tabl1710 lecture wk6 - breach of contract, termination

10
1 TABL 1710 Business and the Law Week 6 Contract Law (Cont’d) Breach of contract/Termination of contract/Remedies for breach of contract Lecturer: Paul Tuohy © 2015 The University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 Australia The original material prepared for this guide is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to the Head of School, Taxation and Business Law, UNSW, Sydney 2 In-Class Exercise on Lecture Topics 1 and 2 PLEASE SPEAK TO YOUR TUTOR IF YOU MISSED THE IN-CLASS EXERCISE Worth 10% of your mark You must do this exercise before week 9 After week 9 students who have not done this exercise will automatically receive 0/10 for this assessment 3 MAJOR ASSIGNMENT On Moodle now DUE WEEK 9: Monday 4 May 2015 Contract law, problem question See Guidelines to Students (attached to the Assignment) See suggested readings and research guidance notes Note: Students should show evidence of research beyond the suggested readings and beyond the textbook 4 MAJOR ASSIGNMENT ONLINE SUBMISSION ONLY Check your plagiarism score and re-submit on Turnitin as many times as you wish UNTIL the deadline of 5pm on 4 May Word limit is 2000 words – please observe the word limit 4 5 Discussion Forum Now available on Moodle Separate Discussion Forum for EACH TUTORIAL CLASS Tutors will provide details about how to use the Discussion Forum for your tutorial class Access problems? Please email Margaret Connor [email protected] 6 Lecture 3: Summary Essential elements of a contract: Intention to enter into a legally binding contract “Agreement” Offer Acceptance Consideration Something of value (price) Exception: Promissory Estoppel

Upload: riders29

Post on 19-Dec-2015

20 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Breach of contrct/terminationRemedies for breach

TRANSCRIPT

  • 111

    TABL 1710Business and the Law

    Week 6Contract Law (Contd)

    Breach of contract/Termination of contract/Remedies for breach of contract

    Lecturer: Paul Tuohy

    2015 The University of New South WalesSydney 2052 Australia

    The original material prepared for this guide is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission.

    Enquiries should be addressed to the Head of School, Taxation and Business Law, UNSW, Sydney22

    In-Class Exercise on Lecture Topics 1 and 2

    PLEASE SPEAK TO YOUR TUTOR IF YOU MISSED THE IN-CLASS EXERCISE

    Worth 10% of your mark You must do this exercise before week 9 After week 9 students who have not done this

    exercise will automatically receive 0/10 for this assessment

    333

    MAJOR ASSIGNMENT On Moodle now DUE WEEK 9: Monday 4 May 2015Contract law, problem questionSee Guidelines to Students (attached to the

    Assignment)See suggested readings and research guidance

    notesNote: Students should show evidence of research

    beyond the suggested readings and beyond the textbook

    4

    MAJOR ASSIGNMENT

    ONLINE SUBMISSION ONLY

    Check your plagiarism score and re-submit onTurnitin as many times as you wish UNTIL the deadline of 5pm on 4 May

    Word limit is 2000 words please observe the word limit

    4

    5

    Discussion Forum

    Now available on Moodle Separate Discussion Forum for EACH TUTORIAL

    CLASS Tutors will provide details about how to use the

    Discussion Forum for your tutorial class Access problems? Please email Margaret Connor

    [email protected]

    666

    Lecture 3: Summary

    Essential elements of a contract: Intention to enter into a legally binding contract Agreement Offer Acceptance

    Consideration Something of value (price) Exception: Promissory Estoppel

  • 777

    Lecture 3: Summary

    Other elements for a valid contract: Legal capacity Genuine consent Legality of purpose Any formal/procedural requirements must be satisfied(See Latimer at 5-510 to 5-570)

    888

    Lecture 4: Summary

    Intention to create legal relations Social/family/domestic/voluntary Commercial/business Historically the rebuttable presumptions Now change in approach

    Terms of a contract Representation:

    - Pre-contractual negotiations Terms

    - Express/Implied- Condition/Warranty- Uncertain/Meaningless/Ambiguous terms

    99

    Week 5: Summary

    Exclusion Clauses Notice to be given before contract made or at time of making of contract

