taken by storm: business survival in the aftermath of ......taken by storm: business survival in the...

20
Taken by Storm: Business Survival in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina * Emek Basker and Javier Miranda Fifth Annual Microeconomics Conference Federal Trade Commission November 2012 Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. All results have been reviewed to ensure that no confidential information is disclosed.

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Taken by Storm: Business Survival in theAftermath of Hurricane Katrina∗

    Emek Basker and Javier Miranda

    Fifth Annual Microeconomics ConferenceFederal Trade Commission

    November 2012

    Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of

    the U.S. Census Bureau. All results have been reviewed to ensure that no confidential

    information is disclosed.

  • Sharkheads Souvenir Store, Biloxi, MS

    Source: Monsterchef.net

  • Which Businesses Survived the Storms?

    I Damaged vs. undamaged

    I Small firm vs. large firm

    I Far from bank vs. near bank

  • Which Businesses Survived the Storms?

    I Damaged vs. undamaged

    I Small firm vs. large firm

    I Far from bank vs. near bank

  • Which Businesses Survived the Storms?

    I Damaged vs. undamaged

    I Small firm vs. large firm

    I Far from bank vs. near bank

  • Which Businesses Survived the Storms?

    I Damaged vs. undamaged

    I Small firm vs. large firm

    I Far from bank vs. near bank

  • Which Businesses Survived the Storms?

    I Damaged vs. undamaged

    I Small firm vs. large firm

    I Far from bank vs. near bank

  • Data Sources

    I Longitudinal Business Database (LBD)

    I Geocoded all MS stores, restaurants, and hotels

    I Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA)

    I Economic Census

  • Katrina Damage: Hancock & Harrison Counties, MS

  • Mississippi Trends

  • Exit Models

    I Cross-sectional linear probability models

    I Damage vector:I Limited/moderate damageI Extensive/catastrophic damage

    I Firm size interacted with damage vector

    I Additional controls: establishment age and employment,productivity, productivity×damage, 82 county FE, 110six-digit NAICS FE

    I Three time periods:I 2004–06 (short run)I 2004–08 (long run)I 2002–04 (falsification exercise)

  • Prob(Exit | Extensive or Catastrophic Damage)− Prob(Exit | No Damage)

  • Bank Proximity

    I Geocoded all MS banks, calculated distance to nearest bankor bank branch (LBD)

    I Triple-difference regression: interact distance with damagevector, firm size, and damage×firm size

    I Continue to control all other covariates

  • Prob(Exit | Extensive or Catastrophic Damage,FirmSize=1) − Prob(Exit | No Damage, FirmSize=1)

  • Counterfactual?

  • Prob(Exit | Extensive or Catastrophic Damage,FirmSize=1) − Prob(Exit | No Damage, FirmSize=1)

  • Summary

    I Vulnerable establishments are more likely to exit immediatelyfollowing damage

    I Establishments in small firms

    I Establishments located far from banks

    I Establishments in small firms located far from banks

    I Evidence consistent with credit/resource constraints

    I Credit?

    I Insurance?

    I Information?

    I Skill?

  • Summary

    I Vulnerable establishments are more likely to exit immediatelyfollowing damage

    I Establishments in small firms

    I Establishments located far from banks

    I Establishments in small firms located far from banks

    I Evidence consistent with credit/resource constraints

    I Credit?

    I Insurance?

    I Information?

    I Skill?

  • Sharkheads Souvenir Store, Biloxi, MS

    Source: Sharkheads.com

  • Thank you