texas a&m e3 summer research program class project jeffrey derry june 27, 2007

26
Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Upload: sven

Post on 17-Jan-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007. Topics… The question General TEA objectives Specific lesson objectives The experiment The test rig Graphs of the data Conclusions Extensions Acknowledgements. THE QUESTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Texas A&ME3 Summer Research

Program Class Project

Jeffrey DerryJune 27, 2007

Page 2: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Topics…The questionGeneral TEA objectivesSpecific lesson objectivesThe experimentThe test rigGraphs of the dataConclusionsExtensionsAcknowledgements

Page 3: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

THE QUESTION

Which of the given test materials provides the greatest damping on the

harmonic motion of a given base material?

Page 4: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

General Objectives: To identify the characteristics of a

graph of a real world application To use graphical analysis to justify a

decision

Page 5: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Specific Objectives:To collect data using the TI-CBRTo import data into ExcelTo identify relative maximaTo identify the period and frequency of a

graph of harmonic motionTo use Excel to graph and interpret dataTo determine which of the test materials

has the greatest damping effect

Page 6: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Experiment:Each group of students will…1.Set up the test rig according to specification,

given the spec sheet and materials.2. For the base and 3 damping materials runs

A. Use the CBR to collect data (time, distance)B. Use TI-Connect to export the data to ExcelC. Make a stat plot for the dataD. Identify the relative maxima for the test runE.Determine the period and frequency for the test run

3. Present a data and graphical analysis of all graphs to determine which material has the greatest damping effect on the base material.

Page 7: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Group ResponsibilitiesPerform experiment

Collect data

Import data into Excel

Interpret data

Plan presentation

Group-1

Group-2

Groups 1&2

NOTE: It is suggested that groups 1 and 2 switch responsibilities after test run 2.

Page 8: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

The Test Rig

Page 9: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

TEST RIG Fig-01

Page 10: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

TEST RIG Fig-02

Page 11: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

TEST RIG Fig-03

Page 12: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

CBR

TI-83

TEST RIG Fig-04

30 cm

Page 13: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

CBR

TI-83

30 cm

10 cm

TEST RIG Fig-05

Page 14: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

TEST RIG Fig-06

Page 15: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

BASE TEST RIG Fig-07

Page 16: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

RUBBER FOAM TEST RIG Fig-08

Damping material

Page 17: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Damping Materials

Felt

Vinyl

Rubber

Page 18: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Graphs of the Data

Page 19: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Metal Base

0.63

0.64

0.65

0.66

0.67

0.68

0.69

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Distance m

Time sec

Page 20: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Felt

0.645

0.65

0.655

0.66

0.665

0.67

0.675

0.68

0.685

0.69

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Distance m

Time sec

Page 21: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Vinyl Foam

0.62

0.63

0.64

0.65

0.66

0.67

0.68

0.69

0.7

0.71

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Distance m

Time sec

Page 22: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Rubber Foam

0.62

0.63

0.64

0.65

0.66

0.67

0.68

0.69

0.7

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Distance m

Time sec

Page 23: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

Response Comparison

0.62

0.63

0.64

0.65

0.66

0.67

0.68

0.69

0.7

0.71

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

time (sec)

base felt vinyl foam rubber foam

Dis

tanc

e (m

)

Time (sec)

Base Felt Vinyl Rubber

Response Comparison

Page 24: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

ConclusionsUsing the data for each test run…The approximate period for each is 0.096768 secThe approximate frequency is 1/0.096768

or 10.33399 cycles/sec

The felt material exhibited the greatest damping effect on the base material.

Page 25: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

ExtensionsDiscuss the theoretical approach to predicting harmonic motionUse the TI-83 to regress the maxima data

of set to identify damping factor, Discuss the use of damping materials in

real world applications

Page 26: Texas A&M E3 Summer Research Program Class Project Jeffrey Derry June 27, 2007

AcknowledgementsDr. Andrew Conkey

Consultant, Fabricator

Dr. Daejong KimMentor