teaching students how to evaluate calculation results james hanson, ph.d, pe rose-hulman institute...
TRANSCRIPT
Teaching Students Teaching Students How to Evaluate How to Evaluate
Calculation ResultsCalculation Results
James Hanson, Ph.D, PERose-Hulman Institute of Technology
ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section ConferenceMarch 27, 2009
OverviewOverview• Motivation• How evaluation is done• How to teach it• Reinforcing it in HW• How well it works
MotivationMotivation• Not in textbooks• Reliance on computers• Experience is retiring!
How Evaluation is DoneHow Evaluation is Done
• Interview 35 practitioners• Ten firms• Experience: 1-55 years
Study PerformedStudy Performed
How Evaluation is DoneHow Evaluation is Done
• Fundamental Principles• Approximations• Features of the Solution
Categories of Evaluation Tools Categories of Evaluation Tools for Analysis Resultsfor Analysis Results
How to Teach ItHow to Teach It
• Structural Engineering• Electrical Engineering• Other Examples
Fundamental PrinciplesFundamental Principles(for Structural Engineering)(for Structural Engineering)
• Statics– Equilibrium always
• Mechanics of Materials– Strain distribution– Stiffness attracts load
Fundamental Principles Fundamental Principles ExampleExample
ApproximationsApproximations(for Structural Engineering)(for Structural Engineering)
• Simplify loading• Simplify geometry• Assume material behavior
Approximations ExampleApproximations Example
L/4 L/4 L/4L/4
P/3 P/3 P/3
Mmax = PL/6
Actual
L
= P/L
Mmax = PL/8
Approximate
Difference = – 25%
Features of the SolutionFeatures of the Solution(for Structural Engineering)(for Structural Engineering)
• Boundary conditions• Continuity• Fundamental principles
• Anticipate graphical features• Bound possible solution
To…
Use…
Features of Solution Features of Solution ExampleExample
C
T= – M
T
C= + M
+–M
Construct the moment diagram:
1. Sketch displaced shape
2. Deduce sign of moment from curvature
3. Construct diagram
Electrical Engineering Electrical Engineering ExamplesExamples
Fundamental Principles:Fundamental Principles:Circuit analysis governed by Ohm’s Law and Kirchoff’s
Current Law
Approximations:Approximations:DC circuit with capacity approximated as open circuitDC circuit with inductor approximated as a short
Features of the Answer:Features of the Answer:Ripples in frequency response of filter relates to order
of the filterThanks to Dr. Yoder, ECE Dept, RHIT
How to Teach ItHow to Teach It
• Fundamental Principles• Approximations• Features of the Solution
Other ExamplesOther Examples
How to Teach ItHow to Teach It
Def:Def: Sequence of steps followed by a person to monitor and improve that person’s own cognitive performance in an area
How:How: Set up student so intuition leads to wrong conclusion, then ask to reflect on why went wrong
MetacognitionMetacognition
MetacognitionMetacognition
(a)
(b)
Which way will right end deflect (up or down)?
a) Guess part of the solution (instructor choice)
b) Generate approximate solution (text prob?)
c) Use computer for solution
d) Identify expected features in computer solution
e) Verify fundamental principles in computer solution
a) Guess part of the solution (instructor choice)
b) Generate approximateapproximate solution (text prob?)
c) Use computer for solution
d) Identify expected featuresfeatures in computer solution
e) Verify fundamental principlesfundamental principles in computer solution
f) Make comprehensive argument that computer result is reasonable
g) Compare guess with solution and reflect on why similar/different
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HW
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
Problem Statement:An indeterminate beam experiences uniformly distributed load.
Objective:Find vertical reactions.
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
a) Guess the deflected shape
Not graded based on correctness, graded based on whether done
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
b) Generate approximate solution
Assumption: load carried by nearest support
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
c) Use computer for solution
Can use as “black box” if teaching how to evaluate results
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
d) Identify expected features in computer solution
• Displaced shape features• Internal force diagram features• Reaction directions
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
e) Verify fundamental principles in computer solution
Check equilibrium:
Fx = 0 Fy = 0 M = 0
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
f) Make comprehensive argument that computer results are reasonable
Features of Solution
Fundamental Principles
Approximate Result
√√
√
Reinforcing It in HWReinforcing It in HWExampleExample
g) Compare guess with solution and reflect on why similar/different
Graded based on candor and depth of reflection, not how similar or different
How Well It WorksHow Well It WorksAttitudeAttitude
Undergrads should be able to determine reasonableness of results
2004200520062007
Average
4 – Strongly Agree 1 – Strongly Disagree
YearStatement
30464229
n(ctrl)
2008
3.13.33.63.53.339
3.03.13.1
Metacognition improved performance in this course
20062007
3323
2008 32
How Well It Works How Well It Works BehaviorBehavior
AffirmativeYearStatement n
I use metacognition more now than before course
20062007
4230
2008
74%74%78%40
How Well It Works How Well It Works BehaviorBehavior
3.5
5 – Almost Always 1 – Never
AverageStatement n(Respond 1 yr after course)
I use fundamental principles, approx, and features of soln to evaluate in other areas of civil
2006 39
3.6I now use metacognition … than before the course
2006 39
5 – Much More 1 – Much Less
Correctly Identify Most Reasonable
How Well It Works How Well It Works CognitiveCognitive
Fall 2004 (Ctrl)Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007
Correctly Explain Why Reasonable
Term
34484430
n
Fall 2008 42
Structural Mechanics I Course (Required)
Practitioners
49%70%69%69%73%
72%
50%67%66%69%69%
92%8
Correctly Identify Most Reasonable
How Well It WorksHow Well It Works CognitiveCognitive
Winter 2004 (Ctrl)Winter 2005Winter 2006Winter 2007
Correctly Explain Why Reasonable
Term
99
1711
n
Winter 2008 16
Structural Mechanics II Course (Elective)
Practitioners
46%44%65%71%68%
58%
35%43%49%48%59%
65%8
SummarySummary• Evaluation of results can be taught• Fundamental principles,
approximations, features of the solution
• Metacognition might help
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
ARCHITECTS•ENGINEERSARCHITECTS•ENGINEERSE N G I N E E R I N GE N G I N E E R I N G
ENGINEERS + CONSULTANTSENGINEERS + CONSULTANTS
Participating Firms
SponsorGrant: DUE-0341212
Questions or comments: [email protected]
Center for Structural Engineering Educationhttp://www.rose-hulman.edu/csee