that fall under the commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. the commission proposes new...

29
141 FERC ¶ 61,037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Part 284 [Docket No. RM12-17-000] Revisions to Procedural Regulations Governing Transportation by Intrastate Pipelines (Issued October 18, 2012) AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is proposing to revise its regulations to provide optional notice procedures for processing rate filings by those natural gas pipelines that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 or section 1(c) of the Natural Gas Act. An intrastate pipeline may elect to use these procedures for approval of a filing pursuant to § 284.123 of the Commission’s regulations. Under these procedures, if there is no protest to the filing as determined under this proposal, the filing would be deemed approved without a Commission order. The proposed rule would result in regulatory certainty and a reduction of regulatory burdens. DATES: Comments are due [INSERT DATE 30 days after publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER] ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the following ways:

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jul-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

141 FERC ¶ 61,037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

18 CFR Part 284

[Docket No. RM12-17-000]

Revisions to Procedural Regulations Governing Transportation by Intrastate Pipelines

(Issued October 18, 2012)

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is proposing to revise its

regulations to provide optional notice procedures for processing rate filings by those

natural gas pipelines that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to section 311

of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 or section 1(c) of the Natural Gas Act. An

intrastate pipeline may elect to use these procedures for approval of a filing pursuant to

§ 284.123 of the Commission’s regulations. Under these procedures, if there is no protest

to the filing as determined under this proposal, the filing would be deemed approved

without a Commission order. The proposed rule would result in regulatory certainty and

a reduction of regulatory burdens.

DATES: Comments are due [INSERT DATE 30 days after publication in the

FEDERAL REGISTER]

ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the following

ways:

Page 2: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 2 -

Electronic Filing through http://www.ferc.gov. Documents created electronically

using word processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-

PDF format and not in a scanned format.

Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable to file electronically may mail or hand-deliver

comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the

Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional

information on the rulemaking process, see the Comment Procedures section of this

document

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Tishman (Legal Information)

Office of the General Counsel

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street NE

Washington, DC 20426

(202) 502-8515

[email protected]

James Sarikas (Technical Information)

Office of Energy Market Regulation

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street NE

Washington, DC 20426

(202) 502-6831

[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Page 3: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Revisions to Procedural Regulations Governing

Transportation by Intrastate Pipelines

Docket No. RM12-17-000

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Paragraph Numbers

I. Background ............................................................................................................................ 2.

II. Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 8.

A. Optional Notice Procedure .............................................................................................. 8.

B. Periodic Rate Review of the Rates and Charges of Intrastate Pipelines ......................... 18.

C. Withdrawal Procedures .................................................................................................... 20.

III. Information Collection Statement ....................................................................................... 21.

IV. Environmental Analysis ...................................................................................................... 28.

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act .................................................................................................... 29.

VI. Comment Procedures .......................................................................................................... 30.

VII. Document Availability ....................................................................................................... 34.

Page 4: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

141 FERC ¶ 61,037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Revisions to Procedural Regulations Governing

Transportation by Intrastate Pipelines

Docket No. RM12-17-000

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

(October 18, 2012)

1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate

pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed rates or operating conditions pursuant to

§ 284.123 of the Commission’s regulations.1 Section 284.123 applies to filings by: (1)

intrastate pipelines providing interstate services pursuant to section 311 of the Natural

Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA)2 and (2) Hinshaw

3 pipelines providing interstate services

subject to the Commission’s Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdiction pursuant to blanket

certificates issued under § 284.224 of the Commission’s regulations.4 If there is no

1 18 CFR 284.123.

2 15 U.S.C. 3372.

3 Section 1(c) of the NGA exempts from the Commission’s NGA jurisdiction

pipelines which transport gas in interstate commerce if (1) they receive natural gas at or

within the boundary of a state, (2) all the gas is consumed within that state, and (3) the

pipeline is regulated by a state Commission. This exemption is referred to as the

Hinshaw exemption after the Congressman who introduced the bill amending the NGA to

include § 1(c). See ANR Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 71 F.3d

897, 898 (1995) (briefly summarizing the history of the Hinshaw exemption).

4 18 CFR 284.224.

Page 5: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 2 -

protest to a filing made under these notice procedures, the filing would be deemed

approved without a Commission order. The Commission finds that the new procedures

will result in regulatory certainty and a reduction of regulatory burdens on intrastate

pipelines.

