technology curriculum plan evaluation evaluators: josh norman

27
Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman Linda Norman

Upload: rowena

Post on 19-Jan-2016

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman Linda Norman. ~About the Evaluators~. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation

Evaluators: Josh Norman Linda Norman

Page 2: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

~About the Evaluators~• Josh Norman is a seventh and eighth grade social

studies teacher at Edison Junior High in Pekin, IL. This is his third year of teaching. He is a CTER 3 student at the University of Illinois. He is marrying Jennifer Olomon on August 3rd of this year.

• Linda Norman is a seventh and eighth grade Learning Center teacher at Edison Junior High, too. She is in her 21st year of teaching. She is also a CTER 3 student. Her big news is her oldest son was married in April and her middle son will marry in August.

Page 3: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Background InformationBackground Information forfor Technology Curriculum PlanTechnology Curriculum Plan

1. Overview of Pekin District 108 Technology Curriculum. Online at http://www.pekin.net (written in 1999 with the intent to implement this by integrating it into the content curriculum.)

• Goal 1 Multimedia Presentations• Goal 2 Internet• Goal 3 Productivity• Goal 4 Use and Troubleshoot a Variety of Technological Hardware

2. Questions to be evaluated • What is the teachers’ general perception of the technology curriculum?• Is the technology curriculum being used in the eighth grade classes with

students, and how is it being used in that curriculum?• What factors inhibit and/or facilitate effective curriculum implementation?• What skills have students developed using the technology curriculum?• Where are the students receiving the most exposure tot he technology while in

junior high? Is this exposure effective and productive?• What are the most effective means to develop students’ technology skills?

Page 4: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Methodology...

• Current Plan

--Deals with basic concepts and understandings of the use of technology.

-- Incorporates technology productivity tools and technology research tools

-- Incorporates implementation of technology curriculum into the academic areas, not teach them in isolation

Page 5: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Methodology Continued...

Obtain Facts:*Surveys

*Focus Groups

*Interviews

*Observations

Page 6: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Methodology Continued...

PowerPoint Presentation Reported To:

•Client, Mrs. Angela Arnold

•Dr. Lizanne DeStefano and Merrill Chandler, University of Illinois

•Mr. Stan Fitzanko, Principal Edison Junior High

Page 7: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Methodology Continued...Evaluation Timeline:•Three meetings with Client to determine questions, priorities, and evaluation procedure.

•The most important piece of information piece of information to help guide future direction is “what factors inhibit and/or facilitate effective curriculum implementation.

•Surveys were given in March

•Focus groups were held to interview in March

•Observations were made in March and April

•Analyzed Data in April

Page 8: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Adminstrators

Students

Teachers

Focus Groups

InterviewsInterviews

Observations

Observations

Surv

eys

Surv

eys

Page 9: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

BenchmarksThe client and evaluators determined that fifty percent in the agree

and above categories on the Likert Scale shows that the goals were

beginning to adapt to the approval and/or integration of the Technology

Curriculum Plan.

Eighty to one hundred percent indicates that this part of the

plan is fully adapted into the curriculum.

Page 10: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Analysis

• For the analysis of the surveys of students and staff we totaled the responses and then calculated the percentage of total surveys.

• For the analysis of the focus groups of students and teachers we tallied in the scoring boxes responses and recorded individual responses

• For the analysis of the observations we kept a log of what we saw and heard. The scoring of this was difficult, so it is in summative form throughout the evaluation.

Page 11: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Student and Teacher Responses

Technology

Importance and

Perception

“The more they know the more sufficient they will be.”

“In history they need to analyze different source material.”

“Need these skills to compete in today’s job world.”

“Every job today uses some form of technology.”

“My parents both use technology in their jobs, so I probably will too.”

“Technology is everywhere and in all we do.”

“Technology makes learning fun.”

“Technology is complex and we need to be taught it.”

TeachersTeachers StudentsStudents

Page 12: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Surveys Analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

StronglyDisagreeDisagree

Agree Some ofthe TimesAgree

Strongly Agree

Percentages

Teachers report that they know the objectives.

Know the Objectives for the 8th Grade Technology Curriculum

Page 13: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Surveys Analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

StronglyDisagreeDisagree

Agree Some ofthe TimesAgree

Strongly Agree

Percentages

Teachers report that they do not have sufficient training for the Technology Curriculum.

