tax issues in real estate partnerships: dealer vs

57
WHO TO CONTACT DURING THE LIVE PROGRAM For Additional Registrations: -Call Strafford Customer Service 1-800-926-7926 x1 (or 404-881-1141 x1) For Assistance During the Live Program: -On the web, use the Chat function to send a message If you get disconnected during the program, you can simply log in using your original instructions and PIN. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM This program is approved for 2 CPE credit hours. To earn credit you must: Participate in the program on your own computer connection (no sharing) – if you need to register additional people, please call customer service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1 (or 404-881-1141 ext. 1). Strafford accepts American Express, Visa, MasterCard, Discover. Listen on-line via your computer speakers. Respond to five prompts during the program plus a single verification code. To earn full credit, you must remain connected for the entire program. Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs. Investor Status, 163(j) Interest Limitations, Section 266 Election, 199A WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2021, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY

Upload: others

Post on 10-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

WHO TO CONTACT DURING THE LIVE PROGRAM

For Additional Registrations:

-Call Strafford Customer Service 1-800-926-7926 x1 (or 404-881-1141 x1)

For Assistance During the Live Program:

-On the web, use the Chat function to send a message

If you get disconnected during the program, you can simply log in using your original instructions and PIN.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM

This program is approved for 2 CPE credit hours. To earn credit you must:

• Participate in the program on your own computer connection (no sharing) – if you need to register

additional people, please call customer service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1 (or 404-881-1141 ext. 1).

Strafford accepts American Express, Visa, MasterCard, Discover.

• Listen on-line via your computer speakers.

• Respond to five prompts during the program plus a single verification code.

• To earn full credit, you must remain connected for the entire program.

Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs. Investor Status, 163(j) Interest Limitations, Section 266 Election, 199A

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2021, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern

FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY

Page 2: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY

Sound Quality

When listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality

of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet

connection.

If the sound quality is not satisfactory, please e-mail [email protected]

immediately so we can address the problem.

Page 3: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Recording our programs is not permitted. However, today's participants can

order a recorded version of this event at a special attendee price. Please call

Customer Service at 800-926-7926 ext.1 or visit Strafford’s website

at www.straffordpub.com.

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

Page 4: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

August 25, 2021

Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs. Investor Status, 163(j) Interest Limitations, Section 266 Election, 199A

Kimberly Arndt

Director, National Tax Services

PricewaterhouseCoopers

[email protected]

Adam S. Feuerstein

Principal, National Real Estate Tax Technical Leader

PricewaterhouseCoopers

[email protected]

Page 5: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Notice

ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY

THE SPEAKERS’ FIRMS TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY

OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT

MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR

RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.

You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons,

without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction

described in the associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to,

any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are

subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be

determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

Page 6: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships

Adam Feuerstein,PwC - National Real Estate TaxTechnical Leader

KimberlyArndt, PwC - Real Estate National Tax, Director

August 25, 2021

Page 7: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Agenda

2

01

02

03

Dealer Property

163(j) Interest Limitations

199A

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships

04 Carried Interests

05Qualified Opportunity Zones

Page 8: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Dealer Property

Page 9: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Implications of Dealer Property

• Implications of dealer property

- Gain on the sale of dealer property is treated as ordinary income.

- Tax Exempt Investors

◦ Gain on the sale from dealer property is treated as unrelated business taxable income for tax exempt investors.

- Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)

◦ Sale of dealer property is a prohibited transaction and subject to 100% tax on the gain on sale.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 9

Page 10: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Dealer Property

• Dealer property is property that is either:

- Inventory or

- Held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 10

Page 11: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Determination of Dealer Property

• Whether property is treated as dealer property or property held forinvestment is a facts and circumstances question.

- Highly litigated and based on case law.

- The law will be based in the circuit of the taxpayer's principal place of business.

• When property is acquired with multiple purposes in mind, dealer property held

"primarily for sale" means "principally" or "of first importance."

- Malat v. Riddell, 383 U.S. 569 (1966)

• Determination made on a property-by-property basis.

- A taxpayer can be a dealer with regard to one property even if it is not with

respect to other properties.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 11

Page 12: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Importance of Intent

• Focus on the intent of the taxpayer when determining dealer status.

- Intent at acquisition.

- Intent over the course of the holding period.

- Intent immediately before deciding to sell.

• Intent is typically subjective.

- Courts look at various objective factors to help assess the taxpayer's intent.

