technical memo re: round 1 analytical results & data … · by ch2m hill, are incorporated into...

Ib 0 0 0 0 0 1

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TO: Kevin Adler/U.S. EPA

FROM: Isaac H. Johnson

DATE: July 21, 1989

RE: G & H LandfillRound I Analytical Results and Data Validation Phase III RI/FS

PROJECT: GL065561.DE.DV

INTRODUCTION

This technical memorandum presents the analytical data collected during theRound I Field Sampling as part of the Phase III RI at the G & H Landfill siteand the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) evaluation of those data. Thepurpose of data validation is verify that the QA/QC requirements of a data sethave been met,to characterize the weaknesses of questionable data (possiblylimiting its use), and to determine which data are unusable.

The QA/QC procedures are documented in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)for this project (CH2M HILL 1988) and include both field sampling and laboratoryanalysis. Data review is performed by U.S. EPA's Region V Central RegionalLaboratory (CRL) according to regional SOPs based on the Laboratory DataValidation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (U.S. EPA1988), and the Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for EvaluatingOrganics Analyses (U.S. EPA 1988). These reviews, plus additional observationsby CH2M HILL, are incorporated into the final data validation written for eachset of data before its use. QA/QC, data review procedures, and the results cfthe data validation for the G & H Landfill site are summarized below.

FIELD AND LABORATORY QA/QC

The analyses discussed below are done to characterize the quality of a data set.They consist of analyzing blank, duplicate, field replicate and spike samples toevaluate data precision, accuracy, and contamination. The results of the QA/QCanalyses are discussed along with the raw analytical data and are used for datareview and validation.

BLANKS

A blank is a ciean sample equivalent that is processed and analyzed as a sampleto determine the existence and magnitude of potential contamination introducedduring sampling or analysis. In the field, High Performance LiquidChromatography (HPLC) water is used for aqueous blanks, and a clean sands areused for soil blanks. Blanks are treated the same as samples from the fieldthrough laboratory analysis and reporting. Laboratory preparation blanks(reagent blanks) are prepared from contaminant-free water in the laboratory andprocessed along with the samples through each sample preparation and analysisstep. Field blanks identify contamination from decontamination, sampling,bottle transport, and laboratory procedures. Trip blanks identify contamination

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

221006

M E M O R A N D U MJuly 21, 1989GL065561.DE.DV

from bottles and bottles transport. Laboratory blanks identify laboratorycontamination.

QUANTIFICATION LIMITS

A quantification limit is the minimum amount of a chemical that can beconsistently detected and quantified. An individual laboratory's detectionlimits may be lower than the Contract Required Quantification Limits (CRQL)established for the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). In this case, data lowerthan the CRQL are reported; these data are considered estimated because theaccuracy of quantification below these levels is uncertain. Contamination orother analytical problems (such as low sample recoveries) may cause the actualquantification limit to be higher than that reported by the laboratory. Whenthat occurs, it is noted in the laboratory validation writeup. Tables 1 and 2present the target compounds or elements that were analyzed by the CLPlaboratories and the CRQLs.

SPIKE RECOVERIES

Spike sample analyses are done to determine the effect of the sample matrix onextraction, digestion, and measurement procedures. Spike recoveries are alsoused to determine the accuracy of the analyses, which is a. measure of theagreement between an experimental determination and the true value of theparameter being measured. In general, a known amount of compound is added to asample, the sample is analyzed, and the amount of spike compound recovered byanalysis is compared to the amount added. The type of spikes vary from organicto inorganic analyses and from low to high concentration analyses.

A "surrogate spike" in organic analysis is a compound not expected to be presentin environmental samples, but with properties similar to those of the targetcompounds. It is added to all samples before extraction and other samplepreparation. Percent recovery (ZR) is calculated by:

IR - SSR/SA x 100J

where:SSR - quantity measured in spiked sampleSA - quantity of spike added

A "matrix spike" consists of target compounds added to a sample just beforeanalysis. It is analogous to the "method spike" done for high concentrationinorganic analysis. Both analyses are performed to evaluate matrix effects onthe analytical-methodology and data accuracy.

Percent recovery for a matrix spike is calculated by:

ZR - SSR-SR x 100ZSA

where:SR - quantity measured in unspiked sampl*SSR - quantity measured in spiked sampleSA * quantity of spike added


The "method spike" for high concentration inorganics and the "spike sampleanalysis" for low and medium inorganic concentrations are the same. The spikeis added before any reagents are added to the sample. Percent recovery iscalculated as for a matrix or method spike.

A recovery above the control limits may indicate a high bias in the data, whilea recovery below the control limits may indicate a low bias and detection limitshigher than those specified by the contract.

DUPLICATES/REPLICATES

Both field replicate and laboratory duplicate samples are analyzed to determinedata precision, a measure of the reproducibility of field sampling and analysis.The results are reported as relative percent differences (RPD) and calculatedby:

RPD - Dl - D2 x 100Z(Dl + D2)/2

where:Dl - concentration of first duplicate/replicateD2 - concentration of second duplicate/replicate

An RPD result greater than the control limit indicates a lack of agreementbetween the results. The data associated with these results are questionableand are flagged estimated or unusable.

SERIAL DILUTIONS

For an inorganic inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis, a serial dilutionanalysis is done for each set of samples of similar matrix type andconcentration. For an analyte concentration at least a factor of 10 above CRQL,the measured concentrations of the undiluted sample and of the sample after afive-fold dilution should agree within 10 percent. If the difference is greaterthan 10 percent, the results for that compound are considered estimated becauseof matrix interference.

INSTRUMENT QC

Other instrument-specific tests include initial and continuing calibration,decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) and bromofluorobenzene (BFB) tuning for theGC/MS, and determining the linearity of standard calibration curves in GFAAanalysis by determining the coefficient of correlation (r).

Initial and continuing calibration of instruments with standard solutions areused to ensure that the instrument is capable of producing acceptablequantitative data. Calibration verification results must fall within controllimits or the results are flagged estimated, or unusable.

Standard compounds, DFTPP and BFB, are used to tune and evaluate the performanceof the GC/MS. If mass calibration is in error or ion abundance criteria forthese compounds is not met, then the associated data are considered unusable.


The method of standard addition may be required of inorganic analysis. Itinvolves a three-point calibration curve prepared by spiking the sample matrix.If the correlation coefficient of a standard calibration curve for the method ofstandard addition is less than 0.995, the data are considered estimated.

DATA REVIEW AND VALIDATION

CRL DATA REVIEW

The Sample Management Office receives data packages from the laboratories in theCLP and distributes them to the Laboratory Sciences Services Section (LSSS) ofthe U.S. EPA Region V CRL. The LSSS reviews all data packages resulting fromregional sampling efforts. The following items are reviewed (as stated in U.S.EPA guidelines):

o Sample holding times at the CLP laboratoryo GC/MS tuning and performance (organics)o Instrument calibrationo Blankso Interference check sample analysis (inorganics)o Surrogate recoveries (organics)o Matrix and analytical spike analysiso Duplicate sample analysiso Compound identification (organics)o Overall assessment of data

DATA VALIDATION

After CH2M HILL receives the CRL-reviewed data packages, the reviewer's commentsare summarized in the final data validation before data interpretation byproject staff. Any data noted in the review that should be qualified areflagged with the appropriate symbol (Table 3). Results for field blanks andfield replicates are reviewed (these may or may not have been considered by theLSSS) and the data further qualified if necessary. Finally, the data set as awhole is examined for consistency, anomalous results, and whether the data arereasonable for the samples involved. Table 3 lists the data qualifiers used inthis project and explanations of their use. Data flagged with a qualifier maybe used to varying degrees or may be completely unusable, depending on the typeof problem and significance of the data point.

Data review packages are identified by sample case numbers and traffic reportnumbers for routine analytical services (RAS) and by SAS numbers for specialanalytical services (e.g., fast turnaround times or high-hazard samples). ForRAS samples a case number is assigned to a group of samples collected at onetime, and individual samples are assigned unique traffic report numbers toidentify them from the time of sampling through reporting of the analyticaldata. For SAS samples, the first four numbers define a group of samples and thefinal letters and numbers identify individual samples (e.g., SAS 3136-E01, SAS3136-E02). CH2M HILL again assigns each sample a unique identification relatedto sampling location, time of sampling, or depth of sample (e.g., GH-GH30A-02for G&H Landfill Round 2 sample collected from shallow monitoring well, GH30A).


GROUNDWATER--INORGANIC ANALYSES

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set andtwo field blanks were analyzed by Enseco/Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory(RMAL) for metals (Case 10968, SDG No. MET253, QC #88168, ITR Nos. MET252-254,MET256-271 and MET274) by low concentration procedures. The data results arepresented in Table 1. The data are qualified as follows:

o The spike sample recovery for vanadium (0 percent) is below controllimits. The data may be biased low and the quantification limits maybe higher than reported for this compound. All detected results torthese samples are considered estimated and flagged "J" and allundetected results are considered unusable and flagged "R."

o The post digestion spike for furnace AA analysis was out of controllimits indicating interference effects and the results for lead(MET252, MET253. MET256, MET257, MET261, MET264, MET266, MET268, andMET271); selenium (MET252, MET253, MET256, MET257, MET260-271, andMET274); and thallium (MET252-254, MET256-258, MET261-271, and MET274)are to be considered estimated (J).

o Aluminum (28.7 to 53.2 ug/1), barium (3.2 to 9.8 ug/1), calcium (391to 838 ug/1), copper (3.9 ug/1), iron (19.7 to 41.7 ug/1), magnesium(48.7 to 146 ug/1), potassium (222 ug/1), sodium (1080 to 1840 ug/1)and zinc (4.8 to 267 ug/1) were found in the field blanks from thissampling round. Samples associated with these blanks that containthese contaminants at concentrations less than five times the blankconcentrations are considered unusable and flagged "B."

Twenty groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate set andone field blank were analyzed by RMAL for metals (Case 10968, SDG No. MET272, QC//88170, ITR Nos. MEBG01-06, MET272, MET273, MET275-278, MET281, MET282, MET284,MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, and MEW490) by low concentration procedures. Thedata results are presented in Table 1. The data are qualified as follows:

o The spike sample recovery for thallium (53 percent) is below controllimits. The data may be biased low and the quantification limits maybe higher than reported for this compound. Positive results for thesesamples are considered estimated and flagged "J." Spike samplerecovery for mercury (200 percent) indicates a high bias although allresults for this compound were below instrument detection limits andthe data is considered acceptable.

o The post digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of controllimits indicating interference effects and the results for arsenic(MET277); lead (MEBG01-03, MEBG05, MET272, MET281, MET289); selenium(MEBG01-05, MET272, MET273, MET276-278, MET281, MET282, MET284,MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, and MEW490); and thallium (MEBG01-06,MET272, MET273, MET275, MET277, MET278, MET281, MET282, MET284,MET285, MET287, MET289, MET290, AND MEW490) are considered to beestimated (J).


o The serial dilution results (12 percent) indicate interference and theresults for zinc for all samples are considered estimated (J).

o The field blanks listed with SDG No. MET253 also apply to this group.

o Because of poor replicate results for samples MET284 and MET289 forzinc, the results for this compound in these samples are consideredestimated (J).

Nineteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells including one replicate setand two field blanks were analyzed by RMAL for metals (Case 10968, SDG No.MEBGOO, QC #88176, ITR Nos. MEBGOO, MEBG07-10, MET279, MET280, MET283, MET288,and MEW491-500) by low concentration procedures. The data results are presentedin Table 1. The data are qualified as follows:

o The post digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of controllimits indicating interference effects and the results for arsenic(MEBGOO, MEBG07, MEBG08, MEBG09, MEW493, and MEW496); lead (MEBG10);selenium (MEBGOO, MEBG07-08, MEBG10, MET279, MET280, MET283, MET288,AND MEW491-500); and thallium (MEBGOO, MEBG08, MEBG09, MET279, MET280,MET283, MET288, AND MEW491-500 ) are considered to be estimated (J).

o The serial dilution results (17 percent) indicate interference and theresults for zinc for all samples are considered estimated (J).

o The results for sodium in sample MET280 exceeded the linear range ofthe instrument and the results are considered estimated (J).

o The method of standard addition correlation coefficient for arsenic onsample MEW491 was less than 0.995 and the results are consideredestimated (J).

o The field blanks listed with SDG No. MET253 also apply to this group.

GROUNDWATER--ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Residential Wells

Fifteen residential well groundwater samples including two replicate sets, andtwo field blanks were analyzed by CompuChem Laboratories (COMPU) for volatileand semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs (Case10968/SAS 4231E, OTR Noe. EALOO-03, EAL06-07, EAL10, EAL11, EAL13, EAL14, EAL19,and EAL22-25) by low concentration procedures. Two trip blanks were alsoanalyzed for volatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EAL04 andEAL08). The data results are presented in Table 2. The data are qualified asfollows:

o Holding times were exceeded for the reanalysis of SVOC fractions forEAL03RE, EAL06RE and EAL22RE and all detected results are consideredestimated (J).


o Surrogate spike recoveries were below control limits for more thanSVOC surrogate for EAL03 (39, 0, and 0 percent), EAL06 (0 and 0percent), and EAL22 (0 and 0 percent). These samples were reanalyzedbut surrogate spike recoveries were still below control limits formore than one SVOC surrogate for EAL03RE (4 and 9 percent), EAL06 (0and 0 percent), and EAL22RE (0 and 0 percent). The data may be biasedlow and the quantification limits may be higher than reported. Alldetected SVOC results for these samples are considered estimated andflagged "J" and all undetected SVOC results are considered unusableand flagged "R."

o Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone, 2-hexanone and acrolein for all samples are considered estimated (J) forall detected results and unusable (R) for undetected results for thesecompounds. Calibration outliers also caused the positive results foracetone and 1,1,1-trichloroethane for all samples to be consideredestimated (J).

o Common laboratory contaminants, acetone (5 ug/1) and bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (3 ug/1) were found in the method blanks.Methylene chloride (0.8 to 1 ug/1) and toluene (0.6 ug/1), both commonlaboratory contaminants were found in the field or trip blanks.Phenol (2 ug/1) was found in the field blank. Samples associated withthese blanks that contain these contaminants at concentrations lessthan 5 times the phenol or 10 times the common laboratory contaminantconcentrations are considered unusable and flagged "B."

