the academy of economic studies bucharest doctoral school of banking and finance
DESCRIPTION
The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance. DISSERTATION PAPER CENTRAL BANK REACTION FUNCTION MSc. Student: ANDRA SERBAN Supervisor: Prof. MOISĂ ALTĂR. Contents. Introduction Review of the concepts The optimal linear regulator problem - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Academy of Economic Studies The Academy of Economic Studies BucharestBucharest
Doctoral School of Banking and FinanceDoctoral School of Banking and Finance
DISSERTATION PAPER
CENTRAL BANK REACTION FUNCTION
MSc. Student: ANDRA SERBANSupervisor: Prof. MOISĂ ALTĂR
![Page 2: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
Introduction Review of the concepts The optimal linear regulator problem Model specification Empirical estimation Conclusion
![Page 3: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
IntroductionIntroduction
The purpose of this paper was The purpose of this paper was to determine an explicit to determine an explicit instrument rule and to instrument rule and to compare it to an optimal compare it to an optimal monetary policy rule (reaction monetary policy rule (reaction function) .function) .
![Page 4: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Review of the concepts
Reaction functionReaction function::
describes the systematic describes the systematic components of economic components of economic policy in a formal model, i.e. policy in a formal model, i.e. equation.equation.
(DJC Smant 2003)(DJC Smant 2003)
![Page 5: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
General approachGeneral approach
In this approach, reaction In this approach, reaction functions are not different functions are not different than than policy rulespolicy rules, specifying , specifying how the central bank should how the central bank should adjust its instrument(s) as a adjust its instrument(s) as a function of the state of the function of the state of the economy. economy.
![Page 6: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Rudebusch and Svensson (1998) Rudebusch and Svensson (1998) describes 2 types of rules:describes 2 types of rules:
1.1. Instrument rules: Instrument rules:
The monetary policy instrument is The monetary policy instrument is expressesd as an explicit function of expressesd as an explicit function of available information available information
22.. Targeting rules Targeting rules
Central bank is assigned to minimize Central bank is assigned to minimize a loss function that is increasing in a loss function that is increasing in the deviation between a target the deviation between a target variable and the target level for this variable and the target level for this variable.variable.
![Page 7: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Instrument rulesInstrument rules::
It = C + B(L)Zt-1 +UtIt = C + B(L)Zt-1 +UtC – vector of constantC – vector of constantB(L) – polynomial distributed lagB(L) – polynomial distributed lagZt-1 – the central bank information at t-1Zt-1 – the central bank information at t-1It – the central bank policy instrumentsIt – the central bank policy instrumentsUt – white noiseUt – white noise
It : - the interest rate It : - the interest rate Taylor (1993), (1999); Henderson-McKibbin (1993)Taylor (1993), (1999); Henderson-McKibbin (1993)
- the monetary aggregate - the monetary aggregate McCallum (1984), (1987); Meltzer (1984), McCallum (1984), (1987); Meltzer (1984),
(1987)(1987) - domestic credit- domestic credit
Jaffee and Russell (1976); Keeton(1979); Stiglitz Jaffee and Russell (1976); Keeton(1979); Stiglitz Weiss (1981)Weiss (1981)
![Page 8: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Targeting rulesTargeting rules
2)(min
xxE ttit
where β- discount factor, 0<β<1 Et- expectation operator
x - targeting variable x* - target level for variable x
it - instrument
![Page 9: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Optimal control Optimal control approachapproach
More specifically, reaction More specifically, reaction functions can be regarded as functions can be regarded as solutions to an solutions to an optimal optimal controlcontrol approach to monetary approach to monetary policy.policy.
Tinbergen (1952), Theil Tinbergen (1952), Theil (1964), Klein (1965)(1964), Klein (1965)
![Page 10: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
THE OPTIMAL LINEAR THE OPTIMAL LINEAR REGULATOR PROBLEMREGULATOR PROBLEM
)()()(
.,,
1:_
)|||(|)(:
***
0
**
0
0
2
0
2
QututCXtCXtQututYtYtuJ
givenXRuRXt
CXtYt
ButAXtXtSpaceState
utYtuJCost
t
t
t
t
mn
t
t
![Page 11: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
THE OPTIMAL LINEAR THE OPTIMAL LINEAR REGULATOR PROBLEMREGULATOR PROBLEM
If the system admits a solution (V, W, If the system admits a solution (V, W, R) so that R is semipositive defined R) so that R is semipositive defined (R0) and A+BF has the |eigenvalues|(R0) and A+BF has the |eigenvalues|<1, than the command ut=FXt stabilize <1, than the command ut=FXt stabilize the system and minimize the cost J(u).the system and minimize the cost J(u).