I. Background

2. NGPA section 311 authorizes the Commission to allow intrastate pipelines to

transport gas “on behalf of” interstate pipelines or local distribution companies served by

interstate pipelines “under such terms and conditions as the Commission may prescribe.”5

NGPA section 601(a)(2) exempts transportation service authorized under NGPA section

311 from the Commission’s NGA jurisdiction. Congress adopted these provisions to

eliminate the regulatory barriers between the intrastate and interstate markets and to

promote the entry of section 311 pipelines into the interstate market. Shortly after the

adoption of the NGPA, the Commission authorized Hinshaw pipelines to apply for NGA

section 7 certificates authorizing them to transport gas in interstate commerce in the same

manner as section 311 pipelines may do under NGPA section 311.6

3. Subpart C of the Commission’s Part 284 open access regulations (18 CFR

284.121-126) implements the provisions of NGPA section 311 concerning transportation

by intrastate pipelines. NGPA section 311 provides that the rates of intrastate pipelines

5 15 U.S.C. 3371(c).

6 Certain Transportation, Sales and Assignments by Pipeline Companies not

Subject to Commission Jurisdiction Under Section 1(c) of the Natural Gas Act, Order

No. 63, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,118, at 30,824-825 (1980).

Page 6: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 3 -

performing transportation service under the NGPA shall be fair and equitable. Section

284.123 of the regulations provides procedures for section 311 and Hinshaw pipelines to

establish fair and equitable rates for interstate services.

4. Section 284.123(b) allows intrastate pipelines an election of the methodology

upon which to base their rates for interstate services. Section 284.123(b)(1) permits an

intrastate pipeline to elect to base its rates on the methodology used by the appropriate

state regulatory agency (A) to design rates to recover transportation or other relevant

costs included in a then effective firm sales rate for city-gate service on file with the state

agency; or (B) to determine the allowance permitted by the state agency to be included in

a natural gas distributor's rates for city-gate natural gas service. Section 284.123(b)(1)

also permits an intrastate pipeline to use the rates contained in one of its then effective

transportation rate schedules for intrastate service on file with the appropriate state

regulatory agency which the intrastate pipeline determines covers service comparable to

service under Subpart C of Part 284.

5. If the intrastate pipeline does not make an election under paragraph (b)(1) of

§ 284.123, § 284.123(b)(2) requires that it “apply for Commission approval, by order, of

the proposed rates and charges” pursuant to the procedures in that paragraph. Section

284.123(b)(2)(i) provides for the pipeline to file a petition for approval of the proposed

rates and charges, as well as information showing the proposed rates and charges are fair

and equitable. Upon filing the petition for approval, the intrastate pipeline is permitted to

commence the transportation service and charge and collect the proposed rate, subject to

refund. Section 284.123(b)(2)(ii) provides that the rate proposed in the application will

Page 7: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 4 -

be deemed to be fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount which interstate

pipelines would be permitted to charge for providing similar transportation service,

unless within the 150 day period after the date on which the Commission received a filed

application, the Commission either extends the time for action, or institutes a proceeding

in which all interested parties will be afforded an opportunity for written comments and

for the oral presentation of views, data, and arguments. The Commission has extended

this 150 day period when necessary, for example, to allow settlement in contested

proceedings or institute proceedings in complex cases.

6. Section 284.123(e) requires that, within thirty days of commencement of a new

service, any intrastate pipeline that engages in transportation arrangements under Subpart

C of Part 284 must file with the Commission a statement that includes the pipeline's

interstate rates, the rate election made pursuant to § 284.123(b) of that section, and a

description of how the pipeline will engage in these transportation arrangements,

including operating conditions, such as gas quality standards and financial viability of the

shipper. This statement is generally referred to as the pipeline’s “Statement of Operating

Conditions.” Section 284.123(e) also requires that, if the pipeline changes its operations,

rates, or rate election, it must amend the statement and file such amendments no later

than thirty days after commencement of the change in operations or the change in rate

election.