- Written documentation can assist with the objective considerations for intent.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 12

Page 13: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Factors to Consider

• Extent of improvements made (e.g., subdividing, developing).

- Development of the property.

- Significant improvements to the property.

- Platting or subdividing.

• Duration of ownership.

- Shorter hold period may indicate an intent to hold for sale.

- Longer hold period indicates intent to hold the property for investment.

- A change in circumstances may mitigate a short holding period.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 13

Page 14: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Factors (continued)

• Frequency, number, and continuity of sales.

- More frequent and high-volume sales, on a continuous basis may indicate

an intent to hold the property for sale.

• Nature and substantiality of transactions.

- The percent of income from the sale of the property over the total income.

- Basis of the property sold over the total basis of assets held.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 14

Page 15: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Factors (continued)

• Extent of advertising to promote sales.

- Advertising, marketing, and soliciting offers for the most profit may indicate

property is held for sale.

- Unsolicited offers may indicate that property is held for investment.

- Significant time and effort spent developing, marketing, and selling other properties may indicate intent to hold property for sale.

• Use of agents to sell property and control or supervision over the sale or effort

involved in the sale.

• Liquidation.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 15

Page 16: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

163(j)Interest

Limitations

Page 17: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Interest Expense Limitation Generally

• Generally business interest expenses paid or accrued in a tax year is deductible.

- Limitation applies at the entity level.

• Section 163(j) limits the deduction to the sum of:

- 30% of adjusted taxable income (ATI),

- Business interest income, and

- Floor plan financing interest.

• There is an exception for any real property trade or business.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 17

Page 18: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Electing Real Property Trade or Business

• Real Property Trade or Business ("RPTB")

- RPTB defined as a real property development, redevelopment, construction,

reconstruction, acquisition, conversion, rental, operation, management,

leasing, or brokerage trade or business.

- Notice 2020-59 provides a safe harbor for a qualified residential living facility

to be considered a RPTB.

• Irrevocable election made by the entity holding real property.

• Electing taxpayers are required to use the alternative depreciation system (ADS).

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 18

Page 19: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Partnership Applicationof 163(j)

• The partnership determines its 163(j) limitation.

• The excess business interest expense (EBIE) is the amount of disallowed business

interest expense with respect to a partnership for a taxable year.

- EBIE is allocated to the partners and carried forward indefinitely at the partner

level.

◦ EBIE can only be used to offset ATI from the partnership from which the

EBIE was derived.

- Deduction of EBIE allowed in a future year if there is excess taxable income

(ETI) or excess business interest income allocated to the partner from the

same partnership.

- Partner's basis in the partnership is reduced by the EBIE but not below zero.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 19

Page 20: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Partnership Applicationof 163(j) (continued)

• The excess taxable income (ETI) is the amount of excess capacity a

partnership has to deduct interest expense.

- ETI equals

ATI X 30% of ATI – (BII - BIE – Floor Plan Financing Interest Expense)

30% of ATI

• ATI is increased by a partner’s distributive share of ETI.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 20

Page 21: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Section 266

• The regulations under section 266 provide that a taxpayer can capitalize an

expense that is otherwise deductible under Subtitle A.

• The 266 election allows taxpayers to capitalize certain:

- Taxes

- Interest

◦ Interest on a loan for real property.

◦ Interest on a mortgage for unimproved and unproductive real property.

- Carrying charges

• The regulations provide that if the item is not deductible, it may not be

capitalized under this election.

- Application to Section 163(j) limitation

- Application to NOL limitation

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 21

Page 22: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs
Page 23: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

199A

Page 24: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

199A General Overview

• Passthrough deduction of 20% for qualified business income (QBI) in a qualified

trade or business (QTB).

- Qualified REIT dividend income and publicly traded partnership income are

eligible for the deduction without limitation.

• Entities that qualify:

- Partnership,

- Sole proprietorship,

- Limited Liability Company (taxed as partnership),

- S Corporations,

- Trusts and Estates.

• Effectively reduces the rate on pass-through income to 29.6%.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 24

Page 25: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Determining QBI

• QBI is separately calculated for each trade or business and is determined at the

partner, shareholder, or individual level.

• Included in QBI

- Income or deductions attributable to a trade or business if taken into account

for taxable income purposes.

- Gains or losses under section 751 (“hot assets”).

- Must be effectively connected with a US trade or business.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 25

Page 26: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Determining QBI (continued)

• Excluded from QBI

- Capital gains and losses.

- Interest income not otherwise properly allocable to a trade or business.

- Income for services rendered to a partnership by a partner.