mxnmxmpxnnxnnxm
t
RWRVRCRARB
WWCCRtAAR
VWRtBA
VRtBBQ
,,,,
***1
**
2*
![Page 12: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
From the system we obtain the Matrix From the system we obtain the Matrix Riccati Difference equation:Riccati Difference equation:
which is solved by the DLQRRICCATI which is solved by the DLQRRICCATI (Discrete Linear Quadratic Regulator) (Discrete Linear Quadratic Regulator) algorithm in Matlabalgorithm in Matlab
RtABRtBBQRtBARtAACCRt*1**2**
1 )(
![Page 13: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MODEL SPECIFICATIONMODEL SPECIFICATION
The model is an extension of The model is an extension of Ball(1998) for an open economy:Ball(1998) for an open economy:
tttttttt
tttttt
tttttt
ttttttt
CSRCSRiiii
IR
tiCSRCSRCSRCSR
RateExchangeal
CSRCSRYY
Phillips
CSRCSRiYYYY
IS
212112101
12101
32121*
110
121111*
0*
)(
)()(
:__Re
)()(
:
)()()()(
IS
![Page 14: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Loss FunctionThe Loss Function
Acording to Rudenbusch and Acording to Rudenbusch and Svensson (1998) I considered the Svensson (1998) I considered the following cost function of the following cost function of the central bank :central bank :
])()()([ 21
2*2*
0
ttttt
t iicbYYa
![Page 15: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Empirical estimation
The data sample covers the The data sample covers the period 1996:01 – 2002:12period 1996:01 – 2002:12
All time series are based on All time series are based on monthly observationmonthly observation..
![Page 16: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
TIME SERIES USED
Symbol Semnification
PI Industrial Production Chained Index Seasonal Adjusted
PI_95 Industrial Production Index computed by taking Dec 1995 as basis
LN_PI_95 Log(PI_95)
HPTREND_PI The trend of LN_PI_95 computed using a Hodrick Prescott filter
OUTPUT_GAP The difference between LN_PI_95 and its trend
IPC Consumer Price Chained Index
IPC_F Consumer Price Chained Index US
![Page 17: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
IPC_95 Consumer Price Index computed by takingDec 1995 as basis
IPC_95_F Consumer Price Index computed by taking Dec 1995 as basis
INFL Log(IPC)
CSN Nominal Exchange Rate
CSR Real Exchange Rate = log(CSN*IPC_95_F/IPC_95)
DIF_CSR First difference of CSR
RA Lending rate for non-bank customers
DIF_RA First difference of RA
RRA Real lending rate for non-bank customers
EXPNET Net exports
DUMCENTRAT dummy variable that takes the value of 1 in March 1997 and 1/(no.of observations - 1) elsewhere.
![Page 18: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
TIME SERIES USEDTIME SERIES USED
-.4
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
LN_PI_95 HPTREND_PI
-.20
-.15
-.10
-.05
.00
.05
.10
.15
.20
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
OUTPUT_GAP
.00
.04
.08
.12
.16
.20
.24
.28
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
INFL
-.01
.00
.01
.02
.03
.04
00:01 00:07 01:01 01:07 02:01 02:07
RRA
![Page 19: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.3
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
CSR
-.4
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
DIF_CSR
-.02
-.01
.00
.01
.02
.03
.04
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
DIF_RA
.02
.03
.04
.05
.06
.07
.08
.09
.10
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
RA
![Page 20: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Unit Root TestsUnit Root Tests
Series Order of IntegrationLevel of
Significance
ADF PP
OUTPUT_GAP I(0) I(0) 1%
INFL I(0) I(0) 1%
CSR I(1) I(1) 1%
DIF_CSR I(0) I(0) 1%
RA I(1) I(1) 1%
DIF_RA I(0) I(0) 1%
RRA I(0) I(0) 1%
model
![Page 21: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
IS estimationIS estimationDependent Variable: OUTPUT_GAP
Method: Least Squares
Date: 07/01/03 Time: 10:45
Sample(adjusted): 1996:02 2002:12
Included observations: 83 after adjusting endpoints
Variable Coefficient Std. Error
t-Statistic Prob.
