teen driver safety · pd3.sd1.ci3: parent teen driving agreements pd3.sd1.ci5: peer-to-peer...

Call (866) 835-7973 to join

Teen Driver Safety

Topic Call #4 February 20, 2018

Strategy Team Updates

2

Tips

Mute yourself when you’re not talking

This webinar is being recorded

Call (866) 835-7973

for audio

Ask questions in the chat at any time

Download

resources from File

Share pod

This webinar is subject to the CS CoIIN data agreement*

3

TDS Staff & Participants

Jenny Stern-

Carusone, M.S.W.

Coordinator

Jane Taylor, EdD

Improvement Advisor

Team

Rebecca Willmer

Tech Guru

Jen Leonardo, Ph.D.

Improvement Advisor

Team

Teen Driver Safety

8 Strategy Teams

•Florida

•Kentucky

•Nebraska

•New Hampshire

•*North Dakota*

•Tennessee

•Texas

•Wisconsin

4

• Strategy Team Updates (approx. 5 min/team for presentation and TA)

• Looking ahead: Setting 90-day Aims

• Upcoming events

Agenda

5

About This Slide Deck

Please contact us if you need assistance!

What we display Where we get it How you can edit it

Drivers & Change Ideas

Process Measures

Aim Statements

Your online Driver DiagramSubmit, re-submit, or edit

your online Driver Diagram

Description of goals, theory

or approachYour Storyboard E-mail us

Charts

Charts are only generated

for the process measures

selected in your driver

diagram

Select the correct Process

Measures in your driver

diagram

Content of your charts

comes from your monthly

report

Submit or edit your monthly

reports

This information is shared with HRSA MCHB and CS CoIIN Topic Teams

6

Teen Driver SafetyEngagement Metrics FL KY NE NH ND TN TX WI Topic Team

Driver Diagram Submitted Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes 100%Reporting

Number of Monthly Reports

Submitted 9 7 7 7 7 7 4 8 100%Reporting at least once

Number of PDSAs Submitted 1 1 9 1 3 2 0 3 88%Reporting at least once

Number of Topic Calls State

Participated In 9 7 9 8 9 7 9 8 8.25On Average

Assessment Scale 2 3.5 3 3 3 3.5 1.5 3 3Mode

Updated February 19, 2018; Run charts updated February

7

TDS: Process Measures

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1. Percent of communities that participate in campaign

2. Percent of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use and

texting

3. Percent of teens reporting driving during restricted hours

4. Percent of teens reporting use of seat belts

5. Percent of teens reporting driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs

6. Percent of teens reporting speeding

7. Percent of teens reporting driving with teen passengers

8. Percent of teens reporting driving while fatigued

9. Percent of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements

10. Percent of teens reporting safe driving practices

11. Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements

12. Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver

13. Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in

an evidence-based teen driver safety program

14. Percent of schools that provide GDL education

15. Percent of health care organizations that give anticipatory guidance to

caregivers on teen driver safety

16. Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety

coalition

Teen Driver Safety Process Measures

8

Florida AIM:

• Deaths: -5%

• Hospitalizations: -5%

• ED Visits: -5%

Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas

PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaign

PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition

PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to

Parents

PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements

PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs

Process Measures

1. % of communities that

participate in campaign

2. % of teens reporting distracted

driving, including cell phone use

and texting

13. % of signed parent-teen driving

agreements among teens

participating in an evidence-based

teen driver safety program

16. % of active stakeholders in the

state/jurisdiction teen driver safety

coalition

The team plans to promote teen driver safety through

messaging tied to national health observances,

including March – Brain Injury Awareness Month; April

– Safe Kids Day, National Minority Health & Health

Disparities Month, World Health Day; June – National

Safety Month; October – Child Health Day USA. The

team will compile and share messaging with partners

and will request to be included on monthly county

health department directors’ conference calls to

facilitate outreach to all 67 county health departments

for presentations and discussions that coincide with

these national health observances. Stakeholders: Safe

Kids coalitions; local health departments; Students

Against Destructive Decisions members and sponsors

9

Florida

Teen Driver Safety

Outcome Measure 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related Fatalities

Florida has begun reporting outcome data, showing an initial reduction in

teen motor vehicle related fatalities.

