texas 2012 nclb report card 1 part i - campus level ...€¦ · portions of the nclb report card...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 4 Reading
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 74 74 85 99 26 51 23
2011-12 86 86 87 99 14 86 n/a
American Indian/AlaskanNative
2010-11* * 86 * * * *
2011-12 * * 88 * * * n/a
Asian 2010-11 * * 93 * * * *
2011-12 * * 94 * * * n/a
Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander
2010-11* * 84 * * * *
2011-12 * * 90 * * * n/a
African American 2010-11 61 61 79 >99% 39 39 23
2011-12 76 76 79 >99% 24 76 n/a
Hispanic 2010-11 67 67 82 98 33 50 17
2011-12 85 85 84 >99% 15 85 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 2: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 2Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 4 Reading
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
White 2010-11 79 79 93 >99% 21 52 27
2011-12 89 89 94 98 11 89 n/a
Two or More Races 2010-11 * * 90 >99% * * *
2011-12 * * 91 * * * n/a
Female 2010-11 79 79 87 99 21 55 24
2011-12 84 84 89 99 16 84 n/a
Male 2010-11 70 70 84 >99% 30 47 23
2011-12 89 89 85 98 11 89 n/a
Special Education 2010-11 67 67 77 >99% 33 63 3
2011-12 74 74 78 >99% 26 74 n/a
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 52 52 75 97 48 47 5
2011-12 76 76 79 >99% 24 76 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 3: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 3Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 4 Reading
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 69 69 80 >99% 31 51 18
2011-12 84 84 82 99 16 84 n/a
Migrant 2010-11 * * 72 * * * *
2011-12 * * 75 * * * n/a
![Page 4: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 4Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 4Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 4 Mathematics
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 87 87 88 >99% 13 50 36
2011-12 94 94 89 99 6 94 n/a
American Indian/AlaskanNative
2010-11* * 89 * * * *
2011-12 * * 90 * * * n/a
Asian 2010-11 * * 96 * * * *
2011-12 * * 97 * * * n/a
Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander
2010-11* * 88 * * * *
2011-12 * * 93 * * * n/a
African American 2010-11 74 74 80 >99% 26 55 19
2011-12 88 88 80 >99% 12 88 n/a
Hispanic 2010-11 85 85 86 >99% 15 50 35
2011-12 98 98 88 >99% 2 98 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 5: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 5Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 4 Mathematics
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
White 2010-11 89 89 92 >99% 11 49 39
2011-12 93 93 94 99 7 93 n/a
Two or More Races 2010-11 * * 91 >99% * * *
2011-12 * * 92 * * * n/a
Female 2010-11 85 85 88 >99% 15 50 36
2011-12 92 92 89 99 8 92 n/a
Male 2010-11 87 87 88 >99% 13 51 37
2011-12 96 96 88 99 4 96 n/a
Special Education 2010-11 70 70 79 >99% 30 43 27
2011-12 81 81 80 >99% 19 81 n/a
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 81 81 83 >99% 19 63 17
2011-12 97 97 85 >99% 3 97 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 6: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 6Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 4 Mathematics
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 86 86 84 >99% 14 56 30
2011-12 94 94 85 >99% 6 94 n/a
Migrant 2010-11 * * 80 * * * *
2011-12 * * 82 * * * n/a
![Page 7: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 7Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 7Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Reading
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 83 83 92 >99% 17 55 28
2011-12 85 85 87 99 15 85 n/a
American Indian/AlaskanNative
2010-11* * 93 * * * *
2011-12 * * 87 * * * n/a
Asian 2010-11 * * 96 * * * *
2011-12 * * 95 * * * n/a
Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander
2010-11* * 94 * * * *
2011-12 * * 88 * * * n/a
African American 2010-11 68 68 90 >99% 33 58 10
2011-12 68 68 82 >99% 32 68 n/a
Hispanic 2010-11 75 75 90 >99% 25 57 18
2011-12 82 82 84 >99% 18 82 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 8: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 8Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Reading
