2radic2

(b2+b3)2t2radic2

3radic2Iy

(b2+b3) 2radic2+ (3b3ndash2b2)b2

2b3t

Figure 56b Thin-walled section properties

Mz calculated from

My = My1 cosα + Mz1 sin αMz = minusMy1 sin α + Mz1 cosα

(511)

162 In-plane bending of beams

M

M

y

y1 (v1 = 0)

Plane of moment

My

Mz

Mz1

y

z1

zz1

z

zM 1

My1

My1y1

Principalplanes

(a) Deflection in a non-principal plane (b) Principal plane moments My Mz

Plane ofdeflection

Figure 57 Bending in a non-principal plane

zw

x

y v

x

y

z

q

C

qy ( ) +

ndash~

+

+

+

qz ( )

My

Mz ve

(b) Bending My in xz plane qy ( )

qz ( )

(a) Section and loading (c) Bending Mz in xy plane

+ ve

Figure 58 Biaxial bending of a zed beam

in which α is the angle between the y1 z1 axes and the principal y z axes as shownin Figure 57b The bending stresses can then be determined from

σ = Myz

Iyminus Mzy

Iz (512)

in which Iy Iz are the principal second moments of area If the values of α Iy Iz

are unknown they can be determined from Iy1 Iz1 Iy1z1 as shown in Section 59Care needs to be taken to ensure that the correct signs are used for My and Mz

in equation 512 as well as for y and z For example if the zed section shown inFigure 58a is simply supported at both ends with a uniformly distributed load qacting in the plane of the web then its principal plane components qy qz causepositive bending My and negative bending Mz as indicated in Figure 58b and c

In-plane bending of beams 163

The deflections of the beam can also be determined from the principal planemoments by solving equations 52 and 55 in the usual way [1ndash8] for the principalplane deflections w and v and by adding these vectorially

Worked examples of the calculation of the elastic stresses and deflections in anangle section cantilever are given in Section 5125

54 Shear stresses in elastic beams

541 Solid cross-sections

A vertical shear force Vz acting parallel to the minor principal axis z of a section ofa beam (see Figure 59a) induces shear stresses τxy τxz in the plane of the sectionIn solid section beams these are usually assumed to act parallel to the shear force(ie τxy = 0) and to be uniformly distributed across the width of the section asshown in Figure 59a The distribution of the vertical shear stresses τxz can bedetermined by considering the horizontal equilibrium of an element of the beamas shown in Figure 59b Because the bending normal stresses σ vary with x theycreate an imbalance of force in the x direction which can only be compensatedfor by the horizontal shear stresses τzx = τv which are equal to the vertical shearstresses τxz It is shown in Section 5101 that the stress τv at a distance z2 fromthe centroid where the section width is b2 is given by

τv = minus Vz

Iyb2

int z2

zT

bzdz (513)

y

z

x

V

ndash z

z

bx2

z

b

z

T

2

bδz

x+ )(

+z

)(

(b) Horizontal equilibrium(a) Assumed shear stress distribution

Shear stresses vparallel to shearforce Vz and constantacross width of section

vbδx

δx

bδzδx

(vb)vb

δz

δzpart

part

partpart

Figure 59 Shear stresses in a solid section

164 In-plane bending of beams

This can also be expressed as

τv = minusVzA2z2

Iyb2(514)

in which A2 is the area above b2 and z2 is the height of its centroidFor the particular example of the rectangular section beam of width b and depth

d shown in Figure 510a the width is constant and so equation 513 becomes

τv = Vz

bd

(15 minus 6z2

d2

) (515)

This shear stress distribution is parabolic as shown in Figure 510b and has amaximum value at the y axis of 15 times of average shear stress Vzbd

The shear stresses calculated from equations 513 or 514 are reasonably accuratefor solid cross-sections except near the unstressed edges where the shear stress isparallel to the edge rather than to the applied shear force

542 Thin-walled open cross-sections

The shear stress distributions in thin-walled open-section beams differ from thosegiven by equations 513 or 514 for solid section beams in that the shear stressesare parallel to the wall of the section as shown in Figure 511a instead of parallelto the applied shear force Because of the thinness of the walls it is quite accurateto assume that the shear stresses are uniformly distributed across the thickness t ofthe thin-walled section Their distribution can be determined by considering thehorizontal equilibrium of an element of the beam as shown in Figure 511b It isshown in Section 5102 that the stress τv at a distance s from the end of the section

b

y

z z

d

Vz

15Vz bd

(a) Cross-section (b) Shear stress distribution

v

Figure 510 Shear stress distribution in a rectangular section

In-plane bending of beams 165

t

yy

zV

0

z

O

C

E

xy

z

x

+

st

)(δx δsδxv

tδx

δx

v

t

tδs

δs δx t δs

δs

tv

v

(a) Shear stress distribution (b) Horizontal equilibrium

partpart

partxpart

Figure 511 Shear stresses in a thin-walled open section

caused by a vertical shear force Vz can be obtained from the shear flow

τvt = minusVz

Iy

int s

0ztds (516)

This can also be expressed as

τv = minusVzAszs

Iyt(517)

in which As is the area from the free end to the point s and zs is the height of thecentroid of this area above the point s

At a junction in the cross-section wall such as that of the top flange and theweb of the I-section shown in Figures 512 and 513 horizontal equilibrium of thezero area junction element requires

(τvtf )21δx + (τvtf )23δx = (τvtw)24δx (518)

This can be thought of as an analogous flow continuity condition for the corre-sponding shear flows in each cross-section element at the junction as shown inFigure 513c so that

(τvtf )21 + (τvtf )23 = (τvtw)24 (519)

which is a particular example of the general junction conditionsum(τvt) = 0 (520)

in which each shear flow is now taken as positive if it acts towards the junction

166 In-plane bending of beams

b

dy

sf

f

f

t sw

wt

z

1 2 3

45 6

42

btdIVvtw

ff

y

z

4==

42

2btdIVvtw

ff

y

zIV

y

z8td wf

= +

btdIV

vtfff

y

z

(b) Shear flow distribution(a) I-section

Figure 512 Shear flow distribution in an I-section

0

12

3

4

y

z

x

V

2

2

2z

4

1 2 3

0

0

My

My My+

(c) Flow analogy(b) Flange-web junction

(a) Sign of shear flow

δx

δ

δA

(+δ)δA

(tf)21δx

(tw)24δx

(tf)23δx

(tw)24

(tf)23(tf)21

(tw)24δx

tf δx

Figure 513 Horizontal equilibrium considerations for shear flow

Afree end of a cross-section element is the special case of a one-element junctionfor which equation 520 reduces to

τvt = 0 (521)

This condition has already been used (at s = 0) in deriving equation 516

In-plane bending of beams 167

An example of the analysis of the shear flow distribution in the I-section beamshown in Figure 512a is given in Section 5126 The shear flow distributionis shown in Figure 512b It can be seen that the shear stress in the web is nearlyconstant and equal to its average value

τv(av) = Vz

df tw (522)

which provides the basis for the commonly used assumption that the applied shearis resisted only by the web A similar result is obtained for the shear stress in theweb of the channel section shown in Figure 514 and analysed in Section 5127

When a horizontal shear force Vy acts parallel to the y axis additional shearstresses τh parallel to the walls of the section are induced These can be obtainedfrom the shear flow

τht = minusVy

Iz

int s

0ytds (523)

which is similar to equation 517 for the shear flow due to a vertical shear forceA worked example of the calculation of the shear flow distribution caused by ahorizontal shear force is given in Section 5128

y

z+

CS

ya

t

b

w

0

df

tf

tf

vf

Vf

Vw

btfIy Iydf tf

df tf b df twVz Vzb

2

2

82

2

+=wv t

Iy

df tf bVz

2=fv t

Iy

df tf bVz

2=wv t

(a) Shear flow due to shear force Vz (b) Shear centre and flange and web shears

Figure 514 Shear flow distribution in a channel section

168 In-plane bending of beams

543 Shear centre

The shear stresses τv induced by the vertical shear force Vz exert a torque equalto intE

0 τvtρds about the centroid C of the thin-walled cross-section as shown inFigure 515 and are therefore statically equivalent to a vertical shear force Vz

which acts at a distance y0 from the centroid equal to

y0 = 1

Vz

int E

0τvtρds (524)

Similarly the shear stresses τh induced by the horizontal shear force Vy arestatically equivalent to a horizontal shear force Vy which acts at a distance z0 fromthe centroid equal to

z0 = minus 1

Vy

int E

0τhtρds (525)

The coordinates y0 z0 define the position of the shear centre S of the cross-sectionthrough which the resultant of the bending shear stresses must act When anyapplied load does not act through the shear centre as shown in Figure 516then it induces another set of shear stresses in the section which are additionalto those caused by the changes in the bending normal stresses described above(see equations 516 and 523) These additional shear stresses are statically equiv-alent to the torque exerted by the eccentric applied load about the shear centreThey can be calculated as shown in Sections 10214 and 10312

s

t

y

z

V

y0

CE

O

z

vtδs

δs

Figure 515 Moment of shear stress τv about centroid

In-plane bending of beams 169

e

y

z

Vz

Vz

VzeS

C y

z

S

C y

z

S

C+

+Pure bendingBending shear stresses

Off shear centreloading

Pure torsionTorsion shear stresses

Figure 516 Off shear centre loading

Centroid C Shear centre S

Figure 517 Centroids and shear centres

The position of the shear centre of the channel section shown in Figure 514 isdetermined in Section 5128 Its y0 coordinate is given by

y0 = d2f tf b2

4Iy+ b2tf

2btf + df tw(526)

while its z0 coordinate is zero because the section is symmetrical about the y axisIn Figure 517 the shear centres of a number of thin-walled open sections are

compared with their centroids It can be seen that

(a) if the section has an axis of symmetry then the shear centre and centroid lieon it

170 In-plane bending of beams

(b) if the section is of a channel type then the shear centre lies outside the weband the centroid inside it and

(c) if the section consists of a set of concurrent rectangular elements (tees anglesand cruciforms) then the shear centre lies at the common point

A general matrix method for analysing the shear stress distributions and fordetermining the shear centres of thin-walled open-section beams has been prepared[11 12]

Worked examples of the determination of the shear centre position are given inSections 5128 and 51210

544 Thin-walled closed cross-sections

The shear stress distribution in a thin-walled closed-section beam is similar tothat in an open-section beam except that there is an additional constant shearflow τvct around the section This additional shear flow is required to prevent anydiscontinuity in the longitudinal warping displacements u which arise from theshear straining of the walls of the closed sections To show this consider the slitrectangular box whose shear flow distribution τvot due to a vertical shear force Vz isas shown in Figure 518a Because the beam is not twisted the longitudinal fibresremain parallel to the centroidal axis so that the transverse fibres rotate throughangles τvoG equal to the shear strain in the wall as shown in Figure 519 Theserotations lead to the longitudinal warping displacements u shown in Figure 518bthe relative warping displacement at the slit being

int E0 (τvoG)ds

b

df

Vz

y

yz

z

x

E

E

y0

C

C

S

S

O

O

Slit

EvoG

0

ds

(b) Warping displacements due to shear stress

Relative warpingdisplacement

(a) Shear flow vo t

Figure 518 Warping of a slit box

In-plane bending of beams 171

v

v v

v

x

s

G

Projection of s x axes onto plane ofelementδs times δx

δsδu

δs

δx=

Change in warpingdisplacement due toshear strain

Element δs times δx times t

Figure 519 Warping displacements due to shear

b

y

z

= +

Thickness tw

Thickness tf

df Vz

(a) Circulating shear flow vc t(slit box shear flow vo t

shown in Fig 518a)

v t vc t vo t (b) Total shear flow

Figure 520 Shear stress distribution in a rectangular box

However when the box is not slit as shown in Figure 520 this relative warpingdisplacement must be zero Thus

∮τv

Gds = 0 (527)

in which total shear stress τv can be considered as the sum

τv = τvc + τvo (528)

of the slit box shear stress τvo (see Figure 518a) and the shear stress τvc due to aconstant shear flow τvct circulating around the closed section (see Figure 520a)Alternatively equation 516 for the shear flow in an open section can be modified

172 In-plane bending of beams

for the closed section to

τvt = τvct minus Vz

Iy

int s

0ztds (529)

since it can no longer be said that τv is zero at s = 0 this not being a free end (theclosed section has no free ends) Mathematically τvct is a constant of integrationSubstituting equation 528 or 529 into equation 527 leads to

τvct = minus∮τvods∮(1t)ds

(530)

which allows the circulating shear flow τvct to be determinedThe shear stress distribution in any single-cell closed section can be obtained

by using equations 529 and 530 The shear centre of the section can then bedetermined by using equations 524 and 525 as for open sections For the particularcase of the rectangular box shown in Figure 520

τvct = Vz

Iy

(d2

f tw

8+ df tf b

4

) (531)

and the resultant shear flow shown in Figure 520b is symmetrical because of thesymmetry of the cross-section while the shear centre coincides with the centroid

A worked example of the calculation of the shear stresses in a thin-walled closedsection is given in Section 51211

The shear stress distributions in multi-cell closed sections can be determinedby extending this method as indicated in Section 5103 A general matrix methodof analysing the shear flows in thin-walled closed sections has been described[11 12] This can be used for both open and closed sections including compositeand asymmetric sections and sections with open and closed parts It can also beused to determine the centroid principal axes section constants and the bendingnormal stress distribution

545 Shear lag

In the conventional theory of bending shear strains are neglected so that it can beassumed that plane sections remain plane after loading From this assumptionfollow the simple linear distributions of the bending strains and stresses dis-cussed in Section 53 and from these the shear stress distributions discussed inSections 541ndash544 The term shear lag [13] is related to some of the discrep-ancies between this approximate theory of the bending of beams and their realbehaviour and in particular refers to the increases of the bending stresses near theflange-to-web junctions and the corresponding decreases in the flange stressesaway from these junctions

The shear lag effects near the mid-point of the simply supported centrally loadedI-section beam shown in Figure 521a are illustrated in Figure 522 The shear

In-plane bending of beams 173

Q

Q2

Q2

(+)

(ndash)

Warping displacementsdue to positive shear

Warping displacementsdue to negative shear

(b) Warping displacements calculated from conventional theory

(a) Beam and shear for diagram

Q2

Q2

Figure 521 Incompatible warping displacements at a shear discontinuity

Real behaviour

Approximateconventionaltheory

Real behaviour

(b) Shear flow distribution(a) Bending stress distribution

Approximateconventionaltheory

Figure 522 Shear lag effects in an I-section beam

stresses calculated by the conventional theory are as shown in Figure 523a andthese induce the warping (longitudinal) displacements shown in Figure 523b Thewarping displacements of the web are almost linear and these are responsible forthe shear deflections [13] which are usually neglected when calculating the beamrsquosdeflections The warping displacements of the flanges vary parabolically and itis these which are responsible for most of the shear lag effect The applicationof the conventional theory of bending at either side of a point in a beam where

174 In-plane bending of beams

y

z

x

C

(b) Warping displacements due to shear

(a) Shear flow due to a vertical shear Vz

Approximate shear flow givenby conventional theory

Figure 523 Warping of an I-section beam

there is a sudden change in the shear force such as at the mid-point of the beamof Figure 521a leads to two different distributions of warping displacement asshown in Figure 521b These are clearly incompatible and so changes are requiredin the bending stress distribution (and consequently in the shear stress distribution)to remove the incompatibility These changes which are illustrated in Figure 522constitute the shear lag effect

Shear lag effects are usually very small except near points of high concentratedload or at reaction points in short-span beams with thin wide flanges In particularshear lag effects may be significant in light-gauge cold-formed sections [14]and in stiffened box girders [15ndash17] Shear lag has no serious consequences ina ductile structure in which any premature local yielding leads to a favourableredistribution of stress However the increased stresses due to shear lag may beof consequence in a tension flange which is liable to brittle fracture or fatiguedamage or in a compression flange whose strength is controlled by its resistanceto local buckling

An approximate method of dealing with shear lag is to use an effective widthconcept in which the actual width b of a flange is replaced by a reduced widthbeff given by

beff

b= nominal bending stress

maximum bending stress (532)

This is equivalent to replacing the actual flange bending stresses by constantstresses which are equal to the actual maximum stress and distributed over theeffective flange area beff times t Some values of effective widths are given in [14ndash16]

In-plane bending of beams 175

This approach is similar to that used to allow for the redistribution of stress whichtakes place in a thin compression flange after local buckling (see Chapter 4) How-ever the two effects of shear lag and local buckling are quite distinct and shouldnot be confused

55 Plastic analysis of beams

551 General

As the load on a ductile steel beam is increased the stresses in the beam alsoincrease until the yield stress is reached With further increases in the load yieldingspreads through the most highly strained cross-section of the beam until it becomesfully plastic at a moment Mp At this stage the section forms a plastic hinge whichallows the beam segments on either side to rotate freely under the moment MpIf the beam was originally statically determinate this plastic hinge reduces it to amechanism and prevents it from supporting any additional load

However if the beam was statically indeterminate the plastic hinge does notreduce it to a mechanism and it can support additional load This additional loadcauses a redistribution of the bending moment during which the moment at theplastic hinge remains fixed at Mp while the moment at another highly strainedcross-section increases until it forms a plastic hinge This process is repeated untilenough plastic hinges have formed to reduce the beam to a mechanism The beamis then unable to support any further increase in load and its ultimate strength isreached

In the plastic analysis of beams this mechanism condition is investigated todetermine the ultimate strength The principles and methods of plastic analysis arefully described in many textbooks [18ndash24] and so only a brief summary is givenin the following sub-sections

552 The plastic hinge

The bending stresses in an elastic beam are distributed linearly across any section ofthe beam as shown in Figure 54 and the bending moment M is proportional to thecurvature minusd2wdx2 (see equation 52) However once the yield strain εy = fyE(see Figure 524) of a steel beam is exceeded the stress distribution is no longerlinear as indicated in Figure 52c Nevertheless the strain distribution remainslinear and so the inelastic bending stress distributions are similar to the basicstressndashstrain relationship shown in Figure 524 provided the influence of shearon yielding can be ignored (which is a reasonable assumption for many I-sectionbeams) The moment resultant M of the bending stresses is no longer proportionalto the curvature minusd2wdx2 but varies as shown in Figure 52d Thus the sectionbecomes elastic-plastic when the yield moment My = fyWel is exceeded and thecurvature increases rapidly as yielding progresses through the section At highcurvatures the limiting situation is approached for which the section is completely

176 In-plane bending of beams

0 sty

Stress

Plastic Strain-hardened

Est

Strain

Rigid plasticassumption

Elastic E

fy

Figure 524 Idealised stressndashstrain relationships for structural steel

yielded at the fully plastic moment

Mp = fyWpl (533)

where Wpl is the plastic section modulus Methods of calculating the fully plasticmoment Mp are discussed in Section 5111 and worked examples are given inSections 51212 and 51213 For solid rectangular sections the shape factorWplWel is 15 but for rolled I-sections WplWel varies between 11 and 12approximately Values of Wpl for hot-rolled I-section members are given in [9]

In real beams strain-hardening commences just before Mp is reached and thereal momentndashcurvature relationship rises above the fully plastic limit of Mp asshown in Figure 52d On the other hand high shear forces cause small reductionsin Mp below fyWpl due principally to reductions in the plastic bending capacityof the web This effect is discussed in Section 452

The approximate approach of the momentndashcurvature relationship shown inFigure 52d to the fully plastic limit forms the basis of the simple rigid-plasticassumption for which the basic stressndashstrain relationship is replaced by the rect-angular block shown by the dashed line in Figure 524 Thus elastic strainsare completely ignored as are the increased stresses due to strain-hardeningThis assumption ignores the curvature of any elastic and elasticndashplastic regions(M ltMp) and assumes that the curvature becomes infinite at any point whereM = Mp

The consequences of the rigid-plastic assumption on the theoretical behaviourof a simply supported beam with a central concentrated load are shown inFigures 525 and 526 In the real beam shown in Figure 525a there is a finitelength of the beam which is elastic-plastic and in which the curvatures are largewhile the remaining portions are elastic and have small curvatures Howeveraccording to the rigid-plastic assumption the curvature becomes infinite at mid-span when this section becomes fully plastic (M = Mp) while the two halves ofthe beam have zero curvature and remain straight as shown in Figure 525b The

In-plane bending of beams 177

Qult = 4Mp L Qult = 4Mp L

Plastichinge

(b) Rigid-plastic beam(a) Real beam

Qult Qult

13

Rigid Rigid

Curvature

Deflectedshape

Beam

Elastic Elastic

Elastic-plasticinfin

Figure 525 Beam with full plastic moment Mp at mid-span

Q

Q

1

2

3 4

5

0

Mp

My 12

34

5

Real

(b) Bending moment

Elastic

Strain-hardened Fully plastic

Elasticndashplastic First yield

Rigidndashplastic

(c) Deflection

(a) Beam

L2L2

Figure 526 Behaviour of a simply supported beam

infinite curvature at mid-span causes a finite change θ in the beam slope and sothe deflected shape of the rigid-plastic beam closely approximates that of the realbeam despite the very different curvature distributions The successive stages inthe development of the bending moment diagram and the central deflection of thebeam as the load is increased are summarised in Figure 526b and c

178 In-plane bending of beams

M M

MM

Mp

(b) Frictionless hinge(a ) Pl a s tic h i n g e s

Behaviour

1313

1313

00

Hinges

Figure 527 Plastic hinge behaviour

The infinite curvature at the point of full plasticity and the finite slope changeθ predicted by the rigid-plastic assumption lead to the plastic hinge concept illus-trated in Figure 527a The plastic hinge can assume any slope change θ once thefull plastic moment Mp has been reached This behaviour is contrasted with thatshown in Figure 527b for a frictionless hinge which can assume any slope changeθ at zero moment

It should be noted that when the full plastic moment Mp of the simply supportedbeam shown in Figure 526a is reached the rigid-plastic assumption predicts thata two-bar mechanism will be formed by the plastic hinge and the two frictionlesssupport hinges as shown in Figure 525b and that the beam will deform freelywithout any further increase in load as shown in Figure 526c Thus the ultimateload of the beam is

Qult = 4MpL (534)

which reduces the beam to a plastic collapse mechanism

553 Moment redistribution in indeterminate beams

The increase in the full plastic moment Mp of a beam over its nominal first yieldmoment My is accounted for in elastic design (ie design based on an elasticanalysis of the bending of the beam) by the use of Mp for the moment capacityof the cross-section Thus elastic design might be considered to be lsquofirst hingersquodesign However the feature of plastic design which distinguishes it from elasticdesign is that it takes into account the favourable redistribution of the bendingmoment which takes place in an indeterminate structure after the first hinge formsThis redistribution may be considerable and the final load at which the collapse

In-plane bending of beams 179

mechanism forms may be significantly higher than that at which the first hinge isdeveloped Thus a first hinge design based on an elastic analysis of the bendingmoment may significantly underestimate the ultimate strength

The redistribution of bending moment is illustrated in Figure 528 for a built-inbeam with a concentrated load at a third point This beam has two redundan-cies and so three plastic hinges must form before it can be reduced to a collapsemechanism According to the rigid-plastic assumption all the bending momentsremain proportional to the load until the first hinge forms at the left-hand sup-port A at Q = 675MpL As the load increases further the moment at this hingeremains constant at Mp while the moments at the load point and the right-handsupport increase until the second hinge forms at the load point B at Q = 868MpLThe moment at this hinge then remains constant at Mp while the moment at theright-hand support C increases until the third and final hinge forms at this point atQ = 900MpL At this load the beam becomes a mechanism and so the ultimateload is Qult = 900MpL which is 33 higher than the first hinge load of 675MpLThe redistribution of bending moment is shown in Figure 528b and d while thedeflection of the load point (derived from an elasticndashplastic assumption) is shownin Figure 528c

554 Plastic collapse mechanisms

A number of examples of plastic collapse mechanisms in cantilevers and single-and multi-span beams is shown in Figure 529 Cantilevers and overhanging beams

Q Q Q

Mp

A B C

Q

M------

p90

AB

C

B

MM----

p10

MpMp

Mp Mp

MpMp

MA

MB

MC

QLM------

p

QL

Mp

Mp

QL

(d ) Ben d ing moment diagrams

( b ) Moment (a ) B u i l t - i n b ea m (c) Deflection

= 868 Mp

QL= 90Mp

QL= 675

redistribution

2L3 L3

675868

90

675868

Hinges

Figure 528 Moment redistribution in a built-in beam

180 In-plane bending of beams

(a ) Can til e v e rs and over- hanging beams

(b) Single-span beams

(c ) Multi-span beams

Figure 529 Beam plastic collapse mechanisms

generally collapse as single-bar mechanisms with a plastic hinge at the supportWhen there is a reduction in section capacity then the plastic hinge may form inthe weaker section

Single-span beams generally collapse as two-bar mechanisms with a hinge(plastic or frictionless) at each support and a plastic hinge within the spanSometimes general plasticity may occur along a uniform moment region

Multi-span beams generally collapse in one span only as a local two-bar mech-anism with a hinge (plastic or frictionless) at each support and a plastic hingewithin the span Sometimes two adjacent spans may combine to form a three-barmechanism with the common support acting as a frictionless pivot and one plastichinge forming within each span Similar mechanisms may form in over-hangingbeams

Potential locations for plastic hinges include supports points of concentratedload and points of cross-section change The location of a plastic hinge in a beamwith distributed load is often not well defined

555 Methods of plastic analysis

The purpose of the methods of plastic analysis is to determine the ultimate load atwhich a collapse mechanism first forms Thus it is only this final mechanism con-dition which must be found and any intermediate load conditions can be ignoredA further important simplification arises from the fact that in its collapse condi-tion the beam is a mechanism and can be analysed by statics without any of thedifficulties associated with the elastic analysis of a statically indeterminate beam

The basic method of plastic analysis is to assume the locations of a series ofplastic hinges and to investigate whether the three conditions of equilibrium mech-anism and plasticity are satisfied The equilibrium condition is that the bending

In-plane bending of beams 181

moment distribution defined by the assumed plastic hinges must be in staticequilibrium with the applied loads and reactions This condition applies to allbeams elastic or plastic The mechanism condition is that there must be a suffi-cient number of plastic and frictionless hinges for the beam to form a mechanismThis condition is usually satisfied directly by the choice of hinges The plastic-ity condition is that the full plastic moment of every cross-section must not beexceeded so that

minusMp le M le Mp (535)

If the assumed plastic hinges satisfy these three conditions they are the correctones and they define the collapse mechanism of the beam so that

(Collapse mechanism) satisfies

Equilibrium

MechanismPlasticity

(536)

The ultimate load can then be determined directly from the equilibrium conditionsHowever it is usually possible to assume more than one series of plastic hinges

and so while the assumed plastic hinges may satisfy the equilibrium and mechanismconditions the plasticity condition (equation 535) may be violated In this casethe load calculated from the equilibrium condition is greater than the true ultimateload (QmgtQult) This forms the basis of the mechanism method of plastic analysis(

Mechanism methodQm ge Qult

)satisfies

(EquilibriumMechanism

) (537)

which provides an upper-bound solution for the true ultimate loadA lower bound solution (Qs le Qult) for the true ultimate load can be obtained

by reducing the loads and bending moments obtained by the mechanism methodproportionally (which ensures that the equilibrium condition remains satisfied)until the plasticity condition is satisfied everywhere These reductions decreasethe number of plastic hinges and so the mechanism condition is not satisfied Thisis the statical method of plastic analysis(

Statical MethodQs le Qult

)satisfies

(EquilibriumPlasticity

)(538)

If the upper and lower bound solutions obtained by the mechanism and staticalmethods coincide or are sufficiently close the beam may be designed immediatelyIf however these bounds are not precise enough the original series of hingesmust be modified (and the bending moments determined in the statical analysiswill provide some indication of how to do this) and the analysis repeated

The use of the methods of plastic analysis is demonstrated in Sections 5112and 5113 for the examples of the built-in beam and the propped cantilever shown

182 In-plane bending of beams

in Figures 530a and 531a A worked example of the plastic collapse analysis ofa non-uniform beam is given in Section 51214

The limitations on the use of the method of plastic analysis in the EC3 strengthdesign of beams are discussed in Section 562

The application of the methods of plastic analysis to rigid-jointed frames isdiscussed in Section 8355 This application can only be made provided the effectsof any axial forces in the members are small enough to preclude any instabilityeffects and provided any significant decreases in the full plastic moments due toaxial forces are accounted for (see Section 722)

321 4L 3 L 3 L 3

Q

Q1

2

4

Q

Q 2 Q

2 Q 2 Q

2δ13

2δ13

δ13

δ13

2 Q

2 Q1

3

4

Mp

Mp

MpMp

Mp Mp

M1 M2 M3 M4

Mp

Mp

Q

M4 M3ndashL3

1 2 3 42 3

(b) Beam segments

(c ) Fi r st mec han i sm and virtual displacements

(a ) Bu i lt- in b e a m

(d ) Co r r ec t mech a n i sm and virtual displacements

M3 M2ndashL3

M2 M1ndashL3

Figure 530 Plastic analysis of a built-in beam

Mp

MpMp

q

L05L

0586L

(a) Propped cantilever (c) First mechanism

(d) Second mechanism(b) Correct mechanism

0583L

Figure 531 Plastic analysis of a propped cantilever

In-plane bending of beams 183

56 Strength design of beams

561 Elastic design of beams

5611 General

For the elastic method of designing a beam for the strength limit state the strengthdesign loads are first obtained by multiplying the nominal loads (dead imposedor wind) by the appropriate load combination factors (see Section 156) The dis-tributions of the design bending moments and shear forces in the beam under thestrength design load combinations are determined by an elastic bending analysis(when the structure is statically indeterminate) or by statics (when it is staticallydeterminate) EC3 also permits a moment redistribution to be made in each ade-quately braced Class 1 or Class 2 span of a continuous beam of up to 15 of thespanrsquos peak elastic moment provided equilibrium is maintained The beam mustbe designed to be able to resist the design moments and shears as well as anyconcentrated forces arising from the factored loads and their reactions

The processes of checking a specified member or of designing an unknownmember for the design actions are summarised in Figure 532 When a specified

Check serviceability

Guess fy and sectionclassification

Check fy andclassification

Select trial section(usually for moment)

Check bracingCheck shearCheck shear and bendingCheck bearing

Analysis for MEd VEd REd

DesigningChecking

Section Length and loading

Find fy Classify section

Check moment

Figure 532 Flow chart for the elastic design of beams

184 In-plane bending of beams

member is to be checked then the cross-section should first be classified asClass 1 2 3 or 4 This allows the effective section modulus to be determinedand the design section moment resistance to be compared with the maximumdesign moment Following this the lateral bracing should be checked then theweb shear resistance and then combined bending and shear should be checkedat any cross-sections where both the design moment and shear are high Finallythe web bearing resistance should be checked at reactions and concentrated loadpoints

When the member size is not known then a target value for the effective sectionmodulus may be determined from the maximum design moment and a trial sectionchosen whose effective section modulus exceeds this target The remainder of thedesign process is then the same as that for checking a specified member Usuallythe moment resistance governs the design but when it doesnrsquot then an iterativeprocess may need to be followed as indicated in Figure 532

The following sub-sections describe each of the EC3 checking processes sum-marised in Figure 532 A worked example of their application is given inSection 51215

5612 Section classification

The moment shear and concentrated load bearing resistances of beams whoseplate elements are slender may be significantly influenced by local buckling con-siderations (Chapter 4) Because of this beam cross-sections are classified asClass 1 2 3 or 4 depending on the ability of the elements to resist local buckling(Section 472)

Class 1 sections are unaffected by local buckling and are able to develop andmaintain their fully plastic resistances until a collapse mechanism forms Class 2sections are able to form a first plastic hinge but local buckling prevents subsequentmoment redistribution Class 3 sections are able to reach the yield stress but localbuckling prevents full plastification of the cross-section Class 4 sections have theirresistances reduced below their first yield resistances by local buckling effects

Sections are classified by comparing the slendernessλ= (ct)radic(fy235)of eachcompression element with the appropriate limits of Table 52 of EC3 These limitsdepend on the way in which the longitudinal edges of the element are supported(either one edge supported as for the flange outstand of an I-section or two edgessupported as for the internal flange element of a box section) the bending stressdistribution (uniform compression as in a flange or varying stresses as in a web)and the type of section as indicated in Figures 533 and 429

The section classification is that of the lowest classification of its elements withClass 1 being the highest possible and Class 4 the lowest All UBrsquos in S275 steelare Class 1 all UCrsquos are Class 1 or 2 but welded I-section members may also beClass 3 or 4

Worked examples of section classification are given in Sections 51215 and492ndash494

In-plane bending of beams 185

cw

cf1 cf1

cf1cf1 cf 2 cf1

cf 2

cw cw cw

Section description

Section andelement widths

Welded box RHS Hot-rolled UBUC

Welded PWG

Flangeoutstandcf1

Class 1Class 2Class 3

Class 1Class 2Class 3

ndashndashndash

ndashndashndash

91014

7283

124

910143338427283

124

3338427283

124

Class 1Class 2Class 3

Flange supportedalong bothedges cf 2

Web cw

Figure 533 Local buckling limits λ = (ct)ε for some beam sections

5613 Checking the moment resistance

For the moment resistance check of a beam that has adequate bracing against lateralbuckling the inequality

MEd le McRd (539)

must be satisfied in which MEd is the maximum design moment and

McRd = WfyγM0 (540)

is the design section moment resistance in which W is the appropriate sectionmodulus fy the nominal yield strength for the section and γM0(=1) the partialfactor for section resistance

For Class 1 and Class 2 sections the appropriate section modulus is the plasticsection modulus Wpl so that

W = Wpl (541)

For Class 3 sections the appropriate section modulus may simply be taken as theminimum elastic section modulus Welmin For Class 4 sections the appropriatesection modulus is reduced below the elastic section modulus Welmin as discussedin Section 472

186 In-plane bending of beams

Worked examples of checking the moment resistance are given inSections 51215 and 492ndash494 and a worked example of using the momentresistance check to design a suitable section is given in Section 51216

5614 Checking the lateral bracing

Beams with insufficient lateral bracing must also be designed to resist lateralbuckling The design of beams against lateral buckling is discussed in Section 69It is assumed in this chapter that there is sufficient bracing to prevent lateralbuckling While the adequacy of bracing for this purpose may be checked bydetermining the lateral buckling moment resistance as in Section 69 EC3 alsogives simpler (and often conservative) rules for this purpose For example lateralbuckling may be assumed to be prevented if the geometrical slenderness of eachsegment between restraints satisfies

Lc

if zle 3756

kc

McRd

MyEd

radic235

fy(542)

in which if z is the radius of gyration about the z axis of an equivalent compressionflange kc is a correction factor which allows for the moment distribution McRd isthe design resistance of a fully braced segment and MyEd is the maximum designmoment in the segment

A worked example of checking the lateral bracing is given in Section 51215

5615 Checking the shear resistance

For the shear resistance check the inequality

VEd le VcRd (543)

must be satisfied in which VEd is the maximum design shear force and VcRd thedesign shear resistance

For a stocky web with dwtw le 72radic(235fy) and for which the elastic shear

stress distribution is approximately uniform (as in the case of an equal flangedI-section) the uniform shear resistance VcRd is usually given by

VcRd = Av(fyradic

3) (544)

in which fyradic

3 is the shear yield stress τy (Section 131) and Av is the shear areaof the web defined in Clause 626(2) of EC3 All the webs of UBrsquos and UCrsquosin S275 steel satisfy dwtw le 72

radic(235fy) A worked example of checking the

uniform shear capacity of a compact web is given in Section 51215

In-plane bending of beams 187

For a stocky web with dwtw le 72radic(235fy) and with a non-uniform elastic

shear stress distribution (such as an unequal flanged I-section) the inequality

τEd le fyradic

3 (545)

must be satisfied in which τEd is the maximum design shear stress induced in theweb by VEd as determined by an elastic shear stress analysis (Section 54)

Webs for which dwtw ge 72radic(235fy) have their shear resistances reduced by

local buckling effects as discussed in Section 474 The shear design of thin websis governed by EC3-1-5 [25] Worked examples of checking the shear capacity ofsuch webs are given in Sections 495 and 496

5616 Checking for bending and shear

High shear forces may reduce the ability of a web to resist bending moment asdiscussed in Section 45 To allow for this Class 1 and Class 2 beams undercombined bending and shear in addition to satisfying equations 539 and 543must also satisfy

MEd le McRd

1 minus

(2VEd

VplRdminus 1

)2

(546)

in which VEd is the design shear at the cross-section being checked and VplRd isthe design plastic shear resistance This condition need only be considered whenVEd gt 05VplRd as indicated in Figure 432 It therefore need only be checked atcross-sections under high bending and shear such as at the internal supports ofcontinuous beams Even so many such beams have VEd le 05VplRd and so thischeck for combined bending and shear rarely governs

5617 Checking the bearing resistance

For the bearing check the inequality

FEd le FRd (547)

must be satisfied at all supports and points of concentrated load In this equationFEd is the design-concentrated load or reaction and FRd the bearing resistance ofthe web and its load-bearing stiffeners if any The bearing design of webs andload-bearing stiffeners is governed by EC3-1-5 [25] and discussed in Sections 46and 476 Stocky webs often have sufficient bearing resistance and do not requirethe addition of load-bearing stiffeners

A worked example of checking the bearing resistance of a stocky unstiffenedweb is given in Section 51215 while a worked example of checking the bearingresistance of a slender web with load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

188 In-plane bending of beams

562 Plastic design of beams

In the plastic method of designing for the strength limit state the distributions ofbending moment and shear force in a beam under factored loads are determinedby a plastic bending analysis (Section 555) Generally the material propertiesfor plastic design should be limited to ensure that the stressndashstrain curve has anadequate plastic plateau and exhibits strain-hardening so that plastic hinges canbe formed and maintained until the plastic collapse mechanism is fully developedThe use of the plastic method is restricted to beams which satisfy certain limitationson cross-section form and lateral bracing (additional limitations are imposed onmembers with axial forces as discussed in Section 7242)

EC3 permits only Class 1 sections which are symmetrical about the axis per-pendicular to the axis of bending to be used at plastic hinge locations in order toensure that local buckling effects (Sections 42 and 43) do not reduce the ability ofthe section to maintain the full plastic moment until the plastic collapse mechanismis fully developed while Class 1 or Class 2 sections should be used elsewhereThe slenderness limits for Class 1 and Class 2 beam flanges and webs are shownin Figure 533

The spacing of lateral braces is limited in plastic design to ensure that inelasticlateral buckling (see Section 63) does not prevent the complete development ofthe plastic collapse mechanism EC3 requires the spacing of braces at both endsof a plastic hinge segment to be limited A conservative approximation for thespacing limit for sections with htf le 40

radic(235fy) is given by

Lstable le 35izradic(235fy) (548)

in which iz is the radius of gyration about the minor z axis although higher valuesmay be calculated by allowing for the effects of moment gradient

The resistance of a beam designed plastically is based principally on its plasticcollapse load Qult calculated by plastic analysis using the full plastic moment Mp

of the beam The plastic collapse load must satisfy QEd le Qult in which QEd is thecorresponding design load

The shear capacity of a beam analysed plastically is based on the fully plasticshear capacity of the web (see Section 4321) Thus the maximum shear VEd

determined by plastic analysis under the design loads is limited to

VEd le VplRd = Avfyradic

3 (549)

EC3 also requires web stiffeners to be provided near all plastic hinge locationswhere an applied load or reaction exceeds 10 of the above limit

In-plane bending of beams 189

The ability of a beam web to transmit concentrated loads and reactions isdiscussed in Section 462 The web should be designed as in Section 476 usingthe design loads and reactions calculated by plastic analysis

A worked example of the plastic design of a beam is given in Section 51217

57 Serviceability design of beams

The design of a beam is often governed by the serviceability limit state forwhich the behaviour of the beam should be so limited as to give a high proba-bility that the beam will provide the serviceability necessary for it to carry out itsintended function The most common serviceability criteria are associated withthe stiffness of the beam which governs its deflections under load These mayneed to be limited so as to avoid a number of undesirable situations an unsightlyappearance cracking or distortion of elements fixed to the beam such as claddinglinings and partitions interference with other elements such as crane girders orvibration under dynamic loads such as traffic wind or machinery loads

Aserviceability design should be carried out by making appropriate assumptionsfor the load types combinations and levels for the structural response to loadand for the serviceability criteria Because of the wide range of serviceability limitstates design rules are usually of limited extent The rules given are often advisoryrather than mandatory because of the uncertainties as to the appropriate values tobe used These uncertainties result from the variable behaviour of real structuresand what is often seen to be the non-catastrophic (in terms of human life) natureof serviceability failures

Serviceability design against unsightly appearance should be based on the totalsustained load and so should include the effects of dead and long-term imposedloads The design against cracking or distortion of elements fixed to a beam shouldbe based on the loads imposed after their installation and will often include theunfactored imposed load or wind load but exclude the dead load The designagainst interference may need to include the effects of dead load as well as ofimposed and wind loads Where imposed and wind loads act simultaneously itmay be appropriate to multiply the unfactored loads by combination factors suchas 08 The design against vibration will require an assessment to be made of thedynamic nature of the loads

Most stiffness serviceability limit states are assessed by using an elastic anal-ysis to predict the static deflections of the beam For vibration design it may besufficient in some cases to represent the dynamic loads by static equivalents andcarry out an analysis of the static deflections More generally however a dynamicelastic analysis will need to be made

The serviceability deflection limits depend on the criterion being used To avoidunsightly appearance a value of L200 (L180 for cantilevers) might be used aftermaking allowances for any pre-camber Values as low as L360 have been usedfor design against the cracking of plaster finishes while a limit of L600 has been

190 In-plane bending of beams

used for crane gantry girders Avalue of H300 has been used for horizontal storeydrift in buildings under wind load

A worked example of the serviceability design is given in Section 51218

58 Appendix ndash bending stresses in elastic beams

581 Bending in a principal plane

When a beam bends in the xz principal plane plane cross-sections rotate asshown in Figure 54 so that sections δx apart become inclined to each other atminus(d2wdx2)δx where w is the deflection in the z principal direction as shownin Figure 55 and δx the length along the centroidal axis between the two cross-sections The length between the two cross-sections at a distance z from the axisis greater than δx by z(minusd2wd x2)δx so that the longitudinal strain is

ε = minuszd2w

d x2

The corresponding tensile stress σ = Eε is

σ = minusEzd2w

d x2(550)

which has the stress resultants

N =int

AσdA = 0

sinceint

A zdA = 0 for centroidal axes (see Section 59) and

My =int

Aσ zdA

whence

My = minusEIyd2w

dx2(52)

sinceint

A z2dA = Iy (see Section 59) If this is substituted into equation 550 thenthe bending tensile stress σ is obtained as

σ = Myz

Iy (53)

In-plane bending of beams 191

582 Alternative formulation for biaxial bending

When bending moments My1 Mz1 acting about non-principal axes y1 z1 causecurvatures d2w1dx2 d2v1dx2 in the non-principal planes xz1 xy1 the stress σat a point y1 sz1 is given by

σ = minusEz1d2w1dx2 minus Ey1d2v1dx2 (551)

and the moment resultants of these stresses are

andMy1 = minusEIy1d2w1dx2 minus EIy1z1d2v1dx2

Mz1 = EIy1z1d2w1dx2 + EIz1d2v1dx2

(552)

These can be rearranged as

and

minusEd2w1

dx2= My1Iz1 + Mz1Iy1z1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

Ed2v1

dx2= My1Iy1z1 + Mz1Iy1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

(553)

which are much more complicated than the principal plane formulations ofequations 59

If equations 553 are substituted then equation 551 can be expressed as

σ =(

My1Iz1 + Mz1Iy1z1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

)z1 minus

(My1Iy1z1 + Mz1Iy1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

)y1 (554)

which is much more complicated than the principal plane formulation ofequation 512

59 Appendix ndash thin-walled section properties

The cross-section properties of many steel beams can be analysed with suffi-cient accuracy by using the thin-walled assumption demonstrated in Figure 534in which the cross-section is replaced by its mid-thickness line While the thin-walled assumption may lead to small errors in some properties due to junction andthickness effects its consistent use will avoid anomalies that arise when a moreaccurate theory is combined with thin-walled theory as might be the case in thedetermination of shear flows The small errors are typically of the same order asthose introduced by the common practice of ignoring the fillets or corner radii ofhot-rolled sections

192 In-plane bending of beams

t2

t1

b1 times t1

b2 times t2

b3 times t3

b1

b 2

b3

t 3

aa

(a) Actual cross-section (b) Thin-walled approximation

Figure 534 Thin-walled cross-section assumption

The area A of a thin-walled section composed of a series of thin rectangles bn

wide and tn thick (bn tn) is given by

A =int

AdA =

sumn

An (555)

in which An = bntn This approximation may make small errors of the order of(tb)2 at some junctions

The centroid of a cross-section is defined by

intA

ydA =int

AzdA = 0

and for a thin-walled section these conditions become

sumn

Anyn =sum

n

Anzn = 0 (556)

in which yn zn are the centroidal distances of the centre of the rectangular ele-ment as demonstrated in Figure 535a The position of the centroid can be foundby adopting any convenient initial set of axes yi zi as shown in Figure 535aso that

yn = yin minus yic

zn = zin minus zic

In-plane bending of beams 193

A2 = b2 times t2 A2 = b2 times t2

z1z1

y1

zi

y12y12 yic

yi2

yi

z12

zi2

zic

132

z12

y1C 0

2

C

2

(b) Second moments of area(a) Centroid

Figure 535 Calculation of cross-section properties

When these are substituted into equation 556 the centroid position is found from

yic =sum

AnyinA

zic =sum

AnzinA

(557)

The second moments of area about the centroidal axes are defined by

Iy =int

Az2 dA =

sum(Anz2

n + In sin2 θn)

Iz =int

Ay2 dA =

sum(Any2

n + In cos2 θn)

Iyz =int

Ayz dA =

sum(Anynzn + In sin θn cos θn)

(558)

in which θn is always the angle from the y axis to the rectangular element (positivefrom the y axis to the z axis) as shown in Figure 535b and

In = b3ntn12 (559)

These thin-walled approximations ignore small terms bnt3n12 while the use of

the angle θn adjusts for the inclination of the element to the y z axes

194 In-plane bending of beams

The principal axis directions y z are defined by the condition that

Iyz = 0 (560)

These directions can be found by considering a rotation of the centroidal axes fromy1 z1 to y2 z2 through an angle α as shown in Figure 536a The y2 z2 coordinatesof any point are related to its y1 z1 coordinates as demonstrated in Figure 536a by

y2 = y1 cosα + z1 sinαz2 = minusy1 sinα + z1 cosα

(561)

The second moments of area about the y2 z2 axes are

Iy2 =int

Az2

2 dA = Iy1 cos2 α minus 2Iy1z1 sinα cosα + Iz1 sin2 α

Iz2 =int

Ay2

2 dA = Iy1 sin2α + 2Iy1z1 sinα cosα + Iz1 cos2 α

Iy2z2 =int

Ay2z2 dA = 1

2(Iy1 minus Iz1) sin 2α + Iy1z1 cos 2α

(562)

The principal axis condition of equation 560 requires Iy2z2 = 0 so that

tan 2α = minus2Iy1z1(Iy1 minus Iz1) (563)

In this book y and z are reserved exclusively for the principal centroidal axes

C

(y1 z1)

z1z2

y2

z2

z1

z1 cos

Iy

1z

IyIz

(Iy1 ndashIy1z1)

(Iy1Iy1z1)

Iyz

y1 sin

2

z1 sin y1 cos

y2

y1

(y2 z2)

(a) Rotation of axes (b) Mohrrsquos circle construction

Figure 536 Calculation of principal axis properties

In-plane bending of beams 195

The principal axis second moments of area can be obtained by using this valueof α in equation 562 whence

Iy = 1

2(Iy1 + Iz1)+ (Iy1 minus Iz1)2 cos 2α

Iz = 1

2(Iy1 + Iz1)minus (Iy1 minus Iz1)2 cos 2α

(564)

These results are summarised by the Mohrrsquos circle constructed in Figure 536b onthe diameter whose ends are defined by (Iy1 Iy1z1) and (Iz1 minusIy1z1) The anglesbetween this diameter and the horizontal axis are equal to 2α and (2α+ 180)while the intersections of the circle with the horizontal axis define the principalaxis second moments of area Iy Iz

Worked examples of the calculation of cross-section properties are given inSections 5121ndash5124

510 Appendix ndash shear stresses in elastic beams

5101 Solid cross-sections

A solid cross-section beam with a shear force Vz parallel to the z principal axis isshown in Figure 59a It is assumed that the resulting shear stresses also act parallelto the z axis and are constant across the width b of the section The correspondinghorizontal shear stresses τzx = τv are in equilibrium with the horizontal bendingstresses σ For the element b times δz times δx shown in Figure 59b this equilibriumcondition reduces to

bpartσ

partxδxδz + part(τvb)

partzδzδx = 0

whence

τv = minus 1

b2

int z2

zT

bpartσ

partxdz (565)

which satisfies the condition that the shear stress is zero at the unstressed boundaryzT The bending normal stresses σ are given by

σ = Myz

Iy

and the shear force Vz is

Vz = dMy

dx

196 In-plane bending of beams

and so

partσ

partx= Vzz

Iy (566)

Substituting this into equation 565 leads to

τv = minus Vz

Iyb2

int z2

zT

bz dz (513)

5102 Thin-walled open cross-sections

A thin-walled open cross-section beam with a shear force Vz parallel to the z prin-cipal axis is shown in Figure 511a It is assumed that the resulting shear stressesact parallel to the walls of the section and are constant across the wall thicknessThe corresponding horizontal shear stresses τv are in equilibrium with the hori-zontal bending stresses σ For the element t times δs times δx shown in Figure 511b thisequilibrium condition reduces to

partσ

partxδxtδs + part(τvt)

partxδsδx = 0

and substitution of equation 566 and integration leads to

τvt = minusVz

Iy

int s

0zt ds (516)

which satisfies the condition that the shear stress is zero at the unstressed boundarys = 0

The direction of the shear stress can be determined from the sign of the right-hand side of equation 516 If this is positive then the direction of the shear stressis the same as the positive direction of s and vice versa The direction of the shearstress may also be determined from the direction of the corresponding horizontalshear force required to keep the out-of-balance bending force in equilibrium asshown for example in Figure 513a Here a horizontal force τvtf δx in the positive xdirection is required to balance the resultant bending force δσ δA (due to the shearforce Vz = dMydx) and so the direction of the corresponding flange shear stressis from the tip of the flange towards its centre

5103 Multi-cell thin-walled closed sections

The shear stress distributions in multi-cell closed sections can be determined byextending the method discussed in Section 544 for single-cell closed sections Ifthe section consists of n junctions connected by m walls then there are (m minus n + 1)independent cells In each wall there is an unknown circulating shear flow τvct

In-plane bending of beams 197

There are (m minus n + 1) independent cell warping continuity conditions of the type(see equation 527)

sumcell

intwall(τG) ds = 0

and (n minus 1) junction equilibrium equations of the typesumjunction

(τ t) = 0

These equations can be solved simultaneously for the m circulating shearflows τvct

511 Appendix ndash plastic analysis of beams

5111 Full plastic moment

The fully plastic stress distribution in a section bent about a y axis of symmetryis antisymmetric about that axis as shown in Figure 537a for a channel sectionexample The plastic neutral axis which divides the cross-section into two equalareas so that there is no axial force resultant of the stress distribution coincides withthe axis of symmetry The moment resultant of the fully plastic stress distribution is

Mpy = fysum

T

Anzn minus fysum

C

Anzn (567)

in which the summationssum

T sum

C are carried out for the tension and com-pression areas of the cross-section respectively Note that zn is negative forthe compression areas of the channel section so that the two summations in

yy

z

z

T

C

T

CT

C

(a) Bending about an axis of symmetry

(b) Bending of a monosymmetric section in a plane of symmetry

(c) Bending of an asymmetric section

b2 times t

b times tf

df times twb times tf

b times tf

df times tw b1 times t

y1 Mpy1

Mpz1

Mp

zp

zp

z1

fyfyfy fy fy

fy

Figure 537 Full plastic moment

198 In-plane bending of beams

equation 567 are additive The plastic section modulus Wply = Mpyfy is obtainedfrom equation 567 as

Wply =sum

T

Anzn minussum

C

Anzn (568)

A worked example of the determination of the full plastic moment of a doublysymmetric I-section is given in Section 51212

The fully plastic stress distribution in a monosymmetric section bent in a planeof symmetry is not antisymmetric as can be seen in Figure 537b for a channelsection example The plastic neutral axis again divides the cross-section into twoequal areas so that there is no axial force resultant but the neutral axis no longerpasses through the centroid of the cross-section The fully plastic moment Mpy

and the plastic section modulus Wply are given by equations 567 and 568 Forconvenience any suitable origin may be used for computing zn Aworked exampleof the determination of the full plastic moment of a monosymmetric tee-section isgiven in Section 51213

The fully plastic stress distribution in an asymmetric section is also not antisym-metric as can be seen in Figure 537c for an angle section example The plasticneutral axis again divides the cross-section into two equal areas The direction ofthe plastic neutral axis is perpendicular to the plane in which the moment resul-tant acts The full plastic moment is given by the vector addition of the momentresultants about any convenient y1 z1 axes so that

Mp = radic(M 2

py1 + M 2pz1) (569)

where Mpy1 is given by an equation similar to equation 567 and Mpz1 isgiven by

Mpz1 = minusfysum

T

Any1n + fysum

C

Any1n (570)

The inclination α of the plastic neutral axis to the y1 axis (and of the plane of thefull plastic moment to the zx plane) can be obtained from

tan α = Mpz1Mpy1 (571)

5112 Built-in beam

51121 General

The built-in beam shown in Figure 530a has two redundancies and so three plastichinges must form before it can be reduced to a collapse mechanism In this casethe only possible plastic hinge locations are at the support points 1 and 4 and at theload points 2 and 3 and so there are two possible mechanisms one with a hinge at

In-plane bending of beams 199

point 2 (Figure 530c) and the other with a hinge at point 3 (Figure 530d) Threedifferent methods of analysing these mechanisms are presented in the followingsub-sections

51122 Equilibrium equation solution

The equilibrium conditions for the beam express the relationships between theapplied loads and the moments at these points These relationships can be obtainedby dividing the beam into the segments shown in Figure 530b and expressing theend shears of each segment in terms of its end moments so that

V12 = (M2 minus M1)(L3)

V23 = (M3 minus M2)(L3)

V34 = (M4 minus M3)(L3)

For equilibrium each applied load must be equal to the algebraic sum of the shearsat the load point in question and so

Q = V12 minus V23 = 1

L(minus3M1 + 6M2 minus 3M3)

2Q = V23 minus V34 = 1

L(minus3M2 + 6M3 minus 3M4)

which can be rearranged as

4QL = minus 6M1 + 9M2 minus 3M4

5QL = minus 3M1 + 9M3 minus 6M4

(572)

If the first mechanism chosen (incorrectly as will be shown later) is that withplastic hinges at points 1 2 and 4 (see Figure 530c) so that

minusM1 = M2 = minusM4 = Mp

then substitution of this into the first of equations 572 leads to 4QL = 18Mp

and so

Qult le 45MpL

If this result is substituted into the second of equations 572 then

M3 = 15 Mp gt Mp

200 In-plane bending of beams

and the plasticity condition is violated The statical method can now be used toobtain a lower bound by reducing Q until M3 = Mp whence

Q = 45Mp

L

M3

Mp= 3Mp

L

and so

3MpL lt Qult lt 45MpL

The true collapse load can be obtained by assuming a collapse mechanismwith plastic hinges at point 3 (the point of maximum moment for the previousmechanism) and at points 1 and 4 For this mechanism

minusM1 = M3 = minusM4 = Mp

and so from the second of equations 572

Qult le 36MpL

If this result is substituted into the first of equations 572 then

M2 = 06Mp lt Mp

and so the plasticity condition is also satisfied Thus

Qult = 36MpL

51123 Graphical solution

A collapse mechanism can be analysed graphically by first plotting the known freemoment diagram (for the applied loading on a statically determinate beam) andthen the reactant bending moment diagram (for the redundant reactions) whichcorresponds to the collapse mechanism

For the built-in beam (Figure 538a) the free moment diagram for a simplysupported beam is shown in Figure 538c It is obtained by first calculating theleft-hand reaction as

RL = (Q times 2L3 + 2Q times L3)L = 4Q3

In-plane bending of beams 201

(+)

L3 L3 L3

4QL9 5QL9

5QL9

321 4

(+)

(-) (-)

(-)Mp MpMp

Mp

(d) Reactant moment diagram(b) Collapse moment diagram

(c) Free moment diagram(a) Built-in beam

Q 2Q

Figure 538 Graphical solution for the plastic collapse of a built-in beam

and then using this to calculate the moments

M2 = (4Q3)times L3 = 4QL9

and

M3 = (4Q3)times 2L3 minus QL3 = 5QL9

Both of the possible collapse mechanisms (Figure 529c and d) require plastichinges at the supports and so the reactant moment diagram is one of uniformnegative bending as shown in Figure 538d When this is combined with the freemoment diagram as shown in Figure 538b it becomes obvious that there must bea plastic hinge at point 3 and not at point 2 and that at collapse

2Mp = 5QultL9

so that

Qult = 36MpL

as before

51124 Virtual work solution

The virtual work principle [4 7 8] can also be used to analyse each mechanismFor the first mechanism shown in Figure 530c the virtual external work done

202 In-plane bending of beams

by the forces Q 2Q during the incremental virtual displacements defined by theincremental virtual rotations δθ and 2δθ shown is given by

δW = Q times (δθ times 2L3)+ 2Q times (δθ times L3) = 4QLδθ3

while the internal work absorbed at the plastic hinge locations during theincremental virtual rotations is given by

δU = Mp times 2δθ + Mp times (2δθ + δθ)+ Mp times δθ = 6Mpδθ

For equilibrium of the mechanism the virtual work principle requires

δW = δU

so that the upper-bound estimate of the collapse load is

Qult le 45MpL

as in Section 51122Similarly for the second mechanism shown in Figure 530d

δW = 5QLδθ3

δU = 6Mpδθ

so that

Qult le 36MpL

once more

5113 Propped cantilever

51131 General

The exact collapse mechanisms for beams with distributed loads are not always aseasily obtained as those for beams with concentrated loads only but sufficientlyaccurate solutions can usually be found without great difficulty Three differentmethods of determining these mechanisms are presented in the following sub-sections for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 531

In-plane bending of beams 203

51132 Equilibrium equation solution

If the plastic hinge is assumed to be at the mid-span of the propped cantilever asshown in Figure 531c (the other plastic hinge must obviously be located at thebuilt-in support) then equilibrium considerations of the left and right segments ofthe beam allow the left and right reactions to be determined from

RLL2 = 2Mp + (qL2)L4

and

RRL2 = Mp + (qL2)L4

while for overall equilibrium

qL = RL + RR

Thus

qL = (4MpL + qL4)+ (2MpL + qL4)

so that

qult le 12MpL2

The left-hand reaction is therefore given by

RL = 4MpL + (12MpL2)L4 = 7MpL

The bending moment variation along the propped cantilever is therefore given by

M = minusMp + (7MpL)x minus (12MpL2)x22

which has a maximum value of 25Mp24gtMp at x = 7L12 Thus the lowerbound is given by

qult ge (12MpL2)(2524) asymp 1152MpL

2

and so

1152Mp

L2lt qult lt

12Mp

L2

If desired a more accurate solution can be obtained by assuming that the hinge islocated at a distance 7L12(= 0583L) from the built-in support (ie at the point

204 In-plane bending of beams

of maximum moment for the previous mechanism) whence

116567Mp

L2lt qult lt

116575Mp

L2

These are very close to the exact solution of

qult = (6 + 4radic

2)MpL2 asymp 116569MpL

2

for which the hinge is located at a distance (2 minus radic2)L asymp 05858L from the built-in

support

51133 Graphical solution

For the propped cantilever of Figure 531 the parabolic free moment diagramfor a simply supported beam is shown in Figure 539c All the possible collapsemechanisms have a plastic hinge at the left-hand support and a frictionless hingeat the right-hand support so that the reactant moment diagram is triangular asshown in Figure 539d A first attempt at combining this with the free momentdiagram so as to produce a trial collapse mechanism is shown in Figure 539b Forthis mechanism the interior plastic hinge occurs at mid-span so that

Mp + Mp2 = qL28

which leads to

q = 12MpL2

as before

q

LRL RR

(+)

Mp ( + ) qL 8

L 2 L 2

Mp

Mp 22

qL 82

Mp

MpMmax

(-)( - )

(d) Reactant moment diagram

(a) Propped cantilever

(b) T ri a l c ol l ap s e m o m e n t d ia gram

(c) Free moment diagram

Figure 539 Graphical analysis of the plastic collapse of a propped cantilever

In-plane bending of beams 205

Figure 539b indicates that in this case the maximum moment occurs to the rightof mid-span and is greater than Mp so that the solution above is an upper boundA more accurate solution can be obtained by trial and error by increasing theslope of the reactant moment diagram until the moment of the left-hand supportis equal to the interior maximum moment as indicated by the dashed line inFigure 539b

51134 Virtual work solution

For the first mechanism for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 531c forvirtual rotations δθ

δW = qL2δθ4

δU = 3Mpδθ

and

qult le 12MpL2

as before

512 Worked examples

5121 Example 1 ndash properties of a plated UB section

Problem The 610 times 229 UB 125 section shown in Figure 540a is strengthened bywelding a 300 mm times 20 mm plate to each flange Determine the section propertiesIy and Wely

Solution Because of the symmetry of the section the centroid of the plated UBis at the web centre Adapting equation 558

Iy = 98 610 + 2 times 300 times 20 times [(6122 + 20)2]2104 = 218 500 cm4

Wely = 218 500[(6122 + 2 times 20)(2 times 10)] = 6701 cm3

5122 Example 2 ndash properties of a tee-section

Problem Determine the section properties Iy and Wely of the welded tee-sectionshown in Figure 540b

206 In-plane bending of beams

80

5

8010

y

zz

y

zpzi

(a) 610 times 229 UB 125

Iy = 98 610 cm4

Wply = 3676 cm3

(b) Tee-section

6122

1 1 9

196229

Figure 540 Worked examples 1 2 and 18

Solution Using the thin-walled assumption and equations 557 and 558

zi = (80 + 52)times 10 times (80 + 52)2

(80 times 5)+ (80 + 52)times 10= 278 mm

Iy = (80 times 5)times 2782 + (8253 times 1012)+ (825 times 10)

times (8252 minus 278)2 mm4

= 9263 cm4

Wely = 9263(825 minus 278)10 = 1693 cm3

Alternatively the equations of Figure 56 may be used

5123 Example 3 ndash properties of an angle section

Problem Determine the properties A Iy1 Iz1 Iy1z1 Iy Iz and α of the thin-walledangle section shown in Figure 541c

Solution Using the thin-walled assumption the angle section is replaced by tworectangles 1425(= 150 minus 152)times 15 and 825(= 90 minus 152)times 15 as shown in

In-plane bending of beams 207

37 mm

967 mm

188 mm

Deflection of tip centroid

(c) Actual cross-section

90 mm

15 mm

15 mm

6 kN15 m

150 90 15unequal angle

A

C

S

6 kN

z

y

93 mm

100 mm

y1

z1

150

mm

Iy = 8426 cm4

Iz = 1205 cm4

=1982o

(a) Cantilever

(b) Section properties(d) Thin-walled section (deflections to different scale)

825 times 15

times times 1425 times 15

Figure 541 Worked examples 3 and 5

Figure 541d If the initial origin is taken at the intersection of the legs and theinitial yi zi axes parallel to the legs then using equations 555 and 557

A = (1425 times 15)+ (825 times 15) = 3375 mm2

yic = (1425 times 15)times 0 + (825 times 15)times (minus8252)3375

= minus151 mm

zic = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252)+ (825 times 15)times 03375

= minus451 mm

Transferring the origin to the centroid and using equations 558

Iy1 = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252 + 451)2 + (14253 times 1512)times sin2 90

+ (825 times 15)times (451)2 + (8253 times 1512)times sin2 180

= 7596 times 106 mm4 = 7596 cm4

208 In-plane bending of beams

Iz1 = (1425 times 15)times (151)2 + (14253 times 1512)times cos2 90

+ (825 times 15)times (minus8252 + 151)2 + (8253 times 1512)times cos2 180

= 2035 times 106 mm4 = 2035 cm4

Iy1z1 = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252 + 451)times 151 + (14253 times 1512)

times sin 90 cos 90 + (825 times 15)times (451)times (minus8252 + 151)

+ (8253 times 1512)times sin 180 cos 180

= minus2303 times 106 mm4 = minus2303 cm4

Using equation 563

tan 2α = minus2 times (minus2303)(7596 minus 2035) = 08283

whence 2α= 3963 and α= 1982Using Figure 530b the Mohrrsquos circle centre is at

(Iy1 + Iz1)2 = (7596 + 2035)2 = 4816 cm4

and the Mohrrsquos circle diameter is

radic(Iy1 minus Iz1)2 + (2Iy1z1)

2 = radic(7596 minus 2035)2 + (2 times 2303)2= 7221 cm4

and so

Iy = 4816 + 72212 = 8426 cm4

Iz = 4816 minus 72212 = 1205 cm4

5124 Example 4 ndash properties of a zed section

Problem Determine the properties Iyl Izl Iylzl Iy Iz and α of the thin-walledZ-section shown in Figure 542aSolution

Iy1 = 2 times (75 times 10 times 752)+ (1503 times 512) = 9844 times 103 mm4

= 9844 cm4

In-plane bending of beams 209

150

50

875

62

5

6 6

6

125

75 100 100505075

1 0

1 0

yy

z

z1

6 6

1

y

z

121 2 3 4

6 5

1 25

4 3

= = 1400 cm4 600 cm4I Iz z

z

yCC

C

150

(b) Pi-section (c) Rectangular hollow section (All dimensions in mm)

(a) Z-section

Figure 542 Worked examples 4 9 10 and 11

Iz1 = 2 times (75 times 10 times 3752)+ 2 times (753 times 1012)

= 2813 times 103 mm4 = 2813 cm4

Iy1z1 = 75 times 10 times 375 times (minus75)+ 75 times 10 times (minus375)times 75

= minus4219 times 103 mm4 = minus4219 cm4

The centre of the Mohrrsquos circle (see Figure 537b) is at

Iy1 + Iz1

2=

[9844 + 2813

2

]= 6328 cm4

The diameter of the circle isradic[(9844 minus 2813)2 + (2 times 4219)2] = 10983 cm4

and so

Iy = (6328 + 109832) = 1182 cm4

Iz = (6328 minus 109832) = 837 cm4

tan 2α = 2 times 4219

(9844 minus 2813)= 1200

α = 251

5125 Example 5 ndash biaxial bending of an anglesection cantilever

Problem Determine the maximum elastic stress and deflection of the angle sectioncantilever shown in Figure 541 whose section properties were determined inSection 5123

210 In-plane bending of beams

Solution for maximum stress The shear centre (see Section 543) load of 6 kNacting in the plane of the long leg of the angle has principal plane components of

6 cos 1982 = 5645 kN parallel to the z axis and

6 sin 1982 = 2034 kN parallel to the y axis

as indicated in Figure 541d These load components cause principal axis momentcomponents at the support of

My = minus5645 times 15 = minus8467 kNm about the y axis and

Mz = +2034 times 15 = +3052 kNm about the z axis

The maximum elastic bending stress occurs at the point A (y1A = 151 mmz1A = minus974 mm) shown in Figure 541d The coordinates of this point can beobtained by using equation 561 as

y = 151 cos 1982 minus 974 sin 1982 = minus188 mm and

z = minus151 sin 1982 minus 974 cos 1982 = minus967 mm

The maximum stress at A can be obtained by using equation 512 as

σmax = (minus8467 times 106)times (minus967)

8426 times 104minus (3052 times 106)times (minus188)

1205 times 104

= 1469 Nmm2

The stresses at the other leg ends should be checked to confirm that the maximumstress is at A

Solution for maximum deflection The maximum deflection occurs at the tip of thecantilever Its components v and w can be calculated using QL33EI Thus

w = (5645 times 103)times (1500)3(3 times 210 000 times 8426 times 104) = 36 mm

and

v = (2034 times 103)times (1500)3(3 times 210 000 times 1205 times 104) = 90 mm

The resultant deflection can be obtained by vector addition as

δ = radic(362 + 902) = 97 mm

Using non-principal plane properties Problems of this type are sometimes incor-rectly analysed on the basis that the plane of loading can be assumed to be a

In-plane bending of beams 211

principal plane When this approach is used the maximum stress calculated forthe cantilever is

σmax = (6 times 103)times 1500 times (974)7596 times 104 = 115 Nmm2

which seriously underestimates the correct value by more than 20 The correctnon-principal plane formulations which are needed to solve the example in thisway are given in Section 582 The use of these formulations should be avoidedsince their excessive complication makes them very error-prone The much simplerprincipal plane formulations of equations 59ndash512 should be used instead

It should be noted that in this book y and z are reserved exclusively for theprincipal axis directions instead of also being used for the directions parallel tothe legs

5126 Example 6 ndash shear stresses in an I-section

Problem Determine the shear flow distribution and the maximum shear stress inthe I-section shown in Figure 512a

Solution Applying equation 516 to the left-hand half of the top flange

τvtf = minus(VzIy)

int sf

0(minusdf 2)tf dsf = (VzIy)df tf sf 2

which is linear as shown in Figure 512bAt the flange web junction (τvtf )12 = (VzIy)df tf b4 which is positive and

so the shear flow acts into the flangendashweb junction as shown in Figure 512aSimilarly for the right-hand half of the top flange (τvtf )23 = (VzIy)df tf b4 andagain the shear flow acts in to the flangendashweb junction

For horizontal equilibrium at the flangendashweb junction the shear flow from thejunction into the web is obtained from equation 520 as

(τvtw)24 = (VzIy)df tf b4 + (VzIy)df tf b4 = (VzIy)df tf b2

Adapting equation 516 for the web

τvtw = (VzIy)(df tf b2)minus (VzIy)

int sw

0(minusdf 2 + sw)twdsw

= (VzIy)(df tf b2)+ (VzIy)(df sw2 minus s2w2)tw

which is parabolic as shown in Figure 512b At the web centre (τvtw)df 2 =(VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2

f tw8) which is the maximum shear flowAt the bottom of the web

(τvtw)df = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw2 minus d2

f tw2)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2) = (τvtw)24

which provides a symmetry check

212 In-plane bending of beams

The maximum shear stress is

(τv)df 2 = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw8)tw

A vertical equilibrium check is provided by finding the resultant of the web shearflow as

Vw =int df

0(τvtw)dsw

= (VzIy)[df tf bsw2 + df tws2w4 minus s3

wtw6]df

0

= (VzIy)(d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12)

= Vz

when Iy = d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12 is substituted

5127 Example 7 ndash shear stress in a channel section

Problem Determine the shear flow distribution in the channel section shown inFigure 514

Solution Applying equation 515 to the top flange

τvtf = minus(VzIy)

int sf

0(minusdf 2)tf dsf = (VzIy)df tf sf 2

(τvtf )b = (VzIy)df tf b2

τvtw = (VzIy)(df tf b2 minusint sw

0(minusdf 2 + sw)twdsw)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2 + df swtw2 minus s2wtw2)

(τvtw)df = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw2 minus d2

f tw2)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2) = (τvtf )b

which provides a symmetry checkA vertical equilibrium check is provided by finding the resultant of the web

flows as

Vw =int df

0(τvtw)dsw

= (VzIy)[df tf bsw2 + df s2wtw4 minus s3

wtw6]df

0

= (VzIy)(d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12)

= Vz

when Iy = d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12 is substituted

In-plane bending of beams 213

5128 Example 8 ndash shear centre of a channel section

Problem Determine the position of the shear centre of the channel section shownin Figure 514

Solution The shear flow distribution in the channel section was analysed inSection 5127 and is shown in Figure 514a The resultant flange shear forcesshown in Figure 514b are obtained from

Vf =int b

0(τvtf )dsf

= (VzIy)[df tf s2f 4]b

0

= (VzIy)(df tf b24)

while the resultant web shear force is Vw = Vz (see Section 5127)These resultant shear forces are statically equivalent to a shear force Vz acting

through the point S which is a distance

a = Vf df

Vw= d2

f tf b2

4Iyfrom the web and so

y0 = d2f tf b2

4Iy+ b2tf

2btf + df tw

5129 Example 9 ndash shear stresses in a pi-section

Problem The pi shaped section shown in Figure 542b has a shear force of 100kN acting parallel to the y axis Determine the shear stress distribution

Solution Using equation 523 the shear flow in the segment 12 is

(τh times 12)12 = minus100 times 103

1400 times 104

int s1

0(minus100 + s1)times 12 times ds1

whence (τh)12 = 0007143 times (100s1 minus s212) Nmm2

Similarly the shear flow in the segment 62 is

(τh times 6)62 = minus100 times 103

1400 times 104

int s6

0(minus50)times 6 times ds1

whence (τh)62 = 0007143 times (50s6) Nmm2

214 In-plane bending of beams

For horizontal equilibrium of the longitudinal shear forces at the junction 2 theshear flows in the segments 12 62 and 23 must balance (equation 520) and so

[(τh times 12)23]s3=0 = [(τh times 12)12]s1=50 + [(τh times 6)62]s6=200

= 0007143

[(100 times 50 minus 502

2

)times 12 + 50 times 200 times 6

]

= 0007143 times 8750

The shear flow in the segment 23 is

(τh times 12)23 = 0007143 times 12 times 8750 minus 100 times 103

1400 times 104

timesint s2

0(minus50 + s2)times 12 times ds2

whence (τh)23 = 0007143(8750 + 50s2 minus s222) Nmm2

As a check the resultant of the shear stresses in the segments 12 23 and 34 is

intτhtds = 2 times 0007143 times 12

int 50

0(100s1 minus s2

12)ds1

+ 0007143 times 12 timesint 100

0(8750 + 50s2 minus s2

22)ds2

= 0007143 times 122 times (100 times 5022 minus 5036)

+ (8750 times 100 + 50 times 10022 minus 10036)N= 100 kN

which is equal to the shear force

51210 Example 10 ndash shear centre of a pi-section

Problem Determine the position of the shear centre of the pi section shown inFigure 542b

Solution The resultant of the shear stresses in the segment 62 is

intτhtds = 0007143 times 6

int 200

0(50s6)times ds6

= 0007143 times 6 times 50 times 20022 N

= 4286 kN

The resultant of the shear stresses in the segment 53 is equal and opposite to this

In-plane bending of beams 215

The torque about the centroid exerted by the shear stresses is equal to the sumof the torques of the force in the flange 1234 and the forces in the webs 62 and 53Thus

intAτhtρds = (100 times 50)+ (2 times 4286 times 50) = 9286 kNmm

For the applied shear to be statically equivalent to the shear stresses it must exertan equal torque about the centroid and so

minus100 times z0 = 9286

whence z0 = minus929 mmBecause of symmetry the shear centre lies on the z axis and so y0 = 0

51211 Example 11 ndash shear stresses in a box section

Problem The rectangular box section shown in Figure 542c has a shear force of100 kN acting parallel to the y axis Determine the maximum shear stress

Solution If initially a slit is assumed at point 1 on the axis of symmetry so that(τ hot)1 = 0 then

(τhot)12 = minus100 times 103

6 times 106

int s1

0s1 times 12 times ds1 = minus01s2

1

(τhot)2 = minus01 times 502 = minus01 times 2500 Nmm

(τhot)23 = minus01 times 2500 minus 100 times 103

6 times 106

int s2

050 times 6 times ds2

= minus01(2500 + 50s2)

(τhot)3 = minus01(2500 + 50 times 150) = minus01 times 10 000 Nmm

(τhot)34 = minus01 times 10 000 minus 100 times 103

6 times 106

int s3

0(50 minus s3)times 6 times ds3

= minus01[10 000 + (50s3 minus s232)]

(τhot)4 = minus01[10 000 + (50 times 100 minus 10022)] = minus01 times 10 000 Nmm

= (τhot)3 which is a symmetry check

The remainder of the shear stress distribution can therefore be obtained bysymmetry

216 In-plane bending of beams

The circulating shear flow τ hct can be determined by adapting equation 530For this∮

τhods = 2 times (01 times 5033)12

+ 2 times (minus01)times (2500 times 150 + 50 times 15022)6

+ (minus01)times (10 000 times 100 + 50 times 10022 minus 10036)6

= (minus01)times (6 000 000)12 Nmm∮1

tds = 100

12+ 150

6+ 100

6+ 150

6

= 90012

Thus

τhct = (minus01)times (6 000 000)

12times 12

900

= 66667 Nmm

The maximum shear stress occurs at the centre of the segment 34 and adaptingequation 529

(τh)max = minus01 times (10 000 + 50 times 50 minus 5022)+ 66676 Nmm2

= minus764 Nmm2

51212 Example 12 ndash fully plastic moment of a plated UB

Problem A 610 times 229 UB 125 beam (Figure 540a) of S275 steel is strengthenedby welding a 300 mm times 20 mm plate of S275 steel to each flange Compare thefull plastic moments of the unplated and the plated sections

Unplated section

For tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Mplu = fyWply = 265 times 3676 times 103 Nmm = 974 kNm

Plated section

For tp = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Because of the symmetry of the cross-section the plastic neutral axis is at thecentroid Adapting equation 567

Mplp = 974 + 2 times 265 times (300 times 20)times (61222 + 202)106 kNm

= 1979 kNm asymp 2 times Mplu

In-plane bending of beams 217

51213 Example 13 ndash fully plastic moment of a tee-section

Problem The welded tee-section shown in Figure 540b is fabricated from twoS275 steel plates Compare the first yield and fully plastic moments

First yield moment The minimum elastic section modulus was determined inSection 5122 as

Wely = 1693 cm3

For tmax = 10 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Mely = fyWely = 275 times 1693 times 103 Nmm = 4656 kNm

Full plastic moment For the plastic neutral axis to divide the cross-section intotwo equal areas then using the thin-walled assumption leads to

(80 times 5)+ (zp times 10) = (825 minus zp)times 10

so that zp = (825 times 10 minus 80 times 5)(2 times 10) = 213 mmUsing equation 567

Mply = 275 times [(80 times 5)times 213 + (213 times 10)times 2132

+ (825 minus 213)2 times 102] Nmm

= 8117 kNm

Alternatively the section properties Wely and Wply can be calculated usingFigure 56 and used to calculate Mely and Mply

51214 Example 14 ndash plastic collapse of a non-uniform beam

Problem The two-span continuous beam shown in Figure 543a is a 610 times 229UB 125 of S275 steel with 2 flange plates 300 mm times 20 mm of S275 steelextending over a central length of 12 m Determine the value of the applied loadsQ at plastic collapse

Solution The full plastic moments of the beam (unplated and plated) weredetermined in Section 51212 as Mplu = 974 kNm and Mplp = 1979 kNm

The bending moment diagram is shown in Figure 543b Two plastic collapsemechanisms are possible both with a plastic hinge (minusMplp) at the central supportFor the first mechanism (Figure 543c) plastic hinges (Mplp) occur in the platedbeam at the load points but for the second mechanism (Figure 543d) plastichinges (Mplu) occur in the unplated beam at the changes of cross-section

218 In-plane bending of beams

Q Q

M M Mpu pp pu

Q 9 6 4

(a) C o n t in u ou s b ea m (le n g t h s

(b) Bending moment

Mpp Mpp

Mpu Mpu

96

48

96

36Mpp

(c) First me chanism

(d) Second mechanism

Mpp

times

36 12 48 3 61248

(+ ) ( + ) ( )ndash

m )i n

Figure 543 Worked example 14

For the first mechanism shown in Figure 543c inspection of the bendingmoment diagram shows that

Mplp + Mplp2 = Q1 times 964

so that

Q1 = (3 times 19792)times 496 = 1237 kN

For the second mechanism shown in Figure 543d inspection of the bendingmoment diagram shows that

Mplu + 36Mplp96 = (3648)times Q2 times 964

so that

Q2 = [974 + (3696)times 1979] times (4836)times 496 = 954 kN

which is less than Q1 = 1237 kNThus plastic collapse occurs at Q = 954 kN by the second mechanism

51215 Example 15 ndash checking a simply supported beam

Problem The simply supported 610 times 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown inFigure 544a has a span of 60 m and is laterally braced at 15 m intervals Checkthe adequacy of the beam for a nominal uniformly distributed dead load of 60 kNmtogether with a nominal uniformly distributed imposed load of 70 kNm

In-plane bending of beams 219

4 1 5 = 6 0 m h

pl

bftf

tw

3 0 m

qD = 60 kNm qI = 70 kNm

QD = 40 kNQI

qD = 20 kNm

qI = 10 kNm

(a) Examples 15 17 and 18

(c) Example 16

bf = 229 mm A = 159 cm2

h = 6122 mm Iz = 3932 cm4

tf = 196 mm i z = 497 mmtw = 119 mm W y = 3676 cm3

r = 127 mm

(b) 610 229 UB 125

= 120 kN

times

Figure 544 Worked examples 15ndash18

Classifying the section

tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε =radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cf (tf ε) = (2292 minus 1192 minus 127)(196 times 0942) T52

= 519 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = (6122 minus 2 times 196 minus 2 times 127)(119 times 0942) T52

= 489 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

(Note the general use of the minimum fy obtained for the flange)

Checking for moment

qEd = (135 times 60)+ (15 times 70) = 186 kNm

MEd = 186 times 628 = 837 kNm

McRd = 3676 times 103 times 26510 Nmm 625

= 974 kNm gt 837 kNm = MEd

which is satisfactory

220 In-plane bending of beams

Checking for lateral bracing

if z =radic

2293 times 19612

229 times 196 + (6122 minus 2 times 196)times 1196= 591 mm 6324

kcLc(if zλ1) = 10 times 1500(591 times 939 times 0942) = 0287 6324

λc0McRdMEd = 04 times 974837 = 0465 gt 0287 6324

and the bracing is satisfactory

Checking for shear

VEd = 186 times 62 = 558 kN

Av = 159 times 102 minus 2 times 229 times 196 + (119 + 2 times 127)times 196

= 7654 mm2 626(3)

VcRd = 7654 times (265radic

3)10 N = 1171 kN gt 558 kN = VEd 626(2)

which is satisfactory

Checking for bending and shear The maximum MEd occurs at mid-span whereVEd = 0 and the maximum VEd occurs at the support where MEd = 0 and so thereis no need to check for combined bending and shear (Note that in any case 05VcRd = 05 times 1171 = 5855 kN gt 558 kN = VEd and so the combined bendingand shear condition does not operate)

Checking for bearing

REd = 186 times 62 = 558 kN

tw = 119 fyw = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

hw = 6122 minus 2 times 196 = 5730 mm

Assume (ss + c) = 100 mm which is not difficult to achieve

kF = 2 + 6 times 1005730 = 3047 EC3-1-5 61(4)(c)

Fcr = 09 times 3047 times 210 000 times 11935730 N = 1694 kNEC3-1-5 64(1)

m1 = (265 times 229)(275 times 119) = 1854 EC3-1-5 65(1)

m2 = 002 times (5727196)2 = 1709 if λF gt 05 EC3-1-5 65(1)

In-plane bending of beams 221

e = 3047 times 210 000 times 1192(2 times 275 times 5730) = 2875 gt 100EC3-1-5 65(3)

y1 = 100 + 196 times radic(18542 + (100196)2 + 1709) = 2419

EC3-1-5 65(3)

y2 = 100 + 196 times radic(1854 + 1709) = 2170 lt 2419 EC3-1-5 65(3)

y = 2170 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

λF =radic

2170 times 119 times 275

1694 times 103= 0648 gt 05 EC3-1-5 64(1)

χF = 050648 = 0772 EC3-1-5 62

Leff = 0772 times 2170 = 1676 mm EC3-1-5 62

FRd = 275 times 1676 times 11910 N = 548 kN EC3-1-5 62

lt 558 kN = REd and so the assumed value of (ss + c) = 100 mm

is inadequate

51216 Example 16 ndash designing a cantilever

Problem A 30 m long cantilever has the nominal imposed and dead loads (whichinclude allowances for self weight) shown in Figure 544c Design a suitable UBsection in S275 steel if the cantilever has sufficient bracing to prevent lateralbuckling

Selecting a trial section

MEd = 135 times (40 times 3 + 20 times 322)+ 15 times (120 times 3 + 10 times 322)

= 891 kNm

Assume that fy = 265 MPa and that the section is Class 2

Wply ge MEdfy = 891 times 106265 mm3 = 3362 cm3 625

Choose a 610 times 229 UB 125 with Wply = 3676 cm3 gt 3362 cm3

Checking the trial section The trial section must now be checked by classifyingthe section and checking for moment shear moment and shear and bearing Thisprocess is similar to that used in Section 51215 for checking a simply supportedbeam If the section chosen fails any of the checks then a new section must bechosen

222 In-plane bending of beams

51217 Example 17 ndash checking a plastically analysed beam

Problem Check the adequacy of the non-uniform beam shown in Figure 543and analysed plastically in Section 51214 The beam and its flange plates areof S275 steel and the concentrated loads have nominal dead load components of250 kN (which include allowances for self weight) and imposed load componentsof 400 kN

Classifying the sections The 610 times 229 UB 125 was found to be Class 1 inSection 51215For the 300 times 20 plate tp = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε= radic(235265)= 0942 T52

For the 300 times 20 plate as two outstands

cp(tpε) = (3002)(196 times 0942) T52

= 813 lt 9 and the outstands are Class 1 T52

For the internal element of the 300 times 20 plate

cp(tpε) = 229(20 times 0942) T52

= 122 lt 33 and the internal element is Class 1 T52

Checking for plastic collapse The design loads are QEd = (135 times 250)+ (15 times400)= 9375 kN

The plastic collapse load based on the nominal full plastic moments of thebeam was calculated in Section 51214 as

Q = 954 kN gt 9375 kN = QEd

and so the resistance appears to be adequate

Checking for lateral bracing For the unplated segment

Lstable = (60 minus 40 times 0)times 0924 times 497 times 10 = 2808 mm 6353

Thus a brace should be provided at the change of section (a plastic hinge location)and a second brace between this and the support

For the plated segment

iz =radic

(3932 times 104)+ (2 times 3003 times 2012)

(159 times 102)+ (2 times 300 times 20)

= 681 mm

and so

Lstable = 60 minus 40 times 974(minus1979) times 0924 times 681 = 5109 mm 6353

Thus a single brace should be provided in the plated segment A satisfactorylocation is at the load point

In-plane bending of beams 223

Checking for shear Under the collapse loads Q = 954 kN the end reactions are

RE = (954times48)minus197996 = 2706 kN

and the central reaction is

RC = 2 times 954 minus 2 times 2706 = 1366 kN

so that the maximum shear at collapse is

V = 13662 = 683 kN

From Section 51215 the design shear resistance is VcRd = 1171 kNgt 683 kNwhich is satisfactory

Checking for bending and shear At the central support V = 683 kN and

05 VcRd = 05 times 1171 = 586 kNlt 683 kN

and so there is a reduction in the full plastic moment Mpp This reduction is from1979 kNm to 1925 kNm (after using Clause 628(3) of EC3) The plastic collapseload is reduced to 942 kNgt 9375 kN = QEd and so the resistance is adequate

Checking for bearing Web stiffeners are required for beams analysed plasticallywithin h2 of all plastic hinge points where the design shear exceeds 10 of theweb capacity or 01 times 1171 = 1171 kN (Clause 56(2b) of EC3) Thus stiffenersare required at the hinge locations at the points of cross-section change and at theinterior support Load-bearing stiffeners should also be provided at the points ofconcentrated load but are not required at the outer supports (see Section 51215)An example of the design of load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

51218 Example 18 ndash serviceability of a simplysupported beam

Problem Check the imposed load deflection of the 610 times 220 UB 125 ofFigure 544a for a serviceability limit of L360

Solution The central deflection wc of a simply supported beam with uniformlydistributed load q can be calculated using

wc = 5qL4

384EIy= 5 times 70 times 60004

384 times 210 000 times 98 610 times 104= 57 mm (573)

(The same result can be obtained using Figure 53)L360 = 6000360 = 167 mmgt 57 mm = wc and so the beam is satisfactory

224 In-plane bending of beams

513 Unworked examples

5131 Example 19 ndash section properties

Determine the principal axis properties Iy Iz of the half box section shown inFigure 545a

5132 Example 20 ndash elastic stresses and deflections

The box section beam shown in Figure 545b is to be used as a simply supportedbeam over a span of 200 m The erection procedure proposed is to fabricate thebeam as two half boxes (the right half as in Figure 545a) to erect them separatelyand to pull them together before making the longitudinal connections between theflanges The total construction load is estimated to be 10 kNm times 20 m

(a) Determine the maximum elastic bending stress and deflection of onehalf box

(b) Determine the horizontal distributed force required to pull the two half boxestogether

(c) Determine the maximum elastic bending stress and deflection after the halfboxes are pulled together

10

16

2020

20

20

30

20

2020

25

400 200 100 200200 200800

1000 1000

1000

500

600

300

800400

25

(a) Half box section(c) I-section with

off-centre web(b) Box section

(d) Monosymmetric I-section

4500

(e) Propped cantilever

QD =150 kN

Q = 200 kNI

qD = 50 kNm

q = 20 kNmI

1500

20

Figure 545 Unworked examples

In-plane bending of beams 225

5133 Example 21 ndash shear stresses

Determine the shear stress distribution caused by a vertical shear force of 500 kNin the section shown in Figure 545c

5134 Example 22 ndash shear centre

Determine the position of the shear centre of the section shown in Figure 545c

5135 Example 23 ndash shear centre of a box section

Determine the shear flow distribution caused by a horizontal shear force of 2000 kNin the box section shown in Figure 545b and determine the position of its shearcentre

5136 Example 24 ndash plastic moment of a monosymmetricI-section

Determine the fully plastic moment and the shape factor of the monosymmetricI-beam shown in Figure 545d if the yield stress is 265 Nmm2

5137 Example 25 ndash elastic design

Determine a suitable hot-rolled I-section member of S275 steel for the proppedcantilever shown in Figure 545e by using the elastic method of design

5138 Example 26 ndash plastic collapse analysis

Determine the plastic collapse mechanism of the propped cantilever shown inFigure 545e

5139 Example 27 ndash plastic design

Use the plastic design method to determine a suitable hot-rolled I-section of S275steel for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 545e

References

1 Popov EP (1968) Introduction to Mechanics of Solids Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

2 Hall AS (1984) An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids 2nd edition John WileySydney

3 Pippard AJS and Baker JF (1968) The Analysis of Engineering Structures4th edition Edward Arnold London

226 In-plane bending of beams

4 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

5 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

6 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 2nd editionPergamon Press Oxford

7 Ghali A Neville AM and Brown TG (1997) Structural Analysis ndash A UnifiedClassical and Matrix Approach 5th edition Routledge Oxford

8 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1990) Structural Analysis 3rd editionVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham

9 British Standards Institution (2005) BS4-12005 Structural Steel Sections ndash Part1Specification for hot-rolled sections BSI London

10 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1981) Bending shear and torsion of thin-walled beamsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 15(1) pp 2ndash18

11 Hancock GJ and Harrison HB (1972) A general method of analysis of stressesin thin-walled sections with open and closed parts Civil Engineering TransactionsInstitution of Engineers Australia CE14 No 2 pp 181ndash8

12 Papangelis JP and Hancock GJ (1995) THIN-WALL ndash Cross-section Analysisand Finite Strip Buckling Analysis of Thin-Walled Structures Centre for AdvancedStructural Engineering University of Sydney

13 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

14 Winter G (1940) Stress distribution in and equivalent width of flanges of wide thin-walled steel beams Technical Note 784 NationalAdvisory Committee forAeronautics

15 Abdel-Sayed G (1969) Effective width of steel deck-plates in bridges Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 95 No ST7 pp 1459ndash74

16 Malcolm DJ and Redwood RG (1970) Shear lag in stiffened box girders Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST7 pp 1403ndash19

17 Kristek V (1983) Shear lag in box girders Plated Structures Stability and Strength(ed R Narayanan) Applied Science Publishers London pp 165ndash94

18 Baker JF and Heyman J (1969) Plastic Design of Frames ndash 1 FundamentalsCambridge University Press Cambridge

19 Heyman J (1971) Plastic Design of Frames ndash 2 Applications Cambridge UniversityPress Cambridge

20 Horne MR (1978) Plastic Theory of Structures 2nd edition Pergamon Press Oxford21 Neal BG (1977) The Plastic Methods of Structural Analysis 3rd edition Chapman

and Hall London22 Beedle LS (1958) Plastic Design of Steel Frames John Wiley New York23 Horne MR and Morris LJ (1981) Plastic Design of Low-rise frames Granada

London24 Davies JM and Brown BA (1996) Plastic Design to BS5950 Blackwell Science

Ltd Oxford25 British Standards Institution (2006) Eυρoχoδε 3 ndash Design of Steel Structures ndash Part

1ndash5 Plated structural elements BSI London

Chapter 6

Lateral buckling of beams

61 Introduction

In the discussion given in Chapter 5 of the in-plane behaviour of beams it wasassumed that when a beam is loaded in its stiffer principal plane it deflects only inthat plane If the beam does not have sufficient lateral stiffness or lateral supportto ensure that this is so then it may buckle out of the plane of loading as shown inFigure 61 The load at which this buckling occurs may be substantially less thanthe beamrsquos in-plane load resistance as indicated in Figure 62

For an idealised perfectly straight elastic beam there are no out-of-plane defor-mations until the applied moment M reaches the elastic buckling moment Mcr when the beam buckles by deflecting laterally and twisting as shown in Figure 61These two deformations are interdependent when the beam deflects laterally theapplied moment has a component which exerts a torque about the deflected longi-tudinal axis which causes the beam to twist This behaviour which is important forlong unrestrained I-beams whose resistances to lateral bending and torsion are lowis called elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling (referred to as elastic lateralndashtorsionalbuckling in EC3) In this chapter it will simply be referred to as lateral buckling

The failure of a perfectly straight slender beam is initiated when the additionalstresses induced by elastic buckling cause the first yield However a perfectlystraight beam of intermediate slenderness may yield before the elastic bucklingmoment is reached because of the combined effects of the in-plane bendingstresses and any residual stresses and may subsequently buckle inelastically asindicated in Figure 62 For very stocky beams the inelastic buckling momentmay be higher than the in-plane plastic collapse moment Mp in which case themoment resistance of the beam is not affected by lateral buckling

In this chapter the behaviour and design of beams which fail by lateral bucklingand yielding are discussed It is assumed that local buckling of the compressionflange or of the web (which is dealt with in Chapter 4) does not occur The behaviourand design of beams bent about both principal axes and of beams with axial loadsare discussed in Chapter 7

228 Lateral buckling of beams

Figure 61 Lateral buckling of a cantilever

62 Elastic beams

621 Buckling of straight beams

6211 Simply supported beams with equal end moments

A perfectly straight elastic I-beam which is loaded by equal and opposite endmoments is shown in Figure 63 The beam is simply supported at its ends sothat lateral deflection and twist rotation are prevented while the flange ends arefree to rotate in horizontal planes so that the beam ends are free to warp (seeSection 1083) The beam will buckle at a moment Mcr when a deflected andtwisted equilibrium position such as that shown in Figure 63 is possible It isshown in Section 61211 that this position is given by

v = Mcr

π2EIzL2φ = δ sin

πx

L (61)

Lateral buckling of beams 229

Full plasticity M = Mp

Beams without residual stresses

Welded beams with residual stresses

MM

L

Elastic bucklingStrain-hardening

14

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Slenderness ratio Liz

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

mom

ent M

My

Hot-rolled beams with residual stresses (see Fig 39)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Figure 62 Lateral buckling strengths of simply supported I-beams

v

L

x

dvdx

v

z

(d) Plan on longitudinal axis

(b) Part plan

y

McrMcr

(a) Elevation

Pins prevent end twist rotation (f = 0) and allow end warping (f = 0)

(c) Section

f

Figure 63 Buckling of a simply supported beam

where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that the elasticbuckling moment is given by

Mcr = Mzx (62)

230 Lateral buckling of beams

where

Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2

) (63)

and in which EIz is the minor axis flexural rigidity GIt is the torsional rigidityand EIw is the warping rigidity of the beam Equation 63 shows that the resistanceto buckling depends on the geometric mean of the flexural stiffness EIz and thetorsional stiffness (GIt + π2EIwL2) Equations 62 and 63 apply to all beamswhich are bent about an axis of symmetry including equal flanged channels andequal angles

Equation 63 ignores the effects of the major axis curvature d2wdx2 =minusMcrEIy and produces conservative estimates of the elastic buckling momentequal to radic[(1minusEIzEIy)1minus (GIt +π2EIwL2)2EIy] times the true value Thiscorrection factor which is just less than unity for many beam sections but may besignificantly less than unity for column sections is usually neglected in designNevertheless its value approaches zero as Iz approaches Iy so that the true elasticbuckling moment approaches infinity Thus an I-beam in uniform bending aboutits weak axis does not buckle which is intuitively obvious Research [1] has indi-cated that in some other cases the correction factor may be close to unity and thatit is prudent to ignore the effect of major axis curvature

6212 Beams with unequal end moments

A simply supported beam with unequal major axis end moments M and βmM isshown in Figure 64a It is shown in Section 61212 that the value of the end

L

Mom

ent

f

acto

r m

3

2

1

M

mM

m M

M

(a) Beam

(b) Bending moment (c) Moment factors m

End moment ratio m

Equation 66

Equation 65

K = 30

K = 005

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

Figure 64 Buckling of beams with unequal end moments

Lateral buckling of beams 231

moment Mcr at elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling can be expressed in the form of

Mcr = αmMzx (64)

in which the moment modification factor αm which accounts for the effect ofthe non-uniform distribution of the major axis bending moment can be closelyapproximated by

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (65)

or by

1αm = 057 minus 033βm + 010β2m ge 043 (66)

These approximations form the basis of a very simple method of predicting thebuckling of the segments of a beam which is loaded only by concentrated loadsapplied through transverse members preventing local lateral deflection and twistrotation In this case each segment between load points may be treated as a beamwith unequal end moments and its elastic buckling moment may be estimated byusing equation 64 and either equation 65 or 66 and by taking L as the segmentlength Each buckling moment so calculated corresponds to a particular bucklingload parameter for the complete load set and the lowest of these parameters givesa conservative approximation of the actual buckling load parameter This simplemethod ignores any buckling interactions between the segments A more accuratemethod which accounts for these interactions is discussed in Section 682

6213 Beams with central concentrated loads

A simply supported beam with a central concentrated load Q acting at a distanceminuszQ above the centroidal axis of the beam is shown in Figure 65a When the beambuckles by deflecting laterally and twisting the line of action of the load moveswith the central cross-section but remains vertical as shown in Figure 65c Thecase when the load acts above the centroid is more dangerous than that of centroidalloading because of the additional torque minusQ zQφL2 which increases the twistingof the beam and decreases its resistance to buckling

It is shown in Section 61213 that the dimensionless buckling loadQL2

radic(EIzGIt) varies as shown in Figure 66 with the beam parameter

K = radic(π2EIwGItL

2) (67)

and the dimensionless height ε of the point of application of the load given by

ε = zQ

L

radic(EIz

GIt

) (68)

232 Lateral buckling of beams

Q(vndashzQf)L2

2

After buckling

Q

x

v

d

d

x

vx

d

d

Before buckling

Qndash zQfL2

zQfL2

fL2

nL2

vL2v

x

Q2

L2 L2

ndashzQ

(b) Plan on longitudinal axis

(c) Section at mid-span(a) Elevation

QQ

ndash

ndashzQ

Figure 65 I-beam with a central concentrated load

= (zQL) (EIzGIt)

= 06

03

0ndash03

ndash06

ndash1

0

2zQdf = 1

Centroid

Approximate equation 64 with m = 135

80

60

40

20

0

Beam parameter K = (2EIwGItL2)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

QL

2 radic(E

I zG

I t)

Top flange

Bottom flange

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

radic

Figure 66 Elastic buckling of beams with central concentrated loads

For centroidal loading (ε = 0) the elastic buckling load Q increases with thebeam parameter K in much the same way as does the buckling moment of beams

Lateral buckling of beams 233

with equal and opposite end moments (see equation 63) The elastic buckling load

Qcr = 4McrL (69)

can be approximated by using equation 64 with the moment modification factorαm (which accounts for the effect of the non-uniform distribution of major axisbending moment) equal to 135

The elastic buckling load also varies with the load height parameter ε andalthough the resistance to buckling is high when the load acts below the cen-troidal axis it decreases significantly as the point of application rises as shown inFigure 66 For equal flanged I-beams the parameter ε can be transformed into

2zQ

df= π

Kε (610)

where df is the distance between flange centroids The variation of the bucklingload with 2zQdf is shown by the solid lines in Figure 66 and it can be seen that thedifferences between top (2zQdf = minus1) and bottom (2zQdf = 1) flange loadingincrease with the beam parameter K This effect is therefore more important fordeep beam-type sections of short span than for shallow column-type sections oflong span Approximate expressions for the variations of the moment modifica-tion factor αm with the beam parameter K which account for the dimensionlessload height 2zQdf for equal flanged I-beams are given in [2] Alternatively themaximum moment at elastic buckling Mcr = QL4 may be approximated by using

Mcr

Mzx= αm

radic[1 +

(04αmzQNcrz

Mzx

)2]

+ 04αmzQNcrz

Mzx

(611)

and αm asymp 135 in which

Ncrz = π2EIzL2 (612)

6214 Other loading conditions

The effect of the distribution of the applied load along the length of a simplysupported beam on its elastic buckling strength has been investigated numericallyby many methods including those discussed in [3ndash5] A particularly powerfulcomputer method is the finite element method [6ndash10] while the finite integralmethod [11 12] which allows accurate numerical solutions of the coupled minoraxis bending and torsion equations to be obtained has been used extensively Manyparticular cases have been studied [13ndash16] and tabulations of elastic bucklingloads are available [2 3 5 13 15 17] as is a user-friendly computer program[18] for analysing elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling

Some approximate solutions for the maximum moments Mcr at elastic bucklingof simply supported beams which are loaded along their centroidal axes can beobtained from equation 64 by using the moment modification factors αm givenin Figure 67 It can be seen that the more dangerous loadings are those which

234 Lateral buckling of beams

M

Beam Moment distribution Range

M

q

M

m

m

Mm

QQ

2a

a

Q

Q

L2 L2

Q

L2 L2

QLm16

3 QL16m3

QLm QL8m

qLm

mqL2

qLm qL212m

QLm

qL2m

----- -----------

8--------- ------

8-- ---- ---- ---------------

q

12--------- --------

12------- -----------

M

QL2

--------(1ndash )L2a------

QL4

-------- 2

QL4

--------(1ndash 3 8)m

QL4

--------(1ndash

qL8

8

-------- (1ndash2

2

qL8

-------- (12

8-- -------- ---- --

1ndash(2 ) aL

2)m

4)m

ndash 3)m2

175 +105 m+ 03m2

25

ndash1 le m le 0606 le m le 1

0 le m le 0909 le m le 1

0 le m le 0707 le m le 1

0 le m le 075075le m le 1

0 le m le1

0 le 2aL le 1

0 le 2aL le 1

10 + 035(1ndash2aL)2

135 + 04(2aL)2

135 + 015mndash12 + 30m

113 + 010mndash125 + 35m

113 + 012mndash238 + 48m

135 + 036m

Figure 67 Moment modification factors for simply supported beams

produce more nearly constant distributions of major axis bending moment andthat the worst case is that of equal and opposite end moments for which αm = 10

For other beam loadings than those shown in Figure 67 the momentmodification factor αm may be approximated by using

αm = 175Mmaxradic(M 2

2 + M 23 + M 2

4 )le 25 (613)

in which Mmax is the maximum moment M2 M4 are the moments at the quarterpoints and M3 is the moment at the mid-point of the beam

The effect of load height on the elastic buckling moment Mcr may generallybe approximated by using equation 611 with αm obtained from Figure 67 orequation 613

622 Bending and twisting of crooked beams

Real beams are not perfectly straight but have small initial crookednesses andtwists which cause them to bend and twist at the beginning of loading If a simplysupported beam with equal and opposite end moments M has an initial crookednessand twist rotation which are given by

v0

δ0= φ0

θ0= sin

πx

L (614)

Lateral buckling of beams 235

in which the central initial crookedness δ0 and twist rotation θ0 are related by

δ0

θ0= Mzx

π2EIzL2 (615)

then the deformations of the beam are given by

v

δ= φ

θ= sin

πx

L (616)

in which

δ

δ0= θ

θ0= MMzx

1 minus MMzx (617)

as shown in Section 6122 The variations of the dimensionless central deflectionδδ0 and twist rotation θθ0 are shown in Figure 68 and it can be seen thatdeformation begins at the commencement of loading and increases rapidly as theelastic buckling moment Mzx is approached

The simple loadndashdeformation relationships of equations 616 and 617 are ofthe same forms as those of equations 38 and 39 for compression memberswith sinusoidal initial crookedness It follows that the Southwell plot tech-nique for extrapolating the elastic buckling loads of compression members fromexperimental measurements (see Section 322) may also be used for beams

Beam with initial crookedness and twist 00 = f0130 = sin xL

0 f0 = Mzx Ncrzequation 617

Straight beam 0 = f0 = 0 equations 61 and 63

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Dimensionless deformation 0 or 13130

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t MM

zx

0 5 10 15 20 25

Figure 68 Lateral deflection and twist of a beam with equal end moments

236 Lateral buckling of beams

As the deformations increase with the applied moments M so do the stresses Itis shown in Section 6122 that the limiting moment ML at which a beam withoutresidual stresses first yields is given by

ML

My= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(618)

in which

Φ = (1 + η + λ2)2 (619)

λ = radic(MyMzx) (620)

is a generalised slenderness My = Welyfy is the nominal first yield moment andη is a factor defining the imperfection magnitudes when the central crookednessδ0 is given by

δ0Ncrz

Mzx= θ0 = WelzWely

1 + (df 2) (NcrzMzx)η (621)

in which Ncrz is given by equation 612 Equations 618ndash620 are similar toequations 311 312 and 35 for the limiting axial force at first yield of a

ndash

==

zx

zcrfzx

crz

M

Nd

WWM

N

0

0

21

)(Generalised slenderness =

0 05 10 15 20 25

Yielding due to major axis bending alone

First yield MLMy due to initial crookedness and twist

Elastic buckling MzxMy

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t Mzx

My

or M

LM

y

My Mcr

13 elyelz

( )

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Figure 69 Buckling and yielding of beams

Lateral buckling of beams 237

compression member The variation of the dimensionless limiting moment MLMy

for η = λ24 is shown in Figure 69 in which λ = radic

(MyMzx) plotted along thehorizontal axis is equivalent to the generalised slenderness ratio used in Figure 34for an elastic compression member Figure 69 shows that the limiting momentsof short beams approach the yield moment My while for long beams the limitingmoments approach the elastic buckling moment Mzx

63 Inelastic beams

The solution for the buckling moment Mzx of a perfectly straight simply sup-ported I-beam with equal end moments given by equations 62 and 63 is onlyvalid while the beam remains elastic In a short-span beam yielding occursbefore the ultimate moment is reached and significant portions of the beamsare inelastic when buckling commences The effective rigidities of these inelasticportions are reduced by yielding and consequently the buckling moment is alsoreduced

For beams with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) the distributionof yield across the section does not vary along the beam and when there are noresidual stresses the inelastic buckling moment can be calculated from a modifiedform of equation 63 as

MI =radic[

π2(EIz)t

L2

] [(GIt)t + π2(EIw)t

L2

](622)

in which the subscripted quantities ( )t are the reduced inelastic rigidities whichare effective at buckling Estimates of these rigidities can be obtained by usingthe tangent moduli of elasticity (see Section 331) which are appropriate to thevarying stress levels throughout the section Thus the values of E and G are usedin the elastic areas while the strain-hardening moduli Est and Gst are used inthe yielded and strain-hardened areas (see Section 334) When the effectiverigidities calculated in this way are used in equation 622 a lower bound esti-mate of the buckling moment is determined (Section 333) The variation of thedimensionless buckling moment MMy with the geometrical slenderness ratioLiz of a typical rolled-steel section which has been stress-relieved is shown inFigure 62 In the inelastic range the buckling moment increases almost linearlywith decreasing slenderness from the first yield moment My = Welyfy to thefull plastic moment Mp = Wplyfy which is reached soon after the flanges arefully yielded beyond which buckling is controlled by the strain-hardening moduliEst Gst

The inelastic buckling moment of a beam with residual stresses can be obtainedin a similar manner except that the pattern of yielding is not symmetrical about thesection major axis so that a modified form of equation 676 for a monosymmetricI-beam must be used instead of equation 622 The inelastic buckling momentvaries markedly with both the magnitude and the distribution of the residual

238 Lateral buckling of beams

stresses The moment at which inelastic buckling initiates depends mainly onthe magnitude of the residual compressive stresses at the compression flange tipswhere yielding causes significant reductions in the effective rigidities (EIz)t and(EIw)t The flange-tip residual stresses are comparatively high in hot-rolled beamsespecially those with high ratios of flange to web area and so the inelastic bucklingis initiated comparatively early in these beams as shown in Figure 62 The resid-ual stresses in hot-rolled beams decrease away from the flange tips (see Figure 39for example) and so the extent of yielding increases and the effective rigiditiessteadily decrease as the applied moment increases Because of this the inelasticbuckling moment decreases in an approximately linear fashion as the slendernessincreases as shown in Figure 62

In beams fabricated by welding flange plates to web plates the compressiveresidual stresses at the flange tips which increase with the welding heat input areusually somewhat smaller than those in hot-rolled beams and so the initiation ofinelastic buckling is delayed as shown in Figure 62 However the variations ofthe residual stresses across the flanges are more nearly uniform in welded beamsand so once flange yielding is initiated it spreads quickly through the flange withlittle increase in moment This causes large reductions in the inelastic bucklingmoments of stocky beams as indicated in Figure 62

When a beam has a more general loading than that of equal and opposite endmoments the in-plane bending moment varies along the beam and so whenyielding occurs its distribution also varies Because of this the beam acts as ifnon-uniform and the torsion equilibrium equation becomes more complicatedNevertheless numerical solutions have been obtained for some hot-rolled beamswith a number of different loading arrangements [19 20] and some of these(for unequal end moments M and βmM ) are shown in Figure 610 together withapproximate solutions given by

MI

Mp= 07 + 03(1 minus 07MpMcr)

(061 minus 03βm + 007β2m)

(623)

in which Mcr is given by equations 64 and 65In this equation the effects of the bending moment distribution are included

in both the elastic buckling resistance Mcr = αmMzx through the use of the endmoment ratio βm in the moment modification factor αm and also through the directuse of βm in equation 623 This latter use causes the inelastic buckling momentsMI to approach the elastic buckling moment Mcr as the end moment ratio increasestowards βm = 1

The most severe case is that of equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) forwhich yielding is constant along the beam so that the resistance to lateral bucklingis reduced everywhere Less severe cases are those of beams with unequal endmoments M andβmM withβm gt 0 where yielding is confined to short regions nearthe supports for which the reductions in the section properties are comparativelyunimportant The least severe case is that of equal end moments that bend the beam

Lateral buckling of beams 239

Elastic buckling Mcr

= 10 05 0 05 10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t MIM

p

11

10

09

08

07

06

05

m = 10 05 0 05 10

L MM

Computer solution (254 UB 31) Approximate equation 623

Full plasticity Mp

Generalised slenderness ( MpMcr)

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

m

m

Figure 610 Inelastic buckling of beams with unequal end moments

in double curvature (βm = 1) for which the moment gradient is steepest and theregions of yielding are most limited

The range of modified slenderness radic(MpMcr) for which a beam can reach

the full plastic moment Mp depends very much on the loading arrangement Anapproximate expression for the limit of this range for beams with end momentsM and βmM can be obtained from equation 623 asradic(

Mp

Mcr

)p

=radic(

039 + 030βm minus 007β2m

070

) (624)

In the case of a simply supported beam with an unbraced central concen-trated load yielding is confined to a small central portion of the beam sothat any reductions in the section properties are limited to this region Inelas-tic buckling can be approximated by using equation 623 with βm = minus07 andαm = 135

64 Real beams

Real beams differ from the ideal beams analysed in Section 621 in much thesame way as do real compression members (see Section 341) Thus any smallimperfections such as initial crookedness twist eccentricity of load or horizon-tal load components cause the beam to behave as if it had an equivalent initialcrookedness and twist (see Section 622) as shown by curve A in Figure 611On the other hand imperfections such as residual stresses or variations in material

240 Lateral buckling of beams

Curve C ndash real beams

Curve B ndash equivalentresidual stresses

Curve A ndash equivalent initialcrookedness and twist

Elastic limit

Elastic bendingand twisting

Inelastic buckling

Elastic buckling

MultMI

ML

Mcr

Lateral deflection and twist

Moment

Figure 611 Behaviour of real beams

properties cause the beam to behave as shown by curve B in Figure 611 Thebehaviour of real beams having both types of imperfection is indicated by curve Cin Figure 611 which shows a transition from the elastic behaviour of a beam withcurvature and twist to the inelastic post-buckling behaviour of a beam with residualstresses

65 Design against lateral buckling

651 General

It is possible to develop a refined analysis of the behaviour of real beams whichincludes the effects of all types of imperfection However the use of such ananalysis is not warranted because the magnitudes of the imperfections are uncer-tain Instead design rules are often based on a simple analysis for one type ofequivalent imperfection which allows approximately for all imperfections or onapproximations of experimental results such as those shown in Figure 612

For the EC3 method of designing against lateral buckling the maximum momentin the beam at elastic lateral buckling Mcr and the beam section resistance Wyfyare used to define a generalised slenderness

λLT =radic(WyfyMcr) (625)

Lateral buckling of beams 241

EC3 welded I-sections (hbf gt 2)

EC3 rolled I-sections (hbf gt 2)

Full plasticity MpElastic buckling Mcr

L

M M

QQ

Q

L4

L4

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

ts M

bR

d M

p or

Mul

tMp

15

10

05

00 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness )( crpLT MM=

159 hot-rolled beams

Figure 612 Moment resistances of beams in near-uniform bending

and this is used in a modification of the first yield equation 618 which approximatesthe experimental resistances of many beams in near-uniform bending such as thoseshown in Figure 612

652 Elastic buckling moment

The EC3 method for designing against lateral buckling is an example of a moregeneral approach to the analysis and the design of structures whose strengths aregoverned by the interaction between yielding and buckling Another example ofthis approach was developed in Section 37 in which the relationship between theultimate strength of a simply supported uniform member in uniform compressionand its squash and elastic buckling loads was used to determine the in-plane ulti-mate strengths of other compression members This method has been called themethod of design by buckling analysis because the maximum moment at elasticbuckling Mcr must be used rather than the approximations of somewhat variableaccuracy which have been used in the past

The first step in the method of design by buckling analysis is to determine theload at which the elastic lateral buckling takes place so that the elastic bucklingmoment Mcr can be calculated This varies with the beam geometry its loadingand its restraints but unfortunately there is no simple general method of finding it

However there are a number of general computer programs which can be usedfor finding Mcr [6 8 10 21ndash23] including the user-friendly computer programPRFELB [18] which can calculate the elastic buckling moment for any beam orcantilever under any loading or restraint conditions While such programs have

242 Lateral buckling of beams

S

B

B

B

B

C

O

O

O

In-plane support

Fixed end

Out-of-plane brace

Buckled shape

Braced

Cantilevered

Overhung

Simply supported

B

C

O

S

Figure 613 Beams cantilevers and overhanging beams

not been widely used in the past it is expected that the use of EC3 will result intheir much greater application

Alternatively many approximations for the elastic buckling moments Mcr undera wide range of loading conditions are given in [16] Later sections summarisethe methods of obtaining Mcr for restrained beams cantilevers and overhangingbeams braced and continuous beams (Figure 613) rigid frames and monosym-metric and non-uniform beams under common loading conditions which causebending about an axis of symmetry

653 EC3 design buckling moment resistances

The EC3 design buckling moment resistance MbRd is defined by

MbRdγM1

Wyfy= 1

ΦLT +radicΦ2

LT minus βλ2LT

(626)

and

ΦLT = 05

1 + αLT (λLT minus λLT 0)+ βλ2LT

(627)

in which γM1 is the partial factor for member instability which has a recommendedvalue of 10 in EC3 Wyfy is the section moment resistance λLT is the modifiedslenderness given by equation 625 and the values of αLT β and λLT 0 depend onthe type of beam section Equations 625ndash627 are similar to equations 620 618and 619 for the first yield of a beam with initial crookedness and twist exceptthat the section moment resistance Wyfy replaces the yield moment My the termαLT (λLT minus λLT 0) replaces η and the term β is introduced

Lateral buckling of beams 243

The EC3 uniform bending design buckling resistances MbRd for β = 075λLT 0 = 04 and αLT = 049 (rolled I-sections with hb gt 2) are compared withexperimental results for beams in near-uniform bending in Figure 612 For veryslender beams with high values of the modified slenderness λLT the design buck-ling moment resistance MbRd shown in Figure 612 approaches the elastic bucklingmoment Mcr while for stocky beams the moment resistance MbRd reaches thesection resistance Wyfy and so is governed by yielding or local buckling asdiscussed in Section 472 For beams of intermediate slenderness equations 625ndash627 provide a transition between these limits which is close to the lower boundof the experimental results shown in Figure 612 Also shown in Figure 612 arethe EC3 design buckling moment resistances for αLT = 076 (welded I-sectionswith hb gt 2)

The EC3 provides two methods of design a simple but conservative methodwhich may be applied to any type of beam section and a less conservative limitedmethod

For the simple general method β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 and the imperfectionfactor αLT depends on the type of beam section as set out in Tables 64 and 63 ofEC3 This method is conservative because it uses a very low threshold modifiedslenderness of λLT 0 = 02 above which the buckling resistance is reduced belowthe section resistance Wyfy and because it ignores the increased inelastic bucklingresistances of beams in non-uniform bending shown for example in Figure 610

For the less conservative limited method for uniform beams of rolled I-sectionβ = 075 and λLT 0 = 04 and a modified design buckling moment resistance

MbRdmod = MbRdf le MbRd (628)

is determined using

f = 1 minus 05(1 minus kc)1 minus 2(λLT minus 08)2 (629)

in which the values of the correction factor kc depend on the bending momentdistribution and are given by

kc = 1radic

C1 = 1radicαm (630)

in which αm is the moment modification factor obtained from Figure 67 orequation 65 66 or 613 The EC3 design buckling moment resistances MbRdmod

for β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 and αLT = 049 (rolled I-sections with hb gt 2) arecompared with the inelastic buckling moment approximations of equation 623 inFigure 614

654 Lateral buckling design procedures

For the EC3 strength design of a beam against lateral buckling the distribution ofthe bending moment and the value of the maximum moment MEd are determined

244 Lateral buckling of beams

10

08

06

04

02

0

m =

Section resistance Wy fy

M mM Elastic buckling Mcr

Inelastic buckling approximationfor MI (equation 623)

EC3 moment resistance MbRdmod Wy fy(equations 628 29)

Generalised slenderness (Wy fyMcr)

m = 10 05 0 10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t Mb

Rd

mod

Wy

f y o

r M

IWy

f y

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

ndash

ndash

ndash05ndash10 0 10

Figure 614 EC3 design buckling moment resistances

by an elastic analysis (if the beam is statically indeterminate) or by statics (ifthe beam is statically determinate) The strength design loads are obtained bysumming the nominal loads multiplied by the appropriate partial load factors γF

(see Section 156)In both the EC3 simple general and less conservative methods of checking a

uniform equal-flanged beam the section moment resistance WyfyγM0 is checkedfirst the elastic buckling moment Mcr is determined and the modified slendernessλLT is calculated using equation 625 The appropriate EC3 values of αLT βand λLT 0 (the values of these differ according to which of the two methods ofdesign is used) are then selected and the design buckling moment resistance MbRd

calculated using equations 626 and 627 In the simple general method the beamis satisfactory when

MEd le MbRd le WyfyγM0 (631)

In the less conservative method MbRd in equation 631 is replaced by MbRdmod

obtained using equations 628ndash630The beam must also be checked for shear shear and bending and bearing

as discussed in Sections 5615ndash5617 and for serviceability as discussed inSection 57

When a beam is to be designed the beam section is not known and so a trialsection must be chosen An iterative process is then used in which the trial sectionis evaluated and a new trial section chosen until a satisfactory section is found

Lateral buckling of beams 245

One method of finding a first-trial section is to make initial guesses for fy (usuallythe nominal value) and MbRdWyfy (say 05) to use these to calculate a targetsection plastic modulus

Wply ge MEd fyMbRd(Wyfy)

(632)

and then to select a suitable trial sectionAfter the trial section has been selected its elastic buckling moment Mcr yield

stress fy and design moment resistance MbRd can be found and used to calculate anew value of Wply and to select a new trial section The iterative process usuallyconverges within a few cycles but convergence can be hastened by using the meanof the previous and current values of MbRdWyfy in the calculation of the targetsection modulus

Worked examples of checking and designing beams against lateral bucklingare given in Sections 6151ndash6157

655 Checking beams supported at both ends

6551 Section moment resistance

The classification of a specified beam cross-section as Class 1 2 3 or 4 is describedin Sections 472 and 5612 and the determination of the design section momentresistance McRd = WyfyγM0 in Sections 472 and 5613

6552 Elastic buckling moment

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supported beam depends onits geometry loading and restraints It may be obtained by calculating Mzx

(equation 63) Ncrz (equation 612) and αm (equation 613) and substitutingthese into equation 611 or by using a computer program such as those referredto in Section 652

6553 Design buckling moment resistance

The design buckling moment resistance MbRd can be obtained as described inSection 653

66 Restrained beams

661 Simple supports and rigid restraints

In the previous sections it was assumed that the beam was supported laterally onlyat its ends When a beam with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus10) has

246 Lateral buckling of beams

an additional rigid restraint at its centre which prevents lateral deflection and twistrotation then its buckled shape is given by

φ

(φ)L4= v

(v)L4= sin

π x

L2 (633)

and its elastic buckling moment is given by

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

(L2)2

) (GIt + π2EIw

(L2)2

) (634)

The end supports of a beam may also differ from simple supports For exampleboth ends of the beam may be rigidly built-in against lateral rotation about the minoraxis and against end warping If the beam has equal and opposite end momentsthen its buckled shape is given by

φ

(φ)L2= v

(v)L2= 1

2

(1 minus cos

π x

L2

) (635)

and its elastic buckling moment is given by equation 634In general the elastic buckling moment Mcr of a restrained beam with equal

and opposite end moments (βm = minus10) can be expressed as

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

) (636)

in which

Lcr = kcrL (637)

is the effective length and kcr is an effective length factorWhen a beam has several rigid restraints which prevent local lateral deflection

and twist rotation then the beam is divided into a series of segments The elasticbuckling of each segment may be approximated by using its length as the effectivelength Lcr One segment will be the most critical and the elastic buckling momentof this segment will provide a conservative estimate of the elastic buckling resis-tance of the whole beam This method ignores the interactions between adjacentsegments which increase the elastic buckling resistance of the beam Approximatemethods of allowing for these interactions are given in Section 68

The use of the effective length concept can be extended to beams with loadingconditions other than equal and opposite end moments In general the maximummoment Mcr at elastic buckling depends on the beam section its loading and itsrestraints so that

McrLradic(EIzGIt)

= fn

(π2EIw

GItL2 loading

2zQ

df restraints

) (638)

A partial separation of the effect of the loading from that of the restraintconditions may be achieved for beams with centroidal loading (zQ = 0) by

Lateral buckling of beams 247

approximating the maximum moment Mcr at elastic buckling by using

Mcr = αm

radic(π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

) (639)

for which it is assumed that the factor αm depends only on the in-plane bend-ing moment distribution and that the effective length Lcr depends only on therestraint conditions This approximation allows the αm factors calculated for sim-ply supported beams (see Section 621) and the effective lengths Lcr determinedfor restrained beams with equal and opposite end moments (αm = 1) to be usedmore generally

Unfortunately the form of equation 639 is not suitable for beams with loadsacting away from the centroid It has been suggested that approximate solutionsfor Mcr may be obtained by using equation 611 with Lcr substituted for L inequations 63 and 612 but it has been reported [16] that predictions obtained inthis way are sometimes of somewhat variable accuracy

662 Intermediate restraints

In the previous sub-section it was shown that the elastic buckling moment of asimply supported I-beam is substantially increased when a restraint is providedwhich prevents the centre of the beam from deflecting laterally and twisting Thisrestraint need not be completely rigid but may be elastic provided its translationaland rotational stiffnesses exceed certain minimum values

The case of the beam with equal and opposite end moments M shown inFigure 615a is analysed in [24] This beam has a central translational restraint ofstiffnessαt (whereαt is the ratio of the lateral force exerted by the restraint to the lat-eral deflection of the beam measured at the height zt of the restraint) and a centraltorsional restraint of stiffness αr (where αr is the ratio of the torque exerted by therestraint to the twist rotation of the beam) It is shown in [24] that the elastic buck-ling moment Mcr can be expressed in the standard form of equation 639 when thestiffnessesαt αr are related to each other and the effective length factor kcr through

αtL3

16EIz

(1 + 2ztdf

2zcdf

)=

2kcr

)3cot π

2kcr

π2kcr

cot π2kcr

minus 1 (640)

αrL3

16EIw

(1 minus 2zt2zc

df df

)=

2kcr

)3cot π

2kcr

π2kcr

cot π2kcr

minus 1 (641)

in which

zc = Mcr

π2EIz(kcrL)2= df

2radic(1 + k2

crK2) (642)

and K = radic(π2EIwGItL2)

248 Lateral buckling of beams

0 5 10 15 20 25

x

y

z

Mcr

Mcr

rfL2ndashzt

t( ndash ztf)L2

(a) Beam

Axis of buckled beam

Second mode buckling

Beam with equal and opposite end moments

Braced first mode buckling

30

25

20

15

10

05

0

Rec

ipro

cal o

f ef

fect

ive

leng

th f

acto

r 1

k cr

Translational restraint stiffness

Rotational restraint stiffness

(b) Effective length factors

+

fdcz

fd

fdfd

tzLr

zEI

Lt

22

cztz 22

13

116

wEI16

3

fL2

L2

2

ndash

)()(

Figure 615 Beam with elastic intermediate restraints

These relationships are shown graphically in Figure 615b and are similar tothat shown in Figure 316c for compression members with intermediate restraintsIt can be seen that the effective length factor kcr varies from 1 when the restraintsare of zero stiffness to 05 when

αtL3

16EIz

(1 + 2ztdf

2zcdf

)= αrL3

16EIw

(1 minus 2zt

df

2zc

df

)= π2 (643)

If the restraint stiffnesses exceed these values the beam buckles in the secondmode with zero central deflection and twist at a moment which corresponds tokcr = 05 When the height minuszt of the translational restraint above the centroidis equal to minusd2

f 4zc the required rotational stiffness αr given by equation 643is zero Since zc is never less than df 2 (see equation 642) it follows that a topflange translational restraint of stiffness

αL = 16π2EIzL3

1 + df 2zc(644)

is always sufficient to brace the beam into the second mode This minimum stiffnesscan be expressed as

αL = 8Mcr

L df

1

1 + radic(1 + 4K2) (645)

Lateral buckling of beams 249

Shear diaphragm Shear diaphragmI - beam

(a) Elevation (b) Section

M M

L

Figure 616 Diaphragm-braced I-beams

and the greatest value of this is

αL = 4Mcr

L df (646)

The flange force Qf at elastic buckling can be approximated by

Qf = Mcrdf (647)

and so the minimum top-flange translational stiffness can be approximated by

αL = 4Qf L (648)

This is of the same form as equation 333 for the minimum stiffness ofintermediate restraints for compression members

There are no restraint stiffness requirements in EC3 This follows the finding[25 26] that compression member restraints which are capable of transmitting25 of the force in the compression member invariably are stiff enough to ensurethe second mode buckling Thus EC3 generally requires any restraining elementat a plastic hinge location to be capable of transmitting 25 of the flange forcein the beam being restrained

The influence of intermediate restraints on beams with central concentrated anduniformly distributed loads has also been studied and many values of the minimumrestraint stiffnesses required to cause the beams to buckle as if rigidly braced havebeen determined [16 24 27ndash30]

The effects of diaphragm bracing on the lateral buckling of simply supportedbeams with equal and opposite end moments (see Figure 616) have also beeninvestigated [16 31 32] and a simple method of determining whether a diaphragmis capable of providing full bracing has been developed [31]

250 Lateral buckling of beams

663 Elastic end restraints

6631 General

When a beam forms part of a rigid-jointed structure the adjacent memberselastically restrain the ends of the beam (ie they induce restraining momentswhich are proportional to the end rotations) These restraining actions significantlymodify the elastic buckling moment of the beam Four different types of restrainingmoment may act at each end of a beam as shown in Figure 617 They are

(a) the major axis end moment M which provides restraint about the major axis(b) the bottom flange end moment MB and(c) the top flange end moment MT which provide restraints about the minor axis

and against end warping and(d) the axial torque T0 which provides restraint against end twisting

6632 Major axis end moments

The major axis end restraining moments M vary directly with the applied loadsand can be determined by a conventional in-plane bending analysis The degree ofrestraint experienced at one end of the beam depends on the major axis stiffness αy

of the adjacent member (which is defined as the ratio of the end moment to the endrotation) This may be expressed by the ratio R1 of the actual restraining moment tothe maximum moment required to prevent major axis end rotation Thus R1 variesfrom 0 when there is no restraining moment to 1 when there is no end rotationFor beams which are symmetrically loaded and restrained the restraint parameter

MB

MT

T0 df M

z

y

x

Figure 617 End-restraining moments

Lateral buckling of beams 251

R1 is related to the stiffness αy of each adjacent member by

αy = EIy

L

2R1

1 minus R1 (649)

Although the major axis end moments are independent of the buckling deforma-tions they do affect the buckling load of the beam because of their effect on thein-plane bending moment distribution (see Section 6214) Many particular caseshave been studied and tabulations of buckling loads are available [5 12 1333ndash35]

6633 Minor axis end restraints

On the other hand the flange end moments MB and MT remain zero until thebuckling load of the beam is reached and then increase in proportion to the flangeend rotations Again the degree of end restraint can be expressed by the ratio of theactual restraining moment to the maximum value required to prevent end rotationThus the minor axis end restraint parameter R2 (which describes the relativemagnitude of the restraining moment MB + MT ) varies between 0 and 1 and theend warping restraint parameter R4 (which describes the relative magnitude of thedifferential flange end moments (MT minusMB)2) varies from 0 when the ends are freeto warp to 1 when end warping is prevented The particular case of symmetricallyrestrained beams with equal and opposite end moments (Figure 618) is analysed inSection 6131 It is assumed for this that the minor axis and end warping restraintstake the form of equal rotational restraints which act at each flange end and whose

Eff

ecti

ve le

ngth

fac

tors

kcr

L

M M

MB+ MT MB + MTx

v

10

05

00 02 04 06 08 10

(c) Effective length factors

Restraint parameter R

(b) Plan on centroidal axis

(a) Elevation

Figure 618 Elastic buckling of end-restrained beams

252 Lateral buckling of beams

stiffnesses are such that

Flange end moment

Flange end rotation= minusEIz

L

R

1 minus R (650)

in which case

R2 = R4 = R (651)

It is shown in Section 6131 that the moment Mcr at which the restrained beambuckles elastically is given by equations 636 and 637 when the effective lengthfactor kcr is the solution of

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (652)

It can be seen from the solutions of this equation shown in Figure 618c thatthe effective length factor kcr decreases from 1 to 05 as the restraint parameter Rincreases from 0 to 1 These solutions are exactly the same as those obtained fromthe compression member effective length chart of Figure 321a when

k1 = k2 = 1 minus R

1 minus 05R (653)

which suggests that the effective length factors kcr for beams with unequal endrestraints may be approximated by using the values given by Figure 321a

The elastic buckling of symmetrically restrained beams with unequal endmoments has also been analysed [36] while solutions have been obtained formany other minor axis and end warping restraint conditions [16 27 32ndash34]

6634 Torsional end restraints

The end torques T0 which resist end twist rotations also remain zero until elasticbuckling occurs and then increase with the end twist rotations It has been assumedthat the ends of all the beams discussed so far are rigidly restrained against endtwist rotations When the end restraints are elastic instead of rigid some end twistrotation occurs during buckling and the elastic buckling load is reduced Analyticalstudies [21] of beams in uniform bending with elastic torsional end restraints haveshown that the reduced buckling moment Mzxr can be approximated by

Mzxr

Mzx=

radic1

(49 + 45 K2)R3 + 1

(654)

in which 1R3 is the dimensionless stiffness of the torsional end restraints given by

1

R3= αxL

GIt(655)

in which αx is the ratio of the restraining torque T0 to the end twist rotation(φ)0 Reductions for other loading conditions can be determined from the elastic

Lateral buckling of beams 253

Top flange unrestrained

Bottom flange prevented from twisting

Figure 619 End distortion of a beam with an unrestrained top flange

buckling solutions in [16 34 37] or by using a computer program [18] to carryout an elastic buckling analysis

Another situation for which end twist rotation is not prevented is illustrated inFigure 619 where the bottom flange of a beam is simply supported at its endand prevented from twisting but the top flange is unrestrained In this case beambuckling may be accentuated by distortion of the cross-section which results in theweb bending shown in Figure 619 Studies of the distortional buckling [38ndash40] ofbeams such as that shown in Figure 619 have suggested that the reduction in thebuckling capacity can be allowed for approximately by using an effective lengthfactor

kcr = 1 + (df 6L

) (tf tw

)3 (1 + bf df

)2 (656)

in which tf and tw are the flange and web thicknesses and bf is the flange widthThe preceding discussion has dealt with the effects of each type of end restraint

but most beams in rigid-jointed structures have all types of elastic restraint actingsimultaneously Many such cases of combined restraints have been analysed andtabular graphical or approximate solutions are given in [12 16 33 35 41]

67 Cantilevers and overhanging beams

671 Cantilevers

The support conditions of cantilevers differ from those of beams in that a cantileveris usually assumed to be completely fixed at one end (so that lateral deflectionlateral rotation and warping are prevented) and completely free (to deflect rotateand warp) at the other The elastic buckling solution for such a cantilever in uniformbending caused by an end moment M which rotatesφL with the end of the cantilever[16] can be obtained from the solution given by equations 62 and 63 for simply

254 Lateral buckling of beams

supported beams by replacing the beam length L by twice the cantilever length 2Lwhence

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

4L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

4L2

) (657)

This procedure is similar to the effective length method used to obtain thebuckling load of a cantilever column (see Figure 315e) This loading condition isvery unusual and probably never occurs and so the solution of equation 657 hasno practical relevance

Cantilevers with other loading conditions are not so easily analysed but numer-ical solutions are available [16 37 42 43] The particular case of a cantileverwith an end concentrated load Q is discussed in Section 61214 and plots ofthe dimensionless elastic buckling moments QL2

radic(EIzGIt) for bottom flange

centroidal and top flange loading are given in Figure 620 together with plotsof the dimensionless elastic buckling moments (qL32)

radic(EIzGIt) of cantilevers

with uniformly distributed loads qMore accurate approximations may be obtained by using

QL2

radic(EIzGIt)

= 11

1 + 12εradic

(1 + 122ε2)

+ 4(K minus 2)

1 + 12(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 122(ε minus 01)2)

(658)

Bottom flange loading Centroidal loading Top flange loading

L

L

Qq

60

40

20

0 0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Cantilever parameter K = (2EIwGItL2)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

sQ

L2

(EI z

GI t)

or

(qL

3 2)

(E

I zG

I t)

Figure 620 Elastic buckling loads of cantilevers

Lateral buckling of beams 255

or

qL3

2radic(EIzGIt)

= 27

1 + 14(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 142(ε minus 01)2)

+ 10(K minus 2)

1 + 13(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 132(ε minus 01)2)

(659)

Cantilevers which have restraints at the unsupported end which prevent lateraldeflection and twist rotation (Figure 613) may be treated as beams which aresupported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

Intermediate restraints which prevent lateral deflection and twist rotation dividea cantilever into segments (Figure 613) The elastic buckling of each segmentcan be approximated by assuming that there are no interactions between adjacentsegments The segment with the free end can then be treated as an overhangingbeam as in Section 672 following while the interior segments may be treated asbeams supported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

672 Overhanging beams

Overhanging beams are similar to cantilevers in that they are free to deflect rotateand warp at one end (Figure 613) However lateral rotation and warping are notcompletely prevented at the supported end but are elastically restrained by thecontinuity of the overhanging beam with its continuation beyond the support Thebuckling moments of some examples are reported in [16 37]

It is usually very difficult to predict the degrees of lateral rotation and warpingrestraint in which case they should be assumed to be zero The elastic buck-ling moments of such overhanging beams with either concentrated end load oruniformly distributed load can be predicted by using [16]

QL2

radic(EIzGIt)

= 6

1 + 15(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 152(ε minus 01)2)

+ 15(K minus 2)

1 + 3(ε minus 03)radic

(1 + 32(ε minus 03)2)

(660)

or

qL3

2radic(EIzGIt)

= 15

1 + 18(ε minus 03)radic

(1 + 182(ε minus 03)2)

+ 40(K minus 2)

1 + 28(ε minus 04)radic

(1 + 282(ε minus 04)2)

(661)

256 Lateral buckling of beams

Overhanging beams which have restraints at the unsupported end which preventlateral deflection and twist rotation (Figure 613) may be treated as beams whichare supported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

Intermediate restraints which prevent lateral deflection and twist rotation dividean overhanging beam into segments (Figure 613) The elastic buckling of eachsegment can be approximated by assuming that there are no interactions betweenadjacent segments The segment with the free end is an overhanging beam whilethe interior segments may be treated as beams supported laterally at both ends asin Section 66

68 Braced and continuous beams

Perhaps the simplest types of rigid-jointed structure are the braced beam and thecontinuous beam (Figure 613) which can be regarded as a series of segmentswhich are rigidly connected together at points where lateral deflection and twistare prevented In general the interaction between the segments during bucklingdepends on the loading pattern for the whole beam and so also do the magnitudesof the buckling loads This behaviour is similar to the in-plane buckling behaviourof rigid frames discussed in Section 8353

681 Beams with only one segment loaded

When only one segment of a braced or continuous beam is loaded its elasticbuckling load may be evaluated approximately when tabulations for segmentswith elastic end restraints are available [12 33 35] To do this it is first necessaryto determine the end restraint parameters R1 R2 R4 (R3 = 0 because it is assumedthat twisting is prevented at the supports and brace points) from the stiffnesses ofthe adjacent unloaded segments For example when only the centre span of thesymmetrical three span continuous beam shown in Figure 621a is loaded (Q1 = 0)then the end spans provide elastic restraints which depend on their stiffnesses Byanalysing the major axis bending minor axis bending and differential flangebending of the end spans it can be shown [34] that

R1 = R2 = R4 = 1

1 + 2L13L2(662)

approximately With these values the elastic buckling load for the centre span canbe determined from the tabulations in [33 35] Some elastic buckling loads (forbeams of narrow rectangular section for which K = 0) determined in this way areshown in a non-dimensional form in Figure 622

A similar procedure can be followed when only the outer spans of the symmetri-cal three span continuous beam shown in Figure 621 are loaded (Q2 = 0) In this

Lateral buckling of beams 257

L1 L2 L1

Q1 Q2 Q1

(a) Elevation

Points of inflection

Points of inflection

(b) Mode1 Q2 = 0

(c) Mode 2 Q1 = 0

(d) Mode 3 zero interaction

Figure 621 Buckling modes for a symmetrical three span continuous beam

0 02 04 06 08 10 08 06 04 02 0

(a) Three span beam

L1L2L1

Q2 Q1Q1

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

QL

2 (

EI z

GI t)60

50

40

30

20

10

L1L2 Span ratios L2L1

(b) Significant buckling loads

Q2L22 (EIzGIt) for zero interaction 3

Q2L22 (EIzGIt) for span L1 unloaded 2

(2EIwGItL2) = 0

Q1L12 (EIzGIt)

for zero interaction 3

Q1L12 (EIzGIt) for span L2 unloaded 1

=K

Figure 622 Significant buckling loads of symmetrical three span beams

case the restraint parameters [12] are given by

R1 = R2 = R4 = 1

1 + 3L22L1(663)

approximately Some dimensionless buckling loads (for beams of narrow rectan-gular section) determined by using these restraint parameters in the tabulations of

258 Lateral buckling of beams

60

50

40

30

20

10

0L1

Zerointeraction

Q2

L1L2

Q1 Q1

Dimensionless buckling load

L2L1 = 02

0 10 20 30 40

L2L1 = 1

L2L1 = 5

(b) Buckling load combinations(a) Three span beam

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

Q2L

22 (E

I zG

I t)

Q1L12 (EIzGIt)(2EIwGItL

2) = 0= K

Figure 623 Elastic buckling load combinations of symmetrical three span beams

[12] are shown in Figure 622 Similar diagrams have been produced [44] for twospan beams of narrow rectangular section

682 Beams with general loading

When more than one segment of a braced or continuous beam is loaded the buck-ling loads can be determined by analysing the interaction between the segmentsThis has been done for a number of continuous beams of narrow rectangularsection [44] and the results for some symmetrical three span beams are shown inFigure 623 These indicate that as the loads Q1 on the end spans increase from zeroso does the buckling load Q2 of the centre span until a maximum value is reachedand that a similar effect occurs as the centre span load Q2 increases from zero

The results shown in Figure 623 suggest that the elastic buckling load interactiondiagram can be closely and safely approximated by drawing straight lines as shownin Figure 624 between the following three significant load combinations

1 When only the end spans are loaded (Q2 = 0) they are restrained duringbuckling by the centre span and the buckled shape has inflection points in theend spans as shown in Figure 621b In this case the buckling loads Q1 canbe determined by using R1 = R2 = R4 = 1(1 + 3L22L1) in the tabulationsof [12]

2 When only the centre span is loaded (Q1 = 0) it is restrained by the end spansand the buckled shape has inflection points in the centre span as shown in

Lateral buckling of beams 259

(2) Spans 1 unloaded (3) Zero interaction

Straight lines(1) Span 2 unloaded

Load Q1

Loa

d Q

2

Figure 624 Straight line approximation

Figure 621c In this case the buckling load Q2 can be determined by usingR1 = R2 = R4 = 1(1 + 2L13L2) in the tabulations of [33 35]

3 Between these two extremes exists the zero interaction load combination forwhich the buckled shape has inflection points at the internal supports as shownin Figure 621d and each span buckles as if unrestrained in the buckling planeIn this case the buckling loads can be determined by using

R2 = R4 = 0 (664)

R11 = 1 + Q2L22Q1L2

1

1 + 3L22L1(665)

R12 = 1 + Q1L21Q2L2

2

1 + 2L13L2 (666)

in the tabulations of [12 33 35] Some zero interaction load combinations(for three span beams of narrow rectangular section) determined in this wayare shown in Figure 622 while other zero interaction combinations are givenin [44]

Unfortunately this comparatively simple approximate method has proved toocomplex for use in routine design possibly because the available tabulations ofelastic buckling loads are not only insufficient to cover all the required loading andrestraint conditions but also too detailed to enable them to be easily used Insteadan approximate method of analysis [45] is often used in which the effects of lateralcontinuity between adjacent segments are ignored and each segment is regardedas being simply supported laterally Thus the elastic buckling of each segment is

260 Lateral buckling of beams

analysed for its in-plane moment distribution (the moment modification factors ofequation 613 or Figure 67 may be used) and for an effective length Lcr equal tothe segment length L The so-determined elastic buckling moment of each segmentis then used to evaluate a corresponding beam load set and the lowest of theseis taken as the elastic buckling load set This method produces a lower boundestimate which is sometimes remarkably close to the true buckling load set

However this is not always the case and so a much more accurate but stillreasonably simple method has been developed [36] In this method the accuracy ofthe lower bound estimate (obtained as described above) is improved by allowing forthe interactions between the critical segment and the adjacent segments at bucklingThis is done by using a simple approximation for the destabilising effects of thein-plane bending moments on the stiffnesses of the adjacent segments and byapproximating the restraining effects of these segments on the critical segment byusing the effective length chart of Figure 321a for braced compression members toestimate the effective length of the critical beam segment A step-by-step summary[36] is as follows

(1) Determine the properties EIz GIt EIw L of each segment(2) Analyse the in-plane bending moment distribution through the beam and

determine the moment modification factors αm for each segment fromequation 613 or Figure 67

(3) Assume all effective length factors kcr are equal to unity(4) Calculate the maximum moment Mcr in each segment at elastic buckling

from

Mcr = αm

radic(π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

)(667)

with Lcr = L and the corresponding beam buckling loads Qs(5) Determine a lower-bound estimate of the beam buckling load as the lowest

value Qms of the loads Qs and identify the segment associated with this asthe critical segment 12 (This is the approximate method [45] described inthe preceding paragraph)

(6) If a more accurate estimate of the beam buckling load is required use the val-ues Qms and Qrs1 Qrs2 calculated in step 5 together with Figure 625 (whichis similar to Figure 319 for braced compression members) to approximatethe stiffnesses αr1αr2 of the segments adjacent to the critical segment 12

(7) Calculate the stiffness of the critical segment 12 from 2EIzmLm(8) Calculate the stiffness ratios k1 k2 from

k12 = 2EIzmLm

05αr1r2 + 2EIzmLm (668)

(9) Determine the effective length factor kcr for the critical segment 12 fromFigure 321a and the effective length Lcr = kcrL

Lateral buckling of beams 261

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

EI1

4

(b) Segment hinged at one end

(c) Segment fixed at one end

(a) Segment providing equal end restraints

r ndash )(

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

EI1

3r ndash )(

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

rL

EI1

2r ndash )(

Figure 625 Stiffness approximations for restraining segments

(10) Calculate the elastic buckling moment Mcr of the critical segment 12using Lcr in equation 667 and from this the corresponding improvedapproximation of the elastic buckling load Qcr of the beam

It should be noted that while the calculations for the lower bound (the first fivesteps) are made for all segments those for the improved estimate are only madefor the critical segment and so comparatively little extra effort is involved Thedevelopment and application of this method is further described in [36] The useof user-friendly computer programs such as in [18] eliminates the need for theseapproximate procedures

69 Rigid frames

Under some conditions the elastic buckling loads of rigid frames with only onemember loaded can be determined from the available tabulations [12 33 35] in asimilar manner to that described in Section 681 for braced and continuous beamsFor example consider a symmetrically loaded beam which is rigidly connected totwo equal cross-beams as shown in Figure 626a In this case the comparativelylarge major axis bending stiffnesses of the cross-beams ensure that end twistingof the loaded beam is effectively prevented and it may therefore be assumed thatR3 = 0 If the cross-beams are of open section so that their torsional stiffness iscomparatively small then it is not unduly conservative to assume that they do notrestrain the loaded beam about its major axis and so

R1 = 0 (669)

262 Lateral buckling of beams

L2

L1

Position and torsionalend restraints

(a) Beam supported by cross-beams (b) Symmetrical portal frame

L2

L1

Figure 626 Simple rigid-jointed structures

By analysing the minor axis and differential flange bending of the cross-beamsit can be shown that

R2 = R4 = 1(1 + L1Iz26L2Iz1) (670)

This result is based on the assumption that there is no likelihood of the cross-beams themselves buckling so that their effective minor axis rigidity can be takenas EIz1 With these values for the restraint parameters the elastic buckling loadcan be determined from the tabulations in [33 35]

The buckling loads of the symmetrical portal frame shown in Figure 626b canbe determined in a similar manner provided there are sufficient external restraintsto position-fix the joints of the frame The columns of portal frames of this typeare usually placed so that the plane of greatest bending stiffness is that of theframe In this case the minor axis stiffness of each column provides only a smallresistance against end twisting of the beam and this resistance is reduced by theaxial force transmitted by the column so that it may be necessary to provideadditional torsional end restraints to the beam If these additional restraints arestiff enough (and the information given in [16 34] will give some guidance) thenit may be assumed without serious error that R3 = 0 The major axis stiffness ofa pinned base column is 3EIy1L1 and of a fixed base column is 4EIy1L1 and itcan be shown by analysing the in-plane flexure of a portal frame that for pinnedbase portals

R1 = 1(1 + 2L1Iy23L2Iy1) (671)

Lateral buckling of beams 263

and for fixed base portals

R1 = 1(1 + L1Iy22L2Iy1) (672)

If the columns are of open cross-section their torsional stiffness is comparativelysmall and it is not unduly conservative to assume that the columns do not restrainthe beam element or its flanges against minor axis flexure and so

R2 = R4 = 0 (673)

Using these values of the restraint parameters the elastic buckling load can bedetermined from the tabulations in [33 35]

When more than one member of a rigid frame is loaded the buckling restraintparameters cannot be easily determined because of the interactions between mem-bers which take place during buckling The typical member of such a frame acts asa beam-column which is subjected to a combination of axial and transverse loadsand end moments The buckling behaviour of beam-columns and of rigid framesis treated in detail in Chapters 7 and 8

610 Monosymmetric beams

6101 Elastic buckling resistance

When a monosymmetric I-beam (see Figure 627) which is loaded in its plane ofsymmetry twists during buckling the longitudinal bending stresses MyzIy exert

S

C

b1 t1

b2 t2

df

z0

z

yh

twz

12

ndash2z0

4])2()2[(

]12[

])(12[)(1

)1(

)()(1

1

2)()(

12)()(

)(

2))((

2)(

22

32

41

42

2111

31

2222

32

0

123

12

2221

32122

2 211

212211

22122

21

fmw

wf

ff

y

f

m

w

wfy

w

wf

f

dtbI

ttztzd

ztbtbz

zdtbtbzd

I

zdz

ttbb

thyttth

ttthzdtbztbI

ttthtbtb

tthtthdtbz

tthd

m

ndashndashndashndash

+ndash

ndashndash

=

=

ndashndash=

+=

ndashndashndash ndash+

ndashndash+ndash+=

ndashndash++ndashndashndash+

=

minusndash=

y

+

+

Figure 627 Properties of monosymmetric sections

264 Lateral buckling of beams

a torque (see Section 614)

TM = Myβydφ

dx(674)

in which

βy = 1

Iy

intA(y2z + z3)dA minus 2z0 (675)

is the monosymmetry property of the cross-section An explicit expression for βy

for an I-section is given in Figure 627The action of the torque TM can be thought of as changing the effective torsional

rigidity of the section from GIt to (GIt + Myβy) and is related to the effect whichcauses some short concentrically loaded compression members to buckle torsion-ally (see Section 375) In that case the compressive stresses exert a disturbingtorque so that there is a reduction in the effective torsional rigidity In doubly sym-metric beams the disturbing torque exerted by the compressive bending stresses isexactly balanced by the restoring torque due to the tensile stresses and βy is zeroIn monosymmetric beams however there is an imbalance which is dominated bythe stresses in the smaller flange which is further from the shear centre Thus whenthe smaller flange is in compression there is a reduction in the effective torsionalrigidity (Myβy is negative) while the reverse is true (Myβy is positive) when thesmaller flange is in tension Consequently the resistance to buckling is increasedwhen the larger flange is in compression and decreased when the smaller flangeis in compression

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supported monosymmetric beamwith equal and opposite end moments can be obtained by substituting Mcr forMzx and the effective rigidity (GIt + Mcrβy) for GIt in equation 63 for a doublysymmetric beam and rearranging whence

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) radic

GIt + π2EIw

L2+

βy

2

radic(π2EIz

L2

)2

+βy

2

radic(π2EIz

L2

) (676)

in which the warping section constant Iw is as given in Figure 627The evaluation of the monosymmetry property βy is not straightforward and it

has been suggested that the more easily calculated parameter

ρm = IczIz (677)

Lateral buckling of beams 265

should be used instead where Icz is the section minor axis second moment ofarea of the compression flange The monosymmetry property βy may then beapproximated [46] by

βy = 09df (2ρm minus 1)(1 minus I2z I

2y ) (678)

and the warping section constant Iw by

Iw = ρm(1 minus ρm)Izd2f (679)

The variations of the dimensionless elastic buckling moment McrLradic(EIzGIt)

with the values of ρm and Km = radic(π2EIzd2

f 4GItL2) are shown in Figure 628The dimensionless buckling resistance for a T-beam with the flange in compression(ρm = 10) is significantly higher than for an equal flanged I-beam (ρm = 05)with the same value of Km but the resistance is greatly reduced for a T-beam withthe flange in tension (ρm = 00)

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of simply supported monosymmetricbeams with other loading conditions has been investigated numerically and tabu-lated solutions and approximating equations are available [5 13 16 42 47ndash49]for beams under moment gradient or with central concentrated loads or uni-formly distributed loads Solutions are also available [16 42 50] for cantileverswith concentrated end loads or uniformly distributed loads These solutions canbe used to find the maximum moment Mcr in the beam or cantilever at elasticbuckling

IzIy = 01

M M

Monosymmetric beam parameter

T

T075

050

025

0

C

C

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

mom

ent

Mcr

L

(E

I zG

I t) 20

15

10

5

00 05 10 15 20 25 30

(2EIzdf 24GItL2) =Km

m = Icz Iz =100

Figure 628 Monosymmetric I-beams in uniform bending

266 Lateral buckling of beams

6102 Design rules

EC3 has no specific rules for designing monosymmetric beams against lateralbuckling because it regards them as being the same as doubly symmetric beamsThus it requires the value of the elastic buckling moment resistance Mcr of themonosymmetric beam to be used in the simple general design method describedin Section 653 However the logic of this approach has been questioned [49]and in some cases may lead to less safe results

A worked example of checking a monosymmetric T-beam is given inSection 6156

611 Non-uniform beams

6111 Elastic buckling resistance

Non-uniform beams are often more efficient than beams of constant section andare frequently used in situations where the major axis bending moment variesalong the length of the beam Non-uniform beams of narrow rectangular sectionare usually tapered in their depth Non-uniform I-beams may be tapered in theirdepth or less commonly in their flange width and rarely in their flange thicknesswhile steps in flange width or thickness are common

Depth reductions in narrow rectangular beams produce significant reductionsin their minor axis flexural rigidities EIz and torsional rigidities GIt Because ofthis there are also significant reductions in their resistances to lateral bucklingClosed form solutions for the elastic buckling loads of many tapered beams andcantilevers are given in the papers cited in [13 16 51 52]

Depth reductions in I-beams have no effect on the minor axis flexural rigidityEIz and little effect on the torsional rigidity GIt although they produce significantreductions in the warping rigidity EIw It follows that the resistance to buckling ofa beam which does not depend primarily on its warping rigidity is comparativelyinsensitive to depth tapering On the other hand reductions in the flange widthcause significant reductions in GIt and even greater reductions in EIz and EIwwhile reductions in flange thickness cause corresponding reductions in EIz andEIw and in GIt Thus the resistance to buckling varies significantly with changesin the flange geometry

General numerical methods of calculating the elastic buckling loads of taperedI-beams have been developed in [51ndash53] while the elastic and inelastic bucklingof tapered monosymmetric I-beams are discussed in [53ndash55] Solutions for beamswith constant flanges and linearly tapered depths under unequal end moments aregiven in [56 57] and more general solutions are given in [58] The buckling ofI-beams with stepped flanges has also been investigated and many solutions aretabulated in [59]

Approximations for the elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supportednon-uniform beam can be obtained by reducing the value calculated for a uniform

Lateral buckling of beams 267

beam having the properties of the maximum section of the beam by multiplyingit by

αst = 10 minus 12

(Lr

L

) 1 minus

(06 + 04

dmin

dmax

)Af min

Af max

(680)

in which Af min Af max are the flange areas and dmin dmax are the section depthsat the minimum and maximum cross-sections and Lr is either the portion of thebeam length which is reduced in section or is 05L for a tapered beam Thisequation agrees well with the buckling solutions shown in Figure 629 for centralconcentrated loads on stepped [59] and tapered [51] beams whose minimum cross-sections are at their simply supported ends

6112 Design rules

EC3 requires non-uniform beams to be designed against lateral buckling by usingthe methods described in Section 653 with the section moment resistance McRd =Wyfy and the elastic buckling moment Mcr being the values for the most criticalsection where the ratio of MEdMcRd of the design bending moment to the sectionmoment capacity is greatest

A worked example of checking a stepped beam is given in Section 6157

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10

Red

uctio

n fa

ctor

st

033

050

067

100

Depth taperedWidth taperedThickness tapered

Mean of width andthickness stepped2

L----r

2L----r

L

Section parameter (06 + 04dmindmax)Afmin Afmax

LrL = 0

LrL = 05

Figure 629 Reduction factors for stepped and tapered I-beams

268 Lateral buckling of beams

612 Appendix ndash elastic beams

6121 Buckling of straight beams

61211 Beams with equal end moments

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of the beam shown in Figure 63 can be deter-mined by finding a deflected and twisted position which is one of equilibrium Thedifferential equilibrium equation of bending of the beam is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMcrφ (681)

which states that the internal minor axis moment of resistance EIzd2vdx2 mustexactly balance the disturbing component minusMcrφ of the applied bending momentMcr at every point along the length of the beam The differential equation of torsionof the beam is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Mcr

dv

dx(682)

which states that the sum of the internal resistance to uniform torsion GItdφdxand the internal resistance to warping torsion minusEIwd3φdx3 must exactly balancethe disturbing torque Mcrdvdx caused by the applied moment Mcr at every pointalong the length of the beam

The derivation of the left-hand side of equation 682 is fully discussed in Sec-tions 102 and 103 The torsional rigidity GIt in the first term determines thebeamrsquos resistance to uniform torsion for which the rate of twist dφdx is constantas shown in Figure 10la For thin-walled open sections the torsion constant It isapproximately given by the summation

It asympsum

bt33

in which b is the length and t the thickness of each rectangular element of thecross-section Accurate expressions for It are given in [3 Chapter 10] from whichthe values for hot-rolled I-sections have been calculated [4 Chapter 10]

The warping rigidity EIw in the second term of equation 682 determines theadditional resistance to non-uniform torsion for which the flanges bend in oppositedirections as shown in Figure 101b and c When this flange bending varies alongthe length of the beam flange shear forces are induced which exert a torqueminusEIwd3φdx3 For equal flanged I-beams

Iw = Izd2f

4

in which df is the distance between flange centroids An expression for Iw for amonosymmetric I-beam is given in Figure 627

Lateral buckling of beams 269

When equations 681 and 682 are both satisfied at all points along the beamthen the deflected and twisted position is one of equilibrium Such a position isdefined by the buckled shape

v = Mcr

π2EIzL2φ = δ sin

π x

L (61)

in which the maximum deflection δ is indeterminate This buckled shape satisfiesthe boundary conditions at the supports of lateral deflection prevented

(v)0 = (v)L = 0 (683)

twist rotation prevented

(φ)0 = (φ)L = 0 (684)

and ends free to warp (see Section 1083)

(d2φ

dx2

)0

=(

d2φ

dx2

)L

= 0 (685)

Equation 61 also satisfies the differential equilibrium equations (equations 681and 682) when Mcr = Mzx where

Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2

)(63)

which defines the moment at elastic lateral buckling

61212 Beams with unequal end moments

The major axis bending moment My and shear Vz in the beam with unequal endmoments M and βmM shown in Figure 64a are given by

My = M minus (1 + βm)MxL

and

Vz = minus(1 + βm)ML

When the beam buckles the minor axis bending equation is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

270 Lateral buckling of beams

and the torsion equation is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= My

dv

dxminus Vzv

These equations reduce to equations 681 and 682 for the case of equal andopposite end moments (βm = minus1)

Closed form solutions of these equations are not available but numerical meth-ods [3ndash11] have been used The numerical solutions can be conveniently expressedin the form of

Mcr = αmMzx (64)

in which the factor αm accounts for the effect of the non-uniform distribution ofthe bending moment My on elastic lateral buckling The variation of αm with theend moment ratio βm is shown in Figure 64c for the two extreme values of thebeam parameter

K =radic(

π2EIw

GJL2

)(67)

of 005 and 3 Also shown in Figure 64c is the approximation

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (65)

61213 Beams with central concentrated loads

The major axis bending moment My and the shear Vz in the beam with a centralconcentrated load Q shown in Figure 65 are given by

My = Q x2 minus Q 〈x minus L2〉Vz = Q2 minus Q 〈x minus L2〉0

in which the values of the second terms are taken as zero when the values insidethe Macaulay brackets 〈〉 are negative When the beam buckles the minor axisbending equation is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

and the torsion equation is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Q

2(v minus zQ φ)L2(1 minus 2〈x minus L2〉0)+ My

dv

dxminus Vzv

in which zQ is the distance of the point of application of the load below the centroidand (Q2)(v minus zQφ)L2 is the end torque

Lateral buckling of beams 271

Numerical solutions of these equations for the dimensionless buckling loadQL2

radic(EIzGIt) are available [3 13 16 42] and some of these are shown in

Figure 66 in which the dimensionless height ε of the point of application of theload is generally given by

ε = zQ

L

radic(EIz

GIt

) (68)

or for the particular case of equal flanged I-beams by

ε = K

π

2zQ

df

61214 Cantilevers with concentrated end loads

The elastic buckling of a cantilever with a concentrated end load Q applied at adistance zQ below the centroid can be predicted from the solutions of the differentialequations of minor axis bending

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

and of torsion

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Q(v minus zQφ)L + My

dv

dxminus Vzv

in which

My = minusQ(L minus x)

and

Vz = Q

These solutions must satisfy the fixed end (x = 0) boundary conditions of

(v)0 = (φ)0 = (dvdx)0 = (dφdx)0 = 0

and the condition that the end x = L is free to warp whence

(d2φdx2)L = 0

Numerical solutions of these equations are available [16 37 42 43] and someof these are shown in Figure 620

272 Lateral buckling of beams

6122 Deformations of beams with initial crookednessand twist

The deformations of a simply supported beam with initial crookedness and twistcaused by equal and opposite end moments Mcan be analysed by considering theminor axis bending and torsion equations

EIzd2v

dx2= minusM (φ + φ0) (686)

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= M

(dv

dxminus dv0

dx

) (687)

which are obtained from equations 681 and 682 by adding the additional momentMφ0 and torque Mdv0dx induced by the initial twist and crookedness

If the initial crookedness and twist rotation are such that

v0

δ0= φ0

θ0= sin

π x

L (614)

in which the central initial crookedness δ0 and twist rotation θ0 are related by

δ0

θ0= Mzx

π2EIzL2 (615)

then the solution of equations 686 and 687 which satisfies the boundary conditions(equations 683ndash685) is given by

v

δ= φ

θ= sin

π x

L (616)

in which

δ

δ0= θ

θ0= MMzx

1 minus MMzx (617)

The maximum longitudinal stress in the beam is the sum of the stresses due tomajor axis bending minor axis bending and warping and is equal to

σmax = M

Welyminus EIz

Welz

(d2(v + df φ2)

dx2

)L2

If the elastic limit is taken as the yield stress fy then the limiting nominal stressσL for which this elastic analysis is valid is given by

σL = fy minus δ0Ncrz

Mzx

(1 + df

2

Ncrz

Mzx

)1

Welz

ML

1 minus MLMzx

Lateral buckling of beams 273

or

ML = My minus δ0Ncrz

Mzx

(1 + df

2

Ncrz

Mzx

)Wely

Welz

ML

1 minus MLMzx

in which Ncrz = π2EIzL2 ML = fLWely is the limiting moment at first yieldand My = fyWely is the nominal first yield moment This can be solved for thedimensionless limiting moment MLMy In the case where the central crookednessδ0 is given by

δ0Ncrz

Mzx= θ0 = WelzWely

1 + (df 2) (NcrzMzx)η (621)

in which η defines the magnitudes δ0θ0 then the dimensionless limiting momentsimplifies to

ML

My= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(618)

in which

Φ = (1 + η + λ2)2 (619)

and

λ =radic(MyMzx) (620)

is a generalised slenderness

613 Appendix ndash effective lengths of beams

6131 Beams with elastic end restraints

The beam shown in Figure 618 is restrained at its ends against minor axis rotationsdvdx and against warping rotations (df 2)dφdx and the boundary conditionsat the end x = L2 can be expressed in the form of

MB + MT

(dvdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R2

1 minus R2

and

MT minus MB

(df 2) (dφdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R4

1 minus R4

274 Lateral buckling of beams

in which MT and MB are the flange minor axis end restraining moments

MT = 12EIz(d2vdx2)L2 + (df 4)EIz(d

2φdx2)L2

MB = 12EIz(d2vdx2)L2 minus (df 4)EIz(d

2φdx2)L2

and R2 and R4 are the dimensionless minor axis bending and warping end restraintparameters If the beam is symmetrically restrained then similar conditions applyat the end x = minusL2 The other support conditions are

(v)plusmnL2 = (φ)plusmnL2 = 0

The particular case for which the minor axis and warping end restraints areequal so that

R2 = R4 = R (651)

may be analysed The differential equilibrium equations for a buckled positionvφ of the beam are

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMcrφ + (MB + MT )

and

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Mcr

dv

dx

These differential equations and the boundary conditions are satisfied by thebuckled shape

v = Mcrφ

π2EIzk2crL2

= A

(cos

π x

kcrLminus cos

π

2kcr

)

in which the effective length factor kcr satisfies

R

1 minus R= minus π

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (652)

The solutions of this equation are shown in Figure 618c

614 Appendix ndash monosymmetric beams

When a monosymmetric beam (see Figure 627) is bent in its plane of symmetryand twisted the longitudinal bending stresses σ exert a torque which is similar

Lateral buckling of beams 275

to that which causes some short concentrically loaded compression members tobuckle torsionally (see Sections 375 and 311) The longitudinal bending force

σ δA = Myz

IyδA

acting on an element δA of the cross-section rotates a0dφdx (where a0 is thedistance to the axis of twist through the shear centre y0 = 0 z0) and so its transversecomponent σ middot δA middot a0dφdx exerts a torque σ middot δA middot a0dφdx middot a0 about the axis oftwist The total torque TM exerted is

TM = dφ

dx

intA

a20

Myz

IydA

in which

a20 = y2 + (z minus z0)

2

Thus

TM = Myβydφ

dx (674)

in which the monosymmetry property βy of the cross-section is given by

βy = 1

Iy

intA

z3 dA +int

Ay2zdA

minus 2z0 (675)

An explicit expression for βy for a monosymmetric I-section is given inFigure 627 and this can also be used for tee-sections by putting the flange thick-ness t1 or t2 equal to zero Also given in Figure 627 is an explicit expression forthe warping section constant Iw of a monosymmetric I-section For a tee-sectionIw is zero

615 Worked examples

6151 Example 1 ndash checking a beam supported at both ends

Problem The 75 m long 610 times 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown in Figure 630 issimply supported at both ends where lateral deflections v are effectively preventedand twist rotations φ are partially restrained Check the adequacy of the beam fora central concentrated top flange load caused by an unfactored dead load of 60 kN(which includes an allowance for self-weight) and an unfactored imposed load of100 kN

Design bending moment

MEd = (135 times 60)+ (15 times 100) times 754 = 433 kNm

276 Lateral buckling of beams

375 m 375 m

QD = 60 kN QI = 100 kN at top flange

Quantity 610 times 229 UB 125 457 times 191 UB 82 Units bf 2290 1913 mmtf 196 160 mmh 6122 4600 mmtw 119 99 mmr 127 102 mm

Wply 3676 1831 cm3

Iz 3932 1871 cm4

It 154 692 cm4

Iw 345 0922 dm6

(b) Section properties

(a) Example 1

Figure 630 Examples 1 and 4

Section resistanceAs in Section 51215 fy = 265 Nmm2 the section is Class 1 and the sectionresistance is McRd = 974 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd and the section resistance isadequate

Elastic buckling momentUsing equation 656 to allow for the partial torsional end restraints

kcr = 1 + (6122 minus 196)(6 times 7500)(196119)3

times 1 + 2290(6122 minus 196)2= 1041

so that Lcr = 1041 times 7500 = 7806 mmAdapting equation 636

Mzx0 =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 3932 times 104

78062

times(

81 000 times 154 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 345 times 1012

78062

)Nmm

= 569 kNm

Using equation 612 Ncrz = π 2 times 210 000 times 3932 times 10475002 N = 1449 kN

Lateral buckling of beams 277

Using Figure 67 αm = 135

04αmzQNcrz

Mzx0= 04 times 135 times (minus 61222)times 1449 times 103

569 times 106= minus0421

Adapting equation 611

Mcr = 135 times 569radic[1 + (minus0421)2] + (minus0421) Nmm = 510 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] with L = 7806 mm leads to Mcr =522 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(974510) = 1382

hb = 61222290 = 267 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(1382 minus 02)+ 10 times 13822 = 1656

Using equation 626

MbRd = 9741656 + radic(16562 minus 13822) kNm

= 379 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequateUsing the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause

6323) and αLT = 049 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 049(1382 minus 04)+ 075 times 13822 = 1457

Using equation 626

MbRd = 9741457 + radic(14572 minus 075 times 13822) kNm

= 426 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance still appears to be inadequateThe design moment resistance is further increased by using equations 629 630

and 628 to find

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

135)1 minus 2 times (1382 minus 08)2 = 0978 and

MbRdmod = 4260978 = 436 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is adequate after all

278 Lateral buckling of beams

Brace preventslateral deflection and twist rotation

254 times 146 UB 37

254 times 146 UB 37

457 times 191 UB 82

70 kN

70kNm

1 2 3

45 m 45 m

(a) Example 2 (c) Example 3 (b) Properties of

12 kNm at top flange

80 m

bf = 1464 mmtf = 109 mmh = 256 mm tw = 63 mm r = 76 mm

Wply = 483 cm3

Iz = 571 cm4

It = 153 cm4

Iw = 00857 dm6

Figure 631 Examples 2 and 3

6152 Example 2 ndash checking a braced beam

Problem The 9 m long 254 times 146 UB 37 braced beam of S275 steel shownin Figure 631a and b has a central concentrated design load of 70 kN (whichincludes an allowance for self-weight) and a design end moment of 70 kNm Lateraldeflections v and twist rotations φ are effectively prevented at both ends and by abrace at mid-span Check the adequacy of the braced beam

Design bending moment

R3 = (70 times 45)minus 709 = 2722 kN MEd2 = 2722 times 45 = 1225 kNm

Section resistance

tf = 109 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (14642 minus 632 minus 76)(109 times 0924) T52

= 620 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = (256 minus 2 times 109 minus 2 times 76)(63 times 0924) T52

= 376 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRd = 275 times 483 times 103 Nmm 625

= 1328 kNm gt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Lateral buckling of beams 279

Elastic buckling momentThe beam is fully restrained at mid-span and so consists of two equal lengthsegments 12 and 23 By inspection the check will be controlled by segment 23which has the lower moment gradient and therefore the lower value of αm UsingFigure 67 αm = 175

Using equation 63

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104

45002

times(

81 000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

45002

) Nmm

= 1112 kNm

Using equation 64

Mcr = 175 times 1112 = 1946 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] on the segment 23 alone leads toMcr = 2045 kNm Using PRFELB on the complete beam leads to Mcr =2379 kNm which indicates the increase caused by the restraint offered by segment12 to segment 23 The increased elastic buckling moment may be approxi-mated by using the improved method given in Section 682 as demonstratedin Section 6155)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(13281946) = 0826

hb = 2561464 = 175 lt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 021 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 021(0826 minus 02)+ 10 times 08262 = 0907

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280907 + radic(09072 minus 08262) kNm

= 1037 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequate

280 Lateral buckling of beams

Using the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause6323) and αLT = 034 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0826 minus 04)+ 075 times 08262 = 0828

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280828 + radic(08282 minus 075 times 08262) kNm = 1066 kNm

The design moment resistance is further increased by using equations 629 630and 628 to find

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

175)1 minus 2 times (0826 minus 08)2 = 0878 and

MbRdmod = 10660878 = 1214 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is just inadequate

6153 Example 3 ndash checking a cantilever

Problem The 80 m long 457 times 191 UB 82 cantilever of S275 steel shown inFigure 631c has the section properties shown in Figure 630b The cantilever haslateral torsional and warping restraints at the support is free at the tip and hasa factored upwards design uniformly distributed load of 12 kNm (which includesan allowance for self-weight) acting at the top flange Check the adequacy of thecantilever

Design bending moment

MEd = 12 times 822 = 384 kNm

Section resistance

tf = 160 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (19132 minus 992 minus 102)(160 times 0924) T52

= 544 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

Lateral buckling of beams 281

cw(twε) = (4602 minus 2 times 160 minus 2 times 102)(99 times 0924) T52

= 446 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRd = 275 times 1831 times 103 Nmm 625

= 5035 kNm gt 384 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Elastic buckling momentThe upwards load at the top flange is equivalent to a downwards load at the bottomflange so that zQ = 46002 = 2300 mm Using equation 68

ε = 2300

8000

radic(210 000 times 1871 times 104

81 000 times 692 times 104

)= 0241

Using equation 67

K = radic(π2 times 210 000 times 0922 times 1012)(81 000 times 692 times 104 times 80002)= 0730

Using equation 659

qL3

2radic

EIzGIt= 27

1 + 14(0241 minus 01)radic1 + 142(0241 minus 01)2

+ 10(0730 minus 2)

1 + 13(0241 minus 01)radic1 + 132(0241 minus 01)2

= 1723

Mcr = qL22 = 1723 times radic(210 000 times 1871 times 104

times 81 000 times 692 times 104)8000 Nmm

= 1011 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1051 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(50351011) = 0706

hb = 46001913 = 240 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0706 minus 02)+ 10 times 07062 = 0835

282 Lateral buckling of beams

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350835 + radic(08352 minus 07062)

= 3930 kNm gt 384 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is adequate

6154 Example 4 ndash designing a braced beam

Problem Determine a suitable UB of S275 steel for the simply supported beamof Section 6151 if twist rotations are effectively prevented at the ends and if abrace is added which effectively prevents lateral deflection v and twist rotation φat mid-span

Design bending momentUsing Section 6151 MEd = 433 kNm

Selecting a trial sectionThe central brace divides the beam into two identical segments each of lengthL = 3750 mm and eliminates the effect of the load height

Guess fy = 275 Nmm2 and MbRdWyfy = 09Using equation 632 Wply ge (433 times 106275)09 mm3 = 1750 cm3Try a 457 times 191 UB 82 with Wply = 1831 cm3 gt 1750 cm3

Section resistanceAs in Section 6153 fy = 275 Nmm2 McRd = 5035 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Elastic buckling momentUsing Figure 67 αm = 175

Using equation 63

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 1871 times 104

37502

times(

81 000 times 692 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 0922 times 1012

37502

) Nmm

= 7275 kNm

Using equation 64

Mcr = 175 times 7275 = 1273 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1345 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(50351273) = 0629

hb = 46001913 = 240 gt 2

Lateral buckling of beams 283

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0629 minus 02)+ 10 times 06292 = 0771

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350771 + radic(07712 minus 06292) kNm

= 414 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequateUsing the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause

6323) and αLT = 049 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 049(0629 minus 04)+ 075 times 06292 = 0704

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350704 + radic(07042 minus 075 times 06292) kNm

= 437 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and so the design moment resistance is adequate after all

6155 Example 5 ndash checking a braced beam bybuckling analysis

Problem Use the method of elastic buckling analysis given in Section 682 tocheck the braced beam of Section 6152

Elastic buckling analysisThe application of the method of elastic buckling analysis given in Section 682is summarised below using the same step numbering as in Section 682

(2) The beam is fully restrained at mid-span and so consists of two segments12 and 23For segment 12 M1 = minus70 kNm and M2 = 1225 kNm (as in Section6152)βm12 = 701225 = 0571Using equation 65 αm12 = 175 + 105 times 0571 + 03 times 05712

= 2448 lt 256For segment 23 βm23 = 01225 = 0 and αm23 = 175 as in Section 6152

(3) Lcr12 = Lcr23 = 4500 mm

284 Lateral buckling of beams

(4) Using Mzx12 = Mzx23 = 1112 kNm from Section 6152

Mcr12 = 2448 times 1112 = 2723 kNm

Qs12 = 70 times 27231225 = 1556 kN

Mcr23 = 175 times 1112 = 1946 kNm

Qs23 = 70 times 19461225 = 1112 kN

(5) Qs23 lt Qs12 and so 23 is the critical segment(6) αr12 = (3 times 210 000 times 571 times 1044500)times (1 minus 11121556)

= 2279 times 106 Nmm(7) α23 = 2 times 210 000 times 571 times 1044500 = 5329 times 106 Nmm(8) k2 = 5329 times 106(05 times 2279 times 106 + 5329 times 106) = 0824

k3 = 10 (zero restraint at 3)(9) Using Figure 321a kcr23 = 093 Lcr23 = 093 times 4500 = 4185 mm

(10) Using equation 639

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104

41852

times(

81 000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

41852

) Nmm

= 1234 kNm

and Mcr23 = 175 times 1234 = 2159 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr23 = 2379 kNm)

Member resistanceMcRd = 1328 kNm as in Section 6152

Using equation 625 λLT = radic(13282159) = 0784

hb = 2561464 = 175 lt 2

Using the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause6323) and αLT = 034 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0784 minus 04)+ 075 times 07842 = 0796

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280796 + radic(07962 minus 075 times 07842) kNm = 1056 kNm

Lateral buckling of beams 285

Using equations 629 630 and 628

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

175)1 minus 2 times (0784 minus 08)2 = 0878 and

MbRdmod = 10560878 = 1202 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is just inadequate

6156 Example 6 ndash checking aT-beam

Problem The 50 m long simply supported monosymmetric 229 times 305 BT 63T-beam of S275 steel shown in Figure 632 has the section properties shown inFigure 632c Determine the uniform bending design moment resistances whenthe flange is in either compression or tension

Section resistance (flange in compression)

tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cf (tf ε) = (22902 minus 1192 minus 127)(196 times 0942) T52

= 519 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

The plastic neutral axis bisects the area and in this case lies in the flange (atzp = 2290 times 196 + (3060 minus 196)times 119(2 times 2290) = 172 mm)

Thus the whole web is in tension and is automatically Class 1

McRd = 265 times 531 times 103 Nmm = 1407 kNm 625

M

119

1963060

2290

50 m

Mr = 127 mm

Wply = 531 cm3

Welymin = 299 cm3

Iz = 1966 cm4

It = 769 cm4

(a) Beam (b) Cross-section (c) Properties

Figure 632 Example 6

286 Lateral buckling of beams

Elastic buckling (flange in compression)Using Figure 627

df = 3060 minus (196 + 0)2 = 2962 mm

z = 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times (3060 minus 0)times 1192

(2290 times 196)+ 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times 119= 660 mm

Iy = (2290 times 196 times 6602)+ 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)3 times 11912

+ (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times 119 times 660 minus (3060 minus 0)22

= 6864 times 106 mm4

1 minus ρm = 0

z0 = 0 times 2962 minus 660 = minus660 mm

βy = 1

6864 times 106

(2962 minus 660)times (0 + 0)minus 660times (

2293 times 19612 + 229 times 196 times 6602)

+ [(2962 minus 660 minus 0)4

minus (660 minus 1962)4] times 1194

minus 2 times (minus660) = 2156 mm

Iw = 0

π2EIz

L2= π2 times 210 000 times 1966 times 104

50002= 1630 times 106N

βy

2

radicπ2EIz

L2= 2156

2times

radic1630 times 106 = 1376 times 103

Using equation 676

Mcr =radic(1633 times 106)times radic[81 000 times 769 times 104 + 0 + (1376 times 103)2]

+ 1376 times 103 = 5401 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 5401 kNm)

Member resistance (flange in compression)Using equation 625 λLT = radic

(14075403) = 0510Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause

6322) and αLT = 076 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 076(0510 minus 02)+ 10 times 05102 = 0748

Lateral buckling of beams 287

Using equation 626

MbRd = 14070748 + radic(07482 minus 05102) kNm = 1086 kNm

Section resistance (flange in tension)Using Table 42 of EN1993-1-5 [60] and the ratio of the web outstand tipcompression to tension of

ψ = σ2σ1 = minus(660 minus 1962 minus 127)(3060 minus 1962 minus 660)

= minus0189

kσ = 057 minus 021 times (minus0189)+ 007 times (minus0189)2 = 0612 and

21radic

kσ = 21 times radic(0612) = 164

cw(twε) = (3060 minus 196 minus 127)(119 times 0942) T52

= 244gt 164 = 21radic

kσ and the web is Class 4 T52

The section may be treated as Class 3 if the effective value of ε is increased so thatthe Class 3 limit is just satisfied in which case

ε = cwtw21

radickσ

= (3060 minus 196 minus 127)119

164= 1400 552(9)

in which case the maximum design compressive stress is

σcomRd = fyγM0

ε2= 26510

14002= 135 Nmm2 552(9)

and so the section resistance is

McRd = 135 times 299 times 103 Nmm = 404 kNm 625

(If the effective section method of Clause 43(4) of EN1993-1-5 [60] is used thenan increased section resistance of McRd = Welyminfy = 532 kNm is obtained)

Elastic buckling (flange in tension)Using Figure 627 leads to βy = minus2156 mm

Using equation 676 leads to Mcr = 1883 kNm(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1883 kNm)

Member resistance (flange in tension)Using equation 625 λLT = radic

(4041883) = 0463Using the EC3 simple general method as before and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 076(0463 minus 02)+ 10 times 04632 = 0708

Using equation 626

MbRd = 4040708 + radic(07082 minus 04632) kNm = 326 kNm

288 Lateral buckling of beams

6157 Example 7 ndash checking a stepped beam

Problem The simply supported non-uniform welded beam of S275 steel shown inFigure 633 has a central concentrated design load Q acting at the bottom flangeThe beam has a 960 times 16 web and its equal flanges are 300 times 32 in the central20 m region and 300 times 20 in the outer 30 m regions Determine the maximumvalue of Q

Section properties

Wplyi = 300 times 32 times (960 + 32)+ 9602 times 164 = 1321 times 106 mm3

Wplyo = 300 times 20 times (960 + 20)+ 9602 times 164 = 9566 times 106 mm3

Izi = 2 times 3003 times 3212 = 144 times 106 mm4

Iti = 2 times 300 times 3233 + 960 times 1633 = 7864 times 106 mm4

Iwi = 144 times 106 times (960 + 32)24 = 3543 times 1012 mm6

Section resistances

tfi = 32 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

tfo = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cfo(tfoε) = (300 minus 16)2(20 times 0942) T52

= 754 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = 960(16 times 0942) T52

= 637 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRdo = 265 times 9566 times 106 Nmm = 2535 kNm 625

McRdi = 265 times 1321 times 106 Nmm = 3501 kNm 625

Quantity Inner length

Outer length Units

bf 300 300 mm tf 32 20 mm d 960 960 mm tw 16 16 mmbf

bf

tf

tw d

tfQ

30 m 10 10 30 m

(a) Beam and loading (b) Section (c) Dimensions

Figure 633 Example 7

Lateral buckling of beams 289

Critical sectionAt mid-span MEd4 = Q times 84 = 20 Q kNmAt the change of section MEd3 = (Q2)times 3 = 15 Q kNmMEd4McRdi = 20 times Q3501 = 0000571 QMEd3McRdo = 15 times Q2535 = 0000592 Q gt 0000571 Qand so the critical section is at the change of section

Elastic bucklingFor a uniform beam having the properties of the central cross-section usingequation 63

Mzxi =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradic

π2 times 210 000 times 144 times 106

80002

times(

81 000 times 7864 times 106 + π2 times 210 000 times 3543 times 1012

80002

)Nmm

= 2885 kNm

Using equation 612 Ncrz = π 2 times 210000 times 144 times 10680002 N = 4663 kNUsing Figure 67 αm = 135

04αmzQNcrz

Mzxi= 04 times 135 times (9602)times 4663 times 103

2885 times 106= 0491

Using equation 611

Mcri = 135 times 2885radic[1 + 04912] + 0491 Nmm = 5854 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcri = 5972 kNm)For the non-uniform beam

LrL = 6080 = 075(06 + 04

dmin

dmax

)Af min

Af max=

(06 + 04 times 960 + 2 times 20

960 + 2 times 32

)300 times 20

300 times 32= 0619

Using equation 680

αst = 10 minus 12 times(

6000

8000

)times (1 minus 0619) = 0657

Mcr = 0657 times 5854 = 3847 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 4420 kNm)

Moment resistanceAt the critical section Mcro = 3847 times 30004000 = 2885 kNm

290 Lateral buckling of beams

Using the values for the critical section in equation 625 λLT = radic(25352885) =

0937

hb = (960 + 2 times 20)300 = 333 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 and λLT 0 = 02(Clause 6322) and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0937 minus 02)+ 09372 = 1065

Using equation 626

MbRd = 25351065 + radic(10652 minus 09372) kNm

= 1615 kNm = (QbRd2

) times 30

QbRd = 1615 times 230 = 1077 kN

616 Unworked examples

6161 Example 8 ndash checking a continuous beam

A continuous 533times210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has two equal spans of 70 m Auniformly distributed design load q is applied along the centroidal axis Determinethe maximum value of q

6162 Example 9 ndash checking an overhanging beam

The overhanging beam shown in Figure 634a is prevented from twisting anddeflecting laterally at its end and supports The supported segment is a 250 times150 times 10 RHS of S275 steel and is rigidly connected to the overhanging segmentwhich is a 254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel Determine the maximum design loadQ that can be applied at the end of the UB

Q

(a) Overhanging beam (b) Braced beam

70 m 140 m 40 m 60 m 80 m

254 times146 UB 37 250 times150 times10 RHS Q kN 15 Q kN

5Q kNm

Lateral deflection and twist prevented at supports and load points

Lateral deflection and twist prevented at end and at supports

Figure 634 Unworked examples 9 and 10

Lateral buckling of beams 291

6163 Example 10 ndash checking a braced beam

Determine the maximum moment at elastic buckling of the braced 533 times 210 UB92 of S275 steel shown in Figure 634b

6164 Example 11 ndash checking a monosymmetric beam

A simply supported 60 m long 530times210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has equal andopposite end moments The moment resistance is to be increased by welding a fulllength 25 times 16 mm plate of S275 steel to one flange Determine the increases inthe moment resistances of the beam when the plate is welded to

(a) the compression flange or(b) the tension flange

6165 Example 12 ndash checking a non-uniform beam

A simply supported 530 times 210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has a concentratedshear centre load at the centre of the 100 m span The moment resistance is to beincreased by welding 250 times 16 plates of S275 steel to the top and bottom flangesover a central length of 40 m Determine the increase in the moment resistance ofthe beam

References

1 Vacharajittiphan P Woolcock ST and Trahair NS (1974) Effect of in-planedeformation on lateral buckling Journal of Structural Mechanics 3 pp 29ndash60

2 Nethercot DA and Rockey KC (1971) A unified approach to the elastic lateralbuckling of beams The Structural Engineer 49 pp 321ndash30

3 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

4 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York5 Structural Stability Research Council (1998) Guide to Design Criteria for Metal

Compression Members 5th edition (ed TV Galambos) John Wiley New York6 Barsoum RS and Gallagher RH (1970) Finite element analysis of torsional and

torsional-flexural stability problems International Journal of Numerical Methods inEngineering 2 pp 335ndash52

7 Krajcinovic D (1969) A consistent discrete elements technique for thin-walledassemblages International Journal of Solids and Structures 5 pp 639ndash62

8 Powell G and Klingner R (1970) Elastic lateral buckling of steel beams Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST9 pp 1919ndash32

9 Nethercot DA and Rockey KC (1971) Finite element solutions for the buckling ofcolumns and beams International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 13 pp 945ndash9

10 Hancock GJ and Trahair NS (1978) Finite element analysis of the lateral bucklingof continuously restrained beam-columns Civil Engineering Transactions Institutionof Engineers Australia CE20 No 2 pp 120ndash7

292 Lateral buckling of beams

11 Brown PT and Trahair NS (1968) Finite integral solution of differentialequations Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10pp 193ndash6

12 Trahair NS (1968) Elastic stability of propped cantilevers Civil EngineeringTransactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10 pp 94ndash100

13 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

14 Lee GC (1960) A survey of literature on the lateral instability of beams WeldingResearch Council Bulletin No 63 August

15 Clark JW and Hill HN (1960) Lateral buckling of beams Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 86 No ST7 pp 175ndash96

16 Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures E and FN SponLondon

17 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

18 Papangelis JP Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (1998) Elastic flexural-torsionalbuckling of structures by computer Computers and Structures 68 pp 125ndash37

19 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1976) Inelastic lateral buckling of determinatebeams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST4 pp 701ndash17

20 Trahair NS (1983) Inelastic lateral buckling of beams Chapter 2 in Beams and Beam-Columns Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied Science PublishersLondon pp 35ndash69

21 Nethercot DA (1972) Recent progress in the application of the finite element methodto problems of the lateral buckling of beams Proceedings of the EIC Conference onFinite Element Methods in Civil Engineering Montreal June pp 367ndash91

22 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1975) Analysis of lateral buckling in planeframes Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST7 pp 1497ndash516

23 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Direct stiffness analysis of lateralbuckling Journal of Structural Mechanics 3 pp 107ndash37

24 Mutton BR and Trahair NS (1973) Stiffness requirements for lateral bracingJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 99 No ST10 pp 2167ndash82

25 Mutton BR and Trahair NS (1975) Design requirements for column bracesCivil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE17 No 1pp 30ndash5

26 Trahair NS (1999) Column bracing forces Australian Journal of StructuralEngineering Institution of Engineers Australia SE2 Nos 23 pp 163ndash8

27 Nethercot DA (1973) Buckling of laterally or torsionally restrained beams Journalof the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 99 No EM4 pp 773ndash91

28 Trahair NS and Nethercot DA (1984) Bracing requirements in thin-walled struc-tures Chapter 3 of Developments in Thin-Walled Structures ndash 2 (eds J Rhodes andAC Walker) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Barking pp 93ndash130

29 Valentino J Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1997) Inelastic buckling of steel beamswith central torsional restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 123 No9 pp 1180ndash6

30 Valentino J and Trahair NS (1998) Torsional restraint against elastic lateral bucklingJournal of Structural Engineering ASCE 124 No 10 pp 1217ndash25

31 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1975) Design of diaphragm braced I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST10 pp 2045ndash61

Lateral buckling of beams 293

32 Trahair NS (1979) Elastic lateral buckling of continuously restrained beam-columnsThe Profession of a Civil Engineer (eds D Campbell-Allen and EH Davis) SydneyUniversity Press Sydney pp 61ndash73

33 Austin WJ Yegian S and Tung TP (1955) Lateral buckling of elastically end-restrained beams Proceedings of the ASCE 81 No 673 April pp 1ndash25

34 Trahair NS (1965) Stability of I-beams with elastic end restraints Journal of theInstitution of Engineers Australia 37 pp 157ndash68

35 Trahair NS (1966) Elastic stability of I-beam elements in rigid-jointed structuresJournal of the Institution of Engineers Australia 38 pp 171ndash80

36 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1976) Lateral buckling approximations for elasticbeams The Structural Engineer 54 pp 197ndash204

37 Trahair NS (1983) Lateral buckling of overhanging beams Instability and PlasticCollapse of Steel Structures (ed LJ Morris) Granada London pp 503ndash18

38 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1981) Distortional buckling of I-beams Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 107 No ST2 pp 355ndash70

39 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1983) Lateral stability of beams on seats Journalof Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No ST9 pp 2212ndash15

40 Bradford MA (1992) Lateral-distortional buckling of steel I-section membersJournal of Constructional Steel Research 23 Nos 1ndash3 pp 97ndash116

41 Trahair NS (1966) The bending stress rules of the draft ASCA1 Journal of theInstitution of Engineers Australia 38 pp 131ndash41

42 Anderson JM and Trahair NS (1972) Stability of monosymmetric beams andcantilevers Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST1 pp 269ndash86

43 Nethercot DA (1973) The effective lengths of cantilevers as governed by lateralbuckling The Structural Engineer 51 pp 161ndash8

44 Trahair NS (1968) Interaction buckling of narrow rectangular continuous beamsCivil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10 No 2pp 167ndash72

45 Salvadori MG (1951) Lateral buckling of beams of rectangular cross-section underbending and shear Proceedings of the First US National Congress of AppliedMechanics pp 403ndash5

46 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1980) Buckling properties of monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 106 No ST5 pp 941ndash57

47 Kitipornchai S Wang CM and Trahair NS (1986) Buckling of monosymmetricI-beams under moment gradient Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112 No 4pp 781ndash99

48 Wang CM and Kitipornchai S (1986) Buckling capacities of monosymmetric I-beams Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112 No 11 pp 2373ndash91

49 Woolcock ST Kitipornchai S and Bradford MA (1999) Design of Portal FrameBuildings 3rd edn Australian Institute of Steel Construction Sydney

50 Wang CM and Kitipornchai S (1986) On stability of monosymmetric cantileversEngineering Structures 8 No 3 pp 169ndash80

51 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1972) Elastic stability of tapered I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST3 pp 713ndash28

52 Nethercot DA (1973) Lateral buckling of tapered beams Publications IABSE 33pp 173ndash92

53 Bradford MA and Cuk PE (1988) Elastic buckling of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 114 No 5 pp 977ndash96

294 Lateral buckling of beams

54 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1975) Elastic behaviour of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST8 pp 1661ndash78

55 Bradford MA (1989) Inelastic buckling of tapered monosymmetric I-beamsEngineering Structures 11 No 2 pp 119ndash126

56 Lee GC Morrell ML and Ketter RL (1972) Design of tapered members Bulletin173 Welding Research Council June

57 Bradford MA (1988) Stability of tapered I-beams Journal of Constructional SteelResearch 9 pp 195ndash216

58 Bradford MA (2006) Lateral buckling of tapered steel members Chapter 1 inAnalysis and Design of Plated Structures Vol1Stability Woodhead Publishing LtdCambridge pp 1ndash25

59 Trahair NS and Kitipornchai S (1971) Elastic lateral buckling of stepped I-beamsJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 97 No ST10 pp 2535ndash48

60 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash5Plated Structural Elements BSI London

Chapter 7

Beam-columns

71 Introduction

Beam-columns are structural members which combine the beam function oftransmitting transverse forces or moments with the compression (or tension)member function of transmitting axial forces Theoretically all structural membersmay be regarded as beam-columns since the common classifications of tensionmembers compression members and beams are merely limiting examples ofbeam-columns However the treatment of beam-columns in this chapter is gen-erally limited to members in axial compression The behaviour and design ofmembers with moments and axial tension are treated in Chapter 2

Beam-columns may act as if isolated as in the case of eccentrically loadedcompression members with simple end connections or they may form part of arigid frame In this chapter the behaviour and design of isolated beam-columnsare treated The ultimate resistance and design of beam-columns in frames arediscussed in Chapter 8

It is convenient to discuss the behaviour of isolated beam-columns under thethree separate headings of In-Plane Behaviour FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling andBiaxial-Bending as is done in Sections 72ndash74 When a beam-column is bentabout its weaker principal axis or when it is prevented from deflecting laterallywhile being bent about its stronger principal axis (as shown in Figure 71a) itsaction is confined to the plane of bending This in-plane behaviour is related to thebending of beams discussed in Chapter 5 and to the buckling of compression mem-bers discussed in Chapter 3 When a beam-column which is bent about its strongerprincipal axis is not restrained laterally (as shown in Figure 71b) it may buckleprematurely out of the plane of bending by deflecting laterally and twisting Thisaction is related to the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams (referred to as lateralndashtorsional buckling in EC3) discussed in Chapter 6 More generally however abeam-column may be bent about both principal axes as shown in Figure 71cThis biaxial bending which commonly occurs in three-dimensional rigid framesinvolves interactions of beam bending and twisting with beam and column buck-ling Sections 72ndash74 discuss the in-plane behaviour flexuralndashtorsional bucklingand biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns

296 Beam-columns

x

y

z

N

NM

L

x

z

N

N

L

x

y

z

N

N My

Lateralrestraints

y

M

Mz

m M m M

mz Mz

myMy

(c) Biaxial bendingMember deflects vwand twists

(b) Flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling Member deflectsw in zx plane then bucklesby deflecting v in yx planeand twisting

(a) In-plane behaviourMember deflects w inzx plane only

Figure 71 Beam-column behaviour

72 In-plane behaviour of isolated beam-columns

When the deformations of an isolated beam-column are confined to the planeof bending (see Figure 71a) its behaviour shows an interaction between beambending and compression member buckling as indicated in Figure 72 Curve 1 ofthis figure shows the linear behaviour of an elastic beam while curve 6 shows thelimiting behaviour of a rigid-plastic beam at the full plastic moment Mpl Curve 2shows the transition of a real elastic ndash plastic beam from curve 1 to curve 6The elastic buckling of a concentrically loaded compression member at its elasticbuckling load Ncr y is shown by curve 4 Curve 3 shows the interaction betweenbending and buckling in an elastic member and allows for the additional momentNδ exerted by the axial load Curve 7 shows the interaction between the bendingmoment and axial force which causes the member to become fully plastic Thiscurve allows for reduction from the full plastic moment Mpl to Mplr caused by theaxial load and for the additional moment Nδ The actual behaviour of a beam-column is shown by curve 5 which provides a transition from curve 3 for an elasticmember to curve 7 for full plasticity

721 Elastic beam-columns

A beam-column is shown in Figures 71a and 73a which is acted on by axialforces N and end moments M and βmM where βm can have any value betweenminus1 (single curvature bending) and +1 (double curvature bending) For isolated

Beam-columns 297

1 2 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

In-plane deflection

Loading M or N

Ncry

Mpl

Mplr

34

57

0

First yield column M = 0

N

N

M

M(M N)max

interactionbeam-column

beam N = 0

Figure 72 In-plane behaviour of a beam-column

N

NM

w

L

x

M

Nw

Bending momentndashEIy d

2wdx2

M (1 + )L

M (1 + )L

M [1 ndash (1 + ) xL]

m M

m

m

m

m M

(b) Bending moment distribution (a) Beam-column

Figure 73 In-plane bending moment distribution in a beam-column

beam-columns these end moments are independent of the deflections and have noeffect on the elastic buckling load Ncr y =π2EIyL2 (They are therefore quite dif-ferent from the end restraining moments discussed in Section 363 which increasewith the end rotations and profoundly affect the elastic buckling load) The beam-column is prevented from bending about the minor axis out of the plane of the endmoments and is assumed to be straight before loading

298 Beam-columns

The bending moment in the beam-column is the sum of M minus M (1 + βm)xLdue to the end moments and shears and Nw due to the deflection w as shownin Figure 73b It is shown in Section 751 that the deflected shape of the beam-column is given by

w = M

N

[cosmicrox minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1 + (1 + βm)

x

L

]

(71)

where

micro2 = N

EIy= π2

L2

N

Ncr y (72)

As the axial force N approaches the buckling load Ncr y the value of microLapproaches π and the values of cosecmicroL cotmicroL and therefore of w approachinfinity as indicated by curve 3 in Figure 72 This behaviour is similar to that ofa compression member with geometrical imperfections (see Section 322) It isalso shown in Section 751 that the maximum moment Mmax in the beam-columnis given by

Mmax = M

1 +

βmcosecπ

radicN

Ncr y+ cot π

radicN

Ncr y

2

05

(73)

when βm lt minus cosπradic(NNcr y) and the point of maximum moment lies in the

span and is given by the end moment M that is

Mmax = M (74)

when βm ge minus cosπradic(NNcr y)

The variations of MmaxM with the axial load ratio NNcr y and the end momentratio βm are shown in Figure 74 In general Mmax remains equal to M for lowvalues of NNcr y but increases later The value of NNcr y at which Mmax beginsto increase above M is lowest for βm = minus1 (uniform bending) and increaseswith increasing βm Once Mmax departs from M it increases slowly at first thenmore rapidly and reaches very high values as N approaches the column bucklingload Ncr y

For beam-columns which are bent in single curvature by equal and oppo-site end moments (βm = minus1) the maximum deflection δmax is given by (seeSection 751)

δmax

δ= 8π2

NNcr y

[sec

π

2

radicN

Ncr yminus 1

](75)

Beam-columns 299

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

02

04

06

08

1010

ndash MN

N

= 10

05

0500

ndash

ndash

05

10

Mmax M

( = 1)

(06 ndash 04 )(1 ndash NNcry) 10

NN

cry

Mmax M or max

m M

mmax

m

m

ge

Figure 74 Maximum moments and deflections in elastic beam-columns

in which δ = ML28EIy is the value of δmax when N = 0 and the maximummoment by

Mmax = M secπ

2

radicN

Ncr y (76)

These two equations are shown non-dimensionally in Figure 74 It can be seenthat they may be approximated by using a factor 1(1 minus NNcr y) to amplify thedeflection δ and the moment M due to the applied moments alone (N = 0) Thissame approximation was used in Section 363 to estimate the reduced stiffness ofan axially loaded restraining member

For beam-columns with unequal end moments (βm gt minus1) the value of Mmax

may be approximated by using

Mmax

M= Cm

1 minus NNcr yge 10 (77)

in which

Cm = 06 minus 04βm (78)

These approximations are also shown in Figure 74 It can be seen that they aregenerally conservative for βm gt 0 and only a little unconservative for βm lt 0

300 Beam-columns

Approximations for the maximum moments Mmax in beam-columns with trans-verse loads can be obtained by using

Mmax = δMmax0 (79)

in which Mmax0 is the maximum moment when N = 0

δ = γm(1 minus γsNNcr)

(1 minus γnNNcr) (710)

Ncr = π2EI(k2crL2) (711)

and kcr = LcrL is the effective length ratio Expressions for Mmax0 and valuesof γm γn γs and kcr are given in Figure 75 for beam-columns with centralconcentrated loads Q and in Figure 76 for beam-columns with uniformly dis-tributed loads q A worked example of the use of these approximations is given inSection 771

The maximum stress σmax in the beam-column is the sum of the axial stress andthe maximum bending stress caused by the maximum moment Mmax It is thereforegiven by

σmax = σac + σbcyMmax

M(712)

Beam-column First-order moment (N = 0) k Mmax 0

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

16---------

Q

8---------

Q

L

4

05 10 10

QL

QL

018

m n s

QL

QL

32QL5

10 10 10 062

10 10 049 014

07

56------

10 10 028

10 10 045

20 10 10 019

10 10 10 018 4---------QL

3

2

8---------QL

32QL5

32QL5

16QL3

16QL3

16QL3

8QL

8QL

8QL

8QL

QL

16---------QL

8---------QL

8---------QL

+

+

+

+

+

+

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash ndash+

Q

L2 L2 L2

L2 L2

L2 L2

L2L2

L2L2

L2L2

3

16---------QL3

16---------QL3

cr

Figure 75 Approximations for beam-columns with central concentrated loads

Beam-columns 301

Mmax0Beam-column k

q

q

q

q

q

8---------

q

12---------

q

L L

8+

+

+

+

+

+

+

05 10 10

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

qL

qL

037

12---------qL

2

2

2

2

qL

82qL

82qL

22qL

82qL

1282qL9

1282qL9

1282qL9

242qL

242qL

122qL

122qL

10 05 10 04

10 10 049 018

07

916------

10 10 036

10 10 029

20 10 10 04

10 10 10 ndash003 8---------qL2

2---------qL2

8---------qL2

8---------qL2

8---------qL2

12---------qL2

12---------qL2

cr m n sFirst-order moment (N = 0)

Figure 76 Approximations for beam-columns with distributed loads

in which σac = NA and σbcy = MWely If the member has no residual stressesthen it will remain elastic while σmax is less than the yield stress fy and so theabove results are valid while

N

Ny+ M

My

Mmax

Mle 10 (713)

in which Ny = Afy is the squash load and My = fyWel the nominal first yieldmoment A typical elastic limit of this type is shown by the first yield point markedon curve 3 of Figure 72 It can be seen that this limit provides a lower boundestimate of the resistance of a straight beam-column while the elastic bucklingload Ncr y provides an upper bound

Variations of the first yield limits of NNy determined from equation 713 withMMy and βm are shown in Figure 77a for the case where Ncr y = Ny15 For abeam-column in double curvature bending (βm = 1) Mmax = M and so N varieslinearly with M until the elastic buckling load Ncr y is reached For a beam-columnin uniform bending (βm = minus1) the relationship between N and M is non-linear andconcave due to the amplification of the bending moment from M to Mmax by theaxial load Also shown in Figure 77a are solutions of equation 713 based on theuse of the approximations of equations 77 and 78 A comparison of these withthe accurate solutions also shown in Figure 77a again demonstrates thecomparative accuracy of the approximate equations 77 and 78

302 Beam-columns

NN

y

N = NbyRd

10

05 0

ndash05ndash10

ndash05ndash10

10

05 0

NN

yNcryNy = 115Ncry Ny = 115

Accurate MmaxMApproximate Mmax M

M = My

0 02 04 06 08 10MM

0

02

04

06

08

10

y

N=Ny

N=Ncry

0 02 04 06 08 10MM

0

02

04

06

08

10

y

N=Ny

N=Ncry

Crooked beam-columns Straight beam-columns

m M

βm

m

MN

N

M=My

(b) Crooked beam-columns(a) Straight beam-columns

Figure 77 First yield of beam-columns with unequal end moments

The elastic in-plane behaviour of members in which the axial forces causetension instead of compression can also be analysed The maximum moment insuch a member never exceeds M and so a conservative estimate of the elasticlimit can be obtained from

N

Ny+ M

Myle 10 (714)

This forms the basis for the methods of designing tension members for in-planebending as discussed in Section 24

722 Fully plastic beam-columns

An upper bound estimate of the resistance of an I-section beam-column bent aboutits major axis can be obtained from the combination of bending moment Mplr andaxial force Nyr which causes the cross-section to become fully plastic A particularexample is shown in Figure 78 for which the distance zn from the centroid to theunstrained fibre is less than (h minus 2tf )2 This combination of moment and forcelies between the two extreme combinations for members with bending momentonly (N = 0) which become fully plastic at

Mpl = fybf tf (h minus tf )+ fytw

(h minus 2tf

2

)2

(715)

Beam-columns 303

4 ndash

ndash

ndash )2(

)(

22

nfwy

fffyrpl

zthtf+

thtbfM

bf

tf

h

tw

zn

fy

y

z

Nyr =

=

2fyzntw

fy

(a) Section (b) Stress distribution (c) Stress resultants

Figure 78 Fully plastic cross-section

0 05 10MplrMpl

0

05

10

Ny

Ny

r

0=yi

L

y y

MplrMpl = 118[1 ndash (Nyr Ny)]

Analytical solution

Figure 79 Interaction curves for lsquozero lengthrsquo members

and members with axial force only (M = 0) which become fully plastic at

Ny = fy[2bf tf + (h minus 2tf )tw] (716)

The variations of Mplr and Nyr are shown by the dashed interaction curve inFigure 79 These combinations can be used directly for very short beam-columnsfor which the bending moment at the fully plastic cross-section is approximatelyequal to the applied end moment M

Also shown in Figure 79 is the approximation

Mplry

Mply= 118

[1 minus Nyr

Ny

]le 10 (717)

304 Beam-columns

which is generally close to the accurate solution except when Nyr asymp 015Nywhen the maximum error is of the order of 5 This small error is quite acceptablesince the accurate solutions ignore the strengthening effects of strain-hardening

A similar analysis may be made of an I-section beam-column bent about itsminor axis In this case a satisfactory approximation for the load and moment atfull plasticity is given by

Mplrz

Mpl z= 119

[1 minus

(Nyr

Ny

)2]

le 10 (718)

Beam-columns of more general cross-section may also be analysed to deter-mine the axial load and moment at full plasticity In general these may be safelyapproximated by the linear interaction equation

Mplr

Mpl= 1 minus Nyr

Ny (719)

In a longer beam-column instability effects become important and failureoccurs before any section becomes fully plastic Afurther complication arises fromthe fact that as the beam-column deflects by δ its maximum moment increasesfrom the nominal value M to (M +Nδ) Thus the value of M at which full plasticityoccurs is given by

M = Mplr minus Nδ (720)

and so the value of M for full plasticity decreases from Mplr as the deflection δincreases as shown by curve 7 in Figure 72 This curve represents an upper boundto the behaviour of beam-columns which is only approached after the maximumstrength is reached

723 Ultimate resistance

7231 General

An isolated beam-column reaches its ultimate resistance at a load which is greaterthan that which causes first yield (see Section 721) but is less than that whichcauses a cross-section to become fully plastic (see Section 722) as indicatedin Figure 72 These two bounds are often far apart and when a more accurateestimate of the resistance is required an elasticndashplastic analysis of the imperfectbeam-column must be made Two different approximate analytical approaches tobeam-column strength may be used and these are related to the initial crookednessand residual stress methods discussed in Sections 322 and 334 of allowing forthe effects of imperfections on the resistances of real compression members Thesetwo approaches are discussed below

Beam-columns 305

7232 Elasticndashplastic resistances of straight beam-columns

The resistance of an initially straight beam-column with residual stresses maybe found by analysing numerically its non-linear elasticndashplastic behaviour anddetermining its maximum resistance [1] Some of these resistances [2 3] are shownas interaction plots in Figure 710 Figure 710a shows how the ultimate load Nand the end moment M vary with the major axis slenderness ratio Liy for beam-columns with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) while Figure 710bshows how these vary with the end moment ratio βm for a slenderness ratio ofLiy = 60

It has been proposed that these ultimate resistances can be simply and closelyapproximated by using the values of M and N which satisfy the interactionequations of both equation 717 and

N

NbyRd+ Cm

(1 minus NNcr y)

M

Mplyle 1 (721)

in which NbyRd is the ultimate resistance of a concentrically loaded column (thebeam-column with M = 0) which fails by deflecting about the major axis Ncr y

is the major axis elastic buckling load of this concentrically loaded column andCm is given by

Cm = 06 minus 04βm ge 04 (722)

Equation 717 ensures that the reduced plastic moment Mplr is not exceededby the end moment M and represents the resistances of very short members

ndash05

ndash10

0

05

10

0 05 10MM

0

05

10

pl

0 05 100

05

10

Li---- = 60y

y y

y y

M

MN

N

LM

MN

N

M

N

N

M

MN

NLiy

20

40

60

80

100120

0

MMpl

NN

y

NN

y

(a) Effect of slenderness (b) Effect of end moment ratio

m

Figure 710 Ultimate resistance interaction curves

306 Beam-columns

NN

y

NN

y

1)1( ndash118

1+

+ ndash

ypl

ycr

m

Rdyb

NNMM

NN

CN

N

Analytical solutions

11 ndash

1

plycrRdyb N M

M=

1plM

M=

=

NN

N

0 05 100

05

10

0 05 10MM

0

05

10

plMMpl

Li---- =120y

y y

M

MN

N

m =1

Li---- = 40y

80

120 0

1ndash

Analytical solutions

le

(a) Effect of slenderness (b) Effect of end moment ratio

Figure 711 Interaction formulae

(Liy rarr 0) and of some members which are not bent in single curvature (ieβm gt 0) as shown for example in Figure 711b

Equation 721 represents the interaction between buckling and bending whichdetermines the resistance of more slender members If the case of equal and oppo-site end moments is considered first (βm = minus1 and Cm = 1) then it will be seen thatequation 721 includes the same approximate amplification factor 1(1minusNNcr y)

as does equation 77 for the maximum moments in elastic beam-columns It is ofa similar form to the first yield condition of equation 713 except that a conver-sion to ultimate resistance has been made by using the ultimate resistance NbyRd and moment Mply instead of the squash load Ny and the yield moment My Thesesubstitutions ensure that this interaction formula gives the same limit predictionsfor concentrically loaded columns (M = 0) and for beams (N = 0) as do thetreatments given in Chapters 3 and 5 The accuracy of equation 721 for beam-columns with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) is demonstrated inFigure 711a

The effects of unequal end moments (βm gt minus1) on the ultimate resistances ofbeam-columns are allowed for approximately in equation 721 by the coefficientCm which converts the unequal end moments M andβmM into equivalent equal andopposite end moments CmM Although this conversion is for in-plane behaviour itis remarkably similar to the conversion used for beams with unequal end momentswhich buckle out of the plane of bending (see Section 6212) The accuracy ofequation 721 for beam-columns with unequal end moments is demonstrated in

Beam-columns 307

Figure 711b and it can be seen that it is good except for high values of βm whenit tends to be oversafe and for high values of M when it tends to overestimatethe analytical solutions for the ultimate resistance (although this overestimate isreduced if strain-hardening is accounted for in the analytical solutions) The over-conservatism for high values ofβm is caused by the use of the 04 cut-off in equation722 for Cm but more accurate solutions can be obtained by using equation 78for which the minimum value of Cm is 02

Thus the interaction equations (equations 717 and 721) provide a reasonablysimple method of estimating the ultimate resistances of I-section beam-columnsbent about the major axis which fail in the plane of the applied moments Theinteraction equations have been successfully applied to a wide range of sectionsincluding solid and hollow circular sections as well as I-sections bent about theminor axis In the latter case Mply NbyRd and Ncr y must be replaced by theirminor axis equivalents while equation 717 should be replaced by equation 718

It should be noted that the interaction equations provide a convenient way ofestimating the ultimate resistances of beam-columns An alternative method hasbeen suggested [4] using simple design charts to show the variation of the momentratio MMplr with the end moment ratio βm and the length ratio LLc in which Lc

is the length of a column which just fails under the axial load N alone (the effectsof strain-hardening must be included in the calculation of Lc)

7233 First yield of crooked beam-columns

In the second approximate approach to the resistance of a real beam-column thefirst yield of an initially crooked beam-column without residual stresses is usedFor this the magnitude of the initial crookedness is increased to allow approx-imately for the effects of residual stresses One logical way of doing this is touse the same crookedness as is used in the design of the corresponding compres-sion member since this has already been increased so as to allow for residualstresses

The first yield of a crooked beam-column is analysed in Section 752 andparticular solutions are shown in Figure 77b for a beam-column with Ncr yNy =115 and whose initial crookedness is defined by η = 0290(Li minus 0152) It canbe seen that as M decreases to zero the axial load at first yield increases to thecolumn resistance NbyRd which is reduced below the elastic buckling load Ncr y

by the effects of imperfections As N decreases the first yield loads for crookedbeam-columns approach the corresponding loads for straight beam-columns

For beam-columns in uniform bending (βm = minus1) the interaction between Mand N is non-linear and concave as it was for straight beam-columns (Figure 77a)If this interaction is plotted using the maximum moment Mmax instead of the endmoment M then the relationships between Mmax and N becomes slightly convexsince the non-linear effects of the amplification of M are then included in MmaxThus a linear relationship between MmaxMy and NNbyRd will provide a sim-ple and conservative approximation for first yield which is of good accuracy

308 Beam-columns

Full plasticity (equation 717)

Column resistance N=NbyRd

05

=10

ndash10ndash10

050

0

Mmax Mpl Mmax Mpl

NN

y

NN

y

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10 N =Ny

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10 N =Ny

M=MplM=Mpl

N =NbyRd N=NbyRd

(a) Approximation (equation 723) (b) Elasticndashplastic analyses of straightbeam-columns

Parabolictransition

Linear

m =10m

Figure 712 Resistances of beam-columns

However if this approximation is used for the resistance then it will becomeincreasingly conservative as Mmax increases since it approaches the first yieldmoment My instead of the fully plastic moment Mpl This difficulty may be over-come by modifying the approximation to a linear relationship between MmaxMpl

and NNbyRd which passes through MmaxMpl = 1 when NNbyRd = 0 as shownin Figure 712a Such an approximation is also in good agreement with the uniformbending (βm = minus1) analytical strengths [2 3] shown in Figure 712b for initiallystraight beam-columns with residual stresses

For beam-columns in double curvature bending (βm = 1) the first yield inter-action shown in Figure 77b forms an approximately parabolic transition betweenthe bounds of the column resistance NbyRd and the first yield condition of astraight beam-column In this case the effects of initial curvature are greatestnear mid-span and have little effect on the maximum moment which is gener-ally greatest at the ends Thus the strength may be simply approximated by aparabolic transition from the column resistance NbyRd to the full plasticity condi-tion given by equation 717 for I-sections bent about the major axis as shown inFigure 712a This approximation is in good agreement with the double curvaturebending (βm = 1) analytical resistances [2 3] shown in Figure 712b for straightbeam-columns with residual stresses and zero strain-hardening

The ultimate resistances of beam-columns with unequal end moments may beapproximated by suitable interpolations between the linear and parabolic approx-imations for beam-columns in uniform bending (βm = minus1) and double curvaturebending (βm = 1) It has been suggested [5 6] that this interpolation should be

Beam-columns 309

made according to

M

Mply=

1 minus

(1 + βm

2

)3(

1 minus N

NbyRd

)

+ 118

(1 + βm

2

)3radic(

1 minus N

Ncr y

)le 1 (723)

This interpolation uses a conservative cubic weighting to shift the resulting curvesdownwards towards the linear curve for βm = minus1 as shown in Figure 712a Thisis based on the corresponding shift shown in Figure 712b of the analytical results[2 3] for initially straight beam-columns with residual stresses

724 Design rules

7241 Cross-section resistance

EC3 requires beam-columns to satisfy both cross-section resistance and overallmember buckling resistance limitations The cross-section resistance limitationsare intended to prevent cross-section failure due to plasticity or local buckling

The general cross-section resistance limitation of EC3 is given by a modificationof the first yield condition of equation 714 to

NEd

NcRd+ MEd

McRdle 1 (724)

in which NEd is the design axial force and MEd the design moment acting at thecross-section under consideration NcRd is the cross-section axial resistance Afy(obtained using the effective cross-sectional area Aeff for slender cross-sections incompression) and McRd is the cross-section moment resistance (based on eitherthe plastic elastic or effective section modulus depending on classification)

This linear interaction equation is often conservative and so EC3 allows theuse of the more economic alternative for Class 1 and 2 cross-sections of directlycalculating the reduced plastic moment resistance MN Rd in the presence of anaxial load NEd The following criterion should be satisfied

MEd le MN Rd (725)

For doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections there is no reduction to the major axisplastic moment resistance (ie MN Rd = MplRd) provided both

NEd le 025NplRd (726a)

and

NEd le 05hwtwfyγM0

(726b)

310 Beam-columns

For larger values of NEd the reduced major axis plastic moment resistance isgiven by

MN yRd = MplyRd(1 minus n)

(1 minus 05a)le MplyRd (727)

in which

n = NEdNplRd (728)

and

a = A minus 2btfA

le 05 (729)

where b and tf and the flange width and thickness respectivelyIn minor axis bending there is no reduction to the plastic moment resistance of

doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections provided

NEd le hwtwfyγM0

(730)

For larger values of NEd the reduced plastic minor axis moment resistance is givenby

MN zRd = Mpl zRd (731a)

for n le a and by

MN zRd = Mpl zRd

[1 minus

(n minus a

1 minus a

)2]

(731b)

for n gt a Similar formulae are also provided for box sections

7242 Member resistance

The general in-plane member resistance limitation of EC3 is given by a simplifi-cation of equation 721 to

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRdle 1 (732)

for major axis buckling and

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MzEd

MczRdle 1 (733)

Beam-columns 311

for minor axis buckling in which kyy and kzz are interaction factors whose valuesmay be obtained from Annex A or Annex B of EC3 and McyRd and MczRd arethe in-plane bending resistances about the major and minor axes respectively Theformer is based on enhancing the elastically determined resistance to allow forpartial plastification of the cross-section (ie following Section 7233) whilst thelatter reduced the plastically determined resistance to allow for instability effects(ie following Section 7232) Lengthy formulae to calculate the interactionfactors are provided in both cases

73 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of isolatedbeam-columns

When an unrestrained beam-column is bent about its major axis it may buckleby deflecting laterally and twisting at a load which is significantly less than themaximum load predicted by an in-plane analysis This flexuralndashtorsional bucklingmay occur while the member is still elastic or after some yielding due to in-planebending and compression has occurred as indicated in Figure 713

731 Elastic beam-columns

7311 Beam-columns with equal end moments

Consider a perfectly straight elastic beam-column bent about its major axis (seeFigure 71b) by equal and opposite end moments M (so that βm = minus1) and loadedby an axial force N The ends of the beam-column are assumed to be simply

Load Load

Out-of-plane deformation In-plane deflection

(a) Out-of-plane behaviour (b) In-plane behaviour

1

2

3

Elastic buckling1

Inelastic buckling2

3

Inelastic buckling

Elasticndashplasticbending

First yield

Elastic buckling

Figure 713 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns

312 Beam-columns

supported and free to warp but end twist rotations are prevented It is also assumedthat the cross-section of the beam-column has two axes of symmetry so that theshear centre and centroid coincide

When the applied load and moments reach the elastic buckling values NcrMN McrMN a deflected and twisted equilibrium position is possible It is shown inSection 761 that this position is given by

v = McrMN

Ncr z minus NcrMNφ = δ sin

πx

L(734)

in which δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that theelastic buckling combination NcrMN McrMN is given by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(735)

in which ip = radic[(Iy + Iz)A] is the polar radius of gyration and

Ncr z = π2EIzL2 (736)

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2

)(737)

are the minor axis and torsional buckling loads of an elastic axially loaded column(see Sections 321 and 375) It can be seen that for the limiting case whenMcrMN = 0 the beam-column buckles as a compression member at the lower ofNcr z and NcrT and when NcrMN = 0 it buckles as a beam at the elastic bucklingmoment (see equation 63)

Mcr = Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

)(GIt + π2EIw

L2

)= ip

radicNcr zNcrT (738)

Some more general solutions of equation 735 are shown in Figure 714The derivation of equation 735 given in Section 761 neglects the approx-

imate amplification by the axial load of the in-plane moments to McrMN

(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y) (see Section 721) When this is accounted for equation 735for the elastic buckling combination of NcrMN and McrMN changes to

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr y

)(1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(739)

The maximum possible value of NcrMN is the lowest value of Ncr y Ncr z andNcrT For most sections this is much less than Ncr y and so equation 739 is usuallyvery close to equation 735 For most hot-rolled sections Ncr z is less than NcrT

Beam-columns 313

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10McrMNMzx

0

02

04

06

08

10

Ncr

MN

N

crz

NcrzNcrT = 50

02

20

05

10

Figure 714 Elastic buckling load combinations for beam-columns with equal end moments

so that (1 minus NcrMN NcrT ) gt (1 minus NcrMN Ncr z)(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y) In this caseequation 739 can be safely approximated by the interaction equation

NcrMN

Ncr z+ 1

(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y)

McrMN

Mzx= 1 (740)

7312 Beam-columns with unequal end moments

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of simply supported beam-columns withunequal major axis end moments M and βmM has been investigated numericallyand many solutions are available [7ndash11] The conservative interaction equation(

Mradic

F

ME

)2

+(

N

Ncr z

)= 1 (741)

has also been proposed [9] in which

M 2E = π2EIzGItL

2 (742)

The factor 1radic

F in equation 741 varies with the end moment ratio βm as shown inFigure 715 and allows the unequal end moments to be treated as equivalent equalend moments M

radicF Thus the elastic buckling of beam-columns with unequal

end moments can also be approximated by modifying equation 735 to

(McrMN radic

F)2

M 2zx

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

) (743)

or by a similar modification of equation 740

314 Beam-columns

0 02 04 06 08 10

04

06

08

Flexural ndash torsional buckling

In-plane behaviour

ndash0ndash04ndash06ndash08ndash10

11

F

Cm

Cm

02

M

M

N

N N

N

10

1 F

M F

M F1

F

m

1 m

m 1m

End moment ratio m

equiv

Cm

Figure 715 Equivalent end moments for beam-columns

It is of interest to note that the variation of the factor 1radic

F for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns is very close to that of the coefficient 1αm

obtained from

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (744)

used for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams (see Section 6212) and closeto that of the coefficient Cm (see equation 722) used for the in-plane behaviour ofbeam-columns

However the results shown in Figure 716 of a more recent investigation [12]of the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns have indicated that thefactor for converting unequal end moments into equivalent equal end momentsshould vary with NNcr z as well as with βm More accurate predictions have beenobtained using

(McrMN

αbcMzx

)2

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

) (745)

with

1

αbc=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

NcrMN

Ncr z

) (746)

Beam-columns 315

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

02

04

08

10

(1ndash )2

(a)

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

02

04

08

10β m M

M

N

N

NNcrz000025050

075095

000025050

075

095

06 06

M

omen

t coe

ffic

ient

1

NNcrz

(1 ndash )2

(b)

mm

bc

M

omen

t coe

ffic

ient

1

bc

End moment ratio mEnd moment ratio m

2EIwGItL2 = 009 2EIwGItL

2 =10

Figure 716 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling coefficients 1αbc in equation 745

7313 Beam-columns with elastic end restraints

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of symmetrically restrained beam-columnswith equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) is analysed in Section 762The particular example considered is one for which the minor axis bending andend warping restraints are equal This corresponds to the situation in which bothends of both flanges have equal elastic restraints whose stiffnesses are such that

Flange end moment

Flange end rotation= minusEIz

L

R

1 minus R(747)

in which the restraint parameter R varies from 0 (flange unrestrained) to 1 (flangerigidly restrained)

It is shown in Section 762 that the elastic buckling values McrMN and NcrMN

of the end moments and axial load for which the restrained beam-column buckleselastically are given by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(748)

in which

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr (749)

316 Beam-columns

and

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2cr

) (750)

where Lcr is the effective length of the beam-column

Lcr = kcrL (751)

and the effective length ratio kcr is the solution of

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (752)

Equation 748 is the same as equation 735 for simply supported beam-columnsexcept for the familiar use of the effective length Lcr instead of the actual lengthL in equations 749 and 750 defining Ncr z and NcrT Thus the solutions shownin Figure 714 can also be applied to end-restrained beam-columns

The close relationships between the flexuralndashtorsional buckling condition ofequation 735 for unrestrained beam-columns with equal end moments (βm = minus1)and the buckling loads Ncr z NcrT of columns and moments Mzx of beams havealready been discussed It should also be noted that equation 752 for the effectivelengths of beam-columns with equal end restraints is exactly the same as equation343 for columns when (1 minus R)R is substituted for γ1 and γ2 and equation 652for beams These suggest that the flexuralndashtorsional buckling condition for beam-columns with unequal end restraints could well be approximated by equations748ndash751 if Figure 321a is used to determine the effective length ratio kcr inequation 751

A further approximation may be suggested for restrained beam-columns withunequal end moments (βm = minus1) in which modifications of equations 745 and746 (after substituting i2

pNcr zNcrT for M 2zx) are used (with equations 749ndash751)

instead of equation 748

732 Inelastic beam-columns

The solutions obtained in Section 731 for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling ofstraight isolated beam-columns are only valid while they remain elastic Whenthe combination of the residual stresses with those induced by the in-plane load-ing causes yielding the effective rigidities of some sections of the member arereduced and buckling may occur at a load which is significantly less than thein-plane maximum load or the elastic buckling load as indicated in Figure 713

A method of analysing the inelastic buckling of I-section beam-columns withresidual stresses has been developed [13] and used [14] to obtain the predictionsshown in Figure 717 for the inelastic buckling loads of isolated beam-columns

Beam-columns 317

0 05 10MMIu

0

05

10

NN

Iz

0 1 2 0 1 2 3

= ndash1

300

150

100 250

200

150

300

200

Accurate [13]

Approximate equations 753 ndash 756

M

N

N

Liz

Liz

Liz

= 0 = +1

MMIu MMIu

m

m M

m m

Figure 717 Inelastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns

with unequal end moments It was found that these could be closely approximatedby modifying the elastic equations 745 and 746 to

(M

αbcI MIu

)2

=(

1 minus N

NIz

)(1 minus N

NcrT

) (753)

1

αbcI=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

N

NIz

)(754)

in which

MIuMpl = 1008 minus 0245MplMzx le 10 (755)

is an approximation for the inelastic buckling of a beam in uniform bending(equation 755 is similar to equation 623 when βm = minus1) and

NIzNy = 1035 minus 0181radic

NyNcr z minus 0128NyNcr z le 10 (756)

provides an approximation for the inelastic buckling of a column

733 Ultimate resistance

The ultimate resistances of real beam-columns which fail by flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling are reduced below their elastic and inelastic buckling loads by the pres-ence of geometrical imperfections such as initial crookedness just as are those ofcolumns (Section 34) and beams (Section 64)

318 Beam-columns

One method of predicting these reduced resistances is to modify the approximateinteraction equation for in-plane bending (equation 721) to

N

Nb zRd+ Cmy

(1 minus NNcr y)

My

Mb0yRdle 1 (757)

where Nb zRd is the minor axis strength of a concentrically loaded column(My = 0) and Mb0yRd the resistance of a beam (N = 0) with equal and oppo-site end moments (βm = minus1) which fails either by in-plane plasticity at Mplyor by flexuralndashtorsional buckling The basis for this modification is the remark-able similarity between equation 757 and the simple linear approximation ofequation 740 for the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns withequal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) The application of equation 757 tobeam-columns with unequal end moments is simplified by the similarity shown inFigure 715 between the values of Cm for in-plane bending and 1

radicF and 1αm

for flexuralndashtorsional bucklingHowever the value of this simple modification is lost if the in-plane strength

of a beam-column is to be predicted more accurately than by equation 721 Iffor example equation 723 is to be used for the in-plane strength as suggested inSection 7233 then it would be more appropriate to modify the flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling equations 745 and 753 to obtain out-of-plane strength predictions It hasbeen suggested [15] that the modified equations should take the form

(M

αbcuMb0yRd

)2

=(

1 minus N

Nb zRd

)(1 minus N

NcrT

)(758)

in which

1

αbcu=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

N

Nb zRd

) (759)

734 Design rules

The design of beam-columns against out-of-plane buckling will generally begoverned by

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRdle 1 (760)

in which kzy is an interaction factor that may be determined from Annex A orAnnex B of EC3 Equation 760 is similar to equation 732 for in-plane majoraxis buckling resistance except for the allowance for lateral torsional buckling inthe second term and the use of the minor axis column buckling resistance in thefirst term

Beam-columns 319

For members with the intermediate lateral restraints against minor axis bucklingfailure by major axis buckling with lateral torsional buckling between the restraintsbecomes a possibility This leads to requirement

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRdle 1 (761)

which incorporates the major axis flexural buckling resistance NbyRd and thelateral torsional buckling resistance MbRd For members with no lateral restraintsalong the span equation 760 will always govern over equation 761

The design of members subjected to bending and tension is discussed inSection 24

A worked example of checking the out-of-plane resistance of a beam-column isgiven in Section 774

74 Biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns

741 Behaviour

The geometry and loading of most framed structures are three-dimensional andthe typical member of such a structure is compressed bent about both principalaxes and twisted by the other members connected to it as shown in Figure 71cThe structure is usually arranged so as to produce significant bending about themajor axis of the member but the minor axis deflections and twists are oftensignificant as well because the minor axis bending and torsional stiffnesses aresmall In addition these deformations are amplified by the components of theaxial load and the major axis moment which are induced by the deformations ofthe member

The elastic biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns with equal and oppositeend moments acting about each principal axis has been analysed [16ndash22] butthe solutions obtained cannot be simplified without approximation These anal-yses have shown that the elastic biaxial bending of a beam-column is similar toits in-plane behaviour (see curve 3 of Figure 72) in that the major and minoraxis deflections and the twist all begin at the commencement of loading andincrease rapidly as the elastic buckling load (which is the load which causes elas-tic flexuralndashtorsional buckling when there are no minor axis moments and torquesacting) is approached First yield predictions based on these analyses have givenconservative estimates of the member resistances The elastic biaxial bending ofbeam-columns with unequal end moments has also been investigated In one ofthese investigations [16] approximate solutions were obtained by changing bothsets of unequal end moments into equivalent equal end moments by multiply-ing them by the conversion factor 1

radicF (see Figure 715) for flexuralndashtorsional

bucklingAlthough the first yield predictions for the resistances of slender beam-columns

are of reasonable accuracy they are rather conservative for stocky members in

320 Beam-columns

which considerable yielding occurs before failure Sophisticated numerical analy-ses have been made [18 20ndash24] of the biaxial bending of inelastic beam-columnsand good agreement with test results has been obtained However such an analysisrequires a specialised computer program and is only useful as a research tool

A number of attempts have been made to develop approximate methods ofpredicting the resistances of inelastic beam-columns One of the simplest of theseuses a linear extension

N

NbRd+ Cmy

(1 minus NNcr y)

My

Mb0yRd+ Cmz

(1 minus NNcr z)

Mz

Mc0zRdle 1 (762)

of the linear interaction equations for in-plane bending and flexuralndashtorsional buck-ling In this extension Mb0yRd is the ultimate moment which the beam-columncan support when N = Mz = 0 for the case of equal end moments (βm = minus1) whileMc0zRd is similarly defined Thus equation 762 reduces to an equation similarto equation 721 for in-plane behaviour when My = 0 and to equation 757 forflexuralndashtorsional buckling when Mz = 0 Equation 762 is used in conjunctionwith

My

Mplry+ Mz

Mplrzle 1 (763)

where Mplry is given by equation 717 and Mplrz by equation 718 Equation 763represents a linear approximation to the biaxial bending full plasticity limit for thecross-section of the beam-column and reduces to equation 718 or 717 whichprovides the uniaxial bending full plasticity limit when My = 0 or Mz = 0

A number of criticisms may be made of these extensions of the interactionequations First there is no allowance in equation 762 for the amplification of theminor axis moment Mz by the major axis moment My (the term (1minusNNcr z) onlyallows for the amplification caused by axial load N ) A simple method of allowingfor this would be to replace the term (1minusNNcr z) by either (1minusNNcrMN ) or by(1 minus MyMcrMN ) where the flexuralndashtorsional buckling load NcrMN and momentMcrMN are given by equation 745

Second studies [22ndash26] have shown that the linear additions of the momentterms in equations 762 and 763 generally lead to predictions which are too con-servative as indicated in Figure 718 It has been proposed that for column typehot-rolled I-sections the section full plasticity limit of equation 763 should bereplaced by(

My

Mplry

)α0

+(

Mz

Mplrz

)α0

le 1 (764)

where Mplry and Mplrz are given in equations 717 and 718 as before and theindex α0 by

α0 = 160 minus NNy

2 ln(NNy) (765)

Beam-columns 321

0 02 04 06 08 100

0 2

0 4

0 6

0 8

1 0 M

zM

crz

Rd

or M

zM

plr

z

Analyticalsolutions

NNy = 03

Liy = 60

Liy = 0

My MbryRd or My Mplry

Modified interactions equations(equation 764 ( = 17) equations 766 and 767)

Linear interactions equations(equations 762 and 763)

0

Figure 718 Interaction curves for biaxial bending

At the same time the linear member interaction equation (equation 762) shouldbe replaced by(

My

MbryRd

)αL

+(

Mz

McrzRd

)αL

le 1 (766)

where MbryRd the maximum value of My when N acts but Mz = 0 is obtainedfrom equation 757 McrzRd is similarly obtained from an equation similar toequation 721 and the index αL is given by

αL = 140 + N

Ny (767)

The approximations of equations 764ndash767 have been shown to be of reasonableaccuracy when compared with test results [27] This conclusion is reinforcedby the comparison of some analytical solutions with the approximations ofequations 764ndash767 (but with α0 = 170 instead of 1725 approximately forNNy = 03) shown in Figure 718 Unfortunately these approximations are oflimited application although it seems to be possible that their use may be extended

742 Design rules

7421 Cross-section resistance

The general biaxial bending cross-section resistance limitation of EC3 is given by

NEd

NcRd+ MyEd

McyRd+ MzEd

MczRdle 1 (768)

322 Beam-columns

which is a simple linear extension of the uniaxial cross-section resistance limitationof equation 724 For Class 1 plastic and Class 2 compact sections a more economicalternative is provided by a modification of equation 763 to

(MyEd

MN yRd

)α+

(MzEd

MN zRd

)βle 1 (769)

in which α = 20 and β = 5n ge 1 for equal flanged I-sections α = β = 20 forcircular hollow sections and α = β = 166(1 minus 113n2) le 6) for rectangularhollow sections where n = NEdNplRd Conservatively α and β may be takenas unity

7422 Member resistance

The general biaxial bending member resistance limitations are given by extensionsof equations 761 and 760 for uniaxial bending to

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRdle 1 (770)

and

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRdle 1 (771)

both of which must be satisfiedAlternative expressions for the interaction factors kyy kyz kzy and kzz are pro-

vided inAnnexesAand B of EC3 TheAnnex B formulations for the determinationof the interaction factors kij are less complex than those set out in Annex A result-ing in quicker and simpler calculations though generally at the expense of somestructural efficiency [28] Annex B may therefore be regarded as the simplifiedapproach whereas Annex A represents a more exact approach The background tothe development of the Annex A interaction factors has been described in [29] andthat of the Annex B interaction factors in [30]

For columns in simple construction the bending moments arising as a resultof the eccentric loading from the beams are relatively small and much simplerinteraction expressions can be developed with no significant loss of structuralefficiency Thus it has been shown [31] that for simple construction with hot-rolledI- and H-sections and with no intermediate lateral restraints along the memberlength equations 770 and 771 may be replaced by the single equation

NEd

Nb zRd+ MyEd

MbRd+ 15

MzEd

MczRdle 1 (772)

Beam-columns 323

provided the ratio of end moments is less than zero (ie a triangular or less severebending moment diagram)

Aworked example for checking the biaxial bending of a beam-column is given inSection 775 Further worked examples of the application of the EC3 beam-columnformulae are given in [30] and [32]

75 Appendix ndash in-plane behaviour of elasticbeam-columns

751 Straight beam-columns

The bending moment in the beam-column shown in Figure 73 is the sum of themoment [M minus M (1 + βm)xL] due to the end moments and reactions and themoment Nw due to the deflection w Thus the differential equation of bending isobtained by equating this bending moment to the internal moment of resistanceminusEIyd2wdx2 whence

minusEIyd2w

dx2= M minus M (1 + βm)

x

L+ Nw (773)

The solution of this equation which satisfies the support conditions (w)0 =(w)L = 0 is

w = M

N

[cosmicrox minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1 + (1 +βm)

x

L

] (71)

where

micro2 = N

EIy= π2

L2

N

Ncr y (72)

The bending moment distribution can be obtained by substituting equation 71 intoequation 773 The maximum bending moment can be determined by solving thecondition

d(minusEIyd2wdx2)

dx= 0

for the position xmax of the maximum moment whence

tanmicroxmax = minusβmcosecmicroL minus cotmicroL (774)

The value of xmax is positive while

βm lt minuscosπ

radicN

Ncr y

324 Beam-columns

and the maximum moment obtained by substituting equation 774 into equation773 is

Mmax = M

1 +

βmcosecπ

radicN

Ncr y+ cot π

radicN

Ncr y

2

05

(73)

When βm gt minus cosπradic(NNcr y) xmax is negative in which case the maximum

moment in the beam-column is the end moment M at x = 0 whence

Mmax = M (74)

For beam-columns which are bent in single curvature by equal and oppositeend moments (βm = minus1) equation 71 for the deflected shape simplifies and thecentral deflection δmax can be expressed non-dimensionally as

δmax

δ= 8π2

NNcr y

[sec

π

2

radicN

Ncr yminus 1

](75)

in which δ = ML28EIy is the value of δmax when N = 0 The maximum momentoccurs at the centre of the beam-column and is given by

Mmax = M secπ

2

radicN

Ncr y (76)

Equations 75 and 76 are plotted in Figure 74

752 Beam-columns with initial curvature

If the beam-column shown in Figure 73 is not straight but has an initialcrookedness given by

w0 = δ0sinπxL

then the differential equation of bending becomes

minusEIyd2w

dx2= M minus M (1 + βm)

x

L+ N (w + w0) (775)

The solution of this equation which satisfies the support conditions of (w)0 =(w)L = 0 is

w = (MN )[cos microx minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1

+ (1 + βm)xL] + [(microLπ)21 minus (microLπ)2]δ0sinπxL (776)

Beam-columns 325

where

(microLπ)2 = NNcr y (777)

The bending moment distribution can be obtained by substituting equation 776into equation 775 The position of the maximum moment can then be determinedby solving the condition d(minusEIyd2wdx2)dx = 0 whence

Nδ0

M= microL

π

(1 minus micro2L2

π2

) (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) cosmicroxmax + sinmicroxmaxcosπxmaxL

(778)

The value of the maximum moment Mmax can be obtained from equations 775and 776 (with x = xmax) and from equation 778 and is given by

Mmax

M= cosmicroxmax minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicroxmax

+ (Nδ0M )

(1 minus micro2L2π2)sin

πxmax

L (779)

First yield occurs when the maximum stress is equal to the yield stress fy inwhich case

N

Ny+ Mmax

My= 1

or

N

Ny

1 + Mmax

M

Nyδ0

My

M

Nδ0

= 1 (780)

In the special case of M = 0 the first yield solution is the same as that given inSection 322 for a crooked column Equation 778 is replaced by xmax = L2 andequation 779 by

Mmax = Nδ0

(1 minus micro2L2π2)

The value NL of N which then satisfies equation 780 is given by the solution of

NL

Ny+ NLδ0My

1 minus (NLNy)(Ncr yNy) = 0 (781)

The value of MMy at first yield can be determined for any specified set ofvalues of Ncr yNy βm δ0NyMy and NNy An initial guess for xmaxL allowsNδ0M to be determined from equation 778 and MmaxM from equation 779and these can then be used to evaluate the left-hand side of equation 780 This

326 Beam-columns

process can be repeated until the values are found which satisfy equation 780Solutions obtained in this way are plotted in Figure 77b

76 Appendix ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling ofelastic beam-columns

761 Simply supported beam-columns

The elastic beam-column shown in Figure 71b is simply supported and preventedfrom twisting at its ends so that

(v)0L = (φ)0L = 0 (782)

and is free to warp (see Section 1083) so that(d2φ

dx2

)0L

= 0 (783)

The combination at elastic buckling of the axial load NcrMN and equal andopposite end moments McrMN (ie βm = minus1) can be determined by findinga deflected and twisted position which is one of equilibrium The differentialequilibrium equations for such a position are

EIzd2v

dx2+ NcrMN v = minusMcrMNφ (784)

for minor axis bending and

(GJ minus NcrMN i2

p

)dφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= McrMN

dv

dx(785)

for torsion where i2p = radic[(Iy+Iz)A] is the polar radius of gyration Equation 784

reduces to equation 359 for compression member buckling when McrMN = 0and to equation 682 for beam buckling when NcrMN = 0 Equation 785 canbe used to derive equation 373 for torsional buckling of a compression mem-ber when McrMN = 0 and reduces to equation 682 for beam buckling whenNcrMN = 0

The buckled shape of the beam-column is given by

v = McrMN

Ncr z minus NcrMNφ = δ sin

πx

L (734)

where Ncr z = π2EIzL2 is the minor axis elastic buckling load of an axiallyloaded column and δ the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection The

Beam-columns 327

boundary conditions of equations 782 and 783 are satisfied by this buckled shapeas is equation 784 while equation 785 is satisfied when

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(735)

where

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2

)(737)

is the elastic torsional buckling load of an axially loaded column (see Section 375)Equation 735 defines the combinations of axial load NcrMN and end momentsMcrMN which cause the beam-column to buckle elastically

762 Elastically restrained beam-columns

If the elastic beam-column shown in Figure 71b is not simply supported but is elas-tically restrained at its ends against minor axis rotations dvdx and against warpingrotations (df 2)dφdx (where df is the distance between flange centroids) thenthe boundary conditions at the end x = L2 of the beam-column can be expressedin the form

MB + MT

(dvdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R2

1 minus R2

MT minus MB

(df 2)(dφdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R4

1 minus R4

(786)

where MT and MB are the flange minor axis end restraining moments

MT = 12EIz(d2vdx2)

L2 + (df 4

)EIz

(d2φdx2)

L2

MB = 12EIz(d2vdx2)

L2 minus (df 4

)EIz

(d2φdx2)

L2

and R2 and R4 are dimensionless minor axis bending and warping end restraintparameters which vary between zero (no restraint) and one (rigid restraint)If the beam-column is symmetrically restrained similar conditions apply at theend x = minusL2 The other support conditions are

(v)plusmnL2 = (φ)plusmnL2 = 0 (787)

328 Beam-columns

The particular case for which the minor axis and warping end restraints areequal so that

R2 = R4 = R (788)

can be analysed When the restrained beam-column has equal and opposite endmoments (βm = minus1) the differential equilibrium equations for a buckled positionv φ are

EIzd2v

dx2+ NcrMN v = minusMcrMNφ + (MB + MT )(

GIt minus NcrMN i2p

)dφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= McrMN

dv

dx

(789)

These differential equations and the boundary conditions of equations 786ndash788are satisfied by the buckled shape

v = McrMNφ

Ncr z minus NcrMN= A

(cos

πx

kcrLminus cos

π

2kcr

)

where

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr (749)

Lcr = kcrL (751)

when the effective length ratio kcr satisfies

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (752)

This is the same as equation 652 for the buckling of restrained beams whosesolutions are shown in Figure 618c The values McrMN and NcrMN for flexuralndashtorsional buckling of the restrained beam-column are obtained by substituting thebuckled shape v φ into equations 789 and are related by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(748)

where

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2cr

) (751)

Beam-columns 329

77 Worked examples

771 Example 1 ndash approximating the maximum elasticmoment

Problem Use the approximations of Figures 75 and 76 to determine the maxi-mum moments Mmaxy Mmax z for the 254 times 146 UB 37 beam-columns shown inFigure 719d and c

Solution for Mmaxy for the beam-column of Figure 719d

Using Figure 75 kcr = 10 γm = 10 γn = 10 γs = 018My = 20 times 94 = 45 kNm

Ncr y = π2 times 210 000 times 5537 times 104(10 times 9000)2 N = 1417 kN

Using equation 710 δy = 10 times (1 minus 018 times 2001417)

(1 minus 10 times 2001417)= 1135

Using equation 79 Mmax y = 1135 times 45 = 511 kNm

Solution for Mmaxz for the beam-column of Figure 719c

Using Figure 76 kcr = 10 γm = 10 γn = 049 γs = 018

Mz = 32 times 4528 = 81 kNm

Ncr z = π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104(10 times 4500)2 N = 5844 kN

Using equation 710 δz = 10 times (1 minus 018 times 2005844)

(1 minus 049 times 2005844)= 1127

Using equation 79 Mmax z = 1127 times 81 = 91 kNm

4500 4500

20 kN

200 kN

z

x

(b) Example 2

4500 4500

32 kNm200 kN

y

x

(c) Examples1 3 5

4500 4500

20 kN

200 kN

z

x

(d) Examples1 4 5

v = = 0

y

z

(a) 254 times 146 UB 37

h = 2560 mm bf = 1464 mm tf = 109 mm tw = 63 mm r = 76 mm

A = 472 cm2

It = 153 cm4

Iw = 00857 dm6

Iy = 5537 cm4

iy = 108 cm Wply = 483 cm3

Wely = 433 cm3

Iz = 571 cm4

iz = 348 cm Wplz = 119 cm3

Welz = 780 cm3

Figure 719 Examples 1ndash5

330 Beam-columns

772 Example 2 ndash checking the major axis in-planeresistance

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719bhas a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a design concen-trated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) acting in themajor principal plane at mid-span The beam-column is the 254 times 146 UB 37of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a The beam-column is continuously bracedagainst lateral deflections v and twist rotations φ Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

tf = 109 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235275)05 = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = ((1464 minus 63 minus 2 times 76)2)(109 times 0924) = 620 lt 9 T52

and the flange is Class 1

cw = 2560 minus (2 times 109)minus (2 times 76) = 2190 mm

The compression proportion of web is

α =(

h

2minus (tf + r)+ 1

2

NEd

twfy

)cw

=(

256

2minus (109 + 76)+ 1

2times 200 times 103

63 times 275

)2190

= 076 gt 05 T52

cwtw = 219063 = 348 lt 413 = 396ε

13α minus 1T52

and the web is Class 1

McyRd = 275 times 483 times 10310 Nmm = 1328 kNm 625(2)

MyEd = 20 times 94 = 450 kNm

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 450

1328= 0493 le 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Beam-columns 331

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

Because the section is Class 1 Clause 6291 can be usedNo reduction in plastic moment resistance is required provided both

NEd = 200 kN lt 3245 kN = (025 times 472 times 102 times 27510)103

= 025NplRd and 6291(4)

NEd = 200 kN lt 2029 kN = 05 times (2560 minus 2 times 109)times 63 times 275

10 times 103

= 05 hwtwfyγM0

6291(4)

and so no reduction in the plastic moment resistance is requiredThus MN yRd = MplyRd = 1328 kNm gt 450 kNm = MyEd

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Compression member buckling resistance

Because the member is continuously braced beam lateral buckling and columnminor axis buckling need not be considered

λy =radic

AfyNcr y

= Lcr y

iy

1

λ1= 9000

(108 times 10)

1

939 times 0924= 0960 6313(1)

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about they-axis use buckling curve (a) with α = 021 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 021(0960 minus 02)+ 09602] = 1041 6312(1)

χy = 1(1041 +radic

10412 minus 09602) = 0693 6312(1)

NbyRd = χyAfyγM1 = 0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510 N

= 900 kN gt 200 kN = NEd 6311(3)

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

αh = MhMs = 0 ψ = 0 Cmy = 090 + 01αh = 090 TB3

Cmy

(1 + (λy minus 02)

NEd

χyNRkγM1

)= 090

times(

1 + (0960 minus 02)times 200 times 103

0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1052

332 Beam-columns

lt Cmy

(1 + 08

NEd

χyNRkγM1

)= 090

times(

1 + 08 times 200 times 103

0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1060 TB1

so that kyy = 1052

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1328

= 0222 + 0356 = 0579 lt 1 633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

λmax = λy = 0960 TA1

Ncr y = π2EIyL2cr = π2 times 21 0000 times 5537 times 10490002 = 1417 kN

Since there is no lateral buckling λ0 = 0 bLT = 0 CmLT = 10 TA1

Cmy = Cmy0 = 1 minus 018NEdNcr y = 1 minus 018 times 2001417 = 0975 TA2

wy = Wply

Wely= 483

433= 1115

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

wyC2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09752 times 0960 minus 16

1115

times09752 times 09602) times 0154 minus 0]

= 0990 gt 0896 = 11115 TA1

Beam-columns 333

microy = 1 minus NEdNcr y

1 minus χyNEdNcr y= 1 minus 2001417

1 minus 0693 times 2001417= 0952 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

(1 minus NEdNcr y)

1

Cyy

= 0975 times 10 times 0952

1 minus 2001417times 1

0990= 1091 TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRd= 200

900+ 1091 times 450

1328

= 0222 + 0370 = 0592 lt 1 633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

773 Example 3 ndash checking the minor axis in-planeresistance

Problem The 9 m long two span beam-column shown in Figure 719c has a fac-tored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a factored design uniformlydistributed load of 32 kNm acting in the minor principal plane The beam-columnis the 254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacyof the beam-column

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

MzEd = 32 times 4528 = 81 kNm

The flange is Class 1 under uniform compression and so remains Class 1 undercombined loading

cw(twε)= (2560 minus 2 times 109 minus 2 times 76)(63 times 0924)= 376lt 38 T52

and the web is Class 2 Thus the overall cross-section is Class 2

MczRd = 275 times 119 times 10310 Nmm = 327 kNm 625(2)

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 81

327= 0402 lt 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

334 Beam-columns

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

Because the section is Class 2 Clause 6291 can be used

NEd = 200 kN lt 406 kN = (256 minus 2 times 109)times 63 times 275

10 times 103= hwtwfy

γM0

6291(4)

and so no reduction in plastic moment resistance is required

Thus MN zRd = Mpl zRd = 327 kNm gt 81 kNm = MzEd 625(2)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Compression member buckling resistance

λz =radic

AfyNcr z

= Lcr z

iz

1

λ1= 4500

(348 times 10)

1

939 times 0924= 1490 6313(1)

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034 (1490 minus 02)+ 14902] = 1829 6312(1)

χz = 1(1829 +radic

18292 minus 14902) = 0346 6312(1)

Nb zRd = χzAfyγM1 = 0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510 N

= 449 kN gt 200 kN = NEd 6311(3)

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

Because the member is bent about the minor axis beam lateral buckling need notbe considered and eLT = 0

Mh = minus81 kNm Ms = 9 times 32 times 452128 = 456 kNm ψ = 0 TB3

αs = MsMh = 456(minus81) = minus0563 TB3

Cmz = 01 minus 08αs = 01 minus 08 times (minus0563) = 0550 gt 040 TB3

Cmz

(1 + (2λz minus 06)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)= 0550 times

(1 + (2 times 1490 minus 06)

times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1133

Beam-columns 335

gt Cmz

(1 + 14

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

= 0550 times(

1 + 14 times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0893 TB1

kzz = 0893 TB1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MzEd

McyRd= 200

449+ 0893

81

327= 0445 + 0221 = 0666 le 1

633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

From Section 772 λy = 0960

λmax = λz = 1490 gt 0960 = λy TA1

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr z = π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 10445002 N = 5844 kN

|δx| = qL4

185EIz= 32 times 45004

185 times 210 000 times 571 times 104= 592 mm

∣∣MzEd(x)∣∣ = 81 kNm

Cmz = Cmz0 = 1 +(

π2EIz |δx|L2

∣∣MzEd(x)∣∣ minus 1

)NEd

Ncr z

= 1 +(π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104 times 59

45002 times 81 times 106minus 1

)200

5844= 0804 TA2

wz = Wpl z

Welz= 119

78= 1526 gt 15

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Czz = 1 + (wz minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wzC2

mzλmax minus 16

wzC2

mzλ2max

)npl minus eLT

]ge Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

15times 08042 times 1490 minus 16

15times 08042 times 14902

)

times 0154 minus 0

]= 0958 gt 0667 = 115 TA1

336 Beam-columns

microz = 1 minus NEdNcr z

1 minus χzNEdNcr z= 1 minus 2005844

1 minus 0346 times 2005844= 0746 TA1

kzz = Cmzmicroz

(1 minus NEdNcr z)

1

Czz= 0804 times 0746

1 minus 200584times 1

0958= 0952

TA1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MyEd

McyRd= 200

449+ 0952 times 81

327= 0445 + 0236 = 0681 lt 1

633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

774 Example 4 ndash checking the out-of-plane resistance

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719dhas a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a factored designconcentrated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) actingin the major principal plane at mid-span Lateral deflections v and twist rotationsφ are prevented at the ends and at mid-span The beam-column is the 254 times146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Design bending moment

MyEd = 450 kNm as in Section 772

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

The cross-section resistance was checked in Section 772

Beam-column member buckling resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

While the member major axis in-plane resistance without lateral buckling waschecked in Section 772 the lateral buckling resistance between supports shouldbe used in place of the in-plane bending resistance to check against equation 661of EC3

From Section 6152 MbRd = 1214 kNmFrom Section 772 NbyRd = 900 kN kyy = 1052 and MyEd = 450 kNm

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1214= 0222 + 0390

= 0612 le 1 633(4)

and the member in-plane resistance is adequateFor the member out-of-plane resistance (equation 662 of EC3)

Beam-columns 337

From Section 773 Nb zRd = 449 kN χz = 0346 λz = 1490 λmax = 1490Ncr z = 5844 kN and wz = 15

ψ = 0 CmLT = 06 + 04ψ = 06 gt 04 TB3(1 minus 01λz

(CmLT minus 025)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

=(

1 minus 01 times 1490

(06 minus 025)times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0810

(1 minus 01

(CmLT minus 025)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

=(

1 minus 01

(06 minus 025)times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0873 TB1

kzy = 0873 TB1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

449+ 0873 times 450

1214= 0445 + 0324 = 0769 lt 1

633(4)

and the member out-of-plane resistance is adequate

Beam-column member buckling resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

The member in-plane resistance was checked in Section 772 but as for the sim-plified approach equation 661 should be checked by taking the lateral bucklingresistance in place of the in-plane major axis bending resistance The interactionfactor kyy also requires re-calculating due to the possibility of lateral buckling

λy = 0960 λmax = λz = 1490 TA1

Using Mzx = 1112 kNm from Section 6152

λ0 = radic13281112 = 1093 TA1

Since cross-section is doubly-symmetrical using equation 737 with

ip =radic(Iy + Iz)A =

radic(5537 times 104 + 571 times 104)472 times 102

= 1138 mm

NcrT = 1

i2p

(G It + π2EIw

L2crT

)

= 1

11382

(81000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

45002

)

= 1636 kN

338 Beam-columns

Using αm of equation 65 for C1 with βm = 0 leads to C1 = 175

02radic

C14

radic(1 minus NEd

Ncr z

)(1 minus NEd

NcrT

)

= 02 times radic175 times 4

radic(1 minus 200

5844

)(1 minus 200

1636

)

= 0231 lt 1093 = λ0 TA1

aLT = 1 minus ItIy = 1 minus 1545537 = 0997 gt 0 TA1

εy = MyEd

NEd

A

Wely= 45 times 106

200 times 103times 472 times 102

433 times 103= 2453 TA1

Using Ncr y = 1417 kN from Section 772

Cmy0 = 1 minus 018NEdNcr y = 1 minus 018 times 2001417 = 0975 TA2

Cmy = Cmy0 + (1 minus Cmy0)

radicεyaLT

1 + radicεyaLT

= 0975 + (1 minus 0975)timesradic

2453 times 0997

1 + radic2453 times 0997

= 0990 TA1

CmLT = C2my

aLTradic(1 minus NEd

Ncr z

)(1 minus NEd

NcrT

)

= 09902 times 0997radic(1 minus 200

5844

)(1 minus 200

1636

) = 1287 gt 1 TA1

wy = Wply

Wely= 483

433= 1115

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

wyC2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

Beam-columns 339

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09902 times 1490 minus 16

1115

times 09902 times 14902)

times 0154 minus 0

]

= 0942 gt 0896 TA1

Using χy = 0693 from Section 772

microy = 1 minus NEdNcr y

1 minus χyNEdNcr y= 1 minus 2001417

1 minus 0693 times 2001417= 0952 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Cyy= 09900 times 1287

times 0952

1 minus 2001417

1

0942= 1499 TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

900+ 1499 times 450

1214

= 0222 + 0556 = 0778 lt 1 633(4)

and the member in-plane resistance (with lateral buckling between the lateralsupports) is adequate

For the member out-of-plane resistance (equation 662 of EC3)

Czy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

2 minus 14

C2myλ

2max

w5y

npl minus dLT

ge 06

radicwy

wz

Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 09902 times 14902

11155

)times 0154 minus 0

]

= 0722 gt 046 TA1

Using χz = 0346 from Section 773

microz = 1 minus NEdNcr z

1 minus χzNEdNcr z= 1 minus 2005844

1 minus 0346 times 2005844= 0746 TA1

kzy = CmyCmLTmicroz

1 minus NEd

Ncr y

1

Czy06

radicwy

wz= 0990 times 1287

times 0746

1 minus 200

1417

times 1

0722times 06 times

radic1115

15= 0793 TA1

340 Beam-columns

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

449+ 0793 times 450

1214= 0445 + 0294 = 0739 lt 1

633(4)

and the member out-of-plane resistance is adequate

775 Example 5 ndash checking the biaxial bending capacity

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719cand d has a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN a factored designconcentrated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) actingin the major principal plane and a factored design uniformly distributed loadof 32 kNm acting in the minor principal plane Lateral deflections v and twistrotations φ are prevented at the ends and at mid-span The beam-column is the254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Design bending moments

MyEd = 450 kNm(Section 772) MzEd = 81 kNm(Section 773)

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

Combining the calculations of Sections 772 and 773

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 450

1328+ 81

327= 0740 lt 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

As shown in Sections 772 and 773 the axial load is sufficiently low for there is tobe no reduction in the moment resistance about either the major or the minor axis

n = NEdNplRd = 200 times 103(472 times 102 times 27510) = 0154

β = 5n = 0770 6291(6)[MyEd

MN yRd

]α+

[MzEd

MN zRd

]β=

[450

1328

]2

+[

81

327

]0770

= 0456 le 1

6291(6)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Beam-columns 341

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

Checks are required against equations 661 and 662 of EC3 From the appropriateparts of Sections 772ndash774

kyy = 1052 kzz = 0893 kzy = 0873 NbyRd = 900 kN

MbRd = 1214 kNm MzRd = 327 kNm and Nb zRd = 449 kN

kyz = 06kzz = 06 times 0893 = 0536 TB1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1214+ 0536

times 81

327= 0222 + 0390 + 0133 = 0745 lt 1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

449+ 0873 times 450

1214

+ 0893 times 81

327= 0445 + 0324 + 0221 = 0990 lt 1

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

Checks are required against equations 661 and 662 of EC3 Relevant details aretaken from the appropriate parts of Sections 772 773 and 774

bLT = 05aLTλ20

MyEd

χLT MplyRd

MzEd

Mpl zRd= 05 times 0997 times 10932

times 45

1214times 81

327= 00546 TA1

cLT = 10aLTλ

20

5 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd= 10 times 0997

times 10932

5 + 14904times 45

0990 times 1214= 0449 TA1

dLT = 2aLTλ0

01 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd

MzEd

CmzMpl zRd

= 2 times 0997 times 1093

01 + 14904times 45

0990 times 1214times 81

0804 times 327

= 00500 TA1

eLT = 17aLTλ0

01 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd= 17 times 0997 times 1093

01 + 14904

times 45

0990 times 1214= 0138 TA1

342 Beam-columns

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

112C2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09902 times 1490 minus 16

1115

times09902 times 14902) times 0154 minus 00546] = 0936 gt 0896 TA1

Cyz = 1 + (wz minus 1)

[(2 minus 14

C2mzλ

2max

w5z

)npl minus cLT

]ge 06

radicwz

wy

Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 08042 times 14902

155

)times 0154 minus 0449

]

= 0726 gt 0456 TA1

Czy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

2 minus 14

C2myλ

2max

w5y

npl minus dLT

ge 06

radicwy

wz

Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 09902 times 14902

11155

)times 0154 minus 00500

]

= 0716 gt 0464 TA1

Czz = 1+ (wz minus1)

[(2 minus 16

wzC2

mzλmax minus 16

wzC2

mzλ2max

)npl minus eLT

]ge Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

15times 08042 times 1490 minus 16

15times 08042

times14902)

times 0154 minus 0138

]= 0888 gt 0655 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Cyy

= 0990 times 1287 times 0952

1 minus 2001417times 1

0936= 1508 TA1

kyz = Cmzmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr z

1

Cyz06

radicwz

wy= 0804 times 0952

1 minus 2005844

times 1

0726times 06 times

radic15

1115= 1115 TA1

Beam-columns 343

kzy = CmyCmLTmicroz

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Czy06

radicwy

wz= 0990

times 1287 times 0746

1 minus 2001417times 1

0716times 06 times

radic1115

15= 0800 TA1

kzz = Cmzmicroz

1 minus NEdNcr z

1

Czz= 0804 times 0746

1 minus 2005844times 1

0888= 1027

TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

900+ 1508 times 450

1214

+ 1115 times 81

327= 0222 + 0559 + 0276 = 1057 gt 1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

449+ 0800 times 450

1214+ 1027

times 81

327= 0445 + 0296 + 0254 = 0995 lt 1

and the member resistance appears to be inadequate

78 Unworked examples

781 Example 6 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 720a and show that the maximum moment Mmax maybe closely approximated by using the greater of Mmax = qL28 and

Mmax = 9qL2

128

(1 minus 029NNcr y)

(1 minus NNcr y)

in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

782 Example 7 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the propped cantilever shownin Figure 720b and show that the maximum moment Mmax may be closelyapproximated by using

Mmax

qL28asymp (1 minus 018NNcr y)

(1 minus 049NNcr y)

in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

344 Beam-columns

qL L8

2

(a) Simply supported beam-column

L

(b) Propped cantilever

q

L

(c) Continuous beam-column

qN

L

Figure 720 Examples 6ndash8

783 Example 8 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the two-span beam-columnshown in Figure 720c and show that the maximum moment Mmax may be closelyapproximated by using

Mmax

qL28asymp (1 minus 018NNcr y)

(1 minus 049NNcr y)

while N le Ncr y in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

784 Example 9 ndash in-plane design

A 70 m long simply supported beam-column which is prevented from swayingand from deflecting out of the plane of bending is required to support a factoreddesign axial load of 1200 kN and factored design end moments of 300 and 150 kNmwhich bend the beam-column in single curvature about the major axis Design asuitable UB or UC beam-column of S275 steel

785 Example 10 ndash out-of-plane design

The intermediate restraints of the beam-column of example 9 which preventdeflection out of the plane of bending are removed Design a suitable UB orUC beam-column of S275 steel

786 Example 11 ndash biaxial bending design

The beam-column of example 10 has to carry additional factored design endmoments of 75 and 75 kNm which cause double curvature bending about theminor axis Design a suitable UB or UC beam-column of S275 steel

Beam-columns 345

References

1 Chen W-F and Atsuta T (1976) Theory of Beam-Columns Vol 1 In-Plane Behaviorand Design McGraw-Hill New York

2 Galambos TV and Ketter RL (1959) Columns under combined bending andthrust Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 85 No EM2 Aprilpp 1ndash30

3 Ketter RL (1961) Further studies of the strength of beam-columns Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 87 No ST6 August pp 135ndash52

4 Young BW (1973) The in-plane failure of steel beam-columns The StructuralEngineer 51 pp 27ndash35

5 Trahair NS (1986) Design strengths of steel beam-columns Canadian Journal ofCivil Engineering 13 No 6 December pp 639ndash46

6 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1987) Limit state design rules for steel beam-columnsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 21 No 2 Septemberpp 2ndash11

7 Salvadori MG (1955) Lateral buckling of I-beams Transactions ASCE 120pp 1165ndash77

8 Salvadori MG (1955) Lateral buckling of eccentrically loaded I-columns Transac-tions ASCE 121 pp 1163ndash78

9 Horne MR (1954) The flexuralndashtorsional buckling of members of symmetricalI-section under combined thrust and unequal terminal moments Quarterly Journalof Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 7 pp 410ndash26

10 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

11 Trahair NS (1993) FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN SponLondon

12 Cuk PE and Trahair NS (1981) Elastic buckling of beam-columns with unequalend moments Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE23 No 3 August pp 166ndash71

13 Bradford MA Cuk PE Gizejowski MA and Trahair NS (1987) Inelastic lateralbuckling of beam-columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 11November pp 2259ndash77

14 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1985) Inelastic buckling of beam-columnswith unequal end moments Journal of Constructional Steel Research 5 No 3pp 195ndash212

15 Cuk PE Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1986) Inelastic lateral buckling ofsteel beam-columns Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 13 No 6 Decemberpp 693ndash9

16 Horne MR (1956) The stanchion problem in frame structures designed accordingto ultimate load carrying capacity Proceedings of the Institution of Civil EngineersPart III 5 pp 105ndash46

17 Culver CG (1966) Exact solution of the biaxial bending equations Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 92 No ST2 pp 63ndash83

18 Harstead GA Birnsteil C and Leu K-C (1968) Inelastic H-columns under biaxialbending Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 94 No ST10 pp 2371ndash98

19 Trahair NS (1969) Restrained elastic beam-columns Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 95 No ST12 pp 2641ndash64

346 Beam-columns

20 Vinnakota S and Aoshima Y (1974) Inelastic behaviour of rotationally restrainedcolumns under biaxial bending The Structural Engineer 52 pp 245ndash55

21 Vinnakota S and Aysto P (1974) Inelastic spatial stability of restrained beam-columns Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST11 pp 2235ndash54

22 Chen W-F and Atsuta T (1977) Theory of Beam-Columns Vol 2 Space Behaviorand Design McGraw-Hill New York

23 Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columnsI Theory Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2041ndash61

24 Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns IIApplications Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2062ndash85

25 Tebedge N and Chen W-F (1974) Design criteria for H-columns under biaxialloading Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST3 pp 579ndash98

26 Young BW (1973) Steel column design The Structural Engineer 51 pp 323ndash3627 Bradford MA (1995) Evaluation of design rules of the biaxial bending of beam-

columns Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE 37No 3 pp 241ndash45

28 Nethercot D A and Gardner L (2005) The EC3 approach to the design of columnsbeams and beam-columns Journal of Steel and Composite Structures 5 pp 127ndash40

29 Boissonnade N Jaspart J-P Muzeau J-P and Villette M (2004) New interactionformulae for beam-columns in Eurocode 3 The French-Belgian approach Journal ofConstructional Steel Research 60 pp 421ndash31

30 Greiner R and Lindner J (2006) Interaction formulae for members subjected tobending and axial compression in EUROCODE 3 ndash the Method 2 approach Journalof Constructional Steel Research 62 pp 757ndash70

31 SCI (2007) Verification of columns in simple construction ndash a simplified interactioncriterion UK localised NCCI The Steel Construction Institute wwwaccess-steelcom

32 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3Design of Steel Structures Thomas Telford Publishing London

Chapter 8

Frames

81 Introduction

Structural frames are composed of one-dimensional members connected togetherin skeletal arrangements which transfer the applied loads to the supports Whilemost frames are three-dimensional they may often be considered as a series of par-allel two-dimensional frames or as two perpendicular series of two-dimensionalframes The behaviour of a structural frame depends on its arrangement andloading and on the type of connections used

Triangulated frames with joint loading only have no primary bending actionsand the members act in simple axial tension or compression The behaviour anddesign of these members have already been discussed in Chapters 2 and 3

Frames which are not triangulated include rectangular frames which may bemulti-storey or multi-bay or both and pitched-roof portal frames The membersusually have substantial bending actions (Chapters 5 and 6) and if they also havesignificant axial forces then they must be designed as beam-ties (Chapter 2) orbeam-columns (Chapter 7) In frames with simple connections (see Figure 93a)the moments transmitted by the connections are small and often can be neglectedand the members can be treated as isolated beams or as eccentrically loaded beam-ties or beam-columns However when the connections are semi-rigid (referred toas semi-continuous in EC3) or rigid (referred to as continuous in EC3) then thereare important moment interactions between the members

When a frame is or can be considered as two-dimensional then its behaviour issimilar to that of the beam-columns of which it is composed With in-plane loadingonly it will fail either by in-plane bending or by flexural ndash torsional buckling outof its plane If however the frame or its loading is three-dimensional then it willfail in a mode in which the individual members are subjected to primary biaxialbending and torsion actions

In this chapter the in-plane out-of-plane and biaxial behaviour analysisand design of two- and three-dimensional frames are treated and related to thebehaviour and design of isolated tension members compression members beamsand beam-columns discussed in Chapters 2 3 5 6 and 7

348 Frames

82 Triangulated frames

821 Statically determinate frames

The primary actions in triangulated frames whose members are concentricallyconnected and whose loads act concentrically through the joints are those of axialcompression or tension in the members and any bending actions are secondaryonly These bending actions are usually ignored in which case the member forcesmay be determined by a simple analysis for which the member connections areassumed to be made through frictionless pin-joints

If the assumed pin-jointed frame is statically determinate then each memberforce can be determined by statics alone and is independent of the behaviourof the remaining members Because of this the frame may be assumed tofail when its weakest member fails as indicated in Figure 81a and b Thuseach member may be designed independently of the others by using the pro-cedures discussed in Chapters 2 (for tension members) or 3 (for compressionmembers)

If all the members of a frame are designed to fail simultaneously (either bytension yielding or by compression buckling) there will be no significant momentinteractions between the members at failure even if the connections are not pin-jointed Because of this the effective lengths of the compression members shouldbe taken as equal to the lengths between their ends If however the membersof a rigid-jointed frame are not designed to fail simultaneously there will bemoment interactions between them at failure While it is a common and conserva-tive practice to ignore these interactions and to design each member as if pin-endedsome account may be taken of these by using one of the procedures discussed inSection 8353 to estimate the effective lengths of the compression members andexemplified in Section 851

Frame fails aftertension diagonalyields or fractures

Frame fails aftercompression diagonalbuckles

Frame remains stableafter compressiondiagonal buckles

with tension diagonalDeterminate framewith compressiondiagonal

Indeterminate framewith double-bracedpanel

(a) Determinate frame (b) (c)

Figure 81 Determinate and indeterminate triangulated frames

Frames 349

822 Statically indeterminate frames

When an assumed pin-jointed triangulated frame without primary bending actionsis statically indeterminate then the forces transferred by the members will dependon their axial stiffnesses Since these decrease with tension yielding or compressionbuckling there is usually some force redistribution as failure is approached Todesign such a frame it is necessary to estimate the member forces at failure andthen to design the individual tension and compression members for these forces asin Chapters 2 and 3 Four different methods may be used to estimate the memberforces

In the first method a sufficient number of members are ignored so that the framebecomes statically determinate For example it is common to ignore completelythe compression diagonal in the double-braced panel of the indeterminate frameof Figure 81c in which case the strength of the now determinate frame is con-trolled by the strength of one of the other members This method is simple andconservative

A less conservative method can be used when each indeterminate member canbe assumed to be ductile so that it can maintain its maximum strength over aconsiderable range of axial deformations In this method the frame is convertedto a statically determinate frame by replacing a sufficient number of early failingmembers by sets of external forces equal to their maximum load capacities Forthe frame shown in Figure 81c this might be done for the diagonal compressionmember by replacing it by forces equal to its buckling strength This simplemethod is very similar in principle to the plastic method of analysing the collapseof flexural members (Section 55) and frames (Section 8357) However themethod can only be used when the ductilities of the members being replaced areassured

In the third method each member is assumed to behave linearly and elasticallywhich allows the use of a linear elastic method to analyse the frame and deter-mine its member force distribution The frame strength is then controlled by thestrength of the most severely loaded member For the frame shown in Figure 81cthis would be the compression diagonal if this reaches its buckling strength beforeany of the other members fail This method ignores redistribution and is conser-vative when the members are ductile or when there are no lacks-of-fit at memberconnections

In the fourth method account is taken of the effects of changes in the memberstiffnesses on the force distribution in the frame Because of its complexity thismethod is rarely used

When the members of a triangulated frame are eccentrically connected orwhen the loads act eccentrically or are applied to the members between thejoints the flexural effects are no longer secondary and the frame should betreated as a flexural frame Flexural frames are discussed in the followingsections

350 Frames

83 Two-dimensional flexural frames

831 General

The structural behaviour of a frame may be classified as two-dimensional whenthere are a number of independent two-dimensional frames with in-plane loadingor when this is approximately so The primary actions in a two-dimensional framein which the members support transverse loads are usually flexural and are oftenaccompanied by significant axial actions The structural behaviour of a flexuralframe is influenced by the behaviour of the member joints which are usuallyconsidered to be either simple semi-rigid (or semi-continuous) or rigid (or con-tinuous) according to their ability to transmit moment The EC3 classifications ofjoints are given in [1]

In the following sub-sections the behaviour analysis and design of two-dimensional flexural frames with simple semi-rigid or rigid joints are discussedtogether with the corresponding EC3 requirements An introduction to the EC3requirements is given in [2]

832 Frames with simple joints

Simple joints may be defined as being those that will not develop restrainingmoments which adversely affect the members and the structure as a wholein which case the structure may be designed as if pin-jointed It is usually assumedtherefore that no moment is transmitted through a simple joint and that the mem-bers connected to the joint may rotate The joint should therefore have sufficientrotation capacity to permit member end rotations to occur without causing failureof the joint or its elements An example of a typical simple joint between a beamand column is shown in Figure 93a

If there are a sufficient number of pin-joints to make the structure staticallydeterminate then each member will act independently of the others and maybe designed as an isolated tension member (Chapter 2) compression member(Chapter 3) beam (Chapters 5 and 6) or beam-column (Chapter 7) Howeverif the pin-jointed structure is indeterminate then some part of it may act as arigid-jointed frame The behaviour analysis and design of rigid-jointed framesare discussed in Sections 834 835 and 836

One of the most common methods of designing frames with simple joints isoften used for rectangular frames with vertical (column) and horizontal (beam)members under the action of vertical loads only The columns in such a frame areassumed to act as if eccentrically loaded A minimum eccentricity of 100 mm fromthe face of the column was specified in [3] but there is no specific guidance inEC3 Approximate procedures for distributing the moment caused by the eccentricbeam reaction between the column lengths above and below the connection aregiven in [1] It should be noted that such a pin-jointed frame is usually incapableof resisting transverse forces and must therefore be provided with an independentbracing or shear wall system

Frames 351

833 Frames with semi-rigid joints

Semi-rigid joints are those which have dependable moment capacities and whichpartially restrain the relative rotations of the members at the joints The actionof these joints in rectangular frames is to reduce the maximum moments in thebeams and so the semi-rigid design method offers potential economies over thesimple design method [4ndash10] An example of a typical semi-rigid joint between abeam and column is shown in Figure 93b

A method of semi-rigid design is permitted by EC3 In this method the stiffnessstrength and rotation capacities of the joints based on experimental evidence aresuggested in [1] and may be used to assess the moments and forces in the membersHowever this method has not found great favour with designers and thereforewill not be discussed further

834 In-plane behaviour of frames with rigid joints

A rigid joint may be defined as a joint which has sufficient rigidity to virtually pre-vent relative rotation between the members connected Properly arranged weldedand high-strength friction grip bolted joints are usually assumed to be rigid (ten-sioned high strength friction grip bolts are referred to in [1] as preloaded bolts)An example of a typical rigid joint between a beam and column is shown inFigure 93c There are important interactions between the members of frames withrigid joints which are generally stiffer and stronger than frames with simple orsemi-rigid joints Because of this rigid frames offer significant economies whilemany difficulties associated with their analysis have been greatly reduced by thewidespread availability of standard computer programs

The in-plane behaviour of rigid frames is discussed in general terms inSection 142 where it is pointed out that although a rigid frame may behavein an approximately linear fashion while its service loads are not exceeded espe-cially when the axial forces are small it becomes non-linear near its in-planeultimate load because of yielding and buckling effects When the axial compres-sion forces are small then failure occurs when a sufficient number of plastic hingeshas developed to cause the frame to form a collapse mechanism in which case theload resistance of the frame can be determined by plastic analysis of the collapsemechanism More generally however the in-plane buckling effects associatedwith the axial compression forces significantly modify the behaviour of the framenear its ultimate loads The in-plane analysis of rigid-jointed frames is discussedin Section 835 and their design in 836

835 In-plane analysis of frames with rigid joints

8351 General

The most common reason for analysing a rigid-jointed frame is to determine themoments shears and axial forces acting on its members and joints These may

352 Frames

then be used with the design rules of EC3 to determine if the members and jointsare adequate

Such an analysis must allow for any significant second-order moments arisingfrom the finite deflections of the frame Two methods may be used to allow forthese second-order moments In the first of these the moments determined by afirst-order elastic analysis are amplified by using the results of an elastic bucklinganalysis In the second and more accurate method a full second-order elasticanalysis is made of the frame

Aless common reason for analysing a rigid-jointed frame is to determine whetherthe frame can reach an equilibrium position under the factored loads in which casethe frame is adequate A first-order plastic analysis may be used for a frame withnegligible second-order effects When there are significant second-order effectsthen an advanced analysis may be made in which account is taken of second-ordereffects inelastic behaviour and residual stresses and geometrical imperfectionsalthough this is rarely done in practice

These various methods of analysis are discussed in more detail in the followingsub-sections

8352 First-order elastic analysis

A first-order (linear) elastic analysis of a rigid-jointed frame is based on theassumptions that

(a) the material behaves linearly so that all yielding effects are ignored(b) the members behave linearly with no member instability effects such as those

caused by axial compressions which reduce the membersrsquo flexural stiffnesses(these are often called the P-δ effects) and

(c) the frame behaves linearly with no frame instability effects such as thosecaused by the moments of the vertical forces and the horizontal framedeflections (these are often called the P- effects)

For example for the portal frame of Figure 82 a first-order elastic analysis ignoresall second-order moments such as RR(δ+zh) in the right-hand column so thatthe bending moment distribution is linear in this case First-order analyses predictlinear behaviour in elastic frames as shown in Figure 115

Rigid-jointed frames are invariably statically indeterminate and while thereare many manual methods of first-order elastic analysis available [11ndash13] theseare labour-intensive and error-prone for all but the simplest frames In the pastdesigners were often forced to rely on approximate methods or available solutionsfor specific frames [14 15] However computer methods of first-order elasticanalysis [16 17] have formed the basis of computer programs such as [18ndash20]which are now used extensively These first-order elastic analysis programs requirethe geometry of the frame and its members to have been established (usually by

Frames 353

N NH

H2H2

N HhL N + HhLL

N N

H

RL RR

HL

HR

Hh2

H h +RRR

h

Frame

Frame

Bending moments

(a) First-order analysis

(b) Second-order behaviour

Bending moments

RR

Mmax

First-orderanalysis

ndash

Figure 82 First-order analysis and second-order behaviour

a preliminary design) and then compute the first-order member moments andforces and the joint deflections for each specified set of loads Because these areproportional to the loads the results of individual analyses may be combined bylinear superposition The results of computer first-order elastic analyses [18] of abraced and an unbraced frame are given in Figures 83 and 84

8353 Elastic buckling of braced frames

The results of an elastic buckling analysis may be used to approximate any second-order effects (Figure 82) The elastic buckling analysis of a rigid-jointed frame iscarried out by replacing the initial set of frame loads by a set which produces thesame set of member axial forces without any bending as indicated in Figure 85bThe set of member forces Ncr which causes buckling depends on the distributionof the axial forces in the frame and is often expressed in terms of a load factor αcr

by which the initial set of axial forces Ni must be multiplied to obtain the memberforces Ncr at frame buckling so that

Ncr = αcrNi (81)

354 Frames

(c) Elasticdeflections

(d) Elasticbuckling

(e) Plasticcollapse

(a) Frame and loads

40 80

6000 6000

5000

500020

10

1

2

3 4 5

(kN mm units)

8106

2864

=1132cr p= 1248

998499

125

250

Member Section

123 152 152 UC 37 2210 47 1 8 5 0345 305 165 UB 40 8503 51 3 1 7 1 3

(b) Section properties

Iy (cm4) A (cm2) Mpy(kNm)

Quantity Units First-orderelastic

Elasticbuckling

Second-orderelastic

First-orderplastic

M kNm 235 246 199M kNm ndash530 0

0ndash536 ndash850

M kNm 1366 0

0

1373 1713M kNm ndash1538 ndash1546 ndash1713

N kN ndash716 ndash8106 ndash716 ndash926N kN ndash253 ndash2864 ndash252 ndash335

v mm 574 (0154) 578u mm 185 (1000) 206

2

3

4

5

123

345

4

2

(f) Analysis results

ndash

ndash

timestimes

Figure 83 Analysis of a braced frame

Alternatively it may be expressed by a set of effective length factors kcr = LcrLwhich define the member forces at frame buckling by

Ncr = π2EI(kcrL)2 (82)

For all but isolated members and very simple frames the determination of theframe buckling factor αcr is best carried out numerically using a suitable computerprogram The bases of frame elastic buckling programs are discussed in [16 17]The computer program PRFSA [18] first finds the initial member axial forces Ni

Frames 355

1531

4485 4485

(c) Elastic deflections

(d) Elastic buckling

(e) Plastic collapse

(a) Frame and loads

20 40

6000 6000

5000

500020

10

12

3

(kN mm units)

12 67 203 203 UC 52timestimestimestimes

5259 663 1 5 5 9 23 78 152 152 UC 37 2210 471 8 5 0

(b) Section properties

5 820

247 356 171 UB 51 14136 649 2 4 6 4 358 254 102 UB 25 3415 320 8 4 2

7

2599 2928

16021602

4537 6512

= 6906

4

40 80 40

6

281 561

281

140

281

5611122

561

= 1403pcr

Quantity Units First-orderelastic

Elasticbuckling

Second-orderelastic

First-orderplastic

(f) Analysis results

MMMMMM

kNm 2360kNm 717 729

1539842

kNm ndash1193 ndash1305 ndash1559kNm ndash1728 ndash1847 ndash2409kNm 535 542 850kNm ndash625 ndash644 ndash842

NNNN

kN ndash1033 ndash7136 ndash1009 ndash1449kN ndash376 ndash2599 ndash376 ndash561kN ndash1367 ndash9438 ndash1383 ndash1917kN ndash424 ndash2926 ndash423 ndash561

vvuu

mm 447 (0003) 461mm 801 (0001) 832mm 855 (0826) 1003mm 1214 (1000) 1404

4

5

76

74

78

8

12

23

67

78

4

5

2

3

ndashndashndashndash

Member Section Iy (cm4) A (cm2) Mpy(kNm)

00

0000

Figure 84 Analysis of an unbraced frame

by carrying out a first-order elastic analysis of the frame under the initial loadsIt then uses a finite element method to determine the elastic buckling load factorsαcr for which the total frame stiffness vanishes [21] so that

[K]D minus αcr[G]D = 0 (83)

in which [K] is the elastic stiffness matrix [G] is the stability matrix associatedwith the initial axial forces Ni and D is the vector of nodal deformations which

356 Frames

0397

0139 0185

0455

0270 0258 0516 0484 crqi

04L

0

2L

015

qiL

q Li

05L 05L

Axial loads only

Actual loads

Typical deflection

(a) Actual loads (b) Initial axial loadsqiL (c) Behaviour

Figure 85 In-plane behaviour of a rigid frame

define the buckled shape of the frame The results of a computer elastic bucklinganalysis [18] of a braced frame are given in Figure 83

For isolated braced members or very simple braced frames a buckling analysismay also be made from first principles as demonstrated in Section 310 Alterna-tively the effective length factor kcr of each compression member may be obtainedby using estimates of the member relative end stiffness factors k1 k2 in a bracedmember chart such as that of Figure 321a The direct application of this chart islimited to the vertical columns of regular rectangular frames with regular loadingpatterns in which each horizontal beam has zero axial force and all the columnsbuckle simultaneously in the same mode In this case the values of the columnend stiffness factors can be obtained from

k = (IcLc)

(IcLc)+(βeIbLb)(84)

where βe is a factor which varies with the restraint conditions at the far end ofthe beam (βe = 05 if the restraint condition at the far end is the same as that atthe column βe = 075 if the far end is pinned and βe = 10 if the far end isfixed ndash note that the proportions 0507510 of these are the same as 234 of theappropriate stiffness multipliers of Figure 319) and where the summations arecarried out for the columns (c) and beams (b) at the column end

The effective length chart of Figure 321a may also be used to approximate thebuckling forces in other braced frames In the simplest application an effectivelength factor kcr is determined for each compression member of the frame byapproximating its member end stiffness factors (see equation 346) by

k = IL

IL +(βeαrIrLr)(85)

where αr is a factor which allows for the effect of axial force on the flexuralstiffness of each restraining member (Figure 319) and the summation is carriedout for all of the members connected to that end of the compression member Each

Frames 357

effective length factor so determined is used with equations 81 and 82 to obtainan estimate of the frame buckling load factor as

αcri = π2EIi(kcriLi)2

Ni (86)

The lowest of these provides a conservative approximation of the actual framebuckling load factor αcr

The accuracy of this method of calculating effective lengths using the stiffnessapproximations of Figure 319 is indicated in Figure 86c for the rectangular frameshown in Figure 86a and b For the buckling mode shown in Figure 86a thebuckling of the vertical members is restrained by the horizontal members Thesehorizontal members are braced restraining members which bend in symmetricalsingle curvature so that their stiffnesses are (2EI1L1)(1 minus N1Ncr1) in whichNcr1 =π2EI1L2

1 as indicated in Figure 319 It can be seen from Figure 86c thatthe approximate buckling loads are in very close agreement with the accurate val-ues Worked examples of the application of this method are given in Sections 851and 852

A more accurate iterative procedure [22] may also be used in which the accu-racies of the approximations for the member end stiffness factors k increase witheach iteration

8354 Elastic buckling of unbraced frames

The determination of the frame buckling load factor αcr of a rigid-jointed unbracedframe may also be carried out using a suitable computer program such as thatdescribed in [16 17]

N2

Ncr

2

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(a) Buckling mode1

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(b) Buckling mode 2

0 05 10 15 20N N

0

05

10

15

20Mode 1

Mode 2

Exact

= 10

cr1

I L22I L11-------- --------------

Approximate

(c) Buckling loads1

Figure 86 Buckling of a braced frame

358 Frames

For isolated unbraced members or very simple unbraced frames a bucklinganalysis may also be made from first principles as demonstrated in Section 310Alternatively the effective length factor kcr of each compression member may beobtained by using estimates of the end stiffness factors k1 k2 in a chart such as thatof Figure 321b The application of this chart is limited to the vertical columns ofregular rectangular frames with regular loading patterns in which each horizontalbeam has zero axial force and all the columns buckle simultaneously in the samemode and with the same effective length factor The member end stiffness factorsare then given by equation 84

The effects of axial forces in the beams of an unbraced regular rectangularframe can be approximated by using equation 85 to approximate the relativeend stiffness factors k1 k2 (but with βe = 15 if the restraint conditions at thefar end are the same as at the column βe = 075 if the far end is pinned andβe = 10 if the far end is fixed ndash note that the proportions 1507510 of theseare the same as 634 of the appropriate stiffness multipliers of Figure 319) andFigure 321b

The accuracy of this method of using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319is indicated in Figure 87c for the rectangular frame shown in Figure 87a and b Forthe sway buckling mode shown in Figure 87a the sway buckling of the verticalmembers is restrained by the horizontal members These horizontal members arebraced restraining members which bend in antisymmetrical double curvature sothat their stiffnesses are (6EI1L1)(1 minus N14Ncr1) as indicated in Figure 319It can be seen from Figure 87c that the approximate buckling loads are in closeagreement with the accurate values A worked example of the application of thismethod is given in Section 854

The effective length factor chart of Figure 321b may also be used to approximatethe storey buckling load factor αcrs for each storey of an unbraced rectangular

N1

N2

Ncr

2

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(a) Buckling mode1

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(b) Buckling mode 2

0 05 10 15 20N N

0

02

04

06

08

Mode 1

Mode 2

Exact

= 10

cr1

I L 22I L11-------- --------------

Approximate

(c) Buckling loads1

Figure 87 Buckling of an unbraced frame

Frames 359

frame with negligible axial forces in the beams as

αcrs =sum(NcrL)sum(NiL)

(87)

in which Ncr is the buckling load of a column in a storey obtained by usingequation 84 and the summations are made for each column in the storey For astorey in which all the columns are of the same length this equation implies thatthe approximate storey buckling load factor depends on the total stiffness of thecolumns and the total load on the storey and is independent of the distributions ofstiffness and load The frame buckling load factor αcr may be approximated by thelowest of the values of αcrs calculated for all the stories of the frame This methodgives close approximations when the buckling pattern is the same in each storeyand is conservative when the horizontal members have zero axial forces and thebuckling pattern varies from storey to storey

A worked example of the application of this method is given in Section 853Alternatively the storey buckling load factor αcrs may be approximated by

using

αcrs = Hs

Vs

hs

δHs(88)

in which Hs is the storey shear hs is the storey height Vs is the vertical loadtransmitted by the storey and δHs is the first-order shear displacement of the storeycaused by Hs This method is an adaptation of the sway buckling load solutiongiven in Section 3106 for a column with an elastic brace (of stiffness HsδHs)

The approximate methods described above of analysing the elastic bucklingof unbraced frames are limited to rectangular frames While the buckling ofnon-rectangular unbraced frames may be analysed by using a suitable computerprogram such as that described in [18] there are many published solutions forspecific frames [23]

Approximate solutions for the elastic buckling load factors of symmetrical portalframes have been presented in [24ndash27] The approximations of [27] for portalframes with elastically restrained bases take the general form of

αcr =(

Nc

ρcNcrc

)C

+(

Nr

ρrNcrr

)Cminus1C

(89)

in which Nc Nr are the column and rafter forces Ncrc Ncrr are the referencebuckling loads obtained from

Ncrcr = π2EIcrL2cr (810)

and the values of C ρc and ρr depend on the base restraint stiffness and thebuckling mode

360 Frames

Nr EIrLr EIrLr

Nr Nr

Nr

EI Lc c EI Lc c

(b) Antisymmetric buckling mode

NN

(a) Frame and loads(c) Symmetric buckling mode

cc

NN cc

Figure 88 Pinned base portal frame

For portal frames with pinned bases

C = 12 (811)

and for antisymmetric buckling as shown in Figure 88b

ρc = 3(10R + 12) (812a)

and

ρr = 1 (812b)

in which

R = (IcLc)(IrLr) (813)

For symmetric buckling as shown in Figure 88c

ρc = 48 + 12R(1 + RH )

24 + 12R(1 + RH )+ 7R2R2H

(814a)

and

ρr = 12R + 84RRH

12R + 4(814b)

in which

RH = (LrLc) sin θR (815)

in which θR is the inclination of the rafter A worked example of the application ofthis method is given in Section 855

Frames 361

For portal frames with fixed bases

C = 16 (816)

and for antisymmetric buckling

ρc = R + 3

4R + 3(817a)

and

ρr = 2R + 4

R + 4(817b)

For symmetric buckling

ρc = 1 + 48R + 42RRH

24R + 2R2R2H

(818a)

and

ρr = 4R + 42RRH + R2R2H

4R + 2(818b)

Approximate methods for multi-bay frames are given in [25]

8355 Second-order elastic analysis

Second-order effects in elastic frames include additional moments such asRR(δ +zh) in the right-hand column of Figure 82 which result from the finitedeflections δ and of the frame The second-order moments arising from the mem-ber deflections from the straight line joining the member ends are often called theP-δ effects while the second-order moments arising from the joint displacements are often called the P- effects In braced frames the joint displacements aresmall and only the P-δ effects are important In unbraced frames the P- effectsare important and often much more so than the P-δ effects Other second-ordereffects include those arising from the end-to-end shortening of the members dueto stress (= NLEA) due to bowing (= 1

2

int L0 (dδdx)2dx) and from finite deflec-

tions Second-order effects cause non-linear behaviour in elastic frames as shownin Figure 114

The second-order P-δ effects in a number of elastic beam-columns havebeen analysed and approximations for the maximum moments are given inSection 721 A worked example of the use of these approximations is givenin Section 771

The P-δ and P- second-order effects in elastic frames are most easily andaccurately accounted for by using a computer second-order elastic analysis pro-gram such as those of [18ndash20] The results of second-order elastic analyses [18]

362 Frames

of braced and unbraced frames are given in Figures 83 and 84 For the bracedframe of Figure 83 the second-order results are only slightly higher than thefirst-order results This is usually true for well-designed braced frames that havesubstantial bending effects and small axial compressions For the unbraced frameof Figure 84 the second-order sway deflections are about 18 larger than those ofthe first-order analysis while the moment at the top of the right-hand lower-storeycolumn is about 10 larger than that of the first-order analysis

Second-order effects are often significant in unbraced frames

8356 Approximate second-order elastic analysis

There are a number of methods of approximating second-order effects which allowa general second-order analysis to be avoided In many of these the results of afirst-order elastic analysis are amplified by using the results of an elastic bucklinganalysis (Sections 8353 and 8354)

For members without transverse forces in braced frames the maximum membermoment Mmax determined by first-order analysis may be used to approximate themaximum second-order design moment M as

M = δMmax (819)

in which δ is an amplification factor given by

δ = δb = cm

1 minus NNcrbge 1 (820)

in which Ncrb is the elastic buckling load calculated for the braced member and

cm = 06 minus 04βm le 10 (821)

in which βm is the ratio of the smaller to the larger end moment (equations 820and 821 are related to equations 77 and 78 used for isolated beam-columns)A worked example of the application of this method is given in Section 856A procedure for approximating the value of βm to be used for members withtransverse forces is available [28] while more accurate solutions are obtained byusing equations 79ndash711 and Figures 75 and 76

For unbraced frames the amplification factor δ may be approximated by

δ = δs = 1

1 minus 1αcr(822)

in which αcr is the elastic sway buckling load factor calculated for the unbracedframe (Section 8354) A worked example of the application of this method isgiven in Section 857

For unbraced rectangular frames with negligible axial forces in the beamsa more accurate approximation can be obtained by amplifying the column moments

Frames 363

of each storey by using the sway buckling load factor αcrs for that storey obtainedusing equation 87 in

δ = δs = 1

1 minus 1αcrs(823)

in which αcrs is the elastic sway buckling load factor calculated for the storey(Section 8354) A worked example of the application of this method is given inSection 858

Alternatively the first-order end moment

Mf = Mfb + Mfs (824)

may be separated into a braced frame component Mfb and a complementary swaycomponent Mfs [29] The second-order maximum moment M may be approximatedby using these components in

M = Mfb + Mfs

(1 minus 1αcr)(825)

in which αcr is the load factor at frame elastic sway buckling (Section 8354)Amore accurate second-order analysis can be made by including the P- effects

of sway displacement directly in the analysis An approximate method of doingthis is to include fictitious horizontal forces equivalent to the P- effects in aniterative series of first-order analyses [30 31] A series of analyses must be carriedout because the fictitious horizontal forces increase with the deflections If theanalysis series converges then the frame is stable An approximate method ofanticipating convergence is to examine the value of (n+1 minus n)(n minus nminus1)

computed from the values of at the steps (n minus 1) n and (n + 1) If this isless than n(n + 1) then the analysis series probably converges This method ofanalysing frame buckling is slow and clumsy but it does allow the use of thewidely available first-order elastic computer programs The method ignores thedecreases in the member stiffnesses caused by axial compressions (the P-δ effects)and therefore tends to underestimate the second-order moments

8357 First-order plastic analysis

In the first-order method of plastic analysis all instability effects are ignored andthe collapse strength of the frame is determined by using the rigid-plastic assump-tion (Section 552) and finding the plastic hinge locations which first convert theframe to a collapse mechanism

The methods used for the plastic analysis of frames are extensions of thosediscussed in Section 555 which incorporate reductions in the plastic momentcapacity to account for the presence of axial force (Section 722) These meth-ods are discussed in many texts such as those [18ndash24 Chapter 5] referred to in

364 Frames

Section 514 The manual application of these methods is not as simple as it is forbeams but computer programs such as [18] are available The results of computerfirst-order plastic analyses [18] of a braced and an unbraced frame are given inFigures 83 and 84

8358 Advanced analysis

Present methods of designing statically indeterminate steel structures rely on pre-dictions of the stress resultants acting on the individual members and on models ofthe strengths of these members These member strength models include allowancesfor second-order effects and inelastic behaviour as well as for residual stressesand geometrical imperfections It is therefore possible that the common methodsof second-order elastic analysis used to determine the member stress resultantswhich do not account for inelastic behaviour residual stresses and geometricalimperfections may lead to inaccurate predictions

Second-order effects and inelastic behaviour cause redistributions of the mem-ber stress resultants in indeterminate structures as some of the more criticalmembers lose stiffness and transfer moments to their neighbours Non-proportionalloading also causes redistributions For example frame shown in Figure 89 thecolumn end moments induced initially by the beam loads decrease as the col-umn load increases and the column becomes less stiff due to second-order effectsat first and then due to inelastic behaviour The end moments may reduce tozero or even reverse in direction In this case the end moments change from ini-tially disturbing the column to stabilising it by resisting further end rotations Thischange in the sense of the column end moments which contributes significantlyto the column strength cannot be predicted unless an analysis is made which moreclosely models the behaviour of the real structure than does a simple plastic analy-sis (which ignores second-order effects) or a second-order elastic analysis (whichignores inelastic behaviour)

Bea

m lo

adin

g on

ly

Bea

m lo

ads

cons

tant

incr

easi

ng c

olum

n lo

ads

Tot

al a

xial

for

ce in

col

umn

Failure

Tot

al a

xial

for

ce in

col

umn

Central column rotation Column end moment

(b) Load-rotation behaviour(a) Frame (c) Variation of column end moment

Figure 89 Reversal of column end moments in frames

Frames 365

Ideally the member stress resultants should be determined by a method offrame analysis which accounts for both second-order effects (P-δ and P-) inelas-tic behaviour residual stresses and geometrical imperfections and any local orout-of-plane buckling effects Such a method has been described as an advancedanalysis Not only can an advanced analysis be expected to lead to predictions thatare of high accuracy it has the further advantage that the design process can begreatly simplified since the structure can be considered to be satisfactory if theadvanced analysis can show that it can reach an equilibrium position under thedesign loads

Past research on advanced analysis and the prediction of the strengths of realstructures has concentrated on frames for which local and lateral buckling areprevented (by using Class 1 sections and full lateral bracing) One of the earliestand perhaps the simplest methods of approximating the strengths of rigid-jointedframes was suggested in [32] where it was proposed that the ultimate load factorαult of a frame should be calculated from the load factorαp at which plastic collapseoccurs (all stability effects being ignored) and the load factor αcr at which elasticin-plane buckling takes place (all plasticity effects being ignored) by using

1

αult= 1

αp+ 1

αcr(826)

or

αultαp = 1 minus αultαcr (827)

However it can be said that this method represents a considerable simplificationof a complex relationship between the ultimate strength and the plastic collapseand elastic buckling strengths of a frame

More accurate predictions of the strengths of two-dimensional rigid frames canbe made using a sub-assemblage method of analysis In this method the bracedor unbraced frame is considered as a number of subassemblies [33ndash35] such asthose shown in Figure 810 The conditions at the ends of the sub-assemblage areapproximated according to the structural experience and intuition of the designer(it is believed that these approximations are not critical) and the sub-assemblage isanalysed by adding together the load-deformation characteristics ([36] and curve 5in Figure 72) of the individual members Although the application of this manualtechnique to the analysis of braced frames was developed to an advanced stage[37 38] it does not appear to have achieved widespread popularity

Further improvements in the prediction of frame strength are provided by com-puter methods of second-order plastic analysis such as the deteriorated stiffnessmethod of analysis in which progressive modifications are made to a second-orderelastic analysis to account for the formation of plastic hinges [16 39 40] The useof such an analysis is limited to structures with appropriate material propertiesand for which local and out-of-plane buckling effects are prevented However theuse of such an analysis has in the past been largely limited to research studies

366 Frames

(a) No-sway sub-assemblage (b) Sway sub-assemblage

Figure 810 Sub-assemblages for multi-storey frames

More recent research [41] has concentrated on extending computer methods ofanalysis so that they allow for residual stresses and geometrical imperfections aswell as for second-order effects and inelastic behaviour Such methods can dupli-cate design code predictions of the strengths of individual members (through theincorporation of allowances for residual stresses and geometrical imperfections) aswell as the behaviour of complete frames Two general types of analysis have devel-oped called plastic zone analysis [42 43] and concentrated plasticity analysis [44]While plastic zone analysis is the more accurate concentrated plasticity is the moreeconomical of computer memory and time It seems likely that advanced meth-ods of analysis will play important roles in the future design of two-dimensionalrigid-jointed frames in which local and lateral buckling are prevented

836 In-plane design of frames with rigid joints

8361 Residual stresses and geometrical imperfections

The effects of residual stresses are allowed for approximately in EC3 by usingenhanced equivalent geometrical imperfections These include both global (frame)imperfections (which are associated with initial sway or lack of verticality) andlocal (member) imperfections (which are associated with initial bow or crooked-ness) EC3 also allows the equivalent geometrical imperfections to be replaced byclosed systems of equivalent fictitious forces The magnitudes of the equivalentgeometrical imperfections and equivalent fictitious forces are specified in Clause532 of EC3

In some low slenderness frames the equivalent imperfections or fictitious forceshave only small effects on the distributions of moments and axial forces in the

Frames 367

frames and may be ignored in the analysis (their effects on member resistanceare included in Clause 63 of EC3) More generally the global (frame) imperfec-tions or fictitious forces are included in the analysis but not the local (member)imperfections or fictitious forces It is rare to include both the global and the localimperfections or fictitious forces in the analysis

The EC3 methods used for the analysis and design of frames with rigid jointsare discussed in the following sub-sections

8362 Strength design using first-order elastic analysis

When a braced or unbraced frame has low slenderness so that

αcr = FcrFEd ge 10 (828)

in which FEd is the design loading on the frame and Fcr is the elastic buckling loadthen EC3 allows the moments and axial forces in the frame to be determined usinga first-order elastic analysis of the frame with all the equivalent imperfections orfictitious forces ignored The frame members are adequate when their axial forcesand moments satisfy the section and member buckling resistance requirements ofClauses 62 and 633 of EC3

When a braced frame does not satisfy equation 828 Clause 522(3)b of EC3appears to allow a first-order elastic analysis to be used which neglects all second-order effects and the imperfections associated with member crookedness providedthe member axial forces and moments satisfy the buckling resistance require-ments of Clause 633 It is suggested however that amplified first-order analysisshould be used for frames of moderate slenderness which satisfy equation 829(Section 8363) and that second-order analysis should be used for frames of highslenderness which satisfy equation 830 (Section 8364)

8363 Strength design using amplified first-order elastic analysis

When an unbraced frame has moderate slenderness so that

10 gt αcr = FcrFEd ge 3 (829)

then EC3 allows the moments in the frame to be determined by amplifying(Section 8356) the moments determined by a first-order elastic analysis pro-vided the equivalent global imperfections or fictitious forces are included in theanalysis The frame members are adequate when their axial forces and momentssatisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3 and the memberbuckling resistance requirements of Clause 633 EC3 allows the member lengthto be used in Clause 633 but this may overestimate the resistances of members forwhich compression effects dominate It is suggested that in this case the member

368 Frames

should also satisfy the member buckling requirements of Clause 631 in whichthe effective length is used

If the member imperfections or fictitious forces are also included in the analysisthen the frame members are satisfactory when their axial forces and momentssatisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3

8364 Strength design using second-order elastic analysis

When an unbraced frame has high slenderness so that

3 gt αcr = FcrFEd (830)

then EC3 requires a more accurate analysis to be made of the second-order effects(Section 8355) than by amplifying the moments determined by a first-orderelastic analysis EC3 requires the equivalent global imperfections or fictitiousforces to be included in the analysis The frame members are adequate when theiraxial forces and moments satisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62of EC3 and the member buckling resistance requirements of Clause 633 EC3allows the member length to be used in Clause 633 but this may overestimate theresistances of members for which compression effects dominate It is suggestedthat in this case the member should also satisfy the member buckling requirementsof Clause 631 in which the effective length is used

If the member imperfections or fictitious forces are also included in the analysisthen the frame members are satisfactory when the axial forces and moments satisfythe section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3

8365 Strength design using first-order plastic collapse analysis

When a braced or unbraced frame has low slenderness so that

αcr = FcrFEd ge 15 (831)

then EC3 allows all the equivalent imperfections or fictitious forces to be ignoredand a first-order rigid plastic collapse analysis (Section 8357) to be used Thislimit is reduced to αcr ge 10 for clad structures and to αcr ge 5 for some portalframes subjected to gravity loads only

All members forming plastic hinges must be ductile so that the plastic momentcapacity can be maintained at each hinge over a range of hinge rotations sufficientto allow the plastic collapse mechanism to develop Ductility is usually ensured byrestricting the steel type to one which has a substantial yield plateau and significantstrain-hardening (Section 131) and by preventing reductions in rotation capacityby local buckling effects (by satisfying the requirements of Clause 56 of EC3including the use of Class 1 sections) by out-of-plane buckling effects (by sat-isfying the requirements of Clause 635 of EC3 including limiting the unbraced

Frames 369

lengths) and by in-plane buckling effects (by using equation 831 to limiting themember in-plane slendernesses and axial compression forces)

The frame members are adequate when

αp = FpFEd ge 1 (832)

in which Fp is the plastic collapse load It should be noted that the use of reducedfull plastic moments (to allow for the axial forces) will automatically ensure thatClause 629 of EC3 for the bending and axial force resistance is satisfied

8366 Strength design using advanced analysis

EC3 permits the use of a second-order plastic analysis When the effects of residualstresses and geometrical imperfections are allowed for through the use of globaland local equivalent imperfections or fictitious forces and when local and lateralbuckling are prevented (Clauses 56 and 635 of EC3) then this provides a methodof design by advanced analysis

The members of the structure are satisfactory when the section resistancerequirements of Clause 62 of EC3 are met Because these requirements are auto-matically satisfied by the prevention of local buckling and the accounting forinelastic behaviour the members can be regarded as satisfactory if the analysisshows that the structure can reach an equilibrium position under the design loads

8367 Serviceability design

Because the service loads are usually substantially less than the factored loadsused for strength design the behaviour of a frame under its service loads isusually closely approximated by the predictions of a first-order elastic analysis(Section 8352) For this reason the serviceability design of a frame is usuallycarried out using the results of a first-order elastic analysis The serviceabilitydesign of a frame is often based on the requirement that the service load deflec-tions must not exceed specified values Thus the member sizes are systematicallychanged until this requirement is met

837 Out-of-plane behaviour of frames with rigid joints

Most two-dimensional rigid frames which have in-plane loading are arranged sothat the stiffer planes of their members coincide with that of the frame Such a framedeforms only in its plane until the out-of-plane (flexuralndashtorsional) buckling loadsare reached and if these are less than the in-plane ultimate loads then the membersand the frame will buckle by deflecting out of the plane and twisting

In some cases the action of one loaded member dominates and its elastic buck-ling load can be determined by evaluating the restraining effects of the remainderof the frame For example when the frame shown in Figure 811 has a zero beam

370 Frames

Q1

Q2

Q1

L2

L1

Lateral restraint

Rigid joint

Column built-in at base

Figure 811 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of a portal frame

load Q2 then the beam remains straight and does not induce moments in thecolumns which buckle elastically out of the plane of the frame at a load givenby Q1 asymp π2EIz(07L1)

2 (see Figure 315c) On the other hand if the effectsof the compressive forces in the columns are small enough to be neglected thenthe elastic stiffnesses and restraining effects of the columns on the beam can beestimated and the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling load Q2 of the beam can beevaluated The solution of a related problem is discussed in Section 69

In general however both the columns and the beams of a rigid frame buckleand there is an interaction between them during out-of-plane buckling Thisinteraction is related to that which occurs during the in-plane buckling of rigidframes (see Sections 8353 and 8354 and Figures 86 and 87) and also tothat which occurs during the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of continuousbeams (see Section 682 and Figure 621) Because of the similarities between theelastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of restrained beam-columns (Section 7313)and restrained columns (Section 364) it may prove possible to extend furtherthe approximate method given in Section 8353 for estimating the in-planeelastic buckling loads of rigid frames (which was applied to the elasticflexuralndashtorsional buckling of some beams in Section 682) Thus the elas-tic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of some rigid frames might be calculatedapproximately by using the column effective length chart of Figure 321aHowever this development has not yet been investigated

On the other hand there have been developments [45ndash47] in the analytical tech-niques used to determine the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of generalrigid plane frames with general in-plane loading systems and a computer program[48] has been prepared which requires only simple data specifying the geometryof the frame its supports and restraints and the arrangement of the loads The use

Frames 371

Bea

m lo

ad Q

2Q1 Q1

Q1 Q1Q2

Q2

L L21 = 05

L L21 = 2

Column loads Q1

Figure 812 Elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of portal frames

of this program to calculate the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling load of a framewill simplify the design problem considerably

Interaction diagrams for the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of a numberof frames have been determined [45] and two of these (for the portal framesshown in Figure 811) are given in Figure 812 These diagrams show that theregion of stability is convex as it is for the in-plane buckling of rigid frames(Figures 86 and 87) and for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of continuous beams(Figure 623b) Because of this convexity linear interpolations (as in Figure 624)made between known buckling load sets are conservative

Although the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of rigid frames has been inves-tigated the related problems of inelastic buckling and its influence on the strengthof rigid frames have not yet been systematically studied However advanced com-puter programs for the inelastic out-of-plane behaviour of beam-columns [49ndash54]have been developed and it seems likely that these will be extended in the nearfuture to rigid-jointed frames

838 Out-of-plane design of frames

While there is no general method yet available of designing for flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling in rigid frames design codes imply that the strength formulations forisolated beam-columns (see Section 734) can be used in conjunction with themoments and forces determined from an appropriate elastic in-plane analysis ofthe frame

372 Frames

A rational design method has been developed [55] for the columns oftwo-dimensional building frames in which laterally braced horizontal beams formplastic hinges Thus when plastic analysis is used columns which do not par-ticipate in the collapse mechanism may be designed as isolated beam-columnsagainst flexuralndashtorsional buckling In later publications [56 57] the method wasextended so that the occurrence of plastic hinges at one or both ends of the column(instead of in the beams) could be allowed for Because the assumption of plastichinges at all the beam-column joints is only valid for frames with vertical loadsthe analysis for lateral loads must be carried out independently A frame analysedby this method must therefore have an independent bracing or shear wall systemto resist the lateral loads

A number of current research efforts are being directed towards the extension ofadvanced methods of analysing the in-plane behaviour of frames (Section 8358)to include the out-of-plane flexuralndashtorsional buckling effects [52ndash54] Theavailability of a suitable computer program will greatly simplify the design of two-dimensional frames in which local buckling is prevented since such a frame canbe considered to be satisfactory if it can be shown that it can reach an equilibriumposition under the factored design loads

84 Three-dimensional flexural frames

The design methods commonly used when either the frame or its loading is three-dimensional are very similar to the methods used for two-dimensional framesThe actions caused by the design loads are usually calculated by allowing forsecond-order effects in the elastic analysis of the frame and then compared withthe design resistances determined for the individual members acting as isolatedbeam-columns In the case of three-dimensional frames or loading the elasticframe analysis is three-dimensional while the design resistances are based on thebiaxial bending resistances of isolated beam-columns (see Section 74)

A more rational method has been developed [55 56] of designing three-dimensional braced rigid frames for which it could be assumed that plastic hingesform at all major and minor axis beam ends This method is an extension of themethod of designing braced two-dimensional frames ([55ndash57] and Section 838)For such frames all the beams can be designed plastically while the columns canagain be designed as if independent of the rest of the frame The method of design-ing these columns is based on a second-order elastic analysis of the biaxial bendingof an isolated beam-column Once again the assumption of plastic hinges at allthe beam ends is valid only for frames with vertical loads and so an independentdesign must be made for the effects of lateral loads

In many three-dimensional rigid frames the vertical loads are carried principallyby the major axis beams while the minor axis beams are lightly loaded and do notdevelop plastic hinges at collapse but restrain and strengthen the columns In thiscase an appropriate design method for vertical loading is one in which the majoraxis beams are designed plastically and the minor axis beams elastically The chief

Frames 373

difficulty in using such a method is in determining the minor axis column momentsto be used in the design In the method presented in [58] this is done by firstmaking a first-order elastic analysis of the minor axis frame system to determinethe column end moments The larger of these is then increased to allow for thesecond-order effects of the axial forces the amount of the increase depending onthe column load ratio NNcrz (in which Ncrz is the minor axis buckling load of theelastically restrained column) and the end moment ratio βm The increased minoraxis end moment is then used in a nominal first yield analysis of the column whichincludes the effects of initial crookedness

However it appears that this design method is erratically conservative [59] andthat the small savings achieved do not justify the difficulty of using it Anotherdesign method was proposed [60] which avoids the intractable problem of inelasticbiaxial bending in frame structures by omitting altogether the calculation of theminor axis column moments This omission is based on the observation that theminor axis moments induced in the columns by the working loads reduce to zeroas the ultimate loads are approached and even reverse in sign so that they finallyrestrain the column as shown in Figure 89 With this simplification the momentsfor which the column is to be designed are the same as those in a two-dimensionalframe However the beneficial restraining effects of the minor axis beams must beallowed for and a simple way of doing this has been proposed [60] For this theelastic minor axis stiffness of the column is reduced to allow for plasticity causedby the axial load and the major axis moments and this reduced stiffness is usedto calculate the effects of the minor axis restraining beams on the effective lengthLcr of the column The reduced stiffness is also used to calculate the effectiveminor axis flexural rigidity EIeff of the column and the ultimate strength Nult ofthe column is taken as

Nult = π2EIeff L2cr (833)

The results obtained from two series of full-scale three-storey tests indicate thatthe predicted ultimate loads obtained by this method vary between 84 and 104of the actual ultimate loads

85 Worked examples

851 Example 1 ndash buckling of a truss

Problem All the members of the rigid-jointed triangulated frame shown inFigure 813a have the same in-plane flexural rigidity which is such thatπ2EIL2 = 1 Determine the effective length factor of member 12 and the elasticin-plane buckling loads of the frame

Solution The member 12 is one of the longest compression members and one ofthe most heavily loaded and so at buckling it will be restrained by its adjacentmembers An initial estimate is required of the buckling load and this can be

374 Frames

300

250

087ndash0 87

ndash1 73

L

L

ndash260

L116 L116 L116

Q

Q Q

=1

Q =1Q = 1

1

2

3

4

(a) Example 1

All members havethe same EI

L05

L05

Q5 Q5

EI2

EI EI

L2

1

2 3L

(b) Example 4

Figure 813 Worked examples 1 and 4

obtained after observing that the end 1 will be heavily restrained by the tensionmember 14 and that the end 2 will be moderately restrained by the short lightlyloaded compression member 24 Thus the initial estimate of the effective lengthfactor of member 12 in this braced frame should be closer to the rigidly restrainedvalue of 05 than to the unrestrained value of 10

Accordingly assume kcr12 = 070Then by using equation 82 Ncr12 = π2EI(070L)2 = 204

and Qcr = Ncr12300 = 068Thus N23 = 170 N24 = 059 N14 = minus177Using the form of equation 345 α12 = 2EIL Using Figure 319

α23 = 3EI

L

[1 minus 170

π2EIL2

]= minus210

EI

L

α24 = 4EI

058L

[1 minus 059

π2EI(058L)2

]= 622

EI

L

α14 = 4EI

116L

[1 minus (minus177)

2π2EI(116L)2

]= 755

EI

L

Using equation 345

k1 = 2(05 times 755 + 2) = 0346

k2 = 205 times (minus210 + 622)+ 2 = 0493

Using Figure 321a kcr12 = 065The calculation can be repeated using kcr12 = 065 instead of the initial estimate

of 070 in which case the solution kcr12 = 066 will be obtained The correspondingframe buckling loads are Qcr = π2EI(066L)23 = 077

Frames 375

852 Example 2 ndash buckling of a braced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factors of the members of the bracedframe shown in Figure 83a and estimate the frame buckling load factor αcr

SolutionFor the vertical member 13 using equation 85

k1 = 10 (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

Using the form of equation 345 and Figure 319

k3 = 2 times 2210 times 10410 000

05 times 4 times 8503 times 10412 000 + 20 times 2210 times 10410 000= 0238

kcr13 = 074 (using Figure 321a)