OUTPUT_GAP(-1) 0.655049 0.082858 7.905.667 0.0000
RRA(-1) -0.247160 0.124724 -1.981.654 0.0510
DIF_CSR 0.179965 0.064865 2.774.448 0.0069
R-squared 0.570380 Mean dependent var 0.000877
Adjusted R-squared 0.559639 S.D. dependent var 0.049507
S.E. of regression 0.032853 Akaike info criterion -3.958.076
Sum squared resid 0.086345 Schwarz criterion -3.870.648
Log likelihood 1.672.602 Durbin-Watson stat 2.035.637
![Page 22: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
System estimation by System estimation by WTSLSWTSLS
Equation: INFL=C(1)*INFL(-1)+C(2)*DIF_CSR(-1)+C(3)*DUMCENTRAT+Equation: INFL=C(1)*INFL(-1)+C(2)*DIF_CSR(-1)+C(3)*DUMCENTRAT+ +C(4)*OUTPUT_GAP(-1)+C(5)+C(4)*OUTPUT_GAP(-1)+C(5)
Observations: 82Observations: 82R-squaredR-squared 0.8196700.819670 Mean dependent var Mean dependent var 0.0352480.035248Adjusted R-squaredAdjusted R-squared 0.8103020.810302 S.D. dependent varS.D. dependent var 0.0365970.036597S.E. of regressionS.E. of regression 0.0159400.015940 Sum squared residSum squared resid 0.0195640.019564Durbin-Watson statDurbin-Watson stat 1.7314111.731411
Equation: DIF_CSR=C(6)*DIF_CSR(-1)+C(7)*RRA+C(8)*DUMCENTRATEquation: DIF_CSR=C(6)*DIF_CSR(-1)+C(7)*RRA+C(8)*DUMCENTRAT
Observations: 82Observations: 82R-squaredR-squared 0.6042700.604270 Mean dependent var Mean dependent var -0.003343-0.003343Adjusted R-squaredAdjusted R-squared 0.5942520.594252 S.D. dependent varS.D. dependent var 0.0572430.057243S.E. of regressionS.E. of regression 0.0364630.036463 Sum squared residSum squared resid 0.1050320.105032Durbin-Watson statDurbin-Watson stat 1.9929431.992943
Equation: DIF_RA=C(9)+C(10)*INFL(-1)+C(11)*DIF_CSR(-1)+DIF_RA(-1)*C(12Equation: DIF_RA=C(9)+C(10)*INFL(-1)+C(11)*DIF_CSR(-1)+DIF_RA(-1)*C(12))
Observations: 82Observations: 82R-squaredR-squared 0.6283090.628309 Mean dependent var Mean dependent var -0.000269-0.000269Adjusted R-squaredAdjusted R-squared 0.6140130.614013 S.D. dependent var S.D. dependent var 0.0053440.005344S.E. of regressionS.E. of regression 0.0033200.003320 Sum squared resid Sum squared resid 0.0008600.000860Durbin-Watson statDurbin-Watson stat 2.0440552.044055
![Page 23: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C(1) 0.573273 0.062073 9.235.474 0.0000
C(2) 0.253345 0.035775 7.081.660 0.0000
C(3) -0.117939 0.018424 -6.401.340 0.0000
C(4) 0.211775 0.050501 4.193.511 0.0000
C(5) 0.015095 0.002715 5.560.436 0.0000
C(6) 0.173626 0.076520 2.269.023 0.0242
C(7) -0.455091 0.162430 -2.801.767 0.0055
C(8) 0.466524 0.045509 1.025.123 0.0000
C(9) -0.001541 0.000601 -2.564.124 0.0110
C(10) 0.042867 0.013404 3.198.055 0.0016
C(11) 0.055321 0.006843 8.084.199 0.0000
C(12) 0.590841 0.093602 6.312.248 0.0000
Determinant residualcovariance 3.01E-12
![Page 24: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
EEstimated Modelstimated Model
ISIS OUTPUT_GAP =0.655049*OUTPUT_GAP(-1) -0.247160*RRA(-1)+OUTPUT_GAP =0.655049*OUTPUT_GAP(-1) -0.247160*RRA(-1)+
+0.179965* DIF_CSR +0.179965* DIF_CSR
PHILLIPSPHILLIPS INFL=0.638493*INFL(-1)+ 0.284684*DIF_CSR(-1)-0.099128*DUMCENTRAT INFL=0.638493*INFL(-1)+ 0.284684*DIF_CSR(-1)-0.099128*DUMCENTRAT
+0.176756*OUTPUT_GAP(-1)+0.012691 +0.176756*OUTPUT_GAP(-1)+0.012691
REAL EXCHANGE RATE EQUATIONREAL EXCHANGE RATE EQUATION DIF_CSR=0.173626*DIF_CSR(-1) -0.455091*RRA+0.466524*DUMCENTRATDIF_CSR=0.173626*DIF_CSR(-1) -0.455091*RRA+0.466524*DUMCENTRAT
IRIR DIF_RA=-0.001541+ 0.590841*DIF_RA(-1)+ 0. 042867*INFL(-1)+ DIF_RA=-0.001541+ 0.590841*DIF_RA(-1)+ 0. 042867*INFL(-1)+
+0.055321*DIF_CSR(-1) +0.055321*DIF_CSR(-1)
![Page 25: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
ButAXtXtSpaceState 1:_
1
ut:Commandt