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
White 2010-11 89 89 97 >99% 11 53 36
2011-12 88 88 93 99 12 88 n/a
Two or More Races 2010-11 * * 96 >99% * * *
2011-12 * * 92 * * * n/a
Female 2010-11 86 86 93 >99% 14 48 38
2011-12 87 87 89 >99% 13 87 n/a
Male 2010-11 80 80 91 >99% 20 60 20
2011-12 82 82 86 99 18 82 n/a
Special Education 2010-11 77 77 87 >99% 23 65 13
2011-12 90 90 78 >99% 10 90 n/a
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 62 62 79 >99% 38 57 5
2011-12 66 66 72 >99% 34 66 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 9: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 9Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Reading
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 80 80 89 >99% 20 61 19
2011-12 81 81 83 99 19 81 n/a
Migrant 2010-11 * * 82 * * * *
2011-12 * * 76 * * * n/a
![Page 10: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 10Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 10Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Mathematics
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 83 83 92 >99% 17 53 29
2011-12 87 87 86 >99% 13 87 n/a
American Indian/AlaskanNative
2010-11* * 92 * * * *
2011-12 * * 85 * * * n/a
Asian 2010-11 * * 96 * * * *
2011-12 * * 96 * * * n/a
Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander
2010-11* * 91 * * * *
2011-12 * * 88 * * * n/a
African American 2010-11 71 71 86 >99% 29 49 22
2011-12 90 90 78 >99% 10 90 n/a
Hispanic 2010-11 81 81 91 >99% 19 56 25
2011-12 87 87 84 >99% 13 87 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 11: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 11Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Mathematics
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
White 2010-11 85 85 96 >99% 15 53 32
2011-12 86 86 92 >99% 14 86 n/a
Two or More Races 2010-11 89 89 94 >99% 11 56 33
2011-12 * * 90 * * * n/a
Female 2010-11 84 84 92 >99% 16 53 31
2011-12 88 88 87 >99% 12 88 n/a
Male 2010-11 81 81 92 >99% 19 54 28
2011-12 85 85 86 >99% 15 85 n/a
Special Education 2010-11 48 48 85 >99% 52 35 13
2011-12 70 70 74 >99% 30 70 n/a
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 74 74 84 >99% 26 59 15
2011-12 76 76 77 >99% 24 76 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 12: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 12Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Mathematics
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 79 79 89 >99% 21 55 24
2011-12 83 83 82 >99% 17 83 n/a
Migrant 2010-11 * * 85 * * * *
2011-12 * * 78 * * * n/a
![Page 13: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 13Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 13Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Science
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 75 75 86 >99% 25 42 32
2011-12 92 92 87 99 8 92 n/a
American Indian/AlaskanNative
2010-11* * 86 * * * *
2011-12 * * 87 * * * n/a
Asian 2010-11 * * 93 * * * *
2011-12 * * 97 * * * n/a
Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander
2010-11* * 83 * * * *
2011-12 * * 87 * * * n/a
African American 2010-11 56 56 78 >99% 44 41 15
2011-12 87 87 79 >99% 13 87 n/a
Hispanic 2010-11 61 61 82 >99% 39 37 24
2011-12 90 90 84 99 10 90 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 14: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 14Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Science
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
White 2010-11 85 85 93 >99% 15 45 40
2011-12 94 94 94 >99% 6 94 n/a
Two or More Races 2010-11 89 89 91 >99% 11 67 22
2011-12 * * 92 * * * n/a
Female 2010-11 77 77 84 >99% 23 46 30
2011-12 89 89 86 >99% 11 89 n/a
Male 2010-11 73 73 87 >99% 27 39 33
2011-12 95 95 88 99 5 95 n/a
Special Education 2010-11 45 45 67 >99% 55 26 19
2011-12 81 81 69 >99% 19 81 n/a
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 46 46 68 >99% 54 33 13
2011-12 82 82 72 >99% 18 82 n/a
(Continued)
![Page 15: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)results at the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due tothe transition to the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge andSkills (TAKS) results at the Met Standard level.
