temperature trends in the upper troposphere/ lower stratosphere as revealed by ccms and aogcms...
TRANSCRIPT
Temperature trends in the upper troposphere/ lower stratosphere as revealed by CCMs and AOGCMs
Eugene Cordero, Sium TesfaiDepartment of Meteorology San Jose State University, USA
Veronika EyringDLR Institute for Physics of the Atmosphere, Germany
Neal Butchart Climate Research Division, Met Office, UK
OutlineGoals and Motivation
20th century
21st century
Aim: To determine if systematic differences exist between AOGCMs and CCMs simulations during the 20th and 21st centuries.
Questions:
§ Are CCM’s better able to simulate the 20th century atmosphere compared to AOGCM models?
§ What effect does ozone forcing have on temperature trends in the stratosphere and troposphere?
§ How will the SRES emission scenarios affect O3 recovery?
AOGCM Simulations (IPCC 2007) AOGCM Simulations (IPCC 2007)
Coupled Atmosphere – Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) - IPCC AR4 (CMIP3)
Simulations from 17 international research groups (23 model simulations)
Variety of emission scenarios– 20th century– 21st century - various scenarios
Model focus is on surface and troposphere
Cordero and Forster, 2006: Stratospheric variability and trends in
models used for the IPCC AR4, ACP.
CCM Simulations (WMO/UNEP 2006) CCM Simulations (WMO/UNEP 2006) Coupled Chemistry Climate Models (CCM) Simulations from 13 international research groups Two primary sets of simulations
– 20th century (REF1)
– 21st century (REF2) Model focus is primarily on evolution of the ozone
layer.
Eyring et al., 2006: Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry climate model simulations of the recent past, JGR.
Eyring et al., 2007: Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone
in the 21st century, JGR
Coupled Chemistry-Climate Models (CCMs)
AOGCM Model Forcings
Cordero and Forster, 2006
Model GHG Volcanic Ozone Solar Z-top S-lev Model top
BCCR-BCM2.0 Y N N N 33 5 Low
CCSM3 Y Y Y Y 40 7 Low
CGCM3.1(T47) Y N Nb ? 49 11 High
CNRM-CM3 Y N Nb N 76 17 High
CSIRO-Mk3.0 Y Na Y N 38 3 Low
ECHAM5/MPI-OM Y N Y ? 29 4 Low
FGOALS-g1.0 Y N Nb Y 45 9 High
GFDL-CM2.0 Y Y Y Y 35 3 Low
GFDL-CM2.1 Y Y Y Y 35 3 Low
GISS-AOM Y N N N 33 3 Low
GISS-EH Y Y Y Y 67 9 High
GISS-ER Y Y Y Y 67 9 High
INM-CM3.0 Y Na N N 32 6 Low
IPSL-CM4 Y N N N 32 7 Low
MIROC3.2(hires) Y Y Y Y 45 19 High
MIROC3.2(medres) Y Y Y Y 67 6 High
MRI-CGCM2.3.2 Y Na N Y 54 8 High
PCM Y Y Y Y 43 7 Low
UKMO-HadCM3 Y N Y ? 39 5 Low
Model Group and location Horiz. resolution
Vertical Layers /Upper Boundary
AMTRAC GFDL, USA 2° x 2.5° 48 L / 0.0017 hPa
CCSRNIES NIES, Tokyo, Japan 2.8° x 2.8° 34 L / 0.01 hPa
CMAM Univ Toronto/York Univ/Environment Canada
3.75 ° x 3.75°
71L / 0.0006 hPa
E39C DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany 3.75 ° x 3.75°
39L / 10 hPa
GEOS CCM NASA/GSFC, USA 2° x 2.5° 55 L / 0.01hPa
LMDZrepro IPSL, France 2.5° x 3.75° 50 L / 0.07 hPa
MAECHAM4CHEM
MPI Mainz, MPI Hamburg, Germany 3.75 ° x 3.75°
39 L / 0.01 hPa
MRI MRI, Tsukuba, Japan 2.8° x 2.8° 68 L / 0.01 hPa
