table of contents - mdl 2179 trial docs...the drilling engineering and drilling fluids laboratory...
TRANSCRIPT
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 2
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 6
INTRODUCTION 6 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 6
SUMMARY OF EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND WORK EXPERIENCE 6
EDUCATION 6 WORK EXPERIENCE 7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
SUMMARY OF OPINIONS 11
DEEPWATER DRILLING AND BP PRESSURE INTEGRITY TESTS 11
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 12 EVOLUTION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 13 OVERBURDEN STRESS 20 FRACTURE GRADIENT 21 PRESSURE INTEGRITY TESTS 23 DRILLING MARGINS 28 SAFE DRILLING MARGIN 33 BP’S PRESSURE INTEGRITY TEST OF THE 9-7/8 INCH LINER SHOE 42
EFFECT OF SPACER ON NEGATIVE PRESSURE TEST INTERPRETATION 48
NEGATIVE TEST NOMENCLATURE 49 FLUID DISPLACEMENT 54 MI-SWACO SPACER 54 NEGATIVE PRESSURE TEST 59 WELL MONITORING FAILURE 64
APPENDIX A 69
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 3
APPENDIX B 70
APPENDIX C 71
APPENDIX D 90
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 4
L I S T O F F I G U R E S
Figure 1: Deepwater Drilling Units and Production Facilities 13 Figure 2a: Pore pressure in hydrostatic equilibrium with surface water 18 Figure 2b: Pore Pressure is controlled by Mud Pressure 18 Figure 2: What is Pore Pressure? 18 Figure 3: What is Mud Weight? 19 Figure 4: Overburden Stress calculated from Macondo Well Logs 21 Figure 5: What is Fracture Gradient 22 Figure 6: Comparison of Calculated and Observed Leak-off Test Results 23 Figure 7: Typical Leak-Off Test Plot 26 Figure 8: Typical Pressure Integrity Test Plot 27 Figure 9: Approximate effect of Water Depth on Fracture Gradient at 3500 feet 28 Figure 10: What is a Kick? 29 Figure 11: Shoe Strength protects Weaker Sediments Above 31 Figure 12: What is an Underground Blowout? 32 Figure 13: Pressure Integrity Test at 13-5/8 inch Liner Shoe 41 Figure 14: Pressure Integrity Test at 9-7/8 inch Liner Shoe 45 Figure 15: Common Assumptions in Fracture Modeling 48 Figure 16: Schematic of Macondo Well after Circulating Cement 50 Figure 17: Planned Configuration of Macondo Well with Temporary Cap 51 Figure 18: Use of Equivalent Mud Weights in Negative Test Nomenclature 53 Figure 19: Displacement Planned by MI-Swaco Drilling Fluid Specialist 55 Figure 20: Plot of Real Time Data Recorded during Negative Pressure Test 61 Figure 21: U-tube analogy for Negative Test being conducted (pressures equal) 64 Figure 22: Real Time Data Showing Kick Indications that were not detected 66
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 5
L I S T O F TA B L E S
Table 1 –Summary of Events during the Initial Displacement 58
Table 2 – Summary of Actions Taken during the First Negative Pressure Test 60
Table 3 – Summary of Actions Taken during the Second Negative Pressure Test 62
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 6
INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
INTRODUCTION
The BP Exploration & Production Inc. Macondo Well (OCSG 32306-001) located offshore Louisiana in Mississippi Canyon Block 252 was in the process of being temporarily capped when a tragic accident occurred in which eleven people lost their lives and 17 others were injured. The rig “Deepwater Horizon,” sank, and the well continued to flow oil into the Gulf of Mexico for 87 days before it was successfully plugged.
The well had been successfully drilled, the production casing had been run, and cement circulated at the time of the blowout. However, an event of this magnitude invariably raises questions about the drilling operations as well as the temporary capping operations.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Upon the request of counsel representing BP, I have reviewed the daily operational summaries and reports, reports of other experts, and other materials provided. The list of those materials is included in Appendix D. I was asked to review various aspects of the drilling operations for the Macondo well.
This report summarizes my opinions reached based on my reviews and analysis. It also provides schematics illustrating well conditions during various operations. These opinions are based on the information I have reviewed at this time. My work is ongoing and I reserve the right to adjust my opinion as new information is obtained.
SUMMARY OF EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND WORK EXPERIENCE
EDUCATION
B. S. in Petroleum Engineering, Cum Laude, May 28, 1966 Louisiana State University
M. S. in Petroleum Engineering, January 23, 1968 Louisiana State University
Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering, January 24, 1970 University of Texas at Austin
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 7
WORK EXPERIENCE
I have more than 45 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, particularly in Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico. My work experience in the oil and gas industry began through participation in summer/co-op programs while in college. I worked for Mobil Oil Company three months as an onshore roustabout and three months as an offshore roustabout. After reaching senior status at Louisiana State University (LSU), I worked three months as an Engineering Assistant involved with offshore drilling and well work-over planning. After receiving my B.S. Degree and prior to entering graduate school, I worked three months for Texaco as an Assistant Drilling Engineer involved with offshore field operations, well planning, and drilling optimization. My training for this position included working as a floor hand on the first semi-submersible rig, the “Ocean Driller.” After entering graduate school, I worked three months for Chevron at their research laboratory in La Habra, California and three months for Conoco at their research laboratory in Ponca City, Oklahoma.
In 1969, after completion of my course work at the University of Texas at Austin (UT-Austin), I joined Conoco in Houston as a Senior Systems Engineer in their Production Engineering Services Group. There, I participated in several drilling and production projects including an offshore drilling project involving real-time drilling data acquisition and estimation of formation pore pressure.
In 1971, I joined LSU as an Assistant Professor. For the next 29 years, I worked in the undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education programs of the LSU Petroleum Engineering Department and in administration of the College of Engineering. I had primary responsibility for the drilling engineering and drilling fluids laboratory courses, but taught production engineering and reservoir engineering courses as well. I served as Chairman of the Petroleum Engineering Department from 1977 to 1983. At the time of my retirement in December of 1999, I was the Campanile Charities Professor of Offshore Mining and Petroleum Engineering and Dean of the College of Engineering.
I have been especially active in the area of blowout prevention. Soon after joining LSU in 1971, I began assisting Professor Bill Hise, one of the more senior LSU faculty members, in teaching industry short-courses on well control for onshore and bottom-supported offshore drilling rigs. Under the sponsorship of the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), Professor Hise had reworked an abandoned well on the LSU Campus for use in “hands on” well control training including the safe circulation of a threatened gas blowout. Building on this foundation, LSU founded the first blowout prevention training program with open enrollment. The program was enthusiastically received by the industry and several hundred industry participants per year attended the program during the 1970s. Discussions held with a
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 8
wide cross-section of industry participants provided me valuable insight into the complications that can arise during well control operations. I became particularly interested in complications associated with deepwater drilling operations with the blowout preventer at the seafloor. A list of publications, training courses and other relevant items is included in Appendix C.
Starting in 1979, I guided the development of a multi-million dollar research and training well facility at LSU to support work on deepwater well control and to complement the older training well. The newer facility was funded through the combined support of 13 major oil companies, 40 service companies, and the Minerals Management Service (MMS) (now the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement or BOEMRE), and became operational in 1981. The facility was initially centered around a 6000-foot well specially configured to model the full-scale well control flow geometry of a floating drilling rig in 3000 feet of water. Extensive surface equipment provided for “hands on” training as well as highly-instrumented well control experiments. Gas could be injected into the bottom of the well to initiate the conditions of a threatened blowout. The goal of the research was the development of improved well control procedures and training for deepwater drilling operations.
The facility, which still operates today, was later expanded to include additional wells and model diverter components for experimental study of flow erosion and pressures seen during diverter operations. This research was aimed at reducing the incidence of failures in diverters used to handle a shallow gas flow that could not be safely shut-in. Under sponsorship of Amoco (now BP) and the Drilling Engineers Association (DEA), the facility was further expanded to include an additional 6000-foot well to study kick detection and other potential well control complications associated with gas solubility in oil base muds.
Between 1981 and my retirement in 1999, I supervised the graduate research of 19 MS theses and 12 PhD dissertations on various well control topics of interest to industry and the MMS (now BOEMRE). Numerous Well Control Research Workshops were held at LSU during this period and were well attended by both MMS and industry personnel. The research has resulted in more than 50 publications related to well control and including formation pore pressure estimation, fracture gradient correlations, Leak-off test data, modeling well control and relief well operations, and improved procedures for safe removal of a gas influx. During this period I also organized and helped to teach specialized deepwater well control schools for Amoco, Exxon, Shell, Conoco, Phillips, and Zapata as well as numerous open enrollment schools.
I am the lead author of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Drilling Engineering Textbook, entitled “Applied Drilling Engineering” which was developed for petroleum engineering college curriculums. This textbook is widely accepted and has been a “top seller” for SPE since it was first published in 1986. I have also written “Drilling Practices,” a chapter in
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 9
the Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design and “Shallow Gas Blowouts,” a chapter in Firefighting and Blowout Control. I have also written several chapters in a well control manual used in LSU’s well control schools. I have served as chairman of the SPE reprint series on “Pore pressure and Fracture Gradient Determination” and also for another reprint series on “Well Control.” I am a past recipient of the SPE Distinguished Achievement Award for Petroleum Engineering Educators and have received the SPE Drilling Engineering Award “for distinguished contributions to petroleum engineering in the area of drilling technology.”
In 1990, I was selected as a Distinguished Member of SPE. In 1997-98, I was selected as a Distinguished Lecturer by the SPE and gave lectures at about 30 locations in the U.S., Europe, and Middle East. During 1998 I also served on a steering committee of the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) that coordinated the development of a manual on well control practices for deepwater drilling operations. I have also served on an ad hoc committee of SPE to review the exam leading to professional registration of Petroleum Engineers. Upon my retirement from LSU, I was recognized by the House of Representatives of the State of Louisiana in House Concurrent Resolution No. 33 of the First Extraordinary Session, 2000, commending me for “achievements in scholarly research and writing in the field of petroleum engineering and for highly significant contributions to higher education in Louisiana.” In December of 2001, I was recognized as a Distinguished Graduate of the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. In 2006, I was inducted into the LSU Engineering Hall of Distinction.
I am currently President of Bourgoyne Enterprises, Inc., which offers Petroleum Engineering consulting services to the Oil and Gas Industry. I have consulted extensively with Pennington Oil and Gas, LLC in their drilling and completion of deep, high-temperature, high-pressure wells in the Tuscaloosa Trend Area of Louisiana. I have also served as an expert witness on blowout and well control matters.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The blowout prevention practices and equipment used in the oil and gas industry are designed to maintain redundant and verifiable barriers to an uncontrolled release of formation fluids. For a blowout to occur there generally must be a “perfect storm” series of both equipment failures and human failures (mistakes) to circumvent all of the intended barriers. The Deepwater Horizon tragedy was not an exception to this rule. As many of the publicly available reports have concluded, the equipment failures required for the blowout to occur included (1) the failure of the cement to seal the annular space through the oil and gas zone, (2) the failure of the cement to seal the shoe track of the production casing, and (3) the failure of the blowout
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 10
preventers to stop the flow at the seafloor. The human failures (mistakes) required for the blowout to occur included (1) the failure to correctly interpret a critical negative pressure test of the cement seals, (2) the failure to detect the influx of formation fluids into the casing, and (3) the failure to use the diverter system to vent overboard the oil and gas that reached the surface.
The human failures are especially hard to understand because there are multiple groups on the rig tasked with constantly monitoring the well during all operations, including the Transocean rig crew and the Sperry-Sun mud loggers. The ability to detect an influx of formation fluid of less than 30 barrels is an expected normal response, and numerous drills are generally conducted while drilling to test this response. An influx of over 600 barrels was required for the formation fluids to reach the seafloor undetected and begin entering the marine riser. It is unknown why standard well control training concepts were not followed that night. If the situation was such that rig pumps were shut down at 9:30, standard well control would dictate that the well be checked for flow, and shut in if flowing, before taking any other steps. Both a driller and a toolpusher were evaluating the well at that time. Yet, on that night, the next action taken was to bleed the drill pipe. Additionally, negative pressure tests involve simple hydrostatic pressure concepts that form the basis of many rig site calculations and the needed hydrostatic pressure concepts are always included in well control training. The parties interpreting the negative pressure test made a mistake in determining that the negative pressure tests run by Transocean’s rig crew were successful.
I reviewed the BP Daily Operational Summaries for the Macondo Well, real time data collected during drilling and other rig operations, deposition transcripts, discovery materials, expert reports issued by other parties and the reports of investigative bodies issued in regard to the tragic accident that occurred. See Appendix D. I saw no evidence that BP drilled this well in a careless or reckless manner with disregard for safety in order to save money and drill fast. There are always advantages and disadvantages to various design options considered when drilling and completing a well. On any given issue, it is normal for members of a drilling team in a large organization to have differences of opinion as to which option is better. In my opinion, all of the final choices made in regard to planning fell within the range of normal drilling and completion practices. A critical review of the planning decisions must recognize that the well was successfully drilled, the production casing was successfully run to bottom, and cement was circulated into the well as planned.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 11
SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
I have reached the following opinions to a reasonable engineering certainty in this matter:
First, this well was drilled to total depth safely and successfully and consistent with industry practices. The Deepwater Horizon crew and BP’s team followed industry practices in conducting formation integrity tests, interpreting those tests and properly managing their mud weights to safely drill each interval.
Second, the use of the Loss Circulation Material (LCM) spacer during the temporary abandonment procedures on April 20, 2010 likely resulted in fluids being displaced in a manner that the rig crew did not fully understand.
Third, the negative pressure test was not properly understood, but the parties involved allowed the displacement to continue. While everyone involved had every incentive to get it right and had no incentive to cut corners, they did not properly interpret the test.
Fourth, the rig crew failed to properly monitor the well on April 20, 2010 and allowed a kick to go unnoticed until it turned into a blowout. Even after recognizing that signs of a kick were present, the Transocean rig crew failed to shut in the well immediately.
DEEPWATER DRILLING AND BP PRESSURE INTEGRITY TESTS
Several issues related to normal drilling practice have arisen in this litigation. These issues are best understood after a discussion of how the practice evolved as the industry moved from land and shallow water operations offshore to floating drilling operations in deep water. A background discussion of my perspective on these issues is provided regarding:
� Historical Perspective � Evolution of Roles and Responsibilities � Pore Pressure � Overburden Stress � Fracture Gradients � Pressure Integrity Test � Drilling Margins � Safe Drilling Margins � Negative Pressure Test
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 12
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE1
Offshore drilling began in California in 1887 in an area where wells drilled nearest to the ocean tended to be better producers. Wharfs were constructed that served as the first platforms for offshore drilling, the longest extending almost a quarter mile offshore. In the early 1930s along the Louisiana and Texas inland waters, rigs built on steel barges were constructed that could be towed to a well’s location and sunk to rest on bottom with the top of the barge still above water. At the end of the job, the derrick was lowered, the barge pumped out to a floating position, and the rig towed to another location.
The use of barge rigs was gradually extended from inland waters in the coastal areas to shallow waters offshore. To extent the water depth ranged to about 40 feet, shell mats were deposited at the well location and the barge was sunk onto the shell mat. The barge rigs evolved into submersible rigs and jackups to further extend the water depth. The first submersible rig was basically an upper and lower barge type structure connected by steel columns. The jackup design was a barge with long legs that could be raised when moving the rig and lowered to jack the barge up to a safe height above the waves. For development wells, offshore platforms were designed to allow a rig to be put on the platform and used to drill multiple directional wells.
The submersible rig evolved into the semisubmersible rig, which could be anchored over the well location and the well drilled from a floating position. The semisubmersible “Ocean Driller,” launched in 1963, was the first drilling vessel designed to drill in a floating position. Since that time, a variety of mobile offshore drilling units and production facilities have been designed (Figure 1). These designs have allowed the search for oil and gas to extend beyond the continental shelf into the deep water of the continental slope.
Anchoring becomes more difficult as water depth increases. Dynamically positioned drillships and semisubmersibles were developed capable of keeping the drilling vessel on location over the well without the use of anchors. Tension Leg Platforms, Compliant Towers, and Spars are used for field development with multiple wells drilled directionally through a template at the seafloor.
Deepwater wells are generally capable of producing at very high flow rates because of the characteristics of the turbidite sands found in deepwater. Deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico offers one of the best opportunities for increasing domestic oil production.
1 This background section is based on my professional experience as summarized in Appendix C, my drilling book, (footnote continued)
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 13
Figure 1: Deepwater Drilling Units and Production Facilities
EVOLUTION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
I have seen the roles and responsibilities for companies involved in drilling operations change during my 46 years of association with the oil and gas industry. In the earlier portion of my career, the oil and gas operators did most of the engineering work. The oil companies were in the final stages of shifting from owning the drilling rigs and manning the rigs with their employees to contracting for rigs and drilling services with drilling contractors. Some oil companies still maintained a few rigs but had sold most of their equipment during the bust of the 1950s that followed the boom after World War II.
Petroleum engineering enrollments had dwindled to a trickle as jobs were scarce during this period of contraction. Petroleum engineering enrollments hit bottom in 1963 and began growing again over the next decade. During this period, almost all of the petroleum engineering graduates went to work for major oil companies. Oil company employees did almost all of the engineering work associated with drilling, completing, producing, and managing the oil and gas reservoirs. Most of the major oil companies had active research and development organizations and my papers on petroleum engineering manpower supply and demand.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 14
and almost all of the technical papers written and presentations on new technology made at technical conferences and meetings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) were by employees of oil companies and a few large service companies. Work done by service companies was primarily at the field technician level. Procedures used in the field were developed largely by the well operators and both engineering and operational supervision was provided almost exclusively by the oil company.
The Arab oil embargo created a domestic oil crisis and oil and gas activities quickly ramped up during the 1970s in response to increasing oil prices. During the boom period that followed, national petroleum engineering enrollment grew from about 2,000 in 1975 to over 10,000 in 1982 in response to high demand and starting salaries. However, the boom ended with another bust before many of these students could graduate. The enrollment fell just as fast as it went up as major changes again took place in the way the oil companies did business. Oil companies became more international and began contracting out more of their engineering work to service companies. While I was serving on the board of directors of SPE in the mid 1980’s, the society made major changes towards becoming a truly international technical society in response to these changes in the industry.
During the 1990s, service companies grew, conducted more research and development, and achieved leadership positions in many technical fields associated with oil and gas drilling. Gradually, the number of technical papers and presentations on new developments at SPE conferences and meetings that were made by engineers employed by service companies increased and became dominant. Service companies increased their training programs and began hiring new graduates as well as experienced engineers. The number of major domestic oil companies decreased and the independent oil companies began to play a major role in domestic operations. This trend has continued through the 2000s with mergers and acquisitions of both major oil companies and service companies as they positioned themselves for competition in a more global economy. The latest boom in oil prices began in 2003.
Drilling for oil and gas in deep water requires teamwork from many specialists. Service company personnel have offices in oil company facilities and work together with oil company personnel in planning and coordinating field operations. The well operator has overall responsibility for drilling, completion, production, and reservoir management. However, the operator transfers some of these responsibilities to service companies when they hire them to use highly specialized procedures and equipment on their behalf. The shared responsibility is controlled by contracts, work agreements and applicable law. The operator’s representative on the rig generally does not have the specialized knowledge to supervise all of the work. The operator’s representative coordinates the implementation of the procedures provided to him,
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 15
helps to coordinate logistics, sees that company policy is followed, and reports on the progress being made.
BP’s representatives on the rig are called Well Site Leaders. They are trained in company safety policies, well control policy and approved operational procedures. General planning documents are generally discussed in meetings (Spud Meetings) held prior to the well starting. Training is provided so that procedures given the Well Site Leaders in outline or abbreviated form can be implemented according to BP’s Drilling and Well Operations Practice (DWOP) manual, Well Control manuals, and other safety policies. This is a common industry practice.
The drilling contractor is responsible for the operation of the drilling vessel and the work done by the rig crew. They have a responsibility for the safety of those aboard their vessel. They too are trained in well control and safety procedures appropriate for their level of job responsibility.2 The driller and his rig crew are highly trained in recognizing the signs of a kick and closing the blowout preventers to stop the flow with the influx still near the well bottom. They are also trained in the use of a diverter to divert flow overboard and away from the rig when hydrocarbons enter the marine riser above the blowout preventer at the seafloor.3 Two diverter lines are available to always allow downwind diversion. The chain of command from the Well Site Leader to the rig crew is through the drilling contractor’s Offshore Installation Manager and Senior Toolpusher.4 The Offshore Installation Manager and Senior Toolpusher have the responsibility to stop work when asked to perform an unsafe operation.5 Any member of the crew can call for work to be stopped if an unsafe condition is seen.
2 Transocean’s policies and procedures are consistent with this general industry standard. Examples include MDL Ex. 1454, Transocean’s Well Control Handbook §1.3 at p. 2; MDL Ex. 1452, Transocean’s Field Operations Handbook §3, 1.3 at pgs. 1-3; MDL Ex. 1453 Transocean Deepwater Horizon Emergency Response Manual, Vol. 1 §7.2. Many Transocean witnesses testified to these responsibilities as well, including Mr. Newman (S. Newman 9/30/11 Dep. Tr. at 177-78. I am also familiar with the IADC Well Cap training that Transocean uses as part of its training program. MDL Ex. 1454, Transocean Well Control Handbook, §1.4. TRN-MDL-0028687-88. 3 Examples of Transocean’s policy on this point include: (i) TRN-INV-01131807-813. On page 811, it provides that “Currently accredited IADC Well Control programs are taught in Transocean, Introductory, Fundamental, and Supervisory. All three provide instruction on how to use these [MGS and Diverter] systems for well control,” (ii) MDL Ex. 1454, Transocean Well Control Handbook at 1.4, and (iii) the Driller and Assistant Driller On the Job Training Module there are tasks (Driller Task 45,46 & Assistant Driller Task 35, 36, 37) covering the diverter that must be completed and signed by a supervisor to be deemed competent. TRN-MDL-00576075-114 (Driller Module) and TRN-MDL-00398653-398722 (Assistant Driller Module). Additionally, the Well Control Handbook states “At any time, if there is a rapid expansion of gas in the riser, the diverter must be closed, if not already and the flow diverted overboard.” MDL Ex. 1454 at 8.4.9.2, TRN-MDL-0286973. 4 MDL Ex. 1453, Transocean’s Deepwater Horizon Emergency Response Manual at TRN-MDL-00048168; MDL Ex. 5644 Transocean Management System - HSE Management at TRN-MDL-02865361. 5 Stop the Job authority is something that is common among rig personnel – they should know that if something is unsafe, they stop the job and correct it. See MDL Ex. 1449, Transocean’s HSE Policies and Procedures Manual at (footnote continued)
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 16
Mud logging services are generally provided by a service company specializing in rig monitoring and drilling data acquisition and transmission. Mud loggers monitor the entrained gas and rock cuttings that are circulated in the drilling mud to the surface as well as monitoring real time data.6 Mud loggers are responsible for monitoring the well at all times, for being aware of the status of the well at all times, for recognizing the signs that formation fluids are entering the well and alerting the crew to shut-in the well. They provide a redundant level of eyes and ears for watching the well in addition to the driller and rig crew.
Cementing services and equipment are generally provided by a service company specializing in oil and gas well cementing. This is a complex and highly technical service that requires a large organization to carry out. Cementing companies have a research group to develop improved proprietary cement compositions and placement techniques, highly trained engineers to properly design the cement job, trained technicians for performing the needed testing and quality control function, and trained field technicians for carrying out the cement placement into the well using their specialized equipment.
Numerous other service companies provide specialty services regarding well logging, downhole equipment and subsea equipment. All of the service companies can have some responsibility in accidents caused by failure of their equipment.
It is now common industry practice for oil companies, such as BP, to work together with specialized, expert contractors in order to successfully drill deepwater wells in the Gulf of Mexico.
PORE PRESSURE
Well design and casing depth placement is largely controlled by how formation pore pressure and fracture pressure vary with increasing depth. The depths of casing strings are initially established based on predicted pore pressure and fracture gradient values, which then are re-evaluated as drilling operations are conducted and actual pore pressure measurements are established. If pre-drilling pore pressure predictions are off (which is common in the Gulf of Mexico), then the casing strings may be set deeper or shallower than originally planned and additional casing strings may be added to the well design.
TRN-MDL-00046468. Steve Newman also noted the stop the job authority for all personnel on the rig in his deposition. S. Newman 9/30/11 Dep. Tr. at 160-61. 6 I conducted independent review and analysis of much of the real time data from the rig, including the data monitored by the Sperry-Sun mudloggers.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 17
The term pore pressure is used to refer to the pressure in the pore space of a rock. The sediments that we drill into in the Gulf of Mexico have been eroded from the North American Continent, carried to the sea by ancient rivers like the present Mississippi river, and laid down in the ancient gulf waters over geologic time. Pore pressure is easier to visualize if we think in terms of a sand bottom offshore from a sand beach (Figure 2a). The pore space is the space between the sand grains and the pore pressure is the pressure of the sea water in the pore space. Since water can flow freely between the grains in this situation, the magnitude of the pore pressure is controlled by the depth of the water column above the point of interest and the density of the seawater. The pressure gradient in a fluid in psi per foot can be obtained by multiplying the density in pounds per gallon by 0.052. Seawater has a density of 8.5 pounds per gallon so that the pressure increases by 0.44 psi for each foot of depth. Note in Figure 2a that the pore pressure at points A, B, and C are all equal to 4.4 psi since all three points are at a depth of 10 feet. If we removed the sediments by drilling a hole at point B, pore fluid would fill the hole. If we refilled the hole with sand, the pressure in the pore space at the bottom of the hole would remain unchanged. This is because the pore fluid can move through the pore space and be in hydrostatic equilibrium with the ocean.
The pore pressure is said to be “normal” when it is in hydrostatic equilibrium with the surface. The average pore water density in the Gulf of Mexico area is a little higher than the density of today’s seawater because of additional dissolved minerals so that the normal formation pore pressure increases by 0.465 psi per foot of depth. In south Louisiana, the prevalent formation type is sandstone down to a depth of approximately 10,000 feet and the sediments are nearly in hydrostatic equilibrium with the surface. Thus, the normal formation pore pressure gradient is 0.465 psi/ft and the pore pressure expected in this area at 10,000 feet is 4,650 psi.
The porosity of rock is the fraction of the total rock volume that is pore space. Permeability is a measure of how easily pore fluid can flow through the rock. A sandstone formation made from the deep burial of sand grains such that one would find on a beach would have a high porosity, typically on the order of 25%, and a high permeability. Such a rock would be an excellent reservoir rock if it contained oil and gas because it could contain a large oil volume that could flow easily into a well. Porosity decreases with depth of burial in normal pressure formations as pore water is squeezed out towards the surface.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 18
Figure 2a: Pore pressure in hydrostatic equilibrium with surface water
Figure 2b: Pore Pressure is controlled by Mud Pressure
Figure 2: What is Pore Pressure?
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 19
When very fine grained clay is converted into shale rock by the elevated temperature and pressure of deep burial, it has an extremely low permeability such that pore fluid can flow only with extreme difficulty. Water is bound up in the crystalline structure of the clays as well as being present as free pore water. Shale can form a good seal so that when thick layers of shale are present, the hydrostatic equilibrium with the surface is interrupted. It becomes more difficult for pore water to escape as sediments are buried more deeply. In addition, more free water is released from the conversion of clay mineral structures from one form to another, e.g., conversion of montmorillonite clay to illites, chlorites, and kaolinite clays. The pore pressure increases and is said to be abnormal pore pressure. As one moves farther offshore into deep water, the top of abnormal pressure is encountered at more shallow depths.
Figure 3: What is Mud Weight?
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 20
Pore pressure at any given vertical depth is often expressed as a pore pressure gradient by dividing the pore pressure by the depth. The pore pressure gradient is also commonly expressed as an equivalent density. The pore pressure gradient in pounds per gallon is obtained by dividing the pore pressure gradient in psi per foot by 0.052. This tells the rig crew that a mud (Figure 3) having at least this density is needed to prevent pore fluids from flowing into the well.
The mud weight at the surface is measured with a mud balance to the nearest 0.1 pounds per
gallon. The mud weight in the well varies slightly with depth due to the effect of increasing temperature and pressure on the density of the synthetic oil and emulsified water in the mud. The annular mud weight can also be slightly affected by the rock cuttings and pore fluids being carried to the surface by the mud.
OVERBURDEN STRESS
Just as the density of a fluid determines the increase in pressure exerted by the fluid with increasing depth, the density of the sediments controls the vertical pressure or overburden stress within the sediments. This concept is more easily visualized if we go back to the example of beach sand. If one is buried under a foot of slightly submerged beach sand, the pressure that is felt is due to the combined density of the water and the sand grains. This average density, called the bulk density, is weight per unit volume of sediment with the pore water in the sediments. The bulk density of the sediments is not a constant but increases with depth because the grains rearrange and get closer together as they are buried deeper and subject to higher overburden stress. Water is squeezed out towards the surface as the porosity decreases.
Overburden stress cannot be measured directly and must be calculated from sediment density values provided using well logging tools. The well logging tools do not make a direct measurement of sediment density. Density values are computed from measurements such as sonic travel time through the rock and neutron absorption. Figure 4 is a plot of bulk density and overburden stress versus depth estimated from well logs run in the Macondo Well.
Since the rock grains or matrix tend to interlock and resist moving in a direction perpendicular to the overburden stress, the horizontal stress is usually less than the overburden stress in a tectonically relaxed region like the Gulf of Mexico. The horizontal stress can vary with horizontal directions and is expected to have a minimum value in a direction perpendicular to local fault lines. However, near salt domes or other intrusions, the horizontal stress can become higher than the overburden stress.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 21
Drilling a borehole through the sediments can create local stress concentrations near the borehole wall. After the borehole is drilled, the stress in the sediments close to the borehole increases to accommodate load that was previously borne by material removed.
Figure 4: Overburden Stress calculated from Macondo Well Logs
FRACTURE GRADIENT
If the pressure in the borehole is increased significantly above the minimum horizontal stress so that rock tensile strength and local stress concentrations are exceeded, the rock of the borehole wall will crack vertically along the wall parallel to the axis of the hole. The crack will begin to open (Figure 5) and mud will enter the crack. The pressure at which the crack begins to open and take mud is called the fracture pressure. The fracture gradient in units of psi per foot is the fracture pressure in psi divided by the vertical depth of the fracture below the rig floor in feet. The fracture gradient can be expressed in pound per gallon by dividing by 0.052. This tells the drill crew that a static mud having this density or higher could fracture the formation.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 22
Figure 5: What is Fracture Gradient
There are a number of correlations that have been developed for estimating the formation fracture gradient. However, because of the wide variability found in nature, there is often considerable disagreement between the predicted and observed fracture gradients. There is no foolproof way of determining the fracture pressure of a section of hole. The best available method is to intentionally create a small fracture at the top of section and measure the pressure required to do so. This operation is called a Leak-off Test (LOT). Figure 6 is a comparison of predicted fracture pressure and Leak-off test results made by one my students using Leak-off test data and presented at the 1994 LSU/MMS Workshop.7 If the measured Leak-off test value for 7 Rocha, L.A. and Bourgoyne, A.T., Session II, Presentation 8, LSU/MMS Well Control Workshop, March 30-31, 1994.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 23
fracture gradient, shown in Figure 6 as a point, agrees with the calculated value of fracture gradient, shown as a dashed line, the point would fall on the line. Note that the measured values for fracture gradient often disagreed with the calculated value by as much as two pounds per gallon. Three different published methods for calculating the fracture gradient were used in the comparison. The Leak-off test data was from the Green Canyon Area of the Gulf of Mexico.
Figure 6: Comparison of Calculated and Observed Leak-off Test Results
In some cases, the formation fracture pressure is higher than needed to finish the next section of hole and the pressure integrity test is stopped before creating a small fracture. The Pressure integrity test does not always go all the way to Leak-off.
PRESSURE INTEGRITY TESTS
Pressure integrity tests provide information about the effectiveness of the cement seal at the bottom of the casing and about the resistance of the formation just below the casing to hydraulic fracturing. This is generally done after setting each casing string. Leakage past the cement is indicated by a non-linear, slower than expected pressure build-up that does not reach the minimum expected pressure. If leakage past the cement outside of the casing is detected, cement is squeezed into the leak and allowed to harden. The cement is again drilled out and the Pressure Integrity Test is repeated. This sequence is repeated until leakage past the cement is no longer seen. Running multiple pressure integrity tests is common.
These tests involve two steps. First, after the cement has hardened, a casing pressure test is made to insure that there are no leaks in the casing. A recorded plot of pressure versus time is made during the casing pressure test. The blowout preventer is closed and mud is pumped into the well at a low pump rate (typically 0.25 or 0.5 barrels per minute) in order to impose the desired pressure on the casing. After reaching the desired test pressure, the pump is stopped and pressure continues to be recorded for at least 30 minutes. The pressure during the shut-in can change slightly due to temperature changes in the mud. MMS (now BOEMRE) limits the
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 24
observed decline in pressure to no more than 10% during a 30 minute period. The onsite operator’s representative signs and dates the casing pressure test as being correct. The driller’s report includes the time, date, and results of the test.
Second, following a successful casing pressure test, the hardened cement is drilled out of the bottom portion of the casing and then a short interval of formation (typically 5 to 10 feet onshore and 10 to 50 feet offshore) is drilled below the casing. After circulating cuttings out of the well, the blowout preventer is closed and mud is pumped into the well at a low pump rate (typically 0.25 or 0.5 barrels per minute). BP’s procedure calls for pumping down both the drill pipe and the casing to minimize the effect of the frictional pressure loss between the surface and the casing seat.8 This also reduces the effect of mud gelation when starting and ending the test. The pump pressure and volume pumped is recorded at even time increments (typically after each minute of pumping). If the cement seal around the bottom of the casing is good, a straight line trend of increasing pressure with volume pumped is seen. If the pressure reaches a value corresponding to the formation strength needed to drill the next section of hole, the test may be terminated prior to creating a small fracture. If the fracture initiation pressure is to be determined, the test is continued until two or three points fall significantly to the right of the straight line trend indicating that mud is beginning to enter a small fracture. BP’s procedure calls for continuing a Leak-off test until the same pressure or a lessor pressure is seen at the previous value recorded. BP’s procedure is consistent with industry practices and my understanding is that BP informed the MMS (now BOEMRE) of their testing procedures in a meeting in February 2009.9
Upon fracture initiation, the rock tends to crack vertically, parallel to the axis of the borehole. The borehole acts as a notch in the rock from which the fracture grows. Fracture resistance is determined by creating a small vertical fracture and then stopping the test. Fracture growth is limited so that it does not extend upward past the casing seat into weaker rock. When the pressure is allowed to bleed off, the small fracture will close. Usually the rock will not be weakened significantly because natural cracks and imperfections are already present and only have to be opened by the mud pressure.
Once it is decided that the pressure integrity test will be terminated, the pump is stopped and pressure readings are then taken at a regular time interval. BP’s procedure calls for recording the
8MDL Ex. 4025 FIT/LOT Worksheet and instructions. 9MDL Ex. 4734; MDL Ex. 4735; MDL Ex. 4736; M. Saucier 7/27/11 Dep. Tr. at 172-78; D. Trocquet 9/23/11 Dep. Tr. at 171-73.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 25
shut-in pressures for a minimum of 10 minutes if performing a Formation Integrity Test (FIT).10 The rate of decline in pump pressure is affected by the permeability of the zone exposed, by the size of the fracture created (if any), and by the rate of increase in mud gel strength. If the test is conducted with only low permeability shale exposed below the casing, the Leak-off rate after the pump is stopped will be much slower that if sand is exposed, and will be negligible if a fracture was not initiated. It is common practice to record the volume of mud bled back at the end of the test when the pressure is released. This volume can then be compared to the volume pumped during the test to estimate the volume leaked-off during the test.
A graph of pump pressure versus volume pumped is generally prepared to assist in the interpretation of a Leak-off test. The casing pressure test is often plotted as a reference for system compressibility expected. This helps in interpreting the test in regard to whether or not the cement seal at the bottom of the casing is leaking. Typical pressure test results to be expected are shown in Figure 7 for a Leak-off test (LOT) and Figure 8 for a Formation Integrity Test (FIT) not taken to Leak-off. Two cases are illustrated in Figure 7. The upper plot is for the case in which a smooth borehole is drilled into impermeable shale that does not have any natural cracks or imperfections and has a significant tensile strength. Rocks are generally weak in tension but previously unbroken rock often has a tensile strength of about 5% of it compressive strength.
When interpreting a Leak-off test, the first few data points after pumping begins can fall off trend and are ignored because any air trapped in the surface piping needs to be compressed sufficiently before it has a negligible effect on the trend line. This can cause the few points to fall to the left of the subsequent straight line trend. After sufficient air compression and before initiation of leakage into a formation fracture or past the cement sheath around the bottom of the casing, the points will fall approximately on a straight line. After the leak begins, the pressure vs. volume pumped plot will begin to depart from a linear relationship, i.e., the points will begin to fall to the right of the straight line trend. The leak may be past the cement sheath around the bottom of the casing or into a fracture that is being initiated. After the fracture begins to grow, the pump pressure will reach a maximum value and in some cases will begin decreasing with increased volume pumped as the fracture is extended away from the borehole.
10 Although nomenclature varies somewhat in industry practice, an FIT in this context is taken to be a Pressure Integrity Test (PIT) that does not go all the way to Leak-off.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 26
Figure 7: Typical Leak-Off Test Plot
The maximum pressure reached is called the breakdown pressure when the shape of the test is similar to upper plot of Figure 7. This is also done by some operators when the shape of the test is similar to the lower plot of Figure 7. Industry practice varies on whether the leak initiation pressure or the breakdown pressure measured at a low pump rate is used to compute the formation integrity expressed as a maximum equivalent mud weight. The maximum pressure seen when the shape of the test is similar to the lower plot of Figure 7 can be sensitive to how fast the mud is being pumped during the test. The leak initiation pressure is not as sensitive to the pump rate used during the test. The computation of fracture gradient using either the fracture initiation pressure or a breakdown pressures measured at a low pump rate clearly falls within normal industry practice. To my knowledge, MMS does not take a position on what constitutes the best available technology for running and interpreting a Pressure Integrity Test and will accept either approach described above.11
11 MDL Ex. 4731; MDL Ex. 4023; M. Saucier 7/27/11 Dep. Tr. at 166-67; F. Patton 7/13/11 Dep. Tr. at 230-31.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 27
.
Figure 8: Typical Pressure Integrity Test Plot
Points in the table are most often obtained every ¼ barrel while pumping at ¼ barrels per minute. However, when the hole-volume is large the test time required becomes unnecessarily large and points are obtained every ½ barrel while pumping at ½ barrels per minute or every barrel while pumping at one barrel per minute. Pump rates higher than one barrel per minute during a Leak-off test are unusual. When the points are too far apart, it becomes more difficult to determine the pressure at which the departure from linearity occurred. A common practice is to draw a straight line through the points on the linear trend and also draw a straight line though the first two or three points that fall to the right of the linear trend. The leak initiation pressure is then determined from the intersection point of these two lines. When pumping is stopped after pumping only a small volume into the fracture, the fracture will close quickly and the Initial Shut-In Pressure (ISIP) will be only slightly higher than the pressure to re-initiate the fracture. This will often yield the same results as the point of departure from the straight-line trend. Also, with the pump off, there is no frictional pressure loss down the drill string.
The interpretation of leak of tests is not an exact science and I have observed significant differences in interpretations among practicing professionals attending my well control class. During the mid-1990’s, my graduate students collected Leak-off test data from a number of offshore operators in an effort to develop improved fracture gradient prediction methods. It was clear that there was variability in the selection of the formation breakdown pressure from the Leak-off test results. Data from softer, less consolidated formations are sometimes more
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 28
difficult to interpret. Experience in some areas has shown that small leakage rates can be tolerated or controlled with loss circulation material.
Dr. Alan Huffman has concluded that in drilling the Macondo Well, BP departed from the standards that would be met by any prudent operator. This was in part based on his analysis of the pressure integrity tests conducted at the bottom of each casing or liner. In some cases Dr. Huffman focuses on reporting errors made in submissions to MMS (now BOEMRE) and in other cases he questions the validity of the tests conducted. As discussed below, I disagree with Dr. Huffman’s assertions.
Figure 9: Approximate effect of Water Depth on Fracture Gradient at 3500 feet
DRILLING MARGINS
For conventional drilling in deepwater, there is a narrow margin between the mud weight needed to control pore pressure and the mud weight that would cause an exposed formation to fracture. Figure 9 is a comparison of fracture gradients below casing set with a sediment penetration of 3500 ft. Note the drastic decrease in fracture gradient for a casing string cemented 3500 feet into the sediments as water depths increase. The narrower margin requires the use of more casing strings than for the same well in shallow water. This occurs because the open hole must support a column of mud that is heavier than seawater and that extends far above the sea floor to the floating drilling vessel at the surface.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 29
Every operator in deepwater wells encounters narrow drilling margins. The way to manage narrow drilling margins is to carefully monitor the well at all times and set more casing strings. The Macondo well was not unusual in that regard.
Figure 10: What is a Kick?
As shown previously in Figure 2b, the mud weight should be sufficient to maintain the pressure within a borehole at any given depth above the pore pressure of a permeable formation exposed to the borehole at that depth. If this is not done, fluids from the rock pores can flow into the well. An influx of formation fluid into the well is called a kick (Figure 10) because in an extreme case it can “kick” the mud out of the well onto the rig floor. The rig crews are trained to recognize a kick early when signs are much less obvious and to close the blowout preventer. Formation fluids entering the well cause the mud to flow out of the well faster than it is being
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 30
pumped and cause the fluid level in the pits to rise. Pit drills, in which a false indication of a pit level increase is created, are routinely conducted to test the response of the crew.12
Kicks are not desired but happen on many wells drilled in the Gulf of Mexico because of the presence of abnormal pressure. Mud logging service companies such as Sperry-Sun display a number of indicators that show when the pore pressure could be increasing. None of this technology is 100% accurate, so occasionally a well will become underbalanced and formation fluids will enter the well. Normally the influx of fluid is detected quickly from either a pit level increase or an increase in the flow returning from the well and the well is shut-in with only a small pit gain. The required mud weight (kill mud weight) is calculated from the observed shut-in drill pipe pressure. The mud service company prepares the kill mud and it is circulated around with the blowout preventers closed and flow from the well taken through an adjustable choke. Formation fluid is circulated out of the well and kill mud is circulated to the surface. After it is verified that the well is dead, normal operations can be resumed. Redundant well control systems and good training practices have been established for many years. Such an event can be handled in a routine manner.
When pulling the drill pipe out of the well to “trip” for a new bit, the pressure at the bottom of the well decreases slightly below that of a static well. Thus, the mud weight must be maintained slightly above the pore pressure gradient in order to prevent a kick. The additional mud weight maintained over the pore pressure gradient is called the “trip margin.”
The mud weight should also be less than the fracture gradient at the bottom of the casing, which is referred to as the “casing seat” or the “casing shoe” or sometimes just “shoe.” As shown in Figure 11, it is important to prevent the development of a very large fracture that could grow upward outside of casing into weaker sediments previously protected by the casing. This can cause an inability to keep the hole full of mud and lead to an “underground blowout,” (Figure 12). Underground blowouts are very expensive to control and usually require sealing off and losing at least the bottom portion of the well. In some cases, the entire well is lost. If the casing penetration is not very deep (less than about 2500 feet) and there are no shallow sands or shell beds to take the flow, the sediments can be broached all the way to the surface and cause a large crater to develop. This is dangerous for bottom supported rigs, since they are not easily moved.
12 Transocean’s procedures require pit drills to be conducted weekly, along with other well control drills on the rig. See MDL Ex. 1454, Transocean Well Control Handbook at TRN-MDL-00286823-26.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 31
When circulating the mud, or when running drill pipe or casing into the well, the pressure at the bottom of the well increases slightly above that of a static well. Thus the mud weight should be maintained below the fracture gradient to prevent loss of mud to a formation fracture. The rig crew is trained to quickly detect when mud is being lost and to take appropriate measures to stop the loss. There have been numerous advancements in the design and use of loss circulation material to “heal” the fracture so that normal operations can be resumed.
Figure 11: Shoe Strength protects Weaker Sediments Above
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 32
Figure 12: What is an Underground Blowout?
When a kick is taken and the blowout preventers are closed, the surface drill pipe pressure increases by the amount that the pore pressure exceeds the mud pressure in the well. The casing pressure increases higher than the drill pipe pressure by an amount equal to the difference in hydrostatic pressure of the mud in the drill pipe and the kick contaminated mud in the annulus. When the kick is detected quickly and the kick volume is small, the casing pressure is only slightly higher than the drill pipe. The shut-in pressure causes the downhole pressures to be higher than static downhole pressure when no kick is present. A higher mud weight must be circulated into the well at a low pump rate and under pressure with the blowout preventers closed before normal operations can be resumed.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 33
SAFE DRILLING MARGIN
The initial drilling plan must be made before starting the well. For the first well drilled in a new prospect area, prediction of how formation pore pressure and fracture gradient will vary with depth is especially difficult and is usually not accurate. This is especially true when the normal trend of increasing pore pressure and fracture gradient with increasing depth is not present. The bottom part of the Macondo well had a reversal of the normal trend in which both formation pore pressure and fracture gradient decreased with increasing depth.13
Changes in the casing program based on information learned while drilling is a common occurrence. The estimation of pore pressure and fracture gradient becomes more accurate after data from previously drilled nearby wells are available. For example, BP was able to use data obtained drilling the original Macondo well to drill a nearby relief well with no delays.14
When planning a section of hole in a well below casing, it is clearly desirable for the operator to plan to use a mud weight below the fracture gradient to allow for circulating, running pipe, or taking an unexpected kick. Since the fracture gradient is known at the casing seat and fracture gradient normally increase with depth, normal practice is to base the planned margin between fracture pressure and mud weight on the Pressure Integrity Test results. The reference to safe drilling margin is in 30 C.F.R. § 250.427 covering the requirements for pressure integrity tests. The fracture gradient included in the Application for Permit to Drill (APD) provided BOEMRE (previously MMS) must be included in a single plot containing estimated pore pressures, formation fracture gradients, proposed drilling fluid weights, and casing setting depths in true vertical measurements. The regulations do not specify how the estimate is made or what safety margins to use. Approval of the plan is at the discretion of the District Manager of MMS based on the information presented. Once the plan is approved, and drilling commences, the plan in the APD defines the approved safety margin. For example, if the planned maximum mud weight is 0.5 pounds per gallon less that the estimated fracture pressure for the hole section, then the approved safety margin is 0.5 pounds per gallon.
It is recognized that the approved APD is based on estimates and that data obtained while drilling must be recorded in the daily drilling reports as the well is being drilled. The regulations state:
13 MDL Ex. 1 BP’s Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report, September 8, 2010 at 16-17; MDL Ex. 986 Chief Counsel’s 2011 National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling Report at 59-61; MWD/LWD real time data recorded on the rig and cited in Appendix D. 14 Daily Drilling Reports for the relief wells are identified in Appendix D.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 34
You must use the pressure integrity test and related hole-behavior observations, such as pore-pressure test results, gas-cut drilling fluid, and well kicks to adjust the drilling fluid program and the setting depth of the next casing string. You must record all test results and hole-behavior observations made during the course of drilling related to formation integrity and pore pressure in the driller's report.15
This recognizes that mud weights must be allowed to deviate from the APD based on what is seen while drilling. MMS does not specify how to interpret the information that you must record, but they want the ability to be able to inspect the available information. In my opinion, it is extremely important for the team on the rig to be able to change mud weights when needed for proper well control and safety without having to wait for approval.
Dr. Alan Huffman expresses the opinion that if mud is lost while drilling, this event is equivalent to an “open-hole pressure integrity test” and requires immediate recalculation of the drilling margin. He states that regulations require that if the mud weight cannot be safely reduced within the approved safe drilling margin (as re-calculated based on loss return incident), then the operator must cease drilling immediately and get approval from BOEMRE to drill ahead with a reduced drilling margin or to set casing immediately. He further indicated that BOEMRE would not allow drilling to continue if the recalculated drilling margin was less than 0.3 pounds per gallon and would require casing to be set immediately. I do not agree with any of this for the following reasons:16
� In deepwater drilling, the margin between pore pressure and fracture gradient is often so small that permeable formations encountered while drilling will initially fracture at mud weights significantly lower than the shoe strength. The fracture resistance of these zones can usually be raised to that of the confining shale by treatment with modern loss circulation material. When the use of loss-circulation-material allows full circulation to be regained, the mud weight that the well will hold can often be gradually increased. There is no way to calculate what the final fracture gradient will be after multiple treatments. Geo-Tap tools can measure pore pressure but do not measure fracture pressure. BP has specialists for calculating fracture gradient from other observations, but these are just estimated and are often inaccurate. The drilling team leader uses this group to provide input, but he must weigh their input against other potential problems and operational risks.
15 30 C.F.R. § 250.427
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 35
� In my opinion, normal drilling practice is to drill through a sandstone interval whenever circulation can be established, even if some mud losses continue. Setting casing in the middle of a sandstone formation would be extremely unwise because the weak zone would still be exposed and it would be much more difficult to get a good cement job on the casing. Furthermore, the formation pore pressure gradient within a permeable formation cannot increase with additional penetration to the bottom of the sandstone formation. The mud weight in use will be sufficient to control formation pore pressure. Care will have to be taken when pulling pipe out of the hole, but again, there are standard drilling practices for not allowing the bottom-hole pressure to fall when pulling pipe out of the hole. This is especially true on modern rigs which allow mud to be pumped when pulling pipe.
� Efforts to heal the loss circulation zone would continue while drilling through the permeable zone and there would be no basis for accurate re-determination of the final fracture gradient. When the use of loss-circulation-material allows full circulation to be regained, the mud weight that the well will hold can often be gradually increased.
� I would expect the District Manager of BOEMRE (previously MMS) and experienced field inspectors to recognize normal practice in such situations. If regulation enforcement was a simple enforcement of pre-determined drilling margins as indicated by Dr. Huffman, then this would be written into the regulations. There would be a many more issuances of non-compliance made in the Gulf of Mexico region if every case of drilling ahead with hole-ballooning seen in a field inspection resulted in one being issued. If casing had to be run every time loss circulation or hole-ballooning was experienced, there would be very few wells successfully drilled in the Gulf of Mexico area.
Dr. Huffman found examples of reporting errors made in documents submitted to BOEMRE (previously MMS). In my opinion, the few errors found in the large amount of material submitted to BOEMRE (previously MMS) do not warrant the leap Dr. Huffman makes to a conclusion that BP intentionally hid information so that they could operate in an unsafe and imprudent manner.
16 Transocean recognized many of these aspects of deepwater drilling as well, as reflected in their “Drilling Deepwater Wells” powerpoint presentation. TRN-MDL-00868570.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 36
Dr. Huffman also based his conclusions regarding purported imprudent practices in part on BP not reporting Pressure Integrity Test results to the nearest hundredth of a pound per gallon. In my opinion, normal engineering practice is not to exceed expected accuracy when reporting test results. Mud weights are measured to the nearest tenth of a pound per gallon. BP used a Pressure While Drilling (PWD) tool above the drill bit on the Macondo well. This tool is not required and the use of this tool is an indication of using the best available technology and incurring extra costs to improve safety. The accuracy of a very good pressure gauge seldom is better than one percent and it is difficult to rely on a PWD tool to be accurate to a hundredth of a pound per gallon when measuring downhole conditions. In my opinion, it is normal practice to record mud weights and equivalent mud weights to the nearest tenth of a pound per gallon. Also, it is my understanding that the MMS’s (now BOEMRE) electronic eWells system requires data to be reported in tenths.17
Dr. Huffman expressed an opinion that the pressure integrity tests that were conducted below the 13-5/8 inch liner and the 9-7/8 inch liner were not valid tests. I was asked to do independent analyses of these pressure integrity tests and to provide an opinion as to whether or not these tests were valid. Both tests were valid pressure integrity tests.
BP’S PRESSURE INTEGRITY TEST PROCEDURE
BP’s written procedure for conducting a Pressure Integrity Test is as follows:
PRE-JOB CONSIDERATIONS:
· Graph casing pressure test versus volume pumped and use as a baseline for the PIT test.
· Use cement unit and cement unit gauges. Ensure sufficient mud supply to the cement unit.
· Calculate estimated Leak-off Test (LOT)/Formation Integrity Test (FIT) pressure and test lines to 1000 psi over expected LOT/FIT pressure.
OPERATIONS
� 1. Drill out the cement shoe track, cleanout rat-hole, and drill 10-ft of new formation or as otherwise specified in well specific program
� Technical Note: � MMS regulations require a minimum of 10-ft md and a maximum of 50-ft md of
new formation.
17 F. Patton 7/13/11 Dep. Tr. at 271:2-6 (“Q. Mr. Patton, the eWell submission, the computer submission, you can only submit data in tenths, correct? A. That is correct, yes.”)
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 37
� 2. Circulate cuttings out of the well or at least above the BOPs. If minimal cuttings have been drilled, circulate a minimum of 1,000-ft above the Bottom-hole Assembly. Ensure consistent mud weight with surface samples with pressurized scales.
� 3. Pull bit back into shoe and space out to close the appropriate BOPs. � 4. While keeping drill string still, circulate up consistent downhole equivalent
static densities (ESDs) from the pressure while drilling (PWD) tool to achieve < 0.05 pound per gallon consistency.
� 5. Displace the appropriate choke or kill line to fresh mud. � Technical Note: � The test will be performed pumping down the drill pipe and down the annulus
simultaneously via the appropriate choke or kill line to reduce friction pressure. � 6. Rig up to pump down the drill pipe and down choke or kill line with the
cement unit. � 7. Break circulation down the drill pipe and down the choke or kill line. � 8. Close the appropriate surface valve on the drill pipe side, and the appropriate
choke/kill line valve at the BOP stack. Test lines to 1,000 psi over anticipated maximum LOT or FIT surface pressure.
� 9. Bleed off test pressure but do not completely drain lines. Open valves and break circulation down drill pipe and down the choke or kill line.
� 10. Shutdown and re-zero pressure gauge at cement unit to account for hydrostatic between cement unit and rig floor.
� 11. Close appropriate BOP and monitor return line to ensure no returns during PIT.
� 12. Perform LOT/FIT, pumping a maximum of ½ barrel per minute (bpm). � 13. Record volume pumped and surface pressure consistent with pump rate. For
example, if pumping ½ bpm, record data every ½ bbl. If pumping � ¼ bpm, record data every ¼ bbl. � 14. Graph data on a Surface Pressure versus Volume Pumped/Time graph. � Technical Note: � Note 1: If performing an FIT, once desired surface pressure is achieved, shutdown
and monitor pressure for a minimum of 10 minutes. � Note 2: If performing a LOT, continue pumping until the pressure flatten or
decreases (pump until the subsequent pressure is equal or less than the last pressure). This is the shut-down point.
�
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 38
BP’S PRESSURE INTEGRITY TEST OF THE 13-5/8 INCH LINER SHOE
The Pressure Integrity Test on the 13-5/8 inch liner shoe was conducted on March 21, 2010 with R. Sepulvado listed the Well Site Leader supervising the test.18 The measured depth of the hole was 13,150 feet, which corresponded to a True Vertical Depth of 13,140 feet. The bottom of the liner was at a measured depth of 13,145 feet which corresponded to a True Vertical Depth of 13,135 feet. The well was vertical on bottom (inclination angle of zero). The top cement plug was at the float collar at 01:30 hours on March 21, 2010. The casing was pressure tested at about 17:00 hrs. The volume of 12.5 pound per gallon mud pumped during the casing test to achieve a test pressure of 2415 psi was 14.0 barrels and the data recorded during the pressure build-up was as follows:
Casing Test
Volume Pump Pumped Pressure (bbl) (psi)
0 0 0.5 240 1 322
1.5 405 2 500
2.5 575 3 670
3.5 765 4 845
4.5 930 5 1020
5.5 1100 6 1180
6.5 1260 7 1345
7.5 1425 8 1505
8.5 1590 9 1670
9.5 1750 18 The data underlying this discussion comes from Daily Operations Reports for March 20 and 21, 2010 (BP-HZN-MBI00013815-26); IADC Drilling Report for March 20 and 21, 2010 (BP-HZN-2179MDL00060910-12, 916-18); Daily Geological Reports for March 20 and 21, 2010 (BP-HZN-2179MDL00060910-12, 16-18), and MDL Ex. 4025 - FIT/LOT Worksheet and the realtime downhole MWD/PWD data referenced in Appendix D.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 39
10 1830 10.5 1900 11 1980
11.5 2060 12 2140
12.5 2220 13 2310
13.5 2400 14 2490
The pressure after 30 minutes was 2370 psi, which was about a 2% decline in 30 minutes and thus much less than the 10% allowed for a successful test. The volume bled back after the test was 14 barrels.
By 10:30 hours the next day, the drilling assembly had been run to bottom and cement was drilled out from 13,100 feet to 13,150 feet. It was reported that the bit exited the shoe at 13,145 feet and cement was drilled in the rat hole from 13,145 feet to 13,150 feet. Ten feet of new formation was drilled from 13,150 feet to 13,160 feet (measured depth). The cuttings were pumped from bottom to the wellhead. A static bottom bole pressure equivalent to 12.72 pounds per gallon was reported with a surface mud weight of 12.5 pounds per gallon when circulating at a measure depth of 13,140 feet. The Pressure Integrity Test was performed at about 13:00 hours using a pump rate of 0.5 barrels per minute. The midpoint of the new formation drilled was a measured depth of 13,155 feet and a true vertical depth of 13,145 feet. The following data was recorded:
Pressure Integrity Test Shut-in Data Pump
Volume Pump Time (min) Pressure Pumped Pressure (min) (psi) (bbl) (psi) 0.17 1416
1 1322 0 0 2 1217
0.5 140 3 1200 1 205 4 1190
1.5 270 5 1187 2 350 6 1183
2.5 438 7 1180 3 520 8 1178
3.5 600 9 1177 4 680 10 1175
4.5 760
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 40
5 840 5.5 930 6 1010
6.5 1090 7 1170
7.5 1250 8 1330
8.5 1420 9 1480
9.5 1480
The volume of mud bled back at the end of the test was 9.25 barrels. Note that 9.5 barrels was pumped into the well when increasing the pressure. This indicates that 0.25 barrels of mud and mud filtrate leaked into the formation during the test.
The results of my analysis are shown graphically in Figure 13. Basing the fracture gradient on the observed fracture initiation pressure of 1480 psi, the fracture gradient is calculated to be equivalent to a surface mud weight of 14.7 pounds per gallon. On this test, the fracture initiation pressure was the breakdown pressure. This is consistent with the 10 feet of formation being exposed consisting of an impermeable smooth borehole with no pre-existing defects or cracks and significant tensile strength and stress concentration near the borehole wall.
The fracture pressure at 13,145 feet calculated using the equivalent mud weight on bottom as measured by the Pressure While Drilling (PWD) tool was 10,175 psi. The overburden stress at a measured depth of 13,155 feet (true vertical depth of 13,145 feet), due to the weight of the sediments above, was calculated from well logs to be 9,632 psi. Thus the Leak-off test gave a value for fracture pressure that was about 543 psi higher than the calculated overburden stress. This is a reasonable value for the tensile strength for impermeable rock that was not previously fractured.
The shut-in pressure versus time plot is indicative of a fracture that closed slowly over a two minute period after pumping was stopped. The fracture closure pressure appears to be about 1,200 psi, which is equivalent to a surface mud weight equivalent to 14.3 pounds per gallon. However, fracture closure pressure generally cannot be accurately measured in mud because the mud starts to gel as soon as pumping is stopped.
Dr. Huffman indicated that Pressure Integrity Test was a bad test because of the following “problems”:
� The slope of the pressure build-up curve for the Pressure Integrity Test was very close to the slope of the casing pressure test build-up curve.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 41
� The leak-off pressure and the propagation pressure was nearly the same. � An initial shut-in pressure that is lower than Dr. Huffman would expect relative to
the apparent leak-off pressure. � An anomalously steep decline in pressure during the shut-in period. � The fracture gradient indicated by the test was higher than expected and higher
than the overburden stress computed from well logs.
Figure 13: Pressure Integrity Test at 13-5/8 inch Liner Shoe
I do not agree that the above observations indicate that the test was bad. I find the test results to be consistent with 10 feet of borehole drilled below casing into low permeability rock that was not previously fractured. A point by point response to Dr. Huffman’s list follows.
� The volume being compressed for the casing and leak-off tests are almost the same. Adding 60 more feet to the 13,100 feet of well depth does not add much to the volume that has to be compressed. The length of drill string in the hole was less for the casing test. Thus, for low permeability rock, the slope would be expected to be nearly the same.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 42
� I do not find it strange for the breakdown and propagation pressure to be the same. Sometimes the breakdown is very sharp and the first point after breakdown is lower than the breakdown pressure as shown in Figure 7. In this case we have only one point and not a continuous curve.
� The Initial Shut in Pressure falls 75 psi below the final pumping pressure on the casing test and 64 psi on the Leak-off test. I find that this is consistent with opening a very small fracture and leaking only 0.25 barrels of mud and mud filtrate into the fracture.19
� I did not find the decline in pressure after shut-in to be anomalous. I find it to be consistent with a small fracture not penetrating all the way through the region of higher stress concentration surrounding a borehole drilled through rock not previously fractured.
� It is true that the test result was higher than expected and was likely not to be representative of the entire hole-section. However, it did indicate that the shoe strength was strong enough to proceed with drilling the next section, which was the main purpose of the test. BP eventually adjusted the fracture gradient curves to calculated values more representative of the hole section.
BP’S PRESSURE INTEGRITY TEST OF THE 9-7/8 INCH LINER SHOE
The Pressure Integrity Test on the 9-7/8 inch liner shoe was conducted on April 2, 2010 with Lee and Price listed as the Well Site Leaders supervising the test.20 The measured depth of the hole was 17,183 feet, which corresponded to a True Vertical Depth of 17,173 feet. The bottom of the liner was at a measured depth of 17,168 feet which corresponded to a True Vertical Depth of 17,158 feet. The well was nearly vertical on bottom (inclination angle of 0.5 degrees). The cement was in place at 11:00 hours on March 31, 2010. The casing was pressure tested at about 13:00 hours on April 1, 2010. The volume of 14.1 pound per gallon mud pumped during the
19 The volume pumped into the well was 9.5 barrels and the volume bleed back after the test was 9.25 barrels. 20 The data for this discussion comes from the Daily Operations Report for April 2, 2010 (BP-HZN-MBI00013890-96), the IADC Drilling Report for April 2, 2010 (BP-HZN-2179MDL00251188-91), Daily Geological Reports for April 2, 2010 (BP-HZN-2179MDL00059370-71), MDL Ex. 4025 - FIT/LOT worksheet, and the real time downhole MWD/PWD data referenced in Appendix D.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 43
casing test to achieve a test pressure of 914 psi was 5.75 barrels and the data recorded during the pressure build-up was as follows:
Casing Test
Volume Pump Pumped Pressure
(bbl) (psi)
0 0 0.5 207 1 257
1.5 365 2 438
2.5 507 3 582
3.5 656 4 731
4.5 795 5 875
5.5 950
The pressure after 30 minutes was 887 psi, which was about a 3% decline in 30 minutes and thus much less than the 10% allowed for a successful test. The volume of mud bled back after the test was 5.5 bbl.
By 05:00 hours on April 2, 2010, the drilling assembly had been run to bottom and cement was drilled out from 17,000 feet to 17,173 feet. Ten feet of new formation was drilled from 17,173 feet to 17,183 feet (measured depth). The cuttings were pumped from bottom to above the blowout preventers. A static bottom bole pressure equivalent to 14.52 pounds per gallon was reported with a surface mud weight of 14.3 pounds per gallon when circulating at a measured depth of 17,183 feet. The Pressure Integrity Test was performed at about 09:00 hours using a pump rate of 0.5 barrels per minute at the liner shoe at 17,168 feet (measured depth). The midpoint of the new formation drilled was a measured depth of 17,178 feet and a true vertical depth of 17,173 feet. The following data was recorded:
Pressure Integrity Test Shut-in Data Pump
Volume Pump Time (min) Pressure Pumped Pressure (min) (psi)
(bbl) (psi) 0.17 1500 1 1500
0 40 2 1500
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 44
Pressure Integrity Test Shut-in Data 0.5 146 3 1500 1 215 4 1500
1.5 293 5 1500 2 365 6 1500
2.5 435 7 1500 3 510 8 1500
3.5 587 9 1500 4 660 10 1500
4.5 735 11 1500 5 805 12 1500
5.5 880 13 1500 6 952 14 1500
6.5 1020 15 1500 7 1092 16 1500
7.5 1164 17 1500 8 1235 18 1500
8.5 1306 9 1380
9.5 1450 10 1520
The volume of mud bled back at the end of the test was 10.0 barrels. Note that 10.0 barrels
was pumped into the well when increasing the pressure. This test did not go to Leak-off. The equivalent mud weight on bottom as measured by the Pressure While Drilling (PWD) tool was reported to be equivalent to 16.22 pounds per gallon. The results of my analysis are shown graphically in Figure 14. Using the pressure of 1,520 psi when the test was terminated, the shoe strength is calculated to be equivalent to a surface mud weight of 16.0 pounds per gallon.
The overburden stress at a true vertical depth of 17,173 feet, due to the weight of the sediments above, was calculated from well logs to be 13,772 psi. The pressure measured with the PWD tool was 16.22 pounds per gallon or 14,470 psi. Thus the Formation Integrity Test gave a strength value that was 698 psi above the calculated overburden stress. This is a reasonable number for 10 feet of formation being exposed consisting of an impermeable smooth borehole with no pre-existing defects or cracks and significant tensile strength and stress concentration near the borehole wall.
Dr. Huffman has suggested that this was not a valid test because of its high value and BP was not a prudent operator because they did not continue testing. I saw no evidence that this was true. There is often a wide variation in shoe test results when comparing results obtained on different wells and when comparing observed results to calculated results. Calculation results
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 45
also vary depending on the correlation used in the calculation. An example of variations on the order of two pounds per gallon was shown previously in Figure 6.
Figure 14: Pressure Integrity Test at 9-7/8 inch Liner Shoe
Dr. Huffman pointed out that the slope of the buildup curve was nearly the same as the casing test and compared the test to the test at the 16 inch shoe which had more difference in slope. The decrease in slope of the straight line buildup curve (between the casing test and the formation test in a deep well with 10 feet of open borehole) depends primarily on the rate at which mud filtrate is being lost during the test. If the 10 feet of borehole is good shale with a very low permeability, then one would expect the slopes to be nearly the same. The permeability of shale is in the nanodarcy range,21 which is about a million times less permeable than
21 Discussion of shale permeability in “Shale Water as a Pressure Support Mechanism in Gas Reservoirs having Abnormal Formation Pressure,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 3 (1990) 305-319.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 46
sandstone, and would be expected to behave much like steel pipe from the standpoint of allowing fluid to enter the borehole wall when no cracks are present.
Dr. Huffman pointed out internal e-mails within the BP organization discussing the high shoe strength. Various reasons were suggested including the possibility that the driller did not know what depth he was at when he drilled out the shoe.22 This issue was brought up in regard to both tests that produced unexpectedly high fracture gradients. BP’s team members that supervised the test recognized that the results were higher than expected and BP even repeated a portion of the test.23 It is not plausible that they would not have checked for possible pipe tally errors and that the driller was off by more than 10 feet. Another speculation is that not all of cement in the five feet of rat hole below the casing had been drilled out. This speculation was partially based on a report of abundant cement mixed with shale cuttings when drilling new formation below the 13-5/8 inch shoe. When cementing with a short rat hole below the casing, the cement is not expected to displace all of the mud out of the rat hole, but sometimes good cement fills the entire rat hole. Good cement in the entire rat hole results in more cement cuttings being circulated to the surface when drilling ahead. I have examined the daily operational reports, cuttings evaluations, penetration rate data, and gamma ray logs and found the speculation about the tests being conducted in casing or cement not being drilled out to be unfounded for both tests. The data is consistent with the depths reported in the operational records and confirmed that both tests were conducted in newly drilled formation below previously drilled larger hole.
It should also be pointed out that cement is often squeezed at the shoe to repair a leaking cement seal. The drilled out cement after a squeeze job is not strong enough in tension to interfere with the Pressure Integrity Test conducted after the squeeze job. Sometimes multiple squeeze jobs must be done to repair the cement seal around the bottom of the casing.
The fact that BP has on its staff a number of scientists that specialize in pore pressure and fracture gradient calculations is an indication to me that it was not trying to cut corners to save money but instead was employing the best available technology to support and advise its experienced team leader. Filings by BP and the number of individuals focused on pore pressure prediction and estimates show a strong emphasis by BP towards obtaining as accurate as possible data related to pore pressure and estimated fracture gradients. The specialists often see only their side of an issue and do not recognize the risk versus benefit of taking additional data. If drilling was stopped to do a Leak-off test in the extended borehole, the risk of getting stuck
22 MDL Ex. 1343, M. Albertin April 2, 2010 email discussing FIT test. 23 MDL Ex. 3734, BP-HZN-2179MDL00247809
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 47
would increase. If the test was carried to a high value, the risk of unnecessarily causing a leak at the liner top had to be considered. Even if the test gave a value close to what was calculated by the specialists, this would not necessarily be representative of formations not yet drilled. The test had accomplished its main objective of demonstrating that the shoe was strong enough to proceed with drilling the next section of hole. Additionally, it is my understanding that the author of the email quoted by Dr. Huffman concluded that the test was valid after he sent the email.24
The resistance of a rock to fracture is controlled primarily by the overburden stress in the sediments caused by the weight of sediments above and other local tectonics. The overburden stress always increases with depth so that the weaker sediments exposed by an open borehole will usually be near the top of the open borehole. However, rock fracture resistance is also affected by pore pressure, permeability, mineral composition, and cementation. Mother Nature is not uniform and large variability in fracture resistance is to be expected. Figure 15, taken from one of my old lectures, shows the common assumptions made to do fracture mechanics modeling on a picture of what Mother Nature has to offer. Fortunately, the technology for healing downhole fractures has been improved. When drilling in deep water, care must be taken to keep a good supply of loss circulation material on hand.
24 M. Albertin 7/13/11 Dep. Tr. at 583-85 (discussing FIT test and stating that after discussion, BP believed it was a valid test of rock stronger than they expected); G. Vinson 6/23/11 Dep. Tr. at 274-75 (same).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 48
Figure 15: Common Assumptions in Fracture Modeling (Homogeneous Layers, Isotropic Media, Elastic Behavior)
EFFECT OF SPACER ON NEGATIVE PRESSURE TEST INTERPRETATION
The discussion of the previous section was regarding the Pressure Integrity Test conducted after setting each casing string or liner required to complete the drilling operations. Once the production casing is run and cement is circulated as planned, additional pressure tests are conducted before completing the well to put it on production or to temporarily cap the well. A temporary cap allows the drilling rig to be released to drill other wells and a smaller rig moved on the well to complete the well and make it ready for production.
An overarching principle of well control that industry follows in drilling and completing wells is to always maintain two independently verified barriers to an uncontrolled release of formation fluids from the well.25 When drilling ahead in deep water, the two barriers are the hydrostatic pressure of the mud and the blowout preventer stack at the seafloor. The blowout preventer stack has redundant blowout preventers so that it can be closed on any size or shape of pipe in the hole or when nothing is in the hole. Provisions are also made for multiple blowout preventers for the same size range of pipe and for pipe to be stripped into the well under pressure. The hydrostatic pressure of the mud is verified to be a barrier simply by keeping the well filled with mud and observing that it does not flow. The blowout preventers are pressure tested on a routine schedule to verify their ability to function as a barrier.
After cementing casing, the casing and cement work together and isolate the rock formations from the inside of the well. However, the casing/cement system must be pressure tested to verify that it serves as a barrier. A positive pressure test of the production casing is conducted in the same manner that the other casing strings and liners are tested. The positive pressure test verifies that the casing is intact and does not leak from the inside of the casing to the outside of the casing from the wellhead to the Top Plug landed on the float collar at the bottom of the casing. However, before the hydrostatic head of the mud in the well can be reduced below formation pressure, a Negative Pressure Test is conducted in which the hydrostatic head is temporarily removed in a controlled manner to observe whether or not fluid can leak past the cement around the outside of the casing and the cement remaining in the bottom portion of the casing. The casing joints below the float collar are called the shoe joints. The purpose of the
25 Transocean’s well control handbook includes a discussion of multiple barriers, consistent with industry practice. See Ex. 1454, Transocean Well Control Handbook at TRN-MDL00286776.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 49
negative test is to verify that formation fluids cannot enter the well from the outside at the negative pressure difference that was imposed in the test.
Once the negative test is passed, the mud that was in the marine riser and in the top part of the well can be replaced with seawater. At this time the two verified barriers would be the tested casing/cement system and the blowout preventer stack. A cement plug could then be set in the top part of the casing.26 The cement plug would have no pressure differential across it and could be verified by tagging it with pipe to insure the cement had hardened and was in place. BP was planning to test the top plug in the Macondo well to 1000 psi, although there was no regulatory requirement to do so. Once the upper plug was in place, the Marine Riser could be pulled back and laid down on the drilling vessel and the temporary well cap put in place. There would be three barriers in place after the temporary cap was installed.
Figure 16 is a schematic showing the Macondo well after circulating cement. The left side of the schematic shows an overview of the well and various casing strings and liners. The right side of the schematic is an enlargement of the bottom part of the production casing and the sediments penetrated below the 9-7/8 inch liner. Figure 17 is a schematic of how the well would have been configured at the end of the temporary capping operation. Note that the change in fluid density occurs only above the depth of the plug (8,367 feet), where the 14 pound per gallon mud is replaced by seawater having a density of about 8.5 pounds per gallon. Everything else remains the same.
NEGATIVE TEST NOMENCLATURE
It is customary to reference a negative pressure test in terms of the depth to which the hydrostatic pressure will change or the depth of the equipment being tested. For the negative pressure test needed for the temporary capping operation, the negative test had to be conducted to an equivalent mud weight of 8.5 pounds per gallon at the plug depth of 8,367 feet. As shown in Figure 18, this is also equivalent to an 11.5 pound per gallon mud at the top of the shoe track at a vertical depth of approximately 18,100 feet.
26 Regulations require that the plug be at least 100 feet in length and be set no more than 1000 feet below the seafloor. However, BP had sought and received permission to set the plug about 3,400 feet below the seafloor, but would use a 300 foot plug. MDL Ex. 2236 (BP-HZN-2179MDL00048427-531). Setting the plug deeper would facilitate using more weight of pipe to set the casing lockdown device in the subsea wellhead at the seafloor.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 50
Figure 16: Schematic of Macondo Well after Circulating Cement
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 51
Figure 17: Planned Configuration of Macondo Well with Temporary Cap
I know of no industry standard regarding Negative Pressure Tests. The most common way to conduct a negative pressure test is to pump water down the drill pipe to a depth sufficient to cause the desired reduction in well hydrostatic pressure. To do this, the needed depth and volume required to fill the drill pipe to that depth is first calculated. The rig crew then pumps the calculated water volume down the drill pipe. When pumping is stopped, the surface drill pipe
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 52
pressure will be equal to the desired reduction in hydrostatic pressure. The blowout preventers are then closed and the surface drill pipe pressure is bled down to zero while the volume of water bled back is measured. When the drill pipe pressure reaches zero, the volume bled back should be the expansion volume of the fluids in the well corresponding to the pressure decrease. The system is then left static for the duration of the test. For a 30 minute negative test, this period would be 30 minutes. If no fluid flows from the drill pipe, the negative test is passed and reported as a good test. If the drill pipe pressure cannot be bled to zero or bleeds down and then increases, or water continues to flow from the drill pipe, the negative test is said to have failed. As shown in Figure 21 and as will be discussed in more detail later in this report, the system is easily understood using a U-tube analogy with the drill pipe being the high pressure side of the U-tube and the annulus being the low pressure side of the U-tube.
The rig crew should know not to let a significant influx of fluid into the well. The test is terminated quickly if the well is flowing. At the end of the test, the pump is started and the drill pipe pressure is increased back to the initial value seen when the blowout preventer was closed. The pressure on the drill pipe is slowly bled through a choke while the annulus kept full of mud by filling through a choke of kill line. This removes the water or synthetic base oil from the drill pipe and returns the well to its initial condition before the test.
On a deepwater rig with the blowout preventer at the seafloor, the luxury of additional piping (the choke and kill lines) down to the seafloor is present. Water or some other low density fluid such as synthetic oil can be pumped down the choke line instead of the drill pipe. This option is often preferred because it simplifies the bleed back part of the test. However, the depth of the choke line is fixed, so the hydrostatic pressure reduction achieved during the test is limited by the lowest density fluid available for pumping down the choke line.
The rig crew does not have to be told how to run a negative test. This should be a routine operation that fits within their training. A typical procedure sent to the rig would say simply to conduct a negative test to an equivalent density of so many pounds per gallon at a depth of so many feet. The procedure could also say to conduct a negative pressure test at a depth of so many feet to a pressure differential of so many psi. The operator’s representative and the rig crew would be expected to know the proper procedure for running the test.
I have reviewed several of Transocean’s written procedures for Performing Negative Flow Tests. These included tests conducted by pumping a low density fluid down the drill string27 and
27 The procedure labeled TRN-INV-00760141 is basically the general procedure described above in which low density fluid is pumped down the drill pipe to create the desired differential.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 53
tests conducted by pumping a low density fluid down the choke line. They also included a negative test run in conjunction with displacing the top part of the well from mud to seawater (separated by a spacer) as was being done on the Macondo Well at the time of the blowout.28
I reviewed several written Transocean procedures for conducting a Negative Pressure Test after pumping synthetic oil down the choke line and/or kill line.29 Transocean’s Task Specific THINK procedure for the Deepwater Horizon for performing a Negative Flow Test using the choke and kill lines is a variation of this procedure that uses both the choke line and kill line as the high pressure side of the U-Tube.30 One of the hazards warned about in the THINK procedure is that a closed flow path can give a false indication of no flow.
Figure 18: Use of Equivalent Mud Weights in Negative Test Nomenclature
28 The procedure labeled TRN-MDL-01323432 uses a spacer between the seawater and mud and pumps the spacer above the BOP stack before closing the Blowout Preventer and performing a Negative Test. 29 The procedure labeled TRN-INV-00760143 does not use the drill pipe and annulus as the two sides of the U-tube, but instead uses the choke line and kill line. The procedure labeled TRN-INV-00760142 is a slight variation of this procedure that uses the annular Blowout Preventer instead of the blind/shear rams. The procedure labeled BP-HZN-2179MDL03287798 used the choke line and the marine riser as the two sides of the U-tube. 30 TRN-MDL-01995569
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 54
FLUID DISPLACEMENT
The removal of the mud from the top part of the well and from the marine riser requires what is called a fluid displacement. This is accomplished by placing the drill string at the depth to be displaced. The replacement fluid is pumped from mud tanks on the rig into the drill pipe while taking return flow of existing well fluid to different mud tanks on the rig.
The displacement of a heavy oil base mud by sea water is complicated by the fact that mixing between the two fluids will take place during the displacement and contamination of the mud by sea water can cause the mud to become unstable. If this happens, the mud solids dispersed in the oil phase can start clumping together in the seawater. In order to avoid this mud chemistry problem, the drilling fluid specialist must design a spacer fluid to pump between the mud being removed from the well and the seawater being pumped into the well. The spacer must be compatible with the mud on the leading edge and the seawater on the trailing edge. The drilling fluid specialist is generally in charge of the displacement.31 He is trained in this operation and the operator depends on him to make sure that the displacement goes well.32 The displacement of oil base fluids by water base fluids or vice versa have been known to go bad and create a highly contaminated well that is hard to clean.
MI-SWACO SPACER
MI-Swaco provided drilling fluid and drilling fluid waste management services on the rig for BP. The MI-Swaco drilling fluid specialist wrote procedures and supervised displacement of various fluids into the well.33 At the end of drilling operations, there was a significant volume of loss circulation material that had been mixed as a contingency in case there was another event of loss circulation. The spacer for the fluid displacement was composed of a blend of two lost circulation material (LCM) pills left over from the drilling operations plus some additional 31 B. Billon 6/23/11 B. Billon Dep. Tr. at 109:11-21 (MI-Swaco personnel “in most cases, always prepare a [displacement] procedure”); B. Billon 6/24/11 Dep. Tr. at 471-482 (discussing M-I Swaco responsibilities); L. Lindner 9/14/11 Dep. Tr. at 231-33 (discussing development of M-I Swaco displacement procedure). 32 MDL Dep. Ex. 567; B. Billon 6/23/11 Dep. Tr. at 109:11-21; L. Lindner 9/15/11 Dep. Tr. at 549:12-17. In addition to the M-I Swaco personnel preparing the displacement procedure and calculating the pumps necessary, the Transocean rig crew would also have evaluated the displacement procedure. Wyman Wheeler’s interview notes reflect the collaborative process involved in displacement when he answered the question about displacement figures and said that displacement figures are evaluated by the Transocean rig crew and that the Assistant Driller, the Driller and the Toolpusher all have to agree before the procedure goes forward. W. Wheeler interview notes, TRN-INV-00004991-97. Leo Lindner also testified that he provided the displacement procedure to the mudloggers, Transocean crew, MI-Swaco personnel on shore and BP’s company man to review. L. Linder 9/14/11 Dep. Tr. at 268-69. 33 L. Lindner 9/14/11 Dep. Tr. at 564-65 (discussing M-I Swaco internal discussions regarding the spacer and Lindner testifying that he “got the idea from Doyle [Maxie of M-I Swaco]”); L. Lindner 9/14/11 Dep. Tr. at 231-33 (discussing development of M-I Swaco displacement procedure); MDL Ex. 2810.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 55
weight material and viscosity enhancer.34 MI-Swaco had not previously used LCM pills for this purpose but believed the mixture could be used effectively and at the same time better manage waste by providing a beneficial re-use of material.35 The mixture chemistry was adjusted by not adding the cross linking chemical so that it would not function in the same manner that it would if used to stop loss circulation. Without the cross linking chemical, the polymers present could not link and make the spacer too thick. The fibers and ground limestone that were in the mixture were inert materials that are routinely circulated in the mud without problems. MI-Swaco personnel has circulated this idea within their organization and also told BP that this was their plan.36
Figure 19: Displacement Planned by MI-Swaco Drilling Fluid Specialist
The basic displacement that was planned is shown in Figure 19. Note how the spacer separates the seawater from the 14 pound per gallon mud. In the drill pipe, the thick 16 pound 34 MDL Ex. 1, BP Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report at Appendices P and Q. 35 MDL Dep. Ex. 567; L. Lindner 9/15/11 Dep. Tr. at 583:22-25; B. Billon 6/24/11 Dep. Tr. at 522:6-12. 36 B. Billon 6/24/11 Dep. Tr. at 510-512 (discussing M-I Swaco internal emails regarding displacement); MDL Ex. 2810 (internal M-I Swaco emails regarding the spacer); L. Lindner 9/15/11 Dep. Tr. at 554-561.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 56
per gallon spacer displaces the mud below it. The spacer is about 14% heavier than the mud, but little mixing would take place at the interface because the spacer is so thick. The water displaces the spacer from the drill pipe and since water is only half as dense as the spacer, there would be little mixing between the water and the spacer in the drill pipe. In the annular space outside of the drill pipe, the spacer efficiently displaces the mud upward because it is heavier than the mud and more viscous. Note that the spacer gets shorter when it enters the large-diameter Marine Riser. When the water pushes the spacer up the Marine Riser, a less efficient displacement takes place and there is some mixing of the water and the spacer. However, the spacer contains only non-toxic material that could be released to the environment along with the seawater.
The final instructions sent to the rig regarding the temporary capping procedure included the following steps:37
1. Test Casing per Application for Permit to Drill to a low pressure test of 250 psi and a high pressure test of 2500 psi.
2. Run in the hole to 8,367 feet. 3. Displace to seawater from there to above the wellhead. 4. With seawater in the kill line, close the annular blowout preventer and do a
negative test to a pressure differential of approximately 2350 psi. 5. Open annular blowout preventer and continue displacement. 6. Set a 300 foot balanced cement plug with 5 barrels in the drill pipe. 7. Pull out of hole about 100 to 200 feet above the top of cement and drop a nerf
ball. Then circulate a drill string38 volume. 8. Spot corrosion inhibitor in the open hole. 9. Pull out of the hole to just below the wellhead or above with the 3-1/2 inch
stinger39. (If desired, wash with the 3-1/2 inch stinger but do not rotate. A separate run will not be made to wash since the displacement will clean up the wellhead.
10. Pull out of the hole and make Lead Impression Tool/Lock-Down Sleeve runs.40
37 MDL Ex. 545. 38 The term drill string is used to refer to all of the drill pipe sections and bottom-hole assembly (if any) as a whole. In this case it was composed of a section of 6-5/8” drill pipe on top, 5-1/2” drill pipe in the middle and 3-1/2” pipe in the bottom section. 39 A section of small diameter pipe on bottom is called a stinger. It is best to set a balanced cement plug using a small diameter pipe to reduce disturbing the slurry when pulling the stinger out of the cement after it is placed. 40 A Lead Impression Tool is used to provide an imprint of the area in the wellhead where the top of the production casing has been landed and the seals installed. The impression made into the soft lead block can confirm that the wellhead at the seafloor is properly configured to accept the lock down sleeve that will lock the top of the casing so that upward movement is prevented.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 57
11. Test casing and surface plug to 1000 psi with seawater as required by BP’s Drilling and Well Operations Practice (DWOP).
a. Confirm volume in barrels needed to pressure up on original casing test versus volume in barrels to test the surface plug. Less volume should be required to test the surface plug because of differences in well fluid volume and compressibility. (seawater versus synthetic oil bas mud).
b. Plot on chart and send to Houston for confirmation. The negative test procedures included in this plan appear very similar to what was used
previously by Transocean on the Kodiak Well in Mississippi Canyon 727 #2.41 After cementing, the drill pipe was pulled to the planned depth of the displacement. The Boost line, Choke Line, and Kill Line were displaced to seawater. They then pumped water base spacer down the drillpipe and displaced the drill pipe and hole with seawater to the top of the BOP Stack to perform the negative test. The differential pressure was put back using the Halliburton Pump, the annular preventer was opened, and the displacement to seawater was completed. This negative test, which was run on January 28, 2010, used essentially the same procedure as used on the Macondo Well.
MI-Swaco’s drilling fluid specialist included the negative test of Step 4 in the displacement procedure that he prepared. This procedure is given as Appendix P in BP’s Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report issued September 8, 2010.42 The procedure called for first displacing the boost line,43 choke line, and kill line44 to seawater and then closing the lower valve where these lines enter the Marine Riser. The MI-Swaco Procedure called for pumping:
� 73 barrels of seawater or 579 strokes to displace the Boost Line, � 8 barrels of seawater or 63 strokes to displace surface lines plus 100 barrels or
794 strokes to displace the choke line (total of 857 strokes), � 100 barrels of seawater or 794 strokes to displace the kill line, � 425 barrels of 16 pound per gallon spacer or 3373 strokes into the drill pipe, � Follow spacer with seawater until 775 barrels or 6150 strokes were pumped.
41 TRN-MDL-00600984. 42 MDL Ex. 1 at Appendix P; MDL Ex. 567. 43 The boost line is attached to the outside of the Marine Riser and enters the Marine Riser above the Blowout Preventer Stack. By pumping down the boost line with the boost pump, the upward fluid velocity in the Marine Riser can be increased. Boosting the fluid velocity in the Marine Riser can help carry the cuttings to the surface in this large diameter pipe. 44 The choke line and kill line are attached to the outside of the Marine riser and provide two high pressure fluid paths to or from the well when the blowout preventers are closed.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 58
At this point in the displacement, the spacer was intended to be above the upper annular in the blowout preventer with only seawater below the blowout preventer down to the planned cement plug depth of 8,367 feet. 45 The blowout preventer would then be closed to run the Negative Pressure Test.
Implementation of the procedure by the Transocean Rig Crew began at about 3:00 pm on April 20, 2010. An overview of the first part of the displacement is shown in Table 1.
ActivityEvent
No.Action Description Time
1Displaced boost line
mud to seawaterPump 1 used to displace boost line from 14-ppg mud to seawater. 15:03 - 15:15
2 Tested surface lines Pump 2 used to test the surface lines. 15:15 - 15:21
3Displaced choke line
mud to seawaterPump 2 used to displace choke line from 14-ppg mud to seawater. 15:21 - 15:38
4Displaced kill line mud to seawater
Pump 2 pumped used to displace kill line from 14-ppg mud to seawater. 15:38 - 15:55
5Pumped spacer
through drillpipe into well
Pumps 3 and 4 used to pump about 454 bbls of 16-ppg spacer from Pit 5 into the well displacing 14-ppg mud.
15:55 - 16:27
6Pumped seawater through drillpipe
into well
Pumps 3 and 4 used to pump 353 bbl of seawater behind the spacer to place the theoretical spacer/water interface above the BOP. Pumps are shut down.
16:27 - 16:53
Displaced mud from Booster,
Choke, and Kill lines
Displaced mud from
Drill pipe and Riser
Table 1 –Summary of Events during the Initial Displacement
Sperry-Sun Real Time Data indicated the following:
� 616 strokes of seawater was pumped (Boost Line), � 872 strokes of seawater was pumped (Surface line and Choke Line), � 845 strokes of seawater was pumped (Kill Line), � 3607 strokes were pumped down drill pipe from the tank containing the
spacer, � Pumping continued with seawater down drill pipe until total stroke count of
6408 (807 barrels) were pumped.
At this point, the pumps were stopped and the blowout preventer was closed to conduct the negative test.
45 Leo Lindner, a MI-Swaco Drilling Fluid Specialist testified that he had calculated that the spacer would be 17 feet above the Blowout Preventer. L. Lindner 9/14/11 Dep. Tr. at 271-72. See also MDL Ex. 1 at page 84, BP Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report at 84 and Appendix Q (spacer calculated to be 12 feet above BOP).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 59
The intent of the procedure was to place the entire spacer above the upper annular in the blowout preventer. The actual position of the bottom of the spacer at the time pumping was stopped to do the negative pressure test cannot be accurately determined. If the spacer tank contained 454 barrels of spacer,46 the interface would be below the bottom of the blowout preventer. In addition, the pump pressure observed when pumping was stopped indicated that the effective height of the spacer was greater than expected for all of the spacer to be above the blowout preventer. I would expect mixing at the spacer seawater interface during the displacement because the spacer was almost twice the density of the water. Once pumping stopped, the rate of settling of solids from the spacer into the seawater below would have increased. Spacers are designed to separate fluids for circulating conditions and not for static conditions. In my opinion, the procedure followed did not place all of the spacer above the blowout preventer and spacer material was in and below the blowout preventer.
NEGATIVE PRESSURE TEST
A summary of the actions taken by the rig crew during the first Negative Pressure Test is shown in Table 2. A plot of data recorded in real time and transmitted to shore bases by the Sperry-Sun well monitors is shown in Figure 20.
The first action was to close the blowout preventer and bleed fluid from the drill pipe. The Transocean Rig crew conducting the negative pressure test should have expected the drill pipe pressure and choke line pressure to both bleed to zero after bleeding about 4 barrels of water from the drill pipe. Estimates of the initial amount of fluid bled back were in the range of 15 to 25 barrels and the pressure did not bleed to zero. This was an indication that the Negative Pressure Test had failed, but it also could be explained by fluid leaking past the closed blowout preventer. With some additional checking and bleeding, it was seen that the annular preventer was leaking and allowing fluid from above the blowout preventer to leak into the casing that was intended to contain only seawater. The leak was stopped by increasing the closing pressure to the annular in the blowout preventer. An estimate of the amount of fluid that was required to refill the casing was in the range of 50-65 barrels.47 This is an indication that the 50-65 barrels of seawater had been bled from the well before the leak was found. This would have moved additional spacer material down into the area where the choke line and kill line connect with the
46 The MI-Swaco Drilling Fluid Specialist testified that the volume of spacer in the tank was measured to be 454 bbl. L. Lindner 9/14/11 Dep. Tr. at 151, 268. 47 MDL Ex. 1 BP Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report at 84; Macondo Well Incident Transocean Investigation Report, Vol. 1 at 96.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 60
well and substantially further down into the drill pipe casing annulus inside the narrower diameter production casing.
ActivityEvent
No.Action Description Time
7 Closed BOP The annular BOP is closed. 16:53 - 16:54
8 Bled drill pipeThe drill pipe is opened and an estimated 25 bbl of fluid are bled from the drill pipe, and the drill pipe pressure decreases to 1,250 psig. The drill pipe is then
closed. 16:54 - 16:57
9Opened subsea kill
valveThe subsea kill valve is opened. The drill pipe pressure increases to 1400 psig
and the kill line pressure decreases to 680 psig. 16:57 -16:58
10Bled drill pipe and
kill lineResume bleeding drill pipe and bleed kill line. The kill line pressure bleeds to 0
psig while the drill pipe pressure decreases to approximately 340 psig.16:58 - 16:59
11
Bled drill pipe; Fluid leaked through BOP;
Spacer moved downward
Continue bleeding drill pipe. The drill pipe pressure decreases to approximately 240 psig before increasing. Discovered fluid level in riser has fallen indicating
leak of annular BOP and downward movement of the spacer.16:59 - 17:05
12Closed drill pipe;
Annular BOP sealed
The drill pipe is closed and the drill pipe pressure increases rapidly to 830 psig, more slowly to 1,250 psig, and then decreases to 1,200 psig. Early in this period
the annular preventer is sealed preventing any further movement of 16 ppg spacer into BOP. Based on the volume used to refill the riser, approximately 50
bbl of spacer passed the BOP during the leak.
17:05 - 17:26
13 Bled drill pipe
The drill pipe is opened and approximately 15 bbl bled. Compressibility calculations indicate that only 3.5 bbl of the fluid bled can be attributed to liquid
expansion, suggesting an cement seal is leaking. The drill pipe pressure decreases to approximately 0 psig.
17:26 - 17:32
14 ~17:30
Crew conducts NPT on Drill pipe
Well becomes underbalanced to formation; hydrocarbons leak into well until pressure builds up to equalize with formation pore pressure.
Table 2 – Summary of Actions Taken during the First Negative Pressure Test
The Transocean rig crew was responsible for placing the fluids in the correct position and for maintenance of the blowout preventer. After refilling the well, it should have been obvious that the spacer was not correctly positioned for the planned negative test using the Kill Line. I would have expected that the situation would have been discussed with the MI-Swaco mud specialist and that allowance would have been made for mixing of seawater and spacer to have taken place while the leaking blowout preventer was being diagnosed and the well refilled. The well had been static so long, it is questionable that a valid 8.5 pound per gallon negative test at 8,367 feet could have been run using the Kill line without first displacing the well back to mud and starting over. Unfortunately, nothing to rectify the situation was done; there was no attempt to circulate the 65 barrels that was known to have leaked below the blowout preventer back to the correct position above it.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 61
Figure 20: Plot of Real Time Data Recorded during Negative Pressure Test
After stopping the leakage past the annular blowout preventer, the rig crew bled an additional approximately 15 barrels from the drill pipe to bring the pressure to zero. This was three times the volume that should have been required and should have caused the test to be interpreted as a failed test. The Well Site Leader decided to re-test using the kill line since the kill line was specified in the procedure approved by MMS (now BOEMRE).48
Table 3 shows a summary of the actions taken during the second Negative Pressure Test. After making the appropriate valve changes to line up for testing using the kill line, the kill line was bled to zero. Estimates of the volume bled were in the range of 3-15 barrels. The surface kill line valve was closed and the drill pipe pressure slowly increased to 1400 psi. This was a direct indication that the second negative test had also failed and that formation fluid was leaking past the cement seals into the well. The leak stopped after the pressure in the well became in balance with the formation pore pressure and the observed drill pipe pressure. This is indicated by the stabilized drill pipe pressure readings.
48 MDL Ex. 2236 (outlining temporary abandonment plan).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 62
ActivityEvent
No.Action Description Time
15Lined up to monitor
test with kill lineSystem lined up to perform negative pressure test on kill line. Pressure likely
had built-up on the drill pipe due to leakage past cement seals.17:32 - 17:52
16Bled drill pipe and
kill line
A valve is opened exposing a gauge to the drill pipe pressure. After rapidly increasing to 770 psig, the pressure is again bled off. Kill line is opened and
witnesses report that between 3 and 15 bbls of seawater flowed from the well, and that the flow spurted before being shut in.
17:52 - 18:00
17 ~18:00
18Closed drill pipe;
Opened kill subsea valve
The drill pipe is closed and the drill pipe pressure gradually increases to 1,200 psig. A slight pressure increase is recorded on the the kill line, suggesting the
subsea kill valve was opened. 18:00 - 18:35
19
Well potentially brought into
balance; Drill pipe pressure stabilizes
The drill pipe pressure increases to 1,400 psig and the kill line pressure increases to 140 psig, suggesting the well is in communication with the formation. The
drillpipe pressure becomes relatively stable at this value throughout the duration of the negative pressure test. This drillpipe pressure conicides with the
well near balance with the formations.
18:35 - 18:40
20Pumped down kill line; Bled kill line
Fluid is pumped into the kill line and the pressure spikes to 490 psig, suggesting the kill line was full. The kill line pressure is then bled off. A slight reduction in
the drill pipe pressure is noted on two occasions with no corresponding response on the kill line pressure. The kill line pressure increases while drill pipe pressure
decreases suggesting the columns of fluid in drill pipe and kill line equalized.
18:40 - 19:07
21 Bled Kill lineThe kill line valves at BOP and surface are opened and the pressure is bled off,
returning a small volume of liquid (0.2 bbl). At least 3 bbl of spacer in BOP is potentially drawn into 150 ft of kill line.
19:07 - 19:15
22 19:15 - 19:54 The negative test is conducted by monitoring the kill line for flow. The drill pipe is stable at 1,400 psig
and the kill line is open with no flow.
Crew conducts NPT
on Kill Line
Crew change time for certain individuals.
Table 3 – Summary of Actions Taken during the Second Negative Pressure Test
The Transocean Toolpushers and BP Well Site Leaders had considerable discussions in an effort to resolve the conflicting information. They appeared to be working together to reach a consensus as to the reason for the conflicting test data. Witness testimony49 indicated that the Toolpusher proposed that the drill pipe pressure was caused by a “bladder effect” that he had seen before. This explanation was accepted by everyone and a conclusion was reached that the Negative Pressure Test had passed, when in actuality it was not.
I find this misinterpretation by experienced people trained in well control extremely hard to understand. Figure 21 is a U-tube analogy that is always taught to be used to understand differences in surface pressures and how surface pressure is related to downhole pressure.50 In this case, if the well was configured as intended with seawater everywhere in the hydraulic path
49 See MDL Ex. 1 at pgs. 25 and 86; L. Lambert 5/9/11 Dep. Tr. at 245-46 (testifying regarding discussions about negative test); L. Lambert 5/10/11 Dep. Tr. at 444 (same). 50 Rig workers are taught in Well Control training to use a U-tube analogy where the drill pipe is one side of the U-Tube or manometer and the annular fluid path is the other side of the U-tube.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 63
between the surface drill pipe pressure and the surface kill line pressure, both the drill pipe pressure and the kill line pressure would have to be zero for the negative test pressure to be good.
As shown in Figure 18, the hydrostatic pressure computed at the top of the shoe joint using a surface mud weight of 14 pounds per gallon is 10,784 psi. Adding a stabilized surface drill pipe pressure of 1,400 psi to the hydrostatic pressure gives a pressure of 12,184 psi at the top of the shoe joint. This is equivalent to a 12.95 pressure gradient, which is close to the measured formation pore pressure. This calculation does not account for low density oil that may have occupied an unknown height above the Shoe Track. The effect of the oil would be to slightly lower the equivalent density calculated and make it even closer to the measured formation pore pressure. This calculation also does not account for the potential effect of the fluid column height of spacer below the blowout preventer, which could also impact the pressure reading.
The reason that the kill line did not flow during the 30 minute test cannot be completely resolved. It could have been caused by a sufficient effective height of spacer material51 on the kill line side of the U-tube, by a plugged kill line due to settling of barite and loss of circulation material, or a closed valve. We know that a pressure relief valve actuated later when trying to start pumping down the kill line. This could have been caused by a plugged kill line or a closed valve. There were other instances of pressure relief valve actuations reported in the drilling records.
If plugging did occur due to spacer, in my opinion, the plugging would be related more to the placement of the spacer than to the inclusion of loss circulation material in the spacer. Barite was by far the predominant solid in the spacer. A 16 pound per gallon spacer with no loss circulation material will contain about 30% barite by volume. The barite is about twice as dense as loss circulation material and would settle readily from a 16 pound per gallon mud that is mixing freely with seawater in a static condition. Barite is a good plugging agent and is sometimes intentionally used to plug off an underground blowout. If a 16 pound per gallon spacer had been used that had no loss circulation material included, placement of the spacer opposite the kill line prior to a negative test would have still been undesirable.
51 Some spacer material would have to be in the kill line and below the closed blowout preventer to have sufficient hydrostatic head.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 64
Figure 21: U-tube analogy for Negative Test being conducted (pressures equal)
WELL MONITORING FAILURE
The blowout preventer upper annular was opened after the negative test and the hydrostatic head of the mud and spacer above the preventer returned the well to an overbalanced condition in which the well could not flow. However, by proceeding with the displacement of mud from the riser, it was just a matter of time until the well began flowing again. Once the barrier of mud weight was removed, normal kick detection practices became extremely important. It was clearly the responsibility of the Transocean Rig Crew and the Sperry-Sun mud loggers to do so.
The Deepwater Horizon was a top of the line rig with approximately 20 mud tanks that could have been configured to properly monitor the well. This would have required organizing the active system52 so that the volume of mud returning from the well could always be compared to
52 Well monitoring systems allow the total volume in the mud tanks designated as included in the circulation system to be constantly monitored. The active system includes the tanks from which fluid is being pumped into the well and the tanks to which fluid is being returned from the well.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 65
the volume of the spacer or seawater being pumped into the well. Regulations, BP Policy, and Transocean policy require that the well be continually monitored. The well must be continually monitored even if you have a tested downhole barrier in addition to the hydrostatic pressure of the mud and especially when the hydrostatic pressure barrier is being intentionally removed.53
Mud to be offloaded to a boat should have been pumped from tanks that were isolated from the active system while offloading from those tanks. If this was not practical, then offloading should have been done through a flow meter so that off-loaded volumes could be tracked and included in the pit gain/pit loss determination.54 When pumping from the sea chest, the total pump strokes times the pump volume factor is an accurate measure of the volume pumped into the well and could have easily been included in the effective pit gain/pit loss calculation. The accuracy of volumes measured from pump strokes is second only to volumes measured in a metering tank.55
In addition to constantly monitoring the total volume removed from the well, the total rate of flow out of the well, less the total rate of flow into the well, should have been monitored. This is generally done by monitoring the total pump strokes per minute for flow into the well and flow meter readings for flow out of the well. When pumping overboard, the Sperry-Sun flow-out meter was bypassed. However, flow was passing through a second flow meter that was part of the rig sensor package.56 This meter should have been maintained in working order and flow should have been monitored at all times through this sensor. It is clear from the size of the kick taken that the overboard flow was not being monitored. If flow overboard could not be accurately monitored, the seawater should have been returned to tanks included in the active system. A full tank could be removed from the active system before dumping overboard.
Changes in pump pressure can also be used to detect an influx into the well, but normally the well is shut-in long before trends of changing pump pressure would be seen. Figure 22 is a plot
53 MDL Ex. 1761 (Sedco 711 Investigation Report) (TRN-MDL-00607583-621); MDL Ex. 2197 (email and report discussing Sedco 711 incident) (TRN-MDL-01288237-284); and TRN-INV-01128907-909 at ¶ 13 (discussing need to monitor well during displacement). 54 The pit gain/pit loss value is the total volume of fluid removed from the well minus the total volume of fluid pumped into the well. If this volume difference is positive, it is equal to the total volume of formation fluids that have entered the well. If it is negative, it is equal to the total loss of mud from the well into an underground or subsea leak. Alarms are generally set to alarm if the pit gain/pit loss is greater than 10 to 30 barrels. 55 A trip tank is a metering tank. Metering tanks are also included with cementing pumps. 56 Transocean’s report confirms that the second flow meter was capable of monitoring flow at this time. Macondo Well Incident, Transocean Investigation Report, Vol. 2, App. G. at pg. 106 (“data from the Hi-Tec flow sensor was still available to all personnel on the rig.”)
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 66
of real time data taken when the first sign of a kick became evident on pump pressure. Several clear sign that the well was flowing are shown in this plot of the real time data.
Figure 22: Real Time Data Showing Kick Indications that were not detected
The failure of so many people to detect the flow of oil into the well until after it had passed through the blowout preventer stack at the seafloor is a human failure that is hard to understand. Big kicks are taken very seriously in industry practice. A failure to detect a pit gain of more than 50 barrels would be considered a major error that could require an internal investigation and a
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 67
report to management.57 The pit gain was more than 600 barrels and the flow rate was very high on the Deepwater Horizon when the oil flow passed through the blowout preventers and began displacing the Marine Riser. When anomalous pressures were noticed, the rig crew began trying to diagnose the meaning of the kick indicators instead of immediately closing the blowout preventers. The failure to shut-in the well and investigate, as opposed to investigating before shut-in, is inconsistent with well control training and guidance.
Wyman Wheeler, a Transocean Toolpusher who was injured in the accident, indicated in answering questions about kick detection that the location of the line may have precluded visual observation of flow. He reportedly said, “you use to be able to visually see flow, but you couldn’t see it in this rig ... you had to trust the gauges.” He also indicated that the position of the return valve on the trip tank cannot be observed visually and that you can only see it on the computer.58
The diverter was closed but flow was not directed overboard away from the rig.59 Two diverter lines were available to always allow downwind diversion. The system should have been set-up for automatic routing to the overboard lines. In the early days of diverter design for bottom supported rigs, failures occurred because the diverter would sometimes be closed before the side valve was opened. This possibility was eliminated by designing systems that would automatically open the valve before closing the diverter. Concern for pollution was the likely cause for having the diverter lined up to flow to a mud gas separator. However, it would be relatively easy to have the overboard lines open up automatically above an appropriately low threshold pressure. When displacing mud with seawater from the top part of the well, I would have expected that the diverter would be lined up to go overboard before starting the displacement.
Answers to questions60 about the mud gas separator and diverter and Transocean Well Control Training manuals clearly showed that their policy was to divert overboard if a kick is taken that goes undetected and a significant gas volume enters the riser. It was also recognized in Transocean presentation material that I reviewed that the Marine Riser could unload quickly
57 I have served as an external reviewer for Diamond Offshore to review an event on one of their rigs when a 98 barrel kick was taken. This review was presented to upper management. 58 W. Wheeler interview notes, TRN-INV-00004991-97 at 95-97. 59 The Transocean Investigation Report (page 31) indicates that flow went to the mud gas separator at 9:45 p.m. The BP Investigation Report (pages 103-04,113) indicates this occurred at 9:41 p.m. 60 TRN-INV-01131807
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 68
when gas begins breaking out of solution.61 The training material that I reviewed was appropriate and of a high quality. What may have been lacking were adequate emergency drills simulating high flow rate conditions. Training intensity for dangerous but very rare events is always hard to maintain. When an event does happen, the response has to be automatic. There might not be time to think about it.
61 See also MDL Ex. 2188 (Transocean Major Accident Hazard Risk Assessment for the Deepwater Horizon discussing gas in the riser) (TRN-MDL-01184580 at 588 and 777).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 69
APPENDIX A
STATEMENT OF COMPENSATION
� Adam T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Ph.D. P.E. $300 per hour
� Engineering support $108 per hour
� Computer Graphics Support $60 per hour
� Travel Reimbursed at cost
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 70
APPENDIX B
LIST OF EXPERT DEPOSITION AND TRIAL TESTIMONY SINCE 2000
Petroleum Engineering Testimony before the Commissioner of Conservation, Office of Conservation, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Docket No. 04-102, January 27, 2004 regarding BolMex 3 Sand, Reservoir D, Broussard Field in Lafayette Parish.
Chevron Texaco vs. INTCO, Inc.; In the Matter of INTCO, Inc., as owner of the C-4 for Exoneration or Limitation of Liability; U.S.D.C. E.D.La. CA No. 00-2566; Retained by Michael Golemi of of Liskow and Lewis; Deposition Only
Marathon and Texaco vs. Transocean Offshore (U.K.) Inc., et al; U.S.D.C. E.D.La. CA No. 00-0760 c/w No. 00-2154, Sec. J, Mag. 2; Review of Claim of Lost Production from Platform due to rupture of Pipeline; Retained by Mr. Dan Picou and Ms Mary K. Denard of Larzelere, Picou, and Wells, L.L.C.; Deposition only.
Denbury Management, Inc. vs. Certain Underwriters; Retained by Charles Talley of Lemle Kelleher, LLP, New Orleans, Louisiana. Deposition only.
Basin Exploration, Inc. vs. BJ Services Company, USA, et al; Retained by Ken Klemm of Lemle Kelleher, LLP, New Orleans, Louisiana. Deposition only.
Mobil Exploration and Producing U. S. Inc. vs. Certain Underwriters; Retained by George H. Robinson with Liskow and Lewis of Lafayette, Louisiana and Mark Brosseau with Kerr Friedrich Brosseau Bartlett, LLC in Denver, Colorado regarding underground blowout and associated lost production; (Deposition in Lafayette, LA. in November, 1999 and trial testimony in Franklin, LA. during January, 2000).
NONE IN LAST FIVE YEARS
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 71
APPENDIX C
RESUME OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. (LA # 15776)
President
Bourgoyne Enterprises, Inc.
Professor Emeritus of Petroleum Engineering
Louisiana State University (since 1999)
Member of Faculty of Petroleum Engineering
Louisiana State University (since 1971)
Registered Professional Engineer (Petroleum)
in Louisiana, No. 15776.
6006 Boone Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70808-5005
Voice: 225 766 6536
Fax: 225 766 3779
Email: [email protected]
EDUCATION
Louisiana State University B. S. in Petroleum Engineering, Cum Laude, 1966 M. S. in Petroleum Engineering, 1967 Inducted into Engineering Hall of Distinction, 2006
University of Texas at Austin Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering, 1969 Recognized as Distinguished Engineering Graduate, 2001
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 72
ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE
Current Title: Professor Emeritus of Petroleum Engineering (Retired December, 1999)
Administrative Assignments:
Dean of the College of Engineering January, 1997 to January, 2000 Director of Petroleum Engineering Research and Technology Transfer Laboratory May 1987 – June 1990 Acting Dean of the College of Engineering December 1985 – May 1987 Chairman of Petroleum Engineering Department May 1977 – July 1983
INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCE PRIOR TO ACADEMIC SERVICE
Continental Oil Company – Houston, TX (1969–70)
Senior Systems Engineer in Production Engineering Services Group working on computer applications in drilling and production. Work included drilling data acquisition, abnormal pressure detection, optimization of drilling hydraulics, optimization of bit weight and rotary speed, multiphase pipeline networks, design of submersible electric pump installations.
Continental Oil Research Laboratory – Ponca City, OK (Summer, 1968)
Performed experimental laboratory evaluation of new surfactant system for enhanced oil recovery
Chevron Oil Research Laboratory – La Habra, CA (Summer, 1967)
Reservoir Engineer assisting with reservoir simulation of fields in Saudi Arabia and development of new computer programs for analysis of drill-stem tests and well interference tests.
Texaco, Inc. – Morgan City, LA (Summer, 1966)
Assistant Drilling Engineer involved with well planning and drilling optimization for offshore area.
Mobil Oil Company – Morgan City, LA (Summer, 1965)
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 73
Assistant Production Engineer involved with planning and economic justification of well workover operations on offshore platforms.
Mobil Oil Company – Cameron, LA (Summer, 1964)
Roustabout involved with installation of automation equipment on offshore production platforms.
Mobil Oil Company – Opelousas, LA (Summer, 1963)
Roustabout in field produced by gas cycling method.
RECENT CONSULTING ACTIVITIES
Pennington Oil and Gas Company Co. – 2001-present
Consultation on drilling, production, and reservoir engineering matters. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Incorporated - 2000-2003
Well Control training activities. Shell Offshore/DeepStar - 1997-1999
Computer simulations of deepwater well control operations. Wild Well Control, Inc. – 1993-2000
Computer simulations of alternative well control operations. Weatherford – 1993-2001
Research and development advisor for rotating control head applications
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES AND ACTIVITIES
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Chairman, Twenty-Five Year/Century Club Committee, 1996 Chairman, Drilling Engineering Award Selection Committee, 1996–98 Chairman, Reprint Series Committee, 1996-98 Board of Directors, 1984–87 Chairman, Manpower Committee, 1981–82 Education and Accreditation Committee, 1980–83 Pass Point Evaluation Committee for Professional Engineering Exam, 1996 Distinguished Lecturer, 1997
American Petroleum Institute Committee concerning the determination of formation pore pressures and fracture gradients
American Association of Drilling Engineers Charter Member, Houston Chapter
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 74
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Adhoc committee, ABET, 1983-1990 Advisory committee, AIME Engineering Accreditation Commission Member, 1983–86
Minerals Management Service Conducted Annual Well Control Research Workshops, 1983-1999 Three U.S. Patents related to Well Drilling Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society, LSU Chapter OTA-US Congress (Advisor on Technology for Deep Water Oil and Gas Development, 1984–85)
National Bureau of Standards Chaired Workshop Panel on Use of Risk Analysis in Offshore Oil and Gas Operation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 1984
National Institute of Standards and Technology Chaired Workshop Session on Reliability of Offshore Operations, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 20–22, 1991
International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Chairman, Committee for Well Control Instructor Certification Standards Member of Steering Committee for development of IADC Deepwater Well Control Guidelines, 1998
International Well Control Symposium Chairman, Symposium co-sponsored by US Minerals Management Service, UK Department of Energy, American Association of Drilling Engineers, and International Association of Drilling Contractors, Baton Rouge, LA, Nov. 27–29, 1989.
American Association of Drilling Engineers Session Chairman, Deepwater Drilling Forum, Lafayette, LA, Feb. 15, 1990. Chairman, Technical Panel, Advanced Well Control Forum, New Orleans, LA, April 3, 1991.
The Oilman’s Editorial Advisory Board member, 1993-95
Elsevier Science Publishing Associate Editor, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1989–1995.
LSU Workshop on Horizontal Drilling in Louisiana Chairman, New Orleans, LA, June 4–5, 1991.
American Filtration Society Session Chairman, Fall Meeting, Baton Rouge, October 29–30, 1990
Petroleum Engineer International
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 75
Advisory Board, 1995-96 Technical Advice Working Group to Integrated Ocean Drilling Program
Chairman, 2000-2001
HONORARY SOCIETIES AND AWARDS
Distinguished Lecturer selected 1997 topic -- Well Control Aspects of Underbalanced Drilling
Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences
elected 1996 Kapitsa Gold Medal of Honor (Russian)
citation - “For outstanding contributions to the field of drilling engineering” Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Member
selected 1990 Charter Member of American Association of Drilling Engineers
selected 1989, No. 0159 Society of Petroleum Engineers Drilling Engineering Award
selected for 1988 citation – “For distinguished contributions to petroleum engineering in the area of drilling technology”
Pi Epsilon Tau National Petroleum Engineering Honor Society Diploma of Honor Selected 1988, citation – “For outstanding contributions to the petroleum industry”
Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Achievement Award for Petroleum Engineering Faculty, selected 1981
Tau Beta Pi, member Pi Epsilon Tau, member Outstanding Alumnus of Redemptorist High School, selected 1989
Citation for Distinguished Service Louisiana House of Representatives, passed 2000
Distinguished Engineering Graduate of University of Texas at Austin, selected 2001
Albert Einstein Gold Medal of Honor US Section of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, awarded 2002
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 76
PUBLICATIONS
REFEREED ARTICLES
“Numerical Simulation of Drillstem Tests as an Interpretation Technique,” J.P. Brill, A.T. Bourgoyne, and T.N. Dixon, Journal of Petroleum Technology, (November 1969).
“The Effect of Interfacial Films on the Displacement Efficiency of a Waterflood,” Transactions, AIME (1971).
“A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection,” A.T. Bourgoyne and F.S. Young, Transactions, AIME (1974).
“Factors Affecting Bubble Rise Velocity of Gas Kicks,” D.W. Rader, A.T. Bourgoyne and R.E. Ward, Journal of Petroleum Technology (May 1975).
“A Feasibility Study on the Use of Subsea Chokes in Well Control Operations on Floating Drilling Vessels,” J.L. Mathews and A.T. Bourgoyne, Journal of Petroleum Technology (May 1982) and Transactions, Society of Petroleum Engineers, (1982).
“Frictional Pressure Losses for Single Phase and Two-Phase Flow of Drilling Muds,” F.A. Elfaghi, J.P. Langlinais, A.T. Bourgoyne, and W.R. Holden, Transactions of the ASME, (September 1983) Vol. 105, pp. 372–78.
“Petroleum Engineering Manpower Supply,” Journal of Petroleum Technology (March 1984) pp. 407–11.
“An Experimental Study of Well Control Procedures for Deepwater Drilling Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne and W.R. Holden, Journal of Petroleum Technology, (July 1985) and Transactions, Society of Petroleum Engineers, (1985) pp. 1239–1250, also SPE Reprint Series, Vol. 42, March 1996, pp. 110–121.
“Frictional Pressure Losses for Annular Flow of Drilling Mud and Mud Gas Mixtures,” J.P. Langlinais, A.T. Bourgoyne and W.R. Holden, Transactions of the ASME (March 1985) Vol. 107, pp. 142–51.
“Manpower Supply - Analysis of Survey Data,” Journal of Petroleum Technology (March 1986) pp. 303–305.
“An Experimental Study of Gas Solubility in Oil-Based Drilling Fluids,” P.L. O’Bryan, A.T. Bourgoyne, T.G. Monger, and D.P. Kopsco, SPE Drilling Engineering (March 1988) pp. 33–42.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 77
“PDC Applications in the Gulf of Mexico with Water-Based Drilling Fluids,” A.D. Gault, H. Knowlton, H.E. Goodman and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., SPE Drilling Engineering, (June 1988) pp. 117–24.
“Fracture Gradient Prediction for Offshore Wells,” W.D. Constant and A.T. Bourgoyne, SPE Drilling Engineering, (June 1988) pp. 136–40.
“Methods for Handling Drilled Gas in Oil-Based Drilling Fluids,” P.L. O’Bryan and A.T. Bourgoyne, SPE Drilling Engineering, (September 1989), pp. 237–246.
“Shale Water as a Pressure Support Mechanism in Gas Reservoirs Having Abnormal Formation Pressure,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, (January 1990), pp. 305–319.
“Experimental Study of Gas Slip Velocity and Liquid Holdup in an Inclined Eccentric Annulus,” E.Y. Nakagawa and A.T. Bourgoyne, FED–Vol. 144, ASME, (November 1992), pp. 71–80.
“How to Handle a Gas Kick Moving Up a Shut-In Well,” J.E. Mathews and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., SPE Reprint Series, Vol. 42, (March 1996), pp. 22–28.
“Method for Determining the Feasibility of Dynamic Kill of Shallow Gas Flows,” W. L. Koederitz, F. E. Beck, J. P. Langlinais, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., SPE Reprint Series, Vol. 42, (March 1996), pp. 66–77.
“Recognizing Downhole Casing Failure During Well Control Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., SPE Reprint Series, Vol. 42, (March 1996), pp. 202–206.
“A New Simple Method to Estimate Fracture Pressure Gradient,” L.A. Rocha and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., SPE Drilling and Completion, (September 1996), pp. 153–159.
“Use of Soil Borings Data for Estimating Break-down Pressure of Shallow Marine Sediments,” C.V. Bender, A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr. and J.N. Suhayda, Journal of Petroleum Engineering, Vol. 14, (1996), pp. 101–114.
“Failure of Wellbores During Well Control Operations,” M. E. Chenevert, A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr. and C. F. H. Fonseca, Turkish Journal of Oil and Gas, Vol. 3 (June 1997) p 22.
“A Computer Assisted Well Control Safety System for Deep Ocean Well Control,” O. A. Kelly, W. R. Holden, and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Turkish Journal of Oil and Gas, Vol. 3 (June 1997) p 30.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 78
“Experimental Study of Gas Slip Velocity and Liquid Holdup in an Inclined Eccentric Annulus,” Nagakawa, E. Y. and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Turkish Journal of Oil and Gas, Vol. 3 (October 1997) p 22.
“An Analysis of the Design Loads placed on a Well by a Diverter System,” Beck, F. E. and J. P. Langlinais and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Trans. ASME, Vol. 120 (March 1998).
“An Analysis of the Design Loads placed on a Well by a Diverter System,” Beck, F. E. and J. P. Langlinais and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Journal of Energy Resource Technology (June 1998).
“Co-current and Countercurrent Migration of Gas Kicks in ‘Horizontal’ Wells,” Baca, H., Nikitopoulos, J. Smith, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Trans. ASME, Vol. 121 (June 1999) p 96.
“New Model to Analyze Non-Linear Leak-off Test Behavior,” Altun, G. and E. Shirman, J. P. Langlinais, and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., accepted for publication by JERC.
BOOKS AND CHAPTERS
“Drilling Practices,” A Chapter in Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, Vol. 16, Edited by John J. Mcketta and William A. Cunningham, Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York 10016 (1982), pp 359– 394.
Applied Drilling Engineering, A.T. Bourgoyne, K.H. Milheim, M.E. Chenevert, and F.S. Young, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, TX (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 2) (1986), 502 pages.
“Shallow Abnormal Pressure Hazards,” Chapter 10 in Studies in Abnormal Pressure, Edited by W.H. Fertl, Richard Chapman, and Rod F. Hotz, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, (1994), pp. 281– 317.
“Shallow Gas Blowouts”, Bourgoyne, A. T. Zwald, E. A., and Abel, L. W., Chapter 4 in Firefighting and Blowout Control, by L. William Abel, Joe R. Bowden, Sr., and Patrick J. Campbell, Wild Well Control, Inc., Houston, TX (1994), pp 83–121.
TRADE JOURNALS
“Graphs Simplify Drilling Hydraulics,” World Oil, (January 1969).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 79
“Computer Graphics Improve Drilling Hydraulics,” A.T. Bourgoyne and R.E. McKee, Petroleum Engineer, (September 1970).
“Porosity and Pore Pressure Logs,” A.T. Bourgoyne, J.A. Rizer and G.M. Myers, The Drilling Contractor, (June 1971).
“A Graphic Approach to Overpressure Detection While Drilling,” Petroleum Engineer, (September 1971).
“Graphic Approach to Kick Severity Calculations,” Petroleum Engineer, (September 1976).
“Well Control Procedures for Deepwater Drilling - Part 1,” A.T. Bourgoyne, W.R. Holden, B.R. Hise and R.S. Sullins, Ocean Resources Engineering (April 1978).
“Well Control Procedures for Deepwater Drilling - Part 2: Control of Shallow Kicks,” A.T. Bourgoyne, W.R. Holden, B.R. Hise, and R.S. Sullins, Ocean Resources Engineering, (October 1978).
“Well Control Procedures for Deepwater Drilling - Part 3: Initiation of Well Control Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, W.R. Holden, B.R. Hise and R.S. Sullins, Ocean Resources Engineering, (December 1978).
“University Uses On-Campus Abandoned Well to Simulate Deep Water Well Control Operations,” Oil& Gas Journal, (May 31,1982), pp. 138–141.
“Bubble Chopping— A New Way to Control Large, Deep Gas Kicks,” World Oil, (December 1984) pp. 75–82.
“Changing Drilling Technology— What Three Experts Say,” J. Smith, D. Hammet, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Petroleum Engineer International (September 1985).
“Integration of MWD & Well Control Technologies,” A.T. Bourgoyne and R. Desbrandes, Offshore (September 1986) pp. 49–52.
“MWD Transmission Data Rates Can Be Optimized,” R. Desbrandes, A.T. Bourgoyne, and J.A. Carter, Petroleum Engineer International (June 1987) pp. 46–52.
“Identifying Crater Potential Improves Shallow Gas Kick Control,” L.A. Rocha and A.T. Bourgoyne, Oil & Gas Journal, (December 27, 1993) pp 93–98.
“Rotating Control Head Applications Increasing,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Oil & Gas Journal, (October 9, 1995), pp. 72–77.
“Annual Editorial Advisor’s Section: Current Issues in Well Control,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Petroleum Engineer International, (February 1996), pp. 27–28.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 80
“New Ideas for Shallow Gas Well Control,” A.T. Bourgoyne, O.A. Kelly, and C.L. Sandoz, World Oil, (June 1996), pp. 50–51.
“New Model Rotating Control Head Tested,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., The Brief, Murphy Publishing, Inc., (October 1996), pp. 25–27.
“Applications and Limitations of Underbalanced Drilling and Completion Technology”, Oil and Gas Reporter (April, 2000).
“Case Histories bring Reality to Well Control Training,” J.R. Smith, A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., S. M. Waly, and E.B. Hoff, World Oil, (June 2000), Vol. 221 No. 8, p 39-46.
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
“A Critical Examination of Rotary Drilling Hydraulics,” Proceedings of Second SPE Conference on Drilling and Rock Mechanics; Austin, TX (January 1968).
“The Determination of Porosity and Pore Pressure Logs from Drilling Data,” A.T. Bourgoyne, J.A. Rizer, and G.M. Myers, Transactions of the Ninth Annual AAODC Rotary Drilling Conference, Houston, TX (February 1971) pp. 15–22.
“The Use of Drillability Logs for Formation Evaluation and Abnormal Pressure Detection,” A.T. Bourgoyne and F.S. Young, Proceedings of SPWLA Fourteenth Annual Logging Symposium; Lafayette, LA (May 1973).
“A University View of the Status and Future of Petroleum Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the First Annual Engineering Manpower Conference of SPE; Houston, TX (June 1978).
“The Dynamics of Well Control,” Proceedings of the Second Research and Development Conference for OCS Oil and Gas Operations; Reston, VA (April 1980).
“Development of Improved Blowout Prevention Procedures for Deepwater Drilling Operations,” Proceedings of the Third Research and Development Conference for OCS Oil and Gas Operations: Reston, VA (November 1981).
“Risk Analysis in Design, Operation, and Maintenance of Offshore Oil and Gas Facilities,” International Workshop on the Application of Risk Analysis to Offshore Oil and Gas Operations, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland (March 1984).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 81
“Development of Improved Blowout Prevention Procedures for Deepwater Drilling Operations,” Proceedings of the Fourth Research and Development Conference for OCS Oil and Gas Operations, Reston, VA (March 1984) pp. 275–86.
“Improved Gas Diverter Systems,” Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Gulf of Mexico Information Transfer Meeting, US Department of Interior, New Orleans, LA (October 1985) pp. 29–30.
“Experimental Study of Diverters,” Proceedings of the Fifth Research and Development Conference for OCS Oil and Gas Operations, Reston, VA (1986) pp. 175–82.
“An Experimental Study of Fluidic Mud Pulser,” Proceedings of the Fifth Research and Development Conference for Oil and Gas Operations, Reston, VA (1986) pp. 183–191.
“Technological Developments for Improved Well-Control Procedures,” Proceedings for the Fifth Research and Development Conference for Oil and Gas Operations, Reston, VA (1986) pp. 192–199.
“Petroleum Engineering Manpower Supply - Results of the 1986 Survey,” Proceedings of the Annual Fall Meeting of SPE, New Orleans, LA (October 1986) SPE 15459.
“Experimental and Theoretical Considerations for Diverter Evaluation and Design,” F.E. Beck, J.P. Langlinais, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the 56th California Regional Meeting of SPE, Oakland, CA (April 1986) SPE 15111.
“An Analysis of the Design Loads Placed on a Well by a Diverter System,” F.E. Beck, J.P. Langlinais, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the 1987 SPE/IADC Rotary Drilling Conference, New Orleans, LA (March 1987) SPE/IADC 16129.
“Petroleum Engineering Manpower Supply - Results of the 1987 Survey,” Proceedings of the Annual Fall Meeting of SPE, Dallas, TX (September 1987) SPE 16834.
“Joint Industry/Government/University Programs of Research and Development,” Proceedings of the Annual Fall Meeting of SPE, Dallas, TX (September 1987) SPE 16825.
“Petroleum Engineering Manpower Supply - Results of the 1988 Survey,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the Annual Fall Meeting of SPE, Houston, TX (October 2–5, 1988) SPE 18336.
“Generation, Migration, and Transportation of Gas Contaminated Regions of Drilling Fluid,” A.T. Bourgoyne and V. Casariego, Proceedings of the Annual Fall Meeting of SPE, Houston, TX (October 2–5, 1988) SPE 18020.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 82
“Experimental Study of Erosion of Diverter Systems Due to Sand Production,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the 1989 SPE/IADC Rotary Drilling Conference, New Orleans, LA (February 28–March 3, 1989) SPE/IADC 18716, pp. 807-816.
“Experimental Study of Diverter Systems Used in Offshore Drilling Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the 1988 Technology Assessment and Research Program for Offshore Minerals Operations, OCS Study MMS 88-0057, U.S. Department of Interior (April 6–7, 1989) pp. 6-10.
“A Microcomputer Aided Experimental Gas Reservoir Simulator for Well-Control Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, SPE Petroleum Computer Conference: Technology for the 90’s Efficiency, Productivity, Applications, (June 26, 1989).
“Experimental Bench Mark Data for Testing Well Control Computer Models,” V. Casariego and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., International Well Control Symposium, (November 27–29, 1989).
“Blowout Prevention in Deepwater Drilling,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., Proceedings of the 11th Annual Information Transfer Meeting, Gulf of Mexico (OCS) Region, (November 13–15, 1990), New Orleans, LA.
“General Computerized Well Control Kill Sheet for Drilling Operations with Graphic Display Capabilities,” H.C. Leitao, E.E. Maidla, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of SPE Computer Conference, Denver, CO (June 25–26, 1990), SPE 20327.
“Reliability of Offshore Drilling Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, G.L. Lever, and B. Berry, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reliability of Offshore Operations, National Bureau of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland (March 20–22, 1991).
“Computerized Kill Sheet for Most Drilling Operations,” H.C. Leitao, E.E. Maidla, O.A. Santos, F.A. Notto, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the 1992 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, LA (February 18–21, 1992) (IADC/SPE 23933).
“Improved Method of Predicting Wellhead Pressure During Diverter Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of IADC's Third Annual European Well Control Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands (June 2–4, 1992).
“A Spreadsheet Approach to Diverter Design Calculations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference of the Americas, Houston, TX (November 17–19, 1992).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 83
“General Access Well Information Database,” A.T. Bourgoyne, V.K. Sinha and L.A. Rocha, Proceedings of the SPE Petroleum Computer Conference, Dallas, TX, (July 31-August 3, 1994) (SPE 28232).
“Advanced Control System Developed for Well Control Operations,” O.A. Kelly and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference of the Americas, Houston, TX (November 16–17, 1994).
“Integration of MWD and Process Control Technology Into an Advanced Well Control System,” O.A. Kelly and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference of the Americas, Houston, TX, (November 16–17, 1994).
“Experimental Study of Erosion Resistant Materials for Use in Diverter Components,” A. Jain and A.T. Bourgoyne, SPE International Student Paper, Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, (October 22–25, 1995).
“Well Control Aspects of Underbalanced Drilling,” A.T. Bourgoyne, IADC Well Control Training Roundtable, Plano, TX, (April 2, 1996).
“Manpower Trends in the Petroleum Industry,” presented to the Gulf Coast Section of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, TX, (May 9, 1996).
“A Method for Planning Well Control Operations Involving an Induced Fracture,” A. F. Negrao and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the ASME Petroleum Division Conference, Houston, TX, (1996).
“New Developments in Computer Modeling of Blowout Control Operations,” A. T. Bourgoyne, D. Barnett, and D. Eby, proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference of the Americas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (July 31-August 2, 1996).
“Feasibility Study of Dual Density Mud System for Deepwater Drilling Operations,” C. A. Lopes and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, (May 5-8, 1997).
“Well Control Considerations for Deepwater Drilling Operations,” A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the IBC Deepwater Technologies Conference, Houston, TX, (July 28-29, 1997).
“Computer-Assisted Well Control System for Deep Ocean Drilling Environments,” O. A. Kelly and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the IADC International Deep Water Well Control Conference, (September 15-16, 1997).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 84
“Case History-Based Training for Control and Prevention of Underground Blowouts,” J. R. Smith and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, (October 5 - 8, 1997).
“Well Control Considerations for Underbalanced Drilling,” A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, (October 5 - 8, 1997).
“A Relief Well Model for Deep Water Drilling and Production Systems,” Bourgoyne, A. T. Jr. and D. Barnett and D. Eby, proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference, Houston, August 26-27, 1998.
“A Subsea Rotating Control Head for Riserless Drilling Applications,” Bourgoyne, D. A. and Bourgoyne, A. T. Jr and D. Hannegan, proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference, Houston, August 26-27, 1998.
“Circulating Kick Tolerance for Deepwater Drilling,” Ohara, S. and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., proceedings of the IADC Well Control Conference of the Americas, Caracas, October 29-30, 1998.
“Sustained Casing Pressure in Offshore Producing Wells,” OTC 11029, Bourgoyne, Adam T., Jr., Stuart L. Scott, and James B. Regg, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 3–6 May 1999.
“Case Histories Bring Reality to Well Control Training,” Smith, J.R., Bourgoyne, A. T., Waly, S.M., and Hoff, E.B., IADC Well Control Conference of the Americas ,Houston, TX, August 25-26, 1999.
“Deepwater Drilling with Lightweight Fluids: Essential Equipment Required,” D.M. Hannegan and A. T. Bourgoyne, Jr., World Oil, March 2001.
“Counter-current and Co-current Gas Kicks in Horizontal Wells: Non-Newtonian Rheology Effects,” H. Baca, D.E. Nikitopoulos, J.R. Smith, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Proceedings of ETCE/OMAE2000 Joint Conference, (February 14-17, 2000), New Orleans, LA. Paper No. ETCE2000/DRIL-10117.
COURSES TAUGHT
UNDERGRADUATE COURSES
CS 1241 FORTRAN Programming PETE 2020 Introduction to Petroleum Engineering
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 85
PETE 3025 Petroleum Economics PETE 3031 Reservoir Fluid Flow PETE 3032 Phase Behavior of Hydrocarbon Systems PETE 3033 Petrophysics Laboratory PETE 3034 Phase Behavior Laboratory PETE 3990 Undergraduate Special Projects PETE 4045 Drilling Engineering PETE 4046 Well Design—Production PETE 4051 Reservoir Engineering PETE 4059 Drilling Fluids Laboratory PETE 4060 Prevention of Oil and Gas Well Blowouts PETE 4086 Advanced Drilling Engineering
GRADUATE COURSES
PETE 7201 Advanced Reservoir Engineering PETE 7241 Horizontal Well Technology PETE 7242 Risk Analysis in making Economic Decisions in the Petroleum Industry PETE 7256 Special Problems in Petroleum Engineering PETE 7280 Reservoir Simulation
EXTENSION COURSES
PETE 4045 Drilling Engineering, USGS Office, Metairie, LA 1979–80 PETE 7241 Horizontal Drilling, UNO Downtown Center, New Orleans, LA 1996
SHORT COURSES
Well Control Training leading to MMS Certification, 1971-1998 Well Completion Short Courses and Drilling Engineering Practicum, 1978-1980 Hydraulic Fracturing School, Rock Mechanics Section, 1996
RESEARCH DIRECTED
GRANTS AND CONTRACTS
“A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection,” Bariod Division of N.L. Industries, Inc., $11,649, 1972–73.
“The Determination of Abnormal Formation Pressure Using a Computerized Mathematical Model of the Rotary Drilling Process,” Bariod Division of N.L. Industries, Inc., $9,200, 1973–74.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 86
“Experimental Research on New Surfactant Placement Techniques for Enhanced Recovery of Petroleum by Water Displacement,” O.K. Kimbler, A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., and W.R. Whitehead, $28,000, 1976–77.
“Development of Improved Laboratory and Field Procedures for Determining the Carrying Capacity of Drilling Fluids,” Milchem, Inc., $12,072.
“Investigation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Through Use of Carbon Dioxide,” W.R. Whitehead, O.K. Kimbler, W.R. Holden, and A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., U.S. Department of Energy, $161,120, 1978–79.
“Technical Support for Geopressured Well Activities in Louisiana,” Z. Bassiouni, W.J. Bernard, and A.T. Bourgoyne, $85,500, 1978–79.
“Development of Improved Blowout Prevention Procedures to be Used in Deepwater Drilling Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., W.R. Holden, and B.R. Hise, U.S. Department of the Interior, $822,962, 1978–82.
“A Proposal for the Expansion of the LSU-IADC Blowout Prevention Training Center,” Various companies in petroleum industry, $2,000,000, 1980–82.
“A Feasibility Study of the Integration of Measurements While Drilling (MWD) Technology and Well Control Technology,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., and W.R. Holden, U.S. Minerals Management Service, $90,000, 1983.
“The Development of Improved Blowout Prevention Systems for Offshore Drilling Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., W.R. Holden, and J.P. Langlinais, U.S. Minerals Management Service, $1,800,000, 1983–88.
“Well Control Problems Associated with Gas Solubility in Oil-Base Muds,” Drilling Engineering Association Project 4, $160,000, 1984–87.
“Field Analysis of Well Control,” Drilling Engineering Association, Project 7, $1,061,505, 1986–88.
“Fluid Dynamics of Oil Storage and Production Cycles in the Weeks Island Strategic Petroleum Reserve,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., S. Acharya and A. Wojtanowicz, Sandia Laboratories, $50,000, 1988–89.
“Improved Contingency Procedures for Complications Arising During Offshore Blowout Prevention Operations,” Minerals Management Service, $950,000, 1988–94.
“Use of Vector Processor for Locating Large Area of Bypassed Oil,” with Moore and Tyler, Louisiana Education Quality Support Fund, $322,000, 1988–90.
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 87
“Memorandum of Understanding - Annex I (Bypassed Oil Study),” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., C.A. Groat, R. Sassen, and B. Baumann, U.S. DOE, $750,000, 1989–90.
“Improved Procedures for Handling Underground Blowouts in a Marine Environment,” Minerals Management Service, A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr., A. Wojtanowicz, and O.A. Kelly, $1,600,000, 1994–99.
“Improved Methods for Selecting Kick Tolerance During Deepwater Drilling Operations,” A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr. and O.A. Kelly, Petrobras, $99,215, 1994–96.
“Improved Recovery from Gulf of Mexico Reservoirs,” Z. Bassiouni, A.T. Bourgoyne, Jr. and C. Kimbrell, DOE, $950,000, 1995–96.
THESES DIRECTED
Mannarino, Remo: “The Effects of Sealing and Non-Sealing Faults on Pressure Build-Up and Pressure Draw-down Analysis” (August, 1971).
Lavaquial, Fernando P.: “Water Influx Into Petroleum Reservoirs from Adjacent Shales” (August, 1971).
Rader, David W.: “Movement of Gas Slugs Through Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Liquids in Vertical Annuli” (May, 1973).
Simmons, Richard D.: “A Comparison of Horizontal Multiphase Flow Pressure Loss Correlations” (May, 1973).
McKenzie, Michael F.: “Factors Affecting Surface Casing Pressure During Well Control Operations,” (August, 1974).
Ward, Robert H.: “Movement of Gas Slugs Through Static Liquids in Large Diameter Annuli,” (August, 1974).
Koederitz, W.L.: “The Mechanics of Large Bubbles Rising in an Annulus,” (May, 1976).
Mathews, Gerald L.: “A Microscopic Investigation of the Use of Preferentially Oil Soluble Surface Active Agents to Enhance Oil Recovery,” (May, 1977).
Ofoh, EberePaulinus: “The Effect of Flood Rate on Displacement Efficiency When Using Oil Soluble Surface Active Agents to Enhance Oil Recovery,” (May, 1978).
Sample, Kenneth John: “Development of Improved Procedures for Determining the Carrying Capacity of Drilling Fluids,” (August, 1978).
Bizanti, Mohamed: “New Bit Designs for Reducing Bottom Hole Pressure While Drilling,” (December, 1978).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 88
Mathews, Jeffrey L.: “Upward Migration of Gas Kicks in a Shut-in Well,” (May, 1980).
Casariego, Vicente G.: “Experimental Study of Two Phase Flow Patterns Occurring in a Well During Pressure Control Operations,” (May, 1981).
Redmann, Kerry P.: “Flow Characteristics of Commercially Available Drilling Chokes Used in Well Control Operations,” (May, 1982).
McFadden, Peter G.: “The Pressure Behavior of a Shut-in Well Due to the Upward Migration of a Gas Kick,” (December, 1984).
O’Bryan, Patrick L.: “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Methane Solubility in an Oil-Base Drilling Fluid,” (December, 1985).
Johnson, Paul: “Experimental Study of Erosion in a Model Diverter System" (December, 1987).
Bourgeois, Steve, "The Evaluation of a Horizontal Well Completion for Recovery of Bypassed Oil in a South Louisiana Bottom Water Drive Reservoir,” (May, 1989).
Cooke, M. Scott, “Reservoir Study of the Lafitte Field in South Louisiana,” (December, 1990).