10

Kentucky

AIM:

• Deaths: -6.67%

• Hospitalizations: -6.67%

• ED Visits: -6.67%

The Kentucky team is working to increase parent and teen

knowledge of Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) and the risks of

inexperience, speed, passengers, no seat belt, rural roads, and all

types of distraction and impairment.

In Cohort 1, a teen driver safety working group was formed, and the

group developed a teen driver safety package, which was adopted

and is being utilized by 6 counties. In Cohort 2, the teen driver

safety working group will increase implementation of CheckPoints

and Alive at 25.

Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas

PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policy Makers

PD2.SD1.CI3: Anticipatory Guidance

PD2.SD1.CI4: Data Collection

PD2.SD1.CI5: Evaluation

PD3.SD1.CI1: Parent Education

PD3.SD1.CI4: Teen Education

Process Measures

1.% of communities that participate in campaign

14. % of schools that offer/provide GDL education

15. % of health care organizations that give anticipatory

guidance to caregivers on teen driver safety

16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction

teen driver safety coalition

11

Kentucky

Teen Driver Safety


Kentucky has been working closely with state epidemiologists and the KY

DOT to collect and report outcome data.

12

Kentucky

Teen Driver Safety

Outcome Measure 2: Rate of Teen Driver-related Hospitalizations



13

Kentucky

Teen Driver Safety

Outcome Measure 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related ED Visits



14

KentuckyProcess Measure 1: Percent of communities that participate in campaign

Teen Driver Safety

Kentucky used their ‘heat mapping’ to determine the highest risk counties and

set a goal of engaging 12 of them to implement CheckPoints. Utlizing strategic

partnerships and incentive funding from KY DOT, they have successfully

engaged all 12 counties and will begin implementation in January 2018.

15

KentuckyProcess Measure 15: Percent of health care organizations that give anticipatory guidance to

caregivers on teen driver safety

Teen Driver Safety

Kentucky Injury Prevention Resource Center is working to engage pediatric

offices to begin providing anticipatory guidance.

16

KentuckyProcess Measure 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver

safety coalition

Teen Driver Safety

Kentucky used their ‘heat mapping’ to determine the highest risk counties and

set a goal of engaging 12 of them to implement CheckPoints. Utlizing strategic

partnerships and incentive funding from KY DOT, they have successfully

engaged all 12 counties and will begin implementation in January 2018.

17

Nebraska AIM:

•Deaths: -9%

•Hospitalizations: -9%

•ED Visits: -9%In Cohort 1, Nebraska developed, tested, implemented,

and spread an informational card on GDL requirements,

which was distributed at 98 sites by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.

In Cohort 2, Nebraska will:

• Educate policy makers on TIRF

• Launch a coalition to support the 28 schools that are implementing Teens in the

Driver Seat

• Design and implement a Parent-Teen

Driving Agreement specific to Nebraska

Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas

PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policy Makers

PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions


Process Measures

3. % of teens reporting driving during

restricted hours

7. % of teens reporting driving with teen

passengers

12. % of parents reporting enforcement of

GDL with their teen driver


agreements among teens participating in an

evidence-based teen driver safety program


state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition

18

Nebraska

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 12: Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver

The first 2 tests of the GDL card showed excellent enforcement of GDL; 100% of the parents

in the first small-scale tests confirmed that they enforce GDL requirements with their teens.

When distributed to a larger group of 75 parents, 95% reported enforcement of GDL.

19

Nebraska

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 13: Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens

participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program

The first 2 tests of the GDL card showed excellent completion of parent-teen driving

agreements. 100% of the parents in the first small-scale tests signed the agreement with

their teen. In a larger group of 76 parents, 95% signed the agreement with their teen.

20

Nebraska

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver

safety coalition

The team turned it’s attention to launching a statewide teen driver safety coalition in cohort

2 in order to support schools implementing Teens in the Driver Seat. As of Sept 2017, they

are looking to move leadership out of DHS and to a school in hopes it will be more flexible

and responsive to school needs.

