t;ps24/pdfs/thermodynamic studies... · report submjtted to doe. nsf and a consortium of supporting...
TRANSCRIPT
~4
The effect of different structural modifications such as change In alkyl chainlength. branching of the alkyl chain and addJtlon of functional groups such as eth~and methyl groups on surfactant adsorpUon has been investigated In detaJl.9.14.IS Animportant Var1atJon In surfactant structure Js the position of furrtlonal groups.However. systematk studies on the effect of the position of fwx:tlonal groups onadsorptkJn an lacking. In thJs work. the effect of position of methyl and sulfonategroups on the benzene r1r1g on the adsorption and mJcelUzatlon of alkyl xylenesulfonates has been Jnvestigated uslr1g mlcrocalonmetry. electrokJneUcs and SU~tension. Calonmetry provides accurate thermodynamtc data and these data are he1pl'ulfor elucidating the mechanJsms of mJcellfzatlon and adsorpUon. Calorimetry has -extensfveJy used to measure the enthalples of mJce1lfzation of ~e surfactants 16-18and also the excess enthalpy of mJxJng of surfactant mixtures. 19. 0 EXtension ofcalorfmetnc work to study adsorption at solld/Jlquid Interface has been Ifmfted.21.25The emphasis in most of the work has been on the estabiJshment of the technique tostudy adsorption and studies show the potenUaJ of thJs techntque to understalxl theadsorption mechanJsms.
'~
Z:..;;.t;-~pial~8Iict
a1~..ciIEtdl~ceJI.readwastJIe!
cOlIC
~dete:
aZei
RE$~
Para S ~Meta S
Inl"lfOPPCbeinJsurU~charadsobull<Ulan-~
~~hydr3CetJSUlkh~
Exnertmental Conditt
Method~
Surfac~ T~~I0~ Surface t~nslon was measured usingr1ng tenslomel~r set to lh~ lest temperature.
water-jacketed d
: Ion on alumina. a gram was condition. Then. 5 mJ of surfactant solution of deNaCI was added and the sluny was contr1fuged and the Supernatant analyzed ft
edwcd
Adsorntlon: For adso:0.03 Janol/m3 NaCI for 2 houconcentration In 0.03 lanolInhours. The sluny was then cconcentration. ~
~~urfactant Ana~I~: Th(DUoS UV-VIs spectrophotometer
1eck:113' SI~Intowas11Ieani!the I
~(teau
surfactant concentration wat a wavelength of 254 nm. ana~ :d
I
294
EXPERIMENTALMatrnalg
~Mixed Micelle FonnaU~
It~ j.; ;:c >'. ~ i
~ ~~ "
Surface tension was also used to measure the CMC of the mixtures <i ~ twosurfactants and the results are given in fig. 5. Also. the theoretal CMC values for thedifferent mixtures calculated using the ideal solution and regular soluUon theorIes ~shown in this figure. The system shows a negative deviation from the ideal behavb .which is not nonnally expected for mlxtUTes of S1mJJar surfactants. Regular soIutbitheory fits the data well With an interacUon parameter (W) of -0.32. The deviations fr'-aideality can be attributed to the difficulty tn packing of the molecules in the mixedmicelles. However. prior to applying the regular soluUon theory to model the data. It IInecessary to verify the validity of the thennodynamic assumpUons of the theory asappUed to the system under investigation. Regular solution theory is based on theassumption that the excesss Gibbs free energy of mixing is given by
~
XIX2WRr 3}JmIx:
where Xl and X2 are the mole fractions of the two surfactants In the mixedmIcelle and W is the interaction parameter. Regular solution theory also assumes thatthe a~ entropy and volume of mJxJng are zero and herreI
HmII: = XIX2WRI 4)
Recently. H(enthalpy of mixingthat the assumptJodata adequately.
10 and Scamehom"'u have measuredonJc surfactants using calorimetry a19b even though the theory fits the su
:ea!xi
The excess enthalpy of mixing of the two surfactants In this study was me~using microcalor1metry and is shown In figure 6. The Interaction parameter obtained byfitting the excess enthalpy data was -0.21. This value Is very close to -0.32 obtained (IUD~e surface tension data. Indicating that the assumptions are valid for our system.