Have Sufficient Training for the 8th Grade Technology Curriculum

Page 14: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Surveys Analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

StronglyDisagreeDisagree

Agree Some ofthe TimesAgree

Strongly Agree

Percentages

Teachers report that they do like the Technology Curriculum.

Do You Like the Current Curriculum?

Page 15: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Surveys Analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

StronglyDisagreeDisagree

Agree Some ofthe TimesAgree

Strongly Agree

Percentages

Teachers report that the Technology Curriculum does fit their teaching style.

Does the Tech Curriculum Fit Your Teaching Style?

Page 16: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Surveys Analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

StronglyDisagreeDisagree

Agree Some ofthe TimesAgree

Strongly Agree

Percentages

Sixty percent of teachers stated that students are mastering the Tech Curriculum goals.

Are Students Mastering the Tech Curriculum Goals ?

Page 17: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Student Surveys Analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50At least once aweek

At Least onceevery two weeks

At Least OnceEvery ThreeweeksAt Least Once aMonth

Percentages

Students report that they use computers either once a week or at least once every two weeks.

Page 18: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Where the Majority Of Computer Usage Happens

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80In the Classroom

In the LC

In the LC andComputer Lab

In the ComputerLab

In the L and theClassroom

In the Classroomand theComputer Lab

Even though there are many choices of where to use computers, the Learning Center (LC) is where they are used the most.

Second is in the Computer Lab.

Student Analysis

Page 19: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Student AnalysisIn Which Subject Area Areas Are

Computers Used Most In both social studies and exploratory mastery of computer usage has been achieved according to this data.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80Language Arts

Math

Science

Social Studies

Exploratory

Both (Social Studies andExploratory)

Both (Social Studies andLanguage Arts)

Other

Page 20: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Focus Groups

• Ninety percent of the teachers Ninety percent of the teachers think students need to be able to think students need to be able to use a variety of productivity tools.use a variety of productivity tools.

• Seventy-five percent of the staff Seventy-five percent of the staff interviewed used productivity interviewed used productivity tools as it fit their curriculum.tools as it fit their curriculum.

• They perceive that administration They perceive that administration supports the technology supports the technology curriculum plancurriculum plan

StrengthsStrengths

Page 21: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Focus Groups

• Not all students have the same access

• Some students not high enough to master productivity tools.

• Their input into the creation of the plan was not solicited.

• Not all believe students need technology.

• Teachers feel students don’t know the goals that they are to achieve.

WeaknessesWeaknesses

Page 22: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Student Focus Groups Analysis

• Majority of students were most comfortable with Microsoft Office programs for productivity.

• All new how to save to a disk, the computer’s hard drive, or networked server.

• One hundred percent feel strong in using the Internet for research.

• All stated they were good using the graphic organizer software, Inspiration.

StrengthsStrengths

Page 23: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Student Focus Groups Continued...

• Majority do not feel comfortable using Excel, which is spreadsheet.

• Web Page authoring was another skill most do not feel they can do.

• Keyboarding was listed as a real weakness which affects their speed at typing projects/papers of any length.

WeaknessesWeaknesses

Page 24: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Student Recommendations for Improvement

Acquire new computers

Add HTML to goals

Add Computer class that teaches the different aspects of software

More time devoted to technology integrated into the curriculum.

Add Keyboarding

Page 25: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Teacher Recommendations for Improvement

•More training for staff

•Include Staff input when revising the plan

•Equity for all students

•More computers in Learning Center

•Keyboarding added

Page 26: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Evaluators’ Findings

•Teacher perceptions are favorable.

•Data very positive

•More training needs to occur for total acceptance.

•Technology is mainly used in the Learning Center or Computer Lab.

Page 27: Technology Curriculum Plan Evaluation Evaluators: Josh Norman

Future Recommendations• Network the staff utilizing

it with those who don’t use it.

• Include the staff input of those not using it in revision of plan.

• Training on how to address the time factor.

• Students keep a portfolio to

assess and track progress.

• Have teachers use Excel to track their progress to use it more.

• Explore scheduling for more usage of computers.

• Create network of peer teachers to instruct at the computers.

• Complete online surveys to track achieving benchmarks.