MONITORING WELLS

Twenty monitoring well groundwater samples including one replicate set and onefield blank were analyzed by Environmental Science and Engineering (EMSI) forvolatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) andpesticides/PCBs (Case 10968, SDG No. EAL27, OTR Nos. EAL26-45) by lowconcentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 3. The dataare qualified as follows:

o Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (allsamples) and 3-nitroaniline (EAL27-31, EAL33, and EAL34) areconsidered estimated (J) for all detected results and unusable (R) forundetected results for these compounds. Calibration outliers alsocaused the positive results for acetone (EAL32, EAL36, EAL38, EAL39,EAL43, EAL44 and EAL45) to be considered estimated (J).

o A cotnmon laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (2 to 6 ug/1) wasfound in the method blanks. N-nitrosodiphenylamine (2 ug/1) wasfound in the method blank. The common laboratory contaminants,acetone (2 ug/1) and toluene (1 to 3 ug/1) were found in the fieldand/or trip blanks. Samples associated with these blanks that containthese contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the N-nitrosodiphenylamine or 10 times the common laboratory contaminantconcentrations are considered unusable and flagged "B."


o Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAL29 were outside the controllimits for 4-nitrophenol. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outsidethe control limits in the same sample for 1,4-dichlorobenzene. Theunspiked sample was considered estimated by the CRL reviewer for thesecompounds although neither was detected in the unspiked sample.

Seventeen groundwater samples frotn monitoring wells including two replicate setsand two field blanks were analyzed by EMSI for volatile and semi-volatileorganic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968, SDG No.EAL46, OTR Nos. EAL46, EAL47, EA49-52, EAL55, EAL57-60, EBGOO, EBG02-05, andEBG07) by low concentration procedures. Two trip blanks were also analyzed forvolatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EAL48 and EBG01). Thedata results are presented in Table 3. The data are qualified as follows:

o The VOC fraction of sample EBG04 was diluted and reanalyzed asEBG04DL.

o Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (allsamples), 3-nitroaniline (EAL47), and 3-3'-dichlorobenzidine (EAL46,EAL47, EAL49-52, EAL55, EAL57, EAL58, EAL59, EAL60, EBGOO, EBG02-05,and EBG07) are considered estimated (J) for all detected results andunusable (R) for undetected results for these compounds. Calibrationoutliers also caused the positive results for 2,4-dimethylphenol(EBG04) and acetone (EAL49-51, EAL55, EAL57-60, EBGOO, EBG03-05, andEBG04DL) to be considered estimated (J) .

o A common laboratory contaminant, methylene chloride (2 to 3 ug/1) wasfound in the method blanks. Benzoic acid (10 ug/1) was also found inthe method blank. Samples associated with these blanks that containthese contaminants at concentrations less than 5 times the benzoicacid or 10 times the common laboratory contaminant concentrations areconsidered unusable and flagged "B."

o Matrix spike recoveries for sample EAL58 were outside the controllimits for 4-nitrophenol. The matrix spike duplicate RPD was outsidethe control limits for the same sample for pentachlorophenol. Theunspiked sample was considered estimated by the CRL reviewer for thesecompounds although neither were detected in the unspiked sample.

o GC/MS tuning, specifically the retention time marker is out of controllimits for the pesticide marker for EAL46. All pesticide results forthis sample are considered estimated (J).

o Field blanks from SDG No. EAL27 also apply to this sample group.

Sixteen groundwater samples from monitoring wells were analyzed by EMSI forvolatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) andpesticides/PCBs (Case 10968, SDG No. EAL56, OTR Nos. EAL56, EBG06, and EBG08-20,EBG22) by low concentration procedures. One trip blank was also analyzed forvolatile organic compounds as part of this sample group (EBG21). The dataresults are presented in Table 3. The data are qualified as follovs:


o The VOC fraction of sample EBG22 was diluted and reanalyzed asEBG22DL.

o Because of calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone (allsamples), and 4-chloroaniline (EBG06) are considered estimated (J) forall detected results and unusable (R) for undetected results for thesecompounds. Calibration outliers also caused the positive results for2,4-dimethylphenol (all samples except EBG06) and acetone (allsamples) to be considered estimated (J).

o Benzoic acid (10 ug/1) was found in the method blank. Samplesassociated with this blank that contain this contaminant atconcentrations less than five times the benzoic acid concentration areconsidered unusable and flagged "B."


o Because of poor replicate results for EAL56 and EBG05 for carbondisulfide, the results for this compound are considered estimated (J)and should be used with caution.

Six groundwater samples from monitoring wells including two field blanks wereanalyzed by Wan Technologies, Inc. (WANTEC) for volatile and semi-volatileorganic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) and pesticides/PCBs (Case 10968, SDG No.EAL53, OTR Nos. EAL53, EAL54, and EBG23-26) by low concentration procedures.The data results are presented in Table 3. The data are qualified as follows:

o Because calibration outliers, the results for 2-butanone and 4-chloroaniline for all samples are considered estimated (J) for alldetected results and unusable (R) for nondetected results for thesecompounds. Calibration outliers also caused the positive results forbis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (all samples), 4,4'-DDT and methoxychlor(EBG25) and heptachlor, dieldrin, 4,4'-DDT, methoxychlor, aldrin,endrin, endosulfan sulfate, alpha-chlordane and gamma-chlordane(EAL53, EAL54, EBG23, EBG24, and EBG26) to be considered estimated(J).

o Common laboratory contaminants, methylene chloride (2 ug/1) and bis(2-ethylh«xyl)phthalate (7 ug/1) were found in the method blanks.Tetrachloroethene (1 ug/1) was also found in the method blank. Samplesassociated with these blanks that contain these contaminants atconcentrations less than five times the tetrachloroethene or ten timesthe common laboratory contaminant concentrations are consideredunusable and flagged "B."


SURFACE SOIL--ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Fifteen soil samples were analyzed by WANTEC for pesticides/PCBs including twosets of replicates (Case 10968, SDG No. EAL53, OTR Nos. EBG27-41) by low


concentration procedures. The data results are presented in Table 4. The dataare qualified as follows:

o Because calibration outliers, the positive results for 4,4'-DDT andmethoxychlor (EBG30 and EBG35-40) and heptachlor, dieldrin, 4,4'-DDT,methoxychlor, aldrin, endrin, endosulfan sulfate, alpha-chlordane andgamma-chlordane (EBG27, EBG29, and EBG41) are considered estimated(J).

Fourteen soil samples including one replicate set were analyzed by DataChem(DATAC) for pesticides/PCBs including one replicate set (Case 11050, SDG No.EBG42, OTR Nos. EBG42-55) by low concentration procedures. The data results arepresented in Table 4. The data are qualified as follows:

o Holding times were for extraction of all samples and all detectedresults are considered estimated (J).

o Surrogate spike recoveries were high for the pesticide surrogate forEBG42 (999 percent). All detected pesticide/PCB results for thissample is considered estimated and flagged "J."

Twelve soil samples were analyzed by American Analytical and Technical Services(AATS) for dioxins/furans including one replicate set (Case SAS4308E, SampleNos. E12-23). The data results are presented in Table 4. The data are qualifiedas follows:

o Because of calibration outliers, the positive results for 2378- TCDD,PENTA-CDD, HEXA-CDD, and HEPTA-CDD (all samples); HEXA-CDD, TETRA-CDD,TETRA-CDF, PENTA-CDF and HEXA-CDF.and 2378-TCDD (E12-17); and PENTA-CDD, HEXA-CDD, TETRA-CDD, HEXA-CDF, and 2378-TCDD (E18-23) areconsidered estimated (J).

SURFACE SOIL--PHYSICAL PARAMETERS

Eleven soil samples were analyzed for grain size and six of these samples werealso analyzed for Atterberg limits (Case SAS 430BE, Sample Nos. E01-E11) by Chenand Associates. The data is qualified as follows:

o No method duplicates were run as specified in the SAS request formsand all data is considered estimated (J).

sk/GLT863/043.-50

REFERENCES

CH2M HILL. Quality Assurance Project Plan. G & H Landfillsite. September 30, 1988.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Laboratory DataValidation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating OrganicsAnalyses. February 1988.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Laboratory DataValidation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating InorganicsAnalyses. July 1988.

GLT863/044.50

Table 1TARGET ANALYTE LIST AND

CONTRACT-REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMITS

Quantification LimitInorganic Target Low Concentration Analysis*

Analyte Water (ug/1)

Aluminum 200Antimony 60Arsenic 10Barium 200Beryllium 5Cadmium 5Calcium 5,000Chromium 10Cobalt 50Copper 25Iron 100Lead 5Magnesium 5000Manganese 15Mercury 0.2Nickel 40Potassium 5,000Selenium 5Silver 10Sodium 5,000Thallium 10Vanadium 50Zinc 20Cyanide 10

'The quantification limits for samples may be considerablyhigher depending on the sample matrix.

[12/87]

GLT863/033.50

Table 2 (Page 1 of 3)TARGET COMPOUND LIST AND

CONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTIFICATION LIMITS

QuancifIcation LimitsLow Concentration Analysis*

Volatile

1. Chloromethane2. Bromomethane3. Vinyl Chloride4. Chloroethane5. Methylene Chloride

6. Acetone7. Carbon Dlsulflde8. 1,1-Dichloroethene9. 1,1-Dlchloroethane10. 1,2-Dlchloroethene (total)

11 .12.13.14.15.

16.17.18.19.20.

21.22.23.24.25.

26.27.28.39.30.

31.32.33.34.

Chloroform1 , 2 -Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon Tetrachloride

Vinyl AcetateBroroodichloromethane1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane1 , 2 -DichloropropaneCls- 1 , 3-Dlchloropropene

TrichloroetheneDibrocoochlorome thane1 , 1 , 2-TrlchloroethaneBenzeneTrans- 1 , 3 -Dlchloropropene

Bromof onn2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanoneTetrachloroetheneToluene

ChlorobenzeneEthyl BenzeneStyreneXylenes (total)

Semivolatile

35. Phenol36. bls(2-Chloro«thyl)ether37. 2-Chloroph«nol38. 1,3-Dichlorob«nzene39. 1,4-Dlchlorobenz«ne

40. Benzyl Alcohol41. 1,2-Dichlorofcenzene42. 2-Methylphenol43. bis(2-Chloroieopropyl)ether

CAS Number

74-87-374-83-975-01-475-00-375-09-2

67-64-175-15-075-34-475-35-3540-59-0

67-66-3107-06-278-93-271-55-656-23-5

108-05-475-27-479-34-578-87-5

10061-02-5

79-01-6124-48-179-00-571-43-2

10061-01-6

75-25-2591-78-6108-10-1127-18-4108-88-3

108-90-7100-41-4100-42-5133-02-7

108-95-2111-44-495-57-8

541-73-1106-46-7

100-51-695-50-195-48-7

39638-32-9

Water(UK/1)

101010105

105555

551055

105555

55555

5101055

5555

1010101010

10101010

Soil/Sedlmentb

(ua/kn)

101010105

105555

551055

105555

55555

5101055

5555

330330330330330

330330330330

Note: Specific quantification limits are highly matrix dependent. The quantificationlimits listed herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.

•Quantification limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. The quantification limitscalculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by thecontract, will be higher."Medium soil/sediment CRQLs for volatile TCL compounds are 100 times the individual low soil/sediment CRQL; for semivolatile TCL compounds they are 60 times the individual low soil/sedimentCRQL.

Table 2 (Page 2 of 3)

Quantification LimitsLou Concentration Analysis a

Senivolatile (Continued)4~4~!4-Methylphenol45. N-Nitroso-Dipropylamine<»6. Hexachloroethane47. Nitrobenzene48. Isophorone

49. 2-Nitrophenol50. 2 ,4-Dimethylphenol51. Benzoic Acid52. bis(2-Chloroethoxy)roethane53. 2,4-Dichlorophenol

54. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene55. Naphthalene56. 4-Chloroaniline57. Hexachlorobutadiene58. 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

(para-chloro-meta-cresol)

59. 2-Methylnaphthalene60. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene61. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol62. 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol63. 2-Chloroanaphthalene

64. 2-Nitroaniline65. Dimethyl Phthalate66. Acenaphthylene67. 2,6-Dinitrotoluene68. 3-Nitroaniline

69. Acenaphthene70. 2,--Dinitrophenol71. M-Nitrophenol72. Dibenzofuran73. 2,4-Dinitrotoluene

74. Diethylphthalate75. 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl ether76. Fluorene77. 4-Nitroaniline78. 4,6-Dinitro-2-raethylphenol

79. N-nitrosodiphenylamine80. 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl ether81. Hexachlorobenzene82. Pentachlorophenol83. Phenanthrene

84. Anthracene85. Di-n-butylphthalate86. Fluoranthene87. Pyrene88. Butyl Benzyl Phthalate

CAS Number106-44-5621-64-767-72-198-95-378-59-1

88-75-5105-67-965-85-0

1 1 1 - 9 1 - 1120-83-2

120-82-191-20-3106-47-887-68-3

59-50-7

91-57-677-47-488-06-295-95-491-58-7

88-74-4131 - 1 1 - 3208-96-8606-20-299-09-2

83-32-951-28-5100-02-7132-64-9121-14-2

84-66-27005-72-386-73-7100-01-6534-52-1

86-30-6101-55-3118-74-187-86-585-01-8

120-12-784-74-2206-44-0129-00-085-68-7

Water(ug/1)

1010101010

1010501010

10101010

10

1010105010

5010101050

1050501010

1010105050

1010105010

1010101010

Soil/ Sediment6

(u(?/kg)330330330330330

330330

1 ,60C330330

330330330330

330

330330330

1,600330

1 ,600330330330

1,600

3301,6001,600330330

330330330

1,6001.600

330330330

1,600330

330330330330330

Note: Specific quantification limits are highly matrix dependent. The quantification limitslisted herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.

"Quantification limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. The quantification limitscalculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by thecontract, will be higher.

bMedium soil/sediment CRQLs for setnivolatile TCL compounds are 60 tiroes the individual lowsoil/sediment CRQL.