7. As part of its overall, more light-handed regulation of section 311 and Hinshaw

pipelines, the Commission has established a policy of requiring a periodic review of the

rates of both types of pipelines. The Commission has held that, because these pipelines

Page 8: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 5 -

are not subject to the same reporting requirements or level of rate review as interstate

pipelines, a periodic review of the rates of section 311 and Hinshaw pipelines is

necessary to ensure that those rates remain fair and equitable. In Order No. 735, the

Commission modified its previous triennial rate review policy in order to decrease the

frequency of review from three to five years from the date the approved rates took effect.7

While the periodic rate review requirement is not part of the Commission’s regulations,

the Commission has consistently imposed that requirement in its orders approving each

rate filing by an intrastate pipeline. The Commission imposes this rate requirement, both

when the intrastate pipeline has chosen to elect a state-based rate pursuant to

§ 284.123(b)(1) or has proposed a rate for a Commission-approved rate pursuant to

§ 284.123(b)(2).8

II. Discussion

A. Optional Notice Procedure

8. In an effort to reduce burdens on regulated entities, the Commission is proposing

to add a new optional notice procedure under which section 311 and Hinshaw pipelines

could seek approval of proposed rates or operating conditions without the need for a

Commission order. Under this procedure, the intrastate pipeline’s filing would be

7 Contract Reporting Requirements of Intrastate Natural Gas Companies, Order

No. 735, 75 Fed. Reg. 29,404, (May 26, 2010) FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,310, at P 96

(2010), order on reh’g, Order No. 735-A, 75 Fed. Reg. 80,685 (Dec. 23, 2010), FERC

Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,318, (2010). 8 Order No. 735 FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,310 at P 92 and cases cited.

Page 9: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 6 -

deemed approved without any order of the Commission, if the filing is not protested

within a specified period after notice of the filing or if any protests are resolved during a

reconciliation period. This optional procedure would be included in § 284.123(g) of our

regulations.

9. The Commission is taking this action as part of its commitment to continually

review its regulations and streamline or eliminate requirements that impose an

unnecessary burden on regulated entities. The Commission believes that this notice

procedure would provide an expedited and less burdensome method of processing filings

by section 311 and Hinshaw pipelines which present few, if any, contested issues. Many

of the intrastate pipeline companies filing rates and/or statements of operating conditions

pursuant to § 284.123 are small and have few interstate shippers. Discount rate

agreements are common, with the result that often the pipeline performs most of its

interstate services at rates which are discounted substantially below its maximum rates

for such services. Most pipeline filings under § 284.123 are not protested by any shipper.

If a rate filing is protested, the protests often raise issues which are relatively amenable to

settlement. The proposed optional notice procedure would permit approval of

uncontested filings without the need for any Commission order upon expiration of a 60-

day notice period (or other period established by the Secretary of the Commission for a

particular filing). If a protest were filed within the notice period, proposed § 284.123(g)

provides for an additional 30-day reconciliation period to resolve contested filings

without the need for the parties to file a formal settlement offer pursuant to the

Page 10: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 7 -

Commission’s settlement rules in § 385.601, et seq.9 or a Commission order on the

pipeline’s proposal.

10. Currently our regulations permit similar prior notice blanket certificate

procedures for interstate pipelines in § 157.205. That program has been in place for over

three decades and has significantly reduced regulatory burden and provides pipelines

certainty with regard to the disposition of their applications.10

The Commission believes

that proposed § 284.123(g) would similarly lessen regulatory burdens, provide increased

regulatory certainty, and create an improved framework in which to achieve settlement of

contested cases.

11. The optional notice procedure in proposed § 284.123(g) would operate as

follows: Within ten days after a filing by an intrastate pipeline pursuant to the optional

notice procedure, the Secretary of the Commission would issue a notice of the filing,

which would be published in the FEDERAL REGISTER. That notice would provide a

deadline for interventions and initial comments fourteen days after the date of the filing

and for final comments and protests sixty days after the date of the filing or such other

date established by the Secretary of the Commission. As proposed, any person or the

Commission’s staff is permitted to file a protest prior to the deadline. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed, the filing would be deemed approved without a

9 18 CFR § 385.601, et seq. (2012).

10 Interstate Pipeline Certificates for Routine Transactions, Order No. 234, FERC

Stats & Regs. ¶ 30,368 (1982).

Page 11: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 8 -

Commission order, upon expiration of the time for filing protests, unless the intrastate

pipeline has withdrawn, amended, or modified its filing or the filing is rejected prior to

that date.

12. If a protest is filed, proposed § 284.123(g)(5) allows a reconciliation period for

negotiations in a structured process to promote settlement of contested cases.

