temperature and hydrophobicity of silicon rubber
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
1/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
31
TEMPERATURE AND HYDROPHOBICITY
OF SILICON RUBBER
1Syed Aamir Raza Naqvi,
2Syed Kashif Imdad
1Water and power development authority [email protected]
2Department of Electrical Engineering, HITEC University Taxila, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
Among new insulating materials used in high voltage power systems, silicon rubber materials are
extremely important. During last 20 years, these materials have been applied for manufacturing outdoor
insulators. Silicon rubber is organic material. It decomposes under different environmental conditions. Its
characteristics change with time, the most important among these characteristics is hydrophobicity.
Hydrophobicity is the formation of water beads on the surface of insulator, which resists the flow of water
in the form of continuous tracks. Hydrophobicity is due to Low Weight Molecules in the bulk of silicon
rubber that skim up to the surface due to difference in diffusion density. With the passage of time,
hydrophobicity reduces and then recovers back. In other words, hydrophobicity goes through cyclic
changes. Temperature slows down the reduction rate of hydrophobicity and increases recovery rate of
hydrophobicity. This phenomenon is experimentally investigated in this research.
KEYWORDS
Polymeric insulators, Hydrophobicity, degradation, SEM, FTIR, STRI
1. INTRODUCTIONHydrophobicity of any material is its resistance to the flow of water on its surface, denying theformation of a continuous stream of water [1]. Hydrophobic nature splits the water layer in the
form of separate drops. Reduction in hydrophobicity for an electrical insulator increases surface
leakage current activity [4, 5, 8, 9]. This is a major silicon rubber insulation performance factor,
because it causes serious effects as [2,13]:
a) Reduction in electrical insulationb) Influence on the aging processIn this research paper, the effects of temperature on hydrophobicity are experimentally
investigated. Temperature has great influence on hydrophobicity [11]. It is thought by many, that
atmospheric temperature depolymerises long chains of silicon rubber. In fact depolymerisationcannot take place at atmospheric temperature [12]. Temperature only speeds up the transfer of
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
2/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
32
low molecular weight components from the inner bulk to the surface. The main reason forhydrophobicity transfer is the diffusion of low molecular weight components (LMW) from the
inner bulk to the surface [18]. This increases the rate of rise of hydrophobicity. Depolymerisation
of silicon rubber molecules occurs by hydrolysis only [17].
The hydrophobicity is measured by:
a) Leakage Current Methodb) STRI Classificationc) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopya) Leakage Current:The Leakage current is directly proportional to the hydrophobicity loss [4, 5, 8, 9]. That is why
the leakage current in this test was measured after every 15 days to show the effects oftemperature on hydrophobicity. For this purpose leakage current was measured using a high
precision digital multimeter. The leakage current is shown in the table-2. For this purpose, rubberpieces were kept energized by a 10kv single phase transformer on one side, whereas the other
ends of rubber pieces were kept grounded. Each piece was kept in its individual wooden box.
Leakage current values were taken after every 15-days. The leakage current reading is the current
going over the surface towards ground.
b) STRI Classification:It is a simple procedure for manually obtaining a collective measure of the hydrophobicity
properties of insulator. For practical purpose, the degree of water repellency of an insulator
surface may be divided into seven hydrophobicity classes according to STRI classification guide[3, 14]. HC-1 is the most hydrophobic class and HC-7 is the most hydrophilic class. Manualmethod is to keep the insulator at 35 degrees from horizontal and spray water on the surface.
Leave insulator for 45 seconds and then take snaps of insulator and compare them with the STRI
guide to assign a hydrophobicity class between HC-1 to HC-7 [4, 6, 7].
c) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy:It is a material analysis technique, which provides us structural information and compound
identification. It is used for quantitative measurement as well. Mostly it is used to identify organic
compounds but in some cases inorganic compounds are also identified. In this technique, the
sample under test is exposed to infrared radiations. The sample absorbs those frequencies that
match with the vibrations of its atoms. A dip is obtained at these frequencies in infrared spectrum.The infrared spectrum is then matched with standard curves stored in computerized reference
library to identify the degradation in the material. The FTIR curves are called transmittance
curves between transmittance in % and wave number in 1/cm.
