Temple Middle School

End of Year Data Review

2012-13

Strategic Goal Area I

Student Achievement

CRCT Meets/Exceeds Data6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade All Students

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Reading 93 89 92 86 93 91 93 89

ELA 85 80 88 88 85 86 86 85

Math 71 56 86 85 70 54 76 65

Science 68 55 82 76 68 71 73 68

Social Studies

69 46 69 68 60 65 66 60

8th Writing NA NA NA NA 7171 75

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

CRCT Exceeds Data6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade All Students

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Reading 36 28 32 16 35 27 34 24

ELA 31 19 36 32 36 27 34 26

Math 22 9 23 15 14 9 20 11

Science 17 11 39 35 16 11 24 19

Social Studies

36 15 34 35 12 15 27 22

8th Writing NA NA NA NA 1 3

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

Sub-group data%

2013 2013 Target 2012 2011

SWD Reading 64% >/= 55% 43% 43%

SWD Math 34% >/= 35% 21% 5%

SWD ELA 52% >/=50% 43% 34%

Black Math 65% >/= 68% 58% 64%

ED Math 69% >/= 70% 61% 63%

Insert data for the sub-group identified in your evaluation

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

Lexile Scores2013Score 2012 Score Target Score

8th Grade 60 62 65

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

Goal Area I Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues

• 6th Grade Met Exceeds Targets in all areas

• Progress in Math at all grade levels

• Progress in Reading at all grade levels

• Use of Blackboard Collaborate

• Lexile Levels

• White, Black, Hispanic, SWD CRCT scores

• Writing

• Improvement in providing engaging lessons

Strategic Goal Area II

Stakeholder Engagement & Loyalty

Discipline & Safety 2013 2012 2011

Discipline Referrals

448 478 359

Tribunal Referrals

3 3 14

Level III Infractions

8 3 14

Perception of Safety

FY 13 Actual FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual

Staff 97 93 91

Parents 93 80 75

Students 82 75 67

Attendance Attendance > 15 Days

FY 13 Actual

FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual

Students 9.0% 8.9% 8.8%

Attendance % FY 13 Actual

FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual

Students 95.75% 95% 94.84%

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

Stakeholder InvolvementFY 13 Actual FY 13 Target FY 12 Actual

Volunteer Hours

1640 1625 1568

Business Partners

25 13 10

StudentVolunteer Hours

1200 1300 1092

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

Extra-Curricular Sport Record Region

PlaceState

PlayoffsNotes

Softball

Golf 2 overall wins

Football 1-6 Replacing the football coach

Comp. Cheerleading

Basketball Boys 3-9Girls 1-10

Replacing the basketball coach

Wrestling

Baseball 4-6

Track Boys 3rd Girls 2nd

7 placed in state meet

Tennis

Soccer 2-6/1 tie

Fine Arts & LiterarySport Participants LGP Score or

Region placeNotes

Band Grades 7-8(40 students)

Scored II’s at LGP

Chorus Honor Chorus District Chorus

Art NA

Academic Team

Grades 6, 7, & 8

3rd Place

Literary

Communication and or Engagement Improvements

• Facebook Page has been an effective communication and engaging tool for parents and students.

• Brag Boards for student recognition has improved student engagement

• Expanded House Points has improved student engagement.• Use of House Leaders has improved student engagement.

List improvements in the area of communication or engagement for this school year

Perception DataSurvey Question FY 13 FY 12 FY 11Parent Perception of Quality (#32 parent survey) 88 80 77Student Perception of Quality (#32 student survey) 85 63 43Staff Perception of Quality (#32 staff survey) 87 78 52

Staff perception of school climate (#16 staff survey) 68 75

Staff perception of consistency (#9 staff survey) 63 69

Parent perception of consistency (#9 parent survey) 87 60

Staff perception of communication (#13 staff survey) 79 91

Parent perception of communication (#13 parent survey 87 70

Use a green, yellow or red coloring coding system for current year scores

Goal Area II Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues

• Improved Attendance - All students who are absent receive personal phone calls.• Parent, student, and staff perception of school quality has improved.• Parent and student perception has improved in all areas.• House Concept continues with strength.• BLIS Program success

• Continue to implement strategies for increased parent involvement.• Encourage more student involvement in extracurricular activities.• Expand BLIS program

Strategic Goal Area III

Efficient and Effective Operational Processes

Technology Improvement

• Increased student Nooks• Increased laptop mobile units x 2• All teachers have laptops

