systems requirement review presentation
DESCRIPTION
Systems Requirement Review Presentation. Joe Appel Todd Beeby Julie Douglas Konrad Habina Katie Irgens Jon Linsenmann David Lynch Dustin Truesdell. Overview. Mission Statement Market, Customers, & Competitors Design Mission Design Requirements New Technologies Sizing Code - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
![Page 2: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Systems Requirement Review Presentation
Joe AppelTodd Beeby
Julie Douglas
Konrad HabinaKatie Irgens
Jon Linsenmann
David LynchDustin Truesdell
![Page 3: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Overview• Mission Statement• Market, Customers, & Competitors• Design Mission• Design Requirements• New Technologies• Sizing Code• Summary & Next Steps
![Page 4: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Mission Statement• Design an Environmentally Responsible Aircraft (ERA) that
lowers noise, minimizes emissions, and reduces fuel burn
• Utilize new technology to develop a competitive medium-size aircraft that meets the demands of transportation for continental market
• Deliver a business plan focusing on capitalizing on growing markets
• Submit final design to NASA ERA College Student Challenge
![Page 5: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
NASA ERA College Student Challenge
1 NASA ERA Goals
Large twin aisle reference configuration = Boeing 777-200LR
![Page 6: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Market• Growth in twin aisle market– Fastest growing market segment (4.4% annually)– Airplane seat count upgauging
2 Boeing Market Outlook
![Page 7: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Market• Geographic Regions:– Asia Pacific– US Domestic– Europe
2 Boeing Market Outlook3 Airbus Market Forecast
![Page 8: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Market• Geographic Regions:– Asia Pacific– US Domestic
3 Airbus Market Forecast
![Page 9: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Customers• Low cost carriers– Point to point model– Shorter distance, larger
passenger capacity
Examples– SpiceJet, Spring Airlines,
JetBlue, EasyJet
4 Point to Point: Asia Pacific
![Page 10: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Competitors• Designing an airplane with similar
capabilities as the Boeing 757-200• Competitors
– Other aircraft (A321-200, A320NEO, 757, 737)
– High speed rail for short distances
3 Airbus Market Forecast6 757-200 5 High Speed Rail
![Page 11: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
City Pairs
Tokyo to Mumbai is 3700 nmi7 Geographical Map of Asia
![Page 12: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Runway LengthsAirport Runway Length (ft)
Beijing Capital International Airport 12,468Haneda 9,843
Hong Kong International Airport 12,467Suvarnabhumi Airport 13,123
Singapore Changi 13,123Guangzhou Baiyun International Aiport 12,467
Narita International Aiport 13,123Soekarno-Hatta International Airport 12,007
Incheon International Airport 13,123Shanghai Pudong International Airport 13,123
Kuala Lumpur International Airport 13,530Mumbai International Airport 11,302
Delhi International Airport 14,534Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport 11,154
Ninoy Aquina International Airport 12,261Taipeo Taoyuan International Airport 12,008
Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport 11,155Chengdu Shuangliu 11,811Kunming Wujiaba 11,155
Kansai International 13,123Gimpo International 11,811Hangzhou Xiaoshan 11,811Jeju International 9843
Ho Chi Minh International 12,468
Shortest Runway: 9843 feet
![Page 13: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Design Mission• Tokyo - Mumbai
01
2
4 5
76
4’ 5’
8 9Taxi & takeoff
Clim
bCruise Climb
No rangedescent
Loiter (30 min)
Land
Clim
b
No rangedescent
Land
Attempt to Land
Loiter (30 min)
6800 ft Range: 3700 nmi 4950 ft Fuel Reserves
W1/W0 0.970W2/W1 0.979W3/W2 0.773W4/W3 0.995W5/W4 0.995
W5’/W4’ 0.970W6/W5’ 0.979W7/W6 0.986W8/W7 0.988W9/W8 0.995
3
W9/W0 0.673Wf/W0 0.330
32000 ft
![Page 14: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Design Requirements• Market Driven Requirements– Similar two class configuration seating capacity to • Boeing 757-200 [200 pax.]• Boeing 737-900ER [177 pax.]• Airbus A321NEO [185 pax.]