(kcr13 = 073 if a base stiffness ratio of 01 is used so that

k1 = (2 times 2210 times 10410 000)(2 times 11 times 2210 times 10410 000) = 0909)

Ncr13 = π2 times 210 000 times 2210 times 104(074 times 10 000)2N = 8365 kN

αcr13 = 8365716 = 117

For the horizontal member 35 using equation 85

k3 = 2 times 8503 times 10412 000

05 times 3 times 2210 times 10410 000 + 2 times 8503 times 10412 000= 0810

k5 = 0 (theoretical value for a fixed end)

kcr35 = 066 (using Figure 321a)

(kcr35 = 077 if a base stiffness ratio of 10 is used so that k5 = 05)

Ncr35 = π2 times 210 000 times 8503 times 104

(066 times 12 000)2N = 28096 kN

αcr35 = 28096253 = 111 gt 117 = αcr13

there4 αcr = 117 (compare with the computer analysis value of αcr = 1132 givenin Figure 83d)

A slightly more accurate estimate might be obtained by using equation 85 withαr obtained from Figure 319 as

αr = 1 minus 253 times 103

(2 times π2 times 210 000 times 8503 times 10412 0002)= 0990

376 Frames

so that

k3 = 2 times 2210 times 10410000

05 times 4 times 0990 times 8503 times 10412 000 + 2 times 2210 times 10410 000

= 0240

but kcr13 is virtually unchanged and so therefore is αcr

853 Example 3 ndash buckling of an unbraced two-storey frame

Problem Determine the storey buckling load factors of the unbraced two-storeyframe shown in Figure 84a and estimate the frame buckling load factor byusing

a the storey deflection method of equation 88 andb the member buckling load method of equation 87

(a) Solution using equation 88For the upper storey using the first-order analysis results shown in Figure 84

αcrsu = 10

(20 + 40 + 20)times 5000

(1214 minus 855)= 1741

For the lower storey using the first-order analysis results shown in Figure 84

αcrsl = (10 + 20)

(20 + 40 + 20 + 40 + 80 + 40)times 5000

855= 731 lt 1741 = αcrsu

there4 αcr = 731 (compare with the computer analysis value of αcr = 6905 given inFigure 84d)(b) Solution using equation 87

For the upper-storey columns using equation 84

kT = 2210 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 15 times 3415 times 10412 000= 0508

kB = 2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000 + 15 times 14136 times 10412 000

= 0458

kcru = 144 (using Figure 321b)

Ncru = π2 times 210 000 times 2210 times 104(144 times 5000)2N = 8836 kN

Frames 377

For the lower-storey columns using equation 84

kT = 2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000 + 15 times 14136 times 10412 000

= 0458

kB = infin (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

kcrl = 24 (using Figure 321b)

Ncrl = π2 times 210 000 times 5259 times 104(24 times 5000)2N = 7569 kN

Using equation 87 and the axial forces of Figure 84f

αcrsu = 2 times 883650

(376 + 424)50= 221

αcrsl = 2 times 756950

(1033 + 1367)50= 631 lt 221 = αcrsu

there4 αcr = 631 (compare with the storey deflection method value of αcr = 731calculated above and the computer analysis value of αcr = 6905 given inFigure 84d)

854 Example 4 ndash buckling of unbraced single storey frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of the member 12 of the unbracedframe shown in Figure 813b (and for whichπ2EIL2 = 1) and the elastic in-planebuckling loads

Solution The sway member 12 is unrestrained at end 1 and moderately restrainedat end 2 by the lightly loaded member 23 Its effective length factor is thereforegreater than 2 the value for a rigidly restrained sway member (see Figure 315e)Accordingly assume kcr12 = 250

Then by using equation 82 Ncr12 = π2EI(250L)2 = 016

and Qcr = Ncr125 = 0032

and N23 = Qcr = 0032

Using Figure 319

αb23 = 6 times (2EI)(2L)(

1 minus 0032

4π2(2EI)(2L)2

)= 5904EIL

378 Frames

and using equation 349

k2 = 6EIL

15 times 5904EIL + 6EIL= 0404

k1 = 10 (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

Using Figure 321b kcr12 = 23The calculation can be repeated using kcr12 = 23 instead of the initial estimate

of 250 in which case the solution kcr12 = 23 will be obtained The correspondingframe buckling loads are given by

Qcr = π2EI(23L)2

5= 0038

855 Example 5 ndash buckling of a portal frame

Problem A uniform section pinned-base portal frame is shown in Figure 814 withits member axial compression forces [42] Determine the elastic buckling loadfactor of the frameSolution

Lr = radic(12 0002 + 30002) = 12 369 mm

The average axial forces are

Nc = (514 + 691)2 = 603 kN

Nr = (581 + 480 + 430 + 530)4 = 505 kN

For a pinned base portal frame C = 12 (811)

581

514 430 480 691

691 514

530

12 000

356 times 171 UB 45 I = 12 066 cm4

12 000

3000

40003

Figure 814 Worked example 5

Frames 379

For antisymmetric buckling

R = (12 080 times 1044000)(12 080 times 10412 369) = 309 (813)

ρc = 3(10 times 309 + 12) = 00699 (812a)

ρr = 1 (812b)

Ncrc = π2 times 210 000 times 12 080 times 10440002N = 15 648 kN (810)

Ncrr = π2 times 210 000 times 12 080 times 10412 3692N = 1637 kN (810)

αcras =(

603

00699 times 15 648

)12

+(

505

1 times 1637

)12minus112

= 130 (89)

For symmetric buckling

RH = (12 3694000)times (300012 369) = 075 (815)

ρc = 48 + 12 times 309 times (1 + 075)

24 + 12 times 309 times (1 + 075)+ 7 times 3092 times 0752

= 0664 (814a)

ρr = 12 times 309 + 84 times 309 times 075

12 times 309 + 4= 1377 (814b)

αcrs =(

603

0664 times 15 648

)12

+(

505

1377 times 1637

)12minus112

= 384

gt 130 = αcras (89)

and so the frame buckling factor isαcr = 130 This is reasonably close to the valueof 139 predicted by a computer elastic frame buckling analysis program [18]

856 Example 6 ndash moment amplificationin a braced frame

Problem Determine the amplified design moments for the braced frame shown inFigure 83 (Second-order effects are rarely important in braced members whichhave significant moment gradients It can be inferred from Clause 522(3)b of EC3that second-order effects need not be considered in braced frames Nevertheless

380 Frames

an approximate method of allowing for second-order effects by estimating theamplified design moments is illustrated below)

Solution For the vertical member 123 the first-order moments are M1 = 0M2 = 235 kNm M3 = minus530 kNm and for these the method of [28] leads toβm = 0585 and so using equation 821

cm = 06 minus 04 times 0585 = 0366

Using Ncr13 = 8365 kN from Section 852 and using equations 819 and 820

MEd3 = 0366 times 530

1 minus 7168365= 212 kNm lt 530 kNm = M3

and so MEd3 = 530 kNm This is close to the second-order moment of 536 kNmdetermined using the computer program of [18]

For the horizontal member 345 the first-order moments are M3 = minus530 kNmM4 = 1366 kNm M5 = minus1538 kNm and for these the method of [28] leads toβm = 0292 and so

cm = 06 minus 04 times 0292 = 0483

Using Ncr35 = 28096 kN from Section 852 and using equations 819 and 820

MEd5 = 0483 times 1538

1 minus 25328096= 750 kNm lt 1538 kNm = M5

and so MEd5 = 1538 kNm This is close to the second-order moment of 1546 kNmdetermined using the computer program of [18]

857 Example 7 ndash moment amplification in a portal frame

Problem The maximum first-order elastic moment in the portal frame ofFigure 814 whose buckling load factor was determined in Section 855 is1518 kNm [26] Determine the amplified design moment

Solution Using the elastic frame buckling load factor determined in Section 855of αcrs = 130 and using equations 819 and 822

MEd = 1518

1 minus 1130= 1645 kNm

which is about 6 higher than the value of 1554 kNm obtained using the computerprogram of [18]

858 Example 8 ndash moment amplificationin an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the amplified design moments for the unbraced frame shownin Figure 84

Frames 381

Solution For the upper-storey columns using the value of αcrsu = 221determined in Section 853(b) and using equation 823

δsu = 1(1 minus 1221) = 1047 and so

MEd8 = 1047 times 625 = 655 kNm

which is close to the second-order moment of 644 kNm determined using thecomputer program of [18]

For the lower-storey columns using the value of αcrsl = 631 determined inSection 853(b) and using equation 823

δsl = 1(1 minus 1631) = 1188 and so

MEd76 = 1188 times 1193 = 1418 kNm

which is 9 higher than the value of 1305 kNm determined using the computerprogram of [18]

For the lower beam the second-order end moment MEd74 may be approximatedby adding the second-order end moments MEd76 and MEd78 so that

MEd74 = 1418 + 535(1 minus 1221) = 1978 kNm

which is 7 higher than the value of 1847 kNm determined using the computerprogram of [18]

Slightly different values of the second-order moments are obtained if the valuesof αcrslu and αcrsl determined by the storey deflection method in Section 853(a)are used

859 Example 9 ndash plastic analysis of a braced frame

Problem Determine the plastic collapse load factor for the braced frame shown inFigure 83 if the members are all of S275 steelSolution For the horizontal member plastic collapse mechanism shown inFigure 83e

δW = 80αph times (δθh times 60) = 480αphδθh for a virtual rotation δθhof 34

and

δU = (850 times δθh)+ (1713 times 2δθh)+ (1713 times δθh) = 5989 δθh

so that

αph = 5989480 = 1248

382 Frames

Checking for reductions in Mp using equation 717

Mpr13 = 118 times 850 times 1 minus 895(275 times 471 times 102103)

= 934 kNm gt 850 kNm = Mp13

and so there is no reduction in Mp for member 13

Mpr35 = 118 times 1713 times 1 minus 321(275 times 513 times 102103)

= 1975 kNm gt 1713 kNm = Mp35

and so there is no reduction in Mp for member 35Therefore αph = 1248For a plastic collapse mechanism in the vertical member with a frictionless hinge

at 1 and plastic hinges at 2 and 3

αpv = 850 times 2 times δθv + 850 times δθv

20 times 50 times δθv

= 255 gt 1248 = αph

and so

αp = 1248

8510 Example 10 ndash plastic analysis of an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the plastic collapse load factor for the unbraced frame shownin Figure 84 if the members are all of S275 steelSolution For the beam plastic collapse mechanism shown in Figure 84e

δW = 40αp times 6δθ = 240αpδθ

for virtual rotations δθ of the half beams 35 and 58 and

δU = (842 times δθ)+ (842 times 2δθ)+ (842 times δθ) = 3368δθ

so that

αp = 368240 = 1403

The frame is only partially determinate when this mechanism forms and so themember axial forces cannot be determined by statics alone The axial force N358

determined by a computer first-order plastic analysis (18) is N358 = 338 kN andthe axial force ratio is (NNy)358 = 338(275 times 320 times 102103) = 00384which is less than 015 the approximate value at which NNy begins to reduceMp and so αp is unchanged at αp = 1403

Frames 383

The collapse load factors calculated for the other possible mechanisms of

bull lower beam (αp = 2 times (1559 + 850 + 2464)(80 times 6) = 2030)bull lower-storey sway (αp = 2 times 1559(30 times 5) = 2079)bull upper-storey sway (αp = 2 times (842 + 850)(10 times 5) = 6768)bull combined beam sway

(αp = 2 times (842 + 842 + 2464 + 850 + 1559)

(40 + 80)times 6 + (20 times 5 + 10 times 10) = 1425

)

are all greater than 1403 and so αp = 1403

8511 Example 11 ndash elastic member design

Problem Check the adequacy of the lower-storey column 67 (of S275 steel) of theunbraced frame shown in Figure 84 The column is fully braced against deflectionout of the plane of the frame and twisting

Design actionsThe first-order actions are N67 = 1367 kN and M76 = 1193 kNm (Figure 84)and the amplified moment is 1418 kNm (Section 858)

HEd = 10 + 20 = 30 kN and

VEd = (20 + 40 + 20)+ (40 + 80 + 40) = 240 kN

HEdVEd = 30240 = 0125 lt 015 532(4)B

and so the effects of sway imperfections should be included

φ0 = 1200 532(3)

αh = 2radic

10 = 0632 lt 23 and so αh = 23 532(3)

m = 1 (one of the columns will have less than the average force) 532(3)

αm = radic05(1 + 11) = 10 and 532(3)

φ = (1200)times (23)times 10 = 000333 532(3)

The increased horizontal forces are 532(7)

10 + 000333 times 80 = 1027 kN for the upper storey and20 + 000333 times 240 = 2080 kN for the lower storey

If the frame is reanalysed for these increased forces then the axial force willincrease from 1367 to NEd = 1372 kN and the moment from 1193 times 1188 =1418 kNm to MyEd = 1219 times 1188 = 1448 kNm

384 Frames

Section resistance

tf = 125 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε =radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (20432 minus 792 minus 102)(125 times 0924) = 762 lt 9 T52

and the flange is Class 1 T52The worst case for the web classification is when the web is fully plastic in

compression for which

cw(twε) = (2062 minus 2 times 125 minus 2 times 102)(79 times 0924) = 220 lt 33T52

and the web is Class 1 T52Thus the section is Class 1

γM0 = 10 61

NcRd = 663 times 102 times 27510 N = 1823 kN = NplRd 624(2)

025NplRd = 025 times 1826 = 4558 kN gt 1372 kN = NEd 6291(4)

05hwtwfy = 05(2062 minus 2 times 125)times 79 times 275 N = 1968 kN 6291(4)

gt 1372 kN = NEd

and so no allowance need be made for the effect of axial force on the plasticresistance moment 6291(4)

MN Rd = MplRd = 567 times 103 times 27510 Nmm

= 1559 kNm gt 1448 kNm = MEd 6291(5)

and the section resistance is adequate 6291(2)

Member resistanceBecause the member is continuously braced out-of-plane beam lateral buckling

and column minor axis and torsional buckling need not be consideredThus MzEd = 0χLT = 10 and

λ0 = 0 CmLT = 10 aLT = 0 and bLT = 0 TA1

Lcr = 5000 522(7b)

Frames 385

Ncr = π2 times 210 000 times 5259 times 10450002 N = 4360 kN

h

b= 20622043 = 1009 lt 12 tf = 125 lt 100 and so for a S275 steel

UC buckling about the y axis use buckling curve b T62

α = 034 T61

λy =radic(663 times 102 times 275)(4360 times 103) = 0647 6312(1)

Φ = 05 times [1 + 034 times (0647 minus 02)+ 06472] = 0785 6312(1)

χy = 1

0785 + radic07852 minus 06472

= 0813 6312(1)

Using Annex A

microy = 1 minus 13724360

1 minus 0813 times 13724360= 0994 TA1

ψy = 01449 = 0 TA2

Cmy = Cmy0 = 079 + 021 times 0 + 036 times (0 minus 033)times 13724360 TA2

= 0786

wy = 567 times 103510 times 103 = 1112 lt 15 TA1

λmax = λy = 0647 TA1

NRk = NplRd times γM0 = 1823 times 10 = 1823 kN 532(11)

γM1 = 10 61

npl = 1372(182310) = 00753 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (1112 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1112times 07852 times 0647 minus 16

1112

times07852 times 06472) times 00753 minus 0] = 1009 TA1

kyy = 0785 times 10 times 0994

1 minus 13724360times 1

1009= 0798 TA1

Substituting into equation 661 of EC3

1372

0813 times 1823+ 0798 times 1448

10 times 1559= 0834 lt 10 633(4)

and so the member resistance is adequate

386 Frames

Alternatively using Annex B

Cmy = 09 TB3

kyy = 09

1 + (0647 minus 02)

1372

0813 times 182310

= 0937 TB1

Substituting into equation 661 of EC3

1372

0813 times 1823+ 0937 times 1448

10 times 1559= 0963 lt 10 633(4)

and so the member resistance is adequate

8512 Example 12 ndash plastic design of a braced frame

Problem Determine the plastic design resistance of the braced frame shownin Figure 83

Solution Using the solution of Section 852

αcr = 117 lt 15 521(3)

and so EC3 does not allow first-order plastic analysis to be used for this frameunless it is clad The restriction of Clause 521(3) of EC3 appears to be unnec-essarily severe in this case since the second-order effects are dominated by thebuckling of the column 123 and will have little effect on the plastic collapsemechanism of the beam 345

If first-order plastic analysis were allowed for this frame then using the solutionof Section 859αp = 1248 gt 10 and the structure would appear to be satisfactory

8513 Example 13 ndash plastic design of an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the plastic design resistance of the unbraced frame shown inFigure 84

Solution Using the solution of Section 853

αcr = 631 lt 10 521(3)

and so EC3 does not allow first-order plastic analysis to be used for this frame

86 Unworked examples

861 Example 14 ndash truss design

The members of the welded truss shown in Figure 815a are all UC sections ofS275 steel with their webs perpendicular to the plane of the truss The member

Frames 387

1 2 3

4 5 6

80

Member Section I

80 80 80

(a) Truss and loads(m kN)

80

100 100 100

f(cm4) (Nmm2)z A(cm2) y

14 36 305 305 UC 97 7308 123 27545 65 12569 201 26512 3242 62

7308 123 2757308 123 275

Member M (kNm)L

14 168 ndash688 ndash2174455612

ndash15022498ndash168

42 815

N (kN)M (kNm)R

2498 ndash1727ndash1502 ndash172 7

89 1591ndash406 85

(b) Memberproperties

(c) Elasticactions

305 305 UC 158305 305 UC 97305 305 UC 97

timestimestimestimes

Figure 815 Example 14

properties and the results of a first-order elastic analysis of the truss under thedesign loads are shown in Figure 815b and c

Determine

(a) the effective length factors kcr of the compression members and the frameelastic buckling load factor αcr

(b) the amplified first-order design moments MEd for the compression members(c) the adequacy of the members for the actions determined by elastic analysis(d) the plastic collapse load factor αp and(e) the adequacy of the truss for plastic design

862 Example 15 ndash unbraced frame design

The members of the unbraced rigid-jointed two-storey frame shown inFigure 816a are all of S275 steel The member properties and the results ofa first-order elastic analysis of the frame under its design loads are shown inFigure 816b and c

Determine

(a) the column effective length factors kcr the storey buckling load factors αcrsand the frame buckling load factor αcr

(b) the amplified first-order design moments MEd for the columns(c) the adequacy of the members for the actions determined by elastic analysis

388 Frames

Member Section I

(a) Frame and loads (m kN)

A f(cm ) (cm ) (Nmm )y y

1ndash3 10ndash12 152 times 152 UC 37305 times 165 UB 40254 times 102 UB 25

2210 471 2752ndash11 8503 513 275

(c) Member properties

(b) Elastic actions

3ndash12 3415 320 275

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

50

50

30 30 30 30

20

10 20 20 20 10

20 40 40 40 20

10

Member M (kNm)L

1ndash2

N (kN)M (kNm)R

10ndash112ndash3

11ndash122ndash44ndash66ndash88ndash113ndash55ndash77ndash99ndash12

ndash188ndash654546

ndash774ndash683895

1274452

ndash488345577209

ndash138795

ndash488759895

1274452

ndash1569345577209

ndash759

ndash1104ndash1297

ndash377ndash423

17171717

ndash307ndash307ndash307ndash307

4 2 2

Figure 816 Example 15

(d) the plastic collapse load factor αp and(e) the adequacy of the frame for plastic design

References

1 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures- Part 1-8Design of Joints BSI London

2 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3Design of Steel Structures General Rules and Rules for Buildings Thomas TelfordPublishing London

3 British Standards Institution (2000) BS5950-1 2000 Structural Use of Steelwork inBuilding ndash Part 1 Code of Practice for Design ndash Rolled and Welded Sections BSILondon

4 British Standards Institution (1969) PD3343 Recommendations for Design (SupplementNo 1 to BS 449) BSI London

5 Nethercot DA (1986) The behaviour of steel frame structures allowing for semi-rigid joint action Steel Structures ndash Recent Research Advances and Their Applica-tions to Design (ed MN Pavlovic) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Londonpp 135ndash51

6 Nethercot DA and Chen W-F (1988) Effect of connections of columns Journal ofConstructional Steel Research 10 pp 201ndash39

7 Anderson DA Reading SJ and Kavianpour K (1991) Wind moment design forunbraced frames SCI Publication P-082 The Steel Construction Institute Ascot

Frames 389

8 Couchman GH (1997) Design of semi-continuous braced frames SCI PublicationP-183 The Steel Construction Institute Ascot

9 Anderson D (ed) (1996) Semi-rigid Behaviour of Civil Engineering StructuralConnections COST-C1 Brussels

10 Faella C Piluso V and Rizzano G (2000) Structural Steel Semi-rigid ConnectionsCRC Press Boca Raton

11 Pippard AJS and Baker JF (1968) The Analysis of Engineering Structures4th edition Edward Arnold London

12 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

13 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1988) Structural Analysis 3rd editionVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham England

14 Kleinlogel A (1931) Mehrstielige Rahmen Ungar New York15 Steel Construction Institute (2005) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th edition Blackwell

Scientific Publications Oxford16 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-Hall

Englewood Cliffs New Jersey17 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 2nd ed Pergamon

Press Oxford18 Hancock GJ Papangelis JP and Clarke MJ (1995) PRFSA Userrsquos Manual Centre

for Advanced Structural Engineering University of Sydney19 Computer Service Consultants (2006) S-Frame Enterprise CSC (UK) Limited Leeds20 Research Engineers Europe Limited (2005) STAAD Pro + QSE RSE Bristol21 Hancock GJ (1984) Structural buckling and vibration analyses on microcomputers

Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE24 No 4pp 327ndash32

22 Bridge RQ and Fraser DJ (1987) Improved G-factor method for evaluating effec-tive lengths of columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 6 Junepp 1341ndash56

23 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

24 Davies JM (1990) In-plane stability of portal frames The Structural Engineer 68No 8 April pp 141ndash7

25 Davies JM (1991) The stability of multi-bay portal frames The Structural Engineer69 No 12 June pp 223ndash9

26 Trahair NS (1993) Steel structures ndash elastic in-plane buckling of pitched roof portalframes AS4100 DS04 Standards Australia Sydney

27 Silvestre N and Camotim D (2007) Elastic buckling and second-order behaviourof pitched roof steel frames Journal of Constructional Steel Research 63 No 6pp 804ndash18

28 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1987) Limit state design rules for steel beam-columnsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 21 No 2 Septemberpp 2ndash11

29 Lai S-MA and MacGregor JG (1983) Geometric non-linearities in unbracedmultistory frames Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No 11 pp 2528ndash45

30 Wood BR Beaulieu D and Adams PF (1976) Column design by P-delta methodJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST2 February pp 411ndash27

390 Frames

31 Wood BR Beaulieu D and Adams PF (1976) Further aspects of design byP-delta method Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST3 Marchpp 487ndash500

32 Merchant W (1954) The failure load of rigid jointed frameworks as influenced bystability The Structural Engineer 32 No 7 July pp 185ndash90

33 Levi V Driscoll GC and Lu L-W (1965) Structural subassemblages preventedfrom sway Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST5 pp 103ndash27

34 Levi V Driscoll GC and Lu L-W (1967) Analysis of restrained columns permittedto sway Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 93 No ST1 pp 87ndash108

35 Hibbard WR and Adams PF (1973) Subassemblage technique for asymmetricstructures Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 99 No STl1 pp 2259ndash68

36 Driscoll GC et al (1965) Plastic Design of Multi-storey Frames Lehigh UniversityPennsylvania

37 American Iron and Steel Institute (1968) Plastic Design of Braced Multi-storey SteelFrames AISI New York

38 Driscoll GC Armacost JO and Hansell WC (1970) Plastic design of multistoreyframes by computer Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST1 pp 17ndash33

39 Harrison HB (1967) Plastic analysis of rigid frames of high strength steel account-ing for deformation effects Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of EngineersAustralia CE9 No 1 April pp 127ndash36

40 El-Zanaty MH and Murray DW (1983) Nonlinear finite element analysis of steelframes Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No 2 February pp 353ndash68

41 White DW and Chen WF (editors) (1993) Plastic Hinge Based Methods forAdvanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames Structural Stability Research CouncilBethlehem Pa

42 Clarke MJ Bridge RQ Hancock GJ and Trahair NS (1993)Australian trends inthe plastic analysis and design of steel building frames Plastic Hinge Based Methods forAdvanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames Structural Stability Research CouncilBethlehem Pa pp 65ndash93

43 Clarke MJ (1994) Plastic-zone analysis of frames Chapter 6 of Advanced Analysisof Steel Frames Theory Software and Applications Chen WF and Toma S edsCRC Press Inc Boca Raton Florida pp 259ndash319

44 White DW Liew JYR and Chen WF (1993) Toward advanced analysis in LRFDPlastic Hinge Based Methods for Advanced Analysis and Design of Steel FramesStructural Stability Research Council Bethlehem Pa pp 95ndash173

45 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1975) Analysis of lateral buckling in planeframes Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST7 pp 1497ndash516

46 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Direct stiffness analysis of lateral bucklingJournal of Structural Mechanics 3 No 1 pp 107ndash37

47 Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN Spon London48 Papangelis JP Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (1995) Elastic flexural-torsional

buckling of structures by computer Proceedings 6th International Conference onCivil and Structural Engineering Computing Cambridge pp 109ndash119

49 Bradford MA Cuk PE Gizejowski MA and Trahair NS (1987) Inelasticbuckling of beam-columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 11pp 2259ndash77

Frames 391

50 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns ndashTheory Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2041ndash61

51 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns ndashApplications Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2062ndash85

52 Wongkaew K and Chen WF (2002) Consideration of out-of-plane buckling inadvanced analysis for planar steel frame design Journal of Constructional SteelResearch 58 pp 943ndash65

53 Trahair NS and Chan S-L (2003) Out-of-plane advanced analysis of steel structuresEngineering Structures 25 pp 1627ndash37

54 Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (2004) Steel member strength by inelastic lateralbuckling Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 130 No 1 pp 64ndash9

55 Horne MR (1956) The stanchion problem in frame structures designed according toultimate carrying capacity Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Part III5 pp 105ndash46

56 Horne MR (1964) Safe loads on I-section columns in structures designed by plastictheory Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 29 September pp 137ndash50

57 Horne MR (1964) The plastic design of columns Publication No 23 BCSA London58 Institution of Structural Engineers and Institute of Welding (1971) Joint Committee

Second Report on Fully Rigid Multi-Storey Steel Frames ISE London59 Wood RH (1973) Rigid-jointed multi-storey steel frame design a state-of-the-

art report Current Paper CP 2573 Building Research Establishment WatfordSeptember

60 Wood RH (1974) A New Approach to Column Design HMSO London

Chapter 9

Joints

91 Introduction

Connections or joints are used to transfer the forces supported by a structuralmember to other parts of the structure or to the supports They are also usedto connect braces and other members which provide restraints to the structuralmember Although the terms connections and joints are often regarded as havingthe same meaning the definitions of EC3-1-8 [1] are slightly different as followsA connection consists of fasteners such as bolts pins rivets or welds and thelocal member elements connected by these fasteners and may include additionalplates or cleats A joint consists of the zone in which the members are connectedand includes the connection as well as the portions of the member or members atthe joint needed to facilitate the action being transferred

The arrangement of a joint is usually chosen to suit the type of action (forceandor moment) being transferred and the type of member (tension or compres-sion member beam or beam-column) being connected The arrangement shouldbe chosen to avoid excessive costs since the design detailing manufacture andassembly of a joint is usually time consuming in particular the joint type has asignificant influence on costs For example it is often better to use a heavier mem-ber rather than stiffeners since this will reduce the number of processes requiredfor its manufacture

A joint is designed by first identifying the force transfers from the memberthrough the components of the joint to the other parts of the structure Each com-ponent is then proportioned so that it has sufficient strength to resist the force thatit is required to transmit General guidance on joints is given in [2ndash11]

92 Joint components

921 Bolts

Several different types of bolts may be used in structural joints including ordinarystructural bolts (ie commercial or precision bolts and black bolts) and high-strength bolts Turned close tolerance bolts are now rarely used Bolts may transfer

Joints 393

Bolt forces

Bearing

Bearing

BearingShear

Shear

(a) Shear and bearingjoint

(b) Preloadedfriction-grip joint

(c) Tension joint

Bearing Bearing

Bolt forces

Tension

Bearing

Bearing

Bearing

Friction

Friction

Friction

Plate forces

Figure 91 Use of bolts in joints

loads by shear and bearing as shown in Figure 91a by friction between platesclamped together as shown in the preloaded friction-grip joint of Figure 91b orby tension as shown in Figure 91c The shear bearing and tension capacitiesof bolts and the slip capacities of preloaded friction-grip joints are discussed inSection 96

The use of bolts often facilitates the assembly of a structure as only very simpletools are required This is important in the completion of site joints especiallywhere the accessibility of a joint is limited or where it is difficult to providethe specialised equipment required for other types of fasteners On the other handbolting usually involves a significant fabrication effort to produce the bolt holes andthe associated plates or cleats In addition special but not excessively expensiveprocedures are required to ensure that the clamping actions required for preloadedfriction-grip joints are achieved Precautions may need to be taken to ensure that thebolts do not become undone especially in situations where fluctuating or impactloads may loosen them Such precautions may involve the provision of speciallocking devices or the use of preloaded high-strength bolts Guidance on bolted(and on riveted) joints is given in [2ndash11]

922 Pins

Pin joints used to be provided in some triangulated frames where it was thoughtto be important to try to realise the common design assumption that these framesare pin-jointed The cost of making a pin joint is high because of the machiningrequired for the pin and its holes and also because of difficulties in assembly Pins

394 Joints

are used in special architectural features where it is necessary to allow relativerotation to occur between the members being connected In addition a joint whichrequires a very large diameter fastener often uses a pin instead of a bolt Guidanceon the design of pin joints is given in Clause 313 of EC3-1-8 [1]

923 Rivets

In the past hot-driven rivets were extensively used in structural joints They wereoften used in the same way as ordinary structural bolts are used in shear and bearingand in tension joints There is usually less slip in a riveted joint because of thetendency for the rivet holes to be filled by the rivets when being hot-driven Shop-riveting was cheaper than site riveting and for this reason shop-riveting was oftencombined with site-bolting However riveting has been replaced by welding orbolting except in some historical refurbishments Rivets are treated in a similarfashion to bolts in EC3-1-8 [1]

924 Welds

Structural joints between steel members are often made by arc-welding techniquesin which molten weld metal is fused with the parent metal of the members or com-ponent plates being connected at a joint Welding is used extensively in fabricatingshops where specialised equipment is available and where control and inspectionprocedures can be readily exercised ensuring the production of satisfactory weldsWelding is often cheaper than bolting because of the great reduction in the prepa-ration required while greater strength can be achieved the members or plates nolonger being weakened by bolt holes and the strength of the weld metal being supe-rior to that of the material connected In addition welds are more rigid than othertypes of load-transferring fasteners On the other hand welding often producesdistortion and high local residual stresses and may result in reduced ductilitywhile site welding may be difficult and costly

Butt welds such as that shown in Figure 92a may be used to splice tensionmembers A full penetration weld enables the full strength of the member to bedeveloped while the butting together of the members avoids any joint eccentric-ity Butt welds often require some machining of the elements to be joined Specialwelding procedures are usually needed for full strength welds between thick mem-bers to control the weld quality and ductility while special inspection proceduresmay be required for critical welds to ensure their integrity These butt weldinglimitations often lead to the selection of joints which use fillet welds

Fillet welds (see Figure 92b) may be used to connect lapped plates as in thetension member splice (Figure 92c) or to connect intersecting plates (Figure 92d)The member force is transmitted by shear through the weld either longitudinallyor transversely Fillet welds although not as efficient as butt welds require littleif any preparation which accounts for their extensive use They also require lesstesting to demonstrate their integrity

Joints 395

(a) Butt welded splice

(b) Fillet weld (c) Fillet welded splice (d) Fillet welded joint

Weldsize s

Throat thickness

legs sShear

Shear

Plate forcesTension~07s for equals

Shear

Figure 92 Use of welds in joints

Nominal webcleat and bolts

Minimum requirementsfor top cleat and

bolts

Full strengthbutt weld

Preloadedfriction gripbolted joint

Seat stiffener

(a) Simple joint (b) Semi-rigid joint (c) Rigid joint

web stiffener

Figure 93 Beam-to-column joints

925 Plates and cleats

Intermediate plates (or gussets) fin (or side) plates end plates and angle or teecleats are frequently used in structural joints to transfer the forces from one memberto another Examples of flange cleats and plates are shown in the beam-to-columnjoints of Figure 93 and an example of a gusset plate is shown in the truss joint ofFigure 94b Stiffening plates such as the seat stiffener (Figure 93b) and the col-umn web stiffeners (Figure 93c) are often used to help transfer the forces in a joint

Plates are comparatively strong and stiff when they transfer the forces byin-plane actions but are comparatively weak and flexible when they transfer theforces by out-of-plane bending Thus the angle cleat and seat shown in Figure 93a

396 Joints

are flexible and allow the relative rotation of the joint members while the flangeplates and web stiffeners (Figure 93c) are stiff and restrict the relative rotation

The simplicity of welded joints and their comparative rigidity has often resultedin the omission of stiffening plates when they are not required for strength purposesThus the rigid joint of Figure 93c can be greatly simplified by butt welding thebeam directly onto the column flange and by omitting the column web stiffenersHowever this omission will make the joint more flexible since local distortionsof the column flange and web will no longer be prevented

93 Arrangement of joints

931 Joints for force transmission

In many cases a joint is only required to transmit a force and there is nomoment acting on the group of connectors While the joint may be capable ofalso transmitting a moment it will be referred to as a force joint

Force joints are generally of two types For the first the force acts in the con-nection plane formed by the interface between the two plates connected and theconnectors between these plates act in shear as in Figure 91a For the secondtype the force acts out of the connection plane and the connectors act in tensionas in Figure 91c

Examples of force joints include splices in tension and compression memberstruss joints and shear splices and joints in beams A simple shear and bearingbolted tension member splice is shown in Figure 91a and a friction-grip boltedsplice in Figure 91b These are simpler than the tension bolt joint of Figure 91cand are typical of site joints

Ordinary structural and high-strength bolts are used in clearance holes (often2 or 3 mm oversize to provide erection tolerances) as shown in Figure 91a Thehole clearances lead to slip under service loading and when this is undesirable apreloaded friction-grip joint such as that shown in Figure 91b may be used In thisjoint the transverse clamping action produced by preloading the high-strengthbolts allows high frictional resistances to develop and transfer the longitudinalforce Preloaded friction-grip joints are often used to make site joints which needto be comparatively rigid

The butt and fillet welded splices of Figure 92a and c are typical of shop jointsand are of high rigidity While they are often simpler to manufacture under shopconditions than the corresponding bolted joints of Figure 91 special care mayneed to be taken during welding if these are critical joints

The truss joint shown in Figure 94b uses a gusset plate in order to providesufficient room for the bolts The use of a gusset plate is avoided in the joint ofFigure 94a while end plates are used in the joint of Figure 94c to facilitate thefield-bolted connection of shop-welded assemblies

The beam web shear splice of Figure 95a shows a typical shop-welded andsite-bolted arrangement The common simple joint between a beam and columnshown in Figure 93a is often considered to transmit only shear from the beam to

Joints 397

Stiffener

Tees

Bearing plate

Buttweld

(a) Butt welded jointbetween tees

Tee

Fillet welds Bolts

BoltsAngles

Double angles

Gusset plate

(b) Bolted joint withdouble angles

(c) Welded and bolted joint

Figure 94 Joints between axially loaded members

V

V

VMM M

V

M

Web plates

Bolts BoltsFillet welds Butt welds

(a) Shear splice (b) Moment splice (c) Shear and moment splice

Flange plate

Figure 95 Beam splices

the column flange Other examples of joints of this type are shown by the beam-to-beam joints of Figure 96a and b Common arrangements of beam splices aregiven in [2ndash9] and discussed in Sections 958 and 959

932 Joints for moment transmission

While it is rare that a real joint transmits only a moment it is not uncommon that theforce transmitted by the joint is sufficiently small for it to be neglected in designExamples of joints which may be used when the force to be transmitted is negligibleinclude the beam moment splice shown in Figure 95b which combines site-boltingwith shop-welding and the welded moment joint of Figure 96c A moment joint isoften capable of transmitting moderate forces as in the case of the beam-to-columnjoint shown in Figure 93c

933 Force and moment joints

A force and moment joint is required to transmit both force and moment asin the beam-to-column joint shown in Figure 97 Other examples include the

398 Joints

(a) Shear connectionto web

(b) Shear connectionto flange

(c) Moment joint

End plate connectedwith fillet welds Web stiffener Butt welds

Bolts Bolts

Figure 96 Joints between beams

e

Q Q

M = Qe

+

Figure 97 Analysis of a force and moment joint

semi-rigid beam-to-column connection of Figure 93b the full-strength beamsplice of Figure 95c and the beam joint of Figure 96c Common beam-to-columnjoints are given in [2ndash11] and are discussed in Section 95

In some instances joints may actually transfer forces or moments which arenot intended by the designer For example the cleats shown in Figure 93a maytransfer some horizontal forces to the column even though the beam is designedas if simply supported while a similar situation occurs in the shear splice shownin Figure 95a

94 Behaviour of joints

941 Joints for force transmission

When shear and bearing bolts in clearance holes are used in an in-plane force jointthere is an initial slip when the shear is first applied to the joint as some of theclearances are taken up (Figure 98) The joint then becomes increasingly stiff as

Joints 399

Preloaded friction-grip joint

High-strength boltsin clearance holes

Close tolerance boltsin fitted holes

Ordinary structural boltsin clearance holes

Jointforce

Slip load

Initial slip

Joint deformation

Figure 98 Behaviour of bolted joints

more of the bolts come into play At higher forces the more highly loaded boltsstart to yield and the joint becomes less stiff Later a state may be reached inwhich each bolt is loaded to its maximum capacity

It is not usual to analyse this complex behaviour and instead it is commonlyassumed that equal size bolts share equally in transferring the force as shown inFigure 99b (except if the joint is long) even in the service load range It is shownin Section 991 that this is the case if there are no clearances and all the boltsfit perfectly and if the members and connection plates act rigidly and the boltselastically If however the flexibilities of the joint component members and platesare taken into account then it is found that the forces transferred are highest inthe end bolts of any line of bolts parallel to the joint force and lowest in the centrebolts as shown in Figure 99c In long bolted joints the end bolt forces may beso high as to lead to premature failure (before these forces can be redistributed byplastic action) and the subsequent lsquounbuttoningrsquo of the joint

Shear and bearing joints using close tolerance bolts in fitted holes behave in asimilar manner to connections with clearance holes except that the bolt slips aregreatly reduced (It was noted earlier that fitted close tolerance bolts are now rarelyused) On the other hand slip is not reduced in preloaded friction-grip bolted shearjoints but is postponed until the frictional resistance is overcome at the slip loadas shown in Figure 98 Again it is commonly assumed that equal size bolts shareequally in transferring the force

This equal sharing of the force transfer is also often assumed for tension forcejoints in which the applied force acts out of the connection plane It is shown inSection 992 that this is the case for joints in which the plates act rigidly and thebolts act elastically

Welded force joints do not slip but behave as if almost rigid Welds are oftenassumed to be uniformly stressed whether loaded transversely or longitudinallyHowever there may be significantly higher stresses at the ends of long weldsparallel to the joint just as there are in the case of long bolted joints

400 Joints

Q

Q

Qn Qn

n connectors

(a) Shear joint (b) Assumed shear (c) Actual sheardistribution distribution(rigid plates) (elastic plates)

Figure 99 Shear distribution in a force connection

Due to the great differences in the stiffnesses of joints using different types ofconnectors it is usual not to allow the joint force to be shared between slip andnon-slip connectors and instead the non-slip connectors are required to transferall the force For example when ordinary site-bolting is used to hold two membersin place at a joint which is subsequently site welded the bolts are designed forthe erection conditions only while the welds are designed for the final total forceHowever it is rational and generally permissible to share the joint force betweenwelds and preloaded friction-grip bolts which are designed against slip and thisis allowed in EC3-1-8 [1]

On the other hand it is always satisfactory to use one type of connector totransfer the complete force at one part of a joint and a different type at anotherpart Examples of this are shown in Figure 95a and b where shop welds are usedto join each connection plate to one member and field bolts to join it to the other

942 Joints for moment transmission

9421 General

Although a real connection is rarely required to transmit only a moment thebehaviour of a moment joint may usefully be discussed as an introduction to theconsideration of joints which transmit both force and moment and to the componentmethod of joint design used in EC3-1-8 [1]

The idealised behaviour of a moment joint is shown in Figure 910 which ignoresany initial slip or taking up of clearances The characteristics of the joint are thedesign moment resistance MjRd the design rotational stiffness Sj and the rotationcapacity φCd These characteristics are related to those of the individual compo-nents of the joint For most joints it is difficult to determine their moment-rotation

Joints 401

Joint rotation fj

Join

t mom

ent M

j

MjRd

Stiffness Sj

MjEd

Initial stiffness Sjini

fCd

Figure 910 Characteristics of a moment joint

characteristics theoretically owing to the uncertainties in modelling the variouscomponents of the joint even though a significant body of experimental data isavailable

EC3-1-8 uses a component method of moment joint design in which the charac-teristics of a joint can be determined from the properties of its basic componentsincluding the fasteners or connectors beam end plates acting in bending col-umn web panels in shear (Section 43) or column webs in transverse compressioncaused by bearing (Section 46) The use of this method for moment joints betweenI-section members is given in Section 6 of EC3-1-8 and discussed in the followingsubsections while the method for moment joints between hollow section membersis given in Section 7 of EC3-1-8

9422 Design moment resistance

Each component of a joint must have sufficient resistance to transmit the actionsacting on it Thus the design moment resistance of the joint is governed by thecomponent which has the highest value of its design action to resistance It istherefore necessary to analyse the joint under its design moment to determine thedistribution of the design actions on the joint components

Joints where the moment acts in the plane of the connectors (as in Figure 911a)so that the moment is transferred by connector shear are often analysed elastically[12] by assuming that all the connectors fit perfectly and that each plate actsas if rigid so that the relative rotation between them is δθ x In this case eachconnector transfers a shear force Vvi from one plate to the other This shear forceacts perpendicular to the radius ri to the axis of rotation and is proportional to therelative displacement riδθ x of the two plates at the connector whence

Vvi = kvAiriδθx (91)

where Ai is the shear area of the connector and the constant kv depends on the shearstiffness of that type of connector It is shown in Section 991 by considering the

402 Joints

y

y

z

z

V

V

M

Vvi

Ai(yi zi)

ri

(yr zr)

(yr zr)

z

y

x

My

Mz

Ai

Nx

(yi zi)

Nxi

Centre of rotation

Centre ofrotation

Typical connector Connection plane

(a) In-plane joint (b) Out-of-plane joint

x

Typicalconnector

δ13x

δ13y

δ13x

Figure 911 Joint forces

equilibrium of the connector forces Vvi that the axis of rotation lies at the centroidof the connector group The moment exerted by the connector force is Vviri andso the total moment Mx is given by

Mx = kvδθx

sumi

Air2i (92)

If this is substituted into equation 91 the connector force can be evaluated as

Vvi = MxAirisumi

Air2i

(93)

However the real behaviour of in-plane moment joints is likely to be somewhatdifferent just as it is for the force joints discussed in Section 941 This differenceis due to the flexibility of the plates the inelastic behaviour of the connectors athigher moments and the slip due to the clearances between any bolts and theirholes

Welded moment joints may be analysed by making the same assumptions asfor bolted joints [12] Thus equations 92 and 93 may be used with the weld sizesubstituted for the bolt area and the summations replaced by integrals along theweld

The simplifying assumptions of elastic connectors and rigid plates are sometimesalso made for joints with moments acting normal to the plane of the connectorsas shown in Figure 912b It is shown in Section 992 that the connector tension

Joints 403

Beam

MEd

VEd

NEd

Supportingmember

Beam

MEd

VEd

NEd

End plate

(a) Welded joint (b) Bolted end plate

Supportingmember

Figure 912 Common rigid end joints

forces Nxi can be determined from

Nxi = MyAizisumAiz2

i

minus MzAiyisumAiy2

i

(94)

in which yi zi are the principal axis coordinates of the connector measured fromthe centroid of the connector group

This result implies that the compression forces are transmitted only by the con-nectors but in real bolted joints these are transmitted primarily through thoseportions of the connection plates which remain in contact Thus the connectortension forces determined from equation 94 will be inaccurate when there is a sig-nificant difference between the centroid of the contact area and that of the assumedcompression connectors Clause 627 of EC3-1-8 [1] corrects this defect by defin-ing the centres of compression for a number of bolted beam-column joints andby requiring the lever arms used in determining the bolt tensions to be measuredfrom these centres

The result of equation 94 is also defective when prying forces are introducedby flexure of any T-stubs (real or idealised) used to transfer bolt tensions asshown in Figure 913 [13ndash15] This shows two T-stubs connected through theirflanges (or tables) by rows of bolts which are used to model the tension zone ofbolted joints in Clause 624 of EC3-1-8 Isolating a T-stub simplifies the analysisof a joint For example the prying forces in the joint in Figure 913b that areproduced by flexure of the flange of the T-stub and which must be included in thetensile action NtEd on the bolt can be determined from bending theory (Chapter 5)Examples of tension zones which include idealised T-stub assemblies are shownin Figures 912 and 914

404 Joints

(a) Bolted T-stub assembly (b) Prying action

Applied force Applied force

Pryingforce

Pryingforce Bolt forces

Figure 913 T-stub elements

(a) Angle seat (b) Flexible end plate (c) Angle cleat

Supportingmember

Angle seat End plate

Beam Beam Beam

Top cleat Angle cleat

REdREd

REd

Supportingmember

Supportingmember

Figure 914 Common flexible end joints

9423 Design moment stiffness

Joints need to be classified for frame analysis purposes (Chapter 8) as being eithereffectively pinned (low moment stiffness) semi-rigid or effectively rigid (high-moment stiffness) When a joint cannot be assumed to be either effectively pinnedor rigid then its moment stiffness needs to be determined so that it can be classifiedIf a frame is to be analysed as if semi-rigid (Section 833) then the momentstiffnesses of its semi-rigid joints need to be used in the analysis

In the component method used in Clause 63 of EC3-1-8 [1] the moment stiff-ness of a joint is determined from the inverse of the sum of the flexibilities of thecomponents used at each link in the chain of force transfer through the joint Thusthe flexibilities of any plate or cleat components used must be included with thoseof the fasteners Plates are comparatively stiff (and often assumed to be rigid)when loaded in their planes but are comparatively flexible when bent out of theirplanes In general the overall behaviour of a joint can be assessed by determiningthe path by which force is transferred through the joint and by synthesising theresponses of all the components to their individual loads

Joints 405

9424 Rotation capacity

When rigid plastic analysis is used in the design of a frame (Section 8537)each plastic hinge location must have sufficient rotation capacity to ensure thatthe plastic moment can be maintained until the collapse mechanism is developedClause 64 of EC3-1-8 [1] provides methods of determining whether joints betweenI-section members have sufficient rotation capacity

9425 Joint classification

The behaviour of a structure is influenced as much by the behaviour of its joints asby the behaviour of its individual members Flexural frames are therefore analysedas being simple semi-continuous or continuous (Section 831) depending on theresistance and stiffness classifications of their joints

Clause 523 of EC3-1-8 [1] classifies joints according to strength as beingnominally pinned of partial strength or of full strength A joint may be classifiedas full strength if its design moment resistance is not less than that of the connectedmembers A joint may be classified as nominally pinned if its design momentresistance is not greater than 025 times that required for a full strength jointprovided it has sufficient rotation capacity A joint which cannot be classified aseither nominally pinned or full strength is classified as partial strength

Clause 522 of EC3-1-8 classifies joints according to stiffness as being nomi-nally pinned semi-rigid or rigid Ajoint in a frame that is braced against significantsway may be classified as rigid if Sj ge 8EIbLb where EIb is the flexural rigidityof the beam connected and Lb is its length A joint may be classified as nom-inally pinned if Sj le 05EIbLb A joint which cannot be classified as eithernominally pinned or rigid is classified as semi-rigid

943 Force and moment joints

Joints which are required to transfer both force and moment may be analysedelastically by using the method of superposition as shown in Section 99 Thus theindividual bolt forces in the eccentrically loaded in-plane plate connections shownin Figure 97 can be determined as the vector sum of the components caused by aconcentric force Q and a moment Qe Similarly the individual connector forcesin a joint loaded out of its plane as shown in Figure 911b may be determinedfrom the sum of the forces due to the out-of-plane force Nx and the principal axismoments My and Mz in which the centre of compression is used to determine theconnector lever arms

The connector forces in joints subjected to combined loadings may be analysedelastically by using superposition to combine the separate effects of in-plane andout-of-plane loading

The following section provides simplified descriptions of the response ofcommon joints

406 Joints

95 Common joints

951 General

There are many different joint arrangements used for force and moment transmis-sion between members and supports depending on the actions which are to betransferred Fabrication and erection procedures may be simplified by standardis-ing a number of joints for the more frequently occurring situations Examples ofsome common joints are shown in Figures 912 and 914ndash917

Flexible joints for simple construction (for which any moment transfer can beneglected) are described in Sections 952ndash954 a semi-rigid joint in Section 955and rigid joints for continuous structures (which are able to transfer moment aswell as force) in Sections 956 and 957 Welded and bolted splices are describedin Sections 958 and 959 and seats and base plates in Sections 9510 and 9511respectively

Guidance on the arrangement and analysis of some of these joints is given in[2ndash11] while EC3-1-8 [1] provides extensive and detailed methods of analysis fora large number of joints by considering them as assemblies of basic componentswhose properties are known Worked examples of a web side plate (fin plate) and

Supportingmember

Web side plate (fin plate)

Beam

MEdVEd

Figure 915 Common semi-rigid end joint

MEd

VEd

NEdErection plate

used as abacking bar

MEd

VEd

NEdWebplate

Flange plate

(a) Butt welded splice (b) Bolted splice

Figure 916 Common splices

Joints 407

Load-bearingstiffener

Column

Base plate

Anchor boltsHolding-down bolts

Beam

Seating plate

REd VEd

NEd

(a) Beam seat (b) Column base plate

Figure 917 Common beam seat and column base plate arrangements

a flexible end plate connection designed in accordance with EC3-1-8 are given inSection 910

952 Angle seat joint

An angle seat joint (Figure 914a) transfers a beam reaction force REd to thesupporting member through the angle seat The top cleat is for lateral restraintonly and may be bolted either to the top of the web or to the top flange The angleseat may be bolted or fillet welded to the supporting member The joint has verylittle moment capacity and is classified as a nominally pinned joint It may beused for simple construction

The beam reaction is transferred by bearing shear and bending of the horizon-tal leg of the angle by vertical shear through the connectors and by horizontalforces in the connectors and between the vertical leg and the supporting member

In this joint the beam is designed for zero end moment and the supportingmember for the eccentric beam reaction The beam web may need to be stiffened toresist shear (Section 474) and bearing (Section 476) Although this joint is easilydesigned its use is often discouraged because of erection difficulties associatedwith the close depth tolerances required at the top and bottom of the beam

953 Flexible end plate joint

A flexible end plate joint (Figures 96a and 914b) also transfers a beam reactionREd to the supporting member The end plate is fillet welded to the beam weband bolted to the supporting member The flanges may be notched or coped ifrequired This joint also has very little moment capacity as there may be significantflexibility in the end plate and is classified as a nominally pinned joint It may beused for simple construction

408 Joints

The beam reaction is transferred by weld shear to the end plate by shear andbearing to the bolts and by shear and bearing to the supporting member In mod-elling this joint the idealised T-stub assembly consists of the end plate and thebeam web to which it is welded as one T-stub which is bolted to the column flangewhich with the column web forms the other T-stub

The beam is designed for zero end moment with the end plate augmenting theweb shear and bearing capacity while the supporting member is designed for theeccentric beam reaction

954 Angle cleat joint

An angle cleat joint (Figure 914c) also transfers a beam reaction REd to the sup-porting member One or two angle cleats may be used and bolted to the beam weband to the supporting member The flanges may be notched or coped if requiredThis joint also has very little moment capacity as there may be significant flex-ibility in the angle legs connected to the supporting member and in the boltedconnection to the beam web The joint is classified as a nominally pinned jointand may be used for simple construction

The beam reaction is transferred by shear and bearing from the web to theweb bolts and to the angle cleats These actions are transferred by the cleats tothe supporting member bolts and by these to the supporting member by sheartension and compression If two angle cleats are used the idealised T-stub assemblyconsists of the column flange and web as one T-stub and angle cleats bolted to thebeam web as the other T-stub

The beam is designed for zero end moment with the angles augmenting theweb shear and bearing capacity while the supporting member is designed for theeccentric beam reaction

955 Web side plate (fin plate) joint

A web side plate (fin plate) joint (Figure 915) transfers a beam reaction REd tothe supporting member and can also transfer a moment MEd The fin plate is filletwelded to the supporting member and bolted to the beam web The flanges may benotched or coped if required This joint has limited flexibility and is classified assemi-rigid It may be used for simple construction and also for semi-continuousconstruction provided that the degree of interaction between the members can beestablished

The beam reaction REd and moment MEd are transferred by shear through thebolts to the fin plate by in-plane bending and shear to the welds and by verticaland horizontal shear to the supporting member

The beam and the supporting member are designed for the reaction REd andmoment MEd

956 Welded moment joint

A fully welded moment joint (Figure 912a) transfers moment MEd axial forceNEd and shear VEd from one member to another The welds may be fillet or butt

Joints 409

welds and erection cleats may be used to facilitate field welding The concentratedflange forces resulting from the moment MEd and axial force NEd may require theother member in the joint to be stiffened (Section 45) in order to transfer theseforces When suitably stiffened such a joint acts as if rigid and may be used incontinuous construction

The shear VEd is transferred by shear through the welds from one member to theother The flange forces are transferred by tension through the flange welds andby compression to the other member while the web moment and the axial forceare transferred by tension through the web welds and by compression to the othermember

957 Bolted moment end plate joint

A bolted moment end plate (extended end plate) joint (Figure 912b) also transfersmoment MEd axial force NEd and shear VEd from one member to another The endplate is fillet welded to the web and flanges of one member and bolted to the othermember Concentrated flange forces may require the other member to be stiffenedin order to transfer these forces This joint is also classified as rigid although it isless stiff than a welded moment joint due to flexure of the end plate EC3-1-8 [1]allows bolted moment end plate joints to be used in continuous construction

The beam moment axial force and shear are transferred by tension through theflange and web welds and compression and by shear through the web welds tothe end plate by bending and shear through the end plate to the bolts and by boltshear and tension and by horizontal plate reaction to the other member

The bolt tensions are increased by prying actions resulting from bending of theend plate as in Figure 913 They can be determined by considering an analysis ofthe idealised T-stub assembly of the end plate and beam web and of the columnflange and web to which it is bolted These prying actions must be considered inthe design of bolts subjected to tension and are discussed in Section 962

958 Welded splice

A fully welded splice (Figure 916a) transfers moment MEd axial force NEd andshear VEd from one member to another concurrent member The flange welds arebutt welds while the web welds may be fillet welds and erection plates may beused to facilitate site welding A welded splice acts as a rigid joint between themembers and may be used in continuous construction

The shear VEd is transferred by shear through the welds The flange forcesresulting from the moment MEd and axial force NEd are transferred by tension orcompression through the flange welds while the web moment and the axial forceare transferred by tension or compression (or shear) through the web welds

959 Bolted splice

A fully bolted splice (Figure 916b) also transfers moment MEd axial force NEd and shear VEd from one member to another concurrent member Flange and web

410 Joints

plates may be provided on one or both sides This joint may be used in continuousconstruction

The moment axial force and shear are transferred from one member by bearingand shear through the bolts to the plates to the other bolts and then to the othermember The flange plates only transfer the flange axial force components of themoment MEd axial force NEd while the web plates transfer all of the shear VEd

together with the web components of MEd and NEd

9510 Beam seat

A beam seat (Figure 917a) transfers a beam reaction REd to its support A seatingplate may be fillet welded to the bottom flange to increase the support bearingarea while holding-down bolts provide positive connections to the support If aload-bearing stiffener is provided to increase the web bearing capacity then thiswill effectively prevent lateral deflection of the top flange (see Figure 619)

The beam reaction REd is transferred by bearing through the seating plate to thesupport

9511 Base plate

A base plate (Figure 917b) transfers a column axial force NEd and shear VEd toa support or a concrete foundation and may also transfer a moment MEd Thebase plate is fillet welded to the flanges and web of the column while the anchoror holding-down bolts provide connections to the support Pinned bases used insimple construction often use four anchor bolts and the flexibility of these and thebase plate limits the effective moment resistance

An axial compression NEd is transferred from the column by end bearing orweld shear to the base plate and then by plate bending shear and bearing to thesupport An axial tension force NEd is transferred from the column by weld shearto the base plate by plate bending and shear to the holding-down anchor boltsand then by bolt tension to the support The shear force VEd is transferred fromthe column by weld shear to the base plate and then by shear and bearing throughthe holding-down bolts to the support or by friction Specific guidance on thedesign of holding-down bolts is given in Clause 62612 of EC3-1-8 [1] whilemore general guidance on the design of base plates as idealised T-stub assembliesis given in Clause 62

96 Design of bolts

961 Bearing bolts in shear

The resistance Fv of a bolt in shear (Figure 91a) depends on the shear strengthof the bolt (of tensile strength fub) and the area A of the bolt in a particular shearplane (either the gross area or the tensile stress area through the threads As as

Joints 411

appropriate) It can be expressed in the form

Fv = αvfubA (95)

in which αv = 06 generally (except Grade 109 bolts when the shear plane passesthrough the threaded portion of the bolt in which case αv = 05) The factorαv = 06 is close to the theoretical yield value of τyfy asymp 0577 (Section 131)and the experimental value of 062 reported in [9]

EC3-1-8 [1] therefore requires the design shear force FvEd to be limited by

FvEd le FvRd = fub

γM2

sumn

αvnAn (96)

where γM2 = 125 is the partial factor for the connector resistance (150 for Grade46 bolts) n is the number of shear planes An and αvn are the appropriate valuesfor the nth shear plane It is common and conservative to determine the area An ata shear plane by substituting the tensile stress area As for the shank area A of thebolt

For bolts in long joints with a distance Lj between the end bolts in the joint theshear resistance of all bolts is reduced by using the factor

βLf = 1 minus Lj minus 15d

200d(97)

provided that 075 le βLf le 1 where d is the diameter of the bolt

962 Bolts in tension

The resistance of a bolt in tension (Figure 91c) depends on the tensile strengthfub of the bolt and the minimum cross-sectional area of the threaded length of thebolt The design force FtEd is limited by EC3-1-8 [1] to

FtEd le FtRd = 09fubAsγM2 (98)

where γM2 = 125 (150 for Grade 46 bolts) and As is the tensile stress area of thebolt The use of 09fub for the limit state of bolt fracture in addition to the partialfactor γM2 for the connector resistance reflects the reduced ductility at tensilefracture compared with shear failure

If any of the connecting plates is sufficiently flexible then additional pryingforces may be induced in the bolts as in Figure 913b However EC3-1-8 does notprovide specific guidance on how to determine the prying force in the bolt even inthe T-stub component based method of design Under some circumstances whichminimise plate flexure in a joint component so that the additional tensile forcescaused by prying are small it has been suggested that the prying forces need not

412 Joints

be calculated provided that FtRd is determined from

FtRd = 072fubAsγM2 (99)

which results from the insertion of a reduction factor of 08 into equation 98Some methods for determining prying forces in T-stub connections are given in[13ndash15]

963 Bearing bolts in shear and tension

Test results [9] for bearing bolts in shear and tension suggest a circular interactionrelationship (Figure 918) for the strength limit state EC3-1-8 [1] uses a moreconservative interaction between shear and tension which can be expressed in theform of equations 96 98 and

FvEd

FvRd+ FtEd

14FtRdle 1 (910)

where FvRd is the shear resistance when there is no tension and FtRd is the tensionresistance when there is no shear

964 Bolts in bearing

It is now commonly the case that bolt materials are of much higher strengths thanthose of the steel plates or elements through which the bolts pass As a result of

Circular [9]

0 02 04 06 08 10

10

08

06

04

02

0

Shear ratio FvEdFvRd

Ten

sion

rat

io F

t EdF

t Rd

Equation 910

Figure 918 Bearing bolts in shear and tension

Joints 413

this bearing failure usually takes place in the plate material rather than in the boltThe design of plates against bearing failure is discussed in Section 972

For the situation in which bearing failure occurs in the bolt rather than the plateEC3-1-8 [1] requires the design bearing force FbEd on a bolt whose ultimate tensilestrength fub is less than that of the plate material fu to be limited to

FbEd le FbRd = fubdt

γM2(911)

in which γM2 = 125 (150 for Grade 46 bolts) t is the thickness of the connectedelement and d is the diameter of the bolt Equation 911 ignores the enhancementof the bearing strength caused by the triaxial stress state that exists in the bearingarea of the bolt but it seldom governs except for very high-strength plates

965 Preloaded friction-grip bolts

9651 Design against bearing

High-strength bolts may be used as bearing bolts or as preloaded bolts in friction-grip joints (Figure 91b) which are designed against joint slip under service orfactored loads When high-strength bolts are used as bearing bolts they should bedesigned as discussed in Sections 961ndash964

9652 Design against slip

For design against slip in a friction-grip joint for either serviceability or at ultimateloading the shear force on a preloaded bolt FvEdser or FvEd determined from theappropriate loads must satisfy

FvEd le FsRd = nksmicroFpCγM3 (912)

in which γM3 = 125 for ultimate loading (for serviceability γM3ser = 11) n isthe number of friction surfaces ks is a coefficient given in Table 36 of EC3-1-8[1] which allows for the shape and size of the hole micro is a slip factor given inTable 37 of EC3-1-8 and the preload FpC is taken as

FpC = 07fubAs (913)

When the joint loading induces bolt tensions these tend to reduce the frictionclamping forces EC3-1-8 requires the shear serviceability or ultimate design loadFvEdser or FvEd to satisfy

FvEd le FsRd = nksmicro(FpC minus 08FtEd

)γM3 (914)

in which FtEdser or FtEd is the total applied tension at service loading or ultimateloading including any prying forces and the slip resistance partial safety factoris γM3 = 11 for service loading and 125 for ultimate loading

414 Joints

97 Design of bolted plates

971 General

Aconnection plate used in a joint is required to transfer actions which may act in theplane of the plate or out of it These actions include axial tension and compressionforces shear forces and bending moments and may include components inducedby prying actions The presence of bolt holes often weakens the plate and failuremay occur very locally by the bearing of a bolt on the surface of the bolt holethrough the plate (punching shear) or in an overall mode along a path whoseposition is determined by the positions of several holes and the actions transferredby the plate such as that considered in Section 223 for staggered connectors intension members

Generally the proportions of the plates should be such as to ensure that thereare no instability effects in which case it will be conservative for the strengthlimit state to design against general yield and satisfactory to design against localfracture

The actual failure stress distributions in bolted connection plates are both uncer-tain and complicated When design is to be based on general yielding it is logicalto take advantage of the ductility of the steel and to use a simple plastic analysisA combined yield criterion such as

σ 2y + σ 2

z minus σyσz + 3τ 2yz le f 2

y (915)

(Section 131) may then be used in which σ y and σ z are the design normal stressesand τ yz is the design shear stress

When design is based on local fracture an elastic analysis may be made of thestress distribution Often approximate bending and shear stresses may be deter-mined by elastic beam theory (Chapter 5) The failure criterion should then betested at all potentially critical locations

972 Bearing and tension

Bearing failure of a plate may occur where a bolt bears against part of the surfaceof the bolt hole through the plate as shown in Figure 919a After local yieldingthe plate material flows plastically increasing the circumference and thickness ofthe bearing area and redistributing the contact force exerted by the bolt

EC3-1-8 [1] requires the plate-bearing force FbEd due to the design loads to belimited by

FbEd le FbRd = k1αd fudtγM2 (916)

in which fu is the ultimate tensile strength of the plate material d is the boltdiameter t is the plate thickness and γM2 = 125 is the partial factor for connectorresistance (150 for Grade 46 bolts)

Joints 415

The coefficient αd in equation 916 is associated with plate tear-out by shearingin the direction of load transfer commonly when the bolt is close to the end of aplate as shown in Figure 919b In this case EC3-1-8 requires αd to be determinedfrom

αd = e1

3d0le 1 (917)

for an end bolt or from

αd = p1

3d0minus 025 le 1 (918)

for internal bolts if these bolts are closely spaced in which d0 is the bolt diameterand the dimensions e1 and p1 are shown in Figure 27

The coefficient k1 in equation 916 is associated with tension fracture perpen-dicular to the direction of load transfer commonly when the bolt is close to anedge as shown in Figure 919e Hence EC3-1-8 uses

k1 = 28e2d0 minus 17 le 25 (919)

if the bolts are at the edge of the plate and

k1 = 14p2d0 minus 17 le 25 (920)

for internal bolts where p2 is the distance between rows of holes (p in Figure 25)

(a) Bearing (b) End shear (c) Shearing between holes

(d) Tension (e) Bending (f) Tension and bending

Boltforce

Boltforce

Boltforce

Boltforces

Boltforces

Boltforce

Plastic flow Failure path Failure path

Platestresses

Platestresses

Platestresses

Fracture plane Fracture Fracture

T

T T T

C C

Figure 919 Bolted plates in bearing shear tension or bending

416 Joints

Tension failure may be caused by tension actions as shown in Figure 919dTension failures of tension members are treated in Section 22 and it is logical toapply the EC3 tension members method discussed in Section 262 to the designof plates in tension However there are no specific limits given in EC3-1-8

973 Shear and tension

Plate sections may be subjected to simultaneous normal and shear stress as inthe case of the splice plates shown in Figure 920a and b These may be designedconservatively against general yield by using the shear and bending stresses deter-mined by elastic analyses of the gross cross-section in the combined yield criterionof equation 915 and against fracture by using the stresses determined by elasticanalyses of the net section in an ultimate strength version of equation 915

Block failure may occur in some connection plates as shown in Figure 920cand d In these failures it may be assumed that the total resistance is provided partlyby the tensile resistance across one section of the failure path and partly by theshear resistance along another section of the failure path This assumption impliesconsiderable redistribution from the elastic stress distribution which is likely tobe very non-uniform Hence EC3-1-8 [1] limits the block-tearing resistance forsituations of concentric loading such as in Figure 920c to

NEd le Veff 1Rd = fuAntγM2 +(

fyradic

3)

AnvγM0 (921)

in which Ant and Anv are the net areas subjected to tension and shear respectivelyfy

radic3 is the yield stress of the plate in shear (Section 13) γM0 = 10 is the partial

(a) Shear and bending

Boltforces

Platestresses

(b) Tension and bending

Bolt forces

Plate stresses

Failurepath

Failurepath

Boltforces

T

C

T

Boltforces

(c) Block tearing in plate (d) Block tearing in coped beam

Figure 920 Bolted plates in shear and tension

Joints 417

factor for plate resistance to yield and γM2 = 11 is the partial factor for fractureEquation 921 corresponds to an elastic analysis of the net section subjected touniform shear and tensile stresses

For situations of eccentric loading such as in Figure 920d the block-tearingresistance is limited to

NEd le Veff 2Rd = 05fuAntγM2 +(

fyradic

3)

AnvγM0 (922)

which corresponds to an elastic analysis of the net section subjected to a uniformshear stress and a triangularly varying tensile stress

98 Design of welds

981 Full penetration butt welds

Full penetration butt welds are so made that their thicknesses and widths are notless than the corresponding lesser values for the elements joined When the weldmetal is of higher strength than those of the elements joined (and this is usuallythe case) the static capacity of the weld is greater than those of the elementsjoined Hence the design is controlled by these elements and there are no designprocedures required for the weld EC3-1-8 [1] requires butt welds to have equalor superior properties to those of the elements joined so that the design resistanceis taken as the weaker of the parts connected

Partial penetration butt welds have effective (throat) thicknesses which are lessthan those of the elements joined EC3-1-8 requires partial penetration butt weldsto be designed as deep-penetration fillet welds

982 Fillet welds

Each of the fillet welds connecting the two plates shown in Figure 921 is of lengthL and the throat thickness a of the weld is inclined at α = tanminus1(s2s1) Eachweld transfers a longitudinal shear VL and transverse forces or shears VTy and VTz

between the plates The average normal and shear stresses σw and τw on the weldthroat may be expressed in terms of the forces

σwLa = VTy sin α + VTz cosα (923)

τwLa = radic [(VTy cosα minus VTz sin α

) 2 + V 2L

] (924)

In addition to these stresses there are local stresses in the weld arising frombending effects shear lag and stress concentrations together with longitudinalnormal stresses induced by compatibility between the weld and each plate

It is customary to assume that the static strength of the weld is determined bythe average throat stresses σw and τw alone and that the ultimate strength of the

418 Joints

s2

VTz2

VTy2

VTy2

VL2

VL2

s1

a

Law

Law

VLVTz

L

(a) Connection (b) Part weld

Throat

VTz2

VTy

Figure 921 Fillet welded joint

weld is reached when

radic(σ 2

w + 3τ 2w

) = fuw (925)

in which fuw is the ultimate tensile strength of the weld which is assumed to begreater than that of the plate This equation is similar to equation 11 used in Section131 to express the distortion energy theory for yield under combined stressesSubstituting equations 923 and 924 into equation 925 and rearranging leads to

3(

V 2Ty + V 2

Tz + V 2L

)minus 2

(VTy sin α + VTz cosα

) 2 = (fuwLa) 2 (926)

This is often simplified conservatively to

VR

La= fuwradic

3(927)

in which VR is the vector resultant

VR =radic(

V 2Ty + V 2

Tz + V 2L

)(928)

of the applied forces VTy VTz and VLIn the simple design method of EC3-1-8 [1] based on equations 927 and 928

the design weld forces FTyEd FTzEd and FLEd per unit length due to the factored

Joints 419

loads are limited by

FwEd le FwRd (929)

where FwEd is the resultant of all of the forces transmitted by the weld per unitlength given by

FwEd =radic(

F2TyEd + F2

TzEd + F2LEd

)(930)

and

FwRd = fvwda (931a)

is the design weld resistance per unit length in which

fvwd = furadic

3

βw γM2(931b)

is the design shear strength of the weld fu is the ultimate tensile strength of theplate which is less than that of the weld βw is a correlation factor for the steeltype between 08 and 10 given in Table 41 of EC3-1-8 and γM2 = 125 is theconnector resistance partial safety factor

EC3-1-8 also provides a less conservative directional method which is based onequations 923 to 925 and which makes some allowance for the dependence ofthe weld strength on the direction of loading by assuming that the normal stressparallel to the axis of the weld throat does not influence the design resistance Forthis method the normal stress perpendicular to the throat σperp is determined fromequation 923 as

σperpa = FTyEd sin α + FTzEd cosα (932)

the shear stress perpendicular to the throat τperp from equation 924 as

τperpa = FTyEd cosα minus FTzEd sin α (933)

and the shear stress parallel to the throat τ || from equation 924 as

τ||a = FLEd (934)

The stresses in equations 932 to 934 are then required to satisfyradic[σ 2perp + 3

(τ 2perp + τ 2||

)]le fuβwγM2

(935)

and

σperp le 09fuγM2 (936)

where γM2 = 125 and βw is the correlation factor used in equation 931b

420 Joints

99 Appendix ndash elastic analysis of joints

991 In-plane joints

The in-plane joint shown in Figure 911a is subjected to a moment Mx and to forcesVy Vz acting through the centroid of the connector group (which may consist ofbolts or welds) defined by (see Section 59)

sumAiyi = 0sumAizi = 0

(937)

in which Ai is the area of the ith connector and yi zi its coordinatesIt is assumed that the joint undergoes a rigid body relative rotation δθ x between

its plate components about a point whose coordinates are yr zr If the plate com-ponents are rigid and the connectors elastic then it may be assumed that eachconnector transfers a force Vvi which acts perpendicular to the line ri to the centreof rotation (Figure 911a) and which is proportional to the distance ri so that

Vvi = kvAiriδθx (91)

in which kv is a constant which depends on the elastic shear stiffness of theconnector

The centroidal force resultants Vy Vz of the connector forces are

Vy = minusVvi (zi minus zr)ri = kvδθxzrAi

Vz = Vvi (yi minus yr)ri = minuskvδθxyrAi (938)

after using equations 937 and 91 The moment resultant Mx of the connectorforces about the centroid is

Mx = Vvi(zi minus zr) ziri +Vvi(yi minus yr) yiri

whence

Mx = kvδθx

sumAi

(y2

i + z2i

) (939)

after using equations 937 and 91 This can be used to eliminate kvδθ x fromequations 938 and these can then be rearranged to find the coordinates of thecentre of rotation as

yr = minusVzsum

Ai(y2

i + z2i

)Mx

sumAi

(940)

zr = Vysum

Ai(y2

i + z2i

)Mx

sumAi

(941)

Joints 421

The term kvδθ x can also be eliminated from equation 91 by using equation 939so that the connector force can be expressed as

Vvi = MxAirisumAi

(y2

i + z2i

) (942)

Thus the greatest connector shear stress VviAi occurs at the connector at thegreatest distance ri from the centre of rotation yr zr

When there are n bolts of equal area these equations simplify to

yr = minusVzsum(

y2i + z2

i

)nMx

(940a)

zr = Vysum(

y2i + z2

i

)nMx

(941a)

Vvi = Mxrisum(y2

i + z2i

) (942a)

When the connectors are welds the summations in equations 940ndash942 shouldbe replaced by integrals so that

yr = minusVz(Iy + Iz

)MxA

(940b)

zr = Vy(Iy + Iz

)MxA

and (941b)

τw = Mxr(Iy + Iz

) (942b)

in which A is the area of the weld group given by the sum of the products of theweld lengths L and throat thicknesses a Iy and Iz are the second moments of areaof the weld group about its centroid and r is the distance to the weld where theshear stress is τw The properties of some specific weld groups are given in [5]

In the special case of a moment joint with Vy Vz equal to zero the centre ofrotation is at the centroid of the connector group (equations 941 and 942) andthe connector forces are given by

Vvi = MxAirisumi

Air2i

(93)

with ri = radic(y2

i + z2i ) In the special case of a force joint with Mx Vz equal to zero

the centre of rotation is at zr = infin and the connector forces are given by

Vvi = VyAisumAi

(943)

422 Joints

In the special case of a force joint with Mx Vy equal to zero the centre of rotationis at yr = minusinfin and the connector forces are given by

Vvi = VzAisumAi

(944)

Equations 943 and 944 indicate that the connector stresses VviAi caused byforces Vy Vz are constant throughout the joint

It can be shown that the superposition by vector addition of the components ofVvi obtained from equations 93 943 and 944 for the separate connection actionsof Vy Vz and Mx leads to the general result given in equation 942

992 Out-of-plane joints

The out-of-plane joint shown in Figure 911b is subjected to a normal force Nx

and moments My Mz acting about the principal axes y z of the connector group(which may consist of bolts or welds) defined by (Section 59)sum

Aiyi = 0sumAizi = 0sumAiyizi = 0

(945)

in which Ai is the area of the ith connector and yi zi are its coordinatesIt is assumed that the plate components of the joint undergo rigid body relative

rotations δθ y δθ z about axes which are parallel to the y z principal axes and whichpass through a point whose coordinates are yr zr and that only the connectorstransfer forces If the plates are rigid and the connectors elastic then it may beassumed that each connector transfers a force Nxi which acts perpendicular tothe plane of the joint and which has components which are proportional to thedistances (yi minus yr) (zi minus zr) from the axes of rotation so that

Nxi = ktAi (zi minus zr) δθy minus ktAi (yi minus yr) δθz (946)

in which kt is a constant which depends on the axial stiffness of the connectorThe centroidal force resultant Nx of the connector forces is

Nx =sum

Nxi = kt(minuszrδθy + yrδθz

)sumAi (947)

after using equations 945 The moment resultants My Mz of the connector forcesabout the centroidal axes are

My =sum

Nxizi = ktδθyAiz2i (948)

Mz = minussum

Nxiyi = ktδθzAiy2i (949)

after using equations 946

Joints 423

Equations 947ndash949 can be used to eliminate kt δθ y δθ z yr zr from equation946 which then becomes

Nxi = NxAisumAi

+ MyAizisumAiz2

i

minus MzAiyisumAiy2

i

(950)

This result demonstrates that the connector force can be obtained by super-position of the separate components due to the centroidal force Nx and the prin-cipal axis moments My Mz When there are n bolts of equal area this equationsimplifies to

Nxi = Nx

n+ Myzisum

z2i

minus Mzyisumy2

i

(950a)

When the connectors are welds the summations in equation 947 should bereplaced by integrals so that

σw = Nx

A+ Myz

Iyminus Mzy

Iz(950b)

in which y z are the coordinates of the weld where the stress is σwThe assumption that only the connectors transfer compression forces through

the connection may be unrealistic when portions of the plates remain in contactIn this case the analysis above may still be used provided that the values Ai yizi used for the compression regions represent the actual contact areas between theplates

910 Worked examples

9101 Example 1 ndash in-plane analysis of a bolt group

Problem The semi-rigid web side plate (fin plate) joint shown in Figure 922a is totransmit factored design actions equivalent to a vertical downwards force of Q kNacting at the centroid of the bolt group and a clockwise moment of 02Q kNmDetermine the maximum bolt shear force

SolutionFor the bolt group(y2

i +z2i ) = 4times(702+1052)+4times(702+352) = 88 200 mm2

Using equation 940 yr = minusQ times 103 times 88 200

minus02Q times 106 times 8= 551 mm

and so the most heavily loaded bolts are at the top and bottom of the right-handrow

For these ri = radic(551 + 70)2 + 1052 = 1633 mmand the maximum bolt force may be obtained from equation 93 as

FvEd = minus02Q times 106

88200N = minus0370 Q kN

424 Joints

t = 8 mm

fy = 355 Nmm2

fu = 510 Nmm2

t =10 mm

fy =355 Nmm2

fu

65

35

70

70

70

35

25 30 140 55

35

70

70

70

35

All bolts are Grade 8820 mm diameter in 22 mmholes with threads in theshear plane

86

(a) Semi-rigid web fin plate joint (b) Flexible end plate joint

30 90 30

= 510 Nmm2

Figure 922 Examples 1ndash9

9102 Example 2 ndash in-plane design resistance of a bolt group

Problem Determine the design resistance of the bolt group in the web fin platejoint shown in Figure 922a

Solution For 20 mm Grade 88 bolts As = At = 245 mm2

αv = 06 EC3-1-8 T34

fub = 800 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 T31

and so

FvRd = 06 times 800 times 245

125N = 941 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the solution of example 1

0370 Q le 941 so that Qv le 2540

9103 Example 3 ndash plate-bearing resistance

Problem Determine the bearing resistance of the web fin plate shown inFigure 922a

Joints 425

Solution

αd = 35(3 times 22) = 0530 fubfu = 800510 = 1569 gt 0530EC3-1-8 T34

and so

αb = 0530 EC3-1-8 T34

28e2d0 minus 17 = 28 times 5522 minus 17 = 53 gt 25 and so k1 = 25EC3-1-8 T34

FbRd = 25 times 0530 times 510 times 20 times 1011 N = 1229 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the solution of example 1 Qb le 12290370 = 3319 gt

2540(ge Qv)

9104 Example 4 ndash plate shear and tension resistance

Problem Determine the shear and tension resistance of the web fin plate shownin Figure 922a

Solution If the yield criterion of equation 915 is used with the elastic stresseson the gross cross-section of the plate then the elastic bending stress may bedetermined using an elastic section modulus of bd26 so that

σy = 02 Q times 106 times 6(10 times 2802) Nmm2 = 1531 Q Nmm2

and the average shear stress is

τyz = Q times 103(280 times 10) Nmm2 = 0357 Q Nmm2

Substituting into equation 915 (1531 Q)2 + 3 times (0357Q)2 le 3552

so that Qvty le 2150 lt 2540(ge Qv)

If the equivalent fracture criterion derived from equation 915 is used with theelastic stresses on the net cross-section of the plate then

Ip = 2803 times 1012 minus 2 times 22 times 10 times 1052 minus 2 times 22 times 10 times 352

= 1290 times 106 mm4

so that

Welp = 1290 times 106140 = 922 times 103mm3 and

σy = 02 Q times 106(922 times 103)Nmm2 = 2170 Q Nmm2

426 Joints

and the average shear stress is

τyz = Q times 103(280 minus 4 times 22)times 10 Nmm2 = 0521 Q Nmm2

Using the equivalent of equation 915 for fracture with fu = 510 Nmm2

(EN10025-2)

(2170 Q)2 + 3 times (0521 Q)2 le 5102

so that Qvtu le 2285 gt 2150(ge Qvty)However these calculations are conservative since the maximum bending

stresses occur at the top and bottom of the plate where the shear stresses are zeroIf the shear stresses are ignored then Qty le 3551531 = 2319 lt 2543(ge Qv)

and

Qtu le 5102170 = 2350gt 2319(ge Qty)

9105 Example 5 ndash fillet weld resistance

Problem Determine the resistance of the two fillet welds shown in Figure 922aWeld forces per unit lengthAt the welds the design actions consist of a vertical shear of Q kN and a moment of

(minus02 Q minus Q times (25 + 30 + 70)1000) kNm = minus0325 Q kNm

leff = 280 minus 2 times 8radic

2 = 2687 mm EC3-1-8 451(1)

The average shear force per unit weld length can be determined as

FLEd = (Q times 103)(2 times 2687)Nmm = 1861 Q Nmm

and the maximum bending force per unit weld length from equation 950b as

FTyEd = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872)

2 times 2687312Nmm = minus1351 Q Nmm

and using equation 930 the resultant of these forces is

FwEd = radic[(1861 Q)2 + (1351 Q)2] = 1363 Q Nmm

Simplified method of EC3-1-8

For Grade S355 steel βw = 09 EC3-1-8 T41

fvwd = 510radic

3

09 times 125= 2617 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 4533

FwRd = 2617 times (8radic

2) = 1481 Nmm EC3-1-8 4533

Hence 1363 Q le 1481

Joints 427

so that

Qw le 1086 lt 2319(ge Qty)

Directional method of EC3-1-8

Using equations 932ndash934

σperp = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872) sin 45o

2 times (2687312)times (8radic

2)= minus1688 Q Nmm2

τperp = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872) cos 45o

2 times (2687312)times (8radic

2)= minus1688 Q Nmm2

τ|| = Q times 103

2 times 2687 times (8radic

2)= 0329 Q Nmm2

The strength condition is

(minus1688 Q)2 + 3 times [(minus1688 Q)2 + (0329Q)2]05 le 510

09 times 125EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 1324 lt 2319(ge Qty)

and

1688Q le 09 times 510125 EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 2175 gt 1324

and so the joint resistance is governed by the shear and bending capacity of thewelds

9106 Example 6 ndash bolt slip

Problem If the bolts of the semi-rigid web fin plate joint shown in Figure 922aare preloaded then determine the value of Q at which the first bolt slip occurs ifthe joint is designed to be non-slip in service and the friction surface is Class B

428 Joints

Solution

FpC = 07 times 800 times 245 N = 1372 kN EC3-1-8 391(2)

ks = 10 EC3-1-8 T36

micro = 04 EC3-1-8 T37

γM3ser = 11 EC3-1-8 22(2)

FsRd = 10 times 04 times 137211 = 499 kN EC3-1-8 391(1)

and using the solution of example 1

QsL = 4990370 = 1347

9107 Example 7 ndash out-of-plane resistance of a bolt group

Problem The flexible end plate joint shown in Figure 922b is to transmit fac-tored design actions equivalent to a downwards force of Q kN acting at thecentroid of the bolt group and an out-of-plane moment of Mx = minus005 QkNm Determine the maximum bolt forces and the design resistance of the boltgroup

Bolt group analysis

z2i = 4 times 1052 + 4 times 352 mm2 = 49 000 mm2

and using equation 950a the maximum bolt tension is

FtEd = (minus005 Q times 106)times (minus35 minus 70)

49 000N = 0107 Q kN

(A less-conservative value of FtEd = 00824 Q kN is obtained if the centre ofcompression is assumed to be at the lowest pair of bolts so that the lever arm tothe highest pair of bolts is 175 mm)

The average bolt shear is FvEd = (Q times 103)8 N = 0125 Q kN

Plastic resistance of plate

If the web thickness is 88 mm

m = 902 minus 882 minus 08 times 6 = 358 mm EC3-1-8 F68

leff = 2 times 358 + 0625 times 30 + 35 = 1254 mm EC3-1-8 T64

Mpl1Rd = 025 times 1254 times 82 times 35510 Nmm = 0712 kNm EC3-1-8 T62

FT 1Rd = 4 times 0712 times 10630 N = 949 kN EC3-1-8 T62

and so FT 1Rd ge 2 times 0107 Q whence Qp le 4430 kN

Joints 429

Bolt resistanceAt plastic collapse of the plate the prying force causes a plastic hinge at the boltline so that the prying force = 0712 times 10630 N = 237 kN

Bolt tension = 0107 times 4430 + 237 = 706 kN

Using the solution of example 2 FvRd = 941 kNFor 20 mm Grade 88 bolts At = 245 mm2 and fub = 800 Nmm2

EC3-1-8 T31

FtRd = 09 times 800 times 245125 N = 1411 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Hence0125 times 4430

941+ 706

14 times 1411= 0946 lt 10 EC3-1-8 T31

and so the bolt resistance does not governThus Q le 4430

9108 Example 8 ndash plate-bearing resistance

Problem Determine the bearing resistance of the end plate of example 7 shownin Figure 922b

Solution

αd = 35(3 times 22) = 0530 fubfu = 800510 = 1569 gt 0530EC3-1-8 T34

and so αb = 0530 EC3-1-8 T34

k1 = 28 times 3022 = 382 gt 25 so that k1 = 25 EC3-1-8 T34

FbRd = 25 times 0530 times 510 times 20 times 811 N = 983 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the analysis solution of example 7 0125 Q le 983so that Qb le 7868 gt 4430 (ge Qp)

9109 Example 9 ndash fillet weld resistance

Problem Determine the resistance of the two fillet welds shown in Figure 922b

Solutionlw = 2687 mm and FLEd = 1861 Q Nmm as in example 5

430 Joints

The maximum bending force per unit weld length can be determined fromequation 950b as

FTyEd = (minus005 Q times 106)times (26872)

2 times 2687312= 2078 Q Nmm

Using equation 930 the resultant of these is

FwEd = radic[(1861 Q)2 + (2078 Q)2] = 2789 Q Nmm

For S355 Grade steel βw = 09 EC3-1-8 T41

fvwd = 510radic

3

09 times 125= 2617 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 4533

FwRd = 2617 times (6

radic2) = 1110 Nmm EC3-1-8 4533

Hence 2789 Q le 1110so that Qw le 3981 lt 4430 (ge Qp)

Using the directional method of EC3-1-8 with equations 932ndash934

σperp = (minus005 Qtimes106)times (26872) sin 45o

2 times (2687312)times (6radic

2)= minus0346 Q Nmm2

τperp = (minus005 Q times 106)times (26872) cos 45o

2 times (2687312)times (6radic

2)= minus0346 Q Nmm2

τ|| = Q times 103

2 times 2687 times (6radic

2)= 0439 Nmm2

The strength condition is

(minus0346 Q)2 + 3 times [(minus0346 Q)2 + (0439 Q)2]05 le 510

09 times 125EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 4410 lt 4430 (ge Qp)

and

0346 Q le 09 times 510125

so that

Qw le 1060 gt 4410

Thus the connection capacity is governed by the shear and bending resistanceof the welds

Joints 431

911 Unworked examples

9111 Example 10 ndash bolted joint

Arrange and design a bolted joint to transfer a design force of 800 kN from theinclined member to the truss joint shown in Figure 923a

9112 Example 11 ndash tension member splice

Arrange and design the tension member splice shown in Figure 923b so as tomaximise the tension resistance

9113 Example 12 ndash tension member welds

Proportion the weld lengths shown in Figure 923c to transfer the design tensionforce concentrically

9114 Example 13 ndash channel section bracket

Determine the design resistance Q of the fillet welded bracket shown inFigure 923d

9115 Example 14 ndash tee-section bracket

Design the fillet welds for the bracket shown in Figure 923e

Teebf = 209tf = 156d = 266tw = 102

bf tf = 152 94 d tw = 1575 66

(d) Channel column bracketfy = 275 Nmm2

fu = 430 Nmm2

FtEd = 800 kN

FtEd = 800 kN

2L100 100 10

(b) Tension member splice (c) Tension member welds

2L125 times 75 times 10

fy = 275 Nmm2

225 243 150

Q

380

(a) Bolted truss joint (e) Tee column bracket

282

718

152 152 UC 30

8

Q

f = 275 Nmmy2

f = 275 Nmmy2times

timestimes times times

times times

Figure 923 Examples 10ndash14

432 Joints

References

1 British Standards Institute (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash8Design of Joints BSI London

2 The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional Steelwork Associ-ation (2002) Joints in Steel Construction Simple Connections SCI and BCSAAscot

3 The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional Steelwork Associ-ation (1995) Joints in Steel Construction Moment Connections SCI and BCSAAscot

4 Jaspart JP Renkin S and Guillaume ML (2003) European Recommendations forthe Design of Simple Joints in Steel Structures University of Liegravege Liegravege

5 Faella C Piluso V and Rizzano G (2000) Structural Steel Semi-rigid ConnectionsCRC Press Boca Raton

6 Owens GW and Cheal BD (1989) Structural Steelwork Connections ButterworthsLondon

7 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2003) Steel Designerrsquos Manual 6th editionBlackwell Publishing Oxford

8 Morris LJ (1988) Connection design in the UK Steel Beam-to-Column BuildingConnections (ed Chen WF) Elsevier Applied Science pp 375ndash414

9 Kulak GL Fisher JW and Struik JHA (1987) Guide to Design Criteria for Boltedand Rivetted Joints 2nd edition John Wiley and Sons New York

10 CIDECT (1992) Design Guide Recommendations for Rectangular Hollow Section(RHS) Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading Comiteacute International pour leDeacuteveloppment et lrsquoEacutetude de la Construction Tubulaire Cologne

11 CIDECT (1991) Design Guide Recommendations for Circular Hollow Section (CHS)Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading Comiteacute International pour le Deacutevelopp-ment et lrsquoEacutetude de la Construction Tubulaire Cologne

12 Harrison HB (1980) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 Pergamon PressOxford

13 Zoetemeijer P (1974) A design method for the tension side of statically loaded boltedbeam-to-column connections Heron 20 No 1 pp 1ndash59

14 Piluso V Faella C and Rizzano G (2001) Ultimate behavior of bolted T-stubsI Theoretical model Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 127 No 6pp 686ndash93

15 Witteveen J Stark JWB Bijlaard FSK and Zoetemeijer P (1982) Welded andbolted beam-to-column connections Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 108No ST2 pp 433ndash55

Chapter 10

Torsion members

101 Introduction

The resistance of a structural member to torsional loading may be considered tobe the sum of two components When the rate of change of the angle of twistrotation is constant along the member (see Figure 101a) it is in a state of uniform(or St Venant) torsion [1 2] and the longitudinal warping deflections are alsoconstant along the member In this case the torque acting at any cross-sectionis resisted by a single set of shear stresses distributed around the cross-sectionThe ratio of the torque acting to the twist rotation per unit length is defined as thetorsional rigidity GIt of the member

The second component of the resistance to torsional loading may act whenthe rate of change of the angle of twist rotation varies along the member (seeFigures 101b and c) so that it is in a state of non-uniform torsion [1] In thiscase the warping deflections vary along the member and an additional set of shearstresses may act in conjunction with those due to uniform torsion to resist thetorque acting The stiffness of the member associated with these additional shearstresses is proportional to the warping rigidity EIw

When the first component of the resistance to torsional loading completelydominates the second the member is in a state of uniform torsion This occurswhen the torsion parameter K = radic

(π2EIwGItL2) is very small as indicatedin Figure 102 which is adapted from [1] Thin-walled closed-section memberswhose torsional rigidities are very large behave in this way as do members withnarrow rectangular sections and angle and tee-sections whose warping rigidi-ties are negligible If on the other hand the second component of the resistanceto torsional loading completely dominates the first the member is in a limit-ing state of non-uniform torsion referred to as warping torsion This may occurwhen the torsion parameter K is very large as indicated in Figure 102 whichis the case for some very thin-walled open sections (such as light gauge cold-formed sections) whose torsional rigidities are very small Between these twoextremes the torsional loading is resisted by a combination of the uniform andwarping torsion components and the beam is in the general state of non-uniformtorsion This occurs for intermediate values of the parameter K as shown in

434 Torsion members

(a) Uniform torsion (c) Non-uniform torsion(b) Non-uniform torsion

Varying torqueConstant torqueends free to warp

End warping prevented

Figure 101 Uniform and non-uniform torsion of an I-section member

= ( 22EI w GIt L )

10

08

06

04

02

0

channel sections

01 1 10

L

Hot-rolledI-sections

Closedsections

Angles

torsiontorsionNon-uniform

Warping torsion

Very thin-walled

Uniform

Torsion parameter K

(War

ping

torq

uet

otal

torq

ue)

at m

id-s

pan

Figure 102 Effect of cross-section on torsional behaviour

Figure 102 which are appropriate for most hot-rolled I- or channel-sectionmembers

Whether a member is in a state of uniform or non-uniform torsion also dependson the loading arrangement and the warping restraints If the torque resisted is con-stant along the member and warping is unrestrained (as in Figure 10la) then themember will be in uniform torsion even if the torsional rigidity is very small Ifhowever the torque resisted varies along the length of the member (Figure 101b)or if the warping displacements are restrained in any way (Figure 101c) thenthe rate of change of the angle of twist rotation will vary and the member willbe in non-uniform torsion In general these variations must be accounted forbut in some cases they can be ignored and the member analysed as if it werein uniform torsion This is the case for members of very low warping rigidity

Torsion members 435

(d) Distortion(c) Torsion

++equiv

(b) Bending(a) Eccentric load

Figure 103 Eccentric loading of a thin-walled closed section

and for members of high-torsional rigidity for which the rates of change of theangle of twist rotation vary only locally near points of concentrated torque andwarping restraint This simple method of analysis usually leads to satisfactory pre-dictions of the angles of twist rotation but may produce underestimates of the localstresses

In this chapter the behaviour and design of torsion members are discussedUniform torsion is treated in Section 102 and non-uniform torsion in Section 103while the design of torsion members for strength and serviceability is treated inSection 104

Structural members however are rarely used to resist torsion alone and it ismuch more common for torsion to occur in conjunction with bending and othereffects For example when the box section beam shown in Figure 103a is subjectedto an eccentric load this causes bending (Figure 103b) torsion (Figure 103c)and distortion (Figure 103d) There may also be interactions between bending andtorsion For example the longitudinal stresses due to bending may cause a changein the effective torsional rigidity This type of interaction is of some importancein the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of thin-walled open-section members as dis-cussed in Sections 375 and 610 Also significant twist rotations of the membermay cause increases in the bending stresses in thin-walled open-section membersHowever these interactions are usually negligible when the torsional rigidity isvery high as in thin-walled closed-section members The behaviour of membersunder combined bending and torsion is discussed in Section 105

The effects of distortion of the cross-section are only significant in very thin-walled open-sections and in thin-walled closed sections with high-distortionalloadings Thus for the box-section beam shown in Figure 103 the relativelyflexible plates may bend out of their planes as indicated in Figure 103d causingthe cross-section to distort Because of this the in-plane plate bending and shearstress distributions are changed and significant out-of-plane plate bending stressesmay be induced The distortional behaviour of structural members is discussedbriefly in Section 106

436 Torsion members

102 Uniform torsion

1021 Elastic deformations and stresses

10211 General

In elastic uniform torsion the twist rotation per unit length is constant along thelength of the member This occurs when the torque is constant and the ends ofthe member are free to warp as shown in Figure 101a When a member twists inthis way

(a) lines which were originally parallel to the axis of twist become helices(b) cross-sections rotate φ as rigid bodies about the axis of twist and(c) cross-sections warp out of their planes the warping deflections (u) being

constant along the length of the member (see Figure 104)

The uniform torque Tt acting at any section induces shear stresses τxy τxz whichact in the plane of the cross-section The distribution of these shear stresses canbe visualised by using Prandtlrsquos membrane analogy as indicated in Figure 105for a rectangular cross-section Imagine a thin uniformly stretched membranewhich is fixed to the cross-section boundary and displaced by a uniform transversepressure The contours of the displaced membrane coincide with the shear stress

x y

z

Element δx times δs times t

Tt

Tt

Helix

Warpingdisplacements u

Figure 104 Warping displacements u due to twisting

Torsion members 437

b

t

z

y

(b) Distribution of shear stress (a) Transversely loaded membrane

Sections through membrane

Membranecontours

Rectangularcross-section

b

t

Figure 105 Prandtlrsquos membrane analogy for uniform torsion

xyxy

yx

yx

x

y δz

δy

δx

z

Longitudinal axis Change in warpingdisplacement dueto shear strain= (yx G)δy

of member

Total change inwarping displacement δu

Change in warpingdue to twisting

Rotation of longitudinalfibres due to twisting

Thin elementδy times δz times δx

Figure 106 Warping displacements

trajectories the slope of the membrane is proportional to the shear stress and thevolume under the membrane is proportional to the torque The shear strains causedby these shear stresses are related to the twisting and warping deformations asindicated in Figure 106

The stress distribution can be found by solving the equation [2]

part2θ

party2+ part2θ

partz2= minus2G

dx (101)

438 Torsion members

(in which G is the shear modulus of elasticity) for the stress function θ (whichcorresponds to the membrane displacement in Prandtlrsquos analogy) defined by

τxz = τzx = minuspartθparty

τxy = τyx = partθpartz

(102)

subject to the condition that

θ = constant (103)

around the section boundary The uniform torque Tt which is the static equivalentof the shear stresses τxy τxz is given by

Tt = 2intint

section

θ dy dz (104)

10212 Solid cross-sections

Closed-form solutions of equations 101ndash103 are not generally available exceptfor some very simple cross-sections For a solid circular section of radius R thesolution is

θ = G

2

dx(R2 minus y2 minus z2) (105)

If this is substituted in equations 102 the circumferential shear stress τt at a radiusr = radic

(y2 + z2) is found to be

τt = Grdφ

dx (106)

The torque effect of these shear stresses is

Tt =int R

0τt(2πr)dr (107)

which can be expressed in the form

Tt = GItdφ

dx(108)

where the torsion section constant It is given by

It = πR42 (109)

which can also be expressed as

It = A4

4π2 (Iy + Iz) (1010)

The same result can be obtained by substituting equation 105 directly intoequation 104 Equation 106 indicates that the maximum shear stress occurs at

Torsion members 439

the boundary and is equal to

τtmax = TtR

It (1011)

For other solid cross-sections equation 1010 gives a reasonably accurateapproximation for the torsion section constant but the maximum shear stressdepends on the precise shape of the section When sections have re-entrant cor-ners the local shear stresses may be very large (as indicated in Figure 107)although they may be reduced by increasing the radius of the fillet at the re-entrantcorner

10213 Rectangular cross-sections

The stress function θ for a very narrow rectangular section of width b and thicknesst is approximated by

θ asymp Gdφ

dx

(t2

4minus z2

) (1012)

The shear stresses can be obtained by substituting equation 1012 intoequations 102 whence

τxy = minus2zGdφ

dx (1013)

which varies linearly with z as shown in Figure 108c The torque effect of theτxy shear stresses can be obtained by integrating their moments about the x axis

0 05 10 15 20Ratio rt

10

15

20

25

30

r

t

t

Note crowding ofcontours at re-entrantcorner correspondingto stress concentration

Equal angle section [3]with large bt ratio

Approximation [2]

(a) Membrane contours at re-entrant corner (b) Increased shear stresses

Rat

io o

f ac

tual

str

ess

nom

inal

str

ess

Figure 107 Stress concentrations at re-entrant corners

440 Torsion members

t

bz

y

(b) Cross-section and shear flow

(a) Membrane or stress function 13

(c) Shear stress distribution

Parabolic tmax

Linear

Figure 108 Uniform torsion of a thin rectangular section

whence

minusint t2

minust2τxybz dz = G

bt3

6

dx(1014)

which is one half of the total torque effect The other half arises from the shearstresses τxz which have their greatest effects near the ends of the thin rectangleAlthough they act there over only a small length of the order of t (compared withb for the τxy stresses) they have a large lever arm of the order of b2 (instead oft2) and they make an equal contribution The total torque can therefore beexpressed in the form of equation 108 with

It asymp bt33 (1015)

The same result can be obtained by substituting equation 1012 directly intoequation 104 Equation 1013 indicates that the maximum shear stress occurs atthe centre of the long boundary and is given by

τtmax asymp Ttt

It (1016)

For stockier rectangular sections the stress function θ varies significantly alongthe width b of the section as indicated in Figure 105 and these approximationsmay not be sufficiently accurate In this case the torsion section constant It andthe maximum shear stress τtmax can be obtained from Figure 109

10214 Thin-walled open cross-sections

The stress distribution in a thin-walled open cross-section is very similar to that ina narrow rectangular section as shown in Figure 1010a Thus the shear stressesare parallel to the walls of the section and vary linearly across the thickness t thispattern remaining constant around the section except at the ends Because of this

Torsion members 441

10

08

06

04

02

0

30

25

20

15

10

05

b

t

0 2 4 6 8 10

33bt

It

)3( 2btTt

tmax

Tor

sion

sec

tion

con

stan

t rat

io I

t (

bt3 3

)

Max

imum

she

ar s

tres

s ra

tio

tm

ax

Tt

(bt2 3

)

Widthndashthickness ratio bt

Figure 109 Torsion properties of rectangular sections

t t t

C C

tmax

tmax

y

z

y

z

(a) Open section

Constant shearflow t

(b) Closed section

t

Figure 1010 Shear stresses due to uniform torsion of thin-walled sections

similarity the torsion section constant It can be closely approximated by

It asympsum

bt33 (1017)

442 Torsion members

where b is the developed length of the mid-line and t the thickness of each thin-walled element of the cross-section while the summation is carried out for all suchelements

The maximum shear stress away from the concentrations at re-entrant cornerscan also be approximated as

τtmax asymp Tttmax

It (1018)

where tmax is the maximum thickness When more accurate values for the torsionsection constant It are required the formulae developed in [3] can be used Thevalues given in [4ndash6] for British hot-rolled steel sections have been calculated inthis way

10215 Thin-walled closed cross-sections

The uniform torsional behaviour of thin-walled closed-section members is quitedifferent from that of open-section members and there are dramatic increases inthe torsional stiffness and strength The shear stress no longer varies linearly acrossthe thickness of the wall but is constant as shown in Figure 1010b and there is aconstant shear flow around the closed section

This shear flow is required to prevent any discontinuities in the longitudinalwarping displacements of the closed section To show this consider the slit rect-angular tube shown in Figure 1011a The mid-thickness surface of this opensection is unstrained and so the warping displacements of this surface are entirelydue to the twisting of the member The distribution of the warping displacementscaused by twisting (see Section 10312) is shown in Figure 1011b The relative

O E

E C

C S

O

S

Slit

xy

z

y

z

E00 ds

dd

z

tw

bf

y0tf

df

(b) Warping displacements(a) Cross-section of a slit tube

Relative warpingdisplacement

ndash

Figure 1011 Warping of a slit tube

Torsion members 443

S

E O

SC

t t

Ae

0

0

0

δs δs

δs

wtδs ttδs

z

y

=21

0ds=21

(b) Uniform torque in a closed section (a) Warping torque in an open section

Shaded area

Total area enclosed

Figure 1012 Torques due to shear flows in thin-walled sections

warping displacement at the slit is equal to

uE minus u0 = minusdφ

dx

int E

0ρ0ds (1019)

in whichρ0 is the distance (see Figure 1012a) from the tangent at the mid-thicknessline to the axis of twist (which passes through the shear centre of the section asdiscussed in Sections 10312 and 543)

However when the tube is not slit this relative warping displacement cannotoccur In this case the relative warping displacement due to twisting shown inFigure 1013a is exactly balanced by the relative warping displacement causedby shear straining (see Figure 106) of the mid-thickness surface shown inFigure 1013b so that the total relative warping displacement is zero It is shownin Section 1071 that the required shear straining is produced by a constant shearflow τt t around the closed section which is given by

τt t = Tt

2Ae(1020)

where Ae is the area enclosed by the section and that the torsion section constantis given by

It = 4A2e∮

(1t)ds (1021)

The maximum shear stress can be obtained from equation 1020 as

τtmax = Tt

2Aetmin(1022)

444 Torsion members

C S C S

xdd 0

x x

y y

z z

Relative warping displacement

(a) Warping displacementsdue to twisting only

(due to twisting)

(b) Warping displacementsdue to shear only

Relative warping displacement

(due to shear)

Constantshearflow t t

ds

G dsndash

Figure 1013 Warping of a closed section

The membrane analogy can also be used for thin-walled closed sections byimagining that the inner-section boundary is fixed to a weightless horizontal platesupported at a distance equivalent to τt t above the outer-section boundary bythe transverse pressures and the forces in the membrane stretched between theboundaries as shown in Figure 1014b Thus the slope (τt t)t of the membraneis substantially constant across the wall thickness and is equivalent to the shearstress τt while twice the volume Aeτt t under the membrane is equivalent to theuniform torque Tt given by equation 1020

The membrane analogy is used in Figure 1014 to illustrate the dramaticincreases in the stiffnesses and strengths of thin-walled closed sections over thoseof open sections It can be seen that the torque (which is proportional to the volumeunder the membrane) is much greater for the closed section when the maximumshear stress is the same The same conclusion can be reached by considering theeffective lever arms of the shear stresses which are of the same order as the overalldimensions of the closed section compared with those of the same order as thewall thickness of the open section

The behaviour of multi-cell closed-section members in uniform torsion can bedetermined by using the warping displacement continuity condition for each cellas indicated in Section 1071 Ageneral matrix method of carrying out this analysisby computer has been given in [7] and a computer program has been developed[8] Alternatively the membrane analogy can be extended by considering a set ofhorizontal plates at different heights one for each cell of the cross-section

Torsion members 445

S lit

M e m b rane

t tt

t

t

14

t t

t

t

tt

t tStressdistribution

Cross-s ec tio n

Membraneanalogy

(a) Slit tube (b) Closed tube

Horizontalplate

Membrane

Figure 1014 Comparison of uniform torsion of open and closed sections

1022 Elastic analysis

10221 Statically determinate members

Some members in uniform torsion are statically determinate such as the cantilevershown in Figure 1015 In these cases the distribution of the total torque Tx = Tt

can be determined from statics and the maximum stresses can be evaluated fromequations 1011 1016 1018 or 1020 or from Figures 107 or 109 The twistedshape of the member can be determined by integrating equation 108 using thesign conventions of Figure 1016a Thus the angle of twist rotation in a region ofconstant torque Tx will vary linearly in accordance with

φ = φ0 + Txx

GIt (1023)

as indicated in Figure 1015c

10222 Statically indeterminate members

Many torsion members are statically indeterminate such as the beam shown inFigure 1017 and the distribution of torque cannot be determined from staticsalone The redundant quantities can be determined by substituting the correspond-ing compatibility conditions into the solution of equation 108 Once these havebeen found the maximum torque can be evaluated by statics and the maximumstress can be determined The maximum angle of twist can also be derived fromthe solution of equation 108

446 Torsion members

(+) T

(+ )

L

T

T

0 = 0

(a) Cantilever

xtGI

TL

Twist rotation prevented

(b) Torque Tx

(c) Twist rotation

Figure 1015 Uniform torsion of a statically determinate cantilever

x

C

B

B

O

EC

x u

z

z S(y0 z0)

a0

0 (+ve)

δs

+ve rsquo ve rsquo+ve Tt ve Tt

+ve rdquo ndashve rdquo

ve rdquorsquo +ve Tw

y

rdquo = 0

y

(a) Positive torsion actions

S(y0 z0)Tx Tt Tw

Tx Tt Tw

(b) Sign convention for 0

(c) Conventions for rsquo rdquo rdquorsquoTt Tw

ndash

ndashndash

Clockwise +ve (RH systemabout S axis parallel to x)

Figure 1016 Torsion sign conventions

As an example of this procedure the indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1017is analysed in Section 1072 The theoretical twisted shape of this beam is shownin Figure 1017c and it can be seen that there is a jump discontinuity in the twist perunit length dφdx at the loaded point This discontinuity is a consequence of the useof the uniform torsion theory to analyse the behaviour of the member In practicesuch a discontinuity does not occur because an additional set of local warpingstresses is induced These additional stresses which may have high values at theloaded point have been investigated in [9 10] High local stresses can usuallybe tolerated in static loading situations when the material is ductile whether thestresses are induced by concentrated torques or by other concentrated loads In

Torsion members 447

(+)

(+)

x

L ndash aa

T

( )

T0 0 = 0 L = 0

T ndash

ndash

ndash T0

T0

T ndash T0

LGIaLTa

t

)(

Twist rotation prevented

(c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

(a) Beam

Figure 1017 Uniform torsion of a statically indeterminate beam

members for which the use of the uniform torsion theory is appropriate such asthose with high torsional rigidity and low warping rigidity these additional stressesdecrease rapidly as the distance from the loaded point increases Because of this theangles of twist predicted by the uniform torsion analysis are of sufficient accuracy

1023 Plastic collapse analysis

10231 Fully plastic stress distribution

The elastic shear stress distributions described in the previous sub-sections remainvalid while the shear yield stress τy is not exceeded The uniform torque at nominalfirst yield Tty may be obtained from equations 1011 1016 1018 or 1022 byusing τtmax = τy Yielding commences at Tty at the most highly stressed regionsand then generally spreads until the section is fully plastic

The fully plastic shear stress distribution can be visualised by using the lsquosandheaprsquo modification of the Prandtl membrane analogy Because the fully plasticshear stress distribution is constant the slope of the Prandtl membrane is alsoconstant and its contours are equally spaced in the same way as are those of aheap formed by pouring sand on to a base area of the same shape as the membercross-section until the heap is fully formed

This is demonstrated in Figure 1018a for a circular cross-section for which thesand heap is conical Its fully plastic uniform torque may be obtained from

Ttp =int R

0τy(2πr)r dr (1024)

whence

Ttp = (2πR33

)τy (1025)

448 Torsion members

Parabola Cone

(b) Rectangular cross-section(a) Circular cross-section

Parabola

First yieldFirst yield Fully plastic Fully plastic

Sectionsandmembercontours

Chisel wedge

Membranesandsand heaps

Figure 1018 First yield and fully plastic uniform torsion shear stress distributions

The corresponding first yield uniform torque may be obtained fromequations 109 and 1011 as

Tty = (πR32

)τy (1026)

and so the uniform torsion plastic shape factor is TtpTty = 43The sand heap for a fully plastic rectangular section b times t is chisel-shaped

as shown in Figure 1018b In this case the fully plastic uniform torque isgiven by

Ttp = bt2

2

(1 minus t

3b

)τy (1027)

and for a narrow rectangular section this becomes Ttp asymp (bt22)τy Thecorresponding first yield uniform torque is

Tty asymp (bt23

)τy (1028)

and so the uniform torsion plastic shape factor is TtpTty = 32For thin-walled open sections the fully plastic uniform torque is approximated

by

Ttp asymp (bt22

)τy (1029)

and the first yield torque is obtained from equation 1018 as

Tty = τyIt

tmax(1030)

Torsion members 449

For a hollow section the equilibrium condition of constant shear flow lim-its the maximum shear flow to the shear flow τytmin in the thinnest wall (seeequation 1022) so that the first yield uniform torque is given by

Tty = 2Aetminτy (1031)

This is the maximum torque that can be resisted even though walls with t gt tmin

are not fully yielded and so this value of Tty should also be used for the fully plasticuniform torque Ttp

10232 Plastic analysis

A member in uniform torsion will collapse plastically when there is a sufficientnumber of fully plastic cross-sections to transform the member into a mechanismas shown for example in Figure 1019 Each fully plastic cross-section can bethought of as a shear lsquohingersquo which allows increasing torsional rotations underthe uniform plastic torque Ttp The plastic shear hinges usually form at the sup-ports where there are reaction torques as indicated in Figure 1019 In generalthe plastic shear hinges develop progressively until the collapse mechanism isformed Examples of uniform torsion plastic collapse mechanisms are shown inFigures 1020 and 1021

At plastic collapse the mechanism is statically determinate and can be analysedby using statics to determine the plastic collapse torques For the member shownin Figure 1019 the mechanism forms when there are plastic shear hinges at eachsupport The total applied torque αtT at plastic collapse must be in equilibriumwith these plastic uniform torques and so

αtT = 2Ttp (1032)

so that the uniform torsion plastic collapse load factor is given by

αt = 2TtpT (1033)

Values of the uniform torsion plastic collapse load factor αt for a number ofexample torsion members can be obtained from Figures 1020 and 1021

103 Non-uniform torsion

1031 Elastic deformations and stresses

10311 General

In elastic non-uniform torsion both the rate of change of the angle of twist rotationdφdx and the longitudinal warping deflections u vary along the length of the

T

L

(ndash)(+)

t TTtp

Ttp

(b) Uniform torsion collapse mechanism

(c) Uniform torque distribution (a) Torsion member and loading

Prevention of warpingineffective in uniform torsion

Uniform torsionplastic shear hinge

Bottom flange

Top flange

Figure 1019 Uniform torsion plastic collapse

Mechanism

T

T

T

T

L

L

L L

L L

T

LT

L

T

L

T

L L

T

L L

T

L L

T

L L

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

0

10

10

10

40

60

80

60

60

80

80

10

10

10

10

025

025

025

025

025

025

025

0333

0667

0583

00208

000931

000521

00150

00142

000751

000721

tT Ttp wTLMfp df

Warping torsion frictionless hinge

Warping torsion plastic hinge

Uniform torsion shear hinges

Free to warp

Warping prevented

Top flange

Bottom flange

Plastic collapseWarping torsionUniform torsion

Memberand

loading

Rotations

Mechanism

Warping

wmEIwTL3

Uniform tm

tmGIt TL

infin

Figure 1020 Plastic collapse and maximum rotation ndash concentrated torque

Torsion members 451

TL

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

0

20

20

20

80

1166

160

1166

1166

160

160

05

05

05

05

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0139

0292

0250

00130

000541

000260

000915

000860

000417

000397

TL

L

TL

L

TL

L

TL

LTL

LTL

L

TL

LTL

LTL

LTL

L

Warping torsion frictionless hinge

Warping torsion plastic hinge

Uniform torsion shear hinges

Free to warp

Warping prevented

Top flange

Bottom flange

tT Ttp wTLMfp df

Plastic collapseWarping torsionUniform torsion

Memberand

loading

Rotations

Mechanism

Warping

wmEIwTL3Uniform

tmGItTL Mechanism

infin

Figure 1021 Plastic collapse and maximum rotation ndash uniformly distributed torque

member The varying warping deflections induce longitudinal strains and stressesσw When these warping normal stresses also vary along the member there areassociated warping shear stresses τw distributed around the cross-section andthese may act in conjunction with the shear stresses due to uniform torsion toresist the torque acting at the section [1 11] In the following sub-sections thewarping deformations stresses and torques in thin-walled open-section membersof constant cross-section are treated The local warping stresses induced by thenon-uniform torsion of closed sections are beyond the scope of this book but are

452 Torsion members

treated in [9 10] while some examples of the non-uniform torsion of taperedopen-section members are discussed in [12 13]

10312 Warping deflections and stresses

In thin-walled open-section members the longitudinal warping deflections u dueto twist are much greater than those due to shear straining (see Figure 106) andthe latter are usually neglected The warping deflections due to twist arise becausethe lines originally parallel to the axis of twist become helical locally as indicatedin Figures 104 1022 and 1023 In non-uniform torsion the axis of twist is thelocus of the shear centres (see Section 543) since otherwise the shear centre axiswould be deformed and the member would be bent as well as twisted It is shownin Section 1081 that the warping deflections due to twist (see Figure 1023) canbe expressed as

u = (αn minus α)dφ

dx (1034)

where

α =int s

0ρ0ds (1035)

and

αn = 1

A

int E

0α t ds (1036)

where ρ0 is the perpendicular distance from the shear centre S to the tangent tothe mid-line of the section wall (see Figures 1016b and 1023)

In non-uniform torsion the warping displacements u vary along the length of themember as shown for example in Figure 101b and c Because of this longitudinal

C δ

δx

x y

z

xdd

a0

a0

a0Line parallel to the

axis of twist

Axis of twist

Helix

(y z)

S(y0 z0)

Figure 1022 Rotation of a line parallel to the axis of twist

Torsion members 453

δx

δs

δs

δu

xdda0

a0

0

0

a0

S

O

E C y

z

x

(b) Plan on axis of twist(not to scale)

Axis of twist

Helix

(a) Section

Figure 1023 Warping of an element δx times δs times t due to twisting

strains are induced and the corresponding longitudinal warping normalstresses are

σw = E(αn minus α)d2φ

dx2 (1037)

These stresses define the bimoment stress resultant

B = minusint E

0σw(αn minus α) tds (1038)

Substituting equation 1037 leads to

B = minusEIwd2φ

dx2(1039)

in which

Iw =int E

0(αn minus α)2tds (1040)

is the warping section constant Substituting equation 1039 into equation 1037allows the warping normal stresses to be expressed as

σw = minusB(αn minus α)

Iw (1041)

Values of the warping section constant Iw and of the warping normal stressesσw for structural sections are given in [5 6] while a general computer program fortheir evaluation has been developed [8]

454 Torsion members

When the warping normal stresses σw vary along the length of the memberwarping shear stresses τw are induced in the same way that variations in thebending normal stresses in a beam induce bending shear stresses (see Section 54)The warping shear stresses can be expressed in terms of the warping shear flow

τwt = minusEd3φ

dx3

int s

0(αn minus α) tds (1042)

Information for calculating the warping shear stresses in structural sections isalso given in [5 6] while a general computer program for their evaluation hasbeen developed [8]

The warping shear stresses exert a warping torque

Tw =int E

0ρ0τwtds (1043)

about the shear centre as shown in Figure 1012a It can be shown [14 15] thatthis reduces to

Tw = minusEIwd3φ

dx3 (1044)

after substituting for τw and integrating by parts The warping torque Tw given byequation 1044 is related to the bimoment B given by equation 1039 through

Tw = dB

dx (1045)

Sign conventions for Tw and B are illustrated in Figure 1016A somewhat simpler explanation of the warping torque Tw and bimoment B

can be given for the I-section illustrated in Figure 1024 This is discussed inSection 1082 where it is shown that for an equal flanged I-section the bimomentB is related to the flange moment Mf through

B = df Mf (1046)

and the warping section constant Iw is given by

Iw = Izd2f

4(1047)

in which df is the distance between the flange centroids

1032 Elastic analysis

10321 Uniform torsion

Some thin-walled open-section members such as thin rectangular sections andangle and tee sections have very small warping section constants In such casesit is usually sufficiently accurate to ignore the warping torque Tw and to analysethe member as if it were in uniform torsion as discussed in Section 1022

Torsion members 455

10322 Warping torsion

Very thin-walled open-section members have very small torsion-section constantsIt while some of these such as I- and channel sections have significant warpingsection constants Iw In such cases it is usually sufficiently accurate to analyse themember as if the applied torque were resisted entirely by the warping torque sothat Tx = Tw Thus the twisted shape of the member can be obtained by solving

minusEIwd3φ

dx3= Tx (1048)

as

minusEIwφ =int x

0

int x

0

int x

0Txdxdxdx + A1x2

2+ A2x + A3 (1049)

where A1 A2 and A3 are constants of integration whose values depend on theboundary conditions

For statically determinate members there are three boundary conditions fromwhich the three constants of integration can be determined As an example ofthe three commonly assumed boundary conditions the statically determinate can-tilever shown in Figures 101c and 1025 is analysed in Section 1083 The twistedshape of the cantilever is shown in Figure 1025c and it can be seen that themaximum angle of twist rotation occurs at the loaded end and is equal to TL33EIw

For statically indeterminate members such as the beam shown in Figure 1026there is an additional boundary condition for each redundant quantity involvedThese redundants can be determined by substituting the additional boundary

vf

yC S

Mf

Mf

dfVf

Vf

yx

z

z (a) Rotation ofcross-section (b) Bimoment and warping stresses

Warping normal stresses w

Bimoment df Mf

Warping shear stresses w

Flange shears Vf

df

Figure 1024 Bimoment and stresses in an I-section member

456 Torsion members

conditions into equation 1049 As an example of this procedure the beam shownin Figure 1026 is analysed in Section 1084

The warping torsion analysis of equal flanged I-sections can also be carried outby analysing the flange bending model shown in Figure 1027 Thus the warping

(+) T

(+)

x L

T

T

Twist rotation andwarping prevented

Free to warpL= 0

0 = 0 = 0

(b) Torque Tx

(c) Twist rotation (a) Cantilever

TL3

3EIw

Figure 1025 Warping torsion of a statically determinate cantilever

(+)

(+)x L

munit length

(-)

E I w

T 0

Twist rotation andwarping prevented Twist rotation

preventedfree to warp0 =0 = 0

L =L = 0

mL - T0

T0mL - T0

(a) Beam (c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

00054mL4

Figure 1026 Warping torsion of a statically indeterminate beam

y

z

y

z

=

(b) Equivalent flange shears Vf

Vf

Vf Tx

dfdf

df

Tx

(a) Flange deflection Vf

=vf w

w

df 2

Figure 1027 Flange bending model of warping torsion

Torsion members 457

torque Tw = Tx acting on the I-section is replaced by two transverse shears

Vf = Txdf (1050)

one on each flange The bending deflections vf of each flange can then be deter-mined by elastic analysis or by using available solutions [4] and the twist rotationscan be calculated from

φw = 2vf df (1051)

10323 Non-uniform torsion

When neither the torsional rigidity nor the warping rigidity can be neglected asin hot-rolled steel I- and channel sections the applied torque is resisted by acombination of the uniform and warping torques so that

Tx = Tt + Tw (1052)

In this case the differential equation of non-uniform torsion is

Tx = GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3 (1053)

the general solution of which can be written as

φ = p(x)+ A1exa + A2eminusxa + A3 (1054)

where

a2 = EIw

GIt= K2L2

π2 (1055)

The function p(x) in this solution is a particular integral whose form dependson the variation of the torque Tx along the beam This can be determined by thestandard techniques used to solve ordinary linear differential equations (see [16]for example) The values of the constants of integration A1 A2 and A3 depend onthe form of the particular integral and on the boundary conditions

Complete solutions for a number of torque distributions and boundary conditionshave been determined and graphical solutions for the twist φ and its derivativesdφdx d2φdx2 and d3φdx3 are available [5 6] As an example the non-uniformtorsion of the cantilever shown in Figure 1028 is analysed in Section 1085

Sometimes the accuracy of the method of solution described above is notrequired in which case a much simpler method may be used The maximumangle of twist rotation φm may be approximated by

φm = φtmφwm

φtm + φwm(1056)

in which φtm is the maximum uniform torsion angle of twist rotation obtained bysolving equation 108 with Tt = Tx and φwm is the maximum warping torsion

458 Torsion members

(+) T

(+)x

T

L

T

Twist rotation andwarping prevented

0 =0 = 0Free to warp

L = 0

(a) Cantilever (c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

TL

GIt

1ndash endash2La1ndash

1+ endash2LaaL

Figure 1028 Non-uniform torsion of a cantilever

angle of twist rotation obtained by solving equation 1048 Values of φtm and φwm

can be obtained from Figures 1020 and 1021 for a number of different torsionmembers

This approximate method tends to overestimate the true maximum angle of twistrotation partly because the maximum values φtm and φwm often occur at differentlocations along the member In the case of the cantilever of Figure 1028 theapproximate solution

φm = TLGIt

1 + 3EIwGItL2(1057)

obtained using Figures 1015c and 1025c in equation 1056 has a maximum errorof about 12 [17]

1033 Plastic collapse analysis

10331 Fully plastic bimoment

The warping normal stresses σw developed in elastic warping torsion are usuallymuch larger than the warping shear stresses τw Thus the limit of elastic behaviouris often reached when the bimoment is close to its nominal first yield value forwhich the maximum value of σw is equal to the yield stress fy

For the equal flanged I-section shown in Figure 1024 the first yield bimomentBy corresponds to the flange moment Mf reaching the yield value

Mfy = fyb2f tf 6 (1058)

so that

By = fydf b2f tf 6 (1059)

in which bf is the flange width tf is the flange thickness and df is the dis-tance between flange centroids As the bimoment increases above By yielding

Torsion members 459

spreads from the flange tips into the cross-section until the flanges become fullyyielded at

Mfp = fyb2f tf 4 (1060)

which corresponds to the fully plastic bimoment

Bp = fydf b2f tf 4 (1061)

The plastic shape factor for warping torsion of the I-section is therefore given byBpBy = 32

Expressions for the full plastic bimoments of a number of monosymmetricthin-walled open sections are given in [18]

10332 Plastic analysis of warping torsion

An equal flanged I-section member in warping torsion will collapse plasticallywhen there is a sufficient number of warping hinges (frictionless or plastic) totransform the member into a mechanism as shown for example in Figure 1029In general the warping hinges develop progressively until the collapse mechanismforms

A frictionless warping hinge occurs at a point where warping is unrestrained(φprimeprime = 0) so that there is a frictionless hinge in each flange while at aplastic warping hinge the bimoment is equal to the fully plastic value Bp

(equation 1061) and the moment in each flange is equal to the fully plastic valueMfp (equation 1060) so that there is a flexural plastic hinge in each flange Warpingtorsion plastic collapse therefore corresponds to the simultaneous plastic collapse

T

L

Mfp

Mfp

(-)

(+)

End warpingprevented

End free towarp

(a) Torsion member and loading

(b) Warping torsion collapse mechanism

(c) Top flange moment distribution

Top flange

Warping torsionplastic hinges

Bottomflange

Frictionlesshinge

Figure 1029 Warping torsion plastic collapse

460 Torsion members

of the flanges in opposite directions with a series of flexural hinges (frictionlessor plastic) in each flange Thus warping torsion plastic collapse can be analysedby using the methods discussed in Section 555 to analyse the flexural plasticcollapse of the flanges

Warping torsion plastic hinges often form at supports or at points of concentratedtorque as indicated in Figure 1029 Examples of warping torsion plastic collapsemechanisms are shown in Figures 1020 and 1021

At plastic collapse each flange becomes a mechanism which is staticallydeterminate so that it can be analysed by using statics to determine the plas-tic collapse torques For the member shown in Figure 1029 each flange formsa mechanism with plastic hinges at the concentrated torque and the right-handsupport and a frictionless hinge at the left-hand support where warping is unre-strained If the concentrated torque αwT acts at mid-length then the flangescollapse when

αw(Tdf )L4 = Mfp + Mfp2 (1062)

so that the warping torsion plastic collapse load factor is given by

αw = 6Mfpdf TL (1063)

Values of the warping torsion plastic collapse load factor αw for a number ofexample-torsion members are given in Figures 1020 and 1021

10333 Plastic analysis of non-uniform torsion

It has not been possible to develop a simple but rigorous model for the analysis ofthe plastic collapse of members in non-uniform torsion where both uniform andwarping torsion are important This is because

(a) different types of stress (shear stresses τt τw and normal stress σw) areassociated with uniform and warping torsion collapse

(b) the different stresses τt τw and σw are distributed differently across thesection and

(c) the uniform torque Tt and the warping torque Tw are distributed differentlyalong the member

A number of approximate theories have been proposed the simplest of which isthe Merchant approximation [19] according to which the plastic collapse loadfactor αx is the sum of the uniform and warping torsion collapse load factorsso that

αx = αt + αw (1064)

Torsion members 461

0604020 08 021 0 0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

0 5 L

T

05L

App

lied

torq

ue T

(kN

m)

Small rotation inelastic analysis [25]

Larger otation inelastic analysis [25]

Plastic collapse [2225]

Test results by Farwell and Galambos [20]

Central twist rotation (radian)

Figure 1030 Comparison of analysis and test results

This approximation assumes that there is no interaction between uniform andwarping torsion at plastic collapse so that the separate plastic collapse capacitiesare additive

If strain-hardening is ignored and only small twist rotations are consideredthen the errors arising from this approximation are on the unsafe side but aresmall because the warping torsion shear stresses τw are small because the yieldinteractions between normal and shear stresses (see Section 131) are smalland because cross-sections which are fully plastic due to warping torsion oftenoccur at different locations along the member than those which are fully plas-tic due to uniform torsion These small errors are more than compensated forby the conservatism of ignoring strain-hardening and second-order longitudinalstresses that develop at large rotations Test results [20 21] and numerical studies[22 23] have shown that these cause significant strengthening at large rotationsas indicated in Figure 1030 and that the approximation of equation 1064 isconservative

An example of the plastic collapse analysis of the non-uniform torsion is givenin Section 1096

104 Torsion design

1041 General

EC3 gives limited guidance for the analysis and design of torsion membersWhile both elastic and plastic analysis are permitted generally only accurateand approximate methods of elastic analysis are specifically discussed for torsionmembers Also while both first yield and plastic design resistances are referred

462 Torsion members

to generally only the first yield design resistance is specifically discussed for tor-sion members Further there is no guidance on section classification for torsionmembers nor on how to allow for the effects of local buckling on the designresistance

In the following sub-sections the specific EC3 provisions for torsion analysisand design are extended so as to provide procedures which are consistent withthose used in EC3 for the design of beams against bending and shear

First the member cross-section is classified as Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 orClass 4 in much the same way as is a beam cross-section (see Sections 472and 5612) and then the effective section resistances for uniform and warpingtorsion are determined Following this an appropriate method of torsion analysis(plastic or elastic) is selected and then an appropriate method (plastic first hingefirst yield or local buckling) is used for strength design All of the strength designmethods suggested ignore the warping shear stresses τw because these are generallysmall and because they occur at different points in the cross-section and alongthe member than do the much more significant uniform torsion shear stresses τt

and the warping bimoment normal stresses σw Finally a method of serviceabilitydesign is discussed

1042 Section classification

Cross-sections of torsion members need to be classified according to the extentby which local buckling effects may reduce their cross-section resistances Cross-sections which are capable of reaching and maintaining plasticity while a torsionplastic hinge collapse mechanism develops may be called Class 1 as are thecorresponding cross-sections of beams Class 2 sections are capable of developinga first hinge but inelastic local buckling may prevent the development of a plasticcollapse mechanism Class 3 sections are capable of reaching the nominal firstyield before local buckling occurs while Class 4 sections will buckle locallybefore the nominal first yield is reached

For open cross-sections the warping shear stresses τw are usually very smalland can be neglected without serious error The uniform torsion shear stresses τt

change sign and vary linearly across the wall thickness t and so can be consideredto have no effect on local buckling The flange elastic and plastic warping normalstress distributions are similar to those due to bending in the plane of the flangeand so the section classification may be based on the same widthndashthickness limitsThus the flange outstands of a Class 1 open section would satisfy

λ le 9 (1065)

in which λ is the element slenderness given by

λ = (ct)radic (

fy235)

(1066)

Torsion members 463

Class 2 open sections would satisfy

9 lt λ le 10 (1067)

Class 3 open sections would satisfy

10 lt λ le 14 (1068)

and Class 4 open sections would satisfy

14 lt λ (1069)

For closed cross-sections the only significant stresses that develop during tor-sion are uniform torsion shear stresses τt that are constant across the wall thicknesst and along the length b of any element of the cross-section This stress distribu-tion is very similar to that caused by a bending shear force in the web of anequal-flanged I-section and so the section classification may be based on thesame widthndashthickness limits [24] Thus the elements of Class 1 Class 2 and Class3 rectangular hollow sections would satisfy

λ le 60 (1070)

in which λ is the element slenderness given by

λ = (hwt)radic (

fy235)

(1071)

in which hw is the clear distance between flanges Rectangular hollow sectionswhich do not satisfy this condition would be classified as Class 4 Circular hollowsections do not buckle under shear unless they are exceptionally slender and sothey may generally be classified as Class 1

1043 Uniform torsion section resistance

The effective uniform torsion section resistance of all open sections TtRd can beapproximated by the plastic section resistance Ttp given by equation 1029 in whichthe shear yield stress is given by

τy = fyradic

3 (1072)

The uniform torsion section resistance of Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3 rectangularhollow sections TtRd123 can be determined by using the first yield uniform torqueTty of equation 1031 The effective uniform torsion section resistance of a Class 4rectangular hollow section TtRd4 can be approximated by reducing the first yielduniform torque Tty of equation 1031 to

TtRd4 = Tty(60λ) (1073)

The effective uniform torsion section resistance of a circular hollow section TtRd

can generally be approximated by using equation 1031 to find the first yielduniform torque Tty

464 Torsion members

1044 Bimoment section resistance

The bimoment section resistance of Class 1 and Class 2 equal-flanged I-sectionsBRd12 is given by equation 1061 The bimoment section resistance of a Class 3equal-flanged I-section can be approximated by using

BRd3 = By + (Bp minus By)(14 minus λ)4 (1074)

in which By is the first yield bimoment given by equation 1059 The bimomentsection resistance of a Class 4 equal-flanged I-section can be approximated byusing

BRd4 = By (14λ) (1075)

These equations may also be used for the bimoment section resistances of otheropen sections by using their fully plastic bimoments Bp [18] or first yield bimo-ments By Alternatively the bimoment section resistances of other Class 1 Class 2or Class 3 open sections can be conservatively approximated by using

BRd123 = By (1076)

and the bimoment section resistances of other Class 4 open sections can be approx-imated using equation 1075

It is conservative to ignore bimoments in hollow section members and so thereis no need to consider their bimoment section resistances

1045 Plastic design

The use of plastic design should be limited to Class 1 members which have suf-ficient ductility to reach the plastic collapse mechanism Plastic design should becarried out by using plastic analysis to determine the plastic collapse load factorαx (see Section 10333) and then checking that

1 le αx (1077)

1046 First hinge design

The use of first hinge design should be limited to Class 1 and Class 2 membersin which the first hinge of a collapse mechanism can form The design uniformtorques Tt and bimoments B can be determined by using elastic analysis and themember is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd2

)2

+(

B

BRd2

)2

le 1 (1078)

is satisfied at all points along the member The first hinge method is more conserva-tive than plastic design and more difficult to use because elastic member analysis

Torsion members 465

is much more difficult than plastic analysis and also because equation 1078 oftenneeds to be checked at a number of points along the member

1047 First yield design

The use of first yield design should be limited to Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3members which can reach first yield The maximum design uniform torques Tt andbimoments B can be determined by elastic analysis The member is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd3

)2

+(

B

BRd3

)2

le 1 (1079)

is satisfied at all points along the member This first yield method is the same asthat specified in EC3 except for the neglect of the warping shear stresses τw It isjust as difficult to use as the first hinge method

1048 Local buckling design

Class 4 members should designed against local buckling The maximum designuniform torques Tt and bimoments B can be determined by elastic analysis Themember is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd4

)2

+(

B

BRd4

)2

le 1 (1080)

is satisfied at all points along the member

1049 Design for serviceability

Serviceability design usually requires the estimation of the deformations under partor all of the serviceability loads Because these loads are usually significantly lessthan the factored combined loads used for strength design the member remainslargely elastic and the serviceability deformations can be evaluated by linearelastic analysis

There are no specific serviceability criteria for satisfactory deformations of atorsion member given in EC3 However general recommendations such as lsquothedeformations of a structure and of its component members should be appropriateto the location loading and function of the structure and the component membersrsquomay be applied to torsion members so that the onus is placed on the designer todetermine what are appropriate magnitudes of the twist rotations

Because of the lack of precise serviceability criteria highly accurate predictionsof the serviceability rotations are not required Thus the maximum twist rotationsof members in non-uniform torsion may be approximated by using equation 1056

Usually the twist rotations of thin-walled closed-section members are verysmall and can be ignored (although in some cases the distortional deformations

466 Torsion members

may be quite large as discussed in Section 106) On the other hand thin-walledopen-section members are comparatively flexible and special measures may berequired to limit their rotations

105 Torsion and bending

1051 Behaviour

Pure torsion occurs very rarely in steel structures Most commonly torsion occursin combination with bending actions The torsion actions may be classified asprimary or secondary depending on whether the torsion action is required to trans-fer load (primary torsion) or whether it arises as a secondary action Secondarytorques may arise as a result of differential twist rotations compatible with the jointrotations of primary frames as shown in Figure 1031 and are often predicted bythree-dimensional analysis programs They are not unlike the secondary bend-ing moments which occur in rigid-jointed trusses but which are usually ignored(a procedure justified by many years of satisfactory experience based on the long-standing practice of analysing rigid-jointed trusses as if pin-jointed) Secondarytorques are usually small when there are alternative load paths of high stiffnessand may often be ignored

Primary torsion actions may be classified as being restrained free or destab-lising as shown in Figure 1032 For restrained torsion the member applying thetorsion action (such as ABC shown in Figure 1032b) also applies a restrainingaction to the member resisting the torsion (DEC in Figure 1032b) In this case thestructure is redundant and compatibility between the members must be satisfied inthe analysis if the magnitudes of the torques and other actions are to be determinedcorrectly Free torsion occurs when the member applying the torsion action (such as

Joint rotation offlexible portalframe

Negligible rotationat end wall

Differential endrotations inducesecondarytorsion

Figure 1031 Secondary torsion in an industrial frame

Torsion members 467

E

C

DB

Q

BAC

CQ

C AB

E

C

D B

AQ

Q

Cantilever BC permitslateral deflection oftorsion member

Reaction eccentricity atpin connection C causestorque

Rigid joint Crequires compatibletwisting

(b) Restrained torsion

Torsionmember DCE

LoadingmemberABC

(a) Torsion and loading members

(c) Free torsion (d) Destabilising torsion

Figure 1032 Torsion actions

ABC in Figure 1032c) does not restrain the twisting of the torsion member (DEF)but does prevent its lateral deflection Destablising torsion may occur when themember applying the torsion action (such as BC in Figure 1032d) does not restraineither the twisting or the lateral deflection of the torsion member (DCE) In thiscase lateral buckling actions (Chapter 6) caused by the in-plane loading of thetorsion member amplify the torsion and out-of-plane bending behaviour

The inelastic non-linear bending and torsion of fully braced centrally bracedand unbraced I-beams with central concentrated loads (see Figure 1033) have beenanalysed [25] and interaction equations developed for predicting their strengths Itwas found that while circular interaction equations are appropriate for short lengthbraced beams these provide unsafe predictions for beams subject to destablis-ing torsion where lateral buckling effects become important On the other handdestablising interactions between lateral buckling and torsion tend to be masked bythe favourable effects of the secondary axial stresses that develop at large rotationsand linear interaction equations based on plastic analyses provide satisfactorystrength predictions as shown in Figure 1034 Proposals based on these find-ings are made below for the analysis and design of members subject to combinedtorsion and bending

468 Torsion members

Q

L

Q

L

Q

L

e

Q

e

Q

(d) Eccentric load

(i) Free torsion (ii) Destabilising torsion

(c) Unbraced(Destabilising torsion)

(b) Centrally braced(Free torsion)

(a) Continuously braced(Free torsion)

Figure 1033 Beams in torsion and bending

0 0 2 0 4 06 08 10 12 1 4 0

0 2

0 4

0 6

0 8

1 0

1 2

1 4

py

0510141

Q

L

eQ

MMzx

Dimensionless torque 1x

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t M

yM

py

Approximateequation 1082( )Accurate

[25]

Figure 1034 Interaction between lateral buckling and torsion for unbraced beams

1052 Plastic design of fully braced members

The member must be Class 1 Plastic collapse analyses should be used to determinethe plastic collapse load factors αi for in-plane bending (Section 55) and αx fortorsion (Section 10333)

The member should satisfy the circular interaction equation

1α2i + 1α2

x le 1 (1081)

Torsion members 469

1053 Design of members without full bracing

A member without full bracing has its bending resistance reduced by lateral buck-ling effects (Chapter 6) Its bending should be analysed elastically and the resultingmoment distribution used to determine its bending resistance MbRd according toEC3

An elastic torsion analysis should be used to find the values of the design uniformtorques Tt and bimoments B An appropriate torsion design method should beselected from Sections 1045ndash1048 and used to find the load factor αx by whichthe design torques and bimoments should be multiplied so that the appropriatetorsion design equation (equations 1077ndash1080) is just satisfied

The member should then satisfy the linear interaction equation

MEd

MbRd+ 1

αxle 1 (1082)

There is no need to amplify the moment because of the finding [25] that lin-ear interaction equations are satisfactory even for unbraced beams as shown inFigure 1034

106 Distortion

Twisting and distortion of a flexural member may be caused by the local distri-bution around the cross-section of the forces acting as shown in Figure 103If the member responds significantly to either of these actions the bending stressdistribution may depart considerably from that calculated in the usual way whileadditional distortional stresses may be induced by out-of-plane bending of the wall(see Figure 103d) To avoid possible failure the designer must either increase thestrength of the member which may be uneconomic or must limit both twistingand distortion

The resistance to distortion of a thin-walled member depends on the arrangementof the cross-section Members with triangular closed cells have high resistancesbecause of the truss-like action of the triangulated cross-section which causes thedistortional loads to be transferred by in-plane bending and shear of the cell wallsOn the other hand the walls of the members with rectangular or trapezoidal cellsbend out of their planes when under distortional loading and when the resistancesto distortion are low [26] while members of open cross-section are even moremore flexible Concentrated distortional loads can be distributed locally by pro-viding stiff diaphragms which reduce or prevent local distortion However isolateddiaphragms are not fully effective when the distortional loads are distributed orcan move along the member In such cases it is necessary to analyse the distortionof the section and the stresses induced by the distortion

The resistance to torsion of a thin-walled open section is comparatively smalland the dominant mode of deformation is twisting of the member Because thistwisting is usually accounted for the importance of distortion lies in its modifying

470 Torsion members

influence on the torsional behaviour Significant distortions occur only in verythin-walled members for which the distortional rigidity which varies as the cubeof the wall thickness reduces at a much faster rate than the warping rigidity whichvaries directly with the thickness [27] These distortions may induce significantwall bending stresses and may increase the angles of twist and change the warpingstress distributions [28 29]

Thin-walled closed-section members are very stiff torsionally and the twistingdeformations due to uniform torsion are not usually of great importance except incurved members On the other hand rectangular and trapezoidal members are notvery resistant to distortional loads and the distortional deformations may be largewhile the stresses induced by the distortional loads may dominate the design [26]

The distortional behaviour of single-cell rectangular or trapezoidal memberscan be classified as uniform or non-uniform Uniform distortion occurs when theapplied distortional loading is uniformly distributed along a member of constantcross-section which has no diaphragms In this case the distortional loading isresisted solely by the out-of-plane bending rigidity of the plate elements of thesection In non-uniform distortion the distortions vary along the member and theplate elements bend in their planes producing in-plane shear stresses which helpto resist the distortional loading

Perhaps the simplest method of analysing non-uniform distortion is by using ananalogy to the problem [30] of a beam on an elastic foundation (BEF analogy) Inthis analogy which is shown diagrammatically in Figure 1035 the distortional

Q q

Deflection wBeam rigidity EIFoundation modulus kBeam loads Q qBeam momentBeam shear

DistortionIn-plane stiffnessOut-of-plane stiffnessDistortional loadsWarping normal stressWarping shear stress

(c) Analogy

(b) Beam on an elasticfoundation

(a) Elevation of abox section member

Rigiddiaphragm

free towarp

Concentrateddistortional

load

Flexiblediaphragm

Distributeddistortional

load

Rigiddiaphragmwarping

preventedBeamrigidity EI

Foundation modulus kEI d4wdx4 + kw = q

Figure 1035 BEF analogy for box section distortion

Torsion members 471

Distortion deflections

Warping normal stresses

Warping shear stresses

Figure 1036 Warping stresses in non-uniform distortion

loading corresponds to the applied beam loads in the analogy and the out-of-planeresistance of the plate elements corresponds to the stiffness k of the elastic foun-dation while the in-plane resistance of these elements corresponds to the flexuralrigidity EI of the analogous beam The BEF analogy can account for concentratedand distributed distortional loads for rigid diaphragms which either permit orprevent warping and for flexible diaphragms and stiffening rings as indicated inFigure 1035 Many solutions for problems of beams on elastic foundations havebeen obtained [31] and these can be used to find the out-of-plane bending stressesin the plate elements (which are related to the foundation reactions) and the warp-ing and normal shear stresses due to non-uniform distortion (which are relatedto the bending moment and shear force in the beam on the elastic foundation)The distributions of the warping stresses in a rectangular box section are shown inFigure 1036

107 Appendix ndash uniform torsion

1071 Thin-walled closed sections

The shear flow τt t around a thin-walled closed-section member in uniform torsioncan be determined by using the condition that the total change in the warpingdisplacement u around the complete closed section must be zero for continuityThe change in the warping displacement due to the twist rotations φ is equal to

472 Torsion members

minus(dφdx)∮ρ0ds (see Section 10215 and Figure 1013a) while the change in

the warping displacement due to the shear straining of the mid-surface is equal to∮(τtG)ds (see Figures 106 and 1013b) Thus∮

τt

Gds = dφ

dx

∮ρ0ds

The shear flow τt t is constant around the closed section (otherwise the correspond-ing longitudinal shear stresses would not be in equilibrium) while

∮ρ0ds is equal

to twice the area Ae enclosed by the section as shown in Figure 1012b Thus

τt t∮

1

tds = 2GAe

dx (1083)

The moment resultant of the shear flow around the section is equal to the torqueacting and so

Tt =∮τt tρ0ds (1084)

whence

τt t = Tt

2Ae (1020)

Substituting this into equation 1083 leads to

Tt = G4A2

e∮(1t)ds

dx

and so the torsion section constant is

It = 4A2e∮

(1t)ds (1021)

The torsion section constants and the shear flows in multi-cell closed-sectionmembers can be determined by extending this method If the member consists ofn junctions linked by m walls then there are (m minus n + 1) independent cells Thelongitudinal equilibrium conditions require there to be m constant shear flows τt tone for each wall and (n minus 1) junction equations of the typesum

junction

(τt t) = 0 (1085)

There are (m minus n + 1) independent cell warping continuity conditions of the typesumcell

intwall

(τtG)ds = 2Aedφ

dx(1086)

where Ae is the area enclosed by the cell Equations 1085 and 1086 can besolved simultaneously for the m shear flows τt t The total uniform torque Tt can

Torsion members 473

be determined as the torque resultant of these shear flows and the torsion sectionconstant It can then be found from

It = Tt

Gdφdx

1072 Analysis of statically indeterminate members

The uniform torsion of the statically indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1017amay be analysed by taking the left-hand reaction torque T0 as the redundant quan-tity The distribution of torque Tx is therefore as shown in Figure 1017b andequation 108 becomes

GItdφ

dx= T0 minus T 〈x minus a〉0

where the value of the second term is taken as zero when the value inside theMacaulay brackets 〈 〉 is negative

The solution of this equation which satisfies the condition that the angle of twistat the left-hand support is zero is

GItφ = T0x minus T 〈x minus a〉 (1087)

The other condition which must be satisfied is that the angle of twist at the right-hand support must be zero Using this in equation 1087

0 = T0L minus T (L minus a)

and so

T0 = T (L minus a)

L

Thus the maximum torque is T0 when a is less than L2 while the maximum angleof twist rotation occurs at the loaded point and is equal to

φa = Ta(L minus a)

GItL

108 Appendix ndash non-uniform torsion

1081 Warping deflections

When a member twists lines originally parallel to the axis of twist become helicaland any element δx times δs times t of the section wall rotates a0dφdx about the line a0

474 Torsion members

from the shear centre S as shown in Figures 104 and 1022 The increase δu inthe warping displacement of the element is shown in Figure 1023 and is equal to

δu = minusρ0dφ

dxδs

where ρ0 is the perpendicular distance from the shear centre S to the tangent to themid-line of the wall The sign convention for ρ0 is demonstrated in Figure 1016bwhich shows a cross-section viewed by looking in the positive x direction Thevalue of ρ0 is positive when the line a0 from the shear centre rotates in a clockwisesense when the distance s increases which is the case for Figure 1016b Thus thewarping displacement is given by

u = (αn minus α)dφ

dx (1034)

where

α =int s

0ρ0ds (1035)

and the quantity αn is chosen to be

αn = 1

A

int E

0αtds (1036)

so that the average warping displacement of the section is zero

1082 Warping torque and bimoment in an I-section

When an equal flanged I-section member twists φ as shown in Figure 1024a theflanges deflect laterally

vf = df

Thus the flanges may have curvatures

d2vf

dx2= df

2

d2φ

dx2

in opposite directions as for example in the cantilever shown in Figure 101cThese curvatures can be thought of as being produced by the equal and opposite

Torsion members 475

flange bending moments

Mf = EIfd2vf

dx2= EIz

2

df

2

d2φ

dx2

shown in Figure 1024b This pair of equal and opposite flange moments Mf spaced df apart form the bimoment

B = df Mf (1046)

The bending stresses induced by the bimoment are the warping normal stresses

σw = ∓Mf y

If= ∓E

df

2y

d2φ

dx2

shown in Figure 1024b These can also be obtained from equation 1037When the flange moments Mf vary along the member they induce equal and

opposite flange shears

Vf = minusdMf

dx= minusEIz

2

df

2

d3φ

dx3

as shown in Figure 1024b The warping shear stresses

τw = plusmn Vf

bf tf

(15 minus 6y2

b2f

)

(in which bf is the flange width) which are statically equivalent to these shear forcesare also shown in Figure 1024b They can also be obtained from equation 1042

The equal and opposite flange shears Vf are statically equivalent to the warpingtorque

Tw = Vf df = minusEIzd2f

4

d3φ

dx3

If this is compared with equation 1044 it can be deduced that the warping sectionconstant for the I-section is

Iw = Izd2f

4 (1047)

This result can also be obtained from equation 1040

476 Torsion members

1083 Warping torsion analysis of staticallydeterminate members

The twisted shape of a statically determinate member in warping torsion is givenby equation 1049 For example the cantilever shown in Figure 1025a the torqueTx is constant and equal to the applied torque T and so the twisted shape is givenby

minusEIwφ = Tx3

6+ A1x2

2+ A2x + A3 (1088)

The constants of integration A1 A2 and A3 depend on the boundary conditionsAt the support it is assumed that twisting is prevented so that

φ0 = 0

and that warping is also prevented so that (see equation 1034)(dφ

dx

)0

= 0

At the loaded end the member is free to warp (ie the warping normal stresses σw

are zero) so that (see equation 1037)(d2φ

dx2

)L

= 0

By substituting these conditions into equation 1088 the constants of integrationcan be determined as

A1 = minusTL

A2 = 0

A3 = 0

If these are substituted into equation 1088 the complete solution for the twistedshape is obtained as

minusEIwφ = Tx3

6minus TLx2

2

The maximum angle of twist occurs at the loaded end and is equal to

φL = TL3

3EIw

The warping shear stress distribution (see equation 1042) is constant along themember but the maximum warping normal stress (see equation 1037) occurs atthe support where d2φdx2 reaches its highest value

Torsion members 477

1084 Warping torsion analysis of staticallyindeterminate members

The warping torsion of the statically indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1026amay be analysed by taking the left-hand reaction torque T0 as the redundant Thedistribution of torque Tx is then given by (see Figure 1026b)

Tx = T0 minus mx

and equation 1049 becomes

minusEIwφ = T0x3

6minus mx4

24+ A1x2

2+ A2x + A3

After using the boundary conditions φ0 = (dφdx)0 = 0 the constants A2 and A3

are determined as

A2 = A3 = 0

while the condition φL = 0 requires that

A1 = minusT0L

3+ mL2

12

The additional boundary condition is (d2φdx2)L = 0 and so

T0 = 5mL8

Thus the complete solution is

minusEIwφ = m

(minusx4

24+ 5Lx3

48minus L2x2

16

)

The maximum angle of twist occurs near x = 058L and is approximately equal to00054mL4EIw The warping shear stresses are greatest at the left-hand supportwhere the torque Tx has its greatest value of 5mL8 The warping normal stressesare greatest at x = 5L8 where ndash EIwd2φdx2 has its maximum value of 9mL2128

1085 Non-uniform torsion analysis

The twisted shape of a member in non-uniform torsion is given by equation 1054For the example of the cantilever shown in Figure 1028a the torque Tx is constant

478 Torsion members

and equal to the applied torque T In this case a particular integral is

p(x) = Tx

GIt

while the boundary conditions require that

0 = A1 + A2 + A3

0 = T

GIt+ A1

aminus A2

a

0 = A1

a2eLa + A2

a2eminusLa

so that

φ = Tx

GItminus Ta

GIt(1 + eminus2La)

[e(xminus2L)a minus eminusxa + 1 minus eminus2La

]

At the fixed end the uniform torque is zero because dφdx = 0 Because ofthis the torque Tx there is resisted solely by the warping torque and the maximumwarping shear stresses occur at this point The value of d2φdx2 is greatest at thefixed end and therefore the value of the warping normal stress is also greatest thereThe value of dφdx is greatest at the loaded end of the cantilever and therefore thevalue of the shear stress due to uniform torsion is also greatest there The warpingtorque at the loaded end is

TwL = T2eminusLa

1 + eminus2La

which decreases from T to zero as La increases from 0 to infin Thus the warp-ing shear stresses at the loaded end are not zero but are less than those at thefixed end

109 Worked examples

1091 Example 1 ndash approximations for the serviceabilitytwist rotation

Problem The cantilever shown in Figure 1028 is 5 m long and has the propertiesshown in Figure 1037 If the serviceability end torque T is 3 kNm determineapproximate values of the serviceability end twist rotation either by

(a) assuming that the cantilever is in uniform torsion (EIw equiv 0) or(b) assuming that the cantilever is in warping torsion (GIt equiv 0) or(c) using the approximation of equation 1056

Torsion members 479

5175

101

z

yI

E

G

=

=

=

=

w

It

2093156

5331

127radius

Dimensions in mm

533 times 210 UB 92

210 000 Nmm2

81 000 Nmm2

757 cm4

160 dm6

Figure 1037 Examples 1ndash7

Solution

(a) If EIw = 0 then the end twist rotation (see Section 10221) is

φum = TL

GIt= 3 times 106 times 5000

81 000 times 757 times 104= 0245 radians = 140

(b) If GIt = 0 then the end twist rotation is (see Section 10322)

φwm = TL33EIw = 3 times 106 times 50003

3 times 210 000 times 16 times 1012= 0372 radians = 213

(c) Using the results of (a) and (b) above in the approximation of equation 1056

φm = 0245 times 0372

0245 + 0372= 0148 radians = 85

1092 Example 2 ndash serviceability twist rotation

Problem Use the solution obtained in Section 1085 to determine an accuratevalue of the serviceability end twist rotation of the cantilever of example 1

Solution Using equation 1051

a =radic

EIw

GIt=

radic(210 000 times 16 times 1012

81 000 times 757 times 104

)= 2341 mm

Therefore eminus2La = eminus2times50002341 = 001396

480 Torsion members

Using Section 1085

φL = TL

GIt

[1 minus a

L

(1 minus eminus2La)

(1 + eminus2La)

]

= 3times106times5000

81 000times757times104

[1minus2341

5000

(1 minus 001396)

(1 + 001396)

]= 0133 radians = 76

which is about 10 less than the approximate value of 85 obtained inSection 1091c

1093 Example 3 ndash elastic uniform torsion shear stress

Problem For the cantilever of example 2 determine the maximum elastic uniformtorsion shear stress caused by a strength design end torque of 5 kNm

Solution An expression for the nominal maximum elastic uniform torsion shearstress can be obtained by combining equations 108 and 1018 whence

τtmax asymp G

(dφ

dx

)max

tmax

An expression for dφdx can be obtained from the solution for φ inSection 1085 whence

dx= T

GIt

1 minus [e(xminus2L)a + eminusxa]

(1 + eminus2La)

The maximum value of this occurs at the free end x = L and is given by

(dφ

dx

)max

= T

GIt

[1 minus 2eminusLa

(1 + eminus2La)

]

Adapting the solution of example 2

(dφ

dx

)max

= T

GIt

[1 minus 2 times radic

(001396)

101396

]= 0767

T

GIt

Thus

τtmax asymp 0767Ttmax

Itasymp 0767 times 5 times 106 times 156

757 times 104Nmm2 asymp 790 Nmm2

Torsion members 481

This nominal maximum shear stress occurs at the centre of the long edge of theflange A similar value may be calculated for the opposite edge but the actualstresses near this point are increased because of the re-entrant corner at the junctionof the web and flange An approximate estimate of the stress concentration factorcan be made by using Figure 107b with

r

t= 127

156= 081

Thus the actual local maximum stress is approximately τtmax = 17 times 790 =134 Nmm2

1094 Example 4 ndash elastic warping shear and normal stresses

Problem For the cantilever of example 3 determine the maximum elastic warpingshear and normal stresses

Solution The maximum warping shear stress τw occurs at the fixed end (x = 0)of the cantilever (see Section 1085) where the uniform torque is zero Thus thetotal torque there is resisted only by the warping torque and so

Vf = Tdf

where Vf is the flange shear (see Section 1082) The shear stresses in the flangevary parabolically (see Figure 1024b) and so

τwmax = 15 Vf

bf tf

Thus

τwmax = 15 times (5 times 106)5175

2093 times 156Nmm2 = 44 Nmm2

The maximum warping normal stress σw occurs where d2φdx2 is a maximum(see equation 1037) An expression for d2φdx2 can be obtained from the solutionin Section 1085 for φ

whenced2φ

dx2= T

aGIt

[(minuse(xminus2L)a + eminusxa)

(1 + eminus2La)

]

The maximum value of this occurs at the fixed end x = 0 and is given by

(d2φ

dx2

)max

= T

aGIt

(1 minus eminus2La)

(1 + eminus2La)

482 Torsion members

The corresponding maximum warping normal stress (see Section 1082) is

σwmax = Edf bf

2 times 2

(d2φ

dx2

)max

= 210 000 times 5175 times 2093 times 5 times 106

2 times 2 times 2341 times 81 000 times 757 times 104times (1 minus 001396)

(1 + 001396)Nmm2

= 1926 Nmm2

1095 Example 5 ndash first yield design torque capacity

Problem If the cantilever of example 2 has a yield stress of 275 Nmm2 then useSection 1047 to determine the torque resistance which is consistent with EC3 anda first yield strength criterion

Solution In this case the maximum uniform torsion shear and warping torsionshear and normal stresses occur either at different points along the cantilever orelse at different points around the cross-section Because of this each stress maybe considered separately

For first yield in uniform torsion equation 1079 is equivalent to

τtτy le 1

in which τy asymp 275radic

3 = 159 Nmm2 Thus

τtmax le 159 Nmm2

Using Section 1093 a design torque of T = 5 kNm causes a maximum shear stressof τtmax = 790 Nmm2 if the stress concentration at the flangendashweb-junction isignored Thus the design uniform torsion torque resistance is

Tt = 5 times 159790 = 1005 kNm

The maximum warping shear stress τwmax caused by a design torque ofT = 5 kNm (see Section 1094) is 44 Nmm2 which is much less than the corre-sponding maximum uniform torsion shear stress τtmax = 790 Nmm2 Becauseof this the design torque resistance is not limited by the warping shear stress

