t girder bridge deck diaphragm-20 m
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
1/14
Page 17
DESIGN OF DECK-SLAB
1.0 INTRODUCTION :
The deck-slab is designed as continuous over three supports with overhang on either side.
Live-load combinations of Class-A X 2 Lane loading ,Axle Load have been checked. BendingMoments at various sections as shown below are found using STAAD-Pro software after calculating
effective load intensities for each case.
2.0 DESIGN DATA:
I Density of concrete = 2.40 t/m3
ii Grade of concrete = M- 25
iii Reinforcement = HYSD bars conforming to IS: 1786
iv Permissible stress in concrete = 8.33 N/mm2
v Permissible stress in steel = 200 N/mm2
vi Maximum permissible shear stres = 2.10 N/mm2
vii Live Load
a) Class A x 2 Lanes
viii Impact Factor
= 50.0% For Class-A
3.0 REFERENCES:
i. IRC: 6 - 2000
ii. IRC: 21 - 2000
550 (other side)
550 C/L Carriageway
1 2 3
300
200 235
50
1 2 150
3
325 325
1500 1800 1800
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
2/14
Page 18
4.0 LOAD CALCULATION
a) Dead Load:
(loads are calculated for one meter strip)
In cantilever portion,
Load is linearly varying in cantilever portion
At end = 0.48 t/m
At 1-1 = 0.6 t/m
In intermediate portion,
Uniformly applied load = 0.564 t/m
b) SIDL :
Outer side,
S/W of Parapet/Side rail = 0.3 t/m
Due to road kerb = 0.396 t/m
U.D.L due to wearing coat = 0.075 x 2.4 = 0.180 t/m
0.3 0.3
0.15 0.15
0.396 0.18 0.396
0.55 0.55
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
3/14
Page 19
c) Live load:
Transverse Positions for various Live load cases have been shown in proceeding
sheets.Effective load intensities are calculated & used in STAADPro 2007 as input to
analyse the deck-slab for various load cases.
4.0 CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE LOAD INTENSITY
THICKNESS OF THE WEARING COAT = 0.075 m
DEPTH OF SLAB = 0.235 m
WIDTH OF SLAB ( c/c of diaphragm) b = 18.460 m
EFFECTIVE LENGTH lo = 1.80 m
VALUE OF a = 2.6
CONTACT AREA:
CLASS A 1 500 250 (FOR LOAD 11.4 t)
WIDTH FOR OVERLAP 1.20 m
CLASS 70 R (Max. Axle Load) 2 360 260 (FOR LOAD 20 t)
WIDTH FOR OVERLAP 1.22 m
CLASS 70 R (T) 3 840 4570 (FOR LOAD 70 t)
CLASS 70 R (Max. Axle Load) 4 360 260 (FOR LOAD 20 t)
WIDTH FOR OVERLAP 1.22 m
IMPACT FACTOR (%) :
CLASS A 50
1.80 1.80
0.550 0.95 3.6 0.95 0.55
6.60
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
4/14
Page 20
LOAD CASE 1 Most Eccentric position for Class A x 2 lanes
LOAD
WITH
IMPACT
a
DISP.
ALONG
SPAN
beff. bOVER-
LAPPIN
G
EFF.
LOAD
INT.
P1 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.550 1.12 1.060 1.2 NO 8.066P2 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.550 1.12 1.393 1.2 YES 6.595
P3 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.550 1.12 1.393 1.2 YES 6.595
P4 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.550 1.12 1.393 1.2 YES 6.595
# indicates load is in cantilever portion
LOAD CASE 2 Class A single lane Eccentrically placed
LOAD
WITH
IMPACT
a
DISP.
ALONG
SPAN
beff. bOVER-
LAPPIN
G
EFF.
LOAD
INT.
P1#
5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.550 1.12 1.060 1.2 NO 8.066
P2 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.550 1.12 1.393 1.2 YES 6.595
LOAD CASE 3 One Wheel of Class A single lane placed Centrally on span
LOAD
WITH
IMPACT
a
DISP.
