team2_incep_presentation
TRANSCRIPT
Interplanetary Comet Exploration Probe (INCEP)
A flyby mission of the comet 209P/LINEAR
Tanish HimaniMark Mote
Matthew OwczarskiSwapnil Pujari
Advisors:Dr. Brian Gunter
Byron DavisMichael Herman
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
Motivation
2
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
209P/LINEAR Specifications
3Position of 209P/LINEAR on July 7th 2019
• The Jupiter Family Comet 209P/LINEAR was discovered in by the Lincoln Near Earth Asteroid research project in May 2004• In May 2014 the comet made a close pass of 8.3 million km• Monitoring of the comet revealed the lowest perihelion dust production of any comet on record, indicating that the comet is currently transitioning to an extinct phase• In July of 2019 the comet once again crosses the ecliptic at a distance of ~1AU presenting the opportunity for a flyby at a relatively low Δv
Dimensions of Nucleus 2.4 x 3 km (third dimension unknown)
Rotation Rate est. 11, 22 hrs
Inclination 21.243 degPeriod 5.09 yr
Eccentricity 0.67258
Perihelion Distance 0.9695 AU
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
Mission Objectives
4
Mission StatementProgram INCEP will investigate the composition and structure of comet 209P/Linear through the use of optical imaging and infrared spectroscopy. The data will be analyzed in order to develop a better understanding of how presolar processes helped to shape bodies in the early solar system.
MO Mission ObjectivesMO-1 The cubesat shall perform a flyby maneuver with comet 209P/LINEAR.
MO-2 The cubesat shall acquire optical and spectroscopic imaging on the comet during flyby.
MO-3 The gravitational disturbances on the cubesat’s orbit shall be calculated to estimate the mass of comet 209P/Linear
MO-4 The cubesat shall utilize onboard processing and telecommunications hardware to relay this data to a ground station on Earth
MDC Mission Success Criteria Source Minimum Full
MSC-1 The cubesat shall have a flyby distance of 500 km with the comet 209P/LINEAR MO-1
MSC-1.1 The cubesat shall have a flyby distance of 250 km with the comet 209P/LINEAR MO-1
MSC-2 The spectrometer payload shall be pointed to within 0.15 degrees of the comet during flyby MO-2
MSC-3 The spectrometer payload shall obtain detect chemical species on the surface of the nucleus of 209P/LINEAR MO-2
MSC-3.1Within the specified spectroscopy range, data collected must be absorption and emission spectra of H20 ice at 1800 and 1380 nm wavelengths
MO-2
MSC-4 The camera payload must capture one image every minute during the total flyby period. MO-2
MSC-5 No more than a 10% data loss shall occur in the received signal MO-4
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
5
Mission Overview
X-band transmission.
7
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
6
Program SchedulePhase 1: Concept Development (10%
Margin)Preliminary Studies on NASA Science
Goals
Determine Science Goal of Project
Create Mission Statement
Determine Mission Requirements
Phase 2: Preliminary Design (20% Margin)
Develop Budget and Management Plan
Perform Architecture Trade Studies
Develop System Level Requirements
Phase 3: Final Design (15% Margin)
Choose Final System Architecture
Choose Final Sub-System Architectures
Purchase S/C Bus Components and Payload
Phase 4: System Assembly, Integration & Testing (25% Margin)
Software Development
Software and Hardware Integration
Integration Testing
Phase 5: Launch (50% Margin)
Prepare for Launch Opportunity
Integration Into Launch Vehicle and Launch