For first yield in warping torsion equation 1079 reduces to

σwfy le 1

Thus

σwmax le 275 Nmm2

Using Section 1094 a design torque of T = 5 kNm causes a design warpingnormal stress of σwmax = 1926 Nmm2 Thus the design warping torsion torque

Torsion members 483

resistance is

Tw = 5 times 2751926 = 714 kNm

This is less than the value of 1005 kNm determined for uniform torsion and sothe design torque resistance is 714 kNm

1096 Example 6 ndash plastic collapse analysis

Problem Determine the plastic collapse torque of the cantilever of example 5

Uniform torsion plastic collapseUsing equation 1029

Ttp = (2 times 2093 times 15622 + (5331 minus 2 times 156)times 10122

)times 159 Nmm = 1215 kNm

Using Figure 1020 αtT = Ttp = 1215 kNm

Warping torsion plastic collapse

Using equation 1060 Mfp = 275 times 20932 times 1564 Nmm = 4698 kNmUsing Figure 1020 αwT = Mfpdf L = 4698 times 51755000 = 486 kNm

Non-uniform torsion plastic collapse

Using equation 1064 αxT = 1215 + 486 = 1701 kNm

1097 Example 7 ndash plastic design

Problem Determine the plastic design torque capacity of the cantilever ofexample 5

Section classification Using equation 1065

tf = 156 mm fy = 275 Nmm2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924

cf (tf ε) = (20932 minus 1012 minus 127)(156 times 0924) = 60 lt 9

and so the section is Class 1 and plastic design can be used

Plastic design torque resistance

Using the result of section 1096 T = 1701 kNmwhich is significantly higher than the first yield design torque resistance of714 kNm determined in Section 1095

484 Torsion members

1 0 0

1 2 6

6

6

8 2 7 6 61 54200

20

20

10

L2 L4 L4

mL 4m

L L= = 00 0= = 0

S C150 500

(c)(b) Channel Statically indeterminatebeam

section(a) Box section

Figure 1038 Examples 8ndash13

1010 Unworked examples

10101 Example 8 ndash uniform torsion of a box section

Determine the torsion section constant It for the box section shown inFigure 1038a and find the maximum elastic shear stress caused by a uniformtorque of 10 kNm

10102 Example 9 ndash warping torsion section constant of achannel section

Determine the warping torsion section constant Iw for the channel section shownin Figure 1038b

10103 Example 10 ndash approximation for the maximumtwist rotation

The steel beam shown in Figure 1038c is 5 m long has the cross-section shownin Figure 1038b and a torque per unit length of m = 1000 Nmm Determineapproximate values of the maximum angle of twist rotation by assuming

(a) that the beam is in uniform torsion (EIw equiv 0) or(b) that the beam is in warping torsion (GIt equiv 0) or(c) the approximation of equation 1056

10104 Example 11 ndash accurate twist rotation

If the steel beam shown in Figure 1026 is 5 m long and has the cross-sectionshown in Figure 1038b determine an accurate value for the maximum angle oftwist rotation

Torsion members 485

10105 Example 12 ndash elastic stresses

Use the solutions of examples 9 and 11 to determine

(a) the maximum nominal uniform torsion shear stress(b) the maximum warping shear stress and(c) the maximum warping normal stress

10106 Example 13 ndash design

Determine the maximum design torque per unit length that should be permitted onthe beam of examples 11 and 12 if the beam has a yield stress of fy = 275 Nmm2

References

1 Kollbrunner CF and Basler K (1969) Torsion in Structures 2nd edition Springer-Verlag Berlin

2 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

3 El Darwish IA and Johnston BG (1965) Torsion of structural shapes Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST1 pp 203ndash27

4 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2005) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th editionBlackwell Scientific Publications Oxford

5 Terrington JS (1968) Combined bending and torsion of beams and girders Publica-tion 31 (First Part) British Construction Steelwork Association London

6 Nethercot DA Salter PR and Malik AS (1989) Design of members subject tocombined bending and torsion SCI Publication 057 The Steel Construction InstituteAscot

7 Hancock GJ and Harrison HB (1972) A general method of analysis of stressesin thin-walled sections with open and closed parts Civil Engineering TransactionsInstitution of Engineers Australia CE14 No 2 pp 181ndash8

8 Papangelis JP and Hancock GJ (1975) THIN-WALL ndash Cross Section Analysis andFinite Strip Buckling Analysis of Thin-walled Structures ndash Users Manual Centre forAdvanced Structural Engineering University of Sydney

9 Von Karman T and Chien W-Z (1946) Torsion with variable twist Journal of theAeronautical Sciences 13 No 10 pp 503ndash10

10 Smith FA Thomas FM and Smith J0 (1970) Torsion analysis of heavy box beamsin structures Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST3 pp 613ndash35

11 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

12 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1972) Elastic stability of tapered I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST3 pp 713ndash28

13 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1975) Elastic behaviour of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST8 pp 1661ndash78

14 Vlasov VZ (1961) Thin-walled Elastic Beams 2nd edition Israel Program forScientific Translations Jerusalem

15 Zbirohowski-Koscia K (1967) Thin-walled Beams Crosby Lockwood and Son LtdLondon

486 Torsion members

16 Piaggio HTH (1962) Differential Equations 3rd edition G Bell London17 Trahair NS and Pi Y-L (1996) Simplified torsion design of compact I-beams Steel

Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 30 No 1 pp 2ndash1918 Trahair NS (1999) Plastic torsion analysis of mono- and point-symmetric beams

Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 125 No 2 pp 175ndash8219 Dinno KS and Merchant W (1965)Aprocedure for calculating the plastic collapse of

I-sections under bending and torsion The Structural Engineer 43 No 7 pp 219ndash22120 Farwell CR and Galambos TV (1969) Non-uniform torsion of steel beams in

inelastic range Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 95 No ST12 pp 2813ndash2921 Aalberg A (1995) An experimental study of beam-columns subjected to combined

torsion bending and axial actions Dring thesis Department of Civil EngineeringNorwegian Institute of Technology Trondheim

22 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1995) Inelastic torsion of steel I-beams Journal of StructuralEngineering ASCE 121 No 4 pp 609ndash20

23 Trahair NS (2005) Non-linear elastic non-uniform torsion Journal of StructuralEngineering ASCE 131 No 7 pp 1135ndash42

24 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 ndash Design of Steel Structures ndash Part1ndash5 Plated structural elements BSI London

25 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Inelastic bending and torsion of steel I-beams Journalof Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 12 pp 3397ndash417

26 Subcommittee on Box Girders of the ASCE-AASHO Task Committee on Flexu-ral Members (1971) Progress report on steel box bridges Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 97 No ST4 pp 1175ndash86

27 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Warping and distortion at I-section jointsJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST3 pp 547ndash64

28 Goodier JN and Barton MV (1944) The effects of web deformation on the torsionof I-beams Journal of Applied Mechanics ASME 2 pp A-35ndashA-40

29 Kubo GG Johnston BG and Eney WJ (1956) Non-uniform torsion of plategirders Transactions ASCE 121 pp 759ndash85

30 Wright RN Abdel-Samad SR and Robinson AR (1968) BEF analogy for analysisof box girders Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 94 No ST7 pp 1719ndash43

31 Hetenyi M (1946) Beams on Elastic Foundations University of Michigan Press

Index

amplification 69 299 306 307 312 320352 362 367 467

analysis 3 5 6 21ndash4 351ndash66 advanced24 364ndash6 371 distortion 469ndash71dynamic 19 elastic first-order 22 23156 157 352 353 369 second-order24 361ndash3 372 elastic buckling 2451ndash4 67ndash73 74ndash9 83ndash9 228ndash30 241245ndash9 251 263ndash5 268ndash71 273ndash5353ndash61 in-plane 352ndash66 joint 401ndash3405 420ndash3 plastic first-order 24175ndash82 302ndash4 363 second-order seeanalysis advanced preliminary 6 23sub-assemblage 365 torsionnon-uniform 449ndash61 473ndash8 plastic447ndash9 458ndash61 uniform 445ndash7 454471ndash3 warping 455ndash7

area effective 38 44 63ndash5 126ndash8gross section 36 37 42ndash4 63ndash5 netsection 36ndash9 42ndash4 reducedsection 38

aspect ratio 103 104 107 115119 125

axis principal 157ndash63 190ndash5axis of twist 78 88 437 443 452

beam 1 154ndash226 227ndash94 built-in 179182 198ndash202 continuous 256ndash61hot-rolled 229 238 243monosymmetric 263ndash6non-uniform 266 stepped 266tapered 266 welded 229 238

beam-column 295ndash346beam-tie 39 44 347bearing 124ndash6 138 bolt 392 410ndash13

plate 124ndash6 415BEF analogy 470

behaviour 14ndash17 brittle 13 15dynamic 18ndash19 elastic 8 22 2333 155 inelastic 15 55ndash61 81 82175 237ndash40 305 316ndash18 in-plane154ndash226 296ndash311 323ndash6 347 350ndash66400ndash6 420ndash2 interaction 16 256ndash61351 467 joint 398ndash411 linear 14ndash1633 349 351ndash3 material 8ndash14 55ndash61member 14 15 non-linear geometrical54 79ndash81 234ndash7 272ndash3 296ndash302361ndash3 material 15 16 24 58 175ndash82296 304ndash7 363ndash6 447ndash9 458ndash61out-of-plane 227ndash94 311ndash19 326ndash8369ndash72 post-buckling 100 109ndash12117ndash18 structure 15ndash17 347ndash51

bending 37ndash40 54 79 118ndash24 154ndash226234ndash7 272 biaxial 159 191 295319ndash21 466

bimoment 453ndash4 plastic 458ndash60 464blunder 26bolt 2 392 396ndash402 410ndash14 bearing

410ndash13 preloaded friction-grip 393396 400 413ndash14

bracing 67 73 83 87 186 188 247ndash9256ndash61 467ndash9

brittle fracture 13buckling flexural 15 50ndash99

flexural-torsional 76ndash8 88 89 227ndash94295 311ndash19 326ndash8 369ndash72 frame353ndash61 369ndash71 inelastic 55ndash61 81ndash2108 237ndash40 316 lateral see bucklingflexural-torsional lateral-torsional seebuckling flexural-torsional local 1563 64 100ndash53 184 462ndash4 465torsional 76ndash8 88 89

buckling coefficient 103ndash8 114 119ndash21125 139ndash41

buckling length see effective length

488 Index

cantilever 179 253ndash5 271 455 457 477propped 182 202ndash5

capacity see resistancecentroid 37 168ndash70 192circular hollow section 45 128 463cleat 392 393 407 408cold working 8component method of design 401 403 404compression member 50ndash99compression resistance curve 62connection see jointconnector 392ndash4 combination of 400crack 9 13critical stress see stress bucklingcrookedness 35 54 61 79 100 112

234ndash7 272 307ndash9 324curvature initial see crookedness major

axis 230

defect 10 13deflection 4 25 30 39 54 79 154 156

163 189 190 296ndash9 323ndash6 352 361deflection limit 189depth-thickness ratio 115 121design 3ndash7 24ndash30 elastic 183ndash7 frame

348 366ndash9 371 limit states 25 28plastic 184 368 464 468 semi-rigid351 serviceability 189 369 465simple 350 stiffness 25 30strength 27ndash9 beam 183ndash9 240ndash5beam-column 309ndash11 318 321ndash3brittle fracture 13 compressionmember 62ndash4 74ndash8 fatigue 9ndash13frame 348 366ndash9 371 plate 126ndash39414ndash17 tension member 42ndash5 torsionmember 461ndash6 ultimate load 27working stress 27

design by buckling analysis 74 241design code 7 27design criterion 24design process 4ndash7design requirements 3 4destabilizing load 231ndash3 torsion 466diaphragm 469dispersion 126 139distortion 253 469ndash71ductility 8 13 34 175

effective area 126effective length beam 245ndash52 258ndash61

273 beam-column 315 327compression member 63 65ndash74 83 86frame 353ndash61

effective width local buckling 111 121129 130 shear lag 174

elasticity 8endurance limit 10example beam 205ndash25 273ndash91

beam-column 329ndash44 compressionmember 89ndash98 frame 373ndash88joint 423ndash31 tension member 45ndash9thin-plate element 141ndash52 torsionmember 478ndash85

fabrication 14 154 393 406factor of safety 27fastener see connectorfatigue 9ndash13fracture 34 36 brittle 13frame 15 347ndash91 advanced analysis 24

364ndash6 design 366ndash9 371 372 elasticbuckling 24 353ndash61 first-orderanalysis 23 352 flexural 350ndash73pin-jointed 348 350 plastic analysis24 352 363 rigid 74 261ndash3 351ndash72second-order analysis 24 361 362semi-rigid 351 serviceability 369statically determinate 22 348 350statically indeterminate 23 349three-dimensional 372 triangulated348 349 two-dimensional 350ndash72

friction coefficient 413

gauge 37gusset 395

hole 35ndash7 41 42

impact 14 18imperfection geometrical see twist

initial material 10 13 56ndash61237ndash40

interaction bearing and tension 414ndash15compression and bending 131 295ndash346shear and bending 121ndash4 137 shearand tension 412 413 416 tension andbending 39 44

interaction behaviour see behaviourinteraction

joint 392ndash432 angle cleat 408 angleseat 407 base plate 410 beamseat 410 bolted moment end plate 409bolted splice 409ndash10 eccentric 37ndash944 fin plate 408 flexible endplate 408ndash9 force 396 398 force and

Index 489

moment 397ndash8 405 moment 397400ndash5 pin 393 preloadedfriction-grip 393 396 399 400 413rivet 394 web side plate 408 weldedmoment 408ndash9 welded splice 409

joint flexibility 399 404

limit state 25 28 30load combination 20 dead 17 design

effect 28 design resistance 28dynamic 18 19 earth or ground-water19 earthquake 19 impact 13 18imposed 18 indirect 20 intermediate76 nominal 27 patch 125 repeated18 snow 18 squash 50 60 82 topflange 233 254 wind 19

load effect 28load factor 20 27 28load sharing 399loading code 6

maximum distortion energy theory 9 122414 418

mechanism 156 175 178ndash82 198ndash205351 363 368 449 459 462 464

mechanism method 180 198ndash205member non-uniform 76 266

structural 1ndash2membrane analogy 436 440 444Minerrsquos rule 12modulus effective elastic 56 108

effective section 130 185 elasticsection 130 185 plastic section 130176 185 198 245 reduced 56 81shear 14 170 230 312 313 316 326439 strain-hardening 8 59 108 237tangent 55 237 Youngrsquos 8 14

monosymmetry property 263ndash5 275

non-linear behaviour see behaviournon-linear

partial factor 21 28pin 392 393plastic hinge 154 175ndash82 188 363

449 459plastic moment 130 175ndash82 188 197

363 459plastic uniform torque 447 463plate 395 396 401 405 407 408 409

410 414ndash17plate assembly 107 120Poissonrsquos ratio 103 114 119 125 140

principal axes 157ndash63 190ndash5probability 9 20 28product second moment of area 159 191ndash5prying force 403

redistribution post-buckling 109ndash12 117121 yielding 34 38 41 126175ndash82 364

residual stress see stress residualresistance bearing 138 187 biaxial

bending 321ndash3 bimoment 464bolt 410ndash14 bolted plate 414ndash17compression 62 74ndash8 126ndash32concentrated load 124ndash6 138 factor27 in-plane 309ndash11 member 45 64130 131 185 242ndash5 310 moment183ndash6 242ndash5 309ndash11 318out-of-plane 240ndash5 317ndash19 section42 44 126 130 131 185 243 245309 shear 133ndash8 186 uniformtorsion 463 weld 417ndash20

restraint end 65 67ndash73 85ndash7 250ndash3 255256ndash62 273 315 327 intermediate 6783 247ndash9 lateral buckling 186 188minor axis rotation 250 251 256ndash62273 315 327 rigid 65 245 twist 250252 warping 250 251 256ndash62 273315 327

restraint stiffness 67ndash71 73 84 85 247ndash9251ndash3 256ndash63 273 315 327

return period 19rigidity flexural 52 82 230 torsional 77

89 230 268 433 warping 77 89 230268 433

rigid-plastic assumption 176 178rivet 392 394rotation capacity 368 405

safety 4 26 27safety index 28sand heap analogy 447second moment of area 156 157 191ndash5section asymmetric 77 198 Class 1 126

128 131 184 187 188 309 462ndash5Class 2 126 128 131 184 187 188309 462ndash5 Class 3 126 128 131 184462ndash5 Class 4 126 128 131 184462ndash5 closed 170ndash2 196 433 442ndash5monosymmetric 77 263ndash6 274open 164ndash70 196 433 440 rectangular164 439 448 rolled 1 58 237 solid 1195 438 thin-walled 1 191ndash5 196welded 238

490 Index

serviceability 4 25 30 189 369 413 465settlement 20 157Shanleyrsquos theory 58shear 113ndash24 133ndash8 163ndash75 186 187

195ndash7 bolt 393 396 399 410 411412 plate 416

shear and bending 121ndash4 137shear and tension 412 416shear centre 168 452shear flow 164ndash7 196 442ndash4shear lag 38 172ndash5slenderness compression member 53 55

62 66 75 flange 111 126ndash9 plate104 116 126ndash9 web 126ndash9

slip 396 399 401 413Southwell plot 54 235splice 396 397 398 406 409squash load see load squashstagger 36statical method 181 200stiffener 105 106 115 117 119 123 124

126 132 135 137 139 187 188stiffness see restraint stiffnessstrain 8 33 158 170 437 443 453strain-hardening 8 35 36 58 108 113

176 237strength 27ndash30 beam 183ndash7 188 240ndash5

266 267 beam-column 309ndash11 318321ndash3 bolt 410ndash14 bolted plate414ndash17 compression member 64 7476 frame 366ndash9 371 local buckling126ndash39 tensile 8 34 36 42 43 tensionmember 42ndash5 torsion member 461ndash5468 469 weld 417ndash20 see alsoresistance

strength limit state 20 28stress bending 157ndash63 190 buckling 53

103 109 111 113 117 119 122 124134 normal 8 permissible 27residual 33 58 61 82 112 155 237239 shear 9 113ndash18 121ndash4 133 136137 163ndash75 186 195ndash7 411 412 416417ndash20 436ndash44 451 454 458 460462 471 475 476 477 478 shearyield 9 114 116 133 186 411 417447 463 ultimate tensile see strengthtensile warping normal 417 449 453458 460 462 yield 8 34 50 104 154236 301 414 458

stress concentration 10 13 33 37 40 442stress raiser 13stress range 10structure statically determinate 22 348

350 statically indeterminate 23 349352 steel 1

tension bolt 393 411 412 plate 414ndash17tension field 117 134 135 136tension member 33ndash49torque see torsiontorsion 433ndash86 non-uniform 433

449ndash61 uniform 433 436ndash49 463warping 433 449ndash57

torsion member 1 433torsion section constant 438 440 441 443twist 76ndash8 88 227 228 239 246 250

252 268ndash73 275 311 326 369433ndash86 initial 234ndash7 272

unbuttoning connection 349uncertainty 25 27 401

vibration 19 30 189virtual work method 201 205

warping 170 173 197 230 268 433 436442ndash4 449ndash61

warping section constant 312 326 328433 453 455

web 116ndash18 122ndash6 128ndash39 165 172186 187 188 397

weld 392 394 397 400 403 407 408409 410 421 423 butt 394 417fillet 394 417ndash19

wind load see load windwind pressure dynamic 19wind speed basic 19

yield 8 beam 175ndash82 184 185 186 197234ndash9 272 beam-column 300ndash9 316324 compression member 54ndash6079ndash82 frame 363 plate 101 104 106108 112 114 117 119 121 122 125126 129 131 137 138 414 tensionmember 34 35 39 40 42 torsionmember 447ndash9 458ndash61 461ndash5467 468

  • Book Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Units and conversion factors
  • Glossary of terms
  • Notations
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
  • Chapter 2 Tension members
  • Chapter 3 Compression members
  • Chapter 4 Local buckling of thin-plate elements
  • Chapter 5 In-plane bending of beams
  • Chapter 6 Lateral buckling of beams
  • Chapter 7 Beam-columns
  • Chapter 8 Frames
  • Chapter 9 Joints
  • Chapter 10 Torsion members
  • Index
Page 3: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3

Also available from Taylor amp Francis

Steel Structures Practical Design Studies3rd EditionH Al Nagiem andT MacGinley Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash30156ndash5

Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash30157ndash2

Limit States Design of Structural SteelworkD Nethercot Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash419ndash26080ndash6

Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash419ndash26090ndash5

Fracture MechanicsM Janssen et al Pb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash34622ndash1

Assessment and Refurbishment of SteelStructuresZ Agocs et al Hb ISBN 978ndash0ndash415ndash23598ndash3

Information and ordering details

For price availability and ordering visit our website wwwtandfcoukbuiltenvironment

Alternatively our books are available from all good bookshops

The Behaviour and Designof Steel Structures to EC3

Fourth edition

NS Trahair MA BradfordDA Nethercot and L Gardner

First edition published 1977Second edition 1988 revised second edition published 1988Third edition ndash Australian (AS4100) published 1998Third edition ndash British (BS5950) published 2001

Fourth edition published 2008byTaylor amp Francis2 Park Square Milton Park Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN

Simultaneously published in the USA and CanadabyTaylor amp Francis270 Madison Ave NewYork NY 10016

Taylor amp Francis is an imprint of theTaylor amp Francis Groupan informa business

copy 1977 1988 2001 2008 NS Trahair MA BradfordDA Nethercot and L Gardner

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reprinted orreproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronicmechanical or other means now known or hereafterinvented including photocopying and recording or in anyinformation storage or retrieval system without permission inwriting from the publishers

The publisher makes no representation express or impliedwith regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book andcannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any efforts oromissions that may be made

British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication DataThe behaviour and design of steel structures to EC3 NS Trahair

[et al] ndash 4th edp cm

Includes bibliographical references and index1 Building Iron and steel I Trahair NS

TA684T7 20086241prime821ndashdc22 2007016421

ISBN10 0ndash415ndash41865ndash8 (hbk)ISBN10 0ndash415ndash41866ndash6 (pbk)ISBN10 0ndash203ndash93593ndash4 (ebk)

ISBN13 978ndash0ndash415ndash41865ndash2 (hbk)ISBN13 978ndash0ndash415ndash41866ndash9 (pbk)ISBN13 978ndash0ndash203ndash93593ndash4 (ebk)

This edition published in the Taylor amp Francis e-Library 2007

ldquoTo purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor amp Francis or Routledgersquoscollection of thousands of eBooks please go to wwweBookstoretandfcoukrdquo

ISBN 0-203-93593-4 Master e-book ISBN

Contents

Preface ixUnits and conversion factors xGlossary of terms xiNotations xv

1 Introduction 1

11 Steel structures 112 Design 313 Material behaviour 814 Member and structure behaviour 1415 Loads 1716 Analysis of steel structures 2117 Design of steel structures 24

References 30

2 Tension members 33

21 Introduction 3322 Concentrically loaded tension members 3323 Eccentrically and locally connected tension members 3724 Bending of tension members 3925 Stress concentrations 4026 Design of tension members 4227 Worked examples 4528 Unworked examples 48

References 49

3 Compression members 50

31 Introduction 5032 Elastic compression members 51

vi Contents

33 Inelastic compression members 5534 Real compression members 6135 Design of compression members 6236 Restrained compression members 6537 Other compression members 7438 Appendix ndash elastic compression members 7839 Appendix ndash inelastic compression members 81310 Appendix ndash effective lengths of compression members 83311 Appendix ndash torsional buckling 88312 Worked examples 89313 Unworked examples 96

References 98

4 Local buckling of thin-plate elements 100

41 Introduction 10042 Plate elements in compression 10243 Plate elements in shear 11344 Plate elements in bending 11845 Plate elements in bending and shear 12146 Plate elements in bearing 12447 Design against local buckling 12648 Appendix ndash elastic buckling of plate elements

in compression 13949 Worked examples 141410 Unworked examples 151

References 152

5 In-plane bending of beams 154

51 Introduction 15452 Elastic analysis of beams 15653 Bending stresses in elastic beams 15754 Shear stresses in elastic beams 16355 Plastic analysis of beams 17556 Strength design of beams 18357 Serviceability design of beams 18958 Appendix ndash bending stresses in elastic beams 19059 Appendix ndash thin-walled section properties 191510 Appendix ndash shear stresses in elastic beams 195511 Appendix ndash plastic analysis of beams 197

Contents vii

512 Worked examples 205513 Unworked examples 224

References 225

6 Lateral buckling of beams 227

61 Introduction 22762 Elastic beams 22863 Inelastic beams 23764 Real beams 23965 Design against lateral buckling 24066 Restrained beams 24567 Cantilevers and overhanging beams 25368 Braced and continuous beams 25669 Rigid frames 261610 Monosymmetric beams 263611 Non-uniform beams 266612 Appendix ndash elastic beams 268613 Appendix ndash effective lengths of beams 273614 Appendix ndash monosymmetric beams 274615 Worked examples 275616 Unworked examples 290

References 291

7 Beam-columns 295

71 Introduction 29572 In-plane behaviour of isolated beam-columns 29673 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of isolated

beam-columns 31174 Biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns 31975 Appendix ndash in-plane behaviour of elastic beam-columns 32376 Appendix ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling of

elastic beam-columns 32677 Worked examples 32978 Unworked examples 343

References 345

8 Frames 347

81 Introduction 34782 Triangulated frames 348

viii Contents

83 Two-dimensional flexural frames 35084 Three-dimensional flexural frames 37285 Worked examples 37386 Unworked examples 386

References 388

9 Joints 392

91 Introduction 39292 Joint components 39293 Arrangement of joints 39694 Behaviour of joints 39895 Common joints 40696 Design of bolts 41097 Design of bolted plates 41498 Design of welds 41799 Appendix ndash elastic analysis of joints 420910 Worked examples 423911 Unworked examples 431

References 432

10 Torsion members 433

101 Introduction 433102 Uniform torsion 436103 Non-uniform torsion 449104 Torsion design 461105 Torsion and bending 466106 Distortion 469107 Appendix ndash uniform torsion 471108 Appendix ndash non-uniform torsion 473109 Worked examples 4781010 Unworked examples 484

References 485

Index 487

Preface

This fourth British edition has been directed specifically to the design of steel structures inaccordance with Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures The principal part of this is Part1-1General Rules and Rules for Buildings and this is referred to generally in the text asEC3 Also referred to in the text are Part 1-5 Plated Structural Elements and Part 1-8Design Of Joints which are referred to as EC3-1-5 and EC3-1-8 EC3 will be accompaniedby NationalAnnexes which will contain any National Determined Parameters for the UnitedKingdom which differ from the recommendations given in EC3

Designers who have previously used BS5950 (which is discussed in the third Britishedition of this book) will see a number of significant differences in EC3 One of the moreobvious is the notation The notation in this book has been changed generally so that it isconsistent with EC3

Another significant difference is the general absence of tables of values computed fromthe basic design equations which might be used to facilitate manual design Some design-ers will want to prepare their own tables but in some cases the complexities of the basicequations are such that computer programs are required for efficient design This is espe-cially the case for members under combined compression and bending which are discussedin Chapter 7 However the examples in this book are worked in full and do not rely on suchdesign aids

EC3 does not provide approximations for calculating the lateral buckling resistancesof beams but instead expects the designer to be able to determine the elastic bucklingmoment to be used in the design equations Additional information to assist designers inthis determination has been given in Chapter 6 of this book EC3 also expects the designerto be able to determine the elastic buckling loads of compression members The additionalinformation given in Chapter 3 has been retained to assist designers in the calculation ofthe elastic buckling loads

EC3 provides elementary rules for the design of members in torsion These are gener-alised and extended in Chapter 10 which contains a general treatment of torsion togetherwith a number of design aids

The preparation of this fourth British edition has provided an opportunity to revise thetext generally to incorporate the results of recent findings and research This is in accordancewith the principal objective of the book to provide students and practising engineers withan understanding of the relationships between structural behaviour and the design criteriaimplied by the rules of design codes such as EC3

NS Trahair MA Bradford DA Nethercot and L GardnerApril 2007

Units and conversion factors

Units

While most expressions and equations used in this book are arranged so that theyare non-dimensional there are a number of exceptions In all of these SI units areused which are derived from the basic units of kilogram (kg) for mass metre (m)for length and second (s) for time

The SI unit of force is the newton (N) which is the force which causes a mass of1 kg to have an acceleration of 1 ms2 The acceleration due to gravity is 9807 ms2

approximately and so the weight of a mass of 1 kg is 9807 NThe SI unit of stress is the pascal (Pa) which is the average stress exerted by a

force of 1 N on an area of 1 m2 The pascal is too small to be convenient in structuralengineering and it is common practice to use either the megapascal (1 MPa =106 Pa) or the identical newton per square millimetre (1 Nmm2 = 106 Pa) Thenewton per square millimetre (Nmm2) is used generally in this book

Table of conversion factors

To Imperial (British) units To SI units

1 kg = 0068 53 slug 1 slug = 1459 kg1 m = 3281 ft 1 ft = 0304 8 m

= 3937 in 1 in = 0025 4 m1 mm = 0003 281 ft 1 ft = 3048 mm

= 0039 37 in 1 in = 254 mm1 N = 0224 8 lb 1 lb = 4448 N1 kN = 0224 8 kip 1 kip = 4448 kN

= 0100 36 ton 1 ton = 9964 kN1 Nmm2lowastdagger = 0145 0 kipin2 (ksi) 1 kipin2 = 6895 Nmm2

= 0064 75 tonin2 1 tonin2 = 1544 Nmm2

1 kNm = 0737 6 kip ft 1 kip ft = 1356 kNm= 0329 3 ton ft 1 ton ft = 3037 kNm

Noteslowast 1 Nmm2 = 1 MPadagger There are some dimensionally inconsistent equations used in this book which arise

because a numerical value (in Nmm2) is substituted for the Youngrsquos modulus of elasticityE while the yield stress fy remains algebraic The value of the yield stress fy used in theseequations should therefore be expressed in Nmm2 Care should be used in convertingthese equations from SI to Imperial units

xii Glossary of terms

Distortion A mode of deformation in which the cross-section of a memberchanges shape

Effective length The length of an equivalent simply supported member whichhas the same elastic buckling load as the actual member Referred to in EC3 asthe buckling length

Effective width That portion of the width of a flat plate which has a non-uniformstress distribution (caused by local buckling or shear lag) which may be con-sidered as fully effective when the non-uniformity of the stress distribution isignored

Elastic buckling analysis An analysis of the elastic buckling of the member orframe out of the plane of loading

Elastic buckling load The load at elastic buckling Referred to in EC3 as theelastic critical buckling load

Elastic buckling stress The maximum stress at elastic buckling Referred to inEC3 as the elastic critical buckling stress

Factor of safety The factor by which the strength is divided to obtain the workingload capacity and the maximum permissible stress

Fastener A bolt pin rivet or weld used in a connectionFatigue A mode of failure in which a member fractures after many applications

of loadFirst-order analysis An analysis in which equilibrium is formulated for the

undeformed position of the structure so that the moments caused by productsof the loads and deflections are ignored

Flexural buckling A mode of buckling in which a member deflectsFlexuralndashtorsional buckling A mode of buckling in which a member deflects

and twists Referred to in EC3 as torsionalndashflexural buckling or lateralndashtorsionalbuckling

Friction-grip joint A joint in which forces are transferred by friction forces gen-erated between plates by clamping them together with preloaded high-strengthbolts

Geometrical imperfection Initial crookedness or twist of a memberGirt A horizontal member between columns which supports wall sheetingGusset A short-plate element used in a connectionImposed load The load assumed to act as a result of the use of the structure but

excluding wind loadInelastic behaviour Deformations accompanied by yieldingIn-plane behaviour The behaviour of a member which deforms only in the plane

of the applied loadsJoint The means by which members are connected together and through which

forces and moments are transmittedLateral buckling Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of a beam Referred to in EC3 as

lateralndashtorsional bucklingLimit states design Amethod of design in which the performance of the structure

is assessed by comparison with a number of limiting conditions of usefulness

Glossary of terms xiii

The most common conditions are the strength limit state and the serviceabilitylimit state

Load effects Internal forces and moments induced by the loadsLoad factor A factor used to multiply a nominal load to obtain part of the design

loadLoads Forces acting on a structureLocal buckling A mode of buckling which occurs locally (rather than generally)

in a thin-plate element of a memberMechanism A structural system with a sufficient number of frictionless and

plastic hinges to allow it to deform indefinitely under constant loadMember A one-dimensional structural element which supports transverse or

longitudinal loads or momentsNominal load The load magnitude determined from a loading code or

specificationNon-uniform torsion The general state of torsion in which the twist of the

member varies non-uniformlyPlastic analysis Amethod of analysis in which the ultimate strength of a structure

is computed by considering the conditions for which there are sufficient plastichinges to transform the structure into a mechanism

Plastic hinge A fully yielded cross-section of a member which allows themember portions on either side to rotate under constant moment (the plasticmoment)

Plastic section A section capable of reaching and maintaining the full plasticmoment until a plastic collapse mechanism is formed Referred to in EC3 as aClass 1 section

Post-buckling strength A reserve of strength after buckling which is possessedby some thin-plate elements

Preloaded bolts High-strength bolts used in friction-grip jointsPurlin A horizontal member between main beams which supports roof sheetingReduced modulus The modulus of elasticity used to predict the buckling of

inelastic members under the so called constant applied load because it isreduced below the elastic modulus

Residual stresses The stresses in an unloaded member caused by non-uniformplastic deformation or by uneven cooling after rolling flame cutting or welding

Rigid frame A frame with rigid connections between members Referred to inEC3 as a continuous frame

Second-order analysis An analysis in which equilibrium is formulated for thedeformed position of the structure so that the moments caused by the productsof the loads and deflections are included

Semi-compact section A section which can reach the yield stress but whichdoes not have sufficient resistance to inelastic local buckling to allow it to reachor to maintain the full plastic moment while a plastic mechanism is formingReferred to in EC3 as a Class 3 section

Semi-rigid frame A frame with semi-rigid connections between membersReferred to in EC3 as a semi-continuous frame

xiv Glossary of terms

Service loads The design loads appropriate for the serviceability limit stateShear centre The point in the cross-section of a beam through which the resultant

transverse force must act if the beam is not to twistShear lag A phenomenon which occurs in thin wide flanges of beams in which

shear straining causes the distribution of bending normal stresses to becomesensibly non-uniform

Simple frame A frame for which the joints may be assumed not to transmitmoments

Slender section Asection which does not have sufficient resistance to local buck-ling to allow it to reach the yield stress Referred to in EC3 as a Class 4 section

Splice A connection between two similar collinear membersSquash load The value of the compressive axial load which will cause yielding

throughout a short memberStiffener A plate or section attached to a web to strengthen a memberStrain-hardening Astressndashstrain state which occurs at stresses which are greater

than the yield stressStrength limit state The state of collapse or loss of structural integritySystem length Length between adjacent lateral brace points or between brace

point and an adjacent end of the memberTangent modulus The slope of the inelastic stressndashstrain curve which is used to

predict buckling of inelastic members under increasing loadTensile strength The maximum nominal stress which can be reached in tensionTension field A mode of shear transfer in the thin web of a stiffened plate girder

which occurs after elastic local buckling takes place In this mode the tensiondiagonal of each stiffened panel behaves in the same way as does the diagonaltension member of a parallel chord truss

Tension member A member which supports axial tension loadsTorsional buckling A mode of buckling in which a member twistsUltimate load design A method of design in which the ultimate load capacity

of the structure is compared with factored loadsUniform torque That part of the total torque which is associated with the rate

of change of the angle of twist of the member Referred to in EC3 as St Venanttorque

Uniform torsion The special state of torsion in which the angle of twist of themember varies linearly Referred to in EC3 as St Venant torsion

Warping A mode of deformation in which plane cross-sections do not remainin plane

Warping torque The other part of the total torque (than the uniform torque)This only occurs during non-uniform torsion and is associated with changes inthe warping of the cross-sections

Working load design A method of design in which the stresses caused by theservice loads are compared with maximum permissible stresses

Yield strength The average stress during yielding when significant strainingtakes place Usually the minimum yield strength in tension specified for theparticular steel

Glossary of terms

Actions The loads to which a structure is subjectedAdvanced analysis An analysis which takes account of second-order effects

inelastic behaviour residual stresses and geometrical imperfectionsBeam A member which supports transverse loads or moments onlyBeam-column A member which supports transverse loads or moments which

cause bending and axial loads which cause compressionBiaxial bending The general state of a member which is subjected to bending

actions in both principal planes together with axial compression and torsionactions

Brittle fracture Amode of failure under a tension action in which fracture occurswithout yielding

Buckling A mode of failure in which there is a sudden deformation in a directionor plane normal to that of the loads or moments acting

Buckling length The length of an equivalent simply supported member whichhas the same elastic buckling load as the actual member

Cleat A short-length component (often of angle cross-section) used in aconnection

Column A member which supports axial compression loadsCompact section Asection capable of reaching the full plastic moment Referred

to in EC3 as a Class 2 sectionComponent method of design A method of joint design in which the behaviour

of the joint is synthesised from the characteristics of its componentsConnection A jointDead load The weight of all permanent construction Referred to in EC3 as

permanent loadDeformation capacity A measure of the ability of a structure to deform as a

plastic collapse mechanism develops without otherwise failingDesign load A combination of factored nominal loads which the structure is

required to resistDesign resistance The capacity of the structure or element to resist the design

load

Notations

The following notation is used in this book Usually only one meaning is assignedto each symbol but in those cases where more meanings than one are possiblethen the correct one will be evident from the context in which it is used

Main symbols

A AreaB Bimomentb WidthC Coefficientc Width of part of sectiond Depth or DiameterE Youngrsquos modulus of elasticitye Eccentricity or ExtensionF Force or Force per unit lengthf Stress property of steelG Dead load or Shear modulus of elasticityH Horizontal forceh Height or Overall depth of sectionI Second moment of areai Integer or Radius of gyrationk Buckling coefficient or Factor or Relative stiffness ratioL LengthM Momentm IntegerN Axial force or Number of load cyclesn Integerp Distance between holes or rows of holesQ Loadq Intensity of distributed loadR Radius or Reaction or Resistancer Radius

xvi Notations

s SpacingT Torquet ThicknessU Strain energyu Deflection in x directionV Shear or Vertical loadv Deflection in y directionW Section modulus or Work donew Deflection in z directionx Longitudinal axisy Principal axis of cross-sectionz Principal axis of cross-sectionα Angle or Factor or Load factor at failure or Stiffnessχ Reduction factor∆ Deflection∆σ Stress rangeδ Amplification factor or Deflectionε Normal strain or Yield stress coefficient = radic

(235fy)φ Angle of twist rotation or Global sway imperfectionγ Partial factor or Shear strainκ Curvatureλ Plate slenderness = (ct)ελ Generalised slendernessmicro Slip factorν Poissonrsquos ratioθ Angleσ Normal stressτ Shear stress

Subscripts

as AntisymmetricB Bottomb Beam or Bearing or Bending or Bolt or Bracedc Centroid or Column or Compressioncr Elastic (critical) bucklingd DesignEd Design load effecteff Effectiveel ElasticF Forcef FlangeG Dead loadI Imposed load

Notations xvii

i Initial or Integerj Jointk Characteristic valueL LeftLT Lateral (or lateralndashtorsional) bucklingM Materialm Momentmax Maximummin MinimumN Axial forcen Integer or Nominal valuenet Netop Out-of-planep Bearing or Platep pl PlasticQ Variable loadR Resistance or Rightr Rafter or ReducedRd Design resistanceRk Characteristic resistances Slip or Storey or Sway or Symmetricser Servicest Stiffener or Strain hardeningT Top or Torsional bucklingt St Venant or uniform torsion or TensionTF Flexuralndashtorsional (or torsionalndashflexural) bucklingtf Tension fieldult UltimateV v ShearW Wind loadw Warping or Web or Weldx x axisy y axis or Yieldz z axisσ Normal stressτ Shear stress0 Initial value1ndash4 Cross-section class

Additional notationsAe Area enclosed by hollow sectionAf max Flange area at maximum sectionAf min Flange area at minimum section

xviii Notations

Ah Area of hole reduced for staggerAnt Anv Net areas subjected to tension or shearAs Tensile stress area of a boltAv Shear area of sectionC Index for portal frame bucklingCm Equivalent uniform moment factorD Plate rigidity Et312(1 minus v2)

D Vector of nodal deformationsEr Reduced modulusEt Tangent modulusF Buckling factor for beam-columns with unequal end momentsFpC Bolt preloadFL FT Weld longitudinal and transverse forces per unit lengthFT Rd Design resistance of a T-stub flange[G] Stability matrixIcz Second moment of area of compression flangeIm Second moment of area of memberIn = b3

ntn12Ir Second moment of area of restraining member or rafterIt Uniform torsion section constantIyz Product second moment of areaIw Warping torsion section constantIzm Value of Iz for critical segmentIzr Value of Iz for restraining segmentK Beam or torsion constant = radic

(π2EIwGJL2) or Fatigue lifeconstant

[K] Elastic stiffness matrixKm = radic

(π2EIyd2f 4GItL2)

Lc Distance between restraints or Length of column which failsunder N alone

Lj Length between end bolts in a long jointLm Length of critical segment or Member lengthLr Length of restraining segment or rafterLstable Stable length for member with plastic hingesLF Load factorMA MB End momentsMb0yRd Design member moment resistance when N = 0 and Mz = 0Mc0zRd Design member moment resistance when N = 0 and My = 0McrMN Elastic buckling moment reduced for axial compressionMN yRd MN zRd Major and minor axis beam section moment resistancesME = (πL)

radic(EIyGIt)

Mf First-order end moment of frame memberMfb Braced component of Mf

Notations xix

Mfp Major axis moment resisted by plastic flangesMfs Sway component of Mf

MI Inelastic beam buckling momentMIu Value of MI for uniform bendingML Limiting end moment on a crooked and twisted beam at first

yieldMmax0 Value of Mmax when N = 0MN Plastic moment reduced for axial forceMb Out-of-plane member moment resistance for bending aloneMbt Out-of-plane member moment resistance for bending and

tensionMry Mrz Section moment capacities reduced for axial loadMS Simple beam momentMty Lesser of Mry and Mbt

Mzx Value of Mcr for simply supported beam in uniform bendingMzxr Value of Mzx reduced for incomplete torsional end restraintNi Vector of initial axial forcesNbRd Design member axial force resistance when My = 0 and Mz = 0NcrMN Elastic buckling load reduced for bending momentNcrL = π2EIL2

Ncrr Reduced modulus buckling loadNim Constant amplitude fatigue life for ith stress rangeNcrt Tangent modulus buckling loadQD Concentrated dead loadQI Concentrated imposed loadQm Upper-bound mechanism estimate of Qult

Qms Value of Qs for the critical segmentQrs Value of Qs for an adjacent restraining segmentQs Buckling load for an unrestrained segment or Lower bound

static estimate of Qult

R Radius of circular cross-section or Ratio of column and rafterstiffnesses or Ratio of minimum to maximum stress

RH Ratio of rafter rise to column heightR R1minus4 Restraint parametersSF Factor of safetySj Joint stiffnessTM Torque exerted by bending momentTP Torque exerted by axial loadVR Resultant shear forceVTy VTz Transverse shear forces in a fillet weldVvi Shear force in ith fastenera = radic

(EIwGJ ) or Distance along member or Distance fromweb to shear centre or Effective throat size of a weld or Ratioof web to total section area or Spacing of transverse stiffeners

xx Notations

a0 Distance from shear centreb cf or cw

c Factor for flange contribution to shear resistancecm Bending coefficient for beam-columns with unequal end

momentsde Depth of elastic coredf Distance between flange centroidsd0 Hole diametere1 End distance in a platee2 Edge distance in a plateeNy Shift of effective compression force from centroidf Factor used to modify χLT

hw Clear distance between flangesif z Radius of gyration of equivalent compression flangeip Polar radius of gyration

i0 =radic(i2

p + y20 + z2

0)

k Deflection coefficient or Modulus of foundation reactionkc Slenderness correction factor or Correction factor for moment

distributionkij Interaction factors for bending and compressionks Factor for hole shape and sizekt Axial stiffness of connectorkv Shear stiffness of connectorkσ Plate buckling coefficientk1 Factor for plate tension fracturek1 k2 Stiffness factorseff Effective length of a fillet weld or Effective length of an

unstiffened column flangey Effective loaded lengthm Fatigue life index or Torque per unit lengthn Axial compression ratio or Number of shear planespF Probability of failurep(x) Particular integralp1 Pitch of bolt holesp2 Spacing of bolt hole liness Distance around thin-walled sectionss Stiff bearing lengths Staggered pitch of holessm Minimum staggered pitch for no reduction in effective areas1 s2 Side widths of a fillet weldw = WplWel

wAB Settlement of B relative to Awc Mid-span deflectionz Distance to centroid

Notations xxi

yp zp Distances to plastic neutral axesyr zr Coordinates of centre of rotationy0 z0 Coordinates of shear centrezc Distance to buckling centre of rotation or Distance to centroidzn Distance below centroid to neutral axiszQ Distance below centroid to loadzt Distance below centroid to translational restraintα Coefficient used to determine effective width or Unit warping

(see equation 1035)αbc Buckling coefficient for beam columns with unequal end

momentsαbcI Inelastic moment modification factor for bending and com-

pressionαbcu Value of αbc for ultimate strengthαd Factor for plate tear outαi In-plane load factorαL Limiting value of α for second mode bucklingαLT Imperfection factor for lateral bucklingαLα0 Indices in interaction equations for biaxial bendingαm Moment modification factor for beam lateral buckling

αn = (1A)int E

0 αtdsαr αt Rotational and translational stiffnessesαxαy Stiffnesses of rotational restraints acting about the x y axesαst Buckling moment factor for stepped and tapered beamsα β Indices in section interaction equations for biaxial bendingβ Correction factor for the lateral buckling of rolled sections or

Safety indexβe Stiffness factor for far end restraint conditionsβLf Reduction factor for bolts in long jointsβm End moment factor or Ratio of end momentsβw Fillet weld correlation factorβy Monosymmetry section constant for I-beamβ23 Effective net area factors for eccentrically connected tension

membersσC Reference value for fatigue siteσL Fatigue endurance limitε Load height parameter = (Kπ)2zQdf

Φ Cumulative frequency distribution of a standard normalvariate or Value used to determine χ

φCd Design rotation capacity of a jointφj Joint rotationγF γG γQ Load partial factorsγm γn γs Factors used in moment amplification

xxii Notations

γ12 Relative stiffnessesη Crookedness or imperfection parameter or Web shear resis-

tance factor (= 12 for steels up to S460)λc0 Slenderness limit of equivalent compression flangeλp Generalised plate slenderness = radic

(fyσcr)

λ1 = πradic(Efy)

micro = radic(NEI)

θ Central twist or Slope change at plastic hinge or Torsion stressfunction

ρ Perpendicular distance from centroid or Reduction factorρm Monosymmetric section parameter = IzcIz

ρc ρr Column and rafter factors for portal frame bucklingρ0 Perpendicular distance from shear centreσac σat Stresses due to axial compression and tensionσbcy Compression stress due to bending about y axisσbty σbtz Tension stresses due to bending about y z axesσcrl Bending stress at local bucklingσcrp Bearing stress at local bucklingσL Limiting major axis stress in a crooked and twisted beam at

first yieldτh τv Shear stresses due to Vy Vz

τhc τvc Shear stresses due to a circulating shear flowτho τvo Shear stresses in an open sectionψ End moment ratio or Stress ratioψ0 Load combination factor

Chapter 1

Introduction

11 Steel structures

Engineering structures are required to support loads and resist forces and totransfer these loads and forces to the foundations of the structures The loads andforces may arise from the masses of the structure or from manrsquos use of the struc-tures or from the forces of nature The uses of structures include the enclosure ofspace (buildings) the provision of access (bridges) the storage of materials (tanksand silos) transportation (vehicles) or the processing of materials (machines)Structures may be made from a number of different materials including steelconcrete wood aluminium stone plastic etc or from combinations of these

Structures are usually three-dimensional in their extent but sometimes they areessentially two-dimensional (plates and shells) or even one-dimensional (linesand cables) Solid steel structures invariably include comparatively high volumesof high-cost structural steel which are understressed and uneconomic except invery small-scale components Because of this steel structures are usually formedfrom one-dimensional members (as in rectangular and triangulated frames) orfrom two-dimensional members (as in box girders) or from both (as in stressedskin industrial buildings) Three-dimensional steel structures are often arranged sothat they act as if composed of a number of independent two-dimensional framesor one-dimensional members (Figure 11)

Structural steel members may be one-dimensional as for beams and columns(whose lengths are much greater than their transverse dimensions) or two-dimensional as for plates (whose lengths and widths are much greater than theirthicknesses) as shown in Figure 12c While one-dimensional steel members maybe solid they are usually thin-walled in that their thicknesses are much less thantheir other transverse dimensions Thin-walled steel members are rolled in a num-ber of cross-sectional shapes [1] or are built up by connecting together a numberof rolled sections or plates as shown in Figure 12b Structural members canbe classified as tension or compression members beams beam-columns torsionmembers or plates (Figure 13) according to the method by which they transmitthe forces in the structure The behaviour and design of these structural membersare discussed in this book

2 Introduction

[2-D]rigid frames

+

[1-D]beams(purlins and girts)

+

[2-D] bracingtrusses

[3-D] structure

equiv

Figure 11 Reduction of a [3-D] structure to simpler forms

(a) Solid [1-D] member (b) Thin-walled [1-D] members

(c) [2-D] member

t d ltlt L~~ t ltlt d ltlt L

t ltlt d L~~

Figure 12 Types of structural steel members

Structural steel members may be connected together at joints in a number ofways and by using a variety of connectors These include pins rivets bolts andwelds of various types Steel plate gussets or angle cleats or other elements mayalso be used in the connections The behaviour and design of these connectors andjoints are also discussed in this book

Introduction 3

(a) Tension member(b) Compression

member (c) Beam

(d) Beam-column (e) Torsion member (f) Plate

Figure 13 Load transmission by structural members

This book deals chiefly with steel frame structures composed of one-dimensionalmembers but much of the information given is also relevant to plate structuresThe members are generally assumed to be hot-rolled or fabricated from hot-rolledelements while the frames considered are those used in buildings However muchof the material presented is also relevant to bridge structures [2 3] and to structuralmembers cold-formed from light-gauge steel plates [4ndash7]

The purposes of this chapter are first to consider the complete design process andthe relationships between the behaviour and analysis of steel structures and theirstructural design and second to present information of a general nature (includinginformation on material properties and structural loads) which is required for usein the later chapters The nature of the design process is discussed first and thenbrief summaries are made of the relevant material properties of structural steeland of the structural behaviour of members and frames The loads acting on thestructures are considered and the choice of appropriate methods of analysing thesteel structures is discussed Finally the considerations governing the synthesis ofan understanding of the structural behaviour with the results of analysis to formthe design processes of EC3 [8] are treated

12 Design

121 Design requirements

The principal design requirement of a structure is that it should be effective thatis it should fulfil the objectives and satisfy the needs for which it was created The

4 Introduction

structure may provide shelter and protection against the environment by enclosingspace as in buildings or it may provide access for people and materials as inbridges or it may store materials as in tanks and silos or it may form part of amachine for transporting people or materials as in vehicles or for operating onmaterials The design requirement of effectiveness is paramount as there is littlepoint in considering a structure which will not fulfil its purpose

The satisfaction of the effectiveness requirement depends on whether the struc-ture satisfies the structural and other requirements The structural requirementsrelate to the way in which the structure resists and transfers the forces and loadsacting on it The primary structural requirement is that of safety and the first con-sideration of the structural engineer is to produce a structure which will not fail inits design lifetime or which has an acceptably low risk of failure The other impor-tant structural requirement is usually concerned with the stiffness of the structurewhich must be sufficient to ensure that the serviceability of the structure is notimpaired by excessive deflections vibrations and the like

The other design requirements include those of economy and of harmony Thecost of the structure which includes both the initial cost and the cost of mainte-nance is usually of great importance to the owner and the requirement of economyusually has a significant influence on the design of the structure The cost of thestructure is affected not only by the type and quantity of the materials used butalso by the methods of fabricating and erecting it The designer must thereforegive careful consideration to the methods of construction as well as to the sizes ofthe members of the structure

The requirements of harmony within the structure are affected by the relation-ships between the different systems of the structure including the load resistanceand transfer system (the structural system) the architectural system the mechan-ical and electrical systems and the functional systems required by the use of thestructure The serviceability of the structure is usually directly affected by the har-mony or lack of it between the systems The structure should also be in harmonywith its environment and should not react unfavourably with either the communityor its physical surroundings

122 The design process

The overall purpose of design is to invent a structure which will satisfy the designrequirements outlined in Section 121 Thus the structural engineer seeks to inventa structural system which will resist and transfer the forces and loads acting onit with adequate safety while making due allowance for the requirements of ser-viceability economy and harmony The process by which this may be achieved issummarised in Figure 14

The first step is to define the overall problem by determining the effectivenessrequirements and the constraints imposed by the social and physical environmentsand by the ownerrsquos time and money The structural engineer will need to consult theowner the architect the site construction mechanical and electrical engineers

Introduction 5

Definition of the problem

Invention of alternatives

Preliminary design

Preliminary evaluation

Selection

Modification

Final design

Final evaluation

Documentation

Execution

Use

Needs

Constraints

Objectives

Overall system

Structural system

Other systems

Structural designLoadsAnalysisProportioningOther design

Effectiveness

Safety and serviceability

Economy

Harmony

Structural design

Other design

DrawingsSpecification

TenderingConstruction andsupervisionCertification

Figure 14 The overall design process

and any authorities from whom permissions and approvals must be obtainedA set of objectives can then be specified which if met will ensure the successfulsolution of the overall design problem

The second step is to invent a number of alternative overall systems and theirassociated structural systems which appear to meet the objectives In doing sothe designer may use personal knowledge and experience or that which can be

6 Introduction

Invention or modificationof structural system

Preliminary analysis

Proportioning membersand joints

KnowledgeExperienceImaginationIntuitionCreativity

Approximations

Loads

Behaviour

Design criteria

Design codes

larrlarrlarrlarrlarr

---

larrlarr

AnalysisLoads

Behaviour

--

EvaluationDesign criteria

Design codes

larrlarr

Figure 15 The structural design process

gathered from others [9ndash12] or the designer may use his or her own imaginationintuition and creativity [13] or a combination of all of these

Following these first two steps of definition and invention come a series of stepswhich include the structural design evaluation selection and modification of thestructural system These may be repeated a number of times before the structuralrequirements are met and the structural design is finalised A typical structuraldesign process is summarised in Figure 15

After the structural system has been invented it must be analysed to obtain theinformation required for determining the member sizes First the loads supportedby and the forces acting on the structure must be determined For this purpose load-ing codes [14 15] are usually consulted but sometimes the designer determinesthe loading conditions or commissions experts to do this Anumber of approximateassumptions are made about the behaviour of the structure which is then analysedand the forces and moments acting on the members and joints of the structureare determined These are used to proportion the structure so that it satisfies thestructural requirements usually by referring to a design code such as EC3 [8]

At this stage a preliminary design of the structure will have been completed how-ever because of the approximate assumptions made about the structural behaviourit is necessary to check the design The first steps are to recalculate the loads and to

Introduction 7

reanalyse the structure designed and these are carried out with more precision thanwas either possible or appropriate for the preliminary analysis The performanceof the structure is then evaluated in relation to the structural requirements and anychanges in the member and joint sizes are decided on These changes may requirea further reanalysis and re-proportioning of the structure and this cycle may berepeated until no further change is required Alternatively it may be necessary tomodify the original structural system and repeat the structural design process untila satisfactory structure is achieved

The alternative overall systems are then evaluated in terms of their service-ability economy and harmony and a final system is selected as indicatedin Figure 14 This final overall system may be modified before the design isfinalised The detailed drawings and specifications can then be prepared andtenders for the construction can be called for and let and the structure canbe constructed Further modifications may have to be made as a consequenceof the tenders submitted or due to unforeseen circumstances discovered duringconstruction

This book is concerned with the structural behaviour of steel structures andthe relationships between their behaviour and the methods of proportioning themparticularly in relation to the structural requirements of the European steel struc-tures code EC3 and the modifications of these are given in the National AnnexesThis code consists of six parts with basic design using the conventional membersbeing treated in Part 1 This part is divided into 12 sub-parts with those likely tobe required most frequently being

Part 11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings [8]Part 15 Plated Structural Elements [16]Part 18 Design of Joints [17] andPart 110 Selection of Steel for Fracture Toughness and Through-Thickness

Properties [18]

Other parts that may be required from time to time include Part 12 that coversresistance to fire Part 13 dealing with cold-formed steel Part 19 dealing withfatigue and Part 2 [19] that covers bridges Composite construction is covered byEC4 [20] Since Part 11 of EC3 is the document most relevant to much of thecontent of this text (with the exception of Chapter 9 on joints) all references toEC3 made herein should be taken to mean Part 11 [8] including any modificationsgiven in the National Annex unless otherwise indicated

Detailed discussions of the overall design process are beyond the scope of thisbook but further information is given in [13] on the definition of the designproblem the invention of solutions and their evaluation and in [21ndash24] on theexecution of design Further the conventional methods of structural analysis areadequately treated in many textbooks [25ndash27] and are discussed in only a fewisolated cases in this book

8 Introduction

13 Material behaviour

131 Mechanical properties under static load

The important mechanical properties of most structural steels under static loadare indicated in the idealised tensile stressndashstrain diagram shown in Figure 16Initially the steel has a linear stressndashstrain curve whose slope is the Youngrsquos mod-ulus of elasticity E The values of E vary in the range 200 000ndash210 000 Nmm2and the approximate value of 205 000 Nmm2 is often assumed (EC3 uses210 000 Nmm2) The steel remains elastic while in this linear range and recoversperfectly on unloading The limit of the linear elastic behaviour is often closelyapproximated by the yield stress fy and the corresponding yield strain εy = fyEBeyond this limit the steel flows plastically without any increase in stress untilthe strain-hardening strain εst is reached This plastic range is usually consider-able and accounts for the ductility of the steel The stress increases above theyield stress fy when the strain-hardening strain εst is exceeded and this contin-ues until the ultimate tensile stress fu is reached After this large local reductionsin the cross-section occur and the load capacity decreases until tensile fracturetakes place

The yield stress fy is perhaps the most important strength characteristic of a struc-tural steel This varies significantly with the chemical constituents of the steel themost important of which are carbon and manganese both of which increase theyield stress The yield stress also varies with the heat treatment used andwith the amount of working which occurs during the rolling process Thus thinnerplates which are more worked have higher yield stresses than thicker plates of thesame constituency The yield stress is also increased by cold working The rateof straining affects the yield stress and high rates of strain increase the upper orfirst yield stress (see the broken line in Figure 16) as well as the lower yieldstress fy The strain rates used in tests to determine the yield stress of a particular

Upper yield stressStress

Strain

Strain-hardening E

Tensile rupture Plastic

Elastic E

f

f

0

u

y

y st

st

Not to scale

Figure 16 Idealised stressndashstrain relationship for structural steel

Introduction 9

steel type are significantly higher than the nearly static rates often encountered inactual structures

For design purposes a lsquominimumrsquo yield stress is identified for each differ-ent steel classification For EC3 these classifications are made on the basis of thechemical composition and the heat treatment and so the yield stresses in each clas-sification decrease as the greatest thickness of the rolled section or plate increasesThe minimum yield stress of a particular steel is determined from the results ofa number of standard tension tests There is a significant scatter in these resultsbecause of small variations in the local composition heat treatment amount ofworking thickness and the rate of testing and this scatter closely follows a nor-mal distribution curve Because of this the minimum yield stress fy quoted fora particular steel and used in design is usually a characteristic value which hasa particular chance (often 95) of being exceeded in any standard tension testConsequently it is likely that an isolated test result will be significantly higherthan the quoted yield stress This difference will of course be accentuated if thetest is made for any but the thickest portion of the cross-section In EC3 [8] theyield stress to be used in design is listed in Table 31 for hot-rolled structural steeland for structural hollow sections for each of the structural grades

The yield stress fy determined for uniaxial tension is usually accepted as beingvalid for uniaxial compression However the general state of stress at a point ina thin-walled member is one of biaxial tension andor compression and yieldingunder these conditions is not so simply determined Perhaps the most generallyaccepted theory of two-dimensional yielding under biaxial stresses acting in the1prime2prime plane is the maximum distortion-energy theory (often associated with namesof Huber von Mises or Hencky) and the stresses at yield according to this theorysatisfy the condition

σ 21prime minus σ1primeσ2prime + σ 2

2prime + 3σ 21prime2prime = f 2

y (11)

in which σ1prime σ2prime are the normal stresses and σ1prime2prime is the shear stress at the pointFor the case where 1prime and 2prime are the principal stress directions 1 and 2 equation 11takes the form of the ellipse shown in Figure 17 while for the case of pure shear(σ1prime = σ2prime = 0 so that σ1 = minusσ2 = σ1prime2prime) equation 11 reduces to

σ1prime2prime = fyradic

3 = τy (12)

which defines the shear yield stress τy

132 Fatigue failure under repeated loads

Structural steel may fracture at low average tensile stresses after a large numberof cycles of fluctuating load This high-cycle fatigue failure is initiated by localdamage caused by the repeated loads which leads to the formation of a small localcrack The extent of the fatigue crack is gradually increased by the subsequent loadrepetitions until finally the effective cross-section is so reduced that catastrophic

10 Introduction

Pri

ncip

al s

tres

s ra

tio

2f

y

100 10

10

ndash

ndash

10

Un i a x i a l t e n si o n

Pu r e s h e a r

Un i a x i a lco m p r e s s i o n

P r i n c i p a l s t r es s

Ma x i m u m d i s t o r t i o n - e n er g ycr i t e r i o n 1

2 ndash 12 + 12 = fy

2

rati o 1fy 2

Figure 17 Yielding under biaxial stresses

failure may occur High-cycle fatigue is only a design consideration when a largenumber of loading cycles involving tensile stresses is likely to occur during thedesign life of the structure (compressive stresses do not cause fatigue) This isoften the case for bridges cranes and structures which support machinery windand wave loading may also lead to fatigue problems

Factors which significantly influence the resistance to fatigue failure includethe number of load cycles N the range of stress

σ = σmax minus σmin (13)

during a load cycle and the magnitudes of local stress concentrations An indi-cation of the effect of the number of load cycles is given in Figure 18 whichshows that the maximum tensile stress decreases from its ultimate static value fuin an approximately linear fashion as the logarithm of the number of cycles Nincreases As the number of cycles increases further the curve may flatten out andthe maximum tensile stress may approach the endurance limit σL

The effects of the stress magnitude and stress ratio on the fatigue life are demon-strated in Figure 19 It can be seen that the fatigue life N decreases with increasingstress magnitude σmax and with decreasing stress ratio R = σminσmax

The effect of stress concentration is to increase the stress locally leading to localdamage and crack initiation Stress concentrations arise from sudden changes inthe general geometry and loading of a member and from local changes due tobolt and rivet holes and welds Stress concentrations also occur at defects in themember or its connectors and welds These may be due to the original rolling of thesteel or due to subsequent fabrication processes including punching shearing

Introduction 11

Max

imum

tens

ile

stre

ngh

Stress range = max ndash min

Stress ratio R = min max

max

1cycle

Ultimate tensile strength

Endurance limit

Number of cycles N (log scale)

(b) Fatigue strength(a) Stress cycle

Stress

min

f

Time1

u

L

Figure 18 Variation of fatigue strength with number of load cycles

Alternating

N =

N = 1

Max

imum

tens

ile

stre

ss

max

(Compression) Minimum stress min (Tension)

Staticloading

loadingTypical ofexperiments

Approximateequation 14

fufu

fu

R = ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

infin

Figure 19 Variation of fatigue life with stress magnitudes

and welding or due to damage such as that caused by stray arc fusions duringwelding

It is generally accepted for design purposes that the fatigue life N varies withthe stress range σ according to equations of the type

σC

)m (N

2 times 106

)= K (14)

in which the reference value σC depends on the details of the fatigue site andthe constants m and K may change with the number of cycles N This assumeddependence of the fatigue life on the stress range produces the approximatingstraight lines shown in Figure 19

12 Introduction

Reference values ∆C

Str

ess

rang

e ∆

=

max

ndash m

in(N

mm

2 )

Constant amplitudefatigue limit

m = 5 Cut-off limit1

Number of stress cycles N10 10 10 10 104 6 7 85 5 5 5 52

m = 3

m =3

m

10

50

100

500

1000

1401129071564536

16012510080635040

∆C =∆ when N = 2 times 106

Reference values ∆C

Figure 110 Variation of the EC3-1-9 fatigue life with stress range

EC3-1-1 [8] does not provide a treatment of fatigue since it is usually the casethat either the stress range σ or the number of high amplitude stress cycles Nis comparatively small However for structures supporting vibrating machineryand plant reference should be made to EC3-1-9 [28] The general relationshipsbetween the fatigue life N and the service stress rangeσ for constant amplitudestress cycles are shown in Figure 110 for reference valuesσC which correspondto different detail categories For N le 5 times 106 m = 3 and K = 1 so thatthe reference value σC corresponds to the value of σ at N = 2 times 106 For5 times 106 le N le 108 m = 5 and K = 0423 asymp 0543

Fatigue failure under variable amplitude stress cycles is normally assessed usingMinerrsquos rule [29]sum

NiNim le 1 (15)

in which Ni is the number of cycles of a particular stress range σi and Nim theconstant amplitude fatigue life for that stress range If any of the stress rangesexceeds the constant amplitude fatigue limit (at N = 5 times 106) then the effects ofstress ranges below this limit are included in equation 15

Designing against fatigue involves a consideration of joint arrangement as wellas of permissible stress Joints should generally be so arranged as to minimisestress concentrations and produce as smooth a lsquostress flowrsquo through the joint as ispracticable This may be done by giving proper consideration to the layout of ajoint by making gradual changes in section and by increasing the amount of mate-rial used at points of concentrated load Weld details should also be determined

Introduction 13

with this in mind and unnecessary lsquostress-raisersrsquo should be avoided It willalso be advantageous to restrict where practicable the locations of joints to lowstress regions such as at points of contraflexure or near the neutral axis Furtherinformation and guidance on fatigue design are given in [30ndash33]

133 Brittle fracture under impact load

Structural steel does not always exhibit a ductile behaviour and under some cir-cumstances a sudden and catastrophic fracture may occur even though the nominaltensile stresses are low Brittle fracture is initiated by the existence or formation ofa small crack in a region of high local stress Once initiated the crack may prop-agate in a ductile (or stable) fashion for which the external forces must supply theenergy required to tear the steel More serious are cracks which propagate at highspeed in a brittle (or unstable) fashion for which some of the internal elastic strainenergy stored in steel is released and used to fracture the steel Such a crack isself-propagating while there is sufficient internal strain energy and will continueuntil arrested by ductile elements in its path which have sufficient deformationcapacity to absorb the internal energy released

The resistance of a structure to brittle fracture depends on the magnitude of localstress concentrations on the ductility of the steel and on the three-dimensionalgeometrical constraints High local stresses facilitate crack initiation and so stressconcentrations due to poor geometry and loading arrangements (including impactloading) are dangerous Also of great importance are flaws and defects in thematerial which not only increase the local stresses but also provide potential sitesfor crack initiation

The ductility of a structural steel depends on its composition heat treatmentand thickness and varies with temperature and strain rate Figure 111 shows theincrease with temperature of the capacity of the steel to absorb energy during

Crack initiationand propagation easy

Crack initiationmore difficult

Crack initiationdifficult

Temperature

Ene

rgy

abso

rpti

on

Figure 111 Effect of temperature on resistance to brittle fracture

14 Introduction

impact At low temperatures the energy absorption is low and initiation andpropagation of brittle fractures are comparatively easy while at high temperaturesthe energy absorption is high because of ductile yielding and the propagation ofcracks can be arrested Between these two extremes is a transitional range in whichcrack initiation becomes increasingly difficult The likelihood of brittle fracture isalso increased by high strain rates due to dynamic loading since the consequentincrease in the yield stress reduces the possibility of energy absorption by ductileyielding The chemical composition of steel has a marked influence on its ductilitybrittleness is increased by the presence of excessive amounts of most non-metallicelements while ductility is increased by the presence of some metallic elementsSteel with large grain size tends to be more brittle and this is significantly influ-enced by heat treatment of the steel and by its thickness (the grain size tendsto be larger in thicker sections) EC3-1-10 [18] provides values of the maximumthickness t1 for different steel grades and minimum service temperatures as wellas advice on using a more advanced fracture mechanics [34] based approach andguidance on safeguarding against lamellar tearing

Three-dimensional geometrical constraints such as those occurring in thickeror more massive elements also encourage brittleness because of the higher localstresses and because of the greater release of energy during cracking and theconsequent increase in the ease of propagation of the crack

The risk of brittle fracture can be reduced by selecting steel types which haveductilities appropriate to the service temperatures and by designing joints with aview to minimising stress concentrations and geometrical constraints Fabricationtechniques should be such that they will avoid introducing potentially dangerousflaws or defects Critical details in important structures may be subjected to inspec-tion procedures aimed at detecting significant flaws Of course the designer mustgive proper consideration to the extra cost of special steels fabrication techniquesand inspection and correction procedures Further information on brittle fractureis given in [31 32 34]

14 Member and structure behaviour

141 Member behaviour

Structural steel members are required to transmit axial and transverse forces andmoments and torques as shown in Figure 13 The response of a member tothese actions can be described by the load-deformation characteristics shown inFigure 112

A member may have the linear response shown by curve 1 in Figure 112at least until the material reaches the yield stress The magnitudes of the defor-mations depend on the elastic moduli E and G Theoretically a member can onlybehave linearly while the maximum stress does not exceed the yield stress fyand so the presence of residual stresses or stress concentrations will cause earlynon-linearity However the high ductility of steel causes a local redistributionafter this premature yielding and it can often be assumed without serious error

Introduction 15

Load Buckling

Linear

Geometric non-linearity

Materialnon-linearity

Material and geometricnon-linearity

Deformation

1

2

3

4

5

Brittle fracture8Local buckling7

Fully plastic6

Figure 112 Member behaviour

that the member response remains linear until more general yielding occurs Themember behaviour then becomes non-linear (curve 2) and approaches the condi-tion associated with full plasticity (curve 6) This condition depends on the yieldstress fy

The member may also exhibit geometric non-linearity in that the bendingmoments and torques acting at any section may be influenced by the deformationsas well as by the applied forces This non-linearity which depends on the elasticmoduli E and G may cause the deformations to become very large (curve 3) as thecondition of elastic buckling is approached (curve 4) This behaviour is modifiedwhen the material becomes non-linear after first yield and the load may approacha maximum value and then decrease (curve 5)

The member may also behave in a brittle fashion because of local bucklingin a thin plate element of the member (curve 7) or because of material fracture(curve 8)

The actual behaviour of an individual member will depend on the forces actingon it Thus tension members laterally supported beams and torsion membersremain linear until their material non-linearity becomes important and then theyapproach the fully plastic condition However compression members and laterallyunsupported beams show geometric non-linearity as they approach their bucklingloads Beam-columns are members which transmit both transverse and axial loadsand so they display both material and geometric non-linearities

142 Structure behaviour

The behaviour of a structure depends on the load-transferring action of its mem-bers and joints This may be almost entirely by axial tension or compressionas in the triangulated structures with joint loading as shown in Figure 113a

16 Introduction

(a) Axial force (b) Bending (c) Shear(d) Axial force and bending

Figure 113 Structural load-transfer actions

Alternatively the members may support transverse loads which are transferred bybending and shear actions Usually the bending action dominates in structures com-posed of one-dimensional members such as beams and many single-storey rigidframes (Figure 113b) while shear becomes more important in two-dimensionalplate structures (Figure 113c) The members of many structures are subjectedto both axial forces and transverse loads such as those in multistorey buildings(Figure 113d) The load-transferring action of the members of a structure dependson the arrangement of the structure including the geometrical layout and the jointdetails and on the loading arrangement

In some structures the loading and joints are such that the members are effec-tively independent For example in triangulated structures with joint loads anyflexural effects are secondary and the members can be assumed to act as ifpin-jointed while in rectangular frames with simple flexible joints the momenttransfers between beams and columns may be ignored In such cases the responseof the structure is obtained directly from the individual member responses

More generally however there will be interactions between the members andthe structure behaviour is not unlike the general behaviour of a member as canbe seen by comparing Figures 114 and 112 Thus it has been traditional toassume that a steel structure behaves elastically under the service loads Thisassumption ignores local premature yielding due to residual stresses and stressconcentrations but these are not usually serious Purely flexural structures andpurely axial structures with lightly loaded compression members behave as iflinear (curve 1 in Figure 114) However structures with both flexural and axialactions behave non-linearly even near the service loads (curve 3 in Figure 114)This is a result of the geometrically non-linear behaviour of its members (seeFigure 112)

Most steel structures behave non-linearly near their ultimate loads unless theyfail prematurely due to brittle fracture fatigue or local buckling This non-linearbehaviour is due either to material yielding (curve 2 in Figure 114) or memberor frame buckling (curve 4) or both (curve 5) In axial structures failure may

Introduction 17

Load Buckling

Linear

Geometric non-linearity

Material non-linearity

Material and geometricnon-linearity

Deformation

1

2

3

4

5

Figure 114 Structure behaviour

involve yielding of some tension members or buckling either of some compressionmembers or of the frame or both In flexural structures failure is associated withfull plasticity occurring at a sufficient number of locations that the structure canform a collapse mechanism In structures with both axial and flexural actions thereis an interaction between yielding and buckling (curve 5 in Figure 114) and thefailure load is often difficult to determine The transitions shown in Figure 114between the elastic and ultimate behaviour often take place in a series of non-linearsteps as individual elements become fully plastic or buckle

15 Loads

151 General

The loads acting on steel structures may be classified as dead loads as imposedloads including both gradually applied and dynamic loads as wind loads as earthor ground-water loads or as indirect forces including those due to temperaturechanges foundation settlement and the like The more general collective termActions is used throughout the Eurocodes The structural engineer must evaluatethe magnitudes of any of these loads which will act and must determine thosewhich are the most severe combinations of loads for which the structure must bedesigned These loads are discussed in the following subsections both individuallyand in combinations

152 Dead loads

The dead loads acting on a structure arise from the weight of the structure includingthe finishes and from any other permanent construction or equipment The dead

18 Introduction

loads will vary during construction but thereafter will remain constant unlesssignificant modifications are made to the structure or its permanent equipment

The dead load may be assessed from the knowledge of the dimensions and spe-cific weights or from the total weights of all the permanent items which contributeto the total dead load Guidance on specific weights is given in [14] the valuesin which are average values representative of the particular materials The dimen-sions used to estimate dead loads should also be average and representative inorder that consistent estimates of the dead loads can be made By making theseassumptions the statistical distribution of dead loads is often taken as being of aWeibull type [35] The practice sometimes used of consistently overestimatingdimensions and specific weights is often wasteful and may also be danger-ous in cases where the dead load component acts in the opposite sense to theresultant load

153 Imposed loads

The imposed loads acting on a structure are gravity loads other than the dead loadsand arise from the weights of materials added to the structure as a result of its usesuch as materials stored people and snow Imposed loads usually vary both inspace and time Imposed loads may be sub-divided into two groups dependingon whether they are gradually applied in which case static load equivalents canbe used or whether they are dynamic including repeated loads and impact orimpulsive loads

Gradually applied imposed loads may be sustained over long periods of timeor may vary slowly with time [36] The past practice however was to consideronly the total imposed load and so only extreme values (which occur rarely andmay be regarded as lifetime maximum loads) were specified The present imposedloads specified in loading codes [14] often represent peak loads which have 95probability of not being exceeded over a 50-year period based on a Weibull typedistribution [35]

It is usual to consider the most severe spatial distribution of the imposed loadsand this can only be determined by using both the maximum and minimum valuesof the imposed loads In the absence of definite knowledge it is often assumed thatthe minimum values are zero When the distribution of imposed load over largeareas is being considered the maximum imposed loads specified which representrare events are often reduced in order to make some allowance for the decreasedprobability that the maximum imposed loads will act on all areas at the same time

Dynamic loads which act on structures include both repeated loads and impactand blast loads Repeated loads are of significance in fatigue problems (see Section132) in which case the designer is concerned with both the magnitudes rangesand the number of repetitions of loads which are very frequently applied At theother extreme impact loads (which are particularly important in the brittle fractureproblems discussed in Section 133) are usually specified by values of extrememagnitude which represent rare events In structures for which the static loads

Introduction 19

dominate it is common to replace the dynamic loads by static force equivalents[14] However such a procedure is likely to be inappropriate when the dynamicloads form a significant proportion of the total load in which case a proper dynamicanalysis [37 38] of the structure and its response should be made

154 Wind loads

The wind loads which act on structures have traditionally been allowed for byusing static force equivalents The first step is usually to determine a basic windspeed for the general region in which the structure is to be built by using infor-mation derived from meteorological studies This basic wind speed may representan extreme velocity measured at a height of 10 m and averaged over a period of3 seconds which has a return period of 50 years (ie a velocity which will onaverage be reached or exceeded once in 50 years or have a probability of beingexceeded of 150) The basic wind speed may be adjusted to account for the topog-raphy of the site for the ground roughness structure size and height above groundand for the degree of safety required and the period of exposure The resultingdesign wind speed may then be converted into the static pressure which will beexerted by the wind on a plane surface area (this is often referred to as the dynamicwind pressure because it is produced by decelerating the approaching wind veloc-ity to zero at the surface area) The wind force acting on the structure may thenbe calculated by using pressure coefficients appropriate to each individual surfaceof the structure or by using force coefficients appropriate to the total structureMany values of these coefficients are tabulated in [15] but in special cases wherethese are inappropriate the results of wind tunnel tests on model structures maybe used

In some cases it is not sufficient to treat wind loads as static forces For examplewhen fatigue is a problem both the magnitudes and the number of wind fluctuationsmust be estimated In other cases the dynamic response of a structure to wind loadsmay have to be evaluated (this is often the case with very flexible structures whoselong natural periods of vibration are close to those of some of the wind gusts) andthis may be done analytically [37 38] or by specialists using wind tunnel testsIn these cases special care must be taken to model correctly those properties ofthe structure which affect its response including its mass stiffness and dampingas well as the wind characteristics and any interactions between wind and structure

155 Earth or ground-water loads

Earth or ground-water loads act as pressure loads normal to the contact surface ofthe structure Such loads are usually considered to be essentially static

However earthquake loads are dynamic in nature and their effects on the struc-ture must be allowed for Very flexible structures with long natural periods ofvibration respond in an equivalent static manner to the high frequencies of earth-quake movements and so can be designed as if loaded by static force equivalents

20 Introduction

On the other hand stiff structures with short natural periods of vibration respondsignificantly and so in such a case a proper dynamic analysis [37 38] shouldbe made The intensities of earthquake loads vary with the region in which thestructure is to be built but they are not considered to be significant in the UK

156 Indirect forces

Indirect forces may be described as those forces which result from the strainingof a structure or its components and may be distinguished from the direct forcescaused by the dead and applied loads and pressures The straining may arise fromtemperature changes from foundation settlement from shrinkage creep or crack-ing of structural or other materials and from the manufacturing process as in thecase of residual stresses The values of indirect forces are not usually specifiedand so it is common for the designer to determine which of these forces should beallowed for and what force magnitudes should be adopted

157 Combinations of loads

The different loads discussed in the preceding subsections do not occur alone but incombinations and so the designer must determine which combination is the mostcritical for the structure However if the individual loads which have differentprobabilities of occurrence and degrees of variability were combined directlythe resulting load combination would have a greatly reduced probability Thusit is logical to reduce the magnitudes of the various components of a combinationaccording to their probabilities of occurrence This is similar to the procedure usedin reducing the imposed load intensities used over large areas

The past design practice was to use the worst combination of dead load withimposed load andor wind load and to allow increased stresses whenever thewind load was included (which is equivalent to reducing the load magnitudes)These increases seem to be logical when imposed and wind loads act togetherbecause the probability that both of these loads will attain their maximum valuessimultaneously is greatly reduced However they are unjustified when applied inthe case of dead and wind load for which the probability of occurrence is virtuallyunchanged from that of the wind load

A different and more logical method of combining loads is used in the EC3 limitstates design method [8] which is based on statistical analyses of the loads andthe structure capacities (see Section 1734) Strength design is usually carriedout for the most severe combination of actions for normal (termed persistent) ortemporary (termed transient) conditions usingsum

jge1

γG jGk j + γQ1Qk 1 +sumigt1

γQiψ0iQk i (16)

where implies lsquothe combined effect ofrsquo γG and γQ are partial factors for thepersistent G and variable Q actions andψ0 is a combination factor The concept is

Introduction 21

Table 11 Partial load factors for common situations

Ultimate limit state Permanent actions γG Variable actions γQ

Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable

EQU 11 09 15 0STRGEO 135 10 15 0

thus to use all the persistent actions Gk j such as self-weight and fixed equipmentwith a leading variable action Qk 1 such as imposed snow or wind load andreduced values of the other variable actions Qk i More information on the Eurocodeapproach to loading for steel structures is given in [39ndash41]

This approach is applied to the following forms of ultimate limit state

EQU = loss of static equilibrium of the structure on any part of itSTR = failure by excessive deformation transformation of the structure or

any part of it into a mechanism rupture or loss of stability of thestructure or of any part of it

GEO = failure or excessive deformation of the groundFAT = fatigue failure

For the most common set of design situations use of the appropriate values from[41] gives the load factors of Table 11

Using the combination factors of ψ0 = 07 and 05 of [41] for most variableactions and wind actions respectively leads to the following common STR loadcombinations for buildings

135 G + 15 QI + 075 QW

135 G + 105 QI + 15 QW

minus 10 G + 15 QI and

minus 10 G + 15 QW

in which the minus signs indicate that the permanent action is favourable

16 Analysis of steel structures

161 General

In the design process the assessment of whether the structural design require-ments will be met or not requires the knowledge of the stiffness and strength ofthe structure under load and of its local stresses and deformations The term struc-tural analysis is used to denote the analytical process by which this knowledge

22 Introduction

of the response of the structure can be obtained The basis for this process is theknowledge of the material behaviour and this is used first to analyse the behaviourof the individual members and joints of the structure The behaviour of the completestructure is then synthesised from these individual behaviours

The methods of structural analysis are fully treated in many textbooks[eg 25ndash27] and so details of these are not within the scope of this book Howeversome discussion of the concepts and assumptions of structural analysis is neces-sary so that the designer can make appropriate assumptions about the structure andmake a suitable choice of the method of analysis

In most methods of structural analysis the distribution of forces and momentsthroughout the structure is determined by using the conditions of static equilib-rium and of geometric compatibility between the members at the joints The wayin which this is done depends on whether a structure is statically determinate(in which case the complete distribution of forces and moments can be determinedby statics alone) or is statically indeterminate (in which case the compatibilityconditions for the deformed structure must also be used before the analysis can becompleted)

An important feature of the methods of structural analysis is the constitutiverelationships between the forces and moments acting on a member or connectionand its deformations These play the same role for the structural element as do thestressndashstrain relationships for an infinitesimal element of a structural material Theconstitutive relationship may be linear (force proportional to deflection) and elastic(perfect recovery on unloading) or they may be non-linear because of material non-linearities such as yielding (inelastic) or because of geometrical non-linearities(elastic) such as when the deformations themselves induce additional momentsas in stability problems

It is common for the designer to idealise the structure and its behaviour so asto simplify the analysis A three-dimensional frame structure may be analysed asthe group of a number of independent two-dimensional frames while individualmembers are usually considered as one-dimensional and the joints as points Thejoints may be assumed to be frictionless hinges or to be semi-rigid or rigid Insome cases the analysis may be replaced or supplemented by tests made on anidealised model which approximates part or all of the structure

162 Analysis of statically determinate membersand structures

For an isolated statically determinate member the forces and moments acting onthe member are already known and the structural analysis is only used to determinethe stiffness and strength of the member A linear elastic (or first-order elastic)analysis is usually made of the stiffness of the member when the material non-linearities are generally unimportant and the geometrical non-linearities are oftensmall The strength of the member however is not so easily determined as oneor both of the material and geometric non-linearities are most important Instead

Introduction 23

the designer usually relies on a design code or specification for this informationThe strength of the isolated statically determinate members is fully discussed inChapters 2ndash7 and 10

For a statically determinate structure the principles of static equilibrium areused in the structural analysis to determine the member forces and moments andthe stiffness and strength of each member are then determined in the same way asfor statically determinate members

163 Analysis of statically indeterminate structures

A statically indeterminate structure can be approximately analysed if a sufficientnumber of assumptions are made about its behaviour to allow it to be treated asif determinate One method of doing this is to guess the locations of points ofzero bending moment and to assume there are frictionless hinges at a sufficientnumber of these locations that the member forces and moments can be determinedby statics alone Such a procedure is commonly used in the preliminary analysisof a structure and followed at a later stage by a more precise analysis Howevera structure designed only on the basis of an approximate analysis can still be safeprovided the structure has sufficient ductility to redistribute any excess forces andmoments Indeed the method is often conservative and its economy increaseswith the accuracy of the estimated locations of the points of zero bending momentMore commonly a preliminary analysis is made of the structure based on thelinear elastic computer methods of analysis [42 43] using approximate memberstiffnesses

The accurate analysis of statically indeterminate structures is complicated by theinteraction between members the equilibrium and compatibility conditions andthe constitutive relationships must all be used in determining the member forcesand moments There are a number of different types of analysis which might bemade and some indication of the relevance of these is given in Figure 115 andin the following discussion Many of these can only be used for two-dimensionalframes

For many structures it is common to use a first-order elastic analysis which isbased on linear elastic constitutive relationships and which ignores any geometricalnon-linearities and associated instability problems The deformations determinedby such an analysis are proportional to the applied loads and so the principle ofsuperposition can be used to simplify the analysis It is often assumed that axialand shear deformations can be ignored in structures whose action is predominantlyflexural and that flexural and shear deformations can be ignored in structureswhose member forces are predominantly axial These assumptions further simplifythe analysis which can then be carried out by any of the well-known methods[25ndash27] for which many computer programs are available [44 45] Some of theseprograms can be used for three-dimensional frames

However a first-order elastic analysis will underestimate the forces andmoments in and the deformations of a structure when instability effects are present

24 Introduction

Deformation

Load

First-order elastic analysis

Elastic stability analysis

Second-orderelastic analysis

First-order plasticanalysis

Advancedanalysis

Strength load

Service load

1

4

3

2

5

Figure 115 Predictions of structural analyses

Some estimate of the importance of these in the absence of flexural effects can beobtained by making an elastic stability analysis A second-order elastic analysisaccounts for both flexure and instability but this is difficult to carry out althoughcomputer programs are now generally available [44 45] EC3 permits the useof the results of an elastic stability analysis in the amplification of the first-ordermoments as an alternative to second-order analysis

The analysis of statically indeterminate structures near the ultimate load isfurther complicated by the decisive influence of the material and geometricalnon-linearities In structures without material non-linearities an elastic stabilityanalysis is appropriate when there are no flexural effects but this is a rare occur-rence On the other hand many flexural structures have very small axial forcesand instability effects in which case it is comparatively easy to use a first-orderplastic analysis according to which a sufficient number of plastic hinges mustform to transform the structure into a collapse mechanism

More generally the effects of instability must be allowed for and as a firstapproximation the nominal first yield load determined from a second-order elasticanalysis may be used as a conservative estimate of the ultimate load A much moreaccurate estimate may be obtained for structures where local and lateral bucklingis prevented by using an advanced analysis [46] in which the actual behaviour isclosely analysed by allowing for instability yielding residual stresses and initialcrookedness However this method is not yet in general use

17 Design of steel structures

171 Structural requirements and design criteria

The designerrsquos task of assessing whether or not a structure will satisfy the structuralrequirements of serviceability and strength is complicated by the existence of errors

Introduction 25

and uncertainties in his or her analysis of the structural behaviour and estimation ofthe loads acting and even in the structural requirements themselves The designerusually simplifies this task by using a number of design criteria which allow him orher to relate the structural behaviour predicted by his or her analysis to the structuralrequirements Thus the designer equates the satisfaction of these criteria by thepredicted structural behaviour with satisfaction of the structural requirements bythe actual structure

In general the various structural design requirements relate to correspondinglimit states and so the design of a structure to satisfy all the appropriate require-ments is often referred to as a limit states design The requirements are commonlypresented in a deterministic fashion by requiring that the structure shall not failor that its deflections shall not exceed prescribed limits However it is not possibleto be completely certain about the structure and its loading and so the structuralrequirements may also be presented in probabilistic forms or in deterministicforms derived from probabilistic considerations This may be done by defining anacceptably low risk of failure within the design life of the structure after reachingsome sort of balance between the initial cost of the structure and the economic andhuman losses resulting from failure In many cases there will be a number of struc-tural requirements which operate at different load levels and it is not unusual torequire a structure to suffer no damage at one load level but to permit some minordamage to occur at a higher load level provided there is no catastrophic failure

The structural design criteria may be determined by the designer or he or shemay use those stated or implied in design codes The stiffness design criteriaadopted are usually related to the serviceability limit state of the structure underthe service loads and are concerned with ensuring that the structure has sufficientstiffness to prevent excessive deflections such as sagging distortion and settle-ment and excessive motions under dynamic load including sway bounce andvibration

The strength limit state design criteria are related to the possible methods offailure of the structure under overload and understrength conditions and so thesedesign criteria are concerned with yielding buckling brittle fracture and fatigueAlso of importance is the ductility of the structure at and near failure ductilestructures give a warning of the impending failure and often redistribute the loadeffects away from the critical regions while ductility provides a method of energydissipation which will reduce the damage due to earthquake and blast loading Onthe other hand a brittle failure is more serious as it occurs with no warning offailure and in a catastrophic fashion with a consequent release of stored energyand increase in damage Other design criteria may also be adopted such as thoserelated to corrosion and fire

172 Errors and uncertainties

In determining the limitations prescribed by design criteria account must be takenof the deliberate and accidental errors made by the designer and of the uncertainties

26 Introduction

in his or her knowledge of the structure and its loads Deliberate errors includethose resulting from the assumptions made to simplify the analysis of the loadingand of the structural behaviour These assumptions are often made so that anyerrors involved are on the safe side but in many cases the nature of the errorsinvolved is not precisely known and some possibility of danger exists

Accidental errors include those due to a general lack of precision either inthe estimation of the loads and the analysis of the structural behaviour or in themanufacture and erection of the structure The designer usually attempts to controlthe magnitudes of these by limiting them to what he or she judges to be suitablysmall values Other accidental errors include what are usually termed blundersThese may be of a gross magnitude leading to failure or to uneconomic structuresor they may be less important Attempts are usually made to eliminate blunders byusing checking procedures but often these are unreliable and the logic of such aprocess is open to debate

As well as the errors described above there exist a number of uncertaintiesabout the structure itself and its loads The material properties of steel fluctuateespecially the yield stress and the residual stresses The practice of using a min-imum or characteristic yield stress for design purposes usually leads to oversafedesigns especially for redundant structures of reasonable size for which an aver-age yield stress would be more appropriate because of the redistribution of loadwhich takes place after early yielding Variations in the residual stress levels arenot often accounted for in design codes but there is a growing tendency to adjustdesign criteria in accordance with the method of manufacture so as to make someallowance for gross variations in the residual stresses This is undertaken to someextent in EC3

The cross-sectional dimensions of rolled-steel sections vary and the valuesgiven in section handbooks are only nominal especially for the thicknesses ofuniversal sections The fabricated lengths of a structural member will vary slightlyfrom the nominal length but this is usually of little importance except wherethe variation induces additional stresses because of lack-of-fit problems or wherethere is a cumulative geometrical effect Of some significance to members subjectto instability problems are the variations in their straightness which arise duringmanufacture fabrication and erection Some allowances for these are usuallymade in design codes while fabrication and erection tolerances are specified inEN1090 [47] to prevent excessive crookedness

The loads acting on a structure vary significantly Uncertainty exists in thedesignerrsquos estimate of the magnitude of the dead load because of the variations inthe densities of materials and because of the minor modifications to the structureduring or subsequent to its erection Usually these variations are not very signif-icant and a common practice is to err on the safe side by making conservativeassumptions Imposed loadings fluctuate significantly during the design usage ofthe structure and may change dramatically with changes in usage These fluctua-tions are usually accounted for by specifying what appear to be extreme values inloading codes but there is often a finite chance that these values will be exceeded

Introduction 27

Wind loads vary greatly and the magnitudes specified in loading codes are usuallyobtained by probabilistic methods

173 Strength design

1731 Load and capacity factors and factors of safety

The errors and uncertainties involved in the estimation of the loads on and thebehaviour of a structure may be allowed for in strength design by using load fac-tors to increase the nominal loads and capacity factors to decrease the structuralstrength In the previous codes that employed the traditional working stress designthis was achieved by using factors of safety to reduce the failure stresses to permis-sible working stress values The purpose of using various factors is to ensure thatthe probability of failure under the most adverse conditions of structural overloadand understrength remains very small The use of these factors is discussed in thefollowing subsections

1732 Working stress design

The working stress methods of design given in previous codes and specificationsrequired that the stresses calculated from the most adverse combination of loadsmust not exceed the specified permissible stresses These specified stresses wereobtained after making some allowances for the non-linear stability and materialeffects on the strength of isolated members and in effect were expressions of theirultimate strengths divided by the factors of safety SF Thus

Working stress le Permissible stress asymp Ultimate stress

SF(16)

It was traditional to use factors of safety of 17 approximatelyThe working stress method of a previous steel design code [48] has been replaced

by the limit states design method of EC3 Detailed discussions of the working stressmethod are available in the first edition of this book [49]

1733 Ultimate load design

The ultimate load methods of designing steel structures required that the calculatedultimate load-carrying capacity of the complete structure must not exceed the mostadverse combination of the loads obtained by multiplying the working loads bythe appropriate load factors LF Thussum

(Working load times LF) le Ultimate load (17)

These load factors allowed some margins for any deliberate and accidentalerrors and for the uncertainties in the structure and its loads and also provided the

28 Introduction

structure with a reserve of strength The values of the factors should depend on theload type and combination and also on the risk of failure that could be expectedand the consequences of failure A simplified approach often employed (perhapsillogically) was to use a single load factor on the most adverse combination of theworking loads

A previous code [48] allowed the use of the plastic method of ultimate loaddesign when stability effects were unimportant These have used load factors of170 approximately However this ultimate load method has also been replacedby the limit states design method in EC3 and will not be discussed further

1734 Limit states design

It was pointed out in Section 156 that different types of load have different proba-bilities of occurrence and different degrees of variability and that the probabilitiesassociated with these loads change in different ways as the degree of overloadconsidered increases Because of this different load factors should be used for thedifferent load types

Thus for limit states design the structure is deemed to be satisfactory if itsdesign load effect does not exceed its design resistance The design load effectis an appropriate bending moment torque axial force or shear force and iscalculated from the sum of the effects of the specified (or characteristic) loadsFk multiplied by partial factors γGQ which allow for the variabilities of the loadsand the structural behaviour The design resistance RkγM is calculated from thespecified (or characteristic) resistance Rk divided by the partial factor γM whichallows for the variability of the resistance Thus

Design load effect le Design resistance (18a)

or sumγgQ times (effect of specified loads) le (specified resistanceγM ) (18b)

Although the limit states design method is presented in deterministic formin equations 18 the partial factors involved are usually obtained by usingprobabilistic models based on statistical distributions of the loads and thecapacities Typical statistical distributions of the total load and the structuralcapacity are shown in Figure 116 The probability of failure pF is indicatedby the region for which the load distribution exceeds that for the structuralcapacity

In the development of limit state codes the probability of failure pF is usuallyrelated to a parameter β called the safety index by the transformation

Φ(minusβ) = pF (19)

where the functionΦ is the cumulative frequency distribution of a standard normalvariate [35] The relationship between β and pF shown in Figure 117 indicates

Introduction 29

Total load effect or resistance

Pro

babi

lity

dens

ity

Total loadeffect

Resistance

Shaded area illustratesprobability of failure

Sum

of

effe

cts

of s

peci

fied

load

sD

esig

n lo

ad e

ffec

t

Des

ign

resi

stan

ce

Spe

cifi

ed r

esis

tanc

e

Figure 116 Limit states design

ndash8 ndash6 ndash4 ndash2

Probability of failure pF

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Saf

ety

inde

x

10 10 10 10

Figure 117 Relationship between safety index and probability of failure

that an increase in β of 05 implies a decrease in the probability of failure byapproximately an order of magnitude

The concept of the safety index was used to derive the partial factors for EC3This was done with reference to previous national codes such as BS 5950 [50]to obtain comparable values of the probability of failure pF although much ofthe detailed calibration treated the load and resistance sides of equations 18separately

30 Introduction

174 Stiffness design

In the stiffness design of steel structures the designer seeks to make the structuresufficiently stiff so that its deflections under the most adverse working load con-ditions will not impair its strength or serviceability These deflections are usuallycalculated by a first-order linear elastic analysis although the effects of geometri-cal non-linearities should be included when these are significant as in structureswhich are susceptible to instability problems The design criteria used in the stiff-ness design relate principally to the serviceability of the structure in that theflexibility of the structure should not lead to damage of any non-structural compo-nents while the deflections should not be unsightly and the structure should notvibrate excessively It is usually left to the designer to choose limiting values foruse in these criteria which are appropriate to the structure although a few valuesare suggested in some design codes The stiffness design criteria which relate tothe strength of the structure itself are automatically satisfied when the appropriatestrength design criteria are satisfied

References

1 British Standards Institution (2005) BS4-1 Structural Steel Sections-Part 1 Specifica-tion for hot-rolled sections BSI London

2 OrsquoConnor C (1971) Design of Bridge Superstructures John Wiley New York3 Chatterjee S (1991) The Design of Modern Steel Bridges BSP Professional Books

Oxford4 Rhodes J (editor) (1991) Design of Cold Formed Members Elsevier Applied Science

London5 Rhodes J and Lawson RM (1992) Design of Steel Structures Using Cold Formed

Steel Sections Steel Construction Institute Ascot6 Yu W-W (2000) Cold-Formed Steel Design 3rd edition John Wiley New York7 Hancock GJ (1998) Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structures 3rd edition Australian

Institute of Steel Construction Sydney8 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 11

General Rules and Rules for Buildings BS EN 1993-1-1 BSI London9 Nervi PL (1956) Structures McGraw-Hill New York

10 Salvadori MG and Heller R (1963) Structure in Architecture Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

11 Torroja E (1958) The Structures of Educardo Torroja FW Dodge Corp New York12 Fraser DJ (1981) Conceptual Design and Preliminary Analysis of Structures Pitman

Publishing Inc Marshfield Massachusetts13 Krick EV (1969) An Introduction to Engineering and Engineering Design 2nd

edition John Wiley New York14 British Standards Institution (2002) Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 11

General Actions ndash Densities Self-weight Imposed Loads for Buildings BS EN1991-1-1 BSI London

15 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 14General Actions ndash Wind Actions BS EN 1991-1-4 BSI London

Introduction 31

16 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 15Plated Structural Elements BS EN 1993-1-5 BSI London

17 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 18Design of Joints BS EN 1993-1-8 BSI London

18 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 110Selection of Steel for Fracture Toughness and Through-Thickness Properties BS EN1993-1-10 BSI London

19 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 2Steel Bridges BS EN 1993-2 BSI London

20 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 4 Design of Composite Steel and Con-crete Structures Part 11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings BS EN 1994-1-1BSI London

21 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2003) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th editionBlackwell Publishing Oxford

22 CIMsteel (1997) Design for Construction Steel Construction Institute Ascot23 Antill JM and Ryan PWS (1982) Civil Engineering Construction 5th edition

McGraw-Hill Sydney24 Australian Institute of Steel Construction (1991) Economical Structural Steelwork

AISC Sydney25 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis 3rd

edition McGraw-Hill New York26 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1990) Structural Analysis 3rd edition

Van Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham27 Ghali A Neville AM and Brown TG (1997) Structural Analysis ndash A Unified

Classical and Matrix Approach 5th edition Routledge Oxford28 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures Part 19

Fatigue Strength of Steel Structures BS EN 1993-1-9 BSI London Rules for BuildingsECS Brussels

29 Miner MA (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue Journal of Applied MechanicsASME 12 No 3 September pp A-159ndashA-164

30 Gurney TR (1979) Fatigue of Welded Structures 2nd edition Cambridge UniversityPress

31 Lay MG (1982) Structural Steel Fundamentals Australian Road Research BoardMelbourne

32 Rolfe ST and Barsoum JM (1977) Fracture and Fatigue Control in Steel StructuresPrentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs New Jersey

33 Grundy P (1985) Fatigue limit state for steel structures Civil Engineering Transac-tions Institution of Engineers Australia CE27 No 1 February pp 143ndash8

34 Navy Department Advisory Committee on Structural Steels (1970) Brittle Fracture inSteel Structures (ed GM Boyd) Butterworth London

35 Walpole RE Myers RH Myers SL and Ye K (2007) Probability and Statisticsfor Engineers and Scientists 8th edition Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs

36 Ravindra MK and Galambos TV (1978) Load and resistance factor design for steelJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 104 No ST9 September pp 1337ndash54

37 Clough RW and Penzien J (2004) Dynamics of Structures 2nd edition CSI BooksBerkeley California

38 Irvine HM (1986) Structural Dynamics for the Practising Engineer Allen andUnwin London

32 Introduction

39 Gulvanesian H Calgaro J-A and Holicky M (2002) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1990Eurocode Basis of Structural Design Thomas Telford Publishing London

40 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) Designersrsquo Guide to EN 1993-1-1 ThomasTelford Publishing London

41 Gardner L and Grubb PJ (2008) Guide to Eurocode Load Combinations for SteelStructures British Constructional Steelwork Association

42 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

43 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 Pergamon PressOxford

44 Computer Service Consultants (2006) S-Frame 3D Structural Analysis Suite CSC(UK) Limited Leeds

45 Research Engineers Europe Limited (2006) STAADPro Space Frame Analysis REEBristol

46 Clarke MJ (1994) Plastic-zone analysis of frames Chapter 6 of Advanced Analysis ofSteel Frames Theory Software and Applications (eds WF Chen and S Toma) CRCPress Inc Boca Raton Florida pp 259ndash319

47 British Standards Institution (1998) Execution of Steel Structures ndash General Rules andRules for Buildings BS DD ENV 1090-1 BSI London

48 British Standards Institution (1969) BS449 Part 2 Specification for the Use ofStructural Steel in Building BSI London

49 Trahair NS (1977) The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures 1st editionChapman and Hall London

50 British Standards Institution (2000) BS5950 The Structural Use of Steelwork inBuilding Part 1 Code of Practice for Design Rolled and Welded Sections BSILondon

Chapter 2

Tension members

21 Introduction

Concentrically loaded uniform tension members are perhaps the simplest structuralelements as they are nominally in a state of uniform axial stress Because of thistheir load-deformation behaviour very closely parallels the stressndashstrain behaviourof structural steel obtained from the results of tensile tests (see Section 131)Thus a member remains essentially linear and elastic until the general yield loadis approached even if it has residual stresses and initial crookedness

However in many cases a tension member is not loaded or connected concen-trically or it has transverse loads acting resulting in bending actions as well asan axial tension action Simple design procedures are available which enable thebending actions in some members with eccentric connections to be ignored butmore generally special account must be taken of the bending action in design

Tension members often have comparatively high average stresses and in somecases the effects of local stress concentrations may be significant especially whenthere is a possibility that the steel material may not act in a ductile fashion In suchcases the causes of stress concentrations should be minimised and the maximumlocal stresses should be estimated and accounted for

In this chapter the behaviour and design of steel tension members are discussedThe case of concentrically loaded members is dealt with first and then a procedurewhich allows the simple design of some eccentrically connected tension membersis presented The design of tension members with eccentric or transverse loads isthen considered the effects of stress concentrations are discussed and finally thedesign of tension members according to EC3 is dealt with

22 Concentrically loaded tension members

221 Members without holes

The straight concentrically loaded steel tension member of length L and constantcross-sectional area A which is shown in Figure 21a has no holes and is free fromresidual stress The axial extension e of the member varies with the load N in the

34 Tension members

Load N

Npl

Nu

Elastic

Plastic

Strain-hardeningFracture

Not to scale

Axial extension e

(b) Axial extension e

ey est

E AN N

L e

(a) Tension member

Figure 21 Load-extension behaviour of a perfect tension member

same way as does the average strain ε= eL with the average stress σ = NA andso the load-extension relationship for the member shown in Figure 21b is similarto the material stressndashstrain relationship shown in Figure 16 Thus the extensionat first increases linearly with the load and is equal to

e = NL

EA (21)

where E is the Youngrsquos modulus of elasticity This linear increase continues untilthe yield stress fy of the steel is reached at the general yield load

Npl = Afy (22)

when the extension increases with little or no increase in load until strain-hardeningcommences After this the load increases slowly until the maximum value

Nu = Afu (23)

is reached in which fu is the ultimate tensile strength of the steel Beyond thisa local cross-section of the member necks down and the load N decreases untilfracture occurs

The behaviour of the tension member is described as ductile in that it can reachand sustain the general yield load while significant extensions occur before itfractures The general yield load Npl is often taken as the load capacity of themember

If the tension member is not initially stress free but has a set of residual stressesinduced during its manufacture such as that shown in Figure 22b then localyielding commences before the general yield load Npl is reached (Figure 22c) andthe range over which the load-extension behaviour is linear decreases Howeverthe general yield load Npl at which the whole cross-section is yielded can stillbe reached because the early yielding causes a redistribution of the stresses The

Tension members 35

1 Residual stress(N = 0)

First yield

b

Fully yielded(N = Npl)

2

3

4

fy

t

(a) Section

(b) Stressdistributions

tc

c

Load N

Npl

est

Extension e

ey1

23 4

(c) Load-extension behaviour

Figure 22 Effect of residual stresses on load-extension behaviour

N = 0 N = 0 N Nww0

(a) Initial crookedness (b) Deflection under load

Figure 23 Tension member with initial crookedness

residual stresses also cause local early strain-hardening and while the plastic rangeis shortened (Figure 22c) the member behaviour is still regarded as ductile

If however the tension member has an initial crookedness w0 (Figure 23a)the axial load causes it to bend and deflect laterally w (Figure 23b) These lateraldeflections partially straighten the member so that the bending action in the centralregion is reduced The bending induces additional axial stresses (see Section 53)which cause local early yielding and strain-hardening in much the same way asdo residual stresses (see Figure 22c) The resulting reductions in the linear andplastic ranges are comparatively small when the initial crookedness is small as isnormally the case and the member behaviour is ductile

222 Members with small holes

The presence of small local holes in a tension member (such as small bolt holesused for the connections of the member) causes early yielding around the holesso that the load-deflection behaviour becomes non-linear When the holes aresmall the member may reach the gross yield load (see equation 22) calculated

36 Tension members

No holesHoles not significantSignificant holes

Extension e

Load N

Afu

Afy

Anet fu

Figure 24 Effect of holes on load-extension behaviour

on the gross area A as shown in Figure 24 because of strain-hardening effectsaround the holes In this case the member behaviour is ductile and the non-linearbehaviour can be ignored because the axial extension of the member under load isnot significantly increased except when there are so many holes along the lengthof the member that the average cross-sectional area is significantly reduced Thusthe extension e can normally be calculated by using the gross cross-sectional areaA in equation 21

223 Members with significant holes

When the holes are large the member may fail before the gross yield load Npl isreached by fracturing at a hole as shown in Figure 24 The local fracture load

Nu = Anet fu (24)

is calculated on the net area of the cross-section Anet measured perpendicular tothe line of action of the load and is given by

Anet = A minussum

d0t (25)

where d0 is the diameter of a hole t the thickness of the member at the hole andthe summation is carried out for all holes in the cross-section under considerationThe fracture load Nu is determined by the weakest cross-section and therefore bythe minimum net area Anet A member which fails by fracture before the grossyield load can be reached is not ductile and there is little warning of failure

In many practical tension members with more than one row of holes the reduc-tion in the cross-sectional area may be reduced by staggering the rows of holes(Figure 25) In this case the possibility must be considered of failure along a zigndashzag path such as ABCDE in Figure 25 instead of across the section perpendicular

Tension members 37

A

B

C

D

E

p

p

s s

N N

Figure 25 Possible failure path with staggered holes

to the load The minimum amount of stagger sm for which a hole no longer reducesthe area of the member depends on the diameter d0 of the hole and the inclinationps of the failure path where p is the gauge distance between the rows of holesAn approximate expression for this minimum stagger is

sm asymp (4pd0)12 (26)

When the actual stagger s is less than sm some reduced part of the hole areaAh must be deducted from the gross area A and this can be approximated byAh = d0t(1 minus s2s2

m) whence

Ah = d0t(1 minus s24pd0) (27)

Anet = A minussum

d0t +sum

s2t4p (28)

where the summations are made for all the holes on the zigndashzag path consideredand for all the staggers in the path The use of equation 28 is allowed for inClause 6222 of EC3 and is illustrated in Section 271

Holes in tension members also cause local stress increases at the hole boundariesas well as the increased average stresses NAnet discussed above These localstress concentrations and their influence on member strength are discussed laterin Section 25

23 Eccentrically and locally connectedtension members

In many cases the fabrication of tension members is simplified by making theirend connections eccentric (ie the centroid of the connection does not coincidewith the centroidal axis of the member) and by connecting to some but not all ofthe elements in the cross-section It is common for example to make connections

38 Tension members

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 26 Eccentrically and locally connected tension members

to an angle section through one leg only to a tee-section through the flange (ortable) or to a channel section through the web (Figure 26) The effect of eccentricconnections is to induce bending moments in the member whilst the effect ofconnecting to some but not all elements in the cross-section is to cause thoseregions most remote from the connection point(s) to carry less load The latter isessentially a shear lag effect (see Section 545) Both of these effects are localto the connections decreasing along the member length and are reduced furtherby ductile stress redistribution after the onset of yielding Members connected bysome but not all of the elements in the cross-section (including those connectedsymmetrically as in Figure 26d) are also discussed in Section 25

While tension members in bending can be designed rationally by using the pro-cedure described in Section 24 simpler methods [1ndash3] also produce satisfactoryresults In these simpler methods the effects described above are approximatedby reducing the cross-sectional area of the member (to an effective net area)and by designing it as if concentrically loaded For a single angle in tension con-nected by a single row of bolts in one leg the effective net section Aneteff to beused in place of the net area Anet in equation 24 is defined in EC3-1-8 [4] It isdependent on the number of bolts and the pitch p1 and for one bolt is given by

Aneteff = 20(e2 minus 05 d0)t (29)

for two bolts by

Aneteff = β2Anet (210)

and for three or more bolts by

Aneteff = β3Anet (211)

The symbols in equations 29ndash211 are defined below and in Figure 27 and Anet

is the net area of the angle For an unequal angle connected by its smaller leg Anet

Tension members 39

e1 p1 p1

e2 d0

Figure 27 Definition of symbols for tension connections in single angles

should be taken as the net section of an equivalent equal angle of leg length equalto the smaller leg of the unequal angle In the case of welded end connections foran equal angle or an unequal angle connected by its larger leg the eccentricitymay be neglected and the effective area Anet may be taken as equal to the grossarea A (Clause 413(2) of EC3-1-8 [4])

For a pair of bolts in a single row in an angle leg β2 in equation 210 is takenas 04 for closely spaced bolts (p1 le 25 d0) as 07 if they are widely spaced(p1 ge 5 d0) or as a linear interpolation for intermediate spacings For three ormore bolts in a single row in an angle leg β3 in equation 211 is taken as 05 forclosely spaced bolts (p1 le 25 d0) as 07 if they are widely spaced (p1 ge 5 d0)or again as a linear interpolation for intermediate spacings

24 Bending of tension members

Tension members often have bending actions caused by eccentric connectionseccentric loads or transverse loads including self-weight as shown in Figure 28These bending actions which interact with the tensile loads reduce the ultimatestrengths of tension members and must therefore be accounted for in design

The axial tension N and transverse deflections w of a tension member causedby any bending action induce restoring moments Nw which oppose the bend-ing action It is a common (and conservative) practice to ignore these restoringmoments which are small when either the bending deflections w or the tensile loadN are small In this case the maximum stress σmax in the member can be safelyapproximated by

σmax = σat + σbty + σbtz (212)

where σat = NA is the average tensile stress and σbty and σbtz are the maximumtensile bending stresses caused by the major and minor axis bending actions My

and Mz alone (see Section 53) The nominal first yield of the member thereforeoccurs when σmax = fy whence

σat + σbty + σbtz = fy (213)

When either the tensile load N or the moments My and Mz are not small the firstyield prediction of equation 213 is inaccurate A suggested interaction equation

40 Tension members

N Nw

(a) Transverse load only (b) Transverse load and tension

Bending moment diagrams

Nw

Figure 28 Bending of a tension member

for failure is the linear inequality

MyEd

MtyRd+ MzEd

MrzRdle 1 (214)

where MrzRd is the cross-section resistance for tension and bending about theminor principal (z) axis given by

MrzRd = MczRd(1 minus NtEdNtRd) (215)

and MtyRd is the lesser of the cross-section resistance MryRd for tension andbending about the major principal (y) axis given by

MryRd = McyRd(1 minus NtEdNtRd) (216)

and the out-of-plane member buckling resistance MbtRd for tension and bendingabout the major principal axis given by

MbtRd = MbRd(1 + NtEdNtRd) le McyRd (217)

in which MbRd is the lateral buckling resistance when N = 0 (see Chapter 6)In these equations NtRd is the tensile resistance in the absence of bending

(taken as the lesser of Npl and Nu) while McyRd and MczRd are the cross-sectionresistances for bending alone about the y and z axes (see Sections 472 and 5613)Equation 214 is similar to the first yield condition of equation 213 but includesa simple approximation for the possibility of lateral buckling under large valuesof MyEd through the use of equation 217

25 Stress concentrations

High local stress concentrations are not usually important in ductile materialsunder static loading situations because the local yielding resulting from these

Tension members 41

concentrations causes a favourable redistribution of stress However in situationsfor which it is doubtful whether the steel will behave in a ductile manner aswhen there is a possibility of brittle fracture of a tension member under dynamicloads (see Section 133) or when repeated load applications may lead to fatiguefailure (see Section 132) stress concentrations become very significant It isusual to try to avoid or minimise stress concentrations by providing suitable jointand member details but this is not always possible in which case some estimateof the magnitudes of the local stresses must be made

Stress concentrations in tension members occur at holes in the member andwhere there are changes or very local reductions in the cross-section and at pointswhere concentrated forces act The effects of a hole in a tension member (ofnet width bnet and thickness t) are shown by the uppermost curve in Figure 29which is a plot of the variation of the stress concentration factor (the ratio ofthe maximum tensile stress to the nominal stress averaged over the reduced cross-section bnet t)with the ratio of the hole radius r to the net width bnet The maximumstress approaches three times the nominal stress when the plate width is very large(rbnet rarr 0)

This curve may also be used for plates with a series of holes spaced equallyacross the plate width provided bnet is taken as the minimum width betweenadjacent holes The effects of changes in the cross-section of a plate in tension areshown by the lower curves in Figure 29 while the effects of some notches or verylocal reductions in the cross-section are given in [5] Methods of analysing theseand other stress concentrations are discussed in [6]

Large concentrated forces are usually transmitted to structural members by localbearing and while this produces high local compressive stresses any subsequent

Str

ess

conc

entr

atio

n fa

ctor

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 01 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

3 0

3 5

N o m i n al s t r e s s i sc a l cu la t e d f o r n e t area bnet times t

b

2 r bnet 2

b r bnet

Ratio rbnet

15 225

(b-bnet )2r=1

Figure 29 Stress concentrations in tension members

42 Tension members

plastic yielding is not usually serious Of more importance are the increased tensilestresses which result when only some of the plate elements of a tension memberare loaded (see Figure 26) as discussed in Section 23 In this case conservativeestimates can be made of these stresses by assuming that the resulting bending andaxial actions are resisted solely by the loaded elements

26 Design of tension members

261 General

In order to design or to check a tension member the design tensile force NtEd ateach cross-section in the member is obtained by a frame analysis (see Chapter 8)or by statics if the member is statically determinate using the appropriate loadsand partial load factors γG γQ (see Section 17) If there is substantial bendingpresent the design moments MyEd and MzEd about the major and minor principalaxes respectively are also obtained

The process of checking a specified tension member or of designing an unknownmember is summarised in Figure 210 for the case where bending actions can beignored If a specified member is to be checked then both the strength limit statesof gross yielding and the net fracture are considered so that both the yield strengthfy and the ultimate strength fu are required When the member size is not knownan approximate target area A can be established The trial member selected maybe checked for the fracture limit state once its holes connection eccentricities andnet area Anet have been established and modified if necessary

The following sub-sections describe each of the EC3 check and design processesfor a statically loaded tension member Worked examples of their application aregiven in Sections 271ndash275

262 Concentrically loaded tension members

The EC3 method of strength design of tension members which are loaded concen-trically follows the philosophy of Section 22 with the two separate limit statesof yield of the gross section and fracture of the net section represented by a singleequation

NtEd le NtRd (218)

where NtRd is the design tension resistance which is taken as the lesser of theyield (or plastic) resistance of the cross-section NplRd and the ultimate (or fracture)resistance of the cross-section containing holes NuRd

The yield limit state of equation 22 is given in EC3 as

NplRd = AfyγM0 (219)

where A is the gross area of the cross-section and γM0 is the partial factor forcross-section resistance with a value of 10

Tension members 43

Checking Designing

Section

Loading

Analysis for NEd

Find fy fu Anet

Assume fy

Find trial section A ge

ge

NEd fy

NtRd is the lesser of NplRd and NuRd

Check NEd Nt Rd

Check complete

Design complete

Find new section

Yes

No

NplRd = Afy γM0 NuRd = 09Anet fu γM2

Figure 210 Flow chart for the design of tension members

The fracture limit state of equation 24 is given in EC3 as

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 (220)

where Anet is the net area of the cross-section and γM2 is the partial factor forresistance in tension to fracture with a value of 11 given in the National Annex

44 Tension members

to EC3 The factor 09 in equation 220 ensures that the effective partial factorγM209(asymp122) for the limit state of material fracture (NuRd) is suitably higherthan the value of γM0(=10) for the limit state of yielding (NplRd) reflecting theinfluence of greater variability in fu and the reduced ductility of members whichfail by fracture at bolt holes

263 Eccentrically connected tension members

The EC3 method of strength design of simple angle tension members which areconnected eccentrically as shown in Figure 26 is similar to the method discussedin Section 262 for concentrically loaded members with the lsquo09Anetrsquo used inequation 220 being replaced by an effective net area Aneteff as described inSection 23

264 Tension members with bending

2641 Cross-section resistance

EC3 provides the conservative inequality

NtEd

NtRd+ MyEd

MyRd+ MzEd

MzRdle 1 (221)

for the cross-section resistance of tension members with design bending momentsMyEd and MzEd where MyRd and MzRd are the cross-section moment resistances(Sections 472 and 5613)

Equation 221 is rather conservative and so EC3 allows I-section tensionmembers with Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections (see Section 472) with bendingabout the major (y) axis to satisfy

MyEd le MN yRd = MplyRd

(1 minus NtEdNplRd

1 minus 05a

)le MplyRd (222)

in which MN yRd is the reduced plastic design moment resistance about themajor (y) axis (reduced from the full plastic design moment resistance MplyRd toaccount for the axial force (see Section 7241) and

a = (A minus 2btf )A le 05 (223)

in which b and tf are the flange width and thickness respectively For I-sectiontension members with Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections with bending about the

Tension members 45

minor (z) axis EC3 allows

MzEd le MN zRd = MplzRd

1 minus

(NtEdNplRd minus a

1 minus a

)2

le MplzRd (224)

where MN zRd is the reduced plastic design moment resistance about the minor (z)axis

EC3 also provides an alternative to equation 221 for the section resistance toaxial tension and bending about both principal axes of Class 1 or Class 2 cross-sections This is the more accurate interaction equation (see Section 742)(

MyEd

MN yRd

)α+

(MzEd

MN z Rd

)βle 1 (225)

where the values of α and β depend on the cross-section type (eg α= 20 andβ = 5NtEdNplRd for I-sections and α=β = 2 for circular hollow sections)

A worked example of a tension member with bending actions is given inSection 275

2642 Member resistance

EC3 does not provide any specific rules for determining the influence of lateralbuckling on the member resistance of tension members with bending This maybe accounted for conservatively by using

MyEd le MbRd (226)

in equation 221 in which MbRd is the design buckling moment resistance of themember (see Section 65) This equation conservatively omits the strengtheningeffect of tension on lateral buckling A less conservative method is provided byequations 214ndash217

27 Worked examples

271 Example 1 ndash net area of a bolted universal columnsection member

Problem Both flanges of a universal column section member have 22 mm diam-eter holes arranged as shown in Figure 211a If the gross area of the section is201 times 102 mm2 and the flange thickness is 25 mm determine the net area Anet ofthe member which is effective in tensionSolution Using equation 26 the minimum stagger is sm = radic

(4 times 60 times 22)=727 mmgt 30 mm = s The failure path through each flange is therefore stag-gered and by inspection it includes four holes and two staggers The net area can

46 Tension members

6 0 6 0 6 0

6 0

1 2 0

6 0

6 0 6 0

Gross area of member = 201times102 mm2

Flange is 3112 mm times 25 mm Holes are 22 mm diameter

(a) Flange of universal column section

1 0 0

1 0 0

1 0 2 9 1

2 6 1 2

1 2 y

z

(b) Universal beam section

(c) Double angle section

Dimensions in mm

A = 159 cm2 A = 2 times 227 cm2

Figure 211 Examples 1ndash6

therefore be calculated from equation 28 (or Clause 6222(4) of EC3) as

Anet = [201 times 102] minus [2 times 4 times (22 times 25)] + [2 times 2 times (302 times 25)(4 times 60)]= 161 times 102 mm2

272 Example 2 ndash checking a bolted universal columnsection member

Problem Determine the tension resistance of the tension member of example 1assuming it is of S355 steel

Solution

tf = 25 mm fy = 345 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 201 times 102 times 34510 = 6935 kN 623(2)a

From Section 271

Anet = 161 times 102 mm2

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 = 09 times 161 times 102 times 49011 = 6445 kN623(2)b

NtRd = 6445 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) 623(2)

Tension members 47

273 Example 3 ndash checking a bolted universal beamsection member

Problem A 610times229 UB 125 tension member of S355 steel is connected throughboth flanges by 20 mm bolts (in 22 mm diameter bolt holes) in four lines twoin each flange as shown in Figure 211b Check the member for a design tensionforce of NtEd = 4000 kN

Solution

tf = 196 mm fy = 345 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

A = 15 900 mm2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 15900 times 34510 = 5486 kN 623(2)a

Anet = 15 900 minus (4 times 22 times 196) = 14175 mm2 6222(3)

NuRd = 09Anet fuγM2 = 09 times 14175 times 49011 = 5683 kN 623(2)b

NtRd = 5486 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) gt 4000 kN = NtEd

623(2)

and so the member is satisfactory

274 Example 4 ndash checking an eccentrically connectedsingle (unequal) angle

Problem A tension member consists of a 150 times 75 times 10 single unequal anglewhose ends are connected to gusset plates through the larger leg by a singlerow of four 22 mm bolts in 24 mm holes at 60 mm centres Use the method ofSection 23 to check the member for a design tension force of NtEd = 340 kN if theangle is of S355 steel and has a gross area of 217 cm2

Solution

t = 10 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 fu = 490 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

Gross area of cross-section A = 2170 mm2

NplRd = AfyγM0 = 2170 times 35510 = 7704 kN 623(2)a

Anet = 2170 minus (24 times 10) = 1930 mm2 6222(3)

β3 = 05 (since the pitch p1 = 60 mm = 25d0) EC3-1-8 3103(2)

NuRd = β3Anet fuγM2 = 05 times 1930 times 49011 = 4299 kN 623(2)b

NtRd = 4299 kN (the lesser of NplRd and NuRd) gt 340 kN = NtEd

623(2)

and so the member is satisfactory

48 Tension members

275 Example 5 ndash checking a member under combinedtension and bending

Problem A tension member consists of two equal angles of S355 steel whose endsare connected to gusset plates as shown in Figure 211c If the load eccentricityfor the tension member is 391 mm and the tension and bending resistances are1438 kN and 377 kNm determine the resistance of the member by treating it asa member under combined tension and bending

SolutionSubstituting into equation 221 leads to

NtEd1438 + NtEd times (3911000)377 le 1 621(7)

so that NtEd le 5772 kNBecause the load eccentricity causes the member to bend about its minor axis

there is no need to check for lateral buckling which only occurs when there ismajor axis bending

276 Example 6 ndash estimating the stress concentration factor

Problem Estimate the maximum stress concentration factor for the tensionmember of Section 271

Solution For the inner line of holes the net width is

bnet = 60 + 30 minus 22 = 68 mm and so

rbnet = (222)68 = 016

and so using Figure 29 the stress concentration factor is approximately 25However the actual maximum stress is likely to be greater than 25 times the

nominal average stress calculated from the effective area Anet = 161 times 102 mm2

determined in Section 271 because the unconnected web is not completelyeffective A safe estimate of the maximum stress can be determined on the basisof the flange areas only of

Anet = [2 times 3106 times 25] minus [2 times 4 times 22 times 25] + [2 times 2 times (302 times 25)(4 times 60)]= 1151 times 102 mm2

28 Unworked examples

281 Example 7 ndash bolting arrangement

A channel section tension member has an overall depth of 381 mm width of1016 mm flange and web thicknesses of 163 and 104 mm respectively and an

Tension members 49

yield strength of 345 Nmm2 Determine an arrangement for bolting the web of thechannel to a gusset plate so as to minimise the gusset plate length and maximisethe tension member resistance

282 Example 8 ndash checking a channel section memberconnected by bolts

Determine the design tensile resistance NtRd of the tension member of Section281

283 Example 9 ndash checking a channel section memberconnected by welds

If the tension member of Section 281 is fillet welded to the gusset plate insteadof bolted determine its design tensile resistance NtRd

284 Example 10 ndash checking a member under combinedtension and bending

The beam of example 1 in Section 6151 has a concentric axial tensile load 5Q inaddition to the central transverse load Q Determine the maximum value of Q

References

1 Regan PE and Salter PR (1984) Tests on welded-angle tension members StructuralEngineer 62B(2) pp 25ndash30

2 Nelson HM (1953) Angles in Tension Publication No 7 British Constructional SteelAssociation pp 9ndash18

3 Bennetts ID Thomas IR and Hogan TJ (1986) Design of statically loaded tensionmembers Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE28No 4 November pp 318ndash27

4 British Standards Institute (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash8Design of Joints BSI London

5 Roark RJ (1965) Formulas for Stress and Strain 4th edition McGraw-HillNew York

6 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

Chapter 3

Compression members

31 Introduction

The compression member is the second type of axially loaded structural elementthe first type being the tension member discussed in Chapter 2 Very stocky com-pression members behave in the same way as do tension members until after thematerial begins to flow plastically at the squash load Ny = Afy However the resis-tance of a compression member decreases as its length increases in contrast tothe axially loaded tension member whose resistance is independent of its lengthThus the compressive resistance of a very slender member may be much less thanits tensile resistance as shown in Figure 31

This decrease in resistance is caused by the action of the applied compressiveload N which causes bending in a member with initial curvature (see Figure 32a)In a tension member the corresponding action decreases the initial curvature andso this effect is usually ignored However the curvature and the lateral deflectionof a compression member increase with the load as shown in Figure 32b Thecompressive stresses on the concave side of the member also increase until themember fails due to excessive yielding This bending action is accentuated bythe slenderness of the member and so the resistance of a compression memberdecreases as its length increases

For the hypothetical limiting case of a perfectly straight elastic member thereis no bending until the applied load reaches the elastic buckling value Ncr (EC3refers to Ncr as the elastic critical force) At this load the compression memberbegins to deflect laterally as shown in Figure 32b and these deflections grow untilfailure occurs at the beginning of compressive yielding This action of suddenlydeflecting laterally is called flexural buckling

The elastic buckling load Ncr provides a measure of the slenderness of acompression member while the squash load Ny gives an indication of itsresistance to yielding In this chapter the influences of the elastic bucklingload and the squash load on the behaviour of concentrically loaded compres-sion members are discussed and related to their design according to EC3Local buckling of thin-plate elements in compression members is treated inChapter 4 while the behaviour and design of eccentrically loaded compression

Compression members 51

Tension memberand very stocky compression member

Slender compression member

Change in length

Axi

al lo

ad

Ny = Afy

fy LE

Figure 31 Resistances of axially loaded members

Straight member 0 = 0 equation 32

Member with initial curvature0 =0 sinπxLequation 39

Straight member 0 = 0

0 5 10 15 20

02

04

06

08

10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss lo

ad N

Ncr

Dimensionless deflection 0

(b) Central deflection(a) Compression member

N

N

L2

L2x

Initial position(N = 0)

δ 0

δ

0

Figure 32 Elastic behaviour of a compression member

members are discussed in Chapter 7 and compression members in frames inChapter 8

32 Elastic compression members

321 Buckling of straight members

Aperfectly straight member of a linear elastic material is shown in Figure 33a Themember has a frictionless hinge at each end its lower end being fixed in positionwhile its upper end is free to move vertically but is prevented from deflectinghorizontally It is assumed that the deflections of the member remain small

52 Compression members

N

N N

N

v

x

L

(a) Unloaded member (b) Undeflected loaded member

(c) Deflected member

Figure 33 Straight compression member

The unloaded position of the member is shown in Figure 33a A concentricaxial load N is applied to the upper end of the member which remains straight(Figure 33b) The member is then deflected laterally by a small amount v asshown in Figure 33c and is held in this position If the original straight positionof Figure 33b is one of stable equilibrium the member will return to it whenreleased from the deflected position while if the original position is one of unstableequilibrium the member will collapse away from it when released When theequilibrium of the original position is neither stable nor unstable the member isin a condition described as one of neutral equilibrium For this case the deflectedposition is one of equilibrium and the member will remain in this position whenreleased Thus when the load N reaches the elastic buckling value Ncr at which theoriginal straight position of the member is one of neutral equilibrium the membermay deflect laterally without any change in the load as shown in Figure 32b

The load Ncr at which a straight compression member buckles laterally can bedetermined by finding a deflected position which is one of equilibrium It is shownin Section 381 that this position is given by

v = δ sin πxL (31)

in which δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that theelastic buckling load is

Ncr = π2EIL2 (32)

in which EI is the flexural rigidity of the compression member

Compression members 53

The elastic buckling load Ncr and the elastic buckling stress

σcr = NcrA (33)

can be expressed in terms of the geometrical slenderness ratio Li by

Ncr = σcrA = π2EA

(Li)2(34)

in which i = radic(IA) is the radius of gyration (which can be determined for a

number of sections by using Figure 56) The buckling load varies inversely asthe square of the slenderness ratio Li as shown in Figure 34 in which thedimensionless buckling load NcrNy is plotted against the generalised slendernessratio

λ =radic

Ny

Ncr=

radicfyσcr

= L

i

radicfyπ2E

(35)

in which

Ny = Afy (36)

is the squash load If the material ceases to be linear elastic at the yield stress fythen the above analysis is only valid for λ = radic

(NyNcr) = radic(fyσcr) ge 1 This

limit is equivalent to a slenderness ratio Li of approximately 85 for a materialwith a yield stress fy of 275 Nmm2

0 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

Dim

ensi

onle

ss lo

ad N

crN

y or

NLN

y Complete

yielding

First yield NLNydue to initial curvature (equations 311ndash314)

Elastic buckling NcrNy

(equations 34 and 35)

Figure 34 Buckling and yielding of compression members

54 Compression members

322 Bending of members with initial curvature

Real structural members are not perfectly straight but have small initial curva-tures as shown in Figure 32a The buckling behaviour of the hypothetical straightmembers discussed in Section 321 must therefore be interpreted as the limit-ing behaviour of real members with infinitesimally small initial curvatures Theinitial curvature of the real member causes it to bend from the commencementof application of the axial load and this increases the maximum stress in themember

If the initial curvature is such that

v0 = δ0 sin πxL (37)

then the deflection of member is given by

v = δ sin πxL (38)

where

δ

δ0= NNcr

1 minus NNcr (39)

as shown in Section 382 The variation of the dimensionless central deflectionδδ0 is shown in Figure 32b and it can be seen that deflection begins at thecommencement of loading and increases rapidly as the elastic buckling load Ncr

is approachedThe simple load-deflection relationship of equation 39 is the basis of the

Southwell plot technique for extrapolating the elastic buckling load from experi-mental measurements If equation 39 is rearranged as

δ

N= 1

Ncrδ + δ0

Ncr (310)

then the linear relation between δN and δ shown in Figure 35 is obtained Thusif a straight line is drawn which best fits the points determined from experimen-tal measurements of N and δ the reciprocal of the slope of this line gives anexperimental estimate of the buckling load Ncr An estimate of the magnitudeδ0 of the initial crookedness can also be determined from the intercept on thehorizontal axis

As the deflections v increase with the load N so also do the bending momentsand the stresses It is shown in Section 382 that the limiting axial load NL at whichthe compression member first yields (due to a combination of axial plus bending

Compression members 55

Central deflection

0

NStraight line of best fit (see equation 310)

Slope = crN

1

0

Figure 35 Southwell plot

stresses) is given by

NL

Ny= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2 (311)

in which

Φ = 1 + η + λ2

2 (312)

η = δ0b

2i2 (313)

and b is the width of the member The variation of the dimensionless limiting axialload NLNy with the generalised slenderness ratio λ is shown in Figure 34 for thecase when

η = 1

4

Ny

Ncr (314)

For stocky members the limiting load NL approaches the squash load Ny whilefor slender members the limiting load approaches the elastic buckling load Ncr Equations 311 and 312 are the basis for the member buckling resistance in EC3

33 Inelastic compression members

331 Tangent modulus theory of buckling

The analysis of a perfectly straight elastic compression member given inSection 321 applies only to a material whose stressndashstrain relationship remains

56 Compression members

Strain Tangent modulus Et Slenderness Li

(a) Elastic stressndashstrainrelationship

(b) Tangent modulus (c) Buckling stress

E

E

Et

Et

Ncr

Ncrt(equation 317)B

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

t

Str

ess

NA

Str

ess

NA

(equation 34)

Figure 36 Tangent modulus theory of buckling

linear However the buckling of an elastic member of a non-linear material suchas that whose stressndashstrain relationship is shown in Figure 36a can be analysedby a simple modification of the linear elastic treatment It is only necessary tonote that the small bending stresses and strains which occur during buckling arerelated by the tangent modulus of elasticity Et corresponding to the average com-pressive stress NA (Figure 36a and b) instead of the initial modulus E Thus theflexural rigidity is reduced from EI to EtI and the tangent modulus buckling loadNcrt is obtained from equation 34 by substituting Et for E whence

Ncrt = π2EtA

(Li)2 (315)

The deviation of this tangent modulus buckling load Ncrt from the elastic bucklingload Ncr is shown in Figure 36c It can be seen that the deviation of Ncrt fromNcr increases as the slenderness ratio Li decreases

332 Reduced modulus theory of buckling

The tangent modulus theory of buckling is only valid for elastic materials Forinelastic nonlinear materials the changes in the stresses and strains are related bythe initial modulus E when the total strain is decreasing and the tangent modulusEt only applies when the total strain is increasing as shown in Figure 37 Theflexural rigidity ErI of an inelastic member during buckling therefore depends onboth E and Et As a direct consequence of this the effective (or reduced) modulusof the section Er depends on the geometry of the cross-section as well It is shownin Section 391 that the reduced modulus of a rectangular section is given by

Er = 4EEt(radicE + radic

Et

)2 (316)

Compression members 57

E

E

Et

Strain

Str

ess

NA

Figure 37 Inelastic stressndashstrain relationship

Lateral deflection

Load

Rate of increase in load required to prevent strain reversal

Ncr

Ncrr

Ncrt

Nmax

Figure 38 Shanleyrsquos theory of inelastic buckling

The reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr can be obtained by substituting Er for Ein equation 34 whence

Ncrr = π2ErA

(Li)2 (317)

Since the tangent modulus Et is less than the initial modulus E it follows thatEt lt Er lt E and so the reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr lies between thetangent modulus buckling load Ncrt and the elastic buckling load Ncr as indicatedin Figure 38

58 Compression members

333 Shanleyrsquos theory of inelastic buckling

Although the tangent modulus theory appears to be invalid for inelastic materialscareful experiments have shown that it leads to more accurate predictions thanthe apparently rigorous reduced modulus theory This paradox was resolved byShanley [1] who reasoned that the tangent modulus theory is valid when bucklingis accompanied by a simultaneous increase in the applied load (see Figure 38) ofsufficient magnitude to prevent strain reversal in the member When this happensall the bending stresses and strains are related by the tangent modulus of elasticityEt the initial modulus E does not feature and so the buckling load is equal to thetangent modulus value Ncrt

As the lateral deflection of the member increases as shown in Figure 38 thetangent modulus Et decreases (see Figure 36b) because of the increased axial andbending strains and the post-buckling curve approaches a maximum load Nmax

which defines the ultimate resistance of the member Also shown in Figure 38is a post-buckling curve which commences at the reduced modulus load Ncrr

(at which buckling can take place without any increase in the load) The tangentmodulus load Ncrt is the lowest load at which buckling can begin and the reducedmodulus load Ncrr is the highest load for which the member can remain straightIt is theoretically possible for buckling to begin at any load between Ncrt and Ncrr

It can be seen that not only is the tangent modulus load more easily calculatedbut it also provides a conservative estimate of the member resistance and is incloser agreement with experimental results than the reduced modulus load Forthese reasons the tangent modulus theory of inelastic buckling has gained wideacceptance

334 Buckling of members with residual stresses

The presence of residual stresses in an intermediate length steel compressionmember may cause a significant reduction in its buckling resistance Resid-ual stresses are established during the cooling of a hot-rolled or welded steelmember (and during plastic deformation such as cold-rolling) The shrinking ofthe late-cooling regions of the member induces residual compressive stresses inthe early-cooling regions and these are balanced by equilibrating tensile stressesin the late-cooling regions In hot-rolled I-section members the flange ndash webjunctions are the least exposed to cooling influences and so these are the regionsof residual tensile stress as shown in Figure 39 while the more exposed flangetips are regions of residual compressive stress In a straight intermediate lengthcompression member the residual compressive stresses cause premature yield-ing under reduced axial loads as shown in Figure 310 and the member bucklesinelastically at a load which is less than the elastic buckling load Ncr

In applying the tangent modulus concept of inelastic buckling to a steel whichhas the stressndashstrain relationships shown in Figure 16 (see Chapter 1) the strain-hardening modulus Est is sometimes used in the yielded regions as well as in

Compression members 59

05fy compression

y

z

03fy tension

03fy compression

Figure 39 Idealised residual stress pattern

N = 0 025Ny N Ny

de

de

0

d

bz

y

(EI)t = EI EIYielded

areas

(a)Load

c ct

fyResidual stress pattern

05Ny

05fy

05fy

(b)Stress

distribution

(c)Cross-section

(d)Effective flexural

rigidity

Fully yielded

EI (EI)t (EI)t = 0

Shaded areas due to axial load

First yield

Elastic

Elasticcore

Elastic

Figure 310 Effective section of a member with residual stresses

the strain-hardened regions This use is based on the slip theory of dislocationin which yielding is represented by a series of dynamic jumps instead of by asmooth quasi-static flow Thus the material in the yielded region is either elasticor strain-hardened and its subsequent behaviour may be estimated conservativelyby using the strain-hardening modulus However the even more conservativeassumption that the tangent modulus Et is zero in both the yielded and strain-hardened regions is frequently used because of its simplicity According to thisassumption these regions of the member are ineffective during buckling and themoment of resistance is entirely due to the elastic core of the section

60 Compression members

Thus for a rectangular section member which has the simplified residual stressdistribution shown in Figure 310 the effective flexural rigidity (EI)t about the zaxis is (see Section 392)

(EI)t = EI [2(1 minus NNy)]12 (318)

when the axial load N is greater than 05Ny at which first yield occurs and theaxial load at buckling Ncrt is given by

Ncrt

Ny=

(Ncr

Ny

)2

[1 + 2(NyNcr)2]12 minus 1 (319)

The variation of this dimensionless tangent modulus buckling load Ncrt Ny withthe generalised slenderness ratio λ = radic

(NyNcr) is shown in Figure 311For stocky members the buckling load Ncrt approaches the squash load Nywhile for intermediate length members it approaches the elastic buckling loadNcr as λ = radic

(NyNcr) approachesradic

2 For more slender members prema-ture yielding does not occur and these members buckle at the elastic bucklingload Ncr

Also shown in Figure 311 is the dimensionless tangent modulus buckling loadNcrtNy given by

Ncrt

Ny= 1 minus 1

4

Ny

Ncr (320)

0 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

tN

y Completeyield

Elastic buckling NcrNy

Inelastic buckling of rectangular section shown in Fig 310 (equation 319)

NN

crt

y---- = 1ndash 1

4----N

Ny

cr----

(equation 320)

radic2

Figure 311 Inelastic buckling of compression members with residual stresses

Compression members 61

which was developed as a compromise between major and minor axis bucklingof hot-rolled I-section members It can be seen that this simple compromise isvery similar to the relationship given by equation 319 for the rectangular sectionmember

34 Real compression members

The conditions under which real members act differ in many ways from theidealised conditions assumed in Section 321 for the analysis of the elastic buck-ling of a perfect member Real members are not perfectly straight and theirloads are applied eccentrically while accidental transverse loads may act Theeffects of small imperfections of these types are qualitatively the same as thoseof initial curvature which were described in Section 322 These imperfectionscan therefore be represented by an increased equivalent initial curvature whichhas a similar effect on the behaviour of the member as the combined effectof all of these imperfections The resulting behaviour is shown by curve A inFigure 312

A real member also has residual stresses and its elastic modulus E and yieldstress fy may vary throughout the member The effects of these material vari-ations are qualitatively the same as those of the residual stresses which weredescribed in Section 334 and so they can be represented by an equivalent set ofthe residual stresses The resulting behaviour of the member is shown by curve B inFigure 312

Since real members have both kinds of imperfections their behaviour is asshown by curve C in Figure 312 which is a combination of curves A and B Thusthe real member behaves as a member with equivalent initial curvature (curve A)until the elastic limit is reached It then follows a path which is similar to andapproaches that of a member with equivalent residual stresses (curve B)

Elastic bending

Curve A ndash equivalentinitial curvature

Curve B ndash equivalent residual stresses

Curve C ndash real members

Elastic limit

Nmax

Elastic buckling

Ncr

NL

Ncrt

Lateral deflection

Load

Figure 312 Behaviour of real compression members

62 Compression members

35 Design of compression members

351 EC3 design buckling resistance

Real compression members may be analysed using a model in which the initialcrookedness and load eccentricity are specified Residual stresses may be includedand the realistic stressndashstrain behaviour may be incorporated in the prediction of theload versus deflection relationship Thus curve C in Figure 312 may be generatedand the maximum load Nmax ascertained

Rational computer analyses based on the above modelling are rarely used exceptin research and are inappropriate for the routine design of real compression mem-bers because of the uncertainties and variations that exist in the initial crookednessand residual stresses Instead simplified design predictions for the maximumload (or resistance) are used in EC3 that have been developed from the results ofcomputer analyses and correlations with available test data

A close prediction of numerical solutions and test results may be obtained byusing equations 311 and 312 which are based on the first yield of a geometricallyimperfect member This is achieved by writing the imperfection parameter η ofequation 312 as

η = α(λminus 02) ge 0 (321)

in which α is a constant (imperfection factor) which shifts the resistance curve asshown in Figure 313 for different cross-section types proportions thicknessesbuckling axes and material strengths (Table 62 of EC3) The advantage of thisapproach is that the resistances (referred to as buckling resistances in EC3) of aparticular group of sections can be determined by assigning an appropriate value

0

02

04

06

08

1

12

0 05 1 15 2 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

resi

stan

ce χ

= N

bR

dN

y

Curve d

Curve c

Curve b

Curve a

Curve a0

Figure 313 Compression resistances of EC3

Compression members 63

of α to them The design buckling resistance NbRd is then given by

NbRd = χNyγM1 (322)

in which γM1 is the partial factor for member instability which has a recommendedvalue of 10 in EC3

The dimensionless compressive design buckling resistances NbRdNy for α =013 021 034 049 and 076 which represent the EC3 compression membercurves (a0) (a) (b) (c) and (d) respectively are shown in Figure 313 Memberswith higher initial crookedness have lower strengths due to premature yieldingand these are associated with higher values of α On the other hand members withlower initial crookedness are not as greatly affected by premature yielding andhave lower values of α assigned to them

352 Elastic buckling load

Although the design buckling resistance NbRd given by equation 322 was derivedby using the expression for the elastic buckling load Ncr given by equation 32 for apin-ended compression member equation 322 is also used for other compressionmembers by generalising equation 32 to

Ncr = π2EIL2cr (323)

in which Lcr is the effective length (referred to as the buckling length in EC3)The elastic buckling load Ncr varies with the member geometry loading and

restraints but there is no guidance given in EC3 for determining either Ncr or Lcr Section 36 following summarises methods of determining the effects of restraintson the effective length Lcr while Section 37 discusses the design of compressionmembers with variable sections or loading

353 Effects of local buckling

Compression members containing thin-plate elements are likely to be affected bylocal buckling of the cross-section (see Chapter 4) Local buckling reduces theresistances of short compression members below their squash loads Ny and theresistances of longer members which fail by flexural buckling

Local buckling of a short compression member is accounted for by using areduced effective area Aeff instead of the gross area A as discussed in Section 471Local buckling of a longer compression member is accounted for by using Aeff

instead of A and by reducing the generalised slenderness to

λ =radic

Aeff fyNcr (324)

but using the gross cross-sectional properties to determine Ncr

64 Compression members

354 Design procedures

For the design of a compression member the design axial force NEd is determinedby a rational frame analysis as in Chapter 8 or by statics for a statically determinatestructure The design loads (factored loads) FEd are for the ultimate limit state andare determined by summing up the specified loads multiplied by the appropriatepartial load factors γF (see Section 156)

To check the compression resistance of a member both the cross-sectionresistance NcRd and the member buckling resistance NbRd should generally beconsidered though it is usually the case for practical members that the bucklingresistance will govern The cross-section resistance of a compression memberNcRd must satisfy

NEd le NcRd (325)

in which

NcRd = AfyγM0 (326)

for a fully effective section in which γM0 is the partial factor for cross-sectionresistance (with a recommended value of 10 in EC3) or

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0 (327)

for the cross-sections that are susceptible to local buckling prior to yieldingThe member buckling resistance NbRd must satisfy

NEd le NbRd (328)

where the member buckling resistance NbRd is given by equation 322The procedure for checking a specified compression member is summarised

in Figure 314 The cross-section is checked to determine if it is fully effective(Aeff = A where A is the gross area) or slender (in which case the reducedeffective area Aeff is used) and the design buckling resistance NbRd is then foundand compared with the design compression force NEd

An iterative series of calculations is required when designing a compressionmember as indicated in Figure 314 An initial trial section is first selected eitherby using tabulations formulations or graphs of design buckling resistance NbRd

versus effective length Lcr or by making initial guesses for fy Aeff A and χ (say05) and calculating a target area A A trial section is then selected and checkedIf the section is not satisfactory then a new section is selected using the latestvalues of fy Aeff A and χ and the checking process is repeated The iterationsusually converge within a few cycles but convergence can be hastened by using themean of the previous and current values of χ in the calculation of the target area A

A worked example of checking the resistance of a compression member is givenin Section 3121 while worked examples of the design of compression membersare given in Sections 3122 and 3123

Compression members 65

No

Yes

Yes

Checking Designing

Section Length and loading

Analysis for NEd

Find fy Aeff

Find

Find

Compression resistance NbRd = Aeff fy M1

Check if NEd NbRd

Check complete

Design complete

Find section A NEd( times fy)

No

Table or graph

Trial section

Find Lcr

Initial values fy (= nom) Aeff (= A)

Find section NbRd NEd

Test convergence

Modify to hasten

convergence

(= 05)

ge

ge

le

Figure 314 Flow chart for the design of compression members

36 Restrained compression members

361 Simple supports and rigid restraints

In the previous sections it was assumed that the compression member was sup-ported only at its ends as shown in Figure 315a If the member has an additionallateral support which prevents it from deflecting at its centre so that (v)L2 = 0

66 Compression members

Ncr Ncr Ncr NcrNcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr

Lcr LcrL L L

L

L

22 LEINcr π=Lcr = L

(a)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = L2

(b)

22 2 LEINcr πasympasympLcr 07L

(c)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = L2

(d)

22 4 LEINcr π=Lcr = 2L

(e)

Figure 315 Effective lengths of columns

as shown in Figure 315b then its buckled shape v is given by

v = δ sin 2πxL (329)

and its elastic buckling load Ncr is given by

Ncr = 4π2EI

L2 (330)

The end supports of a compression member may also differ from the simple sup-ports shown in Figure 315a which allow the member ends to rotate but preventthem from deflecting laterally For example one or both ends may be rigidly built-in so as to prevent end rotation (Figure 315c and d) or one end may be completelyfree (Figure 315e) In each case the elastic buckling load of the member may beobtained by finding the solution of the differential equilibrium equation whichsatisfies the boundary conditions

All of these buckling loads can be expressed by the generalisation ofequation 323 which replaces the member length L of equation 32 by the effectivelength Lcr Expressions for Lcr are shown in Figure 315 and in each case it canbe seen that the effective length of the member is equal to the distance betweenthe inflexion points of its buckled shape

The effects of the variations in the support and restraint conditions on the com-pression member buckling resistance NbRd may be accounted for by replacingthe actual length L used in equation 32 by the effective length Lcr in the calcula-tion of the elastic buckling load Ncr and hence the generalised slenderness λ andusing this modified generalised slenderness throughout the resistance equationsIt should be noted that it is often necessary to consider the member behaviour ineach principal plane since the effective lengths Lcry and Lcrz may also differ aswell as the radii of gyration iy and iz

Compression members 67

0 10 20 30 40Stiffness (16EIL3 )

0

2

4

6

8

Second mode(equation 330)

L = 16 2EIL3 (equation 331)

L2

L2

Ncr

2

x

v

22 4 LEI

(a) Braced firstmode

(b) Second mode

(c) Buckling loadB

uckl

ing

load

Ncr

2

EI

L2

Braced first mode (equations 365 and 366)

Llt L

2

ge

Figure 316 Compression member with an elastic intermediate restraint

362 Intermediate restraints

In Section 361 it was shown that the elastic buckling load of a simply supportedmember is increased by a factor of 4 to Ncr = 4π2EIL2 when an additionallateral restraint is provided which prevents it from deflecting at its centre asshown in Figure 315b This restraint need not be completely rigid but may beelastic (Figure 316) provided its stiffness exceeds a certain minimum value If thestiffness α of the restraint is defined by the force αδ acting on the restraint whichcauses its length to change by δ then the minimum stiffness αL is determined inSection 3101 as

αL = 16π2EIL3 (331)

The limiting stiffness αL can be expressed in terms of the buckling load Ncr =4π2EIL2 as

αL = 4NcrL (332)

Compression member restraints are generally required to be able to transmit 1(Clause 533(3)) of EC3) of the force in the member restrained This is a littleless than the value of 15 suggested [2] as leading to the braces which aresufficiently stiff

363 Elastic end restraints

When the ends of a compression member are rigidly connected to its adjacentelastic members as shown in Figure 317a then at buckling the adjacent members

68 Compression members

N

N

EI L

1

2

(a) Frame (b) Member

2

1

x

v

N

NM1

M2 M1 + M2 + N

L

M1 + M2 + N

L

13

13

Figure 317 Buckling of a member of a rigid frame

exert total elastic restraining moments M1 M2 which oppose buckling and whichare proportional to the end rotations θ1 θ2 of the compression member Thus

M1 = minusα1θ1

M2 = minusα2θ2

(333)

in which

α1 =sum

1

α (334)

where α is the stiffness of any adjacent member connected to the end 1 of thecompression member and α2 is similarly defined The stiffness α of an adjacentmember depends not only on its length L and flexural rigidity EI but also on itssupport conditions and on the magnitude of any axial load transmitted by it

The particular case of a braced restraining member which acts as if simplysupported at both ends as shown in Figure 318a and which provides equal andopposite end moments M and has an axial force N is analysed in Section 3102where it is shown that when the axial load N is compressive the stiffness α isgiven by

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tan(π2)radic

NNcrL(335)

where

NcrL = π2EIL2 (336)

Compression members 69

01 2 3123 23

ndash2

ndash4

ndash6

2

4

Tension Compression

Dimensionless axial load

(b) Stiffness

Exact equation 335

NNcrLL

N

N

v

x

M

M

(a) Braced member

Exact equation 337

Approx equation 338

(2E

IL)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss s

tiff

ness

Figure 318 Stiffness of a braced member

and by

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tanh(π2)radic

NNcrL(337)

when the axial load N is tensile These relationships are shown in Figure 318band it can be seen that the stiffness decreases almost linearly from 2EI L to zeroas the compressive axial load increases from zero to NcrL and that the stiffness isnegative when the axial load exceeds NcrL In this case the adjacent member nolonger restrains the buckling member but disturbs it When the axial load causestension the stiffness is increased above the value 2EI L

Also shown in Figure 318b is the simple approximation

α = 2EI

L

(1 minus N

NcrL

) (338)

The term (1 minus NNcrL) in this equation is the reciprocal of the amplification fac-tor which expresses the fact that the first-order rotations ML2EI associated withthe end moments M are amplified by the compressive axial load N to (ML2EI )(1 minus NNcrL) The approximation provided by equation 338 is close and con-servative in the range 0 lt NNcrL lt 1 but errs on the unsafe side and withincreasing error as the axial load N increases away from this range

70 Compression members

N N N N N N

N N N N N N

(a) Braced members

M M M

M M M M M M

(b) Unbraced members

)1(2

LcrN

N

L

EI minus )1(3

LcrN

N

L

EI minus

)(while

)41(6

Lcr

Lcr

NN

N

N

L

EI

lt

minus ) ) )21( ( (4

LcrN

N

L

EI minus

minusminus

Lcr

Lcr

NN

NN

L

EI

2

1

42 π

minus

minusLcr

Lcr

NN

NN

L

EI

2

41

π

Figure 319 Approximate stiffnesses of restraining members

Similar analyses may be made of braced restraining members under other endconditions and some approximate solutions for the stiffnesses of these are sum-marised in Figure 319 These approximations have accuracies comparable withthat of equation 338

When a restraining member is unbraced its ends sway ∆ as shown inFigure 320a and restoring end moments M are required to maintain equilibriumSuch a member which receives equal end moments is analysed in Section 3103where it is shown that its stiffness is given by

α = minus(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL(339)

when the axial load N is compressive and by

α =(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtanh

π

2

radicN

NcrL(340)

when the axial load N is tensile These relationships are shown in Figure 320band it can be seen that the stiffness α decreases as the tensile load N decreases andbecomes negative as the load changes to compressive Also shown in Figure 320bis the approximation

α = minus2EI

L

(π24)(NNcrL)

(1 minus NNcrL) (341)

Compression members 71

4 3 2 10

1

ndash2

ndash4

ndash6

2

4

Tension

(b) Stiffness

L

N

N

x

M

M

(a) Unbraced member

Exact equation 340

Approx equation 341

Compression

Exact equation 339

Dimensionless axial load NNcrL

(2E

IL

)D

imen

sion

less

sti

ffne

ss

Figure 320 Stiffness of an unbraced member

which is close and conservative when the axial load N is compressive and whicherrs on the safe side when the axial load N is tensile It can be seen from Figure 320bthat the stiffness of the member is negative when it is subjected to compressionso that it disturbs the buckling member rather than restraining it

Similar analyses may be made of unbraced restraining members with other endconditions and another approximate solution is given in Figure 319 This has anaccuracy comparable with that of equation 341

364 Buckling of braced members with end restraints

The buckling of an end-restrained compression member 1ndash2 is analysed inSection 3104 where it is shown that if the member is braced so that it cannotsway (∆ = 0) then its elastic buckling load Ncr can be expressed in the gen-eral form of equation 323 when the effective length ratio kcr = LcrL is thesolution of

γ1γ2

4

kcr

)2

+(γ1 + γ2

2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan(π2kcr)

π2kcr= 1 (342)

where the relative stiffness of the braced member at its end 1 is

γ1 = (2EIL)12sum1α

(343)

72 Compression members

k

0

02

04

06

08

10

2

0

02

04

06

08

10

0 02 04 06 08 10 0 02 04 06 08 10

k2

k1 k1

10 infin

050525

0550575

060625

0650675

07

07508

08509

095

10105

11115

12125

1314

1516

1718

1920

2224

2628

34

5

(a) Bracedmembers (equations 342 344)

(b) Unbraced members (equations 346 348)

Figure 321 Effective length ratios LcrL for members in rigid-jointed frames

in which the summationsum

1 α is for all the other members at end 1 γ2 is similarlydefined and 0 le γ le infin The relative stiffnesses may also be expressed as

k1 = (2EIL)12

05sum1α + (2EIL)12

= 2γ1

1 + 2γ1(344)

and a similar definition of k2 (0 le k le 1) Values of the effective lengthratio LcrL which satisfy equations 342ndash344 are presented in chart form inFigure 321a

In using the chart of Figure 321a the stiffness factors k may be calculatedfrom equation 344 by using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319 Thus forbraced restraining members of the type shown in Figure 318a the factor k1 canbe approximated by

k1 = (IL)12

05sum1(IL)(1 minus NNcrL)+ (IL)12

(345)

in which N is the compression force in the restraining member and NcrL its elasticbuckling load

365 Buckling of unbraced members with end restraints

The buckling of an end-restrained compression member 1ndash2 is analysed inSection 3105 where it is shown that if the member is unbraced against sidesway

Compression members 73

then its elastic buckling load Ncr can be expressed in the general form ofequation 323 when the effective length ratio kcr = LcrL is the solution of

γ1γ2(πkcr)2 minus 36

6(γ1 + γ2)= π

kcrcot

π

kcr (346)

where the relative stiffness of the unbraced member at its end 1 is

γ1 = (6EIL)12sum1α

(347)

in which the summationsum

1 α is for all the other members at end 1 and γ2 issimilarly defined The relative stiffnesses may also be expressed as

k1 = (6EIL)12

15sum1α + (6EIL)12

= γ1

15 + γ1(348)

and a similar definition of k2 Values of the effective length ratio Lcr L whichsatisfy equation 346 are presented in chart form in Figure 321b

In using the chart of Figure 321b the stiffness factors k may be calculatedfrom equation 348 by using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319 Thus forbraced restraining members of the third type shown in Figure 319a

k1 = (IL)12

15sum1(IL)(1 minus N4NcrL)+ (IL)12

(349)