ALONG
SPAN
beff. bOVER-
LAPPIN
G
EFF.
LOAD
INT.
P1 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.900 1.12 1.570 1.2 YES 6.173
P2 5.70 8.55 1 500 250 0.900 1.12 1.570 1.2 YES 6.173
CONTACT AREALOAD
LOAD CONTACT AREA
LOAD CONTACT AREA
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
5/14
I NPUT FI LE: STUP27M. STD
1. STAAD PLANE 20M DECK SLAB ANALYSI S OVER 3 GI RDERS
2. I NPUT WI DTH 72
3. UNI T METER MTON
4. J OI NT COORDI NATES
5. 1 . 000 . 000 . 000
6. 2 1. 500 . 000 . 000 7. 3 3. 200 . 000 . 000
8. 4 5. 100 . 000 . 000
9. 5 6. 600 . 000 . 000
10. MEMBER I NCI DENCES
11. 1 1 2
12. 2 2 3
13. 3 3 4
14. 4 4 5
15. MEMBER PROPERTY I NDI AN
16. 1 TO 4 PRI YD . 2 ZD 1.
17. CONSTANT
18. E CONCRETE ALL 19. DENSI TY CONCRETE ALL
20. SUPPORT
21. 2 TO 4 PI NNED
22. LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD
23. SELFWEI GHT Y - 1.
24. MEMBER LOAD
25. *WEARI NG COURSE
26. 1 UNI GY - . 18 . 55 1. 5
27. 4 UNI GY - . 18 0. . 95
28. 2 3 UNI GY - . 12
29. *HANDRAI L
30. 1 CON GY - . 3 . 15
31. 4 CON GY - . 3 1. 25
32. * ROAD KERB
33. 1 UNI GY - . 3 0. . 55
34. 4 UNI GY - . 3 . 95 1. 5
35. LOAD 2 LI VE LOAD ( MOST ECCY. POSI TI ON - 2 LANES)
36. MEMBER LOAD
37. 1 CON GY - 8. 366 . 85
38. 2 TO 4 CON GY - 6. 663 . 55
39. LOAD 3 LI VE LOAD ( MOST ECCY. POSI TI ON - 1 LANE)
40. MEMBER LOAD
41. 1 CON GY - 8. 366 . 85
42. 2 CON GY - 6. 663 . 55
43. LOAD 4 LI VE LOAD ( CENTRALLY PLACED - 1 LANE) 44. MEMBER LOAD
45. 1 CON GY - 6. 259 . 9
46. 2 TO 4 CON GY - 6. 259 . 9
47. PERFORM ANALYSI S
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
6/14
48. PRI NT SUPPORT REACTI ONS
SUPPORT REACTI ON
SUPPORT REACTI ONS - UNI T MTON METE STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE
J OI NT LOAD FORCE- X FORCE- Y FORCE- Z MOM- X MOM- Y MOM Z
2 1 0. 00 2. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 15. 62 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3 0. 00 15. 72 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4 0. 00 11. 15 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3 1 0. 00 - 0. 36 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 1. 94 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3 0. 00 - 0. 86 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4 0. 00 1. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4 1 0. 00 2. 43 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 10. 80 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3 0. 00 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4 0. 00 12. 54 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
**** **** **** ** END OF LATEST ANALYSI S RESULT ** **** ** **** **
49. PRI NT MEMBER FORCES ALL MEMBER FORCES ALL
MEMBER END FORCES STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE ALL UNI TS ARE - - MTON METE
MEMBER LOAD J T AXI AL SHEAR- Y SHEAR- Z TORSI ON MOM- Y MOM- Z
1 1 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 1. 22 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 1. 06
2 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 8. 37 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 4. 60
3 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 8. 37 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 4. 60
4 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 0. 00 6. 26 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 3. 13
2 1 2 0. 00 1. 28 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 06
3 0. 00 - 0. 19 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 26
2 2 0. 00 7. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. 60