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
3/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
33
2. Experimental SetupFive wooden boxes of size 2X2X2 feet were taken. A 100 watt bulb was fitted inside every box
and temperature was controlled using thermostat. The temperature maintained in different boxes
is tabulated in table-1. The size of silicon rubber piece suspended in the boxes was 6.5X1.2 sq.
inch. The material of samples was High Temperature Vulcanized Silicon Rubber with Alumina
tri-hydrate and Silica. The experiment continued for 5000 hrs as per IEC criterion (from 16/02/09
to 12/09/09). The samples were energized at 10kv using a single phase transformer. The setup is
shown in fig-1. The leakage current was measured by placing 100 resistor placed in series with
every sample, using high precision digital multimeter. The record of leakage current of different
samples is given in table-2.
Box No 1 2 3 4 5
TemperatureC
30 40 45 50 55
At 30C, fig-2 At 40
C, fig-3
The graphs between leakage current in micro amperes and time in days are:
At 45C, fig-4 At 50
C, fig-5
0
5
10
15
0thd
ay
30thd
ay
60thd
ay
90thd
ay
120thd
ay
150thd
ay
190thd
ay
209thd
ay
0
5
10
15
0thd
ay
30thd
ay
60thd
ay
90thd
ay
120thd
ay
150thd
ay
190thd
ay
209thd
ay
0
5
10
15
0thd
ay
30thd
ay
60thd
ay
90thd
ay
120thd
ay
150thd
ay
190thd
ay
209thd
ay
02468
10
0thd
ay
30thd
ay
60thd
ay
90thd
ay
120thd
ay
150thd
ay
190thd
ay
209thd
ay
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
4/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
34
fig-1
3. Leakage Current AnalysisThe leakage current readings are
At
On 12/09, fig-10
( Amps)
Temperature ( C )
30 40 45 50 55 Date
6.5 6.4 6.4 6.6 6.6 16/02/099.5 9.0 9.1 9.0 8.9 02/03
10.5 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.4 17/03
10.8 9.9 9.7 9.4 9.3 31/03
9.6 9.2 9.0 8.9 8.9 15/04
9.2 9.0 8.9 8.8 8.6 30/04
8.5 8.3 8.2 8.0 7.7 15/05
8.2 7.8 8.0 7.4 7.0 30/05
7.5 7.0 7.4 6.9 6.7 14/06
7.1 6.6 6.3 6.7 6.4 29/06
6.9 6.6 6.4 6.6 6.4 14/07
6.5 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.5 29/07
6.6 6.5 6.4 6.6 6.5 13/08
7.0 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.6 28/087.2 7.0 7.1 6.9 6.8 12/09/09
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
5/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
35
55C, fig-6
Also the graphs between temperature in centigrade and leakage current in micro amps for different samples
are shown below as:
On 16/02, fig-7 On 31/03, fig-8
On 14/07, fig-9 On 12/09, fig-10
To analyze the data, method of curve fitting and regression analysis is used. A regression
parabola is fitted to show the trend of variation of leakage current with time. It is interesting to
note that hydrophobicity cyclically changes with time. If the number of readings is odd as in ourcase then take the middle reading as a starting point and assign to it a zero. Then assign the
number 1,2,3,4,5, to the succeeding readings, and -1,-2,-3,-4,.... to the preceding values so that
the sum of the series x is zero, where x = ..,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,.. This shortens the
method. The data required to derive mathematical relationship is given in the table-3.