Phase 6: Operations and Sustainment (5%)
Perform Health Checks
Perform delta-V maneuver (Propulsion Mode)
Enter Science Mode
Transmit Science Data to Ground Station
Phase 7: Closeout (50%)
Storage and Analysis of All Data
Project PhaseYear 1 Year 2
Q4Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
7
Trajectory
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
8
Trajectory
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
9
Trajectory
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
10
INCEP Breakdown
Propulsion
StructureEPS
C&DH
Payload
EPS
Telecom
Payload
ADCSTelecom
Propulsion
Thermal & Radiation
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
11
Component ListSubsystem Component Name QuantityStructures ISIS 6-Unit CubeSat structure 1
EPS
Clyde Space 3G FLEX EPS 1CS 30 Whr Battery 1
CS Deployable Double Sided 6U Panels 4CS 6U Body FixedSolar Panels 1
Thermal & Shielding MLI Blankets 1
Propulsion
Busek 3cm RF Ion Thruster 1Electric Propellant 1Liquid Propellant 1
MPS-120 1ADCS BCT-XACT Module 1
TelecomIRIS X-Band Transponder 1
AntDevCo X-Band Patch Antennas 1C&DH Tyvak Intrepid System Board Computer 1
PayloadArgus 1000 SK Spectrometer 1
NanoCam C1U Camera (50 mm lens) 1
Radiation Shielding Lead radiation shielding 1
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
12
PropulsionPropulsion
Type Component Name Application Delta V (km/s) Margin Total Delta V (km/s)
Electric Propulsion
Busek 3cm RF Ion Thruster BIT-3
Transit2.02998 25% 2.537475
Station Keeping
Liquid Propulsion
Aerojet MPS-120 CHAMPS
Science Maneuvers 0.017 15% 0.01955
Emergency Thrust 0.034 15% 0.0391Desaturation of reaction wheels 0.017 15% 0.01955
Total Delta V Required - Electric
(km/s)2.537475
Total Delta V Required - Liquid
(km/s)0.0782
Total Mass of Propellant (kg) 1.509315746
Burn time (days) 319.7606526Burn Time Margin
(%) 3.102832556
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
13
Science Instruments
Mission Statement Science Goals Science
RequirementsMeasurement Requirements
Instrument Functional
Requirements
"...develop a better
understanding of how presolar
processes helped to shape bodies in
the early solar system"
Understand cometary lifecycle
through the study of a “dying” comet
Precise determination of rotation rate
Ability to acquire images at at least twice the minimum estimated
rotation rate of 209P/LINEAR
Minimum image acquisition rate of 0.18 observations per hour
Characterization of surface topology
through identification of craters, gas jets, and
other natural morphological features
Ability to acquire high resolution images of the
comets surface
Minimum Spatial Resolution better than 20 m/pixel at chosen
flyby distance
Improve understanding of
volatile composition of Jupiter family
comets
Determination of ice grain presence in the near nucleus coma. Ability to detect spectral
identification bands of water ice
Spectrographic detection of 1800 and 1380 nm wavelengths
Determination of ice presence on surface
Spectrographic resolution of less than
13.8 nm
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
14
Science Instruments Argus 1000 SK (Infrared Spectrometer)
• Operation Band: 1000-2400 nm– Capable of detection of H20, C2, N2+, NH3, CH4…
• Spectral Resolution: 6 nm• Mass: 0.23 kg• Dimensions: 45 x 50 x 80 mm
NanoCam C1U 50mm (Camera System)
• Operation Band: 400-1000 nm • Image acquisition rate: 37.9 /hr• Spatial Resolution: 14.1 m/pixel
• 50 mm lens• 225 km flyby distance
• Mass: 0.17 kg• Dimensions: 45 x 50 x 80 mm