,0
rI
1e sulfonate and meta xylene sulfonateFigure 5 CMC or mixtur oCparaxy
.0
1;.:-0uCI%X2:...0
>-Q.-J'"Z--%w
InU)wUxw
~
-o""~~~~30
/0 ~\.\
I,
20
\Ip
I/.10 \
I0'- - , '" ~-~0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 t.O
..oLE fRACTION Of Weta S IN WICElLE
figure 6. Excess enthalpy of mixed micelle fOn11ation of para xylene sulfonate and
meta xylene sulfonate.
CONCWSION"
:/..I.~/~
It is evident from this work that the small changes in the surfactant structure.such as change In the position of sulfonate and methyl groups on alkyl xylene sulfonates
c~have a marked effect on the adsorption characteristics. The Para S adsorbed to agreater extent than the Meta S on alumina. The lower adsorption of Meta S is attributedto its lower hYdrophobicity and Increased stertc hindrance t9 the packing of themoleCules In the hemimicelles. MicrocalOrlnieny is sensitive to such small changes in$tJ'ucture and is an excellent tool to study mechanism of surfactant adsorption. The$tudfes Indicate that at low adsorption densities. enthalpy Js the driving force while athigher concentrations. the adsorption is governed by entropic changes due to~icelle formation. It helped confirm the steric hindrance to the packing of the~lecules as the reason for the dilTerence in the adsorption of the two surfactants.SurpnsJngiy. mixed micellization of the two surfactants is non-ideal and regularsoltJtion theory fits the data well. MJcrocalorJmetry shows that the thermodynamicassumptions of the theory are valid for the surfactant mixtures.
.-..0
ACKNOWLEDGEMENI'S
'gular Mixing
REfERENCES
-J L ~
0.6 0.7 0.& 0.9
>r W.ta S
and meta xylene sulfonate.
I ,,",
f ;~ "'.
::
.',
:.,'
'~:i'
~
;;";1:'~.
;~
2. H. S. Halma and P. Somasundaran. bt wlmproved on Recovety by Surfactant ~ :.~~Polymer JO100d1ng" . D. O. Shah and R S. Schechter. editors. Academic Press. New~;;York. 1977. c";;;;
3. J. D. Swa1en. D. L. AUara. J. D. Andrade. E. A Chandross. S.Garoft". J.lsrae~~,;;T. J. McCarthy. R Murray. R F. Pease. J. F. Ra~ K. J. Wynne and H. Yu, J.A.-.:2-ti!.a. 932 (1~. -~?:
4. M. J. Schwuger, bt"AnionJc Surfactants". Surfactant Science Sertes. E. H. Lucas.eQ;~cReynders. editor. Vol. 11. Marcel Dekker. New York. 1981.
5. M. S. Wr1gi1ton. editor. ~terfadal Processes: EneIgy Conversion and S~".;::'f:Advarx:es In ChemJstty Series. l.8.i. Amel1can Chemkal Society. Washington, D. c;j,::;1980 'c'-
6. J. H,'Fendler and E. J. Fendler. "Catalysis bt Micellar and Macromolecular ~;~Systems". AcademJc ~. New York. 1975. ~~~,
7. P. &xnaswx1aran am D. W. Fuerstenau. J. Pitys. Chern.. 10:. 90 (1966). ;-8. J. F. ~horn. R S. Schechter and W. H. Wade, J. Colk)ld Interface Scl.~. 463
(1982).9. P. Somasundaran. R Mkldleton and K. V. Viswanathan. bt wStructurc/Perf~
Relatk>nshlp bt Swfactants". M. J. Rosen. editor. American Chemical SocietySymposium Sertes. 2.5s1. 270. 1984.
10. L. Matos. J. Raver and G. Serratrtce. J. ColJold Interface ScL, ill, 341 (1989).11. M. Dahanayake and M. J. Rosen. bt"Structure/Perfonnance Relationship in
Surfactants". M. J. Rosen. editor. American Chemical Society Symposium ~~. 49. 1~.