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 15Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Grade 5 Science
Campus % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
District % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
State % ofStudents
MetStandard
(Proficient)and
Commended(Advanced)
%Tested
(In Campus)
Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level
%Not
MeetingStandard(Basic)
%Met
Standard(Proficient)
%Commended(Advanced)
Student Group Year
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 71 71 80 >99% 29 44 27
2011-12 90 90 82 99 10 90 n/a
Migrant 2010-11 * * 74 * * * *
2011-12 * * 76 * * * n/a
![Page 16: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 16Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 16Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Reading/Language Arts
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 80 86 88
2011-12 99 99 99 85 85 88
American Indian/Alaskan Native 2010-11 * >99% 99 * 73 88
2011-12 * >99% 99 * 91 88
Asian 2010-11 * >99% 99 * >99% 94
2011-12 * >99% >99% * >99% 94
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2010-11 * * 99 * * 89
2011-12 * * 99 * * 89
African American 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 65 75 83
2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 71 76 83
(Continued)
![Page 17: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 17Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Reading/Language Arts
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
Hispanic 2010-11 99 >99% 99 72 82 85
2011-12 >99% >99% 99 84 85 85
White 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 85 89 94
2011-12 99 99 99 88 87 94
Two or More Races 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% >99% 88 92
2011-12 >99% 97 >99% 83 86 93
Female 2010-11 99 >99% >99% 84 89 90
2011-12 >99% 99 >99% 86 87 90
Male 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 76 83 86
2011-12 99 99 99 85 83 86
(Continued)
![Page 18: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 18Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Reading/Language Arts
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
80%
'12Target:
87%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
Special Education 2010-11 >99% >99% 99 72 71 67
2011-12 >99% >99% 99 76 70 67
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 98 99 99 69 74 78
2011-12 >99% >99% 99 81 79 79
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 >99% >99% 99 75 83 83
2011-12 99 99 99 82 82 83
Migrant 2010-11 * * 98 * * 76
2011-12 * * 98 * * 76
![Page 19: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 19Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 19Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Mathematics
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 86 82 84
2011-12 99 >99% >99% 91 82 83
American Indian/Alaskan Native 2010-11 * >99% >99% * 82 84
2011-12 * >99% >99% * 68 83
Asian 2010-11 * >99% >99% * >99% 95
2011-12 * >99% >99% * 88 95
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2010-11 * * >99% * * 86
2011-12 * * >99% * * 87
African American 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 72 75 75
2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 91 72 73
(Continued)
![Page 20: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 20Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Mathematics
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
Hispanic 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 83 80 82
2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 93 84 80
White 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 89 84 91
2011-12 99 99 >99% 90 82 90
Two or More Races 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 92 80 89
2011-12 >99% 97 >99% 83 86 88
Female 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 86 83 85
2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 91 82 84
Male 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 85 81 84
2011-12 99 99 >99% 91 82 83
(Continued)
![Page 21: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 21Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Mathematics
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentTested
Target:95%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
PercentMet
Standard(IncludesProficient
Leveland
Above)
'11Target:
75%
'12Target:
83%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
Special Education 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 61 58 63
2011-12 >99% >99% 99 74 65 63
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 83 78 79
2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 92 82 79
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 82 80 79
2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 89 79 78
Migrant 2010-11 * * >99% * * 75
2011-12 * * 99 * * 73
![Page 22: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 22Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 22Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Additional Academic Indicators
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 n/a 86.0 84.3 n/a 85.9 85.1
2011-12 n/a 90.5 85.9 n/a 88.6 88.0
AmericanIndian/Alaskan Native
2010-11n/a * 84.2 n/a - 83.8
2011-12 n/a * 86.6 n/a * 88.1
Asian 2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2011-12 n/a * 95.0 n/a n/a n/a
NativeHawaiian/PacificIslander
2010-11
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2011-12 n/a - 88.0 n/a n/a n/a
African American 2010-11 n/a 82.9 78.8 n/a 88.1 78.8
2011-12 n/a 80.0 80.9 n/a 88.2 82.9
Hispanic 2010-11 n/a 87.7 78.8 n/a 82.5 80.0
2011-12 n/a 95.7 81.8 n/a 87.7 84.0
(Continued)
![Page 23: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 23Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Additional Academic Indicators