List technology improvements for this school year

Technology Data# Rooms with

Interactive Boards

# Rooms with Document Cameras

# Student Response Systems

# iPads for student use

# Nooks for student use

Computer Labs

PK

K

1

2

3

Remedial

20

Regular 23 13 25SPED 3 3

Gifted 4 4 4

Total 30 17 32 20 260 5

Facility or Physical Improvements

• Landscaping at gym entrance• Concrete sidewalk from stadium side to gym entrance• Tiger Pride sign in commons area (donated by High School)• Purchase of Boards on each grade level hall and at commons

area for student recognition

List technology improvements for this school year

Energy Management DataPeriod Classroom

InfractionsOffice Infractions Large Area

InfractionsOther Items

September Check 2

Thanksgiving Check 2

Xmas Check 2 1

February Check 1

Spring Break Check 1

End of Year Check 0

Operational Data

Survey Question FY 13 FY 12School account fund equity 68% 30%SNP lunch participation 91% 93%SNP Health Inspection Score 100 100SNP # months operating reserve .81 (12/31/12)

Goal Area III Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues

• Technology in the classrooms

• Use of Blackboard Collaborate for acceleration/tutoring

• Continuation of landscaping/facility improvements

• Teachers are more energy conscious

• Construction has begun.

• Teachers expanding their knowledge of use of the technology in their classrooms.

• Teachers integrating the use of technology in instruction with students using their technology

Strategic Goal Area IV

Continuous System & School Improvement

My Personal Professional Learning

• Harvard University School Turnaround Leaders Institute

• Working on doctoral dissertation

School Professional Learning Initiatives

• Data Wise Observations/Instructional Rounds – Gail Parmer

• CCGPS – Dr. Evans• Special Ed Instructional Strategies – Dr. Wilson• Thinking Maps – Dr. Lambert

Leadership Rubrics

Rubric Status Areas that need addressing

Visual Reporting

Almost Fully Operational

We need to consistently display more examples of student work for discussion.

Leadership Team

Fully Operational

We have begun posting the minutes from the leadership team meetings in the work room, along with the team leaders cascading the information.

School Improvement Plan

Fully Operational

We will provide more detailed field data for each action step

Professional Learning

Operational We need to provide more differentiated PL to reflect career stages and needs.

2013 CCRPI PredictionYear Score Achievement Progres

sAchievement

GapExceeding

the BarPerformance

Points

2012-13 76.0 54.4 9.1 11 .5 1

2011-12 70.6 50.9 8.7 10.5 .5 0

Put in your 2011-12 CCRPI scores and then predict your 2012-13 CCRPI scores that we will recieve in the Fall.

Under-performing personnel

Send me the final timeline for each of your selected under-performing personnel via

shared a shared Google Drive document prior to the meeting.

Goal Area IV Highlights & IssuesHighlights Issues

• Leadership Team Monitoring SIP

• Teachers are prepared to be involved in Instructional Rounds/Data Wise Observations

• Teachers gained confidence in CCGPS

• Teachers made significant progress in implementing Thinking Maps

• Improvement with teachers using data to guide and differentiate instruction

• A few remaining under-performing teachers

Quality AuditUsing a 1-10 scale with 10 being the highest score, give examples and score them for

each area of this chart.

Quality examples that are positive:

Quality examples needing Improvement:

Processes

• IB Program (School-wide discipline plan) – 8

•RTI Process – 7: 7th grade implemented with consistency and effectiveness

•Data Wise Observation

•Faculty/Staff utilization of SIP

•Fidelity of IB program implementation with all teachers

•RTI Process – 6th and 8th grade implementation

Performance

•Improved instruction – 7

•Accelerated Math – 9

•Improvement in band program – 8

•Continued improvement of instruction focusing on higher order questioning

•Continuation with focus on band supporting high school band program

Quality examples that are positive:

Quality examples needing Improvement:

Service

•Office staff’s immediate acknowledgement of visitors to building - 9

• Providing clean and beautiful facility/campus – 9

•Providing information (letter/brochure) for potential families – 8•All SPED IEP/Eligibility/Transition meetings were held on time - 8

•Customer service PL for faculty and staff with quarterly evaluations

People

•Increased recognition of students – 7

•Parents of the Month for each grade level – 7

•Positive parent contacts – 7

•Cluster Nights – Math/Science/Writing

•Consistency of parent contacts with all teachers

•Increase in parent engagement (Blackboard Collaborate/House Leader Program)

Quality AuditUsing a 1-10 scale with 10 being the highest score, give examples and score them for

each area of this chart.

Key Areas to Improve for Next Year

• School-wide writing process• Reading comprehension/fluency/developing

close reading skills• Math • School-wide implementation of RTI process

with fidelity