12. M. J, Rosen. z. 7Jlu. B. Gu and D. S. Murphy. Langmulr..i. 1273 (1~1.13. A. Sokolowski. B. Burczyk andJ. Beger, Colloids Surfaces. 32. 373 (1989).14. P. Somasundaran. "Adsorptk>n from Flooding Solutions bt Porous Media", Annual
Report SubmJtted to DOE. NSF and a Consortium of Supporting IndustrialOrganizatk>ns, Columbia UnIversity. New York. 1987.
15. S. J. LewIs. L. A. Verkruyse and S. J. Salter, Society of PetroleumEngineers/Department of Energy Preprtnt, 14910 (1986).
16. G. OkJrsson. J. Pbys. Chml.. 89.. 1473 (1985).17. N. A. Mazer am G. O~n. J. Pi1ys. Chern.. B§;. 4584 (1982).18. K..S. Blrdl, Collold POIym. Sci.. .2§.l. 45 (1983).19. Edward Fu, D.E.S. Thesis. Columbia University, New York. 1987.20. J. F. Rathman andJ. F. Scarrr.hom. Langmulr,...4.. 474 (1988).21. S. Partyka. M. Undheimer. S. ZalnI. E. Keh and B. Brun. langmuir. 2.101 (19861.22. L. A. Non. L. A. Woodbury and T. E. Bun:hfield. Colloids Surfaces. a. 349 (1984).23. R Denoyel. F. Rouquerol andJ. Rouquerol. CoUokis Surfaces. 31, 295 (1989).24. N. M. van Os and G. Haandr11m1an. langmuir. 3,. 1051 (1989).25. S. Partyka. W. Rudzinski. B. Brun and J. H. Clint. langmuir. .5.. 297 (1989).26. B. W. Bany and G. J. F. Russell. J. CoIIokllnterface Scl..i.Q. 174 (1972).27. W. Drost-Hansen. bt "Chemistty and Physa of Interfaces-II". American Chemk:a1
Society. Washington. D.C.. 1971. RaseD;28. P. M. Holland. In "Structurc/Performarx:e Relationship In Surfactants". M. J.
editor. American Chemical SocIety Symposium Series. 25J. 141. 1984.
,
I
Invited lecture by P. Somasundara:1H,nIY Kntmb School of ,\(i/lu, Co/llmbia Uniy,rzity. Hew York, USA
DrrRODUCTION
233
operations the clays are liberated fro~ the matrix. It is mainly
this clay which, when present along with other minerals, appears
to be responsible for the slow-settlinq behavior of sliQes. The
role of clays has been inv..tiqated recently by Naqaraj, McAllis-
ter and Somasundaran [12J who studied the sedimentation behavior
of suspensions of various cocbinations c~ major mineral compo-
nents of phosphatic slio£ ~r morpholoqically similar materials
The systems ~nvestigated were essentially composed of kaoli-
nite c= montmorillonite, quartz and a fibrous mineral (attapul-
gite, chrysotile or amphibole). Table llists various the mine-
ral systems that were studied. It was stipulated that a system
should simulate the following settling characteristics of typi-
cal slow-settling slimes: (a) an initial period of qellinq;
(b) slow overall subsid~nce' with a continu~usly chanqi.r.q sl!ttl-
ing r~te that is typic~ of a network structure: (c) absence of
significant segregation of mineral constituents durinq sed~en-
tation; Cd) a clear supernatant and a sharp slurry/supernata~t
interface; Ce) a bulky sediment; (f) presence of tears and
channels in the sedimenting structure, and (g) water exiting &s
microvolcanoes. A system exhibiting such characteristics can
also be used as a model system' for controlled studies onslow
settling'. The study of Naqaraj et al. [l2J showed that none of
the constituent minerals themselves or their binaries resembled
industrial slime with respect to the above characteristics.
From the various combinations of kaolinite, mont=o:i~lonite
attapulqite, quartz, chrysotile, and amphibole studied, the
montmorillonite-attapulqite-kaolinite ternary and the montmoril-
lonite-attapulqite-kaolinite-quartz quarternary were found to
235
t
TABLE 1
Mineral Systems Studied
SJ.nqle Minerals:
Hant80rillonite
~oliD
Attapulqite
Q'.1artZ
Chrysoule
~~b~~l.
Binary Syst_:
~liD-cbryso~l. 1:1 At~pulqit.-Kont=oril1oait. 4:1 an4 6:1
1ao1iD-Attapulqite 1:4 and 1:1 Amphibo1e-MQn~ri11onit. 4:1, 5:1 aDd 6:1
!ao11n-A8phibo1. 1:1 Chryso~i1e-Montmcri11onite 411
bo1iD-Quartz 1:2
Ternary Syst_:
*Hontmorillonite-Attapulqi te-XAolin
Hon tmorilloni te-Attapul q i te-Qua~z
~lin-Atta~i te-Quartz
Ouaternary System:- --.Non tmorilloni te- At tapulqi te- Kaolin-Quart:
behave very similarly to the industrial slime The study using'
these systems also enabled us to determine the role of each
consti~uent. The clay minerals, montcorillonite and attapulqite,
w~re founc ~o be responsible for the slow sedimentation rate
owinq possibly to their peculiar morpholoqy and swellinq pro-
perties. For example, whereas montmorillonite-attapu19ite-kaoli-
nite-quartz behaved similarly to industrial slime, the ternary
system kaolinite-attapulqite-quartz showed no similarity - suq-
qestinq that montmorillonite does playa major role in determi-
ninq the settlinq behavior of slimes. S~larly, systems without
attapulqite or other fibrous-type mineral were also found to
settle differently from typical slimes.
236
period.. It is easily analysed alonq the lines of the modified
Kozeny model for flow throuqh porous media [14 J. Here settlinq
ends-abruptly with little further decrea.e in heiiht; such ma-
terial is said to be incompres8ible.
Fiq. 1. Typical batch sedimentation curve.
On the other hand, when the system contains particles of
diffe:ent sizes, one can obtain multiple interfaces [lS-11J.
Davies [lSJ has shown that the existence of such Qultiple in-
terfaces can b. seen up to a critical solid concentration of
about 30 to JS vol.'. The appearance of multiple interfaces is
attributed to the faster settling of the larger spheres. Above
the critical concentration, this differentia+ settling is pre-
vented by interparticle distances that are smaller than the
diameter of the smaller particle.
In contrast to the above cases, the aedimentation c~rves of
dilute suspensions of clay-type materials display a reverse
S-shape such as the one shown in Fig. 2, which is in fact so
238
TABLE 2
MAjor Criteria in Dewatering
SoUd concentration of sed~~
Vol~ of Hdl.-D~
Sett1.1nq rate
SlIperDatant clarity
Cake yield strenqth
Cake ~i.t.ur.
~w~~w...~
w'X...u.0...z0L&Jz
Fiq. 2. Reverse S-shape sedimentation curve.
239
ea=b
solid concentration
region. T
hese are
shown
in F
i;. 3.
three different
types of
settling curve.
are obtained,
one fo:
particle. A
t low
shear
rate., the
flocs qroup
into large
clus-
curved that
no reqion
could be
described as
exhibitinq a
con-
stant sett1inq
rate period
[19J. M
oreover, settlin9
continues
in this
ca.. at
an ever-decreasin9
rate over
an extrem
ely lon9
240
tended three
dimensional
network.
On
the basis
of this
codel
ters called
aggregates, and
the aqgregates
in turn
form
an ex-
time
period, suggesting
that the
material
is com
pressible.
The
sedimentation
of such
clay suspensions
has been
studied
by a
number
of investigators
~O
-2J J. A
notew
orthy quantitative
study in
thi, area
is that
of M
ichaels and
Bolqer
[24J w
ho re-
lated the
settlinq rate
of flocculated
particles to
the m
icro-
structure of
the floc.
and the
properties of
tM
sun"oundinq ~
um.
The
basic flow
unit
in the
Michaels-B
olger m
odel is
a -=
all
cluster of
particles called
a floc,
rather than
the individual
concentrations [24J.
suggest that the container diameter has a negligible ef~ect on
the settling of flocculated slurries. The effect of container
diameter on the settlinq of a phosphatic clay suspension exami-
ned by us (26J, however, showed that the diameter has a defi-
nite effect on the settlinq rate (Fiq. 4). An increase in dia-
meter caused a decrease in the settlinq rate for diameters up
to about 8 cm and above that, a slight increase. This observa-
tion can, however, be explained with the help of a phenomenolo-
qical model that we have developed.
F1q. 4. Diaqram illustratinq the effect of container
diameter on the heiqht of phosphate slime-super-
natant interface; initi~ solids concentration,
2.6' -37 pm slime; no additives, height of the
slime column, 17.8 cm, time of settling, 8 h (26] .
243
BATCH SETTLING PROCESSES
Oar model is based on the actual visual observation of ~.
..ttling .ystems and the formulation of the .implest plausible
equations for the settling curve. which di.play an S-.hape with
no region exhibiting a con.tant .ettling rate period and .ettl-
inq continuing at an ever-increa.inq rate over an extremely
lonq time period. rn fact it i. in this respect, i.e., where
constant settlinq rate period is abs.nt, that these .y.t~
fail to be satisfactorily represented by the previous models of
Kynch, Richardson-Zaki, etc.
Fiqure 5 illustrate. the observed sequence of the settlinq.
In the first one or two .econds after one .tops mixinq the
slur:y, the rotational movement of the 8uspension cease. due to
gelling- The gelling process itself appear. to be complete over
a period of several minutes, and then due to the downward move-
ment of coarser particles and the upward movement of micro air
bubble. through the structure, fissures and tears beqin to form.
Water seeps up throuqh these tears and when the water meets
re.istance to its continued transport, lenses of water ~e for-
mad. Further seepaqe occurs when channels open up between
tears, with water finally exitinq at the slurry-supernatant in-
terface in the form of microvolcanoes. At this point one can
clearly see the interface settlinq down quickly and water alonq
wi th entrained particles can be seen spouting through the cen-
ter of the dome. of the volcanoes. Water also seeps along the
walls of the container, foldinq the slurry away from the ~ll
at the interfac.. The observed effect of the container di~eter
on the rate of settling is in fact attributed to this seepa;e
244
S£DJI£KTATlOli P~SSES FlJR 8ATCII ~1TIc.'IS
J5 min 'tl2h
Fiq. 5. Sedimentation processes for batch conditions (26].
2.6' phosphatic slimes, 0.5 q coarse qraphite tracer.
Observations: 0 min, suspension qels almost i=:edia-
tely followinq mixinq and the rotational mov~.nt
terminates; -10 min, risinq air bubbles and descen-dinq particles create vertical tears; ,y 13 min to-35 min, water concentrates into lenses aroucd thetears; - 2 h, channelinq and microvolcanoes L~ance
dewaterinq process; -4 h, water filaments depleted,
channels beqin to close and no further siqnificant
sedimentation.
245
, "~"Ae= particles should kbetter additives. ReSults given in Fig. 7, ~owever, show that an
increase in the density of the A~"'i..~..- It4Va prOduced no enhanceme~in Settling: this suggested that the Obser\.ed effects were not
246
TlME.h
Fiq. 6. Diaqram illustratinq the effect of addition of
quartz flotation tailinqs on the .ettlinq of 2.6'-37 pm phosphatic slime, vertic~l bars indicate
ranqe when larqer than the symbol (26].
due to ~~y increase in the weiqht of the network. It is inte-
restinq to not. here that ca..it.rite, the heaviest oin.ral,
produced no effect. on .et.t.linq. A careful examination of the
.et.tlinq suspensions showed that the heavy cassiterite part.i-
cles had broken through the slurry before the slurry had a
chance to gel and trap them. Apparently, since the particles
had thus uready left the slurry, it could produce no effect
Oc.8ub8equent settl'inq. Hydrophobic 8ilicon-coated ql&.$ b~ads.
247
\ GRAfl..BTE. QUARTZ.