Specifically, this section would permit the intrastate pipeline, the person who filed the

protest in accordance with proposed § 284.123(g)(4), any intervenors, and staff thirty

days from the deadline for protests to the pipeline’s filing, to resolve the protest, and to

convene informal settlement conferences to assist in resolving the protest. If all protests

to the filing are withdrawn pursuant to proposed paragraph (g)(6) by the end of the

reconciliation period, the filing would be deemed approved. Alternatively, proposed

paragraph (g)(7) permits the pipeline to amend or modify a tariff record in order to

resolve concerns raised in a protest. Proposed paragraph (g)(7) provides that such a filing

will toll the notice period established under paragraph (g)(3) of this section for the

original filing, and the Secretary of the Commission will issue a notice establishing new

deadlines for comments and protests for the entire filing pursuant to paragraph (g)(3).

The intrastate pipeline may request a deadline for protests less than 60 days after the date

of the filing. If there are no protests to the amendment or modification and any protests

to the entire filing which have been filed are withdrawn, the amended filing would be

deemed approved as of the day after the new deadline for protests established by the

Secretary.

Page 12: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 9 -

13. If a filing is still contested after the above procedures are completed, the filing

would not be deemed approved and, within sixty days from the deadline for filing

protests, the Commission would establish procedures to resolve the proceeding. The 150-

day period in existing § 284.123(b)(2)(ii) under which filings are deemed approved

unless the Commission acts within that period does not apply to filings pursuant to the

new notice procedures.

14. While the proposed rules would establish a reconciliation period to promote

settlement of protested filings, compliance with the Commission’s rules regarding off-

the-record communications in § 385.2201 would be required. Under the general rule set

forth in § 385.2201(b), in any proceeding where an intervenor disputes any material issue

resulting in a contested proceeding, no person outside the Commission shall make or

knowingly cause to be made to a decisional employee, and no decisional employee shall

make or knowingly cause to be made to any person outside the Commission, any off-the-

record conversation, except off-the-record communications exempted by § 385.2201(e).

Therefore, under the Commission’s proposed revisions to § 284.123, when an intervenor

disputes any material issue in the filings by intrastate pipelines the rules governing off-

the-record conversations in § 385.2201 would be applicable.

15. The Commission is also adding procedures to further streamline the processing

of these filings. The Director of the Office of Energy Market Regulation or his designee

is required pursuant to paragraph (g)(2) to reject within seven days of the date of the

filing any filing which patently fails to comply with the provisions of §§ 284.123(e) or

284.123(f), without prejudice to the intrastate pipeline’s refiling a complete application.

Page 13: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 10 -

If such filing was required by § 284.123, it must be refiled within fourteen days of the

date of the rejection.

16. The protestor may withdraw a protest under proposed paragraph (g)(6) by

submitting written notice of withdrawal to the Secretary of the Commission pursuant to §

385.216 of the Commission’s regulations and serving a copy on the intrastate pipeline,

any intervenors, and any other person who has filed a motion to intervene in the

proceeding. If any protest is filed within the time allowed for protests and is

subsequently withdrawn under proposed paragraph (g)(6), the filing by the intrastate

pipeline would be deemed approved effective upon the later of the day after the deadline

for filing protests, if there are no other protests to the filing, or the day after the

withdrawal of all protests unless the intrastate pipeline withdraws, amends, or modifies

its filing or the filing is rejected in accordance with this paragraph prior to that date.

17. Under proposed paragraphs (g)(10) and (h) an intrastate pipeline may file to

withdraw its filing prior to Commission action. Because § 284.123(b)(2)(i) permits an

intrastate pipeline to commence collecting a proposed rate subject to refund upon making

its filing, the pipeline must state in its withdrawal motion that any amounts collected

subject to refund in excess of the rates authorized by the Commission will be refunded

with interest, and that it will file a refund report. The refunds must be made within sixty

days of the date the withdrawal motion becomes effective. A filing that is withdrawn will

not fulfill the requirements under proposed paragraph (g)(8) for approval of a filing.

Page 14: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 11 -

B. Periodic Rate Review of the Rates and Charges of Intrastate Pipelines

18. The Commission has a policy of requiring a review of the rates of both section

311 and Hinshaw pipelines every five years. While the periodic rate review requirement

is not part of the Commission’s existing regulations, the Commission has consistently

imposed that requirement in its orders approving each rate filing by an intrastate pipeline.