    (Thompson V London, Midland & Scottish Railway Co; eBay case; Olley v Marlborough Court; Balmain Ferry case)

    Exclusion clause must be properly incorporated into the contract (Curtis v Chemical Dry Cleaning)

    You are bound by what you sign (LEstrange v Graucob) Rules of interpretation:

    Ambiguity (or Contra Proferentum) Rule; Negligence Rule; Four Corners Rule (Sydney County Council v West; Thomas National

    Transport case)

    9 10

    Week 5: Summary

    Requirements for a valid contract (contd) Capacity Consent Proper formPrivity of contract Agency: the exception to PrivityVitiating elements Mistake Misrepresentation Illegality Inequality between the parties

    Duress (threats of violence to person/property etc) Undue influence (improper use of position of authority) Unconscionable conduct (abuse of superior bargaining position when you

    know other party in situation of special disadvantage/special disability: Commercial Bank v Amadio)

    111111

    Week 5: Summary

    Unconscionable or Unfair Contracts Contract will be set aside as unconscionable (unfair) where the

    defendant has abused their superior bargaining position in their dealings with the plaintiff

    Case: Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio See Latimer at 5-730

    121212

    Week 5: Summary

    Unconscionable or Unfair ContractsThe plaintiff has to establish: They were in a position of special disability or special

    disadvantage That substantially affected their ability to protect

    themselves The defendant knew, or ought to have known, of the

    plaintiffs disability/disadvantage and should not have taken advantage of it

    AND The actions of defendant were unconscionable

  • 1313

    Week 5: Summary

    Unconscionable or Unfair Contracts Examples of special disability/special disadvantage

    include: age financial needs illness ignorance inexperience inability to understand the language inability to read

    See Latimer at 5-730

    141414

    Todays lecture

    Restraint of trade clauses Breach of contract Termination for breach of contract Loss of the right to sue (the limitation period) Time of the essence Remedies available for breach of contract, under the

    common law

    151515

    Overview - Week 6 Breach of Contract/Termination for breach of

    contract/Remedies

    On completion of this week you should beable to:9 Explain when a contract may be terminated or

    discharged9 Identify the remedies for breach of contract9 Explain what is a statutory limitation period 9 Explain what time of the essence means

    161616

    Restraint of trade clauses

    Clauses in restraint of trade are found in:Contracts for employmentContracts for sale of businessContracts between manufacturers and traders

    17

    Restraint of trade clauses

    Restraint of Trade clauses in contracts will generally be unenforceable (ie: void as being contrary to public policy) unless the restraint is reasonable

    181818

    Restraint of trade clauses

    What is reasonable is determined by:The geographic extentThe time period involvedThe nature of the business and the activity being

    restrained Whether the restraint is reasonable, both in the

    interests of the parties and the public

  • 191919

    Enforceability

    Contracts classified by enforceability:

    Valid - a contract which the law will enforce

    Voidable - the contract remains valid and binding unless and until it is repudiated (ie cancelled) by the injured party

    Void - no legal rights or obligations from the outset (void ab initio)

    202020

    Enforceability

    Contracts classified by enforceability:

    Unenforceable - valid on its face but no legal action can be brought on the contract, often because of a procedural defect

    Illegal - the purpose of the contract contravenes a statute or the common law, and generally treated as void

    212121

    Breach of contractRemedies(1) Common Law

    Termination of contract Damages

    (2) Equity Rescission Restitution Rectification Specific Performance Injunctions

    (Also: Remedies under the Australian Consumer Law - to bediscussed in Consumer Law lecture)

    222222

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    When one party: completely fails to perform their obligations (actual

    breach)or indicates that they do not intend to perform their

    obligations (anticipatory breach), the other party is entitled to terminate the contract

    2323

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    Breach of contract may be either:

    Total breach: where one of the parties does not perform the contract at all

    OR Partial breach: where one of the parties does not

    perform the full requirements of the contract

    242424

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    A contract may be terminated or discharged: by performance by agreement by operation of law (eg bankruptcy) by lapse of time by frustration