8 Boeing 737-900ER3 Airbus Market Forecast
![Page 15: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Design Requirements• Improved Specifications (compared to Boeing
757-200)• Extended Range to 4000 nmi• Improved Cruise Efficiency• Increased Payload, Takeoff Weight, and Landing Weight
6 Boeing 757-200
![Page 16: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Design Requirements• ERA driven requirements (compared to Boeing
777-200LR)– 75 % cut in emissions– 42 dB reduction in noise– 50% reduction in fuel burn– 50% reduction in field length
• Summarized in Compliance Matrix
![Page 17: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Design RequirementsCompliance Matrix
![Page 18: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
New Technologies• Noise reduction:
– Chevron Nozzles, Variable Nozzles, Scarf Inlet Active Noise Control, Forward Swept Fans, Swept/Leaned Stators, Soft Vanes, Over-the-Rotor Metal Foam
• Geared turbofan (GTF):– Ultra high bypass ratio engines to reduce fuel consumption, reduce engine
maintenance, and reduce noise by up to 10 dB
10 Scarf Inlet 9 Chevron Nozzles 11 Geared Turbofan
![Page 19: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Example Fuel Savings
12 New Technology Fuel Savings
![Page 20: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Sizing Code Chart
noyes
Geometry(eg S, b, etc.)
Empty Weight Prediction (We)
Set Wφ = (Wφ)calc
Description of Aircraft
Fuel Weight Prediction (Wfuel)
Calculated Gross Weight (Wφ)calc
Performance, Costs, Enviro Impacts
Inputs: , ,
Wφ = (Wφ)calc
![Page 21: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Sizing Code Approach:• Empty Weight Fraction – Raymer Table 6.1
]
• Fuel Weight Fraction• Cruise: Breguet Range Equation and Endurance Equation
• All others: Historical Fractions (Raymer Table 3.2)
𝑊 𝑖
𝑊 𝑖− 1=exp[ −𝐸𝐶𝐿 /𝐷 ]𝑊 𝑖
𝑊 𝑖− 1=exp¿¿
![Page 22: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Sizing Code Calibration:
Boeing 757-200Passengers: 200Range: 2655 nmiCruise Mach Number: 0.8Max Take-off Weight (MTOW): 255000 lbOperating Weight Empty (OWE): 136940 lbFuel Weight: 74510 lb
13 Boeing 757-200
![Page 23: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Sizing Code Calibration:• Original Drag Prediction
• Nicolai Fig 5.3 for Subsonic a/c:
• Adjusted to make
• Results: Parameter Value Units Error
W0 (MTOW) 256370.48 lb 0.54%
We (MEW) 132324.24 lb -3.37%
Wf 80046.24 lb 7.43%
![Page 24: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Sizing Code Early Aircraft Predictions:• Used 757-200 sizing code (similar aircraft)
• Adjusted range, MTOW, thrust, Mach #, passengers
• Based on “threshold” values from compliance matrix
Parameter Value Units ChangeW0 (MTOW) 258692.93 lb +0.91%
We (MEW) 132004.16 lb -0.24%
Wf 81288.77 lb +1.55%
![Page 25: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Sizing Code Next:• Convert entirely to MATLAB
• Same output as with Excel
• Implement the next level of complexity• Component weights• Aerodynamics (drag breakdown)• Propulsion (thrust, fuel consumption)• Future technology factors
![Page 26: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Summary & Next Steps• Summary
– Mission statement– Market & Customers– Design Mission– Design Requirements– New Technologies– Sizing Code
• Next Steps– In depth analysis of technologies (cost and benefits)– Increase complexity and accuracy of sizing code– Formulate customer, regulatory and design requirements and begin
preliminary aircraft performance analysis.
![Page 27: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
![Page 28: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
References1. http://aero.larc.nasa.gov/era_univ/competitions_univ_era.htm2. “Current Market Outlook 2010-2029,” Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Market Analysis, Seattle, WA, Nov. 2010.3. Leahy, John. “Airbus Global Market Forecast 2010-2029,” Airbus.
Toulouse, Dec. 2010.4. www.guidetothailand.com5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:China_high
speed_rail_network.png6. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/google-founders-pick-up-
another-big-plane/7. “Geographical Map of Asia,” Sep. 2010.
[http://www.voyagesphotosmanu.com/geographical_map_asia.html. Accessed 1/22/11.]
![Page 29: Systems Requirement Review Presentation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816774550346895ddc690c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
References8. Tinseth, Randy, “Sharks and Jets,” Boeing Commercial Airlines, Seattle
WA, August 2010.[http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2010/08/sharks_and_jets.html. Accessed 1/22/11.]
9.http://memagazine.asme.org/articles/2006/november/Put_Nozzle.cfm 10. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT/2004/RT/RTL-abbott.html11.
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/print.main?id=4065235
12. Nickol, C. L. (2007). Hybrid Wing Body Configuration System Studies. 13. www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery