tabl1710 lecture wk3 - intro to contract law

10

Click here to load reader

Upload: riders29

Post on 28-Sep-2015

11 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

Contract Law 1-Nature and role of contract law-Requirements for a valid contract

TRANSCRIPT

  • 11

    TABL 1710Business and the Law

    Lecture 3 Introduction to Contract Law

    Lecturer: Dr Leela Cejnar

    2015 The University of New South WalesSydney 2052 Australia

    The original material prepared for this guide is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission.

    Enquiries should be addressed to the Head of School, Taxation and Business Law, UNSW, Sydney

    The Fridge: DIY Self- Management Program

    School of Psychology research project on self-management skills

    See Moodle for details Voluntary program Life-long skills Think about doing it!

    The Fridge: DIY Self- Management Program

    Aim: to provide you with evidence-based tools designed to provide you with tools to help you manage your academic workload

    Tasks: Some activities are in class Some activities will be done by way of an OPTIONAL online program that

    will involve you receiving weekly emails, reviewing short (1-2 mins) videos and completing short worksheets

    See TABL 1710 Moodle under The Fridge, DIY Self-Management Program SIGN UP ASAP!

    If you are interested in this VOLUNTARY program, please engage ASAP (enrolments open for a limited time only) by signing up to the program on TABL 1710 Moodle

    Program funded by the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic) and run by Associate Professor, Dr Jacquelyn Cranney, from the SCHOOL OF PSYCHOLOGY

    The Fridge: DIY Self- Management Program

    First activity: Videohttps://vimeo.com/120112496

    Second activity: Define Your Goals worksheet - to be done in tutorials

    5

    IN-CLASS EXERCISE ON LECTURE TOPICS 1 and 2

    In tutorials in week of 23 March (ie NEXT WEEK) CLOSED BOOK Revise using lecture slides and questions in Tutorial

    Program Students will be allowed to collaborate but no

    materials will be allowed Worth 10%

    TUTORIAL DISCUSSION FORUM

    Discussion ForumOne for each tutorialAvailable from week 4 (Week commencing 23

    March)Your tutor will provide you with details

  • MAJOR ASSIGNMENT

    Will be uploaded on Moodle next week Due in week 9 (Monday 4 May) Contract Law Problem

    TUTORIAL ATTENDANCE

    No further changes to tutorials are allowed 80% attendance requirement ALL STUDENTS MUST ATTEND THE TUTORIAL

    THEY ARE ENROLLED IN - you will be asked to leave if your name is not on the roll

    Almost all classes are full and it is not possible to exceed maximum capacity requirements

    If you are sick or not able to attend your normal tutorial, then contact the LiC and your tutor do not just go along to another class!

    TUTORIAL ATTENDANCE

    Especially dont miss the contract law tutorials!

    1010

    Course Readings

    Refer to the readings set out in the Course Schedule of the Course Outline (Note: these readings cover both the key points raised in lectures AND some additional background materials that may not be discussed in lectures but that will be beneficial)

    Key points (or cases) will be emphasised in the lectures (and in the PDF slides)

    1111

    Todays lecture Role of contract law in business Formation of contracts Elements of a valid contract Offer: rules for offer Acceptance: rules for acceptance The Postal rule Consideration: what is it? Promissory estoppel

    1212

    Overview Lecture 3Contract: Formation and Intention

    On completion of this lecture you should be able to:9 Identify the sources of contract law in Australia9 Distinguish between the different types of contracts9 Identify the elements of a contract9 Identify the rules for offer and acceptance9 Explain what is an invitation to treat9 Explain what the postal rule is9 Explain what is consideration and identify the rules for

    consideration9 Explain what is promissory estoppel

  • 1313

    Contracts

    Contracts are a fundamental part of peoples daily lives

    They form the basis of commercial law and dealings

    Some basic examples:Sales contracts buying foodEmployment contracts going to workRental contracts leasing a flat

    1414

    Sources of contract law in Australia

    Contract law in Australia is derived from:

    Judge-made law: developed in the English common law courts: that is, decisions from the cases

    and

    Legislation/Acts of Parliament: which have amended or supplemented the case law

    1515

    Sources of contract law in Australia

    The study of contract law involves an examination of common law principles and the extent to which they have been affected by legislation

    For an example, later in the course we will look at the impact of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (in the Competition and Consumer Act, 2010) prohibiting misleading or deceptive conduct

    1616

    Types of contracts

    Formal contract: deeds

    Simple contracts: oral or written

    Simple contract: bilateral or unilateral

    1717

    Simple contract

    Primary form of contracts No required formality May be unilateralOnly one party under any obligation

    May be bilateralBoth parties have obligations

    1818

    Formal contract

    Special form of contract Contracts under deed or seal Used in particular circumstances where the parties

    would otherwise have no contractual obligations due to absence of considerationDeedsWillsTrusts

  • 1919

    Contract defined

    A contract can be defined as:

    An agreement concerning promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations upon the parties to that agreement which shall be enforceable in a court of law.

