tam references index

8/14/2019 TAM References INDEX

1/3

1. Loukis, E., Georgiou, S. and Pazalos, K. (2007). A value flow model forthe evaluation of an e-Learning service. In: Proceedings of the EuropeanConference on Information Systems, June, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

-->Summary:

Literature review

Concludes with a model proposition based on TAM

Suggests future use of PLS

2. Chang, S-C and Tung, F-C. (2008). An empirical investigation of studentsbehavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. BritishJournal of Educational Technology 39(1), 71-83

-->Summary:

Empirical study

based on combination of TAM, IDT and other constructs

LISREL, SPSS

3. de Carvalho, R.B., Arajo, M., Ferreira, T. and Wei, C. (2005). Towards aPortal Maturity Model (PMM): Investigating Social and TechnologicalEffects of Portals on Knowledge Management Initiatives. In: Proceedingsof the 34th Canadian Academy of Information Sciences Annual Conference

-->Summary:- Theoretical proposition of the Portal Maturity model

Encapsulates concepts from TAM

4. Ngai, E.W.T., Poon, J.K.L. and Chan, Y.H.C. (2007). Empirical examinationof the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education 48, pp.250267.

-->Summary:- Extended TAM- Empirical study-Uses SEM (does not clarifypossibly PLS since there is no goodness of fit etc )

5. Ong, C-S, Lai, J-Y. and Wang, Y-S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers

acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies.Information & Management 41, pp. 795804.

-->Summary:- Extended TAM- Empirical study amongst engineers from international companies- SAS CALIS ( Similar to LISREL SEM)

6. Ong, C-S, Lai, J-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions andrelationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers inHuman Behavior 22 (2006), pp. 816829.

-->Summary:-TAM- SAS CALIS similar to LISREL


2/3

-empirical study in companies

7. Behrens, S., Jamieson, K., Jones, D. and Cranston, M. (2005).PredictingSystem Success using the Technology Acceptance Model: A Case Study.16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. 9 Nov 2 Dec2005, Sydney.

-->Summary:- empirical investigation based on an Online Assignment Submission,Infocom System (OASIS)- TAM- Does not describe the data analysis method

8. Roca, J.C. and Gagne, M.(2008). Understanding e-learning continuanceintention in the workplace: A self-determination theoryperspective.Computers in Human Behavior 24, pp.15851604.

-->Summary:- Uses the SDT (self-determination theory) and extends TAM- continuance intention concepts- Data analysis with LISREL

9. Saad, R.G., Nebebe, F. and Tan,W.(2007).Viability of the TechnologyAcceptance Modelin Multimedia Learning Environments: A ComparativeStudy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3,-->Summary:

- Uses TAM

- Data analysis PLS

10.Liaw, S-S. (2008). Investigating students perceivedsatisfaction,behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A casestudy of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, pp.864873-->Summary:

- Uses TAM; 3-TUM- Data analysis with multiple regression

11. Sun, P-C., Tsai, R.J., Finger,G., Chen, Y-Y. and Yeh, D. (2008). Whatdrives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation

of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers &Education 50, pp. 11831202-->Summary:

- Uses custom model based on TAM- Data analysis with SPSS


3/3

12.Zhang, N., Guo, X-H. and Chen, G-Q. (2007). Extended InformationTechnology Initial Acceptance Model and Its Empirical Test. SETP, 27(9):123130-->Summary:

- Uses TAM in a generic IT acceptance setting- Data analysis with PLS

THEORETICAL PAPERS

13.King, R.W. And He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technologyacceptance model. Information & Management.

14.Whitworth, B., Bauls, V., Sylla, V. and Mahinda, E. (2008).Expanding theCriteria for Evaluating Socio-Technical Software. IEEE Transactions onSystems, man and Cybernetics 38(4)

tam references index

Documents