The proposed optional notice procedures provide for approval of the filing without a

Commission order. Therefore, the Commission proposes in § 284.123(g)(9) to require

that a NGPA section 311 intrastate pipeline whose rates are deemed approved under the

optional notice procedures file an application for rate approval under § 284.123 on or

before the date five years following the date it filed the application for approval of the

rates pursuant to § 284.123(g). Similarly, a Hinshaw pipeline whose rates are deemed

approved under § 284.123(g) would be required to file either (1) cost and throughput data

sufficient to allow the Commission to determine whether any change to the pipeline’s

rates should be ordered pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act or (2) a petition for

rate approval pursuant to § 284.123, on or before the date five years following the date it

filed the application for approval of rates pursuant to § 284.123(g).11

11

The courts have held that the Commission cannot require interstate pipelines

subject to its NGA jurisdiction to make new rate filings under NGA section 4. Public

Service Commission of New York v. FERC, 866 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1989). Consumers

Energy Co. v. FERC, 226 F.3d 777 (6th

Cir. 2000). Because the Commission regulates

interstate services performed by Hinshaw pipelines under the NGA, the Commission

gives them the option of filing a cost and revenue study every five years, instead of a new

petition for rate approval. Consumers Energy Co., 94 FERC ¶ 61,287 (2001).

Page 15: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 12 -

19. Under the Commission’s proposal, the periodic rate review in our regulations

would only be applicable when intrastate pipelines file under these proposed procedures

in § 284.123(g). Therefore, the overall regulatory burden for the proposed procedures is

less than current procedures for rate approval.

C. Withdrawal Procedures

20. The Commission proposes in § 284.123(h) to codify the procedures for section

311 and Hinshaw pipelines to withdraw any filing under § 284.123 in its entirety prior to

its approval, including filings made under the existing procedures in § 284.123.

Currently, the practice would require a request to withdraw a filing to be filed under the

Commission’s general rules of practice and procedure. Because § 284.123(b)(2)(i)

permits an intrastate pipeline to commence collecting a proposed rate subject to refund

upon making its filing, proposed § 284.123(h)(1) would require the pipeline to

acknowledge that any amounts collected subject to refund in excess of the rates

authorized the Commission will be refunded with interest and a refund report will be

filed. The refunds must be made within sixty days of the date the withdrawal motion

becomes effective. A shipper will have 15 days to respond to the pipeline’s filing.

Section 284.123(h)(2) would make the pipeline’s withdrawal of its filing effective at the

end of 15 days from the date of filing the withdrawal motion, if no opposition to the

motion is filed within that period and the Commission does not issue an order disallowing

the motion. This proposal would add regulatory certainty as to the Commission’s

treatment of withdrawal filings, and ensure that the pipeline will know its obligations if it

withdraws a filing.

Page 16: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 13 -

III. Information Collection Statement

21. The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)12

requires each federal agency to seek and

obtain Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval before undertaking a

collection of information directed to ten or more persons or contained in a rule of general

applicability.13

The OMB’s regulations implementing the PRA require approval of

certain information collection requirements imposed by agency rules.14

Upon approval of

a collection(s) of information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and an

expiration date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements of an agency rule will not

be penalized for failing to respond to these collections of information unless the

collections of information display a valid OMB control number.

22. The Commission is submitting these proposed reporting and recordkeeping

requirements to OMB for its review and approval. The Commission solicits comments

on the proposed modifications, the accuracy of burden estimates, ways to enhance the

quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and any suggested methods

for minimizing respondents’ burden.

23. The Commission’s estimates of the average annual public reporting burden

imposed on the section 311 and Hinshaw intrastate pipelines of making filings for rate

12

44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

13 OMB’s regulations at 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(4)(i) require that “[a]ny recordkeeping,

reporting, or disclosure requirement contained in a rule of general applicability is deemed

to involve ten or more persons.”

14 5 CFR 1320.

Page 17: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 14 -

approval under § 284.123 will not change, except for an estimated burden of only 12

hours per year for the new withdrawal filing requirements as a result of the proposed rule

in Docket No. RM12-17-000. Following is a table showing the existing burden estimate,

a relabeling to reflect the new filing option, and the additional withdrawal procedures

specifically tailored for intrastate pipelines.

FERC-549 (OMB Control No.

1902-0086)

Number of

Respondents

(a)

Burden Hours

Per

Respondent

Per Year

(1 filing/year)

(b)

Total Annual

Burden Hours

(a X b)

Existing Inventory:

Rates and Charges for Intrastate

Pipelines (18 CFR 284.123(b)

and (e)) 67 12 804

Proposed in NOPR in RM12-17:

Rates and Charges for Intrastate

Pipelines (18 CFR 284.123(b),

(e) and (g)) 67 12 804

Withdrawal of Filing prior to

Approval (18 CFR 284.123(h)) 1 12 12

FERC-549 Total (Proposed) 67 12 816

Information Collection Costs: The Commission has reviewed the burdens imposed by

this rulemaking. The Commission’s review found that the proposed changes will not

affect the burden on section 311 intrastate and Hinshaw pipelines of making an initial

filing seeking approval of proposed rates or operating conditions pursuant to § 284.123.

