teacher effectiveness system in act 82 of 2012€¦ · teacher effectiveness system in act 82 of...
TRANSCRIPT
Building Level Data, 15%
Teacher Specific Data, 15%
Elective Data, 20%
Observation/ Evidence,
50%
Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains 1. Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement
Teacher Specific Data PVAAS / Growth
Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements
Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012
1
Building Level Data, 15%
Observation/ Evidence,
50%
Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains 1. Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement
Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local
Elective Data, 35%
2
Practicing the Art of Teaching
Danielson Framework for
Teaching
Curriculum
Instruction
Assessment
Data Analysis
Domain I: Planning & Preparation
Domain II: Classroom Environment
Domain III: Instruction
Domain IV: Professional Practices
• New Blooms – H.O.T. Skills - Creativity
Domain 1 Planning and Preparation
“On-Stage Evidence”
Domain 2: The ClassroomEnvironment Domain 3: Instruction
Data Analysis Process
Step 1
Collect and chart data
Step 2
Analyze data and prioritize needs
Step 3
Set, review or revise
instructional goals based on
prioritized needs
Step 4
Select common instructional
and/or prioritized strategies
Step 5
Determine results indicators/
assessments
Step 6
Monitor and evaluate results
Students
Domain 4 ~ Professional Responsibilities
OBSERVATION ROTATION
• Danielson Model Observation
• Collaborative Initiatives
• Self Selected Initiative
Building Level Data, 15%
Teacher Specific Data, 15%
Elective Data, 20%
Observation/ Evidence,
50%
Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains 1. Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement
Teacher Specific Data PVAAS / Growth
Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements
Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012
8
Pennsylvania
School Performance
Profile
Purpose
Educator Effectiveness System Comparative Measures LEA Resource for Professional Development
Academic Performance Score
24 categories Equaling 100%
Academic Achievement Math – 7.5 (.075) x 77% = 5.78 Reading – 7.5 Science – 7.5 Writing – 7.5 Industry Cert Exams – 2.5 Grade 3 Reading – 2.5 SAT/ACT – 5.0 (1550 or higher)
Closing the Achievement Gap
All Group/Super Subgrp (ELL, ED, SPED) Math – 1.25 Reading – 1.25 Science – 1.25 Writing – 1.25 Equaling – 50%
District Math Example
77% 100%-77%=23% achievement gap Must close one-half of achievement gap over 6 years 11.5% over 6 years = avg. inc. of 2.3% each year Year 1 – 79.3% Year 2 – 81.6% Year 3 – 83.9% Year 4 – 86.2% Year 5 – 88.5% Year 6 – 90.8%
Academic Growth 0=75%/3max=100% No lower than 50% Math – 10 Reading - 10 Science - 10 Writing – 10 Equals – 40%
Other Academic Indicators *Graduation Rate – 2.5 (.025x99%=2.478) *Attendance – 2.5 *AP/IB Prog - 2.5 (offer get full)(AP scaled) *PSAT Participation – 2.5 (57% participate) Equaling – 10%
Extra Credit for Advanced Achievement 1% of each of the following (2 percent for AP) *Maximum 7 Points PSSA/Keytonse Exam Advanced Achievement Math – 77% x .01 = .77 of a pt. Reading Science Writing Industry Standards- Based Competency Assessments Advanced Placement – College Credit Equivalancy (Grade 12 Cohort Scoring 3 or higher)
100% Employed and Paying Taxes
Building Level Data, 15%
Teacher Specific Data, 15%
Elective Data, 20%
Observation/ Evidence,
50%
Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains 1. Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement
Teacher Specific Data PVAAS / Growth
Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements
Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012
19
PVAAS Analyses
PSSA Writing
PSSA Science
PSSA Reading
PSSA Math
LOOKING AHEAD
Planning for Students’ Needs:
Student Projections to Future Tests
LOOKING BACK
Evaluating Schooling Effectiveness:
Value Added & Diagnostic Reports
Keystones
What is PVAAS?
Purpose of PVAAS Teacher Reporting
•Provide a teacher specific growth measure to be used as part of Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness System
•Provide feedback to teachers regarding their influence on the academic growth of students
•Provide data for teachers and administrators to guide discussions about the academic progress of groups of students – Discussions between teachers
– Discussions between teachers and administrators
Achievement vs. Progress
Student Achievement: Where are we?
Student Progress: How far have we come?
By concentrating on the progress students make, PVAAS puts the emphasis on what
educators can influence!
PVAAS Teacher Reporting: When Is it Included in the
Educator Effectiveness System? • It is included when a teacher has a 3 year average.
• The 3 year average is a 3 year rolling average
PILOT: SY12-13
VA Report
SY13-14 VA Report
SY14-15 VA Report
SY15-16 VA Report
1st 3 Year Avg.
VA Report
When is PVAAS Roster Verification?
• April 29 – May 3: School Admin Preview/Pre-Step Week
Verification Windows: Open and Close Dates
Teachers: May 6 – May 17 School Admin: May 20 – May 31 Superintendent/Designee: June 3 - 7
Hard Deadlines
SY12-13 PVAAS PILOT 24
PVAAS Teacher Reporting: Which Tested Courses/Subjects?
• PSSA: With/Without Accommodations
– Grades 4-8: Reading and Math
– Grades 4 & 8: Science
– Grades 5 & 8: Writing
• Future: Transition into ELA Assessment
• Keystone Exams: With/Without Accommodations
– Algebra I
– Literature
– Biology
Teachers ONLY get reports for
subjects/grades/courses in which they provide
instruction - representing their
students
What is content-specific instruction?
• For the purpose of PVAAS teacher-specific reporting, content specific instruction occurs when a teacher has the responsibility to plan the instruction of the assessed eligible content, provide the instruction of the assessed eligible content, and use the assessment information to evaluate the effectiveness of the instruction of the assessed eligible content on a PA state assessment.
• Content specific instruction is defined on the Framework for Teaching by both Domains 1 and 3:
• Content specific instruction is a determination made locally by the LEA.
SY12-13 PVAAS PILOT 26
Building Level Data, 15%
Teacher Specific Data, 15%
Elective Data, 20%
Observation/ Evidence,
50%
Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains 1. Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities
Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement
Teacher Specific Data PVAAS / Growth
Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements
Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012
28
Building Level Data
15%
Correlation between
Teacher PVAAS scores and
Teacher Danielson
rating 15%
Elective Data/ SLOs
20%
Observation/ Evidence
50%
Observation/ Evidence Domains 1. Strategic/Cultural Leadership 2. Systems Leadership 3. Leadership for Learning 4. Professional and Community
Leadership
Building Level Data Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement
Correlation Data Based on Teacher Level Measures PVAAS
Elective Data/SLOs District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements
Principal Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012