- Guaranteed payments under section 707(c).

- Reasonable compensation from an S corporation.

- Dividends and dividend equivalents.

- Gains/loss from certain commodities transactions, or foreign exchange

gains, certain gains from notional principal contracts, non-business annuity

income, and any item of deduction or loss properly allocable to any of the

previous amounts.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 26

Page 27: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Qualified Trades or Businesses (QTB)

• Defined in section 162 and based on case law.

- Good faith intention to enter into the activity and carry on a profit.

- Regular and continuous activity.

- Rev Proc. 2019-38 provides a safe harbor for a rental real estate enterprise

to be treated as a trade or business.

• A trade or business other than the business of:

- Being an employee, or

- A Specified Service Trades or Businesses (SSTBs).

• An entity may have multiple trades or businesses.

- An analysis is required for each trade or business.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 27

Page 28: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Thresholds and Phase In/Outs

• Additional limits for taxpayers above threshold amounts.

- $157,500 for individual taxpayers.

- $315,000 for married filing jointly taxpayers.

- The limitations are phased in over a range of $50,000 for individual filers (i.e.,

$157,500 - $207,500) and $100,000 for married filing jointly taxpayers (i.e.,

315,000 - $415,000).

• Above the $415,000/$207,500 taxable income, the limitations fully apply.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 28

Page 29: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

199A Limitations

• The 20% deduction is limited to the greater of:

- 50% QTB’s W-2 wages or

- 25% W-2 wages plus 2.5% of unadjusted basis in qualified property

immediately after acquisition (UBIA).

• Trades or businesses can be aggregated when:

- Commonly controlled trades or businesses to be aggregated,

- Items for each trade or business are reported on returns in same tax year,

- None of the trades or businesses are SSTBs, and

- Two out of of three interdependency and relatedness elements.

• Generally, not available for income attributable to businesses performing

certain activities, referred to as “specified service trades or businesses” (SSTBs).

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 29

Page 30: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Specified Service Trade or Business (“SSTB”)

• SSTBs are defined as:

- The performance of services in the fields of health, law, accounting, actuarial

science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, or brokerage

services or where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation

or skill of one or more of its employees or owners [section 1202(e)(3)(A)]; or

- Which involves the performance of services that consist of investing and

investment management, trading, or dealing in securities, partnership

interests, or commodities.

• The Final Regulations provide that the performance of services of investing and

investment management does not include directly managing real property.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 30

Page 31: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

De Minimis Rule

• A business that otherwise would be an SSTB will not be treated as an SSTB (and

disallowed from taking the 20% deduction) if the de minimis rule applies.

• Thresholds:

- If Gross receipts are $25M or less: less than 10% of gross receipts attributable

to performance of services in the defined SSTBs.

- If Gross receipts are more than $25M: less than 5% gross receipts attributable

to performance of services in the defined SSTBs.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 31

Page 32: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Providing Services or Property to a SSTB

• A portion of a qualifying trade or business will be considered a separate SSTB

and treated as such if:

- It provides services or property to an SSTB, and

- There is 50% or more common ownership between the SSTB and the

qualifying trade or business.

• Common ownership can be direct or indirect.

- Look for ownership of related parties to see indirect ownership.

- Reference sections 267(b) and 707(b) for related party rules.

• The treatment of the SSTB is only with respect to the related parties.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 32

Page 33: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Wyden's Proposed TaxChanges

• Would limit the deduction to individuals.

- No deduction is allowed for trusts and estates.

• Married taxpayers required to file jointly.

• Changes the deduction to 20% of the least of:

- QBI of taxpayer;

- Threshold amount ($400,000); or

- Taxable income of the taxpayer reduced by net capital gain.

• Qualified REIT dividends are now limited as QBI.

• QTB is redefined as "any trade or business other than the trade or business

of performing services as an employee."

- SSTBs are no longer limited.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 33

Page 34: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Carried Interests

Section 1061

Page 35: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Application of 1061 to Interest Holders

• Section 1061 extends the holding period for certain profits interests issued in

connection with services (i.e., carried interests).

- Specifically, Section 1061 extends the holding period required for certain

taxpayers to obtain long-term capital gain ("LTCG") treatment from more than

one year to more than three years with respect to an "applicable partnership

interest" ("API").

• Section 1061(a) recharacterizes the amount by which an API holder's One Year

Gain Amount exceeds its Three Year Gain Amount as short-term capital gain

("STCG").

