ten markers of success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) defining goals for schools...

Ten Markers of Success Ten Markers of Success

(for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010)(for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010)

Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”“Dashboard Indicators”

Methodology Notes

The Following slides present statistics calculated from the StatsOnline surveys collected in 2008-2009 and 2009-2010

In order to collect accurate data during the summer/fall of the current school year, StatsOnline uses some statistics belonging to the previous fiscal year and others to the current fiscal year as follows:

– From the previous fiscal year: a) Applications per Acceptance; Attrition; Giving; Professional Development and Technology Budget; and Endowment Statistics

– From the current fiscal year: Teachers Salaries; Tuition; Financial Aid; and Full-Time Equivalent Staffing (FTE) Statistics

1st Marker of Success: Market DemandNumber of applications per acceptances measures the market’s perception of the school’s “brand” (high ratio a proxy for reputational value), the higher the ratio, the greater the pricing/tuition) flexibility

Percentile(25) 1.2

Percentile(50) 1.5

Percentile(75) 1.9

Percentile(90) 2.8

Day Schools 2009-2010 Boarding Schools 2009-2010

Percentile(25) 1.3

Percentile(50) 1.6

Percentile(75) 2.1

Percentile(90) 3.1

Day Schools 2008-2009 Boarding Schools 2008-2009

Percentile(25) 1.3

Percentile(50) 1.6

Percentile(75) 2.2

Percentile(90) 3.4

Percentile(25) 1.4

Percentile(50) 1.8

Percentile(75) 2.4

Percentile(90) 3.6

(Years mentioned are data collection years)

2nd Marker of Success: Low Attrition Low annual student attrition measures stability of school and satisfaction of parents (low percent a proxy for high stability and satisfaction)

Percentile(25) 5.9

Percentile(50) 9.2

Percentile(75) 13.8

Percentile(90) 18.6

Attrition Day Schools : 2009-10 Attrition Boarding Schools: 2009-10

Percentile(25) 6.1

Percentile(50) 10.1

Percentile(75) 17.0

Percentile(90) 25.5

Attrition Day Schools: 2008-09 Attrition Boarding Schools: 2008-09

Percentile(25) 5.0

Percentile(50) 7.9

Percentile(75) 12.4

Percentile(90) 18.6

Percentile(25) 5.4

Percentile(50) 9.8

Percentile(75) 17.5

Percentile(90) 26.1


3rd Marker of Success: Giving (Day)Generous giving measures constituent loyalty (generosity as a proxy for high support and attributed effectiveness)

2008-09 Alumni % Parent % Trustee %AlumniAvg Gift

ParentAvg Gift

TrusteeAverage Gift

Percentile(25) 4% 48% 93% $135 $556 $2,007

Percentile(50) 9% 64% 100% $271 $916 $3,670

Percentile(75) 17% 80% 100% $447 $1,508 $6,288

Percentile(90) 29% 91% 100% $692 $2,388 $10,667


ParentAvg Gift

TrusteeAverage Gift

Percentile(25) 4% 49% 93% $137 $508 $1,936

Percentile(50) 8% 64% 100% $261 $860 $3,804

Percentile(75) 16% 79% 100% $427 $1,438 $6,228

Percentile(90) 27% 91% 100% $612 $2,208 $10,486



ParentAvg Gift

TrusteeAverage Gift

Percentile(25) 9% 32% 87% $304 $711 $3,067

Percentile(50) 17% 51% 100% $439 $1,136 $6,334

Percentile(75) 27% 69% 100% $645 $1,771 $10,306

Percentile(90) 39% 81% 100% $988 $3,048 $18,454


ParentAvg Gift

TrusteeAverage Gift

Percentile(25) 8% 28% 87% $268 $688 $2,912

Percentile(50) 15% 48% 96% $443 $1,166 $5,455

Percentile(75) 24% 65% 100% $605 $1,699 $11,076

Percentile(90) 36% 78% 100% $875 $2,647 $18,814

3rd Marker of Success: Giving (Boarding) Generous giving measures constituent loyalty (generosity as a proxy for high support and attributed effectiveness)