Hebert, Lance, “An Experimental Study of Water Coning in Horizontal Wellbores,” (May, 1990).
Rocha, Luiz Alberto Santos, “A Critical Analysis of Petrobras Data System,” (December, 1991).
Ghosh, Biswajit, “Experimental Study of Erosion in a Fluidic Vortex Valve,” (January 1992).
Mendes, Pedro Paulo Melo, “Two Phase Flow in a Vertical and Inclined Eccentric Annulus,” (January, 1992).
Gautam, Anurag, “Effect of Cell Geometry on Pulser Performance for MWD Applications,” (December, 1992).
Franklin, Bernard, “Effect of Produced Gas-Water Ratio on Erosion Rate in a Diverter,” (August, 1993).
Wang, Y.: “Gas Slip Velocity through Water and Non-Newtonian Liquids in Vertical and Inclined Eccentric Annuli.” M.S. Thesis, LSU, Baton Rouge, LA. (Dec. 1993).
Jain, Alok, “Experimental Study of Erosion Resistant Materials for Use in Diverter Components,” (May, 1995).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 89
Smith, John Rogers, “Drilling Overpressured Shales with PDC Bits,” (December, 1995).
DISSERTATIONS DIRECTED
Almedia, Mauricio de A.: “Computer-Aided Analysis of Formation Pressure Integrity Tests Used in Oil Well Drilling” (December, 1986).
Casariego, Vicente G.: “Generation, Migration, and Transportation of Gas Contaminated Regions of Drilling Fluid” (December, 1987).
Santos, Otto Luiz A., “A Dynamic Model of Diverter Operations for Handling Shallow Gas Hazards in Oil and Gas Exploratory Drilling,” (May, 1989).
Nakagawa, Edson, “Gas Kick Behavior During Well Control Operations in Vertical and Slanted Wells,” (November 1990).
Rocha, Luiz, “Mechanisms leading to Crater formation while Drilling for Oil and Gas,” (December 1993).
Negrao, Alvero “Relief Well Requirements for Dynamic Kill of Underground Blowouts,” (May 1995).
Koederitz, W.: “Gas Kick Behavior during Bullheading Operations in Vertical Wells,” (May 1995).
Ohara, Shiniti, “Experimental Study of Plugging Techniques for Underground Blowouts,” (May 1996).
Kelly, O. Allen, “Development of a Prototype Computer-Assisted Well Control System for Deep Ocean Drilling Environments,” (May 1997).
Lopes, Clovis, “Feasibility Study on the Reduction of Hydrostatic Pressure in a Deep Water Riser Using a Gas-Lift Method,” (May 1997).
Smith, John Rogers, “Diagnosis of Poor PDC Bit Performance in Deep Shales,” (August 1998).
Gursat, Altun, “Methods for Determining Fracture Resistance of Upper Marine Sediments,” (May, 1999).
EXPERT REPORT OF ADAM T. (TED) BOURGOYNE, JR., PH.D., P.E. PAGE 90
APPENDIX D
MATERIALS CONSIDERED AS OF OCTOBER 17, 2011 IN SUPPORT OF EXPERT REPORT AND OPINIONS
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
413
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
3M
acon
do S
hallo
w H
azar
d A
sses
smen
t - C
D o
f dat
a an
d fil
esB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0001
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0004
5778
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0004
5778
Mac
ondo
BP
Surf
ace
Para
met
ers R
T (4
.22.
2010
)B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0438
62B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0438
62M
acon
do B
P Su
rfac
e Pa
ram
eter
s Tim
e R
T Lo
gB
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0438
68B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0438
68M
acon
do B
P Pi
ts (4
/21/
2010
)B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
414
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
4H
allib
urto
n W
ell a
nd M
udlo
ggin
g D
ata
- CD
of d
ata
and
files
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
415
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
5H
allib
urto
n M
WD
/LW
D D
ata
- CD
of d
ata
and
files
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
416
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
6H
allib
urto
n W
ell a
nd M
udlo
ggin
g D
ata
- CD
of d
ata
and
files
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
04B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
417
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
7H
allib
urto
n M
WD
/LW
D D
ata
- CD
of d
ata
and
files
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
05B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
418
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
8H
allib
urto
n W
ell a
nd M
udlo
ggin
g D
ata
- CD
of d
ata
and
files
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
06B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
419
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7941
9Sc
hlum
berg
er -
MD
T R
epor
t - C
D o
f dat
a an
d fil
esB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0007
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7942
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0079
420
Schl
umbe
rger
- D
LIS,
LIS
Dep
th/T
ime
LAS,
PD
S R
epor
ts -
CD
of d
ata
and
files
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
08B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0075
243
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7524
3Sc
hlum
berg
er -
DLI
S/LA
S/PD
S w
/ MD
T/M
MS
& P
roce
ssed
Dat
a B
P-H
ZN-
SNR
0000
0009
- C
D o
f dat
a an
d fil
esB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0075
244
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
7524
4Sc
hlum
berg
er -
Dua
l MB
MI P
DS,
LA
S &
Wel
lEye
File
s - C
D o
f dat
a an
d fil
esB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0010
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0024
2955
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0024
879
BP
- TO
1100
0827
(BP-
HZN
-BLY
0024
2955
-487
9).p
dfB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0063
085
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
6308
5M
C25
2_00
1_ST
00B
P01_
APR
15
- Apr
20_
ASC
II (B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0063
085)
.txt
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0019
0158
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0019
0158
MC
252_
001_
ST00
BP0
1_A
PR 1
5 - A
pr 2
0_A
SCII
(BP-
HZN
-BLY
0019
0158
).txt
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0017
6372
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0017
6372
Tim
eSD
LSta
ts 0
5Apr
il 20
Apr
il201
0 (B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
1763
72).l
asB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0269
030
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
6903
0W
ellS
pace
Doc
umen
ts, C
opy
of B
P-00
1318
- C
D o
f dat
a an
d fil
esH
AL_
0123
040
HA
L_01
2304
0M
C25
2_32
306_
3_Ti
me
AD
T V
ib_1
0 Ju
ly 1
0_A
M.e
mf
HA
L_01
9788
3H
AL_
0197
883
MC
252
BP0
1 Pr
essu
re L
og T
VD
.em
fH
AL_
0205
627
HA
L_02
0562
7M
C25
2 B
P01
Pres
sure
Log
TV
D.e
mf
HA
L_02
3419
4H
AL_
0234
194
MC
252_
001_
ST00
BP0
0_R
UN
_600
.EM
FH
AL_
0234
245
HA
L_02
3424
570
2693
9bp1
GT.
emf
HA
L_02
3444
7H
AL_
0234
447
MC
252
BP0
1_ G
EOTA
P TE
ST #
4_17
722M
D_1
7711
TVD
.em
fH
AL_
0243
170
HA
L_02
4317
0M
acon
do B
P1_P
its_T
ime_
RT.
emf
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nH
AL_
0251
624
HA
L_02
5162
4M
C25
2#1_
1in
MD
_Com
posi
te_5
067_
1235
0_PM
_2_2
4_10
.em
fH
AL_
0252
072
HA
L_02
5207
2M
acon
do B
P1_P
its_T
ime_
RT.
emf
HA
L_02
5596
0H
AL_
0255
960
Rec
orde
d M
C25
2 B
P01
PWD
Eng
Log
MD
.em
fH
AL_
0257
929
HA
L_02
5792
9M
acon
do 5
in C
ombo
MD
Fin
al.e
mf
HA
L_02
6532
5H
AL_
0265
325
Rec
orde
d M
C25
2 B
P01
Pres
sure
Log
TV
D.e
mf
HA
L_02
7267
7H
AL_
0272
677
Rec
orde
d M
C25
2 B
P01
Pres
sure
Log
TV
D.e
mf
HA
L_02
8500
3H
AL_
0285
003
Rec
orde
d M
C25
2 B
P01
PWD
Eng
Log
MD
.em
fH
AL_
0292
765
HA
L_02
9276
5M
C 2
52 B
P01_
GEO
TAP
TEST
#6_
1772
3MD
_177
12TV
D.e
mf
HA
L_03
1308
8H
AL_
0313
088
MC
252
BP0
1_ G
EOTA
P TE
ST #
2_16
512M
D_1
6501
TVD
.em
fH
AL_
0321
414
HA
L_03
2141
470
2693
9bp1
com
p.em
fH
AL_
0328
767
HA
L_03
2876
7M
C25
2 B
P01
PWD
Eng
Log
MD
.em
fH
AL_
0330
878
HA
L_03
3087
8M
C25
2#1_
5in
MD
_Com
posi
te_5
067_
1235
0_PM
_2_2
4_10
.em
fH
AL_
0342
497
HA
L_03
4249
7M
acon
do 5
in C
ombo
TV
D F
inal
.em
fH
AL_
0349
596
HA
L_03
4959
6M
acon
do 1
in C
ombo
MD
Fin
al.e
mf
HA
L_03
5845
3H
AL_
0358
453
MC
252#
1_M
WD
_Sur
vey_
RT_
2_18
_10.
emf
HA
L_03
6998
9H
AL_
0369
989
MC
252
BP0
1_ G
EOTA
P TE
ST #
3_17
723M
D_1
7712
TVD
.em
fH
AL_
0373
388
HA
L_03
7338
8M
acon
do P
WD
Eng
inee
ring
Log
Fina
l.em
fH
AL_
0386
159
HA
L_03
8615
9M
C 2
52 B
P01_
GEO
TAP
TEST
#8_
1808
9MD
_180
78TV
D.e
mf
HA
L_03
8848
2H
AL_
0388
483
0000
0444
2746
HA
L_03
9133
3H
AL_
0391
333
MC
252
BP0
1_ G
EOTA
P TE
ST #
5_17
724M
D_1
7713
TVD
.em
fH
AL_
0439
200
HA
L_04
3920
0M
C 2
52 B
P01_
GEO
TAP
TEST
#1_
1651
3MD
_165
02TV
D.e
mf
HA
L_04
5312
7H
AL_
0453
127
MC
252
BP0
1 PW
D E
ng L
og M
D.e
mf
HA
L_04
6622
3H
AL_
0466
223
MC
252
BP0
1_ G
EOTA
P TE
ST #
7_18
090M
D_1
8079
TVD
.em
fH
AL_
0467
694
HA
L_04
6769
4M
acon
do P
ress
ure
Log
Fina
l.em
fH
AL_
0498
853
HA
L_04
9885
3M
acon
do 1
in C
ombo
TV
D F
inal
.em
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0434
280
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3787
4M
acon
do B
P_Ti
me
SDL_
4-21
-201
0.tx
tB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0437
876
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3860
0M
acon
do B
P_C
emen
ting_
4-21
-201
0.tx
tB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0438
601
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3860
1M
acon
do B
P_M
udlo
g.em
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0434
278
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3427
8M
acon
do B
P1_S
urfa
cePa
ram
eter
s_R
T_4-
22-1
0.em
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0434
275
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3427
7Em
fVie
w3.
123
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3860
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0438
602
Mac
ondo
BP_
MW
D B
AT.
emf
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3427
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0434
279
Mac
ondo
BP1
_Sur
face
Para
met
ers_
Tim
e_R
T.em
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0437
875
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
3787
5M
acon
do B
P1_P
its_T
ime_
RT.
emf
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0438
603
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
4051
1M
acon
do B
P_Pi
ts_4
-21-
2010
.txt
TBD
BP-
Mud
logg
ing
Dat
a.xl
sx -
Bou
rgoy
ne c
reat
ed fi
leTB
DM
acon
do D
ispl
acem
ent V
olum
es.x
lsx
- Bou
rgoy
ne c
reat
ed fi
leTB
DM
acon
do O
verb
urde
n vs
. Dep
th.x
lsx
- Bou
rgoy
ne c
reat
ed fi
leTB
DN
egat
ive
Test
Ana
lysi
s.xls
x - B
ourg
oyne
cre
ated
file
TBD
Pres
sure
Inte
grity
Tes
t Ana
lysi
s.xls
x - B
ourg
oyne
cre
ated
file
Expert Report of Adam T. (Ted) Bourgoyne, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Appendix D
Appendix D-3: Materials From The 2179MDL Litigation
In addition to the materials cited in my report, Appendix D-3 lists the materials from the 2179MDL litigation provided to me for my consideration. These materials include deposition transcripts, reports from various experts or investigative bodies, materials produced in the litigation and materials used as deposition exhibits, among other items.
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0000
001
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0076
0B
P D
eepw
ater
Hor
izon
Acc
iden
t Inv
estig
atio
n R
epor
t and
app
endi
ces
N/A
BP
Dee
pwat
er H
oriz
on A
ccid
ent I
nves
tigat
ion
Rep
ort V
ideo
- av
aila
ble
at w
ww
.bp.
com
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L001
6108
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0161
085
Emai
l fro
m S
. Dou
glas
to H
. Pow
ell r
e M
W in
crea
se re
ques
tB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0211
407
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
1140
7Em
ail f
rom
B. M
orel
to S
. Dou
glas
re P
PFG
MW
Cha
rtsB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0239
630
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
3963
1Em
ail f
rom
S. D
ougl
as to
M. H
afle
re M
W in
crea
se re
ques
tB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2470
626
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L024
7062
6Em
ail f
rom
S. D
ougl
as to
J. H
afle
et a
l re
Ver
bal A
ppro
val
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L027
4748
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2747
483
Emai
l fro
m S
. Dou
glas
to L
. Car
ter r
e M
W C
hang
e R
eque
stB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2859
913
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L028
5991
3Em
ail f
rom
L. C
arte
r to
S. D
ougl
as re
MW
cha
nge
Req
uest
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L028
5991
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2859
918
Emai
l fro
m S
. Dou
glas
to B
. Mor
el e
t al r
e F.
Pat
ton
appr
oval
for M
W in
crea
seB
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
2459
45B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
2459
47Em
ail f
rom
D. T
rocq
uet t
o S.
Dou
glas
re M
C 2
52 P
lugb
ack
App
rova
l Req
uest
edIM
S023
-014
842
IMS0
23-0
1484
3Em
ail f
rom
J. L
evin
e to
F. P
atto
n et
al r
e Te
st P
rogr
am P
roto
cols
IMS0
26-0
1082
3IM
S026
-010
825
Emai
l fro
m D
. Tro
cque
t to
G. W
oltm
an e
t al r
e qu
estio
n ab
out p
ress
ure
for L
OT
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5785
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0057
859
Geo
Rep
ort_
10-2
5-09
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5786
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0057
863
Geo
Rep
ort_
10-2
7-09
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5796
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0057
964
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-0
8-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5800
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
006
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-2
2-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5803
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
036
Geo
Rep
ort_
10-3
0-09
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5805
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
051
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-1
5-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5805
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
058
Geo
Rep
ort_
02-1
7-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5808
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
087
Geo
Rep
ort_
02-1
2-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5810
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
108
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-2
0-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5825
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
253
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-3
0-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5826
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
266
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-1
8-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5828
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
286
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-1
4-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5832
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
322
Geo
Rep
ort_
02-2
2-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5832
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
328
Geo
Rep
ort_
04-0
5-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5833
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
334
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-2
1-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5834
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
343
Geo
Rep
ort_
10-2
3-09
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5834
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
346
Geo
Rep
ort_
04-1
4-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5834
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
350
Geo
Rep
ort_
10-2
6-09
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5836
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
366
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-1
7-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5845
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
451
Geo
Rep
ort_
04-1
3-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5845
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
459
Geo
Rep
ort_
03-1
3-10
_Mac
ondo
.doc
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
467
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5846
8G
eoR
epor
t_04
-06-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
504
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5850
7G
eoR
epor
t_04
-03-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
509
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5851
1G
eoR
epor
t_03
-29-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
521
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5852
2G
eoR
epor
t_03
-03-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
532
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5853
3G
eoR
epor
t_03
-11-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
539
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5854
0G
eoR
epor
t_04
-09-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
600
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5860
1G
eoR
epor
t_03
-12-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
604
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5860
5G
eoR
epor
t_03
-23-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
613
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5861
4G
eoR
epor
t_03
-09-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
634
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5863
6G
eoR
epor
t_04
-04-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
665
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5866
6G
eoR
epor
t_04
-11-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
684
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5868
5G
eoR
epor
t_03
-10-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
733
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5873
4G
eoR
epor
t_04
-08-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
769
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5877
0G
eoR
epor
t_02
-24-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
833
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5883
4G
eoR
epor
t_02
-28-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
841
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5884
2G
eoR
epor
t_02
-19-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
912
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5891
3G
eoR
epor
t_10
-31-
09_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
918
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5891
9G
eoR
epor
t_04
-07-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
954
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5895
5G
eoR
epor
t_04
-12-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
959
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5896
0G
eoR
epor
t_02
-15-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
018
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5901
9G
eoR
epor
t_03
-04-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
052
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5905
3G
eoR
epor
t_02
-20-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
126
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5912
7G
eoR
epor
t_03
-25-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
135
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5913
6G
eoR
epor
t_02
-11-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
142
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5914
3G
eoR
epor
t_02
-23-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
177
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5917
8G
eoR
epor
t_02
-13-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
182
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5918
3G
eoR
epor
t_03
-05-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
185
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5918
6G
eoR
epor
t_04
-15-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
209
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5921
0G
eoR
epor
t_03
-26-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
220
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5922
2G
eoR
epor
t_03
-19-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
291
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5929
2G
eoR
epor
t_10
-29-
09_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
321
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5932
3G
eoR
epor
t_02
-18-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
367
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5936
8G
eoR
epor
t_10
-24-
09_M
acon
do.d
oc
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
370
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5937
1G
eoR
epor
t_04
-02-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
378
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5937
9G
eoR
epor
t_02
-10-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
404
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5940
5G
eoR
epor
t_03
-01-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
427
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5942
8G
eoR
epor
t_02
-21-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
483
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5948
4G
eoR
epor
t_04
-01-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
527
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5952
8G
eoR
epor
t_02
-26-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
573
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5957
4G
eoR
epor
t_03
-07-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
626
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5962
9G
eoR
epor
t_03
-24-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
678
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5967
9G
eoR
epor
t_03
-16-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
710
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5971
1G
eoR
epor
t_03
-28-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
721
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5972
3G
eoR
epor
t_10
-28-
09_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
772
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5977
3G
eoR
epor
t_03
-31-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
797
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5979
8G
eoR
epor
t_03
-06-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
805
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5980
6G
eoR
epor
t_02
-25-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
852
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5985
3G
eoR
epor
t_04
-10-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
866
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5986
7G
eoR
epor
t_03
-02-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
869
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5987
0G
eoR
epor
t_02
-27-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
892
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5989
3G
eoR
epor
t_03
-27-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
895
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5989
6G
eoR
epor
t_02
-14-
10_M
acon
do.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
039
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1404
020
09.0
5.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
1) (P
rinte
d 10
0514
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
045
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1404
620
09.0
5.04
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
2) (P
rinte
d 10
0622
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
041
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1404
220
09.0
5.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
3) (P
rinte
d 10
0614
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
033
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1403
420
09.0
5.06
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
4) (P
rinte
d 10
0531
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
035
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1403
620
09.0
5.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
5) (P
rinte
d 10
0539
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
037
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1403
820
09.0
5.08
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
6) (P
rinte
d 10
0547
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
047
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1404
920
09.0
5.09
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
7) (P
rinte
d 10
0606
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
050
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1405
120
09.0
5.10
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
8) (P
rinte
d 10
0557
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
043
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1404
420
09.0
5.11
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
9) (P
rinte
d 10
0523
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
052
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1405
320
09.0
5.16
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
0) (P
rinte
d 09
5223
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
054
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1405
520
09.0
5.17
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
1) (P
rinte
d 09
5231
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
056
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1405
720
09.0
5.18
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
2) (P
rinte
d 09
5239
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
058
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1405
920
09.0
5.19
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
3) (P
rinte
d 09
5246
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
060
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1406
120
09.0
5.20
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
4) (P
rinte
d 09
5254
AM
)
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
062
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1406
320
09.0
5.21
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
5) (P
rinte
d 09
5303
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
064
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1406
520
09.0
6.02
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
6) (P
rinte
d 09
5310
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
066
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1406
720
09.0
6.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
7) (P
rinte
d 09
5317
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
068
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1406
920
09.0
6.04
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
8) (P
rinte
d 09
5325
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
070
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1407
120
09.0
6.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 1
9) (P
rinte
d 09
5333
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
072
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1407
320
09.0
6.06
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 2
0) (P
rinte
d 09
5340
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
074
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1407
520
09.0
6.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 2
1) (P
rinte
d 09
5348
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
076
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1407
720
09.0
6.08
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 2
2) (P
rinte
d 09
5356
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
078
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1407
920
09.0
6.09
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 2
3) (P
rinte
d 09
5405
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
031
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1403
220
09.0
6.10
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 2
4) (P
rinte
d 09
5414
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
083
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1408
520
09.0
9.30
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
1) (P
rinte
d 05
2810
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
086
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1408
820
09.1
0.01
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
2) (P
rinte
d 05
1644
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
089
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1409
120
09.1
0.02
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
3) (P
rinte
d 05
3028
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
092
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1409
520
09.1
0.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
4) (P
rinte
d 05
2954
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
096
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1410
020
09.1
0.04
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
5) (P
rinte
d 05
3542
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
101
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1410
520
09.1
0.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 4
8) (P
rinte
d 06
3107
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
110
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1411
220
09.1
0.06
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
1) (P
rinte
d 05
3614
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
106
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1410
920
09.1
0.06
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 4
9) (P
rinte
d 05
3602
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
113
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1411
620
09.1
0.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
2) (P
rinte
d 04
5026
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
117
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1412
220
09.1
0.08
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
3) (P
rinte
d 05
1742
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
123
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1412
620
09.1
0.09
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
4) (P
rinte
d 05
1936
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
127
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1413
020
09.1
0.10
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
5) (P
rinte
d 04
5723
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
131
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1413
420
09.1
0.11
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Rep
ort 0
6) (P
rinte
d 05
2618
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
191
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1419
520
09.1
0.12
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 07)
(Prin
ted
0724
34
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8381
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0183
822
2009
.10.
12 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t (R
epor
t 07)
(Prin
ted
0525
38 A
M)
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1418
8B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
190
2009
.10.
13 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 0
8) (P
rinte
d 07
2348
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0182
328
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8233
020
09.1
0.13
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 0
8) (P
rinte
d 05
3750
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0181
059
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8106
120
09.1
0.13
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 0
8) (P
rinte
d 07
4313
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0179
040
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7904
220
09.1
0.14
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 09)
(Prin
ted
0719
09
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1418
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
187
2009
.10.
14 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 0
9) (P
rinte
d 07
2255
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0073
003
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
7300
520
09.1
0.14
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 0
9) (P
rinte
d 07
5346
AM
) B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
182
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1418
420
09.1
0.15
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 10)
(Prin
ted
0722
06
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1417
8B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
181
2009
.10.
16 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
1) (P
rinte
d 07
2109
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0183
835
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8383
720
09.1
0.17
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 12)
(Prin
ted
0506
17
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1417
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
177
2009
.10.
17 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
2) (P
rinte
d 07
2008
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
171
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1417
420
09.1
0.18
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 13)
(Prin
ted
0719
07
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1416
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
170
2009
.10.
19 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
4) (P
rinte
d 07
1807
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
161
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1416
520
09.1
0.20
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 15)
(Prin
ted
0716
53
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1413
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
139
2009
.10.
21 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
6) (P
rinte
d 05
5113
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
140
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1414
420
09.1
0.22
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 17)
(Prin
ted
0543
27
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1414
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
150
2009
.10.
23 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
8) (P
rinte
d 05
1345
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
151
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1415
520
09.1
0.24
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 19)
(Prin
ted
0552
05
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1415
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
160
2009
.10.
25 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 2
0) (P
rinte
d 05
4622
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
196
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1420
020
09.1
0.26
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 21)
(Prin
ted
0859
23
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8612
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0186
133
2009
.10.
26 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 21)
(Prin
ted
0700
34 A
M)
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8388
2B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0183
886
2009
.10.
27 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 2
2) (P
rinte
d 05
4408
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0183
887
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8389
120
09.1
0.28
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 23)
(Prin
ted
0707
07
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1420
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
205
2009
.10.
29 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 2
4) (P
rinte
d 04
5642
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
206
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1420
920
09.1
0.30
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 25)
(Prin
ted
0510
25
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1421
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
213
2009
.10.
31 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 2
6) (P
rinte
d 05
0026
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
214
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1421
620
09.1
1.01
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 27)
(Prin
ted
0724
42
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1421
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
219
2009
.11.
02 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 2
8) (P
rinte
d 07
1049
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
220
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1422
220
09.1
1.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 29)
(Prin
ted
0456
35
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1422
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
225
2009
.11.
04 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 3
0) (P
rinte
d 05
0511
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
226
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1422
820
09.1
1.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 31)
(Prin
ted
0547
45
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1422
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
231
2009
.11.
06 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 3
2) (P
rinte
d 06
5355
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
232
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1423
420
09.1
1.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 33)
(Prin
ted
0558
30
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1423
8B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
240
2009
.11.
08 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 3
4) (P
rinte
d 08
1755
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
940
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7894
220
09.1
1.08
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 34)
(Prin
ted
0950
38
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1423
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
237
2009
.11.
09 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 3
5) (P
rinte
d 04
0054
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
241
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1424
320
09.1
1.10
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 36)
(Prin
ted
0538
47
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1424
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
246
2009
.11.
11 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 3
7) (P
rinte
d 05
0919
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
247
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1424
920
09.1
1.12
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 38)
(Prin
ted
0516
25
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1425
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
252
2009
.11.
13 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 3
9) (P
rinte
d 05
0502
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
253
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1425
520
09.1
1.14
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 40)
(Prin
ted
0507
54
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1425
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
258
2009
.11.
15 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 4
1) (P
rinte
d 05
1438
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
259
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1426
120
09.1
1.16
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 42)
(Prin
ted
0548
39
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
8395
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0183
956
2009
.11.
16 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 4
2) (P
rinte
d 07
2314
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
262
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1426
420
09.1
1.17
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 43)
(Prin
ted
0511
25
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1426
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
267
2009
.11.
18 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 4
4) (P
rinte
d 04
3343
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
268
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1427
020
09.1
1.19
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 45)
(Prin
ted
0501
13
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1427
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
273
2009
.11.
20 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 4
6) (P
rinte
d 05
0704
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
274
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1427
620
09.1
1.21
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 47)
(Prin
ted
0457
41
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1427
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
279
2009
.11.
22 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 4
8) (P
rinte
d 05
0602
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
280
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1428
620
09.1
1.23
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 49)
(Prin
ted
0520
26
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1428
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
293
2009
.11.
24 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 5
0) (P
rinte
d 05
1723
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
294
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1430
120
09.1
1.25
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 51)
(Prin
ted
0446
56
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1430
2B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
306
2009
.11.
26 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 5
2) (P
rinte
d 04
4843
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
307
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1431
120
09.1
1.27
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 53)
(Prin
ted
0450
38
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1431
2B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
314
2009
.11.
28 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 5
4) (P
rinte
d 04
4435
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
315
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1431
720
09.1
1.29
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 55)
(Prin
ted
0458
41
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1431
8B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
320
2009
.11.
30 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 5
6) (P
rinte
d 09
4324
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
321
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1432
320
09.1
2.01
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 57)
(Prin
ted
0643
08
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1432
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
326
2009
.12.
02 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 5
8) (P
rinte
d 05
4227
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
327
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1432
920
09.1
2.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 59)
(Prin
ted
0515
12
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1433
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
332
2009
.12.
04 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 6
0) (P
rinte
d 05
1323
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
333
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1433
520
09.1
2.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 61)
(Prin
ted
0521
15
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1433
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
338
2009
.12.
06 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 6
2) (P
rinte
d 05
0319
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
339
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1434
220
09.1
2.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 63)
(Prin
ted
0532
40
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1434
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
345
2009
.12.
08 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 6
4) (P
rinte
d 05
0805
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
346
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1434
920
09.1
2.09
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 65)
(Prin
ted
0514
13
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1435
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
352
2009
.12.
10 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 6
6) (P
rinte
d 05
1608
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
353
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1435
520
09.1
2.11
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 67)
(Prin
ted
0513
02
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1435
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
358
2009
.12.
12 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 6
8) (P
rinte
d 05
1619
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
359
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1436
220
09.1
2.13
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 69)
(Prin
ted
0523
20
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1436
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
365
2009
.12.
14 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 7
0) (P
rinte
d 05
0655
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
366
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1436
820
09.1
2.15
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 71)
(Prin
ted
0529
21
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1436
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
372
2009
.12.