FW)RITE J...A;~,A!l~.AWMINA. ~ -RITE. MOLYBDENITEANO CASSITERITE90
.~I-CONTfD.~w~~WI-~w%...I&-0I-%!:2LA!%
80,
70;I
10
SO
.-CONTROL
-"-:
.,..02h -""
-o-!- -e ~ "-- - -CONTROL .. 8 h - -a
~ :'::':':::...~~~~.~ c - -. --~- t9 ~ ..,--
2t.h.a.-t-~:.. 0 0-- 4-('# I I I .,--~ I I
to 2.0 3.0 '.0 5.0 6.0 10
DENSITY OF COARSE ADOmve. 9 / ~
1.0
Fi9. 7. Dia~am illustratin9 the effect of density of coarseadditives on the .ettlin9 of 2.6\ -37 pm slime ~6J.
which also broke through the slurry too early, similarly failed
to produce any effect on .ettlinq. In contrast, uncoated (and
thus hydrophilic) gla.. beads and quartz particles of the same
.ize did get trapped in the .lurry and were effective in en-
hancing the settling. Thus variou. hydrophilic and partially
hydroph~lic ~erals had approximately the same effect on the
.ubsidence, while totally hydrophobic .ilicone coated glass
beads did not have much effect. This findin9 suqges~ed that
some polar interactions with the aqueous medium is necessary
248
,to hold and trap the coarse particles in the slurry durinq qel-
linq in order that there can be subsequent movements in the
slurry for the creation of tears.
In ~is reqard, it appears ~at addition of certain polymers
to ~e whole slurry or treatment of ~e coarse additives wi~
polymers under certain conditions miqht be beneficial to settl-
inq. The effec~ of polymers co~d possibly be due ~o ~e en-
hanced bridqinq of par~icles ~o clay and resultant better ~rap-
pinq of particles by the slurry. Whe~her such bridqinq occurs
or no~, results of La Mer et ale [28J qiven in Fiq. 8 do show
tha~ addi~ion of polymers can produce siqnificant effects on
settlin9. It is to be noted, however, that while polymers may
increase the initial settlin9 rate, the final solid c~n~.e~t can
even be lower than where there is no such increase, often due
TIME -
Fi9. 8. Sedimentation in the absence (curve I) and in the
presence (curve II) of polymer [28J.
249
to almost permanent entrapment of large quantities of vater
inside the bulky flocs that may form in the presence of poly-
mers. In this respect, the correct choice of polymers and the
proper conditioninq of th. slurry with it, is important.
Recently a polyethylene oxide polymer has been successfully
used by the u.s. Bureau of Mine. for the dewaterinq of Florida
phosphatic clay wast.. both in batch t.ata and in a continuous
test with a trOImDel [29] .
Effect of Air Bubbles-
The experiments conducted to determine the effect of air
bubbles consisted of the application of auction above a suspen-
sion of the slurry. The results obtained are shown in Fig.
Fig. 9. Diagram illustratinq the effect of air bubbles
generated by suction on the settllnq of phosphaticslime [12].
250
Plq. 10. Schematic repres.n~ation of ..tt1inq of sl~es
8howinq princi?a~ reqions [27J.
It can be seen from the results given in Fig. 10 that the gene-
ration of bubbles enhances subsidence significantly. Like the
microbubbles that are ordinarily present in slime, these bub-
bles are also found to act by alterinq ths physical features of
the slurry such that water seepaqe becomes possible throuqh
more channels. It can a~so be seen that suction has no effect
on .ettlinq during the ini~ial ten to twen~y minutes. Also,
once the solids settle to . volume of 25 to 26', mild suction
above the suspension even for lonq periods produces no measur-
able effect. A stronqer suction was found to merely disperse
the sediment. The above observations $uqqest that qeneration
251
parameters than in the reticular stage. A better fit for the
dewaterinq rate has been found to be qiven by the exponential
relation (9) and it represents a moderatinq rate of interaqqre-
qate water expulsion as compared with that durinq the reticular
stalie.
dWadt
~
- -k exp .( w(g)a
This Equation a~so can be rewritten to re~ate ~~e descent of
the interface to settlinq time in the form qiven below:
B(t) . HCt2 - b In(tlt2(10)
Floccular Staqe _~(t3) to - B(-)
When all the water in the macrochannals be~ween aggregates
has been expelled, the end of the vermicular staqe is reached
and furth~r dewatering can take place due to the consolidation
of individual flocs. Water removal at th~s stage, called the
floccular stage, can take place due to two processes: r~ati-
vely fast expulsion of interfloc water in the microchannels
between flocs and relatively slow expulsion of intrafloc water
from within the flocs. The forces involved are qravitational
and opposinq viscous forces. Each of these processes follow
firs~-order kine~ics:
dWf. -kW~- ..
dt(11)
where Wf is now the fraction of inter- and intra-floc water.