The preparation effort or the substance of a filing made pursuant to § 284.123(g) would

be the same as for a filing made pursuant to existing §§ 284.123(b) and/or 284.123(e).

Page 18: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 15 -

24. The Commission is also proposing a new withdrawal procedure for filings made

prior to their approval to reflect the unique nature of the intrastate pipeline regulations

that allow a pipeline to file for a rate change and begin charging the new rates prior to

Commission approval. The proposed new § 284.123(h) regulation will reflect the

regulatory process that addresses that unique rate implementation issue. The

Commission believes it would add certainty to any intrastate pipeline making a

withdrawal filing.

25. The proposed changes will primarily affect the post-filing process and cost. The

changes will reduce overall cost and delay for stakeholders; however that post-filing

burden is beyond the scope of requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The new

optional procedures will provide both intrastate pipelines and their shippers greater

regulatory certainty and a simpler process without any change in the upfront burden of

preparing and making a filing.

TITLE: FERC-549, NGPA Title III Transactions and NGA Blanket Certificate

Transactions (OMB Control No. 1902-0086).

ACTION: Proposed revisions.

RESPONDENTS: Section 311 Intrastate and Hinshaw Natural Gas Pipelines.

FREQUENCY OF RESPONSES: At least once every five years.

NEED FOR INFORMATION: The Commission proposes adding a new optional notice

procedure in § 284.123(g) which section 311 intrastate and Hinshaw pipelines could use

when making a filing seeking approval of proposed rates or operating conditions pursuant

to § 284.123. As proposed, an intrastate pipeline may choose to file using the current

Page 19: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 16 -

procedures pursuant to §§ 284.123(b) and 284.123(e), or may elect to file pursuant to the

new procedure. Section 284.123(g) provides a shortened period for final approval of the

proposed rates and operating conditions and authorization if no protest is filed within the

time allowed and a reconciliation period of 30 days from the deadline for protests to

resolve contested filings without the need for a Commission order on the pipeline’s rate

proposal.

26. In 18 CFR 284.123(h), the Commission also proposes to implement new

regulations with respect to withdrawal of a filing prior to approval. The regulations

provide more details about the rights and obligations of the intrastate pipeline and its

shippers. These procedures would lessen regulatory costs, provide increased regulatory

certainty, and result in an improved framework in which to achieve settlement of

contested cases.

INTERNAL REVIEW: The Commission has reviewed the proposed changes and has

determined that the changes are necessary. These requirements conform to the

Commission’s need for efficient information collection, communication, and

management within the energy industry. The Commission has assured itself, by means of

internal review, that there is specific, objective support for the burden estimates

associated with the information collection requirements.

27. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting requirements by

contacting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington,

DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director, e-mail:

[email protected], Phone: (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873]. Comments on

Page 20: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 17 -

the requirements of this rule may also be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk

Officer for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]. For security reasons, comments

should be sent by e-mail to OMB at [email protected]. Please reference

OMB Control No. 1902-0086, FERC-549, and Docket No. RM12-17 in your submission.

IV. Environmental Analysis

28. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an

Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant adverse effect

on the human environment.15

The Commission has categorically excluded certain actions

from these requirements as not having a significant effect on the human environment.16

The actions proposed to be taken here fall within categorical exclusions in the

Commission’s regulations for rules that are corrective, clarifying or procedural, for

information gathering, analysis, and dissemination, and for sales, exchange, and

transportation of natural gas that requires no construction of facilities.17

Therefore an

environmental review is unnecessary and has not been prepared in this rulemaking.

15

Regulations Implementing National Environmental Policy Act, Order No. 486,

52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs., Regulations Preambles 1986-1990

¶ 30,783 (1987).

16 18 CFR 380.4.

17 See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii), 380.4(a)(5) and 380.4(a)(27).

Page 21: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 18 -

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act

29. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)18

generally requires a description

and analysis of proposed rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. The Commission identified two small entities as respondents to

the requirements in the proposed rule.19

As explained above, the Commission estimates

that the proposed § 284.123(g) regulations will serve as a substitute for filings currently

done pursuant to §§ 284.123(b) and (e), and § 284.123(h) provides regulatory certainty if

a pipeline decides to withdraw its filing. The Commission estimates that intrastate

pipelines will experience little if any change in regulatory burden associated with making

their filings, and pipelines will be able to avoid certain costs and delays post-filing due to

the new streamlined process. Accordingly, the Commission certifies that this rule will

not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities and no regulatory

flexibility analysis is required.