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
15
ADCS and Telecommunications
IRIS Transponder (NASA JPL):
– X-Band (Rx/Tx)– BPSK Modulation
AntDevCo X-Band Patch Antenna
– 16 dB Gain– DSN Compatible
BCT XACT• Slew rate: >=10 deg/sec
– Maximum required angular rate: 4.2 deg/s
DSN
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
16
Power
Clyde Space FLEX EPS
Clyde Space 30 Whr Battery
Clyde Space 6U Double Deployed 2-Sided Solar Panels- 18 cells per side- 90 cells for 5 panels (single side)
EPS
Clyde Space 3G FLEX EPS 1CS 30 Whr Battery 1CS Deployable Double Sided 6U Panels 4
CS 6U Body FixedSolar Panels 1
Power Generated (Worst-case):- 5° Angle -> 86 W- 45° Angle -> 61 W
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
17
Mass Budget and TRLSubsystem Component Name Quantity Mass (g) Contingency Total Mass (g) TRLStructures ISIS 6-Unit CubeSat structure 1 1100 10% 1210 7
EPS
Clyde Space 3G FLEX EPS 1 150 10% 165 9CS 30 Whr Battery 1 260 10% 286 9CS Deployable Double Sided 6U Panels 4 290 20% 1392 9CS 6U Body FixedSolar Panels 1 290 10% 319 9
Thermal & Shielding MLI Blankets 1 100 20% 120 9
Propulsion
Busek 3cm RF Ion Thruster 1 1550 15% 1782.5 5Electric Propellant 1 1184 20% 1420.8 7Liquid Propellant 1 300 10% 330 7MPS-120 1 1300 10% 1430 6
ADCS BCT-XACT Module 1 850 10% 935 6
TelecomIRIS X-Band Transponder 1 400 10% 440 6AntDevCo X-Band Patch Antennas 1 300 10% 330 7
C&DH Tyvak Intrepid System Board Computer 1 55 10% 60.5 8
PayloadArgus 1000 SK Spectrometer 1 230 10% 253 9
NanoCam C1U Camera (50 mm lens) 1 170 20% 204 6
Radiation Shielding Lead radiation shielding 1 1400 5% 1470 9
Total Dry Mass 10727Total Wet Mass 12147.8
Total Allowed Mass 14000Margin 13%
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
18
Power BudgetSubsystem Component
Name Quantity Continegency (%) Safe Mode Duty Cycle
Maneuvering Duty Cycle
Science Duty Cycle
Transmission Duty Cycle
Safe Mode Power Draw
(mW)
Maneuvering Power Draw
(mW)
Science Power Draw
(mW)
Transmission Power
Draw (mW)
EPS
Clyde Space 3G FLEX EPS 100.00% 5.00% 1 1 1 1 157.5 157.5 157.5 157.5
CS 30 Whr Battery 100.00% 5.00% 1 1 1 1 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5
Propulsion
BUSEK 3m RF Ion
Thruster100.00% 15.00% 0 1 0 0 0 69000 0 0
MPS-120 100.00% 15.00% 0 0.1 0.25 0.1 0 287.5 718.75 287.5
ADCS BCT-XACT Module 100.00% 10.00% 0.4 1 1 0.7 1245.2 3113 3113 2179.1
Telecom
IRIS X-Band Transponde
r (RX)100.00% 10.00% 0.2 1 1 1 1408 7040 7040 7040
IRIS X-Band Transponde
r (TX)100.00% 10.00% 0.05 0.1 1 1 349.25 698.5 6985 6985
AntDevCo X-Band Patch
Antennas100.00% 10.00% 0.05 0.1 0.5 1 1375 2750 13750 27500
C&DH Tyvak Computer 100.00% 10.00% 1 1 1 1 550 550 550 550
Payload
Argus 1000 Infrared
Spectrometer
100.00% 15.00% 0 0 1 0 0 0 2525.4 0
NanoCam C1U 100.00% 15.00% 0 0 1 0 0 0 741.75 0
Total (W) 5.13745 83.649 35.6339 44.7516
Margin 1586.22% 3.56% 72.56% 37.40%
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
19
Link and Data Volume Budget
Data Volume Analysis Units Downlink Uplink
Data Rate kbps 13.26 259.87
Data TX Requirement Mbyte 97.60 5.00
Transmission Timesec 58863.58 153.92
hrs 16.35 0.04
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
20
Thermal CalculationsComponent Energy (W)
Solar Input 1360 (1/m2)
Solar Input (30% Area Incident) 109.2819927
Solar Input (40% Area Incident) 145.6579535
INCEP during propulsion 83.649
INCEP during safe mode 5.13745
INCEP during trans mode 44.7516
Qin,total (prop) 170.1309927
Qin,total (safe) 114.4194427
Qin,total (trans) 154.0335927
Mode Temperature (C)
Propulsion 20.28514967