    See Latimer at 6-280 to 6-350

  • 252525

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    By performance: contract usually ends when each party has performed its contractual obligations

    Obligations under a contract must be performed exactlyNear enough is not good enough

    Cases: In re Moore & Co Ltd and Landauer & CoSumpter v Hedges

    See Latimer at 6-2902626

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    By performance:

    Entire or divisible contracts- If a contract does not provide for pro rata recovery expressly or

    by implication then this equals an entire/lump sum contract- If the contract is to be delivered by instalments which are to be

    separately paid for, then the terms of the contract will show whether the breach is a repudiation of the whole contract OR whether the breach is severable (ie referable to the particular instalment only)

    See Latimer at 6-300

    2727

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    By agreement: contractual obligations can be discharged by agreement between the parties

    By operation of law: bankruptcy, death, material alteration of a written document without consent, merger of contract terms into one document

    282828

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    By lapse of time: when contract stipulates a time period after which it will expire and parties allow this time to lapse or expire

    2929

    Time of the essence Performance of the contract must take place in the time

    specified Or, within a reasonable time if no time is specified

    If performance at certain time is essential, contract may contain a time of the essence clause

    If time not of the essence, serving a notice to complete will fix the time for performance/completion of the contract Non-compliance will become a breach

    See Latimer at 6-290

    29 3030

    Loss of the right to sue:Statutes of Limitation

    Statutes of Limitation protect a person from being forced to defend a case after a certain number of years (when the case becomes statute barred)

    Period of limitation begins to run as soon as a cause of action arises (so when the breach of contract first occurs)

    Statutory limitation period: 6 years (or 12 years for formal contracts)

    See Latimer at 6-500

    30

  • 313131

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    By frustration: After formation of the contract, performance may become impossible if something unexpected happens over which neither party has any control

    See Latimer at 6-350

    3232

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    Cases:

    Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW)Ooh! Media Roadside Pty Ltd v Diamond Wheels Pty Ltd

    See Latimer at 6-350

    3333

    At Common Law:Termination of contract

    Frustration can arise if: There is some significant or radical change to

    nature of contractual rights and obligations by an unexpected event

    Neither party caused the unexpected event Neither party contemplated the unexpected event

    when the contract was entered into In the new circumstances, it would be unjust to hold

    the parties to the originally agreed contract

    See Latimer at 6-350, footnote 51: National Carriers Ltd vPanalpina (Northern) Ltd case

    343434

    At Common Law: Damages

    Every breach of contract gives the innocent party a right to claim damages

    Main purpose of damages is to enable the innocent party to receive (monetary) compensation for injury or loss suffered because of the breach

    353535

    At Common Law: Damages

    Damages are calculated on the basis of looking at what the position of the plaintiff would have been if the contract had been properly performed

    363636

    At Common Law: Damages

    Key issues: Causation Remoteness

    Case: Hadley v Baxendale

    See Latimer at 6-430

  • 373737

    At Common Law: Damages

    Causation and Remoteness: The plaintiff must show that the breach of contract by the

    defendant was the cause of the loss

    Must be a connection between the breach and the loss suffered

    38

    At Common Law: Damages

    Causation and Remoteness:

    ASK:

    Is the loss suffered by the injured party a usualand reasonably direct consequence of the breach ofcontract?

    38

    393939

    At Common Law: Damages

    Causation and Remoteness

    Compensation will NOT be awarded for damages that are too remote

    The plaintiff may not be able to recover if an additional factor unconnected with the defendants breach breaks the causal chain between the defendants action and the plaintiffs loss or damage

