testing and validation of a measure of display clutter (interview phase)
TRANSCRIPT
Testing and Validation of a Measure of Display Clutter
(Interview Phase)
Objectives
Development a database of terminology for describing the qualities of aviation display clutter on a head-up
display (HUD)
Identification of pairs of meaningful terms that can be used as anchors for constructing subjective rating
scales to evaluate clutter in new displays
Overall Process
Pre-FlightScenarios
FlightScenarios
Post-FlightScenarios
Informed Consent
Demographic Survey
Pre-ranking & rating Questionnaires
Rating 16 images #1 Rating 16 other images
Post-ranking & rating Questionnaires
Open-ended Survey
Rating 16 images #2
Rating 16 images #3
Rating 16 images #4
FlightScenarios
Post-FlightScenarios
Pre-FlightScenarios
Completing Forms
- Informed Consent Form
- Demographic Questionnaire
Pre-ranking and rating Questionnaires
- View examples of display components
- Ranking and rating 14 semantic pairs of terms for evaluating internal perception after looking at example display
FlightScenarios
Post-FlightScenarios
Pre-FlightScenarios
Rating Semantic Pairs During Flight Scenarios
- Follow narrative of flight scenario for landing airplane at airport, including status, clearance from ATC, and required actions
- View sequence of 16 different configurations of head-up display (HUD) components
- Provide feedback on list of semantic pairs and overall display “clutter” for each display image by using rating questionnaires (paper and pencil).
Repeat 4 Times
Trial #1
Trial #2
Trial #3
Trial #4
FlightScenarios
Post-FlightScenarios
Pre-FlightScenarios
Rating other Images
- Provide ratings on semantic pairs for each of 16 other different HUD images, for two general phases of landing
- Ratings occur in absence of flight scenario
Post-ranking and rating Questionnaires
- Evaluating perception of pairs of terms, independent of display
configurations (presented during previous step)
Open-ended Survey
- Complete set of open-ended questions
- Evaluate perception of overlap / redundancy of semantic pairs
- Subjective comments on pairs and your suggestions