tharakan's april 30 presentation

15
Biofuels in Asia Key Trends and Implications ECO-Asia Clean Development and Climate Program Pradeep Tharakan Asia’s Future Round Table Bangkok, 30-31 March, 2009

Upload: chinaenviro

Post on 14-May-2015

589 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Biofuels in AsiaKey Trends and Implications

ECO-Asia Clean Development and Climate Program

Pradeep Tharakan

Asia’s Future Round TableBangkok, 30-31 March, 2009

Page 2: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Growth in Transport Fuel Demand and Implications

• Transport demand to increase 15 – 350% by 2030.• Fossil fuels currently contribute 5 – 48% of total particulate matter in Asian cities.• Biofuels are roughly 3% of current transport demand in developing Asia (1% globally).

Report Findings

Page 3: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Boom (2004-2005) and Slump (2007-2008)• Introduction of targets and incentives in the US and EU

• Asia starts to produce biofuels for export and countries create targets/mandates of their own

• Current feedstock and oil prices erode producer profitability – a current slump

Study Context

-

15,000

30,000

45,000

60,000

75,000

90,000

As ia World As ia World2004 2008

Million Liters

Page 4: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Ambitious Targets and Mandates Set

Report Findings

Country Ethanol Target Biodiesel Target

China 10 MMT by 2020 2 MMT by 2020

India 20% by 2017 20% by 2017

Indonesia 20% by 2015 10% by 2010

Malaysia na 5% by 2009

Philippines 10% by 2011 2% by 2009

Thailand 10% by 2011 10% by 2012

Vietnam 500 ML by 2020 50 ML by 2020

Page 5: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

In other words…INDONESIA (Ethanol)

• CURRENT: 215 Thousand kL/year;

• 2010: 4 million kL/yr

• 2025: 17.3 million kL/yr

INDONESIA (Biodiesel)

• CURRENT: 2.9 Million kL/year;

• 2010: 5 million kL/yr

• 2025: 25 million kL/yr

• INDIA – TO MEET 20% NEED FOR FUEL BY 2017

Scope and Objectives

Page 6: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Life cycle assessment of biofuels

Indicative Ranges of Net Energy and GHG Balances of Biofuels from Selected Biofuels Feedstocks without Land Use Change

Crop Energy Balance* GHG Savings**

Sugarcane -0.6 to 0.8 MJ 78–133 %Sweet Sorghum -0.6 to -0.3 MJ 67–133 %Cellulosic Ethanol -0.2 to 0.4 MJ 67–111 %Corn 0.4 to 1.2 MJ 11–56 %Oil Palm -0.3 to 0 MJ 122–156 %Jatropha -0.5 to 0.4 MJ 100 –144 %Coconut -0.1 to 0.4 MJ 56–86 %

* By way of comparison, the energy balance of fossil fuels is 1.2 MJ of fossil fuel inputs to produce 1 MJ of energy output. Therefore, biofuels with net energy balances of <1.2 MJ produce net energy savings compared to fossil fuels.** GHG savings are relative to fossil fuels

Report Findings

Page 7: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Carbon payback analysis

Report Findings

• Carbon Debt

• Carbon Payback Time

Years

Page 8: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Impacts on air, soil, and water quality and quantity• Severe water shortages

projected for India and China – may not support biofuels production.

• Reduction in CO, particulates and volatile organics but ozone and NOx are increased

• Water quality impacted by synthetic fertilizer run-off and waste water from processing

Report Findings

Page 9: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Biodiversity impactsSugarcane (0.5 Mil ha)

Oil Palm (3 Mil ha)

HCV Land in Borneo

• High density of species in rainforests of Malaysia and Indonesia

• Peatlands• Indonesia has

recently lifted ban on peatlands

• Poor governance

• Indirect loss of forest (e.g. timber extraction, forest fires) Sources: WWF and

government of Indonesia

Report Findings

Page 10: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Oil Palm Expansion – An almost certain outcomeSource : Oil World 2007a b Only for the 7 major oils

Demand for Edible Oil

Demand 2007 Demand 2050 Plantation 2007

Plantation 2050

121 Mt (37 Mt) 240 (120 Mt) 11 Mha +12 Mha

Source : Crowley (2009)

Page 11: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Social Impacts

• Smallholder schemes have shown mixed results small-scale systems preferable

• Employment potential needs to balanced with efficiency and mechanization Potential problems supplying the infrastructure for

plantation expansion (e.g. jatropha and oil palm expansion in Indonesia)

• Large-scale biofuels can result in infringements on indigenous peoples and labor rightsneed enforcement of rights, avenues for conflict resolution

and participation mechanisms

Page 12: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

From global transport fuels to decentralized energy – from Cars to People • More than half a billion people in Asia lack access to

modern electricity• Negative environmental, economic, and social

impacts from large-scale biofuels decentralized energy using non-food crops can reduce soil

erosion, improve soil fertility and improve water quality and reduce deforestation with careful planning and management

• Biofuels on a smaller, decentralized scale can provide energy for cooking and transport, and electricity

• Biofuels for decentralized energy can provide greater social benefits than biofuels for transport.

Report Findings

Page 13: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Future Priority Areas

• Policy Development Needs• Support for Sustainability Standards and Certification• Support scale-up of decentralized biofuels• Assess and map land resources• Support agronomy research and crop improvement• Tech Transfer on cellulosic ethanol• Technical Assistance on life cycle analysis

Page 14: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Thank You

Pradeep Tharakan

[email protected]

www.cleanenergyasia.net

Page 15: Tharakan's April 30 Presentation

Background• 3-year program, launched Oct 2006• Active in 6 largest developing Asian economies:

China, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam• USAID-led program with additional funding from Dept. of State (APP)• Areas of focus: Cleaner Coal, CFLs, Clean Energy Finance, and now

biofuels.