terri schiavo and the state of exception, eric l santner

Upload: vincent-brown

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Terri Schiavo and the State of Exception, Eric L Santner

    1/3

    2/3/13 Terri Schiavo and the State of Exception, Eric L. Santner

    www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/05april_santner.html 1/3

    Terri Schiavo andthe State of ExceptionEric L. Santner

    Eric L. Santner reflects on the Terri Schiavo case in light of two new Chicago books on

    political theology: Giorgio AgambensThe State of Exceptionand Julia Reinhard Luptons

    Citizen Saints.

    When a series of news items grip the national imagination within a short period of time, one rightly wonders

    whether there might be connections between them, whether an underlying set of issues animates them. I am

    thinking of two stories: the Abu Ghraib prison tortures and the Terri Schiavo case. Let us forget for a

    moment that both stories involve powerful images that dont simply illustrate the subject matter but actually

    co-constitute it (the taking of photographs was a tool of humiliation at Abu Ghraib; the images of Terri

    Schiavo have led manyamong them members of Congressto believe that they know something about

    her medical condition). What interests me more is how in each story human life is positioned with respect to

    law and political power.

    It is now clear that at Abu Ghraib as well as numerous other detention centers, the problem of prisoner

    abuseincluding clear cases of torture and murderhas not simply been the consequence of a handful of

    rogue soldiers living out sadistic fantasies on helpless victims. But nor has the problem been one of isolated

    and contingent miscommunications down the chain of command. The real problem has to do with the legal

    status of the prisoners themselves and of the sites where they are being detained. With respect to

    Guantanamo Bay, to cite the most obvious example, the Bush administration has argued that the detentioncenters there effectively occupy a lawless zone, a site where a permanent (if undeclared) state of exception

    or emergency is in force. The prisoners have been stripped of all legal protections and stand exposed to the

    pure force of American military and political power. They have ceased to count as recognizable agents

    bearing a symbolic status covered by law. They effectively stand at the threshold where biological life and

    political power intersect. That is why it is fundamentally unclear whether anything those in power do to them

    is actually illegal.

    If places like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay represent sites where life, lacking all legal status and

    protection, stands in maximal exposure to pure political power, then the case of Terri Schiavoand here I

    am thinking of the law passed by Congress that was intended to keep her aliveoffers us a strange

    reversal. We find here the paradox of an intrusive excess of legal protection that effectively serves to

    suspend the law (the judicial process running its course in the Florida courts) and take direct hold of human

    life. A law designed to lift a single individual out of an ongoing judicial process is essentially a form or

    caprice, law in its state of exception (a sanctioned suspension of legality). This paradox reaches its greatest

    intensity where the law attempts to take charge of the pure biological life of the human being in question. At

    this point Terri Schiavos life assumes a biopolitical dimension in which life and politics can no longer be

    fully distinguished. To put it simply, if an act of Congress were to lead to the reinsertion of Terri Schiavos

    feeding tube, it will not be only water and chemical nutrients that enter her system; it will also be the invasive

    force of political power. This, of course, says nothing about the cynicism at play in this political power.

    (Many of the most prominent sponsors of the legislation in question have exhibited a shameless disregard

    for human life in countless other areas of public policy.)

    http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3534224.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3534224.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo3534874.html
  • 7/30/2019 Terri Schiavo and the State of Exception, Eric L Santner

    2/3

    2/3/13 Terri Schiavo and the State of Exception, Eric L. Santner

    www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/05april_santner.html 2/3

    Another way of thinking about the two faces of the state of exception in which political power takes a direct

    hold of human life is to note the two modes of reduction/amplification at play in each instance. In Abu

    Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and other such places, the prisoners are fully sentient beings who in some sense

    no longer exist in the book of life; their legal and symbolic status has been nullified, they have been

    reduced to a pure point of application of state power (again, how could those in charge of such beings not

    be confused as to what constitutes abuse?). Terri Schiavo, by contrast, is a no longer sentient being who is

    having a symbolic status imposed on her (she has become, among other things, the name of a Cause). In the

    one case we have human life violently stripped of the cover of a symbolic status/value, in the other, theintrusive imposition a symbolic status/value in the absence of sentient life. The results, however, are

    uncannily similar: the radical exposure of the body to the pure caprice of political power.

    With respect to the latter case, one might ask why it matters at all whether Mrs. Schiavo is kept alive by a

    feeding tube. That is, if it is true that she is in a persistent vegetative state without awareness, without access

    to pleasure and pain, joy and sadnessand no credible evidence has been brought forward that would cast

    any doubt on this diagnosiswhy should anyone care if her parents take her home and keep her alive

    artificially? Whom does it harm if this makes her parents happy? I think that many would respond that it

    harms thesoulof Terri Schiavo to be so totally subjected to the will of others even if those others are her

    parents who no doubt love her (or politicians who at least claim to speak on her behalf). And what greater

    form of subjection is there than to have the will of others impinge directly on our life substance, our

    existence as living tissue? Those pleading for state intervention into Terri Schiavos persistence as living

    tissue are pleading for the most radical form of domination one can imagine. And domination does damage

    to the human soul. I am tempted to say that the effort to keep Terri Schiavo alive is a kind ofsoul murder.