VI. Comment Procedures

30. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on the matters

and issues proposed in this notice to be adopted, including any related matters or

alternative proposals that commenters may wish to discuss. Comments are due

18

5 U.S.C. 601-612.

19 The U. S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Table of Small Business Size

Standards is found in 13 CFR 121.201. SBA’s updated version of the size standards

(effective March 26, 2012, and available at

http://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf) defines a natural

gas pipeline (contained in Subsector 486, Pipeline Transportation) as “small” when it has

average annual receipts of $25,500,000 or less.

Page 22: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 19 -

[INSERT DATE 30 days after publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER]].

Comments must refer to Docket No. RM12-17-000, and must include the commenter's

name, the organization they represent, if applicable, and their address in their comments.

31. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically via the eFiling

link on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts

most standard word processing formats. Documents created electronically using word

processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not

in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not need to make a paper

filing.

32. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically must send an

original of their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the

Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.

33. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and may be

viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the Document Availability

section below. Commenters on this proposal are not required to serve copies of their

comments on other commenters.

VII. Document Availability

34. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register,

the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the

contents of this document via the Internet through the Commission's Home Page

(http://www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal

Page 23: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 20 -

business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE, Room 2A,

Washington DC 20426.

35. From the Commission's Home Page on the Internet, this information is available

on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and

Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this

document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this

document in the docket number field.

36. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission’s website during

normal business hours from the Commission’s Online Support at 202-502-6652 (toll free

at 1-866-208-3676) or email at [email protected], or the Public Reference

Room at (202) 502-8371, TTY (202)502-8659. E-mail the Public Reference Room at

[email protected].

List of subjects in 18 CFR Part 284

Continental shelf

Natural gas

Reporting and recordkeeping requirement

By direction of the Commission.

( S E A L )

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

Page 24: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 21 -

In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission proposes to amend Part 284,

Chapter I, Title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows.

PART 284 – CERTAIN SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS

UNDER THE NATURAL GAS POLICY ACT OF 1978 AND RELATED

AUTHORITIES

1. The authority citation for Part 284 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717z, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352; 43 U.S.C.

1331-1356.

2. Section 284.123 is amended to read as follows:

§284.123 Rates and charges

*****

(g) Election of Notice Procedures.

(1) Applicability. An intrastate pipeline filing for approval of rates, a statement

of operating conditions, and any amendments or modifications thereto

pursuant to § 284.123 may use the notice procedures in this paragraph.

Any intrastate pipeline electing to use these notice procedures for a filing

must clearly state its election to use these procedures on the first page of its

filing. Such filing is approved and the rates deemed fair and equitable and

not in excess of the amount that an interstate pipeline would be permitted to

charge for similar transportation service if the requirements paragraph

(g)(8) have been fulfilled.

Page 25: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 22 -

(2) Rejection of filing. The Director of the Office of Energy Market Regulation

or his designee shall reject within 7 days of the date of filing a request

which patently fails to comply with the provisions of paragraphs (e) or (f)

of this section, without prejudice to the intrastate pipeline's refiling a

complete application. If such filing was required by this section, that filing

must be refiled within 14 days of the date of the rejection.

(3) Publication of notice of filing. The Secretary of the Commission shall issue

a notice of the filing within 10 days of the date of the filing, which will then

be published in the FEDERAL REGISTER. The notice shall designate a

deadline for filing interventions, initial comments, final comments, and

protests to the filing. The deadline for interventions and initial comments

shall be 14 days after the date of the filing. The deadline for final

comments and protests shall be 60 days after the date of the filing or such

other date established by the Secretary of the Commission.

(4) Protests.

(i) Any person or the Commission’s staff may file a protest prior to the

deadline for protests. Copies of the protest must be served on the

Secretary of the Commission and the intrastate pipeline.

(ii) Protests shall be filed with the Commission in the form required by

Part 385 of this Chapter including a detailed statement of the

protestor's interest in the filing and the specific reasons and rationale

for the objection and whether the protestor seeks to be an intervenor.