Table 2 (Page 3 of 3)

Quantification LimitsLow Concentration Analysis"

Semivolatile (Continued)

89. 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine90. Benzo(a)anthracene91. Chrysene92. bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate93. Di-n-octyl Phthalate

94. Benzo(b)fluoranthene95. Benzo(k)fluoranthene96. Benzo(a)pyrene97. Indenot1,2,3-cd)pyrene98. Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

99. Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Pesticides/PCBs

100. alpha-BHC101. beta-BHC102. delta-BHC103. gamraa-BHC (Lindane)104. Heptachlor

105. Aldrin106. Heptachlor Epoxide107. Endosufan I108. Dleldrin109. 4,4'-DDE

110. Endrin111. Endosulfan II112. 4,4'-ODD113. Endosulfan Sulfate114. 4,4'-DDT

115. Endrin Ketone116. Methoxychlor117. Alpha-chlordane118. gamma-chlordane119. Toxaphene

120. PCB Arochlor-1016121. PCB Arochlor-1221122. PCB Arochlor-1232123. PCB Arochlor-1242124. PCB Arochlor-1248

125. PCB Arochlor-1254126. PCB Arochlor-1260

CAS Number

91-94-156-55-3

218-01-9117-81-7117-84-0

205-99-2207-08-950-32-8193-39-553-70-3

191-24-2

319-84-6319-85-7319-86-858-89-976-44-8

309-1024-959-60-72-

72-33213-

72-1031-

50-

53494-72-

5103-5103-8001-

12674-11104-11141-53469-12672-

00-257-398-857-155-9

20-865-954-807-829-3

70-543-571-974-235-2

11-228-2-16-5-21-9•29-6

11097-69-111096-82-5

Water(ue/1)

2010101010

1010101010

10

0.050.050.050.050.05

0.050.050.050. 100. 10

0. 100. 100.100. 100.10

0. 100.50.50.51.0

0.50.50.50.50.5

1.01.0

Soil/SedUnentb

(UK/kg)

660330330330330

33C330330330330

33C

8 . 08.08.08.08.0

8.08.08.016.016.0

16.016.016.0•;6.016.0

16.080.080.080.0160.0

80.080.080.080.080.0

160.0160.0

Note: Specific quantification limits are highly matrix dependent. The quantification limitslisted herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable

"Quantification limits listed for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. The quantification limitscalculated by the laboratory for soil/sediment, calculated by dry weight as required by thecontract, will be higher.bMedium soil/sediment CRQLs for Semivolatile TCL compounds are 60 times the individual lowsoil/sediment CRQL; for pesticide/PCB TCL compounds they are 15 times the individual low soil/sediment CRQL.

[8/87JGLT863/036.50

Table 3DATA QUALIFIERS

Symbol(Data Flag)

B

Definition and Explanation

Blank Contamination

Chemical constituent also found in laboratory orfield blank. Data are not flagged if sampleconcentration exceeds blank concentration by at leasta factor of 10 for common laboratory contaminants(methylene chloride, acetone, toluene 2-butonone, andphthalate esters), or a factor of 5 for othercontaminants. Data not meeting this criterion areflagged and are considered unusable. Data are notcorrected by subtracting the blank value.

Estimated Value

Concentration was above the analytical detectionlimit but less than CRQL, or one or more associatedQA/QC parameters were beyond control limits.

Unusable Data

Diluted Value

Note: All data qualified as estimated are usable at user's discretion.

GLT863/037.50

F

TABLE 1G & H LANDFILL

Rl PHASE 1 1 1 ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING UELLS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 1 of 6

SAMPLEITR NUMBERDATE SAMPLED

(ug/L)

ALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESEMERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMVANADIUMZINC

GH01A-01METC6911/29/88

46.6202

138000

10500

42000118

23700

47600R

504

GH01B-01MET27011/29/88

14.8253

78200

993

2700026.4

3700 J

16200R

746

GH01C-01MET 28012/02/88

1440216000

368

9570056

6530 J

1180000 J

27 J

GH02A-01MEBG0312/01/88

30.3 JB

45.4542

119000

6 JB12500

43400112

50500

101000

569 J

GH02B-01MEBG0212/01/88

34.6 JB

19-5356

975004.6 J4 J

6.1 JB4580

5860034.2

15.8 J18700

128000

239 J

GH02C-01MEBG0812/02/88

6.1 J176 J

42400

126 B

2630013 J

2850 J

172000

37.2 J

GH03A-01MEW49612/01/88

42.7 JB

1.8 J274

129000

8.5 JB570

54200649

18.8 J47400

118000

232 J

GH04B-01MET27811/30/88

33.2 JB

38.4294

75100

4.5 JB1030

3980054.2 B

8 J4260 J

66500

468 J

GH04C-01MET27711/30/88

32 JB

89.3 J20300

3.4 JB53.6 JB

1270011.2 J

1880 J

125000

23.7 J

GH05A-01MET27912/02/88

136 J140000

96502.4 J

106000884

21.3 J23200

111000

1080 J

GH06A-01MEU49812/01/88

42.6 JB

45.4454

1 73000

8.9 J6 JB

12200

61900636

21.6 J50100

1370004.5 J80 J

FR - Field replicateFB - Field blank

B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuable

TABLE 1G &H LANDFILL

RI PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 2 of 6


(ug/L)

ALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESEMERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMVANADIUMZINC

GH06B-01HEU49912/01/88

25.6 JB

316810

1 16000

9 J

135003.1 J

8010049.7

35.8 J82500

194000

534 J

GH07A-01MET27511/30/88

20.1264

10800

4640

5340045.1

13.7 J4610 J

150000

122 J

GH08C-01MEBG0912/02/88

8.7 J636

76100

597

3610014.6 J

3840 J

511000

88.3 J

GH10A-01MET27111/29/88

2.7 J1140129000

1730

6140036.4

5310

788000R

48.4

GH10B-01MET27211/29/88

37.7 JB

96 J131000

5.1 JB139 B

4210082.5

8.4 J3550 J1.1 J

161000

1110 J

GH10C-01MET27311/29/88

33.1 JB

113 J151000

4.1 J

3.9 JB22.5 JB

4690010.3 JB

8.1 J2950 J2.3 J

219000

150 J

GH11B-01MEBG0512/01/88

33.9 JB

3.7 J340

91400

5.5 JB1640

3340053.2

8340

55000

55.1 J

GH12A-01MEU50012/01/88

40.7 JB

43268

141000

10.2 JB14400

41700237

16800

65400

121 J

GH12B-01MEBGOO12/01/88

5.4 J192 J

93400

1390

24400113

3450 J1 J

27700

115 J

GH13 01MET 28411/30/88

32.6 JB

24.7257

110000

5.5 JB6010

35800169

13400

55400

59.7 J

FRGH13 99MET 28911/30/88

51.2 JB

25.1257

111000

9.5 JB6630

36000170

13700

56300

134 J

FR - Field replicateFB - Field blank


SAMPLE

ITR NUMBERDATE SAMPLED

(ug/L)

ALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALT

COPPERIRON

LEADMAGNESIUM

MANGANESEMERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUM

VANADIUM

ZINC

FR - FieldFB - Field

repl icateblank


Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING UELIS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 3 of 6

GH14B-01

MET25311/28/88-

4 J109 J

85500

242

2460088.4

1080 JB

11300R

16.1 J

GH14C-01MET 25411/28/88

51160 J7.3 J26.6 JB

27.7 JB

39 JB

3640 J

20900R

10.7 J

GH16A-01

MET 26811/29/88

23.1 JB140000

4 J

398

33700

50.5

1702700 J

66200R

101

GH16B-01

MET 25211/29/88

50.3 JB

13.1139 J

55700

81.1 JB

2110088.7

1130 J

8180 BR

1060

FRGH16B-99

MET 26211/29/88

27.7 JB

12.9140 J

55700

75.6 JB2.4 J

2120090.5

1140 J

7890 BR

1340

GH16C-01

MET25911/29/88

4030

7.5 J36.8 JB15200

5.1 J

4600

25.93860 J109 B

3540 J

1670017.7 J1020

GH17A-01MET25611/28/88

42.7 JB105000

345

3520060.8

.4

2110 J

196000R

122

GH17B-01

MET25711/28/88

8.4 J75.2 J58200

78.8 JB

20100178.9

1010 JB

8600 BR

434

GH17C-01

MET 25811/28/88

623

4.2 J134 J

146000

74.9 JB185253 JB

3140 J

3610011.9 J136

GH18B-01

MET26111/28/88

12.3118 J

66000

573

2530050

1620 J

8080 BR

149

GH19A-01

MEU49312/01/88

27.2 JB108000

28.1

5.1 JB143 B

20100157

5260

51600

168 J


SAMPLE GH20A-01

ITR NUMBER HET266DATE SAMPLED 11/29/88

(ug/L)

ALUMINUM 26.9 JB

ANTIMONYARSENICBARIUM 71.9 JCALCIUM 138000CHROMIUMCOBALT

COPPERIRON 196 BLEADMAGNESIUM 29000

MANGANESE 197MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUM 7300

SELENIUMSILVERSODIUM 114000VANADIUM RZINC 709

FR - Field replicateFB - Field Blank



Rl PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 4 of 6

GH20B-01 GH21A-01 GH22A-01 GH22B-01 GH23A-01 GH25A-01 GH26A-01 13-01 15-01

MET267 MEBG06 MET264 MET265 MET263 MEW494 MEU495 MET285 MEW49711/29/88 12/01/88 11/29/88 11/29/88 11/29/88 12/01/88 12/01/88 11/30/88 12/01/88

34 JB

22.490.3 J9090

25 JB

598010.3 J

1630 J

118405

104000

10.7 J5.6 JB

13800

4860051.9

26.1 J36200

31000 87200R

73.4 88.2 J

37.3 JB 35.8 JB 57.6 JB 31.5 JB 43.4 JB

8.1 J169 J

113000

357

40400108

3020 J

63200R

234

36.4 JB78200

25 JB

692 JB

3160 J

24400R

186

10.429 JB

14900

22.3 JB5.8828026 J

6040

113000R

151

39.4645

91600

13.8 JB4730

44900110

57900

86500

505 J

93.6505

135000

8.4 JB11000

28100198

9.6 J28900

513003 J

127 J

12.990.2 J28400

4.6 JB62 JB6

325009.7 J

11.3 J34500

1000005.3 J209 J

78.8816

1 79000

4.5 JB28500

58500458

9.9 J64900

86200

92.7 J

DRAFTTABLE 1

G & H LANDFILLRl PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MONITORING WELLS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 5 of 6


(ug/L)

ALUMINUM

ANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALT

COPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUM

MANGANESEMERCURY

NICKELPOTASSIUM

SELENIUMSILVERSODIUMVANADIUM

ZINC

FR - Field replicateFB - Field Blank

B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR • Laboratory data not usuable

RD2X-01MEU49212/01/88

10138 J

59800

3.1 JB56929.9 S2130099.3 B

1460 J

8.6 J9150 B

915 J

RD8XX-01MET 28812/01/88

74.6394

94300

73503.4 J

45200117

woo

73700

1720 J

RD18 01MET 28211/30/88

27.3 JB

13055.9 J103000

4.1 J5.8 JB6310

3820054.2

4890 J

80500

941 J

RL4-01MET 29011/30/88

59.4 JB

1370215000

11.16.7 J10.9 JB46200

48900

667 B

53900

777003.4 J51.4 J

RL6-01MEW49011/30/88

80.3 J

2713601320006.1 J25.1 J8.6 J

47600

83200

509

48.258300

1430003.9 J155 J

RL17-01ME 128711/30/88

30304

136000

12.2 JB16200

32600358

19900

64500

237 J

RU7-01

MET28312/01/88

25.2 JB

65.4199 J

138000

13600

33500

162

89601 J

63200

1050 J

FRRW07-99MEU49112/01/88

30.1 JB

50.7 J203

139000

13400

2.1 J33700166

9330

63700

1420 J

RW12X-01MEBG0112/01/88

31.5 JB

49.6335

139000

6.3 JB22000

2.2 J36700

276

31900

70000

1360 J

RW14-01

MEBG0412/01/88

42.3 JB

52255

1 74000

6.5 J7.4 J

7.8 JB25200

54700

101

16.6 J50200

1360003.4 J655 J

RW19-01

MET28111/30/88

29.1 JB

8.5 J31.7 JB456000

6.3 J5.3 JB

68300

1050002060

18.8 J60000

84400

452 J

TABLL IG & H LANDFILL

Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS - INORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 6 of 6

SAMPLE GWFB01ITR NUMBER MET260DATE SAMPLED 11/28/88

(ug/L)

ALUMINUM 47.6 JANTIMONYARSENICBARIUM 8-6 JCALCIUM 422 JCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRON 27.8 JLEADMAGNESIUM 48.7 JMANGANESEMERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMVANADIUM RZINC 4.8 J

FR - Field replicateFB Field blank


GWFB02MET 27411/30/88

48.6 J

8.3 J838 J

41.7 J

146 J

1080 JR

267

GUFB03MET27611/30/88

53.2 J

9.8 J790 J

3.9 J19.7 J

104 J

1600 J

15.7 J

GUFB04 GWFB05MEBG07 MEBG1012/02/88 12/02/8)

28.7 J 46.8 J

3.2 J 5.7 J526 J 391 J

101 J 54.9 J

222 J

1840 J

11.4 J 37.1 J

SAMPLEOTR NUMBERDATE SAMPLED

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS(ug/L)

1,1,1-TRlCHLOROETHANE1,1-DICHLOftoeTHANE 31.1-DICHLOROETHENE .5 J1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 72-BUTANONE R

2-HEXANONE RACETONE 6 JBBENZENE .8 JCHLOROETHANE .5 JMETHYLENE CHLORIDE

TOLUENETRICHLORCCTHENE 25VINYL CHLORIDE 2

XYLENE (TOTAL)

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

(ug/L)

4-NITROPHENOL RACROLEIN RACRYLONITRILEPHENOL R

RE - Reanalyzed by laboratoryFR - Field replicateFB - Field blankTB - Trip blank


TABLE 2

G & H LANDFILLRl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

RESIDENTIAL WELLS - ORGANIC RESULTS

GR01-01 GR01-01REEAL03 EAL03

11/28/88 11/28/88

GR02-01EAL0611/28/88

R4 JB

4 JR

GR02-01REEAL0611/28/88

GR03-01EAL2211/28/88

R4 JB

5 B1

.9 J

GR03-01REEAL22

11/28/88

GR04-01EAL23

11/28/88

.5 J

3

R7 JB

.8 J

GR06-01EAL2511/28/88

Page 1 of 2

GR10-01 FRGR10-99EAL02 EAL0111/28/88 11/28/88

R5 JB

1 JB

2 B

R4 JB

R

1 JB

rvI '

SAMPLE GR13-01

OTR NUMBER EAL13

ITR NUMBERDATE SAMPLED

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

(ug/L)

1,1,1-TRICHLOfiOETHANE

1,1-DICHLOROETHANE

1,1-DICHLOROETHENE1,2-DICHLOROETHENE

2-BUTANONE R

2-HEXANONE RACETONE 5 JB

BENZENECHLOROETHANE

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 2 B

TOLUENETRICHLOROETHENE .7 J

VINYL CHLORIDEXYLENE (TOTAL)


(ug/L)