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
White 2010-11 n/a 85.8 91.6 n/a 86.3 92.1
2011-12 n/a 90.4 92.0 n/a 88.8 93.6
Two or More Races 2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2011-12 n/a 100.0 92.1 n/a n/a n/a
Female 2010-11 n/a 88.1 86.5 n/a 87.3 86.8
2011-12 n/a 91.2 88.2 n/a 90.4 89.5
Male 2010-11 n/a 83.8 82.1 n/a 84.7 83.5
2011-12 n/a 89.9 83.7 n/a 86.8 86.5
Special Education 2010-11 n/a 79.3 74.4 n/a 92.5 78.1
2011-12 n/a 89.3 76.7 n/a 83.9 80.3
Limited EnglishProficient
2010-11n/a * 62.8 n/a 60.0 67.5
2011-12 n/a * 66.8 n/a * 72.0
(Continued)
![Page 24: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 24Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Additional Academic Indicators
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Four-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:75%
'12 Target:75%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Five-yearGraduation
Rate
'11 Target:80%
'12 Target:80%
Campus District State Campus District State
Student Group Year
EconomicallyDisadvantaged
2010-11n/a 97.0 81.9 n/a 91.1 83.7
2011-12 n/a 93.5 83.7 n/a 96.0 87.0
Migrant 2010-11 n/a - 75.7 n/a - 76.4
2011-12 n/a - 78.7 n/a - 82.4
![Page 25: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 25Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 25Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Additional Academic Indicators
AttendanceRate
Target:90%
AttendanceRate
Target:90%
AttendanceRate
Target:90%
Campus District State
Student Group Year
All Students 2010-11 95.7 n/a 95.5
2011-12 95.9 n/a 95.7
American Indian/Alaskan Native 2010-11 94.1 n/a 95.0
2011-12 93.6 n/a 95.2
Asian 2010-11 * n/a 97.5
2011-12 * n/a 97.7
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2010-11 - n/a 95.5
2011-12 - n/a 95.9
African American 2010-11 96.4 n/a 95.1
2011-12 96.1 n/a 95.4
Hispanic 2010-11 96.6 n/a 95.3
2011-12 97.1 n/a 95.6
White 2010-11 95.3 n/a 95.6
2011-12 95.4 n/a 95.9
Two or More Races 2010-11 94.8 n/a 95.7
2011-12 95.8 n/a 95.9
(Continued)
![Page 26: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation andAttendance Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 26Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Additional Academic Indicators
AttendanceRate
Target:90%
AttendanceRate
Target:90%
AttendanceRate
Target:90%
Campus District State
Student Group Year
Female 2010-11 95.8 n/a 95.5
2011-12 95.8 n/a 95.7
Male 2010-11 95.7 n/a 95.5
2011-12 96.0 n/a 95.7
Special Education 2010-11 94.4 n/a 94.0
2011-12 94.7 n/a 94.3
Limited English Proficient 2010-11 97.0 n/a 96.3
2011-12 97.2 n/a 96.6
Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 95.6 n/a 95.2
2011-12 95.9 n/a 95.4
Migrant 2010-11 * n/a 93.9
2011-12 - n/a 93.9
![Page 27: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
'n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 27Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program(SIP) for Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].
'n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 27Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program(SIP) for Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Met AYP
SIP(for the
subsequentschoolyear)
Year
2010-11 Missed AYP NONE
2011-12 Meets AYP NONE
![Page 28: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].
A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.
Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either due to rounding or because the category 'teachers with nodegree' is not reported.
Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 28Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, AsDefined by the State (Teacher Degree)
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].
A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.
Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either due to rounding or because the category 'teachers with nodegree' is not reported.
Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 28Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, AsDefined by the State (Teacher Degree)
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Bachelors Masters Doctorate
Year
2010-11 87.7 12.3 0.0
2011-12 87.8 12.2 0.0
![Page 29: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].
A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.
Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 29Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers WithEmergency/Provisional Credentials
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].
A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.
Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 29Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers WithEmergency/Provisional Credentials
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
%
Year
2010-11 0.00
2011-12 0.00
![Page 30: Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Campus Level ...€¦ · Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060220/5f071ff07e708231d41b6d8f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Questions regarding Part IV c. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].
A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.
Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 30Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
Questions regarding Part IV c. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].
A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.
Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).
Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.
Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 30Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
February 1, 2013
For KIMMIE M BROWN EL (146902105) DAYTON ISD
%
Year
2010-11 0.00
2011-12 0.00