thank you for joining ismpp u today!€¦ · •how does this compare with current practices –...

The program will begin promptly at 11:00 am EDT

THANK YOU FOR JOINING ISMPP U TODAY!

November 5, 2014

ISMPP WOULD LIKE TO THANK. . .

. . . the following Corporate Platinum Sponsors for their ongoing support of the society

2

ISMPP ANNOUNCEMENTS

• 2015 European Meeting of ISMPP: Registration is now open! Sign up now to receive Early Bird Pricing; go to ISMPP.org for brochure

• Deadline for abstract submissions to the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMPP is Friday, January 16, 2015

• ISMPP offers companies the opportunity to sponsor a single ISMPP U webinar. Benefits include acknowledgment during the presentation, in member-targeted publicity materials and on the ISMPP website. Contact [email protected] for additional information

• Stay “in the know.” ISMPP has recently added a newsfeed to the homepage of our website (www.ismpp.org). Information is updated daily and provides direct links to news relating to the medical publications industry

• Get Social! ISMPP has Group on Linkedin—if you’re not yet a member, join the conversation

3

FOR THE BEST LISTENING EXPERIENCE . . .

To optimize your ISMPP U webinar experience today, please:

• Turn up the volume of your computer speakers

• Use the fastest internet connection available to you

• Use a hardwire connection if available

• If you experience audio problems, please consider switching to a different browser (eg, Chrome vs Internet Explorer)

4

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN PUBLICATION PLANNING

INTRODUCTIONS

• Faculty: Hajira Koeller graduated from Weill Graduate School, Cornell University, New York, NY with a PhD in Neuroscience. She started her professional career in publishing as the Editor for Trends in Neurosciences, Cell Press, Elsevier, Cambridge, MA. Hajira then transitioned to medical publications, first as a Scientific Writer and later as a Scientific Specialist at PAREXEL Inc, Waltham, MA. Following her interests in clinical research, Hajira has recently joined Tesaro, Inc, Waltham, MA as a Clinical Scientist. Hajira is a member of AMWA since 2010 and of ISMPP since 2010 and completed the CMPP earlier in 2014. Hajira has a keen interest in clinical research and development, strategic publication planning and competitive intelligence.

6

INTRODUCTIONS

• Faculty: Donna Simcoe is Principal at Simcoe Consultants, a biomedical consulting company focusing on medical publication strategy and medical writing. Over the past 20 years, Donna has managed publications at Cadence, AstraZeneca, Wyeth and Cephalon. Donna holds 3 Masters degrees (Biomedical Writing, Biotechnology and an MBA), and is a CMPP. She is an active member in AMWA, ISMPP, TIPPA and CBI. Donna recently served as the Chair of the ISMPP U Committee (2013-2014) and is the current AMWA Pacific Southwest Chapter President (2014-2016).

7

INTRODUCTIONS

• Faculty: Gary Burd is Senior Vice President, Global Medical Director at Caudex Medical with 12 years of medical communications and scientific publishing experience. Gary has led communication planning and publication planning activities in several therapy areas, including diabetes, solid tumour oncology, haematological malignancies, transplantation, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and respiratory and lung disease. Prior to his medical communications work he gained valuable editorial experience in journal publishing with Portland Press. Gary obtained his PhD from the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, London working on a monoclonal antibody therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus.

8

INTRODUCTIONS

• Moderator: Charles Rosenblum is Associate Director, Global Scientific and Medical Publications, supporting Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease programs at Merck & Co., Inc. He has worked in the medical communications area since 2008. Prior to this, he was a drug discovery researcher working in pharma. Charles has been a member of the ISMPP U committee since 2011.