4-NITROPHENOL

ACROLEIN R

ACRYLON1TRILEPHENOL

RE - Reanalyzed by laboratoryFR - Field replicateFB - F i e l d blankTB - Trip blank

B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuabte

TABLE 2

G i H LANDFILL

R l PHASE I I I ROUND 1 A N A L Y T I C A L RESULTS

RESIDENTIAL WELLS - ORGANIC RESULTS

GR14-01EAL14

GR19-01

EAL19GR21-01EALOO

GR31-01EAL10

FRGR31-99

EAL11

GRFB01

EAL24GRFB02

EAL07GRTB01EAL08

R

6 JB

R

1 JB

R

5 JB

R

1 JB

R

7 JB

3 B

R

2 B

R

6 JB

4 B

R

2 B

R4 JB

R

1 JB

R

5 JB

.8 J

R

2 B

R

4 JB

.6 J

R9 JB

1 J

Page 2 of 2

GRTB02EAL04

11/26788 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/28/88 11/29/88 11/29/88 11/28/88 11/29/88 11/28/88 11/29/88

1 J

R14 JB

1 J

/ . , r™"B-- * IT" I••> , H 9

SAMPLE

OTR NUMBER

DATE SAMPLED


1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1.2-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHENE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE2-BUTANONE

2-HEXANONE

4-METHYL-2-PENTANONEACETONE

BENZENECARBON BISULFIDE

CHLOROBENZENECHLOROETHANEDIBROMOCHLOROME T HANEETHYLBENZENEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE

STYRENETETRACHLOROETHENE

TOLUENETRICHLOROETHENEVINYL CHLORIDE

XYLENE (TOTAL)

FR - Field replicateFB - Field blankTB - Trip blank

B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuableD - Diluted

GH01A-01EAL4211/29/88

GH01B-01EAL43

11/29/88

GH01C-01EAL5412/02/88

140

2 JB4 J

14

2 BJ

5 B

TABLE 3

G & H LANDFILLR l PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MONITORING WELLS - ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 1 of 12

GH02A-01EBG1812/01/88

1 J

R

2 JB60

2 J12

2 JB

2 J

GH02B-01EBG17

12/01/88

GH02C-01EBG24

12/02/88

GH03A-01EBG1012/01/88

GH04B-01EAL5211/30/88

GH04C-01EAL51

11/30/88

GH05A-01EAL53

12/02/88

GH06A-01EBG12

12/01/88

2 J

R

2 JB5

5 J

56

3 JB

4 J 441 J

1 JB

1 JB

8 B 2 JB

1 JB

'I'-ll


Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS - ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 2 of 12

SAMPLE GH01A-01OTR NUMBER EAL42DATE SAMPLED 11/29/88

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS(ug/L)

1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE2-METHYLPHENOL3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE

3 - N I T R O A N I L 1 N E4-CHLOROANILINE4 METHYLPHENOL4-NITROANILINEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACIDB1S(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHERBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 3 JDt-N-BUTYL PHTHALATEFLUORANTHENE

GH01B-01EAL4311/29/88

GH01C-01EAL5412/02/88

GH02A-01EBG1812/01/88

GH02B-01EBG1712/01/88

GH02C-01EBG2412/02/88

GH03A-01EBG1012/01/88

GH04B-01EAL5211/30/88

GH04C-01EAL5111/30/88

GH05A-01EAL5312/02/88

GH06A-01EBG1212/01/88

9 J2 JB 27 35 JB 11 2 J 11 JB 11

FLUORENEN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINENAPHTHALENEPHENANTHRENEPHENOLPYRENE

5 J

3 J

PESTICIDES/PCBS(ug/L)

4,4'-ODD4.4'-DDT .29



SAMPLE GH06B-01 GH07A-01 GH08C-01OTR NUMBER EBG13 EAL49 EBG25DATE SAMPLED 12/01/88 11/30/88 12/02/88


t,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHENE1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE

2-BUTANONE R R R2-HEXANONE4-HETHYL-2-PENTANONEACETONE 2 JB 5 JBBENZENE 6CARBON DISULFIDE 51

CHLOROBENZENECHLOROETHANE 3 JDIBROMOCHLOROME T HANEETHYLBENZENEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE K B 1 JB

STYRENETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENE 1 JBTRICHLOROETHENEVINYL CHLORIDE 6 JXYLENE (TOTAL)

FR - Field replicateFB - F i e l d blankTB - Trip Blank




Page 3 of 12

GH10A-01EAL4411/29/88

2 JB

1 JB

7 B

GH10B-01EAL4511/29/88

2 JB

1 JB

2 JB

GH10C-01EAL4611/29/88

9 B

GH11B-01EBG2012/01/88

18

6 J

GH12A-01EBG1412/01/88

2 J

18

108

3 J

3 J

GH12B-01EBG1512/01/88

3 J

2 J24

14

GH13-01EAL5811/30/88

1 J

6 JB

1 J

1 J

2 J

FRGH13-99EBG0211/30/88

1 J

1 J

7 J

RI


PHASE 1 1 1 ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS - ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 4 of 12

SAMPLE GH06B-01 GH07A-01 GH08C-01OTR NUMBER EBG13 EAL49 EBG25DATE SAMPLED 12/01/88 11/30/88 12/02/88


1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE2-METHYLPHENOL3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE R

3-NITROANILINE4-CHLOROANILlNE R4-METHYLPHENOL4 - N I T R O A N I L I N EBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACIDBIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHERBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 12 4 J 2 JBOI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATEFLUORANTHEME

FLUCREHEN-N1TROSODIPHENYLAMINENAPHTHALENEPHENANTHRENEPHENOL 3 JPYRENE

GH10A-01EAL4411/29/88

GH10B-01EAL4511/29/88

GH10C-01EAL4611/29/88

GH11B-01EBG2012/01/88

GH12A-01EBG1412/01/88

GH12B 01E6G1512/01/88

GH13-01EAL5811/30/88

FRGH13 99EBG0211/30/88

9 J 3 J

50 J

6 J 5 J

3 J

PESTICIDES/PCBS(ug/L)

4.4--DDD4,4--DDT

FR

FBTB

.29 J

Field replicateField blankTrip Blank

B Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR Laboratory data not usuableD Diluted


Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 5 of 12

SAMPLE GH14B-01 GH14C-01OTR NUMBER EAL27 EAL28DATE SAMPLED 11/28/88 11/28/88


1.1-D1CHLOROETHANE1,2-OICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHENE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE2-BUTANONE R R

2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONEACETONE 5 JBBENZENECARBON DISULF1DE 22

GH16A-01EAL4111/29/88

GH16B-01EAL2611/29/88

FRGH16B-99EAL3511/29/88

GH16C-01EAL3211/29/88

6 JB1 J3 J

1 J

GH17A-01EAL2911/28/88

GH17B-01EAL3011/28/88

GH17C-01EAL3111/28/88

GH18B-01EAL3411/28/88

GH19A-01EBG0712/01/88

4 J

5 JB

3 J

CHLOROBENZENECHLOROE THANEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEETHYLBENZENEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE 5 B

STYRENETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENETRICHLOROETHENEVINYL CHLORIDEXYLENE (TOTAL)



1 J3 J

2 JB14

TABLE 3G & H L A N D F I L L


Page 6 of 12

SAMPLEOTR NUMBER

DATE SAMPLED

GH14B-01EAL27

11/28/88

GH14C-01EAL28

11/28/88

GH16A-01EAL41

11/29/88

GH16B-01EAL2611/29/88

FRGH16B-99EAL35

11/29/88

GH16C-01

EAL32

11/29/88

GH17A-01EAL29

11/28/88

GH17B-01EAL30

11/28/88

GH17C-01EAL31

11/28/88

GH18B-01EAL3411/28/88

GH19A-01EBG07

12/01/88


1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE

2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE2-METHYLPHENOL3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE

3-NITROANILINE4-CHLOROANILINE4-METHYLPHENOL

4-NITROANILINEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACIDBIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHERBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE

DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATEFLUORANTHENE

FLUORENEN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINENAPHTHALENEPHENANTHRENEPHENOLPYRENE

37

2 JB

2 J2 J

3 J 4 J 2 J

2 JB

6 J

3 BJ

5 J2 J

3 J

PESTICIDES/PCBS

(ug/L)

4,4'-DDO4,4'-DDT

FR - F i e l d replicate

FB - F i e l d blankTB - T r i p blank


D - Diluted


Rl PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSMONITORING WELLS - ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Page 7 of 12



1,1-DlCHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-D1CHLOROETHENE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE2-BUTANONE

GH20A-01EAL3911/29/88

GH20B-01EAL4011/29/88

GH21A-01EBG2212/01/88

GH21A-01DLEBG2212/01/88

GH22A-01EAL3711/29/88

GH22B-01EAL3811/29/88

GH23A-01EAL3611/29/88

GH25A-01EBG0812/01/88

GH26A-01EBG0912/01/88

2 J

R

1 J

R

13-01EAL5911/30/88

2 J

15-01EBG1112/01/88

2-HEXANONE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONEACETONEBENZENECARBON DISULFIDE

8 JB 9 JB 8 JB110 140 D

1 JB56

13 JB1019

2 JB18

CHLOROBENZENECHLOROE1HANED I BROMOCHLOROME T HANEETHYLBENZENEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE

22

9

19 DJ1 J

75 2 J

2 J 3 J

14


FR -FB -TB -

Field replicateField BlankTrip blank

1 JB 1 JB

1 J800 J 940 D 30


TABLE 3

G & H LANDFILLRl PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS


Page 8 of 12

SAMPLE GH20A-01 GH20B-01

OTR NUMBER EAL39 EAL40

DATE SAMPLED 11/29/88 11/29/88<


(ug/L)

1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE

2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE2-METHYLPHENOL3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE

3 NITROANUINE4-CHLOROANILINE4-METHYLPHENOL4 NITROANUINEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACIDBIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHERBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 18 4 J

DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATEFLUORANTHENE

GH21A-01

EBG2212/01/88

21 J

GH21A-01DLEBG22

12/01/88

GH22A-01EAL37

11/29/88

GH22B-01EAL3811/29/88

GH23A-01EAL3611/29/88

GH25A-01EBG08

12/01/88

GH26A-01EBG0912/01/88

13 01EAL59

11/30/88

15-01EBG1112/01/88

3 J5 J3 J

43 11 4 J 13

FLUORENEN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE

NAPHTHALENEPHENANTHRENEPHENOL

PYRENE

4 J

6 J 5 J

7 J

2 J

PEDTICIDES/PCBs

(ug/L)

4,4'-DOD4,4'-DDT

FR - Field replicateFB - Field BlankTB - Trip blank

B - Blank contamination

J - Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuable

D - Diluted

•7T

0



1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHENE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE2-BUTANONE


CHLOROBENZENECHLOROETHANEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEETHYLBENZENEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE

7 J

2 JB

TABLE 3G & H L A N D F I L L

RI PHASE III ROUND 1 A N A L Y T I C A L RESULTSMONITORING WELLS • ORGANIC ANALYSIS

RD2X-01 RD8XX-01 RD18-01EBG06 EBGOO EAL5712/01/88 12/01/88 11/30/88

RL4-01ERG0311/30/88

RL6-01ERG0411/30/88

RL17-01EAL6011/30/88

RW7-01EAL5612/01/88

FRRW07-99EBG0512/01/88

R

2 JB5

3 J

120

R R 11 J

770 D4 JB 1 JB 180 DJ2 J 180 120

43 1 J 6

2 J

R R

4 JB2 J 4 J13 42 J

3 J

1 R

3 J

4 JB4 J1 J

12 B1000 D75 DJ

4 J 1 J

RW12X-01EBG1612/01/88

Page 9 of 12

RW14-01 RW19-01EBG19 EAL5512/01/88 11/30/88

1 J3 J63 J

R

4 J

6 J

67 J1500

140 J

200062 J

4 JB3 J1 J

2 J

6 B


FRFBTB

Field replicateF i e l d BlankT r i p blank

B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR Laboratory data not usuableD - Diluted

1 JB 2 JB

36

410 D

186800 D

1 JB

1 J8700

1 J3 J

SAMPLE RD2X-01 RD8XX-01 RD18-01OTR NUMBER EBG06 EBGOO EAL57

DATE SAMPLED 12/01/88 12/01/88 11/30/88


1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE

2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE

2 METHYLPHENOL3,3-DICHLOROBENZlDINE R R

3-N1TROANIL1NE4-CHLOROANILINE R4-METHYLPHENOL

4-NITROANILINEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACID 50 JBIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHERBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 62 60 2 J

Dl-N-BUTYL PHTHALATEFLUORANTHENE

FLUORENE

N-NITROSODIPHENYLAM1NE 3 J

NAPHTHALENEPHENANTHRENEPHENOLPYRENE

TABLE 3

G & H LANDFILLRI PHASE 1 1 1 ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS


Page 10 of 12

RL4-01ERG0311/30/88

2 J

R

2 J

50 J

6 J

3 J

2 J

145 J

3 J

RL6-01ERG04

11/30/88

150 J

45 JR

140

RL17-01EAL60

11/30/88

RU7-01EAL5612/01/88

FRRU07-99

EBG0512/01/88

RW12X-01EBG16

12/01/88

RW14-01EBG19

12/01/88

3 J160 J8 J

46 3 J 28

19 J 3 J

8 J34

1472

27

RW19-01EAL5511/30/88

2 J

PESTICIOES/PCBs

(ug/L)

4,4'-DDD4,4'-DDT

FR - Field replicateFB - Field BlankIB Trip blank

B - Blank contaminationJ Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuableD - Diluted

.3

rTABLE 3

G & H LANDFILLRI PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS


Page 11 of 12



1,1 DICHLOROETHANE1.2-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-DICHLOROETHENE1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE2-BUTANONE


GWFB01EAL3311/28/88

GWFB02EAL4711/50/88

GWFB03EAL5011/30/88

GUFB04EBG2312/02/88

GWFB05EBG2612/02/88

GWTB01 GWTB02 GWTB04EAL48 EBG01 EBG2111/29/88 11/30/88 12/01/88

2 J

CHLOR08ENZENECHLOROE THANEDIBROHOCHLOROMETHANEETHYL8ENZENEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE 6 B 2 JB 2 JB


FR - Field replicateFB Field blankTB - Trip blank

B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR Laboratory data not usuableD Diluted

3 J2 JB1 J

1 J

1 J

TABLE 3 Page 12 of 12G & H LANDFILL


SAMPLE GWFB01 GWFB02 GWFB03 GUFB04 GWFB05 GWT801 GWTB02 GWTB04OTR NUMBER EAL33 EAL47 EAL50 EBG23 EBG26 EAL48 EBG01 EBG21DATE SAMPLED 11/28/88 11/30/88 11/30/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 11/29/88 11/30/88 12/01/88