Safe -7.419603697
Transmission 13.0832871
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
21
Cost EstimateItem Quantity Cost per unit Contingency Total cost after margin
CubeSat Components (contingency accounted for) 1 $1,499,400.66 -- $1,499,400.66
DSN data transmission after flyby (using DSN 70m
stations)1 $82,958.40 15% $95,402.16
DSN station-keeping (weekly updates at 1 hour each, using 34m HSB station)
48 $845.60 15% $46,677.12
One Principal Investigator (Assistant Professor) - one
year4 $10,000.00 25% $50,000.00
Two Project Managers (Grad Students) - one year 4 $40,000.00 25% $200,000.00
Spacecraft Integration, Assembly, and Testing 1 $185,925.68 30% $241,703.39
Online telescope rental (180 hours per year) 4 $4,500.00 20% $21,600.00
Total Mission Cost $2,154,783.33
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
22
Cost Estimate
70%
4%
2%
2%
9%
11%1%
INCEP Cost Breakdown
CubeSat ComponentsDSN Data TransmissionDSN Station-KeepingPrincipal InvestigatorProject ManagersIntegration, Assembly, and TestingTelescope Rental
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
23
Risk Management
RN Risk Mitigation
1 Trajectory Deviation
High precision navigation determination
High precision comet tracking
Secondary Thruster2 Camera System Failure Approach images taken
3 Radiation Damage Radiation ShieldingComponent Placement
4 Cometary Debris Damage Flyby Location
5 Propulsion Unit Failure (TRL5) N/A
6 Reaction Wheel Failure Liquid Thruster
5
4
3 6 3,4
2 1 2 5
1
1 2 3 4 5
Impact
Likelihood
5
4 6 3,4
3 1 2
2 5
1
1 2 3 4 5
Likelihood
Impact
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
24
Summary• INCEP plans to study 209P/LINEAR to better
understand how pre-solar processes helped to shape bodies in the early solar system
• High scientific value
• Cost is far under budget of similar missions and NASA request for proposal
• High margins for all phases and components of the mission
Questions?
Backup Slides
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
27
Link BudgetComet Telecom Link Budget Symbol: Units: Cubesat -> Earth (Downlink) Earth -> Cubesat (Uplink)
Item: f GHz Telemetry and Data: Telemetry and Data:Frequency f Hz 8.45 7.15Frequency P Watts 8450000000 7150000000
Transmitter Power (RF Output Transmit Power) P dBW 10 20000
Transmitter Power (RF Output Transmit Power) Ll dB 10 43.01029996
Transmitter Line Loss Gt dBi 0 0Transmitter Antenna Gain EIRP dBW 16.5 67
Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power S m 26.5 110.0103Propagation Path Length c m/s 99607000000 99607000000
Speed of Light Ls dB 300000000 300000000Free Space Path Loss La dB -270.9446962 -269.4936829
Propagation and Polarization Loss Lpr dB -1 -2Receive Antenna Pointing Loss Gr dBi -0.2 -2
Receive Antenna Gain Ts K 74.4 16System Noise Temperature Ts dBK 20.6 250System Noise Temperature R bps 13.1386722 23.97940009
Data Rate 13264.56928 259867.3358Symbols per Byte Eb/No dB 2 2
Eb/No C/No dB-Hz 6 6Carrier-to-Noise Density Ratio Req Eb/No dB 44.21663157 57.13721698
Required Eb/No dB 2 2Implementation Loss (estimate) dB -1 -1
Margin dB 3 3
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
28
Work Breakdown Schedule
Motivation/Background
Overview
Flight System/Components
Technical Resource Budgets
Summary
29
Descope Options
Option ImpactMass Saved
(kg)Cost Saved
($K)Volume
Saved (U)Power Saved
(W)Switch
Battery from 30 W-hr to
10 W-hrMinimal 0.1 0.5 0 0.01
Removal of Camera Payload
Moderate 0.204 13.57 0.9 0.66
Removal of MPS-120 (Liquid
Propulsion)Major 1.76 150 1 4