366 Bracing stiffness required for a braced member

The elastic buckling load of an unbraced compression member may be increasedsubstantially by providing a translational bracing system which effectively pre-vents sway The bracing system need not be completely rigid but may be elasticas shown in Figure 322 provided its stiffness α exceeds a certain minimumvalue αL It is shown in Section 3106 that the minimum value for a pin-endedcompression member is

αL = π2EIL3 (350)

This conclusion can be extended to compression members with rotational endrestraints and it can be shown that if the sway bracing stiffness α is greater than

αL = NcrL (351)

where Ncr is the elastic buckling load for the braced mode then the member iseffectively braced against sway

74 Compression members

0 10 20 30 400

05

10

15

20Ncr L

EIL22

(a) Mode 2

L

(b) Mode 1 (c) Buckling load

Mode 1

Mode 2

L = 2EIL3

(equation 350)

(EIL3)

Buc

klin

g lo

ad N

cr

2 EI

L2

lt L

Stiffness

ge

Figure 322 Compression member with an elastic sway brace

37 Other compression members

371 General

The design method outlined in Section 35 together with the effective length con-cept developed in Section 36 are examples of a general approach to the analysisand design of the compression members whose ultimate resistances are governedby the interaction between yielding and buckling This approach often termeddesign by buckling analysis originates from the dependence of the design com-pression resistance NbRd of a simply supported uniform compression member onits squash load Ny and its elastic buckling load Ncr as shown in Figure 323which is adapted from Figure 313 The generalisation of this relationship to othercompression members allows the design buckling resistance NbRd of any memberto be determined from its yield load Ny and its elastic buckling load Ncr by usingFigure 323

In the following subsections this design by buckling analysis method isextended to the in-plane behaviour of rigid-jointed frames with joint loadingand also to the design of compression members which either are non-uniformor have intermediate loads or twist during buckling This method has alsobeen used for compression members with oblique restraints [3] Similar andrelated methods may be used for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams(Sections 66ndash69)

372 Rigid-jointed frames with joint loads only

The application of the method of design by buckling analysis to rigid-jointedframes which only have joint loads is a simple extrapolation of the design

Compression members 75

0

02

04

06

08

1

12

050 1 15 2 25

Generalised slenderness cry NN =

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

resi

stan

ce N

bR

dN

y Elastic buckling NcrNy

Design buckling resistance NbRdNy

Figure 323 Compression resistance of structures designed by buckling analysis

method for simply supported compression members For this extrapolation itis assumed that the resistance NbRd of a compression member in a frame isrelated to its squash load Ny and to the axial force Ncr carried by it whenthe frame buckles elastically and that this relationship (Figure 323) is thesame as that used for simply supported compression members of the same type(Figure 313)

This method of design by buckling analysis is virtually the same as the effectivelength method which uses the design charts of Figure 321 because these chartswere obtained from the elastic buckling analyses of restrained members The onlydifference is that the elastic buckling load Ncr may be calculated directly for themethod of design by buckling analysis as well as by determining the approximateeffective length from the design charts

The elastic buckling load of the member may often be determined approximatelyby the effective length method discussed in Section 36 In cases where this is notsatisfactory a more accurate method must be used Many such methods have beendeveloped and some of these are discussed in Sections 8353 and 8354 and in[4ndash13] while other methods are referred to in the literature [14ndash16] The bucklingloads of many frames have already been determined and extensive tabulations ofapproximations for some of these are available [14 16ndash20]

While the method of design by buckling analysis might also be applied torigid frames whose loads act between joints the bending actions present in thoseframes make this less rational Because of this consideration of the effects ofbuckling on the design of frames with bending actions will be deferred untilChapter 8

76 Compression members

373 Non-uniform members

It was assumed in the preceding discussions that the members are uniform butsome practical compression members are of variable cross-section Non-uniformmembers may be stepped or tapered but in either case the elastic buckling loadNcr can be determined by solving a differential equilibrium equation similar to thatgoverning the buckling of uniform members (see equation 358) but which hasvariable values of EI In general this can best be done using numerical techniques[4ndash6] and the tedium of these can be relieved by making use of a suitable computerprogram Many particular cases have been solved and tabulations and graphs ofsolutions are available [5 6 16 21ndash23]

Once the elastic buckling load Ncr of the member has been determined themethod of design by buckling analysis can be used For this the squash load Ny

is calculated for the most highly stressed cross-section which is the section ofminimum area The design buckling resistance NbRd = χNyγM1 can then beobtained from Figure 323

374 Members with intermediate axial loads

The elastic buckling of members with intermediate as well as end loads is alsobest analysed by numerical methods [4ndash6] while solutions of many particularcases are available [5 16 21] Once again the method of design by bucklinganalysis can be used and for this the squash load will be determined by themost heavily stressed section If the elastic buckling load Ncr is calculated for thesame member then the design buckling resistance NbRd can be determined fromFigure 323

375 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling

In the previous sections attention was confined to compression members whichbuckle by deflecting laterally either perpendicular to the section minor axis at anelastic buckling load

Ncrz = π2EIzL2crz (352)

or perpendicular to the major axis at

Ncry = π2EIyL2cry (353)

However thin-walled open section compression members may also buckle bytwisting about a longitudinal axis as shown in Figure 324 for a cruciform sectionor by combined bending and twisting

Compression members 77

L

f

y

x

z

Figure 324 Torsional buckling of a cruciform section

A compression member of doubly symmetric cross-section may buckle elasti-cally by twisting at a torsional buckling load (see Section 311) given by

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2crT

)(354)

in which GIt and EIw are the torsional and warping rigidities (see Chapter 10)LcrT is the distance between inflexion points of the twisted shape and

i20 = i2

p + y20 + z2

0 (355)

in which y0 z0 are the shear centre coordinates (which are zero for doublysymmetric sections see Section 543) and

ip = radic(Iy + Iz)A (356)

is the polar radius of gyration For most rolled steel sections the minor axisbuckling load Ncrz is less than NcrT and the possibility of torsional bucklingcan be ignored However short members which have low torsional and warpingrigidities (such as thin-walled cruciforms) should be checked Such members canbe designed by using Figure 323 with the value of NcrT substituted for the elasticbuckling load Ncr

Monosymmetric and asymmetric section members (such as thin-walled teesand angles) may buckle in a combined mode by twisting and deflecting Thisaction takes place because the axis of twist through the shear centre does not

78 Compression members

0 1 2 3 4 5Length L (m)

0

250

500

750

1000

NcrzNcry

NcrT

Ncr

75

100

6

(a) Cross-section

y

z

(b) Elastic buckling loadsL

oads

Ncr

y N

crz

Ncr

T a

nd N

cr

Figure 325 Elastic buckling of a simply supported angle section column

coincide with the loading axis through the centroid and any twisting which occurscauses the centroidal axis to deflect For simply supported members it is shown in[5 24 25] that the (lowest) elastic buckling load Ncr is the lowest root of the cubicequation

N 3cr

i20 minus y2

0 minus z20

minus N 2cr

(Ncry + Ncrz + NcrT )i

20 minus Ncrzy2

0 minus Ncryz20

+ Ncri2

0NcryNcrz + NcrzNcrT + NcrT Ncry minus NcryNcrzNcrT i20 = 0

(357)

For example the elastic buckling load Ncr for a pin-ended unequal angle is shownin Figure 325 where it can be seen that Ncr is less than any of Ncry Ncrz orNcrT

These and other cases of flexuralndashtorsional buckling (referred to as torsionalndashflexural buckling in EC3) are treated in a number of textbooks and papers [4ndash624ndash26] and tabulations of solutions are also available [16 27] Once the bucklingload Ncr has been determined the compression resistance NbRd can be found fromFigure 323

38 Appendix ndash elastic compression members

381 Buckling of straight members

The elastic buckling load Ncr of the compression member shown in Figure 33 canbe determined by finding a deflected position which is one of equilibrium Thedifferential equilibrium equation of bending of the member is

EId2v

dx2= minusNcrv (358)

Compression members 79

This equation states that for equilibrium the internal moment of resistanceEI (d2vdx2) must exactly balance the external disturbing moment minusNcrv at anypoint along the length of the member When this equation is satisfied at all pointsthe displaced position is one of equilibrium

The solution of equation 358 which satisfies the boundary condition at the lowerend that (v)0 = 0 is

v = δ sinπx

kcrL

where

1

k2cr

= Ncr

π2EIL2

and δ is an undetermined constant The boundary condition at the upper end that(v)L = 0 is satisfied when either

δ = 0v = 0

(359)

or kcr = 1n in which n is an integer so that

Ncr = n2π2EIL2 (360)

v = δ sin nπxL (361)

The first solution (equations 359) defines the straight stable equilibrium positionwhich is valid for all loads N less than the lowest value of Ncr as shown inFigure 32b The second solution (equations 360 and 361) defines the bucklingloads Ncr at which displaced equilibrium positions can exist This solution does notdetermine the magnitude δ of the central deflection as indicated in Figure 32bThe lowest buckling load is the most important and this occurs when n = 1so that

Ncr = π2EIL2 (32)

v = δ sin πxL (31)

382 Bending of members with initial curvature

The bending of the compression member with initial curvature shown inFigure 32a can be analysed by considering the differential equilibrium equation

EId2v

dx2= minusN (v + v0) (362)

which is obtained from equation 358 for a straight member by adding the additionalbending moment minusNv0 induced by the initial curvature

80 Compression members

If the initial curvature of the member is such that

v0 = δ0 sin πxL (37)

then the solution of equation 362 which satisfies the boundary conditions(v)0L = 0 is the deflected shape

v = δ sin πxL (38)

where

δ

δ0= NNcr

1 minus NNcr (39)

The maximum moment in the compression member is N (δ+ δ0) and so the max-imum bending stress is N (δ + δ0)Wel where Wel is the elastic section modulusThus the maximum total stress is

σmax = N

A+ N (δ + δ0)

Wel

If the elastic limit is taken as the yield stress fy then the limiting axial load NL forwhich the above elastic analysis is valid is given by

NL = Ny minus NL(δ + δ0)A

Wel (363)

where Ny = Afy is the squash load By writing Wel = 2Ib in which b is themember width equation 363 becomes

NL = Ny minus δ0b

2i2

NL

(1 minus NLNcr)

which can be solved for the dimensionless limiting load NLNy as

NL

Ny=

[1 + (1 + η)NcrNy

2

]minus

[1 + (1 + η)Ncr Ny

2

]2

minus Ncr

Ny

12

(364)

where

η = δ0b

2i2 (313)

Alternatively equation 364 can be rearranged to give the dimensionless limitingload NLNy as

NL

Ny= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(311)

Compression members 81

in which

Φ = 1 + η + λ2

2(312)

and

λ = radicNyNcr (35)

39 Appendix ndash inelastic compression members

391 Reduced modulus theory of buckling

The reduced modulus buckling load Ncrr of a rectangular section compressionmember which buckles in the y direction (see Figure 326a) can be determinedfrom the bending strain and stress distributions which are related to the curvatureκ(= minusd2vdx2) and the moduli E and Et as shown in Figure 326b and c Theposition of the line of zero bending stress can be found by using the condition thatthe axial force remains constant during buckling from which it follows that theforce resultant of the bending stresses must be zero so that

1

2dbcEtbcκ = 1

2dbtEbtκ

or

bc

b=

radicEradic

E + radicEt

Axial strain b c

b t

bt

bc

(b) Straindistribution

bt

bc

(a) Rectangular cross-section

d

y

z

Et

E

b

(c) Stressdistribution

Axial stress NA Et bc

Eb t

Figure 326 Reduced modulus buckling of a rectangular section member

82 Compression members

The moment of resistance of the section ErI(d2vdx2) is equal to the momentresultant of the bending stresses so that

ErId2v

dx2= minusdbc

2Etbcκ

2bc

3minus dbt

2Ebtκ

2bt

3

or

ErId2v

dx2= minus4b2

cEt

b2

db3

12κ

The reduced modulus of elasticity Er is therefore given by

Er = 4EEt

(radic

E + radicEt)

2 (316)

392 Buckling of members with residual stresses

Arectangular section member with a simplified residual stress distribution is shownin Figure 310 The section first yields at the edges z = plusmnd2 at a load N = 05Nyand yielding then spreads through the section as the load approaches the squashload Ny If the depth of the elastic core is de then the flexural rigidity for bendingabout the z axis is

(EI)t = EI

(de

d

)

where I = b3d12 and the axial force is

N = Ny

(1 minus 1

2

d2e

d2

)

By combining these two relationships the effective flexural rigidity of the partiallyyielded section can be written as

(EI)t = EI [2(1 minus NNy)]12 (318)

Thus the axial load at buckling Nt is given by

Ncrt

Ncr= [2(1 minus NcrtNy)]12

which can be rearranged as

Ncrt

Ny=

(Ncr

Ny

)2

[1 + 2(NyNcr)2]12 minus 1 (319)

Compression members 83

310 Appendix ndash effective lengths of compressionmembers

3101 Intermediate restraints

A straight pin-ended compression member with a central elastic restraint is shownin Figure 316a It is assumed that when the buckling load Ncr is applied to themember it buckles symmetrically as shown in Figure 316a with a central deflec-tion δ and the restraint exerts a restoring force αδ The equilibrium equation forthis buckled position is

EId2v

dx2= minusNcrv + αδ

2x

for 0 le x le L2

The solution of this equation which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 =(dvdx)L2 = 0 is given by

v = αδL

2Ncr

(x

Lminus sin πxkcrL

2(π2kcr) cosπ2kcr

)

where kcr = LcrL and Lcr is given by equation 323 Since δ = (v)L2 itfollows that(

π

2kcr

)3

cotπ

2kcr(π

2kcrcot

π

2kcrminus 1

) = αL3

16EI (365)

The variation with the dimensionless restraint stiffness αL316EI of the dimen-sionless buckling load

Ncr

π2EIL2= 4

π2

2kcr

)2

(366)

which satisfies equation 365 is shown in Figure 316c It can be seen that thebuckling load for this symmetrical mode varies from π2EIL2 when the restraintis of zero stiffness to approximately 8π2EIL2 when the restraint is rigid Whenthe restraint stiffness exceeds

αL = 16π2EIL3 (331)

the buckling load obtained from equations 365 and 366 exceeds the value of4π2EIL2 for which the member buckles in the antisymmetrical second modeshown in Figure 316b Since buckling always takes place at the lowest possibleload it follows that the member buckles at 4π2EIL2 in the second mode shownin Figure 316b for all restraint stiffnesses α which exceed αL

84 Compression members

3102 Stiffness of a braced member

When a structural member is braced so that its ends act as if simply supportedas shown in Figure 318a then its response to equal and opposite disturbing endmoments M can be obtained by considering the differential equilibrium equation

EId2v

dx2= minusNv minus M (367)

The solution of this which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 = (v)L = 0 whenN is compressive is

v = M

N

1 minus cosπ

radicNNcrL

sin πradic

NNcrLsin

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ cos

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus 1

where

NcrL = π2EIL2 (336)

The end rotation θ = (dvdx)0 is

θ = 2M

NL

π

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL

whence

α = M

θ= 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tan(π2)radic

NNcrL (335)

When the axial load N is tensile the solution of equation 367 is

v = M

N

1 minus cosh π

radicNNcrL

sinh πradic

NNcrLsinh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]

+ cosh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus 1

whence

α = 2EI

L

(π2)radic

NNcrL

tanh(π2)radic

NNcrL (337)

Compression members 85

3103 Stiffness of an unbraced member

When a structural member is unbraced so that its ends sway ∆ as shown inFigure 320a restoring end moments M are required to maintain equilibriumThe differential equation for equilibrium of a member with equal end momentsM = N∆2 is

EId2v

dx2= minusNv + M (368)

and its solution which satisfies the boundary conditions (v)0 = 0 (v)L = ∆ is

v = M

N

1 + cosπ

radicNNcrL

sin πradic

NNcrLsin

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]minus cos

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ 1

The end rotation θ = (dvdx)0 is

θ = 2M

NL

π

2

radicN

NcrLcot

π

2

radicN

NcrL

whence

α = minus(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtan

π

2

radicN

NcrL (339)

where the negative sign occurs because the end moments M are restoring insteadof disturbing moments

When the axial load N is tensile the end moments M are disturbing momentsand the solution of equation 368 is

v = M

N

1 + cosh π

radicNNcrL

sinh πradic

NNcrLsinh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]

minus cosh

radicN

NcrL

x

L

]+ 1

whence

α =(

2EI

L

2

radicN

NcrLtanh

π

2

radicN

NcrL (340)

3104 Buckling of a braced member

A typical compression member 1ndash2 in a rigid-jointed frame is shown inFigure 317b When the frame buckles the member sways∆ and its ends rotate by

86 Compression members

θ1 θ2 as shown Because of these actions there are end shears (M1 +M2 +N∆)Land end moments M1 M2 The equilibrium equation for the member is

EId2v

dx2= minusNv minus M1 + (M1 + M2)

x

L+ N∆

x

L

and the solution of this is

v = minus(

M1 cosπkcr + M2

Ncr sin πkcr

)sin

πx

kcrL+ M1

Ncr

(cos

πx

kcrLminus 1

)

+(

M1 + M2

Ncr

)x

L+

x

L

where Ncr is the elastic buckling load transmitted by the member (seeequation 323) and kcr = LcrL By using this to obtain expressions for the endrotations θ1 θ2 and by substituting equation 333 the following equations can beobtained

M1

(NcrL

α1+ 1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ M2

(1 minus π

kcrcosec

π

kcr

)+ Ncr∆ = 0

M1

(1 minus π

kcrcosec

π

kcr

)+ M2

(NcrL

α2+ 1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ Ncr∆ = 0

(369)

If the compression member is braced so that joint translation is effectively pre-vented the sway terms Ncr∆ disappear from equations 369 The moments M1M2 can then be eliminated whence

(EIL)2

α1α2

kcr

)2

+ EI

L

(1

α1+ 1

α2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan π2kcr

π2kcr= 1

(370)

By writing the relative stiffness of the braced member at the end 1 as

γ1 = 2EIL

α1= (2EIL)12sum

(343)

with a similar definition for γ2 equation 370 becomes

γ1γ2

4

kcr

)2

+(γ1 + γ2

2

)(1 minus π

kcrcot

π

kcr

)+ tan(π2kcr)

π2kcr= 1 (342)

3105 Buckling of an unbraced member

If there are no reaction points or braces to supply the member end shears (M1 +M2 + N∆)L the member will sway as shown in Figure 317b and the sway

Compression members 87

moment N∆ will be completely resisted by the end moments M1 and M2 so that

N∆ = minus(M1 + M2)

If this is substituted into equation 369 and if the moments M1 and M2 areeliminated then

(EIL)2

α1α2

kcr

)2

minus 1 = EI

L

(1

α1+ 1

α2

kcrcot

π

kcr(371)

where kcr = LcrL By writing the relative stiffnesses of the unbraced member atend 1 as

γ1 = 6EIL

α1= (6EIL)12sum

(347)

with a similar definition of γ 2 equation 371 becomes

γ1γ2(πkcr)2 minus 36

6(γ1 + γ2)= π

kcrcot

π

kcr (346)

3106 Stiffness of bracing for a rigid frame

If the simply supported member shown in Figure 322 has a sufficiently stiff swaybrace acting at one end then it will buckle as if rigidly braced as shown inFigure 322a at a load π2EIL2 If the stiffness α of the brace is reduced below aminimum value αL the member will buckle in the rigid body sway mode shownin Figure 322b The elastic buckling load Ncr for this mode can be obtained fromthe equilibrium condition that

Ncr∆ = α∆L

where α∆ is the restraining force in the brace so that

Ncr = αL

The variation of Ncr with α is compared in Figure 322c with the braced modebuckling load of π2EIL2 It can be seen that when the brace stiffness α isless than

αL = π2EIL3 (350)

the member buckles in the sway mode and that when α is greater than αL itbuckles in the braced mode

88 Compression members

311 Appendix ndash torsional buckling

Thin-walled open-section compression members may buckle by twisting as shownin Figure 324 for a cruciform section or by combined bending and twisting Whenthis type of buckling takes place the twisting of the member causes the axialcompressive stresses NA to exert a disturbing torque which is opposed by thetorsional resistance of the section For the typical longitudinal element of cross-sectional area δA shown in Figure 327 which rotates a0(dφdx) (where a0 is thedistance to the axis of twist) when the section rotates φ the axial force (NA)δAhas a component (NA)δAa0(dφdx) which exerts a torque (NA)δAa0(dφdx)a0

about the axis of twist (which passes through the shear centre y0 z0 as shown inChapter 5) The total disturbing torque TP exerted is therefore

TP = N

A

dx

intA

a20dA

where

a20 = (y minus y0)

2 + (z minus z0)2

This torque can also be written as

TP = Ni20

dx

where

i20 = i2

p + y20 + z2

0 (355)

ip = radic (Iy + Iz)A

(356)

For members of doubly symmetric cross-section (y0 = z0 = 0) a twistedequilibrium position is possible when the disturbing torque TP exactly balances

xast

AN

d

d 0

xa

d

d0

δ

δ

δδ

xAxis of twist

stAN st

A

N

f

f

Figure 327 Torque exerted by axial load during twisting

Compression members 89

the internal resisting torque

Mx = GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3

in which GIt and EIw are the torsional and warping rigidities (see Chapter 10)Thus at torsional buckling

N

Ai20

dx= GIt

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3 (372)

The solution of this which satisfies the boundary conditions of end twistingprevented ((φ)0L = 0) and ends free to warp ((d2φdx2)0L = 0) (see Chapter 10)is φ = (φ)L2 sin πxL in which (φ)L2 is the undetermined magnitude of theangle of twist rotation at the centre of the member and the buckling load NcrT is

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2

)

This solution may be generalised for compression members with other endconditions by writing it in the form

NcrT = 1

i20

(GIt + π2EIw

L2crT

)(354)

in which the torsional buckling effective length LcrT is the distance betweeninflexion points in the twisted shape

312 Worked examples

3121 Example 1 ndash checking a UB compression member

Problem The 457 times 191 UB 82 compression member of S275 steel of Figure 328ais simply supported about both principal axes at each end (Lcry = 120 m) andhas a central brace which prevents lateral deflections in the minor principal plane(Lcrz = 60 m) Check the adequacy of the member for a factored axial compres-sive load corresponding to a nominal dead load of 160 kN and a nominal imposedload of 230 kN

Factored axial load NEd = (135 times 160)+ (15 times 230) = 561 kN

Classifying the sectionFor S275 steel with tf = 16 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235275)05 = 0924

cf (tf ε) = [(1913 minus 99 minus 2 times 102)2](160 times 0924) = 544 lt 14T52

90 Compression members

125

125

75

12

10

y

z

y

z z

y

1913

4600

99

160

RHS

(a) Example 1

457 times 191 UB 82 Iz = 1871 cm4

A = 104 cm2

iy = 188 cm iz = 423 cm r = 102 mm

(b) Example 3

2 ndash 125 times 75 times 10 UA Iy = 1495 cm4

Iz = 1642 cm4

(c) Example 4

Figure 328 Examples 1 3 and 4

cw = (4600 minus 2 times 160 minus 2 times 102) = 4076 mm T52

cw(twε) = 4076(99 times 0924) = 445 gt 42 T52

and so the web is Class 4 (slender) T52

Effective area

λp =radic

fyσcr

= bt

284εradic

kσ= 407699

284 times 0924 times radic40

= 0784 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρ= λp minus 0055(3 +ψ)λ

2p

= 0784 minus 0055(3 + 1)

07842= 0918 EC3-1-5 44(2)

d minus deff = (1 minus 0918)times 4076 = 336 mm

Aeff = 104 times 102 minus 336 times 99 = 10 067 mm2

Cross-section compression resistance

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0

= 10 067 times 275

10= 2768 kN gt 561 kN = NEd 624(2)

Compression members 91

Member buckling resistance

λy =radic

Aeff fyNcry

= Lcry

iy

radicAeff A

λ1= 12 000

(188 times 10)

radic10 06710 400

939 times 0924= 0724

6313(1)

λz =radic

Aeff fyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

radicAeff A

λ1= 6000

(423 times 10)

radic10 06710 400

939 times 0924

= 1608 gt 0724 6313(1)

Buckling will occur about the minor (z) axis For a rolled UB section (with hb gt12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about the z-axis use buckling curve (b) withα = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034(1608 minus 02)+ 16082] = 2032 6312(1)

χz = 1

2032 + radic20322 minus 16082

= 0305 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAeff fyγM1

= 0305 times 10 067 times 275

10= 844 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the member is satisfactory

3122 Example 2 ndash designing a UC compression member

Problem Design a suitable UC of S355 steel to resist the loading of example 1 inSection 3121

Design axial load NEd = 561 kN as in Section 3121

Target area and first section choiceAssume fy = 355 Nmm2 and χ = 05

A ge 561 times 103(05 times 355) = 3161 mm2

Try a 152 times 152 UC 30 with A = 383 cm2 iy = 676 cm iz = 383 cmtf = 94 mm

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(676 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 2322 6313(1)

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

1

λ1= 6000

(383 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 2050 lt 2322

6313(1)

92 Compression members

Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis For a rolled UC section (with hb le12 and tf le 100 mm) buckling about the y-axis use buckling curve (b) withα = 034 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 034(2322 minus 02)+ 23222] = 3558 6312(1)

χy = 1

3558 + radic35582 minus 23222

= 0160 6312(1)

which is much less than the guessed value of 05

Second section choice

Guess χ = (05 + 0160)2 = 033

A ge 561 times 103(033 times 355) = 4789 mm2

Try a 203 times 203 UC 52 with A = 663 cm2 iy = 891 cm tf = 125 mmFor S355 steel with tf = 125 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = [(2043 minus 79 minus 2 times 102)2](125 times 0814) = 865 lt 14 T52

cw(twε) = (2062 minus 2 times 125 minus 2 times 102)(79 times 0814) = 250 lt 42T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(891 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1763 6313(1)

For a rolled UC section (with hb le 12 and tf le 100 mm) buckling about they-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 034(1763 minus 02)+ 17632] = 2320 6312(1)

χy = 1

2320 + radic23202 minus 17632

= 0261 6312(1)

NbyRd = χAfyγM1

= 0261 times 663 times 102 times 355

10= 615 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the 203 times 203 UC 52 is satisfactory

3123 Example 3 ndash designing an RHS compression member

Problem Design a suitable hot-finished RHS of S355 steel to resist the loading ofexample 1 in Section 3121

Compression members 93

Design axial load NEd = 561 kN as in Section 3121SolutionGuess χ = 03

A ge 561 times 103(03 times 355) = 5268 mm2

Try a 250 times 150 times 8 RHS with A = 608 cm2 iy = 917 cm iz = 615 cmt = 80 mmFor S355 steel with t = 8 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235355)05 = 0814

cw(tε) = (2500 minus 2 times 80 minus 2 times 40)(80 times 0814) = 347 lt 42 T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

λy =radic

AfyNcry

= Lcry

iy

1

λ1= 12 000

(918 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1710 6313(1)

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

= Lcrz

iz

1

λ1= 6000

(615 times 10)

1

939 times 0814= 1276 lt 1710

6313(1)

Buckling will occur about the major (y) axis For a hot-finished RHS use bucklingcurve (a) with α = 021 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 021(1710 minus 02)+ 17102] = 2121 6312(1)

χy = 1

2121 + radic21212 minus 17102

= 0296 6312(1)

NbyRd = χAfyγM1

= 0296 times 608 times 102 times 355

10= 640 kN gt 561 kN = NEd

6311(3)

and so the 250 times 150 times 8 RHS is satisfactory

3124 Example 4 ndash buckling of double angles

Problem Two steel 125 times 75 times 10 UA are connected together at 15 m intervalsto form the long compression member whose properties are given in Figure 328cThe minimum second moment of area of each angle is 499 cm4 The member issimply supported about its major axis at 45 m intervals and about its minor axisat 15 m intervals Determine the elastic buckling load of the member

94 Compression members

Member buckling about the major axis

Ncry = π2 times 210 000 times 1495 times 10445002 N = 1530 kN

Member buckling about the minor axis

Ncrz = π2 times 210 000 times 1642 times 10415002 N = 1513 kN

Single angle buckling

Ncrmin = π2 times 210 000 times 499 times 10415002 N = 4597 kN

and so for both angles 2Ncrmin = 2 times 4597 = 919 kN lt 1520 kNIt can be seen that the lowest buckling load of 919 kN corresponds to the case

where each unequal angle buckles about its own minimum axis

3125 Example 5 ndash effective length factor inan unbraced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of member 1ndash2 of the unbracedframe shown in Figure 329a

Solution Using equation 348

k1 = 6EIL

15 times 0 + 6EIL= 10

k2 = 6EIL

15 times 6(2EI)(2L)+ 6EIL= 04

Using Figure 321b Lcr L = 23

2058

2096

142

94y

z

EI

2EI

2L

L

5N

1

2 3

(a) Example 5

5N

EI

203 times 203 UC 60Iy = 6125 cm4

Iz = 2065 cm4

A = 764 cm2

iz = 520 cmr = 102 mm

(b) Example 7

Figure 329 Examples 5 and 7

Compression members 95

3126 Example 6 ndash effective length factor in a braced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of member 1ndash2 of the frame shownin Figure 329a if bracing is provided which prevents sway buckling

SolutionUsing equation 344

k1 = 2EIL

05 times 0 + 2EIL= 10

k2 = 2EIL

05 times 2(2EI)(2L)+ 2EIL= 0667

Using Figure 321a Lcr L = 087

3127 Example 7 ndash checking a non-uniform member

Problem The 50 m long simply supported 203 times 203 UC 60 member shown inFigure 329b has two steel plates 250 mm times 12 mm times 2 m long welded to itone to the central length of each flange This increases the elastic buckling loadabout the minor axis by 70 If the yield strengths of the plates and the UC are355 Nmm2 determine the compression resistance

Solution

ε = (235355)05 = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = [(2058 minus 93 minus 2 times 102)2](142 times 0814) = 762 lt 14T52

cw(twε) = (2096 minus 2 times 142 minus 2 times 102)(93 times 0814) = 2124 lt 42T52

and so the cross-section is fully effective

Ncrz = 17 times π2 times 210 000 times 2065 times 10450002 = 2910 kN

λz =radic

AfyNcrz

=radic

764 times 102 times 355

2910 times 103= 0965

For a rolled UC section with welded flanges (tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (c) with α = 049 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 049(0965 minus 02)+ 09652] = 1153 6312(1)

χz = 1

1153 + radic11532 minus 09652

= 0560 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAfyγM1

= 0560 times 764 times 102 times 355

10= 1520 kN 6311(3)

96 Compression members

3128 Example 8 ndash checking a member with intermediateaxial loads

Problem A 5 m long simply supported 457 times 191 UB 82 compression member ofS355 steel whose properties are given in Figure 328a has concentric axial loads ofNEd and 2NEd at its ends and a concentric axial load NEd at its midpoint At elasticbuckling the maximum compression force in the member is 2000 kN Determinethe compression resistance

SolutionFrom Section 3121 the cross-section is Class 4 slender and Aeff =10 067 mm2

Ncrz = 2000 kN

λz =radic

Aeff fyNcrz

=radic

10 067 times 355

2000 times 103= 1337

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034(1337 minus 02)+ 13372] = 1587 6312(1)

χz = 1

1587 + radic15872 minus 13372

= 0410 6312(1)

NbzRd = χAeff fyγM1

= 0410 times 10 067 times 355

10= 1465 kN 6311(3)

313 Unworked examples

3131 Example 9 ndash checking a welded column section

The 140 m long welded column section compression member of S355 steel shownin Figure 330(a) is simply supported about both principal axes at each end (Lcry =140 m) and has a central brace that prevents lateral deflections in the minorprincipal plane (Lcrz = 70 m) Check the adequacy of the member for a factoredaxial compressive force corresponding to a nominal dead load of 420 kN and anominal imposed load of 640 kN

3132 Example 10 ndash designing a UC section

Design a suitable UC of S275 steel to resist the loading of example 9 inSection 3131

Compression members 97

300

40

28

355

100 100

175

100

380

25

25090

90

8

Cy y

z z

u

v

Welded column section

Iy = 747 times 10 6 mm4

Iz = 286 times 106 mm4

iy = 145 mm iz = 896 mm A = 35 700 mm2

(a) Example 9

2 ndash 380 times 100 channels

For each channel

Iy = 15034 times 106 mm4

Iz = 643 times 106 mm4

A = 6870 mm2

(b) Example 11

90 times 90 times 8 EA

Iu = 166 times 106 mm4

Iv = 0431 times 106 mm4

iu = 345 mm iv = 176 mm A = 1390 mm2

It = 328 times 103 mm4

y0 = 250 mm

(c) Example 14

Figure 330 Examples 9 11 and 14

L2

N

EA EA

E I L

L2

Figure 331 Example 12

3133 Example 11 ndash checking a compound section

Determine the minimum elastic buckling load of the two laced 380 times 100 channelsshown in Figure 330(b) if the effective length about each axis is Lcr = 30 m

3134 Example 12 ndash elastic buckling

Determine the elastic buckling load of the guyed column shown in Figure 331 Itshould be assumed that the guys have negligible flexural stiffness that (EA)guy =2(EI )columnL2 and that the column is built-in at its base

98 Compression members

3135 Example 13 ndash checking a non-uniform compressionmember

Determine the maximum design load NEd of a lightly welded box section can-tilever compression member 1ndash2 made from plates of S355 steel which taper from300 mm times 300 mm times 12 mm at end 1 (at the cantilever tip) to 500 mm times 500 mmtimes 12 mm at end 2 (at the cantilever support) The cantilever has a length of 100 m

3136 Example 14 ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling

A simply supported 90 times 90 times 8 EA compression member is shown inFigure 330(c) Determine the variation of the elastic buckling load with memberlength

References

1 Shanley FR (1947) Inelastic column theory Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 14No 5 May pp 261ndash7

2 Trahair NS (2000) Column bracing forces Australian Journal of StructuralEngineering Institution of Engineers Australia 3 Nos 2 amp 3 pp 163ndash8

3 Trahair NS and Rasmussen KJR (2005) Finite-element analysis of the flexuralbuckling of columns with oblique restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE131 No 3 pp 481ndash7

4 Structural Stability Research Council (1998) Guide to Stability Design Criteria forMetal Structures 5th edition (ed TV Galambos) John Wiley New York

5 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

6 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York7 Livesley RK (1964) Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis Pergamon Press Oxford8 Horne MR and Merchant W (1965) The Stability of Frames Pergamon Press

Oxford9 Gregory MS (1967) Elastic Instability E amp FN Spon London

10 McMinn SJ (1961) The determination of the critical loads of plane frames TheStructural Engineer 39 No 7 July pp 221ndash7

11 Stevens LK and Schmidt LC (1963) Determination of elastic critical loads Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 89 No ST6 pp 137ndash58

12 Harrison HB (1967) The analysis of triangulated plane and space structures account-ing for temperature and geometrical changes Space Structures (ed RM Davies)Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford pp 231ndash43

13 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

14 Lu LW (1962) A survey of literature on the stability of frames Welding ResearchCouncil Bulletin No 81 pp 1ndash11

15 Archer JS et al (1963) Bibliography on the use of digital computers in structuralengineering Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 89 No ST6 pp 461ndash91

16 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

Compression members 99

17 Brotton DM (1960) Elastic critical loads of multibay pitched roof portal frames withrigid external stanchions The Structural Engineer 38 No 3 March pp 88ndash99

18 Switzky H and Wang PC (1969) Design and analysis of frames for stability Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 95 No ST4 pp 695ndash713

19 Davies JM (1990) In-plane stability of portal frames The Structural Engineer 68No 8 April pp 141ndash7

20 Davies JM (1991) The stability of multi-bay portal frames The Structural Engineer69 No 12 June pp 223ndash9

21 Bresler B Lin TY and Scalzi JB (1968) Design of Steel Structures 2nd editionJohn Wiley New York

22 Gere JM and Carter WO (1962) Critical buckling loads for tapered columns Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 88 No ST1 pp 1ndash11

23 Bradford MA andAbdoli Yazdi N (1999)ANewmark-based method for the stabilityof columns Computers and Structures 71 No 6 pp 689ndash700

24 Trahair NS (1993) FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN SponLondon

25 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

26 Trahair NS and Rasmussen KJR (2005) Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of columnswith oblique eccentric restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 131 No 11pp 1731ndash7

27 Chajes A and Winter G (1965) Torsionalndashflexural buckling of thin-walled membersJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST4 pp 103ndash24

Chapter 4

Local buckling ofthin-plate elements

41 Introduction

The behaviour of compression members was discussed in Chapter 3 where itwas assumed that no local distortion of the cross-section took place so thatfailure was only due to overall buckling and yielding This treatment is appro-priate for solid section members and for members whose cross-sections arecomposed of comparatively thick-plate elements including many hot-rolled steelsections

However in some cases the member cross-section is composed of more slender-plate elements as for example in some built-up members and in most light-gaugecold-formed members These slender-plate elements may buckle locally as shownin Figure 41 and the member may fail prematurely as indicated by the reduc-tion from the full line to the dashed line in Figure 42 A slender-plate elementdoes not fail by elastic buckling but exhibits significant post-buckling behaviouras indicated in Figure 43 Because of this the platersquos resistance to local fail-ure depends not only on its slenderness but also on its yield strength andresidual stresses as shown in Figure 44 The resistance of a plate elementof intermediate slenderness is also influenced significantly by its geometricalimperfections while the resistance of a stocky-plate element depends primar-ily on its yield stress and strain-hardening moduli of elasticity as indicated inFigure 44

In this chapter the behaviour of thin rectangular plates subjected to in-planecompression shear bending or bearing is discussed The behaviour under com-pression is applied to the design of plate elements in compression members andcompression flanges in beams The design of beam webs is also discussed andthe influence of the behaviour of thin plates on the design of plate girders to EC3is treated in detail

Figure 41 Local buckling of an I-section column

0 05 10 15 20 25 30 350

02

04

06

08

10

Complete yielding

Overall elasticbuckling

Ultimate strengthwithout local buckling

Ultimate strengthreduced by local buckling

Modified slenderness (Ny Ncr)

Ult

imat

e lo

ad r

atio

Nul

t N

y

NcrNy

Nult Ny

Nult Ny

Figure 42 Effects of local buckling on the resistances of compression members

102 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 05 10 15 20 25Dimensionless transverse deflection t

0

05

10

15

20First yield

Failure

Elasticpost-bucklingbehaviour

Buckling

Flat plate

Plate with initialcurvatureD

imen

sion

less

load

NN

cr

Figure 43 Post-buckling behaviour of thin plates

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Modified plate slenderness

0

02

04

06

08

10

12

14

Strain-hardening bucklingplates free along one edge

simply supported plates

Yielding

Ultimate strengths of simplysupported plates ultfy

Flat plates withoutresidual stresses

Plates withinitialcurvature

Plates with residualstresses and initial

curvature

Elastic buckling crfy

Str

ess

rati

o c

rf y

ul

tfy

k

f

Et

bf

cr

y2

2)1(12

) )( (=

ndash

Figure 44 Ultimate strengths of plates in compression

42 Plate elements in compression

421 Elastic buckling

4211 Simply supported plates

The thin flat plate element of length L width b and thickness t shown in Figure 45bis simply supported along all four edges The applied compressive loads N are

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 103

L

L

EI

t

t

N

N

b

b= Ebt

12-----------

3

Ebt

12(1ndash2)--------------------------

3bD

Nbt

Nbt

SimplysupportedSimply

supported

(a) Column buckling (b) Plate buckling

SS

2

2

4

4

22

4

4

4

2

2

4

4

2partx

partN

z

zx

x

bDdx

N

dx

EI ndash=++ndash=

xx

yy

z

z

( )

=

partpartpartpartpartdd partpart

Figure 45 Comparison of column and plate buckling

uniformly distributed over each end of the plate When the applied loads are equalto the elastic buckling loads the plate can buckle by deflecting v laterally out ofits original plane into an adjacent position [1ndash4]

It is shown in Section 481 that this equilibrium position is given by

v = δ sinmπx

Lsin

nπz

b(41)

with n = 1 where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection Theelastic buckling load Ncr at which the plate buckles corresponds to the bucklingstress

σcr = Ncrbt (42)

which is given by

σcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(bt)2

(43)

The lowest value of the buckling coefficient kσ (see Figure 46) is

kσ = 4 (44)

which is appropriate for the high aspect ratios Lb of most structural steel members(see Figure 47)

104 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

2

4

6

8

10

L

b2 3 4 5

2

34

m = 1

n = 1

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 46 Buckling coefficients of simply supported plates in compression

b

b b b

L = bm

cr cr

Figure 47 Buckled pattern of a long simply supported plate in compression

The buckling stress σcr varies inversely as the square of the plate slendernessor widthndashthickness ratio bt as shown in Figure 44 in which the dimensionlessbuckling stress σcrfy is plotted against a modified plate slenderness ratio

radicfyσcr

= b

t

radicfyE

12(1 minus ν2)

π2kσ (45)

If the material ceases to be linear elastic at the yield stress fy the above analysisis only valid for

radic(fyσcr) ge 1 This limit is equivalent to a widthndashthickness ratio

bt given by

b

t

radicfy

235= 568 (46)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 105

for a steel with E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 (The yield stress fy inequation 46 and in all of the similar equations which appear later in this chaptermust be expressed in Nmm2)

The values of the buckling coefficient kσ shown in Figure 46 indicate that theuse of intermediate transverse stiffeners to increase the elastic buckling stress ofa plate in compression is not effective except when their spacing is significantlyless than the plate width Because of this it is more economical to use interme-diate longitudinal stiffeners which cause the plate to buckle in a number of halfwaves across its width When such stiffeners are used equation 43 still holds pro-vided b is taken as the stiffener spacing Longitudinal stiffeners have an additionaladvantage when they are able to transfer compressive stresses in which case theircross-sectional areas may be added to that of the plate

An intermediate longitudinal stiffener must be sufficiently stiff flexurally toprevent the plate from deflecting at the stiffener An approximate value for theminimum second moment of area Ist of a longitudinal stiffener at the centre lineof a simply supported plate is given by

Ist = 45bt3[

1 + 23Ast

bt

(1 + 05

Ast

bt

)](47)

in which b is now the half width of the plate and Ast is the area of the stiffenerThis minimum increases with the stiffener area because the load transmitted bythe stiffener also increases with its area and the additional second moment of areais required to resist the buckling action of the stiffener load

Stiffeners should also be proportioned to resist local buckling A stiffener isusually fixed to one side of the plate rather than placed symmetrically about themid-plane and in this case its effective second moment of area is greater than thevalue calculated for its centroid It is often suggested [2 3] that the value of Ist

can be approximated by the value calculated for the mid-plane of the plate butthis may provide an overestimate in some cases [4ndash6]

The behaviour of an edge stiffener is different from that of an intermediatestiffener in that theoretically it must be of infinite stiffness before it can providean effective simple support to the plate However if a minimum value of thesecond moment of area of an edge stiffener of

Ist = 225bt3[

1 + 46Ast

bt

(1 + Ast

bt

)](48)

is provided the resulting reduction in the plate buckling stress is only a few percent[5] Equation 48 is derived from equation 47 on the basis that an edge stiffeneronly has to support a plate on one side of the stiffener while an intermediatestiffener has to support plates on both sides

The effectiveness of longitudinal stiffeners decreases as their number increasesand the minimum stiffness required for them to provide effective lateral supportincreases Some guidance on this is given in [3 5]

106 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

b

L

Simply supported Simply supported

Free edge

cr cr

Figure 48 Buckled pattern of a plate free along one edge

4212 Plates free along one longitudinal edge

The thin flat plate shown in Figure 48 is simply supported along both transverseedges and one longitudinal edge and is free along the other The differen-tial equation of equilibrium of the plate in a buckled position is the sameas equation 4105 (see Section 481) The buckled shape which satisfies thisequation differs however from the approximately square buckles of the simplysupported plate shown in Figure 47 The different boundary conditions along thefree edge cause the plate to buckle with a single half wave along its length asshown in Figure 48 Despite this the solution for the elastic buckling stress σcr

can still be expressed in the general form of equation 43 in which the bucklingcoefficient kσ is now approximated by

kσ = 0425 +(

b

L

)2

(49)

as shown in Figure 49For the long-plate elements which are used as flange outstands in many structural

steel members the buckling coefficient kσ is close to the minimum value of 0425In this case the elastic buckling stress (for a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2

and ν = 03) is equal to the yield stress fy when

b

t

radicfy

235= 185 (410)

Once again it is more economical to use longitudinal stiffeners to increase theelastic buckling stress than transverse stiffeners The stiffness requirements ofintermediate and edge longitudinal stiffeners are discussed in Section 4211

4213 Plates with other support conditions

The edges of flat-plate elements may be fixed or elastically restrained insteadof being simply supported or free The elastic buckling loads of flat plates with

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 107

0 1 2 3 4 5Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

1

2

3

4

5

L

b

Free

Exact= 0425 + (bL)2

0425

k

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 49 Buckling coefficients of plate free along one edge

various support conditions have been determined and many values of the bucklingcoefficient kσ to be used in equation 43 are given in [2ndash6]

4214 Plate assemblies

Many structural steel compression members are assemblies of flat-plate elementswhich are rigidly connected together along their common boundaries The localbuckling of such an assembly can be analysed approximately by assuming that theplate elements are hinged along their common boundaries so that each plate actsas if simply supported along its connected boundary or boundaries and free alongany unconnected boundary The buckling stress of each plate element can then bedetermined from equation 43 with kσ = 4 or 0425 as appropriate and the lowestof these can be used as an approximation for determining the buckling load of themember

This approximation is conservative because the rigidity of the joints between theplate elements causes all plates to buckle simultaneously at a stress intermediatebetween the lowest and the highest of the buckling stresses of the individual plateelements Anumber of analyses have been made of the stress at which simultaneousbuckling takes place [4ndash6]

For example values of the elastic buckling coefficient kσ for an I-section inuniform compression are shown in Figure 410 and for a box section in uniformcompression in Figure 411 The buckling stress can be obtained from these figuresby using equation 43 with the plate thickness t replaced by the flange thicknesstf The use of these stresses and other results [4ndash6] leads to economic thin-walledcompression members

108 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Outstand width to depth ratio bfdf

0

02

04

06

08

10

= E--------------------------

2

12(1ndash 2)k ----------------------

( )b tf f2

bf

df

tw

tf

t twf =100

150

200

075

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

cr

Figure 410 Local buckling coefficients for I-section compression members

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Width to depth ratio bfdf

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

bf

dftw

tf

t twf = 075

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

100

125

150

200

= E--------------------------

2

12(1ndash 2)k----------------------

( )b tf f2cr

Figure 411 Local buckling coefficients for box section compression members

422 Ultimate strength

4221 Inelastic buckling of thick plates

The discussion given in Section 421 on the elastic buckling of rectangular platesapplies only to materials whose stressndashstrain relationships remain linear Thusfor stocky steel plates for which the calculated elastic buckling stress exceeds theyield stress fy the elastic analysis must be modified accordingly

One particularly simple modification which can be applied to strain-hardenedsteel plates is to use the strain-hardening modulus Est and

radic(EEst) instead of E

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 109

in the terms of equation 4105 (Section 481) which represent the longitudinalbending and the twisting resistances to buckling while still using E in the termfor the lateral bending resistance With these modifications the strain-hardeningbuckling stress of a long simply supported plate is equal to the yield stress fy when

b

t

radicfy

235= 237 (411)

More accurate investigations [7] of the strain-hardening buckling of steel plateshave shown that this simple approach is too conservative and that the strain-hardening buckling stress is equal to the yield stress when

b

t

radicfy

235= 321 (412)

for simply supported plates and when

b

t

radicfy

235= 82 (413)

for plates which are free along one longitudinal edge If these are compared withequations 46 and 410 then it can be seen that these limits can be expressed interms of the elastic buckling stress σcr byradic

fyσcr

= 057 (414)

for simply supported plates and byradicfyσcr

= 046 (415)

for plates which are free along one longitudinal edge These limits are shown inFigure 44

4222 Post-buckling strength of thin plates

A thin elastic plate does not fail soon after it buckles but can support loads signifi-cantly greater than its elastic buckling load without deflecting excessively This isin contrast to the behaviour of an elastic compression member which can only carryvery slightly increased loads before its deflections become excessive as indicatedin Figure 412 This post-buckling behaviour of a thin plate is due to a number ofcauses but the main reason is that the deflected shape of the buckled plate cannotbe developed from the pre-buckled configuration without some redistribution ofthe in-plane stresses within the plate This redistribution which is ignored in the

110 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Central deflection

Simply supported thinplates with constantdisplacement of loadededges

Constant displacementalong unloaded edges

Unloaded edgesfree to deflect

Thin column

Small deflection theoryCom

pres

sive

load

on

plat

e N

Ncr

Figure 412 Post-buckling behaviour of thin elastic plates

small deflection theory of elastic buckling usually favours the less stiff portionsof the plate and causes an increase in the efficiency of the plate

One of the most common causes of this redistribution is associated with thein-plane boundary conditions at the loaded edges of the plate In long structuralmembers the continuity conditions along the transverse lines dividing consecu-tive buckled panels require that each of these boundary lines deflects a constantamount longitudinally However the longitudinal shortening of the panel due toits transverse deflections varies across the panel from a maximum at the centreto a minimum at the supported edges This variation must therefore be compen-sated for by a corresponding variation in the longitudinal shortening due to axialstrain from a minimum at the centre to a maximum at the edges The longitudinalstress distribution must be similar to the shortening due to strain and so the stressat the centre of the panel is reduced below the average stress while the stress atthe supported edges is increased above the average This redistribution whichis equivalent to a transfer of stress from the more flexible central region of thepanel to the regions near the supported edges leads to a reduction in the transversedeflection as indicated in Figure 412

A further redistribution of the in-plane stresses takes places when the longitu-dinal edges of the panel are supported by very stiff elements which ensure thatthese edges deflect a constant amount laterally in the plane of the panel In thiscase the variation along the panel of the lateral shortening due to the transversedeflections induces a self-equilibrating set of lateral in-plane stresses which aretensile at the centre of the panel and compressive at the loaded edges The tensilestresses help support the less stiff central region of the panel and lead to furtherreductions in the transverse deflections as indicated in Figure 412 However this

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 111

action is not usually fully developed because the elements supporting the panelsof most structural members are not very stiff

The post-buckling effect is greater in plates supported along both longitudinaledges than it is in plates which are free along one longitudinal edge This is becausethe deflected shapes of the latter have much less curvature than the former and theredistributions of the in-plane stresses are not as pronounced In addition it is notpossible to develop any lateral in-plane stresses along free edges and so it is notuncommon to ignore any post-buckling reserves of slender flange outstands

The redistribution of the in-plane stresses after buckling continues with increas-ing load until the yield stress fy is reached at the supported edges Yielding thenspreads rapidly and the plate fails soon after as indicated in Figure 43 The occur-rence of the first yield in an initially flat plate depends on its slenderness and athick plate yields before its elastic buckling stress σcr is reached As the slender-ness increases and the elastic buckling stress decreases below the yield stress theratio of the ultimate stress fult to the elastic buckling stress increases as shown inFigure 44

Although the analytical determination of the ultimate strength of a thin flat plateis difficult it has been found that the use of an effective width concept can lead tosatisfactory approximations According to this concept the actual ultimate stressdistribution in a simply supported plate (see Figure 413) is replaced by a simplifieddistribution for which the central portion of the plate is ignored and the remainingeffective width beff carries the yield stress fy It was proposed that this effectivewidth should be approximated by

beff

b=

radicσcr

fy (416)

Actual ultimatestress distribution

Averageultimatestress ult

Centralexcess widthignored

(a) Ultimate stress distribution (b) Effective width concept

asymp fyfy

b

equiv

beff 2 beff 2

y

ulteff

fb

b=

Figure 413 Effective width concept for simply supported plates

112 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

which is equivalent to supposing that the ultimate load carrying capacity of the platefybeff t is equal to the elastic buckling load of a plate of width beff Alternativelythis proposal can be regarded as determining an effective average ultimate stressfult which acts on the full width b of the plate This average ultimate stress whichis given by

fult

fy=

radicσcr

fy(417)

is shown in Figure 44Experiments on real plates with initial curvatures and residual stresses have

confirmed the qualitative validity of this effective width approach but suggestthat the quantitative values of the effective width for hot-rolled and welded platesshould be obtained from equations of the type

beff

b= α

radicσcr

fy (418)

where α reflects the influence of the initial curvatures and residual stresses Forexample test results for the ultimate stresses fult(= fybeff b) of hot-rolled sim-ply supported plates with residual stresses and initial curvatures are shown inFigure 414 and suggest a value of α equal to 065 Other values of α are given in[8] Tests on cold-formed members also support the effective width concept withquantitative values of the effective width being obtained from

beff

b=

radicσcr

fy

(1 minus 022

radicσcr

fy

) (419)

4223 Effects of initial curvature and residual stresses

Real plates are not perfectly flat but have small initial curvatures similar to thosein real columns (see Section 322) and real beams (see Section 622) The initialcurvature of a plate causes it to deflect transversely as soon as it is loaded as shownin Figure 43 These deflections increase rapidly as the elastic buckling stress isapproached but slow down beyond the buckling stress and approach those of aninitially flat plate

In a thin plate with initial curvature the first yield and failure occur only slightlybefore they do in a flat plate as indicated in Figure 43 while the initial curvaturehas little effect on the resistance of a thick plate (see Figure 44) It is only in a plateof intermediate slenderness that the initial curvature causes a significant reductionin the resistance as indicated in Figure 44

Real plates usually have residual stresses induced by uneven cooling after rollingor welding These stresses are generally tensile at the junctions between plateelements and compressive in the regions away from the junctions Residual com-pressive stresses in the central region of a simply supported thin plate cause it

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 113

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16

Modified plate slenderness

02

04

06

08

10

12

(f y )

Test results

Yielding

Elastic buckling

equation 418 ( = 065)

cr

Eff

ecti

ve w

idth

rat

io b

eff

b

radic

Figure 414 Effective widths of simply supported plates

to buckle prematurely and reduce its ultimate strength as shown in Figure 44Residual stresses also cause premature yielding in plates of intermediate slender-ness as indicated in Figure 44 but have a negligible effect on the strain-hardeningbuckling of stocky plates

Some typical test results for thin supported plates with initial curvatures andresidual stresses are shown in Figure 414

43 Plate elements in shear

431 Elastic buckling

The thin flat plate of length L depth d and thickness t shown in Figure 415is simply supported along all four edges The plate is loaded by shear stressesdistributed uniformly along its edges When these stresses are equal to the elasticbuckling value τcr then the plate can buckle by deflecting v laterally out of itsoriginal plane into an adjacent position For this adjacent position to be one ofequilibrium the differential equilibrium equation [1ndash4](

part4v

partx4+ 2

part4v

partx2partz2+ part4v

partz4

)= minus2τcrt

D

part2v

partxpartz(420)

must be satisfied (this may be compared with the corresponding equation 4105 ofSection 481 for a plate in compression)

Closed form solutions of this equation are not available but numerical solutionshave been obtained These indicate that the plate tends to buckle along compressiondiagonals as shown in Figure 415 The shape of the buckle is influenced bythe tensile forces acting along the other diagonal while the number of buckles

114 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

L

d

Line of zero deflection

Compression diagonals

cr

cr

Figure 415 Buckling pattern of a simply supported plate in shear

increases with the aspect ratio Ld The numerical solutions for the elastic bucklingstress τcr can be expressed in the form

τcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kτ(dt)2

(421)

in which the buckling coefficient kτ is approximated by

kτ = 534 + 4

(d

L

)2

(422)

when L ge d and by

kτ = 534

(d

L

)2

+ 4 (423)

when L le d as shown in Figure 416The shear stresses in many structural members are transmitted by unstiffened

webs for which the aspect ratio Ld is large In this case the buckling coefficientkτ approaches 534 and the buckling stress can be closely approximated by

τcr = 534π2E12(1 minus ν2)

(dt)2 (424)

This elastic buckling stress is equal to the yield stress in shear τy = fyradic

3 (seeSection 131) of a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 when

d

t

radicfy

235= 864 (425)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 115

Plate aspect ratio Lb

0

5

10

15

20

25

L

b

5341 buckle 2 buckles 3 buckles

Approximations ofequations 422 and 423

Buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Figure 416 Buckling coefficients of plates in shear

The values of the buckling coefficient kτ shown in Figure 416 and the form ofequation 421 indicate that the elastic buckling stress may be significantly increasedeither by using intermediate transverse stiffeners to decrease the aspect ratio Ldand to increase the buckling coefficient kτ or by using longitudinal stiffeners todecrease the depthndashthickness ratio dt It is apparent from Figure 416 that suchstiffeners are likely to be most efficient when the stiffener spacing a is such thatthe aspect ratio of each panel lies between 05 and 2 so that only one buckle canform in each panel

Any intermediate stiffeners used must be sufficiently stiff to ensure that theelastic buckling stress τcr is increased to the value calculated for the stiffenedpanel Some values of the required stiffener second moment of area Ist are givenin [3 5] for various panel aspect ratios ad These can be conservatively approx-imated by using

Ist

at312(1 minus ν2)= 6

ad(426)

when ad ge 1 and by using

Ist

at312(1 minus ν2)= 6

(ad)4(427)

when ad le 1

116 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

432 Ultimate strength

4321 Unstiffened plates

A stocky unstiffened web in an I-section beam in pure shear is shown inFigure 417a The elastic shear stress distribution in such a section is analysedin Section 5102 The web behaves elastically in shear until first yield occurs atτy = fy

radic3 and then undergoes increasing plastification until the web is fully

yielded in shear (Figure 417b) Because the shear stress distribution at first yieldis nearly uniform the nominal first yield and fully plastic loads are nearly equaland the shear shape factor is usually very close to 10 Stocky unstiffened webs insteel beams reach first yield before they buckle elastically so that their resistancesare determined by the shear stress τy as indicated in Figure 418

(a) I-section (b) Shear stress distributions

y y

d

Elastic First yield Fully plastic

Figure 417 Plastification of an I-section web in shear

0 05 10 15 20 25 300

02

04

06

08

10

Yieldingad = 04

0610

15

Ultimate strengthsof stiffened plates

Elastic bucklingUltimate strength ofunstiffened plates

Modified plate slenderness

cr fy

ult fy

kE

f

t

df y

cr

y

2

2)1(12

3

3

3( () )

ult fy33

=ndash

She

ar r

atio

s 3

crf

y 3

ult

fy

Figure 418 Ultimate strengths of plates in shear

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 117

Thus the resistance of a stocky web in a flanged section for which the shearshape factor is close to unity is closely approximated by the web plastic shearresistance

Vpl = dtτy (428)

When the depthndashthickness ratio dt of a long unstiffened steel web exceeds864

radic(fy235) its elastic buckling shear stress τcr is less than the shear yield

stress (see equation 425) The post-buckling reserve of shear strength of such anunstiffened web is not great and its ultimate stress τult can be approximated withreasonable accuracy by the elastic buckling stress τcr given by equation 424 andshown by the dashed line in Figure 418

4322 Stiffened plates

Stocky stiffened webs in steel beams yield in shear before they buckle and so thestiffeners do not contribute to the ultimate strength Because of this stocky websare usually unstiffened

In a slender web with transverse stiffeners which buckles elastically before ityields there is a significant reserve of strength after buckling This is causedby a redistribution of stress in which the diagonal tension stresses in the webpanel continue to increase with the applied shear while the diagonal compressivestresses remain substantially unchanged The increased diagonal tension stressesform a tension field which combines with the transverse stiffeners and the flangesto transfer the additional shear in a truss-type action [7 9] as shown in Figure 419The ultimate shear stresses τult of the web is reached soon after yield occurs in thetension field and this can be approximated by

τult = τcr + τtf (429)

in which τcr is the elastic buckling stress given by equations 421ndash423 with Lequal to the stiffener spacing a and τtf is the tension field contribution at yieldwhich can be approximated by

τtf = fy2

(1 minus radic3τcrfy)radic

1 + (ad)2 (430)

Thus the approximate ultimate strength can be obtained from

radic3τult

fy=

radic3τcr

fy+

radic3

2

(1 minus radic3τcrfy)radic

1 + (ad)2 (431)

which is shown in Figure 418 This equation is conservative as it ignores anycontributions made by the bending resistance of the flanges to the ultimate strengthof the web [9 10]

118 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Chord Web strut Tension member

(a) Equivalent truss

(b)Tension fields

Tension fieldWeb stiffenerFlange

a a a

d

Figure 419 Tension fields in a stiffened web

Not only must the intermediate transverse stiffeners be sufficiently stiff to ensurethat the elastic buckling stress τcr is reached as explained in Section 431 butthey must also be strong enough to transmit the stiffener force

Nst = fydt

2

(1 minus

radic3τcr

fy

)[a

dminus (ad)2radic

1 + (ad)2

](432)

required by the tension field action Intermediate transverse stiffeners are often sostocky that their ultimate strengths can be approximated by their squash loads inwhich case the required area Ast of a symmetrical pair of stiffeners is given by

Ast = Nstfy (433)

However the stability of very slender stiffeners should be checked in whichcase the second moment of area Ist required to resist the stiffener force can beconservatively estimated from

Ist = Nstd2

π2E(434)

which is based on the elastic buckling of a pin-ended column of length d

44 Plate elements in bending

441 Elastic buckling

The thin flat plate of length L width d and thickness t shown in Figure 420is simply supported along all four edges The plate is loaded by bending stress

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 119

Ld

All edges simply supported

2d3

2d3

2d3

crl

crl

crl

crl

Figure 420 Buckled pattern of a plate in bending

distributions which vary linearly across its width When the maximum stressreaches the elastic buckling value σcrl the plate can buckle out of its originalplane as shown in Figure 420 The elastic buckling stress can be expressed inthe form

σcrl = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(dt)2

(435)

where the buckling coefficient kσ depends on the aspect ratio Ld of the plate andthe number of buckles along the plate For long plates the value of kσ is close toits minimum value of

kσ = 239 (436)

for which the length of each buckle is approximately 2d3 By using thisvalue of kσ it can be shown that the elastic buckling stress for a steel for whichE = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03 is equal to the yield stress fy when

d

t

radicfy

235= 1389 (437)

The buckling coefficient kσ is not significantly greater than 239 except when thebuckle length is reduced below 2d3 For this reason transverse stiffeners areineffective unless more closely spaced than 2d3 On the other hand longitudinalstiffeners may be quite effective in changing the buckled shape and therefore thevalue of kσ Such a stiffener is most efficient when it is placed in the compression

120 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

region at about d5 from the compression edge This is close to the position ofthe crests in the buckles of an unstiffened plate Such a stiffener may increase thebuckling coefficient kσ significantly the maximum value of 1294 being achievedwhen the stiffener acts as if rigid The values given in [5 6] indicate that a hypo-thetical stiffener of zero area Ast will produce this effect if its second moment ofarea Ist is equal to 4dt3 This value should be increased to allow for the compres-sive load in the real stiffener and it is suggested that a suitable value might begiven by

Ist = 4dt3[

1 + 4Ast

dt

(1 + Ast

dt

)] (438)

which is of a similar form to that given by equation 47 for the longitudinal stiffenersof plates in uniform compression

442 Plate assemblies

The local buckling of a plate assembly in bending such as an I-beam bent about itsmajor axis can be analysed approximately by assuming that the plate elements arehinged along their common boundaries in much the same fashion as that describedin Section 4214 for compression members The elastic buckling moment canthen be approximated by using kσ = 0425 or 4 for the flanges as appropriateand kσ = 239 for the web and determining the element which is closest tobuckling The results of more accurate analyses of the simultaneous buckling ofthe flange and web elements in I-beams and box section beams in bending aregiven in Figures 421 and 422 respectively

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10Outstand width to depth ratio bf df

0

02

04

06

08

10

t twf

bf

df

tw

t f

= E

--------------------------2

12(1ndash )2----------------------( )b tf f

2 = 10

15

20

40

kcrl

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

Figure 421 Local buckling coefficients for I-beams

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 121

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Width to depth ratio bfdf

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

bf

dftw

tf

= E--------------------------

2----------------------( )b tf f

2= 075

100125

150

200

t twf

Fla

nge

loca

l buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k crl

k

12(1ndash 2)

Figure 422 Local buckling coefficients for box section beams

443 Ultimate strength

The ultimate strength of a thick plate in bending is governed by its yield stress fyand by its plastic shape factor which is equal to 15 for a constant thickness plateas discussed in Section 552

When the width to thickness ratio dt exceeds 1389radic(fy235) the elastic

buckling stress σcrl of a simply supported plate is less than the yield stress fy(see equation 437) A long slender plate such as this has a significant reserve ofstrength after buckling because it is able to redistribute the compressive stressesfrom the buckled region to the area close to the supported compression edge in thesame way as a plate in uniform compression (see Section 4222) Solutions forthe post-buckling reserve of strength of a plate in bending given in [6 11ndash13] showthat an effective width treatment can be used with the effective width being takenover part of the compressive portion of the plate In the more general case of theslender plate shown in Figure 420 being loaded by combined bending and axialforce the post-buckling strength reserve of the plate can be substantial For suchplates the effective width is taken over a part of the compressive portion of the plateEffective widths can be obtained in this way from the local buckling stressσcr undercombined bending and axial force using the modified plate slenderness

radic(f yσcr)

in a similar fashion to that depicted in Figure 414 although the procedure is morecomplex

45 Plate elements in bending and shear

451 Elastic buckling

The elastic buckling of the simply supported thin flat plate shown in Figure 423which is subjected to combined shear and bending can be predicted by using the

122 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

L

d

cr

cr

crcr

crl

crl

crl

crl

Figure 423 Simply supported plate under shear and bending

approximate interaction equation [2 4 5 13]

(τcr

τcro

)2

+(σcrl

σcrlo

)2

= 1 (439)

in which τcro is the elastic buckling stress when the plate is in pure shear(see equations 421ndash424) and σcrlo is the elastic buckling stress for pure bending(see equations 435 and 436) If the elastic buckling stresses τcr σcrl are used inthe HenckyndashVon Mises yield criterion (see Section 131)

3τ 2cr + σ 2

crl = f 2y (440)

it can shown from equations 439 and 440 that the most severe loading conditionfor which elastic buckling and yielding occur simultaneously is that of pure shearThus in an unstiffened web of a steel for which E = 210 000 Nmm2 and ν = 03yielding will occur before buckling while (see equation 425)

d

t

radicfy

235le 864 (441)

452 Ultimate strength

4521 Unstiffened plates

Stocky unstiffened webs in steel beams yield before they buckle and their designresistances can be estimated approximately by using the HenckyndashVon Mises yieldcriterion (see Section 131) so that the shear force Vw and moment Mw in theweb satisfy

3

(Vw

dt

)2

+(

6Mw

d2t

)2

= f 2y (442)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 123

This approximation is conservative as it assumes that the plastic shape factor forweb bending is 10 instead of 15

While the elastic buckling of slender unstiffened webs under combined shearand bending has been studied the ultimate strengths of such webs have not beenfully investigated However it seems possible that there is only a small reserveof strength after elastic buckling so that the ultimate strength can be approxi-mated conservatively by the elastic buckling stress combinations which satisfyequation 439

4522 Stiffened plates

The ultimate strength of a stiffened web under combined shear and bending can bediscussed in terms of the interaction diagram shown in Figure 424 for the ultimateshear force V and bending moment M acting on a plate girder When there isno shear the ultimate moment capacity is equal to the full plastic moment Mpproviding the flanges are Class 1 or Class 2 (see Section 472) while the ultimateshear capacity in the absence of bending moment is

Vult = dtτult (443)

where the ultimate stress τult is given approximately by equation 431 (whichignores any contributions made by the bending resistance of the flanges) Thisshear capacity remains unchanged as the bending moment increases to the valueMfp which is sufficient to fully yield the flanges if they alone resist the momentThis fact forms the basis for the widely used proportioning procedure for which itis assumed that the web resists only the shear and that the flanges are required to

10

08

06

04

02

0

MMp

VV

ult

Equation 444

Typical interaction curve

0 02 04 06 08 10

Figure 424 Ultimate strengths of stiffened webs in shear and bending

124 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

resist the full moment As the bending moment increases beyond Mfp the ultimateshear capacity falls off rapidly as shown A simple approximation for the reducedshear capacity is given by

V

Vult= 05

(1 +

radic1 minus MMp

1 minus MfpMp

)(444)

while MfpMp le MMp le 1 This approximation ignores the influence of thebending stresses on the tension field and the bending resistance of the flanges Amore accurate method of analysis is discussed in [14]

46 Plate elements in bearing

461 Elastic buckling

Plate elements are subjected to bearing stresses by concentrated or locally dis-tributed edge loads For example a concentrated load applied to the top flangeof a plate girder induces local bearing stresses in the web immediately beneaththe load In a slender girder with transverse web stiffeners the load is resisted byvertical shear stresses acting at the stiffeners as shown in Figure 425a Bearingcommonly occurs in conjunction with shear (as at an end support see Figure 425b)bending (as at mid-span see Figure 425c) and with combined shear and bending(as at an interior support see Figure 425d)

In the case of a panel of a stiffened web the edges of the panel may be regardedas simply supported When the bearing load is distributed along the full length a ofthe panel and there is no shear or bending the elastic bearing buckling stress σcrp

VR

VR

VLVL

M M

M M

(a) Bearing (c) Bearing and bending

(b) Bearing and shear (d) Bearing shear and bending

p

p p

p

Figure 425 Plate girder webs in bearing

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 125

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Panel aspect ratio ad

0

5

10

15

20

25

= E

--------------------------2

12(1ndash )2

k---------------( )dt 2

a

a

d

06 =1

=1

0ad = infin

[4]

[15]

Ela

stic

buc

klin

g co

effi

cien

t k

crp

crp

Figure 426 Buckling coefficients of plates in bearing

can be expressed as

σcrp = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(dt)2

(445)

in which the buckling coefficient kσ varies with the panel aspect ratio ad as shownin Figure 426

When a patch-bearing load acts along a reduced length αa of the top edge ofthe panel the value of αkσ is decreased This effect has been investigated [15]and some values of αkσ are shown in Figure 426 These values suggest a limitingvalue of αkσ = 08 approximately for the case of unstiffened webs (ad rarr infin)

with concentrated loads (α rarr 0)For the case of a panel in combined bearing shear and bending it has been

suggested [6 15] that the elastic buckling stresses can be determined from theinteraction equation

σcrp

σcrpo+

(τcr

τcro

)2

+(σcrl

σcrlo

)2

= 1 (446)

in which the final subscripts o indicate the appropriate elastic buckling stress whenonly that type of loading is applied Some specific interaction diagrams are givenin [15]

462 Ultimate strength

The ultimate strength of a thick web in bearing depends chiefly on its yield stressfy Although yielding first occurs under the centre of the bearing plate general

126 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

yielding does not take place until the applied load is large enough to yield a webarea defined by a dispersion of the applied stress through the flange Even at thisload the web does not collapse catastrophically and some further yielding andredistribution is possible When the web is also subjected to shear and bendinggeneral yielding in bearing can be approximated by using the HenckyndashVon Misesyield criterion (see Section 131)

σ 2p + σ 2

b minus σpσb + 3τ 2 = f 2y (447)

in which σp is the bearing stress σb the bending stress and τ the shear stressThin stiffened web panels in bearing have a reserve of strength after elastic buck-

ling which is due to a redistribution of stress from the more flexible central regionto the stiffeners Studies of this effect suggest that the reserve of strength decreasesas the bearing loads become more concentrated [15] The collapse behaviour ofstiffened panels is described in [16 17]

47 Design against local buckling

471 Compression members

The cross-sections of compression members must be designed so that the designcompression force NEd does not exceed the design compressive resistance NcRd whence

NEd le NcRd (448)

This ignores overall member buckling as discussed in Chapter 3 for whichthe non-dimensional slenderness λ le 02 The EC3 design expression forcross-section resistance under uniform compression is

NcRd = Aeff fyγM0

(449)

in which Aeff is the effective area of the cross-section fy is the nominalyield strength for the section and γM0(=1) is the partial section resistancefactor

The cross-section of a compression member may buckle locally before it reachesits yield stress fy in which case it is defined in EC3 as a Class 4 cross-sectionCross-sections of compression members which yield prior to local buckling arelsquoeffectiversquo and are defined in EC3 as being either of Class 1 Class 2 or Class 3For these cross-sections which are unaffected by local bucking the effective areaAeff in equation 449 is taken as the gross area A A cross-section composed offlat-plate elements has no local buckling effects when the widthndashthickness ratio

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 127

bt of every element of the cross-section satisfies

b

tle λ3ε (450)

where λ3ε is the appropriate Class 3 slenderness limit of Table 52 of EC3 andε is a constant given by

ε =radic

235fy (451)

in which fy is in Nmm2 units Some values of λ3ε are given in Figures 427and 428

Class 4 cross-sections are those containing at least one slender element for whichequation 450 is not satisfied For these the effective area is reduced to

Aeff =sum

Aceff (452)

in which Aceff is the effective area of a flat compression element comprising thecross-section which is obtained from its gross area Ac by

Aceff = ρAc (453)

where ρ is a reduction factor given by

ρ = (λp minus 022)λ2p le 10 (454)

along both edges

---- -

Section andelement widths

---Diameter d0

b1 b1 b2 b1

d1

d0

d1 d1

b2

Flange outstand b1

Flange b2 supportedalong both edges

Web d1 supported

Section description UB UC CHS Box RHS

14 14

42 42

4242 42

902

Figure 427 Yield limits for some compression elements

128 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

for element supported on both edges and

ρ = (λp minus 0188)λ2p le 10 (455)

for outstands and where

λp =radic

fyσcr

= b

t

1

284εradic

kσ(456)

is the modified plate slenderness (see equation 45) Values of the local buck-ling coefficient kσ are given in Table 42 of EC3-1-5 and are similar to those inFigures 410 and 411

A circular hollow section member has no local buckling effects when itsdiameterndashthickness ratio dt satisfies

d

tle 90ε2 (457)

If the diameterndashthickness ratio does not satisfy equation 457 then it has a Class4 cross-section whose effective area is reduced to

Aeff =radic

90

d(tε2)A (458)

Worked examples for checking the section capacities of compression members aregiven in Sections 491 and 3121ndash3123

472 Beam flanges and webs in compression

Compression elements in a beam cross-section are classified in EC3 as Class 1Class 2 Class 3 or Class 4 depending on their local buckling resistance

Class 1 elements are unaffected by local buckling and are able to developand maintain their fully plastic capacities (Section 55) while inelastic momentredistribution takes place in the beam Class 1 elements satisfy

bt le λ1ε (459)

in which λ1ε is the appropriate plasticity slenderness limit given in Table 52 ofEC3 (some values of λ1ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits areclosely related to equations 412 and 413 for the strain-hardening buckling stressesof inelastic plates

Class 2 elements are unaffected by local buckling in the development of theirfully plastic capacities (Section 55) but may be unable to maintain these capacities

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 129

Beams Mp

Not to scale

Columns

Mp

0 1 2 3 = bt

Beams

NRd MRd prop1

Wel fy

Ny My

Ny

Sec

tion

res

ista

nces

NR

d M

Rd

1 2 3 4 Section classification

Flange outstands 9 10 14

33 38 42Simplysupportedflanges

Figure 428 EC3 section resistances

while inelastic moment redistribution takes place in the beam Class 2 sectionssatisfy

λ1ε le bt le λ2ε (460)

in which λ2ε is the appropriate Class 2 slenderness limit given in Table 52 of EC3(some values of λ2ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits are slightlygreater than those implied in equations 412 and 413 for the strain-hardeningbuckling of inelastic plates

Class 3 elements are able to reach first yield but buckle locally before theybecome fully plastic Class 3 elements satisfy

λ2ε le bt le λ3ε (461)

in which λ3ε is the appropriate yield slenderness limit given in Table 52 of EC3(some values of λ3ε are shown in Figures 428 and 533) These limits are closelyrelated to equations 418 used to define the effective widths of flange plates inuniform compression or modified from equation 437 for web plates in bendingClass 4 elements buckle locally before they reach first yield and satisfy

λ3ε lt bt (462)

Beam cross-sections are classified as being Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 or Class 4depending on the classification of their elements A Class 1 cross-section has allof its elements being Class 1 A Class 2 cross-section has no Class 3 or Class 4elements and has at least one Class 2 element while a Class 3 cross-section hasno Class 4 elements and at least one Class 3 element A Class 4 cross-section hasat least one Class 4 element

130 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

A beam cross-section must be designed so that its factored design moment MEd

does not exceed the design section moment resistance so that

MEd le McRd (463)

Beams must also be designed for shear (Section 473) and against lateral buckling(Section 69) The section resistance McRd is given by

McRd = WfyγM0

(464)

in which W is the appropriate section modulus fy the yield strength and γM0(=1)the partial section resistance factor For Class 1 and 2 beam cross-sections

W = Wpl (465)

where Wpl is the plastic section modulus and which allows many beams to bedesigned for the full plastic moment

Mp = Wplfy (466)

as indicated in Figure 428For Class 3 beam cross-sections the effective section modulus is taken as the

minimum elastic section modulus Welmin which is that based on the extremefibre that reaches yield first Some I-sections have Class 1 or 2 flanges but con-tain a Class 3 web and so based on the EC3 classification they would be Class3 cross-sections and unsuitable for plastic design However the EC3 permitsthese sections to be classified as effective Class 2 cross-sections by neglectingpart of the compression portion of the web This simple procedure for hot-rolled or welded sections conveniently replaces the compressed portion of theweb by a part of width 20εtw adjacent to the compression flange and withanother part of width 20εtw adjacent to the plastic neutral axis of the effectivecross-section

For a beam with a slender compression flange supported along both edgesthe effective section modulus Wel may be determined by calculating the elasticsection modulus of an effective cross-section obtained by using a compres-sion flange effective width beff obtained using equation 453 The calculationof Wel must incorporate the possibility that the effective section is not sym-metric and that the centroids of the gross and effective sections do notcoincide

Worked examples of classifying the section and checking the section momentcapacity are given in Sections 492ndash494 51215 and 51217

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 131

473 Members in compression and bending

For cross-sections subjected to a design compressive force NEd and a design majoraxis bending moment MyEd EC3 requires the interaction equation

NEd

NRd+ MyEd

MyRdle 1 (467)

to be satisfied where NRd is the compression resistance of the cross-section deter-mined from equation 449 and MyRd is the bending resistance of the cross-sectiondetermined according to equation 463 Generally the provision of equation 467is overly conservative and is of use only for preliminary member sizing and soEC3 provides less conservative and more detailed member checks depending onthe section classification

If the cross-section is Class 1 or 2 EC3 reduces the design bending resistanceMyRd to a value MyN Rd dependent on the coincident axial force NEd Providedthat

NEd le 025NplRd and (468)

NEd le 05hwtwfyγM0

(469)

where NplRd is the resistance based on yielding given by equation 449 andγM0(= 1) is the partial section resistance factor no reduction in the plastic momentcapacity MyRd = MplyRd is needed since for small axial loads the theoreticalreduction in the plastic moment is offset by strain hardening If either of equations468 or 469 is not satisfied EC3 requires that

MN yRd = MplyRd

(1 minus n

1 minus 05a

)(470)

where

n = NEdNplRd (471)

is the ratio of the applied compression load to the plastic compression resistanceof the cross-section and

a = (A minus 2bf tf )A le 05 (472)

is the ratio of the area of the web to the total area of the cross-sectionFor Class 3 cross-sections EC3 allows only a linear interaction of the stresses

arising from the combined bending moment and axial force so that the maximumlongitudinal stress is limited to the yield stress that is

σxEd le fyγM0 (473)

As for Class 3 cross-sections the longitudinal stress in Class 4 sections sub-jected to combined compression and bending is calculated based on the effective

132 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

properties of the cross-section so that equation 473 is satisfied The resultingexpression that satisfies equation 473 is

NEd

Aeff fyγM0+ MyEd + NEdeNy

Weff ymin fyγM0le 1 (474)

Equation 474 accounts for the additional bending moment caused by a shift eNy

in the compression force NEd from the geometric centroid of the net cross-sectionto the centroid of the effective cross-section

474 Longitudinal stiffeners

A logical basis for the design of a web in pure bending is to limit its proportions sothat its maximum elastic bending strength can be used so that the web is a Class 3element When this is done the section resistance MyRd of the beam is governedby the slenderness of the flanges Thus EC3 requires a fully effective unstiffenedweb to satisfy

hwtw le 124ε (475)

This limit is close to the value of 1269 at which the elastic buckling stress is equalto the yield stress (see equation 437)

Unstiffened webs whose slenderness exceeds this limit are Class 4 elementsbut the use of one or more longitudinal stiffeners can delay local buckling so thatthey become Class 3 elements and the cross-section can be designed as a Class 2section as discussed in Section 472 EC3 does not specify the minimum stiffnessof longitudinal stiffeners to prevent the web plate from deflecting at the stiffenerlocation during local buckling such as in equation 438 Rather it allows theplate slenderness λp in equation 456 to be determined from the local bucklingcoefficient kσ p which incorporates both the area and second moment of the areaof the stiffener If the stiffened web plate is proportioned such that λp le 0874 thereduction factor in equation 453 is unity and the longitudinal stress in the stiffenedweb can reach its yield strength prior to local buckling

The Australian standard AS4100 [18] gives a simpler method of design inwhich a first longitudinal stiffener whose second moment of area is at least thatof equation 428 is placed one-fifth of the web depth from the compression whenthe overall depthndashthickness ratio of the web exceeds the limit of

hwtw = 194ε (476)

which is greater than that of equation 475 because it considers the effect of theflanges on the local buckling stress of the web An additional stiffener whosesecond moment of area exceeds

Ist = hwt3w (477)

is required at the neutral axis when hwtw exceeds 242ε

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 133

475 Beam webs in shear

4751 Stocky webs

The factored design shear force VEd on a cross-section must satisfy

VEd le VcRd (478)

in which VcRd is the design uniform shear resistance which may be calculatedbased on a plastic (VplRd) or elastic distribution of shear stress

I-sections have distributions of shear stress through their webs that are approx-imately uniform (Section 542) and for stocky webs with hwtw lt 72ε the yieldstress in shear τy = fy

radic3 is reached before local buckling Hence EC3 requires

that

VcRd = VplRd = Av(fyradic

3)

γM0(479)

where γM0 = 1 and Av is the shear area of the web which is defined in Clause626 of EC3 This resistance is close to but more conservative than the resistancegiven in equation 428 since the shear area Av is reduced for hot-rolled sectionsby including the root radius in its calculation and because equation 479 ignoresthe effects of strain hardening Some sections such as a monosymmetric I-sectionhave non-uniform distributions of the shear stress τEd in their webs Based on anelastic stress distribution the maximum value of τEd may be determined as inSection 542 and EC3 then requires that

τEd le fyradic

3

γM0 (480)

Cross-sections for which hwtw le 72ε are stocky and the webs of all UBrsquos andUCrsquos in Grade 275 steel satisfy hwtw le 72ε

4752 Slender webs

The shear resistance of slender unstiffened webs for which hwtw gt 72ε decreasesrapidly from the value in equation 479 as the slenderness hwtw increases Forthese

VcRd = VbwRd le ηfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (481)

where VbwRd is the design resistance governed by buckling of the web in shearfyw is the yield strength of the web η is a factor for the shear area that can betaken as 12 for steels up to S460 and 10 otherwise and γM1(= 1) is a partialresistance factor based on buckling The buckling resistance of the web is given

134 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

in EC3 as

VbwRd = χwfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (482)

in which the web reduction factor on the yield strength hwtwfywradic

3 due tobuckling is

χw =

1 λw lt 083083λw λw ge 083

(483)

where the modified web plate slenderness is

λw =radic

fywradic

3

τcrasymp 076

radicfyw

τcr(484)

and τcr is the elastic local buckling stress in shear given in equation 421equation 484 is of the same form as equation 45 For an unstiffened webλw = (hwtw)864ε and so it can be seen from equation 482 that the resis-tance of an unstiffened web decreases with an increase in its depthndashthickness ratiohwtw

The shear resistance of a slender web may be increased by providing transversestiffeners which increase the resistance to elastic buckling (Section 431) andalso permit the development of tension field action (Section 4322) Thus

VcRd = VbwRd + Vbf Rd le ηfyw

radic3

γM1hwtw (485)

in which VbwRd is the web resistance given in equation 481 and Vbf Rd isthe flange shear contribution provided by the understressed flanges during thedevelopment of the tension field in the web which further enhances the shearresistance In determining the web resistance reduction factor due to buckling χw

in equation 482 the modified plate slenderness is given by

λw = hw

tw

1

374εradic

kτ(486)

where kτ is the local buckling coefficient given in equations 422 or 423 with Lequal to the stiffener spacing a and d equal to the web depth hw The additionalpost-buckling reserve of capacity due to tension field action for web plates withλw gt 108 is achieved by the use of an enhanced reduction factor of χw = 137(07+λw) instead of the more conservativeχw = 083λw The presence of tensionfield action is also accounted for implicitly in the additional flange resistance

Vbf Rd = bf t2f

c

fyf

γM1

[1 minus

(MEd

Mf Rd

)2]

(487)

where MEd is the design bending moment Mf Rd is the moment of resistance ofthe cross-section consisting of the area of the effective flanges only fyf is the

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 135

yield strength of the flanges and where

c = a

(025 + 16

bf t2f

twh2w

fyf

fyw

) (488)

Worked examples of checking the shear capacity of a slender web are given inSections 495 and 496

4753 Transverse stiffeners

Provisions are made in EC3 for a minimum value for the second moment of areaIst of intermediate transverse stiffeners These must be stiff enough to ensure thatthe elastic buckling stress τcr of a panel can be reached and strong enough totransmit the tension field stiffener force The stiffness requirement of EC3 is thatthe second moment of area of a transverse stiffener must satisfy

Ist ge 075hwt3w (489)

when ahw gtradic

2 in which hw is the depth of the web and

Ist ge 15h3wt3

wa2 (490)

when ahw le radic2 These limits are shown in Figure 429 and are close to those of

equations 427 and 426The strength requirement of EC3 for transverse stiffeners is that they should

be designed as compression members of length hw with an initial imperfection

Value of ad

00 1 2 3

1

2

equation 427

equation 489

equation 490

equation 426

Val

ue o

f I s

at w

3

Figure 429 Stiffness requirements for web stiffeners

136 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

w0 = hw300 using second-order elastic analysis for which the maximum stressis limited by

σzRd = fyγM1 (491)

The effective stiffener cross-section for this design check consists of the cross-section of the stiffener itself plus a width of the web 15εtw each side of the stiffenerand the force to be resisted by the effective stiffener cross-section is

NzEd = VEd minus hwtw

λ2w

fywradic

3

γM1(492)

where λw is given by equation 485 Using equation 38 for the bending of aninitially crooked compression member this procedure implies that the maximumstress in the effective stiffener cross-section is

σzRd = NzEd

Ast

[1 + hwAst

300Wxstmin

(NzEdNcr

1 minus NzEdNcr

)](493)

where

Ncr = π2EIsth2w (494)

is the elastic flexural buckling load of the effective stiffener area and Ast and Ist

are the area and second moment of area of the effective stiffener area and Wxstmin

is its minimum elastic section modulusA worked example of checking a pair of transverse stiffeners is given in

Section 498

4754 End panels

At the end of a plate girder there is no adjacent panel to absorb the horizontalcomponent of the tension field in the last panel and so this load may have to beresisted by the end stiffener A rigid end post is required if tension field action is tobe utilised in design Special treatment of this end stiffener may be avoided if thelength of the last (anchor) panel is reduced so that the tension field contributionτtf to the ultimate stress τult is not required (see equation 429) This is achievedby designing the anchor panel so that its shear buckling resistance VbwRd givenby equation 482 is not less than the design shear force VEd A worked example ofchecking an end panel is given in Section 497

Alternatively a rigid end post consisting of two double-sided load-bearingtransverse stiffeners (see Section 4762) may be used to anchor the tension fieldat the end of a plate girder The end post region consisting of the web and twinpairs of stiffeners can be thought of as a short beam of length hw and EC3 requiresthis beam to be designed to resist the in-plane stresses in the web resulting fromthe shear VEd

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 137

476 Beam webs in shear and bending

Where the design moment MEd and shear VEd are both high the beam must bedesigned against combined shear and bending For stocky webs when the shearforce is less than half the plastic resistance VplRd EC3 allows the effect of theshear on the moment resistance to be neglected When VEd gt 05VplRd EC3requires the bending resistance to be determined using a reduced yield strength

fyr = (1 minus ρ)fyw (495)

for the shear area where

ρ =(

2VEd

VplRdminus 1

)2

(496)

The interaction curve between the design shear force VEd and design moment MEd

is shown in Figure 430 These equations are less conservative than the von-Misesyield condition (see Section 131)

f 2yr + 3τ 2

Ed = f 2y (497)

Equations 495 and 496 may be used conservatively for the well-known propor-tioning method of design for which only the flanges are used to resist the momentand the web to resist the shear force and which is equivalent to using a reducedyield strength fyr = 0 in equation 495 for the web

10

08

06

04

02

00 02 04 06 08 10

MvEd MplRd

VE

dV

plR

d

07

05

Figure 430 Section resistances of beams under bending and shear

138 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

EC3 also uses a simpler reduced design plastic resistance MyV Rd for I-sectionswith a stocky web in lieu of the more tedious use of equations 495 and 496 Hence

MyV Rd = (Wply minus ρA2w4tw)fy

γM0 (498)

where ρ is given in equation 496 Aw = hwtw is the area of the web and Wply isthe major axis plastic section modulus If the web is slender so that its resistanceis governed by shear buckling EC3 allows the effect of shear on the bendingresistance to be neglected when VEd lt 05VbwRd When this is not the case thereduced bending resistance is

MV Rd = MplRd(1 minus ρ2)+ Mf Rdρ2 (499)

where ρ is given in equation 496 using the shear buckling resistance VbwRd

instead of the plastic resistance VplRd Mf Rd is the plastic moment of resistanceconsisting of the effective area of the flanges and MplRd is the plastic resistanceof the cross-section consisting of the effective area of the flanges and the fullyeffective web irrespective of the section class The reduced bending strength inequation 499 is similar to that implied in equation 444 If the contribution ofthe web is conservatively neglected in determining MplRd for the cross-sectionequation 499 leads to MV Rd = Mf Rd which is the basis of the proportioningmethod of design

477 Beam webs in bearing

4771 Unstiffened webs

For the design of webs in bearing according to EC3 the bearing resistance FRd

based on yielding and local buckling is taken as

FRd = χFfywtwy

γM1(4100)

in which y is the effective loaded length of the web and

χF = 05

λF(4101)

is a reduction factor for the yield strength Fy = fywtwy due to local buckling inbearing in which

λF =radic

Fy

Fcr(4102)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 139

is a modified plate slenderness for bearing buckling (which is of the same form asequation 45) and

Fcr = kFπ2E

12(1 minus ν2)

(twhw

)2

hwtw (4103)

is the elastic buckling load for a web of area hwtw in bearing The buck-ling coefficients for plates in bearing are similar to those in Figure 426 withkF = 6 + 2(ahw)

2 being used for a web of the type shown in Figure 425a Theeffective loaded length used in determining the yield resistance Fy in bearing is

y = ss + 2ntf (4104)

in which ss is the stiff bearing length and ntf is the additional length assuming adispersion of the bearing at 1 n through the flange thickness More convenientlythe dispersion can be thought of as being at a slope 11 through a depth of (nminus1)tfinto the web For a thick web (for which λF lt 05) n = 1 + radic

(bf tw) while fora slender web (for which λF gt 05) n = 1 + radic[bf tw + 002(hwtf )2]

4772 Stiffened webs

When a web alone has insufficient bearing capacity it may be strengthened byadding one or more pairs of load-bearing stiffeners These stiffeners increase theyield and buckling resistances by increasing the effective section to that of thestiffeners together with the web lengths 15twε on either side of the stiffeners ifavailable The effective length of the compression member is taken as the stiffenerlength hw or as 075hw if flange restraints act to reduce the stiffener end rotationsduring buckling and curve c of Figure 313 for compression members should beused

A worked example of checking load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

48 Appendix ndash elastic buckling of plateelements in compression

481 Simply supported plates

A simply supported rectangular plate element of length L width b and thicknesst is shown in Figure 45b Applied compressive loads N are uniformly distributedover both edges b of the plate The elastic buckling load Ncr can be determinedby finding a deflected position such as that shown in Figure 45b which is one ofequilibrium The differential equation for this equilibrium position is [1ndash4]

bD

(part4v

partx4+ 2

part4v

partx2partz2+ part4v

partz4

)= minusNcr

part2v

partxpartz(4105)

140 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

where

bD = Ebt3

12(1 minus ν2)(4106)

is the flexural rigidity of the plateEquation 4105 is compared in Figure 45 with the corresponding differential

equilibrium equation for a simply supported rectangular section column (obtainedby differentiating equation 356 twice) It can be seen that bD for the plate corre-sponds to the flexural rigidity EI of the column except for the (1minusν2) term whichis due to the Poissonrsquos ratio effect in wide plates Thus the term bDpart4vpartx4 repre-sents the resistance generated by longitudinal flexure of the plate to the disturbingeffect minusNpart2vpartx2 of the applied load The additional terms 2bDpart4vpartx2partz2 andbDpart4vpartz4 in the plate equation represent the additional resistances generated bytwisting and lateral bending of the plate

A solution of equation 4105 which satisfies the boundary conditions along thesimply supported edges [1ndash4] is

v = δ sinmπx

Lsin

nπz

b (41)

where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the deflected shape When this is sub-stituted into equation 4105 an expression for the elastic buckling load Ncr isobtained as

Ncr = n2π2bD

L2

[1 + 2

(nL

mb

)2

+(

nL

mb

)4]

which has its lowest values when n = 1 and the buckled shape has one half waveacross the width of the plate b Thus the elastic buckling stress

σcr = Ncr

bt(42)

can be expressed as

σcr = π2E

12(1 minus ν2)

kσ(bt)2

(43)

in which the buckling coefficient kσ is given by

kσ =[(

mb

L

)2

+ 2 +(

L

mb

)2]

(4107)

The variation of the buckling coefficient kσ with the aspect ratio Lb of the plateand the number of half waves m along the plate is shown in Figure 46 It can beseen that the minimum value of kσ is 4 and that this occurs whenever the buckles

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 141

are square (mbL = 1) as shown in Figure 47 In most structural steel membersthe aspect ratio Lb of the plate elements is large so that the value of the bucklingcoefficient kσ is always close to the minimum value of 4 The elastic bucklingstress can therefore be closely approximated by

σcr = π2E3(1 minus ν2)

(bt)2 (4108)

49 Worked examples

491 Example 1 ndash compression resistance ofa Class 4 compression member

Problem Determine the compression resistance of the cross-section of the membershown in Figure 431a The weld size is 8 mm

Classifying the section plate elements

tf = 10 mm tw = 10 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = (4002 minus 102 minus 8)(10 times 0814) T52

= 230 gt 14 and so the flange is Class 4 T52

cw(twε) = (420 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 8)(10 times 0814) T52

= 472 gt 42 and so the web is Class 4 T52

400

400

10

10

8 8 1070

1711 97

= 102

10

10

410

20

430

450

420

S355 steel

r

z

S355 steel S355 steel z

351

4

S355 steel z

1540

(a) Section of (b) Section of (c) Section of (d) Section of 356 times 171 UB 45 beam

A = 573 cm2

Wpl = 775 cm3

compression member box beam plate girder

Figure 431 Worked examples

142 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Effective flange area

kσ f = 043 EC3-1-5 T42

λp f = (4002 minus 102 minus 8)10

284 times 0814 times radic043

= 123 gt 0748 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρf = (123 minus 0188)1232 = 0687 EC3-1-5 44(2)

Aeff f = 0687 times 4 times (4002 minus 102 minus 8)times 10

+ (10 + 2 times 8)times 10 times 2 EC3-1-5 44(1)

= 5658 mm2

Effective web area

kσ w = 40 EC3-1-5 T41

λpw = (420 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 8)10

284 times 0814 times radic40

= 0831 gt 0673 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρw = 0831 minus 0055 times (3 + 1)08312 = 0885 EC3-1-5 44(2)

Aeff w = 0885times (420minus2times10minus2 times 8)times (10+8times10times2)

= 3558 mm2 EC3-1-5 44(1)

Compression resistance

Aeff = 5658 + 3558 = 9216 mm2

NcRd = 9216 times 35510 N = 3272 kN

492 Example 2 ndash section moment resistance of aClass 3 I-beam

Problem Determine the section moment resistance and examine the suitability forplastic design of the 356 times 171 UB 45 of S355 steel shown in Figure 431b

Classifying the section-plate elements

tf = 97 mm tw = 70 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = (17112 minus 702 minus 102)(97 times 0814) T52

= 91 gt 9 but lt 10 and so the flange is Class 2 T52

cw(twε) = (3514 minus 2 times 97 minus 2 times 102)(70 times 0814) T52

= 547 lt 72 and so the web is Class 1 T52

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 143

Section moment resistanceThe cross-section is Class 2 and therefore unsuitable for plastic design

McRd = 775 times 103 times 35510 N mm = 2751 kNm 625(2)

493 Example 3 ndash section moment resistance ofa Class 4 box beam

Problem Determine the section moment resistance of the welded-box sectionbeam of S355 steel shown in Figure 431c The weld size is 6 mm

Classifying the section-plate elements

tf = 10 mm tw = 8 mm fy = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

cf (tf ε) = 410(10 times 0814) T52

= 504 gt 42 and so the flange is Class 4 T52

cw(twε) = (430 minus 2 times 10 minus 2 times 6)(8 times 0814) T52

= 611 lt 72 and so the web is Class 1 T52

The cross-section is therefore Class 4 since the flange is Class 4

Effective cross-section

kσ = 40 EC3-1-5 T42

λp = 410

10 times 284 times 0814 times radic40

= 0887 gt 0673

EC3-1-5 44(2)

ψ = 1 EC3-1-5 T41

ρ = (0887 minus 0055 times (3 + 1))08872 = 0848 EC3-1-5 44(2)

bceff = 0848 times 410 = 3475 mm

Aeff = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 + (450 times 10)

+ 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8

= 14 935 mm2

14 935 times zc = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 times (430 minus 102)

+ 450 times 10 times 102 + 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8 times 4302

zc = 2062 mm

Ieff = (450 minus 410 + 3475)times 10 times (430 minus 102 minus 2062)2

+ 450 times 10 times (2062 minus 102)2 + 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)3 times 812

+ 2 times (430 minus 2 times 10)times 8 times (4302 minus 2062)2 mm4

= 4601 times 106 mm4

144 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Section moment resistance

Weff min = 4601 times 106(430 minus 2062) = 2056 times 106 mm3

McRd = 2056 times 106 times 35510 Nmm = 7299 kNm 625(2)

494 Example 4 ndash section moment resistance of aslender plate girder

Problem Determine the section moment resistance of the welded plate girder ofS355 steel shown in Figure 431d The weld size is 6 mm

Solution

tf = 20 mm tw = 10 mm fyf = 345 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235345) = 0825 T52

cf (tf ε) = (4002 minus 102 minus 6)(20 times 0825) T52

= 115 gt 10 but lt 14 and so the flange is Class 3 T52

cw(twε) = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)(10 times 0825) T52

= 1803 gt 124 and so the web is Class 4 T52

A conservative approximation for the cross-section moment resistance may beobtained by ignoring the web completely so that

McRd = Mf = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 20)times 34510 Nmm = 4195 kNm

A higher resistance may be calculated by determining the effective width of theweb

ψ = minus1 EC3-1-5 T41

kσ = 239 EC3-1-5 T41

λp = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)10

284 times 0825 times radic239

= 1299 EC3-1-5 44(2)

ρ = (1299 minus 0055 times (3 minus 1))12992 = 0705 EC3-1-5 44(2)

bc = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2 times 6)1 minus (minus1) = 7440 mm EC3-1-5 T41

beff = 0705 times 7440 = 5244 mm EC3-1-5 T41

be1 = 04 times 5244 = 2098 mm EC3-1-5 T41

be2 = 06 times 5244 = 3146 mm EC3-1-5 T41

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 145

and the ineffective width of the web is

bc minus be1 minus be2 = 7440 minus 2098 minus 3146 = 2196 mm EC3-1-5 T41

Aeff = (1540 minus 2 times 20 minus 2196)times 10 + 2 times 400 times 20

= 28 804 mm2

28 804 times zc = (2 times 400 times 20 + (1540 minus 2 times 20)times 10)times (15402)

minus 2196 times 10 times (1540 minus 20 minus 6 minus 2098 minus 21962)

zc = 7376 mm

Ieff = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 10 minus 7376)2

+ (400 times 20)times (7376 minus 10)2

+ (1540 minus 2 times 20)3 times 1012 + (1540 minus 2 times 20)

times 10 times (15402 minus 7376)2

minus 21963 times 1012 minus 2196

times 10 times (1540 minus 20 minus 6 minus 2098 minus 21962 minus 7376)2 mm4

= 1162 times 109 mm4

Weff = 1162 times 109(1540 minus 7376) = 1448 times 106 mm3

McRd = 1448 times 106 times 34510 Nmm = 4996 kNm

495 Example 5 ndash shear buckling resistance of anunstiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear buckling resistance of the unstiffened plate girderweb of S355 steel shown in Figure 431d

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

η = 12 EC3-1-5 51(2)

hw = 1540 minus 2 times 20 = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 F51

ηhw(twε) = 12 times 1500(10 times 0814)

= 2212 gt 72 and so the web is slender EC3-1-5 51(2)

ahw = infinhw = infin kτ st = 0 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

kτ = 534 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

146 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

τcr = 534 times 190 000 times (101500)2 = 451 Nmm2

EC3-1-5 A1(2)

λw = 076 times radic(355451) = 2132 gt 108 EC3-1-5 53(3)

Assuming that there is a non-rigid end post then

χw = 0832132 = 0389 EC3-1-5 T51

Neglecting any contribution from the flanges

VbRd = VbwRd = 0389 times 355 times 1500 times 10radic3 times 10

N = 1196 kN EC3-1-5 2(1)

496 Example 6 ndash shear buckling resistance of astiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear buckling resistance of the plate girder web of S355steel shown in Figure 431d if intermediate transverse stiffeners are placed at1800 mm spacing

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235355) = 0814 T52

hw = 1540 minus 2 times 20 = 1500 mm

ahw = 18001500 = 120 kτ st = 0 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

kτ = 534 + 4001202 = 812 EC3-1-5 A3(1)

τcr = 812 times 190 000 times (101500)2 = 686 Nmm2 EC3-1-5 A1(2)

Assuming that there is a rigid end post then

λw = 076 times radic(355686) = 173 gt 108 EC3-1-5 53(3)

χw = 137(07 + 173) = 0564 EC3-1-5 T51

Neglecting any contribution from the flanges

VbRd = VbwRd = 0564 times 355 times 1500 times 10radic3 times 10

N = 1734 kN

EC3-1-5 52(1)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 147

If the flange contribution is considered and MEd = 0

2 times (15εtf )+ tw = 2 times (15 times 0814 times 20)+ 10 EC3-1-5 54(1)

= 498 mm gt 400 mm and so bf = 400 mm EC3-1-5 54(1)

c = 1800 times(

025 + 16 times 400 times 202 times 345

10 times 15002 times 355

)= 4699 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

Vbf Rd = (400 times 202 times 345 times 10)(4699 times 10) N = 117 kNEC3-1-5 54(1)

VbRd = 1734 + 117 = 1851 kN EC3-1-5 52(1)

497 Anchor panel in a stiffened plate girder web

Problem Determine the shear elastic buckling resistance of the end anchor panelof the welded stiffened plate girder of Section 496 if the width of the panel is1800 mm

Solution

tw = 10 mm fyw = 355 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Using λw = 173 (Section 496) the shear elastic buckling resistance of the endpanel is

VpRd = (11732)times 355 times 1500 times 10(103 times radic3 times 10) N = 1027 kN

EC3-1-5 933(3)

498 Example 8 ndash intermediate transverse stiffener

Problem Check the adequacy of a pair of intermediate transverse web stiffeners100 times 16 of S460 steel for the plate girder of Section 496

SolutionUsing VEd = 1734 kN (Section 496) and VpRd = 1027 kN (Section 497)

the stiffener section must resist an axial force of

NEds = 1734 minus 1027 = 7064 kN EC3-1-5 933(3)

The stiffener section consists of the two stiffener plates and a length of the webdefined in Figure 91 of EC3-1-5 For the stiffener plates

tp = 16 mm fyp = 460 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235460) = 0715 T52

cp(tpε) = 100(16 times 0715) = 874 lt 9 T51

and so the plates are fully effective and the stiffener section is Class 1

148 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

Using the lower of the web and plate yield stresses of fyw = 355 Nmm2 andε = 0814

Aeff s = 2 times (16 times 100)+ (2 times 15 times 0814 times 10 + 16)times 10

= 5801 mm2 EC3-1-5 F91

Ieff s = (2 times 100 + 10)3 times 1612 = 1235 times 106 mm4 EC3-1-5 F91

ieff s = radic (1235 times 1065801

) = 461 mm

λ1 = 939 times 0814 = 764 6313(1)

Lcr = 10 times 1500 = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 94(2)

λ = 1500(461 times 764) = 0426 6313(1)

For buckling curve c α = 049 EC3-1-5 94(2) T61

Φ = 05 times [1 + 049 times (0426 minus 02)+ 04262] = 06466312(1)

χ = 1[0646 + radic(06462 minus 04262)] = 0884 6312(1)

NbRd = 0884 times 5801 times 35510 N 6311(3)

= 1820 kN gt 7064 kN = NEds OK

ahw = 18001500 = 120 ltradic

2 EC3-1-5 933(3)

15h3wt3

wa2 = 15 times 15003 times 10318002 EC3-1-5 933(3)

= 1563 times 106 mm4 lt 1235 times 106 mm4 = Is OK

499 Example 9 ndash load-bearing stiffener

Problem Check the adequacy of a pair of load-bearing stiffeners 100 times 16 of S460steel which are above the support of the plate girder of Section 496 The flangesof the girder are not restrained by other structural elements against rotation Thegirder is supported on a stiff bearing ss = 300 mm long the end panel width is1000 mm and the design reaction is 1400 kN

Stiffener yield resistance

ts = 16 mm fy = 460 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235460) = 0715 T52

cs(tsε) = 100(16 times 0715) T51

= 874 lt 9 and so the stiffeners are fully effective T51

FsRd = 2 times (100 times 16)times 46010 N = 1472 kN

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 149

Unstiffened web resistance

kF = 2 + 6 times (300 + 0)1500 = 32 EC3-1-5 F61

Fcr = 09 times 32 times 210 000 times 1031500 N = 4032 kN EC3-1-5 64(1)

e = 32 times 210 000 times 102

2 times 355 times 1500= 631 mm lt 300 mm

= ss + c EC3-1-5 65(3)

m1 = (355 times 400)(355 times 10) = 40 EC3-1-5 65(1)

m2 = 002 times (150020)2 = 1125 EC3-1-5 65(1)

ly611 = 631 + 20 timesradic

402 + (63120)2 + 1125

= 3018 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

ly612 = 631 + 20 times radic40 + 1125

= 3101 mm gt 3018 mm = ly611 EC3-1-5 65(3)

ly = 301 8 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

λF =radic

3018 times 10 times 355

4032 times 103= 1630(gt05) EC3-1-5 64(1)

χF = 051630 = 0307 EC3-1-5 64(1)

Leff = 0307 times 3018 = 926 mm EC3-1-5 64(1)

FRd = 355 times 926 times 1010 N EC3-1-5 62(1)

= 3286 kN lt 1400 kN and so load bearing stiffeners are required

Stiffener buckling resistance

Aeff s = 2 times (16 times 100)+ (2 times 15 times 0814 times 10 + 16)times 10

= 5801 mm2 EC3-1-5 F91

Ieff s = (2 times 100 + 10)3 times 1612 = 1235 times 106 mm4 EC3-1-5 F91

ieff s = radic (1235 times 1065801

) = 461 mm

λ1 = 939 times 0814 = 764 6313(1)

Lcr = 10 times 1500 mm = 1500 mm EC3-1-5 94(2)

λ = 1500(461 times 764) = 0426 6313(1)

For buckling curve c α = 049 EC3-1-5 94(2) T61

Φ = 05 times [1 + 049 times (0426 minus 02)+ 04262] = 0646 6312(1)

χ = 1[0646 + radic(06462 minus 04262)] = 0884 6312(1)

NbRd = 0884 times 5801 times 35510 N = 1820 kN gt 1400 kN OK6311(3)

150 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

4910 Example 10 ndash shear and bending of a Class 2 beam

Problem Determine the design resistance of the 356 times 171 UB 45 of S355steel shown in Figure 431b at a point where the design moment is MEd =230 kNm

SolutionAs in Section 492 fy = 355 Nmm2 ε = 0814 η = 12 the flange is Class 2

and the web is Class 1 the section is Class 2 and Wpl = 775 cm3

Av = 573 times 102 minus 2 times 1711 times 97 + (70 + 2 times 102)times 97

= 2676 mm2 626(3)

η = 12 EC3-1-5 51(2)

ηhwtw = 12 times (3514 minus 2 times 97)times 70 = 2789 mm2 gt 2676 mm2

626(3)

VplRd = 2789 times (355radic

3)10 N = 5716 kN 626(2)

ηhw(twε) = 12 times (3514 minus 2 times 97)(70 times 0814) = 700 lt 72EC3-1-5 51(2)

so that shear buckling need not be consideredUsing a reduced bending resistance corresponding to MV Rd = MEd = 230

kNm then

(1 minus ρ)times 355 times 775 times 103 = 230 times 106 so that 628(3)

ρ = 0164

Now ρ = (2VEdVplRd minus 1)2 which leads to 628(3)

VcM RdVplRd = [radic(0164)+ 1]2 = 0702 so that

VcM Rd = 0702 times 5716 = 4015 kN

4911 Example 11 ndash shear and bending of a stiffenedplate girder

Problem Determine the shear resistance of the stiffened plate web girder of Section496 shown and shown in Figure 431d at the point where the design moment isMEd = 4000 kNm

SolutionAs previously fyf = 345 Nmm2 εf = 0825 and the flanges are Class 3

(Section 494) fyw = 345 Nmm2 and εw = 0814 (Section 495) and VbwRd =1733 kNm (Section 496)

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 151

The resistance of the flanges to bending is

Mf Rd = (400 times 20)times (1540 minus 20)times 34510 Nmm

= 4195 kNm gt 4000 kNm = MEd EC3-1-5 54(1)

and so the flange resistance is not completely utilised in resisting the bendingmoment

2 times (15εtf )+ tw = 2 times (15 times 0814 times 20)+ 10 = 498 mm gt 400 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

bf = 400 mm lt 498 mm EC3-1-5 54(1)

c = 1800 times(

025 + 16 times 400 times 202 times 345

10 times 15002 times 355

)= 4699 mm

EC3-1-5 54(1)

Vbf Rd = 400 times 202 times 355

4699 times 10times

[1 minus

(4000

4195

)2]

N = 11 kN

EC3-1-5 54(1)

VbwRd + Vbf Rd = 1733 + 11 = 1744 kN EC3-1-5 52(1)

410 Unworked examples

4101 Example 12 ndash elastic local buckling of a beam

Determine the elastic local buckling moment for the beam shown in Figure 432a

4102 Example 13 ndash elastic local buckling of a beam-column

Determine the elastic local buckling load for the beam-column shown inFigure 432b when MN = 20 mm

4103 Example 14 ndash section capacity of a welded box beam

Determine the section moment resistance for the welded box beam of S275 steelshown in Figure 432c

4104 Example 15 ndash designing a plate web girder

The overall depth of the laterally supported plate girder of S275 steel shown inFigure 432d must not exceed 1800 mm Design a constant section girder for the

152 Local buckling of thin-plate elements

150

10 mm6 mm

150 150600

(a) Beam section

Z = 139 times 10 mm

300

300

6 mm

(b) Beam-column section

300 times 6 mm

200 times 6 mm

(c) Box beam section

A B C

500 kN

15 000 mm 000 mm

(d) Plate girder

95 Nmm

10 mm

max6 3

Z = 091 times10 mmmin6 3

5

Figure 432 Unworked examples

factored loads shown and determine

(a) The flange proportions(b) The web thickness(c) The distribution of any intermediate stiffeners(d) The stiffener proportions and(e) The proportions and arrangements of any load-bearing stiffeners

References

1 Timoshenko SP and Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959) Theory of Plates and Shells2nd edition McGraw-Hill New York

2 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

3 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York4 Bulson PS (1970) The Stability of Flat Plates Chatto and Windus London5 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural Stability

Corona Tokyo6 Allen HG and Bulson PS (1980) Background to Buckling McGraw-Hill (UK)7 Basler K (1961) Strength of plate girders in shear Journal of the Structural Division

ASCE 87 No ST7 pp 151ndash808 Bradford MA Bridge RQ Hancock GJ Rotter JM and Trahair NS (1987)

Australian limit state design rules for the stability of steel structures Proceedings FirstStructural Engineering Conference Institution of Engineers Australia Melbournepp 209ndash16

Local buckling of thin-plate elements 153

9 Evans HR (1983) Longitudinally and transversely reinforced plate girders Chapter1 in Plated Structures Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied SciencePublishers London pp 1ndash37

10 Rockey KC and Skaloud M (1972) The ultimate load behaviour of plate girdersloaded in shear The Structural Engineer 50 No 1 pp 29ndash47

11 Usami T (1982) Postbuckling of plates in compression and bending Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 108 No ST3 pp 591ndash609

12 Kalyanaraman V and Ramakrishna P (1984) Non-uniformly compressed stiffenedelements Proceedings Seventh International Specialty Conference Cold-FormedStructures St Louis Department of Civil Engineering University of Missouri-Rollapp 75ndash92

13 Merrison Committee of the Department of Environment (1973) Inquiry into theBasis of Design and Method of Erection of Steel Box Girder Bridges Her MajestyrsquosStationery Office London

14 Rockey KC (1971)An ultimate load method of design for plate girders Developmentsin Bridge Design and Construction (eds KC Rockey JL Bannister and HR Evans)Crosby Lockwood and Son London pp 487ndash504

15 Rockey KC El-Gaaly MA and Bagchi DK (1972) Failure of thin-walled mem-bers under patch loading Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST12pp 2739ndash52

16 Roberts TM (1981) Slender plate girders subjected to edge loading ProceedingsInstitution of Civil Engineers 71 Part 2 September pp 805ndash19

17 Roberts TM (1983) Patch loading on plate girders Chapter 3 in Plated Struc-tures Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied Science Publishers Londonpp 77ndash102

18 SA (1998) AS4100ndash1998 Steel Structures Standards Australia Sydney Australia

Chapter 5

In-plane bending of beams

51 Introduction

Beams are structural members which transfer the transverse loads they carry to thesupports by bending and shear actions Beams generally develop higher stressesthan axially loaded members with similar loads while the bending deflections aremuch higher These bending deflections of a beam are often therefore a primarydesign consideration On the other hand most beams have small shear deflectionsand these are usually neglected

Beam cross-sections may take many different forms as shown in Figure 51 andthese represent various methods of obtaining an efficient and economical mem-ber Thus most steel beams are not of solid cross-section but have their materialdistributed more efficiently in thin walls Thin-walled sections may be open andwhile these tend to be weak in torsion they are often cheaper to manufacture thanthe stiffer closed sections Perhaps the most economic method of manufacturingsteel beams is by hot-rolling but only a limited number of open cross-sections isavailable When a suitable hot-rolled beam cannot be found a substitute may befabricated by connecting together a series of rolled plates and this has becomeincreasingly common Fabricating techniques also allow the production of beamscompounded from hot-rolled members and plates and of hybrid members in whichthe flange material is of a higher yield stress than the web Tapered and castellatedbeams can also be fabricated from hot-rolled beams In many cases a steel beamis required to support a reinforced concrete slab and in this case its strength maybe increased by connecting the steel and concrete together so that they act com-positely The fire resistance of a steel beam may also be increased by encasing itin concrete The final member cross-section chosen will depend on its suitabilityfor the use intended and on the overall economy

The strength of a steel beam in the plane of loading depends on its sectionproperties and on its yield stress fy When bending predominates in a determinatebeam the effective ultimate strength is reached when the most highly stressedcross-section becomes fully yielded so that it forms a plastic hinge The momentMp at which this occurs is somewhat higher than the first yield moment My at whichelastic behaviour nominally ceases as shown in Figure 52 and for hot-rolled

In-plane bending of beams 155

Solid section Rolled section

Cut

WeldTapered I-beam

Composite beam

Encased beam

Castellated I-beam

WeldWeld

Compoundsection

Fabricatedsection

Cut

Reverse

Shearconnector

Thin-walledopen section

Thin-walledclosed section

Weld

Displace

Figure 51 Beam types

M

2

2

d

d

x

w

Rigid plastic assumption

MpMy 4

5

1

Effect of residual stresses

(d) Momentndashcurvature relationships

3

2

2

d

d

x

w

1 2 3 4 5

fy fy fy fy

(c) Stress distributions

First yield 2

Elastic Firstyield

Strain-hardened

Fullyplastic

Elastic-plastic

Figure 52 Momentndashcurvature relationships for steel beams

I-beams this margin varies between 10 and 20 approximately The attainmentof the first plastic hinge forms the basis for the traditional method of design ofbeams in which the bending moment distribution is calculated from an elasticanalysis

156 In-plane bending of beams

However in an indeterminate beam a substantial redistribution of bendingmoment may occur after the first hinge forms and failure does not occur untilsufficient plastic hinges have formed to cause the beam to become a mechanismThe load which causes this mechanism to form provides the basis for the morerational method of plastic design

When shear predominates as in some heavily loaded deep beams of short spanthe ultimate strength is controlled by the shear force which causes complete plas-tification of the web In the more common sections this is close to the shear forcewhich causes the nominal first yield in shear and so the shear design is carriedout for the shear forces determined from an elastic analysis In this chapter thein-plane behaviour and design of beams are discussed It is assumed that neitherlocal buckling (which is treated in Chapter 4) nor lateral buckling (which is treatedin Chapter 6) occurs Beams with axial loads are discussed in Chapter 7 while thetorsion of beams is treated in Chapter 10

52 Elastic analysis of beams

The design of a steel beam is often preceded by an elastic analysis of the bendingof the beam One purpose of such an analysis is to determine the bending momentand shear force distributions throughout the beam so that the maximum bend-ing moments and shear forces can be found and compared with the moment andshear capacities of the beam An elastic analysis is also required to determine thedeflections of the beam so that these can be compared with the desirable limitingvalues

The data required for an elastic analysis include both the distribution and themagnitudes of the applied loads and the geometry of the beam In particular thevariation along the beam of the effective second moment of area I of the cross-section is needed to determine the deflections of the beam and to determine themoments and shears when the beam is statically indeterminate For this purposelocal variations in the cross-section such as those due to bolt holes may be ignoredbut more general variations including any general reductions arising from theuse of the effective width concept for excessively thin compression flanges (seeSection 4222) should be allowed for

The bending moments and shear forces in statically determinate beams can bedetermined by making use of the principles of static equilibrium These are fullydiscussed in standard textbooks on structural analysis [1 2] as are various methodsof analysing the deflections of such beams On the other hand the conditions ofstatics are not sufficient to determine the bending moments and shear forces instatically indeterminate beams and the conditions of compatibility between thevarious elements of the beam or between the beam and its supports must alsobe used This is done by analysing the deflections of the statically indeterminatebeam Many methods are available for this analysis both manual and computerand these are fully described in standard textbooks [3ndash8] These methods can also

In-plane bending of beams 157

MS = MA ndash MB MS = qL2 8 MS = QL 4 MS = QL 3 MS = QL 4

k = 298 k = k = k = k = 496 397 507 546

L2

MA

L L L2

qQ Q Q QQ

(a) Mid-span deflection wc

(b) Moments MS and deflection coefficients k

and units wc = kMS L

2I wc ndash mm

MS ndash kNm L ndash m I ndash cm4

L3 L3 L3 L4 L2 L4

MB

Figure 53 Mid-span deflections of steel beams

be used to analyse the behaviour of structural frames in which the member axialforces are small

While the deflections of beams can be determined accurately by using themethods referred to above it is often sufficient to use approximate estimatesfor comparison with the desirable maximum values Thus in simply supported orcontinuous beams it is usually accurate enough to use the mid-span deflection(see Figure 53) The mid-span deflection wc (measured relative to the level of theleft-hand support) depends on the distribution of the applied load the end momentsMA and MB (taken as clockwise positive) and the sinking wAB of the right-handsupport below the left-hand support and can be expressed as

wc = kMS + 298(MA minus MB)L2

I+ wAB

2 (51)

In this equation the deflections wc and wAB are expressed in mm the momentsMS MA MB are in kNm the span L is in m and the second moment of area I is incm4 Expressions for the simple beam moments MS and values of the coefficientsk are given in Figure 53 for a number of loading distributions These can becombined together to find the central deflections caused by many other loadingdistributions

53 Bending stresses in elastic beams

531 Bending in a principal plane

The distribution of the longitudinal bending stresses σ in an elastic beam bent in aprincipal plane xz can be deduced from the experimentally confirmed assumptionthat plane sections remain substantially plane during bending provided any shearlag effects which may occur in beams with very wide flanges (see Section 545)

158 In-plane bending of beams

are negligible Thus the longitudinal strains ε vary linearly through the depth ofthe beam as shown in Figure 54 as do the longitudinal stresses σ It is shown inSection 581 that the moment resultant My of these stresses is

My = minusEIyd2w

dx2(52)

where the sign conventions for the moment My and the deflection w are as shownin Figure 55 and that the stress at any point in the section is

σ = Myz

Iy(53)

in which tensile stresses are positive In particular the maximum stresses occur atthe extreme fibres of the cross-section and are given by

in compression and

σmax = MyzT

Iy= minus My

WelyT

σmax = MyzB

Iy= My

WelyB

(54)

in tension in which WelyT = minus IyzT and WelyB = IyzB are the elastic sectionmoduli for the top and bottom fibres respectively for bending about the y axis

The corresponding equations for bending in the principal plane xy are

Mz = EIzd2v

dx2(55)

where the sign conventions for the moment Mz and the deflection v are also shownin Figure 55

σ = minusMzyIz (56)

(c) Strains

δx δx

δx

(b) Bending (a) Cross-section (d) Stresses

= E

=

= ndash

zdAA

(e) Moment resultant

y

ndashzT

z

My

z2

2

dd

xwEI

M

y

y

x

w

d

d2

2

My

zB

z

C

b

Figure 54 Elastic bending of beams

In-plane bending of beams 159

z w

xC

y v

xCMy

My

Mz

Mz

C

y

z

x

+ve My

ndashve d2wdx2

+ve Mz

+ve d2vdx

(b) Curvature in xz plane

(c) Curvature in xy plane(a) Positive bending actions

Figure 55 Bending sign conventions

andσmax = MzWelzL

σmax = minusMzWelzR

(57)

in which WelzL = minus IzyL and WelzR = IzyR are the elastic section moduli forbending about the z axis

Values of Iy Iz Welz Welz for hot-rolled steel sections are given in [9] whilevalues for other sections can be calculated as indicated in Section 59 or in standardtextbooks [1 2] Expressions for the properties of some thin-walled sections aregiven in Figure 56 [10] When a section has local holes or excessive widths (seeSection 4222) these properties may need to be reduced accordingly

Worked examples of the calculation of cross-section properties are given inSections 5121ndash5124

532 Biaxial bending

When a beam deflects only in a plane xz1 which is not a principal plane (seeFigure 57a) so that its curvature d2v1d x2 in the perpendicular xy1 plane is zerothen the bending stresses

σ = minusEz1d2w1dx2 (58)

have moment resultants

andMy1 = minusEIy1d2w1dx2

Mz1 = minusEIy1z1d2w1dx2

(59)

160 In-plane bending of beams

b1

2b

b33t

2t

1t

y

z

1b

1t

2t3b3t

3t

z

y

1b = b2

dt

A

I

I

y

z

y

z

0

0

A + A + A

A z + I

I + I

I b12

12

z

A z + z t

A bnsum2

n 4

0

b

3

2

3

3

321

nnsum3

1

2

sum2

n pn pn 2)(

I I12( )Iz2

A ndashndash ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash A12( )A2

A + A + A321

A z +1 A z +21 2

22

2

2

(

]

2

2 2

SectionGeometry

Wply12

Wplz12

Wely12

Welz12

Iy z

bn3tn 12

A z +323 2I3

I + I + A b 21 21 2 3

I zny

I b1z2

A z + z t3sum2

n pn pn )(

A bnsum2

n 4 + A b13

0

b3I I12( )

Iz2

A A12( )

A2

d

d

d

d

d

d

d

t

t3 8

t3 8

t2 4

t2 4

t2

d t2

0

0

An = b tnn In=

z1 2 = b A + A3 2 1 2) A3

z3 = ( )z z2 1 2

zpn=[0 A An2( )2t3le le b3

Figure 56a Thin-walled section properties

where Iy1z1 is the product second moment of area (see Section 59) Thus theresultant bending moment

M = radic(M 2

y1 + M 2z1

) (510)

is inclined to the xz1 plane of the bending deflections as shown in Figure 57aThe simplest method of analysing this or any other biaxial bending situation is

to replace the moments My1 Mz1 by their principal plane static equivalents My

In-plane bending of beams 161

b1

1b

2b

2b

2b

2b

1b

3b

3b

b3b3

3t

1t

1t t t

y

y

y

z

z

z

SectionGeometry

A 2A +

+ + +++

A3

A2

1 2 A 2sumA+2 A + A321 22 n

sumA2 n

I

I

y

z

y

y1

y2

y3

yp

z

0

0

Wply

Wplz

Wely

Welz

A b 2 2 22

31

A b 23 b

3b

22

1I3

I3 I2 ndash( ) A2 b3

b2

2ndash( 2)

4 +

sumI2

n+

A3 b3

2

2A1y12 +A3y3

2 +2I1 2A1y12 +2A2y2

2 + A3y32+2I1 A2b3

2 4 + A3b224

2Iyb3

Iz(b1 ndash y3) and Izy3

A1b3 + A3b34 A1b3 + A2(b3 ndash b2) + A3b34

(b1 ndash yp)2t1 + yp

2t1+A3yp

A1 b32b1

b1A32A

b1A1A

(A ndash 2 A3)4t1 ge 0 (A ndash 2 A3)4t ge 0

An= bntn In = bn3 tn12

(b1 + 2b2)A1A

b12 ndash y3

b1 ndash y3

4Iy y3

+ (b3 yp)t

ndash 8b233

(b1 ndash yp)2 + yp2 +2b2(b1 ndash yp)

Izy2 and Izy3

2Iyb3

+

0 0 0

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

y3 +b32(b1 + 2b2) A1

4Iy

radic2Iyb3

2radic2Iz(b2+b3)

(b32+2b2 b3 ndash b2

2)t2radic2

(b2+b3)2t2radic2

3radic2Iy

(b2+b3) 2radic2+ (3b3ndash2b2)b2

2b3t

Figure 56b Thin-walled section properties

Mz calculated from

My = My1 cosα + Mz1 sin αMz = minusMy1 sin α + Mz1 cosα

(511)

162 In-plane bending of beams

M

M

y

y1 (v1 = 0)

Plane of moment

My

Mz

Mz1

y

z1

zz1

z

zM 1

My1

My1y1

Principalplanes

(a) Deflection in a non-principal plane (b) Principal plane moments My Mz

Plane ofdeflection

Figure 57 Bending in a non-principal plane

zw

x

y v

x

y

z

q

C

qy ( ) +

ndash~

+

+

+

qz ( )

My

Mz ve

(b) Bending My in xz plane qy ( )

qz ( )

(a) Section and loading (c) Bending Mz in xy plane

+ ve

Figure 58 Biaxial bending of a zed beam

in which α is the angle between the y1 z1 axes and the principal y z axes as shownin Figure 57b The bending stresses can then be determined from

σ = Myz

Iyminus Mzy

Iz (512)

in which Iy Iz are the principal second moments of area If the values of α Iy Iz

are unknown they can be determined from Iy1 Iz1 Iy1z1 as shown in Section 59Care needs to be taken to ensure that the correct signs are used for My and Mz

in equation 512 as well as for y and z For example if the zed section shown inFigure 58a is simply supported at both ends with a uniformly distributed load qacting in the plane of the web then its principal plane components qy qz causepositive bending My and negative bending Mz as indicated in Figure 58b and c

In-plane bending of beams 163

The deflections of the beam can also be determined from the principal planemoments by solving equations 52 and 55 in the usual way [1ndash8] for the principalplane deflections w and v and by adding these vectorially

Worked examples of the calculation of the elastic stresses and deflections in anangle section cantilever are given in Section 5125

54 Shear stresses in elastic beams

541 Solid cross-sections

A vertical shear force Vz acting parallel to the minor principal axis z of a section ofa beam (see Figure 59a) induces shear stresses τxy τxz in the plane of the sectionIn solid section beams these are usually assumed to act parallel to the shear force(ie τxy = 0) and to be uniformly distributed across the width of the section asshown in Figure 59a The distribution of the vertical shear stresses τxz can bedetermined by considering the horizontal equilibrium of an element of the beamas shown in Figure 59b Because the bending normal stresses σ vary with x theycreate an imbalance of force in the x direction which can only be compensatedfor by the horizontal shear stresses τzx = τv which are equal to the vertical shearstresses τxz It is shown in Section 5101 that the stress τv at a distance z2 fromthe centroid where the section width is b2 is given by

τv = minus Vz

Iyb2

int z2

zT

bzdz (513)

y

z

x

V

ndash z

z

bx2

z

b

z

T

2

bδz

x+ )(

+z

)(

(b) Horizontal equilibrium(a) Assumed shear stress distribution

Shear stresses vparallel to shearforce Vz and constantacross width of section

vbδx

δx

bδzδx

(vb)vb

δz

δzpart

part

partpart

Figure 59 Shear stresses in a solid section

164 In-plane bending of beams

This can also be expressed as

τv = minusVzA2z2

Iyb2(514)

in which A2 is the area above b2 and z2 is the height of its centroidFor the particular example of the rectangular section beam of width b and depth

d shown in Figure 510a the width is constant and so equation 513 becomes

τv = Vz

bd

(15 minus 6z2

d2

) (515)

This shear stress distribution is parabolic as shown in Figure 510b and has amaximum value at the y axis of 15 times of average shear stress Vzbd

The shear stresses calculated from equations 513 or 514 are reasonably accuratefor solid cross-sections except near the unstressed edges where the shear stress isparallel to the edge rather than to the applied shear force

542 Thin-walled open cross-sections

The shear stress distributions in thin-walled open-section beams differ from thosegiven by equations 513 or 514 for solid section beams in that the shear stressesare parallel to the wall of the section as shown in Figure 511a instead of parallelto the applied shear force Because of the thinness of the walls it is quite accurateto assume that the shear stresses are uniformly distributed across the thickness t ofthe thin-walled section Their distribution can be determined by considering thehorizontal equilibrium of an element of the beam as shown in Figure 511b It isshown in Section 5102 that the stress τv at a distance s from the end of the section

b

y

z z

d

Vz

15Vz bd

(a) Cross-section (b) Shear stress distribution

v

Figure 510 Shear stress distribution in a rectangular section

In-plane bending of beams 165

t

yy

zV

0

z

O

C

E

xy

z

x

+

st

)(δx δsδxv

tδx

δx

v

t

tδs

δs δx t δs

δs

tv

v

(a) Shear stress distribution (b) Horizontal equilibrium

partpart

partxpart

Figure 511 Shear stresses in a thin-walled open section

caused by a vertical shear force Vz can be obtained from the shear flow

τvt = minusVz

Iy

int s

0ztds (516)

This can also be expressed as

τv = minusVzAszs

Iyt(517)

in which As is the area from the free end to the point s and zs is the height of thecentroid of this area above the point s

At a junction in the cross-section wall such as that of the top flange and theweb of the I-section shown in Figures 512 and 513 horizontal equilibrium of thezero area junction element requires

(τvtf )21δx + (τvtf )23δx = (τvtw)24δx (518)

This can be thought of as an analogous flow continuity condition for the corre-sponding shear flows in each cross-section element at the junction as shown inFigure 513c so that

(τvtf )21 + (τvtf )23 = (τvtw)24 (519)

which is a particular example of the general junction conditionsum(τvt) = 0 (520)

in which each shear flow is now taken as positive if it acts towards the junction

166 In-plane bending of beams

b

dy

sf

f

f

t sw

wt

z

1 2 3

45 6

42

btdIVvtw

ff

y

z

4==

42

2btdIVvtw

ff

y

zIV

y

z8td wf

= +

btdIV

vtfff

y

z

(b) Shear flow distribution(a) I-section

Figure 512 Shear flow distribution in an I-section

0

12

3

4

y

z

x

V

2

2

2z

4

1 2 3

0

0

My

My My+

(c) Flow analogy(b) Flange-web junction

(a) Sign of shear flow

δx

δ

δA

(+δ)δA

(tf)21δx

(tw)24δx

(tf)23δx

(tw)24

(tf)23(tf)21

(tw)24δx

tf δx

Figure 513 Horizontal equilibrium considerations for shear flow

Afree end of a cross-section element is the special case of a one-element junctionfor which equation 520 reduces to

τvt = 0 (521)

This condition has already been used (at s = 0) in deriving equation 516

In-plane bending of beams 167

An example of the analysis of the shear flow distribution in the I-section beamshown in Figure 512a is given in Section 5126 The shear flow distributionis shown in Figure 512b It can be seen that the shear stress in the web is nearlyconstant and equal to its average value

τv(av) = Vz

df tw (522)

which provides the basis for the commonly used assumption that the applied shearis resisted only by the web A similar result is obtained for the shear stress in theweb of the channel section shown in Figure 514 and analysed in Section 5127

When a horizontal shear force Vy acts parallel to the y axis additional shearstresses τh parallel to the walls of the section are induced These can be obtainedfrom the shear flow

τht = minusVy

Iz

int s

0ytds (523)

which is similar to equation 517 for the shear flow due to a vertical shear forceA worked example of the calculation of the shear flow distribution caused by ahorizontal shear force is given in Section 5128

y

z+

CS

ya

t

b

w

0

df

tf

tf

vf

Vf

Vw

btfIy Iydf tf

df tf b df twVz Vzb

2

2

82

2

+=wv t

Iy

df tf bVz

2=fv t

Iy

df tf bVz

2=wv t

(a) Shear flow due to shear force Vz (b) Shear centre and flange and web shears

Figure 514 Shear flow distribution in a channel section

168 In-plane bending of beams

543 Shear centre

The shear stresses τv induced by the vertical shear force Vz exert a torque equalto intE

0 τvtρds about the centroid C of the thin-walled cross-section as shown inFigure 515 and are therefore statically equivalent to a vertical shear force Vz

which acts at a distance y0 from the centroid equal to

y0 = 1

Vz

int E

0τvtρds (524)

Similarly the shear stresses τh induced by the horizontal shear force Vy arestatically equivalent to a horizontal shear force Vy which acts at a distance z0 fromthe centroid equal to

z0 = minus 1

Vy

int E

0τhtρds (525)

The coordinates y0 z0 define the position of the shear centre S of the cross-sectionthrough which the resultant of the bending shear stresses must act When anyapplied load does not act through the shear centre as shown in Figure 516then it induces another set of shear stresses in the section which are additionalto those caused by the changes in the bending normal stresses described above(see equations 516 and 523) These additional shear stresses are statically equiv-alent to the torque exerted by the eccentric applied load about the shear centreThey can be calculated as shown in Sections 10214 and 10312

s

t

y

z

V

y0

CE

O

z

vtδs

δs

Figure 515 Moment of shear stress τv about centroid

In-plane bending of beams 169

e

y

z

Vz

Vz

VzeS

C y

z

S

C y

z

S

C+

+Pure bendingBending shear stresses

Off shear centreloading

Pure torsionTorsion shear stresses

Figure 516 Off shear centre loading

Centroid C Shear centre S

Figure 517 Centroids and shear centres

The position of the shear centre of the channel section shown in Figure 514 isdetermined in Section 5128 Its y0 coordinate is given by

y0 = d2f tf b2

4Iy+ b2tf

2btf + df tw(526)

while its z0 coordinate is zero because the section is symmetrical about the y axisIn Figure 517 the shear centres of a number of thin-walled open sections are

compared with their centroids It can be seen that

(a) if the section has an axis of symmetry then the shear centre and centroid lieon it

170 In-plane bending of beams

(b) if the section is of a channel type then the shear centre lies outside the weband the centroid inside it and

(c) if the section consists of a set of concurrent rectangular elements (tees anglesand cruciforms) then the shear centre lies at the common point

A general matrix method for analysing the shear stress distributions and fordetermining the shear centres of thin-walled open-section beams has been prepared[11 12]

Worked examples of the determination of the shear centre position are given inSections 5128 and 51210

544 Thin-walled closed cross-sections

The shear stress distribution in a thin-walled closed-section beam is similar tothat in an open-section beam except that there is an additional constant shearflow τvct around the section This additional shear flow is required to prevent anydiscontinuity in the longitudinal warping displacements u which arise from theshear straining of the walls of the closed sections To show this consider the slitrectangular box whose shear flow distribution τvot due to a vertical shear force Vz isas shown in Figure 518a Because the beam is not twisted the longitudinal fibresremain parallel to the centroidal axis so that the transverse fibres rotate throughangles τvoG equal to the shear strain in the wall as shown in Figure 519 Theserotations lead to the longitudinal warping displacements u shown in Figure 518bthe relative warping displacement at the slit being

int E0 (τvoG)ds

b

df

Vz

y

yz

z

x

E

E

y0

C

C

S

S

O

O

Slit

EvoG

0

ds

(b) Warping displacements due to shear stress

Relative warpingdisplacement

(a) Shear flow vo t

Figure 518 Warping of a slit box

In-plane bending of beams 171

v

v v

v

x

s

G

Projection of s x axes onto plane ofelementδs times δx

δsδu

δs

δx=

Change in warpingdisplacement due toshear strain

Element δs times δx times t

Figure 519 Warping displacements due to shear

b

y

z

= +

Thickness tw

Thickness tf

df Vz

(a) Circulating shear flow vc t(slit box shear flow vo t

shown in Fig 518a)

v t vc t vo t (b) Total shear flow

Figure 520 Shear stress distribution in a rectangular box

However when the box is not slit as shown in Figure 520 this relative warpingdisplacement must be zero Thus

∮τv

Gds = 0 (527)

in which total shear stress τv can be considered as the sum

τv = τvc + τvo (528)

of the slit box shear stress τvo (see Figure 518a) and the shear stress τvc due to aconstant shear flow τvct circulating around the closed section (see Figure 520a)Alternatively equation 516 for the shear flow in an open section can be modified

172 In-plane bending of beams

for the closed section to

τvt = τvct minus Vz

Iy

int s

0ztds (529)

since it can no longer be said that τv is zero at s = 0 this not being a free end (theclosed section has no free ends) Mathematically τvct is a constant of integrationSubstituting equation 528 or 529 into equation 527 leads to

τvct = minus∮τvods∮(1t)ds

(530)

which allows the circulating shear flow τvct to be determinedThe shear stress distribution in any single-cell closed section can be obtained

by using equations 529 and 530 The shear centre of the section can then bedetermined by using equations 524 and 525 as for open sections For the particularcase of the rectangular box shown in Figure 520

τvct = Vz

Iy

(d2

f tw

8+ df tf b

4

) (531)

and the resultant shear flow shown in Figure 520b is symmetrical because of thesymmetry of the cross-section while the shear centre coincides with the centroid

A worked example of the calculation of the shear stresses in a thin-walled closedsection is given in Section 51211

The shear stress distributions in multi-cell closed sections can be determinedby extending this method as indicated in Section 5103 A general matrix methodof analysing the shear flows in thin-walled closed sections has been described[11 12] This can be used for both open and closed sections including compositeand asymmetric sections and sections with open and closed parts It can also beused to determine the centroid principal axes section constants and the bendingnormal stress distribution

545 Shear lag

In the conventional theory of bending shear strains are neglected so that it can beassumed that plane sections remain plane after loading From this assumptionfollow the simple linear distributions of the bending strains and stresses dis-cussed in Section 53 and from these the shear stress distributions discussed inSections 541ndash544 The term shear lag [13] is related to some of the discrep-ancies between this approximate theory of the bending of beams and their realbehaviour and in particular refers to the increases of the bending stresses near theflange-to-web junctions and the corresponding decreases in the flange stressesaway from these junctions

The shear lag effects near the mid-point of the simply supported centrally loadedI-section beam shown in Figure 521a are illustrated in Figure 522 The shear

In-plane bending of beams 173

Q

Q2

Q2

(+)

(ndash)

Warping displacementsdue to positive shear

Warping displacementsdue to negative shear

(b) Warping displacements calculated from conventional theory

(a) Beam and shear for diagram

Q2

Q2

Figure 521 Incompatible warping displacements at a shear discontinuity

Real behaviour

Approximateconventionaltheory

Real behaviour

(b) Shear flow distribution(a) Bending stress distribution

Approximateconventionaltheory

Figure 522 Shear lag effects in an I-section beam

stresses calculated by the conventional theory are as shown in Figure 523a andthese induce the warping (longitudinal) displacements shown in Figure 523b Thewarping displacements of the web are almost linear and these are responsible forthe shear deflections [13] which are usually neglected when calculating the beamrsquosdeflections The warping displacements of the flanges vary parabolically and itis these which are responsible for most of the shear lag effect The applicationof the conventional theory of bending at either side of a point in a beam where

174 In-plane bending of beams

y

z

x

C

(b) Warping displacements due to shear

(a) Shear flow due to a vertical shear Vz

Approximate shear flow givenby conventional theory

Figure 523 Warping of an I-section beam

there is a sudden change in the shear force such as at the mid-point of the beamof Figure 521a leads to two different distributions of warping displacement asshown in Figure 521b These are clearly incompatible and so changes are requiredin the bending stress distribution (and consequently in the shear stress distribution)to remove the incompatibility These changes which are illustrated in Figure 522constitute the shear lag effect

Shear lag effects are usually very small except near points of high concentratedload or at reaction points in short-span beams with thin wide flanges In particularshear lag effects may be significant in light-gauge cold-formed sections [14]and in stiffened box girders [15ndash17] Shear lag has no serious consequences ina ductile structure in which any premature local yielding leads to a favourableredistribution of stress However the increased stresses due to shear lag may beof consequence in a tension flange which is liable to brittle fracture or fatiguedamage or in a compression flange whose strength is controlled by its resistanceto local buckling

An approximate method of dealing with shear lag is to use an effective widthconcept in which the actual width b of a flange is replaced by a reduced widthbeff given by

beff

b= nominal bending stress

maximum bending stress (532)

This is equivalent to replacing the actual flange bending stresses by constantstresses which are equal to the actual maximum stress and distributed over theeffective flange area beff times t Some values of effective widths are given in [14ndash16]

In-plane bending of beams 175

This approach is similar to that used to allow for the redistribution of stress whichtakes place in a thin compression flange after local buckling (see Chapter 4) How-ever the two effects of shear lag and local buckling are quite distinct and shouldnot be confused

55 Plastic analysis of beams

551 General

As the load on a ductile steel beam is increased the stresses in the beam alsoincrease until the yield stress is reached With further increases in the load yieldingspreads through the most highly strained cross-section of the beam until it becomesfully plastic at a moment Mp At this stage the section forms a plastic hinge whichallows the beam segments on either side to rotate freely under the moment MpIf the beam was originally statically determinate this plastic hinge reduces it to amechanism and prevents it from supporting any additional load

However if the beam was statically indeterminate the plastic hinge does notreduce it to a mechanism and it can support additional load This additional loadcauses a redistribution of the bending moment during which the moment at theplastic hinge remains fixed at Mp while the moment at another highly strainedcross-section increases until it forms a plastic hinge This process is repeated untilenough plastic hinges have formed to reduce the beam to a mechanism The beamis then unable to support any further increase in load and its ultimate strength isreached

In the plastic analysis of beams this mechanism condition is investigated todetermine the ultimate strength The principles and methods of plastic analysis arefully described in many textbooks [18ndash24] and so only a brief summary is givenin the following sub-sections

552 The plastic hinge

The bending stresses in an elastic beam are distributed linearly across any section ofthe beam as shown in Figure 54 and the bending moment M is proportional to thecurvature minusd2wdx2 (see equation 52) However once the yield strain εy = fyE(see Figure 524) of a steel beam is exceeded the stress distribution is no longerlinear as indicated in Figure 52c Nevertheless the strain distribution remainslinear and so the inelastic bending stress distributions are similar to the basicstressndashstrain relationship shown in Figure 524 provided the influence of shearon yielding can be ignored (which is a reasonable assumption for many I-sectionbeams) The moment resultant M of the bending stresses is no longer proportionalto the curvature minusd2wdx2 but varies as shown in Figure 52d Thus the sectionbecomes elastic-plastic when the yield moment My = fyWel is exceeded and thecurvature increases rapidly as yielding progresses through the section At highcurvatures the limiting situation is approached for which the section is completely

176 In-plane bending of beams

0 sty

Stress

Plastic Strain-hardened

Est

Strain

Rigid plasticassumption

Elastic E

fy

Figure 524 Idealised stressndashstrain relationships for structural steel

yielded at the fully plastic moment

Mp = fyWpl (533)

where Wpl is the plastic section modulus Methods of calculating the fully plasticmoment Mp are discussed in Section 5111 and worked examples are given inSections 51212 and 51213 For solid rectangular sections the shape factorWplWel is 15 but for rolled I-sections WplWel varies between 11 and 12approximately Values of Wpl for hot-rolled I-section members are given in [9]

In real beams strain-hardening commences just before Mp is reached and thereal momentndashcurvature relationship rises above the fully plastic limit of Mp asshown in Figure 52d On the other hand high shear forces cause small reductionsin Mp below fyWpl due principally to reductions in the plastic bending capacityof the web This effect is discussed in Section 452

The approximate approach of the momentndashcurvature relationship shown inFigure 52d to the fully plastic limit forms the basis of the simple rigid-plasticassumption for which the basic stressndashstrain relationship is replaced by the rect-angular block shown by the dashed line in Figure 524 Thus elastic strainsare completely ignored as are the increased stresses due to strain-hardeningThis assumption ignores the curvature of any elastic and elasticndashplastic regions(M ltMp) and assumes that the curvature becomes infinite at any point whereM = Mp

The consequences of the rigid-plastic assumption on the theoretical behaviourof a simply supported beam with a central concentrated load are shown inFigures 525 and 526 In the real beam shown in Figure 525a there is a finitelength of the beam which is elastic-plastic and in which the curvatures are largewhile the remaining portions are elastic and have small curvatures Howeveraccording to the rigid-plastic assumption the curvature becomes infinite at mid-span when this section becomes fully plastic (M = Mp) while the two halves ofthe beam have zero curvature and remain straight as shown in Figure 525b The

In-plane bending of beams 177

Qult = 4Mp L Qult = 4Mp L

Plastichinge

(b) Rigid-plastic beam(a) Real beam

Qult Qult

13

Rigid Rigid

Curvature

Deflectedshape

Beam

Elastic Elastic

Elastic-plasticinfin

Figure 525 Beam with full plastic moment Mp at mid-span

Q

Q

1

2

3 4

5

0

Mp

My 12

34

5

Real

(b) Bending moment

Elastic

Strain-hardened Fully plastic

Elasticndashplastic First yield

Rigidndashplastic

(c) Deflection

(a) Beam

L2L2

Figure 526 Behaviour of a simply supported beam

infinite curvature at mid-span causes a finite change θ in the beam slope and sothe deflected shape of the rigid-plastic beam closely approximates that of the realbeam despite the very different curvature distributions The successive stages inthe development of the bending moment diagram and the central deflection of thebeam as the load is increased are summarised in Figure 526b and c

178 In-plane bending of beams

M M

MM

Mp

(b) Frictionless hinge(a ) Pl a s tic h i n g e s

Behaviour

1313

1313

00

Hinges

Figure 527 Plastic hinge behaviour

The infinite curvature at the point of full plasticity and the finite slope changeθ predicted by the rigid-plastic assumption lead to the plastic hinge concept illus-trated in Figure 527a The plastic hinge can assume any slope change θ once thefull plastic moment Mp has been reached This behaviour is contrasted with thatshown in Figure 527b for a frictionless hinge which can assume any slope changeθ at zero moment

It should be noted that when the full plastic moment Mp of the simply supportedbeam shown in Figure 526a is reached the rigid-plastic assumption predicts thata two-bar mechanism will be formed by the plastic hinge and the two frictionlesssupport hinges as shown in Figure 525b and that the beam will deform freelywithout any further increase in load as shown in Figure 526c Thus the ultimateload of the beam is

Qult = 4MpL (534)

which reduces the beam to a plastic collapse mechanism

553 Moment redistribution in indeterminate beams

The increase in the full plastic moment Mp of a beam over its nominal first yieldmoment My is accounted for in elastic design (ie design based on an elasticanalysis of the bending of the beam) by the use of Mp for the moment capacityof the cross-section Thus elastic design might be considered to be lsquofirst hingersquodesign However the feature of plastic design which distinguishes it from elasticdesign is that it takes into account the favourable redistribution of the bendingmoment which takes place in an indeterminate structure after the first hinge formsThis redistribution may be considerable and the final load at which the collapse

In-plane bending of beams 179

mechanism forms may be significantly higher than that at which the first hinge isdeveloped Thus a first hinge design based on an elastic analysis of the bendingmoment may significantly underestimate the ultimate strength

The redistribution of bending moment is illustrated in Figure 528 for a built-inbeam with a concentrated load at a third point This beam has two redundan-cies and so three plastic hinges must form before it can be reduced to a collapsemechanism According to the rigid-plastic assumption all the bending momentsremain proportional to the load until the first hinge forms at the left-hand sup-port A at Q = 675MpL As the load increases further the moment at this hingeremains constant at Mp while the moments at the load point and the right-handsupport increase until the second hinge forms at the load point B at Q = 868MpLThe moment at this hinge then remains constant at Mp while the moment at theright-hand support C increases until the third and final hinge forms at this point atQ = 900MpL At this load the beam becomes a mechanism and so the ultimateload is Qult = 900MpL which is 33 higher than the first hinge load of 675MpLThe redistribution of bending moment is shown in Figure 528b and d while thedeflection of the load point (derived from an elasticndashplastic assumption) is shownin Figure 528c

554 Plastic collapse mechanisms

A number of examples of plastic collapse mechanisms in cantilevers and single-and multi-span beams is shown in Figure 529 Cantilevers and overhanging beams

Q Q Q

Mp

A B C

Q

M------

p90

AB

C

B

MM----

p10

MpMp

Mp Mp

MpMp

MA

MB

MC

QLM------

p

QL

Mp

Mp

QL

(d ) Ben d ing moment diagrams

( b ) Moment (a ) B u i l t - i n b ea m (c) Deflection

= 868 Mp

QL= 90Mp

QL= 675

redistribution

2L3 L3

675868

90

675868

Hinges

Figure 528 Moment redistribution in a built-in beam

180 In-plane bending of beams

(a ) Can til e v e rs and over- hanging beams

(b) Single-span beams

(c ) Multi-span beams

Figure 529 Beam plastic collapse mechanisms

generally collapse as single-bar mechanisms with a plastic hinge at the supportWhen there is a reduction in section capacity then the plastic hinge may form inthe weaker section

Single-span beams generally collapse as two-bar mechanisms with a hinge(plastic or frictionless) at each support and a plastic hinge within the spanSometimes general plasticity may occur along a uniform moment region

Multi-span beams generally collapse in one span only as a local two-bar mech-anism with a hinge (plastic or frictionless) at each support and a plastic hingewithin the span Sometimes two adjacent spans may combine to form a three-barmechanism with the common support acting as a frictionless pivot and one plastichinge forming within each span Similar mechanisms may form in over-hangingbeams

Potential locations for plastic hinges include supports points of concentratedload and points of cross-section change The location of a plastic hinge in a beamwith distributed load is often not well defined

555 Methods of plastic analysis

The purpose of the methods of plastic analysis is to determine the ultimate load atwhich a collapse mechanism first forms Thus it is only this final mechanism con-dition which must be found and any intermediate load conditions can be ignoredA further important simplification arises from the fact that in its collapse condi-tion the beam is a mechanism and can be analysed by statics without any of thedifficulties associated with the elastic analysis of a statically indeterminate beam

The basic method of plastic analysis is to assume the locations of a series ofplastic hinges and to investigate whether the three conditions of equilibrium mech-anism and plasticity are satisfied The equilibrium condition is that the bending

In-plane bending of beams 181

moment distribution defined by the assumed plastic hinges must be in staticequilibrium with the applied loads and reactions This condition applies to allbeams elastic or plastic The mechanism condition is that there must be a suffi-cient number of plastic and frictionless hinges for the beam to form a mechanismThis condition is usually satisfied directly by the choice of hinges The plastic-ity condition is that the full plastic moment of every cross-section must not beexceeded so that

minusMp le M le Mp (535)

If the assumed plastic hinges satisfy these three conditions they are the correctones and they define the collapse mechanism of the beam so that

(Collapse mechanism) satisfies

Equilibrium

MechanismPlasticity

(536)

The ultimate load can then be determined directly from the equilibrium conditionsHowever it is usually possible to assume more than one series of plastic hinges

and so while the assumed plastic hinges may satisfy the equilibrium and mechanismconditions the plasticity condition (equation 535) may be violated In this casethe load calculated from the equilibrium condition is greater than the true ultimateload (QmgtQult) This forms the basis of the mechanism method of plastic analysis(

Mechanism methodQm ge Qult

)satisfies

(EquilibriumMechanism

) (537)

which provides an upper-bound solution for the true ultimate loadA lower bound solution (Qs le Qult) for the true ultimate load can be obtained

by reducing the loads and bending moments obtained by the mechanism methodproportionally (which ensures that the equilibrium condition remains satisfied)until the plasticity condition is satisfied everywhere These reductions decreasethe number of plastic hinges and so the mechanism condition is not satisfied Thisis the statical method of plastic analysis(

Statical MethodQs le Qult

)satisfies

(EquilibriumPlasticity

)(538)

If the upper and lower bound solutions obtained by the mechanism and staticalmethods coincide or are sufficiently close the beam may be designed immediatelyIf however these bounds are not precise enough the original series of hingesmust be modified (and the bending moments determined in the statical analysiswill provide some indication of how to do this) and the analysis repeated

The use of the methods of plastic analysis is demonstrated in Sections 5112and 5113 for the examples of the built-in beam and the propped cantilever shown

182 In-plane bending of beams

in Figures 530a and 531a A worked example of the plastic collapse analysis ofa non-uniform beam is given in Section 51214

The limitations on the use of the method of plastic analysis in the EC3 strengthdesign of beams are discussed in Section 562

The application of the methods of plastic analysis to rigid-jointed frames isdiscussed in Section 8355 This application can only be made provided the effectsof any axial forces in the members are small enough to preclude any instabilityeffects and provided any significant decreases in the full plastic moments due toaxial forces are accounted for (see Section 722)

321 4L 3 L 3 L 3

Q

Q1

2

4

Q

Q 2 Q

2 Q 2 Q

2δ13

2δ13

δ13

δ13

2 Q

2 Q1

3

4

Mp

Mp

MpMp

Mp Mp

M1 M2 M3 M4

Mp

Mp

Q

M4 M3ndashL3

1 2 3 42 3

(b) Beam segments

(c ) Fi r st mec han i sm and virtual displacements

(a ) Bu i lt- in b e a m

(d ) Co r r ec t mech a n i sm and virtual displacements

M3 M2ndashL3

M2 M1ndashL3

Figure 530 Plastic analysis of a built-in beam

Mp

MpMp

q

L05L

0586L

(a) Propped cantilever (c) First mechanism

(d) Second mechanism(b) Correct mechanism

0583L

Figure 531 Plastic analysis of a propped cantilever

In-plane bending of beams 183

56 Strength design of beams

561 Elastic design of beams

5611 General

For the elastic method of designing a beam for the strength limit state the strengthdesign loads are first obtained by multiplying the nominal loads (dead imposedor wind) by the appropriate load combination factors (see Section 156) The dis-tributions of the design bending moments and shear forces in the beam under thestrength design load combinations are determined by an elastic bending analysis(when the structure is statically indeterminate) or by statics (when it is staticallydeterminate) EC3 also permits a moment redistribution to be made in each ade-quately braced Class 1 or Class 2 span of a continuous beam of up to 15 of thespanrsquos peak elastic moment provided equilibrium is maintained The beam mustbe designed to be able to resist the design moments and shears as well as anyconcentrated forces arising from the factored loads and their reactions

The processes of checking a specified member or of designing an unknownmember for the design actions are summarised in Figure 532 When a specified

Check serviceability

Guess fy and sectionclassification

Check fy andclassification

Select trial section(usually for moment)

Check bracingCheck shearCheck shear and bendingCheck bearing

Analysis for MEd VEd REd

DesigningChecking

Section Length and loading

Find fy Classify section

Check moment

Figure 532 Flow chart for the elastic design of beams

184 In-plane bending of beams

member is to be checked then the cross-section should first be classified asClass 1 2 3 or 4 This allows the effective section modulus to be determinedand the design section moment resistance to be compared with the maximumdesign moment Following this the lateral bracing should be checked then theweb shear resistance and then combined bending and shear should be checkedat any cross-sections where both the design moment and shear are high Finallythe web bearing resistance should be checked at reactions and concentrated loadpoints

When the member size is not known then a target value for the effective sectionmodulus may be determined from the maximum design moment and a trial sectionchosen whose effective section modulus exceeds this target The remainder of thedesign process is then the same as that for checking a specified member Usuallythe moment resistance governs the design but when it doesnrsquot then an iterativeprocess may need to be followed as indicated in Figure 532

The following sub-sections describe each of the EC3 checking processes sum-marised in Figure 532 A worked example of their application is given inSection 51215

5612 Section classification

The moment shear and concentrated load bearing resistances of beams whoseplate elements are slender may be significantly influenced by local buckling con-siderations (Chapter 4) Because of this beam cross-sections are classified asClass 1 2 3 or 4 depending on the ability of the elements to resist local buckling(Section 472)

Class 1 sections are unaffected by local buckling and are able to develop andmaintain their fully plastic resistances until a collapse mechanism forms Class 2sections are able to form a first plastic hinge but local buckling prevents subsequentmoment redistribution Class 3 sections are able to reach the yield stress but localbuckling prevents full plastification of the cross-section Class 4 sections have theirresistances reduced below their first yield resistances by local buckling effects

Sections are classified by comparing the slendernessλ= (ct)radic(fy235)of eachcompression element with the appropriate limits of Table 52 of EC3 These limitsdepend on the way in which the longitudinal edges of the element are supported(either one edge supported as for the flange outstand of an I-section or two edgessupported as for the internal flange element of a box section) the bending stressdistribution (uniform compression as in a flange or varying stresses as in a web)and the type of section as indicated in Figures 533 and 429

The section classification is that of the lowest classification of its elements withClass 1 being the highest possible and Class 4 the lowest All UBrsquos in S275 steelare Class 1 all UCrsquos are Class 1 or 2 but welded I-section members may also beClass 3 or 4

Worked examples of section classification are given in Sections 51215 and492ndash494