SOCOL PMOD/WRC and ETHZ, Switzerland 3.75 ° x 3.75°
39 L / 0.1 hPa
ULAQ University of L'Aquila, Italy 10° x 22.5° 26 L / 0.04 hPa
UMETRAC UK Met Office, UK; NIWA Lauder, NZ 2.5° x 3.75° 64 L / 0.01 hPa
UMSLIMCAT University of Leeds, UK 2.5° x 3.75° 64 L / 0.01 hPa
WACCM NCAR, USA 4° x 5° 66 L / 10-6 hPa
CCM Participating Models
Tropopause
Stratopause
AOGCM Vertical Model Levels
Cordero and Forster, 2006
CC
M M
odel
s
AOGCM Temperature bias: Models with high lid compared to models with low lid
High lid models (> 45km)
Low lid models (< 45km)
NCEP 2σCordero and Forster, 2006
2020thth Century Temperature Time Series Century Temperature Time Series and Trendsand Trends
Annual Global Temperature Anomaly @ 50 hPa
Pre
ssu
re (
hP
a)
Global Temperature Trends (1958-99)
ºK/decade
AOGCM/CCM Global Temperature Trends (1958-99)
Yes O3
No O3
Sonde*
AOGCM/CCM Global Temperature Trends (1980-99)
SH Extratropics AOGCM/CCM Global TempTrends (1980-99)
2121stst Century Simulations Century Simulations AOGCMs A1/B2AOGCMs A1/B2
CCMs A1B CCMs A1B
Trends in temperatureTrends in temperature
Global Temperature @ 10hPa A2/A1B Scenario
Global Temperature @ 50hPa A2/A1B Scenario
Global Temp Trends (2000-2050) A2/A1B Scenario
SON - SH extratropics- Temp Trends A2/A1B Scenario
Global Average Temperature Trend 2000-2100
Pre
ssu
re (
hP
a)
ºK/decade
2000-2050 Temp Trends A2/B1 Scenario
Global Average Temperature Trend 2000-2100
Pre
ssu
re (
hP
a)
ºK/decade
2000-2050 Temp Trends A2/A1B/B1 Scenario
Global Average Temperature Trend 2000-2100
Pre
ssu
re (
hP
a)
ºK/decade
2000-2100 Temp Trends A2/A1B/B1 Scenario
SummarySummary 20th Century
– The AOGCM and CCMs produce similar temperature trends (for models including ozone forcing).
– Models trends without ozone forcing appear different in upper troposphere for some regions.
21st Century
– Stratospheric temperature strongly affected by emission scenario.
– CCM simulations of ozone recovery may not based on a middle range emission scenario.
Steps ForwardSteps Forward
Determine ozone forcing fields in AOGCM simulations (future scenarios).
CCM and AOGCM model simulations where interactive chemistry can be isolated.
Further investigate seasonal trends at different latitude ranges.
Aim of the Study:
– PART 1: Evaluation of the current generation of coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs)
– PART 2: Long-term decadal projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century
Motivation:
– WMO/UNEP Assessment 2007, in particular Chapter 6: The Ozone Layer in the 21st Century (Greg E. Bodeker, Darryn W. Waugh et al.)
– IPCC 2007, in particular Chapter 7: Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry (Ken L. Denman, Guy Brasseur, et al.)
The goal of CCMVal is to improve understanding of CCMs through process-oriented evaluation, along with discussion and coordinated analysis of science results.
Annual Global Temperature @ 50 hPa
AOGCM Annual Global Temperature @ 50 hPa
Pre
ssu
re (
hP
a)
Global Average Temperature Trend 2000-2050
Pre
ssu
re (
hP
a)
Global Average Temperature Trend 2000-2050 (Fixed ozone)