terry deane donna breger-stanton irma walker-adame sharon gorman lauri paolinetti
TRANSCRIPT
Terry Deane
Donna Breger-StantonIrma Walker-Adame
Sharon GormanLauri Paolinetti
Graduates establish the rapport needed to sustain
effective personal and professional relationships by actively and empathically listening to patients, families, health-care team members, professional colleagues and other relevant constituents.
Communication must be effective in both verbal and written formats. Effective communication allows for graduates to respect personal, cultural, social and economic values of those they serve and with whom communicate on many levels.
2
Academic Council requests the definition reflects body language as a component of the EF definition
3
Effective communication is the ability to empathically, effectively and accurately exchange information with all parties in healthcare delivery.
4
Graduates at all degree levels will demonstrate effective communication through interpersonal, professional and information exchange skills. These skills allow the graduate to facilitate and sustain effective relationships with patients, families, healthcare team members, professional colleagues and other relevant constituents.
5
Communication must be effective in verbal and written formats and includes non-verbal, behavioral and team building skills. Effective communication enables graduates to respect personal, professional, cultural, social and economic values of those they serve and with whom they communicate in the healthcare setting.
6
Simulation must be addressed Non-technical skills addressed to indicate
the need to understand human factors that are so essential to preventing human errors, i.e. team working and situation awareness can be used in specific assessment tools
Changes in terms
7
Criteria for Assessment/Sub-competencies
Evaluation Methodologies
Communicates clearly and effectively with patients and families
1. Oral Communication
Demonstrates relevant medical and biopsychosocial knowledge in encounters with patients and their families.
Patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS), multiple choice examinations, essay/written examinations
Demonstrates active listening
Faculty /preceptors feedback during teaching sessions/interviews, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS), peer assessment
8
Demonstrates empathic responding, including summarization, use of silence, reflection, patient’s comments, use of facilitative responses, and confrontation as appropriate
Faculty /preceptors feedback during teaching sessions/interviews, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS), peer assessment
Sets priorities for each encounter and demonstrates ability to negotiate therapeutic goals and treatment plans
Faculty /preceptors feedback during teaching sessions/interviews, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS, peer assessment
9
Clearly and coherently explains diagnosis and options in treatment and care in patient-appropriate language (i.e., use of non-technical language)
Faculty /preceptors feedback during teaching sessions/interviews, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS), peer assessment
Demonstrates the ability to convey bad news sensitively, compassionately, and clearly.
Faculty /preceptors feedback during teaching sessions/interviews, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS), peer assessment
10
Recognizes and responds appropriately to patient interactions that are complicated by stigmatizing conditions, socio-economic problems, language and culture, sexual orientation, spiritual/religious, cognitive impairment, personality styles, and /or strong emotional content
Faculty /preceptors feedback during teaching sessions/interviews, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS), peer assessment
11
Implements the process of obtaining informed consent with due regard for threats to validity
Faculty direct observation and feedback, patient or simulated patient feedback, assessment with simulated patient (i.e., OSCE or HFMBS ), peer assessment
12
2. Written Communication
Explains diagnosis and treatment in clear and concise written language
Faculty feedback during teaching sessions, OSCE, CPX, written exams, essays
Composes letters that clearly and effectively advocate for the patient
Prepare sample letters with faculty feedback
13
Communicates clearly and effectively with teachers, colleagues, health- care team members, and the wider community
1. Oral Communication
Accurately and appropriately summarizes patient narratives, clinical evaluations and medical decision making on rounds and in conferences
Faculty feedback during teaching sessions, formalized faculty/clinical preceptor observations of students, peer assessment
Maintains appropriate continued contact with team members regarding patient care
Formalized feedback from other team members (i.e., faculty, peers, RNs, APNs, PA’s, MD’s)
14
Maintains respectful and collegial interpersonal relationships with team members.
Faculty feedback during teaching sessions, formalized faculty/clinical preceptor observations of students, peer assessment
Demonstrates traits of adaptability, flexibility, reliability, punctuality and responsibility
Faculty feedback during teaching sessions, formalized faculty/clinical preceptor observations of students, peer assessment
15
Demonstrates the cognitive and social skills of team working and situation awareness
Faculty feedback during teaching sessions, formalized faculty/clinical preceptor observations of students, simulation-based team assessments (Standardized patient (SP) or HFMBS)
16
2. Written Communication
Communicates the initial patient evaluation (write-up) and subsequent daily evaluation (progress notes) in clear and concise written language appropriate to the task at hand
Faculty/clinical preceptor review of written patient care data
Composes case reports and written medical reports in clear and understandable language
Faculty/clinical preceptor review of written patient care data
17
Develops effective teaching skills appropriate to a variety of settings
Demonstrates competence in oral presentation to larger groups
Formalized faculty observation of students, peer assessment, video tape critique
Demonstrates ability to facilitate the interactive process/team building in small group settings
Formalized faculty observation of students, peer assessment, video tape critique
Demonstrates effective one-to-one teaching on clinical rounds
Formalized faculty/clinical preceptor observation of students, peer assessment, video tape critique
18
Uses computer technology effectively
Uses bibliography databases as a resource for patient care, research, and problem solving
Written assignments and reports, review of presentation materials
Uses common communication software packages (i.e, word processing, powerpoint)
Written assignments and reports, review of presentation materials
Uses computer for communication with patients, families, health-care team members and insurance companies
Written assignments and reports, patient, peer, preceptor, and other professionals reporting
OSCE = Objective Structured Clinical Examination
HFMBS = High Fidelity Mannequin-Based Simulation
19
20
Acknowledgements
Adapted from: http://www.hsc.stonybrook.edu/som/eff_comm.cfm 2/2/2010
With special thanks to Celeste Villaneuva