the battle for mindshare

27
The Battle for The Battle for Mindshare Mindshare A Battle Beyond Access and A Battle Beyond Access and Retrieval Retrieval Dr. John J. Regazzi Miles Conrad Lecture NFAIS Conference 2004

Upload: alva

Post on 07-Jan-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Battle for Mindshare. A Battle Beyond Access and Retrieval. Dr. John J. Regazzi Miles Conrad Lecture NFAIS Conference 2004. Battle for Mindshare. The Context The ‘Shifting Sands’ What Way Forward. THE CONTEXT. Information Supply Chain. Information Supply Chain Historical. AUTHORS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Battle for Mindshare

The Battle for Mindshare The Battle for Mindshare

A Battle Beyond Access and RetrievalA Battle Beyond Access and Retrieval

Dr. John J. Regazzi Miles Conrad Lecture

NFAIS Conference 2004

Page 2: The Battle for Mindshare

Battle for MindshareBattle for Mindshare

The ContextThe Context

The ‘Shifting Sands’The ‘Shifting Sands’

What Way ForwardWhat Way Forward

Page 3: The Battle for Mindshare

3

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain HistoricalInformation Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain Historical

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

AUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORS

PUBLISHERSPUBLISHERSPUBLISHERSPUBLISHERS

LIBRARIESLIBRARIESLIBRARIESLIBRARIES

READERSREADERSREADERSREADERS

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain

Page 4: The Battle for Mindshare

4

Information Supply Chain Information Supply Chain Early Online ImpactInformation Supply Chain Information Supply Chain Early Online Impact

AUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORS

PUBLISHERSPUBLISHERSPUBLISHERSPUBLISHERS

LIBRARIESLIBRARIESLIBRARIESLIBRARIES

READERSREADERSREADERSREADERS

A&I SERVICES, A&I SERVICES, ONLINE ONLINE

VENDORSVENDORS

A&I SERVICES, A&I SERVICES, ONLINE ONLINE

VENDORSVENDORS

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

Page 5: The Battle for Mindshare

5

A simple information “supply chain” A simple information “supply chain”

has been transformed into a complex has been transformed into a complex information network…information network…

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain

Page 6: The Battle for Mindshare

6

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain TodayInformation Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain Today

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

LOCAL SYSTEMS DDS, LOCAL SYSTEMS DDS, SILVER PLATTERSILVER PLATTER

LOCAL SYSTEMS DDS, LOCAL SYSTEMS DDS, SILVER PLATTERSILVER PLATTER

AUTHORSAUTHORS

PUBLISHERSPUBLISHERS

READERSREADERS

SECONDARY SECONDARY PUBLISHINGPUBLISHINGSECONDARY SECONDARY PUBLISHINGPUBLISHING

ONLINE VENDORS ONLINE VENDORS DIALOG,DIALOG,STN, LNSTN, LN

ONLINE VENDORS ONLINE VENDORS DIALOG,DIALOG,STN, LNSTN, LN

INFORMATION INTERMEDIARIESINFORMATION INTERMEDIARIESINFORMATION INTERMEDIARIESINFORMATION INTERMEDIARIES

LIBRARIESLIBRARIESKNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE

MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSSYSTEMS

NATIONAL/REGIONAL NATIONAL/REGIONAL CONSORTIACONSORTIA

CORPORATE CORPORATE INFORMATION INFORMATION

SERVICESSERVICES

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain

DOCUMENT DELIVERY DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICESSERVICES

DOCUMENT DELIVERY DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICESSERVICES

NEW ONLINE NEW ONLINE PORTALSPORTALS

WEB PORTALS WEB PORTALS GOOGLEGOOGLE

NEW ONLINE NEW ONLINE PORTALSPORTALS

WEB PORTALS WEB PORTALS GOOGLEGOOGLE

eBOOK, eJOURNALSeBOOK, eJOURNALSPREPRINT SERVERSPREPRINT SERVERS

CONTENT CONTENT AGGREGATORSAGGREGATORS

eBOOK, eJOURNALSeBOOK, eJOURNALSPREPRINT SERVERSPREPRINT SERVERS

CONTENT CONTENT AGGREGATORSAGGREGATORS

SYNDICATORS & SYNDICATORS & FACTIVA AGENTSFACTIVA AGENTSSYNDICATORS & SYNDICATORS & FACTIVA AGENTSFACTIVA AGENTS

OPEN OPEN ACCESACCES

SS

Page 7: The Battle for Mindshare

7

A simple information “supply chain” A simple information “supply chain”

has been transformed into a (perhaps too) has been transformed into a (perhaps too) complex information network …complex information network …

How did this happen?How did this happen?

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain

Page 8: The Battle for Mindshare

8

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

What Happened?What Happened?

Significant A&I Industry Significant A&I Industry GrowthGrowth

Significant A&I Industry Significant A&I Industry GrowthGrowth

Discovery & Access Systems Discovery & Access Systems GrowthGrowth

Discovery & Access Systems Discovery & Access Systems GrowthGrowth

Directory Data Directory Data ExpansionExpansion

Directory Data Directory Data ExpansionExpansion

Technology Technology ExplosionExplosion

Technology Technology ExplosionExplosion

Or Did Or Did It ?It ?

Page 9: The Battle for Mindshare

9

Information Technology CostsInformation Technology Costs 1972 vs. 2003$ per million transactions

Information Technology CostsInformation Technology Costs 1972 vs. 2003$ per million transactions

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

5000

.001

2500

1000

0

4500

9000Storage Characters

TelecommunicationsCharacters NY - LA

CPU PowerInstructions

1972 2003

Explosion of TechnologyExplosion of Technology

Page 10: The Battle for Mindshare

10

Refereed Academic Journal GrowthRefereed Academic Journal Growth 1900-2000 Number of JournalsRefereed Academic Journal GrowthRefereed Academic Journal Growth 1900-2000 Number of Journals

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

100

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

4.7%4.7%4.7%4.7%

3.3%3.3%3.3%3.3%

3.3%3.3%3.3%3.3%

Growth of DataGrowth of Data

Page 11: The Battle for Mindshare

11

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

Number of DatabasesNumber of DatabasesNumber of DatabasesNumber of Databases

1972 1992 2003

78,000

20,000 est.

Records in DatabasesRecords in DatabasesRecords in DatabasesRecords in Databases

1972 1982 1992 2003

2 M 5.2 M4.5 BN

10 BN est.

Growth of DatabasesGrowth of Databases

122122% 10YR % 10YR Growth RateGrowth Rate122122% 10YR % 10YR Growth RateGrowth Rate

150150% 10YR % 10YR Growth RateGrowth Rate150150% 10YR % 10YR Growth RateGrowth Rate

Page 12: The Battle for Mindshare

12

STM A&I Global RevenuesSTM A&I Global Revenues1972-20031972-2003STM A&I Global RevenuesSTM A&I Global Revenues1972-20031972-2003

Adjusted figures show that the A&I market is Adjusted figures show that the A&I market is shrinkingshrinking in overall size.in overall size.

THE CONTEXTTHE CONTEXT

1972 1982 1992 2003

$200M

$830M

- 5% Market Growth- 5% Market Growthsince 1999since 1999

- 5% Market Growth- 5% Market Growthsince 1999since 1999

1999Note: 0-1% growth in constant dollar

Growth of the A&I MarketGrowth of the A&I Market

$1BN5.35.3% Annual % Annual GrowthGrowth

5.35.3% Annual % Annual GrowthGrowth

Page 13: The Battle for Mindshare

13

What Shifts?What Shifts? University Infrastructure SpendingUniversity Infrastructure Spending A&I Production, Coverage and FocusA&I Production, Coverage and Focus Scientists’ and Researchers’ Search PatternsScientists’ and Researchers’ Search Patterns Early Shifts in Access ModelsEarly Shifts in Access Models Shifts in MindshareShifts in Mindshare