21

New HampshireAIM:

• Deaths: -6.67%



Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas

PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions

PD2.SD1.CI4: Data Collection, Assessment, Tracking

and Reporting

PD3.SD1.CI4: Positive Messaging

• Maximize communication and education for teens

in 40 high schools through the Teen Driver

Program to reduce distracted driving and increase

seat-belt use

• Create a toolkit to enable peer leaders to provide

education and support outside of organized

educational events.

• Educate parents and guardians of teens and

encourage them to be actively involved in the

driving experiences of their teens.

• Utilize safety messaging and social media focused

on teens.

Process Measures

1. % of communities that participate

in campaign


driving, including cell phone use

and texting

4. % of teens reporting use of seat

belts

14. % of schools that provide GDL

education

Alternative measure: # of GDL

education events

22

New Hampshire

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 1: Percent of communities that participate in campaign

The NH TDS team has been working on getting their Peer Learning TDS program into all of

the 250 high schools across the state. They already achieved their grant required goal of

working in 15 high schools. They adjusted their denominator for this measure to 20

schools and hope to achieve 100% engagement in cohort 2.

23

New Hampshire

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 2: Percent of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use

and texting.

The NH TDS team conducts a pre/post observational assessment in the fall/spring and

provide GDL education throughout the school year. The survey assesses use of seat belts

and technology when leaving the school parking lot. The pre (fall) survey indicated 0% of

teens were observed using technology as they left the parking lot.

24

New Hampshire

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 4: Percent of teens reporting use of seatbelts

The NH TDS team conducts a pre/post observational assessment in the fall/spring and

provide GDL education throughout the school year. The survey assesses use of seat belts

and technology when leaving the school parking lot. The pre (fall) survey showed 91%

students were properly using a seat belt.

25

New Hampshire

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 14: Percent of schools that provide GDL education

The NH TDS team has been working on getting their Peer Learning TDS program into all of

the 250 high schools across the state. They already achieved their grant required goal of

working in 15 high schools. They adjusted their denominator for this measure to 20

schools and hope to achieve 100% engagement in cohort 2.

26

North Dakota AIM:

• Deaths: -0.5%


• ED Visits: -%0.5

Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas

PD2.SD1.CI5: Teen Driver Program Evaluations

PD3.SD1.CI5: Educate Teen Drivers Using

Evidence-based Programs

Process Measures

1. % of communities that participate

in campaign


driving, including cell phone use and

texting

9. % of teens reporting understanding

of GDL requirements


education

Alternative measure: % of schools

implementing GDL education program

that are reporting evaluation data

• Implement and grow the Impact Teen Driver

program in North Dakota.

• Increase evaluation of the Impact Teen

Driver program.

• Disseminate messaging on the prevention

of distracted driving from the North Dakota

Department of Transportation.

27

North Dakota

Teen Driver Safety


The North Dakota TDS team is working towards spreading the Impact Teen Driver program

across the state through their partnership with the state Extension Service which has an

office in every county and relationships with most of the Tribes.

28

Tennessee AIM:•Deaths: -6.67%

•Hospitalizations: -6.67%

•ED Visits: -6.67%

In Cohort 1, Tennessee successfully tested

parking pass incentives at one high school.

Another 12 schools made the CheckPoints

program mandatory.

In Cohort 2, they are working with 2 new

counties that have high crash rates and have

spread the CheckPoints program to 10 new

high schools in 2017 with another 10 possible

for the new year, and improve their data

collection process to provide more longitudinal

information.

Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas


PD3.SD1.CI1: Educating Parents

PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent-Teen Driving Agreements

Process Measures

9. % of teens reporting understanding

of GDL requirements

11. % of parents reporting

understanding of GDL requirements

12. % of parents reporting enforcement

of GDL with their teen driver


agreements among teens participating

in an evidence-based teen driver safety

program


education


state/jurisdiction teen driver safety

coalition

29

Tennessee

Teen Driver Safety


30

Tennessee

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 9: Percent of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements

Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up,

Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they begin to spread

the CheckPoints program into schools throughout the state, the total number of teens

is increasing and their percent of teens understanding continues to remain above

80%.

31

Tennessee

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 11: Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements


Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they begin to spread

the CheckPoints program into schools throughout the state, the total number of

parents is increasing and their percent of parents understanding continues to

remain above 80%.