3 0. 00 - 0. 59 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 12
3 2 0. 00 7. 35 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. 60
3 0. 00 - 0. 69 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 30
4 2 0. 00 4. 89 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 13
3 0. 00 1. 37 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 04
3 1 3 0. 00 - 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 26 4 0. 00 1. 25 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 1. 01
2 3 0. 00 2. 52 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 12
4 0. 00 4. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 3. 66
3 3 0. 00 - 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 30
4 0. 00 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4 3 0. 00 - 0. 02 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 04
4 0. 00 6. 28 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 - 5. 63
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
7/14
4 1 4 0. 00 1. 18 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. 01
5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
2 4 0. 00 6. 66 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. 66
5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
3 4 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
4 4 0. 00 6. 26 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5. 63 5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
**** **** **** ** END OF LATEST ANALYSI S RESULT ** **** ** **** **
50. SECTI ON 0. 88 MEMBER 1
51. PRI NT MEMBER SECTI ON FORCES LI ST 1
MEMBER SECTI ON FORCES LI ST
MEMBER FORCES AT I NTERMEDI ATE SECTI ONS ALL UNI TS ARE - - MTON METE
MEMB LOAD SEC SHEAR- Y SHEAR- Z MOM- Y MOM- Z
1 1 0. 88 - 1. 12 0. 00 0. 00 0. 86
2 0. 88 - 8. 37 0. 00 0. 00 3. 20 3 0. 88 - 8. 37 0. 00 0. 00 3. 20
4 0. 88 - 6. 26 0. 00 0. 00 2. 08
**** **** **** ** END OF LATEST ANALYSI S RESULT ** **** ** **** **
52. SECTI ON 0. 09 0. 5 0. 91 MEMBER 2 3
53. PRI NT MEMBER SECTI ON FORCES LI ST 2 3
MEMBER SECTI ON FORCES LI ST
MEMBER FORCES AT I NTERMEDI ATE SECTI ONS ALL UNI TS ARE - - MTON METE
MEMB LOAD SEC SHEAR- Y SHEAR- Z MOM- Y MOM- Z
2 1 0. 09 1. 18 0. 00 0. 00 0. 86
0. 50 0. 73 0. 00 0. 00 0. 15
0. 91 0. 29 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 22
2 0. 09 7. 25 0. 00 0. 00 3. 43
0. 50 0. 59 0. 00 0. 00 0. 41
0. 91 0. 59 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 03
3 0. 09 7. 35 0. 00 0. 00 3. 41
0. 50 0. 69 0. 00 0. 00 0. 32
0. 91 0. 69 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 19
4 0. 09 4. 89 0. 00 0. 00 2. 34 0. 50 4. 89 0. 00 0. 00 - 1. 27
0. 91 - 1. 37 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 26
3 1 0. 09 - 0. 27 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 23
0. 50 - 0. 71 0. 00 0. 00 0. 13
0. 91 - 1. 15 0. 00 0. 00 0. 82
2 0. 09 2. 52 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 53
0. 50 - 4. 14 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 06
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
8/14
0. 91 - 4. 14 0. 00 0. 00 2. 99
3 0. 09 - 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 27
0. 50 - 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 15
0. 91 - 0. 17 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 03
4 0. 09 - 0. 02 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 04
0. 50 - 0. 02 0. 00 0. 00 - 0. 02
0. 91 - 6. 28 0. 00 0. 00 4. 62 **** **** **** ** END OF LATEST ANALYSI S RESULT ** **** ** **** **
54. FI NI SH
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
9/14
Page 22
7.0 SUMMARY OF DESIGN MOMENTS
SECT.