I

SEN I-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS(ug/L)

1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE2-METHYLPHENOL-3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE R R

3-NITROANILINE R R4-CHLOROANILINE R R4-METHYLPHENOL4-NITROANILINEBENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE

BENZOIC ACIDB1S(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHERBIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE 53 JBDI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATEFLUORANTHENE

FLUORENEN-NITROSOD1PHENYLAMINENAPHTHALENEPHENANTHRENEPHENOLPYRENE

PESTICIDES/PCBs(ug/L)

4,4'-ODD4,4'-DDT

FR - F ield replicateFB - Field blankTB - Trip blank


rTABLE 4

G & H LANDFILLRI PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

SURFACE SOIL - ORGANIC RESULTS

SAMPLE SS01-01OTR NUMBER EBG42SAS NUMBERDATE SAMPLED 12/02/88

PESTICIDES/PCBs(ug/kg)

4,4'-DDE 7.4 J4,4'-DDTAROCLOR-1254ENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN I I 4.9 JGAMMA BHC (LINDANE)GAMMA CHLORDANEHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE

DIOXINS/FURANS(ug/kg)

HEXA-CDDHEPTA-CDDOCTA-COOTETRA-CDFPENTA-CDFHEXA-CDFHEPTA-CDFOCTA-CDF

FR - Field replicate


SS02-01EBGA34308E1212/02/88

SS03-01EBG444308E1312/02/88

300 J

57 J

.226

.442 J

.337 J

.063 J

.054

SS04-01EBG27

SS05-01EBG28

SS06-01EBG29

12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88

SS07-01EBG454308E1412/02/88

FRSS07-99EBG464308E1512/02/88

SS08-01EBG30

Page 1 of 3

SS09-01EBG47

12/02/88 12/02/88

275.7 J

150

TABLE 4G t H LANDFILL

Rl PHASE I I I ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTSSURFACE SOIL - ORGANIC RESULTS

Page 2 of 3

SAMPLE SS10-01OTR NUMBER EBG31SAS NUMBER 4308E16 'DATE SAMPLED 12/02/88

PESTICIDES/PCBS(ug/kg)

4,4'-DDE4,4'-DOTAROCLOR-1254ENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIGAMMA BHC (LINDANE)GAMMA CHLORDANEHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE


HEXA-CDDHEPTA-CDDOCTA-CDOTETRA-COFPENTA CDF

HEXA-CDFHEPTA-COFOCTA-CDF


B - Blank contaminationJ - Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuableD • Diluted

SS11-01EBG32430861712/02/88

FRSS11-99EBG33

12/02/88

SS12-01EBG484308E0412/02/88

SS13-01EBG494308E1812/02/88

SS14-01EBG504308E1912/02/88

SS15-01EBG344308E2012/02/88

SS16-01EBG354308E2112/02/88

FRSS16-99 SS17-01EBG36 EBG37

4308E2212/02/88 12/02/88

.107 J

.636

.490

.282

.046 J

.094

.199

.035.081

.0229.029.03

.056 J

.849 J1.697

.0917

.277

.242


Rl PHASE III ROUND 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

SURFACE SOIL - ORGANIC RESULTS

Page 3 of 3

SAMPLE SS18-01

OTR NUMBER EBG38SAS NUMBER 4308E23DATE SAMPLED 12/02/88

PESTICIDES/PCBS(ug/kg)

4.4'-DDE4,4'-DOT 22 JAROCLOR-1254ENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN I IGAMMA BHC (LINDANE)GAMMA CHLORDANEHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE


HEXA-CDDHEPTA-CDD .15OCTA-CDD .4

TETRA-CDF .105PENTA-CDF .146

HEXA-CDF .017 JHEPTA-CDF .042OCTA-CDF .069


B - Blank contaminationJ • Estimated valueR - Laboratory data not usuableD - Diluted

SS19-01EBG39

SS20-01

EBG40SS21-01EBG41

SS22-01

EBG51SS23-01EBG52

SS24-01

EBG53SS25-01EBG54

SS26-01EBG55

12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88 12/02/88

380 1600 J62 J

3.7 J

:A-2-79

chen and associates, inc.•HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

MR 7 MR

SiEVE ANALYSISj S STANDARD SERIES 1 Ct-E>H SQUARE OP

• in 1•NiNGS

*5 MIN '5 MiN 60 MIN 19 MiN 4 M<N '200 "00 'SO '*0 '30

—

1 J<32 OC)5 OCK

1 ^j

9

^^MM

1 J 4 ' 9 2-97 > 5 X) l2

=

20

34 4 « 9 52 • ) l 31 i : 52 -2 J^

XU

(HN

IVH

Ho

?

R

8

9

5

°Q I

S 8

38

10

PE

HC

CM

I

DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS

C-AV TO S I L *SANO

-- NE | MEDIUM JCOABSE3SAVEL

SINE [ COABSECOBBLES

GRAVEL 3

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

SAND

SS SILT AND CLAY ^5 %

SPLASTICITY INDCX

Sample No . G H - S S 0 2 / < + 3 0 8 E - 0 1

HVQROMETER ANALVSIS

MH TMIN i*j

r ME 9EACMNGSIPWIIN 6O MIN 19 MtN 4 MIN • \

i 1 | 1

L- -»i OOJ DC

•BS

» ox

r*2p^=

» 019 a

im 'I

37 0

SIEVE ANALYSIS

X ' 1 C

JS

» '5

74 149 f

STAND/

0 -40 '3

-r=t-:

l — h-

»7 ' 542

kRO SEP

0 -i

W 1

(ES"10

B i

h

19 >220

S

M 4

*

re a

;L£AR s

U K

^UABE

1 31

OPENIN

3

}= — :

1 7«

as• -

•

2 127i

r

mm

xa

10

o40*

8 8

3

8

S PE

RC

EN

T R

ETA

100»


CLAY TO SILTSAND

•'ME | MEDIUM [COAPSEl CINE | COABSEQRAVEL

COBBLES

GRAVEL iO

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE Of

SANO 6 I %

% PLASTICITY INDEX

GRADATION TEST RESULTS

SILT AND CLAY 1 3 ss

Samp le No. G H - S S C 7 / ^ 3 0 8 E -02

Fig _

:A-2-79

chen and associates, inc.

,45

•oo

90

30

•*«

80

MJ

0<

HYDROMETER ANALVSIS

MR :MiN '5

1 X

Tl

HRMIN 60 "«

'

)2 J<

WE Pt£^

UN '9

)5 OC

lO'NGS

MIN 4 M

l 1

19 J

>N i s

\

9

^IN '?

: o

oo ••:

"4 ',

U S STAND

10 '50 '40 •}

^^

9 2

1 1—

97 1 54J

ARC SE?

0

=^

»

Si

»iE5

5

F"

192

EVE ANALYSIS

9•

•

b

im^~

U 4

—

76 9

CC.EAB

52

OU*B€

} i }l

QPENi*

i

1

i

IGS

5

•-

52 12 71

s

2U

s-0

10

20

X

40Z

<

so -z

»sUJ

0.

70

so

30

L°°DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS

CLAY -C SIL-SANO

= 'NE [ MEDIUM ICOARSEGRAVEL

CINE I COARSECOBBLES

GRAVEL 0 S

LIQUID L'MIT

SAMPLE OF

Natu r a 1 MO i s t o r e =

SAND 15 «•

PLASTICITY INOCX

SILT AND CLAY 85 S

Samp le No . G H - S S 1 0 / -»308 E - C 3

24

45

'«

0

HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

Mft •*

M)N 15

' '

01 OC

' ME REHR*4IN 60 MIN 19

2 OC» a

ADINGS

MIN 4 MIN ' k,

-^*

» 01

I" |

9 0.

UN '?

•==sa

37 0

SIEVE ANALYSIS

X '1C

•--

74 IJ

J S

10 '5

9 ?

STA

0 '4

=^

NO

0 '3

b=j

97 ' 542

*BD SEP

0 -i

lES

60'

:

^

90 l 19 122 0

S '<

31 4

*

:L£AR s

k ' v

^TT,71 9U < S

OUARE

11 34

OPENIS

»- 3

M

1 76

as5-

tr=±:

—1

2 127i

r

2tU

10

X

o«>z

8 8

3 8

S P

ER

CE

NT

Rll'

100»


CUkV TO SILTSANO GRAVEL

I MEDIUM [CQAHSEI ciNt | COAHStCOBBLES

GRAVEL 1 2 % SANO 69 %

S

SILT AND CLAY 1 9 S

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

PLASTICITY INDEX

FROM Sample No. GH-SS1 2/^308

,o i s : u r- =

GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig

:A-2-79

chen and associates, inc.HYDflOMETEH- ANALVS1S

TtME f lEAONGSMR " HP

MIN 15 MIN SQ MIN '9 M'N 4 M

L^^^__^_^_

1 J02 3

IN ' MIN ?

i.

a-*-1*=syI ' I

35 009

- — :

9 ,j' ;

S' EVE ANALYSIS

-j S STANDARD SERIES I

OC '30 50 '40 '30 '6 8 • i

^

1 1

-4 '49

H— '

I 1 r_

^~^

97 1 59042

—

19 :2 0

38 i

;fc£AP SQUARE OPENINGS

3 - 5 5

!

1

'6 i32 ' 9 - :e i •

t=

__j

52 127 2S2

0

1C

2C

X

40Z

50-z

60-

80

30

[,00


C L A X - C S , -SANO

•-'NE [ MEDIUM [COARSE

3SAV6Lc NE | COARSE

COBBLES

GRAVEL 2

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

N a t - r a ' MC i s

SAND 60 H

=LAST!CITY INOCX

FROM S a m o i e No. G H - S S 1 * ' / - *308 E - 3 5

j re = l

2445

•00

90

ao

70

tn4

PE

RC

EN

T

..o 6

8 fe

6

j

"YQROMETER A N A L Y S I S

' ME BEMR 7 MR

MIN IS MIN 60 MIN '9

1 l

Ol 302 JOS J

AO'NGS

MIN 4 MIN • K

39 :

CLAY -o SU.T

9 C.

4IN ?

37 0

01*

SIEVE ANALYSIS

X "C

'4 '.4

ME'ER

J S ST*

W '50 '4

9 2

OF BA

NO

0 '3

97 1 542

RTICL

kRO SER

0 - i

90 i

• IN Ml

ES

5 'r

9 >22 0

LLIMET

S

34 4

EPS

SANO

= 'NE [ MEDIUM Ico ARSE

i.

76 9

: E>R S

S2 IS

OUARE OPENIK

3

1 Ml 'I

GRAVEL

' NE COARSE

IGS

2 i2

-

7

-

X>2

10

20

30

O

405

UJ

son2

•OS

a.70

80

90

'00U

COBBLES

GRAVEL 0

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

SAND 2] S

s PLASTICITY INDEX

FROM

SILT AND CLAY / / %

NP s

No. G H - S S : • / - »308 E - 0 6

GRADATION TPST PFS

CA-2-79


24

45100

90

ao

70

160

,040. yj

Z0.0UJ

0.

20

10

o<

HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

MR 7MIN 15

1 y

MIN 60 «.

r=

32 J<

UN <9

W OC

DOINGS

MIN 4 MIN ' V

1 1

» ;i9

i*lN '?

SIEVE A N A L Y S I S

00

4 ' J

j S

XD '5

9 2

STAND

D '40 '}

t \

97 ' SJ?

ABO SE

0

M

>i£S

6

-r.•

192

=

b38 4

a^=a

'6 »

:..E>R

F5*

^2

>G-AP£

^ " ^^

S ' 3(

OPENINGS

r 51 I S3

•

— h

i iHT.T752 i27 2

r0

•o

20

30

40 Z

50-

60 =

70

80

X

»°°

01AMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS

C L A Y -C SILTSAND

-NE [ MEDIUM ICOARSEGRAVEL

: NE | CCABSECOBBLES

GRAVEL 6 S SANO 36 S SILT AND CLAY 58 s

I.IQLJID LIMIT 2^» PLASTICITY INDCX 10

SAMPLE OF FROM S a m o l e No. G H - S S ' 5 / n 3 0 8 E-07

N a t u r a l M o i s : u r e = '•• 1. 8-;

24

45•00

90

60

J

10

00

HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

MR •MIN 15

01 OC

•4RUIN 60 h

=^ '

12 01

ME RE

4IN 19

& Of

40INGS

MIN 4 M

M 0

CLAY TO SILT

IN i *,

I— r*.9 a

<IN '2<

37 0

DIA

SIEVE ANALYSIS

X) "C

74 't

METER

U S

X) '5

« :

OF PA

STAND'

0 '40 '3

[ 1 1

97 1 542

RTICL

kRO SEP

0

| l

90 i

: IN Ml

IES

i

f=

192

LLIM

0

C

h0

n

! '

=ae=

34 <

ERS

SAND

CINE 1 MEDIUM (COARSE

••

=~—

Ud•6 9

:L£AH s

1

t 'a i

OUAHE

i r-) 1 31

0"ENis

T

f^\1 '6

GRAVEL

-'NE | COARSE

GS

— :

03=2 12

~

I

-

-1J

r

"

-

A

"

iO

20

X

o«s

<OJ

z80S

a.70

80

90

10010

COBBLES

GRAVEL 0 % SANO

LIQUID LIMIT 22 S

SAMPLE OF

% SILT AND CLAY 50 s

PLASTICITY INDEX 3 """

FROM S a n o i e No. G H - S S 1 6 / - » 3 0 8 E - " 5

GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig..

CA-2-79


2445

100

90

80

70

60

VI

40

10

y

HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

MR -MIN 15

1 -X

*

MIN 60 v

D2 J<

ME f>Et

rfIN '9

D5 js.

DOINGS

MIN 4 M

)9

CLAY TC S < L '

IN ' *A\» '?

OlA

SIEVE ANALYSIS

30

"4 i

METER

- S

» •«

9 ;

OF P*

STAND

o '4Q ~y

97 I 5

RTICL

A«0 SEF

0 •"

JO t

E IN Ml

iE5

5

192

LLIM

•

0

El

• 4

M 4

'ERSSANO

-'S£ [ MEDIUM COARSE

'

==

'6 9

CLEAR

1

>OUARE CPENiNGS

-s i

mri

3RAV£L

tiNE [ CCARSE

—

52 12

J

i

il'

r0

10

20

X

40Z

z

UJa.