Page 26: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 23 -

(5) Effect of protest. If a protest is filed in accordance with paragraph (g)(4) of

this section, then the intrastate pipeline, the person who filed the protest,

any intervenors, and staff shall have 30 days from the deadline for filing

protests established by the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with

paragraph (g)(3) of this section, to resolve the protest, and to file a

withdrawal of the protest pursuant to paragraph (g)(6) of this section.

Informal settlement conferences may be convened by the Director of the

Office of Energy Market Regulation or his designee during this 30 day

period. If a protest is not withdrawn or dismissed by end of that 30 day

period, the filing shall not be deemed approved pursuant to this paragraph.

Within 60 days from the deadline for filing protests established by the

Secretary of the Commission in accordance with paragraph (g)(3) of this

section the Commission will establish procedures to resolve the proceeding.

(6) Withdrawal of protests. The protestor may withdraw a protest by

submitting written notice of withdrawal to the Secretary of the Commission

pursuant to § 385.216 and serving a copy on the intrastate pipeline, any

intervenors, and any person who has filed a motion to intervene in the

proceeding.

(7) Amendments or modifications to tariff record prior to approval. An

intrastate pipeline may file to amend or modify a tariff record contained in

the initial filing pursuant to the procedures under paragraph (g) which has

not yet been approved pursuant to paragraph (g)(8). Such filing will toll the

Page 27: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 24 -

notice period established in paragraph (g)(3) of this section and the

Secretary of the Commission will issue a notice establishing new deadlines

for comments and protests for the entire filing pursuant to paragraph (g)(3).

(8) Final Approval.

(i) If no protest is filed within the time allowed by the Secretary of the

Commission under paragraph (g)(3), the filing by the intrastate

pipeline is approved, effective on the day after time expires for filing

protests unless, during that time, the intrastate pipeline withdraws,

amends, or modifies its filing or the filing is rejected pursuant to this

paragraph.

(ii) If any protest is filed within the time allowed by the Secretary of the

Commission under paragraph (g)(3) and is subsequently withdrawn

before the end of the 30-day reconciliation period provided by

paragraph (g)(5) of this section, the filing by the intrastate pipeline is

approved effective upon the later of the day after the deadline for

filing protests, if there are no other protests to the filing, or the day

after the withdrawal of all protests unless the intrastate pipeline

withdraws, amends, or modifies its filing or the filing is rejected,

prior to that date.

(9) Periodic rate review. Rates of pipelines approved by the Commission

pursuant to this paragraph are required to be periodically reviewed. Any

intrastate pipeline with rates so approved must file an application for rate

Page 28: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 25 -

approval under § 284.123 of this chapter on or before the date five years

following the date it filed the application for authorization of rates pursuant

to this paragraph. Any Hinshaw pipeline that has been a granted a blanket

certificate under § 284.224 of this chapter and with rates approved pursuant

to this paragraph must on or before the date five years following the date it

filed the application for authorization of the rates pursuant to this

paragraph either file (1) cost, throughput, revenue and other data, in the

form specified in § 154.313 to allow the Commission to determine whether

any change in rates is required pursuant to 5 of the Natural Gas Act or (2)

an application for rate authorization pursuant to § 284.123.

(10) Withdrawal of filing prior to approval. A pipeline may, pursuant to

paragraph (h) of this section, withdraw in its entirety a filing made pursuant

to paragraph (g) of this section that has not been approved by filing a

withdrawal motion with the Commission. A filing that is withdrawn will

not fulfill the requirements under paragraph (g)(8) of this section.

(h) Withdrawal of filing. A pipeline may withdraw in its entirety a filing pursuant to §

284.123 that has not been approved by filing a withdrawal motion with the

Commission.

(1) The withdrawal motion must state that any amounts collected subject to

refund in excess of the rates authorized the Commission will be refunded

with interest calculated and a refund report filed with the Commission in

Page 29: that fall under the Commission’s jurisdiction pursuant to ...1. The Commission proposes new optional notice procedures which intrastate pipelines may elect to use when filing proposed

Docket No. RM12-17-000 - 26 -

accordance with § 154.501 of this chapter. The refunds must be made

within 60 days of the date the withdrawal motion becomes effective.

(2) The withdrawal motion will become effective, and the filing will be

deemed withdrawn at the end of 15 days from the date of filing of the

withdrawal motion, if no order disallowing the motion is issued within that

period. If an answer in opposition is filed within the 15 day period, the

withdrawal is not effective until an order accepting the withdrawal is

issued.