2SS
Plq. 11. Illustration of the fit of the phenomenoloqical
model [27 J.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
A detailed description of behavior of slow-settlinq suspen-
sions has been given here along with the mechanism by which
dewaterinq occurs and the mechanisms by which additives help
the dewatering process. The role of certain major factors such
as vessel diameter and the properties of additiv~s has also
been discussed. FurthermOre a phenomenoloqical settlinq model
that satisfactorily represents the observed behavior of slime
has been reviewed. The problem of dewaterinq is very i=portant
as it can be a very costly operation (Table 3). Dependinq on
the technique used, it can cost anywhere up to $50 per dry ton
and this ranqe of expense is indeed ~prohibitively hiqh.
.,~
TABLE 3
COat of Dewatarinq of Sludq.a by Various Hatbods l30J
Obviou81y there is a great need to develo~ new technoloqy and
to achieve this I there is also an .quai need to fully advance
our scientific underatandinq of the.e systems. Much more re-
.earch certainly needs to be done before we can claim sucb .
full understandinq. Detailed and .ystematic experim.nt~ stu-
dies in the areas discussed above. phys~al and chemical alike,
are in dire need of the proper formulation of settlinq model.
and of full understandinq of the ..ttlinq behavior of slow-
settlinq slimes and sludqes. the processinq of which is steadi-
ly qaininq in importance every day.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The support of the Particulate and Uultipha.~ Processinq
proqram of the National Science Foundation (ENG 78 25213) is
gratefully acknowledged. Authors of Reference. 12, 13, and 27,
published from our laboratory are also acknowledqed
258
REFE~CES
1. xmhoff K. et al. Disrosa1 of Sewaqe L~d Other Water-borne
Wastes, Ann Arbor Sci. Pub., Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.
2. Stokes G. G. Trans. C~ridqe Phil. Soc., 9, 11 (1851).-3. Happel J. and Brenner H. Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics
with Special Ref. to Par~iculate Media, Prentice-Hal~,
EDqelwood Cliffs, 1965.
4. Lamb E. Hydrodynamics, Cambr~dqe University Pres~, London,
1932.
S. Carman P. C. Trans. Inst. Chem. Enqrs., 15,150 (1937)
6. Carman P. C. J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 57, 225 (1938).-7. Mangelsdorf P. C. J. Appl. Phys., 30, 442 (1959).-S. Erqan S. Chem. Eng. Progr., ~ 89 (1962).
9. wyllie K. R. J. and Gregory A. R. Ind. Eng. Cham., 47, 1379-(1955).
10. Coulson J. K. Trans. Inst. Chem. znq:s., ~, 237 (1949).
11. Edmundson I. C. and Toot~ J. P. R. Analyst, ~, 128 (1903).
12. Naqaraj D. R., McAllister L. and Somasundaran P. Int. J.Mn1. Proc., 4, 111 (19-;7).-
13. Somasundaran P. and S:esty G. C. Dewaterinq of Slow-se~tlin~
Sludqes, Second Handbook Volu=a on Particle-Fluid Saparation
Techno1oqy, private publication by XIT Research Institute,Chicaqo, 1977.
14. Carman P. C. Flow of Gases Throuqh Porous Media, Academic
Press, New York, 1956.
15. Davies R. and Kaye B. B. Particle Size Analysis Symposium,
Bradford University, ~q1and, 1970.
5, 61 (197l/72).16. Davies R. and Kaye B. H. Powder Tech.
17. Smith T. N. Trans. Ins~. Chaco En~rs., 43, 769 (1965).-18. Davies R. Powder Tech., 2, 43 (1968/69).
-
259
19. Somasundaran P., Smith E. L., Jr. an4 Barris C. C. Effect
. of Coarser Particles on the Settlinq Characteristics of
Phosphatic Slimes, Proc. 1st Int. Cont. on Particle Techno-
logy, Chi~aqo, Auqust 21"-24,1973, I.I.T. Research Insti-
-tute, 144-150.