70

80

COBBLES

GRAVED 6 -, SAND 5° «s SILT AND CLAY 38 s

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INOCX NP

SAMPLE OF FROM S a m p i e No. GH-Si22/ / :*3r"3 E-09

1 1 MO i s tu re = 2 6 . 0 ^

2445

100

90

90

70

O

z

£40£1

X

20

10

0

-YOROMETEO ANALYSIS

MR 7

MIN 15

:

^=a

HRMIN 60 k

r=

ME RE

OIN '9

5=

ADiNGS

MIN 4 MIN • *.

1

^=

<IIN 21

SIEVE ANALYSIS

» ' ' C

e^

^ S

)0 '5

STA

0 '4

NO

O ' 3

y

tflO SEP

o

IES•10

» 1'

i — h

ir

"" " ^

B V 1

DPENIN

-.- 3

GS

5-

=t

r=P

s

10

08

83

8!

$P

ER

CE

NT

fit

too

42 20 '52

I DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS

'o

CLAY TO

RAVEL

SILTSANO

CINE

17 S SANO 6^

[ MEDIUM

% SILT

ICOARSCGRAVEL

AND CLAY

CINE

19

| COARSECOBBLES

S

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

PLASTICITY INOEJC NP S

FROMSanp ie N o . G H - S S 2 ] : - 3 0 8

CA-2--9


2445

100

90

80

'0

Z 60u/l

PE

HC

INI

wo

o 3 g

6

*

HYDROMETER ANAL ySiS

MR '

MIN '5

^^^^^H

a^-1 J(

MIN 60 *•

F=132 j(

«IN '9 MiN 4 MiN • MIN '?

i 1 i

^SEsd

J4 009 . 1 9 -

r—" -

DIA

CLAY "C Sli.T

Si

oc • • '

=

-4

METER

- S

10 5

9 .

OF PA

STAND

0 '40 '3

1 t

— t—

97 1 542

RT1CL

ARD S€(

0 • '

=

= (

90 '

E IN Ml

HES

6h*— "

2LLIM

EVE ANALYSIS

0

—

:

bEl

38 4

rERSSAND

-iNE [ MEDIUM

GRAVED 21 S SAND 62 S SILT

COARSE

76 9

^^ "

52 S ' 3« 1

jHAVEL

c NE

AND CLAY 1 7

v NP "*

coABse

s

: —

52 12

cost

•J

7 252

)LES

r0

10

20

30

40Z

73

80

30

XJ

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

N a t u r a ' "o ; i t j r e = 8 . k?

PLASTICITY INOCX

FROM S a m p l e No. G H - S S 2 ^ / u 3 0 8 E - ' i

2445•x

90

80

70

O

SAl/><a.

ZUJ

£40UJa.

30

20

10

00

HYDROMETER ANALVSIS

MR 7

=:

01 ac

•4R

a x

ME RE

16 -*

ADiNGS

» 3

1

r-n9 37 0

SIEVE ANALYSIS

X "C

74 11

J S

n 5

9 ?

STAND

0 '40 '3

| — h-

— t—1 — r-E-xr

r r

»7 1 51

42

kRO SER

O -1

= J

r— rr

90 i

fES•10

» I

i h

9 122 0

S

34 4

*

76 9

:LEAR s

^

a •<

OUARE

1 34

OPENIN

——

l '6

GS

2 '271

r

21!,2

10

20

30

«Z<

501

Z

a

70

80

90

100k>


CLAY T0 SILTSANO

•>NE I MEDIUM ICOARSE

GRAVEL

C'NE COARSECOBBLES

GRAVEL S

LIQUID LIMIT

SAMPLE OF

SANO % SILT AND CLAY% PLASTICITY INDEX

FROM

TCT QCCI u

HYDROMETER GRADATJONWORKSHEET

HAMATERIAL JW

JOB PART NO.

JOB M A U P -

PREP.

CALC. C K E P

u n i e DEPTH SAMPLE NO.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION:

RUN BY SAMPLE PREPERAT10N SIEVING TIME

SIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AOC SAMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED^—

on* WT7^y»*iflr ^

% OF T O T A L PASSING

|

-5>

3" 1 1/2" 3/4"

loo

3/8"

7.2-«-,<

NO. 4

22.2.

^z;

W X *

SAMPLE WEIGHTS

WET 0«Y,-ui v-"

e A %.* p ) c *£*/& & * G&

RETAINED _ _ -ON NO. * z c -2.

PN£S!ING ; ^^.i/^UN BY_

SIEVENO.

e iyo16

30 (*£)

SO

100

200

P A N

T O T A L

#yU SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SAVING TIME

WEIGHTRETAINED

2.f

H-*b7-2-I-^t

U,. I^n

W E I G H TP A S S I N G

\ OFT O T A L

P A S S I N G

?- /6 '' ,<?'~J

^ 173 '

'^jla'..

£— /

FACTOR r ^S- =W

/^Zo^ x

MOISTURE D E T E R M I N A T I O N

DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AfD DBH

WT. DRY SOB. AMD DBH

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

• 4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

M Y G R O .'MOISTURE

C^ T— *

k^n.A*Wb

« s v . < & » -r ^J ' - .?^ '

2^^^3^M.ffi

— -*?•

/0.4«0 '

HYDRO.SAMPLE

^TD-S^

J50.^

BUN av HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

C Y L I N D P P NO. >i eocr - te

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

oa-^i.rA «1

CO <^

>cv o*

HV "_

IO'*-\

l-r^-

"»<<J

n P A T * p •-MXGRAlT*0-«fe7

MTY

^ AuntlNT /D ISPERSIN2S~

TEST TIME

S T A R T MIX

STOP MIX

0.5 min "

1 .0 min

4.0 min

1 9 min

60 min

7h 15 mm

2Sh 45 min

TEMP.C*

7.2. O

->-> ^

>- ->

7_1 ^.

^ 02*«<?

H YD.R E A D

^*«rn~z=^.o-)^ ^n — •>

n .^!3'.0

/ y •

H YD.*CORR

4.'.

- . v

4 *

R?A§

FA

CT

OR

X

CO

RR

EC

TE

D R

EA

OIN

Q =

X O

F T

OT

AL

PA

SS

ING

x OF TOTALPASSING

"MS?

/

c 11Z'^ 7 /^ '

ll D A T S

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.00 1 mm

C A L I R

STORAGF 1 nr.ATlON ._

— - • - 5* COMMICTIOM W'OJJOU TXWF, llCtt

DATE IN:

OCM. AMO OCfVOCVUMT

SUPERVISOR:

, HYDROMETER GRADATJON ANALYS1WORKSHEET

f*XwJOB NO

JOB NA

HOLE U

VISUAL

- 1 --41-

UP -E.D

H -«^Pn f

•<*A^ . 21 -a.

D E P T H -

DESCRIPTION: _

P A R T NO

.G^-e -T*

R

^^

AMI

l

TX

PLE NO..

lA^j C.*^ *

PREP. BY Wj\H\

CALC. pv^M ,

^ .^^^•W c>rCVsu]^ »-C3C5

j

DATB.L2.

CKED. B'

iVv rK&\

-fO-«2

^Qp

*Jt Ww=

RUN BY SAMPLE PREPERAT1ON SIEVING TIMESIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AND SAMR£

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED —

in. m i H M ininv -X OF T O T A L PASSING

?— i>

3" 1 1/2" 3/4"

(00

3/a"

A^ riM-y

W X r

NO. 4

7P-2.74/

SAMPLE WEIGHTSWET DRY j

TOT A | - J^T ? LJ

RETAINED _^-» -,ON NO. 4 J7 >g.

PASSING A * • 0NO. 4 V^/0 ^y .«Z

RUN BY

SIEVENO.

8 C10:

16

30 C403

50

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

oicvc MNU riTLmuivic i cn «n«i.Tî.3 îpuiNr; Tiuf

WEIGHTRETAINED

- V\

\"' .^\2.0 .«A

b\ ^^3

4D \2,

4 V ~\~L.

.* 4*^ 7"^^ -

WEIGHT

P A S S I N G

X OFT O T A L

P A S S I N G

(9^ /

^^ J

M- /

Z^ <ic- '! '.T /

F A C T O R =î =W

;^7ST'/ -


DISH NO.

WT. WET SOC A»C DtSH

WT. DRY SOt AND DBH

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

•4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

C-- l9s-

141 Sf*fi*f,

vJ \^1 1 IS

^•L.-L"• w

?.?r

HYGRO.'MOISTURE

ê£i.T»

4*3.0?

"" - »

O.'-H

HYDRO.SAMPLE

ra.r^.

5>?, 3 I '

P,,N pv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

C Y L I N D E R NO / / ceer ie

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

<?.*/.«l

^^^^ •" —

^.^J

n CrQ»_iC*- P A T P 12.1C GRA\-2?. *

/ ITY9 j

JS AMOUNT Li

CISPERSIN

asr ,T E S T TIME

S T A R T MIX

STOP MIX

——0.5 mm.

1.0 min

^,2-^1 4-° min

^.U24 19 mln

)<?,Z5H^t\\.c$

60 min

7h 15 min

25h 45 mm

TEM?.C«

2 0 . 0

-ic.c20, D

-0- -

11 ts

-L-L 0

H YD.R E A D

w.olt>o(0. 5"/g . r^ .0"I O_

HYD.*CORK

^ -r^ •

4 "'• •

CORPREAf i

FA

CT

OR

X

C

OR

RE

CT

ED

R

EA

DIN

G =

X

OF

T

OT

AL

PA

SS

ING

X OF TOTALPASS.NG

/3to "

y

—T *

5 ;3 ;

r,RAVP! ZCo «x «;Awn '« i « r; AV.?Lrr 5 .*

« A/5EK,T-t/Vt/f/><P^«i

il D A T E

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

P A I IR

-

STORAGE LOCATION '• — —

& COMCCTIOH ntCLUDU TlMr, HCM

~ DATE IN:

L-4 r s -SS" 1 L O C A T I O N

Saj*. AMO eCFLOOJLIWT

SUPERVISOR:

HYDROMETER- - - - •- CAUTION: HAZARDC

GRADATJON ANALYSIS MATERIAL IN USELAB NO -----&S.WORKSHEET

JOB NO. PART NO. PREP BY

JOB NAME CALC. BY

.DAT5J

CKED.

DEPTHHOLE

VISUAL DESCRIPTION'. HA.

SAMPLE NO.

V - \J

RUN BY SAMPLE PREPERATION SIEVING TIME

SIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AJVC SAMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED

DRY WT. PASSING


3" 1 1/2"

^

3/4"

^S

3/8"

^^

NO. 4

/ooWX =

SAMPLE WEIGHTS

WET DRY

T O T A LS A M P L E

RETAINEDON NO. 4

PASSINGNO. 4 _

3UN BY

SIEVE

NO.

8 (10)

16

30 ( 4 0 3

50

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

sieve Mrtu n T unwnnt i crv «nn,i_ > -ji<j eieviwr TIUC

WEIGHT

RETAINED

^ 7_<fc

0 fe\

1 .01—

7. »*

A C«,~!

~l-\\

CL *-

WEIGHT

PASSING

X OFT O T A L

P A S S I N G ,

^-1*1 /

J?

*?? '

^(f "* ,Qo '25"

F A C T O R = Jfiii -W

y


DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AND DSH

WT. DRY SOS. AM) DBH

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

»4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAi.

C.-2--

TUtt 0

$?',%'Si Q~

f : Wl a ,S2J

HYGRO.'MOISTURE

— - >

sMif.2>2/

^3.7^

• >i

0,(*0J

HYDRO.SAMPLE

fO- 35"

5o,c^

q,1N qv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS - ^ Ne*J W^TjAC. % u

C Y L I N C E P NO ID eocr ie

DISH N 0 ^iiV-V P A T P / 2,

1C G R A V

-Zif-2^ITY nispensiNft A r t P W T • // /v'V n PO^

5 AMOUNT 12-^ n

CT L , °MCEK !THSTT,ME

9- 9./»f

•v^ _

& •IQ

^% 5 3

QL O «

/O' /«?

t ( ,54<

y/.^

S T A R T MIX

STOP MtX

_ Oif min

1.0 min

4.0 min

19 mtn

60 min

7h 15 min

25h 45 mm

TEMP,C*

20.0

ZO.O

Za.c2r .2.,., _^

•L-L Q

M Y D .R E A D

US*oU UOSS'.O

_^ ^* f (

•2.=,.^

7.1 ^

HYD.*C O R R

^•^ '

~

SgSB

FA

CT

OR

X

C

OR

RE

CT

ED

R

EA

DIN

G

=

X

OF

T

OT

AL P

AS

SIN

G

*PCASSWGAL

-7* '

" / '

5^ '* 3 J

— 0 '?4 '

fiBAVP! (O ' «x CAMP !5" x n AV.SI rr ^"5 •;

il D A T E

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

u.O 1 9 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

r.Ai IB

STORAGE LOCATION

comtcTu»

L-4 ;s-

DATE IN:

LOCATION:

AMD Dcn.ocuUMT

SUPERVISOR:

.' HYDROMETER GRADATION ANALYSfiAUTION: HAZARDpUi

.MATFPiAfaiu.iftp.»JOB PART NOJOB M A U P '

PREP. BY.

CALC. CK EO

y^HOLE i fiPPTH SAMPLE NO. QA

VISUAL DESCRIPTION:

RUN BY.

SIEVE SIZE

SAMPLE PREPARATION

3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/8" NO.4 SAMPLE WEIGHTS

Of PAN AM} SAMPLE WET

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED — -

16 -^% OF T O T A L PASSING /OO ?«

T O T A LSAMPLE

RETAINEDON NO. 4

PASSINGNO. 4

ÛN BY

SIEVENO.

8 (10)

16

30 (40)

SO

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

^^rs=___WEIGHT

RETAINED

«5 .•*<£>

\O.'Va5

\n 7.?3^0.47-

^^.feS

3Q ^(o-Ae-e^

SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVING TIME ' -••jat9

WEIGHTPASSING

X OFT O T A L

P A S S I N G

1°l /

10 /

5^ :3^ ',-1 '

^ ;

F A C T O R = &L =W

-- /,7<//S' / - - '-

UCISTURE DETERMINAT ION

DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AfO DBH

WT. DRY SOt AM3 DBH

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

•4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

r -2A-\a\ ^ /-P&r

t^L \ ~- w

ii ^«r // / ^— '

MYGRO.'MOISTURE: »• r431,

^SO.iTÎ^

5 . V 7 '

HYDRO.SAMPLE

,.;-.- '

r.5.7^-y

/

50. s£

miN qv HYDROMETER ANALYSIS "-

CYLIND

DISH N

C L O C KTIME

9- '3<?. /«y

i. —

PP MO «5 5pE/-|F

O -i*» rv<~C V'vry n A T P i [£

1C GRAVMTY

2. AMOUNT

2ISPERSIN

rr

T E S T TIME

S T A R T MIX

STOP MIX

^^—^~£f*qmi*fL

O / £""T 1 .0 min

?' /£

°\.m

to. is:4.30

I / , 00

4.0 min

1 9 min

60 min

7h 15 min

25h 45 mm

TEMP.C*

ô.^2*.020. &

ZC<0

2.2 n

iV*.

