technical challenges and concerns s. sharma and r. alforque, r. beuman, c. foerster, e. haas, e. hu,...

17
Technical Challenges and Concerns S. Sharma and R. Alforque, R. Beuman, C. Foerster, E. Haas, E. Hu, P. Montanez, P. Mortazavi, S. Pjerov, J. Skaritka, C. Stelmach NSLS-II

Upload: morgan-conley

Post on 02-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Technical Challenges and Concerns

S. Sharma

and

R. Alforque, R. Beuman, C. Foerster, E. Haas, E. Hu, P. Montanez, P. Mortazavi, S. Pjerov, J. Skaritka, C. Stelmach

NSLS-II

Main Technical Concerns

1. Machine Specifications and Tolerances

•Magnetic field quality•Alignment of the SR magnets•Vibration and thermal stability

2. Damping Wigglers

• High power density beam with a large fan

3. Cryogenic Permanent Magnet Undulators (CPMUs)

• Field measurement• Precise gap separation and thermal stability• Vacuum and impedance issues

1. Machine Specifications and Tolerances

SR sextupole alignment tolerance: 30 - 40 μm (2-σ cut)

BPM position stability (thermal): ± 1 μm

Magnet position stability (thermal + vibration): 100 nm (rms, 4 – 50 Hz)

NSLS-II SR Magnet

Magnet Gap

Max. Field (@ 3.6 GeV)

Field Homogeneity

Good Field Region

Dipole 35 mm 0.393 T 2 x10-4 20mm x 10mm

Quadrupole 55 mm 25.0 T/m 2 x10-4 40mm x 20mm

Sextupole 60 mm 800 T/m2 5 x10-4 40mm x 20mm

Magnetic Field Quality

Preliminary designs of the magnets are underway. Magnet vendors will be consulted about the final designs and tolerances.

Magnet Alignment

Very stiff girder with precisely machined slots for the magnet’s support frame.

Adjustable magnet support frame to precisely align magnetic axis to a fixed height. Magnets are directly bolted to the girder without shims or alignment hardware.

Six or more support points for the girder to minimize static deflection

Australian Girder-Magnet Assembly

SPring-8 Girder-Magnet Assembly

Magnet Vibration due to Ambient Ground Motion

Ambient ground motion drops steeply as 1/ω4

No significant vibration amplification for ω/ωn << 1

First natural frequency of the girder-magnet assembly should be above 30 Hz.

Magnet Vibration

Low profile girder beam height of ~ 1m

No pedestals under the girder.

Several (6 or more) girder support points

Simple girder alignment mechanism

No alignment mechanisms between the girder and magnets.

ALBA Girder-Magnet Assembly

Support Concept

f1 = 57 Hz

APS Girder

NSLS-II SR and Booster Rings

Low profile booster and SR rings. The floor drops in the experimental hall by 0.4m to provide a beam height of 1.4 m.

Deep commercial anchors are cast in concrete eliminating the need for pedestals or grouting.

Thermal Stability

• Air and process water temperature regulation: ± 0.1 ºC

• If necessary SR girders can be insulated and sand-filled.

Thermally-Insulated NSRRC Girder

Thermal Insulation

Sand

NSLS-II Damping WigglersNSLS-II Damping Wiggler

Period (mm) 100

Length (m) 6

No. of Periods 60

Field (T) 1.8

Ptotal (kW) 79.7

Pd (kW/mrad2) 98.3

Pv (kW/mrad) 18.8

Horizontal Fan ± K/ γ (mrad)

± 2.45

At 7m from the center of the wiggler, the fan is ~ 34 mm.Incidence power density at 0.6 mrad incidence = ~ 1.6 W/mm

Aluminum chamber will require additional cooling channels.

Dipole Chamber

7m

Cooling Channel

Beam position interlock will be required to protect the chamber.

Incidence power density at 10 m and at 1.5 degree incidence = ~ 50 W/mm. A Glidcop fixed mask can handle this power density.

10 GPM water flow ΔT ~ 30 ºC

NSLS-II Damping Wigglers – Fixed Mask

APS quad with exit port

Wiggler

Gildcop Mask ~ 25 cm long

Thermal FatigueTests at APS (26-ID Beamline)

Beam

StepperMotor

GlidcopSamples

Cooling Tubes

Beam

StepperMotor

GlidcopSamples

Cooling Tubes

Realistic design criteria will be established based on thermal fatigue tests at APS.

Designs of high-heat-load absorbers and photon shutters will be optimized.

NSLS-II CPMU – Technical Challenges

Magnetic Measurements of long small gap, UHV compatible undulators

Precision control of the Undulator gap

Effects of external environmental conditions on undulator gap control, energy and pointing stability.

Temperature/Magnetic uniformity along magnet arrays

Vacuum, Impedance, and beam dynamics issues associated with variable magnet gap to beam tube transitions and large chambers.

3-Meter In-vacuum CPMU based on X-25 Undulator Design

NSLS X-25 Undulator

We can extend experience gained from the Cryo-ready in-vacuum Undulator recently installed at X-25 to design the NSLSII CPMU’s.

A long modern measurements bench and pulsed wire system in temperature-controlled clean room environment will be used for measurements and shimming.

Concept for NSLS-II

Concept of an In-vacuum Cold Mapper for NSLSII CPMU’s

In-vacuum Mapper with Hall probe in fully opened magnet gap

Mapper mounted on custom flange cover.

• Optical Micrometers will directly measure the Cold Magnet Gap to sub-micron accuracy

Precision Gap Control in CPMU

• Measurement accuracy of ±1μm and resolution of ±0.1μm.

• Studies are currently underway to study the effects of environmental factors.

• Temperature feedback control may be implemented to the external Undulator structure

Undulator Impedance Issues

• Detailed modeling of the X-25 and NSLS II undulator cavities will be performed.

• If problems are observed during commissioning a feed back system will be implemented.

• Undulator transition impedances will be studied and low impedance transition designs will be implemented

Summary

There are concerns regarding machine tolerances, damping wigglers and

CPMUs. The important technical issues are well known and are being

addressed.