    This is a question of fact

    See Latimer at 6-420

    4040

    At Common Law: Damages

    Losses which can be claimed are those that: flow naturally from the breach of contract are special losses made known to the defendant when

    the contract was made

    Case: Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd

    See Latimer at 6-430

    4141

    At Common Law: Damages Damages for special losses cannot be awarded unless: the plaintiff made known the special circumstances to the

    defendant at the time the contract was made if so, the defendant will be taken to have accepted the risk

    by default

    Case: Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd

    See Latimer at 6-430

    424242

    Amount of damages

    The aim of damages is to put the injured party back as

    close to the position they would have been in had the

    breach never occurred

  • 434343

    Amount of damages

    Damages are recoverable for economic loss as well as for:Distress and disappointmentUpset/anxietyDiscomfortMental distress

    See Latimer at 6-460

    444444

    Mitigation of damages The innocent party has a duty to take reasonable steps to

    minimise or mitigate their loss. Failure to do so can result in a reduction of damages

    Mitigation is a question of fact

    Onus of proof is on the defendant to show that the innocent party (plaintiff) did nothing to mitigate the loss

    Case: Payzu v Saunders

    See Latimer at 6-480

    454545

    Types of damages

    The type of damages that will be awarded will bedetermined by the seriousness of the breach andwhether the contract has specified the amount ofdamages to be paid in the event of breach

    4646

    Types of damages

    General damages: compensation for loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the breach

    Nominal damages: defendant breached contract but plaintiff has not suffered any actual loss

    Exemplary damages: punitive and may be awarded for non-economic loss

    See Latimer at 6-450

    474747

    Types of damages

    Liquidated damages: awarded where a plaintiff is able to sue for a specified sum, which must be a genuine or bona fide pre-estimate of the actual loss that will flow from the breach

    Unliquidated damages: awarded where an injured party has no fixed sum in mind and leaves the court to decide the amount

    See Latimer at 6-471

    4848

    Types of damages PenaltiesOnly enforceable if amount is a genuine pre-

    estimate of the loss from the breach of contractMust not be extravagant or unconscionableMust not be designed to apply pressure or

    intimidate the other partyMust be transparent: based on reasonable criteria

    and clear evidence/information as to how the amount is calculated

    See Latimer at 6-471

  • 494949

    Equitable remedies

    Restitution Rescission Rectification Specific Performance Injunction

    These are discretionary remedies at equity andonly granted where damages are not an adequateremedy

    505050

    Equitable remedies

    Restitution: The court orders the return of property or the payment of money

    Rescission: Setting aside an agreement and restoring parties to their pre-contractual positions

    Rectification: The court corrects a written document

    515151

    Restitution

    Based on the concept of some UNJUST ENRICHMENT

    Can be used where there has been: a mistake of fact or of law duress some element of compulsion

    See Latimer at 6-510

    525252

    Restitution The plaintiff must establish:Defendant obtained a benefit or enrichment;Benefit was at plaintiffs expense It would be unjust to allow defendant

    to keep benefit or enrichmentandDefendant has no defences (such as estoppel,

    incapacity, illegality) to rely on

    535353

    Rescission

    Termination by right Court order setting aside contract, to restore parties

    to pre-contractual position May be granted because of:mistake misrepresentationundue influenceduress unconscionability

    See Latimer at 6-2805454

    Rectification

    Court order requiring correction of mistake/error, to bring document in line with correct agreement between parties

    See Latimer at 5-695

  • 555555

    Specific Performance

    Court order requiring a party to specifically perform their contractual obligations

    See Latimer at 6-400

    565656

    Injunctions

    Court order prohibiting a party from doing something Court order requiring or compelling a party to do

    something

    See Latimer at 6-410

    5757

    Injunctions

    Cases:

    Lumley v WagnerCurro v Beyond Productions Pty LtdNetwork Ten Pty Ltd v Rowe

    See Latimer at 6-410

    57 58

    Contract Law LECTURE queries

    Your tutor is your primary point of contact but. if you have any contract law LECTURE queries, you may contact Paul Tuohy at: [email protected]

    All contract law TUTORIAL and ASSIGNMENT queries should be directed to your individual tutor

    595959

    Next week

    Introduction to Tort LawTopic for weeks 7 & 8 (Lecturer: Dr Leela Cejnar)Read Latimer Chapter 4: 4-010-4-120

    IMPORTANT TOPICProblem question in the exam