9

DISCLAIMER

• Information presented reflects the personal knowledge and opinion of the presenters and does not represent the position of their current or past employers or the position of ISMPP

10

TODAY’S OBJECTIVES

• At the conclusion of this educational session, attendees should be able to:– Understand real-time collaborative editing programs and the potential

advantages/disadvantages of using such platforms– Access different sites that provide research news and scholarly

publication information– Be knowledgeable about different sites and applications that provide

research news and scholarly publication information

11

INTRODUCTION

Collaborative Editing

PublicationAnalytics

ResearchTools

12

RESEARCH TOOLS: ORGANIZED–RELEVANT–CONTENT

Hajira Koeller, PhD, CMPP Clinical Scientist, Tesaro, Inc

AUDIENCE QUESTION

AUDIENCE QUESTION

How do you mostly keep up-to-date in your therapy/disease area(s)?

A. Automated alerts (eg PubMed or Google)B. Scan top journals C. Custom search using bibliographic softwareD. All of the aboveE. None of the above. I wait for my colleagues to send me relevant pubs!

14

HOW DO FIND PUBLICATIONS OF INTEREST?

One Size FitsAll

One Size FitsAll

‘Push’ Newsletters

eTOCs Podcasts

RSS

‘Pull’Personalized

alertsPre-defined

searches

15

CITATION DATABASES

Database Subject Coverage Owner (Availability)

Medline Biomedicine 1946–present; >5,600 journals, 2-4,000 references added/week

National Library of Medicine (Free)

Google Scholar1 Scholarly literature on the web

Articles, theses, books, abstracts, patents, court opinions

Google (Free)

Scopus1 Science, technology, medicine, social sciences, arts & humanities

20,000 peer-reviewed journals, >700 trade publications + book series, 5.5M conference papers, global patents

Elsevier (Subscription)

Web of Science1 Sciences, social sciences, arts & humanities

>20,000 journals, ~60,000 books, ~2.6M studies + data sets, 15,000 conference proceedings, >51M patents

Thomson Reuters (Subscription)

Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1092-6. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.

16

CURATED ‘NEWS-worthy’ CONTENT

Source Summary (Owner) Link

MedScape Publications, clinical trials, guidelines, conference coverage, regulatory (WebMD)

www.medscape.com

UptoDate Evidence-based, clinical decision support resource (WolterKluwer)

www.uptodate.com

MedPage Today Medical news, conference coverage, CME (Everyday Health)

www.medpagetoday.com

Medical News Today Medical news, conference coverage, regulatory, professional societies (MediLexicon International Ltd)

www.medicalnewstoday.com

Wiki Journal Club Clinician-reviewed summaries of major studies

www.wikijournalclub.org

NEJM, The Lancet,JAMA, Nature Publishing Group, Science

Curated content, podcasts, editorials, topical highlights

www.jwatch.orgJNReader.comSciencemag.org

17

SUMMARY: CURATED CONTENT

• Benefits– Sweeping overview of what’s trending– Professionally curated content

• Disadvantages– Too much information, inefficient– Curated content (!)

18

TOOLS: FINDING RELEVANT RESEARCH

Summary LinkGoogle Scholar Articles, theses, books, abstracts, patents,

court opinionsScholar.google.com

Microsoft Academic Search

Search and discover, graphic visualization of author relationships, publications trends,

academic.research.microsoft.com

PubMed Online search portal for Medline www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

PubMed Pub Reminer Refine queries for Pubmed, by author, region, year, journals

hgserver2.amc.nl/cgi-bin/miner/miner2.cgi

GoPubMed Semantic sorting of searches by concepts(gene ontology, medical subject headings)

gopubmed.com

Docwise Personalized E-journal docwi.seBrowZine Customized browsing, monitoring journals thirdiron.com/browzine/

Read Custom read, monitor journals readbyqxmd.com

19

SUMMARY: RELEVANT RESEARCH

• Benefits– Optimize scope of publications and discover related content– Customize searches for different projects

• Disadvantages– Quality of information depends on your search criteria

21

BEYOND ORGANIZING: PAPERLESS, ANNOTATED, COLLABORATIVE

Refman CiteULikeEndnote RefWorksPaperpile BookendsZotero DocearMendeley SciRefRead Cube RefbaseCitaviPapersQiqqa … many more!