H Y D .R E A D

(6.01^0

U,S^n.r^.ni n

MYD.»CORR

Z.^ '' ' •

4*. 's . c 1

^ ^\ D OO W ™ P it

FA

CT

OR

X

C

OR

RE

CT

ED

RE

AD

ING

X

OF

T

OT

AL

PA

SS

ING

*P*SSNSL

/'g "1 —i '

-7. '

' n

5" yx

3 'rtRAVPl '2- «i <ÂWp ('fl « r\ AV.«;| fT /7 «

/3 A P - E M T l4*/e/VAPO ^

.1 D A T E

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

r A I m

- -

0.037 mm)

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

-

~

STORAGE LOCATION __

COMVCTtOH IKCUMS TtMf, KCM

DATE IN:

OCM. AW OCTLOCUXiVr

SUPERVISOR:

HYDROMETER -CAUTION:GBADATJON ANALYSIS MATEgj&LJN 'jjSg

WORKSHEETPART

JOB M A U P ; E.PA,

PREP. BY_fckU*.vDATE

CALC.

HOLE DEPTH NO.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION: \ .r»W

RUN BY. SAMPLE PREPERATION

SIEVESIZE 3" 1 1/2" if4" s/a NO. 4 SAMPLE WEIGHTS^.

OF PAN A*C SAMPLE WET 0«Y

WT. OF RAM

DRY WT. RETAINED -

TOTALSAMPLE

X OF TOTAL PASSING loowx *

SIEVE AND HYDROMETER

WEIGHTRETAINED

WEIGHT

PASSING

SIEVING TIME

TXOT°AFLP A S S I N G

FACTOR =W

8 (10) MOISTURE DETERMINATION

16 *4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

HYGHO.MOISTURE

HYDRO.SAMPLE

30 (403 Ha. DISH NO. r -SO WT.WETaXANDOeH

100 WT. DRY SCC AM) D6H

200 11 ' WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

RUM By HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

CYLINDER NO. Q CBC/-II

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

9-*7^ro

9 . / /^. >//^.3<?to.n14 >24/o.»

n £y^s-^-) PATP /2.1C G R A \'Z.?-^

/ ITY

t AMOUNT

DISPERSIN

US' n

TEST TIME

START MIX

STOP MIX

fl-5 «in

1.0 min

4.0 min

1 9 min

60 min

7h 15 min

2 S ^ 45 min

TEMP.C*

•

2,0.0

7.9. 0Z6.Olo.oll.^^ i

HYO.READ

no\s.c13. oi ! .r=N 0

"7 Q_

HYD.*CORR

/

5.:

^ I-*• ' -»'

mt

FA

CT

OR

X

C

OR

RE

CT

ED

RE

AD

ING

-

X O

F

TO

TA

L P

AS

SIN

G

%^SSSL

/$ ';5" '

/2 ' ,1 'b ' <3 'w

rtRAVEL PI X CAun ^O * ~ri Av-«Lrr /9 *

<, A / J E - T - ^'/^A/^P.53

il DATE

PARTICLEDIAMETER

O . O S O mm

0.037 mm

C/.O 1 9 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

CALI f t

-.

STORAGE LOCATION

COMWCTION mCUBCl TtM», HCH

DATE IN:

HCU*, 4VMO OCPLOCULEMT

SUPERVISOR:/•> f • T I M .

HYDROMETER GRADATJON ANALYSE/ION: HAZARDOUSWORKSHEET MATERIAiflimjSE

JOB WO.

JOB NAUP

PART NO.

-e. -TPREP.

CALC. BYi.y£LCKED.

iAMPLE NO.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION: =0 . . 33'fc'V

BUN HY SAMPLE PREPERAT10N -£. SfFV1Nfi T^*.**«t *

SIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AND S.AMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED

DRY WT. PASSING


3" 1 1/2" 3/4" 3/a"

/S

NO. 4 J

-.:

//'loo

W X r

C A U D f f "f flMjA U T C" 9^^^^

WfTC;-/ 'DRY

TOTAL ' - 'SAMPLE _>_:*•• - • - '

R£TAINED -. ' ^ » 'ON NO. 4 ' • *

PASSINGNO. 4 '

RUN 8Y

SIEVENO.

a ( 103

16

30 (40)

50

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVING TIME

WEIGHTRETAINED

o, en0-U4

o.4riO.W3

2 ^^

\ \. ~\~\

1^-sT^

WEIGHTPASSING

X OFTOTAL

PASSING

'00 '

100 ' .^\^9 ',^4;71 ;

—

FACTOR = *&. -W

!3V=1$"' l •

MOISTURE DETERMINATION

DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AND D6H

WT. DRY SOL AND 06H

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

% MOISTURE

• 4MATERIAL

•4MATERIAL

CL- W"

^sS1^

^7. \ -

£ W

K,S\"

HYGRO.MOISTURE

L^»r

-ZMZ^Z

y£ti$.*£>

—

r,Z3'

HYDRO.SAMPLE

L-Tt>.3g

/5^,1^

RUN BY. HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

C Y L I N D E R NO. ~7 cec/~ic

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

<?.£>£:9/0^

— —9,07

^./c7

9.^10. 07-V.ivzJa.^i

o ^>V^

TEST TIME

S T A R T ' MIX

STOP MIX

5TS min

1.0 min

4.0 m(n

1 9 mtn

60 min

7f\ 15 min

2 5h 4 5 min

pATF fir '

1C GRA\y iTY

L AMOUNT ?

DISPERSINZ-S

TEMP.

2,0 >0

Zo.o2,0*0zc.o^.i.s

?_nRAVFL 0 %

•^

HYD.READ

3/'02.^,0

it.o15,0

\ -L .O

HYD.«CORR

6>^

/-.i1

• '

fli3^ it

Oz

FACT

OR x

COR

RECT

ED R

EAC

X O

F T

OT

AL

PA

SS

ING

X OF TOTALPASSNG

c_. /

37';

IJZ'''.

}<=} '

/<v /10 '

G AGEfil DA

PARTJCDIAMET

.T- U «/« A/"/? P 0 3TE

t^

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

C A I IR

STORAGE LOCATION

JK COftMCCTlON IMCLLMS TlMP^ MtMISCUi, AMD 0€)*LOCUtJXT

- DATE IN: SUPERVISOR:

L-4 (5-ss) LOCATION:

HYDROMETER GRADATJON ANALYSIS CAUTION: HAZARDOiMATEBAL IN USE

JOB MO l-^fa,--.^,

JOB NAUP =,PA^ A,"^

HOLP,4H-^>M<\ OE*TM

VISUAL DESCRIPTION: I

PABT UQ \

^s - F ~T~A.V.ji- TC

SAMPl^ MO CH

" \c^j ^\ .%^s^r<v, sN <\VW

PREP. BY K^i/v

CALC. BY^H

vr rv -A *» r rNLi

DATE IVl^'V

CKED. BY^_

vsV j*"l.x .- 3

RUN BY SAMPLE PREPERATION SIEVING THE

SIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AND SAMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED . —

orra!C*pT35iH& ^% OF T O T A L PASSING

?

-2>

3" 1 1/2" 3/4"

loo

3/a"

7fS~ tq-i

NO. 4

M.Lfl

°l^wx >

SAMPLE WEIGHTS .

WET O R r jL j

T O T A L ' +"^f r"^ A LJ & 1 C *C^^d M1^ / /

RETAINED i,, ,.ON NO. 4 • m.i{

PASSING 3,H\.-f

RUN BY

SIEVENO.

8 (10)

16

30 (40)

SO

100

200

PAN

T O T A L


WEIGHTRETAINED

! A^

2 W«

A O?)

(oCAVA AS

^C\ ^0

•2.2.^40

WEIGHT

PASSING

X OFT O T A L

PASSING

^'/^;?7-;?/ '.^ /5^ '

FACTOR = -i *. =W

/,^37l/ -


DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AND OGH

WT. DRY SOt AND DSH

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

»4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

r.-ZrS*

VA&«Sr^7. ^

I W

'2,730'

HYGRO.MOISTURE

^>

<£H3j})*#><9n

^>j

:^3"

HYDRO.SAMPLE

S6-1&

/55/04'

RUN BY_

C Y L I N C

DISH NCLOCK

TIME

J.e>iCf'Oi.

^~*^~

9-o39,o^£> ?-?

/^ ' -5

4 ^/o(>/^

n i L/nvivic i en m^ni. i »*io

PP NO 4? . SPFCIF

n "WAX nATP _/'2

'1C GRA\

•z.«T-gy iTY

iJT AMOUNT LA

DISPERSIN

2«S^ n

T E S T TIME

START' MIX

STOP MIX

1.0 min

4.0 min

1 9 min

60 min

7h 15 min

25h 45 min

TEMP.C*

2,0.0ZO.QZD.V2,0^0 jZl o

H.S

HYO.READ

3^.0^ _£ / ^ V^

Z7.0^3.o1^.0

I S - O

HYD.«CORR

J' s

r 1

l.^

SiSE-

II

O

FA

CT

OR

X

C

OR

RE

CT

ED

RE

At

X

OF

T

OT

AL

PA

SS

ING

"PASSO1-

5" J x

^t '

^ox

^3 /

".• L

/?y

GRAVEL d' » SAND- 3£ % ' 'n, AY-SLfT 5? X

G A G E N T ' ^tf/« A/APO~$

it D A T E

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

O.OOS mm

0.002 mm

0.00 1 mm

T A I IP,

STORAGE LOCATION

£ coftftccnoM wcuecs TCM*, MCMOCM, **c otn.oeaj.ta

- DATE IN: SUPERVISOR:

L-4 (5-85) LOCATION: .

HYDROMETERGRADATJON ANALYSIS

WORKSHEET

CAUTION: HAZARDOlUSE

JOB MO. P A B T

JOB NAME

PREP. BY_Js4b*^DATE IT

CALC. CKEO. BY^£_

HOLE DEPTH SAMPLE NO.,

VISUAL DESCRIPTION: V-rr\ ^

RUN BY. SAMPLE PREPERATION SIEVING TIME.

SIEVE SIZE

Of PAN AND SAMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED- .*^^^^\^^^^0^f^^^^£Tjir^^^^^^^^^^^H^^^^^^^^^â^^^^^S^^^^^^ t

% OF TOTAL PASSING

>

— *>

3" 1 1/2" 3/4"

too

3/8"

f'4

K'

W X r

NO. 4

l no,

^

SAMPLE WEIGHTS

WET DRY

T O T A L Ja-T fSAMPI F *Gfc3J «o

RETAINED , r- AON NO. 4 _j_ lAÔ

PASSING jjtr,s~NO. 4 «C4_^_>J

RUN BY_

SIEVENO.

8 (10)

16

30 (40)

50

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

OICVC AIMU HTUnwivicicn «r»rku i <ai«a SIEVING TIME

WEIGHTRETAINED

I .07.

2-CT\

3.^Û C

lê -IS

ZV25

iVa-'VO

WEIGHTPASSING

X OFTOTAL

PASSING

<^7 '

^5 ;

57 '^/ y

^L',—^ /2(-s

FACTOR = *^ :W

!,1S1ZJ


DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AND DGH

WT. DRY SOI. AM) DBH.-'

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

% MOISTURE

• 4MATERIAL

-4 }MATERIAL

f\ _ \v_. - >

"^n^-ayy-y

** ^r .r

*>l ^ -: W

2 / - Z? '

HYGRO.MOISTURE

mm ^J:

12.0 t>7

°2i<1.3g»>

c.^3 '

HYDRO.SAMPLE

Td^c

/&0,1%

y HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

CYLINDER NO ^ coef,t

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

tf.572 SI

?.S99, oz9. it<1,£T>1.V. /^;o.*M

0 i-^rv.H, nATC /.?

1C GRA\-zr-8

/ITY

J AMOUNT

CISPERSIN

12 n

TEST TIME

START- MIX

STOP MIX

A & Ai/jfl.

1.0 min

4.0 min

19 min

60 min

7t\ 15 min

2Sh «S min

TEMP.C«

2.0.0

2.6.020(0

lo.o-L\ «i

"lA S

HYO.READ

29-0•2/z.oZ i > ol^.oIS O

l?5 0

HYD.»CORR

-*' ' J

go

R?A§

<

»O

5 oUJ Z« w0^2UJ "1- O-0 _i

Si <5 •-S oO H-0 u.x- 0

s *h-o<u.

*PASSWGL

_.44 ^ .

-^ <a ,

^ ' ',

2S~X

°{ /5"

GRAVEL 6» ' % SAMP ^H X ~ri AV.SUT 5"° «

rt A rt F f^ T * ^ ' * /wflf* r^ *s _ j

nl D A T E

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

CALIH.

V

STORAGE LOCATION ..

& COMCCTIOM IMCU0CS

DATE IN:

1-4 (5-853 LOCATION

ocn.oauiMT

SUPERVISOR:

HYDROMETER GRADATION ANALYSISWORKSHEET

CAUTION: HAZARDOL

JOB NO. • -

JOB NAME g-OA

PART PREP.

CALC. BYl^LCKED.

HOLE SAMPLE NO.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION'

RUNRY SAMPLE PREPERATION SIEVING TWF '*-'

SIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AND SAMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED

rnv VM. r tAumu <-% OF T O T A L PASSING

^

3" 1 1/2" 3/4"

}00

3/8"

f*f

£>rf

NO. 4

/* .*«

wx >

SAMPLE WEIGHTS

WET DRY ,

TOTAL """ ", .,* ce A uci c Z—fn i

R-ETAINEO . » ,.ON NO. 4 ' /i •*/

PASSING .. -x- (-NO. 4 «5 g j\-T

RUN 9Y_

SIEVENO.