    Of course, the Terri Schiavo case would never have entered the national awareness were it not for certain

    Christian groups that adopted it as a battleground in the larger cause of defending so-called innocent life.

    There is much to say about this phrase, innocent life. Given the fact that many who oppose abortion also

    condone capital punishment, one has good reason to wonder whether what is really at stake here is notinnocent life but rather living innocence, that is, a fantasy of protecting not a human life but a condition of

    purity and innocence that can, in turn, only be truly embodied by non-sentientlife. Indeed, one cannot help

    but wonder whether what President Bush has referred to as the culture of life only refers to non-sentient

    life; as soon as one acquires feeling, perception, and awareness one is more or less abandoned to the

    minimally regulated vagaries of the market place.

    Be that as it may, one of the real theological peculiarities at the heart of the Terri Schiavo case pertains to

    the concepts of creation and creaturely life. As Julia Lupton notes in a wonderful book chapter on

    Shakespeares The Tempestentitled Creature Caliban, the word creature comes from the future-active

    participle of the Latin creare, meaning that the creatura is a thing always in the process of undergoing

    creation; the creature is actively passive or, better,passionate, perpetually becoming-created, subject to

    transformation at the behest of the arbitrary commands of an Other. In its theological sense, then,

    creature isnt so much the name of a determinate state of being or essence as that of an ongoing

    exposure, of being caught up in the process ofbecoming creature through the dictates of divine authority.

    This dimension of radical subjectionof created thing to Creator Godhas induced, in the history of the

    concept, a series of further articulations, ultimately becoming generalized to signify, as Lupton puts it,

    anyone or anything that is produced or controlled by an agent, author, master, or tyrant. At the end of

    such a trajectory it makes sense that a word that once denoted the entire domain ofnature qua Gods

    creation comes to be increasingly applied to those created things that warp the proper canons of creation.

    Perhaps the most famous literary example of such a creature is Frankensteins monster, itself in many ways

    an embodiment of an inability to countenance death in modernity, which is no doubt a central feature of the

    Terri Schiavo case. (Is it not particularly strange that among those who seem to lose all bearings in the face

  • 7/30/2019 Terri Schiavo and the State of Exception, Eric L Santner

    3/3

    2/3/13 Terri Schiavo and the State of Exception, Eric L. Santner

    www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/05april_santner.html 3/3

    of death, all sense of compassion and reverence, are people who claim deep religious faith?)

    What ultimately underwrites this paradoxical passage from the natural to the unnatural in the semantic field

    of creaturely life is that feature of the master I have referred to as the state of exception or emergency.

    That is, it is not the mere fact of being in a relation of subject to law that generates creaturely non-nature

    but rather the exposure to an outlaw dimension of law internal to state authority. Governmental authority

    in the state of exception marks asanctioned suspension of law, an outside of law included within the law.

    Creaturely life emerges precisely at such strange thresholds where the subject is touched by thisforce oflaw in excess of law. The decision to categorize the prisoners taken in the war on terrorism as enemy

    combatants without legal status and Congresss attempt to intervene into the Terri Schiavo case are two

    instances in which life has been rendered creaturely in this sense.

    What is especially disturbing in the Schiavo case is that this process is being performed in the name of a

    culture of life ostensibly consonant with Christian morality. What we find instead is a radical perversion of

    the order of creation and the theological status of the creature, its conversion, that is, into a purely

    biopoliticalentity. Christianity is being used, in other words, to give cover to the radical intrusion of

    political power into the sphere of life. A theology that might have provided the resources for deep

    compassion for a woman in her dying and for the family of this woman, has become instead an ideological

    tool of political power in a state of exception.

    Eric L. Santner is chair of the department of Germanic studies at the University of Chicago. His books

    include The Psychotheology of Everyday Life and The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political

    Theology (co-authored with Slavoj Zizek and Kenneth Reinhard, and forthcoming from the University of

    Chicago Press in December 2005).

    2005 Eric L. Santner. Posted 29 March 2005.

    See also:

    The State of Exception by Giorgio Agamben Read an excerpt.

    Citizen Saints: Shakespeare and Polit ical Theology by Julia Reinhard Lupton.

    Other excerpts and online essays from University of Chicago Press titlesSign up for e-mail notification of new books in this and other subjects

    University of Chicago Press: 1427 E. 60th Street Chicago, IL 60637 USA | Voice:773.702.7700 | Fax: 773.702.9756Privacy PoliciesSite MapBibliovaultChicago Manual of StyleTurabianUniversityof ChicagoAwardsTwitterFacebookYouTube

    http://www.youtube.com/ucbookshttp://www.facebook.com/pages/University-of-Chicago-Press/41372711201http://twitter.com/UChicagoPress/http://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/recentawards.htmlhttp://www.uchicago.edu/index.shtmlhttp://www.turabian.org/http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/http://www.bibliovault.org/http://www.press.uchicago.edu/press/sitemap.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/press/privacy.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/mailnotifier/subscribe.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/News/excerpts.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3534224.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/009254.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo3534874.htmlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/O/bo3635896.html