tetra fish

13
Page 1 Schooling Patterns in Paracheirodon innesi by Marisa Portenti ([email protected]), Frank Minio ([email protected]), Zack Bakun ([email protected])

Upload: tetrafishies

Post on 15-Apr-2017

388 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tetra fish

Page 1

Schooling Patterns in Paracheirodon innesi

by Marisa Portenti ([email protected]), Frank Minio ([email protected]), Zack Bakun ([email protected])

Page 2: Tetra fish

Page 2

Introduction: Habitat

Tropical America

Why School? Minimize predation Mating ritual Food collection Migration

Page 3: Tetra fish

Page 3

Introduction: RQ: Does the movement of a school of tetra

fish (Paracheirodon innesi) affect the movement of an individual tetra fish?

Hypotheses H0 = no correlation H1 ≠ no correlation Expected: correlation between movement of

school with movement of individual fish

Page 4: Tetra fish

Page 4

Materials:• Tank A (Control)• Tank B (Experimental)• Net• Tetra fish

Tank A (Control)

Tank B (Experimental)

Page 5: Tetra fish

Page 5

Methods:• Control (Tank A):• Separate one fish• Stimulus – swipe net from on side of tank to other• Test school movement • Test response of individual fish• Repeat 10 times per each of 3 subjects

School’s Movement

Page 6: Tetra fish

Page 6

Methods, Continued:• Experimental (Tank B):• Separate one fish• Stimulus – swipe net from on side of tank to other• Test change in subject movement• Repeat 10 times per each of 3 subjects

School’s Movement

Page 7: Tetra fish

Page 7

Results, Control:

• For all three subjects

Page 8: Tetra fish

Page 8

Results, Experimental:

Page 9: Tetra fish

Page 9

Conclusions: H0 = no correlation H1 ≠ no correlation Trial #1: 90% responded Trial #2: 80% responded Trial #3: 80% responded ~83% of average trials responded to

school’s movement

Page 10: Tetra fish

Page 10

Conclusions: Data suggests that the null would be

rejected, implying a strong, positive correlation

Schooling patterns were unaffected by transparent barrier

Page 11: Tetra fish

Page 11

Conclusions:

Improvements Testing with no stimulus to school Quantify data further (Pearson

correlational coefficient, r2) Time-based element

Bias Not all fish were always behind barrier Subject moving independently of

school

Page 12: Tetra fish

Page 12

References: Leo N. 2012. Paracheirodon innesi. USGS

nonindigenous aquatic species database, Gainesville, FL. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=426 Buckheim J. A quick course in ichthyology [Internet]. http://www.marinebiology.org/fish.htm

Page 13: Tetra fish

Page 13

Thank You!Any questions?

by Marisa Portenti ([email protected]), Frank Minio ([email protected]), Zack Bakun ([email protected])