the adventure continues: exploring the next generation science standards
DESCRIPTION
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards. Jacob Clark Blickenstaff Program Director, Washington State LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director, OSPI Here today through generous support from Boeing. Session Goals. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards
Jacob Clark BlickenstaffProgram Director, Washington State LASER
Ellen EbertScience Director, OSPI
Here today through generous support from Boeing
Session Goals• Increase awareness of A Framework for K-12 Science
Education and how this document connects to STEM education and informs the Next Generation Science Standards through a first-hand learning experience..
• Plan next steps as related to the Framework and Next Generation Science Standards.
• Reflect on your role in the adoption and implementation of Next Generation Science Standards.
Principles of A Framework for K-12 Science
Education•Children are born investigators •Understanding builds over time •Science and Engineering require both
knowledge and practice •Connecting to students’ interests and
experiences is essential •Instruction focuses on core ideas and practices •Science learning standards promote equity
4
Framework OrganizationDimensions of the Framework
– Scientific and Engineering Practices– Crosscutting Concepts– Disciplinary Core Ideas
Realizing the Vision– Integrating the Three Dimensions– Implementation – Equity and Diversity– Guidance for Standards Development– Looking Toward the Future: Research to Inform K-12
Science Education Standards
6
Eight Practices– Asking questions and defining
problems– Developing and using models– Planning and carrying out
investigations– Analyzing and interpreting data– Using mathematics and
computational thinking– Constructing Explanations and
Designing Solutions – Engaging in argument from evidence– Obtaining, evaluating, and
communicating information
Seven Crosscutting Conceptso Patternso Cause and effecto Scale, proportion, and
quantityo Systems and system modelso Energy and matter: Flows,
cycles, and conservationo Structure and functiono Stability and change
• Four Disciplinary Core Ideas: Life Science, Physical Science Earth and Space Science Engineering
Learning Conceptualized along Three Dimensions
---
Leading to New Educational Standards
Science & Engineering
Practices
CrossCutting
Concepts
DisciplinaryCoreIdeas
Standards are taking the form of performance expectations defined through combinations of elements of the three dimensions that progress across grade levels
WA is a lead state partner2 writers>1000 reviewers during Public Draft Release
NGSS “Lead” States (2011-present)
8
Kindergarten NGSS Earth Science Example
9
Middle School Earth Science Example
10
Note Learning Progression from
kindergarten
High School Earth Science Example
11
Note Learning Progression from
middle school
Connection Boxes
Foun
datio
n Bo
xes
Performance Expectation
States that have adopted standardsNo action yet
States Adopting Next Generation Science StandardsAs of October 4, 2013
WA Science Standards “Evolution”
• Four Essential Academic Learning Requirements (EALRS)– Systems– Inquiry– Application– Domains
• Life Science• Physical Science• Earth and Space Science
• Science and Engineering Practices– Identifies 8 Practices
• Subsumes WA Inquiry• Disciplinary Core Ideas
– Adds Engineering and Technology
• Subsumes WA Application• Crosscutting Concepts
– Adds 7 crosscutting concepts• Subsumes WA Systems
and Application
Washington Science Standards (2009) Next Generation Science Standards (2013)
14
15
Findings
• The vast majority of Washington science standards are fundamentally incorporated into the NGSS.
• There is some movement of disciplinary core ideas between grades at the elementary level, but this realignment goes hand in hand with the goal of not getting ahead of the CCSS-M and CCSS-ELA standards.
• In particular, the Systems, Inquiry and Application standards from Washington’s current standards are well-covered in the NGSS.
• Modest differences exist between the Disciplinary Core Ideas in the NGSS and the Domain standards in Washington’s EALR 4. – Most of the difference involves re-sequencing and an emphasis on current
scientific applications, but there is also a fundamental shift to a deeper focus on fewer topics, much like the CCSS.
6/23
/201
3O
SPI T
each
ing
and
Lear
ning
Sci
ence
NGSS – The 3 ShiftsFocus: The NGSS are Focused on deeper understanding and application of science content reflecting real-world interconnectedness.
Coherence: Science and engineering Build Coherently across K–12.
Integration: Science and Engineering are Integrated across K–12 in the NGSS.
16
Federal Assessment Requirements
• No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires that our state’s science standards must be assessed:– Once in elementary school (we give Measurements of
Student Progress in 5th grade)– Once in middle school (we give MSP in 8th grade)– Once in high school (we give Biology End-of-Course
exam)
• When we change our state standards in science we need to change assessments
(RCW 28A.655.070).17
18
WA State Science Assessment Evolution
Once in elementary; once in middle;
once in HS;exit exam?
(2017?)
Next Generation Science Standards
(2013)
Measurements of Student Progress in grades 5 & 8 (2011);
Biology End of Course exam in HS, usually
grade 9 or 10 (2012)
New State Science Standards (2009)
Measurements of Student Progress in grades 5 & 8; High School Proficiency Exam in grade 10
(2010)
Assessment design changes
WASL comprehensive science test in grades 5, 8, 10
(2006)
Original State Science Standards
(2006)
Transitioning – The 9144m View2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Awareness of NGSS & integrated nature of dimensions
Phase in standards
Continue phasing in standards
Finish phasing in standards
Examine materials
Ongoing: Statewide Coordination and Collaboration to Support Implementation
(Professional Learning Providers and Partners Across WA )
Including:• School Districts• Higher Education• Non-formal education groups• Education and Educator Associations• Business Partners
Washington
20
Paired Verbal Fluency
Find a person that you do not know: Introduce yourselves. Decide who is A and
who is B. Person A listens to person B respond to the
prompt until time is called (1 minute) Person B listens to person A respond to the
topic until time is called (1 minute) Repeat the process as directed (30 seconds))
What might the adoption of Next Generation Science Standards mean for you in your context?
What would a learning experience
be like that integrates engineering, science,
technology, and math?
25
Eight Practices– Asking questions and defining
problems– Developing and using models– Planning and carrying out
investigations– Analyzing and interpreting data– Using mathematics and
computational thinking– Constructing Explanations and
Designing Solutions – Engaging in argument from evidence– Obtaining, evaluating, and
communicating information
Seven Crosscutting Conceptso Patternso Cause and effecto Scale, proportion, and
quantityo Systems and system modelso Energy and matter: Flows,
cycles, and conservationo Structure and functiono Stability and change
• Four Disciplinary Core Ideas: Life Science, Physical Science Earth and Space Science Engineering
DefineAttend to a broad range
of considerations in criteria and constraints for problems of social and global significance
Develop solutions
Break a major problem into smaller problems
that can be solved separately
OptimizePrioritize criteria,
consider trade- offs, and assess social and
environmental impacts as a complex solution is tested and refined
Engineering Design Process
Next StepsToday I learned…My next steps are…