- The Final Section 1061 Regulations (the "Final Regulations") refer to the

amount subject to Section 1061(a) as the "Recharacterization Amount."

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 35

Page 36: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Applicable Partnership Interest(API)

• An API is a partnership interest transferred to a taxpayer in connection with the

performance of substantial services by the taxpayer or a related person in any

applicable trade or business (ATB).

- ATB means raising and returning of capital in connection with either:

◦ Investing in or disposing of specified assets, or

◦ Developing "specified assets."

◦ Real estate is a specified asset.

• Once an API, always an API.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 36

Page 37: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Determining the Existence of an API

• An API arises when a partnership interest is transferred or held in connection

with providing substantial services in an ATB.

• The Final Regulations presume that, if a taxpayer provides any services in an

ATB and receives or holds an API, those services are considered “substantial.”

• An ATB means any activity for which the ATB Activity Test is met.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 37

Page 38: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 38

Determining the Existence of an API (continued)

• The ATB Activity Test is met if Specified Actions are conducted and the total

level of activity, including the combined activities of all Related Persons, satisfies

the level of activity that would be required to establish a trade or business

under Section 162.

- The Final Regulations use the general definition of a person or entity that

is related under Section 707(b) or 267(b) to determine who is a Related

Person.

• Specified Actions are the combination of Raising or Returning Capital Actions

and Investing or Developing Actions.

Page 39: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Exceptions to the Definition of an API

• The Internal Revenue Code provides for three exceptions to the application of

Section 1061:

- Interest granted for services exclusively provided to one entity,

- Corporations, and

- Capital interests.

• The Final Regulations add an additional exception:

- Bona Fide Purchaser Exception.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 39

Page 40: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

General Mechanics

• The amount that an Owner Taxpayer must treat as STCG under Section 1061(a)

is called the Recharacterization Amount.

• Recharacterization Amount is the excess of Owner Taxpayer’s One Year Gain

Amount over their Three Year Gain Amount.

- One Year Gain Amount: The Owner Taxpayer’s (1) combined net API One Year

Distributive Share Amount from all APIs held during the taxable year and (2)

the API One Year Disposition Amount.

- Three Year Gain Amount: The Owner Taxpayer’s (1) combined net API Three

Year Distributive Share Amount from all APIs held during the taxable year and

(2) the API Three Year Disposition Amount.

• The owner’s holding period of the asset sold controls (i.e., a partnership interest

or an asset of the partnership) subject to certain lookthrough rules.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 40

Page 41: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Exceptions to Income Recharacterization

• Section 1231 gain

- Gain from the sale of certain business property.

- Generally, gains are treated as long-term capital gains and losses are treated

as ordinary losses.

• Qualified dividend income

- Dividends paid by domestic and certain foreign corporations on common

stock held more than 60 days during the 121-day period that begins 60 days

before the ex-dividend date (or on preferred stock held more than 90 days

during the applicable 181-day period.

- Subject to preferential long-term capital gains rates.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 41

Page 42: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Exceptions to Income Recharacterization (continued)

• Mixed Straddle gain

- Capital gain from certain offsetting positions in which one leg is a Section

1256 contract.

• Section 1256 gain

- Gain from certain specified contracts, including regulated futures

contracts, foreign currency contracts, and non-equity options, among others.

- Annual mark-to-market treatment of 60% long-term capital gain and

40% short-term capital gain.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 42

Page 43: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Wyden's Proposed TaxChanges

• Proposes a new section 1299 to replace section 1061.

- Section 1061 would be repealed, and all carried interest would be subject to

these provisions.

• Requires a taxpayer who receives or acquires a partnership interest in connection

with the performance of services to recognize annual ordinary income in

an amount equal to the deemed compensation amounts with respect to all

partnership interests.

- The taxpayer would also recognize an offsetting long-term capital loss.

- Expands the definition of APIs to include:

◦ All services, as opposed to “substantial” services and

◦ Applicable loans.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 43

Page 44: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs
Page 45: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Qualified Opportunity

Zones

Page 46: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Qualified OpportunityZone (QOZ) Overview

• A tax incentive for investors to defer capital gains by investing into a

defined QOZ.

• Investors have a short window to invest gains in a qualified opportunity

fund (QOF) in order to receive the full benefit.

- Set to sunset by the end of 2026.

• Required to maintain the investment through for a specified time period

to receive the full benefit.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 46

Page 47: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

OZ Incentives

• The Opportunity Zones program offers investors three incentives for

putting their capital to work rebuilding economically distressed communities:

- A temporary deferral: An investor can defer capital gains taxes until 2026

by investing and keeping unrealized gains in an OZ Fund.