HOGGING SAGGING HOGGING SAGGING
1-1 3.20 0.00 0.86
2-2 0.41 1.27 0.15 0.00
3-3 2.99 1.93 0.82 0.23
For Cantilever portion
Dead Load Moment at section 1-1 0.86 tm
Live-Load Moment 3.20 tm
8.0 DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT
DIA. OF MAIN REINF. 12 mm
DIA. OF DISTRIBUTION REINF. 10 mm
DEPTH OF SLAB - AT INTERM. SECTION. 235 mm
DEPTH OF SLAB - AT CANTIL.SECTION. 250 mmCLEAR COVER TO REINFORCEMENT 40 mm
EFF. DEPTH FOR MAIN STEEL - AT INTERM. SECTION. 189 mm
EFF. DEPTH FOR MAIN STEEL - AT CANTIL. SECTION. 204 mm
EFF. DEPTH FOR DISTRIB. STEEL - AT INTERM. SECTION. 178 mm
EFF. DEPTH FOR DISTRIB. STEEL - AT CANTIL. SECTION. 183 mm
MIN. REINFORCEMENT 2.82 cm2
GRADE OF CONCRETE M- 25 N/mm2
PERM. BENDING COMP. STRESS 8.33 N/mm2
CONSTANT j , 0.902
CONSTANT Q , 110 t/m2
SECT.
HOGGING SAGGING
AT
TOP
AT
BOTTOM HOGGING SAGGING
AT
TOP
AT
BOTTOM
1-1 4.06 0.00 10.82 0.00 1.13 0.00 3.36 0.00
2-2 0.56 1.27 1.61 3.65 0.15 0.38 0.47 1.16
3-3 3.81 2.16 10.96 6.21 1.06 0.63 3.24 1.91
DEPTH REQUIRED AT SECTION 1-1 = 191.7 mm < Provided ,Hence O.K.
DEPTH REQUIRED AT
INTERMEDIATE-SECTIONS = 185.7 mm < Provided ,Hence O.K.
SECT.
1-1
2-2
3-3
AT BOTTOM
LIVE LOAD MOMENTS
DEAD LOAD MOMENTS
& SIDL MOMENTS
DESIGN MOMENTS MAIN STEEL
DISTRIB. STEEL PROVIDED
DISTRIBUTION STEELDISTRIB. MOMENTS
12#@ 200 +
12#@200C/C
12 # @ 150 C/C 10# @ 200 C/C12#@ 200 +
12#@200C/C
12 # @ 150 C/C
AT TOPAT TOPMAIN STEEL PROVIDED
AT BOTTOM
8# @ 200 C/C
10# @ 200 C/C
8# @ 200 C/C
12#@ 200 +
12#@200C/C8# @ 200 C/C 10# @ 200 C/C
8# @ 200 C/C
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
10/14
9.0 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM :
9.1 Design of End Diaphragm :
Dead Load Analysis : 0.28
Load from the hatched area will constitute
the local effect.
1.8 m 1.8 m
Self weight of Diaphragm = 2.45 t
Deck slab & Wearing coat = ( 5.5 x 0.28 + 1/2 x 1.8 x 0.9 x 2 ) x 0.234 x 2.4
= 1.32 t
Wearing coat = ( 5.5 x 0.28 + 1/2 x 1.8 x 0.9 x 2 ) x 0.075 x 2.2 = 0.42 t
Total load = 6.21+ 1.49 + 0.29 = 4.19 t
This load is assumed as a uniform load over a length of 5.0m
U.D.L = 4.19 / 3.6 = 1.16 t/m
Load outside deck slab etc. outside the hatched area will be carried by the main girder
and transmitted directly to the bearings without causing any bending moment and
shear forces in the diaphragm.
Total D L effect is as below1.16 t/m
A B C
1.8 m 1.8 m
Maximum + Ve moment = 0.07 x 1.84 x 1.8 = 0.26 tm
Maximum - Ve moment = 0.125 x 1.84 x 1.8 = 0.47 tm
Maximum shear force = 0.55 x 1.84 x 1.8 = 1.15 t
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
11/14
Live Load Analysis :
Parts of live load in 45oinflunce area will only go to the diaphrm. Parts outside this area will go
directly to the main girder and will not cause any B.M and S.F in the diaphragm. Class A x 2 lanes
will cause max. effect.