8 (10)

16

30 [40}

50

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

aieve ANU MTOMUWICICM an/M-Toio SIEVING TIME

WEIGHTRETAINED

7..-3S

4 41

~1 a^b

ili.-ir^

14 We

V3. i^

^•^..o^

WEIGHT

PASSING

X OFTOTAL

PASSING

^0 '%£> J,71 '(r&'i

<&> :5rS '

FACTOR r -tf-*- =w/,?(,n>'


DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AND O6H

WT. DRY SOt. AND D6H

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

MATERIAL

•

-4MATERIAL.

d-A-?rtfe.feus:s^2. 2.-i w

2b, of

HYGRO.MOISTURE— *r^<>6.<>t>3*L.tf

L— /

O.Of'

HYDRO.SAMPLE

&,1<^

50, yy

ROM RV ~ UnwmC 1 Crl APIAt. T wld

CYLINOeP NO ^ eocne

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

*.T3

£-^»• ••

«. 5S1

z.sg^.<y

f.rJ«./d/C.W

o C-*-^W>^ PATP fl1C GRA\/ ITY

!? AMOUNT /

DISPERSIN

2, 5 n

TEST TIME

START MIX

STOP MIX

•• UT5 min

1.0 min

4.0 min

1 9 min

60 min

7h 15 min

25h 45 min

TEMP.C*

zo. o£0.0

20.0

20,0

2.1 «i

1\ ^

HYO.READ

2.Z.Q

\t.G

IS.o/ 3 - 0

10. o%.o

HYD.«CORR

/

5-5'

1.0'• •

gg26 II

O

< 0u z* 55Q J»uj ~T^*• °-0 -i}" <c >-S o« :x. O

§ *

O

u.

"p^WG*1-

3/ / /*•"» *2^3 y

/?• '

/^ '

9 </

(o4

GRAVEL ^_ » <>*MP "• ' «""n AV.^Lfr ' X

f} A Q g N T ' / J T /0/lf^'f^O .5

il DATE

DIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.018 mm

0.009 mm

O.OOS mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

r.Ai IR

V

STORAGE LOCATION

connection mcuou Ttur^ MCH

DATE JN:- -r -r- i nr

. AMO Xn.OCULCMT

SUPERVISOR:

HYDROMETERGRADATJON ANALYSIS

WORKSHEET' MATEBiAUN USEJOB MQ /- PART NO.JOB N A M E -LT

PREP. BY VyviA PATP IT-lQ.Rf*.,• a^

CALC.

PDEPTH

VISUAL DESCRIPTION:SAMPLE IP

RUN BY SAMPLE PREPERATION SIEVING TUP

SIEVE SIZE

OF PAN AND SAMPLEWT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED —

WIN H^aJlAJBWW ^

X OF T O T A L PASSING

>

—^

3" 1 1/2" 3/4"

(OO

a/a"

«£/ . / /^v

NO. 4

Wi<r)#3 '

w x >

SAMPLE WEIGHTS "WET - »RY- ••-•* ; - < '-J • ¥

T O T A L - d, / ,A ,,SAUPI e *£/HA H

RETAINED "'- tji —ON NO. 4 • W'3

PASSING /A£> f"NO. 4 /*7»V <^

RUN BY_

SIEVE

NO.

8 (10)

16

30 (40)

50

100

200

PAN

T O T A L

OieVC AMU MTUMUMCICM ANAL T 010 <5|(rV|Nr, TIUP

WEIGHT

RETAINED

b SI

"1.7.4

)^.>^

I4=.1«fe

?>-l \T5

bQ C%-40-^r^

WEIGHT

PASSING

X OFTOTAL

PASSING

71 \

71 'Inl ',

3^J/ZZ-',l°l '

—

FACTOR r -&S- =W

L(&>3 . .


DISH NO.

WT.WETSOC.ANDCNSH

WT. DRY SOL AND D6H

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

•4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

CL-?Ty»>?? 4 /

4^_J '

«=»l.~\ "

= W

IZ.tf

HYGRO.MOISTURE

u -i >rI-1 7

'T^. 3*l<*t*tl

— ~v

j0,31'

HYDRO.SAMPLE

ST?'?^

/5~at4

RUN RY HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

CYLl-NDEP. NO, 3 CPCOIS

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

f' 49

g. &

ff.S??, *n1. 10&f C f

L4 ^^ ^f

ic,3*>

o. Atrr>n-v^ O A T P /^ •

1C GRA\/1TYV r •JJ AMOUNT _L<

DISPERSIN

Z'S* n

TEST TIME

START MIX

STOP MIX

P f min

1.0 min

4.0 m(n

1 9 min

60 min

7h IS min

2 5h 45 min

TEMP.C*

20 .O

2.0. 0

2.0<o2.0-0

-L\ ^

L\ O

GRAVE!, / 7 ' % S A N C

HYD.READ

/ £> • °

/•V. &/3 ,o

/ / / 0

^ 0

i 9, h<j

HYD.»CORR

$.<'

"

£.-(.'

>•

X '

fiiSfi

,

CLAY-SLn

II

o

^

FA

CT

OR

}C

C

OR

RE

CT

ED

R

EA

t

X

OF

T

OT

AL P

AS

SIN

G

r ff

*$W$L

/

n '14- ^/2>/°i ' ,£"/3'x

G A O E - T •* '/*A/APo ^it DATE

PARTICLEDIAMETER

0.050 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

CALIB

V

STORAGE LOCATION

COMtCCTIOM

L-4 cs-853

TCH^ HCH

DATE IN:

LOCATION:

, AMD DCPIOOULCKT

SUPERVISOR:

HYDROMETER CAUTION: HAZARDOUGRADATION ANALYS.SUM

MATE[I,A^N USEWORKSHEET

JOB M O . L - . P A P T

JOB MAUP

PREP.

CALC.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION'. e-.r.

RUN BY. SAMPLE PREPERATION SIEVING TME

SIEVE SIZEOF PAN AND SAMPLE

WT. OF PAN

DRY WT. RETAINED —- -IIBT ,TT 1 1 1 I 1 m»

X OF T O T A L PASSING

~^>S~ y.

- — '

3" 1 1/2" a/4"

/OO

a/a"

IH « / .C\^"

W X r

NO. 4

«"f // '**{/

7*?'

SAMPLE WEIGHTS

WET ORY

T O T A L "• - '•l/.-t/r*

RETAINED -fi i.ON NO. 4 * • /-jf

PASSING « -,/ /NO. 4 . *(/ ff^'l

RUN BYSIEVE

NO.

8 (10)

16

30 (40)

SO

100

200

PAN

T O T A L


WEIGHTRETAINED

*=» Â

C\ 04

\4 v^3

7.ta^4.

SfeQ9s

^Qnn

WEIGHTPASSING

X OFTOTAL

PASSING

7 / 7

l^ ',57/^9/

— * / /j*J

> 7 J

FACTOR = %£• =W

/•5~106>C?'


DISH NO.

WT. WET SOL AND DGH

WT. DRY SOL AM) DGH

WT. DISH

WT. OF DRY SOIL

X MOISTURE

• 4MATERIAL

-4MATERIAL

r\-\rv4<iPîflpTT^^r^^

•>2. b-: w

£.f-r

HYGRO.'MOISTURE

L— -4v^77.i2-ZU.SQ- m«*7

I

1.2$

HYDRO.SAMPLE

SD,tb

!

&'12.

R(.N SY HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

CYLINDER NO. Z- c»e,-.«

DISH N

CLOCKTIME

g.4^

#. iV6

.?.iV7

f. 50

9-0£

^.^T4 -02.ID,^

n ^K-VX.VSX PATP IT,'1C GRA\i JJ.J^

/ITY

? AMOUNT

DISPERSIN1 2 n

TEST TIME

"START MIX

STOP MIX

1.0 mtn

4.0 min

1 9 min

60 min

7h 15 min

25h 45 min

TEMP.C'

-

20-*

20.0

20,0

2 0 > r

11 O

IV D

HYD.READ

AS~oILI*0

/2..0

Hi0

Q Oa Q

HYD.*COflfl

/

5,5'

w* ' /

' •

SiSS ..

FA

CT

OR

x

CO

RR

EC

TE

D R

EA

DIN

G

X O

F T

OT

AL

PA

SS

ING

*PCASSOT3AL

/£"'/'-Z '

10 ',°l J,(ft" i4- '

fiPAVFL x^ / * ÂNH 62^ X >.1AV.<?LIT ^"7 «X

G A & £ N T « X^^ flf/j j ^ S

ii D A T EPARTICLEOIAMETER

0.0 50 mm

0.037 mm

0.019 mm

0.009 mm

0.005 mm

0.002 mm

0.001 mm

TAI IR

STORAGE LOCATION

COMVCT1OM MCNQKM, «MO OCn.OCUXHT

DATE IN: SUPERVISOR:

ana associates, me.

ATTERBERG LIMITS: WORKSHEET '*& -A<

LCUDLMT. a

PLASTC LMTT. PL

tcex PI

30 40 50 60 80 TOO

*• NO.OFBLOWS.N

i -CAUTION: HAZARDOUS

MATERIAL IN USE

10

PLASTIC LJMTT DETERMMATION

TRAY LOCATDN

DBHNa

WT.OFWETSCLiD&l

WT. OF DRY SOL & D6H .

WT.OFD&I ' : ' • . - • . - • ' . -

WT.OFWATS1 v 7 ' '"'-•' ^ -r"' -

WATEROOVTWr.^-?!. , -V* --••'- ..'

«, ^.^--

• - - -•*»

.. rr<>'.-

v US*- ^'^-:

rr— - - .%.. - -iv,. ' '-*.

. — - .

-

>-- ••V'U--

•^ -!

* • • ' " •

cnen ana associates, inc.ATTERBERG LIMITS

WORKSHEET

r-^eeff*

UOLCLjVfT. LL

.PL

PLASTICITY M3EX PI

*- Na OF BLOWS. N

CAUTION: HAZARDOUSMATERIAL IN USE

10

PLASTIC UMTT DETERMWATION

LOCATON

D6HNO. 7%WT. OF WET SOL 4 D6H

WT. OF DRY SOL & OBH

WT.OFD8H 10 -WT. OF WATER

WATEiR CONTB/r X - Pi.'

^nen ana associates, inc.

ATTERBERG LIMITSWORKSHEET

PART NO.

DEPTH

UQUD UMTT DETERMINATION

61

/hrihA '

CALC. BY_ BY.

SAMPLE NO.^

LJOLCLMT.LL

PLASTCLWT.PL

PLASnCtTY rOEX PI

~< . L,


15 20 3D 4 0 5 0 6 0-•• NQ OF BLOWS. N

80100

PLASTC LJMfT DETERMWATION

TRAY LOCATON

DBH NO.

WT.OFWETSOL4DSH

WT. OF DRY SOL & DBH %„.

WT.OFDSH : . 4-'- -

WT.OFWAT& -ll%_.

WATEPCONTBfl' X-PL • ..

- - .; •-* • • • •

Objjl.AZ•l-\ >$7IV .71

— . V,

( 4 - - 0 •/

^•c?2 / . g ?^5 ,&-^

IL^fe-, . •-."»"«•

\4»O/— •

• • • • - -': ' "

^

•-•: . .V"

• •

""^SV«— *T J-

.-^•c-:-..•.: .._

i B^T_r> -'

i52tV-*''?>*-

ana associates, me.ATTERBERG LIMITS

/

JOB NO. PART NO. .PREP./RUN BY..CALC. BY_

DATE.BY.

i-fib

HOLE. DEPTH\ W v

SAMPLE NO.c^V

LJOUD UMfT DETERMINATION

JTRAY LOCATON

0<SHNO,._ - ;'

•WT.WETSCL4D8H

WT. DRY SOL 4 D.SH

WT. OF ;»

WT.OFWATB1

WT. OF DRY SOL

WATER CONTEhrr. wX

NO.OFBLOWS.N

/ ) / /H

/l/-'rf

. L^--

•- •— "- • -*

.-.-*»»

! -A • *--5- -

LOUOLMT. LL

PLASTCLMT.PL

FLASTJCTTY hDEX PI


X) 15 20 . 3 0 40 50 60 80 WO

• • - ' -*• NO. OF BLOWS, N

PLASTIC UMTT DETERMtUTION

TRAY LOCATON

D6HNO.

WT. OF WET SOL 4 DBH

WT. OF DRY SOL & DCSH

WT.OFD6H

WT. OF WATW

WATS? OONTBff X - Pi.


WORKSHEET

t-A^t z.JOB NO. (-4JOB NAME_£

PART NO. .PREP.CALC. BY.

BY. /2.-/Q-9*

BY.

HOLE_kafcL^DESCRJPTION

UOUD LJMTT DETERMtUTION

.TRAY LOCATON

D6HNO.

WT. WET SOL 4 DBH

WT. DRY SOL 4 DBH

WT. OF DBH

WT. OF WATB\

WT. OF DRY SOL

WATER CONTENT, wX

NO. OFBLOWS.N

l\ J P> /IV , r, L,

1.

,

1

. 1 . 1 T

| ~

• i ' i1 1 •

! i i

: i

1;"I I I !

i1IT

i i !

1 '

' ' i '

1i ; '

1 i

| '

l 1 . j

a*.

III

' ' '

, I •

,

' '! ' •rU

t

r*s T^V' \v^ .f* TJ 1 \ ^T

I n jTl I lutT I I

pi Acrjr1 i tjtr n

, .-- -v -^ ^"\ t

C A 1 i ^™ .""* • • — -. . t-^ 'f* J '

—4 1 J i w^ • - • ' *f V — * • ' ^ f . • |

M r V - A ' .i^l Ubivlr*. t fc-^i^*- u *

10 15 20 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0

NO. OF BLOWS, N

PLASTIC UMTT DETERMWATK5N

TRAY LOCATON

DBH NO.

WT. OF WET SOL & DBH

WT. OF DRY SOL 4 DBH

WT.OFDBH

WT. OF WATER

WATER CONTBYT.wX - PL,


WORKSHEET

rfib

LJQUD LJMfT DETERMMATION

.TRAY LOCATON

DBH NO.

WT. WET SOL 4 DBH

WT. DRY SOL 4 DBH

WT. OFOBH

WT. OF WATB^

WT. OF DRY SOL

WAT51 CONTENT, wX

NO. OF 9LOWS.N

A / n\\<r*'

ir —

__

LJOUDLMT. LL

FLASTC LMT. PI.

FLASncrTY hOEX, PI

CAUTlCr!: HAZMKDOUSMATERIAL IN USE

10 15 20 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0

NO. OF BLOWS, N

8 0 1 0 0

PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATION

TRAY LOCATON

06HNO.

WT. OF WET SOL 4 DBH

WT. OF DRY SOL 4 DBH

WT.OFDBH

WT. OF WATER

WATER CONT9fl>X - Pi.

technical memo re: round 1 analytical results & data … · by ch2m hill, are incorporated into...

Documents