And why ...?And why ...? With what has commonly been known as the information explosion …With what has commonly been known as the information explosion … With the revolution of information technology fully engaged …With the revolution of information technology fully engaged … With full acceptance, access and use of the technologies now in full With full acceptance, access and use of the technologies now in full

force …force … Why is the Information Access Market Why is the Information Access Market notnot growing but in growing but in

decline?decline?

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

Shifting SandsShifting Sands

Page 14: The Battle for Mindshare

14

Research & Library Spending GrowthResearch & Library Spending Growth1975-1995Index

Research & Library Spending GrowthResearch & Library Spending Growth1975-1995Index

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

US TotalAcademic R&D

Avg ARLLibraryExpenditure

University Infrastructure SpendingUniversity Infrastructure Spending

4.6% CAGR

2.2% CAGR

Page 15: The Battle for Mindshare

15

Library Expenditures as a Percent of University ExpendituresLibrary Expenditures as a Percent of University Expenditures40 ARL Libraries, 1982-2000%

Library Expenditures as a Percent of University ExpendituresLibrary Expenditures as a Percent of University Expenditures40 ARL Libraries, 1982-2000%

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

2.5

2.7

2.9

3.1

3.3

3.5

3.7

3.9

1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000

University Infrastructure SpendingUniversity Infrastructure Spending

Page 16: The Battle for Mindshare

16

Expenditures at (Private) US University AExpenditures at (Private) US University AExpenditures at (Private) US University AExpenditures at (Private) US University A

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

Serials 0.2%

Monographs 0.1%

Other Materials 0.1%

Salaries & Wages 0.6%

Binding 0.0%

Other 0.3%

Academic Support 63.0%

Other 37.5%

Library 1.3%

University Infrastructure SpendingUniversity Infrastructure Spending

Page 17: The Battle for Mindshare

17

A&I Production & CoverageA&I Production & Coverage

Shifting SandsShifting Sands

Creation of inefficient market Creation of inefficient market where library pays multiple times where library pays multiple times for same record, plus (often) for same record, plus (often) increase distribution markupsincrease distribution markups

Shifting SandsShifting Sands

Creation of inefficient market Creation of inefficient market where library pays multiple times where library pays multiple times for same record, plus (often) for same record, plus (often) increase distribution markupsincrease distribution markups

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

Current Indexes OverlapCurrent Indexes Overlap2001 StudyCurrent Indexes OverlapCurrent Indexes Overlap2001 Study

Science Education SocialScience

55%

23%

53%

Records in DatabasesRecords in DatabasesRecords in DatabasesRecords in Databases

1972 1982 1992 2003

2 M 5.2 M4.5 BN

10 BN est.

Significant Significant Redundancies Redundancies

in Public & in Public & Private Private

SectorsSectors

Significant Significant Redundancies Redundancies

in Public & in Public & Private Private

SectorsSectors

122122% % 10YR 10YR

Growth Growth RateRate

122122% % 10YR 10YR

Growth Growth RateRate

STM Database Expansion – Duplication of EffortSTM Database Expansion – Duplication of Effort

Page 18: The Battle for Mindshare

18

Scientists’ and Researchers’ Search PatternsScientists’ and Researchers’ Search Patterns

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

Online Technology ImpactOnline Technology ImpactGrowth in Online Usage DriversOnline Technology ImpactOnline Technology ImpactGrowth in Online Usage Drivers

1972 2002

Web Web HostsHosts

130

172M

1972 2002

Online Online SearchSearch

> 1M

80BN

1972 2002

PC PC UnitsUnits

2.1M

589M

US Household PC AcceptanceUS Household PC AcceptanceSocietal Behavioral Factors

• 22% have more than 1 PC• 7-10% are networked• >50% have Internet Access• 68% children use it for school• 64% adults use it for Information