In-plane bending of beams 185

cw

cf1 cf1

cf1cf1 cf 2 cf1

cf 2

cw cw cw

Section description

Section andelement widths

Welded box RHS Hot-rolled UBUC

Welded PWG

Flangeoutstandcf1

Class 1Class 2Class 3

Class 1Class 2Class 3

ndashndashndash

ndashndashndash

91014

7283

124

910143338427283

124

3338427283

124

Class 1Class 2Class 3

Flange supportedalong bothedges cf 2

Web cw

Figure 533 Local buckling limits λ = (ct)ε for some beam sections

5613 Checking the moment resistance

For the moment resistance check of a beam that has adequate bracing against lateralbuckling the inequality

MEd le McRd (539)

must be satisfied in which MEd is the maximum design moment and

McRd = WfyγM0 (540)

is the design section moment resistance in which W is the appropriate sectionmodulus fy the nominal yield strength for the section and γM0(=1) the partialfactor for section resistance

For Class 1 and Class 2 sections the appropriate section modulus is the plasticsection modulus Wpl so that

W = Wpl (541)

For Class 3 sections the appropriate section modulus may simply be taken as theminimum elastic section modulus Welmin For Class 4 sections the appropriatesection modulus is reduced below the elastic section modulus Welmin as discussedin Section 472

186 In-plane bending of beams

Worked examples of checking the moment resistance are given inSections 51215 and 492ndash494 and a worked example of using the momentresistance check to design a suitable section is given in Section 51216

5614 Checking the lateral bracing

Beams with insufficient lateral bracing must also be designed to resist lateralbuckling The design of beams against lateral buckling is discussed in Section 69It is assumed in this chapter that there is sufficient bracing to prevent lateralbuckling While the adequacy of bracing for this purpose may be checked bydetermining the lateral buckling moment resistance as in Section 69 EC3 alsogives simpler (and often conservative) rules for this purpose For example lateralbuckling may be assumed to be prevented if the geometrical slenderness of eachsegment between restraints satisfies

Lc

if zle 3756

kc

McRd

MyEd

radic235

fy(542)

in which if z is the radius of gyration about the z axis of an equivalent compressionflange kc is a correction factor which allows for the moment distribution McRd isthe design resistance of a fully braced segment and MyEd is the maximum designmoment in the segment

A worked example of checking the lateral bracing is given in Section 51215

5615 Checking the shear resistance

For the shear resistance check the inequality

VEd le VcRd (543)

must be satisfied in which VEd is the maximum design shear force and VcRd thedesign shear resistance

For a stocky web with dwtw le 72radic(235fy) and for which the elastic shear

stress distribution is approximately uniform (as in the case of an equal flangedI-section) the uniform shear resistance VcRd is usually given by

VcRd = Av(fyradic

3) (544)

in which fyradic

3 is the shear yield stress τy (Section 131) and Av is the shear areaof the web defined in Clause 626(2) of EC3 All the webs of UBrsquos and UCrsquosin S275 steel satisfy dwtw le 72

radic(235fy) A worked example of checking the

uniform shear capacity of a compact web is given in Section 51215

In-plane bending of beams 187

For a stocky web with dwtw le 72radic(235fy) and with a non-uniform elastic

shear stress distribution (such as an unequal flanged I-section) the inequality

τEd le fyradic

3 (545)

must be satisfied in which τEd is the maximum design shear stress induced in theweb by VEd as determined by an elastic shear stress analysis (Section 54)

Webs for which dwtw ge 72radic(235fy) have their shear resistances reduced by

local buckling effects as discussed in Section 474 The shear design of thin websis governed by EC3-1-5 [25] Worked examples of checking the shear capacity ofsuch webs are given in Sections 495 and 496

5616 Checking for bending and shear

High shear forces may reduce the ability of a web to resist bending moment asdiscussed in Section 45 To allow for this Class 1 and Class 2 beams undercombined bending and shear in addition to satisfying equations 539 and 543must also satisfy

MEd le McRd

1 minus

(2VEd

VplRdminus 1

)2

(546)

in which VEd is the design shear at the cross-section being checked and VplRd isthe design plastic shear resistance This condition need only be considered whenVEd gt 05VplRd as indicated in Figure 432 It therefore need only be checked atcross-sections under high bending and shear such as at the internal supports ofcontinuous beams Even so many such beams have VEd le 05VplRd and so thischeck for combined bending and shear rarely governs

5617 Checking the bearing resistance

For the bearing check the inequality

FEd le FRd (547)

must be satisfied at all supports and points of concentrated load In this equationFEd is the design-concentrated load or reaction and FRd the bearing resistance ofthe web and its load-bearing stiffeners if any The bearing design of webs andload-bearing stiffeners is governed by EC3-1-5 [25] and discussed in Sections 46and 476 Stocky webs often have sufficient bearing resistance and do not requirethe addition of load-bearing stiffeners

A worked example of checking the bearing resistance of a stocky unstiffenedweb is given in Section 51215 while a worked example of checking the bearingresistance of a slender web with load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

188 In-plane bending of beams

562 Plastic design of beams

In the plastic method of designing for the strength limit state the distributions ofbending moment and shear force in a beam under factored loads are determinedby a plastic bending analysis (Section 555) Generally the material propertiesfor plastic design should be limited to ensure that the stressndashstrain curve has anadequate plastic plateau and exhibits strain-hardening so that plastic hinges canbe formed and maintained until the plastic collapse mechanism is fully developedThe use of the plastic method is restricted to beams which satisfy certain limitationson cross-section form and lateral bracing (additional limitations are imposed onmembers with axial forces as discussed in Section 7242)

EC3 permits only Class 1 sections which are symmetrical about the axis per-pendicular to the axis of bending to be used at plastic hinge locations in order toensure that local buckling effects (Sections 42 and 43) do not reduce the ability ofthe section to maintain the full plastic moment until the plastic collapse mechanismis fully developed while Class 1 or Class 2 sections should be used elsewhereThe slenderness limits for Class 1 and Class 2 beam flanges and webs are shownin Figure 533

The spacing of lateral braces is limited in plastic design to ensure that inelasticlateral buckling (see Section 63) does not prevent the complete development ofthe plastic collapse mechanism EC3 requires the spacing of braces at both endsof a plastic hinge segment to be limited A conservative approximation for thespacing limit for sections with htf le 40

radic(235fy) is given by

Lstable le 35izradic(235fy) (548)

in which iz is the radius of gyration about the minor z axis although higher valuesmay be calculated by allowing for the effects of moment gradient

The resistance of a beam designed plastically is based principally on its plasticcollapse load Qult calculated by plastic analysis using the full plastic moment Mp

of the beam The plastic collapse load must satisfy QEd le Qult in which QEd is thecorresponding design load

The shear capacity of a beam analysed plastically is based on the fully plasticshear capacity of the web (see Section 4321) Thus the maximum shear VEd

determined by plastic analysis under the design loads is limited to

VEd le VplRd = Avfyradic

3 (549)

EC3 also requires web stiffeners to be provided near all plastic hinge locationswhere an applied load or reaction exceeds 10 of the above limit

In-plane bending of beams 189

The ability of a beam web to transmit concentrated loads and reactions isdiscussed in Section 462 The web should be designed as in Section 476 usingthe design loads and reactions calculated by plastic analysis

A worked example of the plastic design of a beam is given in Section 51217

57 Serviceability design of beams

The design of a beam is often governed by the serviceability limit state forwhich the behaviour of the beam should be so limited as to give a high proba-bility that the beam will provide the serviceability necessary for it to carry out itsintended function The most common serviceability criteria are associated withthe stiffness of the beam which governs its deflections under load These mayneed to be limited so as to avoid a number of undesirable situations an unsightlyappearance cracking or distortion of elements fixed to the beam such as claddinglinings and partitions interference with other elements such as crane girders orvibration under dynamic loads such as traffic wind or machinery loads

Aserviceability design should be carried out by making appropriate assumptionsfor the load types combinations and levels for the structural response to loadand for the serviceability criteria Because of the wide range of serviceability limitstates design rules are usually of limited extent The rules given are often advisoryrather than mandatory because of the uncertainties as to the appropriate values tobe used These uncertainties result from the variable behaviour of real structuresand what is often seen to be the non-catastrophic (in terms of human life) natureof serviceability failures

Serviceability design against unsightly appearance should be based on the totalsustained load and so should include the effects of dead and long-term imposedloads The design against cracking or distortion of elements fixed to a beam shouldbe based on the loads imposed after their installation and will often include theunfactored imposed load or wind load but exclude the dead load The designagainst interference may need to include the effects of dead load as well as ofimposed and wind loads Where imposed and wind loads act simultaneously itmay be appropriate to multiply the unfactored loads by combination factors suchas 08 The design against vibration will require an assessment to be made of thedynamic nature of the loads

Most stiffness serviceability limit states are assessed by using an elastic anal-ysis to predict the static deflections of the beam For vibration design it may besufficient in some cases to represent the dynamic loads by static equivalents andcarry out an analysis of the static deflections More generally however a dynamicelastic analysis will need to be made

The serviceability deflection limits depend on the criterion being used To avoidunsightly appearance a value of L200 (L180 for cantilevers) might be used aftermaking allowances for any pre-camber Values as low as L360 have been usedfor design against the cracking of plaster finishes while a limit of L600 has been

190 In-plane bending of beams

used for crane gantry girders Avalue of H300 has been used for horizontal storeydrift in buildings under wind load

A worked example of the serviceability design is given in Section 51218

58 Appendix ndash bending stresses in elastic beams

581 Bending in a principal plane

When a beam bends in the xz principal plane plane cross-sections rotate asshown in Figure 54 so that sections δx apart become inclined to each other atminus(d2wdx2)δx where w is the deflection in the z principal direction as shownin Figure 55 and δx the length along the centroidal axis between the two cross-sections The length between the two cross-sections at a distance z from the axisis greater than δx by z(minusd2wd x2)δx so that the longitudinal strain is

ε = minuszd2w

d x2

The corresponding tensile stress σ = Eε is

σ = minusEzd2w

d x2(550)

which has the stress resultants

N =int

AσdA = 0

sinceint

A zdA = 0 for centroidal axes (see Section 59) and

My =int

Aσ zdA

whence

My = minusEIyd2w

dx2(52)

sinceint

A z2dA = Iy (see Section 59) If this is substituted into equation 550 thenthe bending tensile stress σ is obtained as

σ = Myz

Iy (53)

In-plane bending of beams 191

582 Alternative formulation for biaxial bending

When bending moments My1 Mz1 acting about non-principal axes y1 z1 causecurvatures d2w1dx2 d2v1dx2 in the non-principal planes xz1 xy1 the stress σat a point y1 sz1 is given by

σ = minusEz1d2w1dx2 minus Ey1d2v1dx2 (551)

and the moment resultants of these stresses are

andMy1 = minusEIy1d2w1dx2 minus EIy1z1d2v1dx2

Mz1 = EIy1z1d2w1dx2 + EIz1d2v1dx2

(552)

These can be rearranged as

and

minusEd2w1

dx2= My1Iz1 + Mz1Iy1z1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

Ed2v1

dx2= My1Iy1z1 + Mz1Iy1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

(553)

which are much more complicated than the principal plane formulations ofequations 59

If equations 553 are substituted then equation 551 can be expressed as

σ =(

My1Iz1 + Mz1Iy1z1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

)z1 minus

(My1Iy1z1 + Mz1Iy1

Iy1Iz1 minus I2y1z1

)y1 (554)

which is much more complicated than the principal plane formulation ofequation 512

59 Appendix ndash thin-walled section properties

The cross-section properties of many steel beams can be analysed with suffi-cient accuracy by using the thin-walled assumption demonstrated in Figure 534in which the cross-section is replaced by its mid-thickness line While the thin-walled assumption may lead to small errors in some properties due to junction andthickness effects its consistent use will avoid anomalies that arise when a moreaccurate theory is combined with thin-walled theory as might be the case in thedetermination of shear flows The small errors are typically of the same order asthose introduced by the common practice of ignoring the fillets or corner radii ofhot-rolled sections

192 In-plane bending of beams

t2

t1

b1 times t1

b2 times t2

b3 times t3

b1

b 2

b3

t 3

aa

(a) Actual cross-section (b) Thin-walled approximation

Figure 534 Thin-walled cross-section assumption

The area A of a thin-walled section composed of a series of thin rectangles bn

wide and tn thick (bn tn) is given by

A =int

AdA =

sumn

An (555)

in which An = bntn This approximation may make small errors of the order of(tb)2 at some junctions

The centroid of a cross-section is defined by

intA

ydA =int

AzdA = 0

and for a thin-walled section these conditions become

sumn

Anyn =sum

n

Anzn = 0 (556)

in which yn zn are the centroidal distances of the centre of the rectangular ele-ment as demonstrated in Figure 535a The position of the centroid can be foundby adopting any convenient initial set of axes yi zi as shown in Figure 535aso that

yn = yin minus yic

zn = zin minus zic

In-plane bending of beams 193

A2 = b2 times t2 A2 = b2 times t2

z1z1

y1

zi

y12y12 yic

yi2

yi

z12

zi2

zic

132

z12

y1C 0

2

C

2

(b) Second moments of area(a) Centroid

Figure 535 Calculation of cross-section properties

When these are substituted into equation 556 the centroid position is found from

yic =sum

AnyinA

zic =sum

AnzinA

(557)

The second moments of area about the centroidal axes are defined by

Iy =int

Az2 dA =

sum(Anz2

n + In sin2 θn)

Iz =int

Ay2 dA =

sum(Any2

n + In cos2 θn)

Iyz =int

Ayz dA =

sum(Anynzn + In sin θn cos θn)

(558)

in which θn is always the angle from the y axis to the rectangular element (positivefrom the y axis to the z axis) as shown in Figure 535b and

In = b3ntn12 (559)

These thin-walled approximations ignore small terms bnt3n12 while the use of

the angle θn adjusts for the inclination of the element to the y z axes

194 In-plane bending of beams

The principal axis directions y z are defined by the condition that

Iyz = 0 (560)

These directions can be found by considering a rotation of the centroidal axes fromy1 z1 to y2 z2 through an angle α as shown in Figure 536a The y2 z2 coordinatesof any point are related to its y1 z1 coordinates as demonstrated in Figure 536a by

y2 = y1 cosα + z1 sinαz2 = minusy1 sinα + z1 cosα

(561)

The second moments of area about the y2 z2 axes are

Iy2 =int

Az2

2 dA = Iy1 cos2 α minus 2Iy1z1 sinα cosα + Iz1 sin2 α

Iz2 =int

Ay2

2 dA = Iy1 sin2α + 2Iy1z1 sinα cosα + Iz1 cos2 α

Iy2z2 =int

Ay2z2 dA = 1

2(Iy1 minus Iz1) sin 2α + Iy1z1 cos 2α

(562)

The principal axis condition of equation 560 requires Iy2z2 = 0 so that

tan 2α = minus2Iy1z1(Iy1 minus Iz1) (563)

In this book y and z are reserved exclusively for the principal centroidal axes

C

(y1 z1)

z1z2

y2

z2

z1

z1 cos

Iy

1z

IyIz

(Iy1 ndashIy1z1)

(Iy1Iy1z1)

Iyz

y1 sin

2

z1 sin y1 cos

y2

y1

(y2 z2)

(a) Rotation of axes (b) Mohrrsquos circle construction

Figure 536 Calculation of principal axis properties

In-plane bending of beams 195

The principal axis second moments of area can be obtained by using this valueof α in equation 562 whence

Iy = 1

2(Iy1 + Iz1)+ (Iy1 minus Iz1)2 cos 2α

Iz = 1

2(Iy1 + Iz1)minus (Iy1 minus Iz1)2 cos 2α

(564)

These results are summarised by the Mohrrsquos circle constructed in Figure 536b onthe diameter whose ends are defined by (Iy1 Iy1z1) and (Iz1 minusIy1z1) The anglesbetween this diameter and the horizontal axis are equal to 2α and (2α+ 180)while the intersections of the circle with the horizontal axis define the principalaxis second moments of area Iy Iz

Worked examples of the calculation of cross-section properties are given inSections 5121ndash5124

510 Appendix ndash shear stresses in elastic beams

5101 Solid cross-sections

A solid cross-section beam with a shear force Vz parallel to the z principal axis isshown in Figure 59a It is assumed that the resulting shear stresses also act parallelto the z axis and are constant across the width b of the section The correspondinghorizontal shear stresses τzx = τv are in equilibrium with the horizontal bendingstresses σ For the element b times δz times δx shown in Figure 59b this equilibriumcondition reduces to

bpartσ

partxδxδz + part(τvb)

partzδzδx = 0

whence

τv = minus 1

b2

int z2

zT

bpartσ

partxdz (565)

which satisfies the condition that the shear stress is zero at the unstressed boundaryzT The bending normal stresses σ are given by

σ = Myz

Iy

and the shear force Vz is

Vz = dMy

dx

196 In-plane bending of beams

and so

partσ

partx= Vzz

Iy (566)

Substituting this into equation 565 leads to

τv = minus Vz

Iyb2

int z2

zT

bz dz (513)

5102 Thin-walled open cross-sections

A thin-walled open cross-section beam with a shear force Vz parallel to the z prin-cipal axis is shown in Figure 511a It is assumed that the resulting shear stressesact parallel to the walls of the section and are constant across the wall thicknessThe corresponding horizontal shear stresses τv are in equilibrium with the hori-zontal bending stresses σ For the element t times δs times δx shown in Figure 511b thisequilibrium condition reduces to

partσ

partxδxtδs + part(τvt)

partxδsδx = 0

and substitution of equation 566 and integration leads to

τvt = minusVz

Iy

int s

0zt ds (516)

which satisfies the condition that the shear stress is zero at the unstressed boundarys = 0

The direction of the shear stress can be determined from the sign of the right-hand side of equation 516 If this is positive then the direction of the shear stressis the same as the positive direction of s and vice versa The direction of the shearstress may also be determined from the direction of the corresponding horizontalshear force required to keep the out-of-balance bending force in equilibrium asshown for example in Figure 513a Here a horizontal force τvtf δx in the positive xdirection is required to balance the resultant bending force δσ δA (due to the shearforce Vz = dMydx) and so the direction of the corresponding flange shear stressis from the tip of the flange towards its centre

5103 Multi-cell thin-walled closed sections

The shear stress distributions in multi-cell closed sections can be determined byextending the method discussed in Section 544 for single-cell closed sections Ifthe section consists of n junctions connected by m walls then there are (m minus n + 1)independent cells In each wall there is an unknown circulating shear flow τvct

In-plane bending of beams 197

There are (m minus n + 1) independent cell warping continuity conditions of the type(see equation 527)

sumcell

intwall(τG) ds = 0

and (n minus 1) junction equilibrium equations of the typesumjunction

(τ t) = 0

These equations can be solved simultaneously for the m circulating shearflows τvct

511 Appendix ndash plastic analysis of beams

5111 Full plastic moment

The fully plastic stress distribution in a section bent about a y axis of symmetryis antisymmetric about that axis as shown in Figure 537a for a channel sectionexample The plastic neutral axis which divides the cross-section into two equalareas so that there is no axial force resultant of the stress distribution coincides withthe axis of symmetry The moment resultant of the fully plastic stress distribution is

Mpy = fysum

T

Anzn minus fysum

C

Anzn (567)

in which the summationssum

T sum

C are carried out for the tension and com-pression areas of the cross-section respectively Note that zn is negative forthe compression areas of the channel section so that the two summations in

yy

z

z

T

C

T

CT

C

(a) Bending about an axis of symmetry

(b) Bending of a monosymmetric section in a plane of symmetry

(c) Bending of an asymmetric section

b2 times t

b times tf

df times twb times tf

b times tf

df times tw b1 times t

y1 Mpy1

Mpz1

Mp

zp

zp

z1

fyfyfy fy fy

fy

Figure 537 Full plastic moment

198 In-plane bending of beams

equation 567 are additive The plastic section modulus Wply = Mpyfy is obtainedfrom equation 567 as

Wply =sum

T

Anzn minussum

C

Anzn (568)

A worked example of the determination of the full plastic moment of a doublysymmetric I-section is given in Section 51212

The fully plastic stress distribution in a monosymmetric section bent in a planeof symmetry is not antisymmetric as can be seen in Figure 537b for a channelsection example The plastic neutral axis again divides the cross-section into twoequal areas so that there is no axial force resultant but the neutral axis no longerpasses through the centroid of the cross-section The fully plastic moment Mpy

and the plastic section modulus Wply are given by equations 567 and 568 Forconvenience any suitable origin may be used for computing zn Aworked exampleof the determination of the full plastic moment of a monosymmetric tee-section isgiven in Section 51213

The fully plastic stress distribution in an asymmetric section is also not antisym-metric as can be seen in Figure 537c for an angle section example The plasticneutral axis again divides the cross-section into two equal areas The direction ofthe plastic neutral axis is perpendicular to the plane in which the moment resul-tant acts The full plastic moment is given by the vector addition of the momentresultants about any convenient y1 z1 axes so that

Mp = radic(M 2

py1 + M 2pz1) (569)

where Mpy1 is given by an equation similar to equation 567 and Mpz1 isgiven by

Mpz1 = minusfysum

T

Any1n + fysum

C

Any1n (570)

The inclination α of the plastic neutral axis to the y1 axis (and of the plane of thefull plastic moment to the zx plane) can be obtained from

tan α = Mpz1Mpy1 (571)

5112 Built-in beam

51121 General

The built-in beam shown in Figure 530a has two redundancies and so three plastichinges must form before it can be reduced to a collapse mechanism In this casethe only possible plastic hinge locations are at the support points 1 and 4 and at theload points 2 and 3 and so there are two possible mechanisms one with a hinge at

In-plane bending of beams 199

point 2 (Figure 530c) and the other with a hinge at point 3 (Figure 530d) Threedifferent methods of analysing these mechanisms are presented in the followingsub-sections

51122 Equilibrium equation solution

The equilibrium conditions for the beam express the relationships between theapplied loads and the moments at these points These relationships can be obtainedby dividing the beam into the segments shown in Figure 530b and expressing theend shears of each segment in terms of its end moments so that

V12 = (M2 minus M1)(L3)

V23 = (M3 minus M2)(L3)

V34 = (M4 minus M3)(L3)

For equilibrium each applied load must be equal to the algebraic sum of the shearsat the load point in question and so

Q = V12 minus V23 = 1

L(minus3M1 + 6M2 minus 3M3)

2Q = V23 minus V34 = 1

L(minus3M2 + 6M3 minus 3M4)

which can be rearranged as

4QL = minus 6M1 + 9M2 minus 3M4

5QL = minus 3M1 + 9M3 minus 6M4

(572)

If the first mechanism chosen (incorrectly as will be shown later) is that withplastic hinges at points 1 2 and 4 (see Figure 530c) so that

minusM1 = M2 = minusM4 = Mp

then substitution of this into the first of equations 572 leads to 4QL = 18Mp

and so

Qult le 45MpL

If this result is substituted into the second of equations 572 then

M3 = 15 Mp gt Mp

200 In-plane bending of beams

and the plasticity condition is violated The statical method can now be used toobtain a lower bound by reducing Q until M3 = Mp whence

Q = 45Mp

L

M3

Mp= 3Mp

L

and so

3MpL lt Qult lt 45MpL

The true collapse load can be obtained by assuming a collapse mechanismwith plastic hinges at point 3 (the point of maximum moment for the previousmechanism) and at points 1 and 4 For this mechanism

minusM1 = M3 = minusM4 = Mp

and so from the second of equations 572

Qult le 36MpL

If this result is substituted into the first of equations 572 then

M2 = 06Mp lt Mp

and so the plasticity condition is also satisfied Thus

Qult = 36MpL

51123 Graphical solution

A collapse mechanism can be analysed graphically by first plotting the known freemoment diagram (for the applied loading on a statically determinate beam) andthen the reactant bending moment diagram (for the redundant reactions) whichcorresponds to the collapse mechanism

For the built-in beam (Figure 538a) the free moment diagram for a simplysupported beam is shown in Figure 538c It is obtained by first calculating theleft-hand reaction as

RL = (Q times 2L3 + 2Q times L3)L = 4Q3

In-plane bending of beams 201

(+)

L3 L3 L3

4QL9 5QL9

5QL9

321 4

(+)

(-) (-)

(-)Mp MpMp

Mp

(d) Reactant moment diagram(b) Collapse moment diagram

(c) Free moment diagram(a) Built-in beam

Q 2Q

Figure 538 Graphical solution for the plastic collapse of a built-in beam

and then using this to calculate the moments

M2 = (4Q3)times L3 = 4QL9

and

M3 = (4Q3)times 2L3 minus QL3 = 5QL9

Both of the possible collapse mechanisms (Figure 529c and d) require plastichinges at the supports and so the reactant moment diagram is one of uniformnegative bending as shown in Figure 538d When this is combined with the freemoment diagram as shown in Figure 538b it becomes obvious that there must bea plastic hinge at point 3 and not at point 2 and that at collapse

2Mp = 5QultL9

so that

Qult = 36MpL

as before

51124 Virtual work solution

The virtual work principle [4 7 8] can also be used to analyse each mechanismFor the first mechanism shown in Figure 530c the virtual external work done

202 In-plane bending of beams

by the forces Q 2Q during the incremental virtual displacements defined by theincremental virtual rotations δθ and 2δθ shown is given by

δW = Q times (δθ times 2L3)+ 2Q times (δθ times L3) = 4QLδθ3

while the internal work absorbed at the plastic hinge locations during theincremental virtual rotations is given by

δU = Mp times 2δθ + Mp times (2δθ + δθ)+ Mp times δθ = 6Mpδθ

For equilibrium of the mechanism the virtual work principle requires

δW = δU

so that the upper-bound estimate of the collapse load is

Qult le 45MpL

as in Section 51122Similarly for the second mechanism shown in Figure 530d

δW = 5QLδθ3

δU = 6Mpδθ

so that

Qult le 36MpL

once more

5113 Propped cantilever

51131 General

The exact collapse mechanisms for beams with distributed loads are not always aseasily obtained as those for beams with concentrated loads only but sufficientlyaccurate solutions can usually be found without great difficulty Three differentmethods of determining these mechanisms are presented in the following sub-sections for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 531

In-plane bending of beams 203

51132 Equilibrium equation solution

If the plastic hinge is assumed to be at the mid-span of the propped cantilever asshown in Figure 531c (the other plastic hinge must obviously be located at thebuilt-in support) then equilibrium considerations of the left and right segments ofthe beam allow the left and right reactions to be determined from

RLL2 = 2Mp + (qL2)L4

and

RRL2 = Mp + (qL2)L4

while for overall equilibrium

qL = RL + RR

Thus

qL = (4MpL + qL4)+ (2MpL + qL4)

so that

qult le 12MpL2

The left-hand reaction is therefore given by

RL = 4MpL + (12MpL2)L4 = 7MpL

The bending moment variation along the propped cantilever is therefore given by

M = minusMp + (7MpL)x minus (12MpL2)x22

which has a maximum value of 25Mp24gtMp at x = 7L12 Thus the lowerbound is given by

qult ge (12MpL2)(2524) asymp 1152MpL

2

and so

1152Mp

L2lt qult lt

12Mp

L2

If desired a more accurate solution can be obtained by assuming that the hinge islocated at a distance 7L12(= 0583L) from the built-in support (ie at the point

204 In-plane bending of beams

of maximum moment for the previous mechanism) whence

116567Mp

L2lt qult lt

116575Mp

L2

These are very close to the exact solution of

qult = (6 + 4radic

2)MpL2 asymp 116569MpL

2

for which the hinge is located at a distance (2 minus radic2)L asymp 05858L from the built-in

support

51133 Graphical solution

For the propped cantilever of Figure 531 the parabolic free moment diagramfor a simply supported beam is shown in Figure 539c All the possible collapsemechanisms have a plastic hinge at the left-hand support and a frictionless hingeat the right-hand support so that the reactant moment diagram is triangular asshown in Figure 539d A first attempt at combining this with the free momentdiagram so as to produce a trial collapse mechanism is shown in Figure 539b Forthis mechanism the interior plastic hinge occurs at mid-span so that

Mp + Mp2 = qL28

which leads to

q = 12MpL2

as before

q

LRL RR

(+)

Mp ( + ) qL 8

L 2 L 2

Mp

Mp 22

qL 82

Mp

MpMmax

(-)( - )

(d) Reactant moment diagram

(a) Propped cantilever

(b) T ri a l c ol l ap s e m o m e n t d ia gram

(c) Free moment diagram

Figure 539 Graphical analysis of the plastic collapse of a propped cantilever

In-plane bending of beams 205

Figure 539b indicates that in this case the maximum moment occurs to the rightof mid-span and is greater than Mp so that the solution above is an upper boundA more accurate solution can be obtained by trial and error by increasing theslope of the reactant moment diagram until the moment of the left-hand supportis equal to the interior maximum moment as indicated by the dashed line inFigure 539b

51134 Virtual work solution

For the first mechanism for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 531c forvirtual rotations δθ

δW = qL2δθ4

δU = 3Mpδθ

and

qult le 12MpL2

as before

512 Worked examples

5121 Example 1 ndash properties of a plated UB section

Problem The 610 times 229 UB 125 section shown in Figure 540a is strengthened bywelding a 300 mm times 20 mm plate to each flange Determine the section propertiesIy and Wely

Solution Because of the symmetry of the section the centroid of the plated UBis at the web centre Adapting equation 558

Iy = 98 610 + 2 times 300 times 20 times [(6122 + 20)2]2104 = 218 500 cm4

Wely = 218 500[(6122 + 2 times 20)(2 times 10)] = 6701 cm3

5122 Example 2 ndash properties of a tee-section

Problem Determine the section properties Iy and Wely of the welded tee-sectionshown in Figure 540b

206 In-plane bending of beams

80

5

8010

y

zz

y

zpzi

(a) 610 times 229 UB 125

Iy = 98 610 cm4

Wply = 3676 cm3

(b) Tee-section

6122

1 1 9

196229

Figure 540 Worked examples 1 2 and 18

Solution Using the thin-walled assumption and equations 557 and 558

zi = (80 + 52)times 10 times (80 + 52)2

(80 times 5)+ (80 + 52)times 10= 278 mm

Iy = (80 times 5)times 2782 + (8253 times 1012)+ (825 times 10)

times (8252 minus 278)2 mm4

= 9263 cm4

Wely = 9263(825 minus 278)10 = 1693 cm3

Alternatively the equations of Figure 56 may be used

5123 Example 3 ndash properties of an angle section

Problem Determine the properties A Iy1 Iz1 Iy1z1 Iy Iz and α of the thin-walledangle section shown in Figure 541c

Solution Using the thin-walled assumption the angle section is replaced by tworectangles 1425(= 150 minus 152)times 15 and 825(= 90 minus 152)times 15 as shown in

In-plane bending of beams 207

37 mm

967 mm

188 mm

Deflection of tip centroid

(c) Actual cross-section

90 mm

15 mm

15 mm

6 kN15 m

150 90 15unequal angle

A

C

S

6 kN

z

y

93 mm

100 mm

y1

z1

150

mm

Iy = 8426 cm4

Iz = 1205 cm4

=1982o

(a) Cantilever

(b) Section properties(d) Thin-walled section (deflections to different scale)

825 times 15

times times 1425 times 15

Figure 541 Worked examples 3 and 5

Figure 541d If the initial origin is taken at the intersection of the legs and theinitial yi zi axes parallel to the legs then using equations 555 and 557

A = (1425 times 15)+ (825 times 15) = 3375 mm2

yic = (1425 times 15)times 0 + (825 times 15)times (minus8252)3375

= minus151 mm

zic = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252)+ (825 times 15)times 03375

= minus451 mm

Transferring the origin to the centroid and using equations 558

Iy1 = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252 + 451)2 + (14253 times 1512)times sin2 90

+ (825 times 15)times (451)2 + (8253 times 1512)times sin2 180

= 7596 times 106 mm4 = 7596 cm4

208 In-plane bending of beams

Iz1 = (1425 times 15)times (151)2 + (14253 times 1512)times cos2 90

+ (825 times 15)times (minus8252 + 151)2 + (8253 times 1512)times cos2 180

= 2035 times 106 mm4 = 2035 cm4

Iy1z1 = (1425 times 15)times (minus14252 + 451)times 151 + (14253 times 1512)

times sin 90 cos 90 + (825 times 15)times (451)times (minus8252 + 151)

+ (8253 times 1512)times sin 180 cos 180

= minus2303 times 106 mm4 = minus2303 cm4

Using equation 563

tan 2α = minus2 times (minus2303)(7596 minus 2035) = 08283

whence 2α= 3963 and α= 1982Using Figure 530b the Mohrrsquos circle centre is at

(Iy1 + Iz1)2 = (7596 + 2035)2 = 4816 cm4

and the Mohrrsquos circle diameter is

radic(Iy1 minus Iz1)2 + (2Iy1z1)

2 = radic(7596 minus 2035)2 + (2 times 2303)2= 7221 cm4

and so

Iy = 4816 + 72212 = 8426 cm4

Iz = 4816 minus 72212 = 1205 cm4

5124 Example 4 ndash properties of a zed section

Problem Determine the properties Iyl Izl Iylzl Iy Iz and α of the thin-walledZ-section shown in Figure 542aSolution

Iy1 = 2 times (75 times 10 times 752)+ (1503 times 512) = 9844 times 103 mm4

= 9844 cm4

In-plane bending of beams 209

150

50

875

62

5

6 6

6

125

75 100 100505075

1 0

1 0

yy

z

z1

6 6

1

y

z

121 2 3 4

6 5

1 25

4 3

= = 1400 cm4 600 cm4I Iz z

z

yCC

C

150

(b) Pi-section (c) Rectangular hollow section (All dimensions in mm)

(a) Z-section

Figure 542 Worked examples 4 9 10 and 11

Iz1 = 2 times (75 times 10 times 3752)+ 2 times (753 times 1012)

= 2813 times 103 mm4 = 2813 cm4

Iy1z1 = 75 times 10 times 375 times (minus75)+ 75 times 10 times (minus375)times 75

= minus4219 times 103 mm4 = minus4219 cm4

The centre of the Mohrrsquos circle (see Figure 537b) is at

Iy1 + Iz1

2=

[9844 + 2813

2

]= 6328 cm4

The diameter of the circle isradic[(9844 minus 2813)2 + (2 times 4219)2] = 10983 cm4

and so

Iy = (6328 + 109832) = 1182 cm4

Iz = (6328 minus 109832) = 837 cm4

tan 2α = 2 times 4219

(9844 minus 2813)= 1200

α = 251

5125 Example 5 ndash biaxial bending of an anglesection cantilever

Problem Determine the maximum elastic stress and deflection of the angle sectioncantilever shown in Figure 541 whose section properties were determined inSection 5123

210 In-plane bending of beams

Solution for maximum stress The shear centre (see Section 543) load of 6 kNacting in the plane of the long leg of the angle has principal plane components of

6 cos 1982 = 5645 kN parallel to the z axis and

6 sin 1982 = 2034 kN parallel to the y axis

as indicated in Figure 541d These load components cause principal axis momentcomponents at the support of

My = minus5645 times 15 = minus8467 kNm about the y axis and

Mz = +2034 times 15 = +3052 kNm about the z axis

The maximum elastic bending stress occurs at the point A (y1A = 151 mmz1A = minus974 mm) shown in Figure 541d The coordinates of this point can beobtained by using equation 561 as

y = 151 cos 1982 minus 974 sin 1982 = minus188 mm and

z = minus151 sin 1982 minus 974 cos 1982 = minus967 mm

The maximum stress at A can be obtained by using equation 512 as

σmax = (minus8467 times 106)times (minus967)

8426 times 104minus (3052 times 106)times (minus188)

1205 times 104

= 1469 Nmm2

The stresses at the other leg ends should be checked to confirm that the maximumstress is at A

Solution for maximum deflection The maximum deflection occurs at the tip of thecantilever Its components v and w can be calculated using QL33EI Thus

w = (5645 times 103)times (1500)3(3 times 210 000 times 8426 times 104) = 36 mm

and

v = (2034 times 103)times (1500)3(3 times 210 000 times 1205 times 104) = 90 mm

The resultant deflection can be obtained by vector addition as

δ = radic(362 + 902) = 97 mm

Using non-principal plane properties Problems of this type are sometimes incor-rectly analysed on the basis that the plane of loading can be assumed to be a

In-plane bending of beams 211

principal plane When this approach is used the maximum stress calculated forthe cantilever is

σmax = (6 times 103)times 1500 times (974)7596 times 104 = 115 Nmm2

which seriously underestimates the correct value by more than 20 The correctnon-principal plane formulations which are needed to solve the example in thisway are given in Section 582 The use of these formulations should be avoidedsince their excessive complication makes them very error-prone The much simplerprincipal plane formulations of equations 59ndash512 should be used instead

It should be noted that in this book y and z are reserved exclusively for theprincipal axis directions instead of also being used for the directions parallel tothe legs

5126 Example 6 ndash shear stresses in an I-section

Problem Determine the shear flow distribution and the maximum shear stress inthe I-section shown in Figure 512a

Solution Applying equation 516 to the left-hand half of the top flange

τvtf = minus(VzIy)

int sf

0(minusdf 2)tf dsf = (VzIy)df tf sf 2

which is linear as shown in Figure 512bAt the flange web junction (τvtf )12 = (VzIy)df tf b4 which is positive and

so the shear flow acts into the flangendashweb junction as shown in Figure 512aSimilarly for the right-hand half of the top flange (τvtf )23 = (VzIy)df tf b4 andagain the shear flow acts in to the flangendashweb junction

For horizontal equilibrium at the flangendashweb junction the shear flow from thejunction into the web is obtained from equation 520 as

(τvtw)24 = (VzIy)df tf b4 + (VzIy)df tf b4 = (VzIy)df tf b2

Adapting equation 516 for the web

τvtw = (VzIy)(df tf b2)minus (VzIy)

int sw

0(minusdf 2 + sw)twdsw

= (VzIy)(df tf b2)+ (VzIy)(df sw2 minus s2w2)tw

which is parabolic as shown in Figure 512b At the web centre (τvtw)df 2 =(VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2

f tw8) which is the maximum shear flowAt the bottom of the web

(τvtw)df = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw2 minus d2

f tw2)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2) = (τvtw)24

which provides a symmetry check

212 In-plane bending of beams

The maximum shear stress is

(τv)df 2 = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw8)tw

A vertical equilibrium check is provided by finding the resultant of the web shearflow as

Vw =int df

0(τvtw)dsw

= (VzIy)[df tf bsw2 + df tws2w4 minus s3

wtw6]df

0

= (VzIy)(d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12)

= Vz

when Iy = d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12 is substituted

5127 Example 7 ndash shear stress in a channel section

Problem Determine the shear flow distribution in the channel section shown inFigure 514

Solution Applying equation 515 to the top flange

τvtf = minus(VzIy)

int sf

0(minusdf 2)tf dsf = (VzIy)df tf sf 2

(τvtf )b = (VzIy)df tf b2

τvtw = (VzIy)(df tf b2 minusint sw

0(minusdf 2 + sw)twdsw)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2 + df swtw2 minus s2wtw2)

(τvtw)df = (VzIy)(df tf b2 + d2f tw2 minus d2

f tw2)

= (VzIy)(df tf b2) = (τvtf )b

which provides a symmetry checkA vertical equilibrium check is provided by finding the resultant of the web

flows as

Vw =int df

0(τvtw)dsw

= (VzIy)[df tf bsw2 + df s2wtw4 minus s3

wtw6]df

0

= (VzIy)(d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12)

= Vz

when Iy = d2f tf b2 + d3

f tw12 is substituted

In-plane bending of beams 213

5128 Example 8 ndash shear centre of a channel section

Problem Determine the position of the shear centre of the channel section shownin Figure 514

Solution The shear flow distribution in the channel section was analysed inSection 5127 and is shown in Figure 514a The resultant flange shear forcesshown in Figure 514b are obtained from

Vf =int b

0(τvtf )dsf

= (VzIy)[df tf s2f 4]b

0

= (VzIy)(df tf b24)

while the resultant web shear force is Vw = Vz (see Section 5127)These resultant shear forces are statically equivalent to a shear force Vz acting

through the point S which is a distance

a = Vf df

Vw= d2

f tf b2

4Iyfrom the web and so

y0 = d2f tf b2

4Iy+ b2tf

2btf + df tw

5129 Example 9 ndash shear stresses in a pi-section

Problem The pi shaped section shown in Figure 542b has a shear force of 100kN acting parallel to the y axis Determine the shear stress distribution

Solution Using equation 523 the shear flow in the segment 12 is

(τh times 12)12 = minus100 times 103

1400 times 104

int s1

0(minus100 + s1)times 12 times ds1

whence (τh)12 = 0007143 times (100s1 minus s212) Nmm2

Similarly the shear flow in the segment 62 is

(τh times 6)62 = minus100 times 103

1400 times 104

int s6

0(minus50)times 6 times ds1

whence (τh)62 = 0007143 times (50s6) Nmm2

214 In-plane bending of beams

For horizontal equilibrium of the longitudinal shear forces at the junction 2 theshear flows in the segments 12 62 and 23 must balance (equation 520) and so

[(τh times 12)23]s3=0 = [(τh times 12)12]s1=50 + [(τh times 6)62]s6=200

= 0007143

[(100 times 50 minus 502

2

)times 12 + 50 times 200 times 6

]

= 0007143 times 8750

The shear flow in the segment 23 is

(τh times 12)23 = 0007143 times 12 times 8750 minus 100 times 103

1400 times 104

timesint s2

0(minus50 + s2)times 12 times ds2

whence (τh)23 = 0007143(8750 + 50s2 minus s222) Nmm2

As a check the resultant of the shear stresses in the segments 12 23 and 34 is

intτhtds = 2 times 0007143 times 12

int 50

0(100s1 minus s2

12)ds1

+ 0007143 times 12 timesint 100

0(8750 + 50s2 minus s2

22)ds2

= 0007143 times 122 times (100 times 5022 minus 5036)

+ (8750 times 100 + 50 times 10022 minus 10036)N= 100 kN

which is equal to the shear force

51210 Example 10 ndash shear centre of a pi-section

Problem Determine the position of the shear centre of the pi section shown inFigure 542b

Solution The resultant of the shear stresses in the segment 62 is

intτhtds = 0007143 times 6

int 200

0(50s6)times ds6

= 0007143 times 6 times 50 times 20022 N

= 4286 kN

The resultant of the shear stresses in the segment 53 is equal and opposite to this

In-plane bending of beams 215

The torque about the centroid exerted by the shear stresses is equal to the sumof the torques of the force in the flange 1234 and the forces in the webs 62 and 53Thus

intAτhtρds = (100 times 50)+ (2 times 4286 times 50) = 9286 kNmm

For the applied shear to be statically equivalent to the shear stresses it must exertan equal torque about the centroid and so

minus100 times z0 = 9286

whence z0 = minus929 mmBecause of symmetry the shear centre lies on the z axis and so y0 = 0

51211 Example 11 ndash shear stresses in a box section

Problem The rectangular box section shown in Figure 542c has a shear force of100 kN acting parallel to the y axis Determine the maximum shear stress

Solution If initially a slit is assumed at point 1 on the axis of symmetry so that(τ hot)1 = 0 then

(τhot)12 = minus100 times 103

6 times 106

int s1

0s1 times 12 times ds1 = minus01s2

1

(τhot)2 = minus01 times 502 = minus01 times 2500 Nmm

(τhot)23 = minus01 times 2500 minus 100 times 103

6 times 106

int s2

050 times 6 times ds2

= minus01(2500 + 50s2)

(τhot)3 = minus01(2500 + 50 times 150) = minus01 times 10 000 Nmm

(τhot)34 = minus01 times 10 000 minus 100 times 103

6 times 106

int s3

0(50 minus s3)times 6 times ds3

= minus01[10 000 + (50s3 minus s232)]

(τhot)4 = minus01[10 000 + (50 times 100 minus 10022)] = minus01 times 10 000 Nmm

= (τhot)3 which is a symmetry check

The remainder of the shear stress distribution can therefore be obtained bysymmetry

216 In-plane bending of beams

The circulating shear flow τ hct can be determined by adapting equation 530For this∮

τhods = 2 times (01 times 5033)12

+ 2 times (minus01)times (2500 times 150 + 50 times 15022)6

+ (minus01)times (10 000 times 100 + 50 times 10022 minus 10036)6

= (minus01)times (6 000 000)12 Nmm∮1

tds = 100

12+ 150

6+ 100

6+ 150

6

= 90012

Thus

τhct = (minus01)times (6 000 000)

12times 12

900

= 66667 Nmm

The maximum shear stress occurs at the centre of the segment 34 and adaptingequation 529

(τh)max = minus01 times (10 000 + 50 times 50 minus 5022)+ 66676 Nmm2

= minus764 Nmm2

51212 Example 12 ndash fully plastic moment of a plated UB

Problem A 610 times 229 UB 125 beam (Figure 540a) of S275 steel is strengthenedby welding a 300 mm times 20 mm plate of S275 steel to each flange Compare thefull plastic moments of the unplated and the plated sections

Unplated section

For tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Mplu = fyWply = 265 times 3676 times 103 Nmm = 974 kNm

Plated section

For tp = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Because of the symmetry of the cross-section the plastic neutral axis is at thecentroid Adapting equation 567

Mplp = 974 + 2 times 265 times (300 times 20)times (61222 + 202)106 kNm

= 1979 kNm asymp 2 times Mplu

In-plane bending of beams 217

51213 Example 13 ndash fully plastic moment of a tee-section

Problem The welded tee-section shown in Figure 540b is fabricated from twoS275 steel plates Compare the first yield and fully plastic moments

First yield moment The minimum elastic section modulus was determined inSection 5122 as

Wely = 1693 cm3

For tmax = 10 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

Mely = fyWely = 275 times 1693 times 103 Nmm = 4656 kNm

Full plastic moment For the plastic neutral axis to divide the cross-section intotwo equal areas then using the thin-walled assumption leads to

(80 times 5)+ (zp times 10) = (825 minus zp)times 10

so that zp = (825 times 10 minus 80 times 5)(2 times 10) = 213 mmUsing equation 567

Mply = 275 times [(80 times 5)times 213 + (213 times 10)times 2132

+ (825 minus 213)2 times 102] Nmm

= 8117 kNm

Alternatively the section properties Wely and Wply can be calculated usingFigure 56 and used to calculate Mely and Mply

51214 Example 14 ndash plastic collapse of a non-uniform beam

Problem The two-span continuous beam shown in Figure 543a is a 610 times 229UB 125 of S275 steel with 2 flange plates 300 mm times 20 mm of S275 steelextending over a central length of 12 m Determine the value of the applied loadsQ at plastic collapse

Solution The full plastic moments of the beam (unplated and plated) weredetermined in Section 51212 as Mplu = 974 kNm and Mplp = 1979 kNm

The bending moment diagram is shown in Figure 543b Two plastic collapsemechanisms are possible both with a plastic hinge (minusMplp) at the central supportFor the first mechanism (Figure 543c) plastic hinges (Mplp) occur in the platedbeam at the load points but for the second mechanism (Figure 543d) plastichinges (Mplu) occur in the unplated beam at the changes of cross-section

218 In-plane bending of beams

Q Q

M M Mpu pp pu

Q 9 6 4

(a) C o n t in u ou s b ea m (le n g t h s

(b) Bending moment

Mpp Mpp

Mpu Mpu

96

48

96

36Mpp

(c) First me chanism

(d) Second mechanism

Mpp

times

36 12 48 3 61248

(+ ) ( + ) ( )ndash

m )i n

Figure 543 Worked example 14

For the first mechanism shown in Figure 543c inspection of the bendingmoment diagram shows that

Mplp + Mplp2 = Q1 times 964

so that

Q1 = (3 times 19792)times 496 = 1237 kN

For the second mechanism shown in Figure 543d inspection of the bendingmoment diagram shows that

Mplu + 36Mplp96 = (3648)times Q2 times 964

so that

Q2 = [974 + (3696)times 1979] times (4836)times 496 = 954 kN

which is less than Q1 = 1237 kNThus plastic collapse occurs at Q = 954 kN by the second mechanism

51215 Example 15 ndash checking a simply supported beam

Problem The simply supported 610 times 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown inFigure 544a has a span of 60 m and is laterally braced at 15 m intervals Checkthe adequacy of the beam for a nominal uniformly distributed dead load of 60 kNmtogether with a nominal uniformly distributed imposed load of 70 kNm

In-plane bending of beams 219

4 1 5 = 6 0 m h

pl

bftf

tw

3 0 m

qD = 60 kNm qI = 70 kNm

QD = 40 kNQI

qD = 20 kNm

qI = 10 kNm

(a) Examples 15 17 and 18

(c) Example 16

bf = 229 mm A = 159 cm2

h = 6122 mm Iz = 3932 cm4

tf = 196 mm i z = 497 mmtw = 119 mm W y = 3676 cm3

r = 127 mm

(b) 610 229 UB 125

= 120 kN

times

Figure 544 Worked examples 15ndash18

Classifying the section

tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε =radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cf (tf ε) = (2292 minus 1192 minus 127)(196 times 0942) T52

= 519 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = (6122 minus 2 times 196 minus 2 times 127)(119 times 0942) T52

= 489 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

(Note the general use of the minimum fy obtained for the flange)

Checking for moment

qEd = (135 times 60)+ (15 times 70) = 186 kNm

MEd = 186 times 628 = 837 kNm

McRd = 3676 times 103 times 26510 Nmm 625

= 974 kNm gt 837 kNm = MEd

which is satisfactory

220 In-plane bending of beams

Checking for lateral bracing

if z =radic

2293 times 19612

229 times 196 + (6122 minus 2 times 196)times 1196= 591 mm 6324

kcLc(if zλ1) = 10 times 1500(591 times 939 times 0942) = 0287 6324

λc0McRdMEd = 04 times 974837 = 0465 gt 0287 6324

and the bracing is satisfactory

Checking for shear

VEd = 186 times 62 = 558 kN

Av = 159 times 102 minus 2 times 229 times 196 + (119 + 2 times 127)times 196

= 7654 mm2 626(3)

VcRd = 7654 times (265radic

3)10 N = 1171 kN gt 558 kN = VEd 626(2)

which is satisfactory

Checking for bending and shear The maximum MEd occurs at mid-span whereVEd = 0 and the maximum VEd occurs at the support where MEd = 0 and so thereis no need to check for combined bending and shear (Note that in any case 05VcRd = 05 times 1171 = 5855 kN gt 558 kN = VEd and so the combined bendingand shear condition does not operate)

Checking for bearing

REd = 186 times 62 = 558 kN

tw = 119 fyw = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

hw = 6122 minus 2 times 196 = 5730 mm

Assume (ss + c) = 100 mm which is not difficult to achieve

kF = 2 + 6 times 1005730 = 3047 EC3-1-5 61(4)(c)

Fcr = 09 times 3047 times 210 000 times 11935730 N = 1694 kNEC3-1-5 64(1)

m1 = (265 times 229)(275 times 119) = 1854 EC3-1-5 65(1)

m2 = 002 times (5727196)2 = 1709 if λF gt 05 EC3-1-5 65(1)

In-plane bending of beams 221

e = 3047 times 210 000 times 1192(2 times 275 times 5730) = 2875 gt 100EC3-1-5 65(3)

y1 = 100 + 196 times radic(18542 + (100196)2 + 1709) = 2419

EC3-1-5 65(3)

y2 = 100 + 196 times radic(1854 + 1709) = 2170 lt 2419 EC3-1-5 65(3)

y = 2170 mm EC3-1-5 65(3)

λF =radic

2170 times 119 times 275

1694 times 103= 0648 gt 05 EC3-1-5 64(1)

χF = 050648 = 0772 EC3-1-5 62

Leff = 0772 times 2170 = 1676 mm EC3-1-5 62

FRd = 275 times 1676 times 11910 N = 548 kN EC3-1-5 62

lt 558 kN = REd and so the assumed value of (ss + c) = 100 mm

is inadequate

51216 Example 16 ndash designing a cantilever

Problem A 30 m long cantilever has the nominal imposed and dead loads (whichinclude allowances for self weight) shown in Figure 544c Design a suitable UBsection in S275 steel if the cantilever has sufficient bracing to prevent lateralbuckling

Selecting a trial section

MEd = 135 times (40 times 3 + 20 times 322)+ 15 times (120 times 3 + 10 times 322)

= 891 kNm

Assume that fy = 265 MPa and that the section is Class 2

Wply ge MEdfy = 891 times 106265 mm3 = 3362 cm3 625

Choose a 610 times 229 UB 125 with Wply = 3676 cm3 gt 3362 cm3

Checking the trial section The trial section must now be checked by classifyingthe section and checking for moment shear moment and shear and bearing Thisprocess is similar to that used in Section 51215 for checking a simply supportedbeam If the section chosen fails any of the checks then a new section must bechosen

222 In-plane bending of beams

51217 Example 17 ndash checking a plastically analysed beam

Problem Check the adequacy of the non-uniform beam shown in Figure 543and analysed plastically in Section 51214 The beam and its flange plates areof S275 steel and the concentrated loads have nominal dead load components of250 kN (which include allowances for self weight) and imposed load componentsof 400 kN

Classifying the sections The 610 times 229 UB 125 was found to be Class 1 inSection 51215For the 300 times 20 plate tp = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε= radic(235265)= 0942 T52

For the 300 times 20 plate as two outstands

cp(tpε) = (3002)(196 times 0942) T52

= 813 lt 9 and the outstands are Class 1 T52

For the internal element of the 300 times 20 plate

cp(tpε) = 229(20 times 0942) T52

= 122 lt 33 and the internal element is Class 1 T52

Checking for plastic collapse The design loads are QEd = (135 times 250)+ (15 times400)= 9375 kN

The plastic collapse load based on the nominal full plastic moments of thebeam was calculated in Section 51214 as

Q = 954 kN gt 9375 kN = QEd

and so the resistance appears to be adequate

Checking for lateral bracing For the unplated segment

Lstable = (60 minus 40 times 0)times 0924 times 497 times 10 = 2808 mm 6353

Thus a brace should be provided at the change of section (a plastic hinge location)and a second brace between this and the support

For the plated segment

iz =radic

(3932 times 104)+ (2 times 3003 times 2012)

(159 times 102)+ (2 times 300 times 20)

= 681 mm

and so

Lstable = 60 minus 40 times 974(minus1979) times 0924 times 681 = 5109 mm 6353

Thus a single brace should be provided in the plated segment A satisfactorylocation is at the load point

In-plane bending of beams 223

Checking for shear Under the collapse loads Q = 954 kN the end reactions are

RE = (954times48)minus197996 = 2706 kN

and the central reaction is

RC = 2 times 954 minus 2 times 2706 = 1366 kN

so that the maximum shear at collapse is

V = 13662 = 683 kN

From Section 51215 the design shear resistance is VcRd = 1171 kNgt 683 kNwhich is satisfactory

Checking for bending and shear At the central support V = 683 kN and

05 VcRd = 05 times 1171 = 586 kNlt 683 kN

and so there is a reduction in the full plastic moment Mpp This reduction is from1979 kNm to 1925 kNm (after using Clause 628(3) of EC3) The plastic collapseload is reduced to 942 kNgt 9375 kN = QEd and so the resistance is adequate

Checking for bearing Web stiffeners are required for beams analysed plasticallywithin h2 of all plastic hinge points where the design shear exceeds 10 of theweb capacity or 01 times 1171 = 1171 kN (Clause 56(2b) of EC3) Thus stiffenersare required at the hinge locations at the points of cross-section change and at theinterior support Load-bearing stiffeners should also be provided at the points ofconcentrated load but are not required at the outer supports (see Section 51215)An example of the design of load-bearing stiffeners is given in Section 499

51218 Example 18 ndash serviceability of a simplysupported beam

Problem Check the imposed load deflection of the 610 times 220 UB 125 ofFigure 544a for a serviceability limit of L360

Solution The central deflection wc of a simply supported beam with uniformlydistributed load q can be calculated using

wc = 5qL4

384EIy= 5 times 70 times 60004

384 times 210 000 times 98 610 times 104= 57 mm (573)

(The same result can be obtained using Figure 53)L360 = 6000360 = 167 mmgt 57 mm = wc and so the beam is satisfactory

224 In-plane bending of beams

513 Unworked examples

5131 Example 19 ndash section properties

Determine the principal axis properties Iy Iz of the half box section shown inFigure 545a

5132 Example 20 ndash elastic stresses and deflections

The box section beam shown in Figure 545b is to be used as a simply supportedbeam over a span of 200 m The erection procedure proposed is to fabricate thebeam as two half boxes (the right half as in Figure 545a) to erect them separatelyand to pull them together before making the longitudinal connections between theflanges The total construction load is estimated to be 10 kNm times 20 m

(a) Determine the maximum elastic bending stress and deflection of onehalf box

(b) Determine the horizontal distributed force required to pull the two half boxestogether

(c) Determine the maximum elastic bending stress and deflection after the halfboxes are pulled together

10

16

2020

20

20

30

20

2020

25

400 200 100 200200 200800

1000 1000

1000

500

600

300

800400

25

(a) Half box section(c) I-section with

off-centre web(b) Box section

(d) Monosymmetric I-section

4500

(e) Propped cantilever

QD =150 kN

Q = 200 kNI

qD = 50 kNm

q = 20 kNmI

1500

20

Figure 545 Unworked examples

In-plane bending of beams 225

5133 Example 21 ndash shear stresses

Determine the shear stress distribution caused by a vertical shear force of 500 kNin the section shown in Figure 545c

5134 Example 22 ndash shear centre

Determine the position of the shear centre of the section shown in Figure 545c

5135 Example 23 ndash shear centre of a box section

Determine the shear flow distribution caused by a horizontal shear force of 2000 kNin the box section shown in Figure 545b and determine the position of its shearcentre

5136 Example 24 ndash plastic moment of a monosymmetricI-section

Determine the fully plastic moment and the shape factor of the monosymmetricI-beam shown in Figure 545d if the yield stress is 265 Nmm2

5137 Example 25 ndash elastic design

Determine a suitable hot-rolled I-section member of S275 steel for the proppedcantilever shown in Figure 545e by using the elastic method of design

5138 Example 26 ndash plastic collapse analysis

Determine the plastic collapse mechanism of the propped cantilever shown inFigure 545e

5139 Example 27 ndash plastic design

Use the plastic design method to determine a suitable hot-rolled I-section of S275steel for the propped cantilever shown in Figure 545e

References

1 Popov EP (1968) Introduction to Mechanics of Solids Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

2 Hall AS (1984) An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids 2nd edition John WileySydney

3 Pippard AJS and Baker JF (1968) The Analysis of Engineering Structures4th edition Edward Arnold London

226 In-plane bending of beams

4 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

5 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs New Jersey

6 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 2nd editionPergamon Press Oxford

7 Ghali A Neville AM and Brown TG (1997) Structural Analysis ndash A UnifiedClassical and Matrix Approach 5th edition Routledge Oxford

8 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1990) Structural Analysis 3rd editionVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham

9 British Standards Institution (2005) BS4-12005 Structural Steel Sections ndash Part1Specification for hot-rolled sections BSI London

10 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1981) Bending shear and torsion of thin-walled beamsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 15(1) pp 2ndash18

11 Hancock GJ and Harrison HB (1972) A general method of analysis of stressesin thin-walled sections with open and closed parts Civil Engineering TransactionsInstitution of Engineers Australia CE14 No 2 pp 181ndash8

12 Papangelis JP and Hancock GJ (1995) THIN-WALL ndash Cross-section Analysisand Finite Strip Buckling Analysis of Thin-Walled Structures Centre for AdvancedStructural Engineering University of Sydney

13 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

14 Winter G (1940) Stress distribution in and equivalent width of flanges of wide thin-walled steel beams Technical Note 784 NationalAdvisory Committee forAeronautics

15 Abdel-Sayed G (1969) Effective width of steel deck-plates in bridges Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 95 No ST7 pp 1459ndash74

16 Malcolm DJ and Redwood RG (1970) Shear lag in stiffened box girders Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST7 pp 1403ndash19

17 Kristek V (1983) Shear lag in box girders Plated Structures Stability and Strength(ed R Narayanan) Applied Science Publishers London pp 165ndash94

18 Baker JF and Heyman J (1969) Plastic Design of Frames ndash 1 FundamentalsCambridge University Press Cambridge

19 Heyman J (1971) Plastic Design of Frames ndash 2 Applications Cambridge UniversityPress Cambridge

20 Horne MR (1978) Plastic Theory of Structures 2nd edition Pergamon Press Oxford21 Neal BG (1977) The Plastic Methods of Structural Analysis 3rd edition Chapman

and Hall London22 Beedle LS (1958) Plastic Design of Steel Frames John Wiley New York23 Horne MR and Morris LJ (1981) Plastic Design of Low-rise frames Granada

London24 Davies JM and Brown BA (1996) Plastic Design to BS5950 Blackwell Science

Ltd Oxford25 British Standards Institution (2006) Eυρoχoδε 3 ndash Design of Steel Structures ndash Part

1ndash5 Plated structural elements BSI London

Chapter 6

Lateral buckling of beams

61 Introduction

In the discussion given in Chapter 5 of the in-plane behaviour of beams it wasassumed that when a beam is loaded in its stiffer principal plane it deflects only inthat plane If the beam does not have sufficient lateral stiffness or lateral supportto ensure that this is so then it may buckle out of the plane of loading as shown inFigure 61 The load at which this buckling occurs may be substantially less thanthe beamrsquos in-plane load resistance as indicated in Figure 62

For an idealised perfectly straight elastic beam there are no out-of-plane defor-mations until the applied moment M reaches the elastic buckling moment Mcr when the beam buckles by deflecting laterally and twisting as shown in Figure 61These two deformations are interdependent when the beam deflects laterally theapplied moment has a component which exerts a torque about the deflected longi-tudinal axis which causes the beam to twist This behaviour which is important forlong unrestrained I-beams whose resistances to lateral bending and torsion are lowis called elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling (referred to as elastic lateralndashtorsionalbuckling in EC3) In this chapter it will simply be referred to as lateral buckling

The failure of a perfectly straight slender beam is initiated when the additionalstresses induced by elastic buckling cause the first yield However a perfectlystraight beam of intermediate slenderness may yield before the elastic bucklingmoment is reached because of the combined effects of the in-plane bendingstresses and any residual stresses and may subsequently buckle inelastically asindicated in Figure 62 For very stocky beams the inelastic buckling momentmay be higher than the in-plane plastic collapse moment Mp in which case themoment resistance of the beam is not affected by lateral buckling

In this chapter the behaviour and design of beams which fail by lateral bucklingand yielding are discussed It is assumed that local buckling of the compressionflange or of the web (which is dealt with in Chapter 4) does not occur The behaviourand design of beams bent about both principal axes and of beams with axial loadsare discussed in Chapter 7

228 Lateral buckling of beams

Figure 61 Lateral buckling of a cantilever

62 Elastic beams

621 Buckling of straight beams

6211 Simply supported beams with equal end moments

A perfectly straight elastic I-beam which is loaded by equal and opposite endmoments is shown in Figure 63 The beam is simply supported at its ends sothat lateral deflection and twist rotation are prevented while the flange ends arefree to rotate in horizontal planes so that the beam ends are free to warp (seeSection 1083) The beam will buckle at a moment Mcr when a deflected andtwisted equilibrium position such as that shown in Figure 63 is possible It isshown in Section 61211 that this position is given by

v = Mcr

π2EIzL2φ = δ sin

πx

L (61)

Lateral buckling of beams 229

Full plasticity M = Mp

Beams without residual stresses

Welded beams with residual stresses

MM

L

Elastic bucklingStrain-hardening

14

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Slenderness ratio Liz

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

mom

ent M

My

Hot-rolled beams with residual stresses (see Fig 39)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Figure 62 Lateral buckling strengths of simply supported I-beams

v

L

x

dvdx

v

z

(d) Plan on longitudinal axis

(b) Part plan

y

McrMcr

(a) Elevation

Pins prevent end twist rotation (f = 0) and allow end warping (f = 0)

(c) Section

f

Figure 63 Buckling of a simply supported beam

where δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that the elasticbuckling moment is given by

Mcr = Mzx (62)

230 Lateral buckling of beams

where

Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2

) (63)

and in which EIz is the minor axis flexural rigidity GIt is the torsional rigidityand EIw is the warping rigidity of the beam Equation 63 shows that the resistanceto buckling depends on the geometric mean of the flexural stiffness EIz and thetorsional stiffness (GIt + π2EIwL2) Equations 62 and 63 apply to all beamswhich are bent about an axis of symmetry including equal flanged channels andequal angles

Equation 63 ignores the effects of the major axis curvature d2wdx2 =minusMcrEIy and produces conservative estimates of the elastic buckling momentequal to radic[(1minusEIzEIy)1minus (GIt +π2EIwL2)2EIy] times the true value Thiscorrection factor which is just less than unity for many beam sections but may besignificantly less than unity for column sections is usually neglected in designNevertheless its value approaches zero as Iz approaches Iy so that the true elasticbuckling moment approaches infinity Thus an I-beam in uniform bending aboutits weak axis does not buckle which is intuitively obvious Research [1] has indi-cated that in some other cases the correction factor may be close to unity and thatit is prudent to ignore the effect of major axis curvature

6212 Beams with unequal end moments

A simply supported beam with unequal major axis end moments M and βmM isshown in Figure 64a It is shown in Section 61212 that the value of the end

L

Mom

ent

f

acto

r m

3

2

1

M

mM

m M

M

(a) Beam

(b) Bending moment (c) Moment factors m

End moment ratio m

Equation 66

Equation 65

K = 30

K = 005

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

Figure 64 Buckling of beams with unequal end moments

Lateral buckling of beams 231

moment Mcr at elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling can be expressed in the form of

Mcr = αmMzx (64)

in which the moment modification factor αm which accounts for the effect ofthe non-uniform distribution of the major axis bending moment can be closelyapproximated by

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (65)

or by

1αm = 057 minus 033βm + 010β2m ge 043 (66)

These approximations form the basis of a very simple method of predicting thebuckling of the segments of a beam which is loaded only by concentrated loadsapplied through transverse members preventing local lateral deflection and twistrotation In this case each segment between load points may be treated as a beamwith unequal end moments and its elastic buckling moment may be estimated byusing equation 64 and either equation 65 or 66 and by taking L as the segmentlength Each buckling moment so calculated corresponds to a particular bucklingload parameter for the complete load set and the lowest of these parameters givesa conservative approximation of the actual buckling load parameter This simplemethod ignores any buckling interactions between the segments A more accuratemethod which accounts for these interactions is discussed in Section 682

6213 Beams with central concentrated loads

A simply supported beam with a central concentrated load Q acting at a distanceminuszQ above the centroidal axis of the beam is shown in Figure 65a When the beambuckles by deflecting laterally and twisting the line of action of the load moveswith the central cross-section but remains vertical as shown in Figure 65c Thecase when the load acts above the centroid is more dangerous than that of centroidalloading because of the additional torque minusQ zQφL2 which increases the twistingof the beam and decreases its resistance to buckling

It is shown in Section 61213 that the dimensionless buckling loadQL2

radic(EIzGIt) varies as shown in Figure 66 with the beam parameter

K = radic(π2EIwGItL

2) (67)

and the dimensionless height ε of the point of application of the load given by

ε = zQ

L

radic(EIz

GIt

) (68)

232 Lateral buckling of beams

Q(vndashzQf)L2

2

After buckling

Q

x

v

d

d

x

vx

d

d

Before buckling

Qndash zQfL2

zQfL2

fL2

nL2

vL2v

x

Q2

L2 L2

ndashzQ

(b) Plan on longitudinal axis

(c) Section at mid-span(a) Elevation

QQ

ndash

ndashzQ

Figure 65 I-beam with a central concentrated load

= (zQL) (EIzGIt)

= 06

03

0ndash03

ndash06

ndash1

0

2zQdf = 1

Centroid

Approximate equation 64 with m = 135

80

60

40

20

0

Beam parameter K = (2EIwGItL2)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

QL

2 radic(E

I zG

I t)

Top flange

Bottom flange

0 05 10 15 20 25 30

radic

Figure 66 Elastic buckling of beams with central concentrated loads

For centroidal loading (ε = 0) the elastic buckling load Q increases with thebeam parameter K in much the same way as does the buckling moment of beams

Lateral buckling of beams 233

with equal and opposite end moments (see equation 63) The elastic buckling load

Qcr = 4McrL (69)

can be approximated by using equation 64 with the moment modification factorαm (which accounts for the effect of the non-uniform distribution of major axisbending moment) equal to 135

The elastic buckling load also varies with the load height parameter ε andalthough the resistance to buckling is high when the load acts below the cen-troidal axis it decreases significantly as the point of application rises as shown inFigure 66 For equal flanged I-beams the parameter ε can be transformed into

2zQ

df= π

Kε (610)

where df is the distance between flange centroids The variation of the bucklingload with 2zQdf is shown by the solid lines in Figure 66 and it can be seen that thedifferences between top (2zQdf = minus1) and bottom (2zQdf = 1) flange loadingincrease with the beam parameter K This effect is therefore more important fordeep beam-type sections of short span than for shallow column-type sections oflong span Approximate expressions for the variations of the moment modifica-tion factor αm with the beam parameter K which account for the dimensionlessload height 2zQdf for equal flanged I-beams are given in [2] Alternatively themaximum moment at elastic buckling Mcr = QL4 may be approximated by using

Mcr

Mzx= αm

radic[1 +

(04αmzQNcrz

Mzx

)2]

+ 04αmzQNcrz

Mzx

(611)

and αm asymp 135 in which

Ncrz = π2EIzL2 (612)

6214 Other loading conditions

The effect of the distribution of the applied load along the length of a simplysupported beam on its elastic buckling strength has been investigated numericallyby many methods including those discussed in [3ndash5] A particularly powerfulcomputer method is the finite element method [6ndash10] while the finite integralmethod [11 12] which allows accurate numerical solutions of the coupled minoraxis bending and torsion equations to be obtained has been used extensively Manyparticular cases have been studied [13ndash16] and tabulations of elastic bucklingloads are available [2 3 5 13 15 17] as is a user-friendly computer program[18] for analysing elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling

Some approximate solutions for the maximum moments Mcr at elastic bucklingof simply supported beams which are loaded along their centroidal axes can beobtained from equation 64 by using the moment modification factors αm givenin Figure 67 It can be seen that the more dangerous loadings are those which

234 Lateral buckling of beams

M

Beam Moment distribution Range

M

q

M

m

m

Mm

QQ

2a

a

Q

Q

L2 L2

Q

L2 L2

QLm16

3 QL16m3

QLm QL8m

qLm

mqL2

qLm qL212m

QLm

qL2m

----- -----------

8--------- ------

8-- ---- ---- ---------------

q

12--------- --------

12------- -----------

M

QL2

--------(1ndash )L2a------

QL4

-------- 2

QL4

--------(1ndash 3 8)m

QL4

--------(1ndash

qL8

8

-------- (1ndash2

2

qL8

-------- (12

8-- -------- ---- --

1ndash(2 ) aL

2)m

4)m

ndash 3)m2

175 +105 m+ 03m2

25

ndash1 le m le 0606 le m le 1

0 le m le 0909 le m le 1

0 le m le 0707 le m le 1

0 le m le 075075le m le 1

0 le m le1

0 le 2aL le 1

0 le 2aL le 1

10 + 035(1ndash2aL)2

135 + 04(2aL)2

135 + 015mndash12 + 30m

113 + 010mndash125 + 35m

113 + 012mndash238 + 48m

135 + 036m

Figure 67 Moment modification factors for simply supported beams

produce more nearly constant distributions of major axis bending moment andthat the worst case is that of equal and opposite end moments for which αm = 10

For other beam loadings than those shown in Figure 67 the momentmodification factor αm may be approximated by using

αm = 175Mmaxradic(M 2

2 + M 23 + M 2

4 )le 25 (613)

in which Mmax is the maximum moment M2 M4 are the moments at the quarterpoints and M3 is the moment at the mid-point of the beam

The effect of load height on the elastic buckling moment Mcr may generallybe approximated by using equation 611 with αm obtained from Figure 67 orequation 613

622 Bending and twisting of crooked beams

Real beams are not perfectly straight but have small initial crookednesses andtwists which cause them to bend and twist at the beginning of loading If a simplysupported beam with equal and opposite end moments M has an initial crookednessand twist rotation which are given by

v0

δ0= φ0

θ0= sin

πx

L (614)

Lateral buckling of beams 235

in which the central initial crookedness δ0 and twist rotation θ0 are related by

δ0

θ0= Mzx

π2EIzL2 (615)

then the deformations of the beam are given by

v

δ= φ

θ= sin

πx

L (616)

in which

δ

δ0= θ

θ0= MMzx

1 minus MMzx (617)

as shown in Section 6122 The variations of the dimensionless central deflectionδδ0 and twist rotation θθ0 are shown in Figure 68 and it can be seen thatdeformation begins at the commencement of loading and increases rapidly as theelastic buckling moment Mzx is approached

The simple loadndashdeformation relationships of equations 616 and 617 are ofthe same forms as those of equations 38 and 39 for compression memberswith sinusoidal initial crookedness It follows that the Southwell plot tech-nique for extrapolating the elastic buckling loads of compression members fromexperimental measurements (see Section 322) may also be used for beams

Beam with initial crookedness and twist 00 = f0130 = sin xL

0 f0 = Mzx Ncrzequation 617

Straight beam 0 = f0 = 0 equations 61 and 63

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Dimensionless deformation 0 or 13130

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t MM

zx

0 5 10 15 20 25

Figure 68 Lateral deflection and twist of a beam with equal end moments

236 Lateral buckling of beams

As the deformations increase with the applied moments M so do the stresses Itis shown in Section 6122 that the limiting moment ML at which a beam withoutresidual stresses first yields is given by

ML

My= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(618)

in which

Φ = (1 + η + λ2)2 (619)

λ = radic(MyMzx) (620)

is a generalised slenderness My = Welyfy is the nominal first yield moment andη is a factor defining the imperfection magnitudes when the central crookednessδ0 is given by

δ0Ncrz

Mzx= θ0 = WelzWely

1 + (df 2) (NcrzMzx)η (621)

in which Ncrz is given by equation 612 Equations 618ndash620 are similar toequations 311 312 and 35 for the limiting axial force at first yield of a

ndash

==

zx

zcrfzx

crz

M

Nd

WWM

N

0

0

21

)(Generalised slenderness =

0 05 10 15 20 25

Yielding due to major axis bending alone

First yield MLMy due to initial crookedness and twist

Elastic buckling MzxMy

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t Mzx

My

or M

LM

y

My Mcr

13 elyelz

( )

12

10

08

06

04

02

0

Figure 69 Buckling and yielding of beams

Lateral buckling of beams 237

compression member The variation of the dimensionless limiting moment MLMy

for η = λ24 is shown in Figure 69 in which λ = radic

(MyMzx) plotted along thehorizontal axis is equivalent to the generalised slenderness ratio used in Figure 34for an elastic compression member Figure 69 shows that the limiting momentsof short beams approach the yield moment My while for long beams the limitingmoments approach the elastic buckling moment Mzx

63 Inelastic beams

The solution for the buckling moment Mzx of a perfectly straight simply sup-ported I-beam with equal end moments given by equations 62 and 63 is onlyvalid while the beam remains elastic In a short-span beam yielding occursbefore the ultimate moment is reached and significant portions of the beamsare inelastic when buckling commences The effective rigidities of these inelasticportions are reduced by yielding and consequently the buckling moment is alsoreduced

For beams with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) the distributionof yield across the section does not vary along the beam and when there are noresidual stresses the inelastic buckling moment can be calculated from a modifiedform of equation 63 as

MI =radic[

π2(EIz)t

L2

] [(GIt)t + π2(EIw)t

L2

](622)

in which the subscripted quantities ( )t are the reduced inelastic rigidities whichare effective at buckling Estimates of these rigidities can be obtained by usingthe tangent moduli of elasticity (see Section 331) which are appropriate to thevarying stress levels throughout the section Thus the values of E and G are usedin the elastic areas while the strain-hardening moduli Est and Gst are used inthe yielded and strain-hardened areas (see Section 334) When the effectiverigidities calculated in this way are used in equation 622 a lower bound esti-mate of the buckling moment is determined (Section 333) The variation of thedimensionless buckling moment MMy with the geometrical slenderness ratioLiz of a typical rolled-steel section which has been stress-relieved is shown inFigure 62 In the inelastic range the buckling moment increases almost linearlywith decreasing slenderness from the first yield moment My = Welyfy to thefull plastic moment Mp = Wplyfy which is reached soon after the flanges arefully yielded beyond which buckling is controlled by the strain-hardening moduliEst Gst

The inelastic buckling moment of a beam with residual stresses can be obtainedin a similar manner except that the pattern of yielding is not symmetrical about thesection major axis so that a modified form of equation 676 for a monosymmetricI-beam must be used instead of equation 622 The inelastic buckling momentvaries markedly with both the magnitude and the distribution of the residual

238 Lateral buckling of beams

stresses The moment at which inelastic buckling initiates depends mainly onthe magnitude of the residual compressive stresses at the compression flange tipswhere yielding causes significant reductions in the effective rigidities (EIz)t and(EIw)t The flange-tip residual stresses are comparatively high in hot-rolled beamsespecially those with high ratios of flange to web area and so the inelastic bucklingis initiated comparatively early in these beams as shown in Figure 62 The resid-ual stresses in hot-rolled beams decrease away from the flange tips (see Figure 39for example) and so the extent of yielding increases and the effective rigiditiessteadily decrease as the applied moment increases Because of this the inelasticbuckling moment decreases in an approximately linear fashion as the slendernessincreases as shown in Figure 62

In beams fabricated by welding flange plates to web plates the compressiveresidual stresses at the flange tips which increase with the welding heat input areusually somewhat smaller than those in hot-rolled beams and so the initiation ofinelastic buckling is delayed as shown in Figure 62 However the variations ofthe residual stresses across the flanges are more nearly uniform in welded beamsand so once flange yielding is initiated it spreads quickly through the flange withlittle increase in moment This causes large reductions in the inelastic bucklingmoments of stocky beams as indicated in Figure 62

When a beam has a more general loading than that of equal and opposite endmoments the in-plane bending moment varies along the beam and so whenyielding occurs its distribution also varies Because of this the beam acts as ifnon-uniform and the torsion equilibrium equation becomes more complicatedNevertheless numerical solutions have been obtained for some hot-rolled beamswith a number of different loading arrangements [19 20] and some of these(for unequal end moments M and βmM ) are shown in Figure 610 together withapproximate solutions given by

MI

Mp= 07 + 03(1 minus 07MpMcr)

(061 minus 03βm + 007β2m)

(623)

in which Mcr is given by equations 64 and 65In this equation the effects of the bending moment distribution are included

in both the elastic buckling resistance Mcr = αmMzx through the use of the endmoment ratio βm in the moment modification factor αm and also through the directuse of βm in equation 623 This latter use causes the inelastic buckling momentsMI to approach the elastic buckling moment Mcr as the end moment ratio increasestowards βm = 1

The most severe case is that of equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) forwhich yielding is constant along the beam so that the resistance to lateral bucklingis reduced everywhere Less severe cases are those of beams with unequal endmoments M andβmM withβm gt 0 where yielding is confined to short regions nearthe supports for which the reductions in the section properties are comparativelyunimportant The least severe case is that of equal end moments that bend the beam

Lateral buckling of beams 239

Elastic buckling Mcr

= 10 05 0 05 10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t MIM

p

11

10

09

08

07

06

05

m = 10 05 0 05 10

L MM

Computer solution (254 UB 31) Approximate equation 623

Full plasticity Mp

Generalised slenderness ( MpMcr)

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

m

m

Figure 610 Inelastic buckling of beams with unequal end moments

in double curvature (βm = 1) for which the moment gradient is steepest and theregions of yielding are most limited

The range of modified slenderness radic(MpMcr) for which a beam can reach

the full plastic moment Mp depends very much on the loading arrangement Anapproximate expression for the limit of this range for beams with end momentsM and βmM can be obtained from equation 623 asradic(

Mp

Mcr

)p

=radic(

039 + 030βm minus 007β2m

070

) (624)

In the case of a simply supported beam with an unbraced central concen-trated load yielding is confined to a small central portion of the beam sothat any reductions in the section properties are limited to this region Inelas-tic buckling can be approximated by using equation 623 with βm = minus07 andαm = 135

64 Real beams

Real beams differ from the ideal beams analysed in Section 621 in much thesame way as do real compression members (see Section 341) Thus any smallimperfections such as initial crookedness twist eccentricity of load or horizon-tal load components cause the beam to behave as if it had an equivalent initialcrookedness and twist (see Section 622) as shown by curve A in Figure 611On the other hand imperfections such as residual stresses or variations in material

240 Lateral buckling of beams

Curve C ndash real beams

Curve B ndash equivalentresidual stresses

Curve A ndash equivalent initialcrookedness and twist

Elastic limit

Elastic bendingand twisting

Inelastic buckling

Elastic buckling

MultMI

ML

Mcr

Lateral deflection and twist

Moment

Figure 611 Behaviour of real beams

properties cause the beam to behave as shown by curve B in Figure 611 Thebehaviour of real beams having both types of imperfection is indicated by curve Cin Figure 611 which shows a transition from the elastic behaviour of a beam withcurvature and twist to the inelastic post-buckling behaviour of a beam with residualstresses

65 Design against lateral buckling

651 General

It is possible to develop a refined analysis of the behaviour of real beams whichincludes the effects of all types of imperfection However the use of such ananalysis is not warranted because the magnitudes of the imperfections are uncer-tain Instead design rules are often based on a simple analysis for one type ofequivalent imperfection which allows approximately for all imperfections or onapproximations of experimental results such as those shown in Figure 612

For the EC3 method of designing against lateral buckling the maximum momentin the beam at elastic lateral buckling Mcr and the beam section resistance Wyfyare used to define a generalised slenderness

λLT =radic(WyfyMcr) (625)

Lateral buckling of beams 241

EC3 welded I-sections (hbf gt 2)

EC3 rolled I-sections (hbf gt 2)

Full plasticity MpElastic buckling Mcr

L

M M

QQ

Q

L4

L4

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

ts M

bR

d M

p or

Mul

tMp

15

10

05

00 05 10 15 20 25

Generalised slenderness )( crpLT MM=

159 hot-rolled beams

Figure 612 Moment resistances of beams in near-uniform bending

and this is used in a modification of the first yield equation 618 which approximatesthe experimental resistances of many beams in near-uniform bending such as thoseshown in Figure 612

652 Elastic buckling moment

The EC3 method for designing against lateral buckling is an example of a moregeneral approach to the analysis and the design of structures whose strengths aregoverned by the interaction between yielding and buckling Another example ofthis approach was developed in Section 37 in which the relationship between theultimate strength of a simply supported uniform member in uniform compressionand its squash and elastic buckling loads was used to determine the in-plane ulti-mate strengths of other compression members This method has been called themethod of design by buckling analysis because the maximum moment at elasticbuckling Mcr must be used rather than the approximations of somewhat variableaccuracy which have been used in the past

The first step in the method of design by buckling analysis is to determine theload at which the elastic lateral buckling takes place so that the elastic bucklingmoment Mcr can be calculated This varies with the beam geometry its loadingand its restraints but unfortunately there is no simple general method of finding it

However there are a number of general computer programs which can be usedfor finding Mcr [6 8 10 21ndash23] including the user-friendly computer programPRFELB [18] which can calculate the elastic buckling moment for any beam orcantilever under any loading or restraint conditions While such programs have

242 Lateral buckling of beams

S

B

B

B

B

C

O

O

O

In-plane support

Fixed end

Out-of-plane brace

Buckled shape

Braced

Cantilevered

Overhung

Simply supported

B

C

O

S

Figure 613 Beams cantilevers and overhanging beams

not been widely used in the past it is expected that the use of EC3 will result intheir much greater application

Alternatively many approximations for the elastic buckling moments Mcr undera wide range of loading conditions are given in [16] Later sections summarisethe methods of obtaining Mcr for restrained beams cantilevers and overhangingbeams braced and continuous beams (Figure 613) rigid frames and monosym-metric and non-uniform beams under common loading conditions which causebending about an axis of symmetry

653 EC3 design buckling moment resistances

The EC3 design buckling moment resistance MbRd is defined by

MbRdγM1

Wyfy= 1

ΦLT +radicΦ2

LT minus βλ2LT

(626)

and

ΦLT = 05

1 + αLT (λLT minus λLT 0)+ βλ2LT

(627)

in which γM1 is the partial factor for member instability which has a recommendedvalue of 10 in EC3 Wyfy is the section moment resistance λLT is the modifiedslenderness given by equation 625 and the values of αLT β and λLT 0 depend onthe type of beam section Equations 625ndash627 are similar to equations 620 618and 619 for the first yield of a beam with initial crookedness and twist exceptthat the section moment resistance Wyfy replaces the yield moment My the termαLT (λLT minus λLT 0) replaces η and the term β is introduced

Lateral buckling of beams 243

The EC3 uniform bending design buckling resistances MbRd for β = 075λLT 0 = 04 and αLT = 049 (rolled I-sections with hb gt 2) are compared withexperimental results for beams in near-uniform bending in Figure 612 For veryslender beams with high values of the modified slenderness λLT the design buck-ling moment resistance MbRd shown in Figure 612 approaches the elastic bucklingmoment Mcr while for stocky beams the moment resistance MbRd reaches thesection resistance Wyfy and so is governed by yielding or local buckling asdiscussed in Section 472 For beams of intermediate slenderness equations 625ndash627 provide a transition between these limits which is close to the lower boundof the experimental results shown in Figure 612 Also shown in Figure 612 arethe EC3 design buckling moment resistances for αLT = 076 (welded I-sectionswith hb gt 2)

The EC3 provides two methods of design a simple but conservative methodwhich may be applied to any type of beam section and a less conservative limitedmethod

For the simple general method β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 and the imperfectionfactor αLT depends on the type of beam section as set out in Tables 64 and 63 ofEC3 This method is conservative because it uses a very low threshold modifiedslenderness of λLT 0 = 02 above which the buckling resistance is reduced belowthe section resistance Wyfy and because it ignores the increased inelastic bucklingresistances of beams in non-uniform bending shown for example in Figure 610

For the less conservative limited method for uniform beams of rolled I-sectionβ = 075 and λLT 0 = 04 and a modified design buckling moment resistance

MbRdmod = MbRdf le MbRd (628)

is determined using

f = 1 minus 05(1 minus kc)1 minus 2(λLT minus 08)2 (629)

in which the values of the correction factor kc depend on the bending momentdistribution and are given by

kc = 1radic

C1 = 1radicαm (630)

in which αm is the moment modification factor obtained from Figure 67 orequation 65 66 or 613 The EC3 design buckling moment resistances MbRdmod

for β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 and αLT = 049 (rolled I-sections with hb gt 2) arecompared with the inelastic buckling moment approximations of equation 623 inFigure 614

654 Lateral buckling design procedures

For the EC3 strength design of a beam against lateral buckling the distribution ofthe bending moment and the value of the maximum moment MEd are determined

244 Lateral buckling of beams

10

08

06

04

02

0

m =

Section resistance Wy fy

M mM Elastic buckling Mcr

Inelastic buckling approximationfor MI (equation 623)

EC3 moment resistance MbRdmod Wy fy(equations 628 29)

Generalised slenderness (Wy fyMcr)

m = 10 05 0 10

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t Mb

Rd

mod

Wy

f y o

r M

IWy

f y

0 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

ndash

ndash

ndash05ndash10 0 10

Figure 614 EC3 design buckling moment resistances

by an elastic analysis (if the beam is statically indeterminate) or by statics (ifthe beam is statically determinate) The strength design loads are obtained bysumming the nominal loads multiplied by the appropriate partial load factors γF

(see Section 156)In both the EC3 simple general and less conservative methods of checking a

uniform equal-flanged beam the section moment resistance WyfyγM0 is checkedfirst the elastic buckling moment Mcr is determined and the modified slendernessλLT is calculated using equation 625 The appropriate EC3 values of αLT βand λLT 0 (the values of these differ according to which of the two methods ofdesign is used) are then selected and the design buckling moment resistance MbRd

calculated using equations 626 and 627 In the simple general method the beamis satisfactory when

MEd le MbRd le WyfyγM0 (631)

In the less conservative method MbRd in equation 631 is replaced by MbRdmod

obtained using equations 628ndash630The beam must also be checked for shear shear and bending and bearing

as discussed in Sections 5615ndash5617 and for serviceability as discussed inSection 57

When a beam is to be designed the beam section is not known and so a trialsection must be chosen An iterative process is then used in which the trial sectionis evaluated and a new trial section chosen until a satisfactory section is found

Lateral buckling of beams 245

One method of finding a first-trial section is to make initial guesses for fy (usuallythe nominal value) and MbRdWyfy (say 05) to use these to calculate a targetsection plastic modulus

Wply ge MEd fyMbRd(Wyfy)

(632)

and then to select a suitable trial sectionAfter the trial section has been selected its elastic buckling moment Mcr yield

stress fy and design moment resistance MbRd can be found and used to calculate anew value of Wply and to select a new trial section The iterative process usuallyconverges within a few cycles but convergence can be hastened by using the meanof the previous and current values of MbRdWyfy in the calculation of the targetsection modulus

Worked examples of checking and designing beams against lateral bucklingare given in Sections 6151ndash6157

655 Checking beams supported at both ends

6551 Section moment resistance

The classification of a specified beam cross-section as Class 1 2 3 or 4 is describedin Sections 472 and 5612 and the determination of the design section momentresistance McRd = WyfyγM0 in Sections 472 and 5613

6552 Elastic buckling moment

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supported beam depends onits geometry loading and restraints It may be obtained by calculating Mzx

(equation 63) Ncrz (equation 612) and αm (equation 613) and substitutingthese into equation 611 or by using a computer program such as those referredto in Section 652

6553 Design buckling moment resistance

The design buckling moment resistance MbRd can be obtained as described inSection 653

66 Restrained beams

661 Simple supports and rigid restraints

In the previous sections it was assumed that the beam was supported laterally onlyat its ends When a beam with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus10) has

246 Lateral buckling of beams

an additional rigid restraint at its centre which prevents lateral deflection and twistrotation then its buckled shape is given by

φ

(φ)L4= v

(v)L4= sin

π x

L2 (633)

and its elastic buckling moment is given by

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

(L2)2

) (GIt + π2EIw

(L2)2

) (634)

The end supports of a beam may also differ from simple supports For exampleboth ends of the beam may be rigidly built-in against lateral rotation about the minoraxis and against end warping If the beam has equal and opposite end momentsthen its buckled shape is given by

φ

(φ)L2= v

(v)L2= 1

2

(1 minus cos

π x

L2

) (635)

and its elastic buckling moment is given by equation 634In general the elastic buckling moment Mcr of a restrained beam with equal

and opposite end moments (βm = minus10) can be expressed as

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

) (636)

in which

Lcr = kcrL (637)

is the effective length and kcr is an effective length factorWhen a beam has several rigid restraints which prevent local lateral deflection

and twist rotation then the beam is divided into a series of segments The elasticbuckling of each segment may be approximated by using its length as the effectivelength Lcr One segment will be the most critical and the elastic buckling momentof this segment will provide a conservative estimate of the elastic buckling resis-tance of the whole beam This method ignores the interactions between adjacentsegments which increase the elastic buckling resistance of the beam Approximatemethods of allowing for these interactions are given in Section 68

The use of the effective length concept can be extended to beams with loadingconditions other than equal and opposite end moments In general the maximummoment Mcr at elastic buckling depends on the beam section its loading and itsrestraints so that

McrLradic(EIzGIt)

= fn

(π2EIw

GItL2 loading

2zQ

df restraints

) (638)

A partial separation of the effect of the loading from that of the restraintconditions may be achieved for beams with centroidal loading (zQ = 0) by

Lateral buckling of beams 247

approximating the maximum moment Mcr at elastic buckling by using

Mcr = αm

radic(π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

) (639)

for which it is assumed that the factor αm depends only on the in-plane bend-ing moment distribution and that the effective length Lcr depends only on therestraint conditions This approximation allows the αm factors calculated for sim-ply supported beams (see Section 621) and the effective lengths Lcr determinedfor restrained beams with equal and opposite end moments (αm = 1) to be usedmore generally

Unfortunately the form of equation 639 is not suitable for beams with loadsacting away from the centroid It has been suggested that approximate solutionsfor Mcr may be obtained by using equation 611 with Lcr substituted for L inequations 63 and 612 but it has been reported [16] that predictions obtained inthis way are sometimes of somewhat variable accuracy

662 Intermediate restraints

In the previous sub-section it was shown that the elastic buckling moment of asimply supported I-beam is substantially increased when a restraint is providedwhich prevents the centre of the beam from deflecting laterally and twisting Thisrestraint need not be completely rigid but may be elastic provided its translationaland rotational stiffnesses exceed certain minimum values

The case of the beam with equal and opposite end moments M shown inFigure 615a is analysed in [24] This beam has a central translational restraint ofstiffnessαt (whereαt is the ratio of the lateral force exerted by the restraint to the lat-eral deflection of the beam measured at the height zt of the restraint) and a centraltorsional restraint of stiffness αr (where αr is the ratio of the torque exerted by therestraint to the twist rotation of the beam) It is shown in [24] that the elastic buck-ling moment Mcr can be expressed in the standard form of equation 639 when thestiffnessesαt αr are related to each other and the effective length factor kcr through

αtL3

16EIz

(1 + 2ztdf

2zcdf

)=

2kcr

)3cot π

2kcr

π2kcr

cot π2kcr

minus 1 (640)

αrL3

16EIw

(1 minus 2zt2zc

df df

)=

2kcr

)3cot π

2kcr

π2kcr

cot π2kcr

minus 1 (641)

in which

zc = Mcr

π2EIz(kcrL)2= df

2radic(1 + k2

crK2) (642)

and K = radic(π2EIwGItL2)

248 Lateral buckling of beams

0 5 10 15 20 25

x

y

z

Mcr

Mcr

rfL2ndashzt

t( ndash ztf)L2

(a) Beam

Axis of buckled beam

Second mode buckling

Beam with equal and opposite end moments

Braced first mode buckling

30

25

20

15

10

05

0

Rec

ipro

cal o

f ef

fect

ive

leng

th f

acto

r 1

k cr

Translational restraint stiffness

Rotational restraint stiffness

(b) Effective length factors

+

fdcz

fd

fdfd

tzLr

zEI

Lt

22

cztz 22

13

116

wEI16

3

fL2

L2

2

ndash

)()(

Figure 615 Beam with elastic intermediate restraints

These relationships are shown graphically in Figure 615b and are similar tothat shown in Figure 316c for compression members with intermediate restraintsIt can be seen that the effective length factor kcr varies from 1 when the restraintsare of zero stiffness to 05 when

αtL3

16EIz

(1 + 2ztdf

2zcdf

)= αrL3

16EIw

(1 minus 2zt

df

2zc

df

)= π2 (643)

If the restraint stiffnesses exceed these values the beam buckles in the secondmode with zero central deflection and twist at a moment which corresponds tokcr = 05 When the height minuszt of the translational restraint above the centroidis equal to minusd2

f 4zc the required rotational stiffness αr given by equation 643is zero Since zc is never less than df 2 (see equation 642) it follows that a topflange translational restraint of stiffness

αL = 16π2EIzL3

1 + df 2zc(644)

is always sufficient to brace the beam into the second mode This minimum stiffnesscan be expressed as

αL = 8Mcr

L df

1

1 + radic(1 + 4K2) (645)

Lateral buckling of beams 249

Shear diaphragm Shear diaphragmI - beam

(a) Elevation (b) Section

M M

L

Figure 616 Diaphragm-braced I-beams

and the greatest value of this is

αL = 4Mcr

L df (646)

The flange force Qf at elastic buckling can be approximated by

Qf = Mcrdf (647)

and so the minimum top-flange translational stiffness can be approximated by

αL = 4Qf L (648)

This is of the same form as equation 333 for the minimum stiffness ofintermediate restraints for compression members

There are no restraint stiffness requirements in EC3 This follows the finding[25 26] that compression member restraints which are capable of transmitting25 of the force in the compression member invariably are stiff enough to ensurethe second mode buckling Thus EC3 generally requires any restraining elementat a plastic hinge location to be capable of transmitting 25 of the flange forcein the beam being restrained

The influence of intermediate restraints on beams with central concentrated anduniformly distributed loads has also been studied and many values of the minimumrestraint stiffnesses required to cause the beams to buckle as if rigidly braced havebeen determined [16 24 27ndash30]

The effects of diaphragm bracing on the lateral buckling of simply supportedbeams with equal and opposite end moments (see Figure 616) have also beeninvestigated [16 31 32] and a simple method of determining whether a diaphragmis capable of providing full bracing has been developed [31]

250 Lateral buckling of beams

663 Elastic end restraints

6631 General

When a beam forms part of a rigid-jointed structure the adjacent memberselastically restrain the ends of the beam (ie they induce restraining momentswhich are proportional to the end rotations) These restraining actions significantlymodify the elastic buckling moment of the beam Four different types of restrainingmoment may act at each end of a beam as shown in Figure 617 They are

(a) the major axis end moment M which provides restraint about the major axis(b) the bottom flange end moment MB and(c) the top flange end moment MT which provide restraints about the minor axis

and against end warping and(d) the axial torque T0 which provides restraint against end twisting

6632 Major axis end moments

The major axis end restraining moments M vary directly with the applied loadsand can be determined by a conventional in-plane bending analysis The degree ofrestraint experienced at one end of the beam depends on the major axis stiffness αy

of the adjacent member (which is defined as the ratio of the end moment to the endrotation) This may be expressed by the ratio R1 of the actual restraining moment tothe maximum moment required to prevent major axis end rotation Thus R1 variesfrom 0 when there is no restraining moment to 1 when there is no end rotationFor beams which are symmetrically loaded and restrained the restraint parameter

MB

MT

T0 df M

z

y

x

Figure 617 End-restraining moments

Lateral buckling of beams 251

R1 is related to the stiffness αy of each adjacent member by

αy = EIy

L

2R1

1 minus R1 (649)

Although the major axis end moments are independent of the buckling deforma-tions they do affect the buckling load of the beam because of their effect on thein-plane bending moment distribution (see Section 6214) Many particular caseshave been studied and tabulations of buckling loads are available [5 12 1333ndash35]

6633 Minor axis end restraints

On the other hand the flange end moments MB and MT remain zero until thebuckling load of the beam is reached and then increase in proportion to the flangeend rotations Again the degree of end restraint can be expressed by the ratio of theactual restraining moment to the maximum value required to prevent end rotationThus the minor axis end restraint parameter R2 (which describes the relativemagnitude of the restraining moment MB + MT ) varies between 0 and 1 and theend warping restraint parameter R4 (which describes the relative magnitude of thedifferential flange end moments (MT minusMB)2) varies from 0 when the ends are freeto warp to 1 when end warping is prevented The particular case of symmetricallyrestrained beams with equal and opposite end moments (Figure 618) is analysed inSection 6131 It is assumed for this that the minor axis and end warping restraintstake the form of equal rotational restraints which act at each flange end and whose

Eff

ecti

ve le

ngth

fac

tors

kcr

L

M M

MB+ MT MB + MTx

v

10

05

00 02 04 06 08 10

(c) Effective length factors

Restraint parameter R

(b) Plan on centroidal axis

(a) Elevation

Figure 618 Elastic buckling of end-restrained beams

252 Lateral buckling of beams

stiffnesses are such that

Flange end moment

Flange end rotation= minusEIz

L

R

1 minus R (650)

in which case

R2 = R4 = R (651)

It is shown in Section 6131 that the moment Mcr at which the restrained beambuckles elastically is given by equations 636 and 637 when the effective lengthfactor kcr is the solution of

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (652)

It can be seen from the solutions of this equation shown in Figure 618c thatthe effective length factor kcr decreases from 1 to 05 as the restraint parameter Rincreases from 0 to 1 These solutions are exactly the same as those obtained fromthe compression member effective length chart of Figure 321a when

k1 = k2 = 1 minus R

1 minus 05R (653)

which suggests that the effective length factors kcr for beams with unequal endrestraints may be approximated by using the values given by Figure 321a

The elastic buckling of symmetrically restrained beams with unequal endmoments has also been analysed [36] while solutions have been obtained formany other minor axis and end warping restraint conditions [16 27 32ndash34]

6634 Torsional end restraints

The end torques T0 which resist end twist rotations also remain zero until elasticbuckling occurs and then increase with the end twist rotations It has been assumedthat the ends of all the beams discussed so far are rigidly restrained against endtwist rotations When the end restraints are elastic instead of rigid some end twistrotation occurs during buckling and the elastic buckling load is reduced Analyticalstudies [21] of beams in uniform bending with elastic torsional end restraints haveshown that the reduced buckling moment Mzxr can be approximated by

Mzxr

Mzx=

radic1

(49 + 45 K2)R3 + 1

(654)

in which 1R3 is the dimensionless stiffness of the torsional end restraints given by

1

R3= αxL

GIt(655)

in which αx is the ratio of the restraining torque T0 to the end twist rotation(φ)0 Reductions for other loading conditions can be determined from the elastic

Lateral buckling of beams 253

Top flange unrestrained

Bottom flange prevented from twisting

Figure 619 End distortion of a beam with an unrestrained top flange

buckling solutions in [16 34 37] or by using a computer program [18] to carryout an elastic buckling analysis

Another situation for which end twist rotation is not prevented is illustrated inFigure 619 where the bottom flange of a beam is simply supported at its endand prevented from twisting but the top flange is unrestrained In this case beambuckling may be accentuated by distortion of the cross-section which results in theweb bending shown in Figure 619 Studies of the distortional buckling [38ndash40] ofbeams such as that shown in Figure 619 have suggested that the reduction in thebuckling capacity can be allowed for approximately by using an effective lengthfactor

kcr = 1 + (df 6L

) (tf tw

)3 (1 + bf df

)2 (656)

in which tf and tw are the flange and web thicknesses and bf is the flange widthThe preceding discussion has dealt with the effects of each type of end restraint

but most beams in rigid-jointed structures have all types of elastic restraint actingsimultaneously Many such cases of combined restraints have been analysed andtabular graphical or approximate solutions are given in [12 16 33 35 41]

67 Cantilevers and overhanging beams

671 Cantilevers

The support conditions of cantilevers differ from those of beams in that a cantileveris usually assumed to be completely fixed at one end (so that lateral deflectionlateral rotation and warping are prevented) and completely free (to deflect rotateand warp) at the other The elastic buckling solution for such a cantilever in uniformbending caused by an end moment M which rotatesφL with the end of the cantilever[16] can be obtained from the solution given by equations 62 and 63 for simply

254 Lateral buckling of beams

supported beams by replacing the beam length L by twice the cantilever length 2Lwhence

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

4L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

4L2

) (657)

This procedure is similar to the effective length method used to obtain thebuckling load of a cantilever column (see Figure 315e) This loading condition isvery unusual and probably never occurs and so the solution of equation 657 hasno practical relevance

Cantilevers with other loading conditions are not so easily analysed but numer-ical solutions are available [16 37 42 43] The particular case of a cantileverwith an end concentrated load Q is discussed in Section 61214 and plots ofthe dimensionless elastic buckling moments QL2

radic(EIzGIt) for bottom flange

centroidal and top flange loading are given in Figure 620 together with plotsof the dimensionless elastic buckling moments (qL32)

radic(EIzGIt) of cantilevers

with uniformly distributed loads qMore accurate approximations may be obtained by using

QL2

radic(EIzGIt)

= 11

1 + 12εradic

(1 + 122ε2)

+ 4(K minus 2)

1 + 12(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 122(ε minus 01)2)

(658)

Bottom flange loading Centroidal loading Top flange loading

L

L

Qq

60

40

20

0 0 05 10 15 20 25 30

Cantilever parameter K = (2EIwGItL2)

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

sQ

L2

(EI z

GI t)

or

(qL

3 2)

(E

I zG

I t)

Figure 620 Elastic buckling loads of cantilevers

Lateral buckling of beams 255

or

qL3

2radic(EIzGIt)

= 27

1 + 14(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 142(ε minus 01)2)

+ 10(K minus 2)

1 + 13(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 132(ε minus 01)2)

(659)

Cantilevers which have restraints at the unsupported end which prevent lateraldeflection and twist rotation (Figure 613) may be treated as beams which aresupported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

Intermediate restraints which prevent lateral deflection and twist rotation dividea cantilever into segments (Figure 613) The elastic buckling of each segmentcan be approximated by assuming that there are no interactions between adjacentsegments The segment with the free end can then be treated as an overhangingbeam as in Section 672 following while the interior segments may be treated asbeams supported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

672 Overhanging beams

Overhanging beams are similar to cantilevers in that they are free to deflect rotateand warp at one end (Figure 613) However lateral rotation and warping are notcompletely prevented at the supported end but are elastically restrained by thecontinuity of the overhanging beam with its continuation beyond the support Thebuckling moments of some examples are reported in [16 37]

It is usually very difficult to predict the degrees of lateral rotation and warpingrestraint in which case they should be assumed to be zero The elastic buck-ling moments of such overhanging beams with either concentrated end load oruniformly distributed load can be predicted by using [16]

QL2

radic(EIzGIt)

= 6

1 + 15(ε minus 01)radic

(1 + 152(ε minus 01)2)

+ 15(K minus 2)

1 + 3(ε minus 03)radic

(1 + 32(ε minus 03)2)

(660)

or

qL3

2radic(EIzGIt)

= 15

1 + 18(ε minus 03)radic

(1 + 182(ε minus 03)2)

+ 40(K minus 2)

1 + 28(ε minus 04)radic

(1 + 282(ε minus 04)2)

(661)

256 Lateral buckling of beams

Overhanging beams which have restraints at the unsupported end which preventlateral deflection and twist rotation (Figure 613) may be treated as beams whichare supported laterally at both ends as in Section 66

Intermediate restraints which prevent lateral deflection and twist rotation dividean overhanging beam into segments (Figure 613) The elastic buckling of eachsegment can be approximated by assuming that there are no interactions betweenadjacent segments The segment with the free end is an overhanging beam whilethe interior segments may be treated as beams supported laterally at both ends asin Section 66

68 Braced and continuous beams

Perhaps the simplest types of rigid-jointed structure are the braced beam and thecontinuous beam (Figure 613) which can be regarded as a series of segmentswhich are rigidly connected together at points where lateral deflection and twistare prevented In general the interaction between the segments during bucklingdepends on the loading pattern for the whole beam and so also do the magnitudesof the buckling loads This behaviour is similar to the in-plane buckling behaviourof rigid frames discussed in Section 8353

681 Beams with only one segment loaded

When only one segment of a braced or continuous beam is loaded its elasticbuckling load may be evaluated approximately when tabulations for segmentswith elastic end restraints are available [12 33 35] To do this it is first necessaryto determine the end restraint parameters R1 R2 R4 (R3 = 0 because it is assumedthat twisting is prevented at the supports and brace points) from the stiffnesses ofthe adjacent unloaded segments For example when only the centre span of thesymmetrical three span continuous beam shown in Figure 621a is loaded (Q1 = 0)then the end spans provide elastic restraints which depend on their stiffnesses Byanalysing the major axis bending minor axis bending and differential flangebending of the end spans it can be shown [34] that

R1 = R2 = R4 = 1

1 + 2L13L2(662)

approximately With these values the elastic buckling load for the centre span canbe determined from the tabulations in [33 35] Some elastic buckling loads (forbeams of narrow rectangular section for which K = 0) determined in this way areshown in a non-dimensional form in Figure 622

A similar procedure can be followed when only the outer spans of the symmetri-cal three span continuous beam shown in Figure 621 are loaded (Q2 = 0) In this

Lateral buckling of beams 257

L1 L2 L1

Q1 Q2 Q1

(a) Elevation

Points of inflection

Points of inflection

(b) Mode1 Q2 = 0

(c) Mode 2 Q1 = 0

(d) Mode 3 zero interaction

Figure 621 Buckling modes for a symmetrical three span continuous beam

0 02 04 06 08 10 08 06 04 02 0

(a) Three span beam

L1L2L1

Q2 Q1Q1

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

QL

2 (

EI z

GI t)60

50

40

30

20

10

L1L2 Span ratios L2L1

(b) Significant buckling loads

Q2L22 (EIzGIt) for zero interaction 3

Q2L22 (EIzGIt) for span L1 unloaded 2

(2EIwGItL2) = 0

Q1L12 (EIzGIt)

for zero interaction 3

Q1L12 (EIzGIt) for span L2 unloaded 1

=K

Figure 622 Significant buckling loads of symmetrical three span beams

case the restraint parameters [12] are given by

R1 = R2 = R4 = 1

1 + 3L22L1(663)

approximately Some dimensionless buckling loads (for beams of narrow rectan-gular section) determined by using these restraint parameters in the tabulations of

258 Lateral buckling of beams

60

50

40

30

20

10

0L1

Zerointeraction

Q2

L1L2

Q1 Q1

Dimensionless buckling load

L2L1 = 02

0 10 20 30 40

L2L1 = 1

L2L1 = 5

(b) Buckling load combinations(a) Three span beam

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

load

Q2L

22 (E

I zG

I t)

Q1L12 (EIzGIt)(2EIwGItL

2) = 0= K

Figure 623 Elastic buckling load combinations of symmetrical three span beams

[12] are shown in Figure 622 Similar diagrams have been produced [44] for twospan beams of narrow rectangular section

682 Beams with general loading

When more than one segment of a braced or continuous beam is loaded the buck-ling loads can be determined by analysing the interaction between the segmentsThis has been done for a number of continuous beams of narrow rectangularsection [44] and the results for some symmetrical three span beams are shown inFigure 623 These indicate that as the loads Q1 on the end spans increase from zeroso does the buckling load Q2 of the centre span until a maximum value is reachedand that a similar effect occurs as the centre span load Q2 increases from zero

The results shown in Figure 623 suggest that the elastic buckling load interactiondiagram can be closely and safely approximated by drawing straight lines as shownin Figure 624 between the following three significant load combinations

1 When only the end spans are loaded (Q2 = 0) they are restrained duringbuckling by the centre span and the buckled shape has inflection points in theend spans as shown in Figure 621b In this case the buckling loads Q1 canbe determined by using R1 = R2 = R4 = 1(1 + 3L22L1) in the tabulationsof [12]

2 When only the centre span is loaded (Q1 = 0) it is restrained by the end spansand the buckled shape has inflection points in the centre span as shown in

Lateral buckling of beams 259

(2) Spans 1 unloaded (3) Zero interaction

Straight lines(1) Span 2 unloaded

Load Q1

Loa

d Q

2

Figure 624 Straight line approximation

Figure 621c In this case the buckling load Q2 can be determined by usingR1 = R2 = R4 = 1(1 + 2L13L2) in the tabulations of [33 35]

3 Between these two extremes exists the zero interaction load combination forwhich the buckled shape has inflection points at the internal supports as shownin Figure 621d and each span buckles as if unrestrained in the buckling planeIn this case the buckling loads can be determined by using

R2 = R4 = 0 (664)

R11 = 1 + Q2L22Q1L2

1

1 + 3L22L1(665)

R12 = 1 + Q1L21Q2L2

2

1 + 2L13L2 (666)

in the tabulations of [12 33 35] Some zero interaction load combinations(for three span beams of narrow rectangular section) determined in this wayare shown in Figure 622 while other zero interaction combinations are givenin [44]

Unfortunately this comparatively simple approximate method has proved toocomplex for use in routine design possibly because the available tabulations ofelastic buckling loads are not only insufficient to cover all the required loading andrestraint conditions but also too detailed to enable them to be easily used Insteadan approximate method of analysis [45] is often used in which the effects of lateralcontinuity between adjacent segments are ignored and each segment is regardedas being simply supported laterally Thus the elastic buckling of each segment is

260 Lateral buckling of beams

analysed for its in-plane moment distribution (the moment modification factors ofequation 613 or Figure 67 may be used) and for an effective length Lcr equal tothe segment length L The so-determined elastic buckling moment of each segmentis then used to evaluate a corresponding beam load set and the lowest of theseis taken as the elastic buckling load set This method produces a lower boundestimate which is sometimes remarkably close to the true buckling load set

However this is not always the case and so a much more accurate but stillreasonably simple method has been developed [36] In this method the accuracy ofthe lower bound estimate (obtained as described above) is improved by allowing forthe interactions between the critical segment and the adjacent segments at bucklingThis is done by using a simple approximation for the destabilising effects of thein-plane bending moments on the stiffnesses of the adjacent segments and byapproximating the restraining effects of these segments on the critical segment byusing the effective length chart of Figure 321a for braced compression members toestimate the effective length of the critical beam segment A step-by-step summary[36] is as follows

(1) Determine the properties EIz GIt EIw L of each segment(2) Analyse the in-plane bending moment distribution through the beam and

determine the moment modification factors αm for each segment fromequation 613 or Figure 67

(3) Assume all effective length factors kcr are equal to unity(4) Calculate the maximum moment Mcr in each segment at elastic buckling

from

Mcr = αm

radic(π2EIz

L2cr

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2cr

)(667)

with Lcr = L and the corresponding beam buckling loads Qs(5) Determine a lower-bound estimate of the beam buckling load as the lowest

value Qms of the loads Qs and identify the segment associated with this asthe critical segment 12 (This is the approximate method [45] described inthe preceding paragraph)

(6) If a more accurate estimate of the beam buckling load is required use the val-ues Qms and Qrs1 Qrs2 calculated in step 5 together with Figure 625 (whichis similar to Figure 319 for braced compression members) to approximatethe stiffnesses αr1αr2 of the segments adjacent to the critical segment 12

(7) Calculate the stiffness of the critical segment 12 from 2EIzmLm(8) Calculate the stiffness ratios k1 k2 from

k12 = 2EIzmLm

05αr1r2 + 2EIzmLm (668)

(9) Determine the effective length factor kcr for the critical segment 12 fromFigure 321a and the effective length Lcr = kcrL

Lateral buckling of beams 261

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

EI1

4

(b) Segment hinged at one end

(c) Segment fixed at one end

(a) Segment providing equal end restraints

r ndash )(

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

EI1

3r ndash )(

=rs

ms

r

zr

Q

Q

L

rL

EI1

2r ndash )(

Figure 625 Stiffness approximations for restraining segments

(10) Calculate the elastic buckling moment Mcr of the critical segment 12using Lcr in equation 667 and from this the corresponding improvedapproximation of the elastic buckling load Qcr of the beam

It should be noted that while the calculations for the lower bound (the first fivesteps) are made for all segments those for the improved estimate are only madefor the critical segment and so comparatively little extra effort is involved Thedevelopment and application of this method is further described in [36] The useof user-friendly computer programs such as in [18] eliminates the need for theseapproximate procedures

69 Rigid frames

Under some conditions the elastic buckling loads of rigid frames with only onemember loaded can be determined from the available tabulations [12 33 35] in asimilar manner to that described in Section 681 for braced and continuous beamsFor example consider a symmetrically loaded beam which is rigidly connected totwo equal cross-beams as shown in Figure 626a In this case the comparativelylarge major axis bending stiffnesses of the cross-beams ensure that end twistingof the loaded beam is effectively prevented and it may therefore be assumed thatR3 = 0 If the cross-beams are of open section so that their torsional stiffness iscomparatively small then it is not unduly conservative to assume that they do notrestrain the loaded beam about its major axis and so

R1 = 0 (669)

262 Lateral buckling of beams

L2

L1

Position and torsionalend restraints

(a) Beam supported by cross-beams (b) Symmetrical portal frame

L2

L1

Figure 626 Simple rigid-jointed structures

By analysing the minor axis and differential flange bending of the cross-beamsit can be shown that

R2 = R4 = 1(1 + L1Iz26L2Iz1) (670)

This result is based on the assumption that there is no likelihood of the cross-beams themselves buckling so that their effective minor axis rigidity can be takenas EIz1 With these values for the restraint parameters the elastic buckling loadcan be determined from the tabulations in [33 35]

The buckling loads of the symmetrical portal frame shown in Figure 626b canbe determined in a similar manner provided there are sufficient external restraintsto position-fix the joints of the frame The columns of portal frames of this typeare usually placed so that the plane of greatest bending stiffness is that of theframe In this case the minor axis stiffness of each column provides only a smallresistance against end twisting of the beam and this resistance is reduced by theaxial force transmitted by the column so that it may be necessary to provideadditional torsional end restraints to the beam If these additional restraints arestiff enough (and the information given in [16 34] will give some guidance) thenit may be assumed without serious error that R3 = 0 The major axis stiffness ofa pinned base column is 3EIy1L1 and of a fixed base column is 4EIy1L1 and itcan be shown by analysing the in-plane flexure of a portal frame that for pinnedbase portals

R1 = 1(1 + 2L1Iy23L2Iy1) (671)

Lateral buckling of beams 263

and for fixed base portals

R1 = 1(1 + L1Iy22L2Iy1) (672)

If the columns are of open cross-section their torsional stiffness is comparativelysmall and it is not unduly conservative to assume that the columns do not restrainthe beam element or its flanges against minor axis flexure and so

R2 = R4 = 0 (673)

Using these values of the restraint parameters the elastic buckling load can bedetermined from the tabulations in [33 35]

When more than one member of a rigid frame is loaded the buckling restraintparameters cannot be easily determined because of the interactions between mem-bers which take place during buckling The typical member of such a frame acts asa beam-column which is subjected to a combination of axial and transverse loadsand end moments The buckling behaviour of beam-columns and of rigid framesis treated in detail in Chapters 7 and 8

610 Monosymmetric beams

6101 Elastic buckling resistance

When a monosymmetric I-beam (see Figure 627) which is loaded in its plane ofsymmetry twists during buckling the longitudinal bending stresses MyzIy exert

S

C

b1 t1

b2 t2

df

z0

z

yh

twz

12

ndash2z0

4])2()2[(

]12[

])(12[)(1

)1(

)()(1

1

2)()(

12)()(

)(

2))((

2)(

22

32

41

42

2111

31

2222

32

0

123

12

2221

32122

2 211

212211

22122

21

fmw

wf

ff

y

f

m

w

wfy

w

wf

f

dtbI

ttztzd

ztbtbz

zdtbtbzd

I

zdz

ttbb

thyttth

ttthzdtbztbI

ttthtbtb

tthtthdtbz

tthd

m

ndashndashndashndash

+ndash

ndashndash

=

=

ndashndash=

+=

ndashndashndash ndash+

ndashndash+ndash+=

ndashndash++ndashndashndash+

=

minusndash=

y

+

+

Figure 627 Properties of monosymmetric sections

264 Lateral buckling of beams

a torque (see Section 614)

TM = Myβydφ

dx(674)

in which

βy = 1

Iy

intA(y2z + z3)dA minus 2z0 (675)

is the monosymmetry property of the cross-section An explicit expression for βy

for an I-section is given in Figure 627The action of the torque TM can be thought of as changing the effective torsional

rigidity of the section from GIt to (GIt + Myβy) and is related to the effect whichcauses some short concentrically loaded compression members to buckle torsion-ally (see Section 375) In that case the compressive stresses exert a disturbingtorque so that there is a reduction in the effective torsional rigidity In doubly sym-metric beams the disturbing torque exerted by the compressive bending stresses isexactly balanced by the restoring torque due to the tensile stresses and βy is zeroIn monosymmetric beams however there is an imbalance which is dominated bythe stresses in the smaller flange which is further from the shear centre Thus whenthe smaller flange is in compression there is a reduction in the effective torsionalrigidity (Myβy is negative) while the reverse is true (Myβy is positive) when thesmaller flange is in tension Consequently the resistance to buckling is increasedwhen the larger flange is in compression and decreased when the smaller flangeis in compression

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supported monosymmetric beamwith equal and opposite end moments can be obtained by substituting Mcr forMzx and the effective rigidity (GIt + Mcrβy) for GIt in equation 63 for a doublysymmetric beam and rearranging whence

Mcr =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) radic

GIt + π2EIw

L2+

βy

2

radic(π2EIz

L2

)2

+βy

2

radic(π2EIz

L2

) (676)

in which the warping section constant Iw is as given in Figure 627The evaluation of the monosymmetry property βy is not straightforward and it

has been suggested that the more easily calculated parameter

ρm = IczIz (677)

Lateral buckling of beams 265

should be used instead where Icz is the section minor axis second moment ofarea of the compression flange The monosymmetry property βy may then beapproximated [46] by

βy = 09df (2ρm minus 1)(1 minus I2z I

2y ) (678)

and the warping section constant Iw by

Iw = ρm(1 minus ρm)Izd2f (679)

The variations of the dimensionless elastic buckling moment McrLradic(EIzGIt)

with the values of ρm and Km = radic(π2EIzd2

f 4GItL2) are shown in Figure 628The dimensionless buckling resistance for a T-beam with the flange in compression(ρm = 10) is significantly higher than for an equal flanged I-beam (ρm = 05)with the same value of Km but the resistance is greatly reduced for a T-beam withthe flange in tension (ρm = 00)

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of simply supported monosymmetricbeams with other loading conditions has been investigated numerically and tabu-lated solutions and approximating equations are available [5 13 16 42 47ndash49]for beams under moment gradient or with central concentrated loads or uni-formly distributed loads Solutions are also available [16 42 50] for cantileverswith concentrated end loads or uniformly distributed loads These solutions canbe used to find the maximum moment Mcr in the beam or cantilever at elasticbuckling

IzIy = 01

M M

Monosymmetric beam parameter

T

T075

050

025

0

C

C

Dim

ensi

onle

ss b

uckl

ing

mom

ent

Mcr

L

(E

I zG

I t) 20

15

10

5

00 05 10 15 20 25 30

(2EIzdf 24GItL2) =Km

m = Icz Iz =100

Figure 628 Monosymmetric I-beams in uniform bending

266 Lateral buckling of beams

6102 Design rules

EC3 has no specific rules for designing monosymmetric beams against lateralbuckling because it regards them as being the same as doubly symmetric beamsThus it requires the value of the elastic buckling moment resistance Mcr of themonosymmetric beam to be used in the simple general design method describedin Section 653 However the logic of this approach has been questioned [49]and in some cases may lead to less safe results

A worked example of checking a monosymmetric T-beam is given inSection 6156

611 Non-uniform beams

6111 Elastic buckling resistance

Non-uniform beams are often more efficient than beams of constant section andare frequently used in situations where the major axis bending moment variesalong the length of the beam Non-uniform beams of narrow rectangular sectionare usually tapered in their depth Non-uniform I-beams may be tapered in theirdepth or less commonly in their flange width and rarely in their flange thicknesswhile steps in flange width or thickness are common

Depth reductions in narrow rectangular beams produce significant reductionsin their minor axis flexural rigidities EIz and torsional rigidities GIt Because ofthis there are also significant reductions in their resistances to lateral bucklingClosed form solutions for the elastic buckling loads of many tapered beams andcantilevers are given in the papers cited in [13 16 51 52]

Depth reductions in I-beams have no effect on the minor axis flexural rigidityEIz and little effect on the torsional rigidity GIt although they produce significantreductions in the warping rigidity EIw It follows that the resistance to buckling ofa beam which does not depend primarily on its warping rigidity is comparativelyinsensitive to depth tapering On the other hand reductions in the flange widthcause significant reductions in GIt and even greater reductions in EIz and EIwwhile reductions in flange thickness cause corresponding reductions in EIz andEIw and in GIt Thus the resistance to buckling varies significantly with changesin the flange geometry

General numerical methods of calculating the elastic buckling loads of taperedI-beams have been developed in [51ndash53] while the elastic and inelastic bucklingof tapered monosymmetric I-beams are discussed in [53ndash55] Solutions for beamswith constant flanges and linearly tapered depths under unequal end moments aregiven in [56 57] and more general solutions are given in [58] The buckling ofI-beams with stepped flanges has also been investigated and many solutions aretabulated in [59]

Approximations for the elastic buckling moment Mcr of a simply supportednon-uniform beam can be obtained by reducing the value calculated for a uniform

Lateral buckling of beams 267

beam having the properties of the maximum section of the beam by multiplyingit by

αst = 10 minus 12

(Lr

L

) 1 minus

(06 + 04

dmin

dmax

)Af min

Af max

(680)

in which Af min Af max are the flange areas and dmin dmax are the section depthsat the minimum and maximum cross-sections and Lr is either the portion of thebeam length which is reduced in section or is 05L for a tapered beam Thisequation agrees well with the buckling solutions shown in Figure 629 for centralconcentrated loads on stepped [59] and tapered [51] beams whose minimum cross-sections are at their simply supported ends

6112 Design rules

EC3 requires non-uniform beams to be designed against lateral buckling by usingthe methods described in Section 653 with the section moment resistance McRd =Wyfy and the elastic buckling moment Mcr being the values for the most criticalsection where the ratio of MEdMcRd of the design bending moment to the sectionmoment capacity is greatest

A worked example of checking a stepped beam is given in Section 6157

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10

Red

uctio

n fa

ctor

st

033

050

067

100

Depth taperedWidth taperedThickness tapered

Mean of width andthickness stepped2

L----r

2L----r

L

Section parameter (06 + 04dmindmax)Afmin Afmax

LrL = 0

LrL = 05

Figure 629 Reduction factors for stepped and tapered I-beams

268 Lateral buckling of beams

612 Appendix ndash elastic beams

6121 Buckling of straight beams

61211 Beams with equal end moments

The elastic buckling moment Mcr of the beam shown in Figure 63 can be deter-mined by finding a deflected and twisted position which is one of equilibrium Thedifferential equilibrium equation of bending of the beam is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMcrφ (681)

which states that the internal minor axis moment of resistance EIzd2vdx2 mustexactly balance the disturbing component minusMcrφ of the applied bending momentMcr at every point along the length of the beam The differential equation of torsionof the beam is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Mcr

dv

dx(682)

which states that the sum of the internal resistance to uniform torsion GItdφdxand the internal resistance to warping torsion minusEIwd3φdx3 must exactly balancethe disturbing torque Mcrdvdx caused by the applied moment Mcr at every pointalong the length of the beam

The derivation of the left-hand side of equation 682 is fully discussed in Sec-tions 102 and 103 The torsional rigidity GIt in the first term determines thebeamrsquos resistance to uniform torsion for which the rate of twist dφdx is constantas shown in Figure 10la For thin-walled open sections the torsion constant It isapproximately given by the summation

It asympsum

bt33

in which b is the length and t the thickness of each rectangular element of thecross-section Accurate expressions for It are given in [3 Chapter 10] from whichthe values for hot-rolled I-sections have been calculated [4 Chapter 10]

The warping rigidity EIw in the second term of equation 682 determines theadditional resistance to non-uniform torsion for which the flanges bend in oppositedirections as shown in Figure 101b and c When this flange bending varies alongthe length of the beam flange shear forces are induced which exert a torqueminusEIwd3φdx3 For equal flanged I-beams

Iw = Izd2f

4

in which df is the distance between flange centroids An expression for Iw for amonosymmetric I-beam is given in Figure 627

Lateral buckling of beams 269

When equations 681 and 682 are both satisfied at all points along the beamthen the deflected and twisted position is one of equilibrium Such a position isdefined by the buckled shape

v = Mcr

π2EIzL2φ = δ sin

π x

L (61)

in which the maximum deflection δ is indeterminate This buckled shape satisfiesthe boundary conditions at the supports of lateral deflection prevented

(v)0 = (v)L = 0 (683)

twist rotation prevented

(φ)0 = (φ)L = 0 (684)

and ends free to warp (see Section 1083)

(d2φ

dx2

)0

=(

d2φ

dx2

)L

= 0 (685)

Equation 61 also satisfies the differential equilibrium equations (equations 681and 682) when Mcr = Mzx where

Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

) (GIt + π2EIw

L2

)(63)

which defines the moment at elastic lateral buckling

61212 Beams with unequal end moments

The major axis bending moment My and shear Vz in the beam with unequal endmoments M and βmM shown in Figure 64a are given by

My = M minus (1 + βm)MxL

and

Vz = minus(1 + βm)ML

When the beam buckles the minor axis bending equation is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

270 Lateral buckling of beams

and the torsion equation is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= My

dv

dxminus Vzv

These equations reduce to equations 681 and 682 for the case of equal andopposite end moments (βm = minus1)

Closed form solutions of these equations are not available but numerical meth-ods [3ndash11] have been used The numerical solutions can be conveniently expressedin the form of

Mcr = αmMzx (64)

in which the factor αm accounts for the effect of the non-uniform distribution ofthe bending moment My on elastic lateral buckling The variation of αm with theend moment ratio βm is shown in Figure 64c for the two extreme values of thebeam parameter

K =radic(

π2EIw

GJL2

)(67)

of 005 and 3 Also shown in Figure 64c is the approximation

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (65)

61213 Beams with central concentrated loads

The major axis bending moment My and the shear Vz in the beam with a centralconcentrated load Q shown in Figure 65 are given by

My = Q x2 minus Q 〈x minus L2〉Vz = Q2 minus Q 〈x minus L2〉0

in which the values of the second terms are taken as zero when the values insidethe Macaulay brackets 〈〉 are negative When the beam buckles the minor axisbending equation is

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

and the torsion equation is

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Q

2(v minus zQ φ)L2(1 minus 2〈x minus L2〉0)+ My

dv

dxminus Vzv

in which zQ is the distance of the point of application of the load below the centroidand (Q2)(v minus zQφ)L2 is the end torque

Lateral buckling of beams 271

Numerical solutions of these equations for the dimensionless buckling loadQL2

radic(EIzGIt) are available [3 13 16 42] and some of these are shown in

Figure 66 in which the dimensionless height ε of the point of application of theload is generally given by

ε = zQ

L

radic(EIz

GIt

) (68)

or for the particular case of equal flanged I-beams by

ε = K

π

2zQ

df

61214 Cantilevers with concentrated end loads

The elastic buckling of a cantilever with a concentrated end load Q applied at adistance zQ below the centroid can be predicted from the solutions of the differentialequations of minor axis bending

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMyφ

and of torsion

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Q(v minus zQφ)L + My

dv

dxminus Vzv

in which

My = minusQ(L minus x)

and

Vz = Q

These solutions must satisfy the fixed end (x = 0) boundary conditions of

(v)0 = (φ)0 = (dvdx)0 = (dφdx)0 = 0

and the condition that the end x = L is free to warp whence

(d2φdx2)L = 0

Numerical solutions of these equations are available [16 37 42 43] and someof these are shown in Figure 620

272 Lateral buckling of beams

6122 Deformations of beams with initial crookednessand twist

The deformations of a simply supported beam with initial crookedness and twistcaused by equal and opposite end moments Mcan be analysed by considering theminor axis bending and torsion equations

EIzd2v

dx2= minusM (φ + φ0) (686)

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= M

(dv

dxminus dv0

dx

) (687)

which are obtained from equations 681 and 682 by adding the additional momentMφ0 and torque Mdv0dx induced by the initial twist and crookedness

If the initial crookedness and twist rotation are such that

v0

δ0= φ0

θ0= sin

π x

L (614)

in which the central initial crookedness δ0 and twist rotation θ0 are related by

δ0

θ0= Mzx

π2EIzL2 (615)

then the solution of equations 686 and 687 which satisfies the boundary conditions(equations 683ndash685) is given by

v

δ= φ

θ= sin

π x

L (616)

in which

δ

δ0= θ

θ0= MMzx

1 minus MMzx (617)

The maximum longitudinal stress in the beam is the sum of the stresses due tomajor axis bending minor axis bending and warping and is equal to

σmax = M

Welyminus EIz

Welz

(d2(v + df φ2)

dx2

)L2

If the elastic limit is taken as the yield stress fy then the limiting nominal stressσL for which this elastic analysis is valid is given by

σL = fy minus δ0Ncrz

Mzx

(1 + df

2

Ncrz

Mzx

)1

Welz

ML

1 minus MLMzx

Lateral buckling of beams 273

or

ML = My minus δ0Ncrz

Mzx

(1 + df

2

Ncrz

Mzx

)Wely

Welz

ML

1 minus MLMzx

in which Ncrz = π2EIzL2 ML = fLWely is the limiting moment at first yieldand My = fyWely is the nominal first yield moment This can be solved for thedimensionless limiting moment MLMy In the case where the central crookednessδ0 is given by

δ0Ncrz

Mzx= θ0 = WelzWely

1 + (df 2) (NcrzMzx)η (621)

in which η defines the magnitudes δ0θ0 then the dimensionless limiting momentsimplifies to

ML

My= 1

Φ +radicΦ2 minus λ

2(618)

in which

Φ = (1 + η + λ2)2 (619)

and

λ =radic(MyMzx) (620)

is a generalised slenderness

613 Appendix ndash effective lengths of beams

6131 Beams with elastic end restraints

The beam shown in Figure 618 is restrained at its ends against minor axis rotationsdvdx and against warping rotations (df 2)dφdx and the boundary conditionsat the end x = L2 can be expressed in the form of

MB + MT

(dvdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R2

1 minus R2

and

MT minus MB

(df 2) (dφdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R4

1 minus R4

274 Lateral buckling of beams

in which MT and MB are the flange minor axis end restraining moments

MT = 12EIz(d2vdx2)L2 + (df 4)EIz(d

2φdx2)L2

MB = 12EIz(d2vdx2)L2 minus (df 4)EIz(d

2φdx2)L2

and R2 and R4 are the dimensionless minor axis bending and warping end restraintparameters If the beam is symmetrically restrained then similar conditions applyat the end x = minusL2 The other support conditions are

(v)plusmnL2 = (φ)plusmnL2 = 0

The particular case for which the minor axis and warping end restraints areequal so that

R2 = R4 = R (651)

may be analysed The differential equilibrium equations for a buckled positionvφ of the beam are

EIzd2v

dx2= minusMcrφ + (MB + MT )

and

GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= Mcr

dv

dx

These differential equations and the boundary conditions are satisfied by thebuckled shape

v = Mcrφ

π2EIzk2crL2

= A

(cos

π x

kcrLminus cos

π

2kcr

)

in which the effective length factor kcr satisfies

R

1 minus R= minus π

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (652)

The solutions of this equation are shown in Figure 618c

614 Appendix ndash monosymmetric beams

When a monosymmetric beam (see Figure 627) is bent in its plane of symmetryand twisted the longitudinal bending stresses σ exert a torque which is similar

Lateral buckling of beams 275

to that which causes some short concentrically loaded compression members tobuckle torsionally (see Sections 375 and 311) The longitudinal bending force

σ δA = Myz

IyδA

acting on an element δA of the cross-section rotates a0dφdx (where a0 is thedistance to the axis of twist through the shear centre y0 = 0 z0) and so its transversecomponent σ middot δA middot a0dφdx exerts a torque σ middot δA middot a0dφdx middot a0 about the axis oftwist The total torque TM exerted is

TM = dφ

dx

intA

a20

Myz

IydA

in which

a20 = y2 + (z minus z0)

2

Thus

TM = Myβydφ

dx (674)

in which the monosymmetry property βy of the cross-section is given by

βy = 1

Iy

intA

z3 dA +int

Ay2zdA

minus 2z0 (675)

An explicit expression for βy for a monosymmetric I-section is given inFigure 627 and this can also be used for tee-sections by putting the flange thick-ness t1 or t2 equal to zero Also given in Figure 627 is an explicit expression forthe warping section constant Iw of a monosymmetric I-section For a tee-sectionIw is zero

615 Worked examples

6151 Example 1 ndash checking a beam supported at both ends

Problem The 75 m long 610 times 229 UB 125 of S275 steel shown in Figure 630 issimply supported at both ends where lateral deflections v are effectively preventedand twist rotations φ are partially restrained Check the adequacy of the beam fora central concentrated top flange load caused by an unfactored dead load of 60 kN(which includes an allowance for self-weight) and an unfactored imposed load of100 kN

Design bending moment

MEd = (135 times 60)+ (15 times 100) times 754 = 433 kNm

276 Lateral buckling of beams

375 m 375 m

QD = 60 kN QI = 100 kN at top flange

Quantity 610 times 229 UB 125 457 times 191 UB 82 Units bf 2290 1913 mmtf 196 160 mmh 6122 4600 mmtw 119 99 mmr 127 102 mm

Wply 3676 1831 cm3

Iz 3932 1871 cm4

It 154 692 cm4

Iw 345 0922 dm6

(b) Section properties

(a) Example 1

Figure 630 Examples 1 and 4

Section resistanceAs in Section 51215 fy = 265 Nmm2 the section is Class 1 and the sectionresistance is McRd = 974 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd and the section resistance isadequate

Elastic buckling momentUsing equation 656 to allow for the partial torsional end restraints

kcr = 1 + (6122 minus 196)(6 times 7500)(196119)3

times 1 + 2290(6122 minus 196)2= 1041

so that Lcr = 1041 times 7500 = 7806 mmAdapting equation 636

Mzx0 =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 3932 times 104

78062

times(

81 000 times 154 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 345 times 1012

78062

)Nmm

= 569 kNm

Using equation 612 Ncrz = π 2 times 210 000 times 3932 times 10475002 N = 1449 kN

Lateral buckling of beams 277

Using Figure 67 αm = 135

04αmzQNcrz

Mzx0= 04 times 135 times (minus 61222)times 1449 times 103

569 times 106= minus0421

Adapting equation 611

Mcr = 135 times 569radic[1 + (minus0421)2] + (minus0421) Nmm = 510 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] with L = 7806 mm leads to Mcr =522 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(974510) = 1382

hb = 61222290 = 267 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(1382 minus 02)+ 10 times 13822 = 1656

Using equation 626

MbRd = 9741656 + radic(16562 minus 13822) kNm

= 379 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequateUsing the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause

6323) and αLT = 049 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 049(1382 minus 04)+ 075 times 13822 = 1457

Using equation 626

MbRd = 9741457 + radic(14572 minus 075 times 13822) kNm

= 426 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance still appears to be inadequateThe design moment resistance is further increased by using equations 629 630

and 628 to find

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

135)1 minus 2 times (1382 minus 08)2 = 0978 and

MbRdmod = 4260978 = 436 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is adequate after all

278 Lateral buckling of beams

Brace preventslateral deflection and twist rotation

254 times 146 UB 37

254 times 146 UB 37

457 times 191 UB 82

70 kN

70kNm

1 2 3

45 m 45 m

(a) Example 2 (c) Example 3 (b) Properties of

12 kNm at top flange

80 m

bf = 1464 mmtf = 109 mmh = 256 mm tw = 63 mm r = 76 mm

Wply = 483 cm3

Iz = 571 cm4

It = 153 cm4

Iw = 00857 dm6

Figure 631 Examples 2 and 3

6152 Example 2 ndash checking a braced beam

Problem The 9 m long 254 times 146 UB 37 braced beam of S275 steel shownin Figure 631a and b has a central concentrated design load of 70 kN (whichincludes an allowance for self-weight) and a design end moment of 70 kNm Lateraldeflections v and twist rotations φ are effectively prevented at both ends and by abrace at mid-span Check the adequacy of the braced beam

Design bending moment

R3 = (70 times 45)minus 709 = 2722 kN MEd2 = 2722 times 45 = 1225 kNm

Section resistance

tf = 109 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (14642 minus 632 minus 76)(109 times 0924) T52

= 620 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = (256 minus 2 times 109 minus 2 times 76)(63 times 0924) T52

= 376 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRd = 275 times 483 times 103 Nmm 625

= 1328 kNm gt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Lateral buckling of beams 279

Elastic buckling momentThe beam is fully restrained at mid-span and so consists of two equal lengthsegments 12 and 23 By inspection the check will be controlled by segment 23which has the lower moment gradient and therefore the lower value of αm UsingFigure 67 αm = 175

Using equation 63

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104

45002

times(

81 000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

45002

) Nmm

= 1112 kNm

Using equation 64

Mcr = 175 times 1112 = 1946 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] on the segment 23 alone leads toMcr = 2045 kNm Using PRFELB on the complete beam leads to Mcr =2379 kNm which indicates the increase caused by the restraint offered by segment12 to segment 23 The increased elastic buckling moment may be approxi-mated by using the improved method given in Section 682 as demonstratedin Section 6155)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(13281946) = 0826

hb = 2561464 = 175 lt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 021 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 021(0826 minus 02)+ 10 times 08262 = 0907

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280907 + radic(09072 minus 08262) kNm

= 1037 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequate

280 Lateral buckling of beams

Using the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause6323) and αLT = 034 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0826 minus 04)+ 075 times 08262 = 0828

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280828 + radic(08282 minus 075 times 08262) kNm = 1066 kNm

The design moment resistance is further increased by using equations 629 630and 628 to find

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

175)1 minus 2 times (0826 minus 08)2 = 0878 and

MbRdmod = 10660878 = 1214 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is just inadequate

6153 Example 3 ndash checking a cantilever

Problem The 80 m long 457 times 191 UB 82 cantilever of S275 steel shown inFigure 631c has the section properties shown in Figure 630b The cantilever haslateral torsional and warping restraints at the support is free at the tip and hasa factored upwards design uniformly distributed load of 12 kNm (which includesan allowance for self-weight) acting at the top flange Check the adequacy of thecantilever

Design bending moment

MEd = 12 times 822 = 384 kNm

Section resistance

tf = 160 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (19132 minus 992 minus 102)(160 times 0924) T52

= 544 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

Lateral buckling of beams 281

cw(twε) = (4602 minus 2 times 160 minus 2 times 102)(99 times 0924) T52

= 446 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRd = 275 times 1831 times 103 Nmm 625

= 5035 kNm gt 384 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Elastic buckling momentThe upwards load at the top flange is equivalent to a downwards load at the bottomflange so that zQ = 46002 = 2300 mm Using equation 68

ε = 2300

8000

radic(210 000 times 1871 times 104

81 000 times 692 times 104

)= 0241

Using equation 67

K = radic(π2 times 210 000 times 0922 times 1012)(81 000 times 692 times 104 times 80002)= 0730

Using equation 659

qL3

2radic

EIzGIt= 27

1 + 14(0241 minus 01)radic1 + 142(0241 minus 01)2

+ 10(0730 minus 2)

1 + 13(0241 minus 01)radic1 + 132(0241 minus 01)2

= 1723

Mcr = qL22 = 1723 times radic(210 000 times 1871 times 104

times 81 000 times 692 times 104)8000 Nmm

= 1011 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1051 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(50351011) = 0706

hb = 46001913 = 240 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0706 minus 02)+ 10 times 07062 = 0835

282 Lateral buckling of beams

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350835 + radic(08352 minus 07062)

= 3930 kNm gt 384 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is adequate

6154 Example 4 ndash designing a braced beam

Problem Determine a suitable UB of S275 steel for the simply supported beamof Section 6151 if twist rotations are effectively prevented at the ends and if abrace is added which effectively prevents lateral deflection v and twist rotation φat mid-span

Design bending momentUsing Section 6151 MEd = 433 kNm

Selecting a trial sectionThe central brace divides the beam into two identical segments each of lengthL = 3750 mm and eliminates the effect of the load height

Guess fy = 275 Nmm2 and MbRdWyfy = 09Using equation 632 Wply ge (433 times 106275)09 mm3 = 1750 cm3Try a 457 times 191 UB 82 with Wply = 1831 cm3 gt 1750 cm3

Section resistanceAs in Section 6153 fy = 275 Nmm2 McRd = 5035 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and the section resistance is adequate

Elastic buckling momentUsing Figure 67 αm = 175

Using equation 63

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 1871 times 104

37502

times(

81 000 times 692 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 0922 times 1012

37502

) Nmm

= 7275 kNm

Using equation 64

Mcr = 175 times 7275 = 1273 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1345 kNm)

Member resistanceUsing equation 625 λLT = radic

(50351273) = 0629

hb = 46001913 = 240 gt 2

Lateral buckling of beams 283

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause 6322)and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0629 minus 02)+ 10 times 06292 = 0771

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350771 + radic(07712 minus 06292) kNm

= 414 kNm lt 433 kNm = MEd

and the beam appears to be inadequateUsing the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause

6323) and αLT = 049 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 049(0629 minus 04)+ 075 times 06292 = 0704

Using equation 626

MbRd = 50350704 + radic(07042 minus 075 times 06292) kNm

= 437 kNm gt 433 kNm = MEd

and so the design moment resistance is adequate after all

6155 Example 5 ndash checking a braced beam bybuckling analysis

Problem Use the method of elastic buckling analysis given in Section 682 tocheck the braced beam of Section 6152

Elastic buckling analysisThe application of the method of elastic buckling analysis given in Section 682is summarised below using the same step numbering as in Section 682

(2) The beam is fully restrained at mid-span and so consists of two segments12 and 23For segment 12 M1 = minus70 kNm and M2 = 1225 kNm (as in Section6152)βm12 = 701225 = 0571Using equation 65 αm12 = 175 + 105 times 0571 + 03 times 05712

= 2448 lt 256For segment 23 βm23 = 01225 = 0 and αm23 = 175 as in Section 6152

(3) Lcr12 = Lcr23 = 4500 mm

284 Lateral buckling of beams

(4) Using Mzx12 = Mzx23 = 1112 kNm from Section 6152

Mcr12 = 2448 times 1112 = 2723 kNm

Qs12 = 70 times 27231225 = 1556 kN

Mcr23 = 175 times 1112 = 1946 kNm

Qs23 = 70 times 19461225 = 1112 kN

(5) Qs23 lt Qs12 and so 23 is the critical segment(6) αr12 = (3 times 210 000 times 571 times 1044500)times (1 minus 11121556)

= 2279 times 106 Nmm(7) α23 = 2 times 210 000 times 571 times 1044500 = 5329 times 106 Nmm(8) k2 = 5329 times 106(05 times 2279 times 106 + 5329 times 106) = 0824

k3 = 10 (zero restraint at 3)(9) Using Figure 321a kcr23 = 093 Lcr23 = 093 times 4500 = 4185 mm

(10) Using equation 639

Mzx =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradicπ2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104

41852

times(

81 000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

41852

) Nmm

= 1234 kNm

and Mcr23 = 175 times 1234 = 2159 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr23 = 2379 kNm)

Member resistanceMcRd = 1328 kNm as in Section 6152

Using equation 625 λLT = radic(13282159) = 0784

hb = 2561464 = 175 lt 2

Using the EC3 less conservative method with β = 075 λLT 0 = 04 (Clause6323) and αLT = 034 (Tables 65 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0784 minus 04)+ 075 times 07842 = 0796

Using equation 626

MbRd = 13280796 + radic(07962 minus 075 times 07842) kNm = 1056 kNm

Lateral buckling of beams 285

Using equations 629 630 and 628

f = 1 minus 05 times (1 minus 1radic

175)1 minus 2 times (0784 minus 08)2 = 0878 and

MbRdmod = 10560878 = 1202 kNm lt 1225 kNm = MEd

and the design moment resistance is just inadequate

6156 Example 6 ndash checking aT-beam

Problem The 50 m long simply supported monosymmetric 229 times 305 BT 63T-beam of S275 steel shown in Figure 632 has the section properties shown inFigure 632c Determine the uniform bending design moment resistances whenthe flange is in either compression or tension

Section resistance (flange in compression)

tf = 196 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cf (tf ε) = (22902 minus 1192 minus 127)(196 times 0942) T52

= 519 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

The plastic neutral axis bisects the area and in this case lies in the flange (atzp = 2290 times 196 + (3060 minus 196)times 119(2 times 2290) = 172 mm)

Thus the whole web is in tension and is automatically Class 1

McRd = 265 times 531 times 103 Nmm = 1407 kNm 625

M

119

1963060

2290

50 m

Mr = 127 mm

Wply = 531 cm3

Welymin = 299 cm3

Iz = 1966 cm4

It = 769 cm4

(a) Beam (b) Cross-section (c) Properties

Figure 632 Example 6

286 Lateral buckling of beams

Elastic buckling (flange in compression)Using Figure 627

df = 3060 minus (196 + 0)2 = 2962 mm

z = 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times (3060 minus 0)times 1192

(2290 times 196)+ 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times 119= 660 mm

Iy = (2290 times 196 times 6602)+ 0 + (3060 minus 196 minus 0)3 times 11912

+ (3060 minus 196 minus 0)times 119 times 660 minus (3060 minus 0)22

= 6864 times 106 mm4

1 minus ρm = 0

z0 = 0 times 2962 minus 660 = minus660 mm

βy = 1

6864 times 106

(2962 minus 660)times (0 + 0)minus 660times (

2293 times 19612 + 229 times 196 times 6602)

+ [(2962 minus 660 minus 0)4

minus (660 minus 1962)4] times 1194

minus 2 times (minus660) = 2156 mm

Iw = 0

π2EIz

L2= π2 times 210 000 times 1966 times 104

50002= 1630 times 106N

βy

2

radicπ2EIz

L2= 2156

2times

radic1630 times 106 = 1376 times 103

Using equation 676

Mcr =radic(1633 times 106)times radic[81 000 times 769 times 104 + 0 + (1376 times 103)2]

+ 1376 times 103 = 5401 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 5401 kNm)

Member resistance (flange in compression)Using equation 625 λLT = radic

(14075403) = 0510Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 λLT 0 = 02 (Clause

6322) and αLT = 076 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 076(0510 minus 02)+ 10 times 05102 = 0748

Lateral buckling of beams 287

Using equation 626

MbRd = 14070748 + radic(07482 minus 05102) kNm = 1086 kNm

Section resistance (flange in tension)Using Table 42 of EN1993-1-5 [60] and the ratio of the web outstand tipcompression to tension of

ψ = σ2σ1 = minus(660 minus 1962 minus 127)(3060 minus 1962 minus 660)

= minus0189

kσ = 057 minus 021 times (minus0189)+ 007 times (minus0189)2 = 0612 and

21radic

kσ = 21 times radic(0612) = 164

cw(twε) = (3060 minus 196 minus 127)(119 times 0942) T52

= 244gt 164 = 21radic

kσ and the web is Class 4 T52

The section may be treated as Class 3 if the effective value of ε is increased so thatthe Class 3 limit is just satisfied in which case

ε = cwtw21

radickσ

= (3060 minus 196 minus 127)119

164= 1400 552(9)

in which case the maximum design compressive stress is

σcomRd = fyγM0

ε2= 26510

14002= 135 Nmm2 552(9)

and so the section resistance is

McRd = 135 times 299 times 103 Nmm = 404 kNm 625

(If the effective section method of Clause 43(4) of EN1993-1-5 [60] is used thenan increased section resistance of McRd = Welyminfy = 532 kNm is obtained)

Elastic buckling (flange in tension)Using Figure 627 leads to βy = minus2156 mm

Using equation 676 leads to Mcr = 1883 kNm(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 1883 kNm)

Member resistance (flange in tension)Using equation 625 λLT = radic

(4041883) = 0463Using the EC3 simple general method as before and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 076(0463 minus 02)+ 10 times 04632 = 0708

Using equation 626

MbRd = 4040708 + radic(07082 minus 04632) kNm = 326 kNm

288 Lateral buckling of beams

6157 Example 7 ndash checking a stepped beam

Problem The simply supported non-uniform welded beam of S275 steel shown inFigure 633 has a central concentrated design load Q acting at the bottom flangeThe beam has a 960 times 16 web and its equal flanges are 300 times 32 in the central20 m region and 300 times 20 in the outer 30 m regions Determine the maximumvalue of Q

Section properties

Wplyi = 300 times 32 times (960 + 32)+ 9602 times 164 = 1321 times 106 mm3

Wplyo = 300 times 20 times (960 + 20)+ 9602 times 164 = 9566 times 106 mm3

Izi = 2 times 3003 times 3212 = 144 times 106 mm4

Iti = 2 times 300 times 3233 + 960 times 1633 = 7864 times 106 mm4

Iwi = 144 times 106 times (960 + 32)24 = 3543 times 1012 mm6

Section resistances

tfi = 32 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

tfo = 20 mm fy = 265 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε = radic(235265) = 0942 T52

cfo(tfoε) = (300 minus 16)2(20 times 0942) T52

= 754 lt 9 and the flange is Class 1 T52

cw(twε) = 960(16 times 0942) T52

= 637 lt 72 and the web is Class 1 T52

McRdo = 265 times 9566 times 106 Nmm = 2535 kNm 625

McRdi = 265 times 1321 times 106 Nmm = 3501 kNm 625

Quantity Inner length

Outer length Units

bf 300 300 mm tf 32 20 mm d 960 960 mm tw 16 16 mmbf

bf

tf

tw d

tfQ

30 m 10 10 30 m

(a) Beam and loading (b) Section (c) Dimensions

Figure 633 Example 7

Lateral buckling of beams 289

Critical sectionAt mid-span MEd4 = Q times 84 = 20 Q kNmAt the change of section MEd3 = (Q2)times 3 = 15 Q kNmMEd4McRdi = 20 times Q3501 = 0000571 QMEd3McRdo = 15 times Q2535 = 0000592 Q gt 0000571 Qand so the critical section is at the change of section

Elastic bucklingFor a uniform beam having the properties of the central cross-section usingequation 63

Mzxi =

radicradicradicradicradicradicradic

π2 times 210 000 times 144 times 106

80002

times(

81 000 times 7864 times 106 + π2 times 210 000 times 3543 times 1012

80002

)Nmm

= 2885 kNm

Using equation 612 Ncrz = π 2 times 210000 times 144 times 10680002 N = 4663 kNUsing Figure 67 αm = 135

04αmzQNcrz

Mzxi= 04 times 135 times (9602)times 4663 times 103

2885 times 106= 0491

Using equation 611

Mcri = 135 times 2885radic[1 + 04912] + 0491 Nmm = 5854 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcri = 5972 kNm)For the non-uniform beam

LrL = 6080 = 075(06 + 04

dmin

dmax

)Af min

Af max=

(06 + 04 times 960 + 2 times 20

960 + 2 times 32

)300 times 20

300 times 32= 0619

Using equation 680

αst = 10 minus 12 times(

6000

8000

)times (1 minus 0619) = 0657

Mcr = 0657 times 5854 = 3847 kNm

(Using the computer program PRFELB [18] leads to Mcr = 4420 kNm)

Moment resistanceAt the critical section Mcro = 3847 times 30004000 = 2885 kNm

290 Lateral buckling of beams

Using the values for the critical section in equation 625 λLT = radic(25352885) =

0937

hb = (960 + 2 times 20)300 = 333 gt 2

Using the EC3 simple general method with β = 10 and λLT 0 = 02(Clause 6322) and αLT = 034 (Tables 64 and 63) and equation 627

ΦLT = 051 + 034(0937 minus 02)+ 09372 = 1065

Using equation 626

MbRd = 25351065 + radic(10652 minus 09372) kNm

= 1615 kNm = (QbRd2

) times 30

QbRd = 1615 times 230 = 1077 kN

616 Unworked examples

6161 Example 8 ndash checking a continuous beam

A continuous 533times210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has two equal spans of 70 m Auniformly distributed design load q is applied along the centroidal axis Determinethe maximum value of q

6162 Example 9 ndash checking an overhanging beam

The overhanging beam shown in Figure 634a is prevented from twisting anddeflecting laterally at its end and supports The supported segment is a 250 times150 times 10 RHS of S275 steel and is rigidly connected to the overhanging segmentwhich is a 254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel Determine the maximum design loadQ that can be applied at the end of the UB

Q

(a) Overhanging beam (b) Braced beam

70 m 140 m 40 m 60 m 80 m

254 times146 UB 37 250 times150 times10 RHS Q kN 15 Q kN

5Q kNm

Lateral deflection and twist prevented at supports and load points

Lateral deflection and twist prevented at end and at supports

Figure 634 Unworked examples 9 and 10

Lateral buckling of beams 291

6163 Example 10 ndash checking a braced beam

Determine the maximum moment at elastic buckling of the braced 533 times 210 UB92 of S275 steel shown in Figure 634b

6164 Example 11 ndash checking a monosymmetric beam

A simply supported 60 m long 530times210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has equal andopposite end moments The moment resistance is to be increased by welding a fulllength 25 times 16 mm plate of S275 steel to one flange Determine the increases inthe moment resistances of the beam when the plate is welded to

(a) the compression flange or(b) the tension flange

6165 Example 12 ndash checking a non-uniform beam

A simply supported 530 times 210 UB 92 beam of S275 steel has a concentratedshear centre load at the centre of the 100 m span The moment resistance is to beincreased by welding 250 times 16 plates of S275 steel to the top and bottom flangesover a central length of 40 m Determine the increase in the moment resistance ofthe beam

References

1 Vacharajittiphan P Woolcock ST and Trahair NS (1974) Effect of in-planedeformation on lateral buckling Journal of Structural Mechanics 3 pp 29ndash60

2 Nethercot DA and Rockey KC (1971) A unified approach to the elastic lateralbuckling of beams The Structural Engineer 49 pp 321ndash30

3 Timoshenko SP and Gere JM (1961) Theory of Elastic Stability 2nd editionMcGraw-Hill New York

4 Bleich F (1952) Buckling Strength of Metal Structures McGraw-Hill New York5 Structural Stability Research Council (1998) Guide to Design Criteria for Metal

Compression Members 5th edition (ed TV Galambos) John Wiley New York6 Barsoum RS and Gallagher RH (1970) Finite element analysis of torsional and

torsional-flexural stability problems International Journal of Numerical Methods inEngineering 2 pp 335ndash52

7 Krajcinovic D (1969) A consistent discrete elements technique for thin-walledassemblages International Journal of Solids and Structures 5 pp 639ndash62

8 Powell G and Klingner R (1970) Elastic lateral buckling of steel beams Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST9 pp 1919ndash32

9 Nethercot DA and Rockey KC (1971) Finite element solutions for the buckling ofcolumns and beams International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 13 pp 945ndash9

10 Hancock GJ and Trahair NS (1978) Finite element analysis of the lateral bucklingof continuously restrained beam-columns Civil Engineering Transactions Institutionof Engineers Australia CE20 No 2 pp 120ndash7

292 Lateral buckling of beams

11 Brown PT and Trahair NS (1968) Finite integral solution of differentialequations Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10pp 193ndash6

12 Trahair NS (1968) Elastic stability of propped cantilevers Civil EngineeringTransactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10 pp 94ndash100

13 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

14 Lee GC (1960) A survey of literature on the lateral instability of beams WeldingResearch Council Bulletin No 63 August

15 Clark JW and Hill HN (1960) Lateral buckling of beams Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 86 No ST7 pp 175ndash96

16 Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures E and FN SponLondon

17 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

18 Papangelis JP Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (1998) Elastic flexural-torsionalbuckling of structures by computer Computers and Structures 68 pp 125ndash37

19 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1976) Inelastic lateral buckling of determinatebeams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST4 pp 701ndash17

20 Trahair NS (1983) Inelastic lateral buckling of beams Chapter 2 in Beams and Beam-Columns Stability and Strength (ed R Narayanan) Applied Science PublishersLondon pp 35ndash69

21 Nethercot DA (1972) Recent progress in the application of the finite element methodto problems of the lateral buckling of beams Proceedings of the EIC Conference onFinite Element Methods in Civil Engineering Montreal June pp 367ndash91

22 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1975) Analysis of lateral buckling in planeframes Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST7 pp 1497ndash516

23 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Direct stiffness analysis of lateralbuckling Journal of Structural Mechanics 3 pp 107ndash37

24 Mutton BR and Trahair NS (1973) Stiffness requirements for lateral bracingJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 99 No ST10 pp 2167ndash82

25 Mutton BR and Trahair NS (1975) Design requirements for column bracesCivil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE17 No 1pp 30ndash5

26 Trahair NS (1999) Column bracing forces Australian Journal of StructuralEngineering Institution of Engineers Australia SE2 Nos 23 pp 163ndash8