t
i
i
t
t
tt
t
t
k
Dumcentrat
CSRCSR
YY
1
*
*
Xt: vectorState
![Page 26: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
100000
010000
001000
0.4891 0.1036 0.4175 0.3008 0.2804 0.0678
1.0749 0.2276 0.1077- 0.2794 0.6162 0.1491
0.3537 1.0749 0.0485 0.1232 0.2028 0.7041
A
00
00
00
0 0.4892-
00.0749-
00.3537-
B
0.01510.5733
*0.2472
*1
*
*
ttt
ttk
![Page 27: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The Loss FunctionThe Loss Function
For For =0.9 and c=0.2=0.9 and c=0.2
a+b=0.8a+b=0.8
])(*2.0)()([9.0 21
2*2*
0
ttttt
t iibYYa
![Page 28: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
aa bb THE OPTIMAL RULESTHE OPTIMAL RULES
0.0.88
00 it =1,9907*(y -y*)t + 0,5732* (Πt – Π*) it =1,9907*(y -y*)t + 0,5732* (Πt – Π*)
+0,3483*(CSRt -CSRt -1 )++0,3483*(CSRt -CSRt -1 )++ + 0,1372*DUM+3,039*K+λ0,1372*DUM+3,039*K+λ
0.0.44
0.0.44
it =1,7671*(y -y*)t + 1,1673* (Πt – Π*) +0,643*(CSRt it =1,7671*(y -y*)t + 1,1673* (Πt – Π*) +0,643*(CSRt -CSRt -1 ) -0,0151*DUM+2,6545*K+3,1173*λ -CSRt -1 ) -0,0151*DUM+2,6545*K+3,1173*λ
0.0.22
0.0.66
it =1,561*(y -y*)t + 1,8097* (Πt – Π*) +0,9565*(CSRt it =1,561*(y -y*)t + 1,8097* (Πt – Π*) +0,9565*(CSRt
-CSRt -1 ) -0,1714*DUM+2,3923*K+5,0057*λ -CSRt -1 ) -0,1714*DUM+2,3923*K+5,0057*λ
00 0.0.88
it =1,1829*(y -y*)t + 3,8226* (Πt – Π*) it =1,1829*(y -y*)t + 3,8226* (Πt – Π*) +1,9006*(CSRt -CSRt -1 ) -+1,9006*(CSRt -CSRt -1 ) -0,6181*DUM+2,2098*K+9,1849*λ0,6181*DUM+2,2098*K+9,1849*λ
![Page 29: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The evolution of the coefficients in The evolution of the coefficients in the reaction function for different the reaction function for different
weights put on inflationweights put on inflation
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
b
Output_gapcoefficient(beta)
Inflationcoefficient(1+alfa)
Real exchange ratecoefficient
![Page 30: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Optimal Taylor rulesOptimal Taylor rules
it = rr* + it = rr* + ΠΠt + t + αα ( (ΠΠt – t – ΠΠ*) + *) + (y -y*)t(y -y*)t
Taylor (1993): Taylor (1993): αα=0.5 , =0.5 , =0.5=0.5
Taylor (1999): Taylor (1999): αα=0.5 , =0.5 , =1=1
Henderson-McKibbin (1993): Henderson-McKibbin (1993): αα=1 , =1 , =2=2
Ball (1997): Ball (1997): αα=0.82 , =0.82 , =1.13=1.13
Ball (1998): Ball (1998): αα=0.82 , =0.82 , =1.04 (open =1.04 (open economy)economy)
![Page 31: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ConclusionConclusion
For different combination of For different combination of weights (a,b), put on deviation of weights (a,b), put on deviation of output from its natural trend and output from its natural trend and deviation of inflation from its deviation of inflation from its target, I found: target, I found:
1 ≤ 1 ≤ ≤2 and 0.5≤ α ≤2.88,≤2 and 0.5≤ α ≤2.88,
results comparable to those results comparable to those existing in the literature.existing in the literature.
![Page 32: The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest Doctoral School of Banking and Finance](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/56815a00550346895dc74ba6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ConclusionConclusion
Considering a=0.2 and b=0.6 the Considering a=0.2 and b=0.6 the optimal optimal
rulerule is is::it =it =1,5611,561*(y -y*)t + *(y -y*)t + 1,80971,8097* (Πt – Π*) * (Πt – Π*) +0,9565*(CSRt -CSRt-1 ) -+0,9565*(CSRt -CSRt-1 ) -0,1714*DUM+2,3923*K+5,0057*λ0,1714*DUM+2,3923*K+5,0057*λ
compared to thecompared to the explicit IR: explicit IR:
DIF_RA=-0.001541+ 0.590841*DIF_RA(-1)+ DIF_RA=-0.001541+ 0.590841*DIF_RA(-1)+
0. 0428670. 042867*INFL(-1)+0.055321*DIF_CSR(-1) *INFL(-1)+0.055321*DIF_CSR(-1)