- A reduction: The original amount of capital gains on which an investor has

to pay deferred taxes is reduced by 10% if the OZ Fund investment is held for 5

years and another 5% if held for 7 years.

- Newly invested gains will only be eligible for the 10% reduction.

- An exemption: Any capital gains on investments made through

the Opportunity Fund accrue tax-free as long as the investor holds them for at

least 10 years.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 47

Page 48: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

The Initial Investment

• Gains eligible for investment

- Gross capital gain that is otherwise subject to federal income tax.

◦ Cannot arise from a sale or exchange of property with a related party.

- Section 1231 gains.

- Section 1231 gains and capital gains do not have to be reduced by loss.

• Timing of investment

- Generally, within 180 days of gain realization.

• Partner's timing of investment with partnership gain:

- Begins on the last day of the partnership taxable year in which the partner's

distributive share of the partnership's eligible gain is taken into account.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 48

Page 49: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Sample Opportunity Zone Structure

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 49

Page 50: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF)

• Must be taxed as a corporation or a partnership.

• Must hold at least 90% of its assets in QOZ property.

- Assets are QOZ stock, partnership interest, business property.

- Tested on the last day of the first 6-month period of the taxable year of

the fund and on the last day of the taxable year of the fund.

- Reasonable cause exception for failure to meet this test (no penalty).

- Exception for exclusion of recently contributed property:

◦ Must be solely in exchange for an interest in the QOF, and

◦ Held continuously in cash, cash equivalents, or debt instruments with a

term of 18 months or less.

• QOF must self-certify that is satisfies the eligibility requirement (Form 8996).

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 50

Page 51: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

QOZ Business Requirements

• 70% tangible property owned or leased by business must be QOZ

business property.

• 50% total gross income of QOZ business derived from active conduct of

the business within the QOZ.

• 40% intangible property used in the active conduct.

• Less than 5% average of aggregate unadjusted bases of the property

attributable to nonqualified financial property (NQFP).

- NQFP is debt, stock, partnership interests, options, futures,

forward contracts, warrants, notional principal contract, annuities and other

similar property.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 51

Page 52: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Working Capital SafeHarbor

• Safe harbor makes it easier for a QOZB to satisfy some of the QOZB

requirements during the safe harbor period.

• Requirements for the safe harbor:

- Amounts must be designated in writing for the development of a trade

or business in a QOZ.

- The QOZB must have a written schedule consistent with the ordinary start-

up of a trade or business for the expenditure of the working capital assets.

- Working capital assets must actually be used in a manner that is

substantially consistent with the writing and written schedule.

- Working capital must be spent in 31 months.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 52

Page 53: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

QOZ Business Limitations

• QOZ business cannot engage in more than de minimis amounts in

certain businesses:

- Private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor, hot

tub facility, suntan facility, gambling, and any store the principal business of

which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises.

• Triple Net Lease – needs to be more than mere investment to qualify as

QOZ business property.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 53

Page 54: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

QOZ Business PropertyEligibility

• Eligible property to be used in a QOZ is tangible property used in a trade

or business of a QOF if:

- It was acquired by the QOF by purchase after December 31, 2017.

- The original use of the property commenced with the QOF or the

QOF substantially improved the property.

- During at least 90% of the QOF's holding period, at least 70% of the use of

the property was in a QOZ.

• Considerations for QOZ Business Property

- Cannot be property purchased from a related party.

◦ Stricter requirements for related parties – sections 267(b) and 707(b)

but substituting 20% for50%.

- Can include leased property.PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 54

Page 55: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

QOZ Business Property Eligibility (continued)

• Original Use

- QOF is the first person to place the property in service in the QOZ

and take depreciation/amortization or QOF places property in service that has

been vacant for a requisite amount of time.

• Substantially Improved

- During a 30-month period beginning after the acquisition, additions to basis

of the property in the hands of the QOF exceed the amount of the adjusted

basis of such property immediately after acquisition.

- Land does not need to be substantially improved if purchased after December

31, 2017.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 55

Page 56: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

Exiting the QOZ Investment

• Inclusion event during 10-year period:

- Acceleration of original deferred gain.

• Inclusion event after 10-year period:

- Complete exemption of gain on sale of QOF interest.

PwC | Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships 56

Page 57: Tax Issues in Real Estate Partnerships: Dealer vs

pwc.com

Thank you

© 2021 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.