27 Nethercot DA (1973) Buckling of laterally or torsionally restrained beams Journalof the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 99 No EM4 pp 773ndash91

28 Trahair NS and Nethercot DA (1984) Bracing requirements in thin-walled struc-tures Chapter 3 of Developments in Thin-Walled Structures ndash 2 (eds J Rhodes andAC Walker) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Barking pp 93ndash130

29 Valentino J Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1997) Inelastic buckling of steel beamswith central torsional restraints Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 123 No9 pp 1180ndash6

30 Valentino J and Trahair NS (1998) Torsional restraint against elastic lateral bucklingJournal of Structural Engineering ASCE 124 No 10 pp 1217ndash25

31 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1975) Design of diaphragm braced I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST10 pp 2045ndash61

Lateral buckling of beams 293

32 Trahair NS (1979) Elastic lateral buckling of continuously restrained beam-columnsThe Profession of a Civil Engineer (eds D Campbell-Allen and EH Davis) SydneyUniversity Press Sydney pp 61ndash73

33 Austin WJ Yegian S and Tung TP (1955) Lateral buckling of elastically end-restrained beams Proceedings of the ASCE 81 No 673 April pp 1ndash25

34 Trahair NS (1965) Stability of I-beams with elastic end restraints Journal of theInstitution of Engineers Australia 37 pp 157ndash68

35 Trahair NS (1966) Elastic stability of I-beam elements in rigid-jointed structuresJournal of the Institution of Engineers Australia 38 pp 171ndash80

36 Nethercot DA and Trahair NS (1976) Lateral buckling approximations for elasticbeams The Structural Engineer 54 pp 197ndash204

37 Trahair NS (1983) Lateral buckling of overhanging beams Instability and PlasticCollapse of Steel Structures (ed LJ Morris) Granada London pp 503ndash18

38 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1981) Distortional buckling of I-beams Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 107 No ST2 pp 355ndash70

39 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1983) Lateral stability of beams on seats Journalof Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No ST9 pp 2212ndash15

40 Bradford MA (1992) Lateral-distortional buckling of steel I-section membersJournal of Constructional Steel Research 23 Nos 1ndash3 pp 97ndash116

41 Trahair NS (1966) The bending stress rules of the draft ASCA1 Journal of theInstitution of Engineers Australia 38 pp 131ndash41

42 Anderson JM and Trahair NS (1972) Stability of monosymmetric beams andcantilevers Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST1 pp 269ndash86

43 Nethercot DA (1973) The effective lengths of cantilevers as governed by lateralbuckling The Structural Engineer 51 pp 161ndash8

44 Trahair NS (1968) Interaction buckling of narrow rectangular continuous beamsCivil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE10 No 2pp 167ndash72

45 Salvadori MG (1951) Lateral buckling of beams of rectangular cross-section underbending and shear Proceedings of the First US National Congress of AppliedMechanics pp 403ndash5

46 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1980) Buckling properties of monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 106 No ST5 pp 941ndash57

47 Kitipornchai S Wang CM and Trahair NS (1986) Buckling of monosymmetricI-beams under moment gradient Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112 No 4pp 781ndash99

48 Wang CM and Kitipornchai S (1986) Buckling capacities of monosymmetric I-beams Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 112 No 11 pp 2373ndash91

49 Woolcock ST Kitipornchai S and Bradford MA (1999) Design of Portal FrameBuildings 3rd edn Australian Institute of Steel Construction Sydney

50 Wang CM and Kitipornchai S (1986) On stability of monosymmetric cantileversEngineering Structures 8 No 3 pp 169ndash80

51 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1972) Elastic stability of tapered I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST3 pp 713ndash28

52 Nethercot DA (1973) Lateral buckling of tapered beams Publications IABSE 33pp 173ndash92

53 Bradford MA and Cuk PE (1988) Elastic buckling of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 114 No 5 pp 977ndash96

294 Lateral buckling of beams

54 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1975) Elastic behaviour of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST8 pp 1661ndash78

55 Bradford MA (1989) Inelastic buckling of tapered monosymmetric I-beamsEngineering Structures 11 No 2 pp 119ndash126

56 Lee GC Morrell ML and Ketter RL (1972) Design of tapered members Bulletin173 Welding Research Council June

57 Bradford MA (1988) Stability of tapered I-beams Journal of Constructional SteelResearch 9 pp 195ndash216

58 Bradford MA (2006) Lateral buckling of tapered steel members Chapter 1 inAnalysis and Design of Plated Structures Vol1Stability Woodhead Publishing LtdCambridge pp 1ndash25

59 Trahair NS and Kitipornchai S (1971) Elastic lateral buckling of stepped I-beamsJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 97 No ST10 pp 2535ndash48

60 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash5Plated Structural Elements BSI London

Chapter 7

Beam-columns

71 Introduction

Beam-columns are structural members which combine the beam function oftransmitting transverse forces or moments with the compression (or tension)member function of transmitting axial forces Theoretically all structural membersmay be regarded as beam-columns since the common classifications of tensionmembers compression members and beams are merely limiting examples ofbeam-columns However the treatment of beam-columns in this chapter is gen-erally limited to members in axial compression The behaviour and design ofmembers with moments and axial tension are treated in Chapter 2

Beam-columns may act as if isolated as in the case of eccentrically loadedcompression members with simple end connections or they may form part of arigid frame In this chapter the behaviour and design of isolated beam-columnsare treated The ultimate resistance and design of beam-columns in frames arediscussed in Chapter 8

It is convenient to discuss the behaviour of isolated beam-columns under thethree separate headings of In-Plane Behaviour FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling andBiaxial-Bending as is done in Sections 72ndash74 When a beam-column is bentabout its weaker principal axis or when it is prevented from deflecting laterallywhile being bent about its stronger principal axis (as shown in Figure 71a) itsaction is confined to the plane of bending This in-plane behaviour is related to thebending of beams discussed in Chapter 5 and to the buckling of compression mem-bers discussed in Chapter 3 When a beam-column which is bent about its strongerprincipal axis is not restrained laterally (as shown in Figure 71b) it may buckleprematurely out of the plane of bending by deflecting laterally and twisting Thisaction is related to the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams (referred to as lateralndashtorsional buckling in EC3) discussed in Chapter 6 More generally however abeam-column may be bent about both principal axes as shown in Figure 71cThis biaxial bending which commonly occurs in three-dimensional rigid framesinvolves interactions of beam bending and twisting with beam and column buck-ling Sections 72ndash74 discuss the in-plane behaviour flexuralndashtorsional bucklingand biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns

296 Beam-columns

x

y

z

N

NM

L

x

z

N

N

L

x

y

z

N

N My

Lateralrestraints

y

M

Mz

m M m M

mz Mz

myMy

(c) Biaxial bendingMember deflects vwand twists

(b) Flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling Member deflectsw in zx plane then bucklesby deflecting v in yx planeand twisting

(a) In-plane behaviourMember deflects w inzx plane only

Figure 71 Beam-column behaviour

72 In-plane behaviour of isolated beam-columns

When the deformations of an isolated beam-column are confined to the planeof bending (see Figure 71a) its behaviour shows an interaction between beambending and compression member buckling as indicated in Figure 72 Curve 1 ofthis figure shows the linear behaviour of an elastic beam while curve 6 shows thelimiting behaviour of a rigid-plastic beam at the full plastic moment Mpl Curve 2shows the transition of a real elastic ndash plastic beam from curve 1 to curve 6The elastic buckling of a concentrically loaded compression member at its elasticbuckling load Ncr y is shown by curve 4 Curve 3 shows the interaction betweenbending and buckling in an elastic member and allows for the additional momentNδ exerted by the axial load Curve 7 shows the interaction between the bendingmoment and axial force which causes the member to become fully plastic Thiscurve allows for reduction from the full plastic moment Mpl to Mplr caused by theaxial load and for the additional moment Nδ The actual behaviour of a beam-column is shown by curve 5 which provides a transition from curve 3 for an elasticmember to curve 7 for full plasticity

721 Elastic beam-columns

A beam-column is shown in Figures 71a and 73a which is acted on by axialforces N and end moments M and βmM where βm can have any value betweenminus1 (single curvature bending) and +1 (double curvature bending) For isolated

Beam-columns 297

1 2 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

In-plane deflection

Loading M or N

Ncry

Mpl

Mplr

34

57

0

First yield column M = 0

N

N

M

M(M N)max

interactionbeam-column

beam N = 0

Figure 72 In-plane behaviour of a beam-column

N

NM

w

L

x

M

Nw

Bending momentndashEIy d

2wdx2

M (1 + )L

M (1 + )L

M [1 ndash (1 + ) xL]

m M

m

m

m

m M

(b) Bending moment distribution (a) Beam-column

Figure 73 In-plane bending moment distribution in a beam-column

beam-columns these end moments are independent of the deflections and have noeffect on the elastic buckling load Ncr y =π2EIyL2 (They are therefore quite dif-ferent from the end restraining moments discussed in Section 363 which increasewith the end rotations and profoundly affect the elastic buckling load) The beam-column is prevented from bending about the minor axis out of the plane of the endmoments and is assumed to be straight before loading

298 Beam-columns

The bending moment in the beam-column is the sum of M minus M (1 + βm)xLdue to the end moments and shears and Nw due to the deflection w as shownin Figure 73b It is shown in Section 751 that the deflected shape of the beam-column is given by

w = M

N

[cosmicrox minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1 + (1 + βm)

x

L

]

(71)

where

micro2 = N

EIy= π2

L2

N

Ncr y (72)

As the axial force N approaches the buckling load Ncr y the value of microLapproaches π and the values of cosecmicroL cotmicroL and therefore of w approachinfinity as indicated by curve 3 in Figure 72 This behaviour is similar to that ofa compression member with geometrical imperfections (see Section 322) It isalso shown in Section 751 that the maximum moment Mmax in the beam-columnis given by

Mmax = M

1 +

βmcosecπ

radicN

Ncr y+ cot π

radicN

Ncr y

2

05

(73)

when βm lt minus cosπradic(NNcr y) and the point of maximum moment lies in the

span and is given by the end moment M that is

Mmax = M (74)

when βm ge minus cosπradic(NNcr y)

The variations of MmaxM with the axial load ratio NNcr y and the end momentratio βm are shown in Figure 74 In general Mmax remains equal to M for lowvalues of NNcr y but increases later The value of NNcr y at which Mmax beginsto increase above M is lowest for βm = minus1 (uniform bending) and increaseswith increasing βm Once Mmax departs from M it increases slowly at first thenmore rapidly and reaches very high values as N approaches the column bucklingload Ncr y

For beam-columns which are bent in single curvature by equal and oppo-site end moments (βm = minus1) the maximum deflection δmax is given by (seeSection 751)

δmax

δ= 8π2

NNcr y

[sec

π

2

radicN

Ncr yminus 1

](75)

Beam-columns 299

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

02

04

06

08

1010

ndash MN

N

= 10

05

0500

ndash

ndash

05

10

Mmax M

( = 1)

(06 ndash 04 )(1 ndash NNcry) 10

NN

cry

Mmax M or max

m M

mmax

m

m

ge

Figure 74 Maximum moments and deflections in elastic beam-columns

in which δ = ML28EIy is the value of δmax when N = 0 and the maximummoment by

Mmax = M secπ

2

radicN

Ncr y (76)

These two equations are shown non-dimensionally in Figure 74 It can be seenthat they may be approximated by using a factor 1(1 minus NNcr y) to amplify thedeflection δ and the moment M due to the applied moments alone (N = 0) Thissame approximation was used in Section 363 to estimate the reduced stiffness ofan axially loaded restraining member

For beam-columns with unequal end moments (βm gt minus1) the value of Mmax

may be approximated by using

Mmax

M= Cm

1 minus NNcr yge 10 (77)

in which

Cm = 06 minus 04βm (78)

These approximations are also shown in Figure 74 It can be seen that they aregenerally conservative for βm gt 0 and only a little unconservative for βm lt 0

300 Beam-columns

Approximations for the maximum moments Mmax in beam-columns with trans-verse loads can be obtained by using

Mmax = δMmax0 (79)

in which Mmax0 is the maximum moment when N = 0

δ = γm(1 minus γsNNcr)

(1 minus γnNNcr) (710)

Ncr = π2EI(k2crL2) (711)

and kcr = LcrL is the effective length ratio Expressions for Mmax0 and valuesof γm γn γs and kcr are given in Figure 75 for beam-columns with centralconcentrated loads Q and in Figure 76 for beam-columns with uniformly dis-tributed loads q A worked example of the use of these approximations is given inSection 771

The maximum stress σmax in the beam-column is the sum of the axial stress andthe maximum bending stress caused by the maximum moment Mmax It is thereforegiven by

σmax = σac + σbcyMmax

M(712)

Beam-column First-order moment (N = 0) k Mmax 0

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

16---------

Q

8---------

Q

L

4

05 10 10

QL

QL

018

m n s

QL

QL

32QL5

10 10 10 062

10 10 049 014

07

56------

10 10 028

10 10 045

20 10 10 019

10 10 10 018 4---------QL

3

2

8---------QL

32QL5

32QL5

16QL3

16QL3

16QL3

8QL

8QL

8QL

8QL

QL

16---------QL

8---------QL

8---------QL

+

+

+

+

+

+

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash ndash+

Q

L2 L2 L2

L2 L2

L2 L2

L2L2

L2L2

L2L2

3

16---------QL3

16---------QL3

cr

Figure 75 Approximations for beam-columns with central concentrated loads

Beam-columns 301

Mmax0Beam-column k

q

q

q

q

q

8---------

q

12---------

q

L L

8+

+

+

+

+

+

+

05 10 10

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash

ndash ndash

ndash

qL

qL

037

12---------qL

2

2

2

2

qL

82qL

82qL

22qL

82qL

1282qL9

1282qL9

1282qL9

242qL

242qL

122qL

122qL

10 05 10 04

10 10 049 018

07

916------

10 10 036

10 10 029

20 10 10 04

10 10 10 ndash003 8---------qL2

2---------qL2

8---------qL2

8---------qL2

8---------qL2

12---------qL2

12---------qL2

cr m n sFirst-order moment (N = 0)

Figure 76 Approximations for beam-columns with distributed loads

in which σac = NA and σbcy = MWely If the member has no residual stressesthen it will remain elastic while σmax is less than the yield stress fy and so theabove results are valid while

N

Ny+ M

My

Mmax

Mle 10 (713)

in which Ny = Afy is the squash load and My = fyWel the nominal first yieldmoment A typical elastic limit of this type is shown by the first yield point markedon curve 3 of Figure 72 It can be seen that this limit provides a lower boundestimate of the resistance of a straight beam-column while the elastic bucklingload Ncr y provides an upper bound

Variations of the first yield limits of NNy determined from equation 713 withMMy and βm are shown in Figure 77a for the case where Ncr y = Ny15 For abeam-column in double curvature bending (βm = 1) Mmax = M and so N varieslinearly with M until the elastic buckling load Ncr y is reached For a beam-columnin uniform bending (βm = minus1) the relationship between N and M is non-linear andconcave due to the amplification of the bending moment from M to Mmax by theaxial load Also shown in Figure 77a are solutions of equation 713 based on theuse of the approximations of equations 77 and 78 A comparison of these withthe accurate solutions also shown in Figure 77a again demonstrates thecomparative accuracy of the approximate equations 77 and 78

302 Beam-columns

NN

y

N = NbyRd

10

05 0

ndash05ndash10

ndash05ndash10

10

05 0

NN

yNcryNy = 115Ncry Ny = 115

Accurate MmaxMApproximate Mmax M

M = My

0 02 04 06 08 10MM

0

02

04

06

08

10

y

N=Ny

N=Ncry

0 02 04 06 08 10MM

0

02

04

06

08

10

y

N=Ny

N=Ncry

Crooked beam-columns Straight beam-columns

m M

βm

m

MN

N

M=My

(b) Crooked beam-columns(a) Straight beam-columns

Figure 77 First yield of beam-columns with unequal end moments

The elastic in-plane behaviour of members in which the axial forces causetension instead of compression can also be analysed The maximum moment insuch a member never exceeds M and so a conservative estimate of the elasticlimit can be obtained from

N

Ny+ M

Myle 10 (714)

This forms the basis for the methods of designing tension members for in-planebending as discussed in Section 24

722 Fully plastic beam-columns

An upper bound estimate of the resistance of an I-section beam-column bent aboutits major axis can be obtained from the combination of bending moment Mplr andaxial force Nyr which causes the cross-section to become fully plastic A particularexample is shown in Figure 78 for which the distance zn from the centroid to theunstrained fibre is less than (h minus 2tf )2 This combination of moment and forcelies between the two extreme combinations for members with bending momentonly (N = 0) which become fully plastic at

Mpl = fybf tf (h minus tf )+ fytw

(h minus 2tf

2

)2

(715)

Beam-columns 303

4 ndash

ndash

ndash )2(

)(

22

nfwy

fffyrpl

zthtf+

thtbfM

bf

tf

h

tw

zn

fy

y

z

Nyr =

=

2fyzntw

fy

(a) Section (b) Stress distribution (c) Stress resultants

Figure 78 Fully plastic cross-section

0 05 10MplrMpl

0

05

10

Ny

Ny

r

0=yi

L

y y

MplrMpl = 118[1 ndash (Nyr Ny)]

Analytical solution

Figure 79 Interaction curves for lsquozero lengthrsquo members

and members with axial force only (M = 0) which become fully plastic at

Ny = fy[2bf tf + (h minus 2tf )tw] (716)

The variations of Mplr and Nyr are shown by the dashed interaction curve inFigure 79 These combinations can be used directly for very short beam-columnsfor which the bending moment at the fully plastic cross-section is approximatelyequal to the applied end moment M

Also shown in Figure 79 is the approximation

Mplry

Mply= 118

[1 minus Nyr

Ny

]le 10 (717)

304 Beam-columns

which is generally close to the accurate solution except when Nyr asymp 015Nywhen the maximum error is of the order of 5 This small error is quite acceptablesince the accurate solutions ignore the strengthening effects of strain-hardening

A similar analysis may be made of an I-section beam-column bent about itsminor axis In this case a satisfactory approximation for the load and moment atfull plasticity is given by

Mplrz

Mpl z= 119

[1 minus

(Nyr

Ny

)2]

le 10 (718)

Beam-columns of more general cross-section may also be analysed to deter-mine the axial load and moment at full plasticity In general these may be safelyapproximated by the linear interaction equation

Mplr

Mpl= 1 minus Nyr

Ny (719)

In a longer beam-column instability effects become important and failureoccurs before any section becomes fully plastic Afurther complication arises fromthe fact that as the beam-column deflects by δ its maximum moment increasesfrom the nominal value M to (M +Nδ) Thus the value of M at which full plasticityoccurs is given by

M = Mplr minus Nδ (720)

and so the value of M for full plasticity decreases from Mplr as the deflection δincreases as shown by curve 7 in Figure 72 This curve represents an upper boundto the behaviour of beam-columns which is only approached after the maximumstrength is reached

723 Ultimate resistance

7231 General

An isolated beam-column reaches its ultimate resistance at a load which is greaterthan that which causes first yield (see Section 721) but is less than that whichcauses a cross-section to become fully plastic (see Section 722) as indicatedin Figure 72 These two bounds are often far apart and when a more accurateestimate of the resistance is required an elasticndashplastic analysis of the imperfectbeam-column must be made Two different approximate analytical approaches tobeam-column strength may be used and these are related to the initial crookednessand residual stress methods discussed in Sections 322 and 334 of allowing forthe effects of imperfections on the resistances of real compression members Thesetwo approaches are discussed below

Beam-columns 305

7232 Elasticndashplastic resistances of straight beam-columns

The resistance of an initially straight beam-column with residual stresses maybe found by analysing numerically its non-linear elasticndashplastic behaviour anddetermining its maximum resistance [1] Some of these resistances [2 3] are shownas interaction plots in Figure 710 Figure 710a shows how the ultimate load Nand the end moment M vary with the major axis slenderness ratio Liy for beam-columns with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) while Figure 710bshows how these vary with the end moment ratio βm for a slenderness ratio ofLiy = 60

It has been proposed that these ultimate resistances can be simply and closelyapproximated by using the values of M and N which satisfy the interactionequations of both equation 717 and

N

NbyRd+ Cm

(1 minus NNcr y)

M

Mplyle 1 (721)

in which NbyRd is the ultimate resistance of a concentrically loaded column (thebeam-column with M = 0) which fails by deflecting about the major axis Ncr y

is the major axis elastic buckling load of this concentrically loaded column andCm is given by

Cm = 06 minus 04βm ge 04 (722)

Equation 717 ensures that the reduced plastic moment Mplr is not exceededby the end moment M and represents the resistances of very short members

ndash05

ndash10

0

05

10

0 05 10MM

0

05

10

pl

0 05 100

05

10

Li---- = 60y

y y

y y

M

MN

N

LM

MN

N

M

N

N

M

MN

NLiy

20

40

60

80

100120

0

MMpl

NN

y

NN

y

(a) Effect of slenderness (b) Effect of end moment ratio

m

Figure 710 Ultimate resistance interaction curves

306 Beam-columns

NN

y

NN

y

1)1( ndash118

1+

+ ndash

ypl

ycr

m

Rdyb

NNMM

NN

CN

N

Analytical solutions

11 ndash

1

plycrRdyb N M

M=

1plM

M=

=

NN

N

0 05 100

05

10

0 05 10MM

0

05

10

plMMpl

Li---- =120y

y y

M

MN

N

m =1

Li---- = 40y

80

120 0

1ndash

Analytical solutions

le

(a) Effect of slenderness (b) Effect of end moment ratio

Figure 711 Interaction formulae

(Liy rarr 0) and of some members which are not bent in single curvature (ieβm gt 0) as shown for example in Figure 711b

Equation 721 represents the interaction between buckling and bending whichdetermines the resistance of more slender members If the case of equal and oppo-site end moments is considered first (βm = minus1 and Cm = 1) then it will be seen thatequation 721 includes the same approximate amplification factor 1(1minusNNcr y)

as does equation 77 for the maximum moments in elastic beam-columns It is ofa similar form to the first yield condition of equation 713 except that a conver-sion to ultimate resistance has been made by using the ultimate resistance NbyRd and moment Mply instead of the squash load Ny and the yield moment My Thesesubstitutions ensure that this interaction formula gives the same limit predictionsfor concentrically loaded columns (M = 0) and for beams (N = 0) as do thetreatments given in Chapters 3 and 5 The accuracy of equation 721 for beam-columns with equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) is demonstrated inFigure 711a

The effects of unequal end moments (βm gt minus1) on the ultimate resistances ofbeam-columns are allowed for approximately in equation 721 by the coefficientCm which converts the unequal end moments M andβmM into equivalent equal andopposite end moments CmM Although this conversion is for in-plane behaviour itis remarkably similar to the conversion used for beams with unequal end momentswhich buckle out of the plane of bending (see Section 6212) The accuracy ofequation 721 for beam-columns with unequal end moments is demonstrated in

Beam-columns 307

Figure 711b and it can be seen that it is good except for high values of βm whenit tends to be oversafe and for high values of M when it tends to overestimatethe analytical solutions for the ultimate resistance (although this overestimate isreduced if strain-hardening is accounted for in the analytical solutions) The over-conservatism for high values ofβm is caused by the use of the 04 cut-off in equation722 for Cm but more accurate solutions can be obtained by using equation 78for which the minimum value of Cm is 02

Thus the interaction equations (equations 717 and 721) provide a reasonablysimple method of estimating the ultimate resistances of I-section beam-columnsbent about the major axis which fail in the plane of the applied moments Theinteraction equations have been successfully applied to a wide range of sectionsincluding solid and hollow circular sections as well as I-sections bent about theminor axis In the latter case Mply NbyRd and Ncr y must be replaced by theirminor axis equivalents while equation 717 should be replaced by equation 718

It should be noted that the interaction equations provide a convenient way ofestimating the ultimate resistances of beam-columns An alternative method hasbeen suggested [4] using simple design charts to show the variation of the momentratio MMplr with the end moment ratio βm and the length ratio LLc in which Lc

is the length of a column which just fails under the axial load N alone (the effectsof strain-hardening must be included in the calculation of Lc)

7233 First yield of crooked beam-columns

In the second approximate approach to the resistance of a real beam-column thefirst yield of an initially crooked beam-column without residual stresses is usedFor this the magnitude of the initial crookedness is increased to allow approx-imately for the effects of residual stresses One logical way of doing this is touse the same crookedness as is used in the design of the corresponding compres-sion member since this has already been increased so as to allow for residualstresses

The first yield of a crooked beam-column is analysed in Section 752 andparticular solutions are shown in Figure 77b for a beam-column with Ncr yNy =115 and whose initial crookedness is defined by η = 0290(Li minus 0152) It canbe seen that as M decreases to zero the axial load at first yield increases to thecolumn resistance NbyRd which is reduced below the elastic buckling load Ncr y

by the effects of imperfections As N decreases the first yield loads for crookedbeam-columns approach the corresponding loads for straight beam-columns

For beam-columns in uniform bending (βm = minus1) the interaction between Mand N is non-linear and concave as it was for straight beam-columns (Figure 77a)If this interaction is plotted using the maximum moment Mmax instead of the endmoment M then the relationships between Mmax and N becomes slightly convexsince the non-linear effects of the amplification of M are then included in MmaxThus a linear relationship between MmaxMy and NNbyRd will provide a sim-ple and conservative approximation for first yield which is of good accuracy

308 Beam-columns

Full plasticity (equation 717)

Column resistance N=NbyRd

05

=10

ndash10ndash10

050

0

Mmax Mpl Mmax Mpl

NN

y

NN

y

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10 N =Ny

0 02 04 06 08 100

02

04

06

08

10 N =Ny

M=MplM=Mpl

N =NbyRd N=NbyRd

(a) Approximation (equation 723) (b) Elasticndashplastic analyses of straightbeam-columns

Parabolictransition

Linear

m =10m

Figure 712 Resistances of beam-columns

However if this approximation is used for the resistance then it will becomeincreasingly conservative as Mmax increases since it approaches the first yieldmoment My instead of the fully plastic moment Mpl This difficulty may be over-come by modifying the approximation to a linear relationship between MmaxMpl

and NNbyRd which passes through MmaxMpl = 1 when NNbyRd = 0 as shownin Figure 712a Such an approximation is also in good agreement with the uniformbending (βm = minus1) analytical strengths [2 3] shown in Figure 712b for initiallystraight beam-columns with residual stresses

For beam-columns in double curvature bending (βm = 1) the first yield inter-action shown in Figure 77b forms an approximately parabolic transition betweenthe bounds of the column resistance NbyRd and the first yield condition of astraight beam-column In this case the effects of initial curvature are greatestnear mid-span and have little effect on the maximum moment which is gener-ally greatest at the ends Thus the strength may be simply approximated by aparabolic transition from the column resistance NbyRd to the full plasticity condi-tion given by equation 717 for I-sections bent about the major axis as shown inFigure 712a This approximation is in good agreement with the double curvaturebending (βm = 1) analytical resistances [2 3] shown in Figure 712b for straightbeam-columns with residual stresses and zero strain-hardening

The ultimate resistances of beam-columns with unequal end moments may beapproximated by suitable interpolations between the linear and parabolic approx-imations for beam-columns in uniform bending (βm = minus1) and double curvaturebending (βm = 1) It has been suggested [5 6] that this interpolation should be

Beam-columns 309

made according to

M

Mply=

1 minus

(1 + βm

2

)3(

1 minus N

NbyRd

)

+ 118

(1 + βm

2

)3radic(

1 minus N

Ncr y

)le 1 (723)

This interpolation uses a conservative cubic weighting to shift the resulting curvesdownwards towards the linear curve for βm = minus1 as shown in Figure 712a Thisis based on the corresponding shift shown in Figure 712b of the analytical results[2 3] for initially straight beam-columns with residual stresses

724 Design rules

7241 Cross-section resistance

EC3 requires beam-columns to satisfy both cross-section resistance and overallmember buckling resistance limitations The cross-section resistance limitationsare intended to prevent cross-section failure due to plasticity or local buckling

The general cross-section resistance limitation of EC3 is given by a modificationof the first yield condition of equation 714 to

NEd

NcRd+ MEd

McRdle 1 (724)

in which NEd is the design axial force and MEd the design moment acting at thecross-section under consideration NcRd is the cross-section axial resistance Afy(obtained using the effective cross-sectional area Aeff for slender cross-sections incompression) and McRd is the cross-section moment resistance (based on eitherthe plastic elastic or effective section modulus depending on classification)

This linear interaction equation is often conservative and so EC3 allows theuse of the more economic alternative for Class 1 and 2 cross-sections of directlycalculating the reduced plastic moment resistance MN Rd in the presence of anaxial load NEd The following criterion should be satisfied

MEd le MN Rd (725)

For doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections there is no reduction to the major axisplastic moment resistance (ie MN Rd = MplRd) provided both

NEd le 025NplRd (726a)

and

NEd le 05hwtwfyγM0

(726b)

310 Beam-columns

For larger values of NEd the reduced major axis plastic moment resistance isgiven by

MN yRd = MplyRd(1 minus n)

(1 minus 05a)le MplyRd (727)

in which

n = NEdNplRd (728)

and

a = A minus 2btfA

le 05 (729)

where b and tf and the flange width and thickness respectivelyIn minor axis bending there is no reduction to the plastic moment resistance of

doubly symmetrical I- and H-sections provided

NEd le hwtwfyγM0

(730)

For larger values of NEd the reduced plastic minor axis moment resistance is givenby

MN zRd = Mpl zRd (731a)

for n le a and by

MN zRd = Mpl zRd

[1 minus

(n minus a

1 minus a

)2]

(731b)

for n gt a Similar formulae are also provided for box sections

7242 Member resistance

The general in-plane member resistance limitation of EC3 is given by a simplifi-cation of equation 721 to

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRdle 1 (732)

for major axis buckling and

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MzEd

MczRdle 1 (733)

Beam-columns 311

for minor axis buckling in which kyy and kzz are interaction factors whose valuesmay be obtained from Annex A or Annex B of EC3 and McyRd and MczRd arethe in-plane bending resistances about the major and minor axes respectively Theformer is based on enhancing the elastically determined resistance to allow forpartial plastification of the cross-section (ie following Section 7233) whilst thelatter reduced the plastically determined resistance to allow for instability effects(ie following Section 7232) Lengthy formulae to calculate the interactionfactors are provided in both cases

73 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of isolatedbeam-columns

When an unrestrained beam-column is bent about its major axis it may buckleby deflecting laterally and twisting at a load which is significantly less than themaximum load predicted by an in-plane analysis This flexuralndashtorsional bucklingmay occur while the member is still elastic or after some yielding due to in-planebending and compression has occurred as indicated in Figure 713

731 Elastic beam-columns

7311 Beam-columns with equal end moments

Consider a perfectly straight elastic beam-column bent about its major axis (seeFigure 71b) by equal and opposite end moments M (so that βm = minus1) and loadedby an axial force N The ends of the beam-column are assumed to be simply

Load Load

Out-of-plane deformation In-plane deflection

(a) Out-of-plane behaviour (b) In-plane behaviour

1

2

3

Elastic buckling1

Inelastic buckling2

3

Inelastic buckling

Elasticndashplasticbending

First yield

Elastic buckling

Figure 713 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns

312 Beam-columns

supported and free to warp but end twist rotations are prevented It is also assumedthat the cross-section of the beam-column has two axes of symmetry so that theshear centre and centroid coincide

When the applied load and moments reach the elastic buckling values NcrMN McrMN a deflected and twisted equilibrium position is possible It is shown inSection 761 that this position is given by

v = McrMN

Ncr z minus NcrMNφ = δ sin

πx

L(734)

in which δ is the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection and that theelastic buckling combination NcrMN McrMN is given by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(735)

in which ip = radic[(Iy + Iz)A] is the polar radius of gyration and

Ncr z = π2EIzL2 (736)

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2

)(737)

are the minor axis and torsional buckling loads of an elastic axially loaded column(see Sections 321 and 375) It can be seen that for the limiting case whenMcrMN = 0 the beam-column buckles as a compression member at the lower ofNcr z and NcrT and when NcrMN = 0 it buckles as a beam at the elastic bucklingmoment (see equation 63)

Mcr = Mzx =radic(

π2EIz

L2

)(GIt + π2EIw

L2

)= ip

radicNcr zNcrT (738)

Some more general solutions of equation 735 are shown in Figure 714The derivation of equation 735 given in Section 761 neglects the approx-

imate amplification by the axial load of the in-plane moments to McrMN

(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y) (see Section 721) When this is accounted for equation 735for the elastic buckling combination of NcrMN and McrMN changes to

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr y

)(1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(739)

The maximum possible value of NcrMN is the lowest value of Ncr y Ncr z andNcrT For most sections this is much less than Ncr y and so equation 739 is usuallyvery close to equation 735 For most hot-rolled sections Ncr z is less than NcrT

Beam-columns 313

0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10McrMNMzx

0

02

04

06

08

10

Ncr

MN

N

crz

NcrzNcrT = 50

02

20

05

10

Figure 714 Elastic buckling load combinations for beam-columns with equal end moments

so that (1 minus NcrMN NcrT ) gt (1 minus NcrMN Ncr z)(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y) In this caseequation 739 can be safely approximated by the interaction equation

NcrMN

Ncr z+ 1

(1 minus NcrMN Ncr y)

McrMN

Mzx= 1 (740)

7312 Beam-columns with unequal end moments

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of simply supported beam-columns withunequal major axis end moments M and βmM has been investigated numericallyand many solutions are available [7ndash11] The conservative interaction equation(

Mradic

F

ME

)2

+(

N

Ncr z

)= 1 (741)

has also been proposed [9] in which

M 2E = π2EIzGItL

2 (742)

The factor 1radic

F in equation 741 varies with the end moment ratio βm as shown inFigure 715 and allows the unequal end moments to be treated as equivalent equalend moments M

radicF Thus the elastic buckling of beam-columns with unequal

end moments can also be approximated by modifying equation 735 to

(McrMN radic

F)2

M 2zx

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

) (743)

or by a similar modification of equation 740

314 Beam-columns

0 02 04 06 08 10

04

06

08

Flexural ndash torsional buckling

In-plane behaviour

ndash0ndash04ndash06ndash08ndash10

11

F

Cm

Cm

02

M

M

N

N N

N

10

1 F

M F

M F1

F

m

1 m

m 1m

End moment ratio m

equiv

Cm

Figure 715 Equivalent end moments for beam-columns

It is of interest to note that the variation of the factor 1radic

F for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns is very close to that of the coefficient 1αm

obtained from

αm = 175 + 105βm + 03β2m le 256 (744)

used for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beams (see Section 6212) and closeto that of the coefficient Cm (see equation 722) used for the in-plane behaviour ofbeam-columns

However the results shown in Figure 716 of a more recent investigation [12]of the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns have indicated that thefactor for converting unequal end moments into equivalent equal end momentsshould vary with NNcr z as well as with βm More accurate predictions have beenobtained using

(McrMN

αbcMzx

)2

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

) (745)

with

1

αbc=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

NcrMN

Ncr z

) (746)

Beam-columns 315

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

02

04

08

10

(1ndash )2

(a)

ndash10 ndash05 0 05 10

02

04

08

10β m M

M

N

N

NNcrz000025050

075095

000025050

075

095

06 06

M

omen

t coe

ffic

ient

1

NNcrz

(1 ndash )2

(b)

mm

bc

M

omen

t coe

ffic

ient

1

bc

End moment ratio mEnd moment ratio m

2EIwGItL2 = 009 2EIwGItL

2 =10

Figure 716 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling coefficients 1αbc in equation 745

7313 Beam-columns with elastic end restraints

The elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of symmetrically restrained beam-columnswith equal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) is analysed in Section 762The particular example considered is one for which the minor axis bending andend warping restraints are equal This corresponds to the situation in which bothends of both flanges have equal elastic restraints whose stiffnesses are such that

Flange end moment

Flange end rotation= minusEIz

L

R

1 minus R(747)

in which the restraint parameter R varies from 0 (flange unrestrained) to 1 (flangerigidly restrained)

It is shown in Section 762 that the elastic buckling values McrMN and NcrMN

of the end moments and axial load for which the restrained beam-column buckleselastically are given by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(748)

in which

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr (749)

316 Beam-columns

and

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2cr

) (750)

where Lcr is the effective length of the beam-column

Lcr = kcrL (751)

and the effective length ratio kcr is the solution of

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (752)

Equation 748 is the same as equation 735 for simply supported beam-columnsexcept for the familiar use of the effective length Lcr instead of the actual lengthL in equations 749 and 750 defining Ncr z and NcrT Thus the solutions shownin Figure 714 can also be applied to end-restrained beam-columns

The close relationships between the flexuralndashtorsional buckling condition ofequation 735 for unrestrained beam-columns with equal end moments (βm = minus1)and the buckling loads Ncr z NcrT of columns and moments Mzx of beams havealready been discussed It should also be noted that equation 752 for the effectivelengths of beam-columns with equal end restraints is exactly the same as equation343 for columns when (1 minus R)R is substituted for γ1 and γ2 and equation 652for beams These suggest that the flexuralndashtorsional buckling condition for beam-columns with unequal end restraints could well be approximated by equations748ndash751 if Figure 321a is used to determine the effective length ratio kcr inequation 751

A further approximation may be suggested for restrained beam-columns withunequal end moments (βm = minus1) in which modifications of equations 745 and746 (after substituting i2

pNcr zNcrT for M 2zx) are used (with equations 749ndash751)

instead of equation 748

732 Inelastic beam-columns

The solutions obtained in Section 731 for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling ofstraight isolated beam-columns are only valid while they remain elastic Whenthe combination of the residual stresses with those induced by the in-plane load-ing causes yielding the effective rigidities of some sections of the member arereduced and buckling may occur at a load which is significantly less than thein-plane maximum load or the elastic buckling load as indicated in Figure 713

A method of analysing the inelastic buckling of I-section beam-columns withresidual stresses has been developed [13] and used [14] to obtain the predictionsshown in Figure 717 for the inelastic buckling loads of isolated beam-columns

Beam-columns 317

0 05 10MMIu

0

05

10

NN

Iz

0 1 2 0 1 2 3

= ndash1

300

150

100 250

200

150

300

200

Accurate [13]

Approximate equations 753 ndash 756

M

N

N

Liz

Liz

Liz

= 0 = +1

MMIu MMIu

m

m M

m m

Figure 717 Inelastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns

with unequal end moments It was found that these could be closely approximatedby modifying the elastic equations 745 and 746 to

(M

αbcI MIu

)2

=(

1 minus N

NIz

)(1 minus N

NcrT

) (753)

1

αbcI=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

N

NIz

)(754)

in which

MIuMpl = 1008 minus 0245MplMzx le 10 (755)

is an approximation for the inelastic buckling of a beam in uniform bending(equation 755 is similar to equation 623 when βm = minus1) and

NIzNy = 1035 minus 0181radic

NyNcr z minus 0128NyNcr z le 10 (756)

provides an approximation for the inelastic buckling of a column

733 Ultimate resistance

The ultimate resistances of real beam-columns which fail by flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling are reduced below their elastic and inelastic buckling loads by the pres-ence of geometrical imperfections such as initial crookedness just as are those ofcolumns (Section 34) and beams (Section 64)

318 Beam-columns

One method of predicting these reduced resistances is to modify the approximateinteraction equation for in-plane bending (equation 721) to

N

Nb zRd+ Cmy

(1 minus NNcr y)

My

Mb0yRdle 1 (757)

where Nb zRd is the minor axis strength of a concentrically loaded column(My = 0) and Mb0yRd the resistance of a beam (N = 0) with equal and oppo-site end moments (βm = minus1) which fails either by in-plane plasticity at Mplyor by flexuralndashtorsional buckling The basis for this modification is the remark-able similarity between equation 757 and the simple linear approximation ofequation 740 for the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of beam-columns withequal and opposite end moments (βm = minus1) The application of equation 757 tobeam-columns with unequal end moments is simplified by the similarity shown inFigure 715 between the values of Cm for in-plane bending and 1

radicF and 1αm

for flexuralndashtorsional bucklingHowever the value of this simple modification is lost if the in-plane strength

of a beam-column is to be predicted more accurately than by equation 721 Iffor example equation 723 is to be used for the in-plane strength as suggested inSection 7233 then it would be more appropriate to modify the flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling equations 745 and 753 to obtain out-of-plane strength predictions It hasbeen suggested [15] that the modified equations should take the form

(M

αbcuMb0yRd

)2

=(

1 minus N

Nb zRd

)(1 minus N

NcrT

)(758)

in which

1

αbcu=

(1 minus βm

2

)+

(1 + βm

2

)3 (040 minus 023

N

Nb zRd

) (759)

734 Design rules

The design of beam-columns against out-of-plane buckling will generally begoverned by

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRdle 1 (760)

in which kzy is an interaction factor that may be determined from Annex A orAnnex B of EC3 Equation 760 is similar to equation 732 for in-plane majoraxis buckling resistance except for the allowance for lateral torsional buckling inthe second term and the use of the minor axis column buckling resistance in thefirst term

Beam-columns 319

For members with the intermediate lateral restraints against minor axis bucklingfailure by major axis buckling with lateral torsional buckling between the restraintsbecomes a possibility This leads to requirement

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRdle 1 (761)

which incorporates the major axis flexural buckling resistance NbyRd and thelateral torsional buckling resistance MbRd For members with no lateral restraintsalong the span equation 760 will always govern over equation 761

The design of members subjected to bending and tension is discussed inSection 24

A worked example of checking the out-of-plane resistance of a beam-column isgiven in Section 774

74 Biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns

741 Behaviour

The geometry and loading of most framed structures are three-dimensional andthe typical member of such a structure is compressed bent about both principalaxes and twisted by the other members connected to it as shown in Figure 71cThe structure is usually arranged so as to produce significant bending about themajor axis of the member but the minor axis deflections and twists are oftensignificant as well because the minor axis bending and torsional stiffnesses aresmall In addition these deformations are amplified by the components of theaxial load and the major axis moment which are induced by the deformations ofthe member

The elastic biaxial bending of isolated beam-columns with equal and oppositeend moments acting about each principal axis has been analysed [16ndash22] butthe solutions obtained cannot be simplified without approximation These anal-yses have shown that the elastic biaxial bending of a beam-column is similar toits in-plane behaviour (see curve 3 of Figure 72) in that the major and minoraxis deflections and the twist all begin at the commencement of loading andincrease rapidly as the elastic buckling load (which is the load which causes elas-tic flexuralndashtorsional buckling when there are no minor axis moments and torquesacting) is approached First yield predictions based on these analyses have givenconservative estimates of the member resistances The elastic biaxial bending ofbeam-columns with unequal end moments has also been investigated In one ofthese investigations [16] approximate solutions were obtained by changing bothsets of unequal end moments into equivalent equal end moments by multiply-ing them by the conversion factor 1

radicF (see Figure 715) for flexuralndashtorsional

bucklingAlthough the first yield predictions for the resistances of slender beam-columns

are of reasonable accuracy they are rather conservative for stocky members in

320 Beam-columns

which considerable yielding occurs before failure Sophisticated numerical analy-ses have been made [18 20ndash24] of the biaxial bending of inelastic beam-columnsand good agreement with test results has been obtained However such an analysisrequires a specialised computer program and is only useful as a research tool

A number of attempts have been made to develop approximate methods ofpredicting the resistances of inelastic beam-columns One of the simplest of theseuses a linear extension

N

NbRd+ Cmy

(1 minus NNcr y)

My

Mb0yRd+ Cmz

(1 minus NNcr z)

Mz

Mc0zRdle 1 (762)

of the linear interaction equations for in-plane bending and flexuralndashtorsional buck-ling In this extension Mb0yRd is the ultimate moment which the beam-columncan support when N = Mz = 0 for the case of equal end moments (βm = minus1) whileMc0zRd is similarly defined Thus equation 762 reduces to an equation similarto equation 721 for in-plane behaviour when My = 0 and to equation 757 forflexuralndashtorsional buckling when Mz = 0 Equation 762 is used in conjunctionwith

My

Mplry+ Mz

Mplrzle 1 (763)

where Mplry is given by equation 717 and Mplrz by equation 718 Equation 763represents a linear approximation to the biaxial bending full plasticity limit for thecross-section of the beam-column and reduces to equation 718 or 717 whichprovides the uniaxial bending full plasticity limit when My = 0 or Mz = 0

A number of criticisms may be made of these extensions of the interactionequations First there is no allowance in equation 762 for the amplification of theminor axis moment Mz by the major axis moment My (the term (1minusNNcr z) onlyallows for the amplification caused by axial load N ) A simple method of allowingfor this would be to replace the term (1minusNNcr z) by either (1minusNNcrMN ) or by(1 minus MyMcrMN ) where the flexuralndashtorsional buckling load NcrMN and momentMcrMN are given by equation 745

Second studies [22ndash26] have shown that the linear additions of the momentterms in equations 762 and 763 generally lead to predictions which are too con-servative as indicated in Figure 718 It has been proposed that for column typehot-rolled I-sections the section full plasticity limit of equation 763 should bereplaced by(

My

Mplry

)α0

+(

Mz

Mplrz

)α0

le 1 (764)

where Mplry and Mplrz are given in equations 717 and 718 as before and theindex α0 by

α0 = 160 minus NNy

2 ln(NNy) (765)

Beam-columns 321

0 02 04 06 08 100

0 2

0 4

0 6

0 8

1 0 M

zM

crz

Rd

or M

zM

plr

z

Analyticalsolutions

NNy = 03

Liy = 60

Liy = 0

My MbryRd or My Mplry

Modified interactions equations(equation 764 ( = 17) equations 766 and 767)

Linear interactions equations(equations 762 and 763)

0

Figure 718 Interaction curves for biaxial bending

At the same time the linear member interaction equation (equation 762) shouldbe replaced by(

My

MbryRd

)αL

+(

Mz

McrzRd

)αL

le 1 (766)

where MbryRd the maximum value of My when N acts but Mz = 0 is obtainedfrom equation 757 McrzRd is similarly obtained from an equation similar toequation 721 and the index αL is given by

αL = 140 + N

Ny (767)

The approximations of equations 764ndash767 have been shown to be of reasonableaccuracy when compared with test results [27] This conclusion is reinforcedby the comparison of some analytical solutions with the approximations ofequations 764ndash767 (but with α0 = 170 instead of 1725 approximately forNNy = 03) shown in Figure 718 Unfortunately these approximations are oflimited application although it seems to be possible that their use may be extended

742 Design rules

7421 Cross-section resistance

The general biaxial bending cross-section resistance limitation of EC3 is given by

NEd

NcRd+ MyEd

McyRd+ MzEd

MczRdle 1 (768)

322 Beam-columns

which is a simple linear extension of the uniaxial cross-section resistance limitationof equation 724 For Class 1 plastic and Class 2 compact sections a more economicalternative is provided by a modification of equation 763 to

(MyEd

MN yRd

)α+

(MzEd

MN zRd

)βle 1 (769)

in which α = 20 and β = 5n ge 1 for equal flanged I-sections α = β = 20 forcircular hollow sections and α = β = 166(1 minus 113n2) le 6) for rectangularhollow sections where n = NEdNplRd Conservatively α and β may be takenas unity

7422 Member resistance

The general biaxial bending member resistance limitations are given by extensionsof equations 761 and 760 for uniaxial bending to

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRdle 1 (770)

and

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRdle 1 (771)

both of which must be satisfiedAlternative expressions for the interaction factors kyy kyz kzy and kzz are pro-

vided inAnnexesAand B of EC3 TheAnnex B formulations for the determinationof the interaction factors kij are less complex than those set out in Annex A result-ing in quicker and simpler calculations though generally at the expense of somestructural efficiency [28] Annex B may therefore be regarded as the simplifiedapproach whereas Annex A represents a more exact approach The background tothe development of the Annex A interaction factors has been described in [29] andthat of the Annex B interaction factors in [30]

For columns in simple construction the bending moments arising as a resultof the eccentric loading from the beams are relatively small and much simplerinteraction expressions can be developed with no significant loss of structuralefficiency Thus it has been shown [31] that for simple construction with hot-rolledI- and H-sections and with no intermediate lateral restraints along the memberlength equations 770 and 771 may be replaced by the single equation

NEd

Nb zRd+ MyEd

MbRd+ 15

MzEd

MczRdle 1 (772)

Beam-columns 323

provided the ratio of end moments is less than zero (ie a triangular or less severebending moment diagram)

Aworked example for checking the biaxial bending of a beam-column is given inSection 775 Further worked examples of the application of the EC3 beam-columnformulae are given in [30] and [32]

75 Appendix ndash in-plane behaviour of elasticbeam-columns

751 Straight beam-columns

The bending moment in the beam-column shown in Figure 73 is the sum of themoment [M minus M (1 + βm)xL] due to the end moments and reactions and themoment Nw due to the deflection w Thus the differential equation of bending isobtained by equating this bending moment to the internal moment of resistanceminusEIyd2wdx2 whence

minusEIyd2w

dx2= M minus M (1 + βm)

x

L+ Nw (773)

The solution of this equation which satisfies the support conditions (w)0 =(w)L = 0 is

w = M

N

[cosmicrox minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1 + (1 +βm)

x

L

] (71)

where

micro2 = N

EIy= π2

L2

N

Ncr y (72)

The bending moment distribution can be obtained by substituting equation 71 intoequation 773 The maximum bending moment can be determined by solving thecondition

d(minusEIyd2wdx2)

dx= 0

for the position xmax of the maximum moment whence

tanmicroxmax = minusβmcosecmicroL minus cotmicroL (774)

The value of xmax is positive while

βm lt minuscosπ

radicN

Ncr y

324 Beam-columns

and the maximum moment obtained by substituting equation 774 into equation773 is

Mmax = M

1 +

βmcosecπ

radicN

Ncr y+ cot π

radicN

Ncr y

2

05

(73)

When βm gt minus cosπradic(NNcr y) xmax is negative in which case the maximum

moment in the beam-column is the end moment M at x = 0 whence

Mmax = M (74)

For beam-columns which are bent in single curvature by equal and oppositeend moments (βm = minus1) equation 71 for the deflected shape simplifies and thecentral deflection δmax can be expressed non-dimensionally as

δmax

δ= 8π2

NNcr y

[sec

π

2

radicN

Ncr yminus 1

](75)

in which δ = ML28EIy is the value of δmax when N = 0 The maximum momentoccurs at the centre of the beam-column and is given by

Mmax = M secπ

2

radicN

Ncr y (76)

Equations 75 and 76 are plotted in Figure 74

752 Beam-columns with initial curvature

If the beam-column shown in Figure 73 is not straight but has an initialcrookedness given by

w0 = δ0sinπxL

then the differential equation of bending becomes

minusEIyd2w

dx2= M minus M (1 + βm)

x

L+ N (w + w0) (775)

The solution of this equation which satisfies the support conditions of (w)0 =(w)L = 0 is

w = (MN )[cos microx minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicrox minus 1

+ (1 + βm)xL] + [(microLπ)21 minus (microLπ)2]δ0sinπxL (776)

Beam-columns 325

where

(microLπ)2 = NNcr y (777)

The bending moment distribution can be obtained by substituting equation 776into equation 775 The position of the maximum moment can then be determinedby solving the condition d(minusEIyd2wdx2)dx = 0 whence

Nδ0

M= microL

π

(1 minus micro2L2

π2

) (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) cosmicroxmax + sinmicroxmaxcosπxmaxL

(778)

The value of the maximum moment Mmax can be obtained from equations 775and 776 (with x = xmax) and from equation 778 and is given by

Mmax

M= cosmicroxmax minus (βmcosecmicroL + cotmicroL) sinmicroxmax

+ (Nδ0M )

(1 minus micro2L2π2)sin

πxmax

L (779)

First yield occurs when the maximum stress is equal to the yield stress fy inwhich case

N

Ny+ Mmax

My= 1

or

N

Ny

1 + Mmax

M

Nyδ0

My

M

Nδ0

= 1 (780)

In the special case of M = 0 the first yield solution is the same as that given inSection 322 for a crooked column Equation 778 is replaced by xmax = L2 andequation 779 by

Mmax = Nδ0

(1 minus micro2L2π2)

The value NL of N which then satisfies equation 780 is given by the solution of

NL

Ny+ NLδ0My

1 minus (NLNy)(Ncr yNy) = 0 (781)

The value of MMy at first yield can be determined for any specified set ofvalues of Ncr yNy βm δ0NyMy and NNy An initial guess for xmaxL allowsNδ0M to be determined from equation 778 and MmaxM from equation 779and these can then be used to evaluate the left-hand side of equation 780 This

326 Beam-columns

process can be repeated until the values are found which satisfy equation 780Solutions obtained in this way are plotted in Figure 77b

76 Appendix ndash flexuralndashtorsional buckling ofelastic beam-columns

761 Simply supported beam-columns

The elastic beam-column shown in Figure 71b is simply supported and preventedfrom twisting at its ends so that

(v)0L = (φ)0L = 0 (782)

and is free to warp (see Section 1083) so that(d2φ

dx2

)0L

= 0 (783)

The combination at elastic buckling of the axial load NcrMN and equal andopposite end moments McrMN (ie βm = minus1) can be determined by findinga deflected and twisted position which is one of equilibrium The differentialequilibrium equations for such a position are

EIzd2v

dx2+ NcrMN v = minusMcrMNφ (784)

for minor axis bending and

(GJ minus NcrMN i2

p

)dφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= McrMN

dv

dx(785)

for torsion where i2p = radic[(Iy+Iz)A] is the polar radius of gyration Equation 784

reduces to equation 359 for compression member buckling when McrMN = 0and to equation 682 for beam buckling when NcrMN = 0 Equation 785 canbe used to derive equation 373 for torsional buckling of a compression mem-ber when McrMN = 0 and reduces to equation 682 for beam buckling whenNcrMN = 0

The buckled shape of the beam-column is given by

v = McrMN

Ncr z minus NcrMNφ = δ sin

πx

L (734)

where Ncr z = π2EIzL2 is the minor axis elastic buckling load of an axiallyloaded column and δ the undetermined magnitude of the central deflection The

Beam-columns 327

boundary conditions of equations 782 and 783 are satisfied by this buckled shapeas is equation 784 while equation 785 is satisfied when

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(735)

where

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2

)(737)

is the elastic torsional buckling load of an axially loaded column (see Section 375)Equation 735 defines the combinations of axial load NcrMN and end momentsMcrMN which cause the beam-column to buckle elastically

762 Elastically restrained beam-columns

If the elastic beam-column shown in Figure 71b is not simply supported but is elas-tically restrained at its ends against minor axis rotations dvdx and against warpingrotations (df 2)dφdx (where df is the distance between flange centroids) thenthe boundary conditions at the end x = L2 of the beam-column can be expressedin the form

MB + MT

(dvdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R2

1 minus R2

MT minus MB

(df 2)(dφdx)L2= minusEIz

L

2R4

1 minus R4

(786)

where MT and MB are the flange minor axis end restraining moments

MT = 12EIz(d2vdx2)

L2 + (df 4

)EIz

(d2φdx2)

L2

MB = 12EIz(d2vdx2)

L2 minus (df 4

)EIz

(d2φdx2)

L2

and R2 and R4 are dimensionless minor axis bending and warping end restraintparameters which vary between zero (no restraint) and one (rigid restraint)If the beam-column is symmetrically restrained similar conditions apply at theend x = minusL2 The other support conditions are

(v)plusmnL2 = (φ)plusmnL2 = 0 (787)

328 Beam-columns

The particular case for which the minor axis and warping end restraints areequal so that

R2 = R4 = R (788)

can be analysed When the restrained beam-column has equal and opposite endmoments (βm = minus1) the differential equilibrium equations for a buckled positionv φ are

EIzd2v

dx2+ NcrMN v = minusMcrMNφ + (MB + MT )(

GIt minus NcrMN i2p

)dφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3= McrMN

dv

dx

(789)

These differential equations and the boundary conditions of equations 786ndash788are satisfied by the buckled shape

v = McrMNφ

Ncr z minus NcrMN= A

(cos

πx

kcrLminus cos

π

2kcr

)

where

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr (749)

Lcr = kcrL (751)

when the effective length ratio kcr satisfies

R

1 minus R= minusπ

2kcrcot

π

2kcr (752)

This is the same as equation 652 for the buckling of restrained beams whosesolutions are shown in Figure 618c The values McrMN and NcrMN for flexuralndashtorsional buckling of the restrained beam-column are obtained by substituting thebuckled shape v φ into equations 789 and are related by

M 2crMN

i2pNcr zNcrT

=(

1 minus NcrMN

Ncr z

)(1 minus NcrMN

NcrT

)(748)

where

NcrT = GIt

i2p

(1 + π2EIw

GItL2cr

) (751)

Beam-columns 329

77 Worked examples

771 Example 1 ndash approximating the maximum elasticmoment

Problem Use the approximations of Figures 75 and 76 to determine the maxi-mum moments Mmaxy Mmax z for the 254 times 146 UB 37 beam-columns shown inFigure 719d and c

Solution for Mmaxy for the beam-column of Figure 719d

Using Figure 75 kcr = 10 γm = 10 γn = 10 γs = 018My = 20 times 94 = 45 kNm

Ncr y = π2 times 210 000 times 5537 times 104(10 times 9000)2 N = 1417 kN

Using equation 710 δy = 10 times (1 minus 018 times 2001417)

(1 minus 10 times 2001417)= 1135

Using equation 79 Mmax y = 1135 times 45 = 511 kNm

Solution for Mmaxz for the beam-column of Figure 719c

Using Figure 76 kcr = 10 γm = 10 γn = 049 γs = 018

Mz = 32 times 4528 = 81 kNm

Ncr z = π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104(10 times 4500)2 N = 5844 kN

Using equation 710 δz = 10 times (1 minus 018 times 2005844)

(1 minus 049 times 2005844)= 1127

Using equation 79 Mmax z = 1127 times 81 = 91 kNm

4500 4500

20 kN

200 kN

z

x

(b) Example 2

4500 4500

32 kNm200 kN

y

x

(c) Examples1 3 5

4500 4500

20 kN

200 kN

z

x

(d) Examples1 4 5

v = = 0

y

z

(a) 254 times 146 UB 37

h = 2560 mm bf = 1464 mm tf = 109 mm tw = 63 mm r = 76 mm

A = 472 cm2

It = 153 cm4

Iw = 00857 dm6

Iy = 5537 cm4

iy = 108 cm Wply = 483 cm3

Wely = 433 cm3

Iz = 571 cm4

iz = 348 cm Wplz = 119 cm3

Welz = 780 cm3

Figure 719 Examples 1ndash5

330 Beam-columns

772 Example 2 ndash checking the major axis in-planeresistance

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719bhas a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a design concen-trated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) acting in themajor principal plane at mid-span The beam-column is the 254 times 146 UB 37of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a The beam-column is continuously bracedagainst lateral deflections v and twist rotations φ Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

tf = 109 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN 10025-2

ε = (235275)05 = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = ((1464 minus 63 minus 2 times 76)2)(109 times 0924) = 620 lt 9 T52

and the flange is Class 1

cw = 2560 minus (2 times 109)minus (2 times 76) = 2190 mm

The compression proportion of web is

α =(

h

2minus (tf + r)+ 1

2

NEd

twfy

)cw

=(

256

2minus (109 + 76)+ 1

2times 200 times 103

63 times 275

)2190

= 076 gt 05 T52

cwtw = 219063 = 348 lt 413 = 396ε

13α minus 1T52

and the web is Class 1

McyRd = 275 times 483 times 10310 Nmm = 1328 kNm 625(2)

MyEd = 20 times 94 = 450 kNm

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 450

1328= 0493 le 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Beam-columns 331

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

Because the section is Class 1 Clause 6291 can be usedNo reduction in plastic moment resistance is required provided both

NEd = 200 kN lt 3245 kN = (025 times 472 times 102 times 27510)103

= 025NplRd and 6291(4)

NEd = 200 kN lt 2029 kN = 05 times (2560 minus 2 times 109)times 63 times 275

10 times 103

= 05 hwtwfyγM0

6291(4)

and so no reduction in the plastic moment resistance is requiredThus MN yRd = MplyRd = 1328 kNm gt 450 kNm = MyEd

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Compression member buckling resistance

Because the member is continuously braced beam lateral buckling and columnminor axis buckling need not be considered

λy =radic

AfyNcr y

= Lcr y

iy

1

λ1= 9000

(108 times 10)

1

939 times 0924= 0960 6313(1)

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about they-axis use buckling curve (a) with α = 021 T62 T61

Φy = 05[1 + 021(0960 minus 02)+ 09602] = 1041 6312(1)

χy = 1(1041 +radic

10412 minus 09602) = 0693 6312(1)

NbyRd = χyAfyγM1 = 0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510 N

= 900 kN gt 200 kN = NEd 6311(3)

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

αh = MhMs = 0 ψ = 0 Cmy = 090 + 01αh = 090 TB3

Cmy

(1 + (λy minus 02)

NEd

χyNRkγM1

)= 090

times(

1 + (0960 minus 02)times 200 times 103

0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1052

332 Beam-columns

lt Cmy

(1 + 08

NEd

χyNRkγM1

)= 090

times(

1 + 08 times 200 times 103

0693 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1060 TB1

so that kyy = 1052

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1328

= 0222 + 0356 = 0579 lt 1 633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

λmax = λy = 0960 TA1

Ncr y = π2EIyL2cr = π2 times 21 0000 times 5537 times 10490002 = 1417 kN

Since there is no lateral buckling λ0 = 0 bLT = 0 CmLT = 10 TA1

Cmy = Cmy0 = 1 minus 018NEdNcr y = 1 minus 018 times 2001417 = 0975 TA2

wy = Wply

Wely= 483

433= 1115

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

wyC2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09752 times 0960 minus 16

1115

times09752 times 09602) times 0154 minus 0]

= 0990 gt 0896 = 11115 TA1

Beam-columns 333

microy = 1 minus NEdNcr y

1 minus χyNEdNcr y= 1 minus 2001417

1 minus 0693 times 2001417= 0952 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

(1 minus NEdNcr y)

1

Cyy

= 0975 times 10 times 0952

1 minus 2001417times 1

0990= 1091 TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

McyRd= 200

900+ 1091 times 450

1328

= 0222 + 0370 = 0592 lt 1 633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

773 Example 3 ndash checking the minor axis in-planeresistance

Problem The 9 m long two span beam-column shown in Figure 719c has a fac-tored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a factored design uniformlydistributed load of 32 kNm acting in the minor principal plane The beam-columnis the 254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacyof the beam-column

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

MzEd = 32 times 4528 = 81 kNm

The flange is Class 1 under uniform compression and so remains Class 1 undercombined loading

cw(twε)= (2560 minus 2 times 109 minus 2 times 76)(63 times 0924)= 376lt 38 T52

and the web is Class 2 Thus the overall cross-section is Class 2

MczRd = 275 times 119 times 10310 Nmm = 327 kNm 625(2)

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 81

327= 0402 lt 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

334 Beam-columns

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

Because the section is Class 2 Clause 6291 can be used

NEd = 200 kN lt 406 kN = (256 minus 2 times 109)times 63 times 275

10 times 103= hwtwfy

γM0

6291(4)

and so no reduction in plastic moment resistance is required

Thus MN zRd = Mpl zRd = 327 kNm gt 81 kNm = MzEd 625(2)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Compression member buckling resistance

λz =radic

AfyNcr z

= Lcr z

iz

1

λ1= 4500

(348 times 10)

1

939 times 0924= 1490 6313(1)

For a rolled UB section (with hb gt 12 and tf le 40 mm) buckling about thez-axis use buckling curve (b) with α = 034 T62 T61

Φz = 05[1 + 034 (1490 minus 02)+ 14902] = 1829 6312(1)

χz = 1(1829 +radic

18292 minus 14902) = 0346 6312(1)

Nb zRd = χzAfyγM1 = 0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510 N

= 449 kN gt 200 kN = NEd 6311(3)

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

Because the member is bent about the minor axis beam lateral buckling need notbe considered and eLT = 0

Mh = minus81 kNm Ms = 9 times 32 times 452128 = 456 kNm ψ = 0 TB3

αs = MsMh = 456(minus81) = minus0563 TB3

Cmz = 01 minus 08αs = 01 minus 08 times (minus0563) = 0550 gt 040 TB3

Cmz

(1 + (2λz minus 06)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)= 0550 times

(1 + (2 times 1490 minus 06)

times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 1133

Beam-columns 335

gt Cmz

(1 + 14

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

= 0550 times(

1 + 14 times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0893 TB1

kzz = 0893 TB1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MzEd

McyRd= 200

449+ 0893

81

327= 0445 + 0221 = 0666 le 1

633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

From Section 772 λy = 0960

λmax = λz = 1490 gt 0960 = λy TA1

Ncr z = π2EIzL2cr z = π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 10445002 N = 5844 kN

|δx| = qL4

185EIz= 32 times 45004

185 times 210 000 times 571 times 104= 592 mm

∣∣MzEd(x)∣∣ = 81 kNm

Cmz = Cmz0 = 1 +(

π2EIz |δx|L2

∣∣MzEd(x)∣∣ minus 1

)NEd

Ncr z

= 1 +(π2 times 210 000 times 571 times 104 times 59

45002 times 81 times 106minus 1

)200

5844= 0804 TA2

wz = Wpl z

Welz= 119

78= 1526 gt 15

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Czz = 1 + (wz minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wzC2

mzλmax minus 16

wzC2

mzλ2max

)npl minus eLT

]ge Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

15times 08042 times 1490 minus 16

15times 08042 times 14902

)

times 0154 minus 0

]= 0958 gt 0667 = 115 TA1

336 Beam-columns

microz = 1 minus NEdNcr z

1 minus χzNEdNcr z= 1 minus 2005844

1 minus 0346 times 2005844= 0746 TA1

kzz = Cmzmicroz

(1 minus NEdNcr z)

1

Czz= 0804 times 0746

1 minus 200584times 1

0958= 0952

TA1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzz

MyEd

McyRd= 200

449+ 0952 times 81

327= 0445 + 0236 = 0681 lt 1

633(4)

and the member resistance is adequate

774 Example 4 ndash checking the out-of-plane resistance

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719dhas a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN and a factored designconcentrated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) actingin the major principal plane at mid-span Lateral deflections v and twist rotationsφ are prevented at the ends and at mid-span The beam-column is the 254 times146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Design bending moment

MyEd = 450 kNm as in Section 772

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

The cross-section resistance was checked in Section 772

Beam-column member buckling resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

While the member major axis in-plane resistance without lateral buckling waschecked in Section 772 the lateral buckling resistance between supports shouldbe used in place of the in-plane bending resistance to check against equation 661of EC3

From Section 6152 MbRd = 1214 kNmFrom Section 772 NbyRd = 900 kN kyy = 1052 and MyEd = 450 kNm

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1214= 0222 + 0390

= 0612 le 1 633(4)

and the member in-plane resistance is adequateFor the member out-of-plane resistance (equation 662 of EC3)

Beam-columns 337

From Section 773 Nb zRd = 449 kN χz = 0346 λz = 1490 λmax = 1490Ncr z = 5844 kN and wz = 15

ψ = 0 CmLT = 06 + 04ψ = 06 gt 04 TB3(1 minus 01λz

(CmLT minus 025)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

=(

1 minus 01 times 1490

(06 minus 025)times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0810

(1 minus 01

(CmLT minus 025)

NEd

χzNRkγM1

)

=(

1 minus 01

(06 minus 025)times 200 times 103

0346 times 472 times 102 times 27510

)= 0873 TB1

kzy = 0873 TB1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

449+ 0873 times 450

1214= 0445 + 0324 = 0769 lt 1

633(4)

and the member out-of-plane resistance is adequate

Beam-column member buckling resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

The member in-plane resistance was checked in Section 772 but as for the sim-plified approach equation 661 should be checked by taking the lateral bucklingresistance in place of the in-plane major axis bending resistance The interactionfactor kyy also requires re-calculating due to the possibility of lateral buckling

λy = 0960 λmax = λz = 1490 TA1

Using Mzx = 1112 kNm from Section 6152

λ0 = radic13281112 = 1093 TA1

Since cross-section is doubly-symmetrical using equation 737 with

ip =radic(Iy + Iz)A =

radic(5537 times 104 + 571 times 104)472 times 102

= 1138 mm

NcrT = 1

i2p

(G It + π2EIw

L2crT

)

= 1

11382

(81000 times 153 times 104 + π2 times 210 000 times 00857 times 1012

45002

)

= 1636 kN

338 Beam-columns

Using αm of equation 65 for C1 with βm = 0 leads to C1 = 175

02radic

C14

radic(1 minus NEd

Ncr z

)(1 minus NEd

NcrT

)

= 02 times radic175 times 4

radic(1 minus 200

5844

)(1 minus 200

1636

)

= 0231 lt 1093 = λ0 TA1

aLT = 1 minus ItIy = 1 minus 1545537 = 0997 gt 0 TA1

εy = MyEd

NEd

A

Wely= 45 times 106

200 times 103times 472 times 102

433 times 103= 2453 TA1

Using Ncr y = 1417 kN from Section 772

Cmy0 = 1 minus 018NEdNcr y = 1 minus 018 times 2001417 = 0975 TA2

Cmy = Cmy0 + (1 minus Cmy0)

radicεyaLT

1 + radicεyaLT

= 0975 + (1 minus 0975)timesradic

2453 times 0997

1 + radic2453 times 0997

= 0990 TA1

CmLT = C2my

aLTradic(1 minus NEd

Ncr z

)(1 minus NEd

NcrT

)

= 09902 times 0997radic(1 minus 200

5844

)(1 minus 200

1636

) = 1287 gt 1 TA1

wy = Wply

Wely= 483

433= 1115

npl = NEd

NRkγM1= 200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510= 0154 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

wyC2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

Beam-columns 339

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09902 times 1490 minus 16

1115

times 09902 times 14902)

times 0154 minus 0

]

= 0942 gt 0896 TA1

Using χy = 0693 from Section 772

microy = 1 minus NEdNcr y

1 minus χyNEdNcr y= 1 minus 2001417

1 minus 0693 times 2001417= 0952 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Cyy= 09900 times 1287

times 0952

1 minus 2001417

1

0942= 1499 TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

900+ 1499 times 450

1214

= 0222 + 0556 = 0778 lt 1 633(4)

and the member in-plane resistance (with lateral buckling between the lateralsupports) is adequate

For the member out-of-plane resistance (equation 662 of EC3)

Czy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

2 minus 14

C2myλ

2max

w5y

npl minus dLT

ge 06

radicwy

wz

Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 09902 times 14902

11155

)times 0154 minus 0

]

= 0722 gt 046 TA1

Using χz = 0346 from Section 773

microz = 1 minus NEdNcr z

1 minus χzNEdNcr z= 1 minus 2005844

1 minus 0346 times 2005844= 0746 TA1

kzy = CmyCmLTmicroz

1 minus NEd

Ncr y

1

Czy06

radicwy

wz= 0990 times 1287

times 0746

1 minus 200

1417

times 1

0722times 06 times

radic1115

15= 0793 TA1

340 Beam-columns

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd= 200

449+ 0793 times 450

1214= 0445 + 0294 = 0739 lt 1

633(4)

and the member out-of-plane resistance is adequate

775 Example 5 ndash checking the biaxial bending capacity

Problem The 9 m long simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 719cand d has a factored design axial compression force of 200 kN a factored designconcentrated load of 20 kN (which includes an allowance for self-weight) actingin the major principal plane and a factored design uniformly distributed loadof 32 kNm acting in the minor principal plane Lateral deflections v and twistrotations φ are prevented at the ends and at mid-span The beam-column is the254 times 146 UB 37 of S275 steel shown in Figure 719a Check the adequacy of thebeam-column

Design bending moments

MyEd = 450 kNm(Section 772) MzEd = 81 kNm(Section 773)

Simplified approach for cross-section resistance

Combining the calculations of Sections 772 and 773

200 times 103

472 times 102 times 27510+ 450

1328+ 81

327= 0740 lt 1 621(7)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Alternative approach for cross-section resistance

As shown in Sections 772 and 773 the axial load is sufficiently low for there is tobe no reduction in the moment resistance about either the major or the minor axis

n = NEdNplRd = 200 times 103(472 times 102 times 27510) = 0154

β = 5n = 0770 6291(6)[MyEd

MN yRd

]α+

[MzEd

MN zRd

]β=

[450

1328

]2

+[

81

327

]0770

= 0456 le 1

6291(6)

and the cross-section resistance is adequate

Beam-columns 341

Beam-column member resistance ndash simplified approach (Annex B)

Checks are required against equations 661 and 662 of EC3 From the appropriateparts of Sections 772ndash774

kyy = 1052 kzz = 0893 kzy = 0873 NbyRd = 900 kN

MbRd = 1214 kNm MzRd = 327 kNm and Nb zRd = 449 kN

kyz = 06kzz = 06 times 0893 = 0536 TB1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

900+ 1052 times 450

1214+ 0536

times 81

327= 0222 + 0390 + 0133 = 0745 lt 1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

449+ 0873 times 450

1214

+ 0893 times 81

327= 0445 + 0324 + 0221 = 0990 lt 1

and the member resistance is adequate

Beam-column member resistance ndash more exact approach (Annex A)

Checks are required against equations 661 and 662 of EC3 Relevant details aretaken from the appropriate parts of Sections 772 773 and 774

bLT = 05aLTλ20

MyEd

χLT MplyRd

MzEd

Mpl zRd= 05 times 0997 times 10932

times 45

1214times 81

327= 00546 TA1

cLT = 10aLTλ

20

5 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd= 10 times 0997

times 10932

5 + 14904times 45

0990 times 1214= 0449 TA1

dLT = 2aLTλ0

01 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd

MzEd

CmzMpl zRd

= 2 times 0997 times 1093

01 + 14904times 45

0990 times 1214times 81

0804 times 327

= 00500 TA1

eLT = 17aLTλ0

01 + λ4z

MyEd

CmyχLT MplyRd= 17 times 0997 times 1093

01 + 14904

times 45

0990 times 1214= 0138 TA1

342 Beam-columns

Cyy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

wyC2

myλmax minus 16

112C2

myλ2max

)npl minus bLT

]

ge Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1115times 09902 times 1490 minus 16

1115

times09902 times 14902) times 0154 minus 00546] = 0936 gt 0896 TA1

Cyz = 1 + (wz minus 1)

[(2 minus 14

C2mzλ

2max

w5z

)npl minus cLT

]ge 06

radicwz

wy

Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 08042 times 14902

155

)times 0154 minus 0449

]

= 0726 gt 0456 TA1

Czy = 1 + (wy minus 1)

2 minus 14

C2myλ

2max

w5y

npl minus dLT

ge 06

radicwy

wz

Wely

Wply

= 1 + (1115 minus 1)

[(2 minus 14 times 09902 times 14902

11155

)times 0154 minus 00500

]

= 0716 gt 0464 TA1

Czz = 1+ (wz minus1)

[(2 minus 16

wzC2

mzλmax minus 16

wzC2

mzλ2max

)npl minus eLT

]ge Welz

Wpl z

= 1 + (15 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

15times 08042 times 1490 minus 16

15times 08042

times14902)

times 0154 minus 0138

]= 0888 gt 0655 TA1

kyy = CmyCmLTmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Cyy

= 0990 times 1287 times 0952

1 minus 2001417times 1

0936= 1508 TA1

kyz = Cmzmicroy

1 minus NEdNcr z

1

Cyz06

radicwz

wy= 0804 times 0952

1 minus 2005844

times 1

0726times 06 times

radic15

1115= 1115 TA1

Beam-columns 343

kzy = CmyCmLTmicroz

1 minus NEdNcr y

1

Czy06

radicwy

wz= 0990

times 1287 times 0746

1 minus 2001417times 1

0716times 06 times

radic1115

15= 0800 TA1

kzz = Cmzmicroz

1 minus NEdNcr z

1

Czz= 0804 times 0746

1 minus 2005844times 1

0888= 1027

TA1

NEd

NbyRd+ kyy

MyEd

MbRd+ kyz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

900+ 1508 times 450

1214

+ 1115 times 81

327= 0222 + 0559 + 0276 = 1057 gt 1

NEd

Nb zRd+ kzy

MyEd

MbRd+ kzz

MzEd

MzRd= 200

449+ 0800 times 450

1214+ 1027

times 81

327= 0445 + 0296 + 0254 = 0995 lt 1

and the member resistance appears to be inadequate

78 Unworked examples

781 Example 6 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the simply supported beam-column shown in Figure 720a and show that the maximum moment Mmax maybe closely approximated by using the greater of Mmax = qL28 and

Mmax = 9qL2

128

(1 minus 029NNcr y)

(1 minus NNcr y)

in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

782 Example 7 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the propped cantilever shownin Figure 720b and show that the maximum moment Mmax may be closelyapproximated by using

Mmax

qL28asymp (1 minus 018NNcr y)

(1 minus 049NNcr y)

in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

344 Beam-columns

qL L8

2

(a) Simply supported beam-column

L

(b) Propped cantilever

q

L

(c) Continuous beam-column

qN

L

Figure 720 Examples 6ndash8

783 Example 8 ndash non-linear analysis

Analyse the non-linear elastic in-plane bending of the two-span beam-columnshown in Figure 720c and show that the maximum moment Mmax may be closelyapproximated by using

Mmax

qL28asymp (1 minus 018NNcr y)

(1 minus 049NNcr y)

while N le Ncr y in which Ncr y = π2EIyL2

784 Example 9 ndash in-plane design

A 70 m long simply supported beam-column which is prevented from swayingand from deflecting out of the plane of bending is required to support a factoreddesign axial load of 1200 kN and factored design end moments of 300 and 150 kNmwhich bend the beam-column in single curvature about the major axis Design asuitable UB or UC beam-column of S275 steel

785 Example 10 ndash out-of-plane design

The intermediate restraints of the beam-column of example 9 which preventdeflection out of the plane of bending are removed Design a suitable UB orUC beam-column of S275 steel

786 Example 11 ndash biaxial bending design

The beam-column of example 10 has to carry additional factored design endmoments of 75 and 75 kNm which cause double curvature bending about theminor axis Design a suitable UB or UC beam-column of S275 steel

Beam-columns 345

References

1 Chen W-F and Atsuta T (1976) Theory of Beam-Columns Vol 1 In-Plane Behaviorand Design McGraw-Hill New York

2 Galambos TV and Ketter RL (1959) Columns under combined bending andthrust Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 85 No EM2 Aprilpp 1ndash30

3 Ketter RL (1961) Further studies of the strength of beam-columns Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 87 No ST6 August pp 135ndash52

4 Young BW (1973) The in-plane failure of steel beam-columns The StructuralEngineer 51 pp 27ndash35

5 Trahair NS (1986) Design strengths of steel beam-columns Canadian Journal ofCivil Engineering 13 No 6 December pp 639ndash46

6 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1987) Limit state design rules for steel beam-columnsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 21 No 2 Septemberpp 2ndash11

7 Salvadori MG (1955) Lateral buckling of I-beams Transactions ASCE 120pp 1165ndash77

8 Salvadori MG (1955) Lateral buckling of eccentrically loaded I-columns Transac-tions ASCE 121 pp 1163ndash78

9 Horne MR (1954) The flexuralndashtorsional buckling of members of symmetricalI-section under combined thrust and unequal terminal moments Quarterly Journalof Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 7 pp 410ndash26

10 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

11 Trahair NS (1993) FlexuralndashTorsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN SponLondon

12 Cuk PE and Trahair NS (1981) Elastic buckling of beam-columns with unequalend moments Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE23 No 3 August pp 166ndash71

13 Bradford MA Cuk PE Gizejowski MA and Trahair NS (1987) Inelastic lateralbuckling of beam-columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 11November pp 2259ndash77

14 Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1985) Inelastic buckling of beam-columnswith unequal end moments Journal of Constructional Steel Research 5 No 3pp 195ndash212

15 Cuk PE Bradford MA and Trahair NS (1986) Inelastic lateral buckling ofsteel beam-columns Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 13 No 6 Decemberpp 693ndash9

16 Horne MR (1956) The stanchion problem in frame structures designed accordingto ultimate load carrying capacity Proceedings of the Institution of Civil EngineersPart III 5 pp 105ndash46

17 Culver CG (1966) Exact solution of the biaxial bending equations Journal of theStructural Division ASCE 92 No ST2 pp 63ndash83

18 Harstead GA Birnsteil C and Leu K-C (1968) Inelastic H-columns under biaxialbending Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 94 No ST10 pp 2371ndash98

19 Trahair NS (1969) Restrained elastic beam-columns Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 95 No ST12 pp 2641ndash64

346 Beam-columns

20 Vinnakota S and Aoshima Y (1974) Inelastic behaviour of rotationally restrainedcolumns under biaxial bending The Structural Engineer 52 pp 245ndash55

21 Vinnakota S and Aysto P (1974) Inelastic spatial stability of restrained beam-columns Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST11 pp 2235ndash54

22 Chen W-F and Atsuta T (1977) Theory of Beam-Columns Vol 2 Space Behaviorand Design McGraw-Hill New York

23 Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columnsI Theory Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2041ndash61

24 Pi Y-L and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns IIApplications Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2062ndash85

25 Tebedge N and Chen W-F (1974) Design criteria for H-columns under biaxialloading Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST3 pp 579ndash98

26 Young BW (1973) Steel column design The Structural Engineer 51 pp 323ndash3627 Bradford MA (1995) Evaluation of design rules of the biaxial bending of beam-

columns Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE 37No 3 pp 241ndash45

28 Nethercot D A and Gardner L (2005) The EC3 approach to the design of columnsbeams and beam-columns Journal of Steel and Composite Structures 5 pp 127ndash40

29 Boissonnade N Jaspart J-P Muzeau J-P and Villette M (2004) New interactionformulae for beam-columns in Eurocode 3 The French-Belgian approach Journal ofConstructional Steel Research 60 pp 421ndash31

30 Greiner R and Lindner J (2006) Interaction formulae for members subjected tobending and axial compression in EUROCODE 3 ndash the Method 2 approach Journalof Constructional Steel Research 62 pp 757ndash70

31 SCI (2007) Verification of columns in simple construction ndash a simplified interactioncriterion UK localised NCCI The Steel Construction Institute wwwaccess-steelcom

32 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3Design of Steel Structures Thomas Telford Publishing London

Chapter 8

Frames

81 Introduction

Structural frames are composed of one-dimensional members connected togetherin skeletal arrangements which transfer the applied loads to the supports Whilemost frames are three-dimensional they may often be considered as a series of par-allel two-dimensional frames or as two perpendicular series of two-dimensionalframes The behaviour of a structural frame depends on its arrangement andloading and on the type of connections used

Triangulated frames with joint loading only have no primary bending actionsand the members act in simple axial tension or compression The behaviour anddesign of these members have already been discussed in Chapters 2 and 3

Frames which are not triangulated include rectangular frames which may bemulti-storey or multi-bay or both and pitched-roof portal frames The membersusually have substantial bending actions (Chapters 5 and 6) and if they also havesignificant axial forces then they must be designed as beam-ties (Chapter 2) orbeam-columns (Chapter 7) In frames with simple connections (see Figure 93a)the moments transmitted by the connections are small and often can be neglectedand the members can be treated as isolated beams or as eccentrically loaded beam-ties or beam-columns However when the connections are semi-rigid (referred toas semi-continuous in EC3) or rigid (referred to as continuous in EC3) then thereare important moment interactions between the members

When a frame is or can be considered as two-dimensional then its behaviour issimilar to that of the beam-columns of which it is composed With in-plane loadingonly it will fail either by in-plane bending or by flexural ndash torsional buckling outof its plane If however the frame or its loading is three-dimensional then it willfail in a mode in which the individual members are subjected to primary biaxialbending and torsion actions

In this chapter the in-plane out-of-plane and biaxial behaviour analysisand design of two- and three-dimensional frames are treated and related to thebehaviour and design of isolated tension members compression members beamsand beam-columns discussed in Chapters 2 3 5 6 and 7

348 Frames

82 Triangulated frames

821 Statically determinate frames

The primary actions in triangulated frames whose members are concentricallyconnected and whose loads act concentrically through the joints are those of axialcompression or tension in the members and any bending actions are secondaryonly These bending actions are usually ignored in which case the member forcesmay be determined by a simple analysis for which the member connections areassumed to be made through frictionless pin-joints

If the assumed pin-jointed frame is statically determinate then each memberforce can be determined by statics alone and is independent of the behaviourof the remaining members Because of this the frame may be assumed tofail when its weakest member fails as indicated in Figure 81a and b Thuseach member may be designed independently of the others by using the pro-cedures discussed in Chapters 2 (for tension members) or 3 (for compressionmembers)

If all the members of a frame are designed to fail simultaneously (either bytension yielding or by compression buckling) there will be no significant momentinteractions between the members at failure even if the connections are not pin-jointed Because of this the effective lengths of the compression members shouldbe taken as equal to the lengths between their ends If however the membersof a rigid-jointed frame are not designed to fail simultaneously there will bemoment interactions between them at failure While it is a common and conserva-tive practice to ignore these interactions and to design each member as if pin-endedsome account may be taken of these by using one of the procedures discussed inSection 8353 to estimate the effective lengths of the compression members andexemplified in Section 851

Frame fails aftertension diagonalyields or fractures

Frame fails aftercompression diagonalbuckles

Frame remains stableafter compressiondiagonal buckles

with tension diagonalDeterminate framewith compressiondiagonal

Indeterminate framewith double-bracedpanel

(a) Determinate frame (b) (c)

Figure 81 Determinate and indeterminate triangulated frames

Frames 349

822 Statically indeterminate frames

When an assumed pin-jointed triangulated frame without primary bending actionsis statically indeterminate then the forces transferred by the members will dependon their axial stiffnesses Since these decrease with tension yielding or compressionbuckling there is usually some force redistribution as failure is approached Todesign such a frame it is necessary to estimate the member forces at failure andthen to design the individual tension and compression members for these forces asin Chapters 2 and 3 Four different methods may be used to estimate the memberforces

In the first method a sufficient number of members are ignored so that the framebecomes statically determinate For example it is common to ignore completelythe compression diagonal in the double-braced panel of the indeterminate frameof Figure 81c in which case the strength of the now determinate frame is con-trolled by the strength of one of the other members This method is simple andconservative

A less conservative method can be used when each indeterminate member canbe assumed to be ductile so that it can maintain its maximum strength over aconsiderable range of axial deformations In this method the frame is convertedto a statically determinate frame by replacing a sufficient number of early failingmembers by sets of external forces equal to their maximum load capacities Forthe frame shown in Figure 81c this might be done for the diagonal compressionmember by replacing it by forces equal to its buckling strength This simplemethod is very similar in principle to the plastic method of analysing the collapseof flexural members (Section 55) and frames (Section 8357) However themethod can only be used when the ductilities of the members being replaced areassured

In the third method each member is assumed to behave linearly and elasticallywhich allows the use of a linear elastic method to analyse the frame and deter-mine its member force distribution The frame strength is then controlled by thestrength of the most severely loaded member For the frame shown in Figure 81cthis would be the compression diagonal if this reaches its buckling strength beforeany of the other members fail This method ignores redistribution and is conser-vative when the members are ductile or when there are no lacks-of-fit at memberconnections

In the fourth method account is taken of the effects of changes in the memberstiffnesses on the force distribution in the frame Because of its complexity thismethod is rarely used

When the members of a triangulated frame are eccentrically connected orwhen the loads act eccentrically or are applied to the members between thejoints the flexural effects are no longer secondary and the frame should betreated as a flexural frame Flexural frames are discussed in the followingsections

350 Frames

83 Two-dimensional flexural frames

831 General

The structural behaviour of a frame may be classified as two-dimensional whenthere are a number of independent two-dimensional frames with in-plane loadingor when this is approximately so The primary actions in a two-dimensional framein which the members support transverse loads are usually flexural and are oftenaccompanied by significant axial actions The structural behaviour of a flexuralframe is influenced by the behaviour of the member joints which are usuallyconsidered to be either simple semi-rigid (or semi-continuous) or rigid (or con-tinuous) according to their ability to transmit moment The EC3 classifications ofjoints are given in [1]

In the following sub-sections the behaviour analysis and design of two-dimensional flexural frames with simple semi-rigid or rigid joints are discussedtogether with the corresponding EC3 requirements An introduction to the EC3requirements is given in [2]

832 Frames with simple joints

Simple joints may be defined as being those that will not develop restrainingmoments which adversely affect the members and the structure as a wholein which case the structure may be designed as if pin-jointed It is usually assumedtherefore that no moment is transmitted through a simple joint and that the mem-bers connected to the joint may rotate The joint should therefore have sufficientrotation capacity to permit member end rotations to occur without causing failureof the joint or its elements An example of a typical simple joint between a beamand column is shown in Figure 93a

If there are a sufficient number of pin-joints to make the structure staticallydeterminate then each member will act independently of the others and maybe designed as an isolated tension member (Chapter 2) compression member(Chapter 3) beam (Chapters 5 and 6) or beam-column (Chapter 7) Howeverif the pin-jointed structure is indeterminate then some part of it may act as arigid-jointed frame The behaviour analysis and design of rigid-jointed framesare discussed in Sections 834 835 and 836

One of the most common methods of designing frames with simple joints isoften used for rectangular frames with vertical (column) and horizontal (beam)members under the action of vertical loads only The columns in such a frame areassumed to act as if eccentrically loaded A minimum eccentricity of 100 mm fromthe face of the column was specified in [3] but there is no specific guidance inEC3 Approximate procedures for distributing the moment caused by the eccentricbeam reaction between the column lengths above and below the connection aregiven in [1] It should be noted that such a pin-jointed frame is usually incapableof resisting transverse forces and must therefore be provided with an independentbracing or shear wall system

Frames 351

833 Frames with semi-rigid joints

Semi-rigid joints are those which have dependable moment capacities and whichpartially restrain the relative rotations of the members at the joints The actionof these joints in rectangular frames is to reduce the maximum moments in thebeams and so the semi-rigid design method offers potential economies over thesimple design method [4ndash10] An example of a typical semi-rigid joint between abeam and column is shown in Figure 93b

A method of semi-rigid design is permitted by EC3 In this method the stiffnessstrength and rotation capacities of the joints based on experimental evidence aresuggested in [1] and may be used to assess the moments and forces in the membersHowever this method has not found great favour with designers and thereforewill not be discussed further

834 In-plane behaviour of frames with rigid joints

A rigid joint may be defined as a joint which has sufficient rigidity to virtually pre-vent relative rotation between the members connected Properly arranged weldedand high-strength friction grip bolted joints are usually assumed to be rigid (ten-sioned high strength friction grip bolts are referred to in [1] as preloaded bolts)An example of a typical rigid joint between a beam and column is shown inFigure 93c There are important interactions between the members of frames withrigid joints which are generally stiffer and stronger than frames with simple orsemi-rigid joints Because of this rigid frames offer significant economies whilemany difficulties associated with their analysis have been greatly reduced by thewidespread availability of standard computer programs

The in-plane behaviour of rigid frames is discussed in general terms inSection 142 where it is pointed out that although a rigid frame may behavein an approximately linear fashion while its service loads are not exceeded espe-cially when the axial forces are small it becomes non-linear near its in-planeultimate load because of yielding and buckling effects When the axial compres-sion forces are small then failure occurs when a sufficient number of plastic hingeshas developed to cause the frame to form a collapse mechanism in which case theload resistance of the frame can be determined by plastic analysis of the collapsemechanism More generally however the in-plane buckling effects associatedwith the axial compression forces significantly modify the behaviour of the framenear its ultimate loads The in-plane analysis of rigid-jointed frames is discussedin Section 835 and their design in 836

835 In-plane analysis of frames with rigid joints

8351 General

The most common reason for analysing a rigid-jointed frame is to determine themoments shears and axial forces acting on its members and joints These may

352 Frames

then be used with the design rules of EC3 to determine if the members and jointsare adequate

Such an analysis must allow for any significant second-order moments arisingfrom the finite deflections of the frame Two methods may be used to allow forthese second-order moments In the first of these the moments determined by afirst-order elastic analysis are amplified by using the results of an elastic bucklinganalysis In the second and more accurate method a full second-order elasticanalysis is made of the frame

Aless common reason for analysing a rigid-jointed frame is to determine whetherthe frame can reach an equilibrium position under the factored loads in which casethe frame is adequate A first-order plastic analysis may be used for a frame withnegligible second-order effects When there are significant second-order effectsthen an advanced analysis may be made in which account is taken of second-ordereffects inelastic behaviour and residual stresses and geometrical imperfectionsalthough this is rarely done in practice

These various methods of analysis are discussed in more detail in the followingsub-sections

8352 First-order elastic analysis

A first-order (linear) elastic analysis of a rigid-jointed frame is based on theassumptions that

(a) the material behaves linearly so that all yielding effects are ignored(b) the members behave linearly with no member instability effects such as those

caused by axial compressions which reduce the membersrsquo flexural stiffnesses(these are often called the P-δ effects) and

(c) the frame behaves linearly with no frame instability effects such as thosecaused by the moments of the vertical forces and the horizontal framedeflections (these are often called the P- effects)

For example for the portal frame of Figure 82 a first-order elastic analysis ignoresall second-order moments such as RR(δ+zh) in the right-hand column so thatthe bending moment distribution is linear in this case First-order analyses predictlinear behaviour in elastic frames as shown in Figure 115

Rigid-jointed frames are invariably statically indeterminate and while thereare many manual methods of first-order elastic analysis available [11ndash13] theseare labour-intensive and error-prone for all but the simplest frames In the pastdesigners were often forced to rely on approximate methods or available solutionsfor specific frames [14 15] However computer methods of first-order elasticanalysis [16 17] have formed the basis of computer programs such as [18ndash20]which are now used extensively These first-order elastic analysis programs requirethe geometry of the frame and its members to have been established (usually by

Frames 353

N NH

H2H2

N HhL N + HhLL

N N

H

RL RR

HL

HR

Hh2

H h +RRR

h

Frame

Frame

Bending moments

(a) First-order analysis

(b) Second-order behaviour

Bending moments

RR

Mmax

First-orderanalysis

ndash

Figure 82 First-order analysis and second-order behaviour

a preliminary design) and then compute the first-order member moments andforces and the joint deflections for each specified set of loads Because these areproportional to the loads the results of individual analyses may be combined bylinear superposition The results of computer first-order elastic analyses [18] of abraced and an unbraced frame are given in Figures 83 and 84

8353 Elastic buckling of braced frames

The results of an elastic buckling analysis may be used to approximate any second-order effects (Figure 82) The elastic buckling analysis of a rigid-jointed frame iscarried out by replacing the initial set of frame loads by a set which produces thesame set of member axial forces without any bending as indicated in Figure 85bThe set of member forces Ncr which causes buckling depends on the distributionof the axial forces in the frame and is often expressed in terms of a load factor αcr

by which the initial set of axial forces Ni must be multiplied to obtain the memberforces Ncr at frame buckling so that

Ncr = αcrNi (81)

354 Frames

(c) Elasticdeflections

(d) Elasticbuckling

(e) Plasticcollapse

(a) Frame and loads

40 80

6000 6000

5000

500020

10

1

2

3 4 5

(kN mm units)

8106

2864

=1132cr p= 1248

998499

125

250

Member Section

123 152 152 UC 37 2210 47 1 8 5 0345 305 165 UB 40 8503 51 3 1 7 1 3

(b) Section properties

Iy (cm4) A (cm2) Mpy(kNm)

Quantity Units First-orderelastic

Elasticbuckling

Second-orderelastic

First-orderplastic

M kNm 235 246 199M kNm ndash530 0

0ndash536 ndash850

M kNm 1366 0

0

1373 1713M kNm ndash1538 ndash1546 ndash1713

N kN ndash716 ndash8106 ndash716 ndash926N kN ndash253 ndash2864 ndash252 ndash335

v mm 574 (0154) 578u mm 185 (1000) 206

2

3

4

5

123

345

4

2

(f) Analysis results

ndash

ndash

timestimes

Figure 83 Analysis of a braced frame

Alternatively it may be expressed by a set of effective length factors kcr = LcrLwhich define the member forces at frame buckling by

Ncr = π2EI(kcrL)2 (82)

For all but isolated members and very simple frames the determination of theframe buckling factor αcr is best carried out numerically using a suitable computerprogram The bases of frame elastic buckling programs are discussed in [16 17]The computer program PRFSA [18] first finds the initial member axial forces Ni

Frames 355

1531

4485 4485

(c) Elastic deflections

(d) Elastic buckling

(e) Plastic collapse

(a) Frame and loads

20 40

6000 6000

5000

500020

10

12

3

(kN mm units)

12 67 203 203 UC 52timestimestimestimes

5259 663 1 5 5 9 23 78 152 152 UC 37 2210 471 8 5 0

(b) Section properties

5 820

247 356 171 UB 51 14136 649 2 4 6 4 358 254 102 UB 25 3415 320 8 4 2

7

2599 2928

16021602

4537 6512

= 6906

4

40 80 40

6

281 561

281

140

281

5611122

561

= 1403pcr

Quantity Units First-orderelastic

Elasticbuckling

Second-orderelastic

First-orderplastic

(f) Analysis results

MMMMMM

kNm 2360kNm 717 729

1539842

kNm ndash1193 ndash1305 ndash1559kNm ndash1728 ndash1847 ndash2409kNm 535 542 850kNm ndash625 ndash644 ndash842

NNNN

kN ndash1033 ndash7136 ndash1009 ndash1449kN ndash376 ndash2599 ndash376 ndash561kN ndash1367 ndash9438 ndash1383 ndash1917kN ndash424 ndash2926 ndash423 ndash561

vvuu

mm 447 (0003) 461mm 801 (0001) 832mm 855 (0826) 1003mm 1214 (1000) 1404

4

5

76

74

78

8

12

23

67

78

4

5

2

3

ndashndashndashndash

Member Section Iy (cm4) A (cm2) Mpy(kNm)

00

0000

Figure 84 Analysis of an unbraced frame

by carrying out a first-order elastic analysis of the frame under the initial loadsIt then uses a finite element method to determine the elastic buckling load factorsαcr for which the total frame stiffness vanishes [21] so that

[K]D minus αcr[G]D = 0 (83)

in which [K] is the elastic stiffness matrix [G] is the stability matrix associatedwith the initial axial forces Ni and D is the vector of nodal deformations which

356 Frames

0397

0139 0185

0455

0270 0258 0516 0484 crqi

04L

0

2L

015

qiL

q Li

05L 05L

Axial loads only

Actual loads

Typical deflection

(a) Actual loads (b) Initial axial loadsqiL (c) Behaviour

Figure 85 In-plane behaviour of a rigid frame

define the buckled shape of the frame The results of a computer elastic bucklinganalysis [18] of a braced frame are given in Figure 83

For isolated braced members or very simple braced frames a buckling analysismay also be made from first principles as demonstrated in Section 310 Alterna-tively the effective length factor kcr of each compression member may be obtainedby using estimates of the member relative end stiffness factors k1 k2 in a bracedmember chart such as that of Figure 321a The direct application of this chart islimited to the vertical columns of regular rectangular frames with regular loadingpatterns in which each horizontal beam has zero axial force and all the columnsbuckle simultaneously in the same mode In this case the values of the columnend stiffness factors can be obtained from

k = (IcLc)

(IcLc)+(βeIbLb)(84)

where βe is a factor which varies with the restraint conditions at the far end ofthe beam (βe = 05 if the restraint condition at the far end is the same as that atthe column βe = 075 if the far end is pinned and βe = 10 if the far end isfixed ndash note that the proportions 0507510 of these are the same as 234 of theappropriate stiffness multipliers of Figure 319) and where the summations arecarried out for the columns (c) and beams (b) at the column end

The effective length chart of Figure 321a may also be used to approximate thebuckling forces in other braced frames In the simplest application an effectivelength factor kcr is determined for each compression member of the frame byapproximating its member end stiffness factors (see equation 346) by

k = IL

IL +(βeαrIrLr)(85)

where αr is a factor which allows for the effect of axial force on the flexuralstiffness of each restraining member (Figure 319) and the summation is carriedout for all of the members connected to that end of the compression member Each

Frames 357

effective length factor so determined is used with equations 81 and 82 to obtainan estimate of the frame buckling load factor as

αcri = π2EIi(kcriLi)2

Ni (86)

The lowest of these provides a conservative approximation of the actual framebuckling load factor αcr

The accuracy of this method of calculating effective lengths using the stiffnessapproximations of Figure 319 is indicated in Figure 86c for the rectangular frameshown in Figure 86a and b For the buckling mode shown in Figure 86a thebuckling of the vertical members is restrained by the horizontal members Thesehorizontal members are braced restraining members which bend in symmetricalsingle curvature so that their stiffnesses are (2EI1L1)(1 minus N1Ncr1) in whichNcr1 =π2EI1L2

1 as indicated in Figure 319 It can be seen from Figure 86c thatthe approximate buckling loads are in very close agreement with the accurate val-ues Worked examples of the application of this method are given in Sections 851and 852

A more accurate iterative procedure [22] may also be used in which the accu-racies of the approximations for the member end stiffness factors k increase witheach iteration

8354 Elastic buckling of unbraced frames

The determination of the frame buckling load factor αcr of a rigid-jointed unbracedframe may also be carried out using a suitable computer program such as thatdescribed in [16 17]

N2

Ncr

2

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(a) Buckling mode1

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(b) Buckling mode 2

0 05 10 15 20N N

0

05

10

15

20Mode 1

Mode 2

Exact

= 10

cr1

I L22I L11-------- --------------

Approximate

(c) Buckling loads1

Figure 86 Buckling of a braced frame

358 Frames

For isolated unbraced members or very simple unbraced frames a bucklinganalysis may also be made from first principles as demonstrated in Section 310Alternatively the effective length factor kcr of each compression member may beobtained by using estimates of the end stiffness factors k1 k2 in a chart such as thatof Figure 321b The application of this chart is limited to the vertical columns ofregular rectangular frames with regular loading patterns in which each horizontalbeam has zero axial force and all the columns buckle simultaneously in the samemode and with the same effective length factor The member end stiffness factorsare then given by equation 84

The effects of axial forces in the beams of an unbraced regular rectangularframe can be approximated by using equation 85 to approximate the relativeend stiffness factors k1 k2 (but with βe = 15 if the restraint conditions at thefar end are the same as at the column βe = 075 if the far end is pinned andβe = 10 if the far end is fixed ndash note that the proportions 1507510 of theseare the same as 634 of the appropriate stiffness multipliers of Figure 319) andFigure 321b

The accuracy of this method of using the stiffness approximations of Figure 319is indicated in Figure 87c for the rectangular frame shown in Figure 87a and b Forthe sway buckling mode shown in Figure 87a the sway buckling of the verticalmembers is restrained by the horizontal members These horizontal members arebraced restraining members which bend in antisymmetrical double curvature sothat their stiffnesses are (6EI1L1)(1 minus N14Ncr1) as indicated in Figure 319It can be seen from Figure 87c that the approximate buckling loads are in closeagreement with the accurate values A worked example of the application of thismethod is given in Section 854

The effective length factor chart of Figure 321b may also be used to approximatethe storey buckling load factor αcrs for each storey of an unbraced rectangular

N1

N2

Ncr

2

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(a) Buckling mode1

N2 N2

N1

N1

I L22

I L11

I L11

(b) Buckling mode 2

0 05 10 15 20N N

0

02

04

06

08

Mode 1

Mode 2

Exact

= 10

cr1

I L 22I L11-------- --------------

Approximate

(c) Buckling loads1

Figure 87 Buckling of an unbraced frame

Frames 359

frame with negligible axial forces in the beams as

αcrs =sum(NcrL)sum(NiL)

(87)

in which Ncr is the buckling load of a column in a storey obtained by usingequation 84 and the summations are made for each column in the storey For astorey in which all the columns are of the same length this equation implies thatthe approximate storey buckling load factor depends on the total stiffness of thecolumns and the total load on the storey and is independent of the distributions ofstiffness and load The frame buckling load factor αcr may be approximated by thelowest of the values of αcrs calculated for all the stories of the frame This methodgives close approximations when the buckling pattern is the same in each storeyand is conservative when the horizontal members have zero axial forces and thebuckling pattern varies from storey to storey

A worked example of the application of this method is given in Section 853Alternatively the storey buckling load factor αcrs may be approximated by

using

αcrs = Hs

Vs

hs

δHs(88)

in which Hs is the storey shear hs is the storey height Vs is the vertical loadtransmitted by the storey and δHs is the first-order shear displacement of the storeycaused by Hs This method is an adaptation of the sway buckling load solutiongiven in Section 3106 for a column with an elastic brace (of stiffness HsδHs)

The approximate methods described above of analysing the elastic bucklingof unbraced frames are limited to rectangular frames While the buckling ofnon-rectangular unbraced frames may be analysed by using a suitable computerprogram such as that described in [18] there are many published solutions forspecific frames [23]

Approximate solutions for the elastic buckling load factors of symmetrical portalframes have been presented in [24ndash27] The approximations of [27] for portalframes with elastically restrained bases take the general form of

αcr =(

Nc

ρcNcrc

)C

+(

Nr

ρrNcrr

)Cminus1C

(89)

in which Nc Nr are the column and rafter forces Ncrc Ncrr are the referencebuckling loads obtained from

Ncrcr = π2EIcrL2cr (810)

and the values of C ρc and ρr depend on the base restraint stiffness and thebuckling mode

360 Frames

Nr EIrLr EIrLr

Nr Nr

Nr

EI Lc c EI Lc c

(b) Antisymmetric buckling mode

NN

(a) Frame and loads(c) Symmetric buckling mode

cc

NN cc

Figure 88 Pinned base portal frame

For portal frames with pinned bases

C = 12 (811)

and for antisymmetric buckling as shown in Figure 88b

ρc = 3(10R + 12) (812a)

and

ρr = 1 (812b)

in which

R = (IcLc)(IrLr) (813)

For symmetric buckling as shown in Figure 88c

ρc = 48 + 12R(1 + RH )

24 + 12R(1 + RH )+ 7R2R2H

(814a)

and

ρr = 12R + 84RRH

12R + 4(814b)

in which

RH = (LrLc) sin θR (815)

in which θR is the inclination of the rafter A worked example of the application ofthis method is given in Section 855

Frames 361

For portal frames with fixed bases

C = 16 (816)

and for antisymmetric buckling

ρc = R + 3

4R + 3(817a)

and

ρr = 2R + 4

R + 4(817b)

For symmetric buckling

ρc = 1 + 48R + 42RRH

24R + 2R2R2H

(818a)

and

ρr = 4R + 42RRH + R2R2H

4R + 2(818b)

Approximate methods for multi-bay frames are given in [25]

8355 Second-order elastic analysis

Second-order effects in elastic frames include additional moments such asRR(δ +zh) in the right-hand column of Figure 82 which result from the finitedeflections δ and of the frame The second-order moments arising from the mem-ber deflections from the straight line joining the member ends are often called theP-δ effects while the second-order moments arising from the joint displacements are often called the P- effects In braced frames the joint displacements aresmall and only the P-δ effects are important In unbraced frames the P- effectsare important and often much more so than the P-δ effects Other second-ordereffects include those arising from the end-to-end shortening of the members dueto stress (= NLEA) due to bowing (= 1

2

int L0 (dδdx)2dx) and from finite deflec-

tions Second-order effects cause non-linear behaviour in elastic frames as shownin Figure 114

The second-order P-δ effects in a number of elastic beam-columns havebeen analysed and approximations for the maximum moments are given inSection 721 A worked example of the use of these approximations is givenin Section 771

The P-δ and P- second-order effects in elastic frames are most easily andaccurately accounted for by using a computer second-order elastic analysis pro-gram such as those of [18ndash20] The results of second-order elastic analyses [18]

362 Frames

of braced and unbraced frames are given in Figures 83 and 84 For the bracedframe of Figure 83 the second-order results are only slightly higher than thefirst-order results This is usually true for well-designed braced frames that havesubstantial bending effects and small axial compressions For the unbraced frameof Figure 84 the second-order sway deflections are about 18 larger than those ofthe first-order analysis while the moment at the top of the right-hand lower-storeycolumn is about 10 larger than that of the first-order analysis

Second-order effects are often significant in unbraced frames

8356 Approximate second-order elastic analysis

There are a number of methods of approximating second-order effects which allowa general second-order analysis to be avoided In many of these the results of afirst-order elastic analysis are amplified by using the results of an elastic bucklinganalysis (Sections 8353 and 8354)

For members without transverse forces in braced frames the maximum membermoment Mmax determined by first-order analysis may be used to approximate themaximum second-order design moment M as

M = δMmax (819)

in which δ is an amplification factor given by

δ = δb = cm

1 minus NNcrbge 1 (820)

in which Ncrb is the elastic buckling load calculated for the braced member and

cm = 06 minus 04βm le 10 (821)

in which βm is the ratio of the smaller to the larger end moment (equations 820and 821 are related to equations 77 and 78 used for isolated beam-columns)A worked example of the application of this method is given in Section 856A procedure for approximating the value of βm to be used for members withtransverse forces is available [28] while more accurate solutions are obtained byusing equations 79ndash711 and Figures 75 and 76

For unbraced frames the amplification factor δ may be approximated by

δ = δs = 1

1 minus 1αcr(822)

in which αcr is the elastic sway buckling load factor calculated for the unbracedframe (Section 8354) A worked example of the application of this method isgiven in Section 857

For unbraced rectangular frames with negligible axial forces in the beamsa more accurate approximation can be obtained by amplifying the column moments

Frames 363

of each storey by using the sway buckling load factor αcrs for that storey obtainedusing equation 87 in

δ = δs = 1

1 minus 1αcrs(823)

in which αcrs is the elastic sway buckling load factor calculated for the storey(Section 8354) A worked example of the application of this method is given inSection 858

Alternatively the first-order end moment

Mf = Mfb + Mfs (824)

may be separated into a braced frame component Mfb and a complementary swaycomponent Mfs [29] The second-order maximum moment M may be approximatedby using these components in

M = Mfb + Mfs

(1 minus 1αcr)(825)

in which αcr is the load factor at frame elastic sway buckling (Section 8354)Amore accurate second-order analysis can be made by including the P- effects

of sway displacement directly in the analysis An approximate method of doingthis is to include fictitious horizontal forces equivalent to the P- effects in aniterative series of first-order analyses [30 31] A series of analyses must be carriedout because the fictitious horizontal forces increase with the deflections If theanalysis series converges then the frame is stable An approximate method ofanticipating convergence is to examine the value of (n+1 minus n)(n minus nminus1)

computed from the values of at the steps (n minus 1) n and (n + 1) If this isless than n(n + 1) then the analysis series probably converges This method ofanalysing frame buckling is slow and clumsy but it does allow the use of thewidely available first-order elastic computer programs The method ignores thedecreases in the member stiffnesses caused by axial compressions (the P-δ effects)and therefore tends to underestimate the second-order moments

8357 First-order plastic analysis

In the first-order method of plastic analysis all instability effects are ignored andthe collapse strength of the frame is determined by using the rigid-plastic assump-tion (Section 552) and finding the plastic hinge locations which first convert theframe to a collapse mechanism

The methods used for the plastic analysis of frames are extensions of thosediscussed in Section 555 which incorporate reductions in the plastic momentcapacity to account for the presence of axial force (Section 722) These meth-ods are discussed in many texts such as those [18ndash24 Chapter 5] referred to in

364 Frames

Section 514 The manual application of these methods is not as simple as it is forbeams but computer programs such as [18] are available The results of computerfirst-order plastic analyses [18] of a braced and an unbraced frame are given inFigures 83 and 84

8358 Advanced analysis

Present methods of designing statically indeterminate steel structures rely on pre-dictions of the stress resultants acting on the individual members and on models ofthe strengths of these members These member strength models include allowancesfor second-order effects and inelastic behaviour as well as for residual stressesand geometrical imperfections It is therefore possible that the common methodsof second-order elastic analysis used to determine the member stress resultantswhich do not account for inelastic behaviour residual stresses and geometricalimperfections may lead to inaccurate predictions

Second-order effects and inelastic behaviour cause redistributions of the mem-ber stress resultants in indeterminate structures as some of the more criticalmembers lose stiffness and transfer moments to their neighbours Non-proportionalloading also causes redistributions For example frame shown in Figure 89 thecolumn end moments induced initially by the beam loads decrease as the col-umn load increases and the column becomes less stiff due to second-order effectsat first and then due to inelastic behaviour The end moments may reduce tozero or even reverse in direction In this case the end moments change from ini-tially disturbing the column to stabilising it by resisting further end rotations Thischange in the sense of the column end moments which contributes significantlyto the column strength cannot be predicted unless an analysis is made which moreclosely models the behaviour of the real structure than does a simple plastic analy-sis (which ignores second-order effects) or a second-order elastic analysis (whichignores inelastic behaviour)

Bea

m lo

adin

g on

ly

Bea

m lo

ads

cons

tant

incr

easi

ng c

olum

n lo

ads

Tot

al a

xial

for

ce in

col

umn

Failure

Tot

al a

xial

for

ce in

col

umn

Central column rotation Column end moment

(b) Load-rotation behaviour(a) Frame (c) Variation of column end moment

Figure 89 Reversal of column end moments in frames

Frames 365

Ideally the member stress resultants should be determined by a method offrame analysis which accounts for both second-order effects (P-δ and P-) inelas-tic behaviour residual stresses and geometrical imperfections and any local orout-of-plane buckling effects Such a method has been described as an advancedanalysis Not only can an advanced analysis be expected to lead to predictions thatare of high accuracy it has the further advantage that the design process can begreatly simplified since the structure can be considered to be satisfactory if theadvanced analysis can show that it can reach an equilibrium position under thedesign loads

Past research on advanced analysis and the prediction of the strengths of realstructures has concentrated on frames for which local and lateral buckling areprevented (by using Class 1 sections and full lateral bracing) One of the earliestand perhaps the simplest methods of approximating the strengths of rigid-jointedframes was suggested in [32] where it was proposed that the ultimate load factorαult of a frame should be calculated from the load factorαp at which plastic collapseoccurs (all stability effects being ignored) and the load factor αcr at which elasticin-plane buckling takes place (all plasticity effects being ignored) by using

1

αult= 1

αp+ 1

αcr(826)

or

αultαp = 1 minus αultαcr (827)

However it can be said that this method represents a considerable simplificationof a complex relationship between the ultimate strength and the plastic collapseand elastic buckling strengths of a frame

More accurate predictions of the strengths of two-dimensional rigid frames canbe made using a sub-assemblage method of analysis In this method the bracedor unbraced frame is considered as a number of subassemblies [33ndash35] such asthose shown in Figure 810 The conditions at the ends of the sub-assemblage areapproximated according to the structural experience and intuition of the designer(it is believed that these approximations are not critical) and the sub-assemblage isanalysed by adding together the load-deformation characteristics ([36] and curve 5in Figure 72) of the individual members Although the application of this manualtechnique to the analysis of braced frames was developed to an advanced stage[37 38] it does not appear to have achieved widespread popularity

Further improvements in the prediction of frame strength are provided by com-puter methods of second-order plastic analysis such as the deteriorated stiffnessmethod of analysis in which progressive modifications are made to a second-orderelastic analysis to account for the formation of plastic hinges [16 39 40] The useof such an analysis is limited to structures with appropriate material propertiesand for which local and out-of-plane buckling effects are prevented However theuse of such an analysis has in the past been largely limited to research studies

366 Frames

(a) No-sway sub-assemblage (b) Sway sub-assemblage

Figure 810 Sub-assemblages for multi-storey frames

More recent research [41] has concentrated on extending computer methods ofanalysis so that they allow for residual stresses and geometrical imperfections aswell as for second-order effects and inelastic behaviour Such methods can dupli-cate design code predictions of the strengths of individual members (through theincorporation of allowances for residual stresses and geometrical imperfections) aswell as the behaviour of complete frames Two general types of analysis have devel-oped called plastic zone analysis [42 43] and concentrated plasticity analysis [44]While plastic zone analysis is the more accurate concentrated plasticity is the moreeconomical of computer memory and time It seems likely that advanced meth-ods of analysis will play important roles in the future design of two-dimensionalrigid-jointed frames in which local and lateral buckling are prevented

836 In-plane design of frames with rigid joints

8361 Residual stresses and geometrical imperfections

The effects of residual stresses are allowed for approximately in EC3 by usingenhanced equivalent geometrical imperfections These include both global (frame)imperfections (which are associated with initial sway or lack of verticality) andlocal (member) imperfections (which are associated with initial bow or crooked-ness) EC3 also allows the equivalent geometrical imperfections to be replaced byclosed systems of equivalent fictitious forces The magnitudes of the equivalentgeometrical imperfections and equivalent fictitious forces are specified in Clause532 of EC3

In some low slenderness frames the equivalent imperfections or fictitious forceshave only small effects on the distributions of moments and axial forces in the

Frames 367

frames and may be ignored in the analysis (their effects on member resistanceare included in Clause 63 of EC3) More generally the global (frame) imperfec-tions or fictitious forces are included in the analysis but not the local (member)imperfections or fictitious forces It is rare to include both the global and the localimperfections or fictitious forces in the analysis

The EC3 methods used for the analysis and design of frames with rigid jointsare discussed in the following sub-sections

8362 Strength design using first-order elastic analysis

When a braced or unbraced frame has low slenderness so that

αcr = FcrFEd ge 10 (828)

in which FEd is the design loading on the frame and Fcr is the elastic buckling loadthen EC3 allows the moments and axial forces in the frame to be determined usinga first-order elastic analysis of the frame with all the equivalent imperfections orfictitious forces ignored The frame members are adequate when their axial forcesand moments satisfy the section and member buckling resistance requirements ofClauses 62 and 633 of EC3

When a braced frame does not satisfy equation 828 Clause 522(3)b of EC3appears to allow a first-order elastic analysis to be used which neglects all second-order effects and the imperfections associated with member crookedness providedthe member axial forces and moments satisfy the buckling resistance require-ments of Clause 633 It is suggested however that amplified first-order analysisshould be used for frames of moderate slenderness which satisfy equation 829(Section 8363) and that second-order analysis should be used for frames of highslenderness which satisfy equation 830 (Section 8364)

8363 Strength design using amplified first-order elastic analysis

When an unbraced frame has moderate slenderness so that

10 gt αcr = FcrFEd ge 3 (829)

then EC3 allows the moments in the frame to be determined by amplifying(Section 8356) the moments determined by a first-order elastic analysis pro-vided the equivalent global imperfections or fictitious forces are included in theanalysis The frame members are adequate when their axial forces and momentssatisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3 and the memberbuckling resistance requirements of Clause 633 EC3 allows the member lengthto be used in Clause 633 but this may overestimate the resistances of members forwhich compression effects dominate It is suggested that in this case the member

368 Frames

should also satisfy the member buckling requirements of Clause 631 in whichthe effective length is used

If the member imperfections or fictitious forces are also included in the analysisthen the frame members are satisfactory when their axial forces and momentssatisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3

8364 Strength design using second-order elastic analysis

When an unbraced frame has high slenderness so that

3 gt αcr = FcrFEd (830)

then EC3 requires a more accurate analysis to be made of the second-order effects(Section 8355) than by amplifying the moments determined by a first-orderelastic analysis EC3 requires the equivalent global imperfections or fictitiousforces to be included in the analysis The frame members are adequate when theiraxial forces and moments satisfy the section resistance requirements of Clause 62of EC3 and the member buckling resistance requirements of Clause 633 EC3allows the member length to be used in Clause 633 but this may overestimate theresistances of members for which compression effects dominate It is suggestedthat in this case the member should also satisfy the member buckling requirementsof Clause 631 in which the effective length is used

If the member imperfections or fictitious forces are also included in the analysisthen the frame members are satisfactory when the axial forces and moments satisfythe section resistance requirements of Clause 62 of EC3

8365 Strength design using first-order plastic collapse analysis

When a braced or unbraced frame has low slenderness so that

αcr = FcrFEd ge 15 (831)

then EC3 allows all the equivalent imperfections or fictitious forces to be ignoredand a first-order rigid plastic collapse analysis (Section 8357) to be used Thislimit is reduced to αcr ge 10 for clad structures and to αcr ge 5 for some portalframes subjected to gravity loads only

All members forming plastic hinges must be ductile so that the plastic momentcapacity can be maintained at each hinge over a range of hinge rotations sufficientto allow the plastic collapse mechanism to develop Ductility is usually ensured byrestricting the steel type to one which has a substantial yield plateau and significantstrain-hardening (Section 131) and by preventing reductions in rotation capacityby local buckling effects (by satisfying the requirements of Clause 56 of EC3including the use of Class 1 sections) by out-of-plane buckling effects (by sat-isfying the requirements of Clause 635 of EC3 including limiting the unbraced

Frames 369

lengths) and by in-plane buckling effects (by using equation 831 to limiting themember in-plane slendernesses and axial compression forces)

The frame members are adequate when

αp = FpFEd ge 1 (832)

in which Fp is the plastic collapse load It should be noted that the use of reducedfull plastic moments (to allow for the axial forces) will automatically ensure thatClause 629 of EC3 for the bending and axial force resistance is satisfied

8366 Strength design using advanced analysis

EC3 permits the use of a second-order plastic analysis When the effects of residualstresses and geometrical imperfections are allowed for through the use of globaland local equivalent imperfections or fictitious forces and when local and lateralbuckling are prevented (Clauses 56 and 635 of EC3) then this provides a methodof design by advanced analysis

The members of the structure are satisfactory when the section resistancerequirements of Clause 62 of EC3 are met Because these requirements are auto-matically satisfied by the prevention of local buckling and the accounting forinelastic behaviour the members can be regarded as satisfactory if the analysisshows that the structure can reach an equilibrium position under the design loads

8367 Serviceability design

Because the service loads are usually substantially less than the factored loadsused for strength design the behaviour of a frame under its service loads isusually closely approximated by the predictions of a first-order elastic analysis(Section 8352) For this reason the serviceability design of a frame is usuallycarried out using the results of a first-order elastic analysis The serviceabilitydesign of a frame is often based on the requirement that the service load deflec-tions must not exceed specified values Thus the member sizes are systematicallychanged until this requirement is met

837 Out-of-plane behaviour of frames with rigid joints

Most two-dimensional rigid frames which have in-plane loading are arranged sothat the stiffer planes of their members coincide with that of the frame Such a framedeforms only in its plane until the out-of-plane (flexuralndashtorsional) buckling loadsare reached and if these are less than the in-plane ultimate loads then the membersand the frame will buckle by deflecting out of the plane and twisting

In some cases the action of one loaded member dominates and its elastic buck-ling load can be determined by evaluating the restraining effects of the remainderof the frame For example when the frame shown in Figure 811 has a zero beam

370 Frames

Q1

Q2

Q1

L2

L1

Lateral restraint

Rigid joint

Column built-in at base

Figure 811 Flexuralndashtorsional buckling of a portal frame

load Q2 then the beam remains straight and does not induce moments in thecolumns which buckle elastically out of the plane of the frame at a load givenby Q1 asymp π2EIz(07L1)

2 (see Figure 315c) On the other hand if the effectsof the compressive forces in the columns are small enough to be neglected thenthe elastic stiffnesses and restraining effects of the columns on the beam can beestimated and the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling load Q2 of the beam can beevaluated The solution of a related problem is discussed in Section 69

In general however both the columns and the beams of a rigid frame buckleand there is an interaction between them during out-of-plane buckling Thisinteraction is related to that which occurs during the in-plane buckling of rigidframes (see Sections 8353 and 8354 and Figures 86 and 87) and also tothat which occurs during the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of continuousbeams (see Section 682 and Figure 621) Because of the similarities between theelastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of restrained beam-columns (Section 7313)and restrained columns (Section 364) it may prove possible to extend furtherthe approximate method given in Section 8353 for estimating the in-planeelastic buckling loads of rigid frames (which was applied to the elasticflexuralndashtorsional buckling of some beams in Section 682) Thus the elas-tic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of some rigid frames might be calculatedapproximately by using the column effective length chart of Figure 321aHowever this development has not yet been investigated

On the other hand there have been developments [45ndash47] in the analytical tech-niques used to determine the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of generalrigid plane frames with general in-plane loading systems and a computer program[48] has been prepared which requires only simple data specifying the geometryof the frame its supports and restraints and the arrangement of the loads The use

Frames 371

Bea

m lo

ad Q

2Q1 Q1

Q1 Q1Q2

Q2

L L21 = 05

L L21 = 2

Column loads Q1

Figure 812 Elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of portal frames

of this program to calculate the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling load of a framewill simplify the design problem considerably

Interaction diagrams for the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling loads of a numberof frames have been determined [45] and two of these (for the portal framesshown in Figure 811) are given in Figure 812 These diagrams show that theregion of stability is convex as it is for the in-plane buckling of rigid frames(Figures 86 and 87) and for the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of continuous beams(Figure 623b) Because of this convexity linear interpolations (as in Figure 624)made between known buckling load sets are conservative

Although the elastic flexuralndashtorsional buckling of rigid frames has been inves-tigated the related problems of inelastic buckling and its influence on the strengthof rigid frames have not yet been systematically studied However advanced com-puter programs for the inelastic out-of-plane behaviour of beam-columns [49ndash54]have been developed and it seems likely that these will be extended in the nearfuture to rigid-jointed frames

838 Out-of-plane design of frames

While there is no general method yet available of designing for flexuralndashtorsionalbuckling in rigid frames design codes imply that the strength formulations forisolated beam-columns (see Section 734) can be used in conjunction with themoments and forces determined from an appropriate elastic in-plane analysis ofthe frame

372 Frames

A rational design method has been developed [55] for the columns oftwo-dimensional building frames in which laterally braced horizontal beams formplastic hinges Thus when plastic analysis is used columns which do not par-ticipate in the collapse mechanism may be designed as isolated beam-columnsagainst flexuralndashtorsional buckling In later publications [56 57] the method wasextended so that the occurrence of plastic hinges at one or both ends of the column(instead of in the beams) could be allowed for Because the assumption of plastichinges at all the beam-column joints is only valid for frames with vertical loadsthe analysis for lateral loads must be carried out independently A frame analysedby this method must therefore have an independent bracing or shear wall systemto resist the lateral loads

A number of current research efforts are being directed towards the extension ofadvanced methods of analysing the in-plane behaviour of frames (Section 8358)to include the out-of-plane flexuralndashtorsional buckling effects [52ndash54] Theavailability of a suitable computer program will greatly simplify the design of two-dimensional frames in which local buckling is prevented since such a frame canbe considered to be satisfactory if it can be shown that it can reach an equilibriumposition under the factored design loads

84 Three-dimensional flexural frames

The design methods commonly used when either the frame or its loading is three-dimensional are very similar to the methods used for two-dimensional framesThe actions caused by the design loads are usually calculated by allowing forsecond-order effects in the elastic analysis of the frame and then compared withthe design resistances determined for the individual members acting as isolatedbeam-columns In the case of three-dimensional frames or loading the elasticframe analysis is three-dimensional while the design resistances are based on thebiaxial bending resistances of isolated beam-columns (see Section 74)

A more rational method has been developed [55 56] of designing three-dimensional braced rigid frames for which it could be assumed that plastic hingesform at all major and minor axis beam ends This method is an extension of themethod of designing braced two-dimensional frames ([55ndash57] and Section 838)For such frames all the beams can be designed plastically while the columns canagain be designed as if independent of the rest of the frame The method of design-ing these columns is based on a second-order elastic analysis of the biaxial bendingof an isolated beam-column Once again the assumption of plastic hinges at allthe beam ends is valid only for frames with vertical loads and so an independentdesign must be made for the effects of lateral loads

In many three-dimensional rigid frames the vertical loads are carried principallyby the major axis beams while the minor axis beams are lightly loaded and do notdevelop plastic hinges at collapse but restrain and strengthen the columns In thiscase an appropriate design method for vertical loading is one in which the majoraxis beams are designed plastically and the minor axis beams elastically The chief

Frames 373

difficulty in using such a method is in determining the minor axis column momentsto be used in the design In the method presented in [58] this is done by firstmaking a first-order elastic analysis of the minor axis frame system to determinethe column end moments The larger of these is then increased to allow for thesecond-order effects of the axial forces the amount of the increase depending onthe column load ratio NNcrz (in which Ncrz is the minor axis buckling load of theelastically restrained column) and the end moment ratio βm The increased minoraxis end moment is then used in a nominal first yield analysis of the column whichincludes the effects of initial crookedness

However it appears that this design method is erratically conservative [59] andthat the small savings achieved do not justify the difficulty of using it Anotherdesign method was proposed [60] which avoids the intractable problem of inelasticbiaxial bending in frame structures by omitting altogether the calculation of theminor axis column moments This omission is based on the observation that theminor axis moments induced in the columns by the working loads reduce to zeroas the ultimate loads are approached and even reverse in sign so that they finallyrestrain the column as shown in Figure 89 With this simplification the momentsfor which the column is to be designed are the same as those in a two-dimensionalframe However the beneficial restraining effects of the minor axis beams must beallowed for and a simple way of doing this has been proposed [60] For this theelastic minor axis stiffness of the column is reduced to allow for plasticity causedby the axial load and the major axis moments and this reduced stiffness is usedto calculate the effects of the minor axis restraining beams on the effective lengthLcr of the column The reduced stiffness is also used to calculate the effectiveminor axis flexural rigidity EIeff of the column and the ultimate strength Nult ofthe column is taken as

Nult = π2EIeff L2cr (833)

The results obtained from two series of full-scale three-storey tests indicate thatthe predicted ultimate loads obtained by this method vary between 84 and 104of the actual ultimate loads

85 Worked examples

851 Example 1 ndash buckling of a truss

Problem All the members of the rigid-jointed triangulated frame shown inFigure 813a have the same in-plane flexural rigidity which is such thatπ2EIL2 = 1 Determine the effective length factor of member 12 and the elasticin-plane buckling loads of the frame

Solution The member 12 is one of the longest compression members and one ofthe most heavily loaded and so at buckling it will be restrained by its adjacentmembers An initial estimate is required of the buckling load and this can be

374 Frames

300

250

087ndash0 87

ndash1 73

L

L

ndash260

L116 L116 L116

Q

Q Q

=1

Q =1Q = 1

1

2

3

4

(a) Example 1

All members havethe same EI

L05

L05

Q5 Q5

EI2

EI EI

L2

1

2 3L

(b) Example 4

Figure 813 Worked examples 1 and 4

obtained after observing that the end 1 will be heavily restrained by the tensionmember 14 and that the end 2 will be moderately restrained by the short lightlyloaded compression member 24 Thus the initial estimate of the effective lengthfactor of member 12 in this braced frame should be closer to the rigidly restrainedvalue of 05 than to the unrestrained value of 10

Accordingly assume kcr12 = 070Then by using equation 82 Ncr12 = π2EI(070L)2 = 204

and Qcr = Ncr12300 = 068Thus N23 = 170 N24 = 059 N14 = minus177Using the form of equation 345 α12 = 2EIL Using Figure 319

α23 = 3EI

L

[1 minus 170

π2EIL2

]= minus210

EI

L

α24 = 4EI

058L

[1 minus 059

π2EI(058L)2

]= 622

EI

L

α14 = 4EI

116L

[1 minus (minus177)

2π2EI(116L)2

]= 755

EI

L

Using equation 345

k1 = 2(05 times 755 + 2) = 0346

k2 = 205 times (minus210 + 622)+ 2 = 0493

Using Figure 321a kcr12 = 065The calculation can be repeated using kcr12 = 065 instead of the initial estimate

of 070 in which case the solution kcr12 = 066 will be obtained The correspondingframe buckling loads are Qcr = π2EI(066L)23 = 077

Frames 375

852 Example 2 ndash buckling of a braced frame

Problem Determine the effective length factors of the members of the bracedframe shown in Figure 83a and estimate the frame buckling load factor αcr

SolutionFor the vertical member 13 using equation 85

k1 = 10 (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

Using the form of equation 345 and Figure 319

k3 = 2 times 2210 times 10410 000

05 times 4 times 8503 times 10412 000 + 20 times 2210 times 10410 000= 0238

kcr13 = 074 (using Figure 321a)

(kcr13 = 073 if a base stiffness ratio of 01 is used so that

k1 = (2 times 2210 times 10410 000)(2 times 11 times 2210 times 10410 000) = 0909)

Ncr13 = π2 times 210 000 times 2210 times 104(074 times 10 000)2N = 8365 kN

αcr13 = 8365716 = 117

For the horizontal member 35 using equation 85

k3 = 2 times 8503 times 10412 000

05 times 3 times 2210 times 10410 000 + 2 times 8503 times 10412 000= 0810

k5 = 0 (theoretical value for a fixed end)

kcr35 = 066 (using Figure 321a)

(kcr35 = 077 if a base stiffness ratio of 10 is used so that k5 = 05)

Ncr35 = π2 times 210 000 times 8503 times 104

(066 times 12 000)2N = 28096 kN

αcr35 = 28096253 = 111 gt 117 = αcr13

there4 αcr = 117 (compare with the computer analysis value of αcr = 1132 givenin Figure 83d)

A slightly more accurate estimate might be obtained by using equation 85 withαr obtained from Figure 319 as

αr = 1 minus 253 times 103

(2 times π2 times 210 000 times 8503 times 10412 0002)= 0990

376 Frames

so that

k3 = 2 times 2210 times 10410000

05 times 4 times 0990 times 8503 times 10412 000 + 2 times 2210 times 10410 000

= 0240

but kcr13 is virtually unchanged and so therefore is αcr

853 Example 3 ndash buckling of an unbraced two-storey frame

Problem Determine the storey buckling load factors of the unbraced two-storeyframe shown in Figure 84a and estimate the frame buckling load factor byusing

a the storey deflection method of equation 88 andb the member buckling load method of equation 87

(a) Solution using equation 88For the upper storey using the first-order analysis results shown in Figure 84

αcrsu = 10

(20 + 40 + 20)times 5000

(1214 minus 855)= 1741

For the lower storey using the first-order analysis results shown in Figure 84

αcrsl = (10 + 20)

(20 + 40 + 20 + 40 + 80 + 40)times 5000

855= 731 lt 1741 = αcrsu

there4 αcr = 731 (compare with the computer analysis value of αcr = 6905 given inFigure 84d)(b) Solution using equation 87

For the upper-storey columns using equation 84

kT = 2210 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 15 times 3415 times 10412 000= 0508

kB = 2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000 + 15 times 14136 times 10412 000

= 0458

kcru = 144 (using Figure 321b)

Ncru = π2 times 210 000 times 2210 times 104(144 times 5000)2N = 8836 kN

Frames 377

For the lower-storey columns using equation 84

kT = 2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000

2210 times 1045000 + 5259 times 1045000 + 15 times 14136 times 10412 000

= 0458

kB = infin (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

kcrl = 24 (using Figure 321b)

Ncrl = π2 times 210 000 times 5259 times 104(24 times 5000)2N = 7569 kN

Using equation 87 and the axial forces of Figure 84f

αcrsu = 2 times 883650

(376 + 424)50= 221

αcrsl = 2 times 756950

(1033 + 1367)50= 631 lt 221 = αcrsu

there4 αcr = 631 (compare with the storey deflection method value of αcr = 731calculated above and the computer analysis value of αcr = 6905 given inFigure 84d)

854 Example 4 ndash buckling of unbraced single storey frame

Problem Determine the effective length factor of the member 12 of the unbracedframe shown in Figure 813b (and for whichπ2EIL2 = 1) and the elastic in-planebuckling loads

Solution The sway member 12 is unrestrained at end 1 and moderately restrainedat end 2 by the lightly loaded member 23 Its effective length factor is thereforegreater than 2 the value for a rigidly restrained sway member (see Figure 315e)Accordingly assume kcr12 = 250

Then by using equation 82 Ncr12 = π2EI(250L)2 = 016

and Qcr = Ncr125 = 0032

and N23 = Qcr = 0032

Using Figure 319

αb23 = 6 times (2EI)(2L)(

1 minus 0032

4π2(2EI)(2L)2

)= 5904EIL

378 Frames

and using equation 349

k2 = 6EIL

15 times 5904EIL + 6EIL= 0404

k1 = 10 (theoretical value for a frictionless hinge)

Using Figure 321b kcr12 = 23The calculation can be repeated using kcr12 = 23 instead of the initial estimate

of 250 in which case the solution kcr12 = 23 will be obtained The correspondingframe buckling loads are given by

Qcr = π2EI(23L)2

5= 0038

855 Example 5 ndash buckling of a portal frame

Problem A uniform section pinned-base portal frame is shown in Figure 814 withits member axial compression forces [42] Determine the elastic buckling loadfactor of the frameSolution

Lr = radic(12 0002 + 30002) = 12 369 mm

The average axial forces are

Nc = (514 + 691)2 = 603 kN

Nr = (581 + 480 + 430 + 530)4 = 505 kN

For a pinned base portal frame C = 12 (811)

581

514 430 480 691

691 514

530

12 000

356 times 171 UB 45 I = 12 066 cm4

12 000

3000

40003

Figure 814 Worked example 5

Frames 379

For antisymmetric buckling

R = (12 080 times 1044000)(12 080 times 10412 369) = 309 (813)

ρc = 3(10 times 309 + 12) = 00699 (812a)

ρr = 1 (812b)

Ncrc = π2 times 210 000 times 12 080 times 10440002N = 15 648 kN (810)

Ncrr = π2 times 210 000 times 12 080 times 10412 3692N = 1637 kN (810)

αcras =(

603

00699 times 15 648

)12

+(

505

1 times 1637

)12minus112

= 130 (89)

For symmetric buckling

RH = (12 3694000)times (300012 369) = 075 (815)

ρc = 48 + 12 times 309 times (1 + 075)

24 + 12 times 309 times (1 + 075)+ 7 times 3092 times 0752

= 0664 (814a)

ρr = 12 times 309 + 84 times 309 times 075

12 times 309 + 4= 1377 (814b)

αcrs =(

603

0664 times 15 648

)12

+(

505

1377 times 1637

)12minus112

= 384

gt 130 = αcras (89)

and so the frame buckling factor isαcr = 130 This is reasonably close to the valueof 139 predicted by a computer elastic frame buckling analysis program [18]

856 Example 6 ndash moment amplificationin a braced frame

Problem Determine the amplified design moments for the braced frame shown inFigure 83 (Second-order effects are rarely important in braced members whichhave significant moment gradients It can be inferred from Clause 522(3)b of EC3that second-order effects need not be considered in braced frames Nevertheless

380 Frames

an approximate method of allowing for second-order effects by estimating theamplified design moments is illustrated below)

Solution For the vertical member 123 the first-order moments are M1 = 0M2 = 235 kNm M3 = minus530 kNm and for these the method of [28] leads toβm = 0585 and so using equation 821

cm = 06 minus 04 times 0585 = 0366

Using Ncr13 = 8365 kN from Section 852 and using equations 819 and 820

MEd3 = 0366 times 530

1 minus 7168365= 212 kNm lt 530 kNm = M3

and so MEd3 = 530 kNm This is close to the second-order moment of 536 kNmdetermined using the computer program of [18]

For the horizontal member 345 the first-order moments are M3 = minus530 kNmM4 = 1366 kNm M5 = minus1538 kNm and for these the method of [28] leads toβm = 0292 and so

cm = 06 minus 04 times 0292 = 0483

Using Ncr35 = 28096 kN from Section 852 and using equations 819 and 820

MEd5 = 0483 times 1538

1 minus 25328096= 750 kNm lt 1538 kNm = M5

and so MEd5 = 1538 kNm This is close to the second-order moment of 1546 kNmdetermined using the computer program of [18]

857 Example 7 ndash moment amplification in a portal frame

Problem The maximum first-order elastic moment in the portal frame ofFigure 814 whose buckling load factor was determined in Section 855 is1518 kNm [26] Determine the amplified design moment

Solution Using the elastic frame buckling load factor determined in Section 855of αcrs = 130 and using equations 819 and 822

MEd = 1518

1 minus 1130= 1645 kNm

which is about 6 higher than the value of 1554 kNm obtained using the computerprogram of [18]

858 Example 8 ndash moment amplificationin an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the amplified design moments for the unbraced frame shownin Figure 84

Frames 381

Solution For the upper-storey columns using the value of αcrsu = 221determined in Section 853(b) and using equation 823

δsu = 1(1 minus 1221) = 1047 and so

MEd8 = 1047 times 625 = 655 kNm

which is close to the second-order moment of 644 kNm determined using thecomputer program of [18]

For the lower-storey columns using the value of αcrsl = 631 determined inSection 853(b) and using equation 823

δsl = 1(1 minus 1631) = 1188 and so

MEd76 = 1188 times 1193 = 1418 kNm

which is 9 higher than the value of 1305 kNm determined using the computerprogram of [18]

For the lower beam the second-order end moment MEd74 may be approximatedby adding the second-order end moments MEd76 and MEd78 so that

MEd74 = 1418 + 535(1 minus 1221) = 1978 kNm

which is 7 higher than the value of 1847 kNm determined using the computerprogram of [18]

Slightly different values of the second-order moments are obtained if the valuesof αcrslu and αcrsl determined by the storey deflection method in Section 853(a)are used

859 Example 9 ndash plastic analysis of a braced frame

Problem Determine the plastic collapse load factor for the braced frame shown inFigure 83 if the members are all of S275 steelSolution For the horizontal member plastic collapse mechanism shown inFigure 83e

δW = 80αph times (δθh times 60) = 480αphδθh for a virtual rotation δθhof 34

and

δU = (850 times δθh)+ (1713 times 2δθh)+ (1713 times δθh) = 5989 δθh

so that

αph = 5989480 = 1248

382 Frames

Checking for reductions in Mp using equation 717

Mpr13 = 118 times 850 times 1 minus 895(275 times 471 times 102103)

= 934 kNm gt 850 kNm = Mp13

and so there is no reduction in Mp for member 13

Mpr35 = 118 times 1713 times 1 minus 321(275 times 513 times 102103)

= 1975 kNm gt 1713 kNm = Mp35

and so there is no reduction in Mp for member 35Therefore αph = 1248For a plastic collapse mechanism in the vertical member with a frictionless hinge

at 1 and plastic hinges at 2 and 3

αpv = 850 times 2 times δθv + 850 times δθv

20 times 50 times δθv

= 255 gt 1248 = αph

and so

αp = 1248

8510 Example 10 ndash plastic analysis of an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the plastic collapse load factor for the unbraced frame shownin Figure 84 if the members are all of S275 steelSolution For the beam plastic collapse mechanism shown in Figure 84e

δW = 40αp times 6δθ = 240αpδθ

for virtual rotations δθ of the half beams 35 and 58 and

δU = (842 times δθ)+ (842 times 2δθ)+ (842 times δθ) = 3368δθ

so that

αp = 368240 = 1403

The frame is only partially determinate when this mechanism forms and so themember axial forces cannot be determined by statics alone The axial force N358

determined by a computer first-order plastic analysis (18) is N358 = 338 kN andthe axial force ratio is (NNy)358 = 338(275 times 320 times 102103) = 00384which is less than 015 the approximate value at which NNy begins to reduceMp and so αp is unchanged at αp = 1403

Frames 383

The collapse load factors calculated for the other possible mechanisms of

bull lower beam (αp = 2 times (1559 + 850 + 2464)(80 times 6) = 2030)bull lower-storey sway (αp = 2 times 1559(30 times 5) = 2079)bull upper-storey sway (αp = 2 times (842 + 850)(10 times 5) = 6768)bull combined beam sway

(αp = 2 times (842 + 842 + 2464 + 850 + 1559)

(40 + 80)times 6 + (20 times 5 + 10 times 10) = 1425

)

are all greater than 1403 and so αp = 1403

8511 Example 11 ndash elastic member design

Problem Check the adequacy of the lower-storey column 67 (of S275 steel) of theunbraced frame shown in Figure 84 The column is fully braced against deflectionout of the plane of the frame and twisting

Design actionsThe first-order actions are N67 = 1367 kN and M76 = 1193 kNm (Figure 84)and the amplified moment is 1418 kNm (Section 858)

HEd = 10 + 20 = 30 kN and

VEd = (20 + 40 + 20)+ (40 + 80 + 40) = 240 kN

HEdVEd = 30240 = 0125 lt 015 532(4)B

and so the effects of sway imperfections should be included

φ0 = 1200 532(3)

αh = 2radic

10 = 0632 lt 23 and so αh = 23 532(3)

m = 1 (one of the columns will have less than the average force) 532(3)

αm = radic05(1 + 11) = 10 and 532(3)

φ = (1200)times (23)times 10 = 000333 532(3)

The increased horizontal forces are 532(7)

10 + 000333 times 80 = 1027 kN for the upper storey and20 + 000333 times 240 = 2080 kN for the lower storey

If the frame is reanalysed for these increased forces then the axial force willincrease from 1367 to NEd = 1372 kN and the moment from 1193 times 1188 =1418 kNm to MyEd = 1219 times 1188 = 1448 kNm

384 Frames

Section resistance

tf = 125 mm fy = 275 Nmm2 EN10025-2

ε =radic(235275) = 0924 T52

cf (tf ε) = (20432 minus 792 minus 102)(125 times 0924) = 762 lt 9 T52

and the flange is Class 1 T52The worst case for the web classification is when the web is fully plastic in

compression for which

cw(twε) = (2062 minus 2 times 125 minus 2 times 102)(79 times 0924) = 220 lt 33T52

and the web is Class 1 T52Thus the section is Class 1

γM0 = 10 61

NcRd = 663 times 102 times 27510 N = 1823 kN = NplRd 624(2)

025NplRd = 025 times 1826 = 4558 kN gt 1372 kN = NEd 6291(4)

05hwtwfy = 05(2062 minus 2 times 125)times 79 times 275 N = 1968 kN 6291(4)

gt 1372 kN = NEd

and so no allowance need be made for the effect of axial force on the plasticresistance moment 6291(4)

MN Rd = MplRd = 567 times 103 times 27510 Nmm

= 1559 kNm gt 1448 kNm = MEd 6291(5)

and the section resistance is adequate 6291(2)

Member resistanceBecause the member is continuously braced out-of-plane beam lateral buckling

and column minor axis and torsional buckling need not be consideredThus MzEd = 0χLT = 10 and

λ0 = 0 CmLT = 10 aLT = 0 and bLT = 0 TA1

Lcr = 5000 522(7b)

Frames 385

Ncr = π2 times 210 000 times 5259 times 10450002 N = 4360 kN

h

b= 20622043 = 1009 lt 12 tf = 125 lt 100 and so for a S275 steel

UC buckling about the y axis use buckling curve b T62

α = 034 T61

λy =radic(663 times 102 times 275)(4360 times 103) = 0647 6312(1)

Φ = 05 times [1 + 034 times (0647 minus 02)+ 06472] = 0785 6312(1)

χy = 1

0785 + radic07852 minus 06472

= 0813 6312(1)

Using Annex A

microy = 1 minus 13724360

1 minus 0813 times 13724360= 0994 TA1

ψy = 01449 = 0 TA2

Cmy = Cmy0 = 079 + 021 times 0 + 036 times (0 minus 033)times 13724360 TA2

= 0786

wy = 567 times 103510 times 103 = 1112 lt 15 TA1

λmax = λy = 0647 TA1

NRk = NplRd times γM0 = 1823 times 10 = 1823 kN 532(11)

γM1 = 10 61

npl = 1372(182310) = 00753 TA1

Cyy = 1 + (1112 minus 1)

[(2 minus 16

1112times 07852 times 0647 minus 16

1112

times07852 times 06472) times 00753 minus 0] = 1009 TA1

kyy = 0785 times 10 times 0994

1 minus 13724360times 1

1009= 0798 TA1

Substituting into equation 661 of EC3

1372

0813 times 1823+ 0798 times 1448

10 times 1559= 0834 lt 10 633(4)

and so the member resistance is adequate

386 Frames

Alternatively using Annex B

Cmy = 09 TB3

kyy = 09

1 + (0647 minus 02)

1372

0813 times 182310

= 0937 TB1

Substituting into equation 661 of EC3

1372

0813 times 1823+ 0937 times 1448

10 times 1559= 0963 lt 10 633(4)

and so the member resistance is adequate

8512 Example 12 ndash plastic design of a braced frame

Problem Determine the plastic design resistance of the braced frame shownin Figure 83

Solution Using the solution of Section 852

αcr = 117 lt 15 521(3)

and so EC3 does not allow first-order plastic analysis to be used for this frameunless it is clad The restriction of Clause 521(3) of EC3 appears to be unnec-essarily severe in this case since the second-order effects are dominated by thebuckling of the column 123 and will have little effect on the plastic collapsemechanism of the beam 345

If first-order plastic analysis were allowed for this frame then using the solutionof Section 859αp = 1248 gt 10 and the structure would appear to be satisfactory

8513 Example 13 ndash plastic design of an unbraced frame

Problem Determine the plastic design resistance of the unbraced frame shown inFigure 84

Solution Using the solution of Section 853

αcr = 631 lt 10 521(3)

and so EC3 does not allow first-order plastic analysis to be used for this frame

86 Unworked examples

861 Example 14 ndash truss design

The members of the welded truss shown in Figure 815a are all UC sections ofS275 steel with their webs perpendicular to the plane of the truss The member

Frames 387

1 2 3

4 5 6

80

Member Section I

80 80 80

(a) Truss and loads(m kN)

80

100 100 100

f(cm4) (Nmm2)z A(cm2) y

14 36 305 305 UC 97 7308 123 27545 65 12569 201 26512 3242 62

7308 123 2757308 123 275

Member M (kNm)L

14 168 ndash688 ndash2174455612

ndash15022498ndash168

42 815

N (kN)M (kNm)R

2498 ndash1727ndash1502 ndash172 7

89 1591ndash406 85

(b) Memberproperties

(c) Elasticactions

305 305 UC 158305 305 UC 97305 305 UC 97

timestimestimestimes

Figure 815 Example 14

properties and the results of a first-order elastic analysis of the truss under thedesign loads are shown in Figure 815b and c

Determine

(a) the effective length factors kcr of the compression members and the frameelastic buckling load factor αcr

(b) the amplified first-order design moments MEd for the compression members(c) the adequacy of the members for the actions determined by elastic analysis(d) the plastic collapse load factor αp and(e) the adequacy of the truss for plastic design

862 Example 15 ndash unbraced frame design

The members of the unbraced rigid-jointed two-storey frame shown inFigure 816a are all of S275 steel The member properties and the results ofa first-order elastic analysis of the frame under its design loads are shown inFigure 816b and c

Determine

(a) the column effective length factors kcr the storey buckling load factors αcrsand the frame buckling load factor αcr

(b) the amplified first-order design moments MEd for the columns(c) the adequacy of the members for the actions determined by elastic analysis

388 Frames

Member Section I

(a) Frame and loads (m kN)

A f(cm ) (cm ) (Nmm )y y

1ndash3 10ndash12 152 times 152 UC 37305 times 165 UB 40254 times 102 UB 25

2210 471 2752ndash11 8503 513 275

(c) Member properties

(b) Elastic actions

3ndash12 3415 320 275

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

50

50

30 30 30 30

20

10 20 20 20 10

20 40 40 40 20

10

Member M (kNm)L

1ndash2

N (kN)M (kNm)R

10ndash112ndash3

11ndash122ndash44ndash66ndash88ndash113ndash55ndash77ndash99ndash12

ndash188ndash654546

ndash774ndash683895

1274452

ndash488345577209

ndash138795

ndash488759895

1274452

ndash1569345577209

ndash759

ndash1104ndash1297

ndash377ndash423

17171717

ndash307ndash307ndash307ndash307

4 2 2

Figure 816 Example 15

(d) the plastic collapse load factor αp and(e) the adequacy of the frame for plastic design

References

1 British Standards Institution (2005) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures- Part 1-8Design of Joints BSI London

2 Gardner L and Nethercot DA (2005) DesignersrsquoGuide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3Design of Steel Structures General Rules and Rules for Buildings Thomas TelfordPublishing London

3 British Standards Institution (2000) BS5950-1 2000 Structural Use of Steelwork inBuilding ndash Part 1 Code of Practice for Design ndash Rolled and Welded Sections BSILondon

4 British Standards Institution (1969) PD3343 Recommendations for Design (SupplementNo 1 to BS 449) BSI London

5 Nethercot DA (1986) The behaviour of steel frame structures allowing for semi-rigid joint action Steel Structures ndash Recent Research Advances and Their Applica-tions to Design (ed MN Pavlovic) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Londonpp 135ndash51

6 Nethercot DA and Chen W-F (1988) Effect of connections of columns Journal ofConstructional Steel Research 10 pp 201ndash39

7 Anderson DA Reading SJ and Kavianpour K (1991) Wind moment design forunbraced frames SCI Publication P-082 The Steel Construction Institute Ascot

Frames 389

8 Couchman GH (1997) Design of semi-continuous braced frames SCI PublicationP-183 The Steel Construction Institute Ascot

9 Anderson D (ed) (1996) Semi-rigid Behaviour of Civil Engineering StructuralConnections COST-C1 Brussels

10 Faella C Piluso V and Rizzano G (2000) Structural Steel Semi-rigid ConnectionsCRC Press Boca Raton

11 Pippard AJS and Baker JF (1968) The Analysis of Engineering Structures4th edition Edward Arnold London

12 Norris CH Wilbur JB and Utku S (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

13 Coates RC Coutie MG and Kong FK (1988) Structural Analysis 3rd editionVan Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Wokingham England

14 Kleinlogel A (1931) Mehrstielige Rahmen Ungar New York15 Steel Construction Institute (2005) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th edition Blackwell

Scientific Publications Oxford16 Harrison HB (1973) Computer Methods in Structural Analysis Prentice-Hall

Englewood Cliffs New Jersey17 Harrison HB (1990) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 2nd ed Pergamon

Press Oxford18 Hancock GJ Papangelis JP and Clarke MJ (1995) PRFSA Userrsquos Manual Centre

for Advanced Structural Engineering University of Sydney19 Computer Service Consultants (2006) S-Frame Enterprise CSC (UK) Limited Leeds20 Research Engineers Europe Limited (2005) STAAD Pro + QSE RSE Bristol21 Hancock GJ (1984) Structural buckling and vibration analyses on microcomputers

Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of Engineers Australia CE24 No 4pp 327ndash32

22 Bridge RQ and Fraser DJ (1987) Improved G-factor method for evaluating effec-tive lengths of columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 6 Junepp 1341ndash56

23 Column Research Committee of Japan (1971) Handbook of Structural StabilityCorona Tokyo

24 Davies JM (1990) In-plane stability of portal frames The Structural Engineer 68No 8 April pp 141ndash7

25 Davies JM (1991) The stability of multi-bay portal frames The Structural Engineer69 No 12 June pp 223ndash9

26 Trahair NS (1993) Steel structures ndash elastic in-plane buckling of pitched roof portalframes AS4100 DS04 Standards Australia Sydney

27 Silvestre N and Camotim D (2007) Elastic buckling and second-order behaviourof pitched roof steel frames Journal of Constructional Steel Research 63 No 6pp 804ndash18

28 Bridge RQ and Trahair NS (1987) Limit state design rules for steel beam-columnsSteel Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 21 No 2 Septemberpp 2ndash11

29 Lai S-MA and MacGregor JG (1983) Geometric non-linearities in unbracedmultistory frames Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No 11 pp 2528ndash45

30 Wood BR Beaulieu D and Adams PF (1976) Column design by P-delta methodJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST2 February pp 411ndash27

390 Frames

31 Wood BR Beaulieu D and Adams PF (1976) Further aspects of design byP-delta method Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 102 No ST3 Marchpp 487ndash500

32 Merchant W (1954) The failure load of rigid jointed frameworks as influenced bystability The Structural Engineer 32 No 7 July pp 185ndash90

33 Levi V Driscoll GC and Lu L-W (1965) Structural subassemblages preventedfrom sway Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST5 pp 103ndash27

34 Levi V Driscoll GC and Lu L-W (1967) Analysis of restrained columns permittedto sway Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 93 No ST1 pp 87ndash108

35 Hibbard WR and Adams PF (1973) Subassemblage technique for asymmetricstructures Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 99 No STl1 pp 2259ndash68

36 Driscoll GC et al (1965) Plastic Design of Multi-storey Frames Lehigh UniversityPennsylvania

37 American Iron and Steel Institute (1968) Plastic Design of Braced Multi-storey SteelFrames AISI New York

38 Driscoll GC Armacost JO and Hansell WC (1970) Plastic design of multistoreyframes by computer Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST1 pp 17ndash33

39 Harrison HB (1967) Plastic analysis of rigid frames of high strength steel account-ing for deformation effects Civil Engineering Transactions Institution of EngineersAustralia CE9 No 1 April pp 127ndash36

40 El-Zanaty MH and Murray DW (1983) Nonlinear finite element analysis of steelframes Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 109 No 2 February pp 353ndash68

41 White DW and Chen WF (editors) (1993) Plastic Hinge Based Methods forAdvanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames Structural Stability Research CouncilBethlehem Pa

42 Clarke MJ Bridge RQ Hancock GJ and Trahair NS (1993)Australian trends inthe plastic analysis and design of steel building frames Plastic Hinge Based Methods forAdvanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames Structural Stability Research CouncilBethlehem Pa pp 65ndash93

43 Clarke MJ (1994) Plastic-zone analysis of frames Chapter 6 of Advanced Analysisof Steel Frames Theory Software and Applications Chen WF and Toma S edsCRC Press Inc Boca Raton Florida pp 259ndash319

44 White DW Liew JYR and Chen WF (1993) Toward advanced analysis in LRFDPlastic Hinge Based Methods for Advanced Analysis and Design of Steel FramesStructural Stability Research Council Bethlehem Pa pp 95ndash173

45 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1975) Analysis of lateral buckling in planeframes Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST7 pp 1497ndash516

46 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Direct stiffness analysis of lateral bucklingJournal of Structural Mechanics 3 No 1 pp 107ndash37

47 Trahair NS (1993) Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Structures E amp FN Spon London48 Papangelis JP Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (1995) Elastic flexural-torsional

buckling of structures by computer Proceedings 6th International Conference onCivil and Structural Engineering Computing Cambridge pp 109ndash119

49 Bradford MA Cuk PE Gizejowski MA and Trahair NS (1987) Inelasticbuckling of beam-columns Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 113 No 11pp 2259ndash77

Frames 391

50 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns ndashTheory Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2041ndash61

51 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Nonlinear inelastic analysis of steel beam-columns ndashApplications Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 7 pp 2062ndash85

52 Wongkaew K and Chen WF (2002) Consideration of out-of-plane buckling inadvanced analysis for planar steel frame design Journal of Constructional SteelResearch 58 pp 943ndash65

53 Trahair NS and Chan S-L (2003) Out-of-plane advanced analysis of steel structuresEngineering Structures 25 pp 1627ndash37

54 Trahair NS and Hancock GJ (2004) Steel member strength by inelastic lateralbuckling Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 130 No 1 pp 64ndash9

55 Horne MR (1956) The stanchion problem in frame structures designed according toultimate carrying capacity Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Part III5 pp 105ndash46

56 Horne MR (1964) Safe loads on I-section columns in structures designed by plastictheory Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 29 September pp 137ndash50

57 Horne MR (1964) The plastic design of columns Publication No 23 BCSA London58 Institution of Structural Engineers and Institute of Welding (1971) Joint Committee

Second Report on Fully Rigid Multi-Storey Steel Frames ISE London59 Wood RH (1973) Rigid-jointed multi-storey steel frame design a state-of-the-

art report Current Paper CP 2573 Building Research Establishment WatfordSeptember