16 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 7
2) (P
rinte
d 05
2726
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
373
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1437
520
09.1
2.17
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 73)
(Prin
ted
0506
56
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
376
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1437
820
09.1
2.18
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 74)
(Prin
ted
0502
38
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1437
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
381
2009
.12.
19 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 7
5) (P
rinte
d 05
2029
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
080
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1408
220
09.1
2.20
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 76)
(Prin
ted
0538
45
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1359
2B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
595
2010
.01.
31 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
MO
BIL
IZA
TIO
N) (
Rep
ort 0
1) (P
rinte
d B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
596
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1359
820
10.0
2.01
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (M
OB
ILIZ
ATI
ON
) (R
epor
t 02)
(Prin
ted
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1362
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
624
2010
.02.
02 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
MO
BIL
IZA
TIO
N) (
Rep
ort 0
3) (P
rinte
d B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
599
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1360
220
10.0
2.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (M
OB
ILIZ
ATI
ON
) (R
epor
t 04)
(Prin
ted
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1361
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
620
2010
.02.
04 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
MO
BIL
IZA
TIO
N) (
Rep
ort 0
5) (P
rinte
d B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0100
992
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
0099
420
10.0
2.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (M
OB
ILIZ
ATI
ON
) (R
epor
t 06)
(Prin
ted
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
2088
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0020
887
2010
.02.
06 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 0
7) (P
rinte
d 06
1828
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
991
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1399
420
10.0
2.06
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 77)
(Prin
ted
0504
32
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
2088
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0020
884
2010
.02.
06 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
MO
BIL
IZA
TIO
N) (
Rep
ort 0
7) (P
rinte
d B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
838
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7884
120
10.0
2.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 08)
(Prin
ted
0540
25
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1360
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
610
2010
.02.
07 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 7
8) (P
rinte
d 06
5834
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
603
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1360
620
10.0
2.08
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 79)
(Prin
ted
0615
00
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1361
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
616
2010
.02.
09 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 8
0) (P
rinte
d 05
4913
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
625
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1362
920
10.0
2.10
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 81)
(Prin
ted
0543
11
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1363
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
635
2010
.02.
11 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 8
2) (P
rinte
d 06
1549
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
636
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1364
220
10.0
2.12
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 83)
(Prin
ted
0558
40
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1364
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
648
2010
.02.
13 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 8
4) (P
rinte
d 05
5916
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
649
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1365
420
10.0
2.14
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 85)
(Prin
ted
0609
54
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1365
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
660
2010
.02.
15 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 8
6) (P
rinte
d 06
0226
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
661
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1366
520
10.0
2.16
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 87)
(Prin
ted
0532
09
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1366
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
672
2010
.02.
17 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 8
8) (P
rinte
d 06
2102
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
673
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1367
920
10.0
2.18
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 89)
(Prin
ted
0545
59
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1368
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
686
2010
.02.
19 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 9
0) (P
rinte
d 05
4416
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
687
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1369
320
10.0
2.20
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 91)
(Prin
ted
0529
28
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1369
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
699
2010
.02.
21 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 9
2) (P
rinte
d 05
5323
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
700
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1370
620
10.0
2.22
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 93)
(Prin
ted
0646
22
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1399
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
001
2010
.02.
23 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 9
4) (P
rinte
d 05
1128
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
707
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1371
320
10.0
2.24
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 95)
(Prin
ted
0539
12
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1371
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
720
2010
.02.
25 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 9
6) (P
rinte
d 05
5210
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
002
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1400
620
10.0
2.26
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 97)
(Prin
ted
0513
45
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
719
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7872
320
10.0
2.26
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 97)
(Prin
ted
0544
00
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1400
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
012
2010
.02.
27 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 9
8) (P
rinte
d 05
1505
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
713
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7871
820
10.0
2.27
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 98)
(Prin
ted
0539
14
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1401
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
018
2010
.02.
28 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 9
9) (P
rinte
d 05
1638
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
708
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7871
220
10.0
2.28
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 99)
(Prin
ted
0534
30
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7869
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
707
2010
.03.
01 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
00) (
Prin
ted
0532
15
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1372
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
727
2010
.03.
02 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
01) (
Prin
ted
0604
33
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1401
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
024
2010
.03.
03 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
02) (
Prin
ted
0518
27
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7868
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
691
2010
.03.
03 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
02) (
Prin
ted
0555
26
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1372
8B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
734
2010
.03.
04 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
03) (
Prin
ted
0559
21
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1373
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
740
2010
.03.
05 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
04) (
Prin
ted
0555
18
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1374
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
746
2010
.03.
06 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
05) (
Prin
ted
0548
36
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1374
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
752
2010
.03.
07 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
06) (
Prin
ted
0531
30
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1375
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
758
2010
.03.
08 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
07) (
Prin
ted
0540
09
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1375
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
763
2010
.03.
09 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
08) (
Prin
ted
0544
31
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1376
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
769
2010
.03.
10 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
09) (
Prin
ted
0548
12
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1402
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
030
2010
.03.
11 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
10) (
Prin
ted
0519
51
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1377
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
776
2010
.03.
12 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
11) (
Prin
ted
0618
15
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1377
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
781
2010
.03.
13 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
12) (
Prin
ted
0620
51
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1378
2B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
786
2010
.03.
14 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
13) (
Prin
ted
0550
42
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1378
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
792
2010
.03.
15 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
14) (
Prin
ted
0554
26
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1379
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
795
2010
.03.
16 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
15) (
Prin
ted
0401
43
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7860
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
614
2010
.03.
16 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
15) (
Prin
ted
0545
02
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1379
6B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
802
2010
.03.
17 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
16) (
Prin
ted
0556
58
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1380
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
808
2010
.03.
18 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
17) (
Prin
ted
0535
07
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1380
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
814
2010
.03.
19 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
18) (
Prin
ted
0515
16
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1381
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
820
2010
.03.
20 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
19) (
Prin
ted
0605
20
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1382
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
826
2010
.03.
21 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
20) (
Prin
ted
0551
29
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1382
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
833
2010
.03.
22 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
21) (
Prin
ted
0605
12
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1383
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
838
2010
.03.
23 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
22) (
Prin
ted
0548
12
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1383
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
843
2010
.03.
24 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
23) (
Prin
ted
0524
17
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1384
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
849
2010
.03.
25 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
24) (
Prin
ted
0549
51
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1385
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
855
2010
.03.
26 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
25) (
Prin
ted
0712
33
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
856
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1386
220
10.0
3.27
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 126
) (Pr
inte
d 05
4858
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
863
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1386
720
10.0
3.28
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 127
) (Pr
inte
d 05
3340
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
868
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1387
320
10.0
3.29
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 128
) (Pr
inte
d 05
1614
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
874
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1387
820
10.0
3.30
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 129
) (Pr
inte
d 05
0658
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
879
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1388
320
10.0
3.31
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 130
) (Pr
inte
d 06
1554
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0178
515
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7852
020
10.0
4.01
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 131
) (Pr
inte
d 06
0659
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
884
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1388
920
10.0
4.01
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 131
) (Pr
inte
d 08
3006
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
890
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1389
620
10.0
4.02
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 132
) (Pr
inte
d 06
1314
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
897
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1390
420
10.0
4.03
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 133
) (Pr
inte
d 05
5103
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
905
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1391
020
10.0
4.04
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 134
) (Pr
inte
d 06
1228
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
911
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1391
520
10.0
4.05
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 135
) (Pr
inte
d 06
5442
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
916
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1392
020
10.0
4.06
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 136
) (Pr
inte
d 05
5107
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
921
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1392
520
10.0
4.07
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 137
) (Pr
inte
d 05
4418
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
926
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1393
420
10.0
4.08
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 138
) (Pr
inte
d 06
3816
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
935
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1394
020
10.0
4.09
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 139
) (Pr
inte
d 05
5857
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
941
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1394
620
10.0
4.10
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 140
) (Pr
inte
d 06
0623
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
947
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1395
020
10.0
4.11
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 141
) (Pr
inte
d 05
5615
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
951
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1395
420
10.0
4.12
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 142
) (Pr
inte
d 05
5419
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
955
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1395
920
10.0
4.13
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 143
) (Pr
inte
d 05
3325
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
960
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1396
420
10.0
4.14
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 144
) (Pr
inte
d 05
3749
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
557
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1356
120
10.0
4.15
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (C
ompl
etio
n) (R
epor
t 01)
(Prin
ted
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1397
0B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
974
2010
.04.
15 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
45) (
Prin
ted
0552
28
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1356
2B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
566
2010
.04.
16 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Com
plet
ion)
(Rep
ort 0
2) (P
rinte
d B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
567
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1357
220
10.0
4.17
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (C
ompl
etio
n) (R
epor
t 03)
(Prin
ted
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1357
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
577
2010
.04.
18 D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Com
plet
ion)
(Rep
ort 0
4) (P
rinte
d B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0013
578
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1358
420
10.0
4.19
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (C
ompl
etio
n) (R
epor
t 05)
(Prin
ted
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5807
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
075
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
801
1MD
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5814
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
149
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
110
10M
D.p
dfB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
175
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5817
7PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 1
3305
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5847
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
473
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
123
50.p
dfB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
851
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5885
3PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do B
P01
1808
8MD
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5885
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
859
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
BP0
1 17
761M
D.p
dfB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
921
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5892
2PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 8
878M
D.d
oc
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0058
967
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5896
9PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 8
050M
D.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
079
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5908
0PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do B
P01
1517
5.pd
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
091
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5909
2PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 8
500M
D.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
237
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5923
9PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do B
P01
1511
3.pd
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
401
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5940
3PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 1
1887
MD
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5944
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
443
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
BP0
1 13
780.
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5945
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
459
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
123
50.p
dfB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
474
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5947
5PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 8
970M
D.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
488
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5948
9PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do 8
000M
D.d
ocB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
546
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5954
7PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do B
P01
1183
8.pd
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
558
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5956
0PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do B
P01
1646
0.pd
fB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
632
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5963
3PP
Rep
ort M
acon
do B
P01
1826
0MD
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5969
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
694
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
909
0MD
.doc
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5978
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0059
785
PP R
epor
t Mac
ondo
BP0
1 13
150.
N/A
Dep
ositi
on T
rans
crip
ts &
Exh
ibits
of A
lber
tin, M
artin
N/A
Dep
ositi
on T
rans
crip
ts &
Exh
ibits
of A
lber
ty, M
ark
N/A
Dep
ositi
on T
rans
crip
ts &
Exh
ibits
of L
acy,
Stu
art
N/A
Dep
ositi
on T
rans
crip
ts &
Exh
ibits
of P
aine
, Kat
eN
/AD
epos
ition
Tra
nscr
ipts
& E
xhib
its o
f Pat
ton,
Fra
nkN
/AD
epos
ition
Tra
nscr
ipts
& E
xhib
its o
f Tro
cque
t, D
avid
N/A
Dep
ositi
on T
rans
crip
ts &
Exh
ibits
of V
inso
n, G
raha
mN
/A20
11-0
9-23
Exp
ert R
epor
t of C
alvi
n B
arnh
ill (T
rans
ocea
n)N
/A20
11-0
8-26
Exp
ert R
epor
t of D
avid
Prit
char
d (P
SC)
N/A
2011
-08-
26 E
xper
t Rep
ort o
f Alla
n H
uffm
an (U
S)N
/AM
acon
do W
ell I
ncid
ent -
Tra
nsoc
ean
Inve
stig
atio
n R
epor
t Vol
umes
1 a
nd 2
and
N
/AC
hief
Cou
nsel
's 20
11 N
atio
nal C
omm
issi
on o
n th
e B
P D
eepw
ater
Hor
izon
Oil
Spill
and
N
/AD
epos
ition
Tra
nscr
ipt &
Exh
ibits
of O
'Bry
an, P
atric
kN
/AD
epos
ition
Tra
nscr
ipts
& E
xhib
its o
f Spr
ague
, Joh
nN
/AD
epos
ition
Tra
nscr
ipts
& E
xhib
its o
f Bill
on, B
rad
N/A
Dep
ositi
on T
rans
crip
t & E
xhib
its o
f Lin
dner
, Leo
BP-
HZN
-CEC
0204
94B
P-H
ZN-C
EC02
0510
2010
-03
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-C
EC02
8826
BP-
HZN
-CEC
0288
4020
10-0
4 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
9908
8B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0099
102
2010
-01
Dril
ling
Plan
Pie
ces
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0116
697
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
1670
620
10-0
3 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
2618
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0126
200
2010
-04
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
193
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4020
120
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
211
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4021
320
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
216
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4023
320
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
234
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4025
020
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
251
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4027
020
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
300
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4031
720
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
318
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4033
520
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
336
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4035
320
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
354
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4037
920
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
447
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4046
020
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
461
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4047
320
10-0
1 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
475
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4049
220
09-0
9 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
493
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4050
920
10-0
1 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
522
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4053
020
10-0
1 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
564
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4059
820
10-0
1 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
599
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4060
020
10-0
1 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0140
601
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4061
720
10-0
1 D
rillin
g Pl
an P
iece
sB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
096
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4111
820
10-0
3 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4111
9B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
137
2010
-03
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
205
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4122
120
10-0
3 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4125
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
276
2010
-03
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
297
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4131
620
10-0
3 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4131
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
336
2010
-03
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
400
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4141
120
10-0
3 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4149
3B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
512
2010
-03
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0141
737
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4174
620
10-0
3 D
rillin
g Pi
eces
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
4201
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0142
034
2010
-04
Dril
ling
Piec
esB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0031
758
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
3176
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
(Rep
ort 1
00) (
Prin
ted
0556
33 A
M)
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L019
1779
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1917
797
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-MB
I000
1432
1B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0014
323
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) (R
epor
t 57)
(Prin
ted
0643
08 A
M)
Nat
ive
prod
uctio
nM
DL
Ex. 4
025
- MC
252
For
mat
ion
PIT
Rep
ortin
g W
orks
heet
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0060
898
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
6090
0IA
DC
Dai
ly D
rillin
g R
epor
t for
Feb
ruar
y 14
, 201
0B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
2425
20B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
2425
23IA
DC
Dai
ly D
rillin
g R
epor
t for
Mar
ch 1
5, 2
010
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
2711
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0327
511
BP
EX00
83 -
Tran
soce
an W
ell C
ontro
l Han
dboo
k (0
3.31
.200
9)_M
DL
Bat
es.P
DF
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
3594
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0336
409
BP
Wel
l Con
trol M
anua
l Vol
. 1_M
DL
Bat
es.P
DF
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
3641
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0336
757
BP
Wel
l Con
trol M
anua
l Vol
. 2_M
DL
Bat
es.P
DF
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
3676
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0336
889
BP
Wel
l Con
trol M
anua
l Vol
. 3_M
DL
Bat
es.P
DF
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5726
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0057
372
Dril
ling
and
Wel
l Ope
ratio
ns P
ract
ice,
E&
P D
efin
ed O
pera
ting
Prac
tice
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
18B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0018
Form
MM
S 14
4 - R
ig M
ovem
ent N
otifi
catio
n R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0024
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
51Fo
rm M
MS
123A
/123
S - A
pplic
atio
n fo
r Per
mit
to D
rill N
ew W
ell
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
06B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0408
Form
MM
S 12
5 - E
nd o
f Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0409
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
09Lt
r fro
m W
. Bra
ntle
y to
M. G
riffit
t re
Initi
al E
xplo
ratio
n Pl
an fo
r MC
252
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
25B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0425
Ltr f
rom
M. T
olbe
rt to
S. D
ougl
as re
Rev
ised
Exp
lora
tion
Plan
for M
C 2
52B
p-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0426
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
40Fo
rm M
MS
123A
/123
S - A
pplic
atio
n fo
r Byp
ass
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
41B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0450
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed B
ypas
sB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0493
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0005
00Fo
rm M
MS
123A
/123
S - A
pplic
atio
n fo
r Rev
ised
New
Wel
lB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0509
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0005
12Fo
rm M
MS
124
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0005
13B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0520
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed N
ew W
ell
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0005
75B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0585
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed N
ew W
ell
Bp-
HZN
-SN
R00
0005
86B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0593
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed N
ew W
ell
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0006
16B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0624
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed B
ypas
sB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0625
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0006
32Fo
rm M
MS
123A
/123
S - A
pplic
atio
n fo
r Rev
ised
New
Wel
lB
p-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0651
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0006
63Fo
rm M
MS
124
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
13B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0716
Form
MM
S 12
4 B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0727
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
27Fo
rm 1
44 -
Rig
Mov
emen
t Not
ifica
tion
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
70B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0782
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed N
ew W
ell
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
86B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0788
Form
MM
S 13
3B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0944
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
47Fo
rm M
MS
124
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
48B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0956
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed N
ew W
ell
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
57B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0958
Form
MM
S 12
5 - E
nd o
f Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0959
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
74Fo
rm M
MS
123A
/123
S - A
pplic
atio
n fo
r Rev
ised
Byp
ass
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
78B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0990
Form
MM
S 12
3A/1
23S
- App
licat
ion
for R
evis
ed B
ypas
sB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
122
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0001
50Fo
rm M
MS
123A
/123
S - A
pplic
atio
n fo
r Per
mit
to D
rill N
ew W
ell (
MM
S A
ppro
val)
BP-
HZN
-SN
R-0
0002
71B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
-000
0003
91In
itial
Exp
lora
tion
Plan
- M
issi
ssip
pi C
anyo
n B
lock
252
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
-000
0392
BP-
HZN
-SN
R-0
0000
394
Initi
al E
xplo
ratio
n Pl
an -
Mis
siss
ippi
Can
yon
Blo
ck 2
52 (S
ectio
n 14
.0)
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L025
6744
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2567
557
NA
E Tr
ansc
ript f
or H
allib
urto
n (T
rans
crip
t 3 o
f 4)
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L010
4530
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1045
323
9-26
-201
0 H
allib
urto
n Pr
esen
tatio
n to
NA
EB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0004
060
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0406
0Em
ail f
rom
G. B
enne
tt to
M. A
lber
tin e
t al r
e M
acon
do U
pdat
e 3p
mB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0005
009
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0501
0Em
ail f
rom
F. P
atto
n to
S. D
ougl
as re
BO
P ex
tens
ion
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0512
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0005
129
Emai
l fro
m B
. Mor
el to
D. V
idrin
e re
Mod
ifica
tion
of P
erm
it to
Byp
ass
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0707
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0007
077
Emai
l fro
m F
. pat
ton
to S
. Dou
glas
re M
C 2
52 L
OT
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0711
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0007
111
Emai
l fro
m S
. Dou
glas
to F
. Pat
ton
re 1
6" C
asin
g Te
st P
ress
ure
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
1016
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0210
280
Fina
l Rep
ort -
Blo
w-o
ut P
reve
ntio
n Eq
uipm
ent R
elia
bilit
y Jo
int I
ndus
try P
roje
ctB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0211
240
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
1124
1Em
ail f
rom
S. D
ougl
as to
T. F
leec
e et
al r
e B
OP
Stac
k C
hang
e R
eque
stB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0213
246
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
1324
6Em
ail f
rom
S. D
ougl
as to
D. V
idrin
e et
al r
e M
MS
appr
oval
to se
t plu
g an
d pu
ll st
ack
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
9002
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0290
026
Emai
l fro
m L
. Her
bst t
o J.
Gra
nt re
MM
S D
irect
or T
ripB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0302
808
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
0281
0Em
ail f
rom
J. G
rant
to J.
Gra
nt e
t al r
e B
P N
atio
nal M
MS
SAFE
Aw
ard
Fina
list
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
0281
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0302
812
MM
S SA
FE A
war
d Pr
ogra
mB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0302
813
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
0281
3M
MS
Dis
trict
SA
FE A
war
d R
ecip
ient
sB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1906
814
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L019
0681
5Em
ail f
rom
S. D
ougl
as to
H. P
owel
l re
BO
P St
ack
Cha
nge
Req
uest
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L019
0682
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1906
828
Emai
l fro
m S
. Dou
glas
to J.
Gui
de e
t al r
e Pl
ugnb
ack
appr
oval
requ
este
dB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1952
111
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L019
5211
2Le
tter f
rom
D. T
rocq
uet t
o G
. Gra
y re
Not
ifica
tion
of In
cide
nt o
f Non
com
plia
nce
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L019
9337
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1993
374
Emai
l fro
m F
. Pat
ton
to S
. Dou
glas
re S
EPLA
no
2 fa
iled
reco
very
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L019
9529
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1995
296
MC
252
Pro
spec
t Ove
rvie
wB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2709
676
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L027
0968
3M
MS
Inci
dent
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L029
6214
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2962
175
Emer
genc
y Ev
acua
tion
Plan
- M
C 2
52 -
Dee
pwat
er H
oriz
onB
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
2412
59B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
2412
61Em
ail f
rom
S. D
ougl
as to
B. M
orel
et a
l re
Test
Pre
ssur
eB
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0170
673
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7067
3Lt
r fro
m S
. Dou
glas
re In
itial
Exp
lora
tion
Plan
for M
C 2
52B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0170
742
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
7074
2Em
ail f
rom
F. P
atto
n to
S. D
ougl
as re
Cem
ent V
olum
e C
hang
eB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0247
809
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
4780
9Em
ail f
rom
Mor
el to
Bur
ns re
FIT
/LO
T te
stII
G01
3-03
7711
IIG
013-
0377
15M
MS
Test
C K
ey -
Dril
ling
IMS0
17-0
0033
8IM
S017
-000
341
Min
utes
of F
ield
Ope
ratio
ns D
rillin
g En
gine
ers'
Mee
ting
IMS0
17-0
2503
0IM
S017
-025
031
Min
utes
of D
rillin
g En
gine
ers M
eetin
gIM
S019
-008
027
IMS0
19-0
0803
0Em
ail f
rom
D. T
rocq
uet t
o M
. Sau
cier
re M
MS
Que
sito
nsIM
S020
-011
185
IMS0
20-0
1123
7St
anda
rd O
pera
ting
Proc
edur
es -
Dril
ling
Ope
ratio
ns F
ield
Ope
ratio
ns G
OM
IMS0
22-0
3055
8IM
S022
-030
558
Emai
l fro
m F
. Pat
ton
to A
. Lap
lant
e re
MC
776
Perm
it D
etai
lIM
S023
-016
635
IMS0
23-0
1663
6Em
ail f
rom
J. L
evin
e to
F. P
atto
n et
al r
e M
MS
Dril
l Tes
t B (A
ttach
men
ts a
re a
t Tab
53
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nIM
S023
-016
637
IMS0
23-0
1664
3M
MS
Test
B K
ey -
Dril
ling
IMS0
23-0
1664
4IM
S023
-016
650
MM
S Te
st B
- D
rillin
gIM
S023
-045
399
IMS0
23-0
4540
0Em
ail f
rom
F. P
atto
n to
J. C
hady
(She
ll) re
MM
S A
ppro
val t
o Se
t Con
tinge
ncy
7-5/
8"
IMS-
0260
0079
9IM
S-02
6000
800
Emai
l fro
m F
. Pat
ton
to G
. Cra
ne re
MC
782
IMS0
26-0
0377
4IM
S026
-003
775
Emai
l fro
m F
. Pat
ton
to J.