• Beyond basic reference/document management– Annotation, highlighting– Cross-platform sync, web storage– Collaboration, public and private

22

Collaboration with private and public groupsSynchronized sharing and

exporting of annotations, notes

23

COLLABORATIVE EDITING: WORKING WITH AUTHORS IN REAL-TIME

Donna Simcoe, MS, MS, MBA, CMPP Principal, Simcoe Consultants

AUDIENCE QUESTION

AUDIENCE QUESTION

How many times in 2014 have you used a collaborative program to work with an author/authors in real time?

A. 1 manuscript B. 2 manuscriptsC. 3 manuscripts or more D. I have never used a collaborative website to edit a document with authors in real time

25

WHAT IS A COLLABORATIVE EDITING?

• Software application that allows several people to edit a computer file using different computers– Series Editing

• Similar to static revision control (Track Changes)

– Parallel Editing• Users can edit the same file simultaneously and see

each others edits in real time

26

HOW IT WORKS – SCREEN SHOTSEXAMPLE 1

27

HOW IT WORKS – SCREEN SHOTSEXAMPLE 2

28

COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMS

Adobe Buzzword eXpresso Microsoft OffiSync ShowDocument ThinkFree

beWeeVee Google Docs,Sheets, Slides

Novell Vibe SourceForge RealTime Collaborative Editor

XaitPorter

Creately Kune ownCloud 7 Documents

Sylogent – Online Authoring

Zoho Sheet

Eclipse DocShare LucidChart OneDrive PleaseReview –EditZone

Journals may offer collaborative programs

Etherpad Marratech Whiteboard

SharePoint 2013

29

CONSIDERATIONS (SLIDE 1 OF 2)

– Need to be benchmarked• How does this compare with current practices

– Need to be auditable, compliant• Can it be documented and retained especially if under legal hold

• Would a static final document and Track Changes version retained after edit

• Would video recording of the live changes be acceptable

– Is the best use of the authors’/publication manager's time • Multiple calls

• 4+ hours on a call

30

CONSIDERATIONS (SLIDE 2 OF 2)

– Program security • Password protected

• Who owns the data posted on the program

– Maybe better for initial stage than for wordsmithing– Key author may sway opinion– Global considerations - multiple time zones – Could use in other ways

• Publication planning

• Brainstorming

• Resolving issues

31

BENEFITS OF COLLABORATIVE EDITING

• Efficiency • Interactive • Fosters good collaboration• Encourage engagement and accountability of authors to contribute

– Anonymous changes can no longer be made

– Peer-pressure may increase participation

• Track changes versions to defend contribution was made by author

Final point: Great way to be collaborative but there are many items that need to be considered – need to be performed in the right way

32

PUBLICATIONS ANALYTICS

Gary Burd, Senior Vice President, Global Medical DirectorCaudex Medical

AUDIENCE QUESTION

AUDIENCE QUESTION

Are you measuring the societal impact of your publication plans or your clients’ publication plans?A. YesB. NoC. I don’t understand the question

34

WHY THE FOCUS ON PUBLICATION ANALYTICS?

Time is money

Measuring ROI is

essential

Web has changed publishing

Increasingtransparency

fromjournals

Conversations happen online

Journals aren’t the only place

for scienceanymore

35

ANALYSING WHAT HAPPENS TO A PUBLICATION

Scientific statements

Publication plan

Published/ presented articles

Medical writing

What we need to say

When and where we say it

Communicating it clearly

Disseminating it

But what happens after

that...

36

IN OTHER WORDS... THINGS HAVE CHANGED

Image credit: Eaun Aidie, altmetric

OLD WORLD NEW WORLD

37

SOME TOOLS FOR PUBLICATION ANALYTICS... THERE ARE MORE!