Case I : Placing One track in the mid span TR - I TR - I
0.90 m 0.90 mbeff for 5.7t load along traffic dirn
= 0.82 m
A 1.8 m B 1.8 m C
Load from each Track = 1.5 x 5.7
= 8.55 t
0.82
1.18
0.5
Reaction at A RA = 8.55 x (0.406 - 0.094 ) = 2.67 t
[Coefficients are takenfrom " STEEL DESIGNERS
MANUAL"]
Max. span moment = 2.67 x 0.9
= 2.40 tm
Max. support moment = 2.67 x 1.8 - 8.55 x 0.9 = -2.89 tm
Shear force at B = 2.67 - 8.55 = -5.88 t
Summary of Design moment and shear force :
Moment at support = 3.36 tm
Moment at mid span = 2.66 tm
Maximum shear force = 7.04 t
Overall depth available near outer girder location = 1.6 - 0.1 = 1.5 m
Effective depth = 1500 - 50 - 12 - 10 = 1428 mm = 1.428 m
Width of beam = 325 mm = 0.325 m
Moment of resistance = 110 x 0.325 x 1.8282 = 51.05 tm >> 3.36 tm
Area of steel required = 3.79 / ( 2 x 0.902 x 1.828 ) 1.31 sq.cm
But minimum steel = 0.2 x 32.5 x 142.8 x 10-2
= 9.282 Sq.cm
Provide 5 nos 20 # bars both at top and bottom.
Provide 2 L 10 # stirrups @ 200 c/c all through
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
12/14
Jacking condition.
Reaction at end bearing due to dead load and SIDL = 31.92 t
Reaction at inner bearing due to dead load and SIDL = 31.92 t
End cross girder will be designed for jack lifting . BM & SF Ref. STAAD Output Jack lifting file
1. STAAD PLANE J ACK LI FTI NG ANALYSI S OF GI RDERSI NPUT FI LE: 20 M _Di aphr agm. STD
2. START J OB I NFORMATI ON
3. ENGI NEER DATE 01- SEP- 12
4. END J OB I NFORMATI ON
5. I NPUT WI DTH 79
6. UNI T METER MTON
7. J OI NT COORDI NATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0. 6 0 0; 3 1. 2 0 0; 4 1. 8 0 0; 5 2. 4 0 0; 6 3 0 0;
7 3. 6 0 0
9. MEMBER I NCI DENCES
10. 1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 4 4 5; 5 5 6; 6 6 7
11. DEFI NE MATERI AL START
12. I SOTROPI C CONCRETE 13. E 2. 17185E+007
14. POI SSON 0. 17
15. DENSI TY 23. 5616
16. ALPHA 1E- 005
17. DAMP 0. 05
18. END DEFI NE MATERI AL
19. CONSTANTS
20. MATERI AL CONCRETE ALL
21. MEMBER PROPERTY I NDI AN
22. 1 TO 6 PRI S YD 1. 965 ZD 0. 325
23. SUPPORTS
24. 2 3 5 6 PI NNED
25. LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD 26. SELFWEI GHT Y - 1
27. J OI NT LOAD
28. 1 FY - 31. 923
29. 4 FY - 31. 923
30. 7 FY - 31. 923
31. PERFORM ANALYSI S
32. PRI NT SUPPORT REACTI ON
J ACK LI FTI NG ANALYSI S OF GI RDERS
SUPPORT REACTI ONS - UNI T MTON METE STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
J OI NT LOAD FORCE- X FORCE- Y FORCE- Z MOM- X MOM- Y MOM Z
2 1 0 58. 09 0 0 0 03 1 0 8. 61 0 0 0 0
5 1 0 8. 61 0 0 0 0
6 1 0 58. 09 0 0 0 0
** ** ** ** ** ** ** END OF LATEST ANALYSI S RESULT **** ** ** ** ** **
33. PRI NT MEMBER FORCES ALL