    2020

    The law of contracts

    Therefore, a contract: Contains promises Between two or more parties

    - Promisor: person who makes promise- Promisee: person to whom promise is made- Who intend to be legally bound

    Making it enforceable by law

    2121

    Contract and Agreement

    Terms contract and agreement are often used to mean the same thing

    Traditional definition of contract is: a legally enforceable agreement that is legally binding

    See Latimer 5-010

    2222

    Contract and Agreement

    An agreement is NOT necessarily legally binding An agreement is not necessarily a contract

    2323

    Contract and Agreement

    Q: When does an agreement become a contract?A: When it becomes LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE.

    BUT: when does this occur?

    2424

    Essential elements of a contract

    Intention to enter into a legally binding contract

    Agreement Offer Acceptance

    Consideration (or price)

  • 2525

    Other elements for a valid contract

    Legal capacity

    Genuine consent

    Legality of purpose

    Any formal/procedural requirements must be satisfied

    See Latimer at 5-510 to 5-570

    26

    Intention to create legal relations

    There must be evidence that the parties INTENDED to

    make a legally enforceable contract: to be discussed

    further in next lecture

    2727

    The Offer:Rules in relation to Offers

    There must be:

    1. A firm promise

    2. Communication of the offer Can be communicated to a specific person or more

    broadly, to a class or persons/the whole world

    Communication of the offer can be in writing, orally or by conduct

    3. Revoked (cancelled) at any time BEFORE acceptance

    2828

    Communication of the Offer

    The offer may be directed to: one person, a group of people, or the world at large

    Case:Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co offer to anyone who performed the condition was there an intention to be bound to the offer? deposit of 1000 into bank account to show sincerity in the

    matter see Latimer at 5-080 and 5-212

    2929

    Counter-offers

    Counter-offers

    A counter-offer is a rejection of the original offerCase: Hyde v Wrench, Latimer at 5-300

    3030

    Statements that are not offers

    Invitation to treat

    An offer must be distinguished from an invitation to treat

    An invitation to treat is an offer to consider offersand cannot create an agreement

    KarnHighlight

    KarnUnderline

    KarnHighlight

    KarnHighlight

    KarnUnderline

    KarnUnderline

    KarnUnderline

    KarnUnderline

    KarnUnderline

    KarnHighlight

    KarnUnderline

  • 3131

    Statements that are not offers

    Invitation to treat

    Look at intention of the parties ASK: Is it an offer to consider an offer? Case: Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash

    Chemists (Southern) Ltd, Latimer at 5-180 Invitation to treat: when you select goods from shelf you

    are considering whether to make an offer to purchase Offer: at time you go to counter to pay Acceptance: when cashier accepts payment

    3232

    Statements that are not offers

    Invitation to treat can include:AuctionsAdvertisementsCataloguesPrice listsAnnouncementsGoods on display in shop windows and shelves

    3333

    Statements that are not offers

    Requests for Information A request for information is not a firm promise and so is not

    an offer It does not destroy the offer as it is only an attempt to obtain

    information Case: Harvey v Facey, Latimer at 5-200

    3434

    What can you do with an offer?

    Accept the offer Reject the offer Make a counter-offer: destroys the 1st offer Ask for further information Take no further action on the offer

    3535

    The Acceptance:Rules in relation to Acceptance

    1. Acceptance must be made strictly in response to the offer

    Case: R v Clarke, Latimer at 5-230

    3636

    Rules in relation to Acceptance

    2. Acceptance must be communicated Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror This can be done either by words (expressed) or by

    conduct (implied)Cases: Felthouse v Bindley (Silence not acceptance: see

    Latimer 5-310 ) Empirnall Holdings Pty Ltd v Machon Paull Partners Pty Ltd

    (Acceptance inferred by conduct: see Latimer at 5-310) Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Company (Acceptance

    inferred by conduct: see Latimer at 5-270)

  • 3737

    Rules in relation to Acceptance

    3. Acceptance must be unqualified, absolute andunconditional or it may amount to a counter-offerSee Latimer 5-240

    4. Conditional assent is NOT acceptanceCase: Masters v Cameron, Latimer at 5-250

    5. Acceptance must be clear and certainCase: Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston, Latimer at 5-260

    3838

    The postal rule

    Where the parties contemplate the use of the post as a medium of exchange of promises, the rules as to the time of acceptance change as follows:An offer by letter is not effective until received by

    the offereeAcceptance is effective as soon as it is posted If the offer is to be cancelled/revoked, notice of

    the cancellation must be received by the offeree before their letter of acceptance is posted

    See Latimer 5-330

    3939

    Instantaneous communications

    In cases of agreements communicated by means of telephone, fax or email, the contract is formed when and where the offeror hears or receives the offereesacceptance

    The Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) provides guidance on times for receipt and dispatch

    See Latimer at 5-335

    4040

    Consideration: what is it?