Cam
p re
MC
956
IM
S026
-009
754
IMS0
26-0
0975
4Em
ail f
rom
D. T
rocq
uet t
o G
. Cra
ne re
MC
782
IMS0
26-0
1383
0IM
S026
-013
830
Emai
l fro
m D
. Tro
cque
t to
G. C
rane
re M
C 7
82IM
S026
-047
062
IMS0
26-0
4706
3Em
ail f
rom
G. W
iltz
to F
. Pat
ton
re M
C 5
20 D
ispe
nsat
ions
IMS0
26-0
4905
98IM
S026
-049
598
Emai
l fro
m C
. Lyn
ard
to F
. Pat
ton
et a
l re
MC
250
requ
est t
o de
epen
cas
ing
setti
ng
IMS1
81-0
0000
1IM
S181
-000
001
MM
S N
ew O
rlean
s Dis
trict
Rec
ord
of C
onve
rsat
ion
Publ
icly
Ava
ilabl
eM
DL
Ex. 4
019
- BO
EMR
E - N
atio
nal O
ffic
e Po
tent
ial I
ncid
ent o
f Non
com
plia
nce
Publ
icly
Ava
ilabl
e30
CFR
250
.427
HA
L_05
3996
0H
AL_
0539
979
BP
Am
eric
a Pr
oduc
tion
Com
pany
Mac
ondo
#1,
9 7
/8"
X 7
" Pr
oduc
tion
Cas
ing
Des
ign
HA
L_01
1733
0H
AL_
0117
330
BP
Am
eric
a Pr
oduc
tion
Com
pany
Mac
ondo
#1,
9 7
/8"
X 7
" Pr
oduc
tion
Cas
ing
Des
ign
HA
L_01
1735
2H
AL_
0117
384
BP
Am
eric
a Pr
oduc
tion
Com
pany
Mac
ondo
#1,
9 7
/8"
X 7
" Pr
oduc
tion
Cas
ing
Des
ign
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L005
3968
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0539
696
EPT
Dril
ling,
Eva
luat
ion
of C
asin
g D
esig
n B
asis
for M
acon
do P
rosp
ect,
Mis
sipp
i B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0470
489
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L004
7050
1EP
T D
rillin
g, E
valu
atio
n of
Cas
ing
Des
ign
Bas
is fo
r Mac
ondo
Pro
spec
t, M
issi
ppi
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L030
7432
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3074
252
EPT
Dril
ling,
Eva
luat
ion
of C
asin
g D
esig
n B
asis
for M
acon
do P
rosp
ect,
Mis
sipp
i B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1578
858
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L015
7886
2EP
T D
rillin
g, E
valu
atio
n of
Cas
ing
Des
ign
Bas
is fo
r Mac
ondo
Pro
spec
t, M
issi
ppi
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L013
2814
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L013
2782
8EP
T D
rillin
g, E
valu
atio
n of
Cas
ing
Des
ign
Bas
is fo
r Mac
ondo
Pro
spec
t, M
issi
ppi
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
11B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0014
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
15B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0017
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0000
19B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0023
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0001
11B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0113
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0001
51B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0153
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0001
54B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0156
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0002
40B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0241
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0003
95B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0398
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
00B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0402
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
10B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0412
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
13B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0416
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
88B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0490
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0004
91B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0492
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0594
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0005
95W
eekl
y A
ctiv
ity R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0710
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
12W
eekl
y A
ctiv
ity R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0717
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
19W
eekl
y A
ctiv
ity R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0720
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
22W
eekl
y A
ctiv
ity R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0723
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0007
26Fo
rm M
MS
124
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
13B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0917
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
75B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0977
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-SN
R00
0009
92B
P-H
ZN-S
NR
0000
0994
Wee
kly
Act
ivity
Rep
ort
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0009
6490
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0009
6527
Proj
ect S
pace
r rep
ort
TRN
-MD
L-02
1307
70TR
N-M
DL-
0213
0871
2005
DW
H T
HIN
K P
lans
TRN
-IN
V-0
1131
807
TRN
-IN
V-0
1131
807
Oct
ober
5, 2
010
Farr
to A
mbr
ose
emai
l re
Mud
Gas
Div
erte
r que
stio
nsTR
N-I
NV
-011
3180
8TR
N-I
NV
-011
3181
3A
ttach
men
t to
Oct
ober
5, 2
010
Farr
to A
mbr
ose
emai
lH
AL_
0468
825
HA
L_04
6884
6M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
609
: Sp
erry
Sun
mat
eria
lsTR
N-H
CEC
-000
0540
2TR
N-H
CEC
-000
0579
7M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
674
: TO
Wel
l Con
trol H
andb
ook
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
6753
4B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0167
575
MD
L D
ep. E
x. 5
71:
TO S
afet
y D
rills
TRN
-HC
EC00
0004
727
TRN
-HC
EC00
0052
36M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
144
9: T
O H
SE M
anua
lTR
N-H
CEC
-000
1157
4TR
N-H
CEC
-000
1200
1M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
145
2: T
O F
ield
Ops
Han
dboo
kTR
N-H
CEC
-000
0642
3TR
N-H
CEC
-000
0678
3M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
145
3: T
O E
RM
Vol
. 1TR
N-M
DL-
0028
6767
TRN
-MD
L-00
2871
62M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
145
4: T
O E
RM
Vol
. 1TR
N-M
DL-
0004
7535
TRN
-MD
L-00
0477
54M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
218
7: T
O M
AR
on
DW
HTR
N-M
DL-
0114
6603
TRN
-MD
L-01
1466
07M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
219
4: T
O E
mai
lsTR
N-I
NV
-006
9028
8TR
N-I
NV
-006
9029
0M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
490
2: T
O E
mai
l re
kick
tole
ranc
eTR
N-I
NV
-000
0000
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0000
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
008
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
028
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0002
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0003
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
034
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
046
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0004
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0005
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
052
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
083
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0008
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0009
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
091
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
096
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0009
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0011
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
116
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
121
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0012
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0013
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0013
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0014
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
144
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
160
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0016
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0016
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
166
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
177
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0017
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0018
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
182
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
188
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0018
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0019
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
199
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
201
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0020
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0020
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
208
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
227
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0022
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0023
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
233
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
247
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0024
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0025
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
254
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
266
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0026
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0027
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
272
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
283
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0028
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0028
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
288
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
295
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0029
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0030
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
307
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
350
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0035
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0035
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
355
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
360
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0036
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0036
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
370
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
394
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0039
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0039
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
400
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
417
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0041
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0042
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
424
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
442
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0044
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0044
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
449
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
462
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0046
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0046
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
469
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
480
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0048
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0048
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0048
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0051
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
514
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
518
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0051
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0052
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
528
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
531
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0053
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0054
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
548
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
550
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0055
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0055
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
557
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
560
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0056
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0057
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
573
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
578
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0057
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0059
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
594
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
598
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0059
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0062
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
622
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
625
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0062
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0063
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
636
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
639
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0064
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0065
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
658
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
663
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0066
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0069
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
696
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
699
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0070
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0071
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
720
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
724
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0072
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0073
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
740
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
746
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0074
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0076
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
767
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
771
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0077
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0078
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
781
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
784
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0078
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0079
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
792
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
797
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0079
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0081
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
811
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
815
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0081
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0083
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0083
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0083
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
836
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
842
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0084
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0084
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
848
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
862
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0086
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0086
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
869
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
886
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0088
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0089
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
892
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
897
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0089
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0090
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
905
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
924
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0092
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0093
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
937
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
973
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0097
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0097
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
978
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
991
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0099
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0099
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0000
998
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
015
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0101
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0102
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
023
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
040
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0104
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0104
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
045
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
061
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0106
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0106
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
067
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
093
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0109
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0109
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
099
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
116
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0111
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0112
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
122
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
139
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0114
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0114
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
145
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
162
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0116
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0116
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
168
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
182
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0118
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0118
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
189
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
204
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0120
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0121
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0121
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0123
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
231
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
234
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0123
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0124
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
246
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
252
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0125
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0126
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
266
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
272
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0127
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0129
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
293
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
298
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0129
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0131
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
319
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
323
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0132
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0133
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
339
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
342
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0134
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0135
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
355
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
360
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0136
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0138
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
387
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
391
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0139
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0140
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
407
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
410
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0141
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0142
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
422
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
428
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0142
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0146
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
464
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
464
TO W
itnes
s sta
tem
ent
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
465
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
474
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0147
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0150
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
508
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
511
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0151
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0152
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
521
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
524
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0152
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0153
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
534
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
538
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0153
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0155
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
551
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
557
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0155
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0157
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
579
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
585
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
o
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0158
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0160
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
609
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
616
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0161
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0164
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
642
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
647
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0164
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0167
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
673
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
677
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0167
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0168
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
689
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
693
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0169
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0170
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
703
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
707
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0170
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0174
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
748
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
752
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0175
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0176
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
767
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
774
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0177
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0179
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
798
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
801
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0180
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0181
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
813
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
818
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0181
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0183
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
839
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
842
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0184
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0185
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
856
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
860
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0186
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0186
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
865
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
876
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0187
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0188
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
887
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
912
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0191
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0191
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
919
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
929
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0193
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0193
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
936
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
970
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0197
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0197
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
975
TRN
-IN
V-0
0001
981
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0198
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0198
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0198
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0200
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
010
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
016
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0201
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0204
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
046
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
048
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0204
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0205
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
054
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
059
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0206
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0208
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
081
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
086
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0208
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0209
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
100
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
103
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0210
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0211
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
114
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
123
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0212
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0216
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
163
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
167
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0216
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0219
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
192
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
196
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0219
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0221
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
218
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
222
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0222
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0223
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
238
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
244
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0224
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0227
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
275
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
281
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0228
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0230
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
303
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
316
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0231
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0241
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
420
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
423
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0242
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0243
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
434
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
437
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0243
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0245
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
455
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
460
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0246
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0248
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
487
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
491
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0249
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0250
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0250
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0251
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
514
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
532
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0253
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0253
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
539
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
554
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0255
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0256
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
561
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
575
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0257
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0257
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
580
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
605
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0260
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0261
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
613
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
627
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0262
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0263
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
631
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
644
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0264
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0265
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
653
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
692
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0269
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0269
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
699
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
724
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0272
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0272
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
730
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
739
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0274
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0274
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
743
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
757
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0275
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0276
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
763
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
777
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0277
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0278
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
783
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
788
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0278
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0279
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
793
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
830
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0283
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0283
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
835
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
857
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0285
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0286
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
862
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
872
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0287
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0287
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
879
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
893
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0289
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0289
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0290
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0292
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
924
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
927
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0292
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0293
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
934
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
938
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0293
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0295
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
955
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
955
TO W
itnes
s sta
tem
ent
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
956
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
961
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0296
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0297
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
973
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
977
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0297
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0298
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
988
TRN
-IN
V-0
0002
995
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0299
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0307
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
072
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
075
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0307
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0308
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
087
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
093
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0309
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0311
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
114
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
117
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0311
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0319
0TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
191
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
199
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0320
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0324
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
244
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
249
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0325
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0326
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
270
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
275
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0327
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0329
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
298
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
305
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0330
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0334
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
344
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
348
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0334
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0335
6TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
357
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
359
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0336
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0336
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
365
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
367
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0336
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0337
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
378
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
382
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
o
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0338
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0340
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
406
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
412
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0341
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0341
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
418
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
446
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0344
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0345
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
451
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
472
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0347
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0347
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
477
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
482
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0348
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0349
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
497
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
542
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0354
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0354
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
549
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
562
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0356
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0356
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
567
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
585
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0358
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0359
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
596
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
626
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0362
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0362
7TO
Witn
ess s
tate
men
tTR
N-I
NV
-000
0362
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0363
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
633
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
653
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0365
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0366
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
664
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
691
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0369
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0369
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
696
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
705
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0370
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0370
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
710
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
714
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0371
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0371
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
719
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
729
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0373
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0373
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
734
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
745
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0374
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0375
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
751
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
762
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0376
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0376
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
767
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
773
TO In
terv
iew
Not
es
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0377
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0378
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
781
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
791
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0379
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0379
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
796
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
806
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0380
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0381
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
812
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
827
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0382
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0383
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
832
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
845
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0384
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0385
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
853
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
874
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0387
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0388
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
888
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
936
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0393
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0394
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
941
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
946
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0394
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0394
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
950
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
960
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0396
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0396
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
965
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
985
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0398
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0399
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0003
993
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
007
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0400
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0401
1TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
012
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
018
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0401
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0402
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
023
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
033
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0403
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0403
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
040
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
059
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0406
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0406
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
066
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
090
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0409
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0409
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
098
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
117
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0411
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0412
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
121
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
125
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0412
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0413
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0413
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0414
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
145
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
153
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0415
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0419
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
200
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
208
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0420
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0423
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
239
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
243
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0424
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0426
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
262
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
265
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0426
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0428
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
283
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
287
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0428
8TR
N-I
NV
-000
0430
2TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
303
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
308
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0430
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0432
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
324
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
329
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0433
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0434
8TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
349
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
353
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0435
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0437
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
374
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
378
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0437
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0438
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
388
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
390
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0439
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0439
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
396
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
400
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0440
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0441
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
418
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
421
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0442
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0442
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
428
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
433
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0443
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0444
7TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
448
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
453
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0445
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0447
5TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
476
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
479
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0448
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0448
4TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
485
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
489
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0449
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0449
9TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0450
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0450
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
508
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
528
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0452
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0453
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
535
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
551
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0455
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0455
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
556
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
561
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0456
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0456
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
566
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
572
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0457
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0457
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
578
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
586
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0458
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0459
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
591
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
600
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0460
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0461
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
614
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
673
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0467
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0468
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
683
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
715
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0471
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0471
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
720
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
734
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0473
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0474
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
741
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
756
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0475
7TR
N-I
NV
-000
0476
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
764
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
788
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0478
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0479
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
796
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
832
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0483
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0483
5TO
Witn
ess s
tate
men
tTR
N-I
NV
-000
0483
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0483
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
840
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
851
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0485
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0485
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
858
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
872
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0487
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0487
6TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
877
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
885
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0488
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0489
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
891
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
904
TO In
terv
iew
Not
es
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0490
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0491
0TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
911
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
929
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0493
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0493
4TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
935
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
952
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0495
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0495
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
959
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
990
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0499
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0499
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0004
998
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
018
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0501
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0502
3TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
024
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
042
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0504
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0504
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
049
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
065
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0506
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0506
9TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
070
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
081
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0508
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0508
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
086
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
094
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0509
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0510
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
103
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
142
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0514
3TR
N-I
NV
-000
0514
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
148
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
161
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0516
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0516
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
169
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
184
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0518
5TR
N-I
NV
-000
0518
8TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
189
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
210
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0521
1TR
N-I
NV
-000
0521
3TO
Witn
ess s
tate
men
tTR
N-I
NV
-000
0521
4TR
N-I
NV
-000
0521
7TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
218
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
229
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0523
0TR
N-I
NV
-000
0523
2TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
233
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
238
TO In
terv
iew
Not
esTR
N-I
NV
-000
0523
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0524
5TO
Inte
rvie
w M
emo
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
246
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
251
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0525
2TR
N-I
NV
-000
0528
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
282
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
285
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
o
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nTR
N-I
NV
-000
0528
6TR
N-I
NV
-000
0529
3TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
294
TRN
-IN
V-0
0005
298
TO In
terv
iew
Mem
oTR
N-I
NV
-000
0529
9TR
N-I
NV
-000
0531
1TO
Inte
rvie
w N
otes
TRN
-MD
L-00
8685
70TR
N-M
DL-
0086
8612
Dril
ling
Dee
pwat
er W
ells
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
3644
7B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0136
567
May
12,
201
0 O
ptic
em m
odel
TRN
-MD
L-00
6009
84TR
N-M
DL-
0060
0989
Dai
ly D
rillin
g R
epor
t #14
3TR
N-M
DL-
0060
0990
TRN
-MD
L-00
6009
95M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
346
5: D
aily
Dril
ling
Rep
ort #
142
TRN
-IN
V-0
0760
143
TRN
-IN
V-0
0760
143
Neg
ativ
e Te
st p
roce
dure
sTR
N-I
NV
-007
6014
2TR
N-I
NV
-007
6014
2N
egat
ive
Test
pro
cedu
res
TRN
-IN
V-0
0760
141
TRN
-IN
V-0
0760
141
Neg
ativ
e Te
st p
roce
dure
sTR
N-M
DL-
0132
3431
TRN
-MD
L-01
3234
32N
egat
ive
Test
pro
cedu
res
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
8779
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3287
798
Neg
ativ
e Te
st p
roce
dure
sTR
N-M
DL-
0199
5569
TRN
-MD
L-01
9955
70D
eepw
ater
Hor
izon
Tas
k Sp
ecifi
c Th
ink
Proc
edur
en/
aD
epos
ition
tran
scrip
ts &
exh
ibits
of R
obin
son,
Ste
veB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0010
720
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
1072
2Em
ail f
rom
J. H
ogga
n to
L. L
indn
erB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0015
195
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
1519
5R
helia
nt D
ispl
acem
ent P
roce
dure
s Mac
ondo
OC
S-G
323
06B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0056
402
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
5655
7C
ontra
ct F
or G
ulf O
f Mex
ico
Stra
tegi
c Pe
rfor
man
ce U
nit O
ffsh
ore
Wel
l Ser
vice
s B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0161
670
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L001
6171
4In
terv
iew
not
esB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0251
013
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
5101
3Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to J.
LeB
leu
re F
AS
and
FAS
AK
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
5103
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0251
038
Emai
l fro
m D
. Max
ie to
J. L
eBle
u re
Wat
erba
sed
FAS
pills
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
6294
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0262
944
Dai
ly D
rillin
g R
epor
tB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0262
945
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
6295
0D
aily
Ope
raio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L002
6772
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0267
790
Dril
ling
Flui
ds P
rogr
amB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0312
988
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L003
1298
8Em
ail f
rom
T. D
yer t
o D
. Max
ie, e
t al.
re D
ispo
sal
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0007
1636
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0007
1636
Emai
l fro
m L
. Lin
dner
to R
. Kal
uza
re M
acon
do D
ispl
acem
ent P
roce
dure
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
1519
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0015
195
BP/
Dee
pwat
er H
oriz
on R
helia
nt D
ispl
acem
ent P
roce
dure
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0014
1575
BP-
HZN
-BLY
0014
1599
Inte
rtek
Pote
ntia
l for
Set
tlem
ent F
orm
-A-S
quee
ze &
For
m-A
-Set
Ble
nds
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
3508
5B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0135
090
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g)B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0135
365
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
3537
0D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0331
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0003
313
MD
L D
ep. E
x. 6
97:
Emai
l fro
m J.
LeB
leu
to B
. Mor
el, e
t al.
re P
ropo
sed
Proc
edur
e fo
rB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0007
230
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0723
0M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
100
4: E
mai
l fro
m J.
LeB
leu
to J.
Gui
de, e
t al r
e C
ritic
al n
eed
for
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
0803
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0008
036
MD
L D
ep. E
x. 1
008:
Em
ail f
rom
J. L
eBle
u to
J. M
cFad
din,
et a
l. re
MI S
wac
o N
CR
B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0988
75B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0989
02M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
101
9: D
raft
BP
Proj
ect S
pace
r Pow
erPo
int
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0016
162
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
1622
6M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
102
6: D
rillin
g Fl
uids
Pro
gram
M-I
000
0318
0M
-I 0
0003
185
MD
L D
ep. E
x. 1
030:
Em
ail f
rom
T. A
rman
d to
D. M
axie
re L
esso
n Le
arne
d Fo
rm A
B
P-H
ZN-M
BI0
0129
240
BP-
HZN
-MB
I001
2924
1Em
ail f
rom
J. L
eBle
u to
A. P
ere,
et a
l. re
Ris
er D
ispl
acem
ent S
pace
rM
-I 0
0002
310
M-I
000
0231
2Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to A
. Wild
e re
Wat
erba
sed
FAS
pills
M-I
000
0318
6M
-I 0
0003
189
Emai
l fro
m T
. Arm
and
to D
. Max
ie re
Wat
erba
sed
FAS
pills
M-I
000
0368
5M
-I 0
0003
687
Emai
l fro
m J.
Hog
gan
to L
. Lid
ner,
et a
l. re
Que
stio
n ab
out s
eaw
ater
dis
char
geM
-I 0
0003
727
M-I
000
0373
0Em
ail f
rom
J. M
anue
l to
D. M
axie
, et a
l. re
Wat
erba
sed
FAS
pills
M-I
000
0676
9M
-I 0
0006
769
8-1/
2" x
9-7
/8"
Tand
em P
illM
-I 0
0007
029
M-I
000
0702
9Em
ail f
rom
T. A
rman
d to
E. D
avid
, et a
l. re
PFM
Hig
h le
vel
M-I
000
0703
1M
-I 0
0007
034
Emai
l fro
m L
. Lin
dner
to C
. Det
ivea
ux re
Que
stio
n ab
out s
eaw
ater
dis
char
geM
-I 0
0007
180
M-I
000
0718
0Em
ail f
rom
C. D
etiv
eaux
to D
. Pat
ters
on re
Ris
er C
lean
-Out
M-I
000
0767
7M
-I 0
0007
677
Com
plia
nce
Che
ck S
heet
M-I
000
0775
3M
-I 0
0007
753
MI S
wac
o B
P Ex
plor
atio
n R
epor
tM
-I 0
0007
995
M-I
000
0799
5Em
ail f
rom
W. B
ush
to C
. Boq
uet r
e H
oriz
onM
-I 0
0008
631
M-I
000
0863
1B
P H
oriz
on L
CM
Loa
d ou
ts b
y Pr
oduc
t and
dat
e fo
r cur
rent
wel
lM
-I 0
0009
782
M-I
000
0978
2M
I Sw
aco
Equi
pmen
t Per
form
ance
Rep
ort
M-I
000
0991
2M
-I 0
0009
912
MI S
wac
o R
epor
t Num
ber 7
8M
-I 0
0010
848
M-I
000
1084
9Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to J.
Sm
ith re
Not
esM
-I 0
0010
853
M-I
000
1085
6Ta
mde
m F
orm
-A-S
quee
ze/F
orm
-A-S
et A
K M
ixin
g an
d Sp
ottin
g Pr
oced
ures
M-I
000
1089
1M
-I 0
0010
891
Emai
l fro
m L
. Lin
dner
to J.
Sm
ith re
Not
So
Goo
dM
-I 0
0011
507
M-I
000
1150
7M
ixin
g Ti
mes
Rep
ort
M-I
000
1165
3M
-I 0
0011
653
Emai
l fro
m B
. Tou
ps to
T. A
rman
d re
Hor
izon
LC
MM
-I 0
0011
674
M-I
000
1167
4Em
ail f
rom
A. W
ilde
to T
. Arm
and,
et a
l. re
For
m-A
-Squ
eeze
/For
m-A
-Set
AK
Tan
dem
M
-I 0
0011
765
M-I
000
1176
8Em
ail f
rom
T. A
rman
d to
J. B
arry
re E
MI 1
820
M-I
000
1176
9M
-I 0
0011
770
Emai
l fro
m T
. Arm
and
to A
. Pop
ples
tone
re E
MI 1
820
M-I
000
1178
4M
-I00
0117
85Em
ail f
rom
T. A
rman
d to
D. M
axie
re F
AS
Dra
ft 2
M-I
000
1179
8M
-I 0
0011
799
Emai
l fro
m T
. Arm
and
to D
. Max
ie re
SPM
M-I
000
1185
2M
-I 0
0011
853
Emai
l fro
m T
. Arm
and
to J.
Bac
ho, e
t al.
re H
oriz
on u
pdat
eM
-I 0
0012
598
M-I
000
1260
0Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to F
. Enr
ique
z re
FA
S A
KM
-I 0
0012
623
M-I
000
1262
4O
il-B
ase
Mud
Rep
ort
M-I
000
1337
2M
-I 0
0013
372
Emai
l fro
m V
. Vis
ines
cu to
M. F
reem
an, e
t al.
re F
orm
-A-S
et A
K p
ills f
or H
oriz
onM
-I 0
0013
373
M-I
000
1337
3Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to T
. Que
bode
aux,
et a
l. re
fina
l dra
ftM
-I 0
0013
374
M-I
000
1337
6Ta
ndem
For
m-A
-Squ
eeze
/For
m-A
-Set
AK
Mix
ing
and
Spot
ting
Proc
edur
es
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nM
-I 0
0013
548
M-I
000
1354
8Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to J.
Bro
wn
re F
AS
M-I
000
1354
9M
-I 0
0013
551
Tand
em F
orm
-A-S
quee
ze/F
orm
-A-S
et A
K M
ixin
g an
d Sp
ottin
g Pr
oced
ures
M-I
000
1355
2M
-I 0
0013
554
Tand
em F
orm
-A-S
quee
ze/F
orm
-A-S
et A
K M
ixin
g an
d Sp
ottin
g Pr
oced
ures
M-I
000
1355
5M
-I 0
0013
555
Form
-A-S
et A
K M
ixin
g Fo
rmul
atio
nM
-I 0
0013
571
M-I
000
1357
4PF
M R
ecap
Exe
cutiv
e Su
mm
ary
M-I
000
1357
5M
-I 0
0013
575
Emai
l fro
m D
. Max
ie to
J. Y
earw
ood,
et a
l. re
Dis
plac
emen
tM
-I 0
0013
576
M-I
000
1357
6R
helia
nt D
ispl
acem
ent P
roce
dure
s Mac
ondo
OC
S-G
323
06M
-I 0
0013
705
M-I
000
1370
7Em
ail f
rom
T. A
rman
d to
V. V
isin
escu
, et a
l. re
For
m-A
-Set
AK
pill
s for
Hor
izon
M-I
000
1373
0M
-I 0
0013
733
Emai
l fro
m D
. Max
ie to
B. B
illon
re Q
uest
ion
abou
t sea
wat
er d
isch
arge
M-I
000
1423
6M
-I 0
0014
236
M-I
000
1423
7Em
ail f
rom
B. C
art t
o A
. Hec
k re
Kw
ik se
alM
-I 0
0014
249
M-I
000
1425
0B
P N
CR
LC
M M
ater
ial
M-I
000
1425
2M
-I 0
0014
252
MI S
WA
CO
Inci
dent
Inve
stig
atio
nM
-I 0
0015
330
M-I
000
1533
3Ta
ndem
For
m-A
-Squ
eeze
/For
m-A
-Set
AK
Mix
ing
and
Spot
ting
Proc
edur
esM
-I 0
0015
686
M-I
000
1568
8Em
ail f
rom
J. S
mith
to D
. Cul
lum
re "
Tand
em"
pill
proc
edur
e fo
r inc
lusi
on in
Bar
oid
M-I
000
1596
2M
-I 0
0016
047
MI S
WA
CO
Res
pons
e to
Que
stio
nsM
-I 0
0018
779
M-I
000
1878
0Em
ail f
rom
A. W
ilde
to A
. McL
ean,
et a
l. re
Leo
Lin
der T
estim
ony
- Coa
st G
uard
M
-I 0
0022
768
M-I
000
2277
1Ta
ndem
For
m-A
-Squ
eeze
/For
m-A
-Set
AK
Mix
ing
and
Spot
ting
Proc
edur
esM
-I 0
0031
942
M-I
000
3194
6Em
ail f
rom
D. M
axie
to A
. Wild
e re
Wat
erba
sed
FAS
pills
M-I
000
3195
7M
-I 0
0031
960
Emai
l fro
m A
. Wild
e to
D. M
axie
re W
ater
base
d FA
S pi
llsM
-I 0
0031
984
M-I
000
3198
6Em
ail f
rom
L. L
indn
er to
D. M
axie
re W
ater
base
d FA
S pi
llsM
-I 0
0031
987
M-I
000
3198
8Em
ail f
rom
B. M
orel
to D
. Max
ie, e
t al.
re F
AS
and
FAS
AK
M-I
000
3199
0M
-I 0
0031
991
Emai
l fro
m D
. Max
ie to
B. B
illon
re F
AS
and
FAS
AK
M-I
000
3250
8M
-I 0
0032
510
Emai
l fro
m J.
Bac
ho to
P. H
anso
n, e
t al.
re D
W H
oriz
on In
vest
igat
ion
Flui
ds
M-I
000
3418
3M
-I 0
0034
185
Emai
l fro
m D
. Max
ie to
T. A
rman
d re
Les
sons
cap
ture
dM
-I 0
0034
340
Emai
l fro
m D
. Max
ie to
J. L
eBle
u re
FA
S FA
S A
KM
-I 0
0079
488
M-I
000
7948
9B
radl
ey B
illon
CV
M-I
000
1162
8M
-I 0
0011
631
Emai
l fro
m J.
Man
uel t
o D
. Max
ie, e
t al.
re W
ater
base
d FA
S pi
llsB
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0384
24B
P-H
ZN-B
LY00
0384
61M
DL
Dep
. Ex.
101
8: P
roje
ct S
pace
r rep
ort
M-I
000
3251
6M
-I 0
0032
516
Form
-A-S
et A
K a
nd F
orm
-A-S
quee
ze re
port
M-I
000
3251
7M
-I 0
0032
517
Form
-A-S
quee
ze P
rodu
ct B
ulle
tinB
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
7930
10B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
7930
13D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7701
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4477
015
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4477
021
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7702
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4477
025
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7702
8D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7702
9B
P-H
ZN-2
178M
DL0
4476
989
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
7947
30B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
7947
35D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7704
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4477
044
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4477
052
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7705
9D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
7469
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4474
705
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0602
441
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L006
0244
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L006
0024
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0600
245
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
5814
25B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
5814
30D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L012
0023
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1200
236
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
6008
02B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
6008
07D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L012
1565
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1215
662
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
7714
34B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
7714
39D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L014
0716
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1407
174
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1341
283
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L013
4128
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-SEC
0060
4663
BP-
HZN
-SEC
0060
4670
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3701
169
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L037
0117
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L036
9398
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3693
994
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3695
607
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L036
9561
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L012
1549
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1215
499
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
9637
493
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L036
9749
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#02
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L037
0528
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3705
293
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
02B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4419
758
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
1976
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
2705
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4427
058
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4418
905
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
1891
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
1205
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4412
055
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2365
705
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
6570
9D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
1908
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4419
089
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4429
259
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
2926
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L044
1901
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
4419
020
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
8517
89B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
8517
94D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
6809
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2368
096
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
8526
18B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
8526
21D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
8527
97B
P-H
ZN-S
EC00
8528
03D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4977
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2349
779
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2351
752
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
5175
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
5978
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2359
787
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1215
572
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L012
1557
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
5608
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2356
091
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2360
716
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
6072
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4468
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2344
694
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2340
822
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4083
0D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4955
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2349
557
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2374
906
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
7491
1D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
7909
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2379
104
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1214
956
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L012
1496
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4100
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2341
012
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0882
008
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L008
8201
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4428
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2344
293
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2343
097
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
4310
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9666
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
672
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2357
318
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
5732
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
6448
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2364
488
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
2350
638
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L023
5064
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L005
8208
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0582
089
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
944
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9695
1D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9472
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
727
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
041
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9504
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9592
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
927
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
849
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9685
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
AE-
HZN
-217
9MD
L000
4982
6A
E-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0049
830
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
901
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9390
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L005
8135
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0581
355
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
106
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9411
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9524
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
253
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
131
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9413
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
617
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9262
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9665
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
662
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
801
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9680
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9638
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
392
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
915
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9292
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9519
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
202
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
789
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9279
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9372
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
732
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
049
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9305
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9532
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
329
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
457
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9646
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9463
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
637
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
190
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9419
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9683
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
843
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
302
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9430
9D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9699
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
998
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
518
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9352
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9648
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
491
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
785
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9479
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9366
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
671
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
1591
285
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L015
9129
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9311
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
117
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
197
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9320
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9698
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
990
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
080
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9408
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9309
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
104
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
906
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9691
1D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9564
5B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
645
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
442
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9644
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9671
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
723
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
167
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9317
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9399
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
003
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
573
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9457
9D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
639
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9464
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9566
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
675
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
529
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9353
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9290
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
913
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
635
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9264
0D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9231
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
324
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
507
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9651
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9622
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
228
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
480
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9348
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9351
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
516
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
523
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9252
8D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9569
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
702
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
417
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9642
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9520
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
209
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
475
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9648
1D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9427
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
276
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
698
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9370
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9603
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
041
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
600
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9660
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9657
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
581
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
543
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9654
8D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9314
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
151
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
664
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9266
9D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9596
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
965
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZH-2
179M
DL0
3296
953
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9695
8D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L005
9953
1B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
0599
536
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
448
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9445
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9242
2B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
427
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
778
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9378
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9580
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
808
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
171
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9617
6D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9614
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
153
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
592
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9659
8D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
Expe
rt R
epor
t of A
dam
T. (
Ted)
Bou
rgoy
ne, J
r., P
h.D
., P.
E.A
ppen
dix
D
Beg
Bat
esE
nd B
ates
File
nam
e O
r D
escr
iptio
nB
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
876
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9288
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9528
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
294
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
126
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9313
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9529
6B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
302
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
250
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9225
4D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9334
7B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
352
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
632
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9563
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9471
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3294
719
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
460
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9346
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9373
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
745
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
892
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9589
7D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9604
3B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
048
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
536
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9254
1D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9600
0B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
001
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3296
030
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9603
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9367
8B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
684
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3297
006
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9701
2D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9558
4B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
590
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3295
499
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9550
5D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9242
9B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3292
434
Dai
ly O
pera
tions
Rep
ort -
Par
tner
s (D
rillin
g) M
C 2
52 #
03B
P-H
ZN-2
179M
DL0
3293
706
BP-
HZN
-217
9MD
L032
9371
3D
aily
Ope
ratio
ns R
epor
t - P
artn
ers (
Dril
ling)
MC
252
#03