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
13/14
J ACK LI FTI NG ANALYSI S OF GI RDERS
MEMBER END FORCES STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALL UNI TS ARE - - MTON METE ( LOCAL )
MEMBER LOAD J T AXI AL SHEAR- Y SHEAR- Z TORSI ON MOM- Y MOM- Z1 1 1 0 - 31. 92 0 0 0 0
2 0 38. 19 0 0 0 - 21. 04
2 1 2 0 19. 90 0 0 0 21. 04
3 0 - 13. 63 0 0 0 - 10. 98
3 1 3 0 22. 23 0 0 0 10. 98
4 0 - 15. 96 0 0 0 0. 48
4 1 4 0 - 15. 96 0 0 0 - 0. 48
5 0 22. 23 0 0 0 - 10. 98
5 1 5 0 - 13. 63 0 0 0 10. 986 0 19. 90 0 0 0 - 21. 04
6 1 6 0 38. 19 0 0 0 21. 04
7 0 - 31. 92 0 0 0 0
** ** ** ** ** ** ** END OF LATEST ANALYSI S RESULT **** ** ** ** ** **
34. FI NI SH
Max. hogging moment at support = 21.04 t-m
Max. sagging moment at span = 0.5 t-m
38.2 t
Cross girder will be designed as continuous rectanguler deep beam
Effetive span ( l ) = 1.32 m
1.60 m
l / D = 0.83 < 1
Lever arm z = 0.66
Bottom reinforcement = 0.26 cmMinimum Reinforcement required is , 9.28 cm
Providing 10 No. dia 16 # in five layers.
Ast provided = 20.11 cm
Top reinforcement = 11.14 cm
Providing 10 No. dia 16 # in five layers.
Over all depth ( D ) =
As per Cl. 29.2 IS 456 -2000
Max. shear force =
-
7/23/2019 T Girder Bridge Deck Diaphragm-20 m
14/14
Ast provided = 20.11 cm
Reinforcement shall be provided as per Cl 29.2 IS:456-2000 and is shown in drawing.
For Shear
Providing 2 Legged # 16 stirrups
Asw = 59.93 x 10000 = 6.69 cm/m
s 200 x 202.8 x 2.0
Providing 2 -Legged 16 # stirrups @150 c/c
9.2 Design of Intermediate Diaphragm :
Self weight of Diaphragm = 2.43 t
Self weight of Deck Slab and Wearing coat
= 2 x 1/2 x 1.8 x 0.9 x 2 x 0.234 x 2.4 1.82 t
1.8 1.8
U.D.L = ( 2.43 + 1.82 ) / 3.6 = 1.18 t/m
The support of the intermediate diaphragm will act as a spring , hence reaction = (2.43 + 1.82 ) / 3
= 1.42 t
1.18 t/m
Dead load bending moment At A = 0
A B C
At B =1.18x0.9-1.42x0.9/2 = 0.80 tm 1.8 m 1.8 m
At C = 1.18x1.8-1.62x1.8/2 = 0.64 tm
Dead load shear force
At A = 1.42 t
At B = 0.35 t
At C = -0.71 t
Live Load :
Parts of live load in 45oinflunce area will only go to the diaphrm. Parts outside this area will go
directly to the main girder and will not cause any B.M and S.F in the diaphragm.
Live load on diaphragm from each track = 1.5 x 5.7 = 8.6 t
Reaction = 2 x8.6 /3 = 5.7 t
Maximum L.L moment = 5.7 x 1.8 - 8.6 x 0.9 = 2.6 tm
Design moment = 3.20 tm
deff.
= 1950-62-10 =1878 mm = 1.878 m
Width = 325 mm = 0.325 m
Area of steel required = 3.20 / ( 2 x 0.902 x 1.478 ) = 0.95 Sqcm
Provide 4 nos 20 # bars both at top and bottom.
Provide 2 L 10 # stirrups @ 200 c/c all through