20. Wadsworth M. E. and Cutler I. B. Kining Enq., !J 830 (1956).
21. La Mer V. K. and Smellie Jr. R. B. J. Colloid Sci., 12,-230 (1957).
22. La Mer V. K. and Smell~. Jr. R. B. J. Colloid Sci., 12-566 (1957).
23. Bramer H. C. and Soak R. D. Ind. EDqnq. Chea. Process
Desiqn Development, 1.! 316 (1966).
24. Michaels A. S. and Bolqer J. C. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.,
1.! 24 (1962, Feb.).
25. Bodman S. W., Shah Y. T. and Skriba M. C. Ind. Eng. Cham.
Process Deslqn Develop., 11, 46 (1972).-26. Somasundaran P., smith E. L. Jr. and Barris C. C. Dewater-
ing of Phosphate Slimes Usinq Coars. Additives, XIth Int.Miner. Proc. Conqr. Proceedinqs, IsUtuto de Arte Minerari
e PreparazioDe del Mineral1, UD1versita de Caq1iari, 1975,
1301.
27. Harris C. C., Soma.~aran P. &Cd Jenson R. R. Powder Tech.,
!!..t 7S (1975).
28. La Her V. ~. and Smellie R. B. Jr. Theory of Flocculation,
Sub£1dence and Filtration Rate. of Colloidal Dispersions
Flocculated by Pol~lectrolytes, Clays and Clay Minerals,
9, 1962,295.
29. Smel~ey A. G. and Feld I. L. Flocculation 'Dewaterinq of
Florida Phosphatic Clay Wast.., u.s. Bureau of Minas Report
of Investiqations, No. 9349,1979.
Surd R. S. A Study of Sevaqe Handlinq and Disposal, u. S.Dept. of Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control ~-nistration, publication WP 20-4, May 1968.
30
260
ABSTRACT
Properties of slow-settling suspensions have been described
and it was shown that clays when present along with o~her mine-"
rals appear to be responsible for the slow-settling behaviour
of siimes.The mechanism by which additives help the dewatering process
has been discussed. A phenomenological settling model thatsatisfactorily represents the observed phenomena has been
reviewed.
, ,RESUME
On a decrit les proprietes des suspensions a sedimentationlente et on a montre que les &%qiles en presence d' aut res ~e-
raux sont responsables de la sed~entat1on len~e des bones.
On a discute le mecanisme qrace auquel les acditifs aiden~
lea processus de deshydratation. On a passe en revue les
travaux sur le modele phenomenoloqique de sedimenta~ion quidecrit d 'une maniere sufficante le comportement observe des
bones.
ZUSA.~ASSUNG
Die Eigenschaften der lanqsam sedimentierenden Suspensionenwerden erortert und gleichzeitig wird qezeiqt, da! der Ton in
Anwesenheit van anderen Mineralien ein lanqsames Absetzen der
Schlluane verursacht.Diskutiert wird der Mechanismus, infolqe dessen die Beimen-
gen den EntwasserungsprozeB unterstUtzen. Es wird ein Uber-
blick der Arbei ten zum Thema des phanomenoloqischen Modellsdes Absetzvorqanqes geqeben, da& das beobachtete Verbal ten der
Schlimme vollstandig beschreibt.
261
PEDE
OnHcaHY oBolcTBa Ue~eBHO C~eBl~I~- BSBeCeK H DOKa-SaBa, qro r~BHA ! npHCYTCrBHB xPyrax KHHe~OB B~HRDf pemH-~e~~BHY 06pa30U sa ue~eHHoe oca~eHHe CY3neH3H1. 06CyaAeHuexasHsu, ~3HBaDmHA BcDO»8rare~~Hoe ~e;CTBHe ~06aBOK B Dpo-uecce 06e3BOXHBaW~H. npOM3Be~eH 0130p pa6o! H8 ~eMY ~eHoue-BoaorHqeCKOH Ko~e~H oc~eHHH, KO~OpaH DOXHoc~~m OnBC~Bae~Ha6nD~aeMoe nOBe~eHHe anODe
262