the age of jackson chapter 9. democracy of the common man inauguration march 4, 1829 – americans...
TRANSCRIPT
Democracy of the Common Man Inauguration
March 4, 1829 – Americans from all regions Party continues at the White House
Changing Electorate Ohio - guaranteed all white males right to vote Massachusetts -at convention many complain
that rich are more represented than the poor Daniel Webster “power naturally and necessarily follows
property”
New York -conservatives argue that tax payers is not enough that for that property requirements should exist for Senators
property qualification abolished Rhode Island
Dorr rebellion (reform) Want expanded suffrage
two constitutions / two governments
Dorr arrested Trying to take RI arsenal
leads to reform
Limits South
laws passed favoring traditional planters and politicians People often times had to vote out loud
intimidation bribes
Trends number of voters increased far more rapidly than did the
population as a whole change in method of choosing presidential electors 1800 legislation chose electors in ten of the states, by the
people in six 1828 electors chosen by the people in every state but SC 1824 fewer than 27% of adult white males voted 1828 58%
President Jackson Personal
Not a philosopher or Renaissance Man
simple theory to democracy “equal protection and equal
benefits “ “favor no region or class”
assault on “citadels” of eastern aristocracy
firm commitment to the subjugation of African Americans and Native Americans
Issues Office holding philosophy (Issue #1)
belonged to the people, not the entrenched office holders
“spoils system” officials appoint followers From caucus to convention for party nominations
(Issue #2) caucus is a body of elected officials making a decision convention is a assembly of commoners
Political Parties Changes
for more than thirty years, political parties are considered evil
by 1820’s and 30’s parties are thought of as desirable and essential to democracy
parties give each political faction a sense of purpose attuned to the will of the people check and balance
Beginnings (Martin Van Buren “Bucktails” “Albany Regency”) Anti-Jackson forces began to call themselves the
Whigs Jackson’s followers began to call themselves
Democrats
Nullification Crisis (issue #3) Southern Pride
Calhoun is Jackson’s VP (from SC) Economy struggling in South
soil exhausted “tariff of abominations”
southerners begin mentioning secession
Calhoun in a tight spot comes up with nullification as a
remedy Nullification = state can override an
unconstitutional law idea stemmed from Jefferson’s and
Madison’s Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions
The Peggy Eaton Factor
Van Buren helps carry NY in 1828 elected gov. the same
year resigns from governor’s
post to work as Jackson’s Secretary of State in 1929
The Peggy Eaton Factor Cont’d
Tavern company Peggy O’Neale was the
attractive daughter of a Washington tavern keeper
“took lodgings” with both Andrew Jackson and his friend Senator John Eaton
O’Neale was married, and the mother of two
O’Neale’s husband dies in 1828
Peggy O’Neale marries Senator Eaton shortly thereafter
The Peggy Eaton Factor Cont’d Calhoun’s wife
many administration wives refuse to receive Peggy Eaton as a member of Washington society
this outrages Jackson (remembering that the stress of politics killed his wife)
believes it is Peggy Eaton’s modest social background that is of offense to the elitist women
Jackson demands that members of his cabinet accept Mrs. Eaton into their social world
Calhoun’s wife refuses the president’s demand and Calhoun follows his wife
Webster-Hayne debate
Robert Y. Hayne young Senator from SC argued that the North
East was oppressing both the South and the West
Daniel Webster Senator from
Massachusetts attacked Hayne (and
Calhoun) for threatening the integrity of the union
Webster-Hayne debate Cont’d Two issues
Hayne (and Calhoun) end up arguing for nullification Webster “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and
inseparable!” President Jackson’s response
at banquet in honor of TJ “Our Federal Union – It must be preserved” and while
delivering this speech, he looked directly at Calhoun Calhoun, reportedly, trembled and responded “the
Union – next to our liberty most dear”
The Removal of the Indians (Issue #4) White Attitudes towards the Tribes
concept of “noble savages” being replaced with hostility principal whites should not be expected to live in close
proximity to “savages” desire for land and protection
Legal History only the federal government had authority to negotiate with
the Indians over land Supreme Court (under John Marshall) rules that the Native
Tribes are “nations within a nation” court further rules that tribes are sovereign nations, but
also dependent ones
The Black Hawk War Sauk and Fox Indians fight last battle for the old North
West in 1831-1832 “Black Hawk” Black Hawk refuses to obey treaty ceding lands in Illinois
to USA Rival tribe had signed it for them
Roughly 1000 tribe members move back onto the disputed territory
White leaders vow to exterminate “invaders” and attacked even as Black Hawk attempted to surrender
Sauk and Fox Indians fled West and Whites (and Sioux) slaughtered them as they fled
Black Hawk sent on tour
The “Five Civilized Tribes” Cherokee, Creek, Seminole,
Chickasaw and Choctaw most had established settled
agricultural societies and successful economies
Cherokee had written language and formal constitution policies of the “Cherokee Nation”
Some whites even argued that the Cherokees should be allowed to keep their lands
Jackson overrides the Court When the state of Georgia
tried to expel the Creek Indians with it’s territory, President Adams objected.
Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi passed similar laws supported by President Jackson and US Congress Indian Removal Act of 1830
Cherokees attempted to stay In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
and Worcester v. Georgia the Supreme Court supports the tribe
Andrew Jackson laughs and replies, “John Marshall made his decision... Now let him enforce it.”
Trails of Tears Jackson sends General Winfield
Scott and an army of 7,000 to round up the Cherokee and move them west
From Georgia to “Indian Territory” (Oklahoma) by foot
started in the winter of 1838 “Even aged females, apparently
nearly ready to drop in the grave, were travelling with heavy burdens attached to their backs, sometimes on frozen ground and sometimes on muddy streets, with no covering for their feet.” Thousands, roughly 1/8 died
before or soon after reaching their destination
Between 1830 and 1838 virtually all of the “Five Civilized Tribes” were expelled
Seminoles fight and are never officially defeated or relocated
Meaning of Removal Tribes ceded over 100 million acres, and in return
they got $68 million and 32 million acres of land that was much less hospitable
policy adopted by westward settlers largely mirrors that of original British “transplantations”
but evidence all through North America of tribes and whites living together peacefully fur trading posts in the Pacific Northwest pueblos of New Mexico parts of Texas and California Lewis and Clark Canada
The Removal of The National Bank (issue #5) Federal vs. State Power inconsistent and
convenient Exercising federal power
rebellious states (tariff of abominations) Indian Removal
Limiting federal power Maysville Road veto extravagant expenditures
Biddle’s Institution Bank Growth
centered in Philadelphia branches in 29 other cities most powerful financial institution in the nation
Biddle’s Institution Cont’d Bank Growth Cont’d
by law, bank was the only place that the federal government could deposit it’s own funds
government owned one fifth of bank’s stock dependable medium of exchange
Opposition “soft money”
wanted more currency in circulation state bankers
Hard money gold and silver only basis of money condemned banks that issued bank notes Andrew Jackson
Biddle’s Institution Cont’d Support
North-eastern aristocracy Daniel Webster Henry Clay
Political handiwork charter set to expire in 1836 Webster and co. persuade Biddle to apply early for new
charter plan is to make Jackson veto it and cause the public to be
angry for 1832 election Jackson veto’s proposal, but the public doesn’t respond
with as much anger Jackson beats Clay in 1832 election
Biddle’s Institution Cont’d Destroying the “Monster”
Jackson’s original secretary of Treasury refuses to sign the order and was fired
The replacement also has reservations, and is fired Jackson hires his friend Roger B. Taney to the post and they
begin placing government deposits into state banks (aka “pet banks”)
Nicholas Biddle tries to slander the President called in loans raised interest rates
Biddle’s plan backfires, Jackson grows stronger Taney would succeed John Marshall as chief justice of the
Supreme Court Now what?
lost a valuable financial institution fragmented and unstable banking system cause problems in the economy for the next century
Democrats vs. Whigs
Democrats steadily expanding economic opportunities for
white males limited role of gov’t, create opportunities and
avoid obstacles defending union attack centers of corrupt privilege drew on support of
smaller merchants and workingmen of northeast southern planters suspicious of industrial growth westerners who favored an agrarian society
Whigs expand power of federal gov’t encouraged industrial and commercial development embraced progress, cautious about expansion drew support from
wealthy merchants in Northeast wealthy planters in the South rising commercial class in the West
Election of 1836 “Great Triumvirate”
(Clay, Webster, Calhoun) Whigs have trouble deciding who should run, thus decide
to run three Democrats run Van Buren (hand picked by “King
Andrew”) Votes are not split enough and Van Buren wins
President Van Buren Politically savvy and gifted, but not as popular as Jackson from 1835-1837, only period in history US is Debt Free Panic of “1837”
Before leaving office, Jackson passes policy known as “specie cicular” states that payment for public lands can only be made with gold or silver coins or currency backed by gold or silver
Sparked a financial panic that would haunt Van Buren “Panic of 1837”
Worst depression in US up to that point... lasted five years Independent Treasury System
gov’t would place it’s funds in an independent treasury at Washington and sub treasuries in other cities
No private banks would have the government’s money government and banks are “divorced”