32

Tennessee

Teen Driver Safety



Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they spread the

CheckPoints program across the state, the total number of parents is increasing, yet

their percent reporting enforcement continues to remain at 80%.

33

Tennessee

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 13: Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens

participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program


Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL in the current school

year. Over the course of the program, they have now accumulated 2,212 signed

agreements.

34

Tennessee

Teen Driver Safety

Process Measure 14: Percent of schools that provide GDL education

The original goal was to implement CheckPoints in 20 schools across the state.

The TN TDS team increased from 1 initial pilot school in cohort 1 to 10 current

schools and have a new county on line for implementation in Fall 2018 and a

private day school beginning implementation in January 2018.

35

Texas

Hidalgo CountyAIM:

• Deaths: -2%

• Hospitalizations: -2%

• ED Visits: -2%

Texas is working to improve education to parents and teens in Hidalgo County, focusing on

CheckPoints

Teen Driver Safety

Change Ideas

PD3.SD1.CI1: Educating Parents

PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to Parents


PD3.SD1.CI4: Teen Education


Process Measures

2. % of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use and texting

3. % of teens reporting driving during restricted hours

4. % of teens reporting use of seat belts

5. % of teens reporting driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs

6. % of teens reporting speeding

7. % of teens reporting driving with teen passengers

8. % of teens reporting driving while fatigued

9. % of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements

10. % of teens reporting safe driving practices

11. % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements

12. % of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver

13. % of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in an EB TDS program

16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition

36

Wisconsin: TeenDrivingPlan AIM:

• Deaths: -6.67%



Teen Driver Safety

• Developed facilitator training and data collection tools for TeenDrivingPlan

• Trained local health department staff and community members as facilitators

• Created an online training for facilitators

• Created survey tools in Redcap to collect session and fidelity data• In Cohort 2, they are implementing statewide GDL campaign• Grants proposed for 2018 incorporate components of the change

package (PD1.SD) focusing on policy makers and stakeholders

Change Ideas

PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policymakers

PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaign


PD1.SD2.CI2: MOUs

PD1.SD2.CI3: Strategic Plan

PD2.SD1.CI1: GDL Enforcement

PD2.SD1.CI3: Anticipatory Guidance

PD2.SD1.CI4: Improve Data Collection

PD2.SD1.CI5: Evaluation Plans

PD3.SD1.CI1: Parent Education

PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and

Teach-Back to Parents

PD3.SD1.CI3: Driving Agreements

PD3.SD1.CI4: Educate Teens


Process Measures

1. % of communities that participate in campaign

9. % of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements

10. % of teens reporting safe driving practices

11. % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements

12. % of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen

driver

14. % of schools that provide GDL education

15. % of health care organizations that give anticipatory

guidance to caregivers on teen driver safety

16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen

driver safety coalition

37Teen Driver Safety


WisconsinTeenDrivingPlan

The WI TDS team is aiming to actively engage 72 communities in their GDL

strategy. Thus far, they have 3 communities actively engaged and a few

communities sporadically engaged.


Process Measure 11: Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements

Wisconsin has seen significant variability in parent understanding of GDL, which

continues to inform their multi-media education efforts.




.


Wisconsin has seen significant variability in parent enforcement of GDL, which

continues to inform their multi-media education efforts.


Process Measure 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver

safety coalition

Wisconsin has increased their target number of stakeholders from 12 to 72 over

the course of the two CoIIN cohorts.


41

SUGGESTIONS OR QUESTIONS?

We’re

listening.

42

Upcoming Topic Calls & Deliverables

Monthly Reports about February are due on March 13th

The next QI Corner Topic Call will be held on March 20th

The next Populations and Settings Topic Call will be held on March 27th

On April 19th the IPVP topic call will be used to harvest learning on our change package

Learning Session 5 will be held on May 15th!

43

Thank you for participating!

Please complete this brief evaluation:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NH8G3VW

Questions or Comments? Contact:

[email protected]

617-543-9473

or

[email protected]

617-618-2385

For more information, visit: https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/cscoiin

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/cscoiin

teen driver safety · pd3.sd1.ci3: parent teen driving agreements pd3.sd1.ci5: peer-to-peer...

Documents