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
7
7.1
7.2
7.3
30 40 45 50 55
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
30 40 45 50 55
8
9
10
11
30 40 45 50 55
6
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.87
30 40 45 50 55
6.6
6.8
7
7.2
7.4
30 40 45 50 55
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
6/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
36
The normal equations are:
y = na + bx + cx2
where n is a positive integer
xy = ax + bx + cx
xy = ax + bx + cx4
From above tables, we have:
x = 0, y = 121.6, xy = -60.1, x = 280, xy =
2199.4, x4 = 9352
x = 0
Putting these results in normal equations we have:
y = na + cx (1)
xy = bx (2)
xy = ax + cx4 (3)
And finally we have:
121.6 = 15a + 280c (4)
-61.1 = 280b (5)
2199.4 = 280a + 9352c (6)
From equation 5, we have:
b = -61.1/280 = -0.21
Simultaneously solving equation 4 and 6, we have:
c = -0.01764
a = 8.44
The parabolic equation between leakage current and time is:
y = a + bx + cx
y = 8.44 0.21x 0.017x at 30 CParabolic equations at remaining temperatures are:
y = 8.02 0.21x 0.014x2 at 40 C
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
7/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
37
y = 8.06 0.18x 0.019x2 at 45 C y = 7.84 0.17x 0.010x2 at 50 C y = 7.57 0.18x 0.004x2 at 55 C
Similarly, the parabolic relation between leakage current and temperature was established as
follows: We use the data of 16/02, which is:
Temperature (C): 30 40 45 50 55
L/ current: 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.6 6.6
Origin
The parabolic expression is:
y = a + bx + cx
Assuming the middle temperature as origin we have:
The normal equations are:
y = na + bx + cx (1)
xy = ax + b x + c x (2)
xy = a x + b x + c x4
(3)
From the above table, we have:
x = 0, y = 32.5, xy = 0.4, x = 10, xy = 65.4, x4
= 34
From above results equations (1), (2) and (3) become:
y = na + cx
32.5 = 5a + 10c (4)
xy = b x
0.4 = 10b (5)
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
8/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
38
Table-2
xy = a x + b x + c x4
65.4 = 10a + 34c (6)From equation (5), we have:
b = 0.4/10 = 0.04
Solving equations (4) and (6) simultaneously, we have:
c = 0.0286
Date X Y XY X2
X2Y X
4
16/02/09 -7 6.5 -45.5 49 318.5 2401
02/03 -6 9.5 -57 36 342 1296
17/03 -5 10.5 -52.5 25 262.5 625
31/03 -4 10.8 -43.2 16 172.8 256
15/04 -3 9.6 -28.8 09 86.4 81
30/04 -2 9.2 -18.4 04 36.8 16
15/05 -1 8.5 -8.50 01 8.5 01
30/05 0 8.2 0 00 0 0
14/06 1 7.5 7.5 01 7.5 1
29/06 2 7.1 14.2 04 28.4 16
14/07 3 6.9 20.7 09 62.1 81
29/07 4 6.5 26 16 104 256
13/08 5 6.6 33 25 165 625
28/08 6 7.0 42 36 252 1296
12/09/09 7 7.2 50.4 49 352.8 2401
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
9/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
39
Putting the value of c in equation (6), we have:
a = 6.4428The parabolic expression is:
y = a + bx + cx
Putting the values of a,b,c in above equation, we have a relationship between leakage current and
temperature:
y = 6.442 + 0.04x + 0.028x on 16/02/09Parabolic equations on remaining dates are:
y = 9.014 0.12x + 0.042x2 on 02/03/09 y = 9.940 0.26x 0.100x2 on 17/03/09 y = 10.03 0.35x 0.107x2 on 31/03/09 y = 8.990 0.17x + 0.064x2 on 15/04/09 y = 8.900 0.14x + 0.000x2 on 30/04/09 y = 8.182 0.19x 0.021 on 15/05/09 y = 7.794 0.28x 0.057x2 on 30/06/09 y = 7.142 0.17x 0.021x2 on 14/06/09 y = 6.448 0.13x + 0.086x2 on 29/06/09 y = 6.494 0.10x + 0.042x2 on 14/07/09 y = 6.368 + 0.01x + 0.040x2 on 29/07/09 y = 6.477 0.01x + 0.021x2 on 13/08/09 y = 6.768 0.78x + 0.036x2 on 28/08/09 y = 6.986 0.09x 0.007x2 on 12/09/09
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
10/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
40
4. STRI Classification Hydrophobicity Analysis
Fresh plate, HC-1, fig-11 at 30 C, HC-1, on 16/02, fig-12 at 30 C, HC-2, on 31/03, fig-13
The hydrophobicity classification of all the samples on different dates is shown:
Table-3
at 30 C, HC-1, on 14/07, fig-14 at 40 C, HC-1, on 16/02, fig-15 at 40 C, HC-2 , on 31/03, fig-16
Temperature X Y XY X2
X2Y X
4
30 -2 6.5 -13 4 26 16
40 -1 6.4 -6.4 1 6.4 1
45 0 6.4 0 0 0 0
50 1 6.6 6.6 1 6.6 1
55 2 6.6 13.2 4 26.4 16
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
11/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
41
at 40C, HC-1, on 14/07, fig-17 at 45 C, HC-1, on 16/02, fig-18 At 50 C, HC-1, on 16/02, fig-21
Table 4