4th Marker of Success: Faculty Salaries (Day)Competitive Faculty Salaries: measures a school’s capacity to attract, keep, and reward high quality faculty (salaries a proxy for competitiveness in recruitment and high quality teachers)

2008-09 Highest Median Lowest

Percentile(25) $60,961 $42,284 $31,037

Percentile(50) $72,000 $49,042 $35,325

Percentile(75) $86,000 $57,000 $41,000

Percentile(90) $101,220 $67,262 $46,563


Percentile(25) $61,644 $42,925 $31,809

Percentile(50) $73,394 $50,134 $36,000

Percentile(75) $87,588 $58,500 $41,624

Percentile(90) $105,106 $68,538 $47,205(Years mentioned are data collection years)

4th Marker of Success: Faculty Salaries-BoardingCompetitive Faculty Salaries: measures a school’s capacity to attract, keep, and reward high quality faculty (salaries a proxy for competitiveness in recruitment and high quality teachers)


Percentile(25) $55,000 $36,533 $25,719

Percentile(50) $67,500 $43,100 $29,166

Percentile(75) $83,547 $52,814 $34,260

Percentile(90) $96,873 $59,900 $40,000


Percentile(25) $54,688 $36,554 $25,565

Percentile(50) $67,750 $43,750 $29,445

Percentile(75) $84,276 $53,501 $34,134

Percentile(90) $98,180 $60,261 $38,830(Years mentioned are data collection years)

5th Marker of Success: TuitionsLower percentile/low tuition (a proxy for comparative “affordability” & competing on price); higher percentile/ high tuition (a proxy for competing on brand)

2008-09 Day Schools Avg. Tuition

Day School1Year%Change

Boarding Sch Avg. Tuition

Boarding School1Year%Change

Percentile(25) $13,188 4.9% $34,943 3.1%

Percentile(50) $16,659 4.5% $39,363 5.0%

Percentile(75) $21,327 4.5% $41,729 6.0%

Percentile(90) $27,074 4.6% $43,148 6.0%

2009-10 Day Schools Avg. Tuition

Day School1Year%Change

Boarding Sch Avg. Tuition

Boarding School1Year%Change

Percentile(25) $13,839 4.9% $36,250 3.7%

Percentile(50) $17,532 5.2% $40,890 3.9%

Percentile(75) $22,418 5.1% $43,400 4.0%

Percentile(90) $28,444 5.1% $44,815 3.9%(Years mentioned are data collection years)

6th Marker of Success: Financial Aid - DayA substantial proportion of students receiving financial aid measures a school’s commitment to diversity (financial aid a proxy for socio-economic diversity) and/or a tuition discounting strategy for full enrollment

2008-09Students on Tuition Assistance as % of Enrollment

Tuition Assistance as % of Day Tuition

Percentile(25) 15.2% 44.5%

Percentile(50) 20.9% 55.2%

Percentile(75) 29.1% 65.1%

Percentile(90) 38.9% 74.3%


Tuition Assistance as % of Day Tuition

Percentile(25) 17.1% 43.1%

Percentile(50) 24.0% 54.5%

Percentile(75) 33.0% 64.1%

Percentile(90) 43.9% 72.6%(Years mentioned are data collection years)

6th Marker of Success: Financial Aid-BoardingA substantial proportion of students receiving financial aid measures a school’s commitment to diversity (financial aid a proxy for socio-economic diversity) and/or a tuition discounting strategy for full enrollment


Tuition Assistance as % of Boarding Tuition

Percentile(25) 25.8% 34.2%

Percentile(50) 33.2% 48.4%

Percentile(75) 44.0% 59.5%

Percentile(90) 54.3% 69.9%


Tuition Assistance as % of Boarding Tuition

Percentile(25) 28.2% 35.3%

Percentile(50) 36.8% 49.5%

Percentile(75) 47.1% 60.8%


7th Marker of Success: High Productivity-DayComparatively high student:faculty and student:total staff ratios (percentiles): measure high workload productivity (a proxy for institutional efficiency); low productivity/ratios (a proxy for competing on brand or program not price)