    See Latimer 5-400 - 5-485 Something for something

    Concept of VALUE

    BUT can be broader than just price

    Can include acts, promises etc

    4141

    Consideration: what is it?

    It is what the promisor gives in exchange for the return promise or the return action from the promisee

    Consideration turns an agreement into a contract

    Failure of consideration can make an agreement unenforceable

    4242

    Rules for Consideration

    1. Consideration is essential to the validity of every simple contract

    It may be: something the promisee gives the promisor the carrying out of some actor the refraining from doing something that the promisee had a

    legal right to do Cases: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd; Coulls v Bagots Executor and Trustee Co Ltd

    See Latimer 5-405

  • 4343

    Rules for Consideration

    2. Consideration must not be past Past consideration: occurs where a promise is given after an act has been

    performed

    is generally not enforceable Case: Roscorla v Thomas, Latimer 5-410

    4444

    Rules for Consideration

    BUT: past consideration can be good consideration IF:

    the act was done at the promisors request the parties understood that the act would be remunerated the promise would have been enforceable if it had been promised

    in advance of the act

    Cases: Lampleigh v Braithwait Re Caseys PatentsSee Latimer at 5-410

    4545

    Rules for Consideration

    Therefore:

    Consideration must be Present (executed) consideration which is an act done now

    in return for a promise when the act is completed: see Latimer at 5-430

    Or

    Future (executory) consideration where the parties agree to exchange promises to do something in the future: see Latimer at 5-420

    4646

    Rules for Consideration

    3. Consideration must have value but need not be adequate

    Consideration must have value but need not be adequate as this is something only the parties to the contract can decide

    Case: Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co LtdSee Latimer at 5-440

    4747

    Rules for Consideration

    4. Consideration must be sufficient

    This means that it must have some legal value

    If not, it may be considered insufficient and no consideration at all

    As long as consideration exists, the courts will not be concerned about its adequacy

    4848

    Rules for Consideration

    5. Consideration must be possible of performance

    6. Consideration must be definite

    7. Consideration must be legal

    8. Consideration must be referable to the other partys promise

  • 4949

    Rules for Consideration

    9. Practical benefit can be good consideration

    Cases: Musumeci v Winadell Pty Ltd Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd See Latimer at 5-470

    5050

    Insufficient Consideration

    1. Moral obligations as well as natural love and affection will NOT convert a promise into good consideration

    Case: Eastwood v Kenyon See Latimer at 5-471

    5151

    Insufficient Consideration

    2. Part payment is insufficient consideration Part payment is NOT good consideration Exception: if creditor agrees to accept smaller amount (or

    something different), a debt is considered discharged. Cases: Pinnels case; Foakes v Beer

    See Latimer at 5-4803. Promise to perform a duty already imposed by contract is

    not good consideration Cases: Stilk v Myrick; Hartley v Ponsonby

    See Latimer at 5-470

    5252

    Consideration and Promissory Estoppel: the exception to the rule

    Promissory estoppel will allow a promise to be enforced even though the promisee has not provided good consideration for that promise

    It operates where it would be inequitable, or unconscionable, for the promisor not to be held to their promise

    You cant go back on your word! See Latimer at 5-485

    5353

    Promissory estoppel

    Cases:Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees

    House LtdLegione v HateleyWaltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v MaherSee Latimer at 5-485

    5454

    Promissory estoppelBrennan Js (Waltons v Maher) six-point test for when the promisorcannot go back on his/her word:

    Promisee (Maher = P) assumes existence of particular legal relationship

    Promisor (Waltons = D) responsible for this assumption Promisee acted/did not act in reliance on that assumption Promisor knew what promisee would do or intended for

    promisee to act in this way Promisee will suffer loss or some detriment or harm if the

    assumption/expectation is not fulfilled Promisor did not take any steps to warn promisee s/he may not

    fulfil expectation etc

    See Latimer at 5-485

  • 55

    Promissory estoppel

    The central principle of the doctrine is that the law will not permit an unconscionable or, more accurately, unconscientious departure by one party from the subject matter of an assumption which has been adopted by the other party as the basis of somerelationship, course of conduct, act or omission which would operate to the other partys detriment if the assumption be not adhered to.

    Deane J in Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39See Latimer at 5-485

    5656

    Next lectureContract Law (continued): Intention to create legal relations Terms of a contract Conditions and warranties Exclusion clauses Read: Latimer Ch 6, 6-010 to 6-250 DO NOT MISS ANY CLASSES ON THIS TOPIC!