5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis:The samples were sent for FTIR analysis at the end of the experiment. The Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectroscopy results between transmittance in % and wave number in 1/cm for original
rubber sample is shown in figure-27. The initial readings were used as reference and the
degradation/restoration found is shown in table-7
Spectrum of Original Rubber Sample, fig-21
TemperatureC Absorption ratio Change %30 0.6111 1.972
40 0.6097 2.291
45 0.60317 3.3381
50 0.60162 3.682
55 0.5984 4.10
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
12/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
42
0
2
4
6
30 40 45 50 55
Virgin = 0.624 (absorption ratio)
6. Comparison and Analysis:a) Leakage Current:As is mentioned above, that hydrophobic loss is directly proportionally to leakage current [4, 5, 8,9]. It is worth noting that leakage current was almost the same for all the fresh pieces of rubber
initially on 16/02/09. The leakage current increased in the first one and half month and showed
maximum increase on and around 31/03/09. Increase of leakage current, for the rubber piece at
minimum temperature (30C) is maximum and for the piece at maximum temperature (55C) is
minimum. This proves that temperature rise decreases the hydrophobicity
reduction rate. The main reasonof this is that, at high temperature, the mobility or vibration of
low weight molecules increases. This helps the LMW to rapidly diffuse through the bulk and
reach the surface in large quantity at rapid pace to not only increase hydrophobicity, but also
increase the rate of rise of hydrophobic nature. Temperature only stimulates mobility of LMW.
Temperature cannot depolymerise long chains of silicon-oxygen (siloxane) bonds present in SiR.
The breaking energy of silicon-oxygen bond is 445kj/mole [12]. This energy can be provided at
or above 350C without catalyst and at or above 150C with catalyst [12]. Such high temperaturesdo not exist in atmosphere. Therefore temperature cannot depolymerise/break long chains of SiR.
The diffused LMW cause the water droplets to take circular shape on the surface of SiR. The
circular shape of drops denies the continuous stream of water and consequently the leakage
current. The leakage current readings clearly show a cyclic behavior. Initially leakage current
increased and then decreased later on, until consequent recovery of silicon rubber back to its
original. This is the principal reason of the long life of silicon rubber insulators used in power
systems. The speed of recovery is directly proportional to the temperature. This shows that the
higher the temperature, the greater the transfer rate of LMW is and the speedier is the recovery of
hydrophobicity.
a) STRI Classification:Initially on 16/02(date of energization), all the rubber pieces were falling in HC-1 category as is
clear from pictures. But afterwards, LMW components started disappearing from the surface of
rubber and hydrophobicity started decreasing and maximum decrease was noted on and around
31/03 as is clear by the STRI pictures. Then afterwards, the hydrophobicity started increasing
again and reached HC-1 as shown by pictures taken on 14/07. Water sprayed on the surface of
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
13/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
43
silicon rubber takes certain shape. This shape decides in which class the droplet pattern falls.
When the surface is highly hydrophobic, the water droplets do not spread on the surface. Insteadthey take small circular shape [15,16]. In this state, all the droplets form beads and deny
continuous stream of water. As the hydrophobicity of SiR reduces, the water droplets start
spreading on thesurface, taking elliptical shapes. When this happens, the droplets join each other andform a continuous stream of water. Under such conditions, hydrophobicity class of SiR falls.
a) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscope:FTIR transmittance curve analysis shows that the high the temperature, the more will be the
physical degradation. But in general the speed of degradation is quite slow. This physical
degradation is surface roughness, fissures and small cracks due to temperature/heat. This
deterioration of surface reduces hydrophobicity [1]. Pollution particles trap in these cracks and
mask hydrophobicity of SiR surface.