US Household PC AcceptanceUS Household PC AcceptanceSocietal Behavioral Factors

• 22% have more than 1 PC• 7-10% are networked• >50% have Internet Access• 68% children use it for school• 64% adults use it for Information

1972 2003

⇧⇧600%600%⇧⇧600%600%

HouseholdHouseholds with PC’ss with PC’s

Page 19: The Battle for Mindshare

19

Scientists’ and Researchers’ Search PatternsScientists’ and Researchers’ Search Patterns

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

Work-related Search Engine UseWork-related Search Engine UseDays per Week %

Work-related Search Engine UseWork-related Search Engine UseDays per Week %

0

20

40

60

80

100

Wee

kly

1 Day

2-6

Days

7 Day

s

4112

33

86

Online ExperienceOnline Experience> 3 years using internet%

Online ExperienceOnline Experience> 3 years using internet%

Over 55

PhD's

MD's

Total

82%

70%

91%

86%

Work-related Internet UseWork-related Internet UseDays per Week %

Work-related Internet UseWork-related Internet UseDays per Week %

0

20

40

60

80

100

Wee

kly

1-3

Days

4-5

Days

6-7

Days

47

331595

Increase Increase to to 65%65% in over in over

5555 group group

Increase Increase to to 65%65% in over in over

5555 group group

Page 20: The Battle for Mindshare

20

Scientists’ and Researchers’ Search PatternsScientists’ and Researchers’ Search Patterns

Shifting SandsShifting Sands

Experimentation by Experimentation by primary publishers with primary publishers with free access to metadatafree access to metadata IEEE+IEEE+ GoogleGoogle Cross SearchCross Search

Shifting SandsShifting Sands

Experimentation by Experimentation by primary publishers with primary publishers with free access to metadatafree access to metadata IEEE+IEEE+ GoogleGoogle Cross SearchCross Search

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

Information Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain HistoricalInformation Supply ChainInformation Supply Chain Historical

AUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORSAUTHORS

PUBLISHERSPUBLISHERSPUBLISHERSPUBLISHERS

SEARCH SEARCH ENGINEENGINE

SEARCH SEARCH ENGINEENGINE

READERSREADERSREADERSREADERS

Early shift in Access Models to desktopEarly shift in Access Models to desktop

Page 21: The Battle for Mindshare

21

Top 3 Online Scientific Search ResourcesTop 3 Online Scientific Search ResourcesLibrarians VS ScientistsTop 3 Online Scientific Search ResourcesTop 3 Online Scientific Search ResourcesLibrarians VS Scientists

Shifts in MindshareShifts in Mindshare

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

42%

37%

31%

0%

0%

11%

2%

2%

2%

39%

10%

9%

Science Direct

ISI Web of Science

Medline

Google

Yahoo

PubMedLibrariansScientists

Who has the mindshare lead?Who has the mindshare lead?

Page 22: The Battle for Mindshare

22

Search Engine vs. A&I Industry Search Engine vs. A&I Industry 2002 $, Billions

Search Engine vs. A&I Industry Search Engine vs. A&I Industry 2002 $, Billions

Shifts in MindshareShifts in Mindshare

THE SHIFTING SANDSTHE SHIFTING SANDS

30

3

2

0.8

Market Value

Sales Revenue

Search Engine - 5 YRSDevelopment

A & I - 100 YRSDevelopment

Just how much are Search Engines worth?Just how much are Search Engines worth?