60 Wood RH (1974) A New Approach to Column Design HMSO London

Chapter 9

Joints

91 Introduction

Connections or joints are used to transfer the forces supported by a structuralmember to other parts of the structure or to the supports They are also usedto connect braces and other members which provide restraints to the structuralmember Although the terms connections and joints are often regarded as havingthe same meaning the definitions of EC3-1-8 [1] are slightly different as followsA connection consists of fasteners such as bolts pins rivets or welds and thelocal member elements connected by these fasteners and may include additionalplates or cleats A joint consists of the zone in which the members are connectedand includes the connection as well as the portions of the member or members atthe joint needed to facilitate the action being transferred

The arrangement of a joint is usually chosen to suit the type of action (forceandor moment) being transferred and the type of member (tension or compres-sion member beam or beam-column) being connected The arrangement shouldbe chosen to avoid excessive costs since the design detailing manufacture andassembly of a joint is usually time consuming in particular the joint type has asignificant influence on costs For example it is often better to use a heavier mem-ber rather than stiffeners since this will reduce the number of processes requiredfor its manufacture

A joint is designed by first identifying the force transfers from the memberthrough the components of the joint to the other parts of the structure Each com-ponent is then proportioned so that it has sufficient strength to resist the force thatit is required to transmit General guidance on joints is given in [2ndash11]

92 Joint components

921 Bolts

Several different types of bolts may be used in structural joints including ordinarystructural bolts (ie commercial or precision bolts and black bolts) and high-strength bolts Turned close tolerance bolts are now rarely used Bolts may transfer

Joints 393

Bolt forces

Bearing

Bearing

BearingShear

Shear

(a) Shear and bearingjoint

(b) Preloadedfriction-grip joint

(c) Tension joint

Bearing Bearing

Bolt forces

Tension

Bearing

Bearing

Bearing

Friction

Friction

Friction

Plate forces

Figure 91 Use of bolts in joints

loads by shear and bearing as shown in Figure 91a by friction between platesclamped together as shown in the preloaded friction-grip joint of Figure 91b orby tension as shown in Figure 91c The shear bearing and tension capacitiesof bolts and the slip capacities of preloaded friction-grip joints are discussed inSection 96

The use of bolts often facilitates the assembly of a structure as only very simpletools are required This is important in the completion of site joints especiallywhere the accessibility of a joint is limited or where it is difficult to providethe specialised equipment required for other types of fasteners On the other handbolting usually involves a significant fabrication effort to produce the bolt holes andthe associated plates or cleats In addition special but not excessively expensiveprocedures are required to ensure that the clamping actions required for preloadedfriction-grip joints are achieved Precautions may need to be taken to ensure that thebolts do not become undone especially in situations where fluctuating or impactloads may loosen them Such precautions may involve the provision of speciallocking devices or the use of preloaded high-strength bolts Guidance on bolted(and on riveted) joints is given in [2ndash11]

922 Pins

Pin joints used to be provided in some triangulated frames where it was thoughtto be important to try to realise the common design assumption that these framesare pin-jointed The cost of making a pin joint is high because of the machiningrequired for the pin and its holes and also because of difficulties in assembly Pins

394 Joints

are used in special architectural features where it is necessary to allow relativerotation to occur between the members being connected In addition a joint whichrequires a very large diameter fastener often uses a pin instead of a bolt Guidanceon the design of pin joints is given in Clause 313 of EC3-1-8 [1]

923 Rivets

In the past hot-driven rivets were extensively used in structural joints They wereoften used in the same way as ordinary structural bolts are used in shear and bearingand in tension joints There is usually less slip in a riveted joint because of thetendency for the rivet holes to be filled by the rivets when being hot-driven Shop-riveting was cheaper than site riveting and for this reason shop-riveting was oftencombined with site-bolting However riveting has been replaced by welding orbolting except in some historical refurbishments Rivets are treated in a similarfashion to bolts in EC3-1-8 [1]

924 Welds

Structural joints between steel members are often made by arc-welding techniquesin which molten weld metal is fused with the parent metal of the members or com-ponent plates being connected at a joint Welding is used extensively in fabricatingshops where specialised equipment is available and where control and inspectionprocedures can be readily exercised ensuring the production of satisfactory weldsWelding is often cheaper than bolting because of the great reduction in the prepa-ration required while greater strength can be achieved the members or plates nolonger being weakened by bolt holes and the strength of the weld metal being supe-rior to that of the material connected In addition welds are more rigid than othertypes of load-transferring fasteners On the other hand welding often producesdistortion and high local residual stresses and may result in reduced ductilitywhile site welding may be difficult and costly

Butt welds such as that shown in Figure 92a may be used to splice tensionmembers A full penetration weld enables the full strength of the member to bedeveloped while the butting together of the members avoids any joint eccentric-ity Butt welds often require some machining of the elements to be joined Specialwelding procedures are usually needed for full strength welds between thick mem-bers to control the weld quality and ductility while special inspection proceduresmay be required for critical welds to ensure their integrity These butt weldinglimitations often lead to the selection of joints which use fillet welds

Fillet welds (see Figure 92b) may be used to connect lapped plates as in thetension member splice (Figure 92c) or to connect intersecting plates (Figure 92d)The member force is transmitted by shear through the weld either longitudinallyor transversely Fillet welds although not as efficient as butt welds require littleif any preparation which accounts for their extensive use They also require lesstesting to demonstrate their integrity

Joints 395

(a) Butt welded splice

(b) Fillet weld (c) Fillet welded splice (d) Fillet welded joint

Weldsize s

Throat thickness

legs sShear

Shear

Plate forcesTension~07s for equals

Shear

Figure 92 Use of welds in joints

Nominal webcleat and bolts

Minimum requirementsfor top cleat and

bolts

Full strengthbutt weld

Preloadedfriction gripbolted joint

Seat stiffener

(a) Simple joint (b) Semi-rigid joint (c) Rigid joint

web stiffener

Figure 93 Beam-to-column joints

925 Plates and cleats

Intermediate plates (or gussets) fin (or side) plates end plates and angle or teecleats are frequently used in structural joints to transfer the forces from one memberto another Examples of flange cleats and plates are shown in the beam-to-columnjoints of Figure 93 and an example of a gusset plate is shown in the truss joint ofFigure 94b Stiffening plates such as the seat stiffener (Figure 93b) and the col-umn web stiffeners (Figure 93c) are often used to help transfer the forces in a joint

Plates are comparatively strong and stiff when they transfer the forces byin-plane actions but are comparatively weak and flexible when they transfer theforces by out-of-plane bending Thus the angle cleat and seat shown in Figure 93a

396 Joints

are flexible and allow the relative rotation of the joint members while the flangeplates and web stiffeners (Figure 93c) are stiff and restrict the relative rotation

The simplicity of welded joints and their comparative rigidity has often resultedin the omission of stiffening plates when they are not required for strength purposesThus the rigid joint of Figure 93c can be greatly simplified by butt welding thebeam directly onto the column flange and by omitting the column web stiffenersHowever this omission will make the joint more flexible since local distortionsof the column flange and web will no longer be prevented

93 Arrangement of joints

931 Joints for force transmission

In many cases a joint is only required to transmit a force and there is nomoment acting on the group of connectors While the joint may be capable ofalso transmitting a moment it will be referred to as a force joint

Force joints are generally of two types For the first the force acts in the con-nection plane formed by the interface between the two plates connected and theconnectors between these plates act in shear as in Figure 91a For the secondtype the force acts out of the connection plane and the connectors act in tensionas in Figure 91c

Examples of force joints include splices in tension and compression memberstruss joints and shear splices and joints in beams A simple shear and bearingbolted tension member splice is shown in Figure 91a and a friction-grip boltedsplice in Figure 91b These are simpler than the tension bolt joint of Figure 91cand are typical of site joints

Ordinary structural and high-strength bolts are used in clearance holes (often2 or 3 mm oversize to provide erection tolerances) as shown in Figure 91a Thehole clearances lead to slip under service loading and when this is undesirable apreloaded friction-grip joint such as that shown in Figure 91b may be used In thisjoint the transverse clamping action produced by preloading the high-strengthbolts allows high frictional resistances to develop and transfer the longitudinalforce Preloaded friction-grip joints are often used to make site joints which needto be comparatively rigid

The butt and fillet welded splices of Figure 92a and c are typical of shop jointsand are of high rigidity While they are often simpler to manufacture under shopconditions than the corresponding bolted joints of Figure 91 special care mayneed to be taken during welding if these are critical joints

The truss joint shown in Figure 94b uses a gusset plate in order to providesufficient room for the bolts The use of a gusset plate is avoided in the joint ofFigure 94a while end plates are used in the joint of Figure 94c to facilitate thefield-bolted connection of shop-welded assemblies

The beam web shear splice of Figure 95a shows a typical shop-welded andsite-bolted arrangement The common simple joint between a beam and columnshown in Figure 93a is often considered to transmit only shear from the beam to

Joints 397

Stiffener

Tees

Bearing plate

Buttweld

(a) Butt welded jointbetween tees

Tee

Fillet welds Bolts

BoltsAngles

Double angles

Gusset plate

(b) Bolted joint withdouble angles

(c) Welded and bolted joint

Figure 94 Joints between axially loaded members

V

V

VMM M

V

M

Web plates

Bolts BoltsFillet welds Butt welds

(a) Shear splice (b) Moment splice (c) Shear and moment splice

Flange plate

Figure 95 Beam splices

the column flange Other examples of joints of this type are shown by the beam-to-beam joints of Figure 96a and b Common arrangements of beam splices aregiven in [2ndash9] and discussed in Sections 958 and 959

932 Joints for moment transmission

While it is rare that a real joint transmits only a moment it is not uncommon that theforce transmitted by the joint is sufficiently small for it to be neglected in designExamples of joints which may be used when the force to be transmitted is negligibleinclude the beam moment splice shown in Figure 95b which combines site-boltingwith shop-welding and the welded moment joint of Figure 96c A moment joint isoften capable of transmitting moderate forces as in the case of the beam-to-columnjoint shown in Figure 93c

933 Force and moment joints

A force and moment joint is required to transmit both force and moment asin the beam-to-column joint shown in Figure 97 Other examples include the

398 Joints

(a) Shear connectionto web

(b) Shear connectionto flange

(c) Moment joint

End plate connectedwith fillet welds Web stiffener Butt welds

Bolts Bolts

Figure 96 Joints between beams

e

Q Q

M = Qe

+

Figure 97 Analysis of a force and moment joint

semi-rigid beam-to-column connection of Figure 93b the full-strength beamsplice of Figure 95c and the beam joint of Figure 96c Common beam-to-columnjoints are given in [2ndash11] and are discussed in Section 95

In some instances joints may actually transfer forces or moments which arenot intended by the designer For example the cleats shown in Figure 93a maytransfer some horizontal forces to the column even though the beam is designedas if simply supported while a similar situation occurs in the shear splice shownin Figure 95a

94 Behaviour of joints

941 Joints for force transmission

When shear and bearing bolts in clearance holes are used in an in-plane force jointthere is an initial slip when the shear is first applied to the joint as some of theclearances are taken up (Figure 98) The joint then becomes increasingly stiff as

Joints 399

Preloaded friction-grip joint

High-strength boltsin clearance holes

Close tolerance boltsin fitted holes

Ordinary structural boltsin clearance holes

Jointforce

Slip load

Initial slip

Joint deformation

Figure 98 Behaviour of bolted joints

more of the bolts come into play At higher forces the more highly loaded boltsstart to yield and the joint becomes less stiff Later a state may be reached inwhich each bolt is loaded to its maximum capacity

It is not usual to analyse this complex behaviour and instead it is commonlyassumed that equal size bolts share equally in transferring the force as shown inFigure 99b (except if the joint is long) even in the service load range It is shownin Section 991 that this is the case if there are no clearances and all the boltsfit perfectly and if the members and connection plates act rigidly and the boltselastically If however the flexibilities of the joint component members and platesare taken into account then it is found that the forces transferred are highest inthe end bolts of any line of bolts parallel to the joint force and lowest in the centrebolts as shown in Figure 99c In long bolted joints the end bolt forces may beso high as to lead to premature failure (before these forces can be redistributed byplastic action) and the subsequent lsquounbuttoningrsquo of the joint

Shear and bearing joints using close tolerance bolts in fitted holes behave in asimilar manner to connections with clearance holes except that the bolt slips aregreatly reduced (It was noted earlier that fitted close tolerance bolts are now rarelyused) On the other hand slip is not reduced in preloaded friction-grip bolted shearjoints but is postponed until the frictional resistance is overcome at the slip loadas shown in Figure 98 Again it is commonly assumed that equal size bolts shareequally in transferring the force

This equal sharing of the force transfer is also often assumed for tension forcejoints in which the applied force acts out of the connection plane It is shown inSection 992 that this is the case for joints in which the plates act rigidly and thebolts act elastically

Welded force joints do not slip but behave as if almost rigid Welds are oftenassumed to be uniformly stressed whether loaded transversely or longitudinallyHowever there may be significantly higher stresses at the ends of long weldsparallel to the joint just as there are in the case of long bolted joints

400 Joints

Q

Q

Qn Qn

n connectors

(a) Shear joint (b) Assumed shear (c) Actual sheardistribution distribution(rigid plates) (elastic plates)

Figure 99 Shear distribution in a force connection

Due to the great differences in the stiffnesses of joints using different types ofconnectors it is usual not to allow the joint force to be shared between slip andnon-slip connectors and instead the non-slip connectors are required to transferall the force For example when ordinary site-bolting is used to hold two membersin place at a joint which is subsequently site welded the bolts are designed forthe erection conditions only while the welds are designed for the final total forceHowever it is rational and generally permissible to share the joint force betweenwelds and preloaded friction-grip bolts which are designed against slip and thisis allowed in EC3-1-8 [1]

On the other hand it is always satisfactory to use one type of connector totransfer the complete force at one part of a joint and a different type at anotherpart Examples of this are shown in Figure 95a and b where shop welds are usedto join each connection plate to one member and field bolts to join it to the other

942 Joints for moment transmission

9421 General

Although a real connection is rarely required to transmit only a moment thebehaviour of a moment joint may usefully be discussed as an introduction to theconsideration of joints which transmit both force and moment and to the componentmethod of joint design used in EC3-1-8 [1]

The idealised behaviour of a moment joint is shown in Figure 910 which ignoresany initial slip or taking up of clearances The characteristics of the joint are thedesign moment resistance MjRd the design rotational stiffness Sj and the rotationcapacity φCd These characteristics are related to those of the individual compo-nents of the joint For most joints it is difficult to determine their moment-rotation

Joints 401

Joint rotation fj

Join

t mom

ent M

j

MjRd

Stiffness Sj

MjEd

Initial stiffness Sjini

fCd

Figure 910 Characteristics of a moment joint

characteristics theoretically owing to the uncertainties in modelling the variouscomponents of the joint even though a significant body of experimental data isavailable

EC3-1-8 uses a component method of moment joint design in which the charac-teristics of a joint can be determined from the properties of its basic componentsincluding the fasteners or connectors beam end plates acting in bending col-umn web panels in shear (Section 43) or column webs in transverse compressioncaused by bearing (Section 46) The use of this method for moment joints betweenI-section members is given in Section 6 of EC3-1-8 and discussed in the followingsubsections while the method for moment joints between hollow section membersis given in Section 7 of EC3-1-8

9422 Design moment resistance

Each component of a joint must have sufficient resistance to transmit the actionsacting on it Thus the design moment resistance of the joint is governed by thecomponent which has the highest value of its design action to resistance It istherefore necessary to analyse the joint under its design moment to determine thedistribution of the design actions on the joint components

Joints where the moment acts in the plane of the connectors (as in Figure 911a)so that the moment is transferred by connector shear are often analysed elastically[12] by assuming that all the connectors fit perfectly and that each plate actsas if rigid so that the relative rotation between them is δθ x In this case eachconnector transfers a shear force Vvi from one plate to the other This shear forceacts perpendicular to the radius ri to the axis of rotation and is proportional to therelative displacement riδθ x of the two plates at the connector whence

Vvi = kvAiriδθx (91)

where Ai is the shear area of the connector and the constant kv depends on the shearstiffness of that type of connector It is shown in Section 991 by considering the

402 Joints

y

y

z

z

V

V

M

Vvi

Ai(yi zi)

ri

(yr zr)

(yr zr)

z

y

x

My

Mz

Ai

Nx

(yi zi)

Nxi

Centre of rotation

Centre ofrotation

Typical connector Connection plane

(a) In-plane joint (b) Out-of-plane joint

x

Typicalconnector

δ13x

δ13y

δ13x

Figure 911 Joint forces

equilibrium of the connector forces Vvi that the axis of rotation lies at the centroidof the connector group The moment exerted by the connector force is Vviri andso the total moment Mx is given by

Mx = kvδθx

sumi

Air2i (92)

If this is substituted into equation 91 the connector force can be evaluated as

Vvi = MxAirisumi

Air2i

(93)

However the real behaviour of in-plane moment joints is likely to be somewhatdifferent just as it is for the force joints discussed in Section 941 This differenceis due to the flexibility of the plates the inelastic behaviour of the connectors athigher moments and the slip due to the clearances between any bolts and theirholes

Welded moment joints may be analysed by making the same assumptions asfor bolted joints [12] Thus equations 92 and 93 may be used with the weld sizesubstituted for the bolt area and the summations replaced by integrals along theweld

The simplifying assumptions of elastic connectors and rigid plates are sometimesalso made for joints with moments acting normal to the plane of the connectorsas shown in Figure 912b It is shown in Section 992 that the connector tension

Joints 403

Beam

MEd

VEd

NEd

Supportingmember

Beam

MEd

VEd

NEd

End plate

(a) Welded joint (b) Bolted end plate

Supportingmember

Figure 912 Common rigid end joints

forces Nxi can be determined from

Nxi = MyAizisumAiz2

i

minus MzAiyisumAiy2

i

(94)

in which yi zi are the principal axis coordinates of the connector measured fromthe centroid of the connector group

This result implies that the compression forces are transmitted only by the con-nectors but in real bolted joints these are transmitted primarily through thoseportions of the connection plates which remain in contact Thus the connectortension forces determined from equation 94 will be inaccurate when there is a sig-nificant difference between the centroid of the contact area and that of the assumedcompression connectors Clause 627 of EC3-1-8 [1] corrects this defect by defin-ing the centres of compression for a number of bolted beam-column joints andby requiring the lever arms used in determining the bolt tensions to be measuredfrom these centres

The result of equation 94 is also defective when prying forces are introducedby flexure of any T-stubs (real or idealised) used to transfer bolt tensions asshown in Figure 913 [13ndash15] This shows two T-stubs connected through theirflanges (or tables) by rows of bolts which are used to model the tension zone ofbolted joints in Clause 624 of EC3-1-8 Isolating a T-stub simplifies the analysisof a joint For example the prying forces in the joint in Figure 913b that areproduced by flexure of the flange of the T-stub and which must be included in thetensile action NtEd on the bolt can be determined from bending theory (Chapter 5)Examples of tension zones which include idealised T-stub assemblies are shownin Figures 912 and 914

404 Joints

(a) Bolted T-stub assembly (b) Prying action

Applied force Applied force

Pryingforce

Pryingforce Bolt forces

Figure 913 T-stub elements

(a) Angle seat (b) Flexible end plate (c) Angle cleat

Supportingmember

Angle seat End plate

Beam Beam Beam

Top cleat Angle cleat

REdREd

REd

Supportingmember

Supportingmember

Figure 914 Common flexible end joints

9423 Design moment stiffness

Joints need to be classified for frame analysis purposes (Chapter 8) as being eithereffectively pinned (low moment stiffness) semi-rigid or effectively rigid (high-moment stiffness) When a joint cannot be assumed to be either effectively pinnedor rigid then its moment stiffness needs to be determined so that it can be classifiedIf a frame is to be analysed as if semi-rigid (Section 833) then the momentstiffnesses of its semi-rigid joints need to be used in the analysis

In the component method used in Clause 63 of EC3-1-8 [1] the moment stiff-ness of a joint is determined from the inverse of the sum of the flexibilities of thecomponents used at each link in the chain of force transfer through the joint Thusthe flexibilities of any plate or cleat components used must be included with thoseof the fasteners Plates are comparatively stiff (and often assumed to be rigid)when loaded in their planes but are comparatively flexible when bent out of theirplanes In general the overall behaviour of a joint can be assessed by determiningthe path by which force is transferred through the joint and by synthesising theresponses of all the components to their individual loads

Joints 405

9424 Rotation capacity

When rigid plastic analysis is used in the design of a frame (Section 8537)each plastic hinge location must have sufficient rotation capacity to ensure thatthe plastic moment can be maintained until the collapse mechanism is developedClause 64 of EC3-1-8 [1] provides methods of determining whether joints betweenI-section members have sufficient rotation capacity

9425 Joint classification

The behaviour of a structure is influenced as much by the behaviour of its joints asby the behaviour of its individual members Flexural frames are therefore analysedas being simple semi-continuous or continuous (Section 831) depending on theresistance and stiffness classifications of their joints

Clause 523 of EC3-1-8 [1] classifies joints according to strength as beingnominally pinned of partial strength or of full strength A joint may be classifiedas full strength if its design moment resistance is not less than that of the connectedmembers A joint may be classified as nominally pinned if its design momentresistance is not greater than 025 times that required for a full strength jointprovided it has sufficient rotation capacity A joint which cannot be classified aseither nominally pinned or full strength is classified as partial strength

Clause 522 of EC3-1-8 classifies joints according to stiffness as being nomi-nally pinned semi-rigid or rigid Ajoint in a frame that is braced against significantsway may be classified as rigid if Sj ge 8EIbLb where EIb is the flexural rigidityof the beam connected and Lb is its length A joint may be classified as nom-inally pinned if Sj le 05EIbLb A joint which cannot be classified as eithernominally pinned or rigid is classified as semi-rigid

943 Force and moment joints

Joints which are required to transfer both force and moment may be analysedelastically by using the method of superposition as shown in Section 99 Thus theindividual bolt forces in the eccentrically loaded in-plane plate connections shownin Figure 97 can be determined as the vector sum of the components caused by aconcentric force Q and a moment Qe Similarly the individual connector forcesin a joint loaded out of its plane as shown in Figure 911b may be determinedfrom the sum of the forces due to the out-of-plane force Nx and the principal axismoments My and Mz in which the centre of compression is used to determine theconnector lever arms

The connector forces in joints subjected to combined loadings may be analysedelastically by using superposition to combine the separate effects of in-plane andout-of-plane loading

The following section provides simplified descriptions of the response ofcommon joints

406 Joints

95 Common joints

951 General

There are many different joint arrangements used for force and moment transmis-sion between members and supports depending on the actions which are to betransferred Fabrication and erection procedures may be simplified by standardis-ing a number of joints for the more frequently occurring situations Examples ofsome common joints are shown in Figures 912 and 914ndash917

Flexible joints for simple construction (for which any moment transfer can beneglected) are described in Sections 952ndash954 a semi-rigid joint in Section 955and rigid joints for continuous structures (which are able to transfer moment aswell as force) in Sections 956 and 957 Welded and bolted splices are describedin Sections 958 and 959 and seats and base plates in Sections 9510 and 9511respectively

Guidance on the arrangement and analysis of some of these joints is given in[2ndash11] while EC3-1-8 [1] provides extensive and detailed methods of analysis fora large number of joints by considering them as assemblies of basic componentswhose properties are known Worked examples of a web side plate (fin plate) and

Supportingmember

Web side plate (fin plate)

Beam

MEdVEd

Figure 915 Common semi-rigid end joint

MEd

VEd

NEdErection plate

used as abacking bar

MEd

VEd

NEdWebplate

Flange plate

(a) Butt welded splice (b) Bolted splice

Figure 916 Common splices

Joints 407

Load-bearingstiffener

Column

Base plate

Anchor boltsHolding-down bolts

Beam

Seating plate

REd VEd

NEd

(a) Beam seat (b) Column base plate

Figure 917 Common beam seat and column base plate arrangements

a flexible end plate connection designed in accordance with EC3-1-8 are given inSection 910

952 Angle seat joint

An angle seat joint (Figure 914a) transfers a beam reaction force REd to thesupporting member through the angle seat The top cleat is for lateral restraintonly and may be bolted either to the top of the web or to the top flange The angleseat may be bolted or fillet welded to the supporting member The joint has verylittle moment capacity and is classified as a nominally pinned joint It may beused for simple construction

The beam reaction is transferred by bearing shear and bending of the horizon-tal leg of the angle by vertical shear through the connectors and by horizontalforces in the connectors and between the vertical leg and the supporting member

In this joint the beam is designed for zero end moment and the supportingmember for the eccentric beam reaction The beam web may need to be stiffened toresist shear (Section 474) and bearing (Section 476) Although this joint is easilydesigned its use is often discouraged because of erection difficulties associatedwith the close depth tolerances required at the top and bottom of the beam

953 Flexible end plate joint

A flexible end plate joint (Figures 96a and 914b) also transfers a beam reactionREd to the supporting member The end plate is fillet welded to the beam weband bolted to the supporting member The flanges may be notched or coped ifrequired This joint also has very little moment capacity as there may be significantflexibility in the end plate and is classified as a nominally pinned joint It may beused for simple construction

408 Joints

The beam reaction is transferred by weld shear to the end plate by shear andbearing to the bolts and by shear and bearing to the supporting member In mod-elling this joint the idealised T-stub assembly consists of the end plate and thebeam web to which it is welded as one T-stub which is bolted to the column flangewhich with the column web forms the other T-stub

The beam is designed for zero end moment with the end plate augmenting theweb shear and bearing capacity while the supporting member is designed for theeccentric beam reaction

954 Angle cleat joint

An angle cleat joint (Figure 914c) also transfers a beam reaction REd to the sup-porting member One or two angle cleats may be used and bolted to the beam weband to the supporting member The flanges may be notched or coped if requiredThis joint also has very little moment capacity as there may be significant flex-ibility in the angle legs connected to the supporting member and in the boltedconnection to the beam web The joint is classified as a nominally pinned jointand may be used for simple construction

The beam reaction is transferred by shear and bearing from the web to theweb bolts and to the angle cleats These actions are transferred by the cleats tothe supporting member bolts and by these to the supporting member by sheartension and compression If two angle cleats are used the idealised T-stub assemblyconsists of the column flange and web as one T-stub and angle cleats bolted to thebeam web as the other T-stub

The beam is designed for zero end moment with the angles augmenting theweb shear and bearing capacity while the supporting member is designed for theeccentric beam reaction

955 Web side plate (fin plate) joint

A web side plate (fin plate) joint (Figure 915) transfers a beam reaction REd tothe supporting member and can also transfer a moment MEd The fin plate is filletwelded to the supporting member and bolted to the beam web The flanges may benotched or coped if required This joint has limited flexibility and is classified assemi-rigid It may be used for simple construction and also for semi-continuousconstruction provided that the degree of interaction between the members can beestablished

The beam reaction REd and moment MEd are transferred by shear through thebolts to the fin plate by in-plane bending and shear to the welds and by verticaland horizontal shear to the supporting member

The beam and the supporting member are designed for the reaction REd andmoment MEd

956 Welded moment joint

A fully welded moment joint (Figure 912a) transfers moment MEd axial forceNEd and shear VEd from one member to another The welds may be fillet or butt

Joints 409

welds and erection cleats may be used to facilitate field welding The concentratedflange forces resulting from the moment MEd and axial force NEd may require theother member in the joint to be stiffened (Section 45) in order to transfer theseforces When suitably stiffened such a joint acts as if rigid and may be used incontinuous construction

The shear VEd is transferred by shear through the welds from one member to theother The flange forces are transferred by tension through the flange welds andby compression to the other member while the web moment and the axial forceare transferred by tension through the web welds and by compression to the othermember

957 Bolted moment end plate joint

A bolted moment end plate (extended end plate) joint (Figure 912b) also transfersmoment MEd axial force NEd and shear VEd from one member to another The endplate is fillet welded to the web and flanges of one member and bolted to the othermember Concentrated flange forces may require the other member to be stiffenedin order to transfer these forces This joint is also classified as rigid although it isless stiff than a welded moment joint due to flexure of the end plate EC3-1-8 [1]allows bolted moment end plate joints to be used in continuous construction

The beam moment axial force and shear are transferred by tension through theflange and web welds and compression and by shear through the web welds tothe end plate by bending and shear through the end plate to the bolts and by boltshear and tension and by horizontal plate reaction to the other member

The bolt tensions are increased by prying actions resulting from bending of theend plate as in Figure 913 They can be determined by considering an analysis ofthe idealised T-stub assembly of the end plate and beam web and of the columnflange and web to which it is bolted These prying actions must be considered inthe design of bolts subjected to tension and are discussed in Section 962

958 Welded splice

A fully welded splice (Figure 916a) transfers moment MEd axial force NEd andshear VEd from one member to another concurrent member The flange welds arebutt welds while the web welds may be fillet welds and erection plates may beused to facilitate site welding A welded splice acts as a rigid joint between themembers and may be used in continuous construction

The shear VEd is transferred by shear through the welds The flange forcesresulting from the moment MEd and axial force NEd are transferred by tension orcompression through the flange welds while the web moment and the axial forceare transferred by tension or compression (or shear) through the web welds

959 Bolted splice

A fully bolted splice (Figure 916b) also transfers moment MEd axial force NEd and shear VEd from one member to another concurrent member Flange and web

410 Joints

plates may be provided on one or both sides This joint may be used in continuousconstruction

The moment axial force and shear are transferred from one member by bearingand shear through the bolts to the plates to the other bolts and then to the othermember The flange plates only transfer the flange axial force components of themoment MEd axial force NEd while the web plates transfer all of the shear VEd

together with the web components of MEd and NEd

9510 Beam seat

A beam seat (Figure 917a) transfers a beam reaction REd to its support A seatingplate may be fillet welded to the bottom flange to increase the support bearingarea while holding-down bolts provide positive connections to the support If aload-bearing stiffener is provided to increase the web bearing capacity then thiswill effectively prevent lateral deflection of the top flange (see Figure 619)

The beam reaction REd is transferred by bearing through the seating plate to thesupport

9511 Base plate

A base plate (Figure 917b) transfers a column axial force NEd and shear VEd toa support or a concrete foundation and may also transfer a moment MEd Thebase plate is fillet welded to the flanges and web of the column while the anchoror holding-down bolts provide connections to the support Pinned bases used insimple construction often use four anchor bolts and the flexibility of these and thebase plate limits the effective moment resistance

An axial compression NEd is transferred from the column by end bearing orweld shear to the base plate and then by plate bending shear and bearing to thesupport An axial tension force NEd is transferred from the column by weld shearto the base plate by plate bending and shear to the holding-down anchor boltsand then by bolt tension to the support The shear force VEd is transferred fromthe column by weld shear to the base plate and then by shear and bearing throughthe holding-down bolts to the support or by friction Specific guidance on thedesign of holding-down bolts is given in Clause 62612 of EC3-1-8 [1] whilemore general guidance on the design of base plates as idealised T-stub assembliesis given in Clause 62

96 Design of bolts

961 Bearing bolts in shear

The resistance Fv of a bolt in shear (Figure 91a) depends on the shear strengthof the bolt (of tensile strength fub) and the area A of the bolt in a particular shearplane (either the gross area or the tensile stress area through the threads As as

Joints 411

appropriate) It can be expressed in the form

Fv = αvfubA (95)

in which αv = 06 generally (except Grade 109 bolts when the shear plane passesthrough the threaded portion of the bolt in which case αv = 05) The factorαv = 06 is close to the theoretical yield value of τyfy asymp 0577 (Section 131)and the experimental value of 062 reported in [9]

EC3-1-8 [1] therefore requires the design shear force FvEd to be limited by

FvEd le FvRd = fub

γM2

sumn

αvnAn (96)

where γM2 = 125 is the partial factor for the connector resistance (150 for Grade46 bolts) n is the number of shear planes An and αvn are the appropriate valuesfor the nth shear plane It is common and conservative to determine the area An ata shear plane by substituting the tensile stress area As for the shank area A of thebolt

For bolts in long joints with a distance Lj between the end bolts in the joint theshear resistance of all bolts is reduced by using the factor

βLf = 1 minus Lj minus 15d

200d(97)

provided that 075 le βLf le 1 where d is the diameter of the bolt

962 Bolts in tension

The resistance of a bolt in tension (Figure 91c) depends on the tensile strengthfub of the bolt and the minimum cross-sectional area of the threaded length of thebolt The design force FtEd is limited by EC3-1-8 [1] to

FtEd le FtRd = 09fubAsγM2 (98)

where γM2 = 125 (150 for Grade 46 bolts) and As is the tensile stress area of thebolt The use of 09fub for the limit state of bolt fracture in addition to the partialfactor γM2 for the connector resistance reflects the reduced ductility at tensilefracture compared with shear failure

If any of the connecting plates is sufficiently flexible then additional pryingforces may be induced in the bolts as in Figure 913b However EC3-1-8 does notprovide specific guidance on how to determine the prying force in the bolt even inthe T-stub component based method of design Under some circumstances whichminimise plate flexure in a joint component so that the additional tensile forcescaused by prying are small it has been suggested that the prying forces need not

412 Joints

be calculated provided that FtRd is determined from

FtRd = 072fubAsγM2 (99)

which results from the insertion of a reduction factor of 08 into equation 98Some methods for determining prying forces in T-stub connections are given in[13ndash15]

963 Bearing bolts in shear and tension

Test results [9] for bearing bolts in shear and tension suggest a circular interactionrelationship (Figure 918) for the strength limit state EC3-1-8 [1] uses a moreconservative interaction between shear and tension which can be expressed in theform of equations 96 98 and

FvEd

FvRd+ FtEd

14FtRdle 1 (910)

where FvRd is the shear resistance when there is no tension and FtRd is the tensionresistance when there is no shear

964 Bolts in bearing

It is now commonly the case that bolt materials are of much higher strengths thanthose of the steel plates or elements through which the bolts pass As a result of

Circular [9]

0 02 04 06 08 10

10

08

06

04

02

0

Shear ratio FvEdFvRd

Ten

sion

rat

io F

t EdF

t Rd

Equation 910

Figure 918 Bearing bolts in shear and tension

Joints 413

this bearing failure usually takes place in the plate material rather than in the boltThe design of plates against bearing failure is discussed in Section 972

For the situation in which bearing failure occurs in the bolt rather than the plateEC3-1-8 [1] requires the design bearing force FbEd on a bolt whose ultimate tensilestrength fub is less than that of the plate material fu to be limited to

FbEd le FbRd = fubdt

γM2(911)

in which γM2 = 125 (150 for Grade 46 bolts) t is the thickness of the connectedelement and d is the diameter of the bolt Equation 911 ignores the enhancementof the bearing strength caused by the triaxial stress state that exists in the bearingarea of the bolt but it seldom governs except for very high-strength plates

965 Preloaded friction-grip bolts

9651 Design against bearing

High-strength bolts may be used as bearing bolts or as preloaded bolts in friction-grip joints (Figure 91b) which are designed against joint slip under service orfactored loads When high-strength bolts are used as bearing bolts they should bedesigned as discussed in Sections 961ndash964

9652 Design against slip

For design against slip in a friction-grip joint for either serviceability or at ultimateloading the shear force on a preloaded bolt FvEdser or FvEd determined from theappropriate loads must satisfy

FvEd le FsRd = nksmicroFpCγM3 (912)

in which γM3 = 125 for ultimate loading (for serviceability γM3ser = 11) n isthe number of friction surfaces ks is a coefficient given in Table 36 of EC3-1-8[1] which allows for the shape and size of the hole micro is a slip factor given inTable 37 of EC3-1-8 and the preload FpC is taken as

FpC = 07fubAs (913)

When the joint loading induces bolt tensions these tend to reduce the frictionclamping forces EC3-1-8 requires the shear serviceability or ultimate design loadFvEdser or FvEd to satisfy

FvEd le FsRd = nksmicro(FpC minus 08FtEd

)γM3 (914)

in which FtEdser or FtEd is the total applied tension at service loading or ultimateloading including any prying forces and the slip resistance partial safety factoris γM3 = 11 for service loading and 125 for ultimate loading

414 Joints

97 Design of bolted plates

971 General

Aconnection plate used in a joint is required to transfer actions which may act in theplane of the plate or out of it These actions include axial tension and compressionforces shear forces and bending moments and may include components inducedby prying actions The presence of bolt holes often weakens the plate and failuremay occur very locally by the bearing of a bolt on the surface of the bolt holethrough the plate (punching shear) or in an overall mode along a path whoseposition is determined by the positions of several holes and the actions transferredby the plate such as that considered in Section 223 for staggered connectors intension members

Generally the proportions of the plates should be such as to ensure that thereare no instability effects in which case it will be conservative for the strengthlimit state to design against general yield and satisfactory to design against localfracture

The actual failure stress distributions in bolted connection plates are both uncer-tain and complicated When design is to be based on general yielding it is logicalto take advantage of the ductility of the steel and to use a simple plastic analysisA combined yield criterion such as

σ 2y + σ 2

z minus σyσz + 3τ 2yz le f 2

y (915)

(Section 131) may then be used in which σ y and σ z are the design normal stressesand τ yz is the design shear stress

When design is based on local fracture an elastic analysis may be made of thestress distribution Often approximate bending and shear stresses may be deter-mined by elastic beam theory (Chapter 5) The failure criterion should then betested at all potentially critical locations

972 Bearing and tension

Bearing failure of a plate may occur where a bolt bears against part of the surfaceof the bolt hole through the plate as shown in Figure 919a After local yieldingthe plate material flows plastically increasing the circumference and thickness ofthe bearing area and redistributing the contact force exerted by the bolt

EC3-1-8 [1] requires the plate-bearing force FbEd due to the design loads to belimited by

FbEd le FbRd = k1αd fudtγM2 (916)

in which fu is the ultimate tensile strength of the plate material d is the boltdiameter t is the plate thickness and γM2 = 125 is the partial factor for connectorresistance (150 for Grade 46 bolts)

Joints 415

The coefficient αd in equation 916 is associated with plate tear-out by shearingin the direction of load transfer commonly when the bolt is close to the end of aplate as shown in Figure 919b In this case EC3-1-8 requires αd to be determinedfrom

αd = e1

3d0le 1 (917)

for an end bolt or from

αd = p1

3d0minus 025 le 1 (918)

for internal bolts if these bolts are closely spaced in which d0 is the bolt diameterand the dimensions e1 and p1 are shown in Figure 27

The coefficient k1 in equation 916 is associated with tension fracture perpen-dicular to the direction of load transfer commonly when the bolt is close to anedge as shown in Figure 919e Hence EC3-1-8 uses

k1 = 28e2d0 minus 17 le 25 (919)

if the bolts are at the edge of the plate and

k1 = 14p2d0 minus 17 le 25 (920)

for internal bolts where p2 is the distance between rows of holes (p in Figure 25)

(a) Bearing (b) End shear (c) Shearing between holes

(d) Tension (e) Bending (f) Tension and bending

Boltforce

Boltforce

Boltforce

Boltforces

Boltforces

Boltforce

Plastic flow Failure path Failure path

Platestresses

Platestresses

Platestresses

Fracture plane Fracture Fracture

T

T T T

C C

Figure 919 Bolted plates in bearing shear tension or bending

416 Joints

Tension failure may be caused by tension actions as shown in Figure 919dTension failures of tension members are treated in Section 22 and it is logical toapply the EC3 tension members method discussed in Section 262 to the designof plates in tension However there are no specific limits given in EC3-1-8

973 Shear and tension

Plate sections may be subjected to simultaneous normal and shear stress as inthe case of the splice plates shown in Figure 920a and b These may be designedconservatively against general yield by using the shear and bending stresses deter-mined by elastic analyses of the gross cross-section in the combined yield criterionof equation 915 and against fracture by using the stresses determined by elasticanalyses of the net section in an ultimate strength version of equation 915

Block failure may occur in some connection plates as shown in Figure 920cand d In these failures it may be assumed that the total resistance is provided partlyby the tensile resistance across one section of the failure path and partly by theshear resistance along another section of the failure path This assumption impliesconsiderable redistribution from the elastic stress distribution which is likely tobe very non-uniform Hence EC3-1-8 [1] limits the block-tearing resistance forsituations of concentric loading such as in Figure 920c to

NEd le Veff 1Rd = fuAntγM2 +(

fyradic

3)

AnvγM0 (921)

in which Ant and Anv are the net areas subjected to tension and shear respectivelyfy

radic3 is the yield stress of the plate in shear (Section 13) γM0 = 10 is the partial

(a) Shear and bending

Boltforces

Platestresses

(b) Tension and bending

Bolt forces

Plate stresses

Failurepath

Failurepath

Boltforces

T

C

T

Boltforces

(c) Block tearing in plate (d) Block tearing in coped beam

Figure 920 Bolted plates in shear and tension

Joints 417

factor for plate resistance to yield and γM2 = 11 is the partial factor for fractureEquation 921 corresponds to an elastic analysis of the net section subjected touniform shear and tensile stresses

For situations of eccentric loading such as in Figure 920d the block-tearingresistance is limited to

NEd le Veff 2Rd = 05fuAntγM2 +(

fyradic

3)

AnvγM0 (922)

which corresponds to an elastic analysis of the net section subjected to a uniformshear stress and a triangularly varying tensile stress

98 Design of welds

981 Full penetration butt welds

Full penetration butt welds are so made that their thicknesses and widths are notless than the corresponding lesser values for the elements joined When the weldmetal is of higher strength than those of the elements joined (and this is usuallythe case) the static capacity of the weld is greater than those of the elementsjoined Hence the design is controlled by these elements and there are no designprocedures required for the weld EC3-1-8 [1] requires butt welds to have equalor superior properties to those of the elements joined so that the design resistanceis taken as the weaker of the parts connected

Partial penetration butt welds have effective (throat) thicknesses which are lessthan those of the elements joined EC3-1-8 requires partial penetration butt weldsto be designed as deep-penetration fillet welds

982 Fillet welds

Each of the fillet welds connecting the two plates shown in Figure 921 is of lengthL and the throat thickness a of the weld is inclined at α = tanminus1(s2s1) Eachweld transfers a longitudinal shear VL and transverse forces or shears VTy and VTz

between the plates The average normal and shear stresses σw and τw on the weldthroat may be expressed in terms of the forces

σwLa = VTy sin α + VTz cosα (923)

τwLa = radic [(VTy cosα minus VTz sin α

) 2 + V 2L

] (924)

In addition to these stresses there are local stresses in the weld arising frombending effects shear lag and stress concentrations together with longitudinalnormal stresses induced by compatibility between the weld and each plate

It is customary to assume that the static strength of the weld is determined bythe average throat stresses σw and τw alone and that the ultimate strength of the

418 Joints

s2

VTz2

VTy2

VTy2

VL2

VL2

s1

a

Law

Law

VLVTz

L

(a) Connection (b) Part weld

Throat

VTz2

VTy

Figure 921 Fillet welded joint

weld is reached when

radic(σ 2

w + 3τ 2w

) = fuw (925)

in which fuw is the ultimate tensile strength of the weld which is assumed to begreater than that of the plate This equation is similar to equation 11 used in Section131 to express the distortion energy theory for yield under combined stressesSubstituting equations 923 and 924 into equation 925 and rearranging leads to

3(

V 2Ty + V 2

Tz + V 2L

)minus 2

(VTy sin α + VTz cosα

) 2 = (fuwLa) 2 (926)

This is often simplified conservatively to

VR

La= fuwradic

3(927)

in which VR is the vector resultant

VR =radic(

V 2Ty + V 2

Tz + V 2L

)(928)

of the applied forces VTy VTz and VLIn the simple design method of EC3-1-8 [1] based on equations 927 and 928

the design weld forces FTyEd FTzEd and FLEd per unit length due to the factored

Joints 419

loads are limited by

FwEd le FwRd (929)

where FwEd is the resultant of all of the forces transmitted by the weld per unitlength given by

FwEd =radic(

F2TyEd + F2

TzEd + F2LEd

)(930)

and

FwRd = fvwda (931a)

is the design weld resistance per unit length in which

fvwd = furadic

3

βw γM2(931b)

is the design shear strength of the weld fu is the ultimate tensile strength of theplate which is less than that of the weld βw is a correlation factor for the steeltype between 08 and 10 given in Table 41 of EC3-1-8 and γM2 = 125 is theconnector resistance partial safety factor

EC3-1-8 also provides a less conservative directional method which is based onequations 923 to 925 and which makes some allowance for the dependence ofthe weld strength on the direction of loading by assuming that the normal stressparallel to the axis of the weld throat does not influence the design resistance Forthis method the normal stress perpendicular to the throat σperp is determined fromequation 923 as

σperpa = FTyEd sin α + FTzEd cosα (932)

the shear stress perpendicular to the throat τperp from equation 924 as

τperpa = FTyEd cosα minus FTzEd sin α (933)

and the shear stress parallel to the throat τ || from equation 924 as

τ||a = FLEd (934)

The stresses in equations 932 to 934 are then required to satisfyradic[σ 2perp + 3

(τ 2perp + τ 2||

)]le fuβwγM2

(935)

and

σperp le 09fuγM2 (936)

where γM2 = 125 and βw is the correlation factor used in equation 931b

420 Joints

99 Appendix ndash elastic analysis of joints

991 In-plane joints

The in-plane joint shown in Figure 911a is subjected to a moment Mx and to forcesVy Vz acting through the centroid of the connector group (which may consist ofbolts or welds) defined by (see Section 59)

sumAiyi = 0sumAizi = 0

(937)

in which Ai is the area of the ith connector and yi zi its coordinatesIt is assumed that the joint undergoes a rigid body relative rotation δθ x between

its plate components about a point whose coordinates are yr zr If the plate com-ponents are rigid and the connectors elastic then it may be assumed that eachconnector transfers a force Vvi which acts perpendicular to the line ri to the centreof rotation (Figure 911a) and which is proportional to the distance ri so that

Vvi = kvAiriδθx (91)

in which kv is a constant which depends on the elastic shear stiffness of theconnector

The centroidal force resultants Vy Vz of the connector forces are

Vy = minusVvi (zi minus zr)ri = kvδθxzrAi

Vz = Vvi (yi minus yr)ri = minuskvδθxyrAi (938)

after using equations 937 and 91 The moment resultant Mx of the connectorforces about the centroid is

Mx = Vvi(zi minus zr) ziri +Vvi(yi minus yr) yiri

whence

Mx = kvδθx

sumAi

(y2

i + z2i

) (939)

after using equations 937 and 91 This can be used to eliminate kvδθ x fromequations 938 and these can then be rearranged to find the coordinates of thecentre of rotation as

yr = minusVzsum

Ai(y2

i + z2i

)Mx

sumAi

(940)

zr = Vysum

Ai(y2

i + z2i

)Mx

sumAi

(941)

Joints 421

The term kvδθ x can also be eliminated from equation 91 by using equation 939so that the connector force can be expressed as

Vvi = MxAirisumAi

(y2

i + z2i

) (942)

Thus the greatest connector shear stress VviAi occurs at the connector at thegreatest distance ri from the centre of rotation yr zr

When there are n bolts of equal area these equations simplify to

yr = minusVzsum(

y2i + z2

i

)nMx

(940a)

zr = Vysum(

y2i + z2

i

)nMx

(941a)

Vvi = Mxrisum(y2

i + z2i

) (942a)

When the connectors are welds the summations in equations 940ndash942 shouldbe replaced by integrals so that

yr = minusVz(Iy + Iz

)MxA

(940b)

zr = Vy(Iy + Iz

)MxA

and (941b)

τw = Mxr(Iy + Iz

) (942b)

in which A is the area of the weld group given by the sum of the products of theweld lengths L and throat thicknesses a Iy and Iz are the second moments of areaof the weld group about its centroid and r is the distance to the weld where theshear stress is τw The properties of some specific weld groups are given in [5]

In the special case of a moment joint with Vy Vz equal to zero the centre ofrotation is at the centroid of the connector group (equations 941 and 942) andthe connector forces are given by

Vvi = MxAirisumi

Air2i

(93)

with ri = radic(y2

i + z2i ) In the special case of a force joint with Mx Vz equal to zero

the centre of rotation is at zr = infin and the connector forces are given by

Vvi = VyAisumAi

(943)

422 Joints

In the special case of a force joint with Mx Vy equal to zero the centre of rotationis at yr = minusinfin and the connector forces are given by

Vvi = VzAisumAi

(944)

Equations 943 and 944 indicate that the connector stresses VviAi caused byforces Vy Vz are constant throughout the joint

It can be shown that the superposition by vector addition of the components ofVvi obtained from equations 93 943 and 944 for the separate connection actionsof Vy Vz and Mx leads to the general result given in equation 942

992 Out-of-plane joints

The out-of-plane joint shown in Figure 911b is subjected to a normal force Nx

and moments My Mz acting about the principal axes y z of the connector group(which may consist of bolts or welds) defined by (Section 59)sum

Aiyi = 0sumAizi = 0sumAiyizi = 0

(945)

in which Ai is the area of the ith connector and yi zi are its coordinatesIt is assumed that the plate components of the joint undergo rigid body relative

rotations δθ y δθ z about axes which are parallel to the y z principal axes and whichpass through a point whose coordinates are yr zr and that only the connectorstransfer forces If the plates are rigid and the connectors elastic then it may beassumed that each connector transfers a force Nxi which acts perpendicular tothe plane of the joint and which has components which are proportional to thedistances (yi minus yr) (zi minus zr) from the axes of rotation so that

Nxi = ktAi (zi minus zr) δθy minus ktAi (yi minus yr) δθz (946)

in which kt is a constant which depends on the axial stiffness of the connectorThe centroidal force resultant Nx of the connector forces is

Nx =sum

Nxi = kt(minuszrδθy + yrδθz

)sumAi (947)

after using equations 945 The moment resultants My Mz of the connector forcesabout the centroidal axes are

My =sum

Nxizi = ktδθyAiz2i (948)

Mz = minussum

Nxiyi = ktδθzAiy2i (949)

after using equations 946

Joints 423

Equations 947ndash949 can be used to eliminate kt δθ y δθ z yr zr from equation946 which then becomes

Nxi = NxAisumAi

+ MyAizisumAiz2

i

minus MzAiyisumAiy2

i

(950)

This result demonstrates that the connector force can be obtained by super-position of the separate components due to the centroidal force Nx and the prin-cipal axis moments My Mz When there are n bolts of equal area this equationsimplifies to

Nxi = Nx

n+ Myzisum

z2i

minus Mzyisumy2

i

(950a)

When the connectors are welds the summations in equation 947 should bereplaced by integrals so that

σw = Nx

A+ Myz

Iyminus Mzy

Iz(950b)

in which y z are the coordinates of the weld where the stress is σwThe assumption that only the connectors transfer compression forces through

the connection may be unrealistic when portions of the plates remain in contactIn this case the analysis above may still be used provided that the values Ai yizi used for the compression regions represent the actual contact areas between theplates

910 Worked examples

9101 Example 1 ndash in-plane analysis of a bolt group

Problem The semi-rigid web side plate (fin plate) joint shown in Figure 922a is totransmit factored design actions equivalent to a vertical downwards force of Q kNacting at the centroid of the bolt group and a clockwise moment of 02Q kNmDetermine the maximum bolt shear force

SolutionFor the bolt group(y2

i +z2i ) = 4times(702+1052)+4times(702+352) = 88 200 mm2

Using equation 940 yr = minusQ times 103 times 88 200

minus02Q times 106 times 8= 551 mm

and so the most heavily loaded bolts are at the top and bottom of the right-handrow

For these ri = radic(551 + 70)2 + 1052 = 1633 mmand the maximum bolt force may be obtained from equation 93 as

FvEd = minus02Q times 106

88200N = minus0370 Q kN

424 Joints

t = 8 mm

fy = 355 Nmm2

fu = 510 Nmm2

t =10 mm

fy =355 Nmm2

fu

65

35

70

70

70

35

25 30 140 55

35

70

70

70

35

All bolts are Grade 8820 mm diameter in 22 mmholes with threads in theshear plane

86

(a) Semi-rigid web fin plate joint (b) Flexible end plate joint

30 90 30

= 510 Nmm2

Figure 922 Examples 1ndash9

9102 Example 2 ndash in-plane design resistance of a bolt group

Problem Determine the design resistance of the bolt group in the web fin platejoint shown in Figure 922a

Solution For 20 mm Grade 88 bolts As = At = 245 mm2

αv = 06 EC3-1-8 T34

fub = 800 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 T31

and so

FvRd = 06 times 800 times 245

125N = 941 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the solution of example 1

0370 Q le 941 so that Qv le 2540

9103 Example 3 ndash plate-bearing resistance

Problem Determine the bearing resistance of the web fin plate shown inFigure 922a

Joints 425

Solution

αd = 35(3 times 22) = 0530 fubfu = 800510 = 1569 gt 0530EC3-1-8 T34

and so

αb = 0530 EC3-1-8 T34

28e2d0 minus 17 = 28 times 5522 minus 17 = 53 gt 25 and so k1 = 25EC3-1-8 T34

FbRd = 25 times 0530 times 510 times 20 times 1011 N = 1229 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the solution of example 1 Qb le 12290370 = 3319 gt

2540(ge Qv)

9104 Example 4 ndash plate shear and tension resistance

Problem Determine the shear and tension resistance of the web fin plate shownin Figure 922a

Solution If the yield criterion of equation 915 is used with the elastic stresseson the gross cross-section of the plate then the elastic bending stress may bedetermined using an elastic section modulus of bd26 so that

σy = 02 Q times 106 times 6(10 times 2802) Nmm2 = 1531 Q Nmm2

and the average shear stress is

τyz = Q times 103(280 times 10) Nmm2 = 0357 Q Nmm2

Substituting into equation 915 (1531 Q)2 + 3 times (0357Q)2 le 3552

so that Qvty le 2150 lt 2540(ge Qv)

If the equivalent fracture criterion derived from equation 915 is used with theelastic stresses on the net cross-section of the plate then

Ip = 2803 times 1012 minus 2 times 22 times 10 times 1052 minus 2 times 22 times 10 times 352

= 1290 times 106 mm4

so that

Welp = 1290 times 106140 = 922 times 103mm3 and

σy = 02 Q times 106(922 times 103)Nmm2 = 2170 Q Nmm2

426 Joints

and the average shear stress is

τyz = Q times 103(280 minus 4 times 22)times 10 Nmm2 = 0521 Q Nmm2

Using the equivalent of equation 915 for fracture with fu = 510 Nmm2

(EN10025-2)

(2170 Q)2 + 3 times (0521 Q)2 le 5102

so that Qvtu le 2285 gt 2150(ge Qvty)However these calculations are conservative since the maximum bending

stresses occur at the top and bottom of the plate where the shear stresses are zeroIf the shear stresses are ignored then Qty le 3551531 = 2319 lt 2543(ge Qv)

and

Qtu le 5102170 = 2350gt 2319(ge Qty)

9105 Example 5 ndash fillet weld resistance

Problem Determine the resistance of the two fillet welds shown in Figure 922aWeld forces per unit lengthAt the welds the design actions consist of a vertical shear of Q kN and a moment of

(minus02 Q minus Q times (25 + 30 + 70)1000) kNm = minus0325 Q kNm

leff = 280 minus 2 times 8radic

2 = 2687 mm EC3-1-8 451(1)

The average shear force per unit weld length can be determined as

FLEd = (Q times 103)(2 times 2687)Nmm = 1861 Q Nmm

and the maximum bending force per unit weld length from equation 950b as

FTyEd = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872)

2 times 2687312Nmm = minus1351 Q Nmm

and using equation 930 the resultant of these forces is

FwEd = radic[(1861 Q)2 + (1351 Q)2] = 1363 Q Nmm

Simplified method of EC3-1-8

For Grade S355 steel βw = 09 EC3-1-8 T41

fvwd = 510radic

3

09 times 125= 2617 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 4533

FwRd = 2617 times (8radic

2) = 1481 Nmm EC3-1-8 4533

Hence 1363 Q le 1481

Joints 427

so that

Qw le 1086 lt 2319(ge Qty)

Directional method of EC3-1-8

Using equations 932ndash934

σperp = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872) sin 45o

2 times (2687312)times (8radic

2)= minus1688 Q Nmm2

τperp = (minus0325 Q times 106)times (26872) cos 45o

2 times (2687312)times (8radic

2)= minus1688 Q Nmm2

τ|| = Q times 103

2 times 2687 times (8radic

2)= 0329 Q Nmm2

The strength condition is

(minus1688 Q)2 + 3 times [(minus1688 Q)2 + (0329Q)2]05 le 510

09 times 125EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 1324 lt 2319(ge Qty)

and

1688Q le 09 times 510125 EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 2175 gt 1324

and so the joint resistance is governed by the shear and bending capacity of thewelds

9106 Example 6 ndash bolt slip

Problem If the bolts of the semi-rigid web fin plate joint shown in Figure 922aare preloaded then determine the value of Q at which the first bolt slip occurs ifthe joint is designed to be non-slip in service and the friction surface is Class B

428 Joints

Solution

FpC = 07 times 800 times 245 N = 1372 kN EC3-1-8 391(2)

ks = 10 EC3-1-8 T36

micro = 04 EC3-1-8 T37

γM3ser = 11 EC3-1-8 22(2)

FsRd = 10 times 04 times 137211 = 499 kN EC3-1-8 391(1)

and using the solution of example 1

QsL = 4990370 = 1347

9107 Example 7 ndash out-of-plane resistance of a bolt group

Problem The flexible end plate joint shown in Figure 922b is to transmit fac-tored design actions equivalent to a downwards force of Q kN acting at thecentroid of the bolt group and an out-of-plane moment of Mx = minus005 QkNm Determine the maximum bolt forces and the design resistance of the boltgroup

Bolt group analysis

z2i = 4 times 1052 + 4 times 352 mm2 = 49 000 mm2

and using equation 950a the maximum bolt tension is

FtEd = (minus005 Q times 106)times (minus35 minus 70)

49 000N = 0107 Q kN

(A less-conservative value of FtEd = 00824 Q kN is obtained if the centre ofcompression is assumed to be at the lowest pair of bolts so that the lever arm tothe highest pair of bolts is 175 mm)

The average bolt shear is FvEd = (Q times 103)8 N = 0125 Q kN

Plastic resistance of plate

If the web thickness is 88 mm

m = 902 minus 882 minus 08 times 6 = 358 mm EC3-1-8 F68

leff = 2 times 358 + 0625 times 30 + 35 = 1254 mm EC3-1-8 T64

Mpl1Rd = 025 times 1254 times 82 times 35510 Nmm = 0712 kNm EC3-1-8 T62

FT 1Rd = 4 times 0712 times 10630 N = 949 kN EC3-1-8 T62

and so FT 1Rd ge 2 times 0107 Q whence Qp le 4430 kN

Joints 429

Bolt resistanceAt plastic collapse of the plate the prying force causes a plastic hinge at the boltline so that the prying force = 0712 times 10630 N = 237 kN

Bolt tension = 0107 times 4430 + 237 = 706 kN

Using the solution of example 2 FvRd = 941 kNFor 20 mm Grade 88 bolts At = 245 mm2 and fub = 800 Nmm2

EC3-1-8 T31

FtRd = 09 times 800 times 245125 N = 1411 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Hence0125 times 4430

941+ 706

14 times 1411= 0946 lt 10 EC3-1-8 T31

and so the bolt resistance does not governThus Q le 4430

9108 Example 8 ndash plate-bearing resistance

Problem Determine the bearing resistance of the end plate of example 7 shownin Figure 922b

Solution

αd = 35(3 times 22) = 0530 fubfu = 800510 = 1569 gt 0530EC3-1-8 T34

and so αb = 0530 EC3-1-8 T34

k1 = 28 times 3022 = 382 gt 25 so that k1 = 25 EC3-1-8 T34

FbRd = 25 times 0530 times 510 times 20 times 811 N = 983 kN EC3-1-8 T34

Using this with the analysis solution of example 7 0125 Q le 983so that Qb le 7868 gt 4430 (ge Qp)

9109 Example 9 ndash fillet weld resistance

Problem Determine the resistance of the two fillet welds shown in Figure 922b

Solutionlw = 2687 mm and FLEd = 1861 Q Nmm as in example 5

430 Joints

The maximum bending force per unit weld length can be determined fromequation 950b as

FTyEd = (minus005 Q times 106)times (26872)

2 times 2687312= 2078 Q Nmm

Using equation 930 the resultant of these is

FwEd = radic[(1861 Q)2 + (2078 Q)2] = 2789 Q Nmm

For S355 Grade steel βw = 09 EC3-1-8 T41

fvwd = 510radic

3

09 times 125= 2617 Nmm2 EC3-1-8 4533

FwRd = 2617 times (6

radic2) = 1110 Nmm EC3-1-8 4533

Hence 2789 Q le 1110so that Qw le 3981 lt 4430 (ge Qp)

Using the directional method of EC3-1-8 with equations 932ndash934

σperp = (minus005 Qtimes106)times (26872) sin 45o

2 times (2687312)times (6radic

2)= minus0346 Q Nmm2

τperp = (minus005 Q times 106)times (26872) cos 45o

2 times (2687312)times (6radic

2)= minus0346 Q Nmm2

τ|| = Q times 103

2 times 2687 times (6radic

2)= 0439 Nmm2

The strength condition is

(minus0346 Q)2 + 3 times [(minus0346 Q)2 + (0439 Q)2]05 le 510

09 times 125EC3-1-8 4532(6)

so that

Qw le 4410 lt 4430 (ge Qp)

and

0346 Q le 09 times 510125

so that

Qw le 1060 gt 4410

Thus the connection capacity is governed by the shear and bending resistanceof the welds

Joints 431

911 Unworked examples

9111 Example 10 ndash bolted joint

Arrange and design a bolted joint to transfer a design force of 800 kN from theinclined member to the truss joint shown in Figure 923a

9112 Example 11 ndash tension member splice

Arrange and design the tension member splice shown in Figure 923b so as tomaximise the tension resistance

9113 Example 12 ndash tension member welds

Proportion the weld lengths shown in Figure 923c to transfer the design tensionforce concentrically

9114 Example 13 ndash channel section bracket

Determine the design resistance Q of the fillet welded bracket shown inFigure 923d

9115 Example 14 ndash tee-section bracket

Design the fillet welds for the bracket shown in Figure 923e

Teebf = 209tf = 156d = 266tw = 102

bf tf = 152 94 d tw = 1575 66

(d) Channel column bracketfy = 275 Nmm2

fu = 430 Nmm2

FtEd = 800 kN

FtEd = 800 kN

2L100 100 10

(b) Tension member splice (c) Tension member welds

2L125 times 75 times 10

fy = 275 Nmm2

225 243 150

Q

380

(a) Bolted truss joint (e) Tee column bracket

282

718

152 152 UC 30

8

Q

f = 275 Nmmy2

f = 275 Nmmy2times

timestimes times times

times times

Figure 923 Examples 10ndash14

432 Joints

References

1 British Standards Institute (2006) Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures ndash Part 1ndash8Design of Joints BSI London

2 The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional Steelwork Associ-ation (2002) Joints in Steel Construction Simple Connections SCI and BCSAAscot

3 The Steel Construction Institute and the British Constructional Steelwork Associ-ation (1995) Joints in Steel Construction Moment Connections SCI and BCSAAscot

4 Jaspart JP Renkin S and Guillaume ML (2003) European Recommendations forthe Design of Simple Joints in Steel Structures University of Liegravege Liegravege

5 Faella C Piluso V and Rizzano G (2000) Structural Steel Semi-rigid ConnectionsCRC Press Boca Raton

6 Owens GW and Cheal BD (1989) Structural Steelwork Connections ButterworthsLondon

7 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2003) Steel Designerrsquos Manual 6th editionBlackwell Publishing Oxford

8 Morris LJ (1988) Connection design in the UK Steel Beam-to-Column BuildingConnections (ed Chen WF) Elsevier Applied Science pp 375ndash414

9 Kulak GL Fisher JW and Struik JHA (1987) Guide to Design Criteria for Boltedand Rivetted Joints 2nd edition John Wiley and Sons New York

10 CIDECT (1992) Design Guide Recommendations for Rectangular Hollow Section(RHS) Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading Comiteacute International pour leDeacuteveloppment et lrsquoEacutetude de la Construction Tubulaire Cologne

11 CIDECT (1991) Design Guide Recommendations for Circular Hollow Section (CHS)Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading Comiteacute International pour le Deacutevelopp-ment et lrsquoEacutetude de la Construction Tubulaire Cologne

12 Harrison HB (1980) Structural Analysis and Design Parts 1 and 2 Pergamon PressOxford

13 Zoetemeijer P (1974) A design method for the tension side of statically loaded boltedbeam-to-column connections Heron 20 No 1 pp 1ndash59

14 Piluso V Faella C and Rizzano G (2001) Ultimate behavior of bolted T-stubsI Theoretical model Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 127 No 6pp 686ndash93

15 Witteveen J Stark JWB Bijlaard FSK and Zoetemeijer P (1982) Welded andbolted beam-to-column connections Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 108No ST2 pp 433ndash55

Chapter 10

Torsion members

101 Introduction

The resistance of a structural member to torsional loading may be considered tobe the sum of two components When the rate of change of the angle of twistrotation is constant along the member (see Figure 101a) it is in a state of uniform(or St Venant) torsion [1 2] and the longitudinal warping deflections are alsoconstant along the member In this case the torque acting at any cross-sectionis resisted by a single set of shear stresses distributed around the cross-sectionThe ratio of the torque acting to the twist rotation per unit length is defined as thetorsional rigidity GIt of the member

The second component of the resistance to torsional loading may act whenthe rate of change of the angle of twist rotation varies along the member (seeFigures 101b and c) so that it is in a state of non-uniform torsion [1] In thiscase the warping deflections vary along the member and an additional set of shearstresses may act in conjunction with those due to uniform torsion to resist thetorque acting The stiffness of the member associated with these additional shearstresses is proportional to the warping rigidity EIw

When the first component of the resistance to torsional loading completelydominates the second the member is in a state of uniform torsion This occurswhen the torsion parameter K = radic

(π2EIwGItL2) is very small as indicatedin Figure 102 which is adapted from [1] Thin-walled closed-section memberswhose torsional rigidities are very large behave in this way as do members withnarrow rectangular sections and angle and tee-sections whose warping rigidi-ties are negligible If on the other hand the second component of the resistanceto torsional loading completely dominates the first the member is in a limit-ing state of non-uniform torsion referred to as warping torsion This may occurwhen the torsion parameter K is very large as indicated in Figure 102 whichis the case for some very thin-walled open sections (such as light gauge cold-formed sections) whose torsional rigidities are very small Between these twoextremes the torsional loading is resisted by a combination of the uniform andwarping torsion components and the beam is in the general state of non-uniformtorsion This occurs for intermediate values of the parameter K as shown in

434 Torsion members

(a) Uniform torsion (c) Non-uniform torsion(b) Non-uniform torsion

Varying torqueConstant torqueends free to warp

End warping prevented

Figure 101 Uniform and non-uniform torsion of an I-section member

= ( 22EI w GIt L )

10

08

06

04

02

0

channel sections

01 1 10

L

Hot-rolledI-sections

Closedsections

Angles

torsiontorsionNon-uniform

Warping torsion

Very thin-walled

Uniform

Torsion parameter K

(War

ping

torq

uet

otal

torq

ue)

at m

id-s

pan

Figure 102 Effect of cross-section on torsional behaviour

Figure 102 which are appropriate for most hot-rolled I- or channel-sectionmembers

Whether a member is in a state of uniform or non-uniform torsion also dependson the loading arrangement and the warping restraints If the torque resisted is con-stant along the member and warping is unrestrained (as in Figure 10la) then themember will be in uniform torsion even if the torsional rigidity is very small Ifhowever the torque resisted varies along the length of the member (Figure 101b)or if the warping displacements are restrained in any way (Figure 101c) thenthe rate of change of the angle of twist rotation will vary and the member willbe in non-uniform torsion In general these variations must be accounted forbut in some cases they can be ignored and the member analysed as if it werein uniform torsion This is the case for members of very low warping rigidity

Torsion members 435

(d) Distortion(c) Torsion

++equiv

(b) Bending(a) Eccentric load

Figure 103 Eccentric loading of a thin-walled closed section

and for members of high-torsional rigidity for which the rates of change of theangle of twist rotation vary only locally near points of concentrated torque andwarping restraint This simple method of analysis usually leads to satisfactory pre-dictions of the angles of twist rotation but may produce underestimates of the localstresses

In this chapter the behaviour and design of torsion members are discussedUniform torsion is treated in Section 102 and non-uniform torsion in Section 103while the design of torsion members for strength and serviceability is treated inSection 104

Structural members however are rarely used to resist torsion alone and it ismuch more common for torsion to occur in conjunction with bending and othereffects For example when the box section beam shown in Figure 103a is subjectedto an eccentric load this causes bending (Figure 103b) torsion (Figure 103c)and distortion (Figure 103d) There may also be interactions between bending andtorsion For example the longitudinal stresses due to bending may cause a changein the effective torsional rigidity This type of interaction is of some importancein the flexuralndashtorsional buckling of thin-walled open-section members as dis-cussed in Sections 375 and 610 Also significant twist rotations of the membermay cause increases in the bending stresses in thin-walled open-section membersHowever these interactions are usually negligible when the torsional rigidity isvery high as in thin-walled closed-section members The behaviour of membersunder combined bending and torsion is discussed in Section 105

The effects of distortion of the cross-section are only significant in very thin-walled open-sections and in thin-walled closed sections with high-distortionalloadings Thus for the box-section beam shown in Figure 103 the relativelyflexible plates may bend out of their planes as indicated in Figure 103d causingthe cross-section to distort Because of this the in-plane plate bending and shearstress distributions are changed and significant out-of-plane plate bending stressesmay be induced The distortional behaviour of structural members is discussedbriefly in Section 106

436 Torsion members

102 Uniform torsion

1021 Elastic deformations and stresses

10211 General

In elastic uniform torsion the twist rotation per unit length is constant along thelength of the member This occurs when the torque is constant and the ends ofthe member are free to warp as shown in Figure 101a When a member twists inthis way

(a) lines which were originally parallel to the axis of twist become helices(b) cross-sections rotate φ as rigid bodies about the axis of twist and(c) cross-sections warp out of their planes the warping deflections (u) being

constant along the length of the member (see Figure 104)

The uniform torque Tt acting at any section induces shear stresses τxy τxz whichact in the plane of the cross-section The distribution of these shear stresses canbe visualised by using Prandtlrsquos membrane analogy as indicated in Figure 105for a rectangular cross-section Imagine a thin uniformly stretched membranewhich is fixed to the cross-section boundary and displaced by a uniform transversepressure The contours of the displaced membrane coincide with the shear stress

x y

z

Element δx times δs times t

Tt

Tt

Helix

Warpingdisplacements u

Figure 104 Warping displacements u due to twisting

Torsion members 437

b

t

z

y

(b) Distribution of shear stress (a) Transversely loaded membrane

Sections through membrane

Membranecontours

Rectangularcross-section

b

t

Figure 105 Prandtlrsquos membrane analogy for uniform torsion

xyxy

yx

yx

x

y δz

δy

δx

z

Longitudinal axis Change in warpingdisplacement dueto shear strain= (yx G)δy

of member

Total change inwarping displacement δu

Change in warpingdue to twisting

Rotation of longitudinalfibres due to twisting

Thin elementδy times δz times δx

Figure 106 Warping displacements

trajectories the slope of the membrane is proportional to the shear stress and thevolume under the membrane is proportional to the torque The shear strains causedby these shear stresses are related to the twisting and warping deformations asindicated in Figure 106

The stress distribution can be found by solving the equation [2]

part2θ

party2+ part2θ

partz2= minus2G

dx (101)

438 Torsion members

(in which G is the shear modulus of elasticity) for the stress function θ (whichcorresponds to the membrane displacement in Prandtlrsquos analogy) defined by

τxz = τzx = minuspartθparty

τxy = τyx = partθpartz

(102)

subject to the condition that

θ = constant (103)

around the section boundary The uniform torque Tt which is the static equivalentof the shear stresses τxy τxz is given by

Tt = 2intint

section

θ dy dz (104)

10212 Solid cross-sections

Closed-form solutions of equations 101ndash103 are not generally available exceptfor some very simple cross-sections For a solid circular section of radius R thesolution is

θ = G

2

dx(R2 minus y2 minus z2) (105)

If this is substituted in equations 102 the circumferential shear stress τt at a radiusr = radic

(y2 + z2) is found to be

τt = Grdφ

dx (106)

The torque effect of these shear stresses is

Tt =int R

0τt(2πr)dr (107)

which can be expressed in the form

Tt = GItdφ

dx(108)

where the torsion section constant It is given by

It = πR42 (109)

which can also be expressed as

It = A4

4π2 (Iy + Iz) (1010)

The same result can be obtained by substituting equation 105 directly intoequation 104 Equation 106 indicates that the maximum shear stress occurs at

Torsion members 439

the boundary and is equal to

τtmax = TtR

It (1011)

For other solid cross-sections equation 1010 gives a reasonably accurateapproximation for the torsion section constant but the maximum shear stressdepends on the precise shape of the section When sections have re-entrant cor-ners the local shear stresses may be very large (as indicated in Figure 107)although they may be reduced by increasing the radius of the fillet at the re-entrantcorner

10213 Rectangular cross-sections

The stress function θ for a very narrow rectangular section of width b and thicknesst is approximated by

θ asymp Gdφ

dx

(t2

4minus z2

) (1012)

The shear stresses can be obtained by substituting equation 1012 intoequations 102 whence

τxy = minus2zGdφ

dx (1013)

which varies linearly with z as shown in Figure 108c The torque effect of theτxy shear stresses can be obtained by integrating their moments about the x axis

0 05 10 15 20Ratio rt

10

15

20

25

30

r

t

t

Note crowding ofcontours at re-entrantcorner correspondingto stress concentration

Equal angle section [3]with large bt ratio

Approximation [2]

(a) Membrane contours at re-entrant corner (b) Increased shear stresses

Rat

io o

f ac

tual

str

ess

nom

inal

str

ess

Figure 107 Stress concentrations at re-entrant corners

440 Torsion members

t

bz

y

(b) Cross-section and shear flow

(a) Membrane or stress function 13

(c) Shear stress distribution

Parabolic tmax

Linear

Figure 108 Uniform torsion of a thin rectangular section

whence

minusint t2

minust2τxybz dz = G

bt3

6

dx(1014)

which is one half of the total torque effect The other half arises from the shearstresses τxz which have their greatest effects near the ends of the thin rectangleAlthough they act there over only a small length of the order of t (compared withb for the τxy stresses) they have a large lever arm of the order of b2 (instead oft2) and they make an equal contribution The total torque can therefore beexpressed in the form of equation 108 with

It asymp bt33 (1015)

The same result can be obtained by substituting equation 1012 directly intoequation 104 Equation 1013 indicates that the maximum shear stress occurs atthe centre of the long boundary and is given by

τtmax asymp Ttt

It (1016)

For stockier rectangular sections the stress function θ varies significantly alongthe width b of the section as indicated in Figure 105 and these approximationsmay not be sufficiently accurate In this case the torsion section constant It andthe maximum shear stress τtmax can be obtained from Figure 109

10214 Thin-walled open cross-sections

The stress distribution in a thin-walled open cross-section is very similar to that ina narrow rectangular section as shown in Figure 1010a Thus the shear stressesare parallel to the walls of the section and vary linearly across the thickness t thispattern remaining constant around the section except at the ends Because of this

Torsion members 441

10

08

06

04

02

0

30

25

20

15

10

05

b

t

0 2 4 6 8 10

33bt

It

)3( 2btTt

tmax

Tor

sion

sec

tion

con

stan

t rat

io I

t (

bt3 3

)

Max

imum

she

ar s

tres

s ra

tio

tm

ax

Tt

(bt2 3

)

Widthndashthickness ratio bt

Figure 109 Torsion properties of rectangular sections

t t t

C C

tmax

tmax

y

z

y

z

(a) Open section

Constant shearflow t

(b) Closed section

t

Figure 1010 Shear stresses due to uniform torsion of thin-walled sections

similarity the torsion section constant It can be closely approximated by

It asympsum

bt33 (1017)

442 Torsion members

where b is the developed length of the mid-line and t the thickness of each thin-walled element of the cross-section while the summation is carried out for all suchelements

The maximum shear stress away from the concentrations at re-entrant cornerscan also be approximated as

τtmax asymp Tttmax

It (1018)

where tmax is the maximum thickness When more accurate values for the torsionsection constant It are required the formulae developed in [3] can be used Thevalues given in [4ndash6] for British hot-rolled steel sections have been calculated inthis way

10215 Thin-walled closed cross-sections

The uniform torsional behaviour of thin-walled closed-section members is quitedifferent from that of open-section members and there are dramatic increases inthe torsional stiffness and strength The shear stress no longer varies linearly acrossthe thickness of the wall but is constant as shown in Figure 1010b and there is aconstant shear flow around the closed section

This shear flow is required to prevent any discontinuities in the longitudinalwarping displacements of the closed section To show this consider the slit rect-angular tube shown in Figure 1011a The mid-thickness surface of this opensection is unstrained and so the warping displacements of this surface are entirelydue to the twisting of the member The distribution of the warping displacementscaused by twisting (see Section 10312) is shown in Figure 1011b The relative

O E

E C

C S

O

S

Slit

xy

z

y

z

E00 ds

dd

z

tw

bf

y0tf

df

(b) Warping displacements(a) Cross-section of a slit tube

Relative warpingdisplacement

ndash

Figure 1011 Warping of a slit tube

Torsion members 443

S

E O

SC

t t

Ae

0

0

0

δs δs

δs

wtδs ttδs

z

y

=21

0ds=21

(b) Uniform torque in a closed section (a) Warping torque in an open section

Shaded area

Total area enclosed

Figure 1012 Torques due to shear flows in thin-walled sections

warping displacement at the slit is equal to

uE minus u0 = minusdφ

dx

int E

0ρ0ds (1019)

in whichρ0 is the distance (see Figure 1012a) from the tangent at the mid-thicknessline to the axis of twist (which passes through the shear centre of the section asdiscussed in Sections 10312 and 543)

However when the tube is not slit this relative warping displacement cannotoccur In this case the relative warping displacement due to twisting shown inFigure 1013a is exactly balanced by the relative warping displacement causedby shear straining (see Figure 106) of the mid-thickness surface shown inFigure 1013b so that the total relative warping displacement is zero It is shownin Section 1071 that the required shear straining is produced by a constant shearflow τt t around the closed section which is given by

τt t = Tt

2Ae(1020)

where Ae is the area enclosed by the section and that the torsion section constantis given by

It = 4A2e∮

(1t)ds (1021)

The maximum shear stress can be obtained from equation 1020 as

τtmax = Tt

2Aetmin(1022)

444 Torsion members

C S C S

xdd 0

x x

y y

z z

Relative warping displacement

(a) Warping displacementsdue to twisting only

(due to twisting)

(b) Warping displacementsdue to shear only

Relative warping displacement

(due to shear)

Constantshearflow t t

ds

G dsndash

Figure 1013 Warping of a closed section

The membrane analogy can also be used for thin-walled closed sections byimagining that the inner-section boundary is fixed to a weightless horizontal platesupported at a distance equivalent to τt t above the outer-section boundary bythe transverse pressures and the forces in the membrane stretched between theboundaries as shown in Figure 1014b Thus the slope (τt t)t of the membraneis substantially constant across the wall thickness and is equivalent to the shearstress τt while twice the volume Aeτt t under the membrane is equivalent to theuniform torque Tt given by equation 1020

The membrane analogy is used in Figure 1014 to illustrate the dramaticincreases in the stiffnesses and strengths of thin-walled closed sections over thoseof open sections It can be seen that the torque (which is proportional to the volumeunder the membrane) is much greater for the closed section when the maximumshear stress is the same The same conclusion can be reached by considering theeffective lever arms of the shear stresses which are of the same order as the overalldimensions of the closed section compared with those of the same order as thewall thickness of the open section

The behaviour of multi-cell closed-section members in uniform torsion can bedetermined by using the warping displacement continuity condition for each cellas indicated in Section 1071 Ageneral matrix method of carrying out this analysisby computer has been given in [7] and a computer program has been developed[8] Alternatively the membrane analogy can be extended by considering a set ofhorizontal plates at different heights one for each cell of the cross-section

Torsion members 445

S lit

M e m b rane

t tt

t

t

14

t t

t

t

tt

t tStressdistribution

Cross-s ec tio n

Membraneanalogy

(a) Slit tube (b) Closed tube

Horizontalplate

Membrane

Figure 1014 Comparison of uniform torsion of open and closed sections

1022 Elastic analysis

10221 Statically determinate members

Some members in uniform torsion are statically determinate such as the cantilevershown in Figure 1015 In these cases the distribution of the total torque Tx = Tt

can be determined from statics and the maximum stresses can be evaluated fromequations 1011 1016 1018 or 1020 or from Figures 107 or 109 The twistedshape of the member can be determined by integrating equation 108 using thesign conventions of Figure 1016a Thus the angle of twist rotation in a region ofconstant torque Tx will vary linearly in accordance with

φ = φ0 + Txx

GIt (1023)

as indicated in Figure 1015c

10222 Statically indeterminate members

Many torsion members are statically indeterminate such as the beam shown inFigure 1017 and the distribution of torque cannot be determined from staticsalone The redundant quantities can be determined by substituting the correspond-ing compatibility conditions into the solution of equation 108 Once these havebeen found the maximum torque can be evaluated by statics and the maximumstress can be determined The maximum angle of twist can also be derived fromthe solution of equation 108

446 Torsion members

(+) T

(+ )

L

T

T

0 = 0

(a) Cantilever

xtGI

TL

Twist rotation prevented

(b) Torque Tx

(c) Twist rotation

Figure 1015 Uniform torsion of a statically determinate cantilever

x

C

B

B

O

EC

x u

z

z S(y0 z0)

a0

0 (+ve)

δs

+ve rsquo ve rsquo+ve Tt ve Tt

+ve rdquo ndashve rdquo

ve rdquorsquo +ve Tw

y

rdquo = 0

y

(a) Positive torsion actions

S(y0 z0)Tx Tt Tw

Tx Tt Tw

(b) Sign convention for 0

(c) Conventions for rsquo rdquo rdquorsquoTt Tw

ndash

ndashndash

Clockwise +ve (RH systemabout S axis parallel to x)

Figure 1016 Torsion sign conventions

As an example of this procedure the indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1017is analysed in Section 1072 The theoretical twisted shape of this beam is shownin Figure 1017c and it can be seen that there is a jump discontinuity in the twist perunit length dφdx at the loaded point This discontinuity is a consequence of the useof the uniform torsion theory to analyse the behaviour of the member In practicesuch a discontinuity does not occur because an additional set of local warpingstresses is induced These additional stresses which may have high values at theloaded point have been investigated in [9 10] High local stresses can usuallybe tolerated in static loading situations when the material is ductile whether thestresses are induced by concentrated torques or by other concentrated loads In

Torsion members 447

(+)

(+)

x

L ndash aa

T

( )

T0 0 = 0 L = 0

T ndash

ndash

ndash T0

T0

T ndash T0

LGIaLTa

t

)(

Twist rotation prevented

(c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

(a) Beam

Figure 1017 Uniform torsion of a statically indeterminate beam

members for which the use of the uniform torsion theory is appropriate such asthose with high torsional rigidity and low warping rigidity these additional stressesdecrease rapidly as the distance from the loaded point increases Because of this theangles of twist predicted by the uniform torsion analysis are of sufficient accuracy

1023 Plastic collapse analysis

10231 Fully plastic stress distribution

The elastic shear stress distributions described in the previous sub-sections remainvalid while the shear yield stress τy is not exceeded The uniform torque at nominalfirst yield Tty may be obtained from equations 1011 1016 1018 or 1022 byusing τtmax = τy Yielding commences at Tty at the most highly stressed regionsand then generally spreads until the section is fully plastic

The fully plastic shear stress distribution can be visualised by using the lsquosandheaprsquo modification of the Prandtl membrane analogy Because the fully plasticshear stress distribution is constant the slope of the Prandtl membrane is alsoconstant and its contours are equally spaced in the same way as are those of aheap formed by pouring sand on to a base area of the same shape as the membercross-section until the heap is fully formed

This is demonstrated in Figure 1018a for a circular cross-section for which thesand heap is conical Its fully plastic uniform torque may be obtained from

Ttp =int R

0τy(2πr)r dr (1024)

whence

Ttp = (2πR33

)τy (1025)

448 Torsion members

Parabola Cone

(b) Rectangular cross-section(a) Circular cross-section

Parabola

First yieldFirst yield Fully plastic Fully plastic

Sectionsandmembercontours

Chisel wedge

Membranesandsand heaps

Figure 1018 First yield and fully plastic uniform torsion shear stress distributions

The corresponding first yield uniform torque may be obtained fromequations 109 and 1011 as

Tty = (πR32

)τy (1026)

and so the uniform torsion plastic shape factor is TtpTty = 43The sand heap for a fully plastic rectangular section b times t is chisel-shaped

as shown in Figure 1018b In this case the fully plastic uniform torque isgiven by

Ttp = bt2

2

(1 minus t

3b

)τy (1027)

and for a narrow rectangular section this becomes Ttp asymp (bt22)τy Thecorresponding first yield uniform torque is

Tty asymp (bt23

)τy (1028)

and so the uniform torsion plastic shape factor is TtpTty = 32For thin-walled open sections the fully plastic uniform torque is approximated

by

Ttp asymp (bt22

)τy (1029)

and the first yield torque is obtained from equation 1018 as

Tty = τyIt

tmax(1030)

Torsion members 449

For a hollow section the equilibrium condition of constant shear flow lim-its the maximum shear flow to the shear flow τytmin in the thinnest wall (seeequation 1022) so that the first yield uniform torque is given by

Tty = 2Aetminτy (1031)

This is the maximum torque that can be resisted even though walls with t gt tmin

are not fully yielded and so this value of Tty should also be used for the fully plasticuniform torque Ttp

10232 Plastic analysis

A member in uniform torsion will collapse plastically when there is a sufficientnumber of fully plastic cross-sections to transform the member into a mechanismas shown for example in Figure 1019 Each fully plastic cross-section can bethought of as a shear lsquohingersquo which allows increasing torsional rotations underthe uniform plastic torque Ttp The plastic shear hinges usually form at the sup-ports where there are reaction torques as indicated in Figure 1019 In generalthe plastic shear hinges develop progressively until the collapse mechanism isformed Examples of uniform torsion plastic collapse mechanisms are shown inFigures 1020 and 1021

At plastic collapse the mechanism is statically determinate and can be analysedby using statics to determine the plastic collapse torques For the member shownin Figure 1019 the mechanism forms when there are plastic shear hinges at eachsupport The total applied torque αtT at plastic collapse must be in equilibriumwith these plastic uniform torques and so

αtT = 2Ttp (1032)

so that the uniform torsion plastic collapse load factor is given by

αt = 2TtpT (1033)

Values of the uniform torsion plastic collapse load factor αt for a number ofexample torsion members can be obtained from Figures 1020 and 1021

103 Non-uniform torsion

1031 Elastic deformations and stresses

10311 General

In elastic non-uniform torsion both the rate of change of the angle of twist rotationdφdx and the longitudinal warping deflections u vary along the length of the

T

L

(ndash)(+)

t TTtp

Ttp

(b) Uniform torsion collapse mechanism

(c) Uniform torque distribution (a) Torsion member and loading

Prevention of warpingineffective in uniform torsion

Uniform torsionplastic shear hinge

Bottom flange

Top flange

Figure 1019 Uniform torsion plastic collapse

Mechanism

T

T

T

T

L

L

L L

L L

T

LT

L

T

L

T

L L

T

L L

T

L L

T

L L

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

0

10

10

10

40

60

80

60

60

80

80

10

10

10

10

025

025

025

025

025

025

025

0333

0667

0583

00208

000931

000521

00150

00142

000751

000721

tT Ttp wTLMfp df

Warping torsion frictionless hinge

Warping torsion plastic hinge

Uniform torsion shear hinges

Free to warp

Warping prevented

Top flange

Bottom flange

Plastic collapseWarping torsionUniform torsion

Memberand

loading

Rotations

Mechanism

Warping

wmEIwTL3

Uniform tm

tmGIt TL

infin

Figure 1020 Plastic collapse and maximum rotation ndash concentrated torque

Torsion members 451

TL

L

L

L

L

L

L

L

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

0

20

20

20

80

1166

160

1166

1166

160

160

05

05

05

05

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0125

0139

0292

0250

00130

000541

000260

000915

000860

000417

000397

TL

L

TL

L

TL

L

TL

LTL

LTL

L

TL

LTL

LTL

LTL

L

Warping torsion frictionless hinge

Warping torsion plastic hinge

Uniform torsion shear hinges

Free to warp

Warping prevented

Top flange

Bottom flange

tT Ttp wTLMfp df

Plastic collapseWarping torsionUniform torsion

Memberand

loading

Rotations

Mechanism

Warping

wmEIwTL3Uniform

tmGItTL Mechanism

infin

Figure 1021 Plastic collapse and maximum rotation ndash uniformly distributed torque

member The varying warping deflections induce longitudinal strains and stressesσw When these warping normal stresses also vary along the member there areassociated warping shear stresses τw distributed around the cross-section andthese may act in conjunction with the shear stresses due to uniform torsion toresist the torque acting at the section [1 11] In the following sub-sections thewarping deformations stresses and torques in thin-walled open-section membersof constant cross-section are treated The local warping stresses induced by thenon-uniform torsion of closed sections are beyond the scope of this book but are

452 Torsion members

treated in [9 10] while some examples of the non-uniform torsion of taperedopen-section members are discussed in [12 13]

10312 Warping deflections and stresses

In thin-walled open-section members the longitudinal warping deflections u dueto twist are much greater than those due to shear straining (see Figure 106) andthe latter are usually neglected The warping deflections due to twist arise becausethe lines originally parallel to the axis of twist become helical locally as indicatedin Figures 104 1022 and 1023 In non-uniform torsion the axis of twist is thelocus of the shear centres (see Section 543) since otherwise the shear centre axiswould be deformed and the member would be bent as well as twisted It is shownin Section 1081 that the warping deflections due to twist (see Figure 1023) canbe expressed as

u = (αn minus α)dφ

dx (1034)

where

α =int s

0ρ0ds (1035)

and

αn = 1

A

int E

0α t ds (1036)

where ρ0 is the perpendicular distance from the shear centre S to the tangent tothe mid-line of the section wall (see Figures 1016b and 1023)

In non-uniform torsion the warping displacements u vary along the length of themember as shown for example in Figure 101b and c Because of this longitudinal

C δ

δx

x y

z

xdd

a0

a0

a0Line parallel to the

axis of twist

Axis of twist

Helix

(y z)

S(y0 z0)

Figure 1022 Rotation of a line parallel to the axis of twist

Torsion members 453

δx

δs

δs

δu

xdda0

a0

0

0

a0

S

O

E C y

z

x

(b) Plan on axis of twist(not to scale)

Axis of twist

Helix

(a) Section

Figure 1023 Warping of an element δx times δs times t due to twisting

strains are induced and the corresponding longitudinal warping normalstresses are

σw = E(αn minus α)d2φ

dx2 (1037)

These stresses define the bimoment stress resultant

B = minusint E

0σw(αn minus α) tds (1038)

Substituting equation 1037 leads to

B = minusEIwd2φ

dx2(1039)

in which

Iw =int E

0(αn minus α)2tds (1040)

is the warping section constant Substituting equation 1039 into equation 1037allows the warping normal stresses to be expressed as

σw = minusB(αn minus α)

Iw (1041)

Values of the warping section constant Iw and of the warping normal stressesσw for structural sections are given in [5 6] while a general computer program fortheir evaluation has been developed [8]

454 Torsion members

When the warping normal stresses σw vary along the length of the memberwarping shear stresses τw are induced in the same way that variations in thebending normal stresses in a beam induce bending shear stresses (see Section 54)The warping shear stresses can be expressed in terms of the warping shear flow

τwt = minusEd3φ

dx3

int s

0(αn minus α) tds (1042)

Information for calculating the warping shear stresses in structural sections isalso given in [5 6] while a general computer program for their evaluation hasbeen developed [8]

The warping shear stresses exert a warping torque

Tw =int E

0ρ0τwtds (1043)

about the shear centre as shown in Figure 1012a It can be shown [14 15] thatthis reduces to

Tw = minusEIwd3φ

dx3 (1044)

after substituting for τw and integrating by parts The warping torque Tw given byequation 1044 is related to the bimoment B given by equation 1039 through

Tw = dB

dx (1045)

Sign conventions for Tw and B are illustrated in Figure 1016A somewhat simpler explanation of the warping torque Tw and bimoment B

can be given for the I-section illustrated in Figure 1024 This is discussed inSection 1082 where it is shown that for an equal flanged I-section the bimomentB is related to the flange moment Mf through

B = df Mf (1046)

and the warping section constant Iw is given by

Iw = Izd2f

4(1047)

in which df is the distance between the flange centroids

1032 Elastic analysis

10321 Uniform torsion

Some thin-walled open-section members such as thin rectangular sections andangle and tee sections have very small warping section constants In such casesit is usually sufficiently accurate to ignore the warping torque Tw and to analysethe member as if it were in uniform torsion as discussed in Section 1022

Torsion members 455

10322 Warping torsion

Very thin-walled open-section members have very small torsion-section constantsIt while some of these such as I- and channel sections have significant warpingsection constants Iw In such cases it is usually sufficiently accurate to analyse themember as if the applied torque were resisted entirely by the warping torque sothat Tx = Tw Thus the twisted shape of the member can be obtained by solving

minusEIwd3φ

dx3= Tx (1048)

as

minusEIwφ =int x

0

int x

0

int x

0Txdxdxdx + A1x2

2+ A2x + A3 (1049)

where A1 A2 and A3 are constants of integration whose values depend on theboundary conditions

For statically determinate members there are three boundary conditions fromwhich the three constants of integration can be determined As an example ofthe three commonly assumed boundary conditions the statically determinate can-tilever shown in Figures 101c and 1025 is analysed in Section 1083 The twistedshape of the cantilever is shown in Figure 1025c and it can be seen that themaximum angle of twist rotation occurs at the loaded end and is equal to TL33EIw

For statically indeterminate members such as the beam shown in Figure 1026there is an additional boundary condition for each redundant quantity involvedThese redundants can be determined by substituting the additional boundary

vf

yC S

Mf

Mf

dfVf

Vf

yx

z

z (a) Rotation ofcross-section (b) Bimoment and warping stresses

Warping normal stresses w

Bimoment df Mf

Warping shear stresses w

Flange shears Vf

df

Figure 1024 Bimoment and stresses in an I-section member

456 Torsion members

conditions into equation 1049 As an example of this procedure the beam shownin Figure 1026 is analysed in Section 1084

The warping torsion analysis of equal flanged I-sections can also be carried outby analysing the flange bending model shown in Figure 1027 Thus the warping

(+) T

(+)

x L

T

T

Twist rotation andwarping prevented

Free to warpL= 0

0 = 0 = 0

(b) Torque Tx

(c) Twist rotation (a) Cantilever

TL3

3EIw

Figure 1025 Warping torsion of a statically determinate cantilever

(+)

(+)x L

munit length

(-)

E I w

T 0

Twist rotation andwarping prevented Twist rotation

preventedfree to warp0 =0 = 0

L =L = 0

mL - T0

T0mL - T0

(a) Beam (c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

00054mL4

Figure 1026 Warping torsion of a statically indeterminate beam

y

z

y

z

=

(b) Equivalent flange shears Vf

Vf

Vf Tx

dfdf

df

Tx

(a) Flange deflection Vf

=vf w

w

df 2

Figure 1027 Flange bending model of warping torsion

Torsion members 457

torque Tw = Tx acting on the I-section is replaced by two transverse shears

Vf = Txdf (1050)

one on each flange The bending deflections vf of each flange can then be deter-mined by elastic analysis or by using available solutions [4] and the twist rotationscan be calculated from

φw = 2vf df (1051)

10323 Non-uniform torsion

When neither the torsional rigidity nor the warping rigidity can be neglected asin hot-rolled steel I- and channel sections the applied torque is resisted by acombination of the uniform and warping torques so that

Tx = Tt + Tw (1052)

In this case the differential equation of non-uniform torsion is

Tx = GItdφ

dxminus EIw

d3φ

dx3 (1053)

the general solution of which can be written as

φ = p(x)+ A1exa + A2eminusxa + A3 (1054)

where

a2 = EIw

GIt= K2L2

π2 (1055)

The function p(x) in this solution is a particular integral whose form dependson the variation of the torque Tx along the beam This can be determined by thestandard techniques used to solve ordinary linear differential equations (see [16]for example) The values of the constants of integration A1 A2 and A3 depend onthe form of the particular integral and on the boundary conditions

Complete solutions for a number of torque distributions and boundary conditionshave been determined and graphical solutions for the twist φ and its derivativesdφdx d2φdx2 and d3φdx3 are available [5 6] As an example the non-uniformtorsion of the cantilever shown in Figure 1028 is analysed in Section 1085

Sometimes the accuracy of the method of solution described above is notrequired in which case a much simpler method may be used The maximumangle of twist rotation φm may be approximated by

φm = φtmφwm

φtm + φwm(1056)

in which φtm is the maximum uniform torsion angle of twist rotation obtained bysolving equation 108 with Tt = Tx and φwm is the maximum warping torsion

458 Torsion members

(+) T

(+)x

T

L

T

Twist rotation andwarping prevented

0 =0 = 0Free to warp

L = 0

(a) Cantilever (c) Twist rotation

(b) Torque Tx

TL

GIt

1ndash endash2La1ndash

1+ endash2LaaL

Figure 1028 Non-uniform torsion of a cantilever

angle of twist rotation obtained by solving equation 1048 Values of φtm and φwm

can be obtained from Figures 1020 and 1021 for a number of different torsionmembers

This approximate method tends to overestimate the true maximum angle of twistrotation partly because the maximum values φtm and φwm often occur at differentlocations along the member In the case of the cantilever of Figure 1028 theapproximate solution

φm = TLGIt

1 + 3EIwGItL2(1057)

obtained using Figures 1015c and 1025c in equation 1056 has a maximum errorof about 12 [17]

1033 Plastic collapse analysis

10331 Fully plastic bimoment

The warping normal stresses σw developed in elastic warping torsion are usuallymuch larger than the warping shear stresses τw Thus the limit of elastic behaviouris often reached when the bimoment is close to its nominal first yield value forwhich the maximum value of σw is equal to the yield stress fy

For the equal flanged I-section shown in Figure 1024 the first yield bimomentBy corresponds to the flange moment Mf reaching the yield value

Mfy = fyb2f tf 6 (1058)

so that

By = fydf b2f tf 6 (1059)

in which bf is the flange width tf is the flange thickness and df is the dis-tance between flange centroids As the bimoment increases above By yielding

Torsion members 459

spreads from the flange tips into the cross-section until the flanges become fullyyielded at

Mfp = fyb2f tf 4 (1060)

which corresponds to the fully plastic bimoment

Bp = fydf b2f tf 4 (1061)

The plastic shape factor for warping torsion of the I-section is therefore given byBpBy = 32

Expressions for the full plastic bimoments of a number of monosymmetricthin-walled open sections are given in [18]

10332 Plastic analysis of warping torsion

An equal flanged I-section member in warping torsion will collapse plasticallywhen there is a sufficient number of warping hinges (frictionless or plastic) totransform the member into a mechanism as shown for example in Figure 1029In general the warping hinges develop progressively until the collapse mechanismforms

A frictionless warping hinge occurs at a point where warping is unrestrained(φprimeprime = 0) so that there is a frictionless hinge in each flange while at aplastic warping hinge the bimoment is equal to the fully plastic value Bp

(equation 1061) and the moment in each flange is equal to the fully plastic valueMfp (equation 1060) so that there is a flexural plastic hinge in each flange Warpingtorsion plastic collapse therefore corresponds to the simultaneous plastic collapse

T

L

Mfp

Mfp

(-)

(+)

End warpingprevented

End free towarp

(a) Torsion member and loading

(b) Warping torsion collapse mechanism

(c) Top flange moment distribution

Top flange

Warping torsionplastic hinges

Bottomflange

Frictionlesshinge

Figure 1029 Warping torsion plastic collapse

460 Torsion members

of the flanges in opposite directions with a series of flexural hinges (frictionlessor plastic) in each flange Thus warping torsion plastic collapse can be analysedby using the methods discussed in Section 555 to analyse the flexural plasticcollapse of the flanges

Warping torsion plastic hinges often form at supports or at points of concentratedtorque as indicated in Figure 1029 Examples of warping torsion plastic collapsemechanisms are shown in Figures 1020 and 1021

At plastic collapse each flange becomes a mechanism which is staticallydeterminate so that it can be analysed by using statics to determine the plas-tic collapse torques For the member shown in Figure 1029 each flange formsa mechanism with plastic hinges at the concentrated torque and the right-handsupport and a frictionless hinge at the left-hand support where warping is unre-strained If the concentrated torque αwT acts at mid-length then the flangescollapse when

αw(Tdf )L4 = Mfp + Mfp2 (1062)

so that the warping torsion plastic collapse load factor is given by

αw = 6Mfpdf TL (1063)

Values of the warping torsion plastic collapse load factor αw for a number ofexample-torsion members are given in Figures 1020 and 1021

10333 Plastic analysis of non-uniform torsion

It has not been possible to develop a simple but rigorous model for the analysis ofthe plastic collapse of members in non-uniform torsion where both uniform andwarping torsion are important This is because

(a) different types of stress (shear stresses τt τw and normal stress σw) areassociated with uniform and warping torsion collapse

(b) the different stresses τt τw and σw are distributed differently across thesection and

(c) the uniform torque Tt and the warping torque Tw are distributed differentlyalong the member

A number of approximate theories have been proposed the simplest of which isthe Merchant approximation [19] according to which the plastic collapse loadfactor αx is the sum of the uniform and warping torsion collapse load factorsso that

αx = αt + αw (1064)

Torsion members 461

0604020 08 021 0 0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

2 5

0 5 L

T

05L

App

lied

torq

ue T

(kN

m)

Small rotation inelastic analysis [25]

Larger otation inelastic analysis [25]

Plastic collapse [2225]

Test results by Farwell and Galambos [20]

Central twist rotation (radian)

Figure 1030 Comparison of analysis and test results

This approximation assumes that there is no interaction between uniform andwarping torsion at plastic collapse so that the separate plastic collapse capacitiesare additive

If strain-hardening is ignored and only small twist rotations are consideredthen the errors arising from this approximation are on the unsafe side but aresmall because the warping torsion shear stresses τw are small because the yieldinteractions between normal and shear stresses (see Section 131) are smalland because cross-sections which are fully plastic due to warping torsion oftenoccur at different locations along the member than those which are fully plas-tic due to uniform torsion These small errors are more than compensated forby the conservatism of ignoring strain-hardening and second-order longitudinalstresses that develop at large rotations Test results [20 21] and numerical studies[22 23] have shown that these cause significant strengthening at large rotationsas indicated in Figure 1030 and that the approximation of equation 1064 isconservative

An example of the plastic collapse analysis of the non-uniform torsion is givenin Section 1096

104 Torsion design

1041 General

EC3 gives limited guidance for the analysis and design of torsion membersWhile both elastic and plastic analysis are permitted generally only accurateand approximate methods of elastic analysis are specifically discussed for torsionmembers Also while both first yield and plastic design resistances are referred

462 Torsion members

to generally only the first yield design resistance is specifically discussed for tor-sion members Further there is no guidance on section classification for torsionmembers nor on how to allow for the effects of local buckling on the designresistance

In the following sub-sections the specific EC3 provisions for torsion analysisand design are extended so as to provide procedures which are consistent withthose used in EC3 for the design of beams against bending and shear

First the member cross-section is classified as Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 orClass 4 in much the same way as is a beam cross-section (see Sections 472and 5612) and then the effective section resistances for uniform and warpingtorsion are determined Following this an appropriate method of torsion analysis(plastic or elastic) is selected and then an appropriate method (plastic first hingefirst yield or local buckling) is used for strength design All of the strength designmethods suggested ignore the warping shear stresses τw because these are generallysmall and because they occur at different points in the cross-section and alongthe member than do the much more significant uniform torsion shear stresses τt

and the warping bimoment normal stresses σw Finally a method of serviceabilitydesign is discussed

1042 Section classification

Cross-sections of torsion members need to be classified according to the extentby which local buckling effects may reduce their cross-section resistances Cross-sections which are capable of reaching and maintaining plasticity while a torsionplastic hinge collapse mechanism develops may be called Class 1 as are thecorresponding cross-sections of beams Class 2 sections are capable of developinga first hinge but inelastic local buckling may prevent the development of a plasticcollapse mechanism Class 3 sections are capable of reaching the nominal firstyield before local buckling occurs while Class 4 sections will buckle locallybefore the nominal first yield is reached

For open cross-sections the warping shear stresses τw are usually very smalland can be neglected without serious error The uniform torsion shear stresses τt

change sign and vary linearly across the wall thickness t and so can be consideredto have no effect on local buckling The flange elastic and plastic warping normalstress distributions are similar to those due to bending in the plane of the flangeand so the section classification may be based on the same widthndashthickness limitsThus the flange outstands of a Class 1 open section would satisfy

λ le 9 (1065)

in which λ is the element slenderness given by

λ = (ct)radic (

fy235)

(1066)

Torsion members 463

Class 2 open sections would satisfy

9 lt λ le 10 (1067)

Class 3 open sections would satisfy

10 lt λ le 14 (1068)

and Class 4 open sections would satisfy

14 lt λ (1069)

For closed cross-sections the only significant stresses that develop during tor-sion are uniform torsion shear stresses τt that are constant across the wall thicknesst and along the length b of any element of the cross-section This stress distribu-tion is very similar to that caused by a bending shear force in the web of anequal-flanged I-section and so the section classification may be based on thesame widthndashthickness limits [24] Thus the elements of Class 1 Class 2 and Class3 rectangular hollow sections would satisfy

λ le 60 (1070)

in which λ is the element slenderness given by

λ = (hwt)radic (

fy235)

(1071)

in which hw is the clear distance between flanges Rectangular hollow sectionswhich do not satisfy this condition would be classified as Class 4 Circular hollowsections do not buckle under shear unless they are exceptionally slender and sothey may generally be classified as Class 1

1043 Uniform torsion section resistance

The effective uniform torsion section resistance of all open sections TtRd can beapproximated by the plastic section resistance Ttp given by equation 1029 in whichthe shear yield stress is given by

τy = fyradic

3 (1072)

The uniform torsion section resistance of Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3 rectangularhollow sections TtRd123 can be determined by using the first yield uniform torqueTty of equation 1031 The effective uniform torsion section resistance of a Class 4rectangular hollow section TtRd4 can be approximated by reducing the first yielduniform torque Tty of equation 1031 to

TtRd4 = Tty(60λ) (1073)

The effective uniform torsion section resistance of a circular hollow section TtRd

can generally be approximated by using equation 1031 to find the first yielduniform torque Tty

464 Torsion members

1044 Bimoment section resistance

The bimoment section resistance of Class 1 and Class 2 equal-flanged I-sectionsBRd12 is given by equation 1061 The bimoment section resistance of a Class 3equal-flanged I-section can be approximated by using

BRd3 = By + (Bp minus By)(14 minus λ)4 (1074)

in which By is the first yield bimoment given by equation 1059 The bimomentsection resistance of a Class 4 equal-flanged I-section can be approximated byusing

BRd4 = By (14λ) (1075)

These equations may also be used for the bimoment section resistances of otheropen sections by using their fully plastic bimoments Bp [18] or first yield bimo-ments By Alternatively the bimoment section resistances of other Class 1 Class 2or Class 3 open sections can be conservatively approximated by using

BRd123 = By (1076)

and the bimoment section resistances of other Class 4 open sections can be approx-imated using equation 1075

It is conservative to ignore bimoments in hollow section members and so thereis no need to consider their bimoment section resistances

1045 Plastic design

The use of plastic design should be limited to Class 1 members which have suf-ficient ductility to reach the plastic collapse mechanism Plastic design should becarried out by using plastic analysis to determine the plastic collapse load factorαx (see Section 10333) and then checking that

1 le αx (1077)

1046 First hinge design

The use of first hinge design should be limited to Class 1 and Class 2 membersin which the first hinge of a collapse mechanism can form The design uniformtorques Tt and bimoments B can be determined by using elastic analysis and themember is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd2

)2

+(

B

BRd2

)2

le 1 (1078)

is satisfied at all points along the member The first hinge method is more conserva-tive than plastic design and more difficult to use because elastic member analysis

Torsion members 465

is much more difficult than plastic analysis and also because equation 1078 oftenneeds to be checked at a number of points along the member

1047 First yield design

The use of first yield design should be limited to Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3members which can reach first yield The maximum design uniform torques Tt andbimoments B can be determined by elastic analysis The member is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd3

)2

+(

B

BRd3

)2

le 1 (1079)

is satisfied at all points along the member This first yield method is the same asthat specified in EC3 except for the neglect of the warping shear stresses τw It isjust as difficult to use as the first hinge method

1048 Local buckling design

Class 4 members should designed against local buckling The maximum designuniform torques Tt and bimoments B can be determined by elastic analysis Themember is satisfactory if(

Tt

TtRd4

)2

+(

B

BRd4

)2

le 1 (1080)

is satisfied at all points along the member

1049 Design for serviceability

Serviceability design usually requires the estimation of the deformations under partor all of the serviceability loads Because these loads are usually significantly lessthan the factored combined loads used for strength design the member remainslargely elastic and the serviceability deformations can be evaluated by linearelastic analysis

There are no specific serviceability criteria for satisfactory deformations of atorsion member given in EC3 However general recommendations such as lsquothedeformations of a structure and of its component members should be appropriateto the location loading and function of the structure and the component membersrsquomay be applied to torsion members so that the onus is placed on the designer todetermine what are appropriate magnitudes of the twist rotations

Because of the lack of precise serviceability criteria highly accurate predictionsof the serviceability rotations are not required Thus the maximum twist rotationsof members in non-uniform torsion may be approximated by using equation 1056

Usually the twist rotations of thin-walled closed-section members are verysmall and can be ignored (although in some cases the distortional deformations

466 Torsion members

may be quite large as discussed in Section 106) On the other hand thin-walledopen-section members are comparatively flexible and special measures may berequired to limit their rotations

105 Torsion and bending

1051 Behaviour

Pure torsion occurs very rarely in steel structures Most commonly torsion occursin combination with bending actions The torsion actions may be classified asprimary or secondary depending on whether the torsion action is required to trans-fer load (primary torsion) or whether it arises as a secondary action Secondarytorques may arise as a result of differential twist rotations compatible with the jointrotations of primary frames as shown in Figure 1031 and are often predicted bythree-dimensional analysis programs They are not unlike the secondary bend-ing moments which occur in rigid-jointed trusses but which are usually ignored(a procedure justified by many years of satisfactory experience based on the long-standing practice of analysing rigid-jointed trusses as if pin-jointed) Secondarytorques are usually small when there are alternative load paths of high stiffnessand may often be ignored

Primary torsion actions may be classified as being restrained free or destab-lising as shown in Figure 1032 For restrained torsion the member applying thetorsion action (such as ABC shown in Figure 1032b) also applies a restrainingaction to the member resisting the torsion (DEC in Figure 1032b) In this case thestructure is redundant and compatibility between the members must be satisfied inthe analysis if the magnitudes of the torques and other actions are to be determinedcorrectly Free torsion occurs when the member applying the torsion action (such as

Joint rotation offlexible portalframe

Negligible rotationat end wall

Differential endrotations inducesecondarytorsion

Figure 1031 Secondary torsion in an industrial frame

Torsion members 467

E

C

DB

Q

BAC

CQ

C AB

E

C

D B

AQ

Q

Cantilever BC permitslateral deflection oftorsion member

Reaction eccentricity atpin connection C causestorque

Rigid joint Crequires compatibletwisting

(b) Restrained torsion

Torsionmember DCE

LoadingmemberABC

(a) Torsion and loading members

(c) Free torsion (d) Destabilising torsion

Figure 1032 Torsion actions

ABC in Figure 1032c) does not restrain the twisting of the torsion member (DEF)but does prevent its lateral deflection Destablising torsion may occur when themember applying the torsion action (such as BC in Figure 1032d) does not restraineither the twisting or the lateral deflection of the torsion member (DCE) In thiscase lateral buckling actions (Chapter 6) caused by the in-plane loading of thetorsion member amplify the torsion and out-of-plane bending behaviour

The inelastic non-linear bending and torsion of fully braced centrally bracedand unbraced I-beams with central concentrated loads (see Figure 1033) have beenanalysed [25] and interaction equations developed for predicting their strengths Itwas found that while circular interaction equations are appropriate for short lengthbraced beams these provide unsafe predictions for beams subject to destablis-ing torsion where lateral buckling effects become important On the other handdestablising interactions between lateral buckling and torsion tend to be masked bythe favourable effects of the secondary axial stresses that develop at large rotationsand linear interaction equations based on plastic analyses provide satisfactorystrength predictions as shown in Figure 1034 Proposals based on these find-ings are made below for the analysis and design of members subject to combinedtorsion and bending

468 Torsion members

Q

L

Q

L

Q

L

e

Q

e

Q

(d) Eccentric load

(i) Free torsion (ii) Destabilising torsion

(c) Unbraced(Destabilising torsion)

(b) Centrally braced(Free torsion)

(a) Continuously braced(Free torsion)

Figure 1033 Beams in torsion and bending

0 0 2 0 4 06 08 10 12 1 4 0

0 2

0 4

0 6

0 8

1 0

1 2

1 4

py

0510141

Q

L

eQ

MMzx

Dimensionless torque 1x

Dim

ensi

onle

ss m

omen

t M

yM

py

Approximateequation 1082( )Accurate

[25]

Figure 1034 Interaction between lateral buckling and torsion for unbraced beams

1052 Plastic design of fully braced members

The member must be Class 1 Plastic collapse analyses should be used to determinethe plastic collapse load factors αi for in-plane bending (Section 55) and αx fortorsion (Section 10333)

The member should satisfy the circular interaction equation

1α2i + 1α2

x le 1 (1081)

Torsion members 469

1053 Design of members without full bracing

A member without full bracing has its bending resistance reduced by lateral buck-ling effects (Chapter 6) Its bending should be analysed elastically and the resultingmoment distribution used to determine its bending resistance MbRd according toEC3

An elastic torsion analysis should be used to find the values of the design uniformtorques Tt and bimoments B An appropriate torsion design method should beselected from Sections 1045ndash1048 and used to find the load factor αx by whichthe design torques and bimoments should be multiplied so that the appropriatetorsion design equation (equations 1077ndash1080) is just satisfied

The member should then satisfy the linear interaction equation

MEd

MbRd+ 1

αxle 1 (1082)

There is no need to amplify the moment because of the finding [25] that lin-ear interaction equations are satisfactory even for unbraced beams as shown inFigure 1034

106 Distortion

Twisting and distortion of a flexural member may be caused by the local distri-bution around the cross-section of the forces acting as shown in Figure 103If the member responds significantly to either of these actions the bending stressdistribution may depart considerably from that calculated in the usual way whileadditional distortional stresses may be induced by out-of-plane bending of the wall(see Figure 103d) To avoid possible failure the designer must either increase thestrength of the member which may be uneconomic or must limit both twistingand distortion

The resistance to distortion of a thin-walled member depends on the arrangementof the cross-section Members with triangular closed cells have high resistancesbecause of the truss-like action of the triangulated cross-section which causes thedistortional loads to be transferred by in-plane bending and shear of the cell wallsOn the other hand the walls of the members with rectangular or trapezoidal cellsbend out of their planes when under distortional loading and when the resistancesto distortion are low [26] while members of open cross-section are even moremore flexible Concentrated distortional loads can be distributed locally by pro-viding stiff diaphragms which reduce or prevent local distortion However isolateddiaphragms are not fully effective when the distortional loads are distributed orcan move along the member In such cases it is necessary to analyse the distortionof the section and the stresses induced by the distortion

The resistance to torsion of a thin-walled open section is comparatively smalland the dominant mode of deformation is twisting of the member Because thistwisting is usually accounted for the importance of distortion lies in its modifying

470 Torsion members

influence on the torsional behaviour Significant distortions occur only in verythin-walled members for which the distortional rigidity which varies as the cubeof the wall thickness reduces at a much faster rate than the warping rigidity whichvaries directly with the thickness [27] These distortions may induce significantwall bending stresses and may increase the angles of twist and change the warpingstress distributions [28 29]

Thin-walled closed-section members are very stiff torsionally and the twistingdeformations due to uniform torsion are not usually of great importance except incurved members On the other hand rectangular and trapezoidal members are notvery resistant to distortional loads and the distortional deformations may be largewhile the stresses induced by the distortional loads may dominate the design [26]

The distortional behaviour of single-cell rectangular or trapezoidal memberscan be classified as uniform or non-uniform Uniform distortion occurs when theapplied distortional loading is uniformly distributed along a member of constantcross-section which has no diaphragms In this case the distortional loading isresisted solely by the out-of-plane bending rigidity of the plate elements of thesection In non-uniform distortion the distortions vary along the member and theplate elements bend in their planes producing in-plane shear stresses which helpto resist the distortional loading

Perhaps the simplest method of analysing non-uniform distortion is by using ananalogy to the problem [30] of a beam on an elastic foundation (BEF analogy) Inthis analogy which is shown diagrammatically in Figure 1035 the distortional

Q q

Deflection wBeam rigidity EIFoundation modulus kBeam loads Q qBeam momentBeam shear

DistortionIn-plane stiffnessOut-of-plane stiffnessDistortional loadsWarping normal stressWarping shear stress

(c) Analogy

(b) Beam on an elasticfoundation

(a) Elevation of abox section member

Rigiddiaphragm

free towarp

Concentrateddistortional

load

Flexiblediaphragm

Distributeddistortional

load

Rigiddiaphragmwarping

preventedBeamrigidity EI

Foundation modulus kEI d4wdx4 + kw = q

Figure 1035 BEF analogy for box section distortion

Torsion members 471

Distortion deflections

Warping normal stresses

Warping shear stresses

Figure 1036 Warping stresses in non-uniform distortion

loading corresponds to the applied beam loads in the analogy and the out-of-planeresistance of the plate elements corresponds to the stiffness k of the elastic foun-dation while the in-plane resistance of these elements corresponds to the flexuralrigidity EI of the analogous beam The BEF analogy can account for concentratedand distributed distortional loads for rigid diaphragms which either permit orprevent warping and for flexible diaphragms and stiffening rings as indicated inFigure 1035 Many solutions for problems of beams on elastic foundations havebeen obtained [31] and these can be used to find the out-of-plane bending stressesin the plate elements (which are related to the foundation reactions) and the warp-ing and normal shear stresses due to non-uniform distortion (which are relatedto the bending moment and shear force in the beam on the elastic foundation)The distributions of the warping stresses in a rectangular box section are shown inFigure 1036

107 Appendix ndash uniform torsion

1071 Thin-walled closed sections

The shear flow τt t around a thin-walled closed-section member in uniform torsioncan be determined by using the condition that the total change in the warpingdisplacement u around the complete closed section must be zero for continuityThe change in the warping displacement due to the twist rotations φ is equal to

472 Torsion members

minus(dφdx)∮ρ0ds (see Section 10215 and Figure 1013a) while the change in

the warping displacement due to the shear straining of the mid-surface is equal to∮(τtG)ds (see Figures 106 and 1013b) Thus∮

τt

Gds = dφ

dx

∮ρ0ds

The shear flow τt t is constant around the closed section (otherwise the correspond-ing longitudinal shear stresses would not be in equilibrium) while

∮ρ0ds is equal

to twice the area Ae enclosed by the section as shown in Figure 1012b Thus

τt t∮

1

tds = 2GAe

dx (1083)

The moment resultant of the shear flow around the section is equal to the torqueacting and so

Tt =∮τt tρ0ds (1084)

whence

τt t = Tt

2Ae (1020)

Substituting this into equation 1083 leads to

Tt = G4A2

e∮(1t)ds

dx

and so the torsion section constant is

It = 4A2e∮

(1t)ds (1021)

The torsion section constants and the shear flows in multi-cell closed-sectionmembers can be determined by extending this method If the member consists ofn junctions linked by m walls then there are (m minus n + 1) independent cells Thelongitudinal equilibrium conditions require there to be m constant shear flows τt tone for each wall and (n minus 1) junction equations of the typesum

junction

(τt t) = 0 (1085)

There are (m minus n + 1) independent cell warping continuity conditions of the typesumcell

intwall

(τtG)ds = 2Aedφ

dx(1086)

where Ae is the area enclosed by the cell Equations 1085 and 1086 can besolved simultaneously for the m shear flows τt t The total uniform torque Tt can

Torsion members 473

be determined as the torque resultant of these shear flows and the torsion sectionconstant It can then be found from

It = Tt

Gdφdx

1072 Analysis of statically indeterminate members

The uniform torsion of the statically indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1017amay be analysed by taking the left-hand reaction torque T0 as the redundant quan-tity The distribution of torque Tx is therefore as shown in Figure 1017b andequation 108 becomes

GItdφ

dx= T0 minus T 〈x minus a〉0

where the value of the second term is taken as zero when the value inside theMacaulay brackets 〈 〉 is negative

The solution of this equation which satisfies the condition that the angle of twistat the left-hand support is zero is

GItφ = T0x minus T 〈x minus a〉 (1087)

The other condition which must be satisfied is that the angle of twist at the right-hand support must be zero Using this in equation 1087

0 = T0L minus T (L minus a)

and so

T0 = T (L minus a)

L

Thus the maximum torque is T0 when a is less than L2 while the maximum angleof twist rotation occurs at the loaded point and is equal to

φa = Ta(L minus a)

GItL

108 Appendix ndash non-uniform torsion

1081 Warping deflections

When a member twists lines originally parallel to the axis of twist become helicaland any element δx times δs times t of the section wall rotates a0dφdx about the line a0

474 Torsion members

from the shear centre S as shown in Figures 104 and 1022 The increase δu inthe warping displacement of the element is shown in Figure 1023 and is equal to

δu = minusρ0dφ

dxδs

where ρ0 is the perpendicular distance from the shear centre S to the tangent to themid-line of the wall The sign convention for ρ0 is demonstrated in Figure 1016bwhich shows a cross-section viewed by looking in the positive x direction Thevalue of ρ0 is positive when the line a0 from the shear centre rotates in a clockwisesense when the distance s increases which is the case for Figure 1016b Thus thewarping displacement is given by

u = (αn minus α)dφ

dx (1034)

where

α =int s

0ρ0ds (1035)

and the quantity αn is chosen to be

αn = 1

A

int E

0αtds (1036)

so that the average warping displacement of the section is zero

1082 Warping torque and bimoment in an I-section

When an equal flanged I-section member twists φ as shown in Figure 1024a theflanges deflect laterally

vf = df

Thus the flanges may have curvatures

d2vf

dx2= df

2

d2φ

dx2

in opposite directions as for example in the cantilever shown in Figure 101cThese curvatures can be thought of as being produced by the equal and opposite

Torsion members 475

flange bending moments

Mf = EIfd2vf

dx2= EIz

2

df

2

d2φ

dx2

shown in Figure 1024b This pair of equal and opposite flange moments Mf spaced df apart form the bimoment

B = df Mf (1046)

The bending stresses induced by the bimoment are the warping normal stresses

σw = ∓Mf y

If= ∓E

df

2y

d2φ

dx2

shown in Figure 1024b These can also be obtained from equation 1037When the flange moments Mf vary along the member they induce equal and

opposite flange shears

Vf = minusdMf

dx= minusEIz

2

df

2

d3φ

dx3

as shown in Figure 1024b The warping shear stresses

τw = plusmn Vf

bf tf

(15 minus 6y2

b2f

)

(in which bf is the flange width) which are statically equivalent to these shear forcesare also shown in Figure 1024b They can also be obtained from equation 1042

The equal and opposite flange shears Vf are statically equivalent to the warpingtorque

Tw = Vf df = minusEIzd2f

4

d3φ

dx3

If this is compared with equation 1044 it can be deduced that the warping sectionconstant for the I-section is

Iw = Izd2f

4 (1047)

This result can also be obtained from equation 1040

476 Torsion members

1083 Warping torsion analysis of staticallydeterminate members

The twisted shape of a statically determinate member in warping torsion is givenby equation 1049 For example the cantilever shown in Figure 1025a the torqueTx is constant and equal to the applied torque T and so the twisted shape is givenby

minusEIwφ = Tx3

6+ A1x2

2+ A2x + A3 (1088)

The constants of integration A1 A2 and A3 depend on the boundary conditionsAt the support it is assumed that twisting is prevented so that

φ0 = 0

and that warping is also prevented so that (see equation 1034)(dφ

dx

)0

= 0

At the loaded end the member is free to warp (ie the warping normal stresses σw

are zero) so that (see equation 1037)(d2φ

dx2

)L

= 0

By substituting these conditions into equation 1088 the constants of integrationcan be determined as

A1 = minusTL

A2 = 0

A3 = 0

If these are substituted into equation 1088 the complete solution for the twistedshape is obtained as

minusEIwφ = Tx3

6minus TLx2

2

The maximum angle of twist occurs at the loaded end and is equal to

φL = TL3

3EIw

The warping shear stress distribution (see equation 1042) is constant along themember but the maximum warping normal stress (see equation 1037) occurs atthe support where d2φdx2 reaches its highest value

Torsion members 477

1084 Warping torsion analysis of staticallyindeterminate members

The warping torsion of the statically indeterminate beam shown in Figure 1026amay be analysed by taking the left-hand reaction torque T0 as the redundant Thedistribution of torque Tx is then given by (see Figure 1026b)

Tx = T0 minus mx

and equation 1049 becomes

minusEIwφ = T0x3

6minus mx4

24+ A1x2

2+ A2x + A3

After using the boundary conditions φ0 = (dφdx)0 = 0 the constants A2 and A3

are determined as

A2 = A3 = 0

while the condition φL = 0 requires that

A1 = minusT0L

3+ mL2

12

The additional boundary condition is (d2φdx2)L = 0 and so

T0 = 5mL8

Thus the complete solution is

minusEIwφ = m

(minusx4

24+ 5Lx3

48minus L2x2

16

)

The maximum angle of twist occurs near x = 058L and is approximately equal to00054mL4EIw The warping shear stresses are greatest at the left-hand supportwhere the torque Tx has its greatest value of 5mL8 The warping normal stressesare greatest at x = 5L8 where ndash EIwd2φdx2 has its maximum value of 9mL2128

1085 Non-uniform torsion analysis

The twisted shape of a member in non-uniform torsion is given by equation 1054For the example of the cantilever shown in Figure 1028a the torque Tx is constant

478 Torsion members

and equal to the applied torque T In this case a particular integral is

p(x) = Tx

GIt

while the boundary conditions require that

0 = A1 + A2 + A3

0 = T

GIt+ A1

aminus A2

a

0 = A1

a2eLa + A2

a2eminusLa

so that

φ = Tx

GItminus Ta

GIt(1 + eminus2La)

[e(xminus2L)a minus eminusxa + 1 minus eminus2La

]

At the fixed end the uniform torque is zero because dφdx = 0 Because ofthis the torque Tx there is resisted solely by the warping torque and the maximumwarping shear stresses occur at this point The value of d2φdx2 is greatest at thefixed end and therefore the value of the warping normal stress is also greatest thereThe value of dφdx is greatest at the loaded end of the cantilever and therefore thevalue of the shear stress due to uniform torsion is also greatest there The warpingtorque at the loaded end is

TwL = T2eminusLa

1 + eminus2La

which decreases from T to zero as La increases from 0 to infin Thus the warp-ing shear stresses at the loaded end are not zero but are less than those at thefixed end

109 Worked examples

1091 Example 1 ndash approximations for the serviceabilitytwist rotation

Problem The cantilever shown in Figure 1028 is 5 m long and has the propertiesshown in Figure 1037 If the serviceability end torque T is 3 kNm determineapproximate values of the serviceability end twist rotation either by

(a) assuming that the cantilever is in uniform torsion (EIw equiv 0) or(b) assuming that the cantilever is in warping torsion (GIt equiv 0) or(c) using the approximation of equation 1056

Torsion members 479

5175

101

z

yI

E

G

=

=

=

=

w

It

2093156

5331

127radius

Dimensions in mm

533 times 210 UB 92

210 000 Nmm2

81 000 Nmm2

757 cm4

160 dm6

Figure 1037 Examples 1ndash7

Solution

(a) If EIw = 0 then the end twist rotation (see Section 10221) is

φum = TL

GIt= 3 times 106 times 5000

81 000 times 757 times 104= 0245 radians = 140

(b) If GIt = 0 then the end twist rotation is (see Section 10322)

φwm = TL33EIw = 3 times 106 times 50003

3 times 210 000 times 16 times 1012= 0372 radians = 213

(c) Using the results of (a) and (b) above in the approximation of equation 1056

φm = 0245 times 0372

0245 + 0372= 0148 radians = 85

1092 Example 2 ndash serviceability twist rotation

Problem Use the solution obtained in Section 1085 to determine an accuratevalue of the serviceability end twist rotation of the cantilever of example 1

Solution Using equation 1051

a =radic

EIw

GIt=

radic(210 000 times 16 times 1012

81 000 times 757 times 104

)= 2341 mm

Therefore eminus2La = eminus2times50002341 = 001396

480 Torsion members

Using Section 1085

φL = TL

GIt

[1 minus a

L

(1 minus eminus2La)

(1 + eminus2La)

]

= 3times106times5000

81 000times757times104

[1minus2341

5000

(1 minus 001396)

(1 + 001396)

]= 0133 radians = 76

which is about 10 less than the approximate value of 85 obtained inSection 1091c

1093 Example 3 ndash elastic uniform torsion shear stress

Problem For the cantilever of example 2 determine the maximum elastic uniformtorsion shear stress caused by a strength design end torque of 5 kNm

Solution An expression for the nominal maximum elastic uniform torsion shearstress can be obtained by combining equations 108 and 1018 whence

τtmax asymp G

(dφ

dx

)max

tmax

An expression for dφdx can be obtained from the solution for φ inSection 1085 whence

dx= T

GIt

1 minus [e(xminus2L)a + eminusxa]

(1 + eminus2La)

The maximum value of this occurs at the free end x = L and is given by

(dφ

dx

)max

= T

GIt

[1 minus 2eminusLa

(1 + eminus2La)

]

Adapting the solution of example 2

(dφ

dx

)max

= T

GIt

[1 minus 2 times radic

(001396)

101396

]= 0767

T

GIt

Thus

τtmax asymp 0767Ttmax

Itasymp 0767 times 5 times 106 times 156

757 times 104Nmm2 asymp 790 Nmm2

Torsion members 481

This nominal maximum shear stress occurs at the centre of the long edge of theflange A similar value may be calculated for the opposite edge but the actualstresses near this point are increased because of the re-entrant corner at the junctionof the web and flange An approximate estimate of the stress concentration factorcan be made by using Figure 107b with

r

t= 127

156= 081

Thus the actual local maximum stress is approximately τtmax = 17 times 790 =134 Nmm2

1094 Example 4 ndash elastic warping shear and normal stresses

Problem For the cantilever of example 3 determine the maximum elastic warpingshear and normal stresses

Solution The maximum warping shear stress τw occurs at the fixed end (x = 0)of the cantilever (see Section 1085) where the uniform torque is zero Thus thetotal torque there is resisted only by the warping torque and so

Vf = Tdf

where Vf is the flange shear (see Section 1082) The shear stresses in the flangevary parabolically (see Figure 1024b) and so

τwmax = 15 Vf

bf tf

Thus

τwmax = 15 times (5 times 106)5175

2093 times 156Nmm2 = 44 Nmm2

The maximum warping normal stress σw occurs where d2φdx2 is a maximum(see equation 1037) An expression for d2φdx2 can be obtained from the solutionin Section 1085 for φ

whenced2φ

dx2= T

aGIt

[(minuse(xminus2L)a + eminusxa)

(1 + eminus2La)

]

The maximum value of this occurs at the fixed end x = 0 and is given by

(d2φ

dx2

)max

= T

aGIt

(1 minus eminus2La)

(1 + eminus2La)

482 Torsion members

The corresponding maximum warping normal stress (see Section 1082) is

σwmax = Edf bf

2 times 2

(d2φ

dx2

)max

= 210 000 times 5175 times 2093 times 5 times 106

2 times 2 times 2341 times 81 000 times 757 times 104times (1 minus 001396)

(1 + 001396)Nmm2

= 1926 Nmm2

1095 Example 5 ndash first yield design torque capacity

Problem If the cantilever of example 2 has a yield stress of 275 Nmm2 then useSection 1047 to determine the torque resistance which is consistent with EC3 anda first yield strength criterion

Solution In this case the maximum uniform torsion shear and warping torsionshear and normal stresses occur either at different points along the cantilever orelse at different points around the cross-section Because of this each stress maybe considered separately

For first yield in uniform torsion equation 1079 is equivalent to

τtτy le 1

in which τy asymp 275radic

3 = 159 Nmm2 Thus

τtmax le 159 Nmm2

Using Section 1093 a design torque of T = 5 kNm causes a maximum shear stressof τtmax = 790 Nmm2 if the stress concentration at the flangendashweb-junction isignored Thus the design uniform torsion torque resistance is

Tt = 5 times 159790 = 1005 kNm

The maximum warping shear stress τwmax caused by a design torque ofT = 5 kNm (see Section 1094) is 44 Nmm2 which is much less than the corre-sponding maximum uniform torsion shear stress τtmax = 790 Nmm2 Becauseof this the design torque resistance is not limited by the warping shear stress

For first yield in warping torsion equation 1079 reduces to

σwfy le 1

Thus

σwmax le 275 Nmm2

Using Section 1094 a design torque of T = 5 kNm causes a design warpingnormal stress of σwmax = 1926 Nmm2 Thus the design warping torsion torque

Torsion members 483

resistance is

Tw = 5 times 2751926 = 714 kNm

This is less than the value of 1005 kNm determined for uniform torsion and sothe design torque resistance is 714 kNm

1096 Example 6 ndash plastic collapse analysis

Problem Determine the plastic collapse torque of the cantilever of example 5

Uniform torsion plastic collapseUsing equation 1029

Ttp = (2 times 2093 times 15622 + (5331 minus 2 times 156)times 10122

)times 159 Nmm = 1215 kNm

Using Figure 1020 αtT = Ttp = 1215 kNm

Warping torsion plastic collapse

Using equation 1060 Mfp = 275 times 20932 times 1564 Nmm = 4698 kNmUsing Figure 1020 αwT = Mfpdf L = 4698 times 51755000 = 486 kNm

Non-uniform torsion plastic collapse

Using equation 1064 αxT = 1215 + 486 = 1701 kNm

1097 Example 7 ndash plastic design

Problem Determine the plastic design torque capacity of the cantilever ofexample 5

Section classification Using equation 1065

tf = 156 mm fy = 275 Nmm2

ε = radic(235275) = 0924

cf (tf ε) = (20932 minus 1012 minus 127)(156 times 0924) = 60 lt 9

and so the section is Class 1 and plastic design can be used

Plastic design torque resistance

Using the result of section 1096 T = 1701 kNmwhich is significantly higher than the first yield design torque resistance of714 kNm determined in Section 1095

484 Torsion members

1 0 0

1 2 6

6

6

8 2 7 6 61 54200

20

20

10

L2 L4 L4

mL 4m

L L= = 00 0= = 0

S C150 500

(c)(b) Channel Statically indeterminatebeam

section(a) Box section

Figure 1038 Examples 8ndash13

1010 Unworked examples

10101 Example 8 ndash uniform torsion of a box section

Determine the torsion section constant It for the box section shown inFigure 1038a and find the maximum elastic shear stress caused by a uniformtorque of 10 kNm

10102 Example 9 ndash warping torsion section constant of achannel section

Determine the warping torsion section constant Iw for the channel section shownin Figure 1038b

10103 Example 10 ndash approximation for the maximumtwist rotation

The steel beam shown in Figure 1038c is 5 m long has the cross-section shownin Figure 1038b and a torque per unit length of m = 1000 Nmm Determineapproximate values of the maximum angle of twist rotation by assuming

(a) that the beam is in uniform torsion (EIw equiv 0) or(b) that the beam is in warping torsion (GIt equiv 0) or(c) the approximation of equation 1056

10104 Example 11 ndash accurate twist rotation

If the steel beam shown in Figure 1026 is 5 m long and has the cross-sectionshown in Figure 1038b determine an accurate value for the maximum angle oftwist rotation

Torsion members 485

10105 Example 12 ndash elastic stresses

Use the solutions of examples 9 and 11 to determine

(a) the maximum nominal uniform torsion shear stress(b) the maximum warping shear stress and(c) the maximum warping normal stress

10106 Example 13 ndash design

Determine the maximum design torque per unit length that should be permitted onthe beam of examples 11 and 12 if the beam has a yield stress of fy = 275 Nmm2

References

1 Kollbrunner CF and Basler K (1969) Torsion in Structures 2nd edition Springer-Verlag Berlin

2 Timoshenko SP and Goodier JN (1970) Theory of Elasticity 3rd edition McGraw-Hill New York

3 El Darwish IA and Johnston BG (1965) Torsion of structural shapes Journal ofthe Structural Division ASCE 91 No ST1 pp 203ndash27

4 Davison B and Owens GW (eds) (2005) Steel Designersrsquo Manual 6th editionBlackwell Scientific Publications Oxford

5 Terrington JS (1968) Combined bending and torsion of beams and girders Publica-tion 31 (First Part) British Construction Steelwork Association London

6 Nethercot DA Salter PR and Malik AS (1989) Design of members subject tocombined bending and torsion SCI Publication 057 The Steel Construction InstituteAscot

7 Hancock GJ and Harrison HB (1972) A general method of analysis of stressesin thin-walled sections with open and closed parts Civil Engineering TransactionsInstitution of Engineers Australia CE14 No 2 pp 181ndash8

8 Papangelis JP and Hancock GJ (1975) THIN-WALL ndash Cross Section Analysis andFinite Strip Buckling Analysis of Thin-walled Structures ndash Users Manual Centre forAdvanced Structural Engineering University of Sydney

9 Von Karman T and Chien W-Z (1946) Torsion with variable twist Journal of theAeronautical Sciences 13 No 10 pp 503ndash10

10 Smith FA Thomas FM and Smith J0 (1970) Torsion analysis of heavy box beamsin structures Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 96 No ST3 pp 613ndash35

11 Galambos TV (1968) Structural Members and Frames Prentice-Hall EnglewoodCliffs New Jersey

12 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1972) Elastic stability of tapered I-beams Journalof the Structural Division ASCE 98 No ST3 pp 713ndash28

13 Kitipornchai S and Trahair NS (1975) Elastic behaviour of tapered monosymmetricI-beams Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 101 No ST8 pp 1661ndash78

14 Vlasov VZ (1961) Thin-walled Elastic Beams 2nd edition Israel Program forScientific Translations Jerusalem

15 Zbirohowski-Koscia K (1967) Thin-walled Beams Crosby Lockwood and Son LtdLondon

486 Torsion members

16 Piaggio HTH (1962) Differential Equations 3rd edition G Bell London17 Trahair NS and Pi Y-L (1996) Simplified torsion design of compact I-beams Steel

Construction Australian Institute of Steel Construction 30 No 1 pp 2ndash1918 Trahair NS (1999) Plastic torsion analysis of mono- and point-symmetric beams

Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 125 No 2 pp 175ndash8219 Dinno KS and Merchant W (1965)Aprocedure for calculating the plastic collapse of

I-sections under bending and torsion The Structural Engineer 43 No 7 pp 219ndash22120 Farwell CR and Galambos TV (1969) Non-uniform torsion of steel beams in

inelastic range Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 95 No ST12 pp 2813ndash2921 Aalberg A (1995) An experimental study of beam-columns subjected to combined

torsion bending and axial actions Dring thesis Department of Civil EngineeringNorwegian Institute of Technology Trondheim

22 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1995) Inelastic torsion of steel I-beams Journal of StructuralEngineering ASCE 121 No 4 pp 609ndash20

23 Trahair NS (2005) Non-linear elastic non-uniform torsion Journal of StructuralEngineering ASCE 131 No 7 pp 1135ndash42

24 British Standards Institution (2006) Eurocode 3 ndash Design of Steel Structures ndash Part1ndash5 Plated structural elements BSI London

25 Pi YL and Trahair NS (1994) Inelastic bending and torsion of steel I-beams Journalof Structural Engineering ASCE 120 No 12 pp 3397ndash417

26 Subcommittee on Box Girders of the ASCE-AASHO Task Committee on Flexu-ral Members (1971) Progress report on steel box bridges Journal of the StructuralDivision ASCE 97 No ST4 pp 1175ndash86

27 Vacharajittiphan P and Trahair NS (1974) Warping and distortion at I-section jointsJournal of the Structural Division ASCE 100 No ST3 pp 547ndash64

28 Goodier JN and Barton MV (1944) The effects of web deformation on the torsionof I-beams Journal of Applied Mechanics ASME 2 pp A-35ndashA-40

29 Kubo GG Johnston BG and Eney WJ (1956) Non-uniform torsion of plategirders Transactions ASCE 121 pp 759ndash85

30 Wright RN Abdel-Samad SR and Robinson AR (1968) BEF analogy for analysisof box girders Journal of the Structural Division ASCE 94 No ST7 pp 1719ndash43

31 Hetenyi M (1946) Beams on Elastic Foundations University of Michigan Press

Index

amplification 69 299 306 307 312 320352 362 367 467

analysis 3 5 6 21ndash4 351ndash66 advanced24 364ndash6 371 distortion 469ndash71dynamic 19 elastic first-order 22 23156 157 352 353 369 second-order24 361ndash3 372 elastic buckling 2451ndash4 67ndash73 74ndash9 83ndash9 228ndash30 241245ndash9 251 263ndash5 268ndash71 273ndash5353ndash61 in-plane 352ndash66 joint 401ndash3405 420ndash3 plastic first-order 24175ndash82 302ndash4 363 second-order seeanalysis advanced preliminary 6 23sub-assemblage 365 torsionnon-uniform 449ndash61 473ndash8 plastic447ndash9 458ndash61 uniform 445ndash7 454471ndash3 warping 455ndash7

area effective 38 44 63ndash5 126ndash8gross section 36 37 42ndash4 63ndash5 netsection 36ndash9 42ndash4 reducedsection 38

aspect ratio 103 104 107 115119 125

axis principal 157ndash63 190ndash5axis of twist 78 88 437 443 452

beam 1 154ndash226 227ndash94 built-in 179182 198ndash202 continuous 256ndash61hot-rolled 229 238 243monosymmetric 263ndash6non-uniform 266 stepped 266tapered 266 welded 229 238

beam-column 295ndash346beam-tie 39 44 347bearing 124ndash6 138 bolt 392 410ndash13

plate 124ndash6 415BEF analogy 470

behaviour 14ndash17 brittle 13 15dynamic 18ndash19 elastic 8 22 2333 155 inelastic 15 55ndash61 81 82175 237ndash40 305 316ndash18 in-plane154ndash226 296ndash311 323ndash6 347 350ndash66400ndash6 420ndash2 interaction 16 256ndash61351 467 joint 398ndash411 linear 14ndash1633 349 351ndash3 material 8ndash14 55ndash61member 14 15 non-linear geometrical54 79ndash81 234ndash7 272ndash3 296ndash302361ndash3 material 15 16 24 58 175ndash82296 304ndash7 363ndash6 447ndash9 458ndash61out-of-plane 227ndash94 311ndash19 326ndash8369ndash72 post-buckling 100 109ndash12117ndash18 structure 15ndash17 347ndash51

bending 37ndash40 54 79 118ndash24 154ndash226234ndash7 272 biaxial 159 191 295319ndash21 466

bimoment 453ndash4 plastic 458ndash60 464blunder 26bolt 2 392 396ndash402 410ndash14 bearing

410ndash13 preloaded friction-grip 393396 400 413ndash14

bracing 67 73 83 87 186 188 247ndash9256ndash61 467ndash9

brittle fracture 13buckling flexural 15 50ndash99

flexural-torsional 76ndash8 88 89 227ndash94295 311ndash19 326ndash8 369ndash72 frame353ndash61 369ndash71 inelastic 55ndash61 81ndash2108 237ndash40 316 lateral see bucklingflexural-torsional lateral-torsional seebuckling flexural-torsional local 1563 64 100ndash53 184 462ndash4 465torsional 76ndash8 88 89

buckling coefficient 103ndash8 114 119ndash21125 139ndash41

buckling length see effective length

488 Index

cantilever 179 253ndash5 271 455 457 477propped 182 202ndash5

capacity see resistancecentroid 37 168ndash70 192circular hollow section 45 128 463cleat 392 393 407 408cold working 8component method of design 401 403 404compression member 50ndash99compression resistance curve 62connection see jointconnector 392ndash4 combination of 400crack 9 13critical stress see stress bucklingcrookedness 35 54 61 79 100 112

234ndash7 272 307ndash9 324curvature initial see crookedness major

axis 230

defect 10 13deflection 4 25 30 39 54 79 154 156

163 189 190 296ndash9 323ndash6 352 361deflection limit 189depth-thickness ratio 115 121design 3ndash7 24ndash30 elastic 183ndash7 frame

348 366ndash9 371 limit states 25 28plastic 184 368 464 468 semi-rigid351 serviceability 189 369 465simple 350 stiffness 25 30strength 27ndash9 beam 183ndash9 240ndash5beam-column 309ndash11 318 321ndash3brittle fracture 13 compressionmember 62ndash4 74ndash8 fatigue 9ndash13frame 348 366ndash9 371 plate 126ndash39414ndash17 tension member 42ndash5 torsionmember 461ndash6 ultimate load 27working stress 27

design by buckling analysis 74 241design code 7 27design criterion 24design process 4ndash7design requirements 3 4destabilizing load 231ndash3 torsion 466diaphragm 469dispersion 126 139distortion 253 469ndash71ductility 8 13 34 175

effective area 126effective length beam 245ndash52 258ndash61

273 beam-column 315 327compression member 63 65ndash74 83 86frame 353ndash61

effective width local buckling 111 121129 130 shear lag 174

elasticity 8endurance limit 10example beam 205ndash25 273ndash91

beam-column 329ndash44 compressionmember 89ndash98 frame 373ndash88joint 423ndash31 tension member 45ndash9thin-plate element 141ndash52 torsionmember 478ndash85

fabrication 14 154 393 406factor of safety 27fastener see connectorfatigue 9ndash13fracture 34 36 brittle 13frame 15 347ndash91 advanced analysis 24

364ndash6 design 366ndash9 371 372 elasticbuckling 24 353ndash61 first-orderanalysis 23 352 flexural 350ndash73pin-jointed 348 350 plastic analysis24 352 363 rigid 74 261ndash3 351ndash72second-order analysis 24 361 362semi-rigid 351 serviceability 369statically determinate 22 348 350statically indeterminate 23 349three-dimensional 372 triangulated348 349 two-dimensional 350ndash72

friction coefficient 413

gauge 37gusset 395

hole 35ndash7 41 42

impact 14 18imperfection geometrical see twist

initial material 10 13 56ndash61237ndash40

interaction bearing and tension 414ndash15compression and bending 131 295ndash346shear and bending 121ndash4 137 shearand tension 412 413 416 tension andbending 39 44

interaction behaviour see behaviourinteraction

joint 392ndash432 angle cleat 408 angleseat 407 base plate 410 beamseat 410 bolted moment end plate 409bolted splice 409ndash10 eccentric 37ndash944 fin plate 408 flexible endplate 408ndash9 force 396 398 force and

Index 489

moment 397ndash8 405 moment 397400ndash5 pin 393 preloadedfriction-grip 393 396 399 400 413rivet 394 web side plate 408 weldedmoment 408ndash9 welded splice 409

joint flexibility 399 404

limit state 25 28 30load combination 20 dead 17 design

effect 28 design resistance 28dynamic 18 19 earth or ground-water19 earthquake 19 impact 13 18imposed 18 indirect 20 intermediate76 nominal 27 patch 125 repeated18 snow 18 squash 50 60 82 topflange 233 254 wind 19

load effect 28load factor 20 27 28load sharing 399loading code 6

maximum distortion energy theory 9 122414 418

mechanism 156 175 178ndash82 198ndash205351 363 368 449 459 462 464

mechanism method 180 198ndash205member non-uniform 76 266

structural 1ndash2membrane analogy 436 440 444Minerrsquos rule 12modulus effective elastic 56 108

effective section 130 185 elasticsection 130 185 plastic section 130176 185 198 245 reduced 56 81shear 14 170 230 312 313 316 326439 strain-hardening 8 59 108 237tangent 55 237 Youngrsquos 8 14

monosymmetry property 263ndash5 275

non-linear behaviour see behaviournon-linear

partial factor 21 28pin 392 393plastic hinge 154 175ndash82 188 363

449 459plastic moment 130 175ndash82 188 197

363 459plastic uniform torque 447 463plate 395 396 401 405 407 408 409

410 414ndash17plate assembly 107 120Poissonrsquos ratio 103 114 119 125 140

principal axes 157ndash63 190ndash5probability 9 20 28product second moment of area 159 191ndash5prying force 403

redistribution post-buckling 109ndash12 117121 yielding 34 38 41 126175ndash82 364

residual stress see stress residualresistance bearing 138 187 biaxial

bending 321ndash3 bimoment 464bolt 410ndash14 bolted plate 414ndash17compression 62 74ndash8 126ndash32concentrated load 124ndash6 138 factor27 in-plane 309ndash11 member 45 64130 131 185 242ndash5 310 moment183ndash6 242ndash5 309ndash11 318out-of-plane 240ndash5 317ndash19 section42 44 126 130 131 185 243 245309 shear 133ndash8 186 uniformtorsion 463 weld 417ndash20

restraint end 65 67ndash73 85ndash7 250ndash3 255256ndash62 273 315 327 intermediate 6783 247ndash9 lateral buckling 186 188minor axis rotation 250 251 256ndash62273 315 327 rigid 65 245 twist 250252 warping 250 251 256ndash62 273315 327

restraint stiffness 67ndash71 73 84 85 247ndash9251ndash3 256ndash63 273 315 327

return period 19rigidity flexural 52 82 230 torsional 77

89 230 268 433 warping 77 89 230268 433

rigid-plastic assumption 176 178rivet 392 394rotation capacity 368 405

safety 4 26 27safety index 28sand heap analogy 447second moment of area 156 157 191ndash5section asymmetric 77 198 Class 1 126

128 131 184 187 188 309 462ndash5Class 2 126 128 131 184 187 188309 462ndash5 Class 3 126 128 131 184462ndash5 Class 4 126 128 131 184462ndash5 closed 170ndash2 196 433 442ndash5monosymmetric 77 263ndash6 274open 164ndash70 196 433 440 rectangular164 439 448 rolled 1 58 237 solid 1195 438 thin-walled 1 191ndash5 196welded 238

490 Index

serviceability 4 25 30 189 369 413 465settlement 20 157Shanleyrsquos theory 58shear 113ndash24 133ndash8 163ndash75 186 187

195ndash7 bolt 393 396 399 410 411412 plate 416

shear and bending 121ndash4 137shear and tension 412 416shear centre 168 452shear flow 164ndash7 196 442ndash4shear lag 38 172ndash5slenderness compression member 53 55

62 66 75 flange 111 126ndash9 plate104 116 126ndash9 web 126ndash9

slip 396 399 401 413Southwell plot 54 235splice 396 397 398 406 409squash load see load squashstagger 36statical method 181 200stiffener 105 106 115 117 119 123 124

126 132 135 137 139 187 188stiffness see restraint stiffnessstrain 8 33 158 170 437 443 453strain-hardening 8 35 36 58 108 113

176 237strength 27ndash30 beam 183ndash7 188 240ndash5

266 267 beam-column 309ndash11 318321ndash3 bolt 410ndash14 bolted plate414ndash17 compression member 64 7476 frame 366ndash9 371 local buckling126ndash39 tensile 8 34 36 42 43 tensionmember 42ndash5 torsion member 461ndash5468 469 weld 417ndash20 see alsoresistance

strength limit state 20 28stress bending 157ndash63 190 buckling 53

103 109 111 113 117 119 122 124134 normal 8 permissible 27residual 33 58 61 82 112 155 237239 shear 9 113ndash18 121ndash4 133 136137 163ndash75 186 195ndash7 411 412 416417ndash20 436ndash44 451 454 458 460462 471 475 476 477 478 shearyield 9 114 116 133 186 411 417447 463 ultimate tensile see strengthtensile warping normal 417 449 453458 460 462 yield 8 34 50 104 154236 301 414 458

stress concentration 10 13 33 37 40 442stress raiser 13stress range 10structure statically determinate 22 348

350 statically indeterminate 23 349352 steel 1

tension bolt 393 411 412 plate 414ndash17tension field 117 134 135 136tension member 33ndash49torque see torsiontorsion 433ndash86 non-uniform 433

449ndash61 uniform 433 436ndash49 463warping 433 449ndash57

torsion member 1 433torsion section constant 438 440 441 443twist 76ndash8 88 227 228 239 246 250

252 268ndash73 275 311 326 369433ndash86 initial 234ndash7 272

unbuttoning connection 349uncertainty 25 27 401

vibration 19 30 189virtual work method 201 205

warping 170 173 197 230 268 433 436442ndash4 449ndash61

warping section constant 312 326 328433 453 455

web 116ndash18 122ndash6 128ndash39 165 172186 187 188 397

weld 392 394 397 400 403 407 408409 410 421 423 butt 394 417fillet 394 417ndash19

wind load see load windwind pressure dynamic 19wind speed basic 19

yield 8 beam 175ndash82 184 185 186 197234ndash9 272 beam-column 300ndash9 316324 compression member 54ndash6079ndash82 frame 363 plate 101 104 106108 112 114 117 119 121 122 125126 129 131 137 138 414 tensionmember 34 35 39 40 42 torsionmember 447ndash9 458ndash61 461ndash5467 468

  • Book Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Units and conversion factors
  • Glossary of terms
  • Notations
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
  • Chapter 2 Tension members
  • Chapter 3 Compression members
  • Chapter 4 Local buckling of thin-plate elements
  • Chapter 5 In-plane bending of beams
  • Chapter 6 Lateral buckling of beams
  • Chapter 7 Beam-columns
  • Chapter 8 Frames
  • Chapter 9 Joints
  • Chapter 10 Torsion members
  • Index
Page 4: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 5: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 6: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 7: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 8: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 9: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 10: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 11: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 12: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 13: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 14: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 15: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 16: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 17: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 18: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 19: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 20: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 21: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 22: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 23: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 24: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 25: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 26: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 27: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 28: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 29: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 30: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 31: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 32: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 33: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 34: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 35: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 36: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 37: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 38: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 39: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 40: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 41: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 42: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 43: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 44: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 45: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 46: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 47: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 48: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 49: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 50: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 51: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 52: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 53: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 54: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 55: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 56: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 57: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 58: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 59: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 60: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 61: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 62: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 63: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 64: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 65: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 66: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 67: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 68: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 69: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 70: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 71: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 72: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 73: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 74: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 75: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 76: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 77: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 78: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 79: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 80: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 81: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 82: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 83: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 84: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 85: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 86: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 87: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 88: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 89: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 90: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 91: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 92: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 93: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 94: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 95: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 96: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 97: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 98: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 99: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 100: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 101: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 102: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 103: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 104: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 105: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 106: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 107: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 108: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 109: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 110: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 111: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 112: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 113: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 114: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 115: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 116: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 117: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 118: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 119: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 120: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 121: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 122: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 123: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 124: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 125: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 126: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 127: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 128: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 129: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 130: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 131: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 132: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 133: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 134: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 135: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 136: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 137: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 138: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 139: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 140: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 141: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 142: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 143: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 144: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 145: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 146: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 147: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 148: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 149: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 150: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 151: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 152: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 153: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 154: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 155: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 156: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 157: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 158: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 159: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 160: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 161: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 162: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 163: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 164: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 165: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 166: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 167: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 168: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 169: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 170: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 171: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 172: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 173: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 174: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 175: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 176: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 177: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 178: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 179: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 180: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 181: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 182: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 183: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 184: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 185: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 186: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 187: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 188: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 189: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 190: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 191: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 192: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 193: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 194: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 195: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 196: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 197: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 198: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 199: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 200: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 201: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 202: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 203: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 204: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 205: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 206: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 207: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 208: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 209: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 210: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 211: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 212: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 213: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 214: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 215: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 216: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 217: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 218: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 219: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 220: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 221: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 222: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 223: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 224: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 225: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 226: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 227: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 228: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 229: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 230: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 231: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 232: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 233: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 234: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 235: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 236: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 237: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 238: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 239: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 240: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 241: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 242: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 243: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 244: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 245: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 246: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 247: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 248: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 249: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 250: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 251: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 252: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 253: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 254: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 255: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 256: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 257: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 258: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 259: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 260: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 261: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 262: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 263: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 264: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 265: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 266: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 267: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 268: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 269: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 270: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 271: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 272: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 273: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 274: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 275: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 276: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 277: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 278: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 279: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 280: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 281: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 282: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 283: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 284: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 285: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 286: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 287: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 288: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 289: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 290: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 291: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 292: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 293: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 294: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 295: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 296: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 297: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 298: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 299: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 300: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 301: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 302: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 303: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 304: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 305: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 306: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 307: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 308: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 309: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 310: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 311: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 312: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 313: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 314: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 315: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 316: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 317: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 318: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 319: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 320: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 321: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 322: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 323: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 324: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 325: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 326: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 327: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 328: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 329: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 330: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 331: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 332: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 333: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 334: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 335: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 336: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 337: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 338: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 339: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 340: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 341: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 342: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 343: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 344: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 345: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 346: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 347: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 348: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 349: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 350: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 351: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 352: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 353: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 354: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 355: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 356: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 357: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 358: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 359: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 360: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 361: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 362: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 363: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 364: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 365: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 366: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 367: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 368: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 369: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 370: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 371: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 372: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 373: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 374: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 375: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 376: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 377: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 378: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 379: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 380: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 381: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 382: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 383: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 384: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 385: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 386: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 387: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 388: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 389: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 390: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 391: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 392: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 393: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 394: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 395: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 396: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 397: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 398: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 399: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 400: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 401: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 402: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 403: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 404: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 405: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 406: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 407: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 408: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 409: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 410: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 411: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 412: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 413: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 414: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 415: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 416: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 417: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 418: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 419: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 420: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 421: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 422: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 423: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 424: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 425: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 426: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 427: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 428: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 429: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 430: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 431: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 432: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 433: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 434: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 435: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 436: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 437: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 438: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 439: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 440: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 441: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 442: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 443: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 444: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 445: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 446: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 447: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 448: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 449: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 450: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 451: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 452: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 453: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 454: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 455: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 456: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 457: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 458: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 459: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 460: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 461: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 462: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 463: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 464: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 465: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 466: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 467: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 468: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 469: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 470: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 471: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 472: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 473: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 474: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 475: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 476: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 477: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 478: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 479: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 480: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 481: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 482: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 483: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 484: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 485: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 486: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 487: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 488: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 489: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 490: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 491: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 492: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 493: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 494: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 495: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 496: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 497: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 498: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 499: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 500: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 501: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 502: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 503: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 504: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 505: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 506: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 507: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 508: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 509: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 510: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 511: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 512: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3
Page 513: The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3