Name URL What does it do?altmetrics www.altmetric.com Article metricsPlum analytics www.plumanalytics.com Author metricsImpactStory http://impactstory.org Author online profilesReaderMeter http://www.readermeter.org/ Estimates impact using

bookmarksPLoS Impact Explorer http://www.altmetric.com/

interface/plos.htmlAltmetric analysis of PLoSarticles

altmetrics manifesto www.altmetrics.org altmetrics infoTraackr http://traackr.com/ Author digital influencersTalkwalker www.talkwalker.com Social media listening

38

ARTICLE METRICS:ALTMETRIC EXPLORER

• Measures the impact of an article• Shows all of the attention surrounding papers• Altmetric score: measure of the attention that a scholarly article

has received– Derived from 3 main factors: volume of mentions,

category of sources, author of the mention

• Requires payment for commercial / institution access– Single article metrics for presentation online are available for free

39

RESULTS GATHERED ON THE ARTICLE

40

ALTMETRIC EXPLORER – A HOT TOPIC

Some recent examples at the ISMPP 10th Annual Meeting:

• Feeny SL, Ryder K (2014) Future Perspective on Digital Media/Metrics. ISMPP 10th

Annual Meeting General Session Presentations– https://ismpp.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/Education/AnnualMeeting/10thAM/General_Session_Presentations/05_digitalmedia_metrics_10am.pdf

• Rees T, Adie E and Smith S (2014) Bad news travels furthest: the social media impact of publications around trial disclosure and medical writing. Curr Med Res Opin 30;S1:S10

– https://ismpp.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/Education/AnnualMeeting/10thAM/Abstract_Posters/24_rees_10am_poster_encore_final.pdf

• Huang T, Davies J, Weatherall K et al. (2014) Measuring publication impact using article-level metrics (altmetrics). Curr Med Res Opin 30;S1:S16

– https://ismpp.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/Education/AnnualMeeting/10thAM/Abstract_Posters/4_huang_10am_poster_final.pdf

48

AUDIENCE QUESTION

AUDIENCE QUESTION

Do you believe that Facebook and Twitter are important for measuring impact of journal publications?A. YesB. Not yet, but one dayC. No, and they never will

49

WHAT CAN ALTMETRIC EXPLORER BE USED FOR?

• Quantify the reach of scientific articles • Explore the channels in which the scientific article is being

covered• Gives the geographical reach of the coverage• Links to related mentions for easy research of the sphere of

influence

50

LIMITATIONS

• Sources – altmetric takes it’s information from a variety of sources but there are gaps

• Sentiment – negative and positive coverage is included• Doesn’t compare published studies – manual sorting is needed• Small team – not a huge commercial enterprise

51

AUTHOR METRICS:PLUM ANALYTICS

• Measures the influence of an author• Shows all of the attention surrounding an author (artifacts) – not

just citations– Eg, blog posts, book chapters, conference papers, videos, web pages,

media, interviews, patents, grants

• Artifact summary: measure of the influence an author has• Requires payment for commercial / institution access

– Single article metrics for presentation online are available for free

52

Professor Brown

E-mail

Prof BrownTelephone

53

Metrics for all of the selected author’s articles are shown.

Comparing between authors reveals differences in metrics – We know from altmetrics that some authors get higher levels of interest due to the connections and channels that they use?

Broad range of data sources

Professor Brown

E-mail

Prof BrownTelephone

54

AUDIENCE QUESTION

AUDIENCE QUESTION

Do you consider it appropriate to determine an author’s level of influence to this extent to help develop a publication plan?A. YesB. Not yet, but one dayC. No, and it never will

55

“It is better to be looked over than over looked”

Mae West

56

QUESTIONS......

To ask a question, please type your query into the ‘Q&A’ chat box at the bottom left of your screen. Every attempt will be made to answer all questions.

UPCOMING ISMPP U WEBINARS

• December 2014– Topic: Case-based ISMPP U with a focus on social media

• January 2015– Topic: Guideline Updates + ISMPP Partners

58

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING!

We hope you enjoyed today's presentation.

Please take a moment to click on the link that will be provided and complete the survey. We

depend on your valuable feedback as we develop future educational offerings.

59