7. Conclusions:The above results clearly show:
1. That silicon rubber show cyclic behavior for its hydrophobicity. Its hydrophobicitydecreases with use but later on recovers back as shown by leakage current readings and STRI
classification.
2. Temperature increases the transfer rate of low weight components, as the high the
temperature is the more speedy will be the recovery of hydrophobicity.
3. FTIR transmittance curve analysis shows, that the high the temperature is, the more will
be the physical degradation i.e. surface roughness. But in general the speed of degradation is quite
slow. That is why, all SiR insulators preserve good hydrophobicity properties even after 15 to 20year of service.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Mohammad Amin and Salman Amin reviews on Advanced Material Science
[2] Nipporn Chaipanit, Chaiwat Rattana Khongive and Raji Sundararajan, Accelerated Multistress Aging of
Polymeric Insulator under San Francisco Coastal Environment
[3] STRI Classification, guide 1, 92/1[4] Raji Sundrarajan, Chad Pelletier, Roger Champan, Terry Polock and Robert Nowhin,
Multistress Aging of Polymeric Insulators, (IEEE 2000 annual report conference on Electrical insulation
and Dielectric Phenomena (2000) 369).
[5] R. Matsuoka, K. Naito, T. Irie, and K. Kondo, In: Proc. Transmission and Distribution Conference and
Exhibition 2002 (Asia Pacific. IEEE/PES), Volume 3 p. 2197.
-
7/29/2019 Temperature and Hydrophobicity of Silicon Rubber
14/14
Electrical and Electronics Engineering: An International Journal (ELELIJ) Vol 2, No 1, February 2013
44
[6] K. Naito R. Matsuoka, T. Irie and K. Kondo // IEEE. Transactions on Dielectric and Electrical
Insulation(1999) 732.
[7] Torbjorn Sorqvist, Polymeric outdoor insulators, a long term Study (Department of electric power
engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 1997
[8] J. Lambrecht, R. Basch, S.M. Guhski and M.A. Fernando, In: Proc.1998 IEEE International Conferenceon Conduction and Breakdown in Solid Dielectrics (1998, Vasteris, Sweden) p. 430.
[9] A Ito, B. Marblngsri, A Stake, R. Matsuoka, Z. Gao and Z. Yu, In: Proc. 7th International Conference
on Properties and application for dielectric Materials 2003 (Department ofElectrical Engineering, Chubu
University Japan & Test and Research Institute of State Power East Chan Co, Shanghai, China, 2003) p.
385.
[10] Wang Shaowu, Liang Xidong, Guan Zhicheng and Wang Xun, Hydrophobicity Transfer Properties of
Silicone Rubber
[11] Zhenyu Li, Xidong Liang, Yuanxiang Zhou and Jing Tang, In: 2004 Annual Report Conference on
Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (Shanxi Electrical Power Corporation, Taiyuan, China,
2004) Page 679.
[12]Aging in outdoor insulating polymers due to UV and high temperature. IEEE CEIDP, 1991.
[13] Liang Xidong, Wang Shaowu, et.al. "The Development and Study of Composite Insulators in China",
IEEE Trans DEI, Vol. 6, pp. 586~594, 1999.
[14] S. Wu, Polymer Interface and Adhesion(Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York and Basel, 1982).
[15] Tomohiro Nakanishi, Hidenori Shinokubo, Ryosuke Matsuoka, Kumagai Akita and Hikita Kyushu, In:
IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation (Boston, MA, USA, 2002) p. 252.
[16] A. Dernfalk Gteborg, Image Analysis for diagnostics of insulators with biological contaminations
(School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sweden, Chalmers University of Technology, Technical
Report No. 450L, 2002).
[17] Tomohiro Nakanishi, Hidenori Shinokubo,Ryosuke Matsuoka, Kumagai Akita and Hikita Kyushu, In:
IEEE InternationalSymposium on Electrical Insulation (Boston,MA, USA, 2002) p. 252.
[18] Janssen, H.; Herden, A.; Krner H. C.: The loss and recovery of hydrophobicity on silicone rubber
surfaces. 10th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Montreal, Canada, 1997
[19] Chengrong Li Linjie, Zhao Jun Xiong Shuqi and Zhang Tisha Yao, in Beijing University, China