Page 23: The Battle for Mindshare

23

But what will researchers need and will search But what will researchers need and will search engines alone be able to deliverengines alone be able to deliver

Scientists and Researchers have needed to become much more pragmatic Scientists and Researchers have needed to become much more pragmatic

Researchers increasingly work in teams – less emphasis on research and Researchers increasingly work in teams – less emphasis on research and more on development as seen in top five information sources used more on development as seen in top five information sources used

Corporate research teams are involved from design to market launch and Corporate research teams are involved from design to market launch and need information that is traditional (journals, reports, etc.) but also business need information that is traditional (journals, reports, etc.) but also business and regulatoryand regulatory

Data Integration/Data MiningData Integration/Data Mining

WHAT WAY FORWARDWHAT WAY FORWARD

A Sea of ChangeA Sea of Change

Page 24: The Battle for Mindshare

24

DATA INTEGRATION/DATA MININGDATA INTEGRATION/DATA MINING Scientists still have to integrate different information sources in a Scientists still have to integrate different information sources in a

related context, be they sources of internal & external information, or related context, be they sources of internal & external information, or scientific and business informationscientific and business information

BCG estimates $282M (33% of R&D costs) could be saved with an BCG estimates $282M (33% of R&D costs) could be saved with an integrated content platformintegrated content platform

Making informed decisions: The top three barriers identified by Making informed decisions: The top three barriers identified by Outsell for corporate scientistsOutsell for corporate scientists

Inability to compare across information sourcesInability to compare across information sources Determining quality, credibility and accuracyDetermining quality, credibility and accuracy Knowing what is availableKnowing what is available

Key driver to improved productivity in biopharmaceutical R&D, Key driver to improved productivity in biopharmaceutical R&D, recognized by McKinsey, is successful integration of datarecognized by McKinsey, is successful integration of data

WHAT WAY FORWARDWHAT WAY FORWARD

Pharmaceutical and Biotech NeedsPharmaceutical and Biotech Needs

0

50

100

150

200

250

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001

Ind

exed

Gro

wth

(19

91 =

100

)R&D Expenditure

Sales

Development Time

New Drugs

Page 25: The Battle for Mindshare

25

WHAT WAY FORWARDWHAT WAY FORWARD

Health Care NeedsHealth Care Needs

HistoryHistory Physical ExamPhysical Exam

LabLab

DiagnosisDiagnosis

EvaluationEvaluation

PreventionPrevention

Risk ReductionRisk Reduction

OrdersOrders DrugsDrugs ProceduresProcedures TestsTests

ReferralsReferrals

Patient EducationPatient Education

Patient Information and TreatmentPatient Information and Treatment

Page 26: The Battle for Mindshare

26

Agricultural Engineering NeedsAgricultural Engineering Needs

TREATMENTTREATMENT ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT

CONTEXTCONTEXT

CABI CABI COMPENDIUMCOMPENDIUM

Search the database to produce a list of possible pests.

Datasheet provides a route to further text, pictures and maps.

Compare pest and crop distribution

WHAT WAY FORWARDWHAT WAY FORWARD

Page 27: The Battle for Mindshare

27

Who can deliver these viable information resources? Who can deliver these viable information resources? Well neither content nor search is king here!Well neither content nor search is king here!

Rather it is those organizations which canRather it is those organizations which can Filter and selectFilter and select Structure the contentStructure the content Provide the essential information at the right timeProvide the essential information at the right time Provide a context – ‘a sense-making’ toolProvide a context – ‘a sense-making’ tool

WHAT WAY FORWARDWHAT WAY FORWARD

SummarySummary

In short, the future belongs not to those that merely In short, the future belongs not to those that merely navigate us through cyberspace, nor those who navigate us through cyberspace, nor those who populate it with data. Rather it belongs to those who populate it with data. Rather it belongs to those who help us make sense of all that is available to us.help us make sense of all that is available to us.

In short, the future belongs not to those that merely In short, the future belongs not to those that merely navigate us through cyberspace, nor those who navigate us through cyberspace, nor those who populate it with data. Rather it belongs to those who populate it with data. Rather it belongs to those who help us make sense of all that is available to us.help us make sense of all that is available to us.