2008-09Students : FTE

FacultyStudents : FTE

ALL Staff

Percentile(25) 7.5 4.6






ALL Staff




Percentile(90) 11.5 7.0(Years mentioned are data collection years)

7th Marker of Success: High Productivity-BoardingComparatively high student:faculty and student:total staff ratios (percentiles): measure high workload productivity (a proxy for institutional efficiency); low productivity/ratios (a proxy for competing on brand or program not price)



ALL Staff







ALL Staff




Percentile(90) 9.8 5.0(Years mentioned are data collection years)

8th Marker of Success: Funding Prof Dev & Tech- Day Significant budget for professional development and technology: measures commitment to human resources and innovation (a proxy for investment in supporting a high-quality learning environment).

2008-09Prof Development as %

of ExpensesTechnology Budget as %

of Expenses

Percentile(25) 0.47% 0.62%

Percentile(50) 0.71% 1.05%

Percentile(75) 0.99% 1.65%

Percentile(90) 1.29% 2.41%



of Expenses

Percentile(25) 0.39% 0.60%

Percentile(50) 0.61% 1.01%

Percentile(75) 0.86% 1.65%


8th Marker of Success: Funding Prof Dev & Tech- Boarding Significant budget for professional development and technology: measures commitment to human resources and innovation (a proxy for investment in supporting a high-quality learning environment).



of Expenses

Percentile(25) 0.32% 0.66%

Percentile(50) 0.49% 1.20%

Percentile(75) 0.70% 1.82%

Percentile(90) 0.94% 2.61%



of Expenses

Percentile(25) 0.26% 0.75%

Percentile(50) 0.40% 1.16%

Percentile(75) 0.61% 1.75%


9th Marker of Success: Endowment - DayGrowing endowment: measures commitment to financial security (a proxy for inter-generational equity and long-term stability).

2008-09 Endowment ValueEndowment per Student

Value

Percentile(25) $1,379,789 $3,794

Percentile(50) $4,853,810 $10,721

Percentile(75) $15,103,881 $25,993

Percentile(90) $35,512,368 $50,509


Value

Percentile(25) $1,123,728 $3,102

Percentile(50) $3,853,836 $9,339

Percentile(75) $11,935,669 $19,971

Percentile(90) $27,342,579 $39,818(Years mentioned are data collection years)

9th Marker of Success: Endowment - BoardingGrowing endowment: measures commitment to financial security (a proxy for inter-generational equity and long-term stability).


Value

Percentile(25) $4,075,892 $15,872

Percentile(50) $14,831,665 $44,935

Percentile(75) $44,654,304 $109,199

Percentile(90) $113,750,125 $295,087


Value

Percentile(25) $2,708,421 $12,535

Percentile(50) $11,032,719 $41,458

Percentile(75) $37,581,369 $85,995

Percentile(90) $102,775,000 $265,450(Years mentioned are data collection years)

10th Marker of Success: Student OutcomesStudent outcomes measure overall success of mission (persistence and graduation rates a proxy for effective preparation academically and constitutionally to succeed in future competitive academic environments)

Metrics and Tools To Measure Student Outcomes• Normative Testing (SATs, ERBs, APs, IBs, etc.) • Formative Testing (ERBs, MAP, CWRA, etc.)• Demonstrations of Learning (e-Portfolios)• Matriculation to academically competitive secondary schools and colleges• Graduation from 4-year colleges within six years (NELS)• High School Survey of Student Engagement (HSSSE) • Transcripts/Self-reporting on preparation for and success in college (NAIS Young Alumni Survey; UCLA/HERI Annual College Freshmen Survey)